Chapter 11 International Financial Management
Chapter 11 International Financial Management
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
LEARNING OUTCOMES
After going through the chapter student shall be able to understand
International Capital Budgeting
International Sources of Finance
International Working Capital Management
(a) Multinational Cash Management
(b) Multinational Receivable Management
(c) Multinational Inventory Management
(d) Effect of foreign exchange risk on the parent firm’s cash flow
(e) Changes in rates of inflation causing a shift in the competitive environment and thereby
affecting cash flows over a specific time period
(f) Restrictions imposed on cash flow distribution generated from foreign projects by the host
country
(g) Initial investment in the host country to benefit from the release of blocked funds
(h) Political risk in the form of changed political events reduce the possibility of expected cash
flows
(i) Concessions/benefits provided by the host country ensures the upsurge in the profitability
position of the foreign project
(j) Estimation of the terminal value in multinational capital budgeting is difficult since the buyers
in the parent company have divergent views on acquisition of the project.
1.2 Problems Affecting Foreign Investment Analysis
The various types of problems faced in International Capital Budgeting analysis are as follows:
(1) Multinational companies investing elsewhere are subjected to foreign exchange risk in the
sense that currency appreciates/ depreciates over a span of time. To include foreign exchange risk
in the cash flow estimates of any project, it is necessary to forecast the inflation rate in the host
country during the lifetime of the project. Adjustments for inflation are made in the cash flows
depicted in local currency. The cash flows are converted in parent country’s currency at the spot
exchange rate multiplied by the expected depreciation rate obtained from purchasing power parity.
(2) Due to restrictions imposed on transfer of profits, depreciation charges and technical
differences exist between project cash flows and cash flows obtained by the parent organization.
Such restriction can be diluted by the application of techniques viz internal transfer prices,
overhead payments. Adjustment for blocked funds depends on its opportunity cost, a vital issue in
capital budgeting process.
(3) In multinational capital budgeting, after tax cash flows need to be considered for project
evaluation. The presence of two tax regimes along with other factors such as remittances to the
parent firm in the form of royalties, dividends, management fees etc, tax provisions with held in the
host country, presence of tax treaties, tax discrimination pursued by the host country between
transfer of realized profits vis-à-vis local re-investment of such profits cause serious impediments
to multinational capital budgeting process. MNCs are in a position to reduce overall tax burden
through the system of transfer pricing.
For computation of actual after tax cash flows accruing to the parent firm, higher of home/ host
country tax rate is used. If the project becomes feasible then it is acceptable under a more
favourable tax regime. If not feasible, then, other tax saving aspects need to be incorporated in
order to find out whether the project crosses the hurdle rate.
1.3 Project vis-a-vis Parent Cash Flows
There exists a big difference between the project and parent cash flows due to tax rules, exchange
controls. Management and royalty payments are returns to the parent firm. The basis on which a
project shall be evaluated depend on one’s own cash flows, cash flows accruing to the parent firm
or both.
Evaluation of a project on the basis of own cash flows entails that the project should compete
favourably with domestic firms and earn a return higher than the local competitors. If not, the
shareholders and management of the parent company shall invest in the equity/government bonds of
domestic firms. A comparison cannot be made since foreign projects replace imports and are not
competitors with existing local firms. Project evaluation based on local cash flows avoid currency
conversion and eliminates problems associated with fluctuating exchange rate changes.
For evaluation of foreign project from the parent firm’s angle, both operating and financial cash
flows actually remitted to it form the yardstick for the firm’s performance and the basis for
distribution of dividends to the shareholders and repayment of debt/interest to lenders. An
investment has to be evaluated on basis of net after tax operating cash flows generated by the
project. As both types of cash flows (operating and financial) are clubbed together, it is essential to
see that financial cash flows are not mixed up with operating cash flows.
1.4 Discount Rate and Adjusting Cash Flows
An important aspect in multinational capital budgeting is to adjust cash flows or the discount rate
for the additional risk arising from foreign location of the project. Earlier MNCs adjusted the
discount rate upwards for riskier projects as they considered uncertainties in political environment
and foreign exchange fluctuations. The MNCs considered adjusting the discount rate to be popular
as the rate of return of a project should be in conformity with the degree of risk. It is not proper to
combine all risks into a single discount rate. Political risk/uncertainties attached to a project relate
to possible adverse effects which might occur in future but cannot be foreseen at present. So
adjusting discount rates for political risk penalises early cash flows more than distant cash flows.
Also adjusting discount rate to offset exchange risk only when adverse exchange rate movements
are expected is not proper since a MNC can gain from favourable currency movements during the
life of the project on many occasions. Instead of adjusting discount rate while considering risk it is
worthwhile to adjust cash flows. The annual cash flows are discounted at a rate applicable to the
project either at that of the host country or parent country. Probability with certainty equivalent
method along with decision tree analysis are used for economic and financial forecasting. Cash
flows generated by the project and remitted to the parent during each period are adjusted for
political risk, exchange rate and other uncertainties by converting them into certainty equivalents.
1.5 Adjusted Present Value (APV)
APV is used in evaluating foreign projects. The APV model is a value additive approach to capital
budgeting process i.e. each cash flow is considered individually and discounted at a rate
consistent with risk involved in the cash flow.
Different components of the project’s cash flow have to be discounted separately.
The APV method uses different discount rates for different segments of the total cash flows
depending on the degree of certainty attached with each cash flow. The financial analyst tests the
basic viability of the foreign project before accounting for all complexities. If the project is feasible
no further evaluation based on accounting for other cash flows is done. If not feasible, an
additional evaluation is done taking into consideration the other complexities.
The APV model is represented as follows.
n n n
Xt Tt St
- I0 + ∑ (1 + k ) ∑ (1 + i ) ∑ (1 + i )
t =1
* t
+
t =1
t
+
t =1
t
d d
Tt
→Present Value of Interest Tax Shields
(1 + id )t
St
→Present Value of Interest Subsidies
(1 + id )t
Tt →Tax Saving in year t due to financial mix adopted
St →Before tax value of interests subsidies (on home currency) in year t due to project
specific financing
id →Before tax cost of dollar dept (home currency)
The initial investment will be net of any ‘Blocked Funds’ that can be made use of by the parent
company for investment in the project. ‘Blocked Funds’ are balances held in foreign countries that
cannot be remitted to the parent due to Exchange Control regulations. These are ‘direct blocked
funds’. Apart from this, it is quite possible that significant costs in the form of local taxes or
withholding taxes arise at the time of remittance of the funds to the parent country. Such ‘blocked
funds’ are indirect. If a parent company can release such ‘Blocked Funds’ in one country for the
investment in a overseas project, then such amounts will go to reduce the ‘Cost of Investment
Outlay’.
The last two terms are discounted at the before tax cost of debt to reflect the relative cash flows
due to tax and interest savings.
1.6 Scenarios
Following three illustrations are based on three different scenarios:
1.6.1 A foreign company is investing in India
Illustration 1
Perfect Inc., a U.S. based Pharmaceutical Company has received an offer from Aidscure Ltd., a
company engaged in manufacturing of drugs to cure Dengue, to set up a manufacturing unit in
Baddi (H.P.), India in a joint venture.
As per the Joint Venture agreement, Perfect Inc. will receive 55% share of revenues plus a royalty
@ US $0.01 per bottle. The initial investment will be `200 crores for machinery and factory. The
scrap value of machinery and factory is estimated at the end of five (5) year to be `5 crores. The
machinery is depreciable @ 20% on the value net of salvage value using Straight Line Method. An
initial working capital to the tune of `50 crores shall be required and thereafter `5 crores each
year.
As per GOI directions, it is estimated that the price per bottle will be `7.50 and production will be
24 crores bottles per year. The price in addition to inflation of respective years shall be increased
by `1 each year. The production cost shall be 40% of the revenues.
The applicable tax rate in India is 30% and 35% in US and there is Double Taxation Avoidance
Agreement between India and US. According to the agreement tax credit shall be given in US for
the tax paid in India. In both the countries, taxes shall be paid in the following year in which profit
have arisen.
The Spot rate of $ is `57. The inflation in India is 6% (expected to decrease by 0.50% every year)
and 5% in US.
As per the policy of GOI, only 50% of the share can be remitted in the year in which they are
earned and remaining in the following year.
Though WACC of Perfect Inc. is 13% but due to risky nature of the project it expects a return of
15%.
Determine whether Perfect Inc. should invest in the project or not (from subsidiary point of view).
Solution
Working Notes:
1. Estimated Exchange Rates (Using PPP Theory)
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Exchange rate * 57 57.54 57.82 57.82 57.54 56.99 56.18
2. Share in sales
Year 1 2 3 4 5
Annual Units in crores 24 24 24 24 24
Price per bottle (`) 7.50 8.50 9.50 10.50 11.50
Price fluctuating Inflation Rate 6.00% 5.50% 5.00% 4.50% 4.00%
Inflated Price (`) 7.95 8.97 9.98 10.97 11.96
Inflated Sales Revenue (` Crore) 190.80 215.28 239.52 263.28 287.04
Sales share @55% 104.94 118.40 131.74 144.80 157.87
3. Royalty Payment
Year 1 2 3 4 5
Annual Units in crores 24 24 24 24 24
Royalty in $ 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Total Royalty ($ Crore) 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24
Exchange Rate 57.54 57.82 57.82 57.54 56.99
Total Royalty (` Crore) 13.81 13.88 13.88 13.81 13.68
4. Tax Liability
(` Crore)
Year 1 2 3 4 5
Sales Share 104.94 118.40 131.74 144.80 157.87
Total Royalty 13.81 13.88 13.88 13.81 13.68
Total Income 118.75 132.28 145.61 158.61 171.55
Less: Expenses
Production Cost (Sales
share x 40%) 41.98 47.36 52.69 57.92 63.15
Depreciation (195 x 20%) 39.00 39.00 39.00 39.00 39.00
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Total Remittance (` Crore) -250.00 35.88 70.17 71.37 76.84 122.20 61.62
Exchange Rate 57.00 57.54 57.82 57.82 57.54 56.99 56.18
Remittance ($mn) -43.86 6.24 12.14 12.34 13.35 21.44 10.97
US Tax @35% ($mn) 0.00 0.00 2.18 4.25 4.32 4.67 7.50
Indian Tax ($mn) 0.00 0.00 1.96 2.38 2.82 3.25 3.71
Net Tax ($mn) 0.00 0.00 0.22 1.87 1.51 1.42 3.79
Net Cash Flow ($mn) -43.86 6.24 11.92 10.47 11.84 20.02 7.18
PVF @ 15% 1.000 0.870 0.756 0.658 0.572 0.497 0.432
Present Value ($mn) -43.86 5.43 9.01 6.89 6.77 9.95 3.10
Net Present Value ($mn) = -2.71
Decision: Since NPV of the project is negative, Perfect inc. should not invest in the project.
* Estimated exchange rates have been calculated by using the following formula:
Expected spot rate = Current Spot Rate x expected difference in inflation rates
(1 + Id )
E(S1) = S0 x
(1 + 1f )
Where
E(S1) is the expected Spot rate in time period 1
S0 is the current spot rate (Direct Quote)
Id is the inflation in the domestic country (home country)
If is the inflation in the foreign country
1.6.2 An Indian Company is investing in foreign country by raising fund in the same
country
Illustration 2
Its Entertainment Ltd., an Indian Amusement Company is happy with the success of its Water Park
in India. The company wants to repeat its success in Nepal also where it is planning to establish a
Grand Water Park with world class amenities. The company is also encouraged by a marketing
research report on which it has just spent ` 20,00,000 lacs.
The estimated cost of construction would be Nepali Rupee (NPR) 450 crores and it would be
completed in one years time. Half of the construction cost will be paid in the beginning and rest at
the end of year. In addition, working capital requirement would be NPR 65 crores from the year
end one. The after tax realizable value of fixed assets after four years of operation is expected to
be NPR 250 crores. Under the Foreign Capital Encouragement Policy of Nepal, company is
allowed to claim 20% depreciation allowance per year on reducing balance basis subject to
maximum capital limit of NPR 200 crore. The company can raise loan for theme park in Nepal @
9%.
The water park will have a maximum capacity of 20,000 visitors per day. On an average, it is
expected to achieve 70% capacity for first operational four years. The entry ticket is expected to be
NPR 220 per person. In addition to entry tickets revenue, the company could earn revenue from
sale of food and beverages and fancy gift items. The average sales expected to be NPR 150 per
visitor for food and beverages and NPR 50 per visitor for fancy gift items. The sales margin on
food and beverages and fancy gift items is 20% and 50% respectively. The park would open for
360 days a year.
The annual staffing cost would be NPR 65 crores per annum. The annual insurance cost would be
NPR 5 crores. The other running and maintenance costs are expected to be NPR 25 crores in the
first year of operation which is expected to increase NPR 4 crores every year. The company would
apportion existing overheads to the tune of NPR 5 crores to the park.
All costs and receipts (excluding construction costs, assets realizable value and other running and
maintenance costs) mentioned above are at current prices (i.e. 0 point of time) which are expected
to increase by 5% per year.
The current spot rate is NPR 1.60 per `. The tax rate in India is 30% and in Nepal it is 20%.
The current WACC of the company is 12%. The average market return is 11% and interest rate on
treasury bond is 8%. The company’s current equity beta is 0.45. The company’s funding ratio for
the Water Park would be 55% equity and 45% debt.
Being a tourist Place, the amusement industry in Nepal is competitive and very different from its
Indian counterpart. The company has gathered the relevant information about its nearest
competitor in Nepal. The competitor’s market value of the equity is NPR 1850 crores and the debt
is NPR 510 crores and the equity beta is 1.35.
State whether Its Entertainment Ltd. should undertake Water Park project in Nepal or not.
Solution
Working Notes:
1. Calculation of Cost of Funds/ Discount Rate
Competing Company's Information
Equity Market Value 1850.00
Debt Market Value 510.00
Equity Beta 1.35
Assuming debt to be risk free i.e. beta is zero, the beta of competitor is un-geared as follows:
E 1850
Asset Beta = Equity Beta x = 1.35 x = 1.106
E + D(1 - t) 1850 + 510(1 - 0.20)
Equity beta for Its Entertainment Ltd. in Nepal
Assets beta in Nepal 1.106
Ratio of funding in Nepal
Equity 55.00%
Debt 45.00%
55
1. 1.106 = Equity Beta x
55 + 45(1 - 0.30)
Equity Beta = 1.74
Cost of Equity as per CAPM
Market Return 11.00%
Risk free return 8.00%
Cost of Equity = Risk free return + β (Market Return - Risk free return)
= 8.00% + 1.74(11.00% - 8.00%) = 13.22%
WACC = 13.22% x 0.55 + 9%(1- 0.20) x 0.45 = 10.51%
2. Present Value Factors at the discount rate of 10.51%
Year 0 1 2 3 4 5
PVAF 1.000 0.905 0.819 0.741 0.670 0.607
3. Calculation of Capital Allowances
Year 1 2 3 4
Opening Balance (NPR Crore) 200.00 160.00 128.00 102.40
Less: Depreciation (NPR Crore) 40.00 32.00 25.60 20.48
Closing Balance (NPR Crore) 160.00 128.00 102.40 81.92
Less:
Annual Staffing Cost (NPR
crores) 71.66 75.25 79.01 82.96
Annual Insurance Costs
(NPR crores) 5.51 5.79 6.08 6.38
Depreciation Allowances
(NPR crores) 40.00 32.00 25.60 20.48
Net cash Flow (NPR crores) -225.00 -290.00 45.26 43.32 41.84 369.78
Solution
Working Notes:
1. Calculation of Cost of Capital (GDR)
Current Dividend (D0) 2.50
Expected Divedend (D1) 2.75
Net Proceeds (Rs. 200 per share – 1%) 198.00
Growth Rate 10.00%
2.75
ke = + 0.10 = 0.1139 i.e. 11.39%
198
2. Calculation of Expected Exchange Rate as per Interest Rate Parity
YEAR EXPECTED RATE
1 (1 + 0.12)
= 9.50 × = 9.67
(1 + 0.10)
2 (1 + 0.12) 2
= 9.50 × = 9.85
(1 + 0.10) 2
(i) Assuming that inflow funds are transferred in the year in which same are generated
i.e. first year and second year.
Year 0 1 2
Cash Flows (CN¥) -4500000.00 835500.00 4637340.00
Exchange Rate (`/ CN¥) 9.50 9.67 9.85
Cash Flows (`) -42750000.00 8079285.00 45677799.00
PVF @ 12% 1.00 0.893 0.797
-42750000.00 7214802.00 36405206.00
NPV 870008.00
(ii) Assuming that inflow funds are transferred at the end of the project i.e. second
year.
Year 0 2
Cash Flows (CN¥) -4500000.00 5472840.00
Exchange Rate (Rs./ CN¥) 9.50 9.85
Cash Flows (Rs.) -42750000.00 53907474.00
PVF 1.00 0.797
-42750000.00 42964257.00
NPV 214257.00
Though in terms of CN¥ the NPV of the project is negative but in Rs. it has positive NPV due to
weakening of Rs. in comparison of CN¥. Thus Opus can accept the project.
of guaranteed payments on the bond and are also able to take advantage of any large price
appreciation in the company's stock. (Bondholders take advantage of this appreciation by means
of warrants attached to the bonds, which are activated when the price of the stock reaches a
certain point.) Due to the equity side of the bond, which adds value, the coupon payments on the
bond are lower for the company, thereby reducing its debt-financing costs.
Advantages of FCCBs
(i) The convertible bond gives the investor the flexibility to convert the bond into equity at a price
or redeem the bond at the end of a specified period, normally three years if the price of the
share has not met his expectations.
(ii) Companies prefer bonds as it leads to delayed dilution of equity and allows company to avoid
any current dilution in earnings per share that a further issuance of equity would cause.
(iii) FCCBs are easily marketable as investors enjoys option of conversion into equity if resulting
to capital appreciation. Further investor is assured of a minimum fixed interest earnings.
Disadvantages of FCCBs
(i) Exchange risk is more in FCCBs as interest on bonds would be payable in foreign currency.
Thus companies with low debt equity ratios, large forex earnings potential only opt for FCCBs.
(ii) FCCBs mean creation of more debt and a forex outgo in terms of interest which is in foreign
exchange.
(iii) In the case of convertible bonds, the interest rate is low, say around 3–4% but there is
exchange risk on the interest payment as well as re-payment if the bonds are not converted
into equity shares. The only major advantage would be that where the company has a high
rate of growth in earnings and the conversion takes place subsequently, the price at which
shares can be issued can be higher than the current market price.
2.2 American Depository Receipts (ADRs)
Depository receipts issued by a company in the United States of America (USA) is known as
American Depository Receipts (ADRs). Such receipts must be issued in accordance with the
provisions stipulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission of USA (SEC) which are very
stringent.
An ADR is generally created by the deposit of the securities of a non-United States company with
a custodian bank in the country of incorporation of the issuing company. The custodian bank
informs the depository in the United States that the ADRs can be issued. ADRs are United States
dollar denominated and are traded in the same way as are the securities of United States
companies. The ADR holder is entitled to the same rights and advantages as owners of the
underlying securities in the home country. Several variations on ADRs have developed over time
to meet more specialized demands in different markets. One such variation is the GDR which are
identical in structure to an ADR, the only difference being that they can be traded in more than one
• Markets of GDRs
(i) GDR's are sold primarily to institutional investors.
(ii) Demand is likely to be dominated by emerging market funds.
(iii) Switching by foreign institutional investors from ordinary shares into GDRs is likely.
(iv) Major demand is also in UK, USA (Qualified Institutional Buyers), South East Asia (Hong
kong, Singapore), and to some extent continental Europe (principally France and
Switzerland).
• Mechanism of GDR: The mechanics of a GDR issue may be described with the help of
following diagram.
Company issues
Ordinary shares
to Foreign investors
Characteristics
(i) Holders of GDRs participate in the economic benefits of being ordinary shareholders, though
they do not have voting rights.
(ii) GDRs are settled through CEDEL & Euro-clear international book entry systems.
(iii) GDRs are listed on the Luxemburg stock exchange.
(iv) Trading takes place between professional market makers on an OTC (over the counter) basis.
(v) The instruments are freely traded.
(vi) They are marketed globally without being confined to borders of any market or country as it
can be traded in more than one currency.
(vii) Investors earn fixed income by way of dividends which are paid in issuer currency converted into
dollars by depository and paid to investors and hence exchange risk is with investor.
(viii) As far as the case of liquidation of GDRs is concerned, an investor may get the GDR
cancelled any time after a cooling off period of 45 days. A non-resident holder of GDRs may
ask the overseas bank (depository) to redeem (cancel) the GDRs In that case overseas
depository bank shall request the domestic custodians bank to cancel the GDR and to get the
corresponding underlying shares released in favour of non-resident investor. The price of the
ordinary shares of the issuing company prevailing in the Bombay Stock Exchange or the
National Stock Exchange on the date of advice of redemption shall be taken as the cost of
acquisition of the underlying ordinary share.
Illustration 1
X Ltd. is interested in expanding its operation and planning to install manufacturing plant at US.
For the proposed project it requires a fund of $ 10 million (net of issue expenses/ floatation cost).
The estimated floatation cost is 2%. To finance this project it proposes to issue GDRs.
You as financial consultant is required to compute the number of GDRs to be issued and cost of
the GD R with the help of following additional information.
(i) Expected market price of share at the time of issue of GDR is ` 250 (Face Value ` 100)
(ii) 2 Shares shall underly each GDR and shall be priced at 10% discount to market price.
(iii) Expected exchange rate ` 60/$.
(iv) Dividend expected to be paid is 20% with growth rate 12%.
Solution
Net Issue Size = $10 million
$10 million
Gross Issue = = $ 10.204 million
0.98
Issue Price per GDR in ` (200 x 2 x 90%) ` 450
Issue Price per GDR in $ (` 450/ ` 60) $ 7.50
Dividend Per GDR (D1) (` 20 x 2) ` 40
Net Proceeds Per GDR (` 450 x 0.98) ` 441.00
(a) Number of GDR to be issued
$10.204 million
= 1.3605 million
$7.50
(5) In countries which operate on full capital convertibility, a MNC can move its funds from one
location to another and thus mobilize and ‘position’ the funds in the most efficient way
possible. Such freedom may not be available for MNCs operating in countries that have not
subscribed to full capital convertibility (like India).
A study of International Working Capital Management requires knowledge of Multinational Cash
Management, International Inventory Management and International Receivables Management.
2.2 Multinational Cash Management
MNCs are very much concerned with effective cash management. International money managers
follow the traditional objectives of cash management viz.
(1) effectively managing and controlling cash resources of the company as well as
(2) achieving optimum utilization and conservation of funds.
The former objective can be attained by improving cash collections and disbursements and by
making an accurate and timely forecast of cash flow pattern. The latter objective can be reached
by making money available as and when needed, minimising the cash balance level and
increasing the risk adjusted return on funds that is to be invested.
International Cash Management requires Multinational firms to adhere to the extant rules and
regulations in various countries that they operate in. Apart from these rules and regulations, they
would be required to follow the relevant forex market practices and conventions which may not be
practiced in their parent countries. A host of factors curtail the area of operations of an
international money manager e.g. restrictions on FDI, repatriation of foreign sales proceeds to the
home country within a specified time limit and the, problem of blocked funds. Such restrictions
hinder the movement of funds across national borders and the manager has to plan beforehand
the possibility of such situation arising on a country to country basis. Other complications in the
form of multiple tax jurisdictions and currencies and absence of internationally integrated
exchange facilities result in shifting of cash from one location to another to overcome these
difficulties.
The main objectives of an effective system of international cash management are:
(1) To minimise currency exposure risk.
(2) To minimise overall cash requirements of the company as a whole without disturbing smooth
operations of the subsidiary or its affiliate.
(3) To minimise transaction costs.
(4) To minimise country’s political risk.
(5) To take advantage of economies of scale as well as reap benefits of superior knowledge.
The objectives are conflicting in nature as minimising of transaction costs require cash balance to
be kept in the currency in which they are received thereby contradicting both currency and political
exposure requirements.
A centralized cash management group is required to monitor and manage parent subsidiary and
inter-subsidiary cash flows. Centralization needs centralization of information, reports and decision
making process relating to cash mobilisation, movement and investment. This system benefits
individual subsidiaries which require funds or are exposed to exchange rate risk.
A centralised cash system helps MNCs as follows:
(a) To maintain minimum cash balance during the year.
(b) To manage judiciously liquidity requirements of the centre.
(c) To optimally use various hedging strategies so that MNC’s foreign exchange exposure is
minimised.
(d) To aid the centre to generate maximum returns by investing all cash resources optimally.
(e) To aid the centre to take advantage of multinational netting so that transaction costs and
currency exposure are minimised.
(f) To make maximum utilization of transfer pricing mechanism so that the firm enhances its
profitability and growth.
(g) To exploit currency movement correlations:
(i) Payables & receivables in different currencies having positive correlations
(ii) Payables of different currencies having negative correlations
(iii) Pooling of funds allows for reduced holding – the variance of the total cash flows for the
entire group will be smaller than the sum of the individual variances
Consider an MNC with two subsidiaries in different countries. The two subsidiaries periodically
send fees and dividends to the parent as well as send excess cash – all of them represent
incoming cash to the parent while the cash outflows to the subsidiaries include loans and return on
cash invested by them. As subsidiaries purchase supplies from each other they have cash flows
between themselves.
Excess Cash
Long Term
Long Term
Excess Cash
Funds paid for
new stock issues
Subsidiary B Fees and part of
Sources of
earnings Debt
Cash Dividends
Interest and/or principal on
excess cash invested by subsidiary
Loans
payment before the rupee appreciates. Such a strategy is called Lagging. MNCs should be aware
of the government restrictions in such countries before availing such strategies.
2.7 Netting
It is a technique of optimising cash flow movements with the combined efforts of the subsidiaries
thereby reducing administrative and transaction costs resulting from currency conversion. There is
a co-ordinated international interchange of materials, finished products and parts among the
different units of MNC with many subsidiaries buying /selling from/to each other. Netting helps in
minimising the total volume of inter-company fund flow.
Advantages derived from netting system includes:
1) Reduces the number of cross-border transactions between subsidiaries thereby decreasing
the overall administrative costs of such cash transfers
2) Reduces the need for foreign exchange conversion and hence decreases transaction costs
associated with foreign exchange conversion.
3) Improves cash flow forecasting since net cash transfers are made at the end of each period
4) Gives an accurate report and settles accounts through co-ordinated efforts among all
subsidiaries
There are two types of Netting:
1) Bilateral Netting System – It involves transactions between the parent and a subsidiary or
between two subsidiaries. If subsidiary X purchases $ 20 million worth of goods from
subsidiary Y and subsidiary Y in turn buy $ 30 million worth of goods from subsidiary X, then
the combined flows add up to $ 50 million. But in bilateral netting system subsidiary Y would
pay subsidiary X only $10 million. Thus, bilateral netting reduces the number of foreign
exchange transactions and also the costs associated with foreign exchange conversion. A
more complex situation arises among the parent firm and several subsidiaries paving the way
to multinational netting system.
2) Multilateral Netting System – Each affiliate nets all its inter affiliate receipts against all its
disbursements. It transfers or receives the balance on the position of it being a net receiver
or a payer thereby resulting in savings in transfer / exchange costs. For an effective
multilateral netting system, these should be a centralised communication system along with
disciplined subsidiaries. This type of system calls for the consolidation of information and net
cash flow positions for each pair of subsidiaries.
Subsidiary P sells $ 50 million worth of goods to Subsidiary Q, Subsidiary Q sells $ 50 million
worth of goods to Subsidiary R and Subsidiary R sells $ 50 million worth of goods to Subsidiary P.
Through multilateral netting inter affiliate fund transfers are completely eliminated.
$ 50 $ 50
million
million
Q $ 50 R
million
The netting system uses a matrix of receivables and payables to determine the net receipt / net
payment position of each affiliate at the date of clearing. A US parent company has subsidiaries in
France, Germany, UK and Italy. The amounts due to and from the affiliates is converted into a
common currency viz. US dollar and entered in the following matrix.
Inter Subsidiary Payments Matrix (US $ Thousands)
Paying affiliate
France Germany UK Italy Total
France --- 40 60 100 200
Germany 60 --- 40 80 180
Receiving affiliate UK 80 60 --- 70 210
Italy 100 30 60 --- 190
Total 240 130 160 250 780
Without netting, the total payments are $ 780 Thousands. Through multinational netting these
transfers will be reduced to $ 100 Thousands, a net reduction of 87%. Also currency conversion
costs are significantly reduced. The transformed matrix after consolidation and net payments in
both directions convert all figures to US dollar equivalents to the below form:
Netting Schedule (US $ Thousands)
ANSWERS/ SOLUTIONS
Answers to Theoretical Questions
1. Please refer paragraph 2.4
2. Please refer paragraph 2.3