Domain 3 Reflection
Domain 3 Reflection
Domain 3 Reflection
Kayla M. Gluchowski
Drexel University
2
Domain 3 Reflection
Domain 3 Reflection
For this assignment, I created an ELA lesson plan for my first-grade class in our virtual
setting. After teaching the lesson, I reflected on the plan and the implementation. While
paragraphs you will gain insight of this specific lesson plan, what went well, what improvements
To begin this lesson, we reviewed prerequisite information from the previous day’s
lesson. With this review, I gained valuable insight and was reminded that two students were not
present for the previous day’s lesson. I channeled component 3e and demonstrated flexibility
and responsiveness by quickly adjusting the beginning phase of the lesson and responding to
both student’s needs. I asked for volunteers to explain our key words (shelter and materials). I
connected the student’s personal interests by referencing buildings they may have with their toys
(a Barbie home or a Lego castle). I asked these students to think about the materials needed to
After reviewing the previous days necessary prerequisite information, I communicated
the expectations for learning with the students (3a). I shared that today’s goal was to follow
along to the story and for us to independently or with assistance be able to identify main
characters, the setting, and main events on our white boards. After I communicated our learning
goals for the class, I gave accurate and clear directions that told the students exactly what I was
expecting from them (3a). We began by reviewing the genre of the story, “Cubs in a Hut.”
Students engaged in higher order thinking by explaining how they knew the genre was fantasy
and making predictions for the story based off of the cover page illustrations and title of the story
(3b).
3
Domain 3 Reflection
Throughout the beginning, middle, and end of the lesson, I used questioning and
discussion techniques to facilitate whole group discussion between the students, where I could
disengage as the center focus and allow the students to facilitate the conversation together while
mediating the dialogue. The students became extremely involved in conversation when they
began to talk about their predictions based off of events in the story. Students practiced
respectfully disagreeing and agreeing with other predictions. The students were considering
each other’s responses and challenging each other’s thinking (3b). For example, one student
predicted that the cubs would build three different houses and we would find out what material
worked best. A different student replied, “I think the cubs will be building only one hut and they
will be building it together because the title was ‘Cubs in a hut’ but “cubs in huts.” I
commended them both for their critical thinking and predictions. At the end of the story, I asked
the students to show with their yes/no cards if their predictions were accurate. I was specifically
checking to see if student’s who had inaccurate predictions could identify and express that
correctly.
For this lesson, I specifically chose materials that have been successful in showcasing
student’s knowledge of the learning material, the students enjoy using them, and feedback is able
to be provided quickly (3c). I asked students to use their white boards and I asked them to use
their colored disks. Students were able to use their whiteboard to make a chart for the main
characters, setting, and main events. They were able to draw their answers or write their
answers. This allowed for differentiation. Some students are not ready to move on from
drawing their thoughts and explaining them. I allowed them to still draw should they need to,
but I also gave them the room to challenge themselves, should they want to write out their
independent activity. I monitored each student’s learning while they each participated in the
classroom discussion before, during, and after the read aloud. I was able to closely monitor each
child’s comprehension and provide immediate, as well as, constructive feedback when listening
to their shared white board responses. Student’s accepted their responsibility for learning by
placing their green, yellow, or red colored disk next to their chart on their white board. A green
disk showcased they felt very comfortable with the learning material. A yellow disk showcased
they felt comfortable but wanted a teacher to check their answer to make sure. A red disk meant
the student was not sure and needed additional guidance. Through constant monitoring of
student learning, feedback, and student self-assessment (3d), I was able to ensure that all students
met the learning objective or at least identify additional needs/support for students who did not
components from Domain 3, I was able to ensure that sixteen students met the learning
objective. The two students who did not meet the learning objective, were able to meet 2/3 of it
by providing main characters and key events. They were not able to identify the setting because
they were confused about the setting changing. I did not have enough time before the students
transitioned to lunch to fully ensure the two students grasped the setting and the changing
settings. Despite this, I was able to gain ample information to better assist me in future lessons
that day and in the future. I was able to identify the needs of those two students, weave in
conversation about settings in different lessons that day, and also provide a setting review before
the next day’s ELA lesson. Additionally, I made a note to create a small breakout room group if
I felt the students needed further practice with identifying the setting after the next day’s lesson.
5
Domain 3 Reflection
In the future, I can spend time throughout the read aloud section identifying when the setting
changes to better assist the students and their understanding of the learning material.
Furthermore, I would like to find ways to incorporate the student’s interest aside from the
beginning of the lesson when we review what materials and shelters are. It is important for me
to note that even though this group was fully engaged and did not need additional motivational