Longman Academic Reading Series 4: Reading Skills For College
Longman Academic Reading Series 4: Reading Skills For College
Longman Academic Reading Series 4: Reading Skills For College
The
structure
and
sequence
of
LARS
4
is
clear
and
consistent.
The
primary
unit
of
progression
is
topic,
with
each
of
the
ten
chapters
containing
three
readings
that
are
relevant
to
academic
disciplines
commonly
found
in
university
settings
(e.g.,
media
studies,
psychology).
Chapters
begin
by
explicitly
stating
learning
objectives;
these
are
revisited
at
the
end
of
the
chapter
for
self-‐assessment.
Readings
are
preceded
by
activities
designed
to
activate
background
knowledge,
and
in
my
experience,
The
deliberate
inclusion
and
treatment
of
grammar
is
an
attractive
feature
of
LARS
4
and
an
element
typically
not
found
in
abundance
in
similar
textbooks.
Minimally-‐
altered,
excerpted
texts
provide
students
with
very
useful
models
of
grammar
in
use,
and
LARS
4
capitalizes
on
this
by
selecting
a
number
of
prominent
grammatical
features
of
academic
English,
such
as
the
passive
voice,
hedging
devices,
and
parallel
structure.
The
activities
provide
explicit,
function-‐based
explanation
and
then
direct
students
back
to
the
text
to
find
examples.
Activities
often
ask
students
to
think
about
the
motivations
for
using
the
features.
This
attention
to
grammar
may
possibly
help
students
parse
the
finer
points
of
a
text.
In
our
professional
context,
a
degree
of
overlap
was
found
with
the
grammar
points
commonly
highlighted
in
intermediate
level
academic
writing
courses,
providing
a
ripe
opportunity
for
reinforcement
and
hopefully
transfer
between
courses.
Overall,
LARS
4
represents
a
well-‐rounded
textbook
for
an
EAP
reading
course.
Its
high-‐interest
topics
and
texts
should
(and
in
our
pilot,
did)
capture
the
attention
of
academically-‐oriented
students.
We
believe
such
students
will
benefit
from
the
synthesis
and
critical
thinking
activities
linking
texts
within
a
chapter,
as
synthesis
and
critique
are
skills
not
only
commonly
demanded
by
high-‐stakes
tests
but
also
by
many
university
courses
at
the
undergraduate
and
graduate
levels.
The
welcome
inclusion
of
grammar
explanations
and
activities
present
an
opportunity
to
reinforce
and
deepen
students’
grammar
knowledge,
including
the
functions
of
grammatical
structures
in
the
specific
context
of
academic
texts.
Finally,
LARS
4’s
broad
and
deep
treatment
of
vocabulary,
with
minor
reservations
regarding
activity
design,
should
help
prepare
university-‐bound
students
for
the
considerable
lexical
demands
in
their
futures.
Reviewed
by
Daniel
Isbell
Northern
Arizona
University
[email protected]
Jessica
Sargent
Northern
Arizona
University
[email protected]
Copyright
©
1994
-‐
2014
TESL-‐EJ,
ISSN
1072-‐4303
Copyright
rests
with
the
authors.