All College Professors Must Be Reading Teachers
All College Professors Must Be Reading Teachers
All College Professors Must Be Reading Teachers
BY ESTHER L. BARACEROS
One subject all college freshmen need to finish before they reach sophomore is
English 2: Reading and Thinking Skills for Academic Study. This subject is described by
the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) as “a course that primarily aims at
developing the reading and thinking abilities of students for academic study. It enables
the learners to enhance their HOTS higher-order thinking skill such as inferential,
critical, creative and appreciative thinking for comprehending or understanding
academic texts.” (CHED memo, 2008)
To enhance students’ reading skills for academic study in the tertiary level is to
let them engage in frequent reading activities. They have to be driven or be pushed to
read and read. As what Oscar Wilde, a 20 th-century Irish writer and dramatis once said,
“The door to success is labeled PUSH”. Interpreting this line, one may say that to
succeed in life, he has to depend much on his attitudes, initiative, effort, and optimism.
Applying this line to reading for academic study, one has to drive or push student to
read by doing extra effort to motivate or create in them an intrinsic interest to read
completely and thoroughly any reading material assigned to them.
Motivating tertiary level students to read is not merely giving them the title of the
book or the number of chapters or pages to read. Rather, it is an act of activating
whatever background knowledge the students have about their reading assignment.
This is so, because to understand the text or to get meaning from printed matter one
should bring or combine with the text whatever background knowledge the readers have
about the reading material. This readers’ background is also called schemata, prior
knowledge, stock knowledge, old knowledge, past knowledge, or experience. According
to reading experts, students’ zero stock knowledge about the reading material results in
their poor or no understanding of the text.
Based on the Schema Theory of Reading that considers the reader’s schemata
as the key to comprehending or understanding any reading material, every person on
earth has schemata in his memory for general concepts about groups of people, places,
things, and events. For instance, the word Japan appearing in a text stimulates the
readers’ recall of their schemata, experience, or prior knowledge in relation to this
country. Such as, tsunami, earthquakes, radiation, floods, volcano, Mt. Fuji, and other
existing knowledge about this place. Or, reading the word cow, the readers come to
remember grass, dung, horn, field, farmer, cattle, milk, anthrax, moo, and many more
ideas related to this kind of animal.
What is the reader’s mind is the focus of this current view of reading
comprehension introduced by Schema Theory. Such emphasis on the reader’s
schemata made these two reading experts, David Pearson and Dale Johnson say that
reading comprehension is “building bridges between the new and the known,” that is,
building connection between the writer’s ideas and the reader’s schemata or past
knowledge about the reading material.
Linda K. Crafton argued that the first reading stage, the pre-reading or before-
reading stage means “comprehension without print”. Further, she said that “What
teachers begin with-The Reader-is perhaps the most important part of the transaction.
The information and perceptions readers bring with them to the reading process can
literally make or break the experience. Those components of the readers’ mental setting
are all organized and available to assist comprehension.”
What if every university or college in the country compel all its teachers to
undergo one- or two-day seminar-workshop on reading at the onset of the semester,
could the move of the school alleviate the deteriorating reading abilities of students, and
instead, increase the number of college graduates equipped with HOTS or higher-order
thinking skills that are necessary for global competitiveness or a niche in this Era of
Globalization or Knowledge Explosion?
(This article was first published in Philippine Panorama dated May 29, 2011, pp.
16-17)
Teves, Ricky