Assignment 3 - 174660920-145 - Pom
Assignment 3 - 174660920-145 - Pom
Assignment 3 - 174660920-145 - Pom
UNIVE
RSITY OF GUJRAT
DESIGNING PRODUCT LAYOUTS
The objective in designing process layouts is to place resources close together based on the need
for proximity. This need could stem from the number of trips that are made between these
resources or from other factors, such as sharing of information and communication. Product
layouts are completely different from process layouts. In product layouts, the material moves
continuously and uniformly through a sequence of operations until the work is completed. The
sequence of operations allows for the simultaneous performance of work. When designing
product layouts, our objective is to decide on the sequence of tasks to be performed by each
workstation. To accomplish this we need to consider the logical order of the tasks to be
performed and the time required to perform each task. In addition, we need to consider the speed
of the production process, which will tell us how much time there is at each workstation to
perform the assigned tasks. This entire process is called line balancing. Next, we will go through
the steps that must be followed in designing product layouts.
Line Balancing
The process of assigning tasks to workstations in a product layout in order to achieve a desired
output and balance the workload among stations.
Step 1: Identify Tasks and Their Immediate Predecessors
The first step in designing product layouts is to identify the tasks or work elements that must be
performed in order to produce the product. We also need to determine how long each task takes
to perform and which tasks must be performed in sequence. The task or tasks that must be
performed immediately before another task can be done are called the task's immediate
predecessor. We use an example to illustrate this point.
Immediate predecessor
A task that must be performed immediately before another task.
Step 2: Determine Output Rate
The next step is to determine how many units of product we wish to produce over a period,
called the output rate. Then we can design a product layout that produces the desired number of
units with as few work centers as possible and balance the workload at each workstation. In our
example, Vicki has decided that she wishes to produce 60 pizzas per hour in order to meet her
growing demand.
Output rate
The number of units we wish to produce over a specific period.
For example:
Notice that the total task time to produce one pizza is 165 seconds. If Vicki wants to perform all
nine-work elements herself, her maximum output in 1 hour would be:
Note that in this equation the numerator is the actual work time, whereas the denominator is the
time allocated for performing tasks. To improve efficiency, we try to assign as much work to the
lowest number of workstations needed to produce the volume of product desired while keeping
the workloads balanced.
Balance delay
The amount by which the line efficiency falls short of 100 percent.
Often it is helpful to compute the amount by which the efficiency of the line falls short of 100
percent. Called the balance delay, it is computed as follows:
Balance delay (percentage) = 100 – efficient.
Product Layout
The work is divided into a series of standardized tasks, permitting specialization of equipment
and division of labor. The large volumes handled by these systems usually make it economical to
invest substantial sums of money in equipment and job design. Because only one or a few very
similar items are involved, it is feasible to arrange an entire layout to correspond to the
technological processing requirements of the product or service.
For instance, if a portion of a manufacturing operation required the sequence of cutting, sanding,
and painting, the appropriate pieces of equipment would be arranged in that it sequence. In
addition, because each item follows the same sequence of operations, it is often possible to
utilize fixed-path material-handling equipment such as conveyors to transport items between
operations.
The resulting arrangement forms a line like the one depicted in Figure 1.
Example:
Examples of product layout include:
Car assembly – almost all variants of the same model require the same sequence of
processes.
Self-service cafeteria – generally the sequence of customer requirements (starter, main
course, dessert, and drink) is common to all customers, but layout also helps control
customer flow.
Characteristics:
Product layouts have the following characteristics:
Resources are specialized. Product layouts use specialized resources designed to produce
large quantities of a product.
Facilities are capital intensive. Product layouts make heavy use of automation, which is
specifically designed to increase production.
Processing rates are faster. Processing rates are fast, as all resources are arranged in
sequence for efficient production.
Material handling costs are lower. Due to the arrangement of work centers in close
proximity to one another, material handling costs are significantly lower than for process
layouts.
Space requirements for inventory storage are lower. Product layouts have much faster
processing rates and less need for inventory storage.
Flexibility is low relative to the market. Because all facilities and resources are specialized,
product layouts are locked into producing one type of product. They cannot easily add or
delete products from the existing product line.
Hybrid layouts modify and/or combine some aspects of the three basic layout types to
satisfy the needs of a particular situation
Examples:
o Supermarket layouts: primarily process layout, have fixed-path material-handling
devices as well (roller-type conveyors and belt-type conveyors)
o Hospitals: process layout, fixed-position layout as well (patient care)
o Off-line reworking (customized processing) of faulty parts in a product layout
There are 3 hybrid layouts:
o Cellular Layouts
o Flexible Manufacturing Systems
o Mixed-model assembly lines
Cellular Layouts
In cellular manufacturing, production workstations and equipment are arranged in a
sequence that supports a smooth flow of materials and components through the
production process with Minimal Transport or Delay. Cellular manufacturing can also
provide companies with the flexibility to vary product type or features on the production
line in response to specific customer demands. Using this technique, production capacity
can be incrementally increased or decreased by adding or removing production cells.
Characteristics
Advantages
Faster, lower- cost changes from one part to another which will improve capital
utilization
Lower direct labor cost, due to the reduction in number of workers
Reduced inventory, due to the planning and programming precision
Consistent and better quality, due to the automated control
Lower cost/unit of output, due to the greater productivity using the same number of
workers
Savings from the indirect labor, from reduced errors, rework, repairs and rejects
Mixed model assembly line
Mixed model assembly lines can be found today in many industrial environments. With the
growing trend for greater product variability and shorter life cycles, they are replacing the
traditional mass production assembly lines. In many cases, these lines follow a ‘make-to-order’
production policy, which reduces the customer lead-time, and is expressed in a random arrival
sequence of different model types to the line. Additional common characteristics of such mixed
model lines in a make-to-order environment are small numbers of workstations, a lack of
mechanical conveyance, and highly skilled workers.
A mathematical formulation is presented which considers the differences between our model
and traditional models. A heuristic that minimizes the number of stations for a predetermined
cycle time is developed consisting of three stages: the balancing of a combined precedence
diagram, balancing each model type separately subject to the constraints resulting from the
first stage, and a neighborhood search based improvement procedure.
Traditional assembly lines, designed to process a single model or type of product, can be
used to process more than one type of product but not efficiently. Models of the same type are
produced in long production runs, sometimes lasting for months, and then the line is shut down
and changed over for the next model. The next model is also run for an extended time, producing
perhaps half a year to a year’s supply; then the line is shut down again and changed over for yet
another model; and so on. The problem with this arrangement is the difficulty in responding to
changes in customer demand. If a certain model is selling well and customers want more of it,
they have to wait until the next batch of that model is scheduled to be produced. On the other
hand, if demand is disappointing for models that have already been produced, the manufacturer
is stuck with unwanted inventory.
Warehouse Layouts
Warehouse layouts have the key characteristics of process layouts: products are stored based on
their function, and there is movement of goods. The main difference is that movement within a
warehouse is primarily between the loading/unloading dock and the areas where goods are
stored. Typically, there is no movement between the storage areas themselves; the primary
function of a warehouse is to provide storage space, so the only movement is inbound or
outbound. Think about a warehouse that stores computer equipment and supplies.
Nonetheless, despite the specific circumstances, the general layout of a facility must cover all
these needs:
To achieve these objectives, the first step is to create a warehouse layout, where the design of
the warehouse is represented in the form of a plan.
Reid, R. Dan (Robert Dan), 1949- Operations management / R. Dan Reid, Nada R. Sanders. —
5th ed. [electronic resource 2013, pp. 385-388].
Slack, Nigel, Operations and process management principles and practice for strategic impact 5 th
Edition [Pearson Education Limited 2018, pp. 175].
Roberta S. Russell, Bernard W. Taylor III, and Operations Management: Creating Value along
the Supply Chain 7th edition [John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 2011, pp. 278-284].