0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views

FE 445 - Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management: Fall 2020

This document summarizes key concepts from a lecture on risk and return in investment analysis and portfolio management. It discusses the risk premium and how more risk leads to higher expected returns to overcome investor risk aversion. It then shows historical returns and growth of investments in stocks and bonds from 1926-2013. Other concepts covered include the Sharpe ratio, excess return statistics, forming complete portfolios, changing portfolio weights, the effects of leverage, and quantifying investor risk aversion through indifference curves.

Uploaded by

kate ng
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views

FE 445 - Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management: Fall 2020

This document summarizes key concepts from a lecture on risk and return in investment analysis and portfolio management. It discusses the risk premium and how more risk leads to higher expected returns to overcome investor risk aversion. It then shows historical returns and growth of investments in stocks and bonds from 1926-2013. Other concepts covered include the Sharpe ratio, excess return statistics, forming complete portfolios, changing portfolio weights, the effects of leverage, and quantifying investor risk aversion through indifference curves.

Uploaded by

kate ng
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

FE 445 – Investment Analysis and Portfolio

Management
Fall 2020

Farzad Saidi

Boston University | Questrom School of Business


Lecture 5: Risk and return
Risk premium & risk aversion

• The risk-free rate (nominal) can be earned with certainty (σ = 0)

• The risk premium on a portfolio P is the expected excess return


• Risk aversion: investor’s reluctance to accept risk
• Overcome risk aversion by offering higher returns

More risk ⇒ higher expected excess return

1
Realized returns 1926 – 2016

2
What if you had invested $1 from 1926 – 2013?

Govt bonds Stocks Stocks Stocks


World U.S. World U.S. large U.S. small
Geometric average 5.37 5.07 8.24 9.88 11.82
Growth of $1 (nominal) 100 77 1,060 3,982 18,629

3
Distribution of returns

4
Sharpe ratio

• Reward-to-volatility (or reward-to-variability) ratio:

E (rp ) − rf
SR = ,
σp

where E (rp ) is the expected return on the portfolio and σp the


volatility of the portfolio
• Notes:
• Use realized excess returns to calculate σp , otherwise it picks up
expected changes in the risk-free rate
• Only a good measure for diversified portfolios, not for single assets

5
Excess-return statistic: 1926 – 2013

World markets U.S. market

Large Govt Small Large U.S.


stocks bonds stocks stocks Long-
term
Treasuries
Geometric avg 8.24 5.37 11.82 9.88 5.07
Min -39.94 -13.5 -54.27 -45.56 -13.82
Max 70.81 34.12 159.05 54.56 32.68
Excess return 6.32 2.16 13.94 8.34 1.83
Sharpe ratio 0.33 0.26 0.37 0.41 0.23
Correlation with T-bill -0.25 -0.16 -0.22 -0.17 -0.12

6
Forming a complete portfolio

Complete portfolio: consists of safe (rf ) and risky assets (rp )

• Safe (risk-free) assets: T-bill, money market instruments


• Risky assets: stocks, bonds, etc.

Example: Imagine your total wealth is $10,000, and you decide to


allocate $2,500 in safe assets and $7,500 in a risky portfolio.

• Safe assets: T-bills


• Risky portfolio consists of Apple stock of $2,500, BP stock of
$3,000, and Citigroup stock of $2,000

What are the portfolio weights?

7
Forming a complete portfolio

The weights in the risky portfolio are as follows

• wApple = $2, 500/7, 500 = 33.33%


• wBP = $3, 000/7, 500 = 40.00%
• wCitigroup = $2, 000/7, 500 = 26.67%

The weights in the complete portfolio are as follows:

• The weight of the risky portfolio is $7, 500/10, 000 = 75%, therefore
the weights are
• wApple = 0.75 × 33.33% = 25%
• wBP = 0.75 × 40.00% = 30%
• wCitigroup = 0.75 × 26.67% = 20%

8
Changing the portfolio weights

Problem: You expect a stock market crash soon and want to reallocate
your portfolio. You decide to invest 50% of your wealth into the risk-free
assets and the rest into risky assets. You want to keep the portfolio
weights as is. What is your new portfolio?

T-bills = $.........
Apple = $.........
BP = $.........
Citigroup = $.........

9
The complete portfolio

Expected return for complete portfolio:

E (rc ) = yE (rp ) + (1 − y )rf ,

where y is the portfolio weight for risky assets

• For the complete portfolio σc = y σp


• Note that this is NOT true in general when you have 2 risky assets!

Example: Complete portfolio with rf = 5%, E (rp ) = 14%, σp = 22% and


y = 0.75.

E (rc ) = .........
σc = .........

10
Possible combinations

rf = 5%, E (rp ) = 14%, σp = 22%


E (rc )

11
What if you could use leverage?

• Assume you can borrow at the risk-free rate and invest in the risky
asset using 50% leverage. In other words, if your wealth is $10,000,
you can borrow an extra $5,000
• What is E (rc ) and σc now?

12
What if you could use leverage?

• Assume you can borrow at the risk-free rate and invest in the risky
asset using 50% leverage. In other words, if your wealth is $10,000,
you can borrow an extra $5,000
• What is E (rc ) and σc now?

Solution: Your new weight in risky assets is y = 1.5, hence,

E (rc ) = 1.5 × 14% + (−0.5) × 5% = 18.5%


σc = 1.5 × 22% = 33%

12
Example

A stock sells for $40 a share the beginning of the year. You believe there
are 3 equally possible scenarios by year end:

Scenario Dividend Price


Recession $0.50 $34
Normal $1.00 $43
Boom $2.00 $50

• What is the your expected return and variance on the stock?


• What about a portfolio which is half stock and half T-bill (rf = 4%)?

13
Solution

• Calculate holding-period returns (HPRs)

14
Solution

• Calculate holding-period returns (HPRs)


• Boom: 30%
• Normal: 10%
• Recession: -13.75%
• Expected HPR = 13 0.3 + 31 0.1 + 13 (−0.1375) = 0.0875
• Variance = 0.031979 ⇒ volatility = 0.1788

14
Solution

• Calculate holding-period returns (HPRs)


• Boom: 30%
• Normal: 10%
• Recession: -13.75%
• Expected HPR = 13 0.3 + 31 0.1 + 13 (−0.1375) = 0.0875
• Variance = 0.031979 ⇒ volatility = 0.1788
• Portfolio return = 0.5 × 0.0875 + 0.5 × 0.04 = 0.06375
• Portfolio volatility = 0.5 × 0.1788 = 0.0894, as T-bill = zero risk

14
The slope and the Sharpe ratio

E(r)

P
14%

E(rP ) - rf 9
Slope = =
sP 22
5%

0 σ
22%

• Combinations of the risky portfolio and the riskless asset offer return
per unit of risk = 9/22
• Slope is always the Sharpe ratio ⇒ constant Sharpe ratio
irrespective of portfolio weight y

15
Quantifying Risk Aversion

General assumption: Investors maximize mean-variance utility

U = E (r ) − 0.5 × σ 2 × A

where A is the coefficient of risk aversion

• Investors care about high expected returns


• But dislike risk (captured by σ)
• They do not care about skewness and kurtosis...
• What is A? Typically values between 2 − 4. If there is no risk, then
A = 0 (risk neutrality)

The optimal allocation in this case is:

E (rp ) − rf
y? =
σp2 × A

16
Indifference curves for A = 2

U3 > U2 > U1 > U0=0


E(r)

0.22=0.04

0 0.2 s

Utility is constant along the blue indifference curves! Investor is


indifferent between these portfolios!
17
Example

• Investor has utility U = E (r ) − 0.5σ 2 A with A = 4


• Which of the four investments would the investor choose? What if
you have A = 0 (risk neutral)?

Investment E (r ) σ Utility
1 0.12 0.30
2 0.15 0.50
3 0.21 0.16
4 0.24 0.21

• With A = 4 choose investment . . . . . . . . . since it has the highest


utility
• With A = 0 choose investment . . . . . . . . . since it has the highest
utility
18
Summary

• This class:
• Higher-risk assets should have higher returns
• Optimal allocation between risky and risk-free asset depends on the
investors’ risk aversion
• Next class:
• Diversification
• The efficient mean-variance frontier

19

You might also like