0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views18 pages

Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics Lecture 5 - McMaster

This document summarizes lecture material on scattering and connection in the general lossy case, modeling boundaries using the transmission line matrix (TLM) method, and analyzing dispersion in a 2D TLM mesh. Key points include: the scattering matrix is reduced to 5x5 for the lossy case; boundary conditions like magnetic walls have reflection coefficients of 1 while electric walls have -1; the Johns matrix allows modeling wideband absorbing boundary conditions; and dispersion analysis shows the network velocity in TLM matches the wave velocity regardless of frequency.

Uploaded by

Sharan Shastri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views18 pages

Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics Lecture 5 - McMaster

This document summarizes lecture material on scattering and connection in the general lossy case, modeling boundaries using the transmission line matrix (TLM) method, and analyzing dispersion in a 2D TLM mesh. Key points include: the scattering matrix is reduced to 5x5 for the lossy case; boundary conditions like magnetic walls have reflection coefficients of 1 while electric walls have -1; the Johns matrix allows modeling wideband absorbing boundary conditions; and dispersion analysis shows the network velocity in TLM matches the wave velocity regardless of frequency.

Uploaded by

Sharan Shastri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

EE750

Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics


Lecture 5

1
Scattering and Connection (the General Lossy Case)

• Six links exist for the general lossy case


• We, however, do not care about the value of the reflected
impulses on the loss stub (energy is just being absorbed)
• Also, no incident wave appear on the loss stub because it
is matched
• It follows that the scattering matrix can be reduced in
dimension by 1 (S∈R5×5)
• Following a similar approach to that used in the lossless
case we derive the scattering relationship

EE750, 2003, Dr. Mohamed Bakr


2
Scattering and Connection (Cont’d)

V 1r  2 − y 2 2 2 2 yo  V 1i 
 r  2 2 − y 2 2 2  i 
V 2  1  yo  V 2 
V 3r  =  2 2 2− y 2 2 yo  V i3 
 r y   i 
V 4   2 2 2 2− y 2 yo  V 4 
V 5r   2 2 2 2 2 yo − y  V i5 

σ∆l
Where y=4+yo+go , y o = 4.0(ε r − 1) , g o =
C/L

EE750, 2003, Dr. Mohamed Bakr


3
Modeling of Boundaries

• In establishing the equivalence between Maxwell’s


equations and a network of TLM nodes we noted that
node voltage models the electric field and that link
currents model the magnetic field
• It follows that the boundary resistive load represents the
wave impedance
• Lossless nondispersive boundaries include open and short
circuit (magnetic and electric walls, respectively)

EE750, 2003, Dr. Mohamed Bakr


4
Modeling of Boundaries (Cont’d)
• The general expression of the link reflection coefficient
due to a non dispersive load RL is
RL −ηo 2
Γ=
RL + ηo 2

• V
i
For a magnetic wall we have k +1 = V
r
k , link reflection
RL −ηo 2
coefficient is 1, Γ m = Rlim = 1. 0
L → ∞
RL + ηo 2

• V
i
For an electric wall we have k +1 = -V
r
k , link reflection
RL −ηo 2
coefficient is -1, Γ e = Rlim = − 1. 0
L→0 R L + η
o 2

EE750, 2003, Dr. Mohamed Bakr


5
Modeling of Boundaries (Cont’d)
• For a lossy boundary with surface resistance Rs the link
Rs − η o 2
Γ
reflection coefficient s = , V
i
k +1 = Γ V
s k
r

Rs η o
+ 2
• For TEM waves propagating in free space, the wave
impedance is ηo regardless of the wave frequency. It
follows that a wideband Absorbing Boundary Condition
(ABC) has an impulse reflection coefficient
ηo −ηo 2
Γ= = −0.17157, Vki+1 = Γ Vkr
ηo +ηo 2
• For TEM waves propagating in a dielectric with εr , wave
impedance is ηo/ ε r regardless of the wave frequency. It
ηo / εr −η o 2
follows that Γ = , Vki+1 = Γ Vkr
ηo / εr + ηo 2
EE750, 2003, Dr. Mohamed Bakr
6
Modeling of Boundaries (Cont’d)

• For TEno modes in a rectangular waveguide, the wave


impedance above cut-off is real but dispersive. It follows
that an ABC using a real impulse reflection coefficient is
feasible only at one frequency
( )
λ
η o / εr g −η o 2
λ
Γ= , Vki+1 = Γ Vkr
(ηo / εr )
λg
λ
+ηo 2

λg is the guide wavelength and λ is the open medium


• A wideband ABC is obtained in this case using the John’s
matrix
EE750, 2003, Dr. Mohamed Bakr
7
Discrete Time-Domain Green’s Function
EW EW


ABC

EW EW

EW
N
.
.
. EW
2
1
EW
Excite with an impulse at node i and register all impulses
coming out at all links for all time steps
EE750, 2003, Dr. Mohamed Bakr
8
The Johns Matrix
• This matrix is also denoted as the Johns’ matrix
• The Johns matrix is a three-dimensional matrix
• The ith row of this matrix is obtained by exciting an
impulse at the ith node and registering all impulses
coming out at all links for all time steps
• This is repeated for all links, so N TLM analyses are
required
• Sequences of the form g(m,n,k) are being generated. Here
g(m,n,k) is the reflected impulse at the mth node at the kth
time step due to a unit incident impulse at the nth node at
the 0th time step
EE750, 2003, Dr. Mohamed Bakr
9
The Johns’ Matrix (Cont’d)

• Using convolution summation we have


(Vm )k = ∑ ∑ g (m, n, k − k ′) (V in )k ′
N k
r
n =1 k ′ = 0

 g11 (k ) g12 (k ) L g1N (k ) 


 g (k ) . . . 
Alternatively G (k ) =  21 
 . . . . 
 
g N1 ( k ) . . g NN ( k )
k
V ( k ) = ∑ G (k − k ′)V (k ′)
r i
k ′=0

• Johns’ Matrix is utilized in partioning of a large structure


into small substructures and in time-domain modeling of
wideband ABC in non-TEM waveguides
EE750, 2003, Dr. Mohamed Bakr
10
Dispersion in a 2D TLM Mesh

• We first study propagation at 45°

Christos, Transmission Line Modeling (TLM)

EE750, 2003, Dr. Mohamed Bakr


11
Dispersion in a 2D TLM Mesh (Cont’d)

• Exciting ports 1 and 2 by 1V results in V1r = V 2r = 0V and


V 3 = V 4 = 1V. These reflected impulses travel to become
r r

incident on neighboring nodes at the next time step. This


will give V1r = V 2r = 1V and V 3r = V r4 = 0V . It took 2 time
steps to travel a distance of ∆l 2
• The network velocity is
∆l 2 vL
vN = = = vo regardless of frequency
2∆t 2
• It follows that no dispersion appears for this case

EE750, 2003, Dr. Mohamed Bakr


12
Dispersion in a 2D TLM Mesh (Cont’d)
• For propagation in the direction of one of the axis,
symmetry allows us to represent the network by a cascade
of periodic structures
oc oc oc
zL zL zL
zL z z 0.5zL 0.5zL 0.5zL
oc oc
L L oc oc oc
oc
∆l / 2 ∆l / 2

[T ] = [T 1][T 2][T 3]

0.
5Z
L
EE750, 2003, Dr. Mohamed Bakr
13
Dispersion in a 2D TLM Mesh (Cont’d)

• It follows that we have


 Cos θ j Z L Sin θ   1 0  Cos θ j Z L Sin θ 
[T ] =  j Sin θ Cos θ  
  2 j tan θ   j Sin θ
Cos θ 

 1 
 ZL  Z L  Z L 
ω ∆t
θ=
2
• Equating this product to the ABCD of a single section
of transmission line
 Cos β∆l j Z L Sin β∆l 
V1    V 2 
  =  j Sin β∆l Cos β∆l  I 2 
 I1   Z L 

EE750, 2003, Dr. Mohamed Bakr


14
Dispersion in a 2D TLM Mesh (Cont’d)

• It follows that we have sin( β∆l/ 2) = 2 sin(ω∆t/ 2)


∆t ω ∆l 2πf ∆l v ∆l ∆l
• But ω = = =π L =π
2 2 vL 2 vL λ o vL λo
ω 2πf 2π v L 2π v L
and v N = = = β=
β β β λo λo vN
• Combining the above equations we obtain the dispersion
vN π (∆l/ λ o )
relationship v L = sin −1 ( 2 sin (π∆l/ λ ))
o

• Notice that vN depends on the ratio ∆l/λo

• Also, for ∆l<<λo , v N ≈ 2 vL


EE750, 2003, Dr. Mohamed Bakr
15
Dispersion in a 2D TLM Mesh (Cont’d)

Christos, Transmission Line Modeling (TLM)

EE750, 2003, Dr. Mohamed Bakr


16
3D TLM

• The symmetric condensed node (SCN) is the most


widely used node
12
4
7
2

3 11
6 10

9
1
5

• The SCN has 6 branches with 2 transmission lines in each


branch
EE750, 2003, Dr. Mohamed Bakr
17
3D TLM (Cont’d)

• For modeling free space S∈ ℜ12×12


• Components of S are determined through conservation of
energy
• Open and short circuit stubs are used to model the proper
capacitance and inductance in the x,y and z directions
• In this case S∈ℜ18×18

EE750, 2003, Dr. Mohamed Bakr


18

You might also like