Here are a few key points in response to your questions:
1. General theories provide a broad framework but may lack specifics. Strengths are their wide applicability and parsimony. Weaknesses are they may overgeneralize and not account for unique situational factors.
2. To improve motivation for low-achieving employees, I would focus on setting clear, specific, challenging yet attainable goals. Provide frequent, constructive feedback and recognition for progress. Look for ways to design jobs that foster autonomy, variety, impact and learning. Address any organizational barriers and ensure fair, competitive compensation. Cultivating social support and an inclusive culture could also boost engagement. The right mix of strategies depends on accurately diagnosing specific motivational
Here are a few key points in response to your questions:
1. General theories provide a broad framework but may lack specifics. Strengths are their wide applicability and parsimony. Weaknesses are they may overgeneralize and not account for unique situational factors.
2. To improve motivation for low-achieving employees, I would focus on setting clear, specific, challenging yet attainable goals. Provide frequent, constructive feedback and recognition for progress. Look for ways to design jobs that foster autonomy, variety, impact and learning. Address any organizational barriers and ensure fair, competitive compensation. Cultivating social support and an inclusive culture could also boost engagement. The right mix of strategies depends on accurately diagnosing specific motivational
Here are a few key points in response to your questions:
1. General theories provide a broad framework but may lack specifics. Strengths are their wide applicability and parsimony. Weaknesses are they may overgeneralize and not account for unique situational factors.
2. To improve motivation for low-achieving employees, I would focus on setting clear, specific, challenging yet attainable goals. Provide frequent, constructive feedback and recognition for progress. Look for ways to design jobs that foster autonomy, variety, impact and learning. Address any organizational barriers and ensure fair, competitive compensation. Cultivating social support and an inclusive culture could also boost engagement. The right mix of strategies depends on accurately diagnosing specific motivational
Here are a few key points in response to your questions:
1. General theories provide a broad framework but may lack specifics. Strengths are their wide applicability and parsimony. Weaknesses are they may overgeneralize and not account for unique situational factors.
2. To improve motivation for low-achieving employees, I would focus on setting clear, specific, challenging yet attainable goals. Provide frequent, constructive feedback and recognition for progress. Look for ways to design jobs that foster autonomy, variety, impact and learning. Address any organizational barriers and ensure fair, competitive compensation. Cultivating social support and an inclusive culture could also boost engagement. The right mix of strategies depends on accurately diagnosing specific motivational
Objectives motivation and evaluate their applicability today
Compare contemporary theories of
motivation Motivation Concepts
Luke: “I don’t believe it.”
Yoda: “That is why you fail.” —The Empire Strikes Back Motivation Quotes Defining Motivation Motivation • The processes that account for an individual’s intensity, direction, and persistence of effort toward attaining a goal. • The force that energizes, directs, and sustains behaviour (Steers & Porter, 1991) The Three Elements of Motivation
Intensity describes how hard a person tries.
Direction lead to favorable job-performance outcomes.
Persistence how long a person can maintain effort.
Highly Motivated Employees will be highly motivated if • A personality that predisposes them to be motivated; • The expectations have been met; • The job and the organization are consistent with their values; • the employees have been given achievable goals; • the employees receive feedback on their goal attainment; • the organization rewards them for achieving their goals; • the employees perceive they are being treated fairly; and • their coworkers demonstrate a high level of motivation. Theories of Motivation Needs Theory Motivation
Basic Need Theory
The best-known theory of motivation is Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs . Maslow hypothesized that within every human being, there exists a hierarchy of five needs:
➢ Physiological. Includes food (hunger), water (thirsty), shelter,
sex, and other bodily needs. ➢ Safety. Security and protection from physical and emotional harm. ➢ Social. Affection, belongingness, acceptance, and friendship. Theories of Motivation ➢ Esteem. Internal factors such as self-respect, autonomy, and achievement, and external factors such as status, recognition, and attention. ➢ Self-actualization. Drive to become what we are capable of becoming; includes growth, achieving our potential, and self- fulfillment. Theories of Motivation McClelland’s Achievement Motivation Theory
McClelland’s theory of needs was developed by David
McClelland and his associates. It looks at three needs:
● Need for achievement (nAch) is the compelling drive to
succeed and to get the job done (love the challenge of work)
● Need for power (nPow) is the need to direct and control the activities of others and to be influential.
● Need for affiliation (nAff) is the desire to be liked and
accepted by others. Individuals motivated by affiliation needs strive for friendship. Theories of Motivation Behavior Based Theories Motivation
Reinforcement Theory : the theory that
behaviour is motivated by its consequences o positive reinforcers desirable events that strengthen the tendency to respond o negative reinforcers events that strengthen a behavior through the avoidance of an existing negative state
Punishment unpleasant consequences that
reduce the tendency to respond Theories of Motivation Behavior Based Theories Motivation
• Extrinsic vs Instrinsic Motivation
• Extrinsic motivation Work motivation that arises from such nonpersonal factors as pay, coworkers, and opportunities for advancement. • Intrinsic motivation the notion that people are motivated by internal rewards Theories of Motivation Behavior Based Theories Motivation
GOAL-SETTING THEORY : the theory that behaviour is motivated
by its consequences o positive reinforcers desirable events that strengthen the tendency to respond o negative reinforcers events that strengthen a behavior through the avoidance of an existing negative state
Punishment unpleasant consequences that reduce the tendency
to respond Theories of Motivation Behavior Based Theories Motivation Goal-Setting Theory A theory that says that specific and difficult goals, with feedback, lead to higher performance. Chung Mong-koo, chairman of Hyundai Motor Company, is well known for articulating difficult and specific goals as a potent motivating force. For example, although Hyundai was a latecomer in the development of a hybrid vehicle, the South Korean automaker launched its first U.S. hybrid in 2010, with annual sales set at 50,000 units. By 2018, the company expects hybrid sales to balloon to 500,000 units worldwide. Challenging employees to reach high goals has helped Hyundai experience tremendous growth in recent years. Theories of Motivation Implementing Goal-Setting As a manager, how do you make goal-setting theory operational? That’s often left up to the individual. Some managers set aggressive performance targets—what General Electric called “stretch goals.” Some CEOs, such as Procter & Gamble’s A. G. Lafley and SAP AG’s Hasso Plattner, are known for the demanding performance goals they set. But many managers don’t set goals. When asked whether their job had clearly defined goals, only a minority of employees in a recent survey said yes. A more systematic way to utilize goal-setting is with management by objectives (MBO) , which emphasizes participatively set goals that are tangible, verifiable, and measurable. VIEDO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNRNPTsBFfg How to Create Motivation at Work Theories of Motivation Job Design Theories of Motivation HERZBERG’S Two-Factor Theory • Believing an individual’s relationship to work is basic, and that attitude toward work can determine success or failure, psychologist Frederick Herzberg wondered, “What do people want from their jobs?” • He asked people to describe, in detail, situations in which they felt exceptionally good or bad about their jobs. The responses differed significantly and led Hertzberg to his two-factor theory —also called motivation-hygiene theory. Theories of Motivation The two-factor theory has not been well supported in the literature, and it has many detractors. Criticisms include the following: ➢ Herzberg’s methodology is limited because it relies on self- reports. When things are going well, people tend to take credit. Contrarily, they blame failure on the extrinsic environment.
➢ The reliability of Herzberg’s methodology is questionable.
Raters have to make interpretations, so they may contaminate the findings by interpreting one response in one manner while treating a similar response differently. Theories of Motivation
➢ No overall measure of satisfaction was utilized. A person may
dislike part of a job yet still think the job is acceptable overall.
➢ Herzberg assumed a relationship between satisfaction and
productivity, but he looked only at satisfaction. To make his research relevant, we must assume a strong relationship between satisfaction and productivity. Regardless of the criticisms, Herzberg’s theory has been widely read, and few managers are unfamiliar with its recommendations. Theories of Motivation Job Design Theories of Motivation Job characteristics model : a theory that emphasizes the role that certain aspects of jobs play in influencing work motivation • Skill variety—the degree to which a job requires the worker to use a variety of abilities and skills to perform work-related tasks. • Task identity—the degree to which a job requires the completion of an entire job or function. • Task significance—the degree to which a job has a substantial impact on other people within the organization. • Autonomy—the degree to which the job gives the worker freedom and independence to choose how to schedule and carry out the necessary tasks. • Feedback—the degree to which the job allows the worker to receive direct and clear information about the effectiveness of performance. Theories of Motivation Job Design Theories of Motivation
The Job Characteristics Model of Work Motivation
Theories of Motivation Theory X and Theory Y Theories of Motivation Self-Determination Theory It’s called self-determination theory , which proposes that people prefer to feel they have control over their actions, so anything that makes a previously enjoyed task feel more like an obligation than a freely chosen activity will undermine motivation. Theories of Motivation Job Engagement When nurse Melissa Jones comes to work, it seems that everything else in her life goes away, and she becomes completely absorbed in what she is doing. Her emotions, her thoughts, and her behavior are all directed toward patient care. In fact, she can get so caught up in her work that she isn’t even aware of how long she’s been there. As a result of this total commitment, she is more effective in providing patient care and feels uplifted by her time at work. Melissa has a high level of job engagement , the investment of an employee’s physical, cognitive, and emotional energies into job performance. Many studies attempt to measure this deeper level of commitment. Theories of Motivation Theories of Motivation Motivation and Performance Worker motivation could affect productivity with 4 four categories:
• Systems and technology variables
• Individual difference variables • Group dynamics variables • Organizational variables. Q&A 1. Basic need theories, goal-setting theory, and reinforcement theory are very general models of work motivation. What are the strengths and weaknesses of such general theories?
2. How would you design a program to improve motivation
for a group of low-achieving high school students? What would the elements of the program be? What theories would you use? THANK YOU