8628 2
8628 2
8628 2
3. Application: The ability to use learned material, 3. Applying: Carrying out or using a procedure through
or to implement material in new and concrete executing, or implementing. Applying relates to or refers
situations. Examples of verbs that relate to this to situations where learned material is used through
function are: products like models, presentations, interviews or
simulations.
5. Synthesis: The ability to put parts together to 5. Evaluating: Making judgments based on criteria and
form a coherent or unique new whole. In the standards through checking and critiquing. Critiques,
revised version of Bloom’s synthesis recommendations, and reports are some of the products
becomes creating and becomes the last and most that can be created to demonstrate the processes of
complex cognitive function. Examples of verbs that evaluation. In the newer taxonomy, evaluating comes
relate to the synthesis function are: before creating as it is often a necessary part of the
precursory behavior before one creates something.
6. Evaluation: The ability to judge, check, and even 6. Creating: Putting elements together to form a
critique the value of material for a given purpose. coherent or functional whole; reorganizing elements
This function goes to #5 in the revised version of into a new pattern or structure through generating,
Bloom’s. Examples of verbs that relate to evaluation planning, or producing. Creating requires users to put
are: parts together in a new way, or synthesize parts into
something new and different thus creating a new form
or product. This process is the most difficult mental
judge assess argue decidevalidate consider
function in the new taxonomy.
compare choose rateappraise value
evaluate select estimate criticize infer
conclude
measure
deduce
Q. 3 What is the outcome based assessment criteria? Support your answer with suitable examples.
Ans:
Assessment for learning occurs throughout the learning process. It is designed to make each student’s
understanding visible, so that teachers can decide what they can do to help students progress. Students learn
in individual and idiosyncratic ways, yet, at the same time, there are predictable patterns of connections and
preconceptions that some students may experience as they move along the continuum from emergent to
proficient. In assessment for learning, teachers use assessment as an investigative tool to find out as much as
they can about what their students know and can do, and what confusions, preconceptions, or gaps they
might have. The wide variety of information that teachers collect about their students’ learning processes
provides the basis for determining what they need to do next to move student learning forward. It provides
the basis for providing descriptive feedback for students and deciding on groupings, instructional strategies,
and resources. Assessment as learning focusses on students and emphasizes assessment as a process of
metacognition (knowledge of one’s own thought processes) for students. Assessment as learning emerges
from the idea that learning is not just a matter of transferring ideas from someone who is knowledgeable to
someone who is not, but is an active process of cognitive restructuring that occurs when individuals interact
with new ideas. Within this view of learning, students are the critical connectors between assessment and
learning. For students to be actively engaged in creating their own understanding, they must learn to be
critical assessors who make sense of information, relate it to prior knowledge, and use it for new learning. This
is the regulatory process in metacognition; that is, students become adept at personally monitoring what they
are learning, and use what they discover from the monitoring to make adjustments, adaptations, and even
major changes in their thinking. Assessment of learning refers to strategies designed to confirm what students
know, demonstrate whether or not they have met curriculum outcomes or the goals of their individualized
programs, or to certify proficiency and make decisions about students’ future programs or placements. It is
designed to provide evidence of achievement to parents, other educators, the students themselves, and
sometimes to outside groups (e.g., employers, other educational institutions). Assessment of learning is the
assessment that becomes public and results in statements or symbols about how well students are learning. It
often contributes to pivotal decisions that will affect students’ futures. It is important, then, that the
underlying logic and measurement of assessment of learning be credible and defensible.
If we think of our children as plants … Summative assessment of the plants is the process of simply measuring
them. It might be interesting to compare and analyze measurements but, in themselves, these do not affect
the growth of the plants. Formative assessment, on the other hand, is the equivalent of feeding and watering
the plants appropriate to their needs - directly affecting their growth.
Factors Inhibiting Assessment:
A tendency for teachers to assess quantity and presentation of work rather than quality of learning. Greater
attention given to marking and grading, much of it tending to lower self-esteem of students, rather than
providing advice for improvement. A strong emphasis on comparing students with each other, which
demoralizes the less successful learners.
Shifts in Assessment:
Shifts in Assessment From assessing to learn what students do not know From using results to calculate grades
From end-of-term assessments by teachers From judgmental feedback that may harm student motivation To
assessing to learn what students understand To using results to inform instruction To students engaged in
ongoing assessment of their work and others To descriptive feedback that empowers and motivates students
Why these shifts in assessment? Why these shifts in assessment?
A change in the mission of schools:
A shift from a focus on sorting and ranking students to a focus on leaving no child behind. A strong research
base: Evidence of the substantial impact on student achievement Self-Evaluation Where would you place your
assessment practice on the following continuum? The main focus is on: Quantity of work/Presentation Quality
of teach Marking/Grading Comparing students Advice for improvement identifying individual progress
Implications for classroom practice Share learning goals with students. Involve students in self-assessment.
Provide feedback that helps students recognize their next steps and how to take them. Be confident that
every student can improve. Assessment AS Learning. Develops students’ skills of metacognition
• critical thinking skills
• communication and interpersonal skills.
Q. 4 Discuss the attitudes in science education. How can we develop scientific attitude among science
students?
Ans:
Attitudes towards science, scientists, and learning science have always been a concern for science educators.
Attitude is very broadly used in discussing issues in science education and is often used in various contexts.
Two broad categories are distinguishable. The first one is attitude toward science (e.g., interest in science,
attitude toward scientists, or attitudes toward social responsibility in science). Attitude towards science can be
defined as the feelings, beliefs, and values held about an object that may be the endeavor of science, school
science, the impact of science and technology on society, or scientists. The second one is scientific attitude
(i.e., open-minded, honesty, or skepticism). Scientific attitude is the desire to know and understand,
questioning to all statements, search for data and their meaning, search for verification, and consideration of
consequences (Gardner, 1975; Osborne, Simon & Collins, 2003).
Research studies that indicate positive correlations between achievement in science courses and positive
attitudes toward science, attitude and certain characteristics of the classroom environments that include
personal support, use of a variety of teaching strategies, innovative learning activities, and student-centered
instructional designs have all been reported in the recent research journal (Osborne, Simon & Collins, 2003;
Russell & Hollander, 1975; Shrigley, Koballa & Simpson, 1988; French & Russell, 2006). Attitudes towards
science and scientists influence views of science, future career awareness, and classroom participation.
Students who have positive attitudes show increased attention to classroom instruction and participate more
in science activities (Germann, 1988; Jarvis & Pell, 2005).
Most research indicates that students develop more negative attitudes toward studying science, toward their
science classes, and toward their science teachers the longer they study typical school science (Yager &
McCormack, 1989). It is important to develop student positive attitude toward science. When they have
positive attitudes, the learning of scientific information and science process skills are enhanced (Yager, 1996).
After fourth grade student attitude toward science starts to decline through junior and high school (Penick &
Yager, 1982). Assessment of student attitudes toward science have been conducted and reported. Student
responses indicate that student interest in science decreases the longer the students study science (NAEP,
1978). Reasons why students develop more negative attitudes towards science as they move through
elementary school include;
Students are interested in a number of non-school activities when they get older
Low achievement with school work
More emphasis on specific science facts
More emphasis on test results
Not much opportunity for students to enjoy science (Yager, 1996)
Research studies indicate many factors influencing attitudes toward science. Probably gender is the most
significant variable related student attitudes toward science (Gardner, 1975; Schibeci, 1984; Weinburgh,
1995). Children receive messages about gender and ethnic stereotypes everyday from television programs and
commercials, books, and the adults around them. They also see pictures of scientists most of whom are all
men, are all white, and have strange/weird behaviors. The strong correlation between attitude toward science
and achievement indicate little difference between girls and boys. Also, more positive attitudes are necessary
for girls to enable them to achieve high scores (Weingburgh, 1995; Jarvis &Pell, 2005).
The National Science Teachers Association defined the STS approach as the teaching and learning science and
technology in the context of human experience (NSTA, 1990). STS means focusing upon current issues and
attempts at their resolution as the best way of preparing students for current and future citizenship roles. This
means identifying local, regional, national, and international problems with students, planning for individual
and group activities which address them, and moving to actions designed to resolve the issues investigated.
The emphasis is on responsible decision-making in the real world of the student. STS provides a means for
achieving scientific and technological literacy for all. The emphasis is on responsible decision-making in the
real world of the student where science and technology are components.
The view of the student where the STS approaches are practiced make classrooms very different than they are
where traditional teaching is practiced. In traditional teaching the teacher decides which topics to include, in
what sequence, and in what ways. The teacher is the authority and students are the passive recipients.
Conversely, students are central in the STS approach. Students generate their own questions rather than
purely relying on the questions provided by others. Based on their own questions, student view their own
previous understandings of the problem and issues. Student-directed questions further serve to define
problems, potential solutions, and actions need to resolve them. This enables students to see/ do science in
the same way that scientists do. This makes science more meaningful, exciting, and appropriate for most
students. The main goal of the STS approach is to achieve scientific literacy for all. It creates student-centered
environments where students improve on their own ideas, raise questions, and undertake investigations. The
STS approach starts with real world issues, and problems that related to students lives. Table 1 indicates the
differences between students involved in an STS program and those in a traditional science program in terms
of the attitude domain
Table 1: Contrast between STS Programs and Traditional Science Programs in terms of the Attitude Domain
STS Traditional