Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 43 views

    Capitalism and Income Inequality

    Uploaded by

    Divyansh Tomar
    Capitalism has existed since the 17th century, beginning with traders exchanging goods between countries for large profits. However, capitalism also exacerbates economic inequality, with the wealthiest members of society accumulating the majority of resources while many struggle in poverty. For example, in India the top 1% hold 42.5% of national wealth while the bottom 50% hold just 2.8%. Rising inequality is due to factors like technological changes replacing unskilled labor and tax policies that favor the wealthy. However, countries like Sweden and Japan have lower inequality through policies like high taxes and generous social benefits. Going forward, policies aimed at improving education, job training, taxation of top earners, and adapting to technological changes could help address rising

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Capitalism and Income Inequality

    Uploaded by

    Divyansh Tomar
    43 views2 pages
    Capitalism has existed since the 17th century, beginning with traders exchanging goods between countries for large profits. However, capitalism also exacerbates economic inequality, with the wealthiest members of society accumulating the majority of resources while many struggle in poverty. For example, in India the top 1% hold 42.5% of national wealth while the bottom 50% hold just 2.8%. Rising inequality is due to factors like technological changes replacing unskilled labor and tax policies that favor the wealthy. However, countries like Sweden and Japan have lower inequality through policies like high taxes and generous social benefits. Going forward, policies aimed at improving education, job training, taxation of top earners, and adapting to technological changes could help address rising

    Original Description:

    Income Inequality

    Original Title

    Income Inequality

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Capitalism has existed since the 17th century, beginning with traders exchanging goods between countries for large profits. However, capitalism also exacerbates economic inequality, with the wealthiest members of society accumulating the majority of resources while many struggle in poverty. For example, in India the top 1% hold 42.5% of national wealth while the bottom 50% hold just 2.8%. Rising inequality is due to factors like technological changes replacing unskilled labor and tax policies that favor the wealthy. However, countries like Sweden and Japan have lower inequality through policies like high taxes and generous social benefits. Going forward, policies aimed at improving education, job training, taxation of top earners, and adapting to technological changes could help address rising

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    43 views2 pages

    Capitalism and Income Inequality

    Uploaded by

    Divyansh Tomar
    Capitalism has existed since the 17th century, beginning with traders exchanging goods between countries for large profits. However, capitalism also exacerbates economic inequality, with the wealthiest members of society accumulating the majority of resources while many struggle in poverty. For example, in India the top 1% hold 42.5% of national wealth while the bottom 50% hold just 2.8%. Rising inequality is due to factors like technological changes replacing unskilled labor and tax policies that favor the wealthy. However, countries like Sweden and Japan have lower inequality through policies like high taxes and generous social benefits. Going forward, policies aimed at improving education, job training, taxation of top earners, and adapting to technological changes could help address rising

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Capitalism and Income inequality

    Since the beginning of human civilisation, people have been exchanging simple commodities.
    It began with the method of the Barter. In 1531 Antwerp had the first stock exchange.
    Development of printing press and human colonization forever changed the history of
    mankind. Capitalism is there since the 17th century. In Europe, traders used to buy goods
    from eastern countries and sell them to other countries on huge profits. Adam Smith, who is
    known as the father of capitalism, in his book Wealth of Nations, argued that free,
    unregulated economic competition would maximize profits and innovation, create a division
    of labour, and make prices reasonable.
    The world is full of inequality. Ethnic, gender, political and economic disparities exist. The
    economic inequalities are there since medieval times where kings and emperors used to enjoy
    the surplus wealth and workers did not. With the industrial revolution, the economic
    disparity between countries increased. Globalization and foreign trade are accelerating it.

    Noam Chomsky father of modern linguistics states "A basic principle of modern state
    capitalism is that costs and risks are socialized to the extent possible, while profit privatized."
    In 2017, the world's 50% of the wealth was with top 1% population. According to Credit
    Suisse’s Global Wealth Databook 2014, the bottom 10% of Indian society owns merely 0.2%
    of national wealth, while the top 10% holds a whopping 77% of the wealth share. Since 2000,
    the rich 10% have become steadily wealthier. Recently OXFAM report takes centre stage in
    the World economic forum where it gives a reality check of the inequality that stands in the
    country. The report shows that in India top 1% of the population holds 42.5% of the national
    wealth, whereas the bottom 50% holds as little as 2.8%. It also states that 6 of every 10
    Indian is surviving on a daily wage of 3$ and 20cents. The wealth of India has increased by
    $625.5Billion, from 2018 to 2019. Of this increase, the wealth of the top 1% has increased by
    46% and just 3% increase for the bottom 50%. One of the richest men on earth Bill gates
    states "Yes, some level of inequality is built on to the capitalism... It is inherent to the system.
    The question is, what level of inequality is acceptable? And when does inequality start doing
    more harm than good?"

    An interesting study conducted by world bank on "How much richer is the richest 20% in
    each country than the poorest 20%?". The results were quite fascinating. Countries at the
    bottom of the list like Japan, Sweden, Denmark had half the times of inequality than the
    countries on the top of the list like Singapore, USA and UK. Problems with social gradients
    such as homicide rate, imprisonment, violence, infant mortality, mental illness, low math and
    literacy scores of kids have a strong correlation with the level of income inequality. When we
    look at the same factors between countries on per capita GDP scale, there is no correlation at
    all. It gives rise to a paradox. Between our society’s income means nothing but, it’s
    something important within societies. Within societies, we are looking at relative income and
    the size of the gaps between us. Another difference is how countries like Japan and Sweden
    gets their greater equality. Sweden has a huge difference in earnings and it uses high taxation
    and generous benefits to narrow the gap. Japan, on the other hand, has a lesser difference in
    earnings before taxes. We can conclude that it does not matter how we get our greater
    equality as long as we get close to it somehow.
    There is a skill-based technological transition that is causing a rise in inequality. During
    industrial revolution the jobs changed from farming to manufacturing. Jobs now produced are
    more technology-based, and usually need new skills. It was easier before to upskill compared
    to now. Educated and skilled workers are doing great while others are left behind. For skilled
    workers technology has become a compliment but a replacement for unskilled workers. Only
    the low skill (less paid) and high skill (highly paid) jobs are left. The medium scale and
    medium pay jobs are getting automated. There is less income for people with fewer skills.
    Also, there is less influence of labour unions so the minimum wage is not getting increased
    significantly. The tax policies are in favour of the wealthy and are not as progressive.
    Oxfam report states that if we improve the tax policies and increase the tax paid by richest in
    India by just 0.5% on their wealth over the next decade then that money would create 117
    million jobs in the sectors such as elderly and childcare, education and health. In January
    2019 in Senator Elizabeth Warren proposed Wealth tax. We mostly pay tax when we earn
    money or make payment and there is no tax on the wealth. Warren proposed a tax on wealth
    if it is above $50milllion. If this law got implemented in the US then in the year 2016 itself it
    could have raised about $200Billion.
    Technology has surely created more jobs than it has taken. It has also given many innovative
    solutions to critical problems like communication, transport and health. Technology
    advancements are growing exponentially. We are using more and more software and are
    automating almost all manual low skill tasks. We have to use technology to improve
    education quality and make future generation job-ready.

    You might also like