Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 425 views

    Jakim Bey All Debt Discharge To GRAHAM LINTON, GREG MANBECK, AND JOSEPH AGUCCI

    Uploaded by

    jakim el bey
    The document is an affidavit from Jakim Bey that discharges any outstanding debt to Graham Linton and Greg Manbeck. It cites several Supreme Court cases that establish that no fee can be charged for a liberty or right, that fraudulent contracts are void from the inception, and that unconstitutional acts confer no rights or duties. It also references international laws and treaties, as well as provisions of the US Constitution regarding debts only being payable in gold and silver. The affidavit aims to demonstrate that any purported debt was not tendered in lawful money and is therefore discharged.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Jakim Bey All Debt Discharge To GRAHAM LINTON, GREG MANBECK, AND JOSEPH AGUCCI

    Uploaded by

    jakim el bey
    425 views8 pages
    The document is an affidavit from Jakim Bey that discharges any outstanding debt to Graham Linton and Greg Manbeck. It cites several Supreme Court cases that establish that no fee can be charged for a liberty or right, that fraudulent contracts are void from the inception, and that unconstitutional acts confer no rights or duties. It also references international laws and treaties, as well as provisions of the US Constitution regarding debts only being payable in gold and silver. The affidavit aims to demonstrate that any purported debt was not tendered in lawful money and is therefore discharged.

    Original Description:

    jakim bey all debt discharge to GRAHAM LINTON, GREG MANBECK, AND JOSEPH AGUCCI

    Original Title

    jakim bey all debt discharge to GRAHAM LINTON, GREG MANBECK, AND JOSEPH AGUCCI

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document is an affidavit from Jakim Bey that discharges any outstanding debt to Graham Linton and Greg Manbeck. It cites several Supreme Court cases that establish that no fee can be charged for a liberty or right, that fraudulent contracts are void from the inception, and that unconstitutional acts confer no rights or duties. It also references international laws and treaties, as well as provisions of the US Constitution regarding debts only being payable in gold and silver. The affidavit aims to demonstrate that any purported debt was not tendered in lawful money and is therefore discharged.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    425 views8 pages

    Jakim Bey All Debt Discharge To GRAHAM LINTON, GREG MANBECK, AND JOSEPH AGUCCI

    Uploaded by

    jakim el bey
    The document is an affidavit from Jakim Bey that discharges any outstanding debt to Graham Linton and Greg Manbeck. It cites several Supreme Court cases that establish that no fee can be charged for a liberty or right, that fraudulent contracts are void from the inception, and that unconstitutional acts confer no rights or duties. It also references international laws and treaties, as well as provisions of the US Constitution regarding debts only being payable in gold and silver. The affidavit aims to demonstrate that any purported debt was not tendered in lawful money and is therefore discharged.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 8

    moorish americans

    aboriginal and indigenous natural peoples of the land of the america’s


    ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    affidavit of fact November 25th, 2020

    1. to whom it may concern, this is to clear up any misconception surrounding outstanding debt to Graham Linton and Greg Manbeck.
    my ex rel: GARRY BROWNE, Garry Browne, garry browne. my appellation is jakim bey. all debt discharge in full with this bills of
    exchange, according to the law.

    2. Supreme Court Case Study: “No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.” Murdock v. Penn., 319 US
    105 . “A writing is ‘void ab initio’ in the case of fraud in the inception, and it need not be formally rescinded as a prerequisite to right of avoidance”.
    Bonacci v. Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co., (1943) 58 CA 2d 657,664

    3. Supreme Court Case Study: "An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no
    office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 p. 442
    4. Supreme Court Case Study: "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no 'rule making' or legislation which would
    abrogate them." ." MIRANDA v. ARIZONA , 384 U.S. 436 (1966) 491; 86 S. Ct. 1603
    5. Convention Providing a Uniform Law For Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes
    (Geneva, 1930) The League of Nations. Geneva Convention of 1930

    6. 73d CONGRESS. SESS. I. CHS. 48, 49. JUNE 5, 6, 1933. Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of
    America in Congress assembled, That

    (a) every provision contained in or made with respect to any obligation which purports to give the obligee a right to require payment in gold or a
    particular kind of coin or currency, or in an amount in money of the United States measured thereby, is declared to be against public policy;
    and no such provision shall be contained in or made with respect to any obligation hereafter incurred. Every obligation, heretofore or hereafter
    incurred, whether or not any such provision is contained therein or made with respect thereto, shall be discharged upon payment, dollar for dollar,
    in any coin or currency which at the time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts. Any such provision contained in any law
    authorizing obligations to be issued by or under authority of the United States , is hereby repealed, but the repeal of any such provision shall not
    invalidate any other provision or authority contained in such law.

    7. Title 8, 22 & 28 USC December 26th, 1933 49 Statute 3097 Treaty Series 881 (Convention Rights and Duties of
    States) stated CONGRESS replace STATUTES with international Law, placing all states under international Law.

    8. U.S. Constitution - Article 1 Section 10


    Article 1 - The Legislative Branch
    Section 10 - Powers Prohibited of States
    No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit;
    make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the
    Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

    Bill of Credit; A bill of credit is some sort of paper medium by which value is exchanged between the government and individuals. Money is
    a bill of credit, but a bill of credit need not be money. An interest-bearing certificate that was issued by Missouri, and usable in the payment of
    taxes, was thus ruled to be an unconstitutional bill of credit.
    9. All debts contracted and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United
    States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation. This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in
    pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the
    land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. The
    Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of
    the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever
    be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States. The Constitution for the United States Article VI
    10. note: Supreme Court Case Study: the Credit River decision (MN) in 1968 found that federal reserve notes were not lawful tender for
    the payment of debts  the affidavit above by jakim bey specifies gold and silver as the form of money acceptable to moors no lawful tender
    was offered for the interest held by jakim bey. in the Credit River case. it clearly stated that federal reserve notes were not lawful money
    …"Federal reserve notes are legal tender in absence of objection thereto." 1925, MacLeod vs Hoover…  “. . . checks, drafts, money
    orders, and bank notes are not lawful money of the United States ...” State v. Neilon, 73 Pac 324, 43 Ore 168.  the corporate entities were
    prevented and precluded from violating the law established. the court in the case (Neilon) also prevented the form of “payment” .

    11. 18 U.S. Code § 241.Conspiracy against rights


    If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or
    District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because
    of his having so exercised the same; or
    If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or
    enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—
    They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in
    violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit
    aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or
    may be sentenced to death.

    12. and 18 U.S. Code § 242.Deprivation of rights under color of law

    13. Supreme Court Case Study: “Once Challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proved to exist.
    ”Stuck v Medical Examiners 94 Ca 2d 751.211, P2d 389.

    14. UCC § 3-603. TENDER OF PAYMENT


    (a) If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument, the effect of tender is
    governed by principles of law applicable to tender of payment under a simple contract.
    (b) If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument and the tender is
    refused, there is discharge, to the extent of the amount of the tender, of the obligation of an indorser or accommodation party having a
    right of recourse with respect to the obligation to which the tender relates.
    (c) If tender of payment of an amount due on an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument, the obligation of the obligor to
    pay interest after the due date on the amount tendered is discharged. If presentment is required with respect to an instrument and the obligor is
    able and ready to pay on the due date at every place of payment stated in the instrument, the obligor is deemed to have made tender of payment
    on the due date to the person entitled to enforce the instrument.
    document have been place on public record google and scribd.com title jakim bey all debt discharge. Graham Linton and Greg Manbeck
    15. 15 USC CHAPTER 41, SUBCHAPTER V: DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES
    From Title 15—COMMERCE AND TRADE CHAPTER 41—CONSUMER CREDIT PROTECTION

    SUBCHAPTER V—DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES


    §1692. Congressional findings and declaration of purpose
    (a) Abusive practices
    There is abundant evidence of the use of abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices by many debt collectors. Abusive debt collection
    practices contribute to the number of personal bankruptcies, to marital instability, to the loss of jobs, and to invasions of individual privacy.
    (b) Inadequacy of laws
    Existing laws and procedures for redressing these injuries are inadequate to protect consumers.
    (c) Available non-abusive collection methods
    Means other than misrepresentation or other abusive debt collection practices are available for the effective collection of debts.
    (d) Interstate commerce
    Abusive debt collection practices are carried on to a substantial extent in interstate commerce and through means and instrumentalities of such
    commerce. Even where abusive debt collection practices are purely intrastate in character, they nevertheless directly affect interstate commerce.
    (e) Purposes
    It is the purpose of this subchapter to eliminate abusive debt collection practices by debt collectors, to insure that those debt collectors who
    refrain from using abusive debt collection practices are not competitively disadvantaged, and to promote consistent State action to protect
    consumers against debt collection abuses.
    (Pub. L. 90–321, title VIII, §802, as added Pub. L. 95–109, Sept. 20, 1977, 91 Stat. 874.)

    16. EFFECTIVE DATE: Pub. L. 90–321, title VIII, §819, formerly §818, as added by Pub. L. 95–109, Sept. 20, 1977, 91 Stat. 883, §818; renumbered
    §819, Pub. L. 109–351, title VIII, §801(a)(1), Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 2004, provided that: "This title [enacting this subchapter] takes effect upon the
    expiration of six months after the date of its enactment [Sept. 20, 1977], but section 809 [section 1692g of this title] shall apply only with respect to
    debts for which the initial attempt to collect occurs after such effective date."

    17. SHORT TITLE: This subchapter known as the "Fair Debt Collection Practices Act", see Short Title note set out under section 1601 of
    this title.

    18. §1692c. Communication in connection with debt collection(b) Communication with third parties
    Except as provided in section 1692b of this title, without the prior consent of the consumer given directly to the debt collector, or the express
    permission of a court of competent jurisdiction, or as reasonably necessary to effectuate a postjudgment judicial remedy, a debt collector may not
    communicate, in connection with the collection of any debt, with any person other than the consumer, his attorney, a consumer reporting agency if
    otherwise permitted by law, the creditor, the attorney of the creditor, or the attorney of the debt collector.

    (c) Ceasing communication


    If a consumer notifies a debt collector in writing that the consumer refuses to pay a debt or that the consumer wishes the debt collector to cease
    further communication with the consumer, the debt collector shall not communicate further with the consumer with respect to such debt, except—
    (1) to advise the consumer that the debt collector's further efforts are being terminated;
    (2) to notify the consumer that the debt collector or creditor may invoke specified remedies which are ordinarily invoked by such debt collector
    or creditor; or
    (3) where applicable, to notify the consumer that the debt collector or creditor intends to invoke a specified remedy.
    If such notice from the consumer is made by mail, notification shall be complete upon
    19. §1692d. Harassment or abuse
    A debt collector may not engage in any conduct the natural consequence of which is to harass, oppress, or abuse any person in connection with the
    collection of a debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section:
    (1) The use or threat of use of violence or other criminal means to harm the physical person, reputation, or property of any person.
    (2) The use of obscene or profane language or language the natural consequence of which is to abuse the hearer or reader.
    (3) The publication of a list of consumers who allegedly refuse to pay debts, except to a consumer reporting agency or to persons meeting the
    requirements of section 1681a(f) or 1681b(3) 1 of this title.
    (4) The advertisement for sale of any debt to coerce payment of the debt.
    (5) Causing a telephone to ring or engaging any person in telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously with intent to annoy, abuse, or
    harass any person at the called number.
    (6) Except as provided in section 1692b of this title, the placement of telephone calls without meaningful disclosure of the caller's identity.
    (Pub. L. 90–321, title VIII, §806, as added Pub. L. 95–109, Sept. 20, 1977, 91 Stat. 877.)

    20. §1692e. False or misleading representations


    A debt collector may not use any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt. Without
    limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section:
    (1) The false representation or implication that the debt collector is vouched for, bonded by, or affiliated with the United States or any State,
    including the use of any badge, uniform, or facsimile thereof.
    (2) The false representation of—
    (A) the character, amount, or legal status of any debt; or
    (B) any services rendered or compensation which may be lawfully received by any debt collector for the collection of a debt.§1692k. Civil liability
    (a) Amount of damages
    Except as otherwise provided by this section, any debt collector who fails to comply with any provision of this subchapter with respect to any person
    is liable to such person in an amount equal to the sum of—
    (1) any actual damage sustained by such person as a result of such failure;
    (d) Jurisdiction
    An action to enforce any liability created by this subchapter may be brought in any appropriate United States district court without regard to the
    amount in controversy, or in any other court of competent jurisdiction, within one year from the date on which the violation occurs.

    You might also like