Total Quality Management of E-Commerce Sector of Flipkart: Assignment
Total Quality Management of E-Commerce Sector of Flipkart: Assignment
Submitted by: -
POOJA MISHRA
MBA 3rd Semester
ERP ID – 0181MBA177
Submitted to:-
Prof. Rajeev Ranjan
Asst. Professor Doon Business School
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION:-.................................................................2
TOOLS & TECHNIQUES:-....................................................7
ISO 9000 (QMS, EMS, OHSAS):-........................................7
BPR (Business Process Re-Engineering):-...........................9
SIX SIGMA (6Ϭ):-...............................................................10
TQM FRAMEWORK:-......................................................11
7 QC TOOLS:-.....................................................................11
BENCHMARKING:-..........................................................11
FMEA:-.................................................................................12
QFD (VOICE OF CUSTOMER):-.....................................13
LEAN MANUFACTURING:-............................................14
GAPS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF TQM:-.......................15
TQM FRAMEWORK:-.........................................................16
CONCLUSION:-....................................................................27
INTRODUCTION:-
Total Quality Management is a management approach that originated in the 1950s and has
steadily become more popular since the early 1980s. Total Quality is a description of the
culture, attitude and organization of a company that strives to provide customers with products
and services that satisfy their needs. The culture requires quality in all aspects of the company’s
operations, with processes being done right the first time and defects and waste eradicated from
operations.
Total Quality Management, TQM, is a method by which management and employees can
become involved in the continuous improvement of the production of goods and services. It is a
combination of quality and management tools aimed at increasing business and reducing losses
due to wasteful practices.
TQM Defined
TQM is a management philosophy that seeks to integrate all organizational functions
(marketing, finance, design, engineering, and production, customer service, etc.) to focus on
meeting customer needs and organizational objectives.
TQM views an organization as a collection of processes. It maintains that organizations must
strive to continuously improve these processes by incorporating the knowledge and experiences
of workers. The simple objective of TQM is “Do the right things, right the first time, every
time.” TQM is infinitely variable and adaptable. Although originally applied to manufacturing
operations, and for a number of years only used in that area, TQM is now becoming recognized
as a generic management tool, just as applicable in service and public sector organizations.
There are a number of evolutionary strands, with different sectors creating their own versions
from the common ancestor. TQM is the foundation for activities, which include:
Commitment by senior management and all employees
Meeting customer requirements
Reducing development cycle times
Just in time/demand flow manufacturing
Improvement teams
Reducing product and service costs
Systems to facilitate improvement
Line management ownership
Employee involvement and empowerment
Recognition and celebration
Challenging quantified goals and benchmarking
Focus on processes / improvement plans
Specific incorporation in strategic planning
Principles of TQM
The key principles of TQM are as following:
Management Commitment
Plan (drive, direct)
Do (deploy, support, participate)
Check (review)
Act (recognize, communicate, revise)
Employee Empowerment
Training
SPC (statistical process control)
DOE, FMEA
However, a certain level of stress is probably desirable to initiate TQM. People need to feel a
need for a change. Kanter (1983) addresses this phenomenon be describing building blocks
which are present in effective organizational change. These forces include departures from
tradition, a crisis or galvanizing event, strategic decisions, individual “prime movers,” and
action vehicles. Departures from tradition are activities, usually at lower levels of the
organization, which occur when entrepreneurs move outside the normal ways of operating to
solve a problem. A crisis, if it is not too disabling, can also help create a sense of urgency
which can mobilize people to act. In the case of TQM, this may be a funding cut or threat, or
demands from consumers or other stakeholders for improved quality of service. After a crisis, a
leader may intervene strategically by articulating a new vision of the future to help the
organization deal with it. A plan to implement TQM may be such a strategic decision. Such a
leader may then become a prime mover, who takes charge in championing the new idea and
showing others how it will help them get where they want to go. Finally, action vehicles are
needed and mechanisms or structures to enable the change to occur and become
institutionalized.
To communicate the change, mechanisms beyond existing processes will need to be developed.
Special all-staff meetings attended by executives, sometimes designed as input or dialog
sessions, may be used to kick off the process, and TQM newsletters may be an effective
ongoing communication tool to keep employees aware of activities and accomplishments.
Management of resources for the change effort is important with TQM because outside
consultants will almost always be required. Choose consultants based on their prior relevant
experience and their commitment to adapting the process to fit unique organizational needs.
While consultants will be invaluable with initial training of staff and TQM system design,
employees (management and others) should be actively involved in TQM implementation,
perhaps after receiving training in change management which they can then pass on to other
employees. A collaborative relationship with consultants and clear role definitions and
specification of activities must be established.
In summary, first assess preconditions and the current state of the organization to make sure the
need for change is clear and that TQM is an appropriate strategy. Leadership styles and
organizational culture must be congruent with TQM. If they are not, this should be worked on
or TQM implementation should be avoided or delayed until favorable conditions exist.
TQM FRAMEWORK:-
Total quality management (TQM) consists of organization-wide efforts to "install and make
permanent climate where employees continuously improve their ability to provide on demand
products and services that customers will find of particular value." "Total" emphasizes that
departments in addition to production (for example sales and marketing, accounting and
finance, engineering and design) are obligated to improve their operations; "management"
emphasizes that executives are obligated to actively manage quality through funding, training,
staffing, and goal setting. While there is no widely agreed-upon approach, TQM efforts
typically draw heavily on the previously developed tools and techniques of quality control.
The key concepts in the TQM effort undertaken by the Navy in the 1980s include:
"Quality is defined by customers' requirements."
"Top management has direct responsibility for quality improvement."
"Increased quality comes from systematic analysis and improvement of work processes."
"Quality improvement is a continuous effort and conducted throughout the organization."
7 QC TOOLS:-
The seven basic tools of quality is a designation given to a fixed set of graphical techniques
identified as being most helpful in troubleshooting issues related to quality. They are called
basic because they are suitable for people with little formal training in statistics and because
they can be used to solve the vast majority of quality-related issues.
The seven tools are:
Check sheet
Control chart
Stratification (alternately, flow chart or run chart)
Pareto chart
Histogram
Cause-and-effect diagram (also known as the "fishbone" or Ishikawa diagram)
Scatter diagram
BENCHMARKING:-
Benchmarking is the practice of comparing business processes and performance metrics to
industry bests and best practices from other companies. Dimensions typically measured are
quality, time and cost.
Benchmarking is used to measure performance using a specific indicator (cost per unit of
measure, productivity per unit of measure, cycle time of x per unit of measure or defects per
unit of measure) resulting in a metric of performance that is then compared to others.
Also referred to as "best practice benchmarking" or "process benchmarking", this process is
used in management in which organizations evaluate various aspects of their processes in
relation to best-practice companies' processes, usually within a peer group defined for the
purposes of comparison. This then allows organizations to develop plans on how to make
improvements or adapt specific best practices, usually with the aim of increasing some aspect
of performance. Benchmarking may be a one-off event, but is often treated as a continuous
process in which organizations continually seek to improve their practices.
In project management benchmarking can also support the selection, planning and delivery of
projects.
In the process of best practice benchmarking, management identifies the best firms in their
industry, or in another industry where similar processes exist, and compares the results and
processes of those studied (the "targets") to one's own results and processes. In this way, they
learn how well the targets perform and, more importantly, the business processes that explain
why these firms are successful.
There is no single benchmarking process that has been universally adopted. The wide appeal
and acceptance of benchmarking has led to the emergence of benchmarking methodologies.
One seminal book is Boxwell's Benchmarking for Competitive Advantage (1994).[6] The first
book on benchmarking, written and published by Kaiser Associates, is a practical guide and
offers a seven-step approach. Robert Camp (who wrote one of the earliest books on
benchmarking in 1989)[8] developed a 12-stage approach to benchmarking.
The 12 stage methodology consists of:
Select subject
Define the process
Identify potential partners
Identify data sources
Collect data and select all partners
Determine the gap
Establish process differences
Target future performance
Communicate
Adjust goal
Implement
Review and recalibrate
FMEA:-
The FMEA is a design tool used to systematically analyze postulated component failures and
identify the resultant effects on system operations. The analysis is sometimes characterized as
consisting of two sub-analyses, the first being the failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA),
and the second, the criticality analysis (CA). Successful development of an FMEA requires that
the analyst include all significant failure modes for each contributing element or part in the
system. FMEAs can be performed at the system, subsystem, assembly, subassembly or part
level. The FMECA should be a living document during development of a hardware design. It
should be scheduled and completed concurrently with the design. If completed in a timely
manner, the FMECA can help guide design decisions. The usefulness of the FMECA as a
design tool and in the decision-making process is dependent on the effectiveness and timeliness
with which design problems are identified. Timeliness is probably the most important
consideration. In the extreme case, the FMECA would be of little value to the design decision
process if the analysis is performed after the hardware is built. While the FMECA identifies all
part failure modes, its primary benefit is the early identification of all critical and catastrophic
subsystem or system failure modes so they can be eliminated or minimized through design
modification at the earliest point in the development effort; therefore, the FMECA should be
performed at the system level as soon as preliminary design information is available and
extended to the lower levels as the detail design progresses.
FMEA is calculated through Risk Priority No. (RPN). RPN is calculated through three
components,
Frequency of occurrence. (F)
Severity. (I)
Detectability. (D)
RPN= F x I x D
QFD (VOICE OF CUSTOMER):-
Quality function deployment (QFD) is a method developed in Japan beginning in 1966 to help
transform the voice of the customer into engineering characteristics for a product. Yoji Akao,
the original developer, described QFD as a "method to transform qualitative user demands into
quantitative parameters, to deploy the functions forming quality, and to deploy methods for
achieving the design quality into subsystems and component parts, and ultimately to specific
elements of the manufacturing process."
QFD is applied in a wide variety of applications viz product design, manufacturing, production,
engineering, research and development (R&D), information technology (IT), support, testing,
regulatory, and other phases in hardware, software, service, and system organizations.
organization functions necessary to assure customer satisfaction, including business planning,
packaging and logistics, procurement, marketing, sales & service. QFD is also deployed in
quality improvement, quality management, military needs and consumer products. Customer
services Applications for Education improvement and services in hotels etc.
LEAN MANUFACTURING:-
Lean manufacturing or lean production is a systematic method originating in the Japanese
manufacturing industry for the minimization of waste within a manufacturing system without
sacrificing productivity, which can cause problems. Lean also takes into account waste created
through overburden and unevenness in workloads. Working from the perspective of the client
who consumes a product or service, "value" is any action or process that a customer would be
willing to pay for.[citation needed]
Lean manufacturing attempts to make obvious what adds value, through reducing everything
else (because it is not adding value). This management philosophy is derived mostly from the
Toyota Production System (TPS) and identified as "lean" only in the 1990s, TPS is renowned
for its focus on reduction of the original Toyota seven wastes to improve overall customer
value, but there are varying perspectives on how this is best achieved. The steady growth of
Toyota, from a small company to the world's largest automaker, has focused attention on how it
has achieved this success.
For many, lean is the set of "tools" that assist in the identification and steady elimination of
waste. As waste is eliminated quality improves while production time and cost are reduced. A
non exhaustive list of such tools would include: SMED, value stream mapping, Five S, Kanban
(pull systems), poka-yoke (error-proofing), total productive maintenance, elimination of time
batching, mixed model processing, rank order clustering, single point scheduling, redesigning
working cells, multi-process handling and control charts (for checking mura).
There is a second approach to lean manufacturing, which is promoted by Toyota, called The
Toyota Way, in which the focus is upon improving the "flow" or smoothness of work, thereby
steadily eliminating mura ("unevenness") through the system and not upon 'waste reduction' per
se. Techniques to improve flow include production leveling, "pull" production (by means of
kanban) and the Heijunka box. This is a fundamentally different approach from most
improvement methodologies, and requires considerably more persistence than basic application
of the tools, which may partially account for its lack of popularity.
The difference between these two approaches is not the goal itself, but rather the prime
approach to achieving it. The implementation of smooth flow exposes quality problems that
already existed, and thus waste reduction naturally happens as a consequence. The advantage
claimed for this approach is that it naturally takes a system-wide perspective, whereas a waste
focus sometimes wrongly assumes this perspective.
Both lean and TPS can be seen as a loosely connected set of potentially competing principles
whose goal is cost reduction by the elimination of waste.[6][not in citation given] These
principles include: pull processing, perfect first-time quality, waste minimization, continuous
improvement, flexibility, building and maintaining a long term relationship with suppliers,
autonomation, load leveling and production flow and visual control. The disconnected nature of
some of these principles perhaps springs from the fact that the TPS has grown pragmatically
since 1948 as it responded to the problems it saw within its own production facilities. Thus
what one sees today is the result of a 'need' driven learning to improve where each step has built
on previous ideas and not something based upon a theoretical framework
One of the greatest challenges confronting organizations recently is fierce competition, and
the continuous increase in customer expectation. Customers are day by day becoming more
critical towards the quality of service they experience (Albrecht & Zemke, 1985;
Kandampully, 1998). Now the criterion for long term sustainability and success of any
business is subsequently determined by an organization’s ability to develop, maintain, and
continuously improve customers’ loyalty: to fulfill customers’ present needs, to forecast
prospective needs, and to upgrade the ongoing relationship. The organization’s motives to
transform into EC can broadly be identified as improving efficiency and effectiveness, and
ultimately gaining superior competitiveness. These competitive advantages include
improving supply chain coordination, differentiating service offer, improving customer
service, and entering new markets.
Quality Practice in EC
There is high component of self-service (customer uses the web-site) and even in
case of manufactured goods, the service component of the total offering is
increasing.
Trust, Security, and Privacy play a very distinctive role in internet based purchase
As such, there is a need to identify the EC quality dimensions and recommend how the
company can improve these quality dimensions by integrating quality principles.
Identification of the EC quality dimensions and integration of quality principles in EC
context is a new and important area to investigate.
Quick interaction
Security control and trust
Open disposal of information & privacy
Self-service shopping
Online environment
Robust service speed
Extended functionality beyond an organization’s boundary
Website content and accessibility
24 hours availability
Contracting and risk assessment
Involvement of top management
Complexity
Huge quantity of non transactional customers
Transactions from physical to virtual
Customer satisfaction
Ordering and delivery
Efficiency
Interactivity
Substantial comparisons with competitors
Diversity in system users
Centralized warehouse management
Security in payment automation
Integration of information technology
Although the basic principles of service quality are universally and equally valuable
to both traditional and online business, academic research into web based service quality has
started being addressed only recently. This study attempts to identify various quality
dimensions in EC from the literature and set a mechanism to implement quality principles in
EC to improve those dimensions. The importance of improving e-service quality is now well
recognized among managers of e-services (Johnson and Wang, 2002). There are a number of
online rating companies, such as Bizrate, Rating wonders, Web watchdog, Gomez advisors,
Consumer reports online, etc. These rating companies evaluate the performance of an e-
business based on abstract, perceptual e-service quality dimensions. Several dimensions
including customers’ perception of convenience, product and service quality, process
information, documentation and quality practice, site design, financial security of internet
stores, privacy, and trust are found influential to customer satisfaction with online shopping
(Liang and Huang, 1998; Szymanski and Hise, 2000; Gefen et al., 2003; Vatanasombut et al.,
2004). Inevitably, upgrading the performance of those associated factors can potentially
attract and retain more customers and increase the effectiveness of EC. Based on the review
of relevant literature (e.g., Chou, 2001; Molla, 2001; Balasubramanian et al., 2003; Geoffrion
et al., 2003; Wang, 2003; Yang, 2003; Field et al., 2004; Ohl et al., 2004; Prybutok et al.,
2004; Schoder et al., 2004; Chiu et al., 2005; Parasuraman et al., 2005) and reports of quality
rating companies, a number of major quality dimensions of EC are identified which require
quality practice to improve continuously. This research has categorized these quality
dimensions into the following six customer-interaction domains relevant to EC.
1. Website Operation – It includes user-friendly technology, efficient ordering system,
up-to- date information delivery, and improved website. Customer feedback is
essential for website operation. Only a high quality website operation can attract and
retain customers. Quality management practice is the vital issue to improve website
operation continuously.
3. Process Operation – High quality process operation is the emerging issue of quality
management practice. Sub items covered in this segment are: efficient supply chain
and centralized warehouse management, continuous innovation, efficient operation,
cost management, and secured electronic payment. All these factors are internal
management oriented, but the pivotal beneficiary group is the customer. Through the
successful operation of this segment, one company tends to reduce the gap between
customer expectation and perceived quality.
4. Policy – Since EC transactions are completely virtual, the policy of a company plays
a key function for customer satisfaction. It mainly includes return policy, external and
internal environment, and legal service. To stay in the global market as a leader,
continuous, up-to- date, and customized improvements of policy are important to
attract new customers and to support the competitiveness of the system.
Quality principles emphasize customer orientation, that is, through all levels of
employees’ participation and teamwork, they preach continuous improvement to fulfill
customer needs and expectations (Bertram, 1991; Ross, 1993; McAdam & Mckeown, 1999).
The quality management practice includes a toolbox for efficient and effective quality
(process and product): control, assurance, improvement (continuous) and innovation for
process, products, and services. According to EC quality dimension model as presented in
Figure 3, to gain continuous improvement in customer aspects, the major six customer-
interaction domains of EC, Website Operation, Fulfillment
/Responsiveness, Process Operation, Policy, Credibility, and Customer Service, need
effective quality practice in a cyclic manner to ride on seamless competition. Various
principles of quality management practice should cover all of the above six aspects referred
as EC customer-interaction domains. Such integration should be characterized by customer
focus, long term commitment, continuous innovation, scientific approach, education and
training, and responsibility to society with the involvement of empowered employee and
addition of values in all stages to gain most competitiveness. Each web business should
detect its unique essence in terms of processes, payments, products and services, and
seamless needs of customers. Chou (2001) emphasized that EC needs to develop a scientific
approach and provide a long term commitment to implement the quality management
practice. Kurtus (2000), for example, pointed out that EC should follow TQM management
philosophies and use ISO 9000 standards to enhance their chances of success.
The quality principles emphasize satisfying customers and giving them value for the
money paid. Often that value goes beyond simply delivering a product or service. It should
include special services. An important aspect of customer satisfaction is finding out what the
customer really wants and expects. The basic objective and success story of EC lies on the
assurance of this question.
Customer Service: The other major area of EC where quality management practice
might play an important role is customer service which includes improved pre-sale, sale, and
post-sale services, effective responsiveness, and assurance. Direct application of the Plan-Do-
Check-Act cycle can benefit customer service. Actually, two way transmittal of quality and
other information (Management to and from Customer) through the Plan-Do-Check-Act
cycle will detect defectiveness or deficiencies, scheduling, planning, and quality related
other issues. This is primarily a fact-finding exercise that requires analysis of data on
products and services, process, and customers. Quality practices can fix the customer
problem to identifying causes and eliminating the potential recurrence. Adopting quality
management in EC enhances product, service, and process quality which consequently
increase the demand for information on customers, products, and processes. It also makes it
inevitable to transfer information horizontally across departmental boundaries and forward
and backward in the operation chain to suppliers and customers. This information is a critical
component of the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle advocated by Deming (1986). Using quality
principles, continuous analysis of customer requirements and satisfaction indicators become
an essential component of the decision making of customer service.
DEMING CYCLE:-
The Deming cycle can be used in Flipkart for continuous improvement in work. This is called
the PDCA cycle. A conceptual framework has been shown below.
DEMING CYCLE
Plan: define the quality issues which measures the extent of customers' requirements and
then uses them in the planning for the design of website contents and provides services that
meet the customers' need.
Do: develop and test possible solutions with high quality which is determined in the
planning stage.
Check: measure the effectiveness of the solutions through customers' responses acts to
ensure perfect implementation of the possible solutions.
Act: Analyze the customers' satisfaction and then send the results to the planning phase for
review. Therefore, it is applied Deming Cycle.
CONCLUSION:-
The TQM tools which we have discussed in the above report has to be implemented very carefully. As
mentioned in the report some e-commerce companies used TQM but failed to gain from the process.
TQM should be implemented with utmost care and according to the business model the company is
following. For Flipkart it will be different and for Amazon it will be different. Flipkart should not
compare and copy TQM model with Amazon as it was the mistake which other companies made in the
past. With proper implementation and utmost care and control Flipkart can gain a lot from TQM in terms
of quality and customer satisfaction.