0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views

Control Systems Lab: Submitted by

This document describes an experiment to verify the effect of pole location on stability in a negative feedback control system. The experiment evaluates stability for different values of K using Routh's table and root locus analysis. It then approximates the third order system as a second order system to model underdamped, overdamped and critically damped cases.

Uploaded by

Fahad Siddiq
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views

Control Systems Lab: Submitted by

This document describes an experiment to verify the effect of pole location on stability in a negative feedback control system. The experiment evaluates stability for different values of K using Routh's table and root locus analysis. It then approximates the third order system as a second order system to model underdamped, overdamped and critically damped cases.

Uploaded by

Fahad Siddiq
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Control Systems Lab

P2

Submitted By:
Syed Muhammed Baqir Naqvi (170984)
Muhammed Inam Anwar (170966)
Qazi Ahasan Nawaz (171008)
Class/Sec: BEEP 5A
Submitted To: Engr. Hussain Asif
Instructor’s Remarks:

Submission Time: In Late in Working Days


Time 0 1 2 3 4 5

Marks: Total Marks Obtained Marks

Additional Remarks: _______________________________________


________________________________________________________

Instructor’s Signature: _____________


Lab No 8
Effect of Pole location on stability
1. Objectives:

To verify the effect of pole location upon stability.To verify the effect upon stability of loop
gain in a negative feedback system.

2. Procedures:
 First we evaluate the value of K by Routh’s Table.Where we found out that K lies from
0<K<16 which will determine its root locus.

 The we obtained via this process are


Code:
For roots and root Locus
clc
close all
R=[];
for k=0:0.1:15.9
A=[1 4 4 k];

b=roots(A);
R=[R b]
end
figure
plot(real(R(1,:)),imag(R(1,:)),'r+')
hold on
plot(real(R(2,:)),imag(R(2,:)),'b+')
hold on
plot(real(R(3,:)),imag(R(3,:)),'g+')
hold on
Result:

This would be the distribution of poles where the system is stable


Second Order Approximation:

 The equation that needs to be approximated by the second order is


K
T (s )= 3 2
s +4 s +4 s+K
 We received 160 roots, now we have to ignore farthest root for third order system.
 Different poles on root locus shows different behavior.
 We are generally picking roots for Under damped, Over damped and Critically
damped.

2.1. Under Damped:


 Among the numerous roots that shows the under damped behavior we chose the following we found
on best approximation.

 Whre the value of K is 15.9.


Code:
clc
close all
R=[];
for k=0:0.1:15.9
A=[1 4 4 k];

b=roots(A);
R=[R b]
end
z=poly([-0.0025+1.9950i -0.0025-1.9950i])
y=tf(1,z)
figure
step (y)
Result:

 Now we have to verify our approximation by putting the value of K obtained in third order system .
Code:
clc
close all
A=[1 4 4 15.9];
B=15.9;
C=tf(B,A)
figure
step (C)

Result:
2.2. Over Damped:
 Among the numerous roots that show the over damped behavior we chose the following we found on
best approximation.

 Whre the value of K is 1.2.


Code:
clc
close all
R=[];
for k=0:0.1:15.9
A=[1 4 4 k];

b=roots(A);
R=[R b]
end
z=poly([-0.8853 -0.4698])
y=tf(1,z)
figure
step (y)

Result:
 Now we have to verify our approximation by putting the value of K obtained in third order system .
Code:
close all
A=[1 4 4 1.2];
B=1.2;
C=tf(B,A)
figure
step (C)

Result:
2.3. Critically Damped:
 Among the numerous roots that show the critically damped behavior we chose the following we
found on best approximation.

 Whre the value of K is 0.1.


Code:
clc
close all
R=[];
for k=0:0.1:15.9
A=[1 4 4 k];

b=roots(A);
R=[R b]
end
z=poly([-2 -2])
y=tf(1,z)
figure
step (y)

Result:

 Now we have to verify our approximation by putting the value of K obtained in third order system .
Code:
clc
close all
A=[1 4 4 1];
B=1;
C=tf(B,A)
figure
step (C)

Result:

 We noticed that, third order graph does not satisfy our second order assumption.
 As in the case of critically damped we know third order system doesn’t have three same roots in our
case on real axis.
 So our system in third order will behave over damped rather than critically damped.

3. Learning Outcomes:
 We learned that in higher order systems our approximation relies on the roots we select.
 Real and same roots devise Critical second order response.
 Real and Distinctive roots devise an over damped response.
 Roots with real and imaginary parts both devise under damped response.
 More our roots lay near jw axis our response is closer to the un damped where as it never reaches un
damped exactly.

You might also like