CISCO Reusable Learning Object Models
CISCO Reusable Learning Object Models
Reusable Information
Object Strategy
Definition,
Creation Overview,
and Guidelines
Version 3.0
June 25 1999
Table of Contents Forward ......................................................................................................... 1
What is the Reusable Information Object Strategy? ................................... 2
Why Are RIOs Important to Cisco?............................................................. 3
What is the RLO-RIO Structure?.................................................................. 4
RIO Creation Process.................................................................................... 6
Phase I: Design ....................................................................................... 7
Phase II: Development ........................................................................... 9
Phase III: Delivery ................................................................................ 11
Phase IV: Evaluation ............................................................................ 12
Guidelines for Building the RLO ............................................................... 13
1. Overview........................................................................................... 14
2. Summary........................................................................................... 16
3. Assessment........................................................................................ 17
Guidelines for Building RIOs..................................................................... 19
Practice Items........................................................................................ 21
Assessment Items ................................................................................. 23
Cognitive Level..................................................................................... 25
1. Concept ............................................................................................. 27
2. Fact .................................................................................................... 30
3. Procedure .......................................................................................... 32
4. Process............................................................................................... 35
5. Principle ............................................................................................ 38
RLO-RIO Structure Summary.................................................................... 41
Copyright 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco, Cisco Systems, and the Cisco Systems logo are registered trademarks of Cisco Systems,
Inc. in the U.S. and certain other countries. All other trademarks mentioned in this document are the property of their respective owners.
Forward
Abstract Cisco Systems recognizes a need to move from creating and delivering large inflexible
training courses, to database driven objects that can be reused, searched, and modified
independent of their delivery media. This effort is called the Reusable Information
Object Strategy.
This strategy defines the standards and process for designing and developing Reusable
Information Objects (RIOs) at Cisco Systems.
Audience for this This document assumes the reader has experience in course development, training or
Document instructional design; or, the reader is responsible for creating content and information
that will be used to build Reusable Information Objects.
However the RIO Strategy itself is designed to be used by ANY content providers, be it
third party developers, Cisco Sales Engineers, or other content experts from the Cisco
line of businesses.
Introduction Training offerings need to move from large, inflexible "courses" to reusable, granular
objects that can be written independent of a delivery media and accessed dynamically
through a database. The Reusable Information Object (RIO) Strategy describes how this
is being done at Cisco Systems.
Reusable The RIO Strategy is built upon the Reusable Information Object (RIO). An RIO is
Information Object granular, reusable chunk of information that is media independent. An RIO can be
developed once, and delivered in multiple delivery mediums.
Each RIO can stand alone as a collection of content items, practice items and assessment
items that are combined based on a single learning objective.
Individual RIOs are then combined to form a larger structure called a Reusable
Learning Object (RLO).
See “What is the RLO-RIO Structure?” for more detail about these objects.
Other Ways of Reusable objects are popular in the fields of human performance technology and
Saying It knowledge information management.
Other terms used in the industry include:
• Educational objects
• Learning objects
• Content objects
• Training components
• Nuggets
• Chunks
Based on Experts The RIO Strategy represents a synthesis of modified information mapping and the work
of Dr. Ruth Clark fitted Cisco System’s requirements.
In defining a methodology to design and develop training, Dr. Clark combines a
modification of information mapping with Dr. Merrill's component display theory. The
result is a structured approach for creating and categorizing content based on five
information types: concept, fact, process, procedure, and principle.
Cisco System has adopted Dr. Clark's methodology, and added unique elements that
make our database driven, Reusable Information Object Strategy possible.
See “References,” in lieu of footnoting, for a listing of major sources that have been used,
either directly or indirectly.
Introduction If you attend any conference on human performance technology, online learning, or
traditional training, you'll find presentations on reusable, database-driven learning
objects. Very few organizations have actually developed a methodology to design,
develop and implement Reusable Information Objects.
Paradigm Shift Traditional training "courses" are built as large, monolithic structures that are difficult
to repurpose into searchable self-paced objects. For example, the average instructor-led
training (ILT) is a five-day event, built around 60-minute lectures followed by 30-
minutes of Learner activities. The ILT experience is fixed in length, sequence and scope.
This instructor-led model does not addressed the need for similar knowledge and skills
to be taught on self-paced, media driven platforms such as the Web. The RIO Strategy
addresses this problem. However, the strategy requires a shift in how content is
designed, developed and "published."
Benefits for Authors • RIO specific templates ensure that design and development is consistent across the
organization.
• Authors write effective and efficient job/task based training.
• Authors can reuse any an RIO in future development.
• Authors can combine old and new RIOs to form larger structures called Reusable
Learning Objectives (RLOs.)
• The same database of RIOs can be used to create leader-led training, self-paced web
based training or performance support tools.
Introduction Individual RIOs can be combined to form a larger structure called a Reusable Learning
Object. As you view the illustration below showing the relationship between the RLO
and RIOs, keep in mind that the primary focus of this document is to describe what it
takes to build this structure.
Inside the RLO A Reusable Learning Object is created by combining an Overview, Summary,
Assessment and five to nine (7 ± 2) RIOs.
R
O
L v S
u
O e RIOs m
r
(7 ± 2)
m
V a
I r
E y
W
pre
Assessment post
An RLO is based on a single objective, derived from a specific job task. Each RIO is
built upon an objective that supports the RLO’s objective.
The Overview, Summary and Assessment are defined in detail in the “Building a RLO” section
of this document.
Inside the RIO Combining content items, practice items and assessment items creates a Reusable
Information Object.
R
Content Items
I
O
Practice Items
Assessment Items
Each RIO is built upon a single objective. As defined by Information Mapping, each
RIO is classified as either being a Concept, Fact, Process, Principle or Procedure.
Content items and Practices (learning activities) are presented to the Learner to support
that objective.
From the Learner’s The Learner can drill into an RIO as a stand-alone performance support tool, job-aid, or
Point of View just-in-time training coach. An RIO can be titled in any manner that is intuitive to the
Learner given corporate style considerations. The terms “page” or “job aid” may be
used generically but must fit in several delivery context.
The Learner may choose to take the entire RLO, which could be called a “lesson.” As in
any traditional lesson, the RLO gives the Learner the needed learning context, the
knowledge and skills they need to perform the given objective, and a method to assess
mastery.
An Administrator or Curriculum Manager may combine RIOs to form larger structures,
such as “Modules,” “Units” and “Courses” that are based on major topic areas
(strands), job functions, time constraints (five day class), or some other business needs.
As part of a personal portal, RLOs and RIOs can appear as offerings on a “Road Map”
that is customize to each Learners wants and needs. Learners see from this “Road
Map” what they need to take, what they have completed, and their learning
destination.
Regardless of how the Learner accesses an RLO or an RIO, or what label is presented to
the Learner, the structure of the RLO and RIO is the same.
Introduction Building RIOs is similar to building any instructional event or offering. For this
discussion we have chosen to use a simple four-phase process for creating RLOs and
RIOs.
While these phases might not directly map to your development process, each of these
phases should be familiar to anyone developing content at Cisco.
The key point is that there no significant change in process, only greater flexibility in
each phase due to the reusable, granular nature of the RIO Strategy.
Four Phases Each phase has many stages that interrelate with each other. Note that this document
does not define every stage that needs to take place, but simply highlights some of the
key stages for each phase.
Introduction The design phase lays the foundation for creating a successful learning event. Without
this phase being complete and accurate, the subsequent development, delivery, and
evaluation phases will fail.
While there are many stages that actually take place during this phase, these four are
key:
• Needs Assessment
• Tasks Analysis
• Learning Objectives
• RIO Types
Stage 1: An RLO and each RIO must be created to solve a real need in the organization. At
Needs Assessment Cisco, like most organizations, there are three main catalysts for "training" to be created:
• New product introduction
• Product update
• New market strategy
The need must be measurable and quantifiable in order for the training intervention, or
RIOs in this case, to be successfully implemented.
Needs assessment is critical for completing an evaluation. Without it, we are unable to
measure if the RIO meets a performance gap, or increases the Learner’s knowledge and
skills.
Stage 2: In this step the Author relates the needs to specific job tasks.
Task Analysis At this stage the Author also separates prerequisite knowledge and “nice-to-know”
information, from knowledge and skills that are critical to meet the training needs
identified in Stage 1.
With a specific job task identified, the Author adds other “need-to-know” information
that helps the Learner learn the job task (such as a definition of a fact, or an explanation
of a concept or process).
The combination of these elements forms a hierarchy of RIOs, which are nested into
RLOs. If the task is simple, there could be a single RIO, with no associated RLO. If the
task is complex and part of a larger scope, such as training an entire job function, then
many RIOs and RLOs would be formed.
Stage 3: Once the job tasks have been analyzed, the Author creates learning objectives for each
Learning RLO and for each RIO.
Objectives
Objectives tell the Learner what they must do in order to achieve mastery. For the
Author, they identify what type of practice and assessment should be included in the
RIO in order to assure mastery.
Each objective consists of an action statement, a performance condition and a
performance criterion.
Identify the Directly tied to each learning objective, cognitive level is an important designation that
Cognitive Level identifies how the Learner will remember or use the skills and knowledge they are
acquiring by taking an RIO.
When combined with the learning objective, the cognitive level identifies what the
Learner is required to remember or do in order to demonstrate mastery of a given RIO.
There are many methods of classifying cognitive levels. The RIO Strategy combines
aspects of both Dr. David Merrill’s component display theory and Dr. Bloom’s
"Taxonomy."
See “Guidelines for Building RIO: Cognitive Level” from more information
Stage 4: The Author uses the learning objective to categorize each RIO as a concept, fact process,
RIO Types principle, and procedure. These five types are based on modified information mapping
as defined by Dr. Ruth Clark.
See "Guidelines for Building RIOs" describes these five types in great detail.
7 ± 2 Rule During the Design phase, the Author may need to group like RLOs based on a job
function. Similarly, RIOs are grouped to form an RLO.
It is important to note that the entire RIO Strategy is based in the 7 ± 2 rule. This means
that there are a minimum of five and a maximum of nine content items inside of an
RIO, and that each RLO contains five to nine RIOs.
Detail Design Traditionally, the deliverable at the end of this phase is a detail design document
Document (DDD). However, with an integrated design and development tool and database, the
Author could easily move from The Design phase to the Development phase without
this formal deliverable.
In fact, given the granular nature of RIOs, it is possible that each RIO could be designed
and approved independent of the larger RLO structure it may ultimately form.
Introduction Now that the Design phase has been completed, the RIOs can be developed. At this
phase, text, graphics, video, and other content are built. Content items, practice items
and assessment items are created based on the learning objects defined in the Design
phase.
Like any development process, a number of stages take place, including the
development of content, media production, milestone reviews, alpha and beta testing.
Four typical stages in an RLO-RIO development process are:
• Build the RLO
• Build the RIOs
• Conduct an Alpha Review
• Conduct an Beta Review
While we refer to building the RLO and RIO as separate stages, their development can
occur in any order, or simultaneously. Different Authors could develop individual
RIOs, and content items within those RIOs could be assigned to Subject Matter Experts
(SMEs) to develop.
Authoring Tools In the future, Authors will have an easy-to-use, database driven authoring tool to create
RLO and RIOs. This authoring tool would ideally transfer the tasks and objectives from
the Design phase into the Development phase. It would allow the Author to mine the
database for of existing RLOs, RIOs, content items, practice items and assessment items
in order to speed the development process.
The CNLA team has dedicated resources to look at what tools and technologies will
make this vision a reality.
Specific requirements for this Authoring tool are defined in CNLA- Knowledge
Information Management Requirements Document (contact Rick Crowley at
[email protected]).
Stage 1: Using published guidelines and templates, the Author builds an RLO to meet the
Build the RLO design requirements specified in the Design phase.
Each RLO is constructed out of the following:
• Overview
• RIOs (7 ± 2)
• Summary
• Assessment
See “Guidelines for Building the RLO ” for details on the Overview, Summary and Assessment.
Stage 2: Using published guidelines and templates for each type of RIO (concept, fact, process,
Reusable principle, and procedure), the Author builds an RIO to meet the requirements specified
Information Objects in the Design phase.
Regardless of the type of RIO, each is built out these three elements:
• Content items
• Practice items
• Assessment items
An Author can develop these items or assign the items to a subject mater experts
(SMEs). The SME is given simplified templates and guideline for each item. The
Author’s role is to review and edit the SME’s work into the larger RLO.
Media production for each item would also begin at this stage. This includes graphics,
video clips, simulations and so on. Note that while RIOs are created independent of
how they are delivered, some media may not work on all delivery formats. For
example, a Video on Demand clip would not be available in the print version of an RIO.
See “Building RIOs” for details and guidelines for building the five types of RIOs, and for
building content, practice and assessment items.
Introduction At the beginning of this phase, all the reusable objects are complete (RLO and RIOs), all
media has been produced, and Alpha and Beta testing has been finished. The reusable
objects are stored in a database and are ready for delivery.
How RIOs are delivered is largely up to the Learner's preference. If an object exists in
multiple delivery mediums, the Learner is free to choose the one that best matches their
learning style, metacognition, and available time.
For example, a Learner may access some time critical objects at their desk via the web,
at the time of need, while they save a group of objects for a live instructor led "class"
being held a week later.
Three common types of delivery include:
• Dynamic Web packages
• CD-ROMs
• Instructor-Led training materials
Dynamic Web In this case, Web pages are built as needed and delivered to the Learner through a Web
Packages browser. When the Learner wants to take a "lesson" or reference a "job aid" they simply
request the raw items that make up the RLO and RIO from the database. Format and
style sheets are then applied to the objects as they are packaged and delivered to the
Learner's Web browser.
CD-ROMs In cases where the Learner is separated from a network connection, due to travel, or
other physical constraints, RLO-RIOs can be packaged onto a physical medium such as
a CD-ROM.
Ideally, the CD-ROM should be created like the dynamic Web package, and then
simply written onto a CD-ROM just-in-time. Otherwise, a catalog of pre-packaged CD-
ROMs can be made available via the Cisco Learning Store or other venue.
Another possibility is that smaller packages of RLOs can be downloaded to the
Learner’s local drive and run independent of the network, eliminating the need to
create a CD-ROM.
Instructor Led The need for live, instructor led training will not diminish because of the availability of
Training Materials Web based training. The RIO Strategy supports the creation of instructor-led training
materials such as student workbooks, instructor guides, learning activities and
presentation materials.
Because RIOs are stored free of format and style, they can be packaged using style
sheets and templates specific for instructor-led training delivery.
Introduction Evaluations can be performed at four levels. Each has its benefits in what it can tell the
Author and organization about the effectiveness of a training event of intervention.
While these levels are not specific to the RIO Strategy, it is important to acknowledge
that Evaluating the success of each RLO and RIO is important to Cisco Systems, and to
the organizations who use our training materials.
Dr. Donald These four levels of evaluation are based on the research Dr. Donald Kirkpatrick started
Kirkpatrick in 1959. Throughout the field of training and education, Kirkpatrick's four levels are
regarded as the most complete model for assessing the success of training interventions.
For complete details, refer to Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (Kirkpatrick,
1996).
Level 1: Measures the Learner's reaction to the event (Did Learners like it?). Sometimes called
Survey "smile sheets," Level 1 measures if the Learner liked the training. It is all opinion based
and does not test actual learning. However, the data collected at this level is important
for business and development considerations.
Level 2: Measures if the learning objectives have been met immediately following the event (Did
Assessment Learners learn?). The Level 2 assessment should match the objective found in the RIO,
and therefore must be job-task focused.
This level is built into the RIO Strategy. Assessment items are part of each RIO, and the
Assessment is part of each RLO.
See "Building the RLO: Assessment" for more details.
Level 3: Measures the transfer of skills back to the job (Are they using it?). This level determines
Transfer if the Learners actually are using what the RIO taught them when back on the job.
Usually, transfer is measured through some type of 360 degree peer/manager review
and by observation. Simply re-testing the Learner can indicate only if they still have the
knowledge and skills, not if they are actually using them on the job.
Ideally, the same instrument used during the needs would be used to test if job transfer
occurred as a result of the RIO.
Level 4: Measures the impact on the business (Did it matter?). Level 4 measures how the
Impact organization's bottom line was affected as a result of the RIO. Examples include
increase in profitability, increase in customer satisfaction, increase in sales, and decrease
in returns.
Correlating business impact, productivity and return on investment (ROI) to any
training intervention can be a laborious process. Most organizations only strive to
calculate an ROI on 5% of their training interventions.
Introduction A Reusable Learning Object is a collection of seven plus or minus two RIOs that are
grouped together to teach a common job task based on a single learning objective. In
order to make the collection of RIOs into a complete learning experience or "lesson," an
Overview, Summary and Assessment are added to the package.
R
O S
L V US
u
O E RIOs Mm
R Mm
V (7 + - 2) Aa
I Rr
E Yy
W
pre
Assessment post
Guidelines not This section defines the components that go into the RLO and what guidelines or rules
Procedures are applied to each of these components.
This section does not present the "how to build an RLO" as a step-by-step procedure.
That discussion is outside the scope of this document.
RLO Level Metadata The RLO is tagged with metadata that further describes its characteristics, function and
associated objects.
While this document does not define all the metadata needed for the RLO, these are
some of the types of metadata that will be collected by the Author and the system;
• RLO title and RLO level objective
• Strand (major topic area)
• Job function, job task
• Author name, owner name
• Creation date, published date, expiration date
• Prerequisites
A strategy for metadata is defined in RIO Metadata Strategy (contact Deborah Lewis at
[email protected]).
Purpose The Overview is used to introduce the RLO and act as an advanced organizer for the
Learner by listing the objective, outline, and job-based scenario for this "lesson."
Sequence For a web based training experience, the order of objects within the RLO will largely be
up to the Learner. The Learner may have gone through the Assessment prior to the
Overview, or they may skip the Overview and begin taking RIOs.
Content Item Authors use the following guidelines when writing an Overview:
Guidelines
Item Guideline
Introduction • Required.
• One or two paragraphs that explains the purpose of this
RLO.
• Do NOT repeat information found in other blocks.
Objectives • Required.
• One objective per RIO in this RLO
• System will generated by taking the RIO-level "objective"
and displaying it for the Learner.
Prerequisites • Required.
• List the knowledge and skills needed to complete this RLO.
• Identify other RLOs that the Learner may need to complete
("system" should be able to automatically display
prerequisite RLOs and show which have been completed).
• Focus on the primary or target audience for this RLO.
Scenario • Optional.
• Relate to a job function. You can use a fictitious company to
help explain the purpose of the RLO.
• Individual RIOs may use this scenario when listing
Examples, or explaining Processes or Procedures. Keep in
mind, however, the RIOs will stand alone, and may be
reused by other RLOs. As an RIO Author, don't assume the
Scenario will be the same in the wrapper as it is in the RIOs.
• Ideally, this scenario is specific to the primary audience for
this RLO.
• Tie scenario into summary to bring closure to this RLO.
Outline • Required.
• List the title of each RIOs contained in this RLO.
• List the Summary and Case Study.
• Ideally, this information will be generated automatically by
the "system".
Purpose The Summary is used to conclude the RLO and tie the scenario and objectives covered
in each RIO together. It also offers a suggest course of action for the Learner to broaden
their knowledge and skills in this area. Finally, the Summary is a transition between
the RIOs and the final Assessment.
Sequence Assuming the Learner is taking the RLO is its suggested order, the Summary will
immediately follows the last RIO.
Item Guideline
Review • Required.
• One or two paragraphs that recap what the Learner just
learned in the RLO (touch on all the RIOs in this RLO).
• Restate objectives and importance of this RLO.
• Conclude the scenario established in the Overview.
Additional • Optional.
Resources • List URLs, PDFs, documents and other resources that will
help the Learner learn more about the knowledge and skills
covered in this RLO.
• Provide one sentence to describe each resource so the
Learner knows what they will get when they access the
link/file.
Sequence The Assessment can be taken at any time. For this discussion, an Assessment can occur
before the "lesson" (pre-RLO), or upon completing the entire "lesson" (post-RLO).
Inside the The Assessment is simply a collection of the assessment items that are written to match
Assessment the objective of each RIO found in this RLO. For each RIO, there is at least two
assessment items to form a pool of items.
From the Learner's point of view, assessment items appear as the Assessment for the
entire RLO or "lesson."
From the Authors point of view, assessment items are created for each RIO. This is
important because if the RIO is reused by another RLO, then its assessment item must
be available to the new RLO.
Assessment items are covered in more detail in the Guidelines for Building RIOs section of this
document.
Pre-RLO When the Assessment is taken prior to starting the "lesson" it functions as a prescriptive
Assessment tool. The Assessment evaluates if the Student meets the objective of each RIO found in
the RLO.
If the Learner passes the Assessment, the system tells the Learner that they do not need
to take the RLO, and have earned credit for all the knowledge and skills covered by this
"lesson."
If the Student fails any item in the Assessment, the system “prescribes” individual RIOs
for the Student to take. This is possible because each assessment item is mapped to a
specific RIO.
Post-RLO When the Assessment is taken after the "lesson" it functions as mastery assessment.
Assessment
If the Learner passes the Assessment, the system indicates they have successfully
completed the entire RLO, and have earned credit for all the knowledge and skills
covered by the RLO.
If the Student fails part of the post-assessment, then the system “prescribes” individual
RIOs for the Student to review. This function is similar to the pre-RLO function
described above.
Guidelines Because assessment items are written for each RIO, the guidelines for writing
assessment items are discussed in the "Guidelines for Building RIOs" section of this
document.
Even so, there are a few RLO level parameters the Author may be required to set;
Item Guidelines
Pass or Fail Does the Learner need to "pass" every objective, every RIO, in
Threshold order to receive full credit for completing the RLO? Or is there
some number of assessment items that the Learner can miss,
and still "pass.".
Number of Re- How many times can a Learner repeat the Assessment? This
Takes could be important give the limited size of the assessment item
pool.
Weighted When an RLO is constructed, not all of the RIOs will hold equal
Assessment Items importance to the Job Task being taught. Therefore the
assessment items associated with those RIOs have varying
levels of importance.
Introduction Reusable Information Objects are self-contained chunks of information built around a
single learning objective. Groups of RIOs are combined to form a RLO.
Each RIO is built out of three components;
• Content items
• Practice items
• Assessment items
RIO Types RIOs are classified into five types based on a modified information mapping;
• Concept
• Fact
• Procedure
• Principle
• Process
Not only does this classification scheme make RIOs reusable, it also provides authoring
templates and guidelines to speed the creation of new RIOs.
Any learning objective, and therefore any RIO, can be classified into one of these types.
The definition of each type and the guidelines for writing each of type of RIO and are
described in detail in the following pages.
RIO Level Metadata As RLOs, each RIO is tagged with metadata that describes its characteristics, purpose
and relationships with other objects.
While this document does not define all the metadata needed for the RIO, these are
some of the types of metadata that will be collected by the Author and the system;
• RIO title and RIO level objective
• RIO type
• Job function, job task
• Author name, owner name
• Creation date, published date, expiration date
• Prerequisites
Practice and While there are specific guidelines for writing content items for each type of RIO,
Assessment Items practice items and assessment items share guidelines common to all five types of RIOs
and are therefore discussed separately in this document.
Notes are made when there is something unique about practice or assessment items in
regard to one of the five types of RIOs.
Even though practice and assessment items share common guidelines, they are still
tagged as one of the five RIO types.
Introduction Practice items are one of the three components that form an RIO. Regardless of the type
of RIO being built (concept, fact, process, procedure, principle) there are common
characteristics and guidelines the Author must follow when building Practice items.
Definition A practice item is any reinforcement activity that gives the Learner the opportunity to
apply their skills and knowledge. Often the system provides mentoring and feedback.
Performance may or may not affect the Learner’s overall assessment.
Practice activities can take on many forms including case study, learning activity,
practice quizzes, practice test, testing quiz and practice labs.
Importance Practice items are those elements that make RIOs more than simple "information."
Practices are tied directly to the learning objective for the RIO. They provide the
Learner with a way to self-assess their learning prior to attempting a scored assessment
(See Assessment Items).
Without practice items, an RIO is incomplete, and it becomes merely a transfer-of-
information instead of a learning event.
Objective and During the Design phase, a learning objective was written for each RIO, and a cognitive
Cognitive Level level was assigned to the RIO based on that learning objective.
It is important that the practice item matches the objective and cognitive level. For
example, if the RIO objective has the Learner "List the five commands used to configure
an Access-List," with a "Remember: Knowledge" cognitive level, then the practice item
should help the Learner memorize the five commands.
Likewise, if the RIO objective has the Learner "Correctly configure an Access-List using
no more than five commands" with a "Use: Application" cognitive level, then the
practice items should give the Learner a hands-on activity so they can practice that skill
of entering the correct configuration.
Media While RIOs are ideally created to be delivery media independent, some practice items
Independence may not work in all delivery formats.
For example, in an instructor-led course, a valid practice is to have group of Learners
form small groups to work on an assignment. For a self paced, Web experience, a
similar practice may not be possible, and therefore an alternative practice would be
created for this RIO.
Types of Practices There are hundreds of possible practice items, or learning activities that an Author may
want to use. However, there are reasons to limit the number that an Author is allowed
to use. These may include delivery media, time to develop, time to administer and so
on.
With these limitations in mind, here are the practice items that will be supported;
• True and false tests
• Single answer multiple choice
• Multiple answer multiple choice
• Matching
• Drag and drop (not for ILT versions)
• Hot Spot
• Fill in the blank
• Single answer entry
• Group activity (not for self-paced/Web versions)
This list does not include all the learning activities that may be included in a Practice
(i.e. flash cards, chalk talks, small group activity, mentor session, etc) and will therefor
be added to over time as Cisco development and delivery systems mature.
Practice Vs The purpose and function of Practices are very different than Assessment Items, even
Assessment though the authoring tools and engine that deliver them may be the same.
Practices:
• Are completed by the Learner during the RIO, while assessment items are
completed during the Assessment
• Teach, while assessment items test
• Function as a learning activity, not as an assessment
• Are for the Learner’s benefit. The results of practices are not reported in the
Learner performance record, instead instructional feedback is given
• Offer remediation, coaching and guidance
• May include activities that are not found in the Assessment types list: small group
activity, chalk talks, flash cards, observation, exploration, mentor session, and so
on.
Guidelines Here are the preliminary guidelines for creating practice items for an RIO:
• At least one per RIO
• Must match the RIO learning objective and cognitive level
• Must work in all delivery media, or more than one is required
• Must prepare the Learner for the Assessment
• Practice must have some form of remediation, coaching or guidance for the Learner
Introduction Assessment items are one of the three components that form an RIO. Regardless of the
type of RIO being built (concept, fact, process, procedure, principle) there are common
characteristics and guidelines the Author must follow when building assessment items.
Importance Assessment items are a required in order to generate the RLO Assessment. Without
assessment items, an RIO is incomplete, and the RIO moves into the realm of
information and away from the realm of learning.
How they are used The Author writes a pool of assessment items for each RIO. This pool is used by the
RLO Assessment to prescribe RIOs and to determine mastery of the RIOs.
In the illustration above, RIO #5 has three assessment items. These assessment items
used by the RLO Assessment Delivery Engine to generate an Assessment for the
Learner. The engine records the Learner’s score and reports that data to the
management system.
A pool of assessment items is needed to allow the Learner to take the Assessment more
than once without repeating the same question.
Objective and Like the practice items, each assessment item must match the objective and cognitive
Cognitive Level level for the RIO.
For example if the RIO objective has the Learner "List the five commands used to
configure an Access-List," with a "Remember: Knowledge" cognitive level, then the
assessment items should test the Learner on their recall of those the five commands.
Likewise, if the RIO objective has the Learner "Correctly configure an Access-List using
no more than five commands" with a "Use: Application" cognitive level, then the
assessment items should test the Learner through a hands-on exercise that measures
their skill in configuration the Access-List.
Media While RIOs are ideally created to be delivery media independent, some assessment
Independence items may not work in all delivery formats. In some cases, especially when it comes to
certification, a proctored assessment may be required. In other cases, direct observation
may be needed to assess a Learner’s performance of a skill on the job. In either case the
results of that assessment will be entered into the training management system.
Types of These are the assessment items that should be supported by the on-line assessment
Assessment Items engine. Those assessments requiring direct observation are not defined in this
document.
• True and false tests
• Single answer multiple choice
• Multiple answer multiple choice
• Matching
• Drag and drop
• Hot Spot
• Fill in the blank
• Single answer entry
How to write each of these assessment items and the specific guidelines for each type is
not covered in this document.
Introduction Cognitive Level is an important designation that identifies how the Learner will
remember or use the skills and knowledge they are acquiring by taking an RIO.
When combined with the learning objective, the cognitive level identifies what the
Learner is required to remember or do in order to demonstrate mastery of a given RIO.
There are many methods of classifying cognitive levels. The RIO Strategy has
combined aspects of both Dr. David Merrill’s component display theory and Dr.
Bloom’s "Taxonomy."
The combined The table below compares with Merrill's taxonomy (left) with Bloom’s taxonomy (right
Taxonomy column).
Merrill Bloom
Simple to teach
Remember Knowledge & assess
Use Comprehension
Application
Analysis
Synthesis
Difficult to teach
Evaluation & assess
Notice that Merrill identifies two levels of cognition: Remember and Use, where Bloom
identifies six levels, ranging from Knowledge to Evaluation.
The RIO Strategy has matched Merrill's Remember to Bloom's Knowledge, and Merrill's
"Use" to the other 5 levels from Bloom's taxonomy.
Importance The Author uses the cognitive level when they are writing Practice and Assessment
Items for an RIO.
For example, if the task analysis tells the Author that the Learner will need to "Use" the
knowledge and skills they are being taught in the RIO back on the job, then the Author
will create a Practice that has them "Use" that knowledge and skill. Likewise, the
assessment items will test their knowledge and skill by having them actually do that
something just like they where on the job.
If the Learner will simply need to recall knowledge, but not actually do anything with
that knowledge, then the Practice will have the Learner "Remember" that knowledge.
Likewise the assessment items will simply need to test the Learner's recall of
information and not the demonstration of higher cognitive functions.
Verb Identifies the Correctly applying the cognitive level may seem difficult to those new to Bloom's
Level Taxonomy. However, the verb contained in the learning objective phrase often gives
the Author a valuable clue they can use to determine the cognitive level.
For example, the verb "List" has the Learner recalling information so the RIO is tagged
"Remember" and "Knowledge." While the verb "Configure" has the Learning doing
something, so the RIO is tagged "Use" and "Application."
An extensive verb list will be made available to the Author and application wizards will
guide the Author to correctly tag each RIO.
When to Use A Concept RIO is used when you need to teach a group of objects, symbols, ideas, or
events which:
• Are designated by a single word or term
• Share a common feature
• Vary on irrelevant features
Sequence When sequencing the RIOs with the RLO, keep in mind that typically concepts are
taught before a major topic, as knowledge needed to do x.
For example, if you are creating an RLO to teach the configuration of a standard access
list, then you may need a concept RIO entitled "What Is an Access-List?"
Examples Here are some examples of things you would teach using a Concept RIO:
• Cat
• Horse
• Computer
• Hub
• Router
• Switch
Identifying a Generally you use a Concept RIO when the job-task can be written as:
Concept RIO
• What is a <technology, object, species> ?
• What are the types of <technology, object, species>?
Note: This structure is also used as the title for this RIO. It gives the Learner a clue as to
the learning outcome and purpose of the RIO.
Content Item Authors follow these guidelines when building the content items for a Concept RIO.
Guidelines
Note that these guidelines will become more descriptive over time. Some guidelines will become
rules. Ideally our future authoring system will verify that these guidelines are being followed.
These guidelines will also be used to validate the quality of RIOs as they are being built.
Item Guideline
1. Introduction • Required—use in all cases.
• Establish the purpose of this RIO and orient the Learner to
what they are expected to learn.
• Written short and to the point.
• Do NOT tie to other RIOs, or assume the Learner has visited
other RIOs within this RLO.
5. Non-Example • Optional.
• Illustrate easily confused examples of related concepts.
• Is a sequence from simple to complex.
• Present using text or illustrations.
• State why it is not a member (not an example).
6. Analogy • Optional.
• Is instructionally powerful.
• Relate the to audience's background.
7. Instructor • Optional.
Notes • Include if there is anything special or unique about teaching
this Concept to a live classroom.
• This field does NOT appear to the Learner, but to the
Instructor in either print or on-line instructor guide.
Practice Item Here are specific guidelines for using Practices with a Concept RIO. See the practice
Guidelines item portion of this document for generic Practice guidelines.
Use • Include if the Learner needs to USE this concept on the job.
• Have Learners discriminate between examples and non-
examples.
• Can be a quiz question or some other activity.
When to Use A Fact RIO is used when you need teach unique, specific, one-of-a-kind pieces of
information.
Facts are presented as statements, data, or pictures of specific objects.
Sequence A Fact RIO is unique in that it can be taught as both a standalone RIO or as a link from
another RIO.
If you need to teach a fact, then ideally it would have a link to the concept, procedure,
process, or principle that it is referencing (or vice versa).
Sequence the facts so they logically flow within the RLO, or better yet, link to the other
RIOs that reference that fact.
Examples Here are some examples of factual information you may teach using a Fact RIO:
• This router has four ports.
• That device is a Catalyst 8510.
• That laptop is a Toshiba Tecra 550CDT.
• That beaker holds 500 ml.
Identifying a You should use a Fact RIO when you have a job task that requires the Learner to
Concept RIO remember specific facts. See the examples above.
Guidelines Authors follow these guidelines when building the content items for a Fact RIO.
Block Guidelines
1. Introduction • Use in all cases.
• Establish the purpose of this RIO and orient the Learner to
what they are expected to learn.
• Keep short and to the point.
• Do NOT tie to other RIOs, or assume the Learner has visited
other RIOs within this RLO.
5. Instructor • Optional.
Notes • Included if there is anything special or unique about teaching
this Fact to a live classroom.
• This field does NOT appear to the Learner, but to the
Instructor in either print or on-line instructor guide.
Practice Item Here are specific guidelines for using practices with a Fact RIO. See the Practice Item
Guidelines portion of this document for generic practice guidelines.
Use • NONE! Integrate facts with other RIO types and create
practice for that content.
When to Use A Procedure RIO is used when you need to teach a performance use on the job.
In order to be successful, the procedures must be clear and the RIO must provide job-
based practices in order for learning to transfer to the job.
Specifically:
• A procedure is a sequential set of steps to be followed by one individual to
accomplish a task or make decisions.
• A procedure lists directions for procedural tasks.
• Actions within a procedure must be done the same way each time (within a given
situation).
Sequence Typically a Procedure RIO will come after a Concept or Process RIO.
For example, if you are creating an RLO to teach the configuration of a standard access-
list, then you may need a Concept RIO entitled "What Is an Access List?"
Examples Here are some examples of things you would teach using a Procedure RIO:
• How to fill out a time sheet
• How to configure Fast EtherChannel on the 8510
• How to troubleshoot network congestion
• How to configure an access list on interface Ethernet 0
• How to verify that your access list is correctly configured
Note This structure is also used as the title for this RIO. It gives the Learner a clue about
the learning outcome and purpose of the RIO.
Content Item Authors follow these guidelines when building the content items for a Procedure RIO.
Guidelines
Item Guidelines
1. Introduction • Required—use in all cases.
• Establish the purpose of this RIO and orient the Learner to what
they are expected to learn.
• Keep short and to the point.
• Do NOT tie to other RIOs, or assume the Learner has visited
other RIOs within this RLO.
6. Demonstration • Required.
• Use to illustrate a presentation.
• Performed by the instructor or media.
• As instructor clue, text block says "Your instructor will now
demonstrate the procedure for you".
7. Instructor • Optional.
Notes • Included if there is anything special or unique about teaching
this Fact to a live classroom.
• This field does NOT appear to the Learner, but to the Instructor
in either print or on-line "instructor guide."
Practice Item Here are specific guidelines for using practices with a Procedure RIO. See the Practice
Guidelines Item portion of this document for generic practice guidelines.
When to Use A Process RIO is used when you need to teach how a system works. This is helpful in
supporting underlying job tasks, providing motivation, and ensuring overall quality of
job performance.
A process can be defined as:
• A flow of events that describes how something works
• Not a task to be done by one person
• Many persons or organizations are involved
• Mechanical, business, or scientific
Sequence A Process RIO can be placed at any point within an RLO. If the goal of the RLO is to
teach the process, then multiple Process RIOs may be with Concept RIOs.
If a Process RIO is being presented to establish the context of a procedure, then it should
come before the Procedure RIO within the RLO.
Examples Here are some examples of things you would teach using a Process RIO:
• How a transmission works
• How new employees are hired
• How the Internet works
• How a computer system responds to commands
Identifying a Generally you use a Process RIO when the job-task can be written as:
Process RIO
• Stages of . . .
• How the . . . Works
Item Guidelines
1. Introduction • Use in all cases.
• Establish the purpose of this RIO and orient the Learner to what
they are expected to learn.
• Keep short and to the point.
• Do NOT tie to other RIOs, or assume the Learner has visited
other RIOs within this RLO.
6. Instructor • Optional.
Notes • Included if there is anything special or unique about teaching
this Fact to a live classroom.
• This field does NOT appear to the Learner, but to the Instructor
in either print or on-line instructor guide.
Practice Item Here are specific guidelines for using practices with a Procedure RIO. See the Practice
Guidelines Item portion of this document for generic practice guidelines.
Examples:
• Explain what would happen if...
• Evaluate the symptoms.... where might the problem be located.
• Look at the display ... indicate where there may be problems
with the system.
When to Use A Principle RIO is used when you need to create a job task that requires judgement, or
when guidelines must be applied to a job situation.
Sequence Typically a Principle RIO will come after a Concept or Process RIO.
For example, if you are creating an RLO to teach the guidelines for handling employee
conflicts, the Concept RIO titled "What is a Conflict" may be taught first.
Examples Here are some examples of things you would teach using a Principle RIO:
• Guidelines for handling employees with personal problems
• Guidelines for designing effective visual aids
• Responding appropriately to an angry customer
• Designing Learner-centered training
Identifying a Generally you use a Principle RIO when the job task can be written as:
Principle RIO
• How to . . .
• Guidelines for . . .
Notice that the Principle and Procedure RIO start with "how to." The distinction is that
the Principle RIO focuses on what the Learner will do with the guideline.
3. Principle • Required.
Statement • Give a statement describing the accepted standard of behavior.
4. Guidelines • Required.
• Derive guidelines from your analysis of expert performance.
• List the guidelines.
6. Non-Example • Optional.
• Draw attention to how guidelines are violated.
• Violate one guideline at a time.
• State which guideline was not followed and why.
7. Analogy • Optional.
• Powerful instructionally.
• Must be easily identifiable.
8. Instructor • Optional.
Notes • Included if there is anything special or unique about teaching
this Fact to a live classroom.
• This field does NOT appear to the Learner, but to the Instructor
in either print or on-line "instructor guide."
Practice Item Here are specific guidelines for using practices with a Principle RIO. See the Practice
Guidelines Item portion of this document for generic practice guidelines.
Introduction The following is a list the content items, practice items and assessment items used in the
RIO Strategy.
Because the RLO Assessment is a collection of RIO assessment items, it is not listed in
this summary.
Major References The following works have been used as major sources, either directly or indirectly, to
create this document:
Bloom, Benjamin S. & Krathwohl, David R., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook
1 : Cognitive Domain, Addison-Wesley Pub Co., 1994.
Clark, R., Developing Technical Training: A Structured Approach for the Development of
Classroom and Computer-Based Instructional Materials, Performance Technology Press,
1989.
Horn, R.E., Structured Writing and Text Design, in D.H. Jonassen, ed., The Technology of
Text, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1982.
Mager, B.F., Preparing Instructional Objectives, Second Edition, David S. Lake Publishers,
Belmont CA, 1975.
Merrill, M.D. & Twitchell, D.G. (Editor), Instructional Design Theory, Educational
Technology Publication, 1994.
Merrill, M.D., Component Display Theory, In Reighluth, CM, ed., Instructional Design
Theories and Models , Hillsdale, NJ, 1983.
Phillips, J.J., Return on investment in training and performance improvement programs, Gulf
Publishing Co., Houston, TX, 1997.