Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research
quantitative research
When collecting and analyzing data, quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while
qualitative research deals with words and meanings. Both are important for gaining different kinds of
knowledge.
Qualitative research
Common qualitative methods include interviews with open-ended questions, observations described in
words, and literature reviews that explore concepts and theories.
Quantitative research
Quantitative research is expressed in numbers and graphs. It is used to test or confirm theories and
assumptions. This type of research can be used to establish generalizable facts about a topic.
Common quantitative methods include experiments, observations recorded as numbers, and surveys
with closed-ended questions.
The quantitative research suggests that the data concerned can be analyzed in terms of numbers. An
example that we can give for this study is a study comparing the performance of Grade 12 in Upper
Tumapoc National High School and Burgos National high School in Physical Science when ICT is
integrated in teaching. This can be approached by getting the average performance of both schools
before and after integrating ICT. Then the averages can be compared and analyzed to see the
differences or effectiveness. In this case, numbers are used as data for analysis. Another is surveying
what do viewers in Burgos, La Union prefer to watch: is it GMA dramarama or ABS-CBN Golden
Kapamilya noontime show. In here, it may be approached by making a survey questionnaire asking for
the preference of viewers in Burgos, La Union.
CHARACTERISTICS OF QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
1. OBJECTIVE. Quantitative research seeks accurate measurement and analysis of target concepts. It is
not based on mere intuition and guesses. Data are gathered before proposing a conclusion or solution to
a problem.
2. CLEARLY DEFINED RESEARCH QUESTIONS. The researchers know in advance what they are looking
for. The research questions are well-defined for which objective answers are sought. All aspects of the
study are carefully designed before data are gathered.
4. NUMERICAL DATA. Figures, tables or graphs showcase summarized data collection in order to show
trends, relationships or differences among variables. In sum, the charts and tables allow you to see the
evidence collected.
5. LARGE SAMPLE SIZES. To arrive at a more reliable data analysis, a normal population distribution
curve is preferred. This requires a large sample size, depending on how the characteristics of the
population vary. Random sampling is recommended in determining the sample size to avoid
researcher’s bias in interpreting the results. 6. REPLICATION. Quantitative methods can be repeated to
verify findings in another setting, thus strengthen and reinforcing validity of findings eliminating the
possibility of spurious conclusions.
7. FUTURE OUTCOMES. By using complex mathematical calculations and with the aid of computers, if-
then scenarios may be formulated thus predicting future results. Quantitative research puts emphasis
on proof, rather than discovery.
2. The use of statistical techniques facilitates sophisticated analyses and allows you to comprehend a
huge amount of vital characteristics of data.
3. It is real and unbiased. If the research is properly designed it filters out external factors, and so can be
seen as real and unbiased.
4. The numerical data can be analyzed in a quick and easy way. By employing statistically valid random
models, findings can be generalized to the population about which information is necessary.
5. Quantitative studies are replicable. Standardized approaches allow the study to be replicated in
different areas or over time with formulation of comparable findings. 6. Quantitative experiments are
useful for testing the results gained by a series of qualitative experiments, leading to a final answer, and
narrowing down of possible directions to follow.
2. It is costly. Since, there are more respondents compared to qualitative research, the expenses will be
greater in reaching out to these people and in reproducing questionnaires.
3. The information is contextual factors to help interpret the results or to explain variations are usually
ignored. It does not consider the distinct capacity of the respondents to share and elaborate further
information unlike the qualitative research.
4. Much information are difficult to gather using structured research instruments, specifically on
sensitive issues like pre-marital sex, domestic violence, among others.
5. If not done seriously and correctly, data from questionnaires may be incomplete and inaccurate.
Researchers must be on the look-out on respondents who are just guessing in answering the instrument.