See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/320078923

Sources, Fates and Control of Dichloro-DiphenylTrichloroethane (DDT); a

case study on the Alpine Lakes

Article · November 2016

CITATIONS READS

0 1,128

3 authors:

Muhammad Mubarak Nasir Jamilu Usman

Newcastle University Sokoto State University
1 PUBLICATION   0 CITATIONS    8 PUBLICATIONS   2 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Shamsuddeen Abdullahi Ahmad

University of Huddersfield
10 PUBLICATIONS   81 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Microwave thermal analysis of pharmaceuticals View project

Development of Superamphiphobic Clay base Ceramic Membrane for Oil recovery View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Jamilu Usman on 27 November 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences
Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci., Vol 5 [12] November 2016: 134-140
©2016 Academy for Environment and Life Sciences, India
Online ISSN 2277-1808
Journal’s URL:http://www.bepls.com
CODEN: BEPLAD
Global Impact Factor 0.533
Universal Impact Factor 0.9804
REVIEW ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS

Sources, Fates and Control of Dichloro-DiphenylTrichloroethane

(DDT); a case study on the Alpine Lakes
Muhammad M Nasir a *, Jamilu Usmanb, Shamsuddeen A. Abdullahib
a School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Drummond Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle
upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
bDepratment of Chemistry, Sokoto state University, P.M.B 2134, Sokoto state, Nigeria

ABSTRACT
DDT was assumed to be diluted in oceans to negligible concentrations and was considered ‘unblemished’’ as pristine in
high-altitude or cold mountainous environment. Banned during the Stolkholm Convention due to its hazardous impact
on both human and ecosystems as it’s extremely difficult to completely degrade once in the environment. The main
sources were identified to be from mountain glaciers, agricultural run-off, surface and lacustrine sediments; industries
leading to run-off into rivers and atmospheric emission, which is more dominant to occur in the alpine lakes due to
evaporation from other warm environment. Major pathways includes Aeolian dispersion, floods/ run-off,
bioaccumulation as well as biota migration the toxic effects of these compounds on biota. The toxic effects of these
compounds on biota endocrine disruptor’s behavioural changes and its reproductive systems. Environmental
remediating of such pollution may be achieved using supercritical fluid extraction and clean up from soil, at high
temperature and pressure which is highly expensive. We thus further recommend the use of environmental fate
modelling of pollutants.
Keywords: DDT, POPs, Alpine lakes

Received 21.07.2016 Revised 21.09.2016 Accepted 11.10.2016

INTRODUCTION
DDT-p, p’-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane is a pesticide used for variety of crops classified as a
Persistent organic Pollutant (POPs) perhaps the best known [1]. Although DDT was assumed to be diluted
in oceans to negligible concentrations [2], it was widely used during the second war to combat insect of
vector borne diseases before its ban in the 1970’s by the legislation decrees during the Stockholm
convention to regulate its use although no restriction was put on its production. Although, it is still been
used in applications of floriculture and zootechnics [3] and in region where malaria poses major health
hazard, where it’s of immense benefit[1]. Its widespread, uncontrolled, intensive use has resulted in
worldwide pollution.
Alpine lakes are high latitudes lakes similar to high mountains which may serve as ‘cold traps’ for
persistent organic pollutants [4]. Cold temperatures at higher latitudes favour deposition from the
atmosphere on to soil and water [5-8]. As such DDT contagion was evident in the Italian Alps as higher
precipitation intensities and gradient in agreement with altitude [9.
POPs can migrate to higher latitudes in a series of relatively short jumps sometimes termed the
‘grasshopper effect’ [10]. Several organochlorines, including DDT, peaked in the most recent layers in the
high arctic lakes. DDT is stored in all tissues with the highest accumulation in fat where repeated
exposures, even at low concentrations, it accumulate resulting in a high level storage [11]. This lipophilic
behaviour of DDT results in growing concern over the toxic effect on biota for instance the
bioaccumulation is greater the longer an organism lives [3]. Suggesting that large predatory fish likely
have the highest probability of accumulation and endangered. In this work a careful review of the sources,
fate and control of DDT was achieved considering the alpine lake as a case study area.

SOURCES
There are different sources and means of transportation of this pollutant through the aquatic
environment as revealed in Figure 1 in the alpine lakes. For instance, DDT pollution in Lake Maggiore in
Italy since 1996 has been identified [12] and caused by industrial production and effluents, traced back to

BEPLS Vol 5 [12] November 2016 134 | P a g e ©2016 AELS, INDIA

 Nasir et al

a chemical plant [13]. The plant both produced and discharged DDT for decades before it closure on a
tributary of the River Toce, one of the major affluent of the lake [3].
Analysis from the Zebra mussel specimens of Baveno Bay where River Toce flows, indicates
contamination source is probably derived from the lacustrine sediments and the River Toce [3]. Similarly,
flood events might lead to contaminants adsorbed to resuspended sediments, as in the case of Pallaza Bay
where sediments are considered to be one of the main sources of DDT pollution [14].
Another major source of DDT in water is agricultural run-off from fields that were once heavily sprayed
with DDT for pest control. Similarly, rainfall might probably be the dominant mechanism for the removal
of DDT in contrast to the atmosphere that is more dominant to occur in the alpine lakes due to
condensation [15]. The soil can also be major contributor to sources of DDT generated from weathering,
as they bind very strongly to soil particles which makes them very slow in reaching ground water and are
thus available to be easily run off, as well as evaporates from the soil and surface water into the air.
Mountain glaciers are used as natural archives for studying historical trends of pollution [4] and are
acknowledged as a significant source of DDT in the alpine lakes [16-18]. Melt-water from glaciers may
contribute relatively high concentrations of DDTs and HCHs to cold aquatic ecosystems of the Himalayas
[4]. Less volatile POPs will partition into water, snow, ice, soil, or vegetation. Bizzotto et al, [19] concluded
that meltwaters originating from old glacier ice could represent the main source of legacy pollutants to
alpine ecosystems. As, condensed DDT might have been stored in glaciers during their volumetric growth
[20] and then released into glacier-fed lakes during the recent retreat. Cold slows evaporation of POPs
from water and promotes their condensation and movement, or "partitioning," from the atmosphere to
the surface [10].

Figure 1: Sources of DDT in the Environment [21]

TRANSPORT
Generally, there are different agents that aids in the transportation of contaminants (POPs) which
includes atmospheric dispersion by air/wind current, floods/ run-off as well as biota migration.
Contaminants may enter alpines lakes via atmospheric deposition run off in which alpine lakes may be
sensitive to airborne contaminants [22]. POPs exist in the atmosphere both as vapour-phase chemicals as
gases and in condensed form adsorbed to atmospheric aerosol particles. The combination of stability and
propensity to form a gas under appropriate environmental conditions means that POPs are subject to
long-range atmospheric transport [23]. The combination of resistance to metabolism and lipophilicity
means that POPs will accumulate in food chains through the biota [23]. They can bioaccumulate and
biomagnify through the food chain thus making the organisms on the top of the chain to have the highest
concentration example fish-preying bird. Binelli and Provini, [3] explained that flooding contributed to
large extent on DDT transport in Lake Maggiore, North Italy. The study investigated the environmental
risk associated with contaminants, histopathological markers, and bioaccumulation which shows

BEPLS Vol 5 [12] November 2016 135 | P a g e ©2016 AELS, INDIA

 Nasir et al

fluctuations typical of flood events over a year period. The flow processes of DDT in the environment are
as shown in Figure 1 according to Randers [24].

Figure 1 the flow of DDT in the environment. [24]

FATE IN THE ENVIRONMENT

DDT is a very persistent substance and is extremely difficult to degrade once it is present in the
environment [25]. DDT residues (DDTr) still persist in the environment are predominantly in the form of
DDT, 1,1-dichloro- 2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene (DDE), 1,1- dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane
(DDD), and 1,1,1 -trichloro-2-(o-chlorophenyl)-2-(p chlorophenyl) ethane (o,p'-DDT) [26]. Boul [27]
described that both DDD and DDE are transformation products of DDT. DDD is formed by dechlorination
of DDT under reducing conditions [28-32], either microbial mediated [33] or as the result of chemical
reactions [34-38] some of which are mediated by biomolecules [39]. DDE is formed from DDT through
photochemical reactions in the presence of sunlight [40] and through dehydrochlorination in bacteria
[41] and animals [42]. Heberer and Dunnbier [43] proposed that DDA is formed by the biodegradation of
DDD, as shown in the figure (2) below.

Figure 2: Proposed bacterial degradation pathways for DDT

Adopted from Heberer and Dunnbier [43].

BEPLS Vol 5 [12] November 2016 136 | P a g e ©2016 AELS, INDIA

 Nasir et al

EFFECTS ON BIOTA
The endocrine-disrupting properties of DDT on biota has been extensively discussed [44, 45] and the
problem of endocrine disruptors is one of the five priority research areas established by the Committee
on the Environment and Natural Resources of the United States [46]. There is a growing concern over the
toxic effects of these compounds on biota, particularly on higher species resulting from food chain due to
bioaccumulations as presented in figure (3), even at extremely low environmental levels [3]. Some of
these chemicals are endocrine disruptors and thus give rise to various dangerous effects such as eggshell
thinning, behavioural changes, impaired male reproductive ability and estrogenic activity interfering with
sex hormones have been confirmed [47]. It is well documented that such effects does occurs virtually in
all types of organisms ranging from mollusks to predators at different stages of food web [48-50].
Zebra mussels from Lake Maggiore were evaluated for DDT contamination and it was identified that in
the ovaries of the most highly polluted mussels, histological analyses showed a delay in oocyte
maturation and a high incidence of pathological pictures mainly referable to oocyte degeneration and
haemocytic infiltration [51]. Histological studies carried out in 1997 [52] showed that a significant
percentage of specimens sampled inside the Baveno Bay had a marked oocyte degeneration and released
gametes earlier than those sampled at a nearby reference station outside the bay, suggesting a possible
endocrine-disrupting effect of DDTs [23,3, 53, 54]. It is well known that pp0DDE is an antiadrogenic
compound while op0DDT was found to determine pseudo-estrogenic effects on several organisms [47].

Figure 3: Showing the principle of Bioaccumulation of DDT [57]

HOW THE POLLUTANT CAN BE MEASURED

De la Cal et al., [55] analysed Total Organic carbon of sediments samples for DDT contaminations as well
as fish tissues were also analysed. The analyses obtained from the fish tissues can be termed as the fish
uptake. The values obtained in the contaminated area are always compared to the values of fishes or
sediments from uncontaminated lakes. The sediments are analysed because POPs are known to bind well
to soil and sediments. Among the biomarkers used to study the effects of animal exposure to
environmental contaminants, histological changes are particularly effective for their morphological
responses affect all levels of biological organization [56]. A single toxicity test can be carried out such as
that of the Zebra mussels in Lake Maggiore in which the reproductive biology of Zebra Mussels are known
to be altered by DDT [51].

CONTROLS
According to UNEP [1] during the Stockholm convention, not much can be done with the traces of
chemicals that are literally everywhere, from the industrial region of the Northern hemisphere to the
Antarctica except to let time do it work. Various measures against the use of DDT in European countries
has been highlighted by UNEP, [58]. There are different policy recommendations highlighted in the work
of [8]. These includes a global restriction on the release of these compounds, reduction or elimination of

BEPLS Vol 5 [12] November 2016 137 | P a g e ©2016 AELS, INDIA

 Nasir et al

emissions, discharges and where appropriate a ban on manufacture and use of persistent organic
pollutants. Likewise, production of unintentional POPs should be extremely controlled by taking various
measures such as development of action plans and preventative actions to reduce the release into
environment. Such as banning of open burning and precautionary measure to reduce the scale of forest
fires.
Environmental fate modelling of pollutants can help to reducing uncertainties and also give a clearer
insight to the behaviour of this pollutant in the environment. [59]. Developed countries will have to
provide funds and technical assistance to less developed nations, so that the latter can take effective
measures [60]. Establishment of agreements between countries such as Commission for Environmental
Cooperation (CEC) which list steps to reduce and eliminate the pollution of certain chemicals [61]. Which
may help in regulating the use of DDT in all countries to be seize, by initiating more generating a more
effective and efficient methods to fight Malaria and none or less toxic insecticide [45]. We thus
recommend that more concentration should be given into generation of better modelling of such
environmental pollutants which will increase the area coverage and hence a better understanding of
other remediation ways.

REFERENCES
1. Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2001). Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants
(POPs). Available at: http://irptc.unep.ch/pops and: http://www.chem.unep.ch/sc/
2. Killops, S. D., & Killops, V. J. (2013). Introduction to organic geochemistry, DDT and Related Compounds. John
Wiley & Sons.
3. Binelli, A., & Provini, A., 2003. DDT is still a problem in developed countries: the heavy pollution of Lake
Maggiore. Chemosphere 52, 717 -723
4. Wang, X. P., Yao, T. D., & Wang, P. L. (2008). The recent deposition of persistent organic pollutants and mercury
to the Dasuopu glacier, Mt. Xixiabangma, central Himalayas. Science of the Total Environment, 394(1), 134-143.
5. Kurtz, D.A., 1990. In: Kurtz, (Ed.), Long Range Transport of Pesticides. Lewis Publisher, Chelsea, MI, p. 440.
6. Cotham, W.E., & Bidleman, T.F., 1991. Estimating the atmospheric deposition of Organochlorine contaminants to
the Arctic. Chemosphere 22 (1–2), 165–188.
7. Wania, E., & Mackay, D. 1995. Sci. Total Environ, 160/161, 211-32.
8. Wania, E., & Mackay, D. 1996. Tracking the Distribution of Persistent Organic Pollutants. Environmental science
& technology. VOL. 30, NO. 9, 390- 396.
9. Paolo Tremolada, Sara Villa, Paolo Bazzarin, Elisa Bizzotto, Roberto Comolli, Marco Vighi, 2008. POPs in
Mountain Soils from the Alps and Andes: Suggestions for a ‘Precipitation Effect’ on Altitudinal Gradients. Water
Air Soil Pollut. 188: 93-109.
10. Wania, E; Mackay, D. 1996. The Global Fractionation of Persistent Organic Chemical. NILU Technical Report;
Norwegian Institute for Air Research: Kjeller, Norway; TR10/96.
11. Smith AG. 1991. Chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides. In: Handbook of Pesticides Toxicology (Hayes WJ, Laws
ER, eds). San Diego/New York: Academic Press Inc.731–915.
12. Ceschi, M., De Rossa, M., e Jaggli, M., 1996. Organic, inorganic and radionuclide contaminants in the lakes Ceresio
and Verbano (Swiss basins). Trav. Chem. Aliment. hig 87, 189-211.
13. CIPAIS, 2003. Monitoring the presence of DDT and other contaminants in Lake Maggiore ecosystem. Annual
Reports.
14. CIPAIS, 2003. Monitoring the presence of DDT and other contaminants in Lake Maggiore ecosystem. Annual
Reports.
15. Woodwell, G. M., Craig, P. P., Johnson, H. A., 1975. DDT in the Biosphere: Where does it go? In The Changing
Global Environment (pp. 295-309). Springer Netherlands.
16. Bettinetti R., Quadroni S., Galassi S., Bacchetta R., Bonardi L., & Vailati G., 2008. Is meltwater from Alpine glaciers
a secondary DDT source for lakes? Chemosphere 73. 1027 -1031.
17. Bogdal C., Schmid P., Zennegg M., Anselmetti F. S., Scheringer M., Hungerbuhler K., 2009. Blast from the Past:
Melting Glaciers as a relevant source for Persistent Organic Pollutants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 8173-8177.
18. Schmid P., Bogdal C., Bluthgen N., Anselmetti F. S., Zwyssig A., Hungerbuhler K., 2011. The missing piece:
Sediment Records in remote mountain lakes confirm glaciers being secondary sources of Persistent organic
pollutants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 203-208.
19. Bizzotto, E. C., Villa, S., Vaj, C., & Vighi, M. 2009. Comparison of glacial and non-glacial-fed streams to evaluate the
loading of persistent organic pollutants through seasonal snow/ice melt. Chemosphere, 74(7), 924-930.
20. Rovelli, E., 2008. Variations of the Italian Glaciers from the Little Ice Age to the present. In: Bonardi, L. (Ed.),
Mountain Glaciers and Climate Changes in the Last Century, Terra Glacia¯ lis 10 (special issue). Servizio
Glaciologico Lombardo, Milano, pp. 89-103.
21. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC).1997. Canadian Arctic Contaminants Assessment Report, Northern
Contaminants Program.
22. Daly, G. L., & Wania F., 2005. Organic contaminants in Mountains. Environ. Sci. Technol Vol. 39, No 2. 385-398.
23. Jones, K.C., & de Voogt, P., 1999. Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs): state of science. Environmental Pollution.
Volume 100, Issues 1-3, 209-221.

BEPLS Vol 5 [12] November 2016 138 | P a g e ©2016 AELS, INDIA

 Nasir et al

24. Randers, J. 1973. System simulation to test environmental policy: DDT. International Journal of Environmental
Studies, 4(1-4), 51-61.
25. Prudom, C. M., & McLean, Va., 1976. "Microbial degradation of DDT." U.S. Patent No. 3,979,283. 7
26. Aislabie, J. M., Richards, N. K., & Boul, H. L. 1997. Microbial degradation of DDT and its residues—a review. New
Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 40(2), 269-282.
27. Boul, H. L. 1995: DDT residues in the environment-a review with a New Zealand perspective. New Zealand
journal of agricultural research 38:257-277.
28. Johnsen, R. E. 1976: DDT metabolism in microbial systems. Pesticide reviews 61: 1-28.
29. Essac, E. G., & Matsumura, F. 1980: Metabolism of insecticides by reductive systems. Pharmacology and
therapeutics 9: 1-12
30. Lai, R., & Saxena, D. M. 1982: Accumulation, metabolism, and effects of organochlorine insecticides on
microorganisms. Microbiological reviews 46: 95-127.
31. Kuhn, E. P., & Sulflita, J. M. 1986: Dehalogenation of pesticides by anaerobic microorganisms in soils and
groundwater—a review. Pp. 111-180 in: Reactions and movement of organic chemicals in soil. SSSA special
publication no. 22. Madison, Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy.
32. Rochkind-Dubinsky, M. L.; Sayler, G. S., & Blackburn, J. W. 1987: Microbiological decomposition of chlorinated
aromatic compounds. Pp. 153-162 in: Microbiology series, vol. 18. New York, Marcel Dekker.
33. Nadeau, L. J.; Menn, F.-M.; Breen, A., & Sayler, G. S. 1994: Aerobic degradation of 1,1,1-trichloro- 2,2-bis(4-
chlorophenyl)ethane (DDT) by Alcaligenes eutrophus A5. Applied and environmental microbiology 60: 51-55.
34. Castro, T. F., & Yoshida, T. 1974: Effect of organic matter on the biodegradation of some organochloride
insecticides in submerged soils. Soil science and plant nutrition 20: 363-370.
35. Miskus, R. P.; Blair, D. P., & Casida, J. E. 1965: Conversion of DDT to DDD by bovine rumen fluid, lake water, and
reduced porphyrins. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 13: 481-483.
36. Glass, B. L. 1972: Relation between the degradation of DDT and the iron redox system in soils. Journal of
agricultural and food chemistry 20: 324-327.
37. Zoro, J. A.; Hunter, J. M.; Eglinton, G.; Ware, G. C. 1974: Degradation of p,p'-DDT in reducing environments. Nature
247: 235-237.
38. Baxter, R. M. 1990: Reductive dechlorination of certain chlorinated organic compounds by reduced hematin
compared with their behaviour in the environment. Chemosphere 21: 451-458.
39. Aislabie, J., & Lloyd-Jones, G. 1995. A review of bacterial-degradation of pesticides. Soil Research, 33(6), 925-942.
40. Maugh, T. H. 1973: An unrecognized source of polychlorinated biphenyls. Science 180: 578-579.
41. Pfaender, F. K., & Alexander, M. 1972: Extensive microbial degradation of DDT in vitro and DDT metabolism by
natural communities. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 20: 842-846.
42. Kurihara, N.; Ikemoto, Y., & Clark, A. G. 1988: Dehydrochlorination mechanisms of DDT analogs catalyzed by
housefly enzymes. Agriculture and biological chemistry 52: 1831-1833.
43. Heberer, T., & Dunnbier, U., 1999. DDT metabolite bis(chlorophenyl) acetic acid: the neglected environmental
contaminant. Environmental Science and Technology 33, 2346–2361.
44. Keith, L.H., 1997. Environmental Endocrine Disruptors – A Handbook of Property Data. John Wiley, New York.
45. Turusov, V., Rakitsky, V., &Tomatis, L., 2002. Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT): ubiquity, persistence, and
risk. Environ. Health Persp. 110, 125–128.
46. Kavlock, R.J., 1999. Overview of endocrine disruptor research activity in the United States. Chemosphere 39 (8),
1227– 1236.
47. Kelce, W.R., Stone, C.R., Laws, S.C., Gray, L.E., Kemppainen, J.A., Wilson, M., 1995. Persistent DDT metabolite pp0
DDE is a potent androgen receptor antagoniste. Nature 375, 581–585.
48. Haave, M., Ropstad, E., Derocher, A.E., Lie, E., Dahl, E., Wiig, O., Skaare, J.U., Jensen, B.M., 2003. Environ. Health
Perspect 111, 431–436.
49. Nash, J.P., Kime, D.E., Van der Ven, L.T.M., Wester, P.W., Brion, F., Maack, G., Stahlschmidt-Allner, P., Tyler, C.R.,
2004. Environ. Health Perspect 112, 1725–1733.
50. Brossa, L., Marce, R.A., Borull, F., & Pocurull, E., 2005. Envrion. Toxicol. Chem. 24, 261–267
51. Binelli, A., Bacchetta, R., Mantecca, P., Ricciardi, F., Provini, A., & Vailati, G. 2004. DDT in zebra mussels from Lake
Maggiore (N. Italy): level of contamination and endocrine disruptions. Aquatic toxicology, 69(2), 175-188.
52. Binelli, A., Galassi, S., & Provini, A., 2001. Factors affecting the use of Dreissena polymorpha as a bioindicator: the
PCB pollution in Lake Como (N. Italy). Water, Air and Soil Pollution 125, 19e32.
53. WHO (2010). Persistent Organic Pollutants: Impact on Child Health, Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved 8th May
2013 from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241501101_eng.pdf
54. Gabrielsen, G. W. (2007). Levels and effects of persistent organic pollutants in arctic animals. In Arctic alpine
ecosystems and people in a changing environment (pp. 377-412). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
55. de la Cal, A., Eljarrat, E., Raldúa, D., Durán, C., & Barceló, D. (2008). Spatial variation of DDT and its metabolites in
fish and sediment from Cinca River, a tributary of Ebro River (Spain). Chemosphere, 70(7), 1182-1189.
56. Hinton, D.E., 1997. Histologic responses signifying exposure or effect and their application to aquatic
ecotoxicology. In: Zelikoff, J.T. (Ed.), Ecotoxicology: Responses, Biomarkers and Risk Assessment. SOS
Publications, Fair Haven, NJ, pp. 293–309.
57. Harrington, J; Hutchinson G, & Irvine J. 2013. Sea-Eaglecam Team. Web: http://www.sea-eaglecam.org/eagle-
study-13.html.
58. United UNEP, 1995. Towards global action. International experts meeting on persistent organic pollutants.
Meeting Background Report, Vancouver, Canada, 4–8 June.

BEPLS Vol 5 [12] November 2016 139 | P a g e ©2016 AELS, INDIA

 Nasir et al

59. Schenker, U., Scheringer, M., Sohn, M. D., Maddalena, R. L., McKone, T. E., & Hungerbuhler, K. (2008). Using
information on uncertainty to improve environmental fate modeling: A case study on DDT. Environmental
science & technology, 43(1), 128-134.
60. Porta, M., & Zumeta, E. (2002). Implementing the Stockholm treaty on persistent organic pollutants.
Occupational and environmental medicine, 59(10), 651-652.
61. EPA, (2009). Persistent Organic Pollutants: A Global Issue, a Global Response. Web: http://www.epa.gov
/international /toxics/pop.html, Last accessed 10/05/2015

CITATION OF THIS ARTICLE

M M Nasir, J Usman, S A. Abdullahi. Sources, Fates and Control of Dichloro-DiphenylTrichloroethane (DDT); a case
study on the Alpine Lakes.Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci., Vol 5 [12] November 2016: 134-140

BEPLS Vol 5 [12] November 2016 140 | P a g e ©2016 AELS, INDIA

View publication stats