Chapter 1B - I-LEARN
Chapter 1B - I-LEARN
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
Materials
Ferrous Thermoplastics
Elastomers
1
26/2/2020
Materials
Metals
Family
Ferrous
Sub-family
Cast iron
Carbon steel
Alloy steel Classes
Stainless steel
METALS
METALS
Ferrous Non-ferrous
aluminum
cast iron
brass
carbon steel
bronze
alloy steel
copper
stainless steel
lead
magnesium
nickel
tin
titanium
tungsten
zinc
4
2
26/2/2020
POLYMER
POLYMERS
POLYMERS
3
26/2/2020
CERAMICS
Strong in compression, weak in tension, brittle, stiff, electrically and
thermally insulating, not impact-resistant, medium weight, very
temperature tolerant, very hard, corrosion-resistant
Ceramic
alumina
beryllia
diamond
magnesia
silicon carbide
silicon nitride
zirconia
SILICON CARBIDE
• excellent corrosion resistant
• low density
• resistant to high temperatures
• high electrical resistance
• high hardness
• low tensile strength
• low toughness difficult to shape
• products: electrical insulators, cutting tools, grinding wheel
4
26/2/2020
COMPOSITES
Stiff, strong, light, non-conducting, moderately corrosion-resistant,
sensitive to temperature
10
5
26/2/2020
11
12
6
26/2/2020
Metals
13
13
Ceramics
14
14
7
26/2/2020
Polymers
15
15
Composites
16
16
8
26/2/2020
Semiconductors
Micro-Electrical-
Mechanical Systems
(MEMS)
17
17
18
9
26/2/2020
19
Material Selection
20
10
26/2/2020
Material Selection
How do you decide on a specific material for your application ?
21
21
22
11
26/2/2020
FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES
23
FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES
24
12
26/2/2020
25
26
13
26/2/2020
27
28
14
26/2/2020
29
30
15
26/2/2020
31
32
16
26/2/2020
• MATERIALS SELECTION
• MATERIALS ARE SELECTED FOR APPLICATIONS BASED UPON
• Cost of part (piece price)
• Material cost accounts for 50% to 90% of total part cost
• Mechanical properties
• stiffer materials for load bearing applications (tensile modulus)
• stronger materials for impact and bending applications
• electrical and thermal properties
• Shape
• forming a material to a particular shape limits material selection
• Appearance
• paintability, shininess, texture, smell, etc.
33
34
17
26/2/2020
STATIC STRENGTH
• Material must support ultimate loads without failure. material
must support limit loads without permanent deformation.
• initial evaluation for each component
• usually aluminum is the initial material selection
• if aluminum cannot support the applied load within the
size limitation of the component, higher strength
materials must be considered (titanium or steel)
• if aluminum is too heavy to meet the performance
requirements, graphite/epoxy or next generation
materials should be considered
35
STIFFNESS
36
18
26/2/2020
37
38
19
26/2/2020
WEIGHT
39
CORROSION
• Surface corrosion
• galvanic corrosion of dissimilar metals
• surface treatments
• proper drainage
• Stress corrosion cracking
• certain alloys are more susceptible to stress corrosion cracking
• especially severe in the short transverse grain direction
40
20
26/2/2020
PRODUCIBILITY
• Commercial availability
• fabrication alternatives
• PM
• machined from plate
• machined from forging
• casting
41
COST
• Raw material cost comparisons
• aluminum plate = $2 - $3 / lb.
• steel plate = $5 - $10 / lb.
• titanium plate = $15 - $25 / lb.
• fiberglass/epoxy prepreg = $15 - $25 / lb.
• graphite/epoxy prepreg = $50 - $100 / lb.
• Detail fabrication costs
• Assembly costs
• Life cycle costs
• cost of weight (loss of payload, increased fuel consumption)
• cost of maintenance
42
21
26/2/2020
SPECIALIZED REQUIREMENTS
• temperature
• lightning and static electricity dissipation
• erosion and abrasion
• marine environment
• impact resistance
43
44
22
26/2/2020
Material Types
45
ALUMINUM
• Aluminum accounts for ~80% of the structural material of most
commercial and military transport aircraft
• Inexpensive and easy to form and machine
• Alloys are tailored to specific needs
• 2000 series alloys (aluminum-copper-magnesium) are medium to high
strength with good fatigue resistance but low stress corrosion cracking
resistance.
• 2024-t3 is the yardstick for fatigue properties
• 5000 and 6000 series alloys are low to medium strength but easily
welded
46
23
26/2/2020
ALUMINUM (CONT.)
47
ALUMINUM TEMPERS
48
24
26/2/2020
49
50
25
26/2/2020
51
TITANIUM
• Better strength to weight ratio than aluminum or steel
• Typically comprises ~5% by weight in commercial aircraft and up to
~25% by weight for high performance military aircraft
• Good corrosion resistance
• Good temperature resistance
• Good fatigue and damage tolerance properties in the annealed
form
• Typical alloy is Ti 6Al-4V either annealed or solution treated and
aged
• High cost for metals
52
26
26/2/2020
STEEL
• Steel may be selected when tensile strengths greater than titanium are
necessary
• Steel is usually limited to a few highly loaded components such as
landing gear
• There are many steel alloys to choose from (see chart); select the one
that is tailored for your application.
53
STEEL (CONT.)
Mil-Hdbk-5 List of Aerospace Steel Alloys:
54
27
26/2/2020
COMPOSITE
• The embedding of small diameter high strength high modulus fibers in a
homogeneous matrix material
• Material is anisotropic (much stronger in the fiber oriented directions)
• Fibers
• graphite (high strength, stiffness)
• fiberglass (fair strength, low cost, secondary structure)
• kevlar (damage tolerant)
• Matrix
• epoxy (primary matrix material) to 250° F
• bismaleimide (high temp applications) to 350° F
55
56
28
26/2/2020
• Aluminum lithium
• Glare (fiberglass reinforced aluminum)
• Tigr (graphite reinforced titanium)
57
29