This document discusses overdenture attachments, including when they are mandatory, types of attachments, and their advantages and disadvantages. The main points are:
1. Attachments are mandatory when additional retention is needed, such as with a reduced labial flange, reduced palatal coverage, or to splint questionable abutments.
2. The three main types of attachments are stud attachments like Zest anchors, ball/ring attachments, and bar attachments which can be rigid or flexible.
3. Attachments provide retention but also have drawbacks like increased cost, bulkiness, and requiring more cleaning. The type of attachment chosen depends on the clinical situation and patients' needs and limitations.
This document discusses overdenture attachments, including when they are mandatory, types of attachments, and their advantages and disadvantages. The main points are:
1. Attachments are mandatory when additional retention is needed, such as with a reduced labial flange, reduced palatal coverage, or to splint questionable abutments.
2. The three main types of attachments are stud attachments like Zest anchors, ball/ring attachments, and bar attachments which can be rigid or flexible.
3. Attachments provide retention but also have drawbacks like increased cost, bulkiness, and requiring more cleaning. The type of attachment chosen depends on the clinical situation and patients' needs and limitations.
This document discusses overdenture attachments, including when they are mandatory, types of attachments, and their advantages and disadvantages. The main points are:
1. Attachments are mandatory when additional retention is needed, such as with a reduced labial flange, reduced palatal coverage, or to splint questionable abutments.
2. The three main types of attachments are stud attachments like Zest anchors, ball/ring attachments, and bar attachments which can be rigid or flexible.
3. Attachments provide retention but also have drawbacks like increased cost, bulkiness, and requiring more cleaning. The type of attachment chosen depends on the clinical situation and patients' needs and limitations.
This document discusses overdenture attachments, including when they are mandatory, types of attachments, and their advantages and disadvantages. The main points are:
1. Attachments are mandatory when additional retention is needed, such as with a reduced labial flange, reduced palatal coverage, or to splint questionable abutments.
2. The three main types of attachments are stud attachments like Zest anchors, ball/ring attachments, and bar attachments which can be rigid or flexible.
3. Attachments provide retention but also have drawbacks like increased cost, bulkiness, and requiring more cleaning. The type of attachment chosen depends on the clinical situation and patients' needs and limitations.
Not all cases of overdenture need attachment, sometimes attachment just to increase the confidence of the patient, but in some cases, attachments are mandatory otherwise failure will be the result of the treatment. * When is it mandatory to put attachment? 1. When additional retention is needed, as in the case of reduced labial flange. As we know, In overdenture we don’t extract the tooth; we just prepare it to preserve the bone “So no bone resorption will occur as in the case of extraction”. And also we know that the denture replace both, missing teeth and supporting tissues, so if there’s no resorption, the flange of the Overdenture will make bulkiness and the patient can’t tolerate it, and also it’s of poor aesthetics. In such cases, the dentist needs to reduce the labial flange, breaking the seal that gives retention in cases of complete denture. The reduction of labial flange might lead to flangeless denture, in this case and to compensate for retention, it’s a must to use attachments. 2. Reduced palatal coverage, in cases of torus palatinus or if the patient can’t tolerate the palatal coverage. The same point, we lose retention and we need to compensate by attachments. In cases of reduced palatal coverage and we have abutments “Overdenture”, we use attachment. But if we don’t have abutments, we put implants with attachment “if the patient is well enough to pay”. 3. Splinting: if we have questionable abutments, we use attachments to gain retention and to splint abutments to distribute the load and protect the abutments. Bar attachment is used to achieve splinting. * Types of overdentureOverdenture attachments: Three main types: 1. Stud attachment: a. Zest anchor attachment: a metal part is inserted and cemented in the root of the abutment, and a nylon part will be fixed in the denture. Dimensions: width of 4 mm, and length of 6 mm. Mini Zest attachments are also available. They’re smaller than the Zest attachment, and used for smaller teeth or teeth that aren’t covered by bone. Clinical procedures: primary impression, mouth preparation, final impression –just like making a Co\Cr partial denture-. On the insertion step, we prepare for the post cavity that will contain the metal part of the Zest anchor attachment. The attachment kit contains bur that has the same size and shape of the metal part, this bur is used for the preparation. Then the metal part is cemented in the root of the abutment, usually it’s cemented with GI cement due to Fluoride leaching abilities. One more thing is to do a pick up impression for the nylon part. Blue collar of 1 mm of height is used as a stopper to prevent the over insertion of the nylon part during the impression. As we applying pressure during impression making, if the nylon part is under high pressure and there’s no collar, it will be over inserted, and relapse will result each time the patient tries to put on the denture, so we use the blue collar to prevent this. After taking the impression, we remove the blue collar, and the space “1 mm” that was made between the denture and the metal part will increase the resilience and perform a stress breaking action. The pickup impression is taken using cold cure acrylic. Advantages of Zest attachment: I. Eliminate the need for metal coping of the overdenture over the abutments. II. Temporary fixation for transitional Overdenture. III. Chair - side procedure. Disadvantages of Zest attachment: 1- Require meticulous cleaning and caring. They’re supplied with cover, but it’s usually lost, so the denture needs continuous cleaning that will affect the size and shape of the nylon part. 2- The need for changing the nylon part frequently “every three to six months”. Keep in mind, patients reached this stage of poor dentition, won’t clean sufficiently, but we just give a chance to patients that will clean. Failure of Overdenture and extraction of abutments will be the result if the patient didn’t clean enough. -ring attachment: two parts as all attachments, one to be fixed to the denture and the other one to the abutment. The ball is cemented to the abutment then pick up impression is made. Tin foil is put on the abutment to prevent the acryl from going into the undercuts. Cold cure acrylic is used in the impression. The ring part –usually made of nylon- is fixed to the denture and the ball-like part is attached to the abutment. Also called ball and socket, the socket here indicates the ring. Meticulous cleaning is also needed in this type. Rothermann attachment Rothermann attachment: two parts, one to be fixed on the denture and one on the abutments. Two sizes, the mini size is smaller in height “only 3.5 mm” and it’s used for patients with limited inter-arch space. It looks like C-clasps, and gives retention as the clasp. It could be made chair side or in the lab, but it’s very difficult on the chair side, because the C-shape could move in any direction during the pickup impression. The bulkiness from the lingual side causes annoying feeling to the patient, and this is one of the drawbacks of this type of attachments. Advantages of the Rothermann attachment: 1- Low in height. 2- Adequate retention similar to the clasp. Two arms provide enough retention. 3- Female clip is well retained in the resin due to the presence of holes. Disadvantages of the Rothemann attachment: 1- Sufficient bulkiness should be available lingually to secure the female lug. 2- Chair side insertion is very difficult. 2. Bar attachment: Two main types: rigid or flexible Doldar bar is the most popular example that can be rigid or flexible. Also it could be Doldar bar unit “rigid” or Doldar bar joint “flexible”. The unit type provides retention by friction as there’s no space available provided that there’s no movements in this type “rigid”. In the joint type, space is available both horizontally and vertically which allows for certain movements bucco-lingually and in the vertical direction, and retention is gained by the engagement of the saddle to the undercuts of the bar. 3. Magnet attachment: Cobalt Samarium magnets “also called rare earth magnet” is a common example. Properties of Cobalt Samarium magnets: a. It has a high magnetic field strength that holds the denture in its place in the patient’s mouth. b. They possess a high intrinsic coercivity “resistance to demagnetization”. The old types of magnets were affected by the saliva and the oral environment and showed a decrease in the effectiveness with time, but the Cobalt Samarium “rare earth” magnet showed a continuous effectiveness and was not affected by the oral environment. c. Magnetic retention is self limiting: retentive forces within the range 155-980 g have been reported. The magnetic field is self limited, which means, if the patient is eating or talking, the denture will be stable in the mouth. And when the patient tries to remove the denture from its place, it will be easily removed, and this is very important, because if the magnet provides very strong field, each time the patient tries to remove the denture, the abutments will be affected. A study showed a range of 155-980 gram of resistance force to the removal forces. One part of the magnet will be on the abutment, the other part will be in the denture. The smoothness of the magnet makes it easier to be cleaned than other types of attachments. Advantages of magnet attachment: 1. Simple to use, once the patient inserts the denture, the magnets will move it to the proper place. Other types need to be aligned in a special way to be inserted in the patient’s mouth, which is harder for the patient. 2. Economically, it’s cheaper and doesn’t require a frequent change as it’s easier to be used and easier to be cleaned. 3. Reduce the forces transmitted to the abutments “as we said about the self limited magnetic field”. 4. Require little maintenance. * Drawbacks of Overdenture attachments: 1. Increase the cost of treatment. 2. Maintenance is mostly more complicated, as it needs more care from the patient. 3. Increase the bulkiness might lead to denture fracture, whether the bulk was lingually as in the case of Rothermann attachment or in the vertical dimension as in other attachments. Increase in the bulkiness might lead to unwanted forces on the denture and results in fracture of the denture. 4. Plaque control is more difficult. As we said before, the shape of attachments increases the liability to plaque accumulation. 5. Higher loads transmitted to abutments, as the attachment is directly inside the abutment itself, which increase the load on the abutment. Precision attachments It’s defined as a mechanical device other than clasp that functions as a direct retainer. This is used for partial dentures and not Overdenture. Again, attachments are the same wither for Overdenture or partial denture, they’re composed of two parts, one to be cemented on the abutment “wither the abutment is a crown or amputated crown”, and the other part will be fixed to the denture “wither it’s a Co\Cr partial denture or a complete Overdenture”. Though attachments come in different shapes, they follow the same principles, they attach the denture to the abutment to provide retention, and they could be rigid “retention is gained by friction” or flexible “flexibility is gained by the shape of the attachment itself”. * Classification of attachments: 1. According to fabrication: i. Precision- prefabricated, machined component. It’s more precise. ii. Semi precision – less precise tolerance, manufactured, hand made 2. According to the rigidity: i. Rigid type that takes retention from friction ii. Resilient type that gives stress breaking action for the attachment 3. According to the design: i. Key and key hole. ii. Ball and socket. iii. Bar attachment. 4. According to the relation to the abutment i. Intra coronal, inside the crown. Consist of two parts: A flange joined to a prosthesis. A slot impeded in the restoration. • Provide rigid connection. • Frictional retention. ii. Extra coronal, outside the crown. iii. All or part of there mechanism laying outside the contour of abutment tooth. iv. Loads are applied outside the long axis of abutment tooth. v. Usually resilient. 5. According to Preiscel classification: i. Intra coronal attachment ii. Extra coronal attachment iii. Stud attachment iv. Bar attachment Preiscel mixed all type of attachments and there’s no specific rule for him. Extra coronal attachments should always be resilient. A clinical case for a patient with severe bone loss, and as we know, fixed prosthesis don’t provide supporting tissues, we decided that we want to replace the missing tissues so we have chosen a removable partial denture with two attachments. The attachments were inside the crown “intra coronal”. Increase the friction area will result in increase in the retention. * Negative aspects on attachment use: 1- Additional expenses. 2- Poor dental motivation. 3- Manual dexterity. Very old patients won’t be able to use attachments. 4- Repair. * Contra-indications of attachment use:
1- Short clinical crown. Minimal accepted length of
crown is 6 mm. 2- Minimum 4mm of vertical space for attachment 3- Short bucco-lingual width. 4- Inadequate space between the pulp and the normal contour. Severe preparation is performed and we don’t want to do pulp exposure. Kennedy class I and II requires extra coronal resilient attachments Advantages and disadvantages: Advantages of Precision attachments • It provide retention without metal display. • It provide some horizontal stabilization. • It has been claimed that stimulation to the underlying structure is greater. Disadvantages of Precision attachments • They must never be used in distal extension condition without stress breaker • Full cast crown must be prepared on abutment. • They cant be used in short clinical crowns • They cant be used when the pulp is large. • They are not appropriate for patient who lack muscular coordination. • Both clinical and laboratory procedures require special skill. • They are difficult to repair. • Very expensive. Conclusion: Clasp – type RPD o Low cost o Ease of fabrication and maintenance o Predictability of results Attachment RPD o More esthetic o Need for abutment alignment o Need for cross-arch bracing thanks