UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM & ENERGY STUDIES

SCHOOL OF LAW

B.A., LL.B. (HONS.)

SEMESTER III

ACADEMIC YEAR: 2020-21 SESSION: AUG-DEC, 2020

RESEARCH PAPER WORK CRPC

SUBMITTED TO:Kanchal Mam

(TO BE FILLED BY THE STUDENT)

NAME:ANKIT GUPTA & MANSI RAGHAV

ROLL NO: R450219209 & R450210218

SAP NO- 500077346 & 500077680

Introduction

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 lays down the procedural aspects of procedure of arrest.
Under this, the complete process been mentioned related to arrest a person who committed
any offence. The fundamental object of criminal law to shield society from criminals and
from law-breakers. Hence, criminal law comprises of both substantive and procedural law.
Part V of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arrangements with the capture of people under
(Sections 41 to Section 60). Three People can give the cycle of capture, they are as follows:

 A police officer with or without warrant, or

 A private person, or

 A magistrate

The constitution of India and the criminal procedure code give some essential rights to the
individual being arrested. (Muchera 2011) [16] One of the essential fundamentals of our legal
framework is the advantage of the presumption of innocence of the accused till he is seen as
liable toward the finish of a preliminary on legal evidence in a democratic society even the
rights of the accused are holy, the accused in India are managed the cost of specific rights, the
most essential of which are found in the Indian constitution. What's more, it has been
contrasting and the Malaysian constitution and code of criminal procedure the option to
quietness option to know the grounds of arrest individual, data with respect to one side to be
delivered on bail directly at trail right of free legal guide a few rights are same aside from
right to a fast preliminary in Malaysia and option to be trail on evidence not flourished by an
infringement of principal right. This will clarify in detail path with the cases. (Mutunga 1990)
[17] The motivation behind an arrest is to bring the arrestee under the steady gaze of a court
or in any case secure the organization of the law. An arrest serves the capacity of advising the
network that an individual has been accused of a wrongdoing and furthermore may reprimand
and discourage the arrested individual from carrying out different violations. Arrests can be
made on both criminal allegations and common charges, albeit common arrest is an extreme
measure that isn't viewed with favour by the courts. The government Constitution forces
limits on both common and criminal arrests. (Johnston and Hutton 2017) [12] The point of
the examination is to give cautious thought to the set up rights and criminal system rights
Analysis the advantage of the caught people under Crpc and set up base to make legitimate
care for the advantages of the accused and caught person.
PROCEDURE OF ARREST

(1). The Police officer making the arrest shall actually touch or confine the body of the

person to be arrested, unless there be a submission to the Police custody (S. 46(1) Cr.P.C.)

(2). If any person resists the arrest or attempts to evade the arrest, the Police officer

arresting him may use all means necessary to effect the arrest. The Police officer is not given

right to cause the death of a person who is not accused of an offence punishable with death or

with imprisonment for life (S. 46 (2)(3) Cr.P.C.)

(3). Any Police officer to make an arrest may break open any outer or inner door or

window of any house or place in order to liberate himself or any other person who, having

lawfully entered for the purpose of making an arrest, is detained therein. (S. 47 (3) Cr.P.C.)

(4). A Police officer may, for the purpose of arresting without warrant any person whom

he is authorized to arrest, pursue such person into any place in India (S. 48 Cr.P.C.)

(5). The Police officer making an arrest shall follow the following:

(a). He may search the arrested person.

(b). He may place in safe custody all articles other than necessary wearing apparel

found upon the arrested person.

(c). If any article is seized from the arrested person, a receipt showing the articles

taken in possession by the Police officer shall be given to the arrested person

(S. 51 Cr.P.C.)

(6). Whenever it is necessary to cause a female to be searched, the search shall be made

by the Woman Police or Women Home Guards with strict regard to decency. (S. 51 (2)

Cr.P.C.)

(7). The Police officer making an investigation can depute any officer subordinate to him
to arrest without a warrant with an order in writing, specifying the person to be arrested and

the offence or other cause for which the arrest is to be made and the subordinate officer so

required shall, before making the arrest, notify the person to be arrested the substance of the

order. If required, he shall show the order to the arrestee. (P. 55 Cr.P.C.)

Note: -

The investigating officer shall record all steps in deputing the subordinate officer to

make the arrest in the following files / registers.

(a). General Diary

(b). Case diary

(c). Pocket note book of the subordinate

(d). A copy of the written order to arrest to be kept in the case diary.

(8). Any person arrested by any Police officer shall not be detained in the custody of the

Police more than twenty-four hours (S. 57 Cr.P.C.)

(9). Officers in charge of the Police Stations shall report the Judicial Magistrate the cases

of all persons arrested in Form No. I F.3 “Arrest Court / Surrender Memo” u/s 58 Cr.P.C.

Besides, a memo of arrest, as laid down under clause ………… (Manual II) shall also be

sent.

(10). No person who has been arrested by a Police officer shall be discharged except on his

own bond or on bail, if the offences committed by the arrested are bailable. In non-bailable

cases, if the investigation cannot be completed in twenty-four hours, the Police officer

making the investigation, if he is not below the rank of Sub-Inspector of Police, shall

forthwith transmit to the nearest Judicial Magistrate a copy of the entries in the diary along

with a report under section 167 Cr.P.C. and shall at the same time forward the accused to the

Magistrate who may, whether he has or has no jurisdiction to try the case, authorize the
detention of the accused in such custody as he thinks fir for a term not exceeding fifteen

days. If he has no jurisdiction to try the case or commit it for trial and if considers further

detention unnecessary, he may order the accused to be forwarded to a magistrate having such

jurisdiction.

RELEVANT CASES:

As, in instances of "arrest" we have landmark decisions that have been given by the Supreme
court of India which sets some rule for arrested people and furthermore to forestall the abuse
of powers.

Case 1: JOGINDER KUMAR VS STATE OF U.P. [(1994) 4 SCC 260]

OBSERVATION- For this situation Apex Court decided that an arrested individual being
held in custody is entitled, on the off chance that he so demands, to have one companion,
relative or other individual inspired by his government assistance, informed that he has been
arrested and where he is being confined. The police will advise the arrested individual when
is brought to the police station of this right. A passage will be mentioned to be made in the
journal regarding who was educated regarding the capture. The Magistrate is obliged to fulfil
himself that their prerequisites have been agreed to.

Case 2: ARNESH KUMAR VS STATE OF BIHAR [(2014) 8 SCC 273]

OBSERVATION-, In this case Apex Court ruled that an arrested person being held in
custody is entitled, if he so requests, to have one friend, relative or other person interested in
his welfare, told that he has been arrested and where he is being detained. The police officer
shall inform the arrested person when is brought to the police station of this right. An entry
shall be requested to be made in the diary as to who was informed of the arrest. The
Magistrate is obliged to satisfy himself that their requirements have been complied with.

CONCLUSION

Up to now we attempted to comprehend the expression "Arrest", procedure of arrest, rights of

the arrested individual and related case laws to the themes. Previously mentioned each case
has its own essentialness. By experiencing Law Commission paper on Law of arrest, by we
can peruse with information's that how power of arrest is being abused and more in view of
unawareness of individuals about their right. We by one way or another reassure ourselves
that these defenders of law and request must do right however we have several cases where
we saw of this power being abused. These report shows high rates of arrests are made even in
bailable offenses; bails are not conceded to those where getting bail is one's correct.
Expanding level of no. of under trial detainees in prisons, we can manage the predicament of
this subject independently. Arrest has a decreasing and debilitating impact on the character.
He is shocked, estranged and gets antagonistic. In any case, there should be balance between
security of state on one hand and individual opportunity on other hand. There should be a few
keeps an eye on this power and more mindfulness should be made among the people groups
about their rights, so that balance system can be structure.

PRE-ARREST

The power to arrest without a warrant ought to be practiced simply after a sensible
satisfaction is reached, after some examination, concerning the rules and bonafide of an
objection and a sensible conviction as to both the individual's complicity just as the need to
impact arrest [Joginder Kumar's case – (1994) 4 SCC 2006]. Arrest can't be advocated only
on the presence of power, as an issue of law, to arrest without a warrant in a cognizable case.

After Joginder Kumar's declaration of the Supreme Court the inquiry regardless of whether
the power of arrest has been practiced sensible or not is unmistakably a legitimate one. Arrest
in cognizable cases may be considered justified in one or other of the

following circumstances:

(I) the case includes a grave offense like murder, dacoity, robbery, rape, and so forth, and it is
important to arrest the suspect to keep him from getting away or sidestepping the cycle of
law.

(ii) The suspect is given to fierce conduct and is probably going to submit further offenses.

(iii) The suspect needs to be kept from obliterating evidence or meddling with witnesses or
notice different suspects who have not yet been arrested.
(iv) The suspect is an ongoing offender who, except if arrested, is probably going to submit
comparative or further offenses. (Third Report of National Police Commission). Besides in
heinous offenses, as referenced over, an arrest must be dodged if a Police officer issues notice
to the individual to go to the Police Station and not leave the station without authorization
[ see Joginder Kumar's case (1994) 4 SCC 260].

The power to arrest must be evaded where the offenses are bailable except if there is a solid
anxiety of the suspect slipping off. Police officer doing an arrest or cross examination should
bear clear ID and unofficial IDs with assignments. The points of interest of Police staff doing
the arrest or cross examination ought to be recorded contemporaneously, in a register kept at
the Police Station.

ARREST

Generally speaking, utilization of power ought to be dodged while effecting arrest. In any
case, in case of coercive protection from arrest, least power to beat such obstruction might be
utilized. Notwithstanding, care must be taken to guarantee that injuries to the individual being
arrested, noticeable or something else, is evaded. The dignity of individual being arrested
ought to be ensured. Public presentation or marching of the individual arrested ought not to
be allowed at any expense. Searches of the individual arrested must be finished with due
regard to the dignity of the individual, without power or hostility and with care for the
individual's right to privacy. Searches of ladies should just be made by other ladies with strict
respect to decency [S. 51 (2) Crpc.]

The utilization of handcuffs or leg chains ought to be maintained a strategic distance from
and if by any means, it ought to be turned to strictly as per the law more than once clarified
and ordered in Judgment of the Supreme Court in Prem Shanker Shukla V. Delhi
Administration [(1980) 3 SCC 526] and Citizen for Democracy V. Province of Assam
[(1995) 3 SCC 743].

To the extent practicable ladies Police officials ought to be related where the individual or
people being arrested are ladies. The arrest of ladies between dusk and dawn ought to be
stayed away from.
Where kids or juveniles are looked to be arrested, no power or beatings should be directed
under any conditions. Cop, May for this reason, partner good residents with the goal that the
youngsters or juveniles are definitely not threatened and insignificant intimidation is utilized.

Where the arrest is without a warrant, the individual arrested must be quickly educated
regarding the ground of arrest in a language which the individual gets it. Once more, for this
reason, the Police if vital, may take the help of decent residents. These grounds must have
just been recorded as a hard copy in Police records. The individual arrested ought to be
demonstrated the composed reasons too and furthermore given a duplicate on request [S. 50
(1) Crpc.].

The arrested individual can, on a solicitation may by the person in question, request that a
companion, relative or other individual known to him be educated regarding the reality of his
arrest and the spot of his confinement. The Police should record in a register the name of the
individual so educated. [Joginder Kumar's case (supra)]. In the event that an individual is
arrested for a bailable offense, the Police official ought to advise him of his qualification to
be delivered on bail so he may organize sureties [S. 50(2) Crpc.]

Aside from advising the individual arrested of the above rights, the Police ought to likewise
educate him regarding his rights to consult and be guarded by a lawyer of his decision. He
should likewise be educated that he is qualified for nothing legal aid at state cost [D.K. Basu's
case (1997) 1 SCC].

At the point when the individual arrested is brought to the Police Station, he should, on the
off chance that he causes a solicitation in such manner, to be given brief clinical assistance.
He should be educated on this right. Where the Police official finds that the arrested
individual is in a condition where he can't make such ask for yet is out of luck of clinical
assistance, he ought to expeditiously mastermind the equivalent. This must likewise be
recorded contemporaneously in a register. The female mentioning for clinical help ought to
be inspected simply by a female enlisted clinical practitioner (S. 53 Crpc.)
Data with respect to the arrested and the spot of confinement ought to be imparted by the
Police official effecting the arrest immediately to the Police Control Room and District/State
Headquarters. There must be a checking instrument working nonstop. When the individual is
arrested, Police official effecting the arrest will make a notice of the presence of non-
presence of any injury(s) on the individual of the arrestee in the register of arrest. On the off
chance that any injuries are found on the individual of the arrestee, full depiction and
different specifics with respect to the way in which the injuries were caused ought to be
referenced in the register, which passage will additionally be endorsed by the Police official
and the arrestee. At the hour of arrival of the arrestee, a declaration of the Police official will
be given to the arrestee. In the event that the arrestee has been remanded to Police authority
compelled of the court, the arrestee ought to be exposed to clinical assessment by a prepared
Clinical Officer like clockwork during his detainment in care by a specialist on the board of
affirmed specialists delegated by Director, Health Services of the concerned State or Union
Territory. At the hour of his delivery from the Police authority, the arrestee will be got
therapeutically inspected and an endorsement will be given to him expressing in that the real
situation of the presence or nonexistence of any injuries with the rest of his personal effects.

POST ARREST

The individual nabbed must be created under the watchful eye of the suitable court inside 24
hours of the arrest (Ss. 56 and 57 Crpc.) The individual arrested ought to be allowed to meet
his lawyer whenever during the interrogation.

The interrogation ought to be led in an obviously identifiable spot, which has been told for
this reason by the Government. The spot must be available and the family members or friends
of the individual arrested must be educated of the spot of interrogation occurring. The
techniques for interrogation must be reliable with the perceived rights to life, dignity and
freedom, and right against torment and corrupting treatment.

Conclusion and Suggestion

Notwithstanding the different protections in the cr. p.c just as the in constitution the intensity
of arrest given to the police is being abused till this day. It is the obligation of the police to
ensure the rights of society. It must rembered that this society incorporates all individuals,
including the arrested. The blamed are the arrested individual is made mindful of the rounds
of his arrest educated whether he is qualified for bail and obviously created before a judge.
Inside twenty - four hours of his arrest. The examination is separating India and Malaysia
more than a few law are be revised dependent on the crime percentage. My examination is
demonstrate dependent on my work the rights which are accommodated arrested and charged
individual are altogether same few rights are changed. Through this near investigation the
Right to be taken a stab at proof not got by infringement of key rights, right to fast
preliminary Malaysia. Hence I would like to conclude with that, by saying it should be
liberty, equality, and in a dignity way also there should not be violations of any rights of any
person.

References

1. A Right of Appeal? n.d. In the Court of Appeal.

2. Batra, Manjula. Protection of Human Rights in Criminal Justice Administration, 1989.

3. A Study of the Rights of the Accused in Indian and Soviet Legal Systems.

4. Cook Joseph G. Constitutional Rights of the Accused: Trial Rights, 1974.

5. Costigan, Ruth, Richard Stone. 5. Right to a Fair Trial: Article 6, 2017a. 6.

6. Article 8: Right to Respect for Private Life, 2017b.

7. Garcés -Mascareñas, Blanca. Labour Migration in Malaysia and Spain, 2012.

8. Markets, Citizenship Rights. Amsterdam University Press.

9. Higgins Dbe Qc, Rosalyn, Rosalyn Higgins Dbe Qc, 2009.

10. Extradition. The Right to Life, and the Prohibition Against Cruel and Inhuman
Punishment and Treatment. In Themes and Theories, 667 –78.

11. Johari JC. The constitution of India A Politico -Legal Study. Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd,
2004.

12. Johnston, David, and Glenn Hutton. 2017. “Release of Person Arrested. In Blackstone’s
Police Manual Volume 2: Evidence and Procedure, 2018.

13. Kerker, Sindee. n.d. Speedy Trial Legislation. In Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment,
2004.
14. Machielsen . Magistrate. In Martin Delrio, 2015.

15. Mohan S. Law of Evidence in Malaysia: With Cases and Commentaries, 1992.

16. Muchera, Joshua Nyariki. Rights of an Arrested Person to Bail Bond the Kenyan Legal
Perspective. SSRN Electronic, 2011, Journal. https://doi .org/10.2139/ ssrn.2359922.

17. Mutunga, Willy. The Rights of an Arrested and an Accused Person, 1990.

18. Omar, Imtiaz. Rights, Emergencies, and Judicial Review. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,
1996.

19. Prinsep H T. Of Juries and Assessors. In the Code of Criminal Procedure Relating to
Procedure in the Criminal Courts of British India, 1996, 182 0 -95.

20. n.d. of the Maintenance of Wives and Children. In the Code of Criminal Procedure
Relating to Procedure in the Criminal Courts of British India, 177 -78.

21. Right to a Speedy Trial. n.d. In Student’s Guide to the Supreme Court.