Aggression - Practice Set 4
Aggression - Practice Set 4
Aggression - Practice Set 4
AGGRESSION
When one animal attacks another, it engages in the most obvious example of aggres-
sive behavior. Psychologists have adopted several approaches to understanding
aggressive behavior in people.
The Biological Approach. Numerous biological structures and chemicals appear to
be involved in aggression. One is the hypothalamus, a region of the brain. In response
to certain stimuli, many animals show instinctive aggressive reactions. The hypo-
thalamus appears to be involved in this inborn reaction pattern: electrical stimula-
tion of part of the hypothalamus triggers stereotypical aggressive behaviors in many
animals. In people, however, whose brains are more complex, other brain structures
apparently moderate possible instincts.
An offshoot of the biological approach called sociobiology suggests that aggres-
sion is natural and even desirable for people. Sociobiology views much social behav-
ior, including aggressive behavior, as genetically determined. Consider Darwin’s
theory of evolution. Darwin held that many more individuals are produced than can
find food and survive into adulthood. A struggle for survival follows. Those individu-
als who possess characteristics that provide them with an advantage in the struggle
for existence are more likely to survive and contribute their genes to the next genera-
tion. In many species, such characteristics include aggressiveness. Because aggres-
sive individuals are more likely to survive and reproduce, whatever genes are linked
to aggressive behavior are more likely to be transmitted to subsequent generations.
The sociobiological view has been attacked on numerous grounds. One is that
people’s capacity to outwit other species, not their aggressiveness, appears to be the
dominant factor in human survival. Another is that there is too much variation among
people to believe that they are dominated by, or at the mercy of, aggressive impulses.
The Psychodynamic Approach. Theorists adopting the psychodynamic approach
hold that inner conflicts are crucial for understanding human behavior, including
aggression. Sigmund Freud, for example, believed that aggressive impulses are
inevitable reactions to the frustrations of daily life. Children normally desire to vent
aggressive impulses on other people, including their parents, because even the most
attentive parents cannot gratify all of their demands immediately. Yet children, also
fearing their parents’ punishment and the loss of parental love, come to repress
most aggressive impulses. The Freudian perspective, in a sense, sees us as “steam
engines.” By holding in rather than venting “steam,” we set the stage for future explo-
sions. Pent-up aggressive impulses demand outlets. They may be expressed toward
parents in indirect ways such as destroying furniture, or they may be expressed
toward strangers later in life.
According to psychodynamic theory, the best ways to prevent harmful aggres-
sion may be to encourage less harmful aggression. In the steam-engine analogy, ver-
bal aggression may vent some of the aggressive steam. So might cheering on one’s
favorite sports team. Psychoanalysts, therapists adopting a psychodynamic approach,
refer to the venting of aggressive impulses as “catharsis.”1 Catharsis is theorized to be
a safety valve. But research findings on the usefulness of catharsis are mixed. Some
90
This ebook was issued to najah suaidani, order #16191247145. Unlawful distribution of this ebook is prohibited.
Reading Section
studies suggest that catharsis leads to reductions in tension and a lowered likelihood
of future aggression. Other studies, however, suggest that letting some steam escape
actually encourages more aggression later on.
The Cognitive Approach. Cognitive psychologists assert that our behavior is influ-
enced by our values, by the ways in which we interpret our situations, and by choice.
For example, people who believe that aggression is necessary and justified—as dur-
ing wartime—are likely to act aggressively, whereas people who believe that a partic-
ular war or act of aggression is unjust, or who think that aggression is never justified,
are less likely to behave aggressively.
One cognitive theory suggests that aggravating and painful events trigger
unpleasant feelings. These feelings, in turn, can lead to aggressive action, but not
automatically. Cognitive factors intervene. People decide whether they will act aggres-
sively or not on the basis of factors such as their experiences with aggression and
their interpretation of other people’s motives. Supporting evidence comes from
research showing that aggressive people often distort other people’s motives. For
example, they assume that other people mean them harm when they do not.
1. Catharsis: In psychodynamic theory, the purging of strong emotions or the relieving of tensions
Directions: Mark your answer by filling in the oval next to your choice.
91
This ebook was issued to najah suaidani, order #16191247145. Unlawful distribution of this ebook is prohibited.
Reading Section
92
This ebook was issued to najah suaidani, order #16191247145. Unlawful distribution of this ebook is prohibited.
Reading Section
P The Cognitive Approach. Cognitive psychologists assert that our behavior is influ-
A
R enced by our values, by the ways in which we interpret our situations, and by choice.
A
G For example, people who believe that aggression is necessary and justified—as dur-
R ing wartime—are likely to act aggressively, whereas people who believe that a partic-
A
P ular war or act of aggression is unjust, or who think that aggression is never justified,
H
are less likely to behave aggressively.
7
P One cognitive theory suggests that aggravating and painful events trigger unpleasant
A
R feelings. These feelings, in turn, can lead to aggressive action, but not automatically.
A Cognitive factors intervene. People decide whether they will act aggressively or not
G
R on the basis of factors such as their experiences with aggression and their interpre-
A
P tation of other people’s motives. Supporting evidence comes from research show-
H
ing that aggressive people often distort other people’s motives. For example, they
8 assume that other people mean them harm when they do not.
93
This ebook was issued to najah suaidani, order #16191247145. Unlawful distribution of this ebook is prohibited.
Reading Section
11. Look at the four squares [7] that indicate where the following sentence can be
added to the passage.
94
This ebook was issued to najah suaidani, order #16191247145. Unlawful distribution of this ebook is prohibited.
Reading Section
95
This ebook was issued to najah suaidani, order #16191247145. Unlawful distribution of this ebook is prohibited.
Reading Section
12. Directions: Complete the table below by matching five of the six answer choices
with the approach to aggression that they exemplify. This question is worth 3
points.
Answer Choices
1. Aggressive impulses toward people 4. The need to express aggressive
are sometimes expressed in indirect impulses declines with age.
ways. 5. Acting aggressively is the result of
2. Aggressiveness is often useful a choice influenced by a person’s
for individuals in the struggle for values and beliefs.
survival. 6. Repressing aggressive impulses can
3. Aggressive behavior may involve a result in aggressive behavior.
misunderstanding of other people’s
intentions.
96
This ebook was issued to najah suaidani, order #16191247145. Unlawful distribution of this ebook is prohibited.