A Study On Geotechnical Properties of Heavy Metal Contaminated Soil
A Study On Geotechnical Properties of Heavy Metal Contaminated Soil
A Study On Geotechnical Properties of Heavy Metal Contaminated Soil
properties of the soil but will also alter the geotechnical properties of heavy metal-contaminated soil. Approach: This study
presented the geotechnical properties of Heavy metal-contaminated soils as well as uncontaminated soils for comparison.
Testing programs performed on the studied soils included basic properties, Atterberg limit, and compaction test. The
Black cotton soils used procured from GUJARAT AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE, SURAT. Soil samples were
artificially contaminated with Barium (Ba) – 471.7 mg/kg, chromium (Cr) – 305.2 mg/kg, zinc (Zn) - 139 mg/kg, copper (Cu)
– 137.5 mg/kg, nickel (Ni) - 79 mg/kg, cobbalt (Co) – 51.3 mg/kg, Vanadium (V) – 380.6 mg/kg, (Sr) – 317.9 mg/kg. Results:
The results showed that the Heavy metal contamination decreased the specific gravity and Optimum Moisture Content. The
liquid limit, plastic limit and Maximum Dry Density were seen to decrease with heavy metal as contaminant. Conclusion: The
results showed that the addition of Heavy metal has minor effects to the geotechnical properties of the studied clayey soil.
Contaminated clayey soils might be used for geotechnical purposes and these results will benefit to engineers or decision
makers in recycling or re-using of contaminated soils.
KEYWORDS Contaminated soil; Heavy metal; Specific Gravity, Atterberge limit, Compaction characteristics
HEAVY METALS WHICH ARE ADDED IN SOIL 2 Liquid limit (%) 11.36
Barium (Ba) – 471.7 mg/kg
chromium (Cr) – 305.2 mg/kg 3 Plastic limit (%) 8.07
zinc (Zn) - 139 mg/kg
copper (Cu) – 137.5 mg/kg 4 Optimum moisture content (%) -2.75
nickel (Ni) - 79 mg/kg
cobbalt (Co) – 51.3 mg/kg 5 Maximum dry density (gm/cc) 0.56
Vanadium (V) – 380.6 mg/kg
(Sr) – 317.9 mg/kg (-) sign indicates decreases and (+) sign indicates increases
in property
SCHEDULE OF WORK
The black cotton soil used for this study was procured from The change in geotechnical properties of Black cotton soil was
“GUJARAT AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE, SU- observed as below (From Table 2)
RAT.
The specific Gravity of Black cotton soil decreased by 5.12%
Heavy Metals used for this study were collected from Durga due to Heavy metal contamination. The liquid limit and plastic
Enterprise, Vadodara. limit increased by 11.36% and 8.07% due to contamination.
The optimum moisture content was observed to be decreased
The soil was dried to sun light for 5 days and finely powdered by 2.75% and Maximum dry density increased by 0.56% due
to 300 micron size. The addition of heavy metal was done in to contamination.
the powered form.
Conclusions :
Following tests were performed on virgin black cotton The results shows that the addition of heavy metals in prescri-
soil and heavy metal contaminated soil: bed content had decreased the Specific gravity and Optimum
Liquid Limit Test Moisture Content of black cotton soil. However the affect
Plastic Limit Test of contamination on Specific gravity and Optimum Moisture
Specific Gravity Content was found very small as shown in Table2. The liuid
Standard Procter Test limit, Plastic limit and Maximum Dry Density was observed to
be increased due to contamination. The amount of increase
Results and Discussion: in liquid limit and plastic limit was found moderate while
Basic geotechnical properties of the virgin black cotton soil change in maximum dry density was found very less as shown
and heavy metal contaminated soil instead of basic and en- in table2.
gineering properties of uncontaminated silty and virgin black
cotton soil was found 44% and 27.5% respectively. The Plas- So finally the conclusion arrives from this study is that the ef-
ticity index (PI) for uncontaminated soil was found 16.5%. The fect of heavy metal contamination on geotehnical properties
average value of Liquid Limit and Plastic limit for Heavy metal of blackcotton soil is negligible.
contaminated soil was found 49% and 29.72% respectively.
The Plasticity index (PI) for uncontaminated soil was found
19.28%.The type of soil was CI in both cases.
REFERENCES
A.K.KRISHNA and P.K.GOVIL(July 2007) “Soil Contamination Due to Heavy Metals from an Industrial Area of Surat, Gujarat, Western India”,Journal of Environmental Moni-
toring and Assessments,Volume 124,pg.263-275 | | | A Fotinich, V.K.Dhir, and S. Lingineni (January1999)”Remediation of simulated soils contaminated with Diesel”, Journal
of Enviornmental engineering,p.g 36-45 | | Hasan A. Al-sanad,Walid K-Eid and Nabil F-Ismael (may-1995) “Geotechnical Properties of Oil Contaminated Kuwaiti Sand” ASCE
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering p.g.407-415 | | Jay N.Meegoda (January 1999) “ Stabilization /Solidification of Petroleum contaminated Soils with Asphalt Emulsions”
Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxin, and Radioactive Waste Management p.g.46-55 | | Sanjay J shah, A.V.Shroff, Jignesh V Patel, K.C.Tiwari, D Ramakrishanan (2003)
“stabilization of Fuel Oil Contaminated Soil-A Case Study” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, p.g.415-427 |