OM Assignment PDF
OM Assignment PDF
OM Assignment PDF
Operations Management
Assignment
6. Job Design and Human Resources. Sufficient and effective human
resources are the objective in this strategic decision area of operations
management. Burger King satisfies this concern through standardized
training programs. The firm has field teams and Restaurant Support
Centers for this purpose.
9. Scheduling. Burger King’s approach for this strategic decision area is
based on industry standards. For example, the company’s operations
management uses automated scheduling for human resources. In
addition, manual scheduling is used, especially at individual Burger King
restaurants.
References
● Burger King Corporation (2015). Burger King Corporate Responsibility.
● Burger King Corporation (2015). My BK Experience.
● Liu, S., & Jiang, M. (2011). Providing Efficient Decision Support for Green Operations
Management: An Integrated Perspective. INTECH.
● Najdawi, M. K., Chung, Q. B., & Salaheldin, S. I. (2008). Expert systems for strategic
planning in operations management: a framework for executive decisions. International Journal
of Management and Decision Making, 9(3), 310-327.
● Restaurant Services, Inc. (2015). About Us.
● Schrunder, C. P., Galletly, J. E., & Bicheno, J. R. (1994). A fuzzy, knowledge-based
decision support tool for production operations management. Expert Systems, 11(1), 3-11.
● Verdaasdonk, P. (1999). Defining an information structure to analyse resource
spending changes of operations management decisions. Production Planning & Control, 10(2),
162-174.
2. Intel Corporation
Intel Corporation’s operations management (OM) strategy focuses on
supporting product development as the basic factor in the 10 strategic
decision areas. Operations managers deal with these 10 strategic
decisions for the purpose of optimizing organizational processes and
productivity. As a leading semiconductor business, Intel already maintains
optimized operations that suit strategic objectives. The company’s efficient
semiconductor fabrication processes are an indicator of operations
management success.
Operations management needs in its global semiconductor business
pushes Intel to find new ways to optimize efficiency and productivity. As a
technology business, the company takes advantage of its technology savvy
human resources to successfully maintain automation to support
operations managers’ activities. Through these efforts and a constant
monitoring of the global market, Intel remains effective in the 10 strategic
decision areas. Such effectiveness depicts continuous success and
long-term leadership in the industry.
6. Job Design and Human Resources. In this strategic decision area, the
main objective is to maintain adequate human resources to support
operational efficiency and productivity goals. Intel satisfies this objective
through an operations management approach that primarily involves
human resource management. For example, the HR strategy involves job
designs that support Intel’s organizational culture, which emphasizes
discipline, results orientation, and other factors. Also, the company has
productivity enhancement measures, such as leadership development
programs and seminars for better employee output. Thus, Intel’s operations
management addresses the aims in this strategic decision area.
10. Maintenance. Process stability and reliability are the objectives in this
strategic decision area of operations management. Intel has a
multi-pronged approach to ensure effective solutions for these concerns.
For example, operations managers coordinate with HR management teams
to maintain an adequate workforce. In addition, Intel supports high
operational productivity by maintaining cutting-edge technologies, such as
equipment used to fabricate semiconductor chips. Another operations
management approach involves high R&D investment to maintain
technological competitive advantage, which addresses the external force of
competitive rivalry (Read: Porter’s Five Forces Analysis of Intel
Corporation).
Productivity at Intel
Considering its global business and a growing product mix, Intel
Corporation uses various sets of measures or criteria for evaluating
productivity. Some of these criteria refer directly to individual employee
output, while others measure group or organizational productivity to guide
operations management decision-making. The following are some of the
quantitative productivity criteria applicable at Intel:
References
● Brown, S., Bessant, J. R., & Lamming, R. (2013). Strategic operations
management. Routledge.
● Ceko, E. (2014, May). Relations between Strategic Management, Operations
Management and Environment Protection. In International Conference: Fostering
Sustainable Development through Creation of Knowledge Society (Vol. 17, p.
18).
● Gundersen, T. F. (2017). Best Strategic Decisions in Management of Complex
Operations. In International Manufacturing Strategy in a Time of Great Flux (pp.
85-104). Springer International Publishing.
● Intel Corporation – Official Website.
● Intel Corporation Form 10-K.
● Parnell, J. A. (1997). New evidence in the generic strategy and business
performance debate: A research note. British Journal of Management, 8(2),
175-181.
● Spry, A., & Lukas, B. A. (2016). Brand Portfolio Architecture and Firm
Performance: The Moderating Impact of Generic Strategy. In Looking Forward,
Looking Back: Drawing on the Past to Shape the Future of Marketing (pp.
866-867). Springer International Publishing.
● Varadarajan, P., & Dillon, W. R. (1982). Intensive growth strategies: A closer
examination. Journal of Business Research, 10(4), 503-522.
3. Nike Inc.
Nike Inc. is a leading global manufacturer and seller of sports shoes,
apparel and equipment. This market position is partly a result of effective
and efficient operations management (OM). To ensure success, Nike’s
managers must continually examine and improve strategies and
approaches used in the 10 strategic decision areas of operations
management. These areas pertain to the main decisions in managing
streamlined operations and productivity that effectively address business
goals and objectives.
The 10 strategic decisions of operations management (OM) at Nike Inc.
cover a wide variety of issues, considering the company’s global market for
sports shoes, apparel and equipment. Nike effectively addresses these
decision areas through standards consistently applied in operations
management throughout the global organization.
References
● About Nike – The official corporate website for Nike, Inc. and its affiliate brands.
● Liu, S., & Jiang, M. (2011). Providing Efficient Decision Support for Green Operations
Management: An Integrated Perspective. INTECH.
● Najdawi, M. K., Chung, Q. B., & Salaheldin, S. I. (2008). Expert systems for strategic
planning in operations management: a framework for executive decisions. International
Journal of Management and Decision Making, 9(3), 310-327.
● Nike, Inc. Form 10-K, 2015.
● Schrunder, C. P., Galletly, J. E., & Bicheno, J. R. (1994). A fuzzy, knowledge-based
decision support tool for production operations management. Expert Systems, 11(1),
3-11.
● Verdaasdonk, P. (1999). Defining an information structure to analyse resource spending
changes of operations management decisions. Production Planning & Control, 10(2),
162-174.
● Verdaasdonk, P., & Wouters, M. (2001). A generic accounting model to support
operations management decisions. Production Planning & Control, 12(6), 605-620.
6. Job Design and Human Resources. The company applies The Toyota
Way and TPS for this strategic decision area of operations management.
The firm emphasizes respect for all people in The Toyota Way, and this is
integrated in HR programs and policies. Also, Toyota has training programs
based on TPS to ensure lean manufacturing practice.
Productivity at Toyota
Toyota’s operations management uses productivity measures or criteria
based on the area of business considered. For instance, some of these
productivity measures are as follows:
References
● Kachwala, T. T., & Mukherjee, P. N. (2009). Operations management and productivity
techniques. PHI Learning.
● Liu, S., & Jiang, M. (2011). Providing Efficient Decision Support for Green Operations
Management: An Integrated Perspective. INTECH.
● Najdawi, M. K., Chung, Q. B., & Salaheldin, S. I. (2008). Expert systems for strategic
planning in operations management: a framework for executive decisions. International
Journal of Management and Decision Making, 9(3), 310-327.
● Toyota Motor Corporation (2015). Guiding Principles at Toyota.
● Toyota Motor Corporation (2015). Toyota Way 2001.
● Verdaasdonk, P. (1999). Defining an information structure to analyse resource spending
changes of operations management decisions. Production Planning & Control, 10(2),
162-174.
● Verdaasdonk, P., & Wouters, M. (2001). A generic accounting model to support
operations management decisions. Production Planning & Control, 12(6), 605-620.
5. Walmart
Walmart’s operations management covers a variety of approaches
that are focused on managing the supply chain and inventory, as well as
sales performance. The company’s success is partly based on effective
performance in operations management. Specifically, Walmart’s
management covers all of the 10 decision areas of operations
management. These decision areas pertain to the issues and concerns that
managers face on a daily basis.
The 10 decisions of operations management are effectively applied in
Walmart’s business through a combination of approaches that emphasize
supply chain management, inventory management, and sales and
marketing.
Buffer inventory. Walmart uses the buffer inventory type in its stores by
keeping a small margin of extra goods in order to maintain business
continuity when demand suddenly fluctuates. For this purpose, there will
always be an extra stock of goods at Walmart stores. The role of this type
of inventory is to ensure the adequate capacity of the company to satisfy
sudden increases in demand, considering that current retail market
prediction models may be accurate, but not perfect in modeling such
fluctuations.
1. Inventory turnover
2. Stock-out rate
3. Inventory size
Inventory turnover is the rate at which Walmart’s inventory is sold out and
replenished. It is a measure of the cost of keeping each item in stock. A
higher inventory turnover rate is less costly and more desirable for the
company. The stock-out rate is the frequency at which Walmart’s inventory
becomes inadequate in satisfying demand. A lower stock-out rate is
desirable. In addition, the company uses inventory size as a gauge of cost.
As noted, the corporation spends less for a smaller inventory. These
measures reflect the cost minimization objectives linked to Walmart’s cost
leadership generic competitive strategy, which requires low costs to
maintain attractive low selling prices.
References
● Agrawal, N., & Smith, S. A. (Eds.). (2015). Retail Supply Chain Management:
Quantitative Models and Empirical Studies (Vol. 223). Springer.
● Ball, D. R. (2011). Integrating Multiple Sustainability Criteria in Technology, Innovation,
and Operations Management Strategic Decisions. Proceedings of the Northeast
Business & Economics Association, 27-33.
● Barratt, M., Choi, T. Y., & Li, M. (2011). Qualitative case studies in operations
management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications. Journal of
Operations Management, 29(4), 329-342.
● Brown, S., Bessant, J. R., & Lamming, R. (2013). Strategic operations management.
Routledge.
● Dedeke, A., & Watson, N. (2008). Exploring Inventory Trends in Six U.S. Retail
Segments. Harvard Business School.
● Eroglu, C., Williams, B. D., & Waller, M. A. (2013). The backroom effect in retail
operations. Production and Operations Management, 22(4), 915-923.
● Kaki, A., Salo, A., & Talluri, S. (2013). Impact of the shape of demand distribution in
decision models for operations management. Computers in Industry, 64(7), 765-775.
● Kistruck, G. M., Morris, S. S., Webb, J. W., & Stevens, C. E. (2015). The importance of
client heterogeneity in predicting make-or-buy decisions. Journal of Operations
Management, 33, 97-110.
● Kouvelis, P., & Tian, Z. (2014). Flexible Capacity Investments and Product Mix: Optimal
Decisions and Value of Postponement Options. Production and Operations
Management, 23(5), 861-876.
● U.S. Department of Commerce (2015). The Retail Services Industry in the United States.
● Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (2015). Walmart Form 10-K, 2015.
● Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (2015). Walmart’s Official E-commerce Website.
● Jin, Y. H., Williams, B. D., Tokar, T., & Waller, M. A. (2015). Forecasting with temporally
aggregated demand signals in a retail supply chain. Journal of Business Logistics, 36(2),
199-211.
● Saha, S., & Goyal, S. K. (2015). Supply chain coordination contracts with inventory level
and retail price dependent demand. International Journal of Production Economics, 161,
140-152.
● Smith, S. A., & Agrawal, N. (2000). Management of multi-item retail inventory systems
with demand substitution. Operations Research, 48(1), 50-64.