Assignment On: Performance Management and Potential Appraisal
Assignment On: Performance Management and Potential Appraisal
On
“Performance Management and Potential
Appraisal”
Human resource planning takes into consideration of the existing human resources of an
organization, their promote ability and the possibility of their development. In this process
crucial promotion decisions have to be made. To make these decisions prudent and ensure a
healthy climate in an organization, performance appraisal, performance management and
potential appraisal has become important.
Performance Management (PM) is a term coined by Dr. Aubrey Daniels in the late 1970s to
describe a science imbedded technology in applications methods for managing behavior and
results. It includes all the activities that ensure consistent achievement of goals in an effective
and efficient manner. Performance management can focus on the performance of an
organization as a whole, a department or an individual employee. Even, it can also focus on
the processes to build a product or service, as well as many other areas. Generally, a
performance management system includes the following actions.
Designing reinforced compensation and recognition systems that reward people for their
contributions
Assisting with exit interviews to understand the reason for which valued employees leave
the organization.
It helps to clarify corporate goals and translates it into individual, team, department
and divisional goals.
It requires a management approach that is open and honest and encourages two-way
communication between superiors and subordinates.
It requires continuous feedback that enables the individuals to gain on the job
experiences and knowledge to modify corporate objectives.
It applies to all employees and is not primarily concerned with linking performance to
financial reward.
People at workplaces are usually caught up with daily routine work. As a result of
which the purpose of an organization is forgotten many times. Performance
management make the people understand and remember that, Individual performance
drives organizational performance. It ensures that, everyone understands
organizations vision and goals. It helps them to understand how their work fits into
and contribute to organizations mission accomplishment. This practice increases
employee engagement and improves delivery.
Performance management set clearly defined specific job duties for all the employees.
When the employees and supervisors have a clear understanding of it, ambiguities in
the workplaces are reduced or may be eliminated. Each and every individual remain
accountable for their own duties and responsibilities. Performance management
empowers an individual to think about and clarify his own role in the organization by
setting clear goals and expectations. A balanced credible employee performance plans
must be designed to get the desired result. While measuring expected results, the
performance plans measures quality, quantity, timeliness, and cost effectiveness. To
be credible, performance expectations must be based on proper job analysis. It must
be very clear, specific, and understandable, reasonable and attainable, measurable,
observable or verifiable, and results oriented. More importantly, it must be
communicated to the concerned employees in timely manner and foster continual
improvement in productivity.
b) Lower Stress
d) Focus on performance
f) High Visibility
g) Planning
By reviewing more frequently, all managers and staff plan and execute well thought
out objectives which results in better resource management, less firefighting and
enables managers to work on the business.
i) Compliance
Moreover, since the objectives setting and development plan for employees is well
thought-out. Employees see real planning, are involved in setting meaningful
objectives and have input into personal development plans which benefit both
themselves and the organization as well. In all, this result in more engaged workforces
committed to achieving real outcomes for the organization.
The terms 'performance management' and 'performance appraisal' are sometimes used
synonymously, but they are different. Performance management is a comprehensive,
continuous and flexible approach to the management of organizations, teams and
individuals which involves the maximum amount of dialogue between those
concerned. Performance appraisal is a more limited approach which involves
managers making top-down assessments and rating the performance of their
subordinates at an annual performance appraisal meeting.
Potential Appraisals
o Self – appraisals
o Peer appraisals
o Superior appraisals
o MBO
There are people in the organization who have potential but who do not perform due
to attitudinal problem. If they are promoted to higher designations then it becomes a
problem for the employees as well as for the company. Dealing with workhorses too
could be tricky. They can perform very well on routine tasks but have limited
potential. Hence, if promoted, they are unable to perform higher level jobs. To
conclude ‘stars’ are ideal people to have in organizations. But retaining these stars
could be difficult. They have high potential backed by high levels of performance and
could be always on the lookout for greener pastures. Thus, as we see, potential
appraisal is more intricate and complex vis-à-vis performance appraisal.
It is under the discretion of the manager to hold the assessment activity. Unlike
performance review, it does not happen at a particular period in every organization.
The managers generally exercise it when an employee achieves a certain milestone, or
completes a year or is planning to change jobs for whatever reasons. Usually it is
recommended to take place within 6 months.
Potential appraisals commence and end with a meeting between the two parties.
In the first meeting the manager can list the abilities required to deliver additional
tasks. He/she can recommend various ways to attain them – in-house training
programmers, external workshops, etc. The latter meeting usually happens after six
months and can be a review to test whether the skills have been rightly acquired or
not. During the observation time the manager is supposed to note the various abilities
adopted and used by the candidate in work and the improvement areas. They can then
chalk out a plan to chase the potential and taste growth in the organization.
Improvement in performance
Acquisition of skills
Changes in behavior
Climate of openness and trust: A climate of reasonable degree of trust, confidence and
openness is inevitably essential for effective counselling. Counselling cannot be
effective if the subordinate does not trust his supervisor.
Empathetic attitude of Management: Effective counselling encompasses with a
general helpful a d empathetic attitude of counsellor towards counselled.
Rapport Building: This step is very necessary as it generates the necessary confidence
in the subordinate and assures him of his superior’s genuine interest in helping him. In
the rapport building phase, a good counsellor attempts to establish a climate of
acceptance, warmth, support, openness and mutuality that facilitate the employees to
open up frankly, share his perceptions, problems, concerns, feelings etc. The
subordinate must be made to feel wanted and that his superior is genuinely interested
in his development.
Exploration: During this stage the counsellor puts to the subordinate’s various
questions, which may elicit elaborate information on the latter’s achievement,
strengths, failures and short comings. The object is to make the subordinate himself to
introspect and define his strengths and weaknesses. Questions are asked that help the
employees focus on his problem since problem identification is a critical step in
planning for improvement. To help the employee make a correct diagnosis of the
problem, open-ended questions may be asked. For example, if an employee’s problem
is that others do not co-operate with him, the counsellor may narrow down the
problem to the employees’ interpersonal relationship with other individuals then help
the employee understand what he does or says to his colleagues which is making it
difficult for him to win their co-operations.
Action Planning: Counselling interviews should end with specific plans of action for
development of the employee. The main contribution of the superior in this phase is in
helping the employee think of alternative ways of dealing with a problem. For
example, in case of an employee whose relationships with colleagues are poor, the
superior may suggest "What three things could he do in the coming week in order to
improve his relationship with X?" After helping the employee brainstorm, the
superior may also add more alternatives to the solutions already generated. Finally,
the superior may render some assistance in helping the employee implement the
agreed upon action plan. Often good counselling sessions fail to produce effective
results due to lack of follow up.
Interview
Performance Metrics
A performance metric is a measure of an organization's activities and performance.
Performance metrics should support a range of stakeholder needs from customers,
shareholders to employees. A metric is nothing more than a standard measure to
assess one’s performance in a particular area. Metrics are at the heart of a good,
customer-focused process management system and any program directed at
continuous improvement. The focus on customers and performance standards show
up in the form of metrics that assess one’s ability to meet customers’ needs and
business objectives. Traditional performance measures, such as profit performance,
return on investment or earnings per share, provide reasonable estimates of whether a
company achieves its ultimate goals of making profits, but do not reveal how the
business achieves this position. However, performance metrics professionals choose
measures that have little value, which is referred as the "measurement inversion". For
example, metrics seem to emphasize what organizations find immediately measurable
even if those are low value and tend to ignore high value measurements simply
because they seem harder to measure whether they are or not. To correct for the
measurement inversion, "value of information analysis" needs to be introduced in the
process so that metrics can focus on high-value measures.
Relevant relationships: Process and activity metrics must form a chain of co-relations
leading to the ultimate end results of enhancing profits, brand equity and market
valuation.
Measurability: Data for the Metrics can be accurately collected in a timely manner
without undue cost.
Summary