Penicillin and Semisynthetic Penicillins in Dermatology: Disease-a-Month June 2004
Penicillin and Semisynthetic Penicillins in Dermatology: Disease-a-Month June 2004
Penicillin and Semisynthetic Penicillins in Dermatology: Disease-a-Month June 2004
net/publication/278152970
CITATIONS READS
3 3,050
3 authors, including:
Georgeta Bocheva
Medical University of Sofia
39 PUBLICATIONS 234 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Effect of environmental factors, diseases and drugs on the oxidative stress in model animals. View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Georgeta Bocheva on 15 March 2018.
P
enicillins are one of most important antibiotics salts are given by intramuscular (IM) injection, and the
groups. They are extremely effective and still penicillin releases slowly and gives prolonged levels of
widely used. Moreover, they are the drugs of drug.
choice for a large number of infectious diseases. Peni- 6-Aminopenicillanic acid was obtained from cultures
cillins belong to the -lactam group, which also include of Penicillinium chrysogenum. Now it is produced with
cephalosporins, monobactams, and carbapenems. -lac- the aid of an amidase from P. chrysogenum. The amidase
tam antibiotics have four-membered ring structure. splits the peptide linkage, by which the side chain of
penicillin is joined to 6-aminopenicillanic acid (see Fig
History 1) and makes the development of the semisynthetic
penicillins possible.
The era of modern microbial chemotherapy stems from
The type of the side chain (eg, adding an amino, a
Paul Erlich’s work a century ago. In 1928, Alexander
carboxyl group etc.) markedly changes the activity
Fleming isolated penicillin from a sample of the mold
against bacteria and pharmacologic characteristics of
Penicillinium notatum in his laboratory at St. Mary’s
each particular semisynthetic penicillins.5 R also con-
Hospital in London. This antibacterial substance was
trols a susceptibility of the molecule to the penicilli-
named penicillin by Fleming. It was not introduced into
nases, produced of most Staphylococcus aureus and some
clinical practice until 1941, when Florey, Chain, and
other bacteria, which hydrolyze the -lactam ring and
their colleagues had been successful in extracting
inactivate penicillins.6
enough penicillin.1– 4 The first clinical trials were con-
The specific activity of penicillin G is defined in
ducted in 1942 at Yale University and the Mayo Clinic
international units. One milligram of pure penicillin G
with excellent results. Since 1957, after the 6-aminopeni-
sodium thus equals 1667 U. The dosage and antibacte-
cillinic acid’s isolation, the development of numerous
rial potency of the semisynthetic penicillins are ex-
semisynthetic penicillins has continued.
pressed in terms of weight.
Chemistry
Mechanisms of Action
The basic structure of penicillin includes a nucleus (6-
All -lactam antibiotics share general mechanisms of
aminopenicillanic acid, 6-APA) and side chain (R) (see
antibacterial action. These mechanisms involve: (1) at-
Fig 1). The penicillin nucleus consists of thiazolidine
tachment to specific penicillin-binding proteins
ring (A) linked to a -lactam ring (B) and it is a require-
(PBPs)7–9; (2) inhibition of the bacterial cell wall pepti-
ment for biologic activity of these molecules. The side
doglycan synthesis10; and (3) inactivation of an inhibi-
chain determines many of the antibacterial and phar-
tor of the autolytic enzymes in the cell wall, which
macologic characteristics of penicillins. In the natural
initiate bacterial cell lysis and death.11
penicillin (penicillin G), the R is benzyl; in the semisyn-
The relationship between inhibition of PBP’s activity
thetic penicillins, other groups are used. Penicillin G
and activation of autolysins is unclear. Some organisms
(benzylpenicillin) has the greatest antimicrobial activity
have defective autolytic enzymes and are inhibited but
within all natural penicillins.
not lysed—they are referred to as tolerant.11,12 The PBPs
Penicillin can interact with amines, such as procaine,
vary in their affinities for different -lactam antibiotics.
and benzathine to form salts with low solubility. These
Resistance
From the Clinic of Dermatology and Venereology, Military Academy of
Medicine, Sofia, Bulgaria. Resistance to penicillin may be due to different causes.
Address correspondence to Miroslava Kadurina, MD, Clinic of Derma- The production of -lactamases, which inactivate some
tology and Venereology, Military Academy of Medicine, 3 G. Sofiiski Street,
1606 Sofia, Bulgaria. penicillins by breaking the -lactam ring (over 90% of S.
E-mail address: [email protected] aureus, some Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseria gonor-
© 2003 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved. 0738-081X/03/$–see front matter
360 Park Avenue South, New York, NY 10010 doi:10.1016/S0738-081X(02)00329-2
Clinics in Dermatology Y 2003;21:12-23 PENICILLIN AND SEMISYNTHETIC PENICILLINS 13
Figure 1. Two- (a) and three (b)-dimensional structures of penicillin nucleus. A, thiazolidine ring; B, -lactam ring. Sites of
penicillinase action: circled 1, amidase; circled 2, -lactamase. Side chain (R): 1-penicillin G; 2-penicillin V; 3-methicillin; 4-izoxasolyl
penicillins; 5-nafcillin; 6-aminopenicillins; 7-carbenicillins; 8-ticarcillin.
rhoeae, most Gram-negative enteric rods). It is suggested action of -lactamase-resistant penicillins, such as
that there are three classes -lactamases. Classes A and methicillin.15 The tolerant organisms (eg, certain staph-
C include serine enzymes, and class B includes metal- ylococci, streptococci, Listeria) are inhibited but not
loproteins. The -lactame compounds, clavulanic acid killed because the autolytic cell wall enzymes are not
and sulbactam, act as strong inhibitors of class A but activated.
not of classes B or C -lactamases. Approximately 50 Another reason may be that the organisms that lack
different types of -lactamases are known. Their pro- cell walls (Mycoplasma, L-forms) or are metabolically
duction is genetically controlled. The information for inactive are resistant to penicillin because they do not
staphylococcal penicillinase is encoded in a plasmid, synthesize peptidoglycans.
-lactamases of Gram-negative bacteria are encoded Finally, resistance can occur as a result of a reduction
either in chromosomes or plasmids, and they may be in the permeability of the outer membrane and a de-
constitutive or inducible. The plasmids can be trans- creased in the ability of the drug to penetrate to the
ferred from one bacterium to another by conjuga- target site. This occurs with Gram-negative organisms,
tion.13,14 Other penicillins (eg, nafcillin) and cephalo- which have an outer membrane that limits the penetra-
sporins are -lactamase resistant because the -lactam tion of hydrophilic antibiotics.16
ring is protected by parts of the side chain. Such peni-
cillins are active against -lactamase-producing micro-
Types of Penicillin and Their
organisms.
Bacterial Susceptibility
Resistance to penicillin also may be caused by the
occurrence of modified penicillin-binding sites. Some The first penicillins are the naturally occurring ben-
bacteria (eg, staphylococci) may be insusceptible to the zylpenicillin and its congeners. Because of their suscep-
14 KADURINA ET AL. Clinics in Dermatology Y 2003;21:12-23
400 –500 mg/kg for carbenicillin, and 100,000 –200,000 penicillins or even skin testing with these drugs may be
IU/kg for aqueous benzylpenicillin (1 UI ⫽ 0.6 g).19,75 followed of fatal episodes of anaphylaxis. The mecha-
The parenteral penicillins are usually administered nism of these reactions involves the chemical reactivity
in four to six equal doses per day. The depot-penicillin of the -lactam ring. Penicillins are a classic example of
G preparations (procaine and benzathine) are pre- haptens and when they are degraded, the -lactam ring
scribed as a single daily, weekly, or monthly dose. The opens and reacts with tissue proteins making them
approximate dose for these long-acting penicillins is immunogenic. This is the so-called “major determi-
1.2–2.4 million units. These doses are average and must nant” because it is the major reaction leading to protein
be adjusted for renal insufficiency.75 binding and penicillin allergy. There are “minor anti-
genic determinants” composed mainly of penicilloic
Contradictions and penillic acids also. Although these determinants
refer only to the relative quantity of haptens available
The majority of patients who give a history of allergy to
and not to their immunologic importance, a high per-
penicillins should be treated with different type of
centage of immediate reactions (eg, anaphylaxis) is
antimicrobials. In the unusual instance where treatment
caused by minor determinants.
with penicillin is essential, skin tests should be placed.76
The most serious reactions after administration of
If the infection is life-treating only with penicillin (eg,
penicillin, such as acute anaphylactic shock and angio-
bacterial endocarditis) desensitization is recommended,
edema, are fortunately very rarely fatal. The most dra-
although it is a potentially dangerous procedure in
matic clinical picture described anaphylactic shock in-
itself.
cludes sudden, severe hypotension with collapse;
About 10% of patients sensitive to penicillins who
bronchospasm; and abdominal pain, nausea, and vom-
are given cephalosporins will exhibit cross-drug sensi-
iting. At the same time, urticaria or angioedema may
tivity and develop eruption. It is recommended that
occur. Angioedema and/or a drug-induce acute urti-
patients with a history of immediate or accelerated
caria are other important immediate allergic reaction
reactions to penicillin (type I—IgE mediated— or severe
that are characterized clinically by marked swelling of
type IV delayed hypersensitivity reactions) not be
the lips, face and periorbital tissues, genitalia and distal
treated with cephalosporins. It is suggested that the
parts of the extremities, and urticarial wheals. The risk
newer generation of cephalosporins have less allergic
of angioedema is swelling of the tongue, larynx, and/or
cross-reactivity with penicillin molecule than cephalo-
pharynx, which can lead to bronchoconstriction.79 – 81
thin.77
Accelerated reactions (occurring within 1– 48 hours) are
usually manifested by rash and sometimes by fever.
Side Effects
Delayed reactions (beginning more than 48 hours after
The penicillins have very low toxic effects and are exposure) can present of skin reactions or systemic
completely safe in pregnancy.78 They have pregnancy reactions (such as nephritis or serum sickness).
risk factor of B according to FDA. Penicillins also have Skin eruption (scarlatiniform, morbilliform, urticar-
little effect on mammalian cells. However, all penicillins ial, vesicular, and bullous eruptions) and fever are the
may cause penicillin allergy (they are the most common most common manifestations of penicillin allergy. Fe-
cause of drug allergy), neuro- and nephrotoxicity, and ver may be the only evidence of hypersensitivity and
uncommon hematologic toxicity. Sensitivity to penicil- can reach high levels. Purpuric lesions are uncommon
lin is a contraindication to exposure any of the semi- and are mainly the results of a vasculitis. Schönlein-
synthetic analogs. Henoch purpura with renal involvement has been rare
Hypersensitivity reactions are most commonly ad- complication.82 Exfoliative dermatitis and exudative er-
verse reactions caused by penicillin, which occur in ythema multiforme of either the erythemopapular or
about 5% of patients. The incidence of hypersensitivity vesiculobullous type also have occurred.
is three to four times higher in atopic than in nonatopic Some medications, including aminopenicillins (am-
patients. The relationship between atopic symptoms- picillin, amoxicillin), may cause severe drug reaction
complex and penicillin allergy is unclear.79 with atypical target lesions, widespread loss of epider-
Hypersensitivity reactions may appear in the ab- mis, and mucosal involvement (in about 90% of pa-
sence of a previous known drug exposure (eg, in the tients).83
environment). The most serious of hypersensitivity re- Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal
actions are anaphylaxis and angioedema that occurs necrolysis (TEN), and SJS-TEN overlap are referred to
immediately after application (in less than 30 minutes) the most severe skin reactions caused by medications.
and are mediated by IgE.79 The incidence of anaphy- The pathogenesis of these severe skin reactions has not
laxis is about 0.01%. Parenteral administration appears been well defined immunologically. In general, these
the most likely route inducing anaphylaxis in hu- reactions are held to be cell-mediated cytotoxic re-
mans.79 – 81 It must be known that very small doses of sponses as the epidermis is infiltrated by activated lym-
20 KADURINA ET AL. Clinics in Dermatology Y 2003;21:12-23
phocytes. It is unclear whether the cytotoxic T cells eosinophilia, pyuria, proteinuria, elevation of serum
directly damage the epidermis or release cytokines that creatinine, and even oliguria have been noted.92,94 –96
stimulate apoptosis.39,84,85 Hypokalemia may be a side effect of high dose par-
Penicillin is also an agent that causes fixed drug enteral penicillin therapy because the penicillins act as
eruption. Clinical and immunologic studies suggest nonreabsorbable anions.
that fixed drug eruption is delayed hypersensitivity Other hypersensitivity reactions seen occasionally
reaction, which is also referred to as cell-mediated re- are vasculitis (of the skin or other organs); Coomb’s
action. Patients frequently give a history of identical test-positive hemolytic anemia (it has been described in
lesion(s) occurring at the same skin site. The most com- patients, receiving massive IV doses of penicillin for 1
mon sites are palms and soles, glans penis, scrotum, week or more.79
and oral mucosa. Reversible neutropenia is also seen, especially pa-
Incidences of drug-induced pemphigus (DIP) from tients taking methicillin, nafcillin, or cloxacillin.97 It is
penicillin have been described. Even though DIP is unclear if this is truly hypersensitivity reaction.
suggested to be relate to thiol compounds of the drug, All penicillins, particularly high doses of carbenicil-
many nonthiol drugs termed “masked” thiols, like pen- lin and ticarcillin, may cause decreased platelet aggre-
icillin, may also induce pemphigus.86 Penicillins con- gation by binding to adenosine diphosphate receptors
tain sulfur in their molecule, and the sulfur may change on the platelets. Significant bleeding disorders are in-
metabolically to form active thiol groups. Analyses of frequent.98,99
the penicillin chemical structure reveal an active amide Convulsions, twitching, multifocal myoclonus, local-
group in their molecule that may be responsible for ized or generalized epileptiform seizures, or other
induction of the disease, not the sulfur.87,88 forms of encephalopathy may occur when extremely
Few reports relate penicillin as a possible provoca- large doses of penicillin G have been prescribed. These
tion of generalized pustular psoriasis (von Zumbusch’s reactions are more likely to occur to patients with renal
type). The penicillin and some semisynthetic penicillins insufficiency.
(eg, ampicillin, amoxicillin) may initiate and exacerbate Many people taking oral penicillins experience nau-
this disease. The mechanism induced pustular psoriasis sea, vomiting, and even diarrhea (especially with am-
by the penicillins is unknown.89 –91 picillin and amoxicillin). These gastrointestinal mani-
Serum sickness is a reaction usually appearing after festations are mild and transient and often are related to
1 week or more penicillin treatment, and is mediated by the dose of the drug. The incidence of diarrhea is higher
IgG antibody. The typical clinical manifestations, in- in children receiving amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.100
cluding fever, urticarial lesions, lymphadenopathy, Rarely, ampicillin and other penicillins may cause a
polyarthritis, neuritis, serositis and acute glomerulone- pseudomembranous colitis. Mild elevation of serum
phritis, is thought to be secondary to circulating anti- glutamic oxalacetalate transaminase has been reported
gen-antibody complexes.92 When long-acting penicillin during therapy with oxacillin and nafcillin.
preparations are used, clinical findings may be delayed After IM injection of penicillin (especially procaine
up to three weeks and symptoms may be prolonged and benzathine forms), occasionally the medication en-
several weeks rather than a few days to a week.93 ters or irritates an artery, causing arteriospasm that
Contact dermatitis is observed occasionally in phar- leads to distal ischemic necrosis. It is also known as
macists, nurses, and physicians after preparing penicil- Nicolau syndrome or embolia cutis medicamentosa,
lin solutions. which present with hemorrhagic livid lesions progress-
The specific maculo-papular skin eruption is much ing to cutaneous necrosis. If an injection damage a
more common after using of ampicillin or amoxicillin nerve, it may cause not only pain but also paralysis and
(being about 9%) and is not related to true penicillin vasoconstriction.101
hypersensitivity. It may represent a “toxic” rather than If after IM injection microcrystals of depot-penicillin
a truly allergic reaction.30 Patients with infectious enter in venous system, immediate nonallergic reaction
mononucleosis almost always get an ampicillin erup- can develop known as Hoigné syndrome. Dizziness,
tion (more than 90%). The ampicillin eruption is also tinnitus, headache, hallucinations, sometimes seizures,
common among patients with other virus infections cough, and angina manifest this reaction.102
(cytomegalovirus), patients with lymphoid malignan- Local reactions, such as pain and sterile inflamma-
cies, and patients receiving allopurinol together with tory reactions at the site of injection, have been de-
ampicillin. The incidence of ampicillin eruption is not a scribed after penicillin application. As a result of local
contraindication to treatment with penicillins at a later damage to muscle, serum transaminases and lactic de-
date.18 –22 hydrogenase can be elevated.
Acute interstitial nephritis is uncommon, occurring Some persons receiving penicillin IV also have de-
most generally with methicillin exposure. Hematuria, veloped phlebitis or thrombophlebitis. Finally, the lit-
Clinics in Dermatology Y 2003;21:12-23 PENICILLIN AND SEMISYNTHETIC PENICILLINS 21
erature mentions a few cases of postinflammatory elas- 10. Tipper DJ. Antibiotic inhibitors of bacterial cell wall
tolysis (cutis laxa) after penicillin therapy.103,104 biosynthesis. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1987.
11. Tomasz A. From penicillin-binding proteins to the lysis
and death of bacteria. Rev Infect Dis 1979;1:434 –67.
Drug Interactions 12. Tomasz A, Holtje JV. Murein hydrolases and the lytic
and killing action of penicillin. In: Schlessinger D, editor.
Penicillins bind to aminoglycoside antibiotics and inac- Microbiology. Washington, DC: American Society for
tivate them both in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, peni- Microbiology, 1977:209 –15.
cillins and aminoglycosides should not be mixed in IV 13. Lindberg F, Normark S. Contribution of chromosomal
infusions and should be given separately in time.105 beta-lactamase to beta-lactam resistance in enterobacte-
Penicillins and bacteriostatic drugs are often antag- ria. Rev Infect Dis 1986;8:292–304.
onistic in vitro. The only in vivo example of this antag- 14. Neu HC. Contribution of beta-lactamases to bacterial
onism is the lack of improvement in S. pneumoniae resistance and mechanisms to inhibit beta-lactamases.
meningitis when is treated with both penicillin and Am J Med 1985;79:2–12.
tetracycline. 15. Brumfitt W, Hamilton-Miller J Methicillin-resistant
Drugs, which inhibit renal tubular secretion of the Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med 1989;320:1188 –95.
16. Nakae T. Outer-membrane permeability of bacteria. CRC
penicillins, may cause accumulation with higher and
Crit Rev Microbiol 1986;13:1–62.
prolonged serum levels. Medications having such an 17. Jacoby GA, Medeiros A. More extended-spectrum -lac-
effect include probenecid, phenylbutazone, indometha- tamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991;324:601–
cin, and sulfinpyrazone. Such an advantage is taken of 12.
the interaction with the concurrent use of probenecid 18. Chambers HF, Neu HC. Penicillins. In: Mandell GL,
and penicillin. This enhances the therapeutic efficacy in Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Ben-
the treatment of gonorrhea and of bacterial endocardi- nett’s principles of infectious diseases, 4th ed. New York:
tis;106 however, concomitant administration of probene- John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1995:233–46.
cid does not affect the serum concentration of clavu- 19. Kalant H, Roschlau W. Penicillins. In: Principles of med-
lanic acid agents. ical pharmacology, 6th ed. New York-Oxford: Oxford
Allopurinol increases the risk of ampicillin-induced University Press, 1998:658 –71.
20. Jawetz E. Penicillins & cephalosporins. In: Katzun B,
eruption.30 Penicillins do not affect significantly the
editor. Basic & clinical pharmacology, 7th ed. East Nor-
pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol, levonorgestrel,
walk, CT: Appleton & Lange, 1999:680 –6.
and norethindrone or reduce the serum concentrations 21. Mandell GL, Petri WA. Antimicrobial agents. In: Hard-
of gonadotropins.107 man JG, Limbird LE, Molinoft PB, et al. (eds.), Goodman
& Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics,
10th ed. New York: McMillan Co, 2001:1073–98.
References
22. Finch R. The penicillins today. Br Med J 1990;300:1289 –
1. Fleming A. History and development of penicillin. In: 90.
Fleming A, editor. Penicillin: Its practical application. 23. Neu HC, Fu KP. Clavulanic acid, a novel inhibitor of
Philadelphia: The Blakiston Co, 1946:1–33. -lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
2. Florey HW. Historical introduction. In: Florey HW, 1978;14:650 –5.
Chain E, Heatley NG, et al, editors. Antibiotics, Vol. I. 24. Dacey RG, Sandle MA. Effect of probenecid on cerebro-
New York: Oxford University Press, 1949:1–73. spinal fluid concentrations of penicillin and cephalospo-
3. Chain EB. The development of bacterial chemotherapy. rin derivates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1974;6:437–
Antibiot Chemother 1954;4:215–41. 41.
4. Abraham EP. The action of antibiotics on bacteria. In: 25. Bisno AL, Dismukes WE, Durack DT, et al. Treatment of
Florey HW, Chain E, Heatley NG, et al, editors. Antibi- infective endocarditis due to viridans streptococci. Cir-
otics, Vol. II. New York: Oxford University Press, 1949: culation 1981;63:730A–3A.
1438 –96. 26. Levison ME, Mangura CT, Lorber B, et al. Clindamycin
5. Donowitz GR, Mandel GL. Beta-lactam antibiotics. compared with penicillin for the treatment of anaerobic
N Engl J Med 1988;318:419 –26490 –500. lung abscess. Ann Intern Med 1983;98:466 –71.
6. Davies J. Inactivation of antibiotics and the dissemina- 27. Mendelman PM, Campos J, Chaffin DO, et al. Relative
tion of resistance genes. Science 1994;264:375–82. penicillin G resistance in Neisseria meningitidis and re-
7. Spratt BG. Biochemical and genetical approaches to the duced affinity of penicillin-binding protein 3. Antimi-
mechanism of action of penicillin. Philos Trans R Soc crob Agents Chemother 1988;32:706 –9.
Lond [Biol] 1980;289:273–83. 28. Sprott MS, Kearns AM, Field JM. Penicillin-insensitive
8. Waxman DJ, Strominger LJ. Penicillin-binding proteins Neisseria meningitidis. Lancet 1988;1:1167.
and the mechanism of action of beta-lactam antibiotics. 29. Handsfield HH, Sparling PF. Neisseria gonorrhoeae. In:
Annu Rev Biochem 1983;52:825. Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Mandell,
9. Yocum RR, Waxman DW, Strominger JL. The mecha- Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infec-
nism of action of penicillin. J Biol Chem 1980;255:3977– tious diseases, 4th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone,
86. Inc, 1995:1909 –25.
22 KADURINA ET AL. Clinics in Dermatology Y 2003;21:12-23
30. Tsankov N. Clinical, laboratory and therapeutical inves- 52. Maloy AL, Black RD, Segurola RJ. Lyme disease compli-
tigations on patients with Penicillin allergy and Ampi- cated by the Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction. J Emerg Med
cillin rashes. PhD Thesis, Sofia, 1979. 1998;16:437–8.
31. Granier F. Manadement of erysipelas. Ann Dermatol 53. Gordon RC. Listeria Monocytogenes infections. Indian
Venereol 2001;128:429 –42. J Pediatr 1995;62:33–9.
32. Balabanova M. Erysipelas. In: Katsambas AD, Lotti TM, 54. Rathinam SR, Namperumalsamy P. Leptospirosis. Ocul
editors. European handbook of dermatological treat- Immunol Inflamm 1999;7:109-18.R.
ments. Berlin: Springler-Verlag, 1999:177–80. 55. Tosti A, Varotti C, Ballardini G, et al. Scleroderma ther-
33. Maye E, Toussaint P, Lamarque D, et al. Erysipelas in the apy with penicillin G. Preliminary note. G Ital Dermatol
young population of a military hospital. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1983;118:183–6.
Venereol 1999;126:953–9. 56. Asboe-Hansen G. Treatment of generalized scleroderma:
34. Veyssier-Belot C, Lejoyeux-Chartier F, Bouvet A. Erysip- updated results. Acta Derm Venereol 1979;59:465–7.
elas, cellulitis and other severe Streptococcus pyogenes 57. Haustein UF. Current status and trends in treatment of
skin infections. Presse Med 1999;28:1959 –65. scleroderma. Hautarzt 1992;43:409 –16.
35. Cribier B. Erysipelas and impetigo. Rev Prat 1996;46: 58. von Schulze E, Herrmann K, Haustein UF, et al. Einfluss
1593–8. von Penicillin and D-Penicillamin auf die -Galactosi-
36. Becq-Giraudon B. Primary and secondary prevention for daseaktivität bei Patienten mit progressiver Skleroder-
erysipelas. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2001;128:368 –75. mie. Dermatol Monatsschr 1988;174:661–6.
37. Sjoblom AC, Eriksson B, Jorup-Ronstrom C, et al. Anti- 59. Nagy E, Ladányi E. Behandlung der umschreibenen
biotic prophylaxis in recurrent erysipelas. Infection 1993; Sklerodermie (US) im Kindesalter. Hautkr 1987;62:547–9.
21:390 –3. 60. Lohrer R, Barran L, Kellnar S, Belohradsky BH. Atropho-
38. Olivier C. Severe Streptococcus pyogenes cutaneous in- dermia idiopathica et progressiva Pasini et Pierini, eine
fections. Arch Pediatr 2001;I 8:757–61. wenig bekannte Form der zirkumskripten Sklerodermie
39. Braun-Falco O, Plewig G, Wolf HH, et al. Bacterial dis- im Kindesalter. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 1986;134:878 –
eases. In: Braun-Falco O, Plewig G, Wolf HH, et al, 80.
61. Rompel R, Mischke AL, Langner C, Happle R. Linear
editors. Dermatology, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springler-Verlag,
atrophoderma of Moulin. Eur J Dermatol 2000;10:611–3.
2000:128 –236.
62. Krasagakis K, Hettmannsperger U, Trautmann C, et al.
40. Clyti E, Claudel P, Gautier C, Geniaux M. Cutaneous
Persistent scleredema of Buschke in a diabetic: improve-
manifestations of erysipeloid septicemia. Ann Dermatol
ment with high-dose penicillin. Br J Dermatol 1996;134:
Venereol 1998;125:196 –8.
597–8.
41. Kovalev GK. Biological problems of Erysipelothrix rhu-
63. Theodoridis A, Capetanakis J. Scleredema of Buschke
siophathiae. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol (Mos-
with IgA deficiency. Acta Derm Venereol 1979;59:182–3.
cow) 1982;3:11–8.
64. Kazandjieva J, Mateev G, Tsankov N. Is pityriasis rubra
42. Swatz MN. Recognition and management of an-
pilaris an infectious disease? Dermatol Monatsschr 1993;
thrax—an update. N Engl J Med 2001;29 [epub ahead of
179:105–7.
print].
65. Stanoeva L, Konstantinov D, Ristov R. Clinical aspect of
43. Caksen H, Arabaci F, Abuhandan M, et al. Cutaneous Pytiriasis rubra pilaris in childhood. Dermatologica 1971;
anthrax in eastern Turkey. Cutis 2001;67:488 –92. 142:1–6.
44. Celebi S, Aykan U, Alagoz G, Esmerligil S. Palbebral 66. Watt T, Jillson O, Hanover NH. Pityriasis rubra pilaris.
anthrax. Eur J Ophthalmol 2001;11:171–4. Arch Dermatol 1965;92:428 –30.
45. Hercogova J, Brzonova I. Lyme disease in central Eu- 67. Mahoney EM, Arnold RC, Harris A. Penicillin treatment
rope. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2001;14:133–7. of early syphilis. J Vener Dis Inform 1943;24:355–7.
46. Janovska D, Hulinska D, Godova T. Sensitivity of Borre- 68. Anderson J, Mindel A., Tovey SJ, Williams P. Primary
lia burgdorferi strains isolated in the Czech Republic. and secondary syphilis, 20 years’ experience. 3: Diagno-
Cent Eur J Health 2001;9:38 –40. sis, treatment, and follow up. Genitourin Med 1989;65:
47. Terkeltaub RA. Lyme disease 2000. Emerging zoonoses 239 –43.
complicate patient work-up and treatment. Geriatrics 69. Voorst Vader PC. Syphilis management and treatment.
2000;55:34 –5 , 39 – 40, 43– 4. Dermatol Clin 1998;16:699 –711.
48. Arnez M, Radsel-Medvescek A, Pleterski-Rigler D, et al. 70. Klein VR, Cox SM, Mitchell MD, Wendel CD. The Ja-
Comparison of cefuroxime axetil and phenoxymethyl risch-Herxheimer reaction complicating syphilotherapy
penicillin for the treatment of children with solitary er- in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:375–80.
ythema migrans. Wien Klin Wochenschr 1999;111:912– 71. Crespo A, Suh B. Helicobacter pylori infection: epidemi-
22. ology, pathophysiology, and therapy. Arch Pharm Res
49. Maraspin V, Cimperman J, Lotric-Fulran S, et al. Ery- 2001;24:485–98.
thema migrans in pregnancy. Wien Klin Wochenschr 72. Elias PM, Fritsch PM, Epstein EH. Staphylococcal
1999;111:933–40. scalded skin syndrome. Clinical features, pathogenesis,
50. Coyle PK. Chronic Meningitis. Curr Treat Options Neu- and recent microbiological and biochemical develop-
rol 2001;2:375–87. ments. Arch Dermatol 1977;113:207–19.
51. Halperin JJ. Neuroborreliosis (nervous system lyme dis- 73. Tan JS, Wishnow RM, Talan DA, et al. The piperacillin-
ease). Curr Treat Options Neurol 1999;1:139 –46. tazobactam skin and skin structure study group: treatment
Clinics in Dermatology Y 2003;21:12-23 PENICILLIN AND SEMISYNTHETIC PENICILLINS 23
of hospitalized patients with complicated skin and skin 90. Tsankov N, Kazanjieva J, Drenovska K. Drugs exacerba-
structure infections: double-blind, randomized multicenter tion and provocation of psoriasis. Clin Dermatol 1988;
study of piperacillin-tazobactam versus ticarcillin-clavu- 16:333–51.
lanate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993;37:1580 –6. 91. Manders SM, Heymann WR. Acute generalized exan-
74. Jacobson GF, Autry AM, Kirby RS, et al. A randomized themic pustulosis. Cutis 1994;54:194 –6.
controlled trial comparing amoxicillin and azithromycin 92. DeSwarte RD. Drug allergy. In: Patterson R, editor. Al-
for the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis in preg- lergic diseases— diagnosis and management. Philadel-
nancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1352–4. phia: JB Lippincott Company, 1980.
75. Laurence DR, Bennett PN, Brawn MJ. Clinical pharma- 93. Lawley TJ, Bielory L, Gascon P, et al. A study of human
cology, 8th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1997. serum sickness. J Invest Dermatol 1985;85:129 –32.
94. Appel GB. A decade of penicillin related acute interstitial
76. Solley GO, Gleich GJ, Van Dellen RG. Penicilln allergy:
nephritis- more questions than answers. Clin Nephrol
clinical experience with a battery of skin-test reagents. J
1980;13:151.
Allergy Clin Immunol 1982;69:238 –44.
95. Ditlove J, Weidmann P, Bernstein M, et al. Methicillin
77. Adkinson NF, Saxon A, Spence MR, et al. Cross allerge-
nephritis. Medicine 1977;56:483.
nicity and immunogenicity of aztreonam. Rev Infect Dis 96. Linton A, Clark WF, Driedger AA, et al. Acute interstitial
1985;74:613–21. nephritis due to drugs. Ann Intern Med 1980;93:735.
78. Briggs G, Freeman RK, Yaffe SJ. Drug in pregnancy and 97. Kirkwood CF, Smith LL, Rustagi PK, Schentag JJ. Neu-
lactation, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & tropenia associated with -lactam antibiotics. Clin Phar-
Wilkins, 2001. macol 1983;2:569 –78.
79. Sher TH. Penicillin Hypersensitivity—a review. Pediatr 98. Fass RJ, Copelan EA, Brandt JT, Turnbull J. Platelet-
Clin North Am 1983;30:161–76. mediated bleeding caused by broad-spectrum penicil-
80. Saxon A, Beall GN, Rohr AS, et al. Immediate hypersen- lins. J Infect Dis 1987;155:1242–8.
sitivity reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics. Ann Intern 99. Shattil JS, Bennett JS, McDough M, et al. Carbenicillin
Med 1987;107:204 –15. and penicillin G inhibit platelet functions in vitro by
81. Idsoe O, Guthe T, Wilcox RR, et al. Nature and extent of impairing the interaction of agonists with the platelet
penicillin side reactions, with particular reference to fa- surface. J Clin Invest 1980;65:329 –37.
talities from anaphylactic shock. Bull WHO 1968;38:159. 100. Stein GE, Gurwit MJ. Amoxicillin-potassium clavu-
82. Beeching NJ, Gruer LD, Findlay CD, Geddes AM. A case lanate, a beta-lactamase-resistant antibiotic combination.
of Henoch-Schonlein purpura following oral ampicillin. J Clin Pharm 1984;3:591–9.
Antimicrob Chemother 1982;10:479 –82. 101. Merkelen FP, Cottenot F. Dermite livedoı̈de de type
83. Wolkenstein P, Revuz J. Drug-induced severe skin reac- Nicolau à distance d’une injection fessière de benza-
tions. Incidence, management and prevention. Drug thine-pénicilline huileuse. Bull Soc Fr Dermatol Syphiligr
Safety 1995;13:56 –68. 1965;72:198.
84. Tagami H, Tatsuta K, Iwatsuki K, et al. Delayed hyper- 102. Tsankov N, Bonev A. Acute nonallergic reaction to ben-
zacillin compositum (Case report). Dermatol i Venerol
sensitivity in ampicillin-induced toxic epidermal
(Sofia) 1979;2:94 –7.
necrolysis. Arch Dermatol 1983;119:910 –3.
103. Kerl H, Burg G, Hashimoto K. Fatal, penicillin-induced,
85. Atanasov V. 24 cases with toxic epidermal necrolysis.
generalized, postinflammatory elastolysis (cutis laxa).
Dermatol i Venerol (Sofia) 1973;3:185–90.
Am J Dermatopathol 1983;5:267–76.
86. Caccialanza P, Bellone AG. Tentativi di terapia penicil- 104. Hunziker T, Berther T, Zala L, et al. Acquired cutis laxa
linica a dosi molto elevate in alcune dermatosi ad etio- (elastolysis generalisata). Hautarzt 1986;37:463–6.
logia sconosciuta. G Ital Dermatol Sif 1951;92:35–48. 105. Krushkov I, Durmishev A, Tsankov N, Reference book of
87. Ruocco V, Sacerdoti G. Pemphigus and bullous pemphi- adverse reactions. Medicina i Fiscultura (Sofia) 1996.
goid due to drugs. Int J Dermatol 1991;30:307–12. 106. Staniforth DH, Jackson D, Clarke HL, et al. Amoxicillin/
88. Brenner S, Bialy-Golan A, Ruocco V. Drug-induced pem- clavulanic acid: the effect of probenecid. J Antimicrob
phigus. Clin Dermatol 1998;16:393–7. Chemother 1983;12:273–5.
89. Katz M, Seidenbaum M, Weinrauch L. Penicillin-in- 107. Dickinson BD, Altman RD, Nielsen NH, Sterling ML.
duced generalized pustular psoriasis. J Am Acad Der- Drug interactions between oral contraceptives and anti-
matol 1987;17:918 –20. biotics. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:853–60.