Reading Comprehension 1.3 Activity Quiz 5
Reading Comprehension 1.3 Activity Quiz 5
Email 1
Email 2
Email 3
Email 4
Email 5
Email 6
2. Understanding
Using information from the material, give two qualifications or characteristics of each of the following candidates. Justify your response for
each.
a. Philo Latraux
b. JulieParemen
c. Warren Hernandez
3. Understanding
Give two characteristics that all email correspondents (including Malik Iswaran) collectively share.
4. Understanding
Look at the use of brackets (parenthesis) in Email 3 from Philo Latraux to Malik Iswaran. In one word or a short phrase, describe the tone of
these phrases.
5. Understanding
Review the context of Email 4. Using your own words as far as possible, explain the purpose of paragraph 2.
6. Understanding
Using your own words, explain Philo’s causes for doubt of Sands’ innocence as outlined in Email 3.
9. Applying
Using evidence from the material and your knowledge of the present day, explain the challenges that celebrities face once they are in public
view.
10. Analysing
Briefly explain the differences between Julie's and Warren's approach in responding to Malik Iswaran's proposal. Justify your answer, using
the material and your own knowledge/opinion.
11. Analysing
What do you learn about Malik's character from the emails? Answer in about 60 words, giving justifications for your answer.
12. Analysing
Infer reasons why Malik might have taken on the Sands case.
13. Analysing
Explain briefly what Malik means when he says Sands’ situation is a ‘textbook’ case.
14. Analysing
Analyse the sign-off phrases that the candidates use in the first five emails (Sincerely, etc.). What does each seem to suggest? In roughly 80
words, compare their approaches.
15. Analysing
a. overstepping my boundaries
c. no end in sight
d. on my plate
16. Analysing
Using context as a clue, offer one synonym for each of the words as they are used in email 4.
a. keen
b. perusal
c. allegations
d. meticulous
e. hard-line
17. Analysing
Use each of the words from question 7 in a separate sentence to illustrate their meaning as used in the email. Your sentences not deal with the
same topic as the email scenario.
a. keen
b. perusal
c. allegations
d. meticulous
e. hard-line
18. Analysing
What is Malik’s tone in paragraph 2 of Email 6? Justify your answer with at least two expressions that he uses.
19. Evaluating
Explain which candidate is most suitable for the position, considering the positive and negative aspects of each. You should limit your
discussion to the candidate you have chosen and not refer to the others. Use your own words.
20. Evaluating
Considering the positive and negative aspects of each candidate, explain which one is least suitable for the position. You should limit your
discussion to the chosen candidate and not refer to the others. Use your own words.
21. Evaluating
Choosing ONE of the employees from the email thread, explain what you would have done better in response to your boss’s advertisement of
the position.
22. Evaluating
If you were applying for the same position as Julie, Philo, and Warren, how would you set yourself apart? What qualities do you possess that
could contribute to this line of work and/or this case specifically?
24. Communicating
In your own opinion, what is one advantage and one disadvantage of being a defense lawyer?
25. Communicating
Because of recent events, Cooper Sands is preparing for a radio interview on a popular, celebrity gossip news programme. Imagine you are
his PR manager and suggest at least three relevant questions you would use to prepare him for this. Be creative in your approach to
questioning.