Module

2
Analysis of Statically
Indeterminate
Structures by the
Matrix Force Method
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
 Lesson
9
The Force Method of
Analysis:
Beams (Continued)
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Instructional Objectives
After reading this chapter the student will be able to
1. Calculate additional stresses developed in statically indeterminate structures
due to support settlements.
2. Analyse continuous beams which are supported on yielding supports.
3. Sketch the deflected shape of the member.
4. Draw banding moment and shear force diagrams for indeterminate beams
undergoing support settlements.

9.1 Introduction
In the last lesson, the force method of analysis of statically indeterminate beams
subjected to external loads was discussed. It is however, assumed in the
analysis that the supports are unyielding and the temperature remains constant.
In the design of indeterminate structure, it is required to make necessary
provision for future unequal vertical settlement of supports or probable rotation of
supports. It may be observed here that, in case of determinate structures no
stresses are developed due to settlement of supports. The whole structure
displaces as a rigid body (see Fig. 9.1). Hence, construction of determinate
structures is easier than indeterminate structures.

Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
The statically determinate structure changes their shape due to support
settlement and this would in turn induce reactions and stresses in the system.
Since, there is no external force system acting on the structures, these forces
form a balanced force system by themselves and the structure would be in
equilibrium. The effect of temperature changes, support settlement can also be
easily included in the force method of analysis. In this lesson few problems,
concerning the effect of support settlement are solved to illustrate the procedure.

9.2 Support Displacements

Consider a two span continuous beam, which is statically indeterminate to
second degree, as shown in Fig. 9.2. Assume the flexural rigidity of this beam to
be constant throughout. In this example, the support B is assumed to have
settled by an amount ' b as shown in the figure.

This problem was solved in the last lesson, when there was no support
settlement (vide section 8.2). In section 8.2, choosing reaction at B and C as the
redundant, the total deflection of the primary structure due to applied external
loading and redundant R1 and R2 is written as,

'1 ' L 1  a11 R1  a12 R2 (9.1a)

'2 ' L 2  a21 R1  a22 R2 (9.1b)

wherein, R1 and R2 are the redundants at B and C respectively, and ' L 1 , and
' L 2 are the deflections of the primary structure at B and C due to applied
loading. In the present case, the support B settles by an amount ' b in the
direction of the redundant R1 . This support movement can be readily incorporated
in the force method of analysis. From the physics of the problem the total
deflection at the support may be equal to the given amount of support movement.
Hence, the compatibility condition may be written as,

'1 ' b (9.2a)

'2 0 (9.2b)

It must be noted that, the support settlement ' b must be negative as it is

displaces downwards. It is assumed that deflections and reactions are positive in
the upward direction. The equation (9.1a) and (9.1b) may be written in compact
form as,

Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

 ª a11 a12 º ­ R1 ½ ­ '1 ½ ­ ' L 1 ½
«a ® ¾ ® ¾® ¾ (9.3a)
¬ 21 a 22 »¼ ¯ R2 ¿ ¯' 2 ¿ ¯' L 2 ¿

>A@^R` ^'` ^' L ` (9.3b)

Solving the above algebraic equations, one could evaluate redundants R1 and R2
due to external loading and support settlement.

9.3 Temperature Stresses

Internal stresses are also developed in the statically indeterminate structure if the
free movement of the joint is prevented.

For example, consider a cantilever beam AB as shown in Fig. 9.3. Now, if the
temperature of the member is increased uniformly throughout its length, then the
length of the member is increased by an amount

'T D LT (9.4)

In which, ' T is the change in the length of the member due to temperature
change, D is the coefficient of thermal expansion of the material and T is the
change in temperature. The elongation (the change in the length of the member)
and increase in temperature are taken as positive. However if the end B is
restrained to move as shown in Fig 9.4, then the beam deformation is prevented.
This would develop an internal axial force and reactions in the indeterminate
structure.

Next consider a cantilever beam AB , subjected to a different temperature, T1 at

the top and T2 at the bottom as shown in Fig. 9.5(a) and (b). If the top
temperature T1 is higher than the bottom beam surface temperature T2 , then the
beam will deform as shown by dotted lines. Consider a small element dx at a
distance x from A . The deformation of this small element is shown in Fig. 9.5c.
Due to rise in temperature T1 qC on the top surface, the top surface elongates by

' T1 D T1 dx (9.5a)

Similarly due to rise in temperature T2 , the bottom fibers elongate by

' T2 D T2 dx (9.5b)

Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

As the cross section of the member remains plane, the relative angle of rotation
dT between two cross sections at a distance dx is given by

D (T1  T2 )dx
dT (9.6)
d

where, d is the depth of beam. If the end B is fixed as in Fig. 9.4, then the
differential change in temperature would develop support bending moment and
reactions.

The effect of temperature can also be included in the force method of analysis
quite easily. This is done as follows. Calculate the deflection corresponding to
redundant actions separately due to applied loading, due to rise in temperature
(either uniform or differential change in temperature) and redundant forces. The
deflection in the primary structure due to temperature changes is denoted by
' T i which denotes the deflection corresponding to i th redundant due to
temperature change in the determinate structure. Now the compatibility equation
for statically indeterminate structure of order two can be written as

ª a11 a12 º ­ R1 ½ ­ '1 ½ ­ ' L 1 ½ ­ ' T 1 ½

«a ® ¾ ® ¾® ¾® ¾
¬ 21 a22 »¼ ¯ R2 ¿ ¯' 2 ¿ ¯' L 2 ¿ ¯' T 2 ¿

>A@^R` ^'` ^' L ` ^'T ` (9.7)

wherein, ^' L ` is the vector of displacements in the primary structure

corresponding to redundant reactions due to external loads; ^'T ` is the
displacements in the primary structure corresponding to redundant reactions and
due to temperature changes and ^'` is the matrix of support displacements
corresponding to redundant actions. Equation (9.7) can be solved to obtain the
unknown redundants.

Example 9.1
Calculate the support reactions in the continuous beam ABC (see Fig. 9.6a)
having constant flexural rigidity EI throughout, due to vertical settlement of the
support B by 5 mm as shown in the figure. E 200 GPa and I 4 u 104 m 4 .

Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
As the given beam is statically indeterminate to second degree, choose reaction
at B ( R1 ) and C ( R2 ) as the redundants. In this case the cantilever beam AC is
the basic determinate beam (primary structure). On the determinate beam only
redundant reactions are acting. The first column of flexibility matrix is evaluated
by first applying unit load along the redundant R1 and determining deflections
a11 and a 21 respectively as shown in Fig. 9.6b.

53 125
a11
3EI 3EI

125 25 625
a 21  u5 (1)
3EI 2 EI 6 EI

Simply by applying the unit load in the direction of redundant R2 , one could
evaluate flexibility coefficients a12 and a 22 (see Fig. 9.6c).

625 1000
a12 and a 22 (2)
6 EI 3EI

The compatibility condition for the problem may be written as,

a11 R1  a12 R2 5 u 10 3
(3)
a21 R1  a22 R2 0

The redundant reactions are,

3
>A@1 ® 5 u10
­ R1 ½ ­ ½
® ¾ ¾ (4)
¯ R2 ¿ ¯ 0 ¿

­ R1 ½ 3EI ª 1000  312.5º ­ 5 u 10 3 ½

® ¾ u® ¾ (5)
¯ R2 ¿ 27343.75 «¬ 312.5 125 »¼ ¯ 0 ¿

Substituting the values of E and I in the above equation, the redundant reactions
are evaluated.

R1 43.885 kN and R2 13.71 kN

R1 acts downwards and R2 acts in the positive direction of the reaction

i.e. upwards. The remaining two reactions R3 and R4 are evaluated by the
equations of equilibrium.

Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

 ¦F y 0 Ÿ R1  R2  R3 0

Hence R3 30.175 kN

¦M A 0 Ÿ R4  5 u R1  10 u R2 0

Solving for R4 ,

R4 82.325 kN.m (counter clockwise)

The shear force and bending moment diagrams are shown in Figs. 9.6d and 9.6e
respectively.

Example 9.2
Compute reactions and draw bending moment diagram for the continuous beam
ABCD loaded as shown in Fig. 9.7a, due to following support movements.
Support B , 0.005 m vertically downwards.
Support C , 0.01 m vertically downwards.

Assume, E 200GPa ; I 1.35 u 10 3 m 4 .

Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

The given beam is statically indeterminate to second degree. Select vertical
reactions at BR1  and C R2  as redundants. The primary structure in this case is
a simply supported beam AD as shown in Fig. 9.7b.
The deflection ' L 1 and ' L 2 of the released structure are evaluated from unit
load method. Thus,

Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

  45833.33 u 10 3  45833.33 u 10 3
' L 1 0.169 m
EI 200 u 10 9 u 1.35 u 10 3

 45833.33 u 10 3
' L 2 0.169 m (1)
EI

The flexibility matrix is evaluated as explained in the previous example, i.e. by

first applying unit load corresponding to the redundant R1 and determining
deflections a11 and a 21 respectively as shown in Fig. 9.7c. Thus,

444.44
a11
EI

388.89
a 21 (2)
EI

444.44
a 22
EI

388.89
a12
EI

In this case the compatibility equations may be written as,

 0.169  a11 R1  a12 R2 0.005

(3)
 0.169  a21 R1  a22 R2 0.01

Solving for redundant reactions,

­ R1 ½ EI ª 444.44  388.89º ­0.164½

® ¾ u® ¾ (4)
¯ R2 ¿ 46291.48 «¬ 388.89 444.44 »¼ ¯0.159¿

Substituting the value of E and I in the above equation,

R1 64.48kN and R2 40.174 kN

Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

Both R1 and R2 acts in the upward direction. The remaining two reactions R3 and
R4 are evaluated by the equations of static equilibrium.

¦M A 0 10 u R1  20 u R2  30 u R4  5 u 30 u15 0

Hence R4 26.724 kN

¦F y 0 R3  R1  R2  R4  5 u 30 0

Hence R3 18.622 kN (5)

The shear force and bending moment diagrams are now constructed and are
shown in Figs. 9.7e and 9.7f respectively.

Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

Summary
In this lesson, the effect of support settlements on the reactions and stresses in
the case of indeterminate structures is discussed. The procedure to calculate
additional stresses caused due to yielding of supports is explained with the help
of an example. A formula is derived for calculating stresses due to temperature
changes in the case of statically indeterminate beams.

Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur