Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 66 views

    Assessment 1 Presentation Criteria Reem

    Uploaded by

    api-316412817
    This document contains the grading criteria and feedback for a student named Reem Naser Alkarbi for course EDU 4103. Reem received an overall grade of 96/A. The teacher provided positive feedback on Reem's work, noting that she checked her work regularly, clearly covered all details, showed contents and permission taken for an interview, used good in-text citations, and provided an organized presentation that covered all assessment guidelines. The teacher also commented that Reem answered questions well, spent 17:30 minutes on her presentation, and collaborated well as part of a team. Areas for improvement included paying attention to pronunciation and language mistakes.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Assessment 1 Presentation Criteria Reem

    Uploaded by

    api-316412817
    66 views2 pages
    This document contains the grading criteria and feedback for a student named Reem Naser Alkarbi for course EDU 4103. Reem received an overall grade of 96/A. The teacher provided positive feedback on Reem's work, noting that she checked her work regularly, clearly covered all details, showed contents and permission taken for an interview, used good in-text citations, and provided an organized presentation that covered all assessment guidelines. The teacher also commented that Reem answered questions well, spent 17:30 minutes on her presentation, and collaborated well as part of a team. Areas for improvement included paying attention to pronunciation and language mistakes.

    Original Title

    assessment 1 presentation criteria reem

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains the grading criteria and feedback for a student named Reem Naser Alkarbi for course EDU 4103. Reem received an overall grade of 96/A. The teacher provided positive feedback on Reem's work, noting that she checked her work regularly, clearly covered all details, showed contents and permission taken for an interview, used good in-text citations, and provided an organized presentation that covered all assessment guidelines. The teacher also commented that Reem answered questions well, spent 17:30 minutes on her presentation, and collaborated well as part of a team. Areas for improvement included paying attention to pronunciation and language mistakes.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    66 views2 pages

    Assessment 1 Presentation Criteria Reem

    Uploaded by

    api-316412817
    This document contains the grading criteria and feedback for a student named Reem Naser Alkarbi for course EDU 4103. Reem received an overall grade of 96/A. The teacher provided positive feedback on Reem's work, noting that she checked her work regularly, clearly covered all details, showed contents and permission taken for an interview, used good in-text citations, and provided an organized presentation that covered all assessment guidelines. The teacher also commented that Reem answered questions well, spent 17:30 minutes on her presentation, and collaborated well as part of a team. Areas for improvement included paying attention to pronunciation and language mistakes.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Higher Colleges of Technology

    Education Division

    Course teacher: Fatema Al Awadi Course code: EDU 4103 Grade:


    Student name: Reem Naser Alkarbi ID: H00293411 96 / A
    Criteria A B C D F
    1. Research/experimentation exploration of ideas 
    2. Explanation/ description and or justification/ Discussion was 
    made
    3. Analysis 
    4. Subject knowledge 
    5. References 
    6. Delivery performance 

    7. Spoken language/ clarity and accuracy 


    8. Presentation length 
    Comments:
    - Checked work regularly
    - Clear coverage including all the details
    - Showed the contents
    - Showed the permission taken from the principal for the interview
    - Good in-text citation
    - Provided the organizational structure along with the type
    - Well organized presentation covering all the assessment guidelines
    - Good in-text citation
    - What is the school leadership model? Reem answered the question well
    - Used 4 sources as references with some APA errors
    - Spent 17:30
    - Collaborated very well as a team
    Reem:
    - Continues the administrative processes other aspects
    - Good to discuss the discipline process based on own understanding
    - Pay attention to pronunciation and language mistakes
    - Mentioned the use of people of determination curriculum in school
    - Good link to the interview answers to support the discussion
    - Good presentation skills
    Higher Colleges of Technology
    Education Division
    - What types of records are kept in school? Well answered the question
    - Good explanation of the record keeping
    - Good discussion of the students’ academic advising
    - Mentioned the leadership styles based on decision made with Ahlam – good
    - Linked to the interview
    - Mentioned the characters of participative leaders
    - Discussed the relationship with MOE
    - Good link to the reading of the class
    - Reem answered the question well about the leadership model

    You might also like