www.nature.

com/scientificreports

OPEN Two Sprayer CVD Synthesis of

Nitrogen-doped Carbon Sponge-
type Nanomaterials
Received: 10 August 2017 Emilio Muñoz-Sandoval, Juan L. Fajardo-Díaz   , Roque Sánchez-Salas   ,
Accepted: 28 December 2017 Alejandro J. Cortés-López & Florentino López-Urías
Published: xx xx xxxx
Nitrogen-doped carbon sponge-type nanostructures (N-CSTNs) containing coaxial multiwalled
carbon nanotubes are synthesized at 1020 °C by using a modified chemical vapor deposition (CVD)
arrangement. Here, the CVD reactor is supplied by two flows coming from two independent sprayers
(called sprayer A and sprayer B). The nebulized material in each sprayer is transported by two different
gases with different flow velocities. The synthesis of carbon N-CSTNs is performed using different
precursors: sprayer A contains a solution composed of ethanol, thiophene and ferrocene, whereas
sprayer B contains a solution of benzylamine, thiophene and ferrocene. Samples are classified
according to the position inside the reactor and characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM),
transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
(XPS), Raman spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Samples collected at the beginning
of the reactor contain curly structures with diameters of 10–100 nm. At the end of the reactor, the
sample is mainly formed by one type of structure. A spongy-type material is mainly formed in the
hottest zone of the tubular furnace. The N-CSTNs are highly hydrophobic with oil sorption properties,
which could be used for adsorption of oil spills.

Single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) have been one of the most important breakthrough contributions to the
technology of materials science1. Futaba et al., fabricated a macroscopic bulk material that they called SWCNT
solid2. This material is composed of densely packed SWCNTs, but the bulk material also exhibits the fundamental
properties of individual SWCNTs. It was proposed that this material could be used as supercapacitor electrodes.
The intention of that research was to build a 3D framework while keeping the individual properties of the build-
ing blocks. The ability to connect individual carbon materials to build 3D networks for improving their mechan-
ical and elastic properties is a technology with broad possible applications3,4. Carbon sponges are one of the most
important carbon materials, with exceptional and diverse properties made with carbon nanotubes as the building
blocks5. These carbon materials have been used in supercapacitors by different groups. For example, Cheng et al.,
fabricated hybrid flexible α-Fe2O3/carbon nanotube supercapacitors that presented porous hierarchical structures
and high specific capacitances6. In this case, the carbon sponges were synthesized by the method outlined by Gui
et al7. and decorated with α-Fe2O3 using chemical routes. This combination improved the capacitance of the
spongy material. Furthermore, He et al8. combined a skeleton of carbon foam and nitrogen-doped carbon nano-
tubes to build a 3D carbon hybrid. Nitrogen atoms distributed in the carbon nanostructure were considered as
promising electrode materials for supercapacitor applications8. Carbon sponges could also be used in the fabrica-
tion of long-term rechargeable batteries9. Their application in Li-ion batteries is another research topic with great
scientific and commercial potential10,11. Sharifi et al. fabricated 3D architectures decorated with hematite nano-
rods with 3D morphology to be used as negative electrodes for Li-ion batteries. They also proposed the impor-
tance of nitrogen atoms as preferential adsorption sites for the Li+ ions9. Ke et al. introduced carbon nanotubes
into Co3O4 nanowire arrays to build a 3D structure with supercapacitor potentialities. These CNT-oxide nanohy-
brids showed low conductivity with an enhanced redox reaction, which makes them useful as a high-performance
electrode material for energy storage12. In addition, materials with sponge morphologies have been proposed for
use as shielding material in the GHz range13. Using Ni-Cu alloy as a catalyst Ge et al14. fabricated carbon nanofiber
sponges to be used for oil absorption. The sponges were fabricated at 580 °C by CVD using C2H4 as the carbon
source and were tested for oil absorption, showing absorption capacities of up to 75 g/g. The hydrophobic and

Advanced Materials Division, IPICYT, Camino a la presa San José 2055, Lomas 4a sección, San Luis Potosí, 78216,
Mexico. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to F.L.-U. (email: [email protected])

Scientific REPOrTS | (2018) 8:2983 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-20079-9 1

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

oleophilic properties of carbon sponges fabricated using the method outlined in Gui et al7,15. have been used for
oil recovery, showing oil adsorption of over 95 wt% after several cycles. Stolz et al., used pyrolysis to fabricate a
carbon sponge containing a 3D interconnected network with excellent absorption capacities16. Using a melamine
sponge as a template, Qiu et al., fabricated a potential sorbent for the removal of oil from water that also displayed
high porosity and hydrophobicity17. Another interesting property is their high surface area, which could serve to
capture undesirable metals or chemical species in the environment18. Wang et al., proved that commercial carbon
nanotube sponges could be used for solid-phase extraction of organic pollutants at trace levels. They have
reported the successful use of these sponges as an adsorbent for the enrichment and analysis of polychlorinated
biphenyls at trace levels in water samples19. Santangelo et al., investigated tensional states due to the interconnec-
tions in carbon nanotube sponges fabricated on a Co-Mo-Mg trimetallic catalyst by the decomposition of meth-
ane at 900 °C. They concluded that the observed Raman spectra modifications were due to the CNT
interconnections20. Zhao et al., studied boron-doped and nitrogen-doped isotropic 3D CNT frameworks that
contained elbow-like junctions with hyperelastic properties. The boron-doped carbon sponges were fabricated
with ferrocene, toluene and triethylborane at 860 °C using an aerosol-assisted catalytic CVD method, and the
nitrogen-doped materials were made using ferrocene, thiophene and pyridine through a syringe pump proce-
dure21. The mechanical properties of carbon sponges are also interesting due to their ability to return to their
original form after deformation, which could be important in the fabrication of artificial muscles22. Dai et al.,
revealed the highly outstanding mechanical and elastic properties of sponges. The randomly interconnected indi-
vidual carbon nanotubes grown by CVD that presented super-elasticity, a high strength-to-weight ratio, fatigue
resistance, thermo-mechanical stability and electro-mechanical stability23. These three-dimensional networks
could also serve as scaffolding or a template for growing biological systems such as cells and artificial bone24.
Using a chemical vapor deposition technique with few precursors and a three-zone furnace, Erbay and collabora-
tors fabricated inexpensive carbon sponges with potential applications in microbial electrochemical cell sys-
tems25. Wang et al., fabricated a sponge-like carbon matrix containing nitrogen and iron to be used in the oxygen
reduction reaction as a catalyst. Their procedure involved several steps to synthesize the sponge. However, their
ORR catalytic activity apparently exceeded that of Pt/C, probably due to their high pyridinic-type nitrogen con-
tent26. Thermal annealing was applied to carbon sponges to bring about Fe2O3 nanoparticles attached to the
sponge’s CNTs. They demonstrated that the new structure could be used for applications in catalysis and energy
fields 27. An interesting spongy carbon was fabricated by Barborini et al. This spongy carbon was a
three-dimensional, highly porous structure that consisted of fully connected sp2 negatively curved networks28.
These three-dimensional networks were synthesized using the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method in a
one-step synthesis strategy13,29–32, a hybrid CVD method on templates33–36 or through electron beam irradiation
at high temperatures37,38. Synthesis of carbon sponges was performed by Xue et al., where they used copper wires
as a substrate and dichlorobenzene and ferrocene as precursors for the CNT sponge growth through CVD39.
Other routes have been attempted to create macroscopic materials by interconnecting carbon nanomaterials. New
technology using spongy carbon materials has also been proposed by several important research groups for
unconventional applications. One of the most important goals of nanotechnology is the use of new macroscopic
materials constructed piece by piece of nanomaterials, which should show outstanding properties. Carbon nano-
tube sponges are one member of this category of nanomaterials. For such reasons, the synthesis of carbon nano-
materials must be carefully performed. For example, Liu et al., demonstrated that using the same precursor can
produce different and complex structures40. There is no doubt that among the most important carbon materials
nowadays are the 3D carbon networks, including the so-called “sponges”, which have interesting and exceptional
mechanical, elastic, catalytic, energetic, and capacitive properties. An enormous effort has been invested to fabri-
cate these types of nanomaterials. Generally, well-aligned multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) are fabri-
cated by CVD using ferrocene (C5H5)2Fe and toluene (C7H8)41. However changes to the electronic structure and
the morphology can be obtained by doping. For example, nitrogen in the graphitic layers of carbon nanotubes
produces a bamboo structure42. A boron atom occupying the place of a carbon atom induces knees and corru-
gated walls43, phosphorous-doping can produce tubes with low oxidation temperatures44, oxygen can be trapped
on the surface of carbon nanotubes by a functional group to cause solubility45, and sulfur can be used to create a
Y junction37,46–54. Boron-doped carbon sponges also have been successfully fabricated54,55. The participation of
sulfur in the synthesis of carbon sponges could increase their diameter50,51,53. Most of the time, the temperatures
for the fabrication of this 3D carbon structures are relatively low (850–1000 °C). It could be important to fabricate
these nanostructures at higher temperatures to avoid possible negative effects if they were to be used in high tem-
perature environments. Recently, a carbon sponge-like nanostructure has been prepared at a relatively high tem-
perature (1020 °C) by AACVD using benzylamine as a nitrogen and carbon precursor and ferrocene as the
catalyst source 56. Sulfur was used to promote the building of 3D-architectures. In the present work,
nitrogen-doped carbon sponge-type nanostructures (N-CSTNs) are synthesized by a single-step aerosol-assisted
chemical vapor deposition method (AACVD) at 1020 °C. The N-CSTNs are fabricated by combining two inde-
pendent sprayers that contain two different solutions whose respective clouds are carried by different gases and
flows. The importance of the present investigation lies in the fact that the concurrence of both the flow and the
sources involved in the synthesis can be controlled, resulting in a novel material with important characteristics, as
can be seen in the following sections. We demonstrate that the use of the two-sprayer strategy can produce com-
plex or hybrid morphologies with potential application in the electrochemical sensors field57, as hybrid reinforce-
ments58, or for use with environmental issues3, among others. A combination of strategies to fabricate 2D or 3D
carbon nanomaterials has been a successful route to producing novel structures with astonishing mechanical,
chemical and physical properties59,60. Here, we used an ethanol substance with a high oxygen inclusion in the
synthesis that helps the benzylamine solution, which acts as a carbon and nitrogen precursor, interact with the
iron coming from the ferrocene and thiophene for incorporation of sulfur.

Scientific REPOrTS | (2018) 8:2983 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-20079-9 2

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Figure 1.  Schematic representation of the chemical vapor deposition setup used to synthesize N-CSTNs.
Samples are synthesized at 1020 °C. The resulting material was collected from the quartz tube (reactor) by
scraping its inner walls and classifying the sample according to the region in the tubular furnace. The different
regions are labeled as S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, and S6. Sprayer (A) contains an ethanol solution, whereas sprayer (B)
contains a benzylamine solution. Both sprayers contain thiophene and ferrocene. More details on the precursor
concentrations are given in the text.

Methodology
N-CSTNs were synthesized using the AACVD technique. Figure 1 shows the approach, which involves pyrolysis
using two different sprayers (RBI instrumentation): i) sprayer A, with an ethanol (C2H5OH) solution contain-
ing thiophene (C4H4S, 0.124 wt%) and ferrocene (Fe(C5H5)2, 1.252 wt%); and ii) sprayer B, with a benzylamine
(C6H5CH2NH2) solution containing thiophene (C4H4S, 0.5 wt%) and ferrocene (Fe(C5H5)2, 2.5 wt%). The
AACVD experiments were carried out at 930, 960, 990, and 1020 °C for 40 minutes under an inert atmosphere.
In the case of sprayer A, following the work of Campos-Delgado et al.61, Ar gas with a flow of 0.8 L/min trans-
ported the cloud. In the case of sprayer B, the gas carrier was a mixture of Ar-H2 (95%-5%) with a flow of 1.0 L/
min, similar to the case in Ref.21. The temperature was controlled by a type 21100 Barnstead/Thermolyne series
tubular furnace with one central thermocouple outside the ceramic fiber on the heating chamber to monitor the
temperature changes. Inside of this furnace, a quartz tube 1.10 m in length and with an outer diameter of 2.63 cm
and 1.5 mm thickness was placed to perform the synthesis. In order to see the modification of the morphology
and efficiency, two more experiments were performed changing the flow of sprayer B (0.6 L/min and 1.4 L/min).
The two sprayers were connected to the quartz tube by a 24/40 shape glass connecting adapter. The sprayers were
turned on at the same time, each forming a cloud of micro-drops after a few seconds, by a piezoelectric piece cou-
pled to an internal hermetic 1-L glass container and an electronic generator (brand RBI ref. 7901). The synthesis
of the N-CSTNs began when both clouds entered the furnace. After the catalytic dissolution was pyrolyzed inside
the reactor, the organic by-products were cooled by a Liebig condenser and finally were deposited in a bubble gas
trap. Figure SI-1a in the supplementary information provides a description of the sprayer and the main parts that
were used in our investigations. The resulting material was collected from the reaction quartz tube by scraping
its inner walls, and the samples were classified according to different zones in the tubular furnace. Samples were
associated with each of the zones and were named sample 1 (S1), sample 2 (S2), and so on, through sample 6 (S6).
Scanning and (high-resolution) transmission electron microscopy characterizations were used for morphological
studies of the samples. A Helios Nanolab 600 Dual Beam was used to perform the SEM measurements, and the
TEM images were taken by an FEI Tecnai F30. A Renishaw micro Raman spectrometer with a 532 nm excitation
wavelength was used to evaluate the crystalline structure. The carbon, nitrogen and oxygen contents in the carbon
N-CSTNs were measured by XPS (PHI 5000 VersaProbeII). Thermogravimetric analysis was performed using
STA 6000 Perkin-Elmer equipment in a temperature range of 50–950 °C with a heating speed of 10 °C/min under
dynamic flow of oxygen (20 mL/min). The temperature profile (see Fig. SI-1b) of the furnace was measured cm
by cm employing a resistivity scan (RS) pro K type thermocouple stainless steel probe 500 mm in length, 3 mm
in diameter, plugged into an RS pro ANSI connector for K type measurements. Steren MUL-600 hardware and
software were used to acquire the data on a PC interface (see Fig. SI-1c).

Results and Discussion

Figure  2 depicts SEM images of samples synthesized at 1020 °C during a 40-min growth period.
High-magnification SEM images are also shown in the supplementary Information (Fig. SI-2). Different mor-
phologies can be observed depending on their position alongside of the reactor. The robustness of the carbon
structure increases as we move away from the reactor inlet, as shown by the difference between sample S6 (reac-
tor inlet) and sample S1 (reactor outlet) in Fig. 2. Furthermore, unlike in the single-sprayer approach (previous
work reported in Ref.56), the two-sprayer setup promotes the growth of diverse types of carbon structures and
morphologies in each reactor zone. This diversity of structures is richer in morphologies for samples close to the
reactor inlet. For example, in sample S1 (Fig. 2a), just at the end of the tubular furnace, the morphology of the
N-CSTNs is formed by aggregates or chains that are extremely curved and apparently constructed from individ-
ual enormous spherical nanoparticles made of graphite material with large diameters of approximately 600 nm,
also shown in Fig. SI-2a. In sample S2 (Fig. 2b), graphite spherical nanoparticle aggregates are present in smaller
quantities and zigzagged-corrugated carbon nanotubes with diameters of approximately 50 nm appear, as shown
in Fig. SI-2b. For the hottest zone (the center part of the tubular furnace), seen in sample S3 (Fig. 2c), the amount

Scientific REPOrTS | (2018) 8:2983 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-20079-9 3

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Figure 2.  SEM images of samples produced at 1020 °C with 40 min of growth. The images correspond to
the different furnace zones: S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, and S6 (see Fig. 1). Note that depending on the furnace zone,
the collected material exhibits different morphologies and sizes in the carbon structures. The hottest zones
correspond to zones 3 and 4. High magnification images can be seen in Fig. SI-1.

of coalesced graphite spherical nanoparticles almost disappears, and zigzagged-corrugated carbon nanotubes
and robust long carbon fibers (LCFs) with diameters of approximately 400 nm emerge, as shown in Fig. SI-2c.
The largest amount of spongy material was found in samples rich in LCFs. Therefore, we believe that LCFs are
the most important component of the N-CSTNs. Figure 2d shows the different morphologies found in sample
S4. The LCFs are more frequently observed, but with slightly reduced diameters. These LCFs are accompanied by
carbon tubular structures with small diameters and zigzagged-corrugated carbon nanotubes that are distributed
throughout the entirety of sample S4 (Fig. SI-2d). In sample S5, there are also LCFs with small and large diam-
eters and graphite nanoribbons (Fig. 1e). The graphite nanoribbons can be seen in Fig. SI-2e. In addition to the
morphologies found in sample S5, sample S6 contains wavy carbon nanotubes (Fig. 1f and Fig. SI-2f). Most of the
N-CSTN samples are concentrated in sample S3 (46.1 mg), S4 (58.8 mg) and sample S5 (87.8 mg). In general, we
found a strong dependence of the carbon nanostructure morphologies with the growth zone, and the sample with
the highest yield of LCFs material was sample S4. If the gas flow of sprayer B (benzylamine solution) is deceased,
the yield of sample S2 is considerably increased, due to the more abundant material. In contrast, if the gas flow is
increased to 1.4 L/min, the sample with the highest weight is sample S5. The morphology of each of the samples is
similar for the three different flow cases. Figure SI-3 shows the photos of each sample and their respective weight
profiles. We also found that the synthesis temperature plays an important role. Figures SI–(5–9) show the SEM
images of samples produced at 930 °C, 960 °C, and 990 °C. It is clear that with a reduction in the synthesis temper-
ature, other carbon nanostructures can emerge.
Figure 3 depicts the XRD characterization results for N-CSTNs. Figure 3a shows the (002) graphite peak for
all samples. The peak features, such as intensity, angle position, and broadness, are different for all samples. The
peaks are shifted to lower angles than the ones they appear at with graphite. Furthermore, the peaks exhibit an
asymmetric shape, suggesting the presence of at least two different graphite layer materials. To elucidate this
point, we performed a deconvolution analysis using two curves (Gaussian and Lorentz) to study the different
types of layered materials involved in the (002) graphite peak. The lower angle peak is called gamma (γ), whereas
the higher angle peak is called pi (π), an example of which can be seen in Fig. SI-4 for sample S4. In general, the
interlayer distances associated with the gravity center of the γ-peak yields ~3.5 Å, whereas the π-peak yields
~3.4 Å. Note that the interlayer distance in graphite is 3.34 Å. Most graphite materials with an interlayer distance
of ~3.4 Å could be attributed to very well-ordered graphite layers, whereas the interlayer distance of ~3.5 Å could
be attributed to defected graphite or turbostratic graphite layers. The integrated area under the Gaussian curves
provides an estimation of the amount of the two involved different materials corresponding to the γ-peak (turbo-
stratic graphite or defected graphite layers) and the π-peak (ordered graphite layers). An interesting competition
between disordered and ordered graphite layers can be observed for the different samples (see Table SI-1 for
details). Note that in sample S4 where LCFs are abundant, the deconvolution yields that 83% of the sample corre-
sponds to disordered graphite layers. The catalytic materials in the N-CSTNs were determined to be Fe3C, α-Fe,
and γ-Fe phases (Fig. 3b). Sample S6 exhibits a well-defined XRD pattern perfectly showing these phases. Despite
the fact that the XRD patterns for samples S1-S4 are noisy, it is also possible to distinguish the peaks representing
the main planes of the Fe3C, α-Fe, and γ-Fe phases. This fact could mean that the catalytic nanoparticles reduced
their size.

Scientific REPOrTS | (2018) 8:2983 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-20079-9 4

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Figure 3.  XRD patterns of samples collected from inside the furnace, grown at 1020 °C for 40 min. (a) The
C(002) graphitic peak, designated by a vertical line, corresponds to highly oriented graphite. The asymmetric
shape of this peak suggests the presence of at least two types of graphite materials. A deconvolution analysis of
the C(002) plane can be seen in Table SI-1 and explained in the text. (b) XRD signals attributed to Fe3C, α-Fe,
γ-Fe, and graphite.

Gravity Integrated
Sample C1s-XPS center FWHM area %
283.61 0.51 2.5
Fe-carbide
284.56 0.97 68.8
sp2-carbon
S1 285.38 1.02 17.7
sp3-carbon
286.40 1.51 7.4
C-OO-C=O
288.75 3.95 3.9
Fe-carbide 282.75 0.5 0.5
sp2-carbon 284.03 1.23 80.4
S2 sp3-carbon 285.01 0.72 8.3
C-O 285.69 1.15 7.2
O-C=O 286.97 2.95 3.6
Fe-carbide 283.41 0.77 6.1
sp2-carbon 284.17 0.87 58.2
S3 sp3-carbon 284.92 0.88 13.2
C-O 285.68 1.71 12.1
O-C=O 288.56 5.09 10.4
Fe-carbide 283.96 1.04 9.4
sp2-carbon 284.62 0.85 48.9
S4 sp3-carbon 285.28 1.20 29.9
C-O 286.48 1.40 8.3
O-C=O 288.45 3.46 3.5
Fe-carbide 283.58 0.78 5.0
sp2-carbon 284.40 0.91 66.9
S5 sp3-carbon 285.32 0.97 16.8
C-O 286.40 0.97 4.5
O-C=O 288.29 4.23 6.8
Fe-carbide 283.12 0.40 1.7
sp2-carbon 284.12 1.03 69.5
S6 sp3-carbon 285.12 0.87 13.2
C-O 286.05 1.25 7.5
O-C=O 288.42 4.22 8.1

Table 1.  Deconvolution analysis data for the C1s spectrum. Results for samples S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, and S6. The
sp3 signal could be attributed to the presence of organic ether (R-O-R) and organic ester (RCOO-R) groups
attached to the surface of N-CSTNs.

Figure 4 shows TEM images corresponding to sample S4. Fiber sponges, junctions, zigzagged, helical and
wavy nanotubes can be observed in Fig. 4a. For example, a magnification of a wave carbon fiber is shown in
Fig. 4b, where it is possible to observe the larger internal diameter and internal bamboo-shaped compartments.
Due to the large diameter, it is possible that these carbon fibers collapsed to form graphite nanoribbons. A large
diameter carbon fiber with attached large metal nanoparticles surrounded by graphite materials is depicted in
Fig. 4c. These nanoparticles could act as a catalyst to start the growth of new carbon fibers, thus producing the

Scientific REPOrTS | (2018) 8:2983 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-20079-9 5

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Figure 4.  TEM images of a sample synthesized at 1020 °C for 40 min. The sample was obtained from the
S4 zone. (a) Junctions formed from carbon nanotubes. (b) Graphitic nanoribbons with rolled-up edges. (c)
Carbon nanotubes with anchored metal nanoparticles. (d), (e), and (f) close-up images of carbon nanotubes.
(g) and (h) HRTEM images of metal nanoparticles inside carbon nanotubes. (i) FFT refinement from the
enclosed area shown in (h). The determined interlayer distance corresponds to 2.06 Å, which is attributed to the
crystallographic plane (−1 1 1) of α-Fe.

branches observed in N-CSTNs. Figure 4(d–e) shows a very small material anchored to its surface and several
black spots distributed alongside the nanotube. The internal tubular hole of these types of nanotubes does not
present a bamboo shape. Figure 4f illustrates three types of carbon structures: i) the structure of a zigzagged
nanotube with several metal nanoparticles inside, ii) a straight few-layer carbon nanotube with a large metal
nanoparticle at the tip, and iii) a carbon fiber joined to a metal nanoparticle. Figure 5(g–h) shows a high mag-
nification image of the elongated nanoparticle found at the tip of the carbon nanotube. This nanoparticle is not
monocrystalline (Fig. 5h). It was not possible to define unique zone axes for this nanoparticle. The inset in Fig. 5h
shows the corresponding fast Fourier transformation (FFT). Through an image refinement process employing the
inverse fast Fourier transformation (IFFT), the interlayer distance (Fig. 5i) was determined to be 2.06 Å, which
corresponds to the plane (−1 1 1) of α-Fe.
Figure 5 shows TEM and HRTEM images of a carbon fiber found in sample S4. Figure 5a displays the TEM
image of the core-shell carbon fiber with its innermost ordered graphite layers surrounded by disordered outer-
most graphite layers. Another type of carbon structure found in the N-CSTNs is the graphite nanoribbons, which
are also present in Fig. 5a (lower left). At this magnification, this carbon material shows several defects, likely
due to the nitrogen doping and embedded Fe, Fe3C-nanoparticles, or due to small Fe clusters intercalated in the
graphite layers. Figure 5b displays well-aligned innermost graphite layers (high degree of graphitization) and a
large shell composed of not-well-layered carbon material (Fig. 5c). The diameter of the internal carbon nanotubes
is approximately 60 nm and contains around 30 carbon layers (Fig. 5d). Additional HRTEM images showing the
disordered outermost graphite layers can be seen in Fig. SI-10.

Scientific REPOrTS | (2018) 8:2983 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-20079-9 6

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Figure 5.  HRTEM images of the samples synthesized at 1020 °C and grown for 40 min. The sample was
obtained from zone S4. (a) Typical samples found in the N-CSTN materials, which consist of N-MWCNTs with
a high graphitization surrounded by graphite layers with a poor graphitization (coaxial-like carbon fibers). (b)
Image showing the innermost layers. (c) Image showing the outermost layers. (d) Image showing the interlayer
distance between the carbon layers.

Figure 6 exhibits a typical XPS survey spectrum of N-CSTNs and their respective C1s, N1s and O1s in
high-resolution spectra along with the deconvolution. The sample in question is S4, which is one of the sam-
ples that presents a macroscopic spongy appearance. Deconvolutions were performed considering the chem-
ical species O-C=O 3.5% (288.4 eV), C-O 8.3% (286.4 eV), C-C 29.9% (285.2 eV), C=C 48.9% (284.6 eV) and
Fe3C, iron carbide 9.4% (283.9 eV) for C1s (Fig. 6b). In the case of N1s (Fig. 6c), the chemical species were
N-O nitrogen-oxygen (402 eV), N-quaternary (401 eV), N-pyrrolic (400.3 eV) and N-pyridinic (398.6 eV).
High-resolution spectrum of O1s (Fig. 6d) was built using O-C=O 40.7% (533.6 eV), C-O 52.7% (532.3 eV),
and Fe2O3 iron oxide 6.6% (531 eV) chemical bonding. Similar considerations were employed to study the other
samples.
Figure 7 shows a comparison of the XPS analysis of the six samples. The gravity center and the broadness of the
peaks of C1s, N1s, and O1s core-level X-ray photoelectron spectra depend on the sample type. For example, in the
C1s spectrum, samples S1, S4, and S5 contain a high amount of sp3 carbons (~285 eV), shown in Fig. 7a. In these
cases, the samples contain robust structures with large diameters (Fig. 2a,d and e). Samples S1, S2, and S6 seem to
exhibit more sp2 carbons when compared to graphite material. The deconvolution data can be seen in Tables 1–3
showing the gravity center, full width at half maximum (FWHM) and the integrated area (%). The integrated area
provides an estimation of the degree of hybridization and functionalization of the sample58. The results revealed
that samples S2 and S6 present the highest degrees of sp2 hybridization with measurements of approximately
80.4% and 69.5%, respectively (Table 1). Conversely, samples S3 and S4, revealed the lowest sp2 concentration
with 58.2% and 48.9%, respectively. The deteriorating contribution of the graphite material was due to the incre-
ment of the sp3 hybridization reaching up to ~29.9% in sample S4. It is worth mentioning that samples S3, S4, and
S5 are formed mainly by LCFs, with S4 being the sample that mostly contains LCFs. The deconvolution analysis
showed that the carbon atom may be joined to oxygen atoms via single and double bonds (C-O, O-C=O). These
are probably part of ether and ester groups (~286 eV), carboxyl groups (~288 eV) and less influenced by carbonyl
groups (~287 eV), and these signals of single and double bonds were remarkable in sample S3. The presence of

Scientific REPOrTS | (2018) 8:2983 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-20079-9 7

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Figure 6. (a) Survey XPS spectrum of sample S4 with the peaks related to C1s, N1s and O1s; (b) high-
resolution C 1s peak, (c) high-resolution N 1s peak, and (d) high-resolution O1s peak.

Figure 7.  X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis results for N-CSTNs. (a) The C1s line scan shows
a sp2-hybridized C signal and a broad shoulder containing a signal coming from oxygenated carbon groups
and C−O groups. (b) The N1s line scan exhibits a broad N signal, which could be composed by quaternary N
(401.2–402.2 eV), pyrrolic N (399.8–401.2 eV), and pyridinic N (398.1–399.8 eV). (c) The O1s line scans show
the presence of an ether C-O bond.

Scientific REPOrTS | (2018) 8:2983 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-20079-9 8

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Gravity Integrated
Sample N1s-XPS center FWHM area %
Pyrrolic-N 400.60 1.84 67.5
S1
Pyridinic-N 399.04 1.72 32.5
Quaternary-N 401.19 0.60 9.5
S2 Pyrrolic-N 400.31 0.90 75.2
Pyridinic-N 399.32 0.48 15.3
Quaternary-N 401.83 0.59 3.3
S3 Pyrrolic-N 400.31 1.82 66.5
Pyridinic-N 398.47 1.57 30.1
N-O 402.75 0.91 13.3
S4 Quaternary-N 401.84 0.92 18.6
Pyrrolic-N 400.67 1.21 68.1
N-O 403.37 0.89 12.1
Quaternary-N 402.24 1.32 25.6
S5
Pyrrolic-N 400.96 1.20 48.5
Pyridinic-N 399.76 0.95 13.8
N-O 402.65 1.40 31.4
Quaternary-N 401.20 0.51 16.5
S6
Pyrrolic-N 400.45 0.95 43.3
Pyridinic-N 399.53 0.60 8.8

Table 2.  Deconvolution analysis data for the N1s spectrum. Results for samples S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, and S6. The
following ranges of binding energy were considered for the peak assignation. Quaternary-N: 401.2–402.2 eV,
pyrrolic-N (399.8–401.2 eV), and pyridinic-N: 398.1–399.8 eV. Samples S4, S5, and S6 exhibit a signal around
403 eV, which is attributed to N-O bonds.

Gravity Integrated
Sample O1s-XPS center FWHM area %
FeOOH 530.69 0.76 4.4
S1 C-O 532.18 1.41 61.5
C=O 533.44 1.72 34.1
FeOOH 530.79 1.93 14.2
S2 C-O 531.97 1.28 71.2
C=O 532.96 1.29 14.7
FeOOH 530.64 1.28 13.3
S3 C-O 532.15 1.20 20.3
C=O 533.59 1.49 66.4
FeOOH 531.04 0.94 6.6
S4 C-O 532.32 1.45 52.7
C=O 533.61 1.44 40.7
C-O 532.12 1.66 59.8
S5
C=O 533.50 1.89 40.2
C-O 532.01 1.78 71.3
S6
C=O 533.48 1.37 28.7

Table 3.  Deconvolution analysis data for the O1s spectrum. Results for samples S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, and S6. The
C-O bonds may be attributed to the presence of ethoxy or hydroxyl groups. The presence of the C=O bond
signal suggests the presence of ester, carbonyl, or carboxyl groups.

the Fe-C signal from iron-carbide materials was clearly detected for samples S3, S4 and S5, reaching up to 9.4%
of the material. This fact was also confirmed by the XRD results. Figure 7b depicts the XPS result for the nitrogen
spectra. The main peak was found around the binding energy of 401.5 eV where the nitrogen can be incorporated
into the graphite lattice in quaternary, pyrrolic, and pyridinic chemical bonding states. The N1s spectra in all
cases demonstrated that nitrogen is mainly incorporated into the sample in a pyrrolic fashion. The results of the
deconvolution analysis are listed in Table 2. The highest contribution of pyrrolic nitrogen was found in samples
S1, S2 and S4 with percentages of approximately 67.5%, 75.2% and 68.1%, respectively. Regarding samples S5 and
S6, the three types of N-doping are competitive. The estimated percentages shown in Table 2 are correlated to the
sample morphology. For example, samples S1, S2 and S3 exhibit a great amount of zigzagged carbon fibers, which
could contain higher concentrations of pyrrolic nitrogen, whereas sample S4 is formed mainly by robust wavy
and straight carbon nanotubes, which could contain higher concentrations of quaternary nitrogen. XPS results
for the O1s spectra are shown in Fig. 7c, revealing that the width and position of the main peak depend on the
type of sample. Samples S1, S2, S3, and S6 present a shift towards the organic C-O binding energy, whereas sam-
ples S4 and S5 exhibit broad peaks shifted towards organic C=O/COO− binding energies. The presence of metal
FeOOH (530.5 eV) can be detected in almost all of the samples (samples S1 to S4). The deconvolution analysis
data for the O1s peak can be seen in Table 3. Based on the XPS results, the super hydrophobicity of the N-CSTNs
could be related to the presence of organic C-O and C=O functionalities associated with ether and ester groups,
respectively60,61, where a steric impediment is generated as a consequence of the incorporation of these types of
functional groups to the defected carbon fiber surface. We found that the hydrophobicity in samples S4 and S5 is

Scientific REPOrTS | (2018) 8:2983 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-20079-9 9

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Figure 8.  Thermogravimetric analysis of N-CSTNs. The onset temperatures displayed by the N-CSTNs are
similar to those found in carbon nanotubes. The residual or remaining material at the high temperature limit
is larger for samples collected close to the entrance of the reactor. XRD characterizations have shown that the
residual contains different iron oxide materials. This result suggests that the ferrocene used as a precursor in the
CVD experiment is mainly decomposed close to the entrance of the reactor.

Figure 9.  Raman spectra from different synthesized samples using 532 nm (1.958 eV) laser as an excitation
source. The D- and G-bands at 1354 cm1 and 1597 cm1, respectively, for graphite are indicated by the vertical
line. The ratio of the intensity of the D- Raman peak to the G- Raman peak (ID/IG) is indicated for each sample.
The non-null value of the ID/IG ratio indicates the presence of defects in the graphite layers.

due mainly to ester compounds, probably in acetate groups, whereas in samples S1, S2, and S3, it is due to ether
groups, probably in an ethoxy radical, and in both cases, oxygen atoms are bonded to the carbon surface.
TGA results for samples S2, S3, S4, and S5 are shown in Fig. 8. The oxidation temperatures are around 620 °C,
which is higher than that of typical carbon nanotubes (~520 °C)44. In general, at the beginning of the oxidation
process, the samples start to lose weight slowly (3–5%) during the first 500 °C. This behavior could be due to the

Scientific REPOrTS | (2018) 8:2983 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-20079-9 10

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Figure 10.  Absorption capacity for different oils/solvents measured from N-CSTNs. (A) direct relation between
the solvent density and the absorption capacity is observed. Sample S3 yields the maximum absorption capacity
above the 25% weight (with ethylene glycol).

decomposition of functional groups and amorphous carbon oxidation. All analyzed samples are degraded almost
entirely in the range of 590 °C to 650 °C, and after this decrement, non-appreciable changes in the TGA curve
were observed. The amount of residual material increases proportionally as the sample is collected close to the
furnace entrance. For example, in sample S2 (far from the reactor entrance), the residual is ~2%, whereas in sam-
ple S5 (close to the reactor entrance), the residual is ~5%. This trend is consistent with the XRD characterization,
where narrow peak signals related to Fe- or Fe3C-nanoparticles are easily observed in samples collected close to
the furnace entrance (samples S4, S5, and S6). This fact indicates the large sizes of the nanoparticles containing Fe.
Raman spectroscopy characterizations revealed that N-CSTNs exhibit the typical D and G bands of graphitic
materials (Fig. 9). The D-Raman band is related to defects in the graphite materials (edges, vacancies, N-doping),
whereas the G-Raman peak is attributed to ordered graphite. The ratio of the intensity of the D-Raman peak to
the G-Raman peak (ID/IG) is indicated for each sample. Values of ID/lG < 1 indicate that the N-CSTNs are formed
mainly by ordered graphite. The highest value of ID/IG was found for sample S4. This fact is concomitant with the
XPS results, where the concentration of the carbon sp3 hybridization of sample S4 is higher. We have also found
that samples S3, S5, and S6 exhibit a downshift in the G-Raman peak. This downshift may be associated with the
innermost and outermost layers of the LCFs. Also the emergent downshift could be due to the presence of nitro-
gen doping in the graphite layer, as confirmed by XPS analysis.
All samples exhibited a super hydrophobic behavior similar to other reported carbon sponges7,31. However, the
origin of the super hydrophobicity in carbon sponges is far from clear. We propose a possible origin of the super
hydrophobicity based on our XPS results. The nature of the C-O and C=O bonds is important. It is unlikely that
the C-O bonds are associated with phenolic groups (hydrophilic) since the samples are hydrophobic. Then, C-O
bonds may be attributed to hydrophobic groups such as epoxy groups or parts of ethoxy groups. On the other
hand, C=O bonds could not be attributed to carbonyl or carboxyl groups, since these are hydrophilic. It is likely
that C=O bonds are contained in ester groups. The ester and ethoxy groups attached to the N-CSTNs could create
a steric impediment where all of the surface charges are homogeneously distributed on the N-CSTNs and promote
a superhydrophobic behavior. The hydrophobicity in sample S3 could be mainly due to ester groups, whereas in
samples S1, S2, S4, S5, and S6, the hydrophobicity is probably due to the existence of ethoxy groups (Table 3). The
absorption capacity of the N-CSTNs was also tested on different oil/solvents, shown in Fig. 10. The test was carried
out for gasoline, diesel, pump-oil, vegetable oil, and ethylene-glycol. It was found that sample S3 absorbed 25 times
its own weight for the ethylene-glycol and approximately 15 times its own weight for all other considered solvents.

Discussion
N-CSTNs present different morphologies depending on the zone where they were extracted. It seems that the
main morphology is LCFs that are composed of two types of materials, namely, one is a high crystalline core

Scientific REPOrTS | (2018) 8:2983 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-20079-9 11

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

carbon nanotube and the other is composed of thick shell disordered graphite layers, which wrap the crystalline
carbon nanotubes. Unlike carbon sponges synthesized with a single sprayer56, the spongy materials synthesized
using the two-sprayer approach exhibit a less-thick disordered carbon shell with a high graphitization of graphite
layers of the core carbon fiber (see samples S3–S5 in Fig. 2). Another significant difference is the appearance of a
high percentage of pyrrolic-N in the N-CSTNs. This pyrrolic-N doping could live in the outermost graphite layers
of the carbon fibers. An exception is found only in sample S4, where the quaternary-N is more abundant (57.7%).
Conversely, in carbon sponges synthesized with a single sprayer, sample S4 contains mainly quaternary-N. Also,
in the single-sprayer approach, the pyrrolic-N and pyridinic-N are competitive, which is also the case in sample
S2, but in sample S1, the competition is between pyrrolic-N and quaternary-N56. In general, the two-sprayer
approach promotes long carbon fibers with different diameters, zigzagged carbon fibers, and graphite ribbons. We
found that carbon sponges fabricated using the two-sprayer approach are more thermally stable than those syn-
thesized with a single sprayer. The oxidative temperatures derived from the TGA yielded 620 °C and 610–670 °C
for the double- and single-sprayer approaches, respectively. The absorption capacity of N-CSTNs considerably
decreased with respect to the absorption reported in Ref.56. This fact could be associated with the existence of
organic ethoxy and ester groups on the N-CSTN surface that avoid the absorption of different oil/solvents.

Conclusions
We have synthesized CSTNs using a two-sprayer approach in an AACVD method. The CSTNs were classified
according to where they grow inside the reactor. We demonstrated that the two-sprayer approach promotes the
growth of coaxial carbon fibers, zigzagged carbon fibers, and graphite nanoribbons close to the reactor entrance.
XPS revealed that all of these structures are doped with nitrogen. Furthermore, the diameter of the carbon fib-
ers increased for samples synthesized far from the reactor entrance. The best sponges were found in the hottest
zone of the reactor (sample S4). These are formed mainly by coaxial long carbon fibers, 300 nm in diameter. A
deconvolution analysis of the (002) peak provided two different peaks associated with the 3.4 Å and 3.5 Å inter-
layer distances. It was also found that the sample formed mostly of coaxial carbon nanotubes contains 83% of
the expanded graphite material and has an appreciable amount of pyrrolic nitrogen. The absorption properties
of one sample were tested with oil and solvents, reaching an absorption capacity of 25 times its own weight. The
N-CSTNs were shown to be super hydrophobic, similar to sponges fabricated with a single sprayer. This study
provides important information on carbon sponges classified inside the reactor. For instance, if one requires a
carbon sponge rich in N-pyrrolic for a specific application, samples collected from sample S4 are recommended.

References
1. Iijima, S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354(6348), 56–58 (1991).
2. Futaba, D. N. et al. Shape-engineerable and highly densely packed single-walled carbon nanotubes and their application as super-
capacitor electrodes. Nature Materials 5, 987–994 (2006).
3. Dasgupta, A., Rajukumar, L. P., Rotella, C., Leib, Y. & Terrones, M. Covalent three-dimensional networks of graphene and carbon
nanotubes: synthesis and environmental applications. Nano Today 12, 116–135 (2017).
4. Romo-Herrera, J. M., Terrones, M., Terrones, H., Dag, S. & Meunier, V. Covalent 2D and 3D Networks from 1D: Nanostructures:
Designing New Materials. Nano Letters 7(3), 570–576 (2007).
5. Elías, A. L. et al. Chapter 17 - Three-dimensional Nanotube Networks and a New Horizon of Applications. Nanotube Superfiber
Materials, edited by Mark J. Schulz, Vesselin N. Shanov and Zhangzhang Yin, William Andrew Publishing, Boston, Pages 457–493,
(2014).
6. Cheng, X. et al. Three-dimensional α-Fe2O3/carbon nanotube sponges as flexible supercapacitor electrodes. Journal of Materials
Chemistry A 3, 20927–20934 (2015).
7. Gui, X. et al. Carbon nanotube sponges. Advanced Materials 22, 617–621 (2010).
8. He, S., Hou, H. & Chen, W. 3D porous and ultralight carbon hybrid nanostructure fabricated from carbon foam covered by
monolayer of nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes for high performance supercapacitors. Journal of Power Sources 280, 678–686
(2015).
9. Sharifi, T. et al. Hierarchical self-assembled structures based on nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes as advanced negative electrodes
for Li-ion batteries and 3D microbatteries. Journal of Power Sources 279, 581–592 (2015).
10. Li, H., Wang, Z., Chen, L. & Huang, X. Research on Advanced Materials for Li-ion Batteries. Advanced Materials 21, 4593–4607
(2009).
11. Shen, Y. et al. A high-capacity lithium–air battery with Pd modified carbon nanotube sponge cathode working in regular air. Carbon
62, 288–295 (2013).
12. Ke, Q. et al. 3D Nanostructure of Carbon Nanotubes Decorated Co3O4 Nanowire Arrays for High Performance Supercapacitor
Electrode. Electrochimica Acta 163, 9–15 (2015).
13. Crespo, M. et al. Ultra-light carbon nanotube sponge as an efficient electromagnetic shielding material in the GHz range. Physica
Status Solidi Rapid Research Letters 8(8), 698–704 (2014).
14. Ge, X. et al. Flexible carbon nanofiber sponges for highly efficient and recyclable oil absorption. RCS Advances 5, 70025–70031
(2015).
15. Gui, X. et al. Recyclable carbon nanotube sponges for oil absorption. Acta Materialia 59(12), 4798–4804 (2011).
16. Stolz, A. et al. Melamine-derived carbon sponges for oil-water separation. Carbon 107, 198–208 (2016).
17. Qiu, S. et al. Hydrophobic and fire-resistant carbon monolith from melamine sponge: A recyclable sorbent for oil–water separation.
Carbon 84, 551–559 (2015).
18. Li, H. et al. Carbon nanotube sponge filters for trapping nanoparticles and dye molecules from water. Chemical Communications
46(42), 7966–7968 (2010).
19. Wang, L., Wang, X., Zhou, J. B. & Zhao, R. S. Carbon nanotube sponges as a solid-phase extraction adsorbent for the enrichment and
determination of polychlorinated biphenyls at trace levels in environmental waters samples. Talanta 160, 79–85 (2016).
20. Santangelo, S. et al. Micro-Raman Analysis of Three-Dimensional Macroporous Sponge-Like Network of Carbon Nanotubes under
Tension. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 118, 13912–13919 (2014).
21. Zhao, W. et al. Hyperelasticity of three-dimensional carbon nanotube sponge controlled by the stiffness of covalent junctions.
Carbon 95, 640–645 (2015).
22. Aliev, A. E. et al. Giant-stroke, super elastic carbon nanotube aerogel muscles. Science 323(5921), 1575–1578 (2009).
23. Dai, Z. et al. Three-dimensional Sponges with Super Mechanical Stability: Harnessing True Elasticity of Individual Carbon
Nanotubes in Macroscopic Architectures. Scientific Reports 6, 18930 (2016).

Scientific REPOrTS | (2018) 8:2983 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-20079-9 12

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

24. Correa-Duarte, M. A. et al. Fabrication and biocompatibility of carbon nanotube-based 3D networks as scaffolds for cell seeding and
growth. Nano Letters 4(11), 2233–2236 (2004).
25. Erbay, C. et al. Three-dimensional porous carbon nanotube sponges for high-performance anodes of microbial fuel cells material.
Journal of Power Sources 298, 177–183 (2015).
26. Wang, H. et al. Sponge-like carbon containing nitrogen and iron provides a non-precious oxygen reduction catalyst. Journal of Solid
State Electrochemistry 19(4), 1181–1186 (2015).
27. Yang, L. et al. Exposing residual catalyst in a carbon nanotube sponge. RSC Advances 6, 45103–45111 (2016).
28. Barborini, E., Piseri, P. & Milania, P. Negatively curved spongy carbon. Applied Physics Letters 81(18), 3359–3361 (2002).
29. Shan, C. et al. Three-Dimensional Nitrogen-Doped Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Sponges with Tunable Properties. Nano Letters 13,
5514–5520 (2013).
30. Cassell, A. M. et al. Carbon nanotube networks by chemical vapor deposition. Applied Physics Letters 82(5), 817–819 (2003).
31. Hashim, D. P. et al. Covalently bonded three-dimensional carbon nanotube solids via boron induced nanojunctions. Scientific
Reports 2(363), (2012).
32. Yu, H., Li, Z., Luo, G. & Wei, F. Growth of branch carbon nanotubes on carbon nanotubes as support. Diamond and Related Materials
15(9), 1447–1451 (2006).
33. El Mel, A. A. et al. Hierarchical carbon nanostructure design: ultra-long carbon nanofibers decorated with carbon nanotubes.
Nanotechnology 22, (2011) 435302 (7pp).
34. Sun, X., Li, R., Stansfield, B., Dodelet, J. P. & Desilets, S. 3D carbon nanotube network based on a hierarchical structure grown on
carbon paper backing. Chemical Physics Letters 394, 266–270 (2004).
35. Meng, G., Jung, Y. J., Cao, A., Vajtai, R. & Ajayan, P. M. Controlled fabrication of hierarchically branched nanopores, nanotubes, and
nanowires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102(20), 7074–7078 (2005).
36. Li, W. Z. et al. Large-scale synthesis of aligned carbon nanotubes. Science 274(5293), 1701–1703 (1996).
37. Rodriguez-Manzo, J. A., Wang, M. S., Banhart, F., Bando, Y. & Golberg, D. Multibranched junctions of carbon nanotubes via cobalt
particles. Advanced Materials 21(44), 4477–4482 (2009).
38. Terrones, M. et al. Molecular junctions by joining single-walled carbon nanotubes. Physical Review Letters 89(7), (2002) 075505 (4pp).
39. Xue, Y. et al. A Switchable and Compressible Carbon Nanotube Sponge Electrocapillary Imbiber. Advanced Materials 27, 7241–7246
(2015).
40. Liu, Q., Liu, W., Cui, Z. M., Song, W. G. & Wan, L. J. Synthesis and characterization of 3D double branched K junction carbon
nanotubes and nanorods. Carbon 45, 268–273 (2007).
41. Liu, X. Y. & Huang, B. C. Coville. The influence of synthesis parameters on the production of multiwalled carbon nanotubes by the
ferrocene catalyzed pyrolysis of toluene. Fullerenes, Nanotubes, and Carbon Nanostructures 10(4), 339–352 (2002).
42. Jang, J. W., Lee, C. E., Lyu, S. C., Lee, T. J. & Lee, C. J. Structural study of nitrogen-doping effects in bamboo-shaped multiwalled
carbon nanotubes. Applied Physics Letters 84(15), 2877–2879 (2004).
43. Koós, A. A., Dillon, F., Obraztsova, E. A., Crossley, A. & Grobert, N. Comparison of structural changes in nitrogen and boron-doped
multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 48, 3033–3041 (2010).
44. Cruz-Silva, E. et al. Heterodoped Nanotubes: Theory, Synthesis and Characterization of Phosphorus-Nitrogen Doped Multiwalled
Carbon Nanotubes. ACS Nano 2(3), 441–448 (2008).
45. Botello-Méndez, A. et al. Controlling the dimensions, reactivity and crystallinity of multiwalled carbon nanotubes using low ethanol
concentrations. Chemical Physics Letters 453, 55–61 (2008).
46. Liang, C., Dudney, N. J. & Howe, J. Y. Hierarchically Structured Sulfur/Carbon Nanocomposite Material for High-Energy Lithium
Battery. Chemistry of Materials 21(19), 4724–4730 (2009).
47. Kato, T., Kusakabe, S. & Morooka, S. Effect of sulfur on formation of vapor-grown carbon-fiber. Journal of Materials Science Letters
13(5), 374–377 (1994).
48. Satishkumar, B. C., Thomas, P. J., Govindaraj, A. & Rao, C. N. R. Y-junction carbon nanotubes. Applied Physics Letters 77(16),
2530–2532 (2000).
49. Deepak, F. L., John, N. S., Govindaraj, A., Kulkarni, G. U. & Rao, C. N. R. Nature and electronic properties of Y-junctions in CNTs
and N-doped CNTs obtained by the pyrolysis of organometallic precursors. Chemical Physics Letters 411, 468–473 (2005).
50. Vallés, C. et al. Towards helical and Y-shaped carbon nanotubes: the role of sulfur in CVD processes. Nanotechnology 17, 4292–4299 (2006).
51. Romo-Herrera, J. M. et al. An atomistic branching mechanism for carbon nanotubes: sulfur as the triggering agent. Angewandte
Chemie International Edition 47(16), 2948–2953 (2008).
52. Romo-Herrera, J. M. et al. The role of sulfur in the synthesis of novel carbon morphologies: from covalent Y-junctions to sea-urchin-
like structures. Advanced Functional Materials 19(8), 1193–1199 (2009).
53. Wei, J. et al. The effect of sulfur on the number of layers in a carbon nanotube. Carbon 45, 2152–2158 (2007).
54. Zhao, W. et al. Controllable and Predictable Viscoelastic Behavior of 3D Boron-Doped Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Sponges.
Particle & Particle Systems Characterization 33, 21–26 (2016).
55. Terrones, M. et al. Pure and doped boron nitride nanotubes. Materials Today 10(5), 30–38 (2007).
56. Muñoz-Sandoval, E. et al. Carbon sponge-type nanostructures based on coaxial nitrogen-doped multiwalled carbon nanotubes
grown by CVD using benzylamine as precursor. Carbon 115, 409–421 (2017).
57. Hernández-Ferrer, J. et al. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes/graphene nanoribbons hybrid materials with superior electrochemical
performance. Electrochemistry Communications 39, 26–29 (2014).
58. Yang, M. et al. Leaf-like carbon nanotube-graphene nanoribbon hybrid reinforcements for enhanced load transfer in copper matrix
composites. Scripta Materialia 138, 17–21 (2017).
59. Campos-Delgado, J. et al. Bulk Production of a New Form of sp2 Carbon: Crystalline Graphene Nanoribbons. Nano Letters 8(9),
2773–2778 (2008).
60. Terrones, M. et al. Graphene and graphite nanoribbons: morphology, properties, synthesis, defects and applications. Nano Today
5(4), 351–372 (2010).
61. Guerrero-Bermea, C. et al. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional hybrid assemblies based on graphene oxide and other layered
structures: A carbon science perspective. Carbon 125, 437–453 (2017).

Acknowledgements
JAEB thanks CONACYT for a scholarship from the CB-2013-220744 (EMS) grant. EMS thanks CONACYT for
grant CB-2013-220744. We thank LINAN and IPICYT for the characterization facilities. Also, we thank M.C.
Beatriz A. Rivera-Escoto, M.C. Ana Iris Peña-Maldonado, Dr. Gladis J. Labrada-Delgado, and Dr. Héctor G. Silva-
Pereyra for their technical assistance.

Author Contributions
E.M.S. performed the synthesis of the carbon sponges; J.L.F.D. performed and discussed the X.P.S., S.E.M. and
T.E.M. characterizations; R.S.S. performed the X.R.D. analysis; A.J.C.L. performed the T.G.A. and absorption
measurements; and F.L.U. and E.M.S. supervised the research, discussed the results and wrote the manuscript.

Scientific REPOrTS | (2018) 8:2983 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-20079-9 13

www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Additional Information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20079-9.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or
format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Cre-
ative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the
material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not per-
mitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the
copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

© The Author(s) 2018

Scientific REPOrTS | (2018) 8:2983 | DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-20079-9 14