Bonitus Impactos PDF
Bonitus Impactos PDF
Bonitus Impactos PDF
Gorazd Kosec, Jelena Vojvodič Tuma, Mirko Gojić, Aleš Nagode, Antun Stoić, Ivan Samardžić, Borut Kosec
Keywords: Charpy impact energy, Fracture surface, HSLA steel, Microstructure, Transition temperature
Ključne riječi: Charpy energija udara, Prijelomna površina, HSLA čelik, Mikrostruktura, Prijelazna temperatura
samples was quenched in water. The second group of This pearlite can be formed by nucleation of cementite at
samples was quenched up to 400 °C in lead bath for 5 austenite/ferrite boundaries followed by carbide-free
minutes and then cooled in the air. After that the samples ferrite layers enclosing the cementite in the temperature
are reheated for 5 s up to 750 °C (with holding time of 3 range the formation of conventional lamellar pearlite and
s) with direct conduction heating and air cooled with the upper bainite [26]. After rapid heating up to 750 °C
cooling time t750÷500°C = 17 s using Gleeble 1500 device. microstructure consisted of accicular ferrite, degenerated
By this heat treatment of the steel the welding process at pearlite and secondary martensite (Fig. 1b). The
next deposition was simulated by means of short time quenching in water from 1250 °C produced a coarse
annealing (5 s) in intercritical temperature range (750 °C) microstructure with platelets of ferrite and lath of primary
where two-phase region (austenite and ferrite) exists. On martensite (Fig. 2a). After rapid heating of quenched
all specimens the Charpy V-notch was cut after heat samples up to 750 °C primary and secondary martensite
treatment. occurred (Fig. 2b). In Fig 2b stringers of cementite
The Charpy tests were carried out in temperature particles in ferrite grains and inserts of secondary
range from 196 °C to 60 °C. Hardness was measured by martensite at grain boundaries can be also observed. The
Vickers method (HV5). Samples for metallographic cooling in lead bath from 1250 °C up to 400 °C produced
analysis were prepared by mechanically grinding and the coarse grain of bainite microstructure that consisted of
polishing. Etching of samples was performed by nital stringers of cementite particles at borders of ferrite
solution. Metallography analysis was performed using platelets, (Fig. 3a). After reheat (up to 750 °C) lower
scanning electron microscopy (SEM) method. bainite which was obtained with cooling in lead bath from
Fractography analysis was carried on Charpy samples 1250 °C changed into a microstructure consisting of
fractured. The fracture surfaces were investigated with platelets of secondary martensite at the boundaries of
SEM Jeol JSM 5610 [23, 24], and the space orientation of coarse grains and bainite microstructure (Fig. 3b).
cleavage facets was determined with electron backscatter
diffraction (EBSD) method [25].
a)
3 Results and discussion
a)
b)
(Figs. 1÷3) and hardness (Tab. 2) indicate that depending heat treatment is presented in Figs. 4÷6. It can be seen
on the initial microstructure three different processes may that Charpy impact energy is closely associated with the
occur at short reheat: (1) the dissolution of cementite with microstructure. The Charpy curves show that at upper
a formation of secondary austenite around cementite shelf range the microstructure behaves as 100 % ductile
particles in the interior of ferrite grains and its fracture, while at lower shelf the Charpy impact energy
transformation to secondary martensite at cooling, (2) the tends to minimum (brittle fracture). The transition
formation of inserts (grains) of secondary martensite at temperature can be expressed in different ways. One of
triple points and boundaries of ferrite grains and (3) the them is that the Charpy impact transition temperature can
decomposition of primary martensite. be estimated as the average of maximum and minimum
shelf energy values in Charpy curves [27]. In this
investigation the trend in shift in the transition
a)
temperature was observed.
b)
Figure 5 Charpy impact energy versus testing temperature for the steel
quenched in water from 1250 °C, and after reheating up to 750 °C
Figure 3 SEM micrographs of the steel after lead bath cooling from
1250 °C (a) and after reheating (b)
Figure 6 Charpy impact energy versus testing temperature for the steel
cooled from 1250oC in lead bath at 400 °C,
and after reheating up to 750 °C
transition temperature was lower for lower bainite than composition that the investigated, slower cooling could be
that for martensite. After the applied reheat (up to 750 more harmful than faster cooling.
°C), the fracture energy was decreased and the transition
temperature increased much more for lower bainite than
for martensite. The difference reflects the change of both
initial microstructures at reheating temperature and air
cooling. For bainite, in areas of cementite particles in the
interior of ferrite grains secondary martensite was formed
at reheat, while, at reheat virtually only a partial
decomposition of primary martensite occurred in the
interior of grains. In the very short reheat time of some
seconds, secondary austenite rich in carbon was formed
with dissolution of cementite particles and then
transformed to secondary martensite at cooling. The
Figure 8 Microfractography of fracture surface of steel after Charpy test
extent and form of decomposition of primary martensite
at 40 °C
in the applied reheating are not clear, yet. The extent of
formation of secondary austenite with dissolution of
cementite particles was sufficient to produce a volume of
martensite that greatly diminished the notch toughness.
Also, the change of primary martensite at reheating
decreased significantly the fracture energy, however, the
decrease was much lower than for bainite. An opposite
effect would be expected after the completed
decomposition of martensite.
a)
ductile range is consumed for the plastic deformation the cleavage surface can have only the index
before the crack is started at the notch tip. Similar fracture corresponding to a simple lattice plane (001) or (011), it is
mode is observed on microalloyed cast steel after post- concluded that it occurred in the lattice plane (001)
forging heat treatment [28]. At temperature above −20 °C independently on steel microstructure.
fracture consisted of a mixture of brittle and ductile
surface (Fig. 8). After quenching from 1250 °C in water
the cleavage facets were coarse (Fig. 9) and without
details related to the presence of inserts of secondary
martensite at grain boundaries. After reheating up to 750
°C was observed brittle fracture by cleavage mechanism
(Fig. 10). The shape and size of brittle facets was related
to the size of ferrite grains. Brittle crack initiation is
probably associated with carbide particles at boundaries (a)
for bainite and martensite microstructures. It is in
accordance with previous fractography study [29] on
Charpy V-notch impact tests which showed that
microalloying elements can change the fracture mode
from ductile to brittle.
The cleavage could occur in (110) and (100) lattice
planes with a greater density of rivers for the (110)
planes. The examinations of the obtained fractures did not (b)
confirm this observation although on cleavage facets of αFe {3 -3 19}〈13 25 6〉
coarse lower bainite the rivers density was greater. The
accurate EBSD (electron backscatter diffraction) analysis
is achieved with the angle of approximately 70° between
the facet surface and the incident electron beam and a
small distance between the incident spot and the electron
collector. This geometry could not be achieved at the (c)
Figure12 SEM micrography of fracture surface (a), diffraction lines (b),
examination of the uneven fracture surfaces. and lattice indexing of the cleavage facet (c) of steel quenched from
1250 °C in water and reheated at 750 °C
4 Conclusions
Authors’ addresses