Scribd
Upload
30 views5 pages

PGP 2019 Computer Assignment

This document is a computer assignment submitted by Group D2 to Prof. Sabyasachi Mukhopadhyay in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the course Statistics for Management. The group members are Supreethi Undi, Ansal V S, Vaibhav Jha, Subhajit Roy, and Deepanshu Singh. The assignment contains 5 solutions analyzing sample data using statistical techniques such as confidence intervals, hypothesis testing using t and F distributions.

Uploaded by

DEEPANSHU SINGH
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
30 views5 pages

PGP 2019 Computer Assignment

This document is a computer assignment submitted by Group D2 to Prof. Sabyasachi Mukhopadhyay in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the course Statistics for Management. The group members are Supreethi Undi, Ansal V S, Vaibhav Jha, Subhajit Roy, and Deepanshu Singh. The assignment contains 5 solutions analyzing sample data using statistical techniques such as confidence intervals, hypothesis testing using t and F distributions.

Uploaded by

DEEPANSHU SINGH
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

PGP 2019 Computer Assignment

A Group project submitted to


Prof. Sabyasachi Mukhopadhyay

In partial fulfilment of the requirements of the course


Statistics for Management

By
Group D2
Supreethi Undi- 1911281
Ansal V S- 1911036
Vaibhav Jha-1911286
Subhajit Roy- 1911264
Deepanshu Singh- 1911076

On
16/09/2019
Sol 1) Sample size, n:10000
Sample mean: 1323095.892
Sample variance: 19470528.71
Interval: 95%
Information regarding population mean and population variance are missing, and the sample
size is greater than 30,
T distribution is being used
t0.025,9999=1.96
Confidence interval for Gross output (2001-2002) has been calculated by the formula as
[1323095.892 ± 1.96 × (19470528.71÷ √10000)]
= [941473.5293, 1704718.255]

Sol 3) x is the random variable that gives value of exports for the year 2001-02
µ is the average value of the exports for the year 2001-02
Here µ0 is the population mean given as 87300
Sample mean: 77854.4463
Sample standard deviation s: 3875181.38
Since, we can observe that the sample mean is less than the population mean, we conduct a
left tailed test,
For Null Hypothesis Ho: µ ≥ 87300
Alternate Hypothesis H1: µ< 87300
Our assumption is that the confidence interval is 95%, α = 0.05,
We do not know the population standard deviation
Hence, t-distribution with sample data is used for testing the hypothesis.
t= -0.2437
p= 0.5963
We do not feel to reject the null hypothesis
For the period of 2001-02, the mean value of exports is proven to be greater than or
equal to 87300
Sol 5) x is the random variable that gives the employee productivity
Let, µm = mean of male employees’ productivity,
µf = mean of female employees’ productivity
We calculate the sample sizes using count function,
The number of firms handled by males (nm) = 9157
The number of firms handled by females (nf) = 843
The mean value of the productivity for the year 2001-02 is the mean value of the GOP
Mean value of productivity of male employees (Xm) = 1395416.03
Mean value of productivity of female employees (Xf) = 537525.902
Standard deviation for males (Sm) = 20218842.1
Standard deviation for females (Sf) = 7477634.27
For the hypothesis testing by F-distribution, we need to test the equality of variances of the
two populations of male and female employee
H0: σ12 = σ22 V/s H1: H1: σ12 ≠ σ22
F (nm-1, nf-1) = Sm2/Sf2
Fcalc(9157,843) = 7.3112
Fcrit(9157, 843) = 1.0893
Since, Fcalc> Fcrit, we reject the null hypothesis,
Hence the alternate hypothesis that the standard deviations are not equal σ1 ≠ σ2
Though we assume σ1 = σ2
The null hypothesis is stating that average productivity of male employees’ is greater than
that of the female employees’ productivity. The alternate hypothesis states that it is less.
H0: µm ≥ µf V/s H1: µm < µf
Now, t-distribution is applied for hypothesis testing as population standard deviation is
unknown
Taking 95% as the confidence level, α=5%
Degrees of freedom, 9189
Tcri = 1.96 Tcal= 2.57528047
Since, Tcal > Tcri, we do not feel to reject the null hypothesis,
Therefore, it is agreed that the male employees’ productivity is greater than that of
female employees
Appendix:

You might also like