Lojban Book

Chapter 1
Lojban As We Mangle It In Lojbanistan: About This Book

1. What is Lojban?
Lojban (pronounced ``LOZH-bahn'') is a constructed language. Previous versions o
f the language were called ``Loglan'' by Dr. James Cooke Brown, who founded the
Loglan Project and started the development of the language in 1955. The goals fo
r the language were first described in the open literature in the article ``Logl
an'', published in Scientific American, June, 1960. Made well-known by that arti
cle and by occasional references in science fiction (most notably in Robert Hein
lein's novel The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress and computer publications, Loglan and
Lojban have been built over four decades by dozens of workers and hundreds of su
pporters, led since 1987 by The Logical Language Group (who are the publishers o
f this book).
There are thousands of artificial languages (of which Esperanto is the best-know
n), but Loglan/Lojban has been engineered to make it unique in several ways. The
following are the main features of Lojban:
* Lojban is designed to be used by people in communication with each other,
and possibly in the future with computers.
* Lojban is designed to be neutral between cultures.
* Lojban grammar is based on the principles of predicate logic.
* Lojban has an unambiguous yet flexible grammar.
* Lojban has phonetic spelling, and unambiguously resolves its sounds into w
ords.
* Lojban is simple compared to natural languages; it is easy to learn.
* Lojban's 1300 root words can be easily combined to form a vocabulary of mi
llions of words.
* Lojban is regular; the rules of the language are without exceptions.
* Lojban attempts to remove restrictions on creative and clear thought and c
ommunication.
* Lojban has a variety of uses, ranging from the creative to the scientific,
from the theoretical to the practical.
* Lojban has been demonstrated in translation and in original works of prose
and poetry.
2. What is this book?
This book is what is called a ``reference grammar''. It attempts to expound the
whole Lojban language, or at least as much of it as is understood at present. Lo
jban is a rich language with many features, and an attempt has been made to disc
over the functions of those features. The word ``discover'' is used advisedly; L
ojban was not `ìnvented'' by any one person or committee. Often, grammatical fe
atures were introduced into the language long before their usage was fully under
stood. Sometimes they were introduced for one reason, only to prove more useful
for other reasons not recognized at the time.
By intention, this book is complete in description but not in explanation. For e
very rule in the formal Lojban grammar (given in Chapter 21), there is a bit of
explanation and an example somewhere in the book, and often a great deal more th
an a bit. In essence, Chapter 2 gives a brief overview of the language, Chapter
21 gives the formal structure of the language, and the chapters in between put s
emantic bones on that formal flesh. I hope that eventually more grammatical mate
rial founded on (or even correcting) the explanations in this book will become a
vailable.
Nevertheless, the publication of this book is, in one sense, the completion of a
long period of language evolution. With the exception of a possible revision of
the language that will not even be considered until five years from publication
date, and any revisions of this book needed to correct outright errors, the lan
guage described in this book will not be changing by deliberate act of its creat
ors any more. Instead, language change will take place in the form of new vocabu
lary --- Lojban does not yet have nearly the vocabulary it needs to be a fully u
sable language of the modern world, as Chapter 12 explains --- and through the i
rregular natural processes of drift and (who knows?) native-speaker evolution. (
Teach your children Lojban!) You can learn the language described here with assu
rance that (unlike previous versions of Lojban and Loglan, as well as most other
artificial languages) it will not be subject to further fiddling by language-me
isters.
It is probably worth mentioning that this book was written somewhat piecemeal. E
ach chapter began life as an explication of a specific Lojban topic; only later
did these begin to clump together into a larger structure of words and ideas. Th
erefore, there are perhaps not as many cross-references as there should be. Howe
ver, I have attempted to make the index as comprehensive as possible.
Each chapter has a descriptive title, often involving some play on words; this i
s an attempt to make the chapters more memorable. The title of Chapter 1 (which
you are now reading), for example, is an allusion to the book English As We Spea
k It In Ireland, by P. W. Joyce, which is sort of informal reference work about
Hiberno-English. ``Lojbanistan'' is both an imaginary country where Lojban is th
e native language, and a term for the actual community of Lojban-speakers, scatt
ered over the world. Why ``mangle''? As yet, nobody in the real Lojbanistan spea
ks the language at all well, by the standards of the imaginary Lojbanistan; that
is one of the circumstances this book is meant to help remedy.
3. What are the typographical conventions of this book?
Each chapter is broken into numbered sections; each section contains a mixture o
f expository text, numbered examples, and possibly tables.
The reader will notice a certain similarity in the examples used throughout the
book. One chapter after another rings the changes on the self-same sentences:
1.1) mi klama le zarci
I go-to that-which-I-describe-as-a store.
I go to the store.
will become wearisomely familiar before Chapter 21 is reached. This method is de
liberate; I have tried to use simple and (eventually) familiar examples wherever
possible, to avoid obscuring new grammatical points with new vocabulary. Of cou
rse, this is not the method of a textbook, but this book is not a textbook (alth
ough people have learned Lojban from it and its predecessors). Rather, it is int
ended both for self-learning (of course, at present would-be Lojban teachers mus
t be self-learners) and to serve as a reference in the usual sense, for looking
up obscure points about the language.
It is useful to talk further about Example 1.1 for what it illustrates about exa
mples in this book. Examples usually occupy three lines. The first of these is i
n Lojban, the second in a word-by-word literal translation of the Lojban into En
glish, and the third in colloquial English. The second and third lines are somet
imes called the ``literal translation'' and the ``colloquial translation'' respe
ctively. Sometimes, when clarity is not sacrificed thereby, one or both are omit
ted. If there is more than one Lojban sentence, it generally means that they hav
e the same meaning.
Words are sometimes surrounded by square brackets. In Lojban texts, these enclos
e optional grammatical particles that may (in the context of the particular exam
ple) be either omitted or included. In literal translations, they enclose words
that are used as conventional translations of specific Lojban words, but don't h
ave exactly the meanings or uses that the English word would suggest. In Chapter
3, square brackets surround phonetic representations in the International Phone
tic Alphabet.
Many of the tables, especially those placed at the head of various sections, are
in three columns. The first column contains Lojban words discussed in that sect
ion; the second column contains the grammatical category (represented by an UPPE
R CASE Lojban word) to which the word belongs, and the third column contains a b
rief English gloss, not necessarily or typically a full explanation. Other table
s are explained in context.
A few Lojban words are used in this book as technical terms. All of these are ex
plained in Chapter 2, except for a few used only in single chapters, which are e
xplained in the introductory sections of those chapters.
4. Disclaimers
It is necessary to add, alas, that the examples used in this book do not refer t
o any existing person, place, or institution, and that any such resemblance is e
ntirely coincidental and unintentional, and not intended to give offense.
When definitions and place structures of gismu, and especially of lujvo, are giv
en in this book, they may differ from those given in the English-Lojban dictiona
ry (which, as of this writing, is not yet published). If so, the information giv
en in the dictionary supersedes whatever is given here.
5. Acknowledgements and Credits
Although the bulk of this book was written for the Logical Language Group (LLG)
by John Cowan, who is represented by the occasional authorial `Ì'', certain cha
pters were first written by others and then heavily edited by me to fit into thi
s book.
In particular: Chapter 2 is a fusion of originally separate documents, one by At
helstan, and one by Nora Tansky LeChevalier and Bob LeChevalier; Chapters 3 and
4 were originally written by Bob LeChevalier with contributions by Chuck Barton;
Chapter 12 was originally written (in much longer form) by Nick Nicholas; the d
ialogue near the end of Chapter 13 was contributed by Nora Tansky LeChevalier; C
hapter 15 and parts of Chapter 16 were originally by Bob LeChevalier; and the YA
CC grammar in Chapter 21 is the work of several hands, but is primarily by Bob L
eChevalier and Jeff Taylor. The BNF grammar, which is also in Chapter 21, was or
iginally written by me, then rewritten by Clark Nelson, and finally touched up b
y me again.
The research into natural languages from which parts of Chapter 5 draw their mat
erial was performed by Ivan Derzhanski. LLG acknowledges his kind permission to
use the fruits of his research.
The pictures in this book were drawn by Nora Tansky LeChevalier, except for the
picture appearing in Chapter 4, which is by Sylvia Rutiser.
I would like to thank the following people for their detailed reviews, suggestio
ns, comments, and early detection of my embarrassing errors in Lojban, logic, En
glish, and cross-references: Nick Nicholas, Mark Shoulson, Veijo Vilva, Colin Fi
ne, And Rosta, Jorge Llambias, Iain Alexander, Paulo S. L. M. Barreto, Robert J.
Chassell, Ivan Derzhanski, Jim Carter, Irene Gates, Bob LeChevalier, John Parks
-Clifford (also known as ``pc''), and Nora Tansky LeChevalier.
Nick Nicholas (NSN) would like to thank the following Lojbanists: Mark Shoulson,
Veijo Vilva, Colin Fine, And Rosta, and Iain Alexander for their suggestions an
d comments; John Cowan, for his extensive comments, his exemplary trailblazing o
f Lojban grammar, and for solving the ``manskapi'' dilemma for NSN; Jorge Llambi
as, for his even more extensive comments, and for forcing NSN to think more than
he was inclined to; Bob LeChevalier, for his skeptical overview of the issue, h
is encouragement, and for scouring all Lojban text his computer has been burdene
d with for lujvo; Nora Tansky LeChevalier, for writing the program converting ol
d rafsi text to new rafsi text, and sparing NSN from embarrassing errors; and Ji
m Carter, for his dogged persistence in analyzing lujvo algorithmically, which i
nspired this research, and for first identifying the three lujvo classes.
Of course, the entire Loglan Project owes a considerable debt to James Cooke Bro
wn as the language inventor, and also to several earlier contributors to the dev
elopment of the language. Especially noteworthy are Doug Landauer, Jeff Prothero
, Scott Layson, Jeff Taylor, and Bob McIvor. Final responsibility for the remain
ing errors and infelicities is solely mine.
6. Informal Bibliography
The founding document for the Loglan Project, of which this book is one of the p
roducts, is Loglan 1: A Logical Language by James Cooke Brown (4th ed. 1989, The
Loglan Institute, Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A.) The language described therein
is not Lojban, but is very close to it and may be considered an ancestral versio
n. It is regrettably necessary to state that nothing in this book has been appro
ved by Dr. Brown, and that the very existence of Lojban is disapproved of by him
.
The logic of Lojban, such as it is, owes a good deal to the American philosopher
W. v.O. Quine, especially Word and Object (1960, M.I.T. Press). Much of Quine's
philosophical writings, especially on observation sentences, reads like a liter
al translation from Lojban.
The theory of negation expounded in Chapter 15 is derived from a reading of Larr
y Horn's work The Natural History of Negation.
Of course, neither Brown nor Quine nor Horn is in any way responsible for the us
es or misuses I have made of their works.
Depending on just when you are reading this book, there may be three other books
about Lojban available: a textbook, a Lojban/English dictionary, and a book con
taining general information about Lojban. You can probably get these books, if t
hey have been published, from the same place where you got this book. In additio
n, other books not yet foreseen may also exist.
7. Captions to Pictures
The following examples list the Lojban caption, with a translation, for the pict
ure at the head of each chapter. If a chapter's picture has no caption, ``(none)
'' is specified instead.
7.1) coi lojban. coi rodo
Greetings, O Lojban! Greetings, all-of you
7.2) (none)
7.3) .i .ai .i .ai .o
[untranslatable]
7.4) jbobliku
Lojbanic-blocks
7.5) (none)
7.6) lei re nanmu cu bevri le re nanmu
The-mass-of two men carry the two men
Two men (jointly) carry two men (both of them).
7.7) ma drani danfu
.i di'e
.i di'u
.i dei
.i ri
.i do'i
[What sumti] is-the-correct type-of-answer?
The-next-sentence.
The-previous-sentence.
This-sentence.
The-previous-sentence.
An-unspecified-utterance.
7.8) ko viska re prenu poi bruna la santas.
[You!] see two persons who-are brothers-of Santa.
7.9) (none)
7.10) za'o klama
[superfective] come/go
Something goes (or comes) for too long.
7.11) le si'o kunti
The concept-of emptiness
7.12) (none)
7.13) .oi ro'i ro'a ro'e
[Pain!] [emotional] [social] [mental]
7.14) (none)
7.15) mi na'e lumci le karce
I other-than wash the car
I didn't wash the car.
7.16) drata mupli pe'u .djan.
another example [please] John
Another example, John, please!
7.17) zai xanlerfu by. ly. .obu .jy by. .abu ny.
[Shift] hand-letters l o j b a n
"Lojban" in the manual alphabet
7.18) no no
0 0
7.19) (none)
7.20) (none)
7.21) (none)
8. Boring Legalities
This book is Copyright Â© 1997 by The Logical Language Group, Inc.
Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this book, eithe
r in electronic or in printed form, provided the copyright notice and this permi
ssion notice are preserved on all copies.
Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of this book, pro
vided that the modifications are clearly marked as such, and provided that the e
ntire resulting derived work is distributed under the terms of a permission noti
ce identical to this one.
Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations of this manual into an
other language, under the above conditions for modified versions, except that th
is permission notice may be stated in a translation that has been approved by th
e Logical Language Group, rather than in English.
The contents of Chapter 21 are in the public domain.
Chapter 2
A Quick Tour of Lojban Grammar, With Diagrams
1. The concept of the bridi
This chapter gives diagrammed examples of basic Lojban sentence structures. The
most general pattern is covered first, followed by successive variations on the
basic components of the Lojban sentence. There are many more capabilities not co
vered in this chapter, but covered in detail in later chapters, so this chapter
is a ``quick tour'' of the material later covered more slowly throughout the boo
k. It also introduces most of the Lojban words used to discuss Lojban grammar.
Let us consider John and Sam and three statements about them:
1.1) John is the father of Sam.
1.2) John hits Sam.
1.3) John is taller than Sam.
These examples all describe relationships between John and Sam. However, in Engl
ish, we use the noun ``father'' to describe a static relationship in Example 1.1
, the verb ``hits'' to describe an active relationship in Example 1.2 , and the
adjective ``taller'' to describe an attributive relationship in Example 1.3 . I
n Lojban we make no such grammatical distinctions; these three sentences, when e
xpressed in Lojban, are structurally identical. The same part of speech is used
to represent the relationship. In formal logic this whole structure is called a
``predication''; in Lojban it is called a ``bridi'', and the central part of spe
ech is the ``selbri''. Logicians refer to the things thus related as arguments,
while Lojbanists call them ``sumti''. These Lojban terms will be used for the re
st of the book.
bridi (predicate)
______________|________________
| |
John is the father of Sam
|____| |______________| |___|
| | |
sumti selbri sumti (argument)
In a relationship, there are a definite number of things being related. In Engli
sh, for example, ``give'' has three places: the donor, the recipient and the gif
t. For example:
1.4) John gives Sam the book.
and
1.5) Sam gives John the book.
mean two different things because the relative positions of ``John'' and ``Sam''
have been switched.
Further,
1.6) The book gives John Sam.
seems strange to us merely because the places are being filled by unorthodox arg
uments. The relationship expressed by ``give'' has not changed.
In Lojban, each selbri has a specified number and type of arguments, known colle
ctively as its ``place structure''. The simplest kind of selbri consists of a si
ngle root word, called a ``gismu'', and the definition in a dictionary gives the
place structure explicitly. The primary task of constructing a Lojban sentence,
after choosing the relationship itself, is deciding what you will use to fill i
n the sumti places.
This book uses the Lojban terms ``bridi'', ``sumti'', and ``selbri'', because it
is best to come to understand them independently of the English associations of
the corresponding words, which are only roughly similar in meaning anyhow.
The Lojban examples in this chapter (but not in the rest of the book) use a sing
le underline (---) under each sumti, and a double underline (===) under each sel
bri, to help you to tell them apart.
2. Pronunciation
Detailed pronunciation and spelling rules are given in Chapter 3 , but what foll
ows will keep the reader from going too far astray while digesting this chapter.
Lojban has six recognized vowels: `à'', `è'', `ì'', `ò'', `ù'' and ``y''. T
he first five are roughly pronounced as `à'' as in ``father'', `è'' as in ``le
t'', `ì'' as in ``machine'', `ò'' as in ``dome'' and `ù'' as in ``flute''. ``
y'' is pronounced as the sound called ``schwa'', that is, as the unstressed `à'
' as in `àbout'' or `àround''.
Twelve consonants in Lojban are pronounced more or less as their counterparts ar
e in English: ``b'', ``d'', ``f'', ``k'', ``l'', ``m'', ``n'', ``p'', ``r'', ``t
'', ``v'' and ``z''. The letter ``c'', on the other hand is pronounced as the ``
sh'' in ``hush'', while ``j'' is its voiced counterpart, the sound of the ``s''
in ``pleasure''. ``g'' is always pronounced as it is in ``gift'', never as in ``
giant''. ``s'' is as in ``sell'', never as in ``rose''. The sound of ``x'' is no
t found in English in normal words. It is found as ``ch'' in Scottish ``loch'',
as ``j'' in Spanish ``junta'', and as ``ch'' in German ``Bach''; it also appears
in the English interjection ``yecchh!''. It gets easier to say as you practice
it. The letter ``r'' can be trilled, but doesn't have to be.
The Lojban diphthongs `ài'', `èi'', `òi'', and `àu'' are pronounced much as
in the English words ``sigh'', ``say'', ``boy'', and ``how''. Other Lojban dipht
hongs begin with an `ì'' pronounced like English ``y'' (for example, `ìo'' is
pronounced ``yo'') or else with a `ù'' pronounced like English ``w'' (for examp
le, `ùa'' is pronounced ``wa'').
Lojban also has three ``semi-letters'': the period, the comma and the apostrophe
. The period represents a glottal stop or a pause; it is a required stoppage of
the flow of air in the speech stream. The apostrophe sounds just like the Englis
h letter ``h''. Unlike a regular consonant, it is not found at the beginning or
end of a word, nor is it found adjacent to a consonant; it is only found between
two vowels. The comma has no sound associated with it, and is used to separate
syllables that might ordinarily run together. It is not used in this chapter.
Stress falls on the next to the last syllable of all words, unless that vowel is
``y'', which is never stressed; in such words the third-to-last syllable is str
essed. If a word only has one syllable, then that syllable is not stressed.
All Lojban words are pronounced as they are spelled: there are no silent letters
.
3. Words that can act as sumti
Here is a short table of single words used as sumti. This table provides example
s only, not the entire set of such words, which may be found in Chapter 7 .
mi I/me, we/us
do you
ti this, these
ta that, those
tu that far away, those far away
zo'e unspecified value (used when a sumti is
unimportant or obvious)
Lojban sumti are not specific as to number (singular or plural), nor gender (mas
culine/feminine/neutral). Such distinctions can be optionally added by methods t
hat are beyond the scope of this chapter.
The cmavo ``ti'', ``ta'', and ``tu'' refer to whatever the speaker is pointing a
t, and should not be used to refer to things that cannot in principle be pointed
at.
Names may also be used as sumti, provided they are preceded with the word ``la''
:
la meris. the one/ones named Mary
la djan. the one/ones named John
Other Lojban spelling versions are possible for names from other languages, and
there are restrictions on which letters may appear in Lojban names: see Chapter
6 for more information.
4. Some words used to indicate selbri relations
Here is a short table of some words used as Lojban selbri in this chapter:
vecnu x1 (seller) sells x2 (goods) to x3 (buyer)
for x4 (price)
tavla x1 (talker) talks to x2 (audience)
about x3 (topic) in language x4
sutra x1 (agent) is fast at doing x2 (action)
blari'o x1 (object/light source) is blue-green
melbi x1 (object/idea) is beautiful to x2 (observer)
by standard x3
cutci x1 is a shoe/boot for x2 (foot)
made of x3 (material)
bajra x1 runs on x2 (surface) using x3 (limbs)
in manner x4 (gait)
klama x1 goes/comes to x2 (destination) from
x3 (origin point) via x4 (route)
using x5 (means of transportation)
pluka x1 pleases/is pleasing to x2 (experiencer)
under conditions x3
gerku x1 is a dog of breed x2
kurji x1 takes care of x2
kanro x1 is healthy by standard x2
stali x1 stays/remains with x2
zarci x1 is a market/store/shop selling x2 (products)
operated by x3 (storekeeper)
Each selbri (relation) has a specific rule that defines the role of each sumti i
n the bridi, based on its position. In the table above, that order was expressed
by labeling the sumti positions as x1, x2, x3, and x4.
Like the table in Section 3 , this table is far from complete: in fact, no compl
ete table can exist, because Lojban allows new words to be created (in specified
ways) whenever a speaker or writer finds the existing supply of words inadequat
e. This notion is a basic difference between Lojban (and some other languages su
ch as German and Chinese) and English; in English, most people are very leery of
using words that `àren't in the dictionary''. Lojbanists are encouraged to inv
ent new words; doing so is a major way of participating in the development of th
e language. Chapter 4 explains how to make new words, and Chapter 12 explains ho
w to give them appropriate meanings.
5. Some simple Lojban bridi
Let's look at a simple Lojban bridi. The place structure of the gismu ``tavla''
is
5.1) x1 talks to x2 about x3 in language
x4
where the ``x''es with following numbers represent the various arguments that co
uld be inserted at the given positions in the English sentence. For example:
5.2) John talks to Sam about engineering
in Lojban.
has ``John'' in the x1 place, ``Sam'' in the x2 place, `èngineering'' in the x3
place, and ``Lojban'' in the x4 place, and could be paraphrased:
5.3) Talking is going on,
with speaker John
and listener Sam
and subject matter engineering
and language Lojban.
The Lojban bridi corresponding to Example 5.1 will have the form
5.4) x1 [cu] tavla x2 x3 x4
-- ===== -- -- --
The word ``cu'' serves as a separator between any preceding sumti and the selbri
. It can often be omitted, as in the following examples.
5.5) mi tavla do zo'e zo'e
-- ===== -- ---- ----
I talk to you about something in some language.
5.6) do tavla mi ta zo'e
-- ===== -- -- ----
You talk to me about that thing in a language.
5.7) mi tavla zo'e tu ti
-- ===== ---- -- --
I talk to someone about that thing yonder
in this language.
( Example 5.7 is a bit unusual, as there is no easy way to point to a language;
one might point to a copy of this book, and hope the meaning gets across!)
When there are one or more occurrences of the cmavo ``zo'e'' at the end of a bri
di, they may be omitted, a process called `èllipsis''. Example 5.5 and Example
5.6 may be expressed thus:
5.8) mi tavla do
-- ===== --
I talk to you (about something in some language).
5.9) do tavla mi ta
-- ===== -- --
You talk to me about that thing (in some language).
Note that Example 5.7 is not subject to ellipsis by this direct method, as the `
`zo'e'' in it is not at the end of the bridi.
6. Variant bridi structure
Consider the sentence
6.1) mi [cu] vecnu ti
ta zo'e
-- ===== -- -- ----
seller-x1 sells goods-sold-x2 buyer-x3 price-x4
I sell this to that for some price.
I sell this-thing/these-things to that-buyer/those-buyers.
(The price is obvious or unimportant.)
Example 6.1 has one sumti (the x1) before the selbri. It is also possible to put
more than one sumti before the selbri, without changing the order of sumti:
6.2) mi ti [cu] vecnu ta
-- -- ===== --
seller-x1 goods-sold-x2 sells buyer-x3
I this sell to that.
(translates as stilted or poetic English)
I this thing do sell to that buyer.
6.3) mi ti ta
[cu] vecnu
-- -- -- =====
seller-x1 goods-sold-x2 buyer-x3 sells
I this to-that sell.
(translates as stilted or poetic English)
I this thing to that buyer do sell.
Examples 6.1 through 6.3 mean the same thing. Usually, placing more than one sum
ti before the selbri is done for style or for emphasis on the sumti that are out
-of-place from their normal position. (Native speakers of languages other than E
nglish may prefer such orders.)
If there are no sumti before the selbri, then it is understood that the x1 sumti
value is equivalent to ``zo'e''; i.e. unimportant or obvious, and therefore not
given. Any sumti after the selbri start counting from x2.
6.4) ta [cu] melbi
-- =====
object/idea-x1 is-beautiful
(to someone by some standard)
That/Those is/are beautiful.
That is beautiful.
Those are beautiful.
when the x1 is omitted, becomes:
6.5) melbi
-------------- =====
unspecified-x1 is-beautiful
(to someone by some standard)
Beautiful!
It's beautiful!
Omitting the x1 adds emphasis to the selbri relation, which has become first in
the sentence. This kind of sentence is termed an observative, because it is ofte
n used when someone first observes or takes note of the relationship, and wishes
to quickly communicate it to someone else. Commonly understood English observat
ives include ``Smoke!'' upon seeing smoke or smelling the odor, or ``Car!'' to a
person crossing the street who might be in danger. Any Lojban selbri can be use
d as an observative if no sumti appear before the selbri.
The word ``cu'' does not occur in an observative; ``cu'' is a separator, and the
re must be a sumti before the selbri that needs to be kept separate for ``cu'' t
o be used. With no sumti preceding the selbri, ``cu'' is not permitted. Short wo
rds like ``cu'' which serve grammatical functions are called ``cmavo'' in Lojban
.
7. Varying the order of sumti
For one reason or another you may want to change the order, placing one particul
ar sumti at the front of the bridi. The cmavo ``se'', when placed before the las
t word of the selbri, will switch the meanings of the first and second sumti pla
ces. So
7.1) mi tavla do ti
-- ===== -- --
I talk to you about this.
has the same meaning as
7.2) do se tavla mi ti
-- ======== -- --
You are talked to by me about this.
The cmavo ``te'', when used in the same location, switches the meanings of the f
irst and the third sumti places.
7.3) mi tavla do ti
-- ===== -- --
I talk to you about this.
has the same meaning as
7.4) ti te tavla do mi
-- ======== -- --
This is talked about to you by me.
Note that only the first and third sumti have switched places; the second sumti
has remained in the second place.
The cmavo ``ve'' and ``xe'' switch the first and fourth sumti places, and the fi
rst and fifth sumti places, respectively. These changes in the order of places a
re known as ``conversions'', and the ``se'', ``te'', ``ve'', and ``xe'' cmavo ar
e said to convert the selbri.
More than one of these operators may be used on a given selbri at one time, and
in such a case they are evaluated from left to right. However, in practice they
are used one at a time, as there are better tools for complex manipulation of th
e sumti places. See Chapter 5 for details.
The effect is similar to what in English is called the ``passive voice''. In Loj
ban, the converted selbri has a new place structure that is renumbered to reflec
t the place reversal, thus having effects when such a conversion is used in comb
ination with other constructs such as ``le selbri [ku]'' (see Section 10 ).
8. The basic structure of longer utterances
People don't always say just one sentence. Lojban has a specific structure for t
alk or writing that is longer than one sentence. The entirety of a given speech
event or written text is called an utterance. The sentences (usually, but not al
ways, bridi) in an utterance are separated by the cmavo ``ni'o'' and ``.i''. The
se correspond to a brief pause (or nothing at all) in spoken English, and the va
rious punctuation marks like period, question mark, and exclamation mark in writ
ten English. These separators prevent the sumti at the beginning of the next sen
tence from being mistaken for a trailing sumti of the previous sentence.
The cmavo ``ni'o'' separates paragraphs (covering different topics of discussion
). In a long text or utterance, the topical structure of the text may be indicat
ed by multiple ``ni'o''s, with perhaps ``ni'oni'oni'o'' used to indicate a chapt
er, ``ni'oni'o'' to indicate a section, and a single ``ni'o'' to indicate a subt
opic corresponding to a single English paragraph.
The cmavo ``.i'' separates sentences. It is sometimes compounded with words that
modify the exact meaning (the semantics) of the sentence in the context of the
utterance. (The cmavo ``xu'', discussed in Section 1 .7, is one such word --- it
turns the sentence from a statement to a question about truth.) When more than
one person is talking, a new speaker will usually omit the ``.i'' even though sh
e/he may be continuing on the same topic.
It is still O.K. for a new speaker to say the ``.i'' before continuing; indeed,
it is encouraged for maximum clarity (since it is possible that the second speak
er might merely be adding words onto the end of the first speaker's sentence). A
good translation for ``.i'' is the `ànd'' used in run-on sentences when people
are talking informally: `Ì did this, and then I did that, and ..., and ...''.
9. tanru
When two gismu are adjacent, the first one modifies the second, and the selbri t
akes its place structure from the rightmost word. Such combinations of gismu are
called ``tanru''. For example,
9.1) sutra tavla
has the place structure
9.2) x1 is a fast type-of talker to x2
about x3
in language x4
x1 talks fast to x2 about x3 in language x4
When three or more gismu are in a row, the first modifies the second, and that c
ombined meaning modifies the third, and that combined meaning modifies the fourt
h, and so on. For example
9.3) sutra tavla cutci
9.4) s1 is a fast-talker type of shoe
worn by s2 of material s3
That is, it is a shoe that is worn by a fast talker rather than a shoe that is f
ast and is also worn by a talker.
Note especially the use of ``type-of'' as a mechanism for connecting the English
translations of the two or more gismu; this convention helps the learner unders
tand each tanru in its context. Creative interpretations are also possible, howe
ver:
9.5) bajra cutci
runner shoe
most probably refers to shoes suitable for runners, but might be interpreted in
some imaginative instances as ``shoes that run (by themselves?)''. In general, h
owever, the meaning of a tanru is determined by the literal meaning of its compo
nents, and not by any connotations or figurative meanings. Thus
9.6) sutra tavla
fast-talker
would not necessarily imply any trickery or deception, unlike the English idiom,
and a
9.7) jikca toldi
social butterfly
must always be an insect with large brightly-colored wings, of the family Lepido
ptera .
The place structure of a tanru is always that of the final component of the tanr
u. Thus, the following has the place structure of ``klama'':
9.8) mi [cu] sutra klama la meris.
-- =========== ---------
I quickly-go to Mary.
With the conversion ``se klama'' as the final component of the tanru, the place
structure of the entire selbri is that of ``se klama'': the x1 place is the dest
ination, and the x2 place is the one who goes:
9.9) mi [cu] sutra se klama la meris.
-- ============== ---------
I quickly am-gone-to by Mary.
The following example shows that there is more to conversion than merely switchi
ng places, though:
9.10) la tam. [cu] melbi tavla la
meris.
------- =========== ---------
Tom beautifully-talks to Mary.
Tom is a beautiful-talker to Mary.
has the place structure of ``tavla'', but note the two distinct interpretations.
Now, using conversion, we can modify the place structure order:
9.11) la meris. [cu] melbi se tavla
la tam.
--------- ============== -------
Mary is beautifully-talked-to by Tom.
Mary is a beautiful-audience for Tom.
and we see that the modification has been changed so as to focus on Mary's role
in the bridi relationship, leading to a different set of possible interpretation
s.
Note that there is no place structure change if the modifying term is converted,
and so less drastic variation in possible meanings:
9.12) la tam. [cu] tavla melbi la
meris.
------- =========== ---------
Tom is talkerly-beautiful to Mary.
9.13) la tam. [cu] se tavla melbi la
meris.
------- ============== ---------
Tom is audiencely-beautiful to Mary.
and we see that the manner in which Tom is seen as beautiful by Mary changes, bu
t Tom is still the one perceived as beautiful, and Mary, the observer of beauty.
10. Description sumti
Often we wish to talk about things other than the speaker, the listener and thin
gs we can point to. Let's say I want to talk about a talker other than ``mi''. W
hat I want to talk about would naturally fit into the first place of ``tavla''.
Lojban, it turns out, has an operator that pulls this first place out of a selbr
i and converts it to a sumti called a ``description sumti''. The description sum
ti ``le tavla ku'' means ``the talker'', and may be used wherever any sumti may
be used.
For example,
10.1) mi tavla do le tavla ku
-- ===== -- -----------
means the same as
10.2) I talk to you about the talker
where ``the talker'' is presumably someone other than me, though not necessarily
.
Similarly ``le sutra tavla ku'' is ``the fast talker'', and ``le sutra te tavla
ku'' is ``the fast subject of talk'' or ``the subject of fast talk''. Which of t
hese related meanings is understood will depend on the context in which the expr
ession is used. The most plausible interpretation within the context will genera
lly be assumed by a listener to be the intended one.
In many cases the word ``ku'' may be omitted. In particular, it is never necessa
ry in a description at the end of a sentence, so:
10.3) mi tavla do le tavla ku
-- ===== -- -----------
I talk-to you about-the talker
means exactly the same thing as Example 10.1 .
There is a problem when we want to say ``The fast one is talking.'' The `òbviou
s'' translation ``le sutra tavla'' turns out to mean ``the fast talker'', and ha
s no selbri at all. To solve this problem we can use the word ``cu'', which so f
ar has always been optional, in front of the selbri.
The word ``cu'' has no meaning, and exists only to mark the beginning of the sel
bri within the bridi, separating it from a previous sumti. It comes before any o
ther part of the selbri, including other cmavo like ``se'' or ``te''. Thus:
10.4) le sutra tavla
--------------
The fast talker
10.5) le sutra cu tavla
-------- =====
The fast one is talking.
10.6) le sutra se tavla
-----------------
The fast talked-to one
10.7) le sutra cu se tavla
-------- ========
The fast one is talked to.
Consider the following more complex example, with two description sumti.
10.8) mi [cu] tavla le vecnu [ku]
le blari'o [ku]
-- ===== ------------- ---------------
I talk-to the seller about the blue-green-thing.
The sumti ``le vecnu'' contains the selbri ``vecnu'', which has the ``seller'' i
n the x1 place, and uses it in this sentence to describe a particular ``seller''
that the speaker has in mind (one that he or she probably expects the listener
will also know about). Similarly, the speaker has a particular blue-green thing
in mind, which is described using ``le'' to mark ``blari'o'', a selbri whose fir
st sumti is something blue-green.
It is safe to omit both occurrences of ``ku'' in Example 10.8 , and it is also s
afe to omit the ``cu''.
11. Examples of brivla
The simplest form of selbri is an individual word. A word which may by itself ex
press a selbri relation is called a ``brivla''. The three types of brivla are gi
smu (root words), lujvo (compounds), and fu'ivla (borrowings from other language
s). All have identical grammatical uses. So far, most of our selbri have been gi
smu or tanru built from gismu.
gismu:
11.1) mi [cu] klama ti
zo'e zo'e ta
-- ===== -- ---- ---- --
Go-er goes destination origin route means.
I go here (to this) using that means
(from somewhere via some route).
lujvo:
11.2) ta [cu] blari'o
-- =======
That is-blue-green.
fu'ivla:
11.3) ti [cu] djarspageti
-- ===========
This is-spaghetti.
Some cmavo may also serve as selbri, acting as variables that stand for another
selbri. The most commonly used of these is ``go'i'', which represents the main b
ridi of the previous Lojban sentence, with any new sumti or other sentence featu
res being expressed replacing the previously expressed ones. Thus, in this conte
xt:
11.4) ta [cu] go'i
-- ====
That too/same-as-last selbri.
That (is spaghetti), too.
12. The sumti ``di'u'' and ``la'e di'u''
In English, I might say ``The dog is beautiful'', and you might reply ``This ple
ases me.'' How do you know what ``this'' refers to? Lojban uses different expres
sions to convey the possible meanings of the English:
12.1) le gerku [ku] cu melbi
------------- =====
The dog is beautiful.
The following three sentences all might translate as ``This pleases me.''
12.2) ti [cu] pluka mi
-- ===== --
This (the dog) pleases me.
12.3) di'u [cu] pluka mi
---- ===== --
This (the last sentence) pleases me
(perhaps because it is grammatical or sounds nice).
12.4) la'e di'u [cu] pluka mi
--------- =====
This (the meaning of the last sentence; i.e. that
the dog is beautiful) pleases me.
Example 12.4 uses one sumti to point to or refer to another by inference. It is
common to write ``la'edi'u'' as a single word; it is used more often than ``di'u
'' by itself.
13. Possession
``Possession'' refers to the concept of specifying an object by saying who it be
longs to (or with). A full explanation of Lojban possession is given in Chapter
8 . A simple means of expressing possession, however, is to place a sumti repres
enting the possessor of an object within the description sumti that refers to th
e object: specifically, between the ``le'' and the selbri of the description:
13.1) le mi gerku cu sutra
----------- =====
The of-me dog is fast.
My dog is fast.
In Lojban, possession doesn't necessarily mean ownership: one may ``possess'' a
chair simply by sitting on it, even though it actually belongs to someone else.
English uses possession casually in the same way, but also uses it to refer to a
ctual ownership or even more intimate relationships: ``my arm'' doesn't mean ``s
ome arm I own'' but rather ``the arm that is part of my body''. Lojban has metho
ds of specifying all these different kinds of possession precisely and easily.
14. Vocatives and commands
You may call someone's attention to the fact that you are addressing them by usi
ng ``doi'' followed by their name. The sentence
14.1) doi djan.
means `Òh, John, I'm talking to you''. It also has the effect of setting the va
lue of ``do''; ``do'' now refers to ``John'' until it is changed in some way in
the conversation. Note that Example 14.1 is not a bridi, but it is a legitimate
Lojban sentence nevertheless; it is known as a ``vocative phrase''.
Other cmavo can be used instead of ``doi'' in a vocative phrase, with a differen
t significance. For example, the cmavo ``coi'' means ``hello'' and ``co'o'' mean
s ``good-bye''. Either word may stand alone, they may follow one another, or eit
her may be followed by a pause and a name. (Vocative phrases with ``doi'' do not
need a pause before the name.)
14.2) coi. djan.
Hello, John.
14.3) co'o. djan.
Good-bye, John.
Commands are expressed in Lojban by a simple variation of the main bridi structu
re. If you say
14.4) do tavla
-- =====
You are-talking.
you are simply making a statement of fact. In order to issue a command in Lojban
, substitute the word ``ko'' for ``do''. The bridi
14.5) ko tavla
-- =====
instructs the listener to do whatever is necessary to make Example 14.4 true; it
means ``Talk!'' Other examples:
14.6) ko sutra
-- =====
Be fast!
The ``ko'' need not be in the x1 place, but rather can occur anywhere a sumti is
allowed, leading to possible Lojban commands that are very unlike English comma
nds:
14.7) mi tavla ko
-- ===== --
Be talked to by me
Let me talk to you.
The cmavo ``ko'' can fill any appropriate sumti place, and can be used as often
as is appropriate for the selbri:
14.8) ko kurji ko
-- ===== --
and
14.9) ko ko kurji
-- -- =====
both mean ``You take care of you'' and ``Be taken care of by you'', or to put it
colloquially, ``Take care of yourself''.
15. Questions
There are many kinds of questions in Lojban: full explanations appear in Chapter
19 and in various other chapters throughout the book. In this chapter, we will
introduce three kinds: sumti questions, selbri questions, and yes/no questions.
The cmavo ``ma'' is used to create a sumti question: it indicates that the speak
er wishes to know the sumti which should be placed at the location of the ``ma''
to make the bridi true. It can be translated as ``Who?'' or ``What?'' in most c
ases, but also serves for ``When?'', ``Where?'', and ``Why?'' when used in sumti
places that express time, location, or cause. For example:
15.1) ma tavla do mi
-- ===== -- --
Who? talks to-you about-me.
Who is talking to you about me?
The listener can reply by simply stating a sumti:
15.2) la djan.
--------
John (is talking to you about me).
Like ``ko'', ``ma'' can occur in any position where a sumti is allowed, not just
in the first position:
15.3) do [cu] tavla ma
-- ===== --
You talk to what/whom?
A ``ma'' can also appear in multiple sumti positions in one sentence, in effect
asking several questions at once.
15.4) ma [cu] tavla ma
-- ===== --
What/Who talks to what/whom?
The two separate ``ma'' positions ask two separate questions, and can therefore
be answered with different values in each sumti place.
The cmavo ``mo'' is the selbri analogue of ``ma''. It asks the respondent to pro
vide a selbri that would be a true relation if inserted in place of the ``mo'':
15.5) do [cu] mo
-- ==
You are-what/do-what?
A ``mo'' may be used anywhere a brivla or other selbri might. Keep this in mind
for later examples. Unfortunately, by itself, ``mo'' is a very non-specific ques
tion. The response to the question in Example 15.5 could be:
15.6) mi [cu] melbi
-- =====
I am beautiful.
or:
15.7) mi [cu] tavla
-- =====
I talk.
Clearly, ``mo'' requires some cooperation between the speaker and the respondent
to ensure that the right question is being answered. If context doesn't make th
e question specific enough, the speaker must ask the question more specifically
using a more complex construction such as a tanru (see Section 9 ).
It is perfectly permissible for the respondent to fill in other unspecified plac
es in responding to a ``mo'' question. Thus, the respondent in Example 15.7 coul
d have also specified an audience, a topic, and/or a language in the response.
Finally, we must consider questions that can be answered ``Yes'' or ``No'', such
as
15.8) Are you talking to me?
Like all yes-or-no questions in English, Example 15.8 may be reformulated as
15.9) Is it true that you are talking
to me?
In Lojban we have a word that asks precisely that question in precisely the same
way. The cmavo ``xu'', when placed in front of a bridi, asks whether that bridi
is true as stated. So
15.10) xu do tavla
mi
-- ===== --
Is-it-true-that you are-talking to-me?
is the Lojban translation of Example 15.8 .
The answer ``Yes'' may be given by simply restating the bridi without the ``xu''
question word. Lojban has a shorthand for doing this with the word ``go'i'', me
ntioned in Section 11 . Instead of a negative answer, the bridi may be restated
in such a way as to make it true. If this can be done by substituting sumti, it
may be done with ``go'i'' as well. For example:
15.11) xu do kanro
-- =====
Are you healthy?
can be answered with
15.12) mi kanro
-- =====
I am healthy.
or
15.13) go'i
====
I am healthy.
(Note that ``do'' to the questioner is ``mi'' to the respondent.)
or
15.14) le tavla cu kanro
-------- =====
The talker is healthy.
or
15.15) le tavla cu go'i
-------- ====
The talker is healthy.
A general negative answer may be given by ``na go'i''. ``na'' may be placed befo
re any selbri (but after the ``cu''). It is equivalent to stating `Ìt is not tr
ue that ...'' before the bridi. It does not imply that anything else is true or
untrue, only that that specific bridi is not true. More details on negative stat
ements are available in Chapter 15 .
16. Indicators
Different cultures express emotions and attitudes with a variety of intonations
and gestures that are not usually included in written language. Some of these ar
e available in some languages as interjections (i.e. Aha!, Oh no!, Ouch!, Aahh!,
etc.), but they vary greatly from culture to culture.
Lojban has a group of cmavo known as `àttitudinal indicators'' which specifical
ly covers this type of commentary on spoken statements. They are both written an
d spoken, but require no specific intonation or gestures. Grammatically they are
very simple: one or more attitudinals at the beginning of a bridi apply to the
entire bridi; anywhere else in the bridi they apply to the word immediately to t
he left. For example:
16.1) .ie mi [cu] klama
-- =====
Agreement! I go.
Yep! I'll go.
16.2) .ei mi [cu] klama
-- =====
Obligation! I go.
I should go.
16.3) mi [cu] klama le melbi .ui [ku]
-- ===== --------( )---
I go to the beautiful-thing
(and I am happy because it is the beautiful
thing I'm going to).
Not all indicators indicate attitudes. Discursives, another group of cmavo with
the same grammatical rules as attitudinal indicators, allow free expression of c
ertain kinds of commentary about the main utterances. Using discursives allows a
clear separation of these so-called ``metalinguistic'' features from the underl
ying statements and logical structure. By comparison, the English words ``but''
and `àlso'', which discursively indicate contrast or an added weight of example
, are logically equivalent to `ànd'', which does not have a discursive content.
The average English-speaker does not think about, and may not even realize, the
paradoxical idea that ``but'' basically means `ànd''.
16.4) mi [cu] klama .i do [cu] stali
-- ===== -- =====
I go. You stay.
16.5) mi [cu] klama .i ji'a do [cu]
stali
-- ===== -- =====
I go. In addition, you stay. (added weight)
16.6) mi [cu] klama .i ku'i do [cu]
stali
-- ===== -- =====
I go. However, you stay. (contrast)
Another group of indicators are called `èvidentials''. Evidentials show the spe
aker's relationship to the statement, specifically how the speaker came to make
the statement. These include ``za'a'' (I directly observe the relationship), ``p
e'i'' (I believe that the relationship holds), ``ru'a'' (I postulate the relatio
nship), and others. Many American Indian languages use this kind of words.
16.7) pe'i do [cu] melbi
-- =====
I opine! You are beautiful.
16.8) za'a do [cu] melbi
-- =====
I directly observe! You are beautiful.
17. Tenses
In English, every verb is tagged for the grammatical category called tense: past
, present, or future. The sentence
17.1) John went to the store
necessarily happens at some time in the past, whereas
17.2) John is going to the store
is necessarily happening right now.
The Lojban sentence
17.3) la djan. [cu] klama le
zarci
-------- ========== --------
John goes/went/will go to-the store
serves as a translation of either Example 17.1 or Example 17.2 , and of many oth
er possible English sentences as well. it is not marked for tense, and can refer
to an event in the past, the present or the future. This rule does not mean tha
t Lojban has no way of representing the time of an event. A close translation of
Example 17.1 would be:
17.4) la djan. pu klama le zarci
-------- ======== --------
John [past] goes to-the store
where the tag ``pu'' forces the sentence to refer to a time in the past. Similar
ly,
17.5) la djan. ca klama le
zarci
-------- ======== --------
John [present] goes to-the store
necessarily refers to the present, because of the tag ``ca''. Tags used in this
way always appear at the very beginning of the selbri, just after the ``cu'', an
d they may make a ``cu'' unnecessary, since tags cannot be absorbed into tanru.
Note that Example 17.3 has and requires a ``cu'' to prevent ``bajra'' and ``klam
a'' from forming a tanru, but Example 17.4 and Example 17.5 lack the unnecessary
``cu''. Such tags serve as an equivalent to English tenses and adverbs. In Lojb
an, tense information is completely optional. If unspecified, the appropriate te
nse is picked up from context.
Lojban also extends the notion of ``tense'' to refer not only to time but to spa
ce. The following example uses the tag ``vu'' to specify that the event it descr
ibes happens far away from the speaker:
17.6) do [cu] vu vecnu zo'e
-- ========
You yonder sell something-unspecified.
In addition, tense tags (either for time or space) can be prefixed to the selbri
of a description, producing a tensed sumti:
17.7) le pu bajra [ku] cu
tavla
---------------- =====
The earlier/former/past runner talked/talks.
(Since Lojban tense is optional, we don't know when he or she talks.)
Tensed sumti with space tags correspond roughly to the English use of ``this'' o
r ``that'' as adjectives, as in the following example, which uses the tag ``vi''
meaning ``nearby'':
17.8) le vi bajra [ku] cu tavla
---------------- =====
The nearby runner talks.
This runner talks.
Do not confuse the use of ``vi'' in Example 17.8 with the cmavo ``ti'', which al
so means ``this'', but in the sense of ``this thing''.
Furthermore, a tense tag can appear both on the selbri and within a description,
as in the following example (where ``ba'' is the tag for future time):
17.9) le vi tavla [ku] cu ba klama
---------------- ========
The here talker [future] goes.
The talker who is here will go
This talker will go.
18. Lojban grammatical terms
Here is a review of the Lojban grammatical terms used in this chapter, plus some
others used throughout this book. Only terms that are themselves Lojban words a
re included: there are of course many expressions like `ìndicator'' in Chapter
16 that are not explained here. See the Index for further help with these.
bridi:
predication; the basic unit of Lojban expression; the main kind of Lojban se
ntence; a claim that some objects stand in some relationship, or that some singl
e object has some property.
sumti:
argument; words identifying something which stands in a specified relationsh
ip to something else, or which has a specified property. See Chapter 6 .
selbri:
logical predicate; the core of a bridi; the word or words specifying the rel
ationship between the objects referred to by the sumti. See Chapter 5 .
cmavo:
one of the Lojban parts of speech; a short word; a structural word; a word u
sed for its grammatical function.
brivla:
one of the Lojban parts of speech; a content word; a predicate word; can fun
ction as a selbri; is a gismu, a lujvo, or a fu'ivla. See Chapter 4 .
gismu:
a root word; a kind of brivla; has associated rafsi. See Chapter 4 .
lujvo:
a compound word; a kind of brivla; may or may not appear in a dictionary; do
es not have associated rafsi. See Chapter 4 and Chapter 12 .
fu'ivla:
a borrowed word; a kind of brivla; may or may not appear in a dictionary; co
pied in a modified form from some non-Lojban language; usually refers to some as
pect of culture or the natural world; does not have associated rafsi. See Chapte
r 4 .
rafsi:
a word fragment; one or more is associated with each gismu; can be assembled
according to rules in order to make lujvo; not a valid word by itself. See Chap
ter 4 .
tanru:
a group of two or more brivla, possibly with associated cmavo, that form a s
elbri; always divisible into two parts, with the first part modifying the meanin
g of the second part (which is taken to be basic). See Chapter 5 .
selma'o:
a group of cmavo that have the same grammatical use (can appear interchangea
bly in sentences, as far as the grammar is concerned) but differ in meaning or o
ther usage. See Chapter 20 .
Chapter 3
The Hills Are Alive With The Sounds Of Lojban
1. Orthography
Lojban is designed so that any properly spoken Lojban utterance can be uniquely
transcribed in writing, and any properly written Lojban can be spoken so as to b
e uniquely reproduced by another person. As a consequence, the standard Lojban o
rthography must assign to each distinct sound, or phoneme, a unique letter or sy
mbol. Each letter or symbol has only one sound or, more accurately, a limited ra
nge of sounds that are permitted pronunciations for that phoneme. Some symbols i
ndicate stress (speech emphasis) and pause, which are also essential to Lojban w
ord recognition. In addition, everything that is represented in other languages
by punctuation (when written) or by tone of voice (when spoken) is represented i
n Lojban by words. These two properties together are known technically as `àudi
o-visual isomorphism''.
Lojban uses a variant of the Latin (Roman) alphabet, consisting of the following
letters and symbols:
' , . a b c d e f g i j k l m n o p r s t u v x y z
omitting the letters ``h'', ``q'', and ``w''.
The alphabetic order given above is that of the ASCII coded character set, widel
y used in computers. By making Lojban alphabetical order the same as ASCII, comp
uterized sorting and searching of Lojban text is facilitated.
Capital letters are used only to represent non-standard stress, which can appear
only in the representation of Lojbanized names. Thus the English name ``Josephi
ne'', as normally pronounced, is Lojbanized as ``DJOsefin.'', pronounced [Ã dZo sE f
in/]. (See Section 2 for an explanation of the symbols within square brackets.)
Technically, it is sufficient to capitalize the vowel letter, in this case `Ò''
, but it is easier on the reader to capitalize the whole syllable.
Without the capitalization, the ordinary rules of Lojban stress would cause the
``se'' syllable to be stressed. Lojbanized names are meant to represent the pron
unciation of names from other languages with as little distortion as may be; as
such, they are exempt from many of the regular rules of Lojban phonology, as wil
l appear in the rest of this chapter.
2. Basic Phonetics
Lojban pronunciations are defined using the International Phonetic Alphabet, or
IPA, a standard method of transcribing pronunciations. By convention, IPA transc
riptions are always within square brackets: for example, the word ``cat'' is pro
nounced (in General American pronunciation) [kQt]. Section 10 contains a brief e
xplanation of the IPA characters used in this chapter, with their nearest analog
ues in English, and will be especially useful to those not familiar with the tec
hnical terms used in describing speech sounds.
The standard pronunciations and permitted variants of the Lojban letters are lis
ted in the table below. The descriptions have deliberately been made a bit ambig
uous to cover variations in pronunciation by speakers of different native langua
ges and dialects. In all cases except ``r'' the first IPA symbol shown represent
s the preferred pronunciation; for ``r'', all of the variations (and any other r
hotic sound) are equally acceptable.
Letter IPA Description
' [h] a unvoiced glottal spirant
, --- the syllable separator
. [/] a glottal stop or a pause
a [a], [A] an open vowel
b [b] a voiced bilabial stop
c [S], [Â§] an unvoiced coronal sibilant
d [d] a voiced dental/alveolar stop
e [E], [e] a front mid vowel
f [f], [Â¸] an unvoiced labial fricative
g [g] a voiced velar stop
i [i] a front close vowel
j [Z],[Â½] a voiced coronal sibilant
k [k] an unvoiced velar stop
l [l], [l`] a voiced lateral approximant
(may be syllabic)
m [m], [m`] a voiced bilabial nasal
(may be syllabic)
n [n], [n`], a voiced dental or velar nasal
[N], [N`] (may be syllabic)
o [o], [] a back mid vowel
p [p] an unvoiced bilabial stop
r [r], [Â¨], [R], [{], a rhotic sound
[r`], [Â¨`], [R`], [{`]
s [s] an unvoiced alveolar sibilant
t [t] an unvoiced dental/alveolar stop
u [u] a back close vowel
v [v], [B] a voiced labial fricative
x [x] an unvoiced velar fricative
y [Â«] a central mid vowel
z [z] a voiced alveolar sibilant
The Lojban sounds must be clearly pronounced so that they are not mistaken for e
ach other. Voicing and placement of the tongue are the key factors in correct pr
onunciation, but other subtle differences will develop between consonants in a L
ojban-speaking community. At this point these are the only mandatory rules on th
e range of sounds.
Note in particular that Lojban vowels can be pronounced with either rounded or u
nrounded lips; typically `ò'' and `ù'' are rounded and the others are not, as
in English, but this is not a requirement; some people round ``y'' as well. Lojb
an consonants can be aspirated or unaspirated. Palatalizing of consonants, as fo
und in Russian and other languages, is not generally acceptable in pronunciation
, though a following `ì'' may cause it.
The sounds represented by the letters ``c'', ``g'', ``j'', ``s'', and ``x'' requ
ire special attention for speakers of English, either because they are ambiguous
in the orthography of English (``c'', ``g'', ``s''), or because they are striki
ngly different in Lojban (``c'', ``j'', ``x''). The English ``c'' represents thr
ee different sounds, [k] in ``cat'' and [s] in ``cent'', as well as the [S] of `
òcean''. Similarly, English ``g'' can represent [g] as in ``go'', [dZ] as in ``
gentle'', and [Z] as in ``garage'' (in some pronunciations). English ``s'' can b
e either [s] as in ``cats'', [z] as in ``cards'', [S] as in ``tension'', or [Z]
as in ``measure''. The sound of Lojban ``x'' doesn't appear in most English dial
ects at all.
There are two common English sounds that are found in Lojban but are not not Loj
ban consonants: the ``ch'' of ``church'' and the ``j'' of ``judge''. In Lojban,
these are considered two consonant sounds spoken together without an intervening
vowel sound, and so are represented in Lojban by the two separate consonants: `
`tc'' (IPA [tS]) and ``dj'' (IPA [dZ]). In general, whether a complex sound is c
onsidered one sound or two depends on the language: Russian views ``ts'' as a si
ngle sound, whereas English, French, and Lojban consider it to be a consonant cl
uster.
3. The Special Lojban Characters
The apostrophe, period, and comma need special attention. They are all used as i
ndicators of a division between syllables, but each has a different pronunciatio
n, and each is used for different reasons:
The apostrophe represents a phoneme similar to a short, breathy English ``h'', (
IPA [h]). The letter ``h'' is not used to represent this sound for two reasons:
primarily in order to simplify explanations of the morphology, but also because
the sound is very common, and the apostrophe is a visually lightweight represent
ation of it. The apostrophe sound is a consonant in nature, but is not treated a
s either a consonant or a vowel for purposes of Lojban morphology (word-formatio
n), which is explained in Chapter 4. In addition, the apostrophe visually parall
els the comma and the period, which are also used (in different ways) to separat
e syllables.
The apostrophe is included in Lojban only to enable a smooth separation between
vowels, while joining the vowels within a single word. In fact, one way to think
of the apostrophe is as representing a unvoiced vowel glide.
As a permitted variant, any unvoiced fricative other than those already used in
Lojban may be used to render the apostrophe: IPA [T] is one possibility. The con
venience of the listener should be regarded as paramount in deciding to use a su
bstitute for [h].
The period represents a mandatory pause, with no specified length; a glottal sto
p (IPA [/]) is considered a pause of shortest length. A pause (or glottal stop)
may appear between any two words, and in certain cases -- explained in detail in
Chapter 4 --- must occur. In particular, a word beginning with a vowel is alway
s preceded by a pause, and a word ending in a consonant is always followed by a
pause.
Technically, the period is an optional reminder to the reader of a mandatory pau
se that is dictated by the rules of the language; because these rules are unambi
guous, a missing period can be inferred from otherwise correct text. Periods are
included only as an aid to the reader.
A period also may be found apparently embedded in a word. When this occurs, such
a written string is not one word but two, written together to indicate that the
writer intends a unitary meaning for the compound. It is not really necessary t
o use a space between words if a period appears.
The comma is used to indicate a syllable break within a word, generally one that
is not obvious to the reader. Such a comma is written to separate syllables, bu
t indicates that there must be no pause between them, in contrast to the period.
Between two vowels, a comma indicates that some type of glide may be necessary
to avoid a pause that would split the two syllables into separate words. It is a
lways legal to use the apostrophe (IPA [h]) sound in pronouncing a comma. Howeve
r, a comma cannot be pronounced as a pause or glottal stop between the two lette
rs separated by the comma, because that pronunciation would split the word into
two words.
Otherwise, a comma is usually only used to clarify the presence of syllabic ``l'
', ``m'', ``n'', or ``r'' (discussed later). Commas are never required: no two L
ojban words differ solely because of the presence or placement of a comma.
Here is a somewhat artificial example of the difference in pronunciation between
periods, commas and apostrophes. In the English song about Old MacDonald's Farm
, the vowel string which is pronounced `èe-i-ee-i-o'' in English could be Lojba
nized with periods as:
3.1) .i.ai.i.ai.o
[/i /aj /i /aj /o]
Ee! Eye! Ee! Eye! Oh!
However, this would sound clipped, staccato, and unmusical compared to the Engli
sh. Furthermore, although Example 3.1 is a string of meaningful Lojban words, as
a sentence it makes very little sense. (Note the use of periods embedded within
the written word.)
If commas were used instead of periods, we could represent the English string as
a Lojbanized name, ending in a consonant:
3.2) .i,ai,i,ai,on.
[/i jaj ji jaj jon/]
The commas represent new syllable breaks, but prohibit the use of pauses or glot
tal stop. The pronunciation shown is just one possibility, but closely parallels
the intended English pronunciation.
However, the use of commas in this way is risky to unambiguous interpretation, s
ince the glides might be heard by some listeners as diphthongs, producing someth
ing like
3.3) .i,iai,ii,iai,ion.
which is technically a different Lojban name. Since the intent with Lojbanized n
ames is to allow them to be pronounced more like their native counterparts, the
comma is allowed to represent vowel glides or some non-Lojbanic sound. Such an e
xception affects only spelling accuracy and the ability of a reader to replicate
the desired pronunciation exactly; it will not affect the recognition of word b
oundaries.
Still, it is better if Lojbanized names are always distinct. Therefore, the apos
trophe is preferred in regular Lojbanized names that are not attempting to simul
ate a non-Lojban pronunciation perfectly. (Perfection, in any event, is not real
ly achievable, because some sounds simply lack reasonable Lojbanic counterparts.
)
If apostrophes were used instead of commas in Example 3.2, it would appear as:
3.4) .i'ai'i'ai'on.
[/i hai hi hai hon/]
which preserves the rhythm and length, if not the exact sounds, of the original
English.
4. Diphthongs and Syllabic Consonants
There exist 16 diphthongs in the Lojban language. A diphthong is a vowel sound t
hat consists of two elements, a short vowel sound and a glide, either a labial (
IPA [w]) or palatal (IPA [j]) glide, that either precedes (an on-glide) or follo
ws (an off-glide) the main vowel. Diphthongs always constitute a single syllable
.
For Lojban purposes, a vowel sound is a relatively long speech-sound that forms
the nucleus of a syllable. Consonant sounds are relatively brief and normally re
quire an accompanying vowel sound in order to be audible. Consonants may occur a
t the beginning or end of a syllable, around the vowel, and there may be several
consonants in a cluster in either position. Each separate vowel sound constitut
es a distinct syllable; consonant sounds do not affect the determination of syll
ables.
The six Lojban vowels are `à'', `è'', `ì'', `ò'', `ù'', and ``y''. The firs
t five vowels appear freely in all kinds of Lojban words. The vowel ``y'' has a
limited distribution: it appears only in Lojbanized names, in the Lojban names o
f the letters of the alphabet, as a glue vowel in compound words, and standing a
lone as a space-filler word (like English `ùh'' or `èr'').
The Lojban diphthongs are shown in the table below. (Variant pronunciations have
been omitted, but are much as one would expect based on the variant pronunciati
ons of the separate vowel letters: `ài'' may be pronounced [Aj], for example.)
Letters IPA Description
ai [aj] an open vowel
with palatal off-glide
ei [Ej] a front mid vowel
oi [oj] a back mid vowel
au [aw] an open vowel
with labial off-glide
ia [ja] an open vowel
with palatal on-glide
ie [jE] a front mid vowel
ii [ji] a front close vowel
io [jo] a back mid vowel
iu [ju] a back close vowel
ua [wa] an open vowel
with labial on-glide
ue [wE] a front mid vowel
ui [wi] a front close vowel
uo [wo] a back mid vowel
uu [wu] a back close vowel
iy [jÂ«] a central mid vowel
uy [wÂ«] a central mid vowel
(Approximate English equivalents of most of these diphthongs exist: see Section
11 for examples.)
The first four diphthongs above (`ài'', `èi'', `òi'', and `àu'', the ones wi
th off-glides) are freely used in most types of Lojban words; the ten following
ones are used only as stand-alone words and in Lojbanized names and borrowings;
and the last two (`ìy'' and `ùy'') are used only in Lojbanized names.
The syllabic consonants of Lojban, [l`], [m`], [n`], and [r`], are variants of t
he non-syllabic [l], [m], [n], and [r] respectively. They normally have only a l
imited distribution, appearing in Lojban names and borrowings, although in princ
iple any ``l'', ``m'', ``n'', or ``r'' may be pronounced syllabically. If a syll
abic consonant appears next to a ``l'', ``m'', ``n'', or ``r'' that is not sylla
bic, it may not be clear which is which:
4.1) brlgan.
[br`l gan]
or [brl` gan]
is a hypothetical Lojbanized name with more than one valid pronunciation; howeve
r it is pronounced, it remains the same word.
Syllabic consonants are treated as consonants rather than vowels from the standp
oint of Lojban morphology. Thus Lojbanized names, which are generally required t
o end in a consonant, are allowed to end with a syllabic consonant. An example i
s ``rl.'', which is an approximation of the English name `Èarl'', and has two s
yllabic consonants.
Syllables with syllabic consonants and no vowel are never stressed or counted wh
en determining which syllables to stress (see Section 9).
5. Vowel Pairs
Lojban vowels also occur in pairs, where each vowel sound is in a separate sylla
ble. These two vowel sounds are connected (and separated) by an apostrophe. Lojb
an vowel pairs should be pronounced continuously with the [h] sound between (and
not by a glottal stop or pause, which would split the two vowels into separate
words).
All vowel combinations are permitted in two-syllable pairs with the apostrophe s
eparating them; this includes those which constitute diphthongs when the apostro
phe is not included.
The Lojban vowel pairs are:
a'a a'e a'i a'o a'u a'y
e'a e'e e'i e'o e'u e'y
i'a i'e i'i i'o i'u i'y
o'a o'e o'i o'o o'u o'y
u'a u'e u'i u'o u'u u'y
y'a y'e y'i y'o y'u y'y
Vowel pairs involving ``y'' appear only in Lojbanized names. They could appear i
n cmavo (structure words), but only ``.y'y.'' is so used --- it is the Lojban na
me of the apostrophe letter (see Chapter 17).
When more than two vowels occur together in Lojban, the normal pronunciation pai
rs vowels from the left into syllables, as in the Lojbanized name:
5.1) meiin.
mei,in.
Example 5.1 contains the diphthong `èi'' followed by the vowel `ì''. In order
to indicate a different grouping, the comma must always be used, leading to:
5.2) me,iin.
which contains the vowel `è'' followed by the diphthong `ìi''. In rough Englis
h representation, Example 5.1 is ``May Een'', whereas Example 5.2 is ``Meh Yeen'
'.
6. Consonant Clusters
A consonant sound is a relatively brief speech-sound that precedes or follows a
vowel sound in a syllable; its presence either preceding or following does not a
dd to the count of syllables, nor is a consonant required in either position for
any syllable. Lojban has seventeen consonants: for the purposes of this section
, the apostrophe is not counted as a consonant.
An important distinction dividing Lojban consonants is that of voicing. The foll
owing table shows the unvoiced consonants and the corresponding voiced ones:
UNVOICED VOICED
p b
t d
k g
f v
c j
s z
x -
The consonant ``x'' has no voiced counterpart in Lojban. The remaining consonant
s, ``l'', ``m'', ``n'', and ``r'', are typically pronounced with voice, but can
be pronounced unvoiced.
Consonant sounds occur in languages as single consonants, or as doubled, or as c
lustered combinations. Single consonant sounds are isolated by word boundaries o
r by intervening vowel sounds from other consonant sounds. Doubled consonant sou
nds are either lengthened like [s] in English ``hiss'', or repeated like [k] in
English ``backcourt''. Consonant clusters consist of two or more single or doubl
ed consonant sounds in a group, each of which is different from its immediate ne
ighbor. In Lojban, doubled consonants are excluded altogether, and clusters are
limited to two or three members, except in Lojbanized names.
Consonants can occur in three positions in words: initial (at the beginning), me
dial (in the middle), and final (at the end). In many languages, the sound of a
consonant varies depending upon its position in the word. In Lojban, as much as
possible, the sound of a consonant is unrelated to its position. In particular,
the common American English trait of changing a ``t'' between vowels into a ``d'
' or even a flap (IPA [Â¨]) is unacceptable in Lojban.
Lojban imposes no restrictions on the appearance of single consonants in any val
id consonant position; however, no consonant (including syllabic consonants) occ
urs final in a word except in Lojbanized names.
Pairs of consonants can also appear freely, with the following restrictions:
1)
It is forbidden for both consonants to be the same, as this would violate th
e rule against double consonants.
2)
It is forbidden for one consonant to be voiced and the other unvoiced. The c
onsonants ``l'', ``m'', ``n'', and ``r'' are exempt from this restriction. As a
result, ``bf'' is forbidden, and so is ``sd'', but both ``fl'' and ``vl'', and b
oth ``ls'' and ``lz'', are permitted.
3)
It is forbidden for both consonants to be drawn from the set ``c'', ``j'', `
`s'', ``z''.
4)
The specific pairs ``cx'', ``kx'', ``xc'', ``xk'', and ``mz'' are forbidden.
These rules apply to all kinds of words, even Lojbanized names. If a name would
normally contain a forbidden consonant pair, a ``y'' can be inserted to break up
the pair:
6.1) djeimyz.
[dZEj mÂ«z/]
James
The regular English pronunciation of ``James'', which is [dZEjmz], would Lojbani
ze as ``djeimz.'', which contains a forbidden consonant pair.
7. Initial Consonant Pairs
The set of consonant pairs that may appear at the beginning of a word (excluding
Lojbanized names) is far more restricted than the fairly large group of permiss
ible consonant pairs described in Section 6. Even so, it is more than English al
lows, although hopefully not more than English-speakers (and others) can learn t
o pronounce.
There are just 48 such permissible initial consonant pairs, as follows:
bl br cf ck cl cm cn cp cr ct dj dr dz fl fr gl gr jb jd jg jm jv kl kr ml m
r pl pr sf sk sl sm sn sp sr st tc tr ts vl vr xl xr zb zd zg zm zv
Lest this list seem almost random, a pairing of voiced and unvoiced equivalent v
owels will show significant patterns which may help in learning:
pl pr fl fr
bl br vl vr
cp cf ct ck cm cn cl cr
jb jv jd jg jm
sp sf st sk sm sn sl sr
zb zv zd zg zm
tc tr ts kl kr
dj dr dz gl gr
ml mr xl xr
Note that if both consonants of an initial pair are voiced, the unvoiced equival
ent is also permissible, and the voiced pair can be pronounced simply by voicing
the unvoiced pair. (The converse is not true: ``cn'' is a permissible initial p
air, but ``jn'' is not.)
Consonant triples can occur medially in Lojban words. They are subject to the fo
llowing rules:
1)
The first two consonants must constitute a permissible consonant pair;
2)
The last two consonants must constitute a permissible initial consonant pair
;
3)
The triples ``ndj'', ``ndz'', ``ntc'', and ``nts'' are forbidden.
Lojbanized names can begin or end with any permissible consonant pair, not just
the 48 initial consonant pairs listed above, and can have consonant triples in a
ny location, as long as the pairs making up those triples are permissible. In ad
dition, names can contain consonant clusters with more than three consonants, ag
ain requiring that each pair within the cluster is valid.
8. Buffering Of Consonant Clusters
Many languages do not have consonant clusters at all, and even those languages t
hat do have them often allow only a subset of the full Lojban set. As a result,
the Lojban design allows the use of a buffer sound between consonant combination
s which a speaker finds unpronounceable. This sound may be any non-Lojbanic vowe
l which is clearly separable by the listener from the Lojban vowels. Some possib
ilities are IPA [I], [Ã¶], [U], or even [Y], but there probably is no universally ac
ceptable buffer sound. When using a consonant buffer, the sound should be made a
s short as possible. Two examples showing such buffering (we will use [I] in thi
s chapter) are:
8.1) vrusi
[Ã vru si]
or [vI Ã ru si]
8.2) .AMsterdam.
[/am ster dam/]
or [Ã /a mI sI tE rI da mI/]
When a buffer vowel is used, it splits each buffered consonant into its own syll
able. However, the buffering syllables are never stressed, and are not counted i
n determining stress. They are, in effect, not really syllables to a Lojban list
ener, and thus their impact is ignored.
Here are more examples of unbuffered and buffered pronunciations:
8.3) klama
[Ã kla ma]
[kI Ã la ma]
8.4) xapcke
[Ã xap ckE]
[Ã xa pI ckE]
[Ã xa pI cI kE]
In Example 8.4, we see that buffering vowels can be used in just some, rather th
an all, of the possible places: the second pronunciation buffers the ``pc'' cons
onant pair but not the ``ck''. The third pronunciation buffers both.
8.5) ponyni'u
[po nÂ« Ã ni hu]
Example 8.5 cannot contain any buffering vowel. It is important not to confuse t
he vowel ``y'', which is pronounced [Â«], with the buffer, which has a variety of po
ssible pronunciations and is never written. Consider the contrast between
8.6) bongynanba
[boN gÂ« Ã nan ba]
an unlikely Lojban compound word meaning ``bone bread'' (note the use of [N] as
a representative of ``n'' before ``g'') and
8.7) bongnanba
[boN Ã gnan ba]
a possible borrowing from another language (Lojban borrowings can only take a li
mited form). If Example 8.7 were pronounced with buffering, as
8.8) [boN gI Ã nan ba]
it would be very similar to Example 8.6. Only a clear distinction between ``y''
and any buffering vowel would keep the two words distinct.
Since buffering is done for the benefit of the speaker in order to aid pronounce
ability, there is no guarantee that the listener will not mistake a buffer vowel
for one of the six regular Lojban vowels. The buffer vowel should be as laxly p
ronounced as possible, as central as possible, and as short as possible. Further
more, it is worthwhile for speakers who use buffers to pronounce their regular v
owels a bit longer than usual, to avoid confusion with buffer vowels. The speake
rs of many languages will have trouble correctly hearing any of the suggested bu
ffer vowels otherwise. By this guideline, Example 8.8 would be pronounced
8.9) [boÃ¹N gI Ã naÃ¹n baÃ¹]
with lengthened vowels.
9. Syllabication And Stress
A Lojban word has one syllable for each of its vowels, diphthongs, and syllabic
consonants (referred to simply as ``vowels'' for the purposes of this section.)
Syllabication rules determine which of the consonants separating two vowels belo
ng to the preceding vowel and which to the following vowel. These rules are conv
entional only; the phonetic facts of the matter about how utterances are syllabi
fied in any language are always very complex.
A single consonant always belongs to the following vowel. A consonant pair is no
rmally divided between the two vowels; however, if the pair constitute a valid i
nitial consonant pair, they are normally both assigned to the following vowel. A
consonant triple is divided between the first and second consonants. Apostrophe
s and commas, of course, also represent syllable breaks. Syllabic consonants usu
ally appear alone in their syllables.
It is permissible to vary from these rules in Lojbanized names. For example, the
re are no definitive rules for the syllabication of names with consonant cluster
s longer than three consonants. The comma is used to indicate variant syllabicat
ion or to explicitly mark normal syllabication.
Here are some examples of Lojban syllabication:
9.1) pujenaicajeba
pu,je,nai,ca,je,ba
This word has no consonant pairs and is therefore syllabified before each medial
consonant.
9.2) ninmu
nin,mu
This word is split at a consonant pair.
9.3) fitpri
fit,pri
This word is split at a consonant triple, between the first two consonants of th
e triple.
9.4) sairgoi
sair,goi
sai,r,goi
This word contains the consonant pair ``rg''; the ``r'' may be pronounced syllab
ically or not.
9.5) klezba
klez,ba
kle,zba
This word contains the permissible initial pair ``zb'', and so may be syllabicat
ed either between ``z'' and ``b'' or before ``zb''.
Stress is a relatively louder pronunciation of one syllable in a word or group o
f words. Since every syllable has a vowel sound (or diphthong or syllabic conson
ant) as its nucleus, and the stress is on the vowel sound itself, the terms ``st
ressed syllable'' and ``stressed vowel'' are largely interchangeable concepts.
Most Lojban words are stressed on the next-to-the-last, or penultimate, syllable
. In counting syllables, however, syllables whose vowel is ``y'' or which contai
n a syllabic consonant (``l'', ``m'', ``n'', or ``r'') are never counted. (The L
ojban term for penultimate stress is ``da'amoi terbasna''.) Similarly, syllables
created solely by adding a buffer vowel, such as [I], are not counted.
There are actually three levels of stress --- primary, secondary, and weak. Weak
stress is the lowest level, so it really means no stress at all. Weak stress is
required for syllables containing ``y'', a syllabic consonant, or a buffer vowe
l.
Primary stress is required on the penultimate syllable of Lojban content words (
called ``brivla''). Lojbanized names may be stressed on any syllable, but if a s
yllable other than the penultimate is stressed, the syllable (or at least its vo
wel) must be capitalized in writing. Lojban structural words (called ``cmavo'')
may be stressed on any syllable or none at all. However, primary stress may not
be used in a syllable just preceding a brivla, unless a pause divides them; othe
rwise, the two words may run together.
Secondary stress is the optional and non-distinctive emphasis used for other syl
lables besides those required to have either weak or primary stress. There are f
ew rules governing secondary stress, which typically will follow a speaker's nat
ive language habits or preferences. Secondary stress can be used for contrast, o
r for emphasis of a point. Secondary stress can be emphasized at any level up to
primary stress, although the speaker must not allow a false primary stress in b
rivla, since errors in word resolution could result.
The following are Lojban words with stress explicitly shown:
9.6) dikyjvo
DI,ky,jvo
(In a fully-buffered dialect, the pronunciation would be: [Ã di kÂ« jI vo].) Note that t
he syllable ``ky'' is not counted in determining stress. The vowel ``y'' is neve
r stressed in a normal Lojban context.
9.7) .armstrong.
.ARM,strong.
This is a Lojbanized version of the name `Àrmstrong''. The final ``g'' must be
explicitly pronounced. With full buffering, the name would be pronounced:
9.8) [Ã /a rI mI sI tI ro nI gI/]
However, there is no need to insert a buffer in every possible place just becaus
e it is inserted in one place: partial buffering is also acceptable. In every ca
se, however, the stress remains in the same place: on the first syllable.
The English pronunciation of `Àrmstrong'', as spelled in English, is not correc
t by Lojban standards; the letters ``ng'' in English represent a velar nasal (IP
A [N]) which is a single consonant. In Lojban, ``ng'' represents two separate co
nsonants that must both be pronounced; you may not use [N] to pronounce Lojban `
`ng'', although [Ng] is acceptable. English speakers are likely to have to prono
unce the ending with a buffer, as one of the following:
9.9) [Ã /arm stron gI/]
or [Ã /arm stroN gI/]
or even [Ã /arm stro nIg/]
The normal English pronunciation of the name `Àrmstrong'' could be Lojbanized a
s:
9.10) .ARMstron.
since Lojban ``n'' is allowed to be pronounced as the velar nasal [N].
Here is another example showing the use of ``y'':
9.11) bisydja
BI,sy,dja
BI,syd,ja
This word is a compound word, or lujvo, built from the two affixes ``bis'' and `
`dja''. When they are joined, an impermissible consonant pair results: ``sd''. I
n accordance with the algorithm for making lujvo, explained in Chapter 4, a ``y'
' is inserted to separate the impermissible consonant pair; the ``y'' is not cou
nted as a syllable for purposes of stress determination.
9.12) da'udja
da'UD,ja
da'U,dja
These two syllabications sound the same to a Lojban listener --- the association
of unbuffered consonants in syllables is of no import in recognizing the word.
9.13) e'u bridi
e'u BRI,di
E'u BRI,di
e'U.BRI,di
In Example 9.13, `è'u'' is a cmavo and ``bridi'' is a brivla. Either of the fir
st two pronunciations is permitted: no primary stress on either syllable of `è'
u'', or primary stress on the first syllable. The third pronunciation, which pla
ces primary stress on the second syllable of the cmavo, requires that --- since
the following word is a brivla --- the two words must be separated by a pause. C
onsider the following two cases:
9.14) le re nobli prenu
le re NObli PREnu
9.15) le re no bliprenu
le re no bliPREnu
If the cmavo ``no'' in Example 9.15 were to be stressed, the phrase would sound
exactly like the given pronunciation of Example 9.14, which is unacceptable in L
ojban: a single pronunciation cannot represent both.
10. IPA For English Speakers
There are many dialects of English, thus making it difficult to define the stand
ardized symbols of the IPA in terms useful to every reader. All the symbols used
in this chapter are repeated here, in more or less alphabetical order, with exa
mples drawn from General American. In addition, some attention is given to the R
eceived Pronunciation of (British) English. These two dialects are referred to a
s GA and RP respectively. Speakers of other dialects should consult a book on ph
onetics or their local television sets.
[Ã ]
An IPA indicator of primary stress; the syllable which follows [Ã ] receives pri
mary stress.
[/]
An allowed variant of Lojban ``.''. This sound is not usually considered par
t of English. It is the catch in your throat that sometimes occurs prior to the
beginning of a word (and sometimes a syllable) which starts with a vowel. In som
e dialects, like Cockney and some kinds of American English, it is used between
vowels instead of ``t'': ``bottle'' [bo/l`]. The English interjection `ùh-oh!''
almost always has it between the syllables.
[Ã¹]
A symbol indicating that the previous vowel is to be spoken for a longer tim
e than usual. Lojban vowels can be pronounced long in order to make a greater co
ntrast with buffer vowels.
[a]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban `à''. This sound doesn't occur in GA,
but sounds somewhat like the `àr'' of ``park'', as spoken in RP or New England
American. It is pronounced further forward in the mouth than [A].
[A]
An allowed variant of Lojban `à''. The `à'' of GA ``father''. The sound [a
] is preferred because GA speakers often relax an unstressed [A] into a schwa [Â«],
as in the usual pronunciations of `àbout'' and ``sofa''. Because schwa is a dis
tinct vowel in Lojban, English speakers must either learn to avoid this shift or
to use [a] instead: the Lojban word for ``sofa'' is ``sfofa'', pronounced [sfof
a] or [sfofA] but never [sfofÂ«] which would be the non-word ``sfofy''.
[Q]
Not a Lojban sound. The `à'' of English ``cat''.
[b]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban ``b''. As in English ``boy'', ``sober'
', or ``job''.
[B]
An allowed variant of Lojban ``v''. Not an English sound; the Spanish ``b''
or ``v'' between vowels. This sound should not be used for Lojban ``b''.
[d]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban ``d''. As in English ``dog'', ``soda''
, or ``mad''.
[E]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban `è''. The `è'' of English ``met''.
[e]
An allowed variant of Lojban `è''. This sound is not found in English, but
is the Spanish `è'', or the tense `è'' of Italian. The vowel of English ``say'
' is similar except for the off-glide: you can learn to make this sound by holdi
ng your tongue steady while saying the first part of the English vowel.
[Â«]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban ``y''. As in the `à'' of English ``so
fa'' or `àbout''. Schwa is generally unstressed in Lojban, as it is in English.
It is a totally relaxed sound made with the tongue in the middle of the mouth.
[f]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban ``f''. As in ``fee'', ``loafer'', or `
`chef''.
[Â¸]
An allowed variant of Lojban ``f''. Not an English sound; the Japanese ``f''
sound.
[g]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban ``g''. As in English ``go'', `èagle''
, or ``dog''.
[h]
The preferred pronunciation of the Lojban apostrophe sound. As in English ``
aha'' or `òh, hello''.
[i]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban `ì''. Essentially like the English vo
wel of ``pizza'' or ``machine'', although the English vowel is sometimes pronoun
ced with an off-glide, which should not be present in Lojban.
[I]
A possible Lojban buffer vowel. The `ì'' of English ``bit''.
[Ã¶]
A possible Lojban buffer vowel. The `ù'' of ``just'' in some varieties of G
A, those which make the word sound more or less like ``jist''. Also Russian ``y'
' as in ``byt''' (to be); like a schwa [Â«], but higher in the mouth.
[j]
Used in Lojban diphthongs beginning or ending with `ì''. Like the ``y'' in
English ``yard'' or ``say''.
[k]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban ``k''. As in English ``kill'', ``token
'', or ``flak''.
[l]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban ``l''. As in English ``low'', ``nylon'
', or `èxcel''.
[l`]
The syllabic version of Lojban ``l'', as in English ``bottle'' or ``middle''
.
[m]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban ``m''. As in English ``me'', ``humor''
, or ``ham''.
[m`]
The syllabic version of Lojban ``m''. As in English ``catch 'em'' or ``botto
m''.
[n]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban ``n''. As in English ``no'', ``honor''
, or ``son''.
[n`]
The syllabic version of Lojban ``n''. As in English ``button''.
[N]
An allowed variant of Lojban ``n'', especially in Lojbanized names and befor
e ``g'' or ``k''. As in English ``sing'' or ``singer'' (but not ``finger'' or ``
danger'').
[N`]
An allowed variant of Lojban syllabic ``n'', especially in Lojbanized names.
[o]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban `ò''. As in the French ``haute (cuisi
ne)'' or Spanish ``como''. There is no exact English equivalent of this sound. T
he nearest GA equivalent is the `ò'' of ``dough'' or ``joke'', but it is essent
ial that the off-glide (a [w]-like sound) at the end of the vowel is not pronoun
ced when speaking Lojban. The RP sound in these words is [Â«w] in IPA terms, and has
no [o] in it at all; unless you can speak with a Scots, Irish, or American acce
nt, you may have trouble with this sound.
[]
An allowed variant of Lojban `ò'', especially before ``r''. This sound is a
shortened form of the `àw'' in GA ``dawn'' (for those people who don't pronoun
ce ``dawn'' and ``Don'' alike; if you do, you may have trouble with this sound).
In RP, but not GA, it is the `ò'' of ``hot''.
[p]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban ``p''. As in English ``pay'', ``super'
', or `ùp''.
[r]
One version of Lojban ``r''. Not an English sound. The Spanish ``rr'' and th
e Scots ``r'', a tongue-tip trill.
[Â¨]
One version of Lojban ``r''. As in GA ``right'', ``baron'', or ``car''. Not
found in RP.
[R]
One version of Lojban ``r''. In GA, appears as a variant of ``t'' or ``d'' i
n the words ``metal'' and ``medal'' respectively. A tongue-tip flap. [{] One ver
sion of Lojban ``r''. Not an English sound. The French or German ``r'' in ``rein
e'' or ``rot'' respectively. A uvular trill.
[r`], [Â¨`], [R`], [{`] are syllabic versions of the above. [Â¨`] appears in the GA
(but not RP) pronunciation of ``bird''.
[s]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban ``s''. As in English ``so'', ``basin''
, or ``yes''.
[S]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban ``c''. The ``sh'' of English ``ship'',
`àshen'', or ``dish''.
[Â§]
An allowed variant of Lojban ``s''. Not an English sound. The Hindi retrofle
x ``s'' with underdot, or Klingon ``S''.
[t]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban ``t''. As in English ``tea'', ``later'
', or ``not''. It is important to avoid the GA habit of pronouncing the ``t'' be
tween vowels as [d] or [R].
[T]
Not normally a Lojban sound, but a possible variant of Lojban ``'''. The ``t
h'' of English ``thin'' (but not ``then'').
[v]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban ``v''. As in English ``voice'', ``savo
r'', or ``live''.
[w]
Used in Lojban diphthongs beginning or ending with `ù''. Like the ``w'' in
English ``wet'' [wEt] or ``cow'' [kAw].
[x]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban ``x''. Not normally an English sound,
but used in some pronunciations of ``loch'' and ``Bach''; ``gh'' in Scots ``migh
t'' and ``night''. The German `Àch-Laut''. To pronounce [x], force air through
your throat without vibrating your vocal chords; there should be lots of scrape.
[Y]
A possible Lojban buffer vowel. Not an English sound: the ``Ã¼'' of German ``hÃ¼bsch
''.
[z]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban ``z''. As in English ``zoo'', ``hazard
'', or ``fizz''.
[Z]
The preferred pronunciation of Lojban ``j''. The ``si'' of English ``vision'
', or the consonant at the end of GA ``garage''.
[Â½]
An allowed variant of Lojban ``z''. Not an English sound. The voiced version
of [Â§].
11. English Analogues For Lojban Diphthongs
Here is a list of English words that contain diphthongs that are similar to the
Lojban diphthongs. This list does not constitute an official pronunciation guide
; it is intended as a help to English-speakers.
Lojban English
ai ``pie''
ei ``pay''
oi ``boy''
au ``cow''
ia ``yard''
ie ``yes''
ii ``ye''
io ``yodel'' (in GA only)
iu `ùnicorn'' or ``few''
ua ``suave''
ue ``wet''
ui ``we''
uo ``woe'' (in GA only)
uu ``woo''
iy ``million'' (the `ìo'' part, that is)
uy ``was'' (when unstressed)
12. Oddball Orthographies
The following notes describe ways in which Lojban has been written or could be w
ritten that differ from the standard orthography explained in the rest of this c
hapter. Nobody needs to read this section except people with an interest in the
obscure. Technicalities are used without explanation or further apology.
There exists an alternative orthography for Lojban, which is designed to be as c
ompatible as possible (but no more so) with the authority used in pre-Lojban ver
sions of Loglan. The consonants undergo no change, except that ``x'' is replaced
by ``h''. The individual vowels likewise remain unchanged. However, the vowel p
airs and diphthongs are changed as follows:
`ài'', `èi'', `òi'', `àu'' become `ài'', `èi'', `òi'', `ào''.
`ìa'' through `ìu'' and `ùa'' through `ùu'' remain unchanged.
`à'i'', `è'i'', `ò'i'' and `à'o'' become `à,i'', `è,i'', `ò,i'' and `
à,o''.
`ì'a'' through `ì'u'' and `ù'a'' through `ù'u'' are changed to `ìa'' th
rough `ìu'' and `ùa'' through `ùu'' in lujvo and cmavo other than attitudinal
s, but become `ì,a'' through `ì,u'' and `ù,a'' through `ù,u'' in names, fu'i
vla, and attitudinal cmavo.
All other vowel pairs simply drop the apostrophe.
The result of these rules is to eliminate the apostrophe altogether, replacing i
t with comma where necessary, and otherwise with nothing. In addition, names and
the cmavo ``.i'' are capitalized, and irregular stress is marked with an apostr
ophe (now no longer used for a sound) following the stressed syllable.
Three points must be emphasized about this alternative orthography:
It is not standard, and has not been used.
It does not represent any changes to the standard Lojban phonology; it is si
mply a representation of the same phonology using a different written form.
It was designed to aid in a planned rapprochement between the Logical Langua
ge Group and The Loglan Institute, a group headed by James Cooke Brown. The rapp
rochement never took place.
There also exists a Cyrillic orthography for Lojban which was designed when the
introductory Lojban brochure was translated into Russian. It uses the letters ``
a'', ``be'', ``ve'', ``ge'', ``de'', `è'', ``zhe'', ``ze'', `ì'', ``ka'', `èl
'', `èm'', `èn'', `ò'', ``pe'', `èr'', `ès'', ``te'', `ù'', `èf'', ``kha'
', and ``sha'' in the obvious ways. The Latin letter ``y'' is mapped onto the ha
rd sign, as in Bulgarian. The apostrophe, comma, and period are unchanged. Dipht
hongs are written as vowel pairs, as in the Roman representation.
Finally, an orthography using the Tengwar of FÃ©anor, a fictional orthography invent
ed by J. R. R. Tolkien and described in the Appendixes to The Lord Of The Rings,
has been devised for Lojban. The following mapping, which closely resembles tha
t used for Westron, will be meaningful only to those who have read those appendi
xes. In brief, the tincotÃ©ma and parmatÃ©ma are used in the conventional ways; the calm
atÃ©ma represents palatal consonants, and the quessetÃ©ma represents velar consonants.
t tinco p parma
- calma k quesse
d ando b umbar
- anga g ungwe
- thule f formen
c harma x hwesta
- anto v ampa
j anca - unque
n numen m malta
- noldo - nwalme
r ore u vala
i anna - vilya
The letters ``vala'' and `ànna'' are used for `ù'' and `ì'' only when those l
etters are used to represent glides. Of the additional letters, ``r'', ``l'', ``
s'', and ``z'' are written with ``rÃ³men'', ``lambe'', ``silme'', and ``Ã¡re/`èsse'' re
spectively; the inverted forms are used as free variants.
Lojban, like Quenya, is a vowel-last language, so tehtar are read as following t
he tengwar on which they are placed. The conventional tehtar are used for the fi
ve regular vowels, and the under-dot for ``y''. The Lojban apostrophe is represe
nted by ``halla''. There is no equivalent of the Lojban comma or period.
Chapter 4
The Shape Of Words To Come: Lojban Morphology
1. Introductory
Morphology is the part of grammar that deals with the form of words. Lojban's mo
rphology is fairly simple compared to that of many languages, because Lojban wor
ds don't change form depending on how they are used. English has only a small nu
mber of such changes compared to languages like Russian, but we do have changes
like ``boys'' as the plural of ``boy'', or ``walked'' as the past-tense form of
``walk''. To make plurals or past tenses in Lojban, you add separate words to th
e sentence that express the number of boys, or the time when the walking was goi
ng on.
However, Lojban does have what is called ``derivational morphology'': the capabi
lity of building new words from old words. In addition, the form of words tells
us something about their grammatical uses, and sometimes about the means by whic
h they entered the language. Lojban has very orderly rules for the formation of
words of various types, both the words that already exist and new words yet to b
e created by speakers and writers.
A stream of Lojban sounds can be uniquely broken up into its component words acc
ording to specific rules. These so-called ``morphology rules'' are summarized in
this chapter. (However, a detailed algorithm for breaking sounds into words has
not yet been fully debugged, and so is not presented in this book.) First, here
are some conventions used to talk about groups of Lojban letters, including vow
els and consonants.
1)
V represents any single Lojban vowel except ``y''; that is, it represents ``
a'', `è'', `ì'', `ò'', or `ù''.
2)
VV represents either a diphthong, one of the following:
ai ei oi au
or a two-syllable vowel pair with an apostrophe separating the vowels, one o
f the following:
a'a a'e a'i a'o a'u e'a e'e e'i e'o e'u i'a i'e i'i i'o i'u o'a o'e o'i o'o
o'u u'a u'e u'i u'o u'u
3)
C represents a single Lojban consonant, not including the apostrophe, one of
``b'', ``c'', ``d'', ``f'', ``g'', ``j'', ``k'', ``l'', ``m'', ``n'', ``p'', ``
r'', ``s'', ``t'', ``v'', ``x'', or ``z''. Syllabic ``l'', ``m'', ``n'', and ``r
'' always count as consonants for the purposes of this chapter.
4)
CC represents two adjacent consonants of type C which constitute one of the
48 permissible initial consonant pairs:
bl br cf ck cl cm cn cp cr ct dj dr dz fl fr gl gr jb jd jg jm jv kl kr ml m
r pl pr sf sk sl sm sn sp sr st tc tr ts vl vr xl xr zb zd zg zm zv
5)
C/C represents two adjacent consonants which constitute one of the permissib
le consonant pairs (not necessarily a permissible initial consonant pair). The p
ermissible consonant pairs are explained in Chapter 3. In brief, any consonant p
air is permissible unless it contains: two identical letters, both a voiced (exc
luding ``r'', ``l'', ``m'', ``n'') and and an unvoiced consonant, or is one of c
ertain specified forbidden pairs.
6)
C/CC represents a consonant triple. The first two consonants must constitute
a permissible consonant pair; the last two consonants must constitute a permiss
ible initial consonant pair.
Lojban has three basic word classes --- parts of speech --- in contrast to the e
ight that are traditional in English. These three classes are called cmavo, briv
la, and cmene. Each of these classes has uniquely identifying properties --- an
arrangement of letters that allows the word to be uniquely and unambiguously rec
ognized as a separate word in a string of Lojban, upon either reading or hearing
, and as belonging to a specific word-class.
They are also functionally different: cmavo are the structure words, correspondi
ng to English words like `ànd'', `ìf'', ``the'' and ``to''; brivla are the con
tent words, corresponding to English words like ``come'', ``red'', ``doctor'', a
nd ``freely''; cmene are proper names, corresponding to English ``James'', `Àfg
hanistan'', and ``Pope John Paul II''.
2. cmavo
The first group of Lojban words discussed in this chapter are the cmavo. They ar
e the structure words that hold the Lojban language together. They often have no
semantic meaning in themselves, though they may affect the semantics of brivla
to which they are attached. The cmavo include the equivalent of English articles
, conjunctions, prepositions, numbers, and punctuation marks. There are over a h
undred subcategories of cmavo, known as ``selma'o'', each having a specifically
defined grammatical usage. The various selma'o are discussed throughout Chapters
5 to 19 and summarized in Chapter 20.
Standard cmavo occur in four forms defined by their word structure. Here are som
e examples of the various forms:
V-form .a .e .i .o .u
CV-form ba ce di fo gu
VV-form .au .ei .ia .o'u .u'e
CVV-form ki'a pei mi'o coi cu'u
In addition, there is the cmavo ``.y.'' (remember that ``y'' is not a V), which
must have pauses before and after it.
A simple cmavo thus has the property of having only one or two vowels, or of hav
ing a single consonant followed by one or two vowels. Words consisting of three
or more vowels in a row, or a single consonant followed by three or more vowels,
are also of cmavo form, but are reserved for experimental use: a few examples a
re ``ku'a'e'', ``sau'e'', and ``bai'ai''. All CVV cmavo beginning with the lette
r ``x'' are also reserved for experimental use. In general, though, the form of
a cmavo tells you little or nothing about its grammatical use.
`Èxperimental use'' means that the language designers will not assign any stand
ard meaning or usage to these words, and words and usages coined by Lojban speak
ers will not appear in official dictionaries for the indefinite future. Experime
ntal-use words provide an escape hatch for adding grammatical mechanisms (as opp
osed to semantic concepts) the need for which was not foreseen.
The cmavo of VV-form include not only the diphthongs and vowel pairs listed in S
ection 1, but also the following ten additional diphthongs:
.ia .ie .ii .io .iu
.ua .ue .ui .uo .uu
In addition, cmavo can have the form ``Cy'', a consonant followed by the letter
``y''. These cmavo represent letters of the Lojban alphabet, and are discussed i
n detail in Chapter 17.
Compound cmavo are sequences of cmavo attached together to form a single written
word. A compound cmavo is always identical in meaning and in grammatical use to
the separated sequence of simple cmavo from which it is composed. These words a
re written in compound form merely to save visual space, and to ease the reader'
s burden in identifying when the component cmavo are acting together.
Compound cmavo, while not visually short like their components, can be readily i
dentified by two characteristics:
1)
They have no consonant pairs or clusters, and
2)
They end in a vowel.
For example:
2.1) .iseci'i
.i se ci'i
2.2) punaijecanai
pu nai je ca nai
2.3) ki'e.u'e
ki'e .u'e
The cmavo ``.u'e'' begins with a vowel, and like all words beginning with a vowe
l, requires a pause (represented by ``.'') before it. This pause cannot be omitt
ed simply because the cmavo is incorporated into a compound cmavo. On the other
hand,
2.4) ki'e'u'e
is a single cmavo reserved for experimental purposes: it has four vowels.
2.5) cy.ibu.abu
cy. .ibu .abu
Again the pauses are required (see Section 9); the pause after ``cy.'' merges wi
th the pause before ``.ibu''.
There is no particular stress required in cmavo or their compounds. Some convent
ions do exist that are not mandatory. For two-syllable cmavo, for example, stres
s is typically placed on the first vowel; an example is
2.6) .e'o ko ko kurji
.E'o ko ko KURji
This convention results in a consistent rhythm to the language, since brivla are
required to have penultimate stress; some find this esthetically pleasing.
If the final syllable of one word is stressed, and the first syllable of the nex
t word is stressed, you must insert a pause or glottal stop between the two stre
ssed syllables. Thus
2.7) le re nanmu
can be optionally pronounced
2.8) le RE. NANmu
since there are no rules forcing stress on either of the first two words; the st
ress on ``re'', though, demands that a pause separate ``re'' from the following
syllable ``nan'' to ensure that the stress on ``nan'' is properly heard as a str
essed syllable. The alternative pronunciation
2.9) LE re NANmu
is also valid; this would apply secondary stress (used for purposes of emphasis,
contrast or sentence rhythm) to ``le'', comparable in rhythmical effect to the
English phrase ``THE two men''. In Example 2.8, the secondary stress on ``re'' w
ould be similar to that in the English phrase ``the TWO men''.
Both cmavo may also be left unstressed, thus:
2.10) le re NANmu
This would probably be the most common usage.
3. brivla
Predicate words, called ``brivla'', are at the core of Lojban. They carry most o
f the semantic information in the language. They serve as the equivalent of Engl
ish nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs, all in a single part of speech.
Every brivla belongs to one of three major subtypes. These subtypes are defined
by the form, or morphology, of the word --- all words of a particular structure
can be assigned by sight or sound to a particular type (cmavo, brivla, or cmene)
and subtype. Knowing the type and subtype then gives you, the reader or listene
r, significant clues to the meaning and the origin of the word, even if you have
never heard the word before.
The same principle allows you, when speaking or writing, to invent new brivla fo
r new concepts `òn the fly''; yet it offers people that you are trying to commu
nicate with a good chance to figure out your meaning. In this way, Lojban has a
flexible vocabulary which can be expanded indefinitely.
All brivla have the following properties:
1)
always end in a vowel;
2)
always contain a consonant pair in the first five letters, where ``y'' and a
postrophe are not counted as letters for this purpose. (See Section 6.)
3)
always are stressed on the next-to-the-last (penultimate) syllable; this imp
lies that they have two or more syllables.
The presence of a consonant pair distinguishes brivla from cmavo and their compo
unds. The final vowel distinguishes brivla from cmene, which always end in a con
sonant. Thus ``da'amei'' must be a compound cmavo because it lacks a consonant p
air; ``lojban.'' must be a name because it lacks a final vowel.
Thus, ``bisycla'' has the consonant pair ``sc'' in the first five non-``y'' lett
ers even though the ``sc'' actually appears in the form of ``syc''. Similarly, t
he word ``ro'inre'o'' contains ``nr'' in the first five letters because the apos
trophes are not counted for this purpose.
The three subtypes of brivla are:
1)
gismu, the Lojban primitive roots from which all other brivla are built;
2)
lujvo, the compounds of two or more gismu; and
3) fu'ivla (literally ``copy-word''), the specialized
words that are not Lojban primitives or natural
compounds, and are therefore borrowed from other
languages.
4. gismu
The gismu, or Lojban root words, are those brivla representing concepts most bas
ic to the language. The gismu were chosen for various reasons: some represent co
ncepts that are very familiar and basic; some represent concepts that are freque
ntly used in other languages; some were added because they would be helpful in c
onstructing more complex words; some because they represent fundamental Lojban c
oncepts (like ``cmavo'' and ``gismu'' themselves).
The gismu do not represent any sort of systematic partitioning of semantic space
. Some gismu may be superfluous, or appear for historical reasons: the gismu lis
t was being collected for almost 35 years and was only weeded out once. Instead,
the intention is that the gismu blanket semantic space: they make it possible t
o talk about the entire range of human concerns.
There are about 1350 gismu. In learning Lojban, you need only to learn most of t
hese gismu and their combining forms (known as ``rafsi'') as well as perhaps 200
major cmavo, and you will be able to communicate effectively in the language. T
his may sound like a lot, but it is a small number compared to the vocabulary ne
eded for similar communications in other languages.
All gismu have very strong form restrictions. Using the conventions defined in S
ection 1, all gismu are of the forms CVC/CV or CCVCV. They must meet the rules f
or all brivla given in Section 3; furthermore, they:
1)
always have five letters;
2)
always start with a consonant and end with a single vowel;
3)
always contain exactly one consonant pair, which is a permissible initial pa
ir (CC) if it's at the beginning of the gismu, but otherwise only has to be a pe
rmissible pair (C/C);
4)
are always stressed on the first syllable (since that is penultimate).
The five letter length distinguishes gismu from lujvo and fu'ivla. (It is possib
le to have fu'ivla like ``spa'i'' that are five letters long, but they must have
``'''; no gismu contains ``'''.)
With the exception of five special brivla variables, ``broda'', ``brode'', ``bro
di'', ``brodo'', and ``brodu'', no two gismu differ only in the final vowel. Fur
thermore, the set of gismu was specifically designed to reduce the likelihood th
at two similar sounding gismu could be confused. For example, because ``gismu''
is in the set of gismu, ``kismu'', ``xismu'', ``gicmu'', ``gizmu'', and ``gisnu'
' cannot be.
Almost all Lojban gismu are constructed from pieces of words drawn from other la
nguages, specifically Chinese, English, Hindi, Spanish, Russian, and Arabic, the
six most widely spoken natural languages. For a given concept, words in the six
languages that represent that concept were written in Lojban phonetics. Then a
gismu was selected to maximize the recognizability of the Lojban word for speake
rs of the six languages by weighting the inclusion of the sounds drawn from each
language by the number of speakers of that language. See Section 14 for a full
explanation of the algorithm.
Here are a few examples of gismu, with rough English equivalents (not definition
s):
3.1) creka
shirt
3.2) lijda
religion
3.3) blanu
blue
3.4) mamta
mother
3.5) cukta
book
3.6) patfu
father
3.7) nanmu
man
3.8) ninmu
woman
A small number of gismu were formed differently; see Section 15 for a list.
5. lujvo
When specifying a concept that is not found among the gismu (or, more specifical
ly, when the relevant gismu seems too general in meaning), a Lojbanist generally
attempts to express the concept as a tanru. Lojban tanru are an elaboration of
the concept of ``metaphor'' used in English. In Lojban, any brivla can be used t
o modify another brivla. The first of the pair modifies the second. This modific
ation is usually restrictive --- the modifying brivla reduces the broader sense
of the modified brivla to form a more narrow, concrete, or specific concept. Mod
ifying brivla may thus be seen as acting like English adverbs or adjectives. For
example,
5.1) skami pilno
is the tanru which expresses the concept of ``computer user''.
The simplest Lojban tanru are pairings of two concepts or ideas. Such tanru take
two simpler ideas that can be represented by gismu and combine them into a sing
le more complex idea. Two-part tanru may then be recombined in pairs with other
tanru, or with individual gismu, to form more complex or more specific ideas, an
d so on.
The meaning of a tanru is usually at least partly ambiguous: ``skami pilno'' cou
ld refer to a computer that is a user, or to a user of computers. There are a va
riety of ways that the modifier component can be related to the modified compone
nt. It is also possible to use cmavo within tanru to provide variations (or to p
revent ambiguities) of meaning.
Making tanru is essentially a poetic or creative act, not a science. While the s
yntax expressing the grouping relationships within tanru is unambiguous, tanru a
re still semantically ambiguous, since the rules defining the relationships betw
een the gismu are flexible. The process of devising a new tanru is dealt with in
detail in Chapter 5.
To express a simple tanru, simply say the component gismu together. Thus the bin
ary metaphor ``big boat'' becomes the tanru
5.2) barda bloti
representing roughly the same concept as the English word ``ship''.
The binary metaphor ``father mother'' can refer to a paternal grandmother (`à f
ather-ly type of mother''), while ``mother father'' can refer to a maternal gran
dfather (`à mother-ly type of father''). In Lojban, these become the tanru
5.3) patfu mamta
and
5.4) mamta patfu
respectively.
The possibility of semantic ambiguity can easily be seen in the last case. To in
terpret Example 5.4, the listener must determine what type of motherliness perta
ins to the father being referred to. In an appropriate context, ``mamta patfu''
could mean not ``grandfather'' but simply ``father with some motherly attributes
'', depending on the culture. If absolute clarity is required, there are ways to
expand upon and explain the exact interrelationship between the components; but
such detail is usually not needed.
When a concept expressed in a tanru proves useful, or is frequently expressed, i
t is desirable to choose one of the possible meanings of the tanru and assign it
to a new brivla. For Example 5.1, we would probably choose `ùser of computers'
', and form the new word
5.5) sampli
Such a brivla, built from the rafsi which represent its component words, is call
ed a ``lujvo''. Another example, corresponding to the tanru of Example 5.2, woul
d be:
5.6) bralo'i
big-boat
ship
The lujvo representing a given tanru is built from units representing the compon
ent gismu. These units are called ``rafsi'' in Lojban. Each rafsi represents onl
y one gismu. The rafsi are attached together in the order of the words in the ta
nru, occasionally inserting so-called ``hyphen'' letters to ensure that the piec
es stick together as a single word and cannot accidentally be broken apart into
cmavo, gismu, or other word forms. As a result, each lujvo can be readily and ac
curately recognized, allowing a listener to pick out the word from a string of s
poken Lojban, and if necessary, unambiguously decompose the word to a unique sou
rce tanru, thus providing a strong clue to its meaning.
The lujvo that can be built from the tanru ``mamta patfu'' in Example 5.4 is
5.7) mampa'u
which refers specifically to the concept ``maternal grandfather''. The two gismu
that constitute the tanru are represented in ``mampa'u'' by the rafsi ``mam-''
and ``-pa'u'', respectively; these two rafsi are then concatenated together to f
orm ``mampa'u''.
Like gismu, lujvo have only one meaning. When a lujvo is formally entered into a
dictionary of the language, a specific definition will be assigned based on one
particular interrelationship between the terms. (See Chapter 12 for how this ha
s been done.) Unlike gismu, lujvo may have more than one form. This is because t
here is no difference in meaning between the various rafsi for a gismu when they
are used to build a lujvo. A long rafsi may be used, especially in noisy enviro
nments, in place of a short rafsi; the result is considered the same lujvo, even
though the word is spelled and pronounced differently. Thus the word ``brivla''
, built from the tanru ``bridi valsi'', is the same lujvo as ``brivalsi'', ``bri
dyvla'', and ``bridyvalsi'', each of which uses a different combination of rafsi
.
When assembling rafsi together into lujvo, the rules for valid brivla must be fo
llowed: a consonant cluster must occur in the first five letters (excluding ``y'
' and ``'''), and the lujvo must end in a vowel.
A ``y'' (which is ignored in determining stress or consonant clusters) is insert
ed in the middle of the consonant cluster to glue the word together when the res
ulting cluster is either not permissible or the word is likely to break up. Ther
e are specific rules describing these conditions, detailed in Section 6.
An ``r'' (in some cases, an ``n'') is inserted when a CVV-form rafsi attaches to
the beginning of a lujvo in such a way that there is no consonant cluster. For
example, in the lujvo
5.8) soirsai
sonci sanmi
soldier meal
field rations
the rafsi ``soi-'' and ``-sai'' are joined, with the additional ``r'' making up
the ``rs'' consonant pair needed to make the word a brivla. Without the ``r'', t
he word would break up into ``soi sai'', two cmavo. The pair of cmavo have no re
lation to their rafsi lookalikes; they will either be ungrammatical (as in this
case), or will express a different meaning from what was intended.
Learning rafsi and the rules for assembling them into lujvo is clearly seen to b
e necessary for fully using the potential Lojban vocabulary.
Most important, it is possible to invent new lujvo while you speak or write in o
rder to represent a new or unfamiliar concept, one for which you do not know any
existing Lojban word. As long as you follow the rules for building these compou
nds, there is a good chance that you will be understood without explanation.
6. rafsi
Every gismu has from two to five rafsi, each of a different form, but each such
rafsi represents only one gismu. It is valid to use any of the rafsi forms in bu
ilding lujvo --- whichever the reader or listener will most easily understand, o
r whichever is most pleasing --- subject to the rules of lujvo making. There is
a scoring algorithm which is intended to determine which of the possible and leg
al lujvo forms will be the standard dictionary form (see Section 12).
Each gismu always has at least two rafsi forms; one is the gismu itself (used on
ly at the end of a lujvo), and one is the gismu without its final vowel (used on
ly at the beginning or middle of a lujvo). These forms are represented as -CVC/C
V or -CCVCV (called ``the 5-letter rafsi''), and -CVC/C- or -CCVC- (called ``the
4-letter rafsi'') respectively. The dashes in these rafsi form representations
show where other rafsi may be attached to form a valid lujvo. When lujvo are for
med only from 4-letter and 5-letter rafsi, known collectively as ``long rafsi'',
they are called `ùnreduced lujvo''.
Some examples of unreduced lujvo forms are:
6.1) mamtypatfu
from ``mamta patfu''
``mother father'' or ``maternal grandfather''
6.2) lerfyliste
from ``lerfu liste''
``letter list'' or a ``list of letters''
(letters of the alphabet)
6.3) nancyprali
from ``nanca prali''
``year profit'' or `ànnual profit''
6.4) prunyplipe
from ``pruni plipe''
`èlastic (springy) leap'' or ``spring'' (the verb)
6.5) vancysanmi
from ``vanci sanmi''
`èvening meal'' or ``supper''
In addition to these two forms, each gismu may have up to three additional short
rafsi, three letters long. All short rafsi have one of the forms -CVC-, -CCV-,
or -CVV-. The total number of rafsi forms that are assigned to a gismu depends o
n how useful the gismu is, or is presumed to be, in making lujvo, when compared
to other gismu that could be assigned the rafsi.
For example, ``zmadu'' (``more than'') has the two short rafsi ``-zma-'' and ``-
mau-'' (in addition to its unreduced rafsi ``-zmad-'' and ``-zmadu''), because a
vast number of lujvo have been created based on ``zmadu'', corresponding in gen
eral to English comparative adjectives ending in ``-er'' such as ``whiter'' (Loj
ban ``labmau''). On the other hand, ``bakri'' (``chalk'') has no short rafsi and
few lujvo.
There are at most one CVC-form, one CCV-form, and one CVV-form rafsi per gismu.
In fact, only a tiny handful of gismu have both a CCV-form and a CVV-form rafsi
assigned, and still fewer have all three forms of short rafsi. However, gismu wi
th both a CVC-form and another short rafsi are fairly common, partly because mor
e possible CVC-form rafsi exist. Yet CVC-form rafsi, even though they are fairly
easy to remember, cannot be used at the end of a lujvo (because lujvo must end
in vowels), so justifying the assignment of an additional short rafsi to many gi
smu.
The intention was to use the available ``rafsi space'' --- the set of all possib
le short rafsi forms --- in the most efficient way possible; the goal is to make
the most-used lujvo as short as possible (thus maximizing the use of short rafs
i), while keeping the rafsi very recognizable to anyone who knows the source gis
mu. For this reason, the letters in a rafsi have always been chosen from among t
he five letters of the corresponding gismu. As a result, there are a limited set
of short rafsi available for assignment to each gismu. At most seven possible s
hort rafsi are available for consideration (of which at most three can be used,
as explained above).
Here are the only short rafsi forms that can possibly exist for gismu of the for
m CVC/CV, like ``sakli''. The digits in the second column represent the gismu le
tters used to form the rafsi.
CVC 123 -sak-
CVC 124 -sal-
CVV 12'5 -sa'i-
CVV 125 -sai-
CCV 345 -kli-
CCV 132 -ska-
(The only actual short rafsi for ``sakli'' is ``-sal-''.)
For gismu of the form CCVCV, like ``blaci'', the only short rafsi forms that can
exist are:
CVC 134 -bac-
CVC 234 -lac
CVV 13'5 -ba'i-
CVV 135 -bai-
CVV 23'5 -la'i-
CVV 235 -lai-
CCV 123 -bla-
(In fact, ``blaci'' has none of these short rafsi; they are all assigned to othe
r gismu. Lojban speakers are not free to reassign any of the rafsi; the tables s
hown here are to help understand how the rafsi were chosen in the first place.)
There are a few restrictions: a CVV-form rafsi without an apostrophe cannot exis
t unless the vowels make up one of the four diphthongs `ài'', `èi'', `òi'', o
r `àu''; and a CCV-form rafsi is possible only if the two consonants form a per
missible initial consonant pair (see Section 1). Thus ``mamta'', which has the s
ame form as ``salci'', can only have ``mam'', ``mat'', and ``ma'a'' as possible
rafsi: in fact, only ``mam'' is assigned to it.
Some cmavo also have associated rafsi, usually CVC-form. For example, the ten co
mmon numerical digits, which are all CV form cmavo, each have a CVC-form rafsi f
ormed by adding a consonant to the cmavo. Most cmavo that have rafsi are ones us
ed in composing tanru (for a complete list, see Chapter 12).
The term for a lujvo made up solely of short rafsi is ``fully reduced lujvo''. H
ere are some examples of fully reduced lujvo:
6.6) cumfri
from ``cumki lifri''
``possible experience''
6.7) klezba
from ``klesi zbasu''
``category make''
6.8) kixta'a
from ``krixa tavla''
``cry-out talk''
6.9) sniju'o
from ``sinxa djuno''
``sign know''
In addition, some of the unreduced forms in the previous example may be fully re
duced to:
6.10) mampa'u
from ``mamta patfu''
``mother father'' or ``maternal grandfather''
6.11) lerste
from ``lerfu liste''
``letter list'' or a ``list of letters''
As noted above, CVC-form rafsi cannot appear as the final rafsi in a lujvo, beca
use all lujvo must end with one or two vowels. As a brivla, a lujvo must also co
ntain a consonant cluster within the first five letters --- this ensures that th
ey cannot be mistaken for compound cmavo. Of course, all lujvo have at least six
letters since they have two or more rafsi, each at least three letters long; he
nce they cannot be confused with gismu.
When attaching two rafsi together, it may be necessary to insert a hyphen letter
. In Lojban, the term ``hyphen'' always refers to a letter, either the vowel ``y
'' or one of the consonants ``r'' and ``n''. (The letter ``l'' can also be a hyp
hen, but is not used as one in lujvo.)
The ``y''-hyphen is used after a CVC-form rafsi when joining it with the followi
ng rafsi could result in an impermissible consonant pair, or when the resulting
lujvo could fall apart into two or more words (either cmavo or gismu).
Thus, the tanru ``pante tavla'' (``protest talk'') cannot produce the lujvo ``pa
tta'a'', because ``tt'' is not a permissible consonant pair; the lujvo must be `
`patyta'a''. Similarly, the tanru ``mudri siclu'' (``wooden whistle'') cannot fo
rm the lujvo ``mudsiclu''; instead, ``mudysiclu'' must be used. (Remember that `
`y'' is not counted in determining whether the first five letters of a brivla co
ntain a consonant cluster: this is why.)
The ``y''-hyphen is also used to attach a 4-letter rafsi, formed by dropping the
final vowel of a gismu, to the following rafsi. (This procedure was shown, but
not explained, in Examples 6.1 to 6.5.) The lujvo forms ``zunlyjamfu'', ``zunlyj
ma'', ``zuljamfu'', and ``zuljma'' are all legitimate and equivalent forms made
from the tanru ``zunle jamfu'' (``left foot''). Of these, ``zuljma'' is the pref
erred one since it is the shortest; it thus is likely to be the form listed in a
Lojban dictionary.
The ``r''-hyphen and its close relative, the ``n''-hyphen, are used in lujvo onl
y after CVV-form rafsi. A hyphen is always required in a two-part lujvo of the f
orm CVV-CVV, since otherwise there would be no consonant cluster.
An ``r-''hyphen or ``n''-hyphen is also required after the CVV-form rafsi of any
lujvo of the form CVV-CVC/CV or CVV-CCVCV since it would otherwise fall apart i
nto a CVV-form cmavo and a gismu. In any lujvo with more than two parts, a CVV-f
orm rafsi in the initial position must always be followed by a hyphen. If the hy
phen were to be omitted, the supposed lujvo could be broken into smaller words w
ithout the hyphen: because the CVV-form rafsi would be interpreted as a cmavo, a
nd the remainder of the word as a valid lujvo that is one rafsi shorter.
An ``n''-hyphen is only used in place of an ``r''-hyphen when the following rafs
i begins with ``r''. For example, the tanru ``rokci renro'' (``rock throw'') can
not be expressed as ``ro'ire'o'' (which breaks up into two cmavo), nor can it be
``ro'irre'o'' (which has an impermissible double consonant); the ``n''-hyphen i
s required, and the correct form of the hyphenated lujvo is ``ro'inre'o''. The s
ame lujvo could also be expressed without hyphenation as ``rokre'o''.
There is also a different way of building lujvo, or rather phrases which are gra
mmatically and semantically equivalent to lujvo. You can make a phrase containin
g any desired words, joining each pair of them with the special cmavo ``zei''. T
hus,
6.12) bridi zei valsi
is the exact equivalent of ``brivla'' (but not necessarily the same as the under
lying tanru ``bridi valsi'', which could have other meanings.) Using ``zei'' is
the only way to get a cmavo lacking a rafsi, a cmene, or a fu'ivla into a lujvo:
6.13) xy. zei kantu
X ray
6.14) kulnr,farsi zei lolgai
Farsi floor-cover
Persian rug
6.15) na'e zei .a zei na'e zei by. livgyterbilma
non-A, non-B liver-disease
non-A, non-B hepatitis
6.16) .cerman. zei xarnykarce
Sherman war-car
Sherman tank
Example 6.15 is particularly noteworthy because the phrase that would be produce
d by removing the ``zei''s from it doesn't end with a brivla, and in fact is not
even grammatical. As written, the example is a tanru with two components, but b
y adding a ``zei'' between ``by.'' and ``livgyterbilma'' to produce
6.17) na'e zei .a zei na'e zei by. zei livgyterbilma
non-A-non-B-hepatitis
the whole phrase would become a single lujvo. The longer lujvo of Example 6.17 m
ay be preferable, because its place structure can be built from that of ``bilma'
', whereas the place structure of a lujvo without a brivla must be constructed a
d hoc.
Note that rafsi may not be used in ``zei'' phrases, because they are not words.
CVV rafsi look like words (specifically cmavo) but there can be no confusion bet
ween the two uses of the same letters, because cmavo appear only as separate wor
ds or in compound cmavo (which are really just a notation for writing separate b
ut closely related words as if they were one); rafsi appear only as parts of luj
vo.
7. fu'ivla
The use of tanru or lujvo is not always appropriate for very concrete or specifi
c terms (e.g. ``brie'' or ``cobra''), or for jargon words specialized to a narro
w field (e.g. ``quark'', `ìntegral'', or `ìambic pentameter''). These words ar
e in effect names for concepts, and the names were invented by speakers of anoth
er language. The vast majority of words referring to plants, animals, foods, and
scientific terminology cannot be easily expressed as tanru. They thus must be b
orrowed (actually ``copied'') into Lojban from the original language.
There are four stages of borrowing in Lojban, as words become more and more modi
fied (but shorter and easier to use). Stage 1 is the use of a foreign name quote
d with the cmavo ``la'o'' (explained in full in Chapter 19):
7.1) me la'o ly. spaghetti .ly.
is a predicate with the place structure ``x1 is a quantity of spaghetti''.
Stage 2 involves changing the foreign name to a Lojbanized name, as explained in
Section 8:
7.2) me la spagetis.
One of these expedients is often quite sufficient when you need a word quickly i
n conversation. (This can make it easier to get by when you do not yet have full
command of the Lojban vocabulary, provided you are talking to someone who will
recognize the borrowing.)
Where a little more universality is desired, the word to be borrowed must be Loj
banized into one of several permitted forms. A rafsi is then usually attached to
the beginning of the Lojbanized form, using a hyphen to ensure that the resulti
ng word doesn't fall apart.
The rafsi categorizes or limits the meaning of the fu'ivla; otherwise a word hav
ing several different jargon meanings in other languages would require the word-
inventor to choose which meaning should be assigned to the fu'ivla, since fu'ivl
a (like other brivla) are not permitted to have more than one definition. Such a
Stage 3 borrowing is the most common kind of fu'ivla.
Finally, Stage 4 fu'ivla do not have any rafsi classifier, and are used where a
fu'ivla has become so common or so important that it must be made as short as po
ssible. (See Section 16 for a proposal concerning Stage 4 fu'ivla.)
The form of a fu'ivla reliably distinguishes it from both the gismu and the cmav
o. Like cultural gismu, fu'ivla are generally based on a word from a single non-
Lojban language. The word is ``borrowed'' (actually ``copied'', hence the Lojban
tanru ``fukpi valsi'') from the other language and Lojbanized --- the phonemes
are converted to their closest Lojban equivalent and modifications are made as n
ecessary to make the word a legitimate Lojban fu'ivla-form word. All fu'ivla:
1)
must contain a consonant cluster in the first five letters of the word; if t
his consonant cluster is at the beginning, it must either be a permissible initi
al consonant pair, or a longer cluster such that each pair of adjacent consonant
s in the cluster is a permissible initial consonant pair: ``spraile'' is accepta
ble, but not ``ktraile'' or ``trkaile'';
2)
must end in one or more vowels;
3)
must not be gismu or lujvo, or any combination of cmavo, gismu, and lujvo; f
urthermore, a fu'ivla with a CV cmavo joined to the front of it must not have th
e form of a lujvo (the so-called ``slinku'i test'');
4)
cannot contain ``y'', although they may contain syllabic pronunciations of L
ojban consonants;
5)
like other brivla, are stressed on the penultimate syllable.
Note that consonant triples or larger clusters that are not at the beginning of
a fu'ivla can be quite flexible, as long as all consonant pairs are permissible.
There is no need to restrict fu'ivla clusters to permissible initial pairs exce
pt at the beginning.
This is a fairly liberal definition and allows quite a lot of possibilities with
in ``fu'ivla space''. Stage 3 fu'ivla can be made easily on the fly, as lujvo ca
n, because the procedure for forming them always guarantees a word that cannot v
iolate any of the rules. Stage 4 fu'ivla require running tests that are not simp
le to characterize or perform, and should be made only after deliberation and by
someone knowledgeable about all the considerations that apply.
Here is a simple and reliable procedure for making a non-Lojban word into a vali
d Stage 3 fu'ivla:
1)
Eliminate all double consonants and silent letters.
2)
Convert all sounds to their closest Lojban equivalents. Lojban ``y'', howeve
r, may not be used in any fu'ivla.
3)
If the last letter is not a vowel, modify the ending so that the word ends i
n a vowel, either by removing a final consonant or by adding a suggestively chos
en final vowel.
4)
If the first letter is not a consonant, modify the beginning so that the wor
d begins with a consonant, either by removing an initial vowel or adding a sugge
stively chosen initial consonant.
5)
Prefix the result of steps 1-5 with a 4-letter rafsi that categorizes the fu
'ivla into a ``topic area''. It is only safe to use a 4-letter rafsi; short rafs
i sometimes produce invalid fu'ivla. Hyphenate the rafsi to the rest of the fu'i
vla with an ``r''-hyphen; if that would produce a double ``r'', use an ``n''-hyp
hen instead; if the rafsi ends in ``r'' and the rest of the fu'ivla begins with
``n'' (or vice versa) use an ``l''-hyphen. (This is the only use of ``l''-hyphen
in Lojban.)
Alternatively, if a CVC-form short rafsi is available it can be used instead
of the long rafsi.
6)
Remember that the stress necessarily appears on the penultimate (next-to-the
-last) syllable.
In this section, the hyphen is set off with commas in the examples, but these co
mmas are not required in writing, and the hyphen need not be pronounced as a sep
arate syllable.
Here are a few examples:
7.3) spaghetti (from English or Italian)
spageti (Lojbanize)
cidj,r,spageti (prefix long rafsi)
dja,r,spageti (prefix short rafsi)
where ``cidj-'' is the 4-letter rafsi for ``cidja'', the Lojban gismu for ``food
'', thus categorizing ``cidjrspageti'' as a kind of food. The form with the shor
t rafsi happens to work, but such good fortune cannot be relied on: in any event
, it means the same thing.
7.4) Acer (the scientific name of maple trees)
acer (Lojbanize)
xaceru (add initial consonant and final vowel)
tric,r,xaceru (prefix rafsi)
ric,r,xaceru (prefix short rafsi)
where ``tric-'' and ``ric-'' are rafsi for ``tricu'', the gismu for ``tree''. No
te that by the same principles, ``maple sugar'' could get the fu'ivla ``saktrxac
eru'', or could be represented by the tanru ``tricrxaceru sakta''. Technically,
``ricrxaceru'' and ``tricrxaceru'' are distinct fu'ivla, but they would surely b
e given the same meanings if both happened to be in use.
7.5) brie (from French)
bri (Lojbanize)
cirl,r,bri (prefix rafsi)
where ``cirl-'' represents ``cirla'' (``cheese'').
7.6) cobra
kobra (Lojbanize)
sinc,r,kobra (prefix rafsi)
where ``sinc-'' represents ``since'' (``snake'').
7.7) quark
kuark (Lojbanize)
kuarka (add final vowel)
sask,r,kuarka (prefix rafsi)
where ``sask-'' represents ``saske'' (``science''). Note the extra vowel `à'' a
dded to the end of the word, and the diphthong `ùa'', which never appears in gi
smu or lujvo, but may appear in fu'ivla.
The use of the prefix helps distinguish among the many possible meanings of the
borrowed word, depending on the field. As it happens, ``spageti'' and ``kuarka''
are valid Stage 4 fu'ivla, but ``xaceru'' looks like a compound cmavo, and ``ko
bra'' like a gismu.
For another example, `ìntegral'' has a specific meaning to a mathematician. But
the Lojban fu'ivla `ìntegrale'', which is a valid Stage 4 fu'ivla, does not co
nvey that mathematical sense to a non-mathematical listener, even one with an En
glish-speaking background; its source --- the English word `ìntegral'' --- has
various other specialized meanings in other fields.
Left uncontrolled, `ìntegrale'' almost certainly would eventually come to mean
the same collection of loosely related concepts that English associates with `ì
ntegral'', with only the context to indicate (possibly) that the mathematical te
rm is meant.
The prefix method would render the mathematical concept as ``cmacrntegrale'', if
the `ì'' of `ìntegrale'' is removed, or something like ``cmacrnintegrale'', i
f a new consonant is added to the beginning; ``cmac-'' is the rafsi for ``cmaci'
' (``mathematics''). The architectural sense of `ìntegral'' might be conveyed w
ith ``djinrnintegrale'' or ``tarmrnintegrale'', where ``dinju'' and ``tarmi'' me
an ``building'' and ``form'' respectively.
Here are some fu'ivla representing cultures and related things, shown with more
than one rafsi prefix:
7.8) bang,r,blgaria
Bulgarian (in language)
7.9) kuln,r,blgaria
Bulgarian (in culture)
7.10) gugd,r,blgaria
Bulgaria (the country)
7.11) bang,r,kore,a
Korean (the language)
7.12) kuln,r,kore,a
Korean (the culture)
Note the commas in Examples 7.11 and 7.12, used because `èa'' is not a valid di
phthong in Lojban. Arguably, some form of the native name ``Chosen'' should have
been used instead of the internationally known ``Korea''; this is a recurring p
roblem in all borrowings. In general, it is better to use the native name unless
using it will severely impede understanding: ``Navajo'' is far more widely know
n than ``Dine'e''.
8. cmene
Lojbanized names, called ``cmene'', are very much like their counterparts in oth
er languages. They are labels applied to things (or people) to stand for them in
descriptions or in direct address. They may convey meaning in themselves, but d
o not necessarily do so.
Because names are often highly personal and individual, Lojban attempts to allow
native language names to be used with a minimum of modification. The requiremen
t that the Lojban speech stream be unambiguously analyzable, however, means that
most names must be modified somewhat when they are Lojbanized. Here are a few e
xamples of English names and possible Lojban equivalents:
8.1) djim.
Jim
8.2) djein.
Jane
8.3) .arnold.
Arnold
8.4) pit.
Pete
8.5) katrinas.
Katrina
8.6) kat,r,in.
Catherine
(Note that syllabic ``r'' is skipped in determining the stressed syllable, so Ex
ample 8.6 is stressed on the ``ka''.)
8.7) katis.
Cathy
8.8) keit.
Kate
Names may have almost any form, but always end in a consonant, and are followed
by a pause. They are penultimately stressed, unless unusual stress is marked wit
h capitalization. A name may have multiple parts, each ending with a consonant a
nd pause, or the parts may be combined into a single word with no pause. For exa
mple,
8.9) djan. djonz.
and
8.10) djandjonz.
are both valid Lojbanizations of ``John Jones''.
The final arbiter of the correct form of a name is the person doing the naming,
although most cultures grant people the right to determine how they want their o
wn name to be spelled and pronounced. The English name ``Mary'' can thus be Lojb
anized as ``meris.'', ``maris.'', ``meiris.'', ``merix.'', or even ``marys.''. T
he last alternative is not pronounced much like its English equivalent, but may
be desirable to someone who values spelling over pronunciation. The final conson
ant need not be an ``s''; there must, however, be some Lojban consonant at the e
nd.
Names are not permitted to have the sequences ``la'', ``lai'', or ``doi'' embedd
ed in them, unless the sequence is immediately preceded by a consonant. These mi
nor restrictions are due to the fact that all Lojban cmene embedded in a speech
stream will be preceded by one of these words or by a pause. With one of these w
ords embedded, the cmene might break up into valid Lojban words followed by a sh
orter cmene. However, break-up cannot happen after a consonant, because that wou
ld imply that the word before the ``la'', or whatever, ended in a consonant with
out pause, which is impossible.
For example, the invalid name ``laplas.'' would look like the Lojban words ``la
plas.'', and `ìlanas.'' would be misunderstood as ``.i la nas.''. However, ``ne
derlants.'' cannot be misheard as ``neder lants.'', because ``neder'' with no fo
llowing pause is not a possible Lojban word.
There are close alternatives to these forbidden sequences that can be used in Lo
jbanizing names, such as ``ly'', ``lei'', and ``dai'' or ``do'i'', that do not c
ause these problems.
Lojban cmene are identifiable as word forms by the following characteristics:
1)
They must end in one or more consonants. There are no rules about how many c
onsonants may appear in a cluster in cmene, provided that each consonant pair (w
hether standing by itself, or as part of a larger cluster) is a permissible pair
.
2)
They may contain the letter y as a normal, non-hyphenating vowel. They are t
he only kind of Lojban word that may contain the two diphthongs `ìy'' and `ùy'
'.
3)
They are always followed in speech by a pause after the final consonant, wri
tten as ``.''.
4)
They may be stressed on any syllable; if this syllable is not the penultimat
e one, it must be capitalized when writing. Neither names nor words that begin s
entences are capitalized in Lojban, so this is the only use of capital letters.
Names meeting these criteria may be invented, Lojbanized from names in other lan
guages, or formed by appending a consonant onto a cmavo, a gismu, a fu'ivla or a
lujvo. Some cmene built from Lojban words are:
8.11) pav.
the One
from the cmavo ``pa'', with rafsi ``pav'', meaning `òne''
8.12) sol.
the Sun
from the gismu ``solri'', meaning ``solar'', or actually
``pertaining to the Sun''
8.13) ralj.
Chief (as a title)
from the gismu ``ralju'', meaning ``principal''.
8.14) nol.
Lord/Lady
from the gismu ``nobli'', with rafsi ``nol'',
meaning ``noble''.
To Lojbanize a name from the various natural languages, apply the following rule
s:
1)
Eliminate double consonants and silent letters.
2)
Add a final ``s'' or ``n'' (or some other consonant that sounds good) if the
name ends in a vowel.
3)
Convert all sounds to their closest Lojban equivalents.
4)
If possible and acceptable, shift the stress to the penultimate (next-to-the
-last) syllable. Use commas and capitalization in written Lojban when it is nece
ssary to preserve non-standard syllabication or stress. Do not capitalize names
otherwise.
5)
If the name contains an impermissible consonant pair, insert a vowel between
the consonants: ``y'' is recommended.
6)
No cmene may have the syllables ``la'', ``lai'', or ``doi'' in them, unless
immediately preceded by a consonant. If these combinations are present, they mus
t be converted to something else. Possible substitutions include ``ly'', ``ly'i'
', and ``dai'' or ``do'i'', respectively.
There are some additional rules for Lojbanizing the scientific names (technicall
y known as ``Linnaean binomials'' after their inventor) which are internationall
y applied to each species of animal or plant. Where precision is essential, thes
e names need not be Lojbanized, but can be directly inserted into Lojban text us
ing the cmavo ``la'o'', explained in Chapter 19. Using this cmavo makes the alre
ady lengthy Latinized names at least four syllables longer, however, and leaves
the pronunciation in doubt. The following suggestions, though incomplete, will a
ssist in converting Linnaean binomals to valid Lojban names. They can also help
to create fu'ivla based on Linnaean binomials or other words of the internationa
l scientific vocabulary. The term ``back vowel'' in the following list refers to
any of the letters `à'', `ò'', or `ù''; the term ``front vowel'' correspondi
ngly refers to any of the letters `è'', `ì'', or ``y''.
1)
Change double consonants other than ``cc'' to single consonants.
2)
Change ``cc'' before a front vowel to ``kc'', but otherwise to ``k''.
3)
Change ``c'' before a back vowel and final ``c'' to ``k''.
4)
Change ``ng'' before a consonant (other than ``h'') and final ``ng'' to ``n'
'.
5)
Change ``x'' to ``z'' initially, but otherwise to ``ks''.
6)
Change ``pn'' to ``n'' initially.
7)
Change final `ìe'' and `ìi'' to `ì''.
8)
Make the following idiosyncratic substitutions:
aa a ae e ch k ee i eigh ei ew u igh ai oo u ou u ow au ph f q k sc sk w u y
i
However, the diphthong substitutions should not be done if the two vowels ar
e in two different syllables.
9)
Change ``h'' between two vowels to ``''', but otherwise remove it completely
. If preservation of the ``h'' seems essential, change it to ``x'' instead.
10)
Place ``''' between any remaining vowel pairs that do not form Lojban diphth
ongs.
Some further examples of Lojbanized names are:
English ``Mary'' meris.
or meiris.
English ``Smith'' smit.
English ``Jones'' djonz.
English ``John'' djan. or jan. (American)
or djon. or jon. (British)
English `Àlice'' .alis.
English `Èlise'' .eLIS.
English ``Johnson'' djansn.
English ``William'' .uiliam.
or .uil,iam.
English ``Brown'' braun.
English ``Charles'' tcarlz.
French ``Charles'' carl.
French ``De Gaulle'' dyGOL.
German ``Heinrich'' xainrix.
Spanish ``Joaquin'' xuaKIN.
Russian ``Svetlana'' sfietlanys.
Russian ``Khrushchev'' xrucTCOF.
Hindi ``Krishna'' kricnas.
Polish ``Lech Walesa'' lex. va,uensas.
Spanish ``Don Quixote'' don. kicotes.
or modern Spanish: don. kixotes.
or Mexican dialect: don. ki'otes.
Chinese ``Mao Zedong'' maudzydyn.
Japanese ``Fujiko'' fudjikos.
or fujikos.
9. Rules for inserting pauses
Summarized in one place, here are the rules for inserting pauses between Lojban
words:
1)
Any two words may have a pause between them; it is always illegal to pause i
n the middle of a word, because that breaks up the word into two words.
2)
Every word ending in a consonant must be followed by a pause. Necessarily, a
ll such words are cmene.
3)
Every word beginning with a vowel must be preceded by a pause. Such words ar
e either cmavo, fu'ivla, or cmene; all gismu and lujvo begin with consonants.
4)
Every cmene must be preceded by a pause, unless the immediately preceding wo
rd is one of the cmavo ``la'', ``lai'', ``la'i'', or ``doi'' (which is why those
strings are forbidden in cmene). However, the situation triggering this rule ra
rely occurs.
5)
If the last syllable of a word bears the stress, and a brivla follows, the t
wo must be separated by a pause, to prevent confusion with the primary stress of
the brivla. In this case, the first word must be either a cmavo or a cmene with
unusual stress (which already ends with a pause, of course).
6)
A cmavo of the form ``Cy'' must be followed by a pause unless another ``Cy''
-form cmavo follows.
7)
When non-Lojban text is embedded in Lojban, it must be preceded and followed
by pauses. (How to embed non-Lojban text is explained in Chapter 19.)
10. Considerations for making lujvo
Given a tanru which expresses an idea to be used frequently, it can be turned in
to a lujvo by following the lujvo-making algorithm which is given in Section 11.
In building a lujvo, the first step is to replace each gismu with a rafsi that u
niquely represents that gismu. These rafsi are then attached together by fixed r
ules that allow the resulting compound to be recognized as a single word and to
be analyzed in only one way.
There are three other complications; only one is serious.
The first is that there is usually more than one rafsi that can be used for each
gismu. The one to be used is simply whichever one sounds or looks best to the s
peaker or writer. There are usually many valid combinations of possible rafsi. T
hey all are equally valid, and all of them mean exactly the same thing. (The sco
ring algorithm given in Section 12 is used to choose the standard form of the lu
jvo --- the version which would be entered into a dictionary.)
The second complication is the serious one. Remember that a tanru is ambiguous -
-- it has several possible meanings. A lujvo, or at least one that would be put
into the dictionary, has just a single meaning. Like a gismu, a lujvo is a predi
cate which encompasses one area of the semantic universe, with one set of places
. Hopefully the meaning chosen is the most useful of the possible semantic space
s. A possible source of linguistic drift in Lojban is that as Lojbanic society e
volves, the concept that seems the most useful one may change.
You must also be aware of the possibility of some prior meaning of a new lujvo,
especially if you are writing for posterity. If a lujvo is invented which involv
es the same tanru as one that is in the dictionary, and is assigned a different
meaning (or even just a different place structure), linguistic drift results. Th
is isn't necessarily bad. Every natural language does it. But in communication,
when you use a meaning different from the dictionary definition, someone else ma
y use the dictionary and therefore misunderstand you. You can use the cmavo ``za
'e'' (explained in Chapter 19) before a newly coined lujvo to indicate that it m
ay have a non-dictionary meaning.
The essential nature of human communication is that if the listener understands,
then all is well. Let this be the ultimate guideline for choosing meanings and
place structures for invented lujvo.
The third complication is also simple, but tends to scare new Lojbanists with it
s implications. It is based on Zipf's Law, which says that the length of words i
s inversely proportional to their usage. The shortest words are those which are
used more; the longest ones are used less. Conversely, commonly used concepts wi
ll be tend to be abbreviated. In English, we have abbreviations and acronyms and
jargon, all of which represent complex ideas that are used often by small group
s of people, so they shortened them to convey more information more rapidly.
Therefore, given a complicated tanru with grouping markers, abstraction markers,
and other cmavo in it to make it syntactically unambiguous, the psychological b
asis of Zipf's Law may compel the lujvo-maker to drop some of the cmavo to make
a shorter (technically incorrect) tanru, and then use that tanru to make the luj
vo.
This doesn't lead to ambiguity, as it might seem to. A given lujvo still has exa
ctly one meaning and place structure. It is just that more than one tanru is com
peting for the same lujvo. But more than one meaning for the tanru was already c
ompeting for the ``right'' to define the meaning of the lujvo. Someone has to us
e judgment in deciding which one meaning is to be chosen over the others.
If the lujvo made by a shorter form of tanru is in use, or is likely to be usefu
l for another meaning, the decider then retains one or more of the cmavo, prefer
ably ones that set this meaning apart from the shorter form meaning that is used
or anticipated. As a rule, therefore, the shorter lujvo will be used for a more
general concept, possibly even instead of a more frequent word. If both words a
re needed, the simpler one should be shorter. It is easier to add a cmavo to cla
rify the meaning of the more complex term than it is to find a good alternate ta
nru for the simpler term.
And of course, we have to consider the listener. On hearing an unknown word, the
listener will decompose it and get a tanru that makes no sense or the wrong sen
se for the context. If the listener realizes that the grouping operators may hav
e been dropped out, he or she may try alternate groupings, or try inserting an a
bstraction operator if that seems plausible. (The grouping of tanru is explained
in Chapter 5; abstraction is explained in Chapter 11.) Plausibility is the key
to learning new ideas and to evaluating unfamiliar lujvo.
11. The lujvo-making algorithm
The following is the current algorithm for generating Lojban lujvo given a known
tanru and a complete list of gismu and their assigned rafsi. The algorithm was
designed by Bob LeChevalier and Dr. James Cooke Brown for computer program imple
mentation. It was modified in 1989 with the assistance of Nora LeChevalier, who
detected a flaw in the original ``tosmabru test''.
Given a tanru that is to be made into a lujvo:
1)
Choose a 3-letter or 4-letter rafsi for each of the gismu and cmavo in the t
anru except the last.
2)
Choose a 3-letter (CVV-form or CCV-form) or 5-letter rafsi for the final gis
mu in the tanru.
3)
Join the resulting string of rafsi, initially without hyphens.
4)
Add hyphen letters where necessary. It is illegal to add a hyphen at a place
that is not required by this algorithm. Right-to-left tests are recommended, fo
r reasons discussed below.
4a)
If there are more than two words in the tanru, put an ``r''-hyphen (or an ``
n''-hyphen) after the first rafsi if it is CVV-form. If there are exactly two wo
rds, then put an ``r''-hyphen (or an ``n''-hyphen) between the two rafsi if the
first rafsi is CVV-form, unless the second rafsi is CCV-form (for example, ``sai
cli'' requires no hyphen). Use an ``r''-hyphen unless the letter after the hyphe
n is ``r'', in which case use an ``n''-hyphen. Never use an ``n''-hyphen unless
it is required.
4b)
Put a ``y''-hyphen between the consonants of any impermissible consonant pai
r. This will always appear between rafsi.
4c)
Put a ``y''-hyphen after any 4-letter rafsi form.
5)
Test all forms with one or more initial CVC-form rafsi --- with the pattern
``CVC ... CVC + X'' --- for ``tosmabru failure''. X must either be a CVCCV long
rafsi that happens to have a permissible initial pair as the consonant cluster,
or is something which has caused a ``y''-hyphen to be installed between the prev
ious CVC and itself by one of the above rules. The test is as follows:
5a)
Examine all the C/C consonant pairs that join the CVC rafsi, and also the pa
ir between the last CVC and the X portion, ignoring any ``y''-hyphen before the
X. These consonant pairs are called ``joints''.
5b)
If all of those joints are permissible initials, then the trial word will br
eak up into a cmavo and a shorter brivla. If not, the word will not break up, an
d no further hyphens are needed.
5c)
Install a ``y''-hyphen at the first such joint.
Note that the ``tosmabru test'' implies that the algorithm will be more efficien
t if rafsi junctures are tested for required hyphens from right to left, instead
of from left to right; when the test is required, it cannot be completed until
hyphenation to the right has been determined.
12. The lujvo scoring algorithm
This algorithm was devised by Bob and Nora LeChevalier in 1989. It is not the on
ly possible algorithm, but it usually gives a choice that people find preferable
. The algorithm may be changed in the future. The lowest-scoring variant will us
ually be the dictionary form of the lujvo. (In previous versions, it was the hig
hest-scoring variant.)
1)
Count the total number of letters, including hyphens and apostrophes; call i
t ``L''.
2)
Count the number of apostrophes; call it `À''.
3)
Count the number of ``y''-, ``r''-, and ``n''-hyphens; call it ``H''.
4)
For each rafsi, find the value in the following table. Sum this value over a
ll rafsi; call it ``R'':
CVC/CV (final) (-sarji) 1 CVC/C (-sarj-) 2 CCVCV (final) (-zbasu) 3 CCVC (-z
bas-) 4 CVC (-nun-) 5 CVV with an apostrophe (-ta'u-) 6 CCV (-zba-) 7 CVV with n
o apostrophe (-sai-) 8
5)
Count the number of vowels, not including ``y''; call it ``V''.
The score is then:
(1000 * L) - (500 * A) + (100 * H) - (10 * R) - V
In case of ties, there is no preference. This should be rare. Note that the algo
rithm essentially encodes a hierarchy of priorities: short words are preferred (
counting apostrophes as half a letter), then words with fewer hyphens, words wit
h more pleasing rafsi (this judgment is subjective), and finally words with more
vowels are chosen. Each decision principle is applied in turn if the ones befor
e it have failed to choose; it is possible that a lower-ranked principle might d
ominate a higher-ranked one if it is ten times better than the alternative.
Here are some lujvo with their scores (not necessarily the lowest scoring forms
for these lujvo, nor even necessarily sensible lujvo):
12.1) zbasai
zba + sai
(1000 * 6) - (500 * 0)
+ (100 * 0) - (10 * 15) - 3 = 5847
12.2) nunynau
nun + y + nau
32500 - (1000 * 7) + (500 * 0)
- (100 * 1) + (10 * 13) + 3 = 6967
12.3) sairzbata'u
sai + r + zba + ta'u
32500 - (1000 * 11) + (500 * 1)
- (100 * 1) + (10 * 21) + 5 = 10385
12.4) zbazbasysarji
zba + zbas + y + sarji
32500 - (1000 * 13) + (500 * 0)
- (100 * 1) + (10 * 12) + 4 = 12976
13. lujvo-making examples
This section contains examples of making and scoring lujvo. First, we will start
with the tanru ``gerku zdani'' (``dog house'') and construct a lujvo meaning ``
doghouse'', that is, a house where a dog lives. We will use a brute-force applic
ation of the algorithm in Section 12, using every possible rafsi.
The rafsi for ``gerku'' are:
-ger-, -ge'u-, -gerk-, -gerku
The rafsi for ``zdani'' are:
-zda-, -zdan-, -zdani.
Step 1 of the algorithm directs us to use ``-ger-'', ``-ge'u-'' and ``-gerk-'' a
s possible rafsi for ``gerku''; Step 2 directs us to use ``-zda-'' and ``-zdani'
' as possible rafsi for ``zdani''. The six possible forms of the lujvo are then:
ger-zda ger-zdani ge'u-zda ge'u-zdani gerk-zda gerk-zdani
We must then insert appropriate hyphens in each case. The first two forms need n
o hyphenation: ``ge'' cannot fall off the front, because the following word woul
d begin with ``rz'', which is not a permissible initial consonant pair. So the l
ujvo forms are ``gerzda'' and ``gerzdani''.
The third form, ``ge'u-zda'', needs no hyphen, because even though the first raf
si is CVV, the second one is CCV, so there is a consonant cluster in the first f
ive letters. So ``ge'uzda'' is this form of the lujvo.
The fourth form, ``ge'u-zdani'', however, requires an ``r''-hyphen; otherwise, t
he ``ge'u-'' part would fall off as a cmavo. So this form of the lujvo is ``ge'u
rzdani''.
The last two forms require ``y''-hyphens, as all 4-letter rafsi do, and so are `
`gerkyzda'' and ``gerkyzdani'' respectively.
The scoring algorithm is heavily weighted in favor of short lujvo, so we might e
xpect that ``gerzda'' would win. Its L score is 6, its A score is 0, its H score
is 0, its R score is 12, and its V score is 3, for a final score of 5878. The o
ther forms have scores of 7917, 6367, 9506, 8008, and 10047 respectively. Conseq
uently, this lujvo would probably appear in the dictionary in the form ``gerzda'
'.
For the next example, we will use the tanru ``bloti klesi'' (``boat class'') pre
sumably referring to the category (rowboat, motorboat, cruise liner) into which
a boat falls. We will omit the long rafsi from the process, since lujvo containi
ng long rafsi are almost never preferred by the scoring algorithm when there are
short rafsi available.
The rafsi for ``bloti'' are ``-lot-'', ``-blo-'', and ``-lo'i-''; for ``klesi''
they are ``-kle-'' and ``-lei-''. Both these gismu are among the handful which h
ave both CVV-form and CCV-form rafsi, so there is an unusual number of possibili
ties available for a two-part tanru:
lotkle blokle lo'ikle
lotlei blolei lo'irlei
Only ``lo'irlei'' requires hyphenation (to avoid confusion with the cmavo sequen
ce ``lo'i lei''). All six forms are valid versions of the lujvo, as are the six
further forms using long rafsi; however, the scoring algorithm produces the foll
owing results:
lotkle 5878 blokle 5858 lo'ikle 6367
lotlei 5867 blolei 5847 lo'irlei 7456
So the form ``blolei'' is preferred, but only by a tiny margin over ``blokle'';
the next two forms are only slightly worse; ``lo'ikle'' suffers because of its a
postrophe, and ``lo'irlei'' because of having both apostrophe and hyphen.
Our third example will result in forming both a lujvo and a name from the tanru
``logji bangu girzu'', or ``logical-language group'' in English. (``The Logical
Language Group'' is the name of the publisher of this book and the organization
for the promotion of Lojban.) The available rafsi are ``-loj-'' and ``-logj-'';
``-ban-'', ``-bau-'', and ``-bang-''; and ``-gri-'' and ``-girzu'', and (for nam
e purposes only) ``-gir-'' and ``-girz-''. The resulting 12 lujvo possibilities
are:
loj-ban-gri loj-bau-gri loj-bang-gri
logj-ban-gri logj-bau-gri logj-bang-gri
loj-ban-girzu loj-bau-girzu loj-bang-girzu
logj-ban-girzu logj-bau-girzu logj-bang-girzu
and the 12 name possibilities are:
loj-ban-gir. loj-bau-gir. loj-bang-gir.
logj-ban-gir. logj-bau-gir. logj-bang-gir.
loj-ban-girz. loj-bau-girz. loj-bang-girz.
logj-ban-girz. logj-bau-girz. logj-bang-girz.
After hyphenation, we have:
lojbangri lojbaugri lojbangygri
logjybangri logjybaugri logjybangygri
lojbangirzu lojbaugirzu lojbangygirzu
logjybangirzu logjybaugirzu logjybangygirzu
lojbangir. lojbaugir. lojbangygir.
logjybangir. logjybaugir. logjybangygir.
lojbangirz. lojbaugirz. lojbangygirz.
logjybangirz. logjybaugirz. logjybangygirz.
The only fully reduced lujvo forms are ``lojbangri'' and ``lojbaugri'', of which
the latter has a slightly lower score: 8827 versus 8796, respectively. However,
for the name of the organization, we chose to make sure the name of the languag
e was embedded in it, and to use the clearer long-form rafsi for ``girzu'', prod
ucing ``lojbangirz.''
Finally, here is a four-part lujvo with a cmavo in it, based on the tanru ``nakn
i ke cinse ctuca'' or ``male (sexual teacher)''. The ``ke'' cmavo ensures the in
terpretation ``teacher of sexuality who is male'', rather than ``teacher of male
sexuality''. Here are the possible forms of the lujvo, both before and after hy
phenation:
nak-kem-cin-ctu nakykemcinctu
nak-kem-cin-ctuca nakykemcinctuca
nak-kem-cins-ctu nakykemcinsyctu
nak-kem-cins-ctuca nakykemcinsyctuca
nakn-kem-cin-ctu naknykemcinctu
nakn-kem-cin-ctuca naknykemcinctuca
nakn-kem-cins-ctu naknykemcinsyctu
nakn-kem-cins-ctuca naknykemcinsyctuca
Of these forms, ``nakykemcinctu'' is the shortest and is preferred by the scorin
g algorithm. On the whole, however, it might be better to just make a lujvo for
``cinse ctuca'' (which would be ``cinctu'') since the sex of the teacher is rare
ly important. If there was a reason to specify ``male'', then the simpler tanru
``nakni cinctu'' (``male sexual-teacher'') would be appropriate. This tanru is a
ctually shorter than the four-part lujvo, since the ``ke'' required for grouping
need not be expressed.
14. The gismu creation algorithm
The gismu were created through the following process:
1)
At least one word was found in each of the six source languages (Chinese, En
glish, Hindi, Spanish, Russian, Arabic) corresponding to the proposed gismu. Thi
s word was rendered into Lojban phonetics rather liberally: consonant clusters c
onsisting of a stop and the corresponding fricative were simplified to just the
fricative (``tc'' became ``c'', ``dj'' became ``j'') and non-Lojban vowels were
mapped onto Lojban ones. Furthermore, morphological endings were dropped. The sa
me mapping rules were applied to all six languages for the sake of consistency.
2)
All possible gismu forms were matched against the six source-language forms.
The matches were scored as follows:
2a)
If three or more letters were the same in the proposed gismu and the source-
language word, and appeared in the same order, the score was equal to the number
of letters that were the same. Intervening letters, if any, did not matter.
2b)
If exactly two letters were the same in the proposed gismu and the source-la
nguage word, and either the two letters were consecutive in both words, or were
separated by a single letter in both words, the score was 2. Letters in reversed
order got no score.
2c)
Otherwise, the score was 0.
3)
The scores were divided by the length of the source-language word in its Loj
banized form, and then multiplied by a weighting value specific to each language
, reflecting the proportional number of first-language and second-language speak
ers of the language. (Second-language speakers were reckoned at half their actua
l numbers.) The weights were chosen to sum to 1.00. The sum of the weighted scor
es was the total score for the proposed gismu form.
4)
Any gismu forms that conflicted with existing gismu were removed. Obviously,
being identical with an existing gismu constitutes a conflict. In addition, a p
roposed gismu that was identical to an existing gismu except for the final vowel
was considered a conflict, since two such gismu would have identical 4-letter r
afsi.
More subtly: If the proposed gismu was identical to an existing gismu except
for a single consonant, and the consonant was ``too similar'' based on the foll
owing table, then the proposed gismu was rejected.
proposed gismu existing gismu
b p, v c j, s d t f p, v g k, x j c, z k g, x l r m n n m p b, f r l s c, z
t d v b, f x g, k z j, s
See Section 4 for an example.
5)
The gismu form with the highest score usually became the actual gismu. Somet
imes a lower-scoring form was used to provide a better rafsi. A few gismu were c
hanged in error as a result of transcription blunders (for example, the gismu ``
gismu'' should have been ``gicmu'', but it's too late to fix it now).
The language weights used to make most of the gismu were as follows:
Chinese 0.36
English 0.21
Hindi 0.16
Spanish 0.11
Russian 0.09
Arabic 0.07
reflecting 1985 number-of-speakers data. A few gismu were made much later
using updated weights:
Chinese 0.347 Hindi 0.196 English 0.160 Spanish 0.123 Russian 0.089 Arabic 0
.085
(English and Hindi switched places due to demographic changes.)
Note that the stressed vowel of the gismu was considered sufficiently distinctiv
e that two or more gismu may differ only in this vowel; as an extreme example, `
`bradi'', ``bredi'', ``bridi'', and ``brodi'' (but fortunately not ``brudi'') ar
e all existing gismu.
15. Cultural and other non-algorithmic gismu
The following gismu were not made by the gismu creation algorithm. They are, in
effect, coined words similar to fu'ivla. They are exceptions to the otherwise ma
ndatory gismu creation algorithm where there was sufficient justification for su
ch exceptions. Except for the small metric prefixes and the assignable predicate
s beginning with ``brod-'', they all end in the letter `ò'', which is otherwise
a rare letter in Lojban gismu.
The following gismu represent concepts that are sufficiently unique to Lojban th
at they were either coined from combining forms of other gismu, or else made up
out of whole cloth. These gismu are thus conceptually similar to lujvo even thou
gh they are only five letters long; however, unlike lujvo, they have rafsi assig
ned to them for use in building more complex lujvo. Assigning gismu to these con
cepts helps to keep the resulting lujvo reasonably short.
broda 1st assignable predicate
brode 2nd assignable predicate
brodi 3rd assignable predicate
brodo 4th assignable predicate
brodu 5th assignable predicate
cmavo structure word (from ``cmalu valsi'')
lojbo Lojbanic (from ``logji bangu'')
lujvo compound word (from ``pluja valsi'')
mekso Mathematical EXpression
It is important to understand that even though ``cmavo'', ``lojbo'', and ``lujvo
'' were made up from parts of other gismu, they are now full-fledged gismu used
in exactly the same way as all other gismu, both in grammar and in word formatio
n.
The following three groups of gismu represent concepts drawn from the internatio
nal language of science and mathematics. They are used for concepts that are rep
resented in most languages by a root which is recognized internationally.
Small metric prefixes (less than 1):
decti .1/deci
centi .01/centi
milti .001/milli
mikri 1E-6/micro
nanvi 1E-9/nano
picti 1E-12/pico
femti 1E-15/femto
xatsi 1E-18/atto
zepti 1E-21/zepto
gocti 1E-24/yocto
Large metric prefixes (greater than 1):
dekto 10/deka
xecto 100/hecto
kilto 1000/kilo
megdo 1E6/mega
gigdo 1E9/giga
terto 1E12/tera
petso 1E15/peta
xexso 1E18/exa
zetro 1E21/zetta
gotro 1E24/yotta
Other scientific or mathematical terms:
delno candela
kelvo kelvin
molro mole
radno radian
sinso sine
stero steradian
tanjo tangent
xampo ampere
The gismu ``sinso'' and ``tanjo'' were only made non-algorithmically because the
y were identical (having been borrowed from a common source) in all the dictiona
ries that had translations. The other terms in this group are units in the inter
national metric system; some metric units, however, were made by the ordinary pr
ocess (usually because they are different in Chinese).
Finally, there are the cultural gismu, which are also borrowed, but by modifying
a word from one particular language, instead of using the multi-lingual gismu c
reation algorithm. Cultural gismu are used for words that have local importance
to a particular culture; other cultures or languages may have no word for the co
ncept at all, or may borrow the word from its home culture, just as Lojban does.
In such a case, the gismu algorithm, which uses weighted averages, doesn't accu
rately represent the frequency of usage of the individual concept. Cultural gism
u are not even required to be based on the six major languages.
The six Lojban source languages:
jungo Chinese (from ``Zhong1 guo2'')
glico English
xindo Hindi
spano Spanish
rusko Russian
xrabo Arabic
Seven other widely spoken languages that were on the list of candidates for gism
u-making, but weren't used:
bengo Bengali
porto Portuguese
baxso Bahasa Melayu/Bahasa Indonesia
ponjo Japanese (from ``Nippon'')
dotco German (from ``Deutsch'')
fraso French (from ``FranÃ§ais'')
xurdo Urdu
(Urdu and Hindi began as the same language with different writing systems, but h
ave now become somewhat different principally in borrowed vocabulary. Urdu-speak
ers were counted along with Hindi-speakers when weights were assigned for gismu-
making purposes.)
Countries with a large number of speakers of any of the above languages (where t
he meaning of ``large'' is dependent on the specific language):
English: merko American brito British skoto Scottish sralo Australian kadno
Canadian
Spanish: gento Argentinian mexno Mexican
Russian: softo Soviet/USSR vukro Ukrainian
Arabic: filso Palestinian jerxo Algerian jordo Jordanian libjo Libyan lubno
Lebanese misro Egyptian (from ``Mizraim'') morko Moroccan rakso Iraqi sadjo Saud
i sirxo Syrian
Bahasa Melayu/Bahasa Indonesia: bindo Indonesian meljo Malaysian
Portuguese: brazo Brazilian
Urdu: kisto Pakistani
The continents (and oceanic regions) of the Earth:
bemro North American (from ``berti merko'')
dzipo Antarctican (from ``cadzu cipni'')
ketco South American (from ``Quechua'')
friko African
polno Polynesian/Oceanic
ropno European
xazdo Asiatic
A few smaller but historically important cultures:
latmo Latin/Roman
srito Sanskrit
xebro Hebrew/Israeli
xelso Greek (from ``Hellas'')
Major world religions:
budjo Buddhist
dadjo Taoist
muslo Islamic/Moslem
xriso Christian
A few terms that cover multiple groups of the above:
jegvo Jehovist (Judeo-Christian-Moslem)
semto Semitic
slovo Slavic
xispo Hispanic (New World Spanish)
16. rafsi fu'ivla: a proposal
The list of cultures represented by gismu, given in Section 15, is unavoidably c
ontroversial. Much time has been spent debating whether this or that culture ``d
eserves a gismu'' or ``must languish in fu'ivla space''. To help defuse this arg
ument, a last-minute proposal was made when this book was already substantially
complete. I have added it here with experimental status: it is not yet a standar
d part of Lojban, since all its implications have not been tested in open debate
, and it affects a part of the language (lujvo-making) that has long been stable
, but is known to be fragile in the face of small changes. (Many attempts were m
ade to add general mechanisms for making lujvo that contained fu'ivla, but all f
ailed on obvious or obscure counterexamples; finally the general ``zei'' mechani
sm was devised instead.)
The first part of the proposal is uncontroversial and involves no change to the
language mechanisms. All valid Type 4 fu'ivla of the form CCVVCV would be reserv
ed for cultural brivla analogous to those described in Section 15. For example,
16.1) tci'ile
Chilean
is of the appropriate form, and passes all tests required of a Stage 4 fu'ivla.
No two fu'ivla of this form would be allowed to coexist if they differed only in
the final vowel; this rule was applied to gismu, but does not apply to other fu
'ivla or to lujvo.
The second, and fully experimental, part of the proposal is to allow rafsi to be
formed from these cultural fu'ivla by removing the final vowel and treating the
result as a 4-letter rafsi (although it would contain five letters, not four).
These rafsi could then be used on a par with all other rafsi in forming lujvo. T
he tanru
16.2) tci'ile ke canre tutra
Chilean type-of (sand territory)
Chilean desert
could be represented by the lujvo
16.3) tci'ilykemcantutra
which is an illegal word in standard Lojban, but a valid lujvo under this propos
al. There would be no short rafsi or 5-letter rafsi assigned to any fu'ivla, so
no fu'ivla could appear as the last element of a lujvo.
The cultural fu'ivla introduced under this proposal are called ``rafsi fu'ivla''
, since they are distinguished from other Type 4 fu'ivla by the property of havi
ng rafsi. If this proposal is workable and introduces no problems into Lojban mo
rphology, it might become standard for all Type 4 fu'ivla, including those made
for plants, animals, foodstuffs, and other things.
Chapter 5
``Pretty Little Girls' School'': The Structure Of Lojban selbri
1. Lojban content words: brivla
At the center, logically and often physically, of every Lojban bridi is one or m
ore words which constitute the selbri. A bridi expresses a relationship between
things: the selbri specifies which relationship is referred to. The difference b
etween:
1.1) do mamta mi
You are-a-mother-of me.
You are my mother.
and
1.2) do patfu mi
You are-a-father-of me.
You are my father.
lies in the different selbri.
The simplest kind of selbri is a single Lojban content word: a brivla. There are
three different varieties of brivla: those which are built into the language (t
he gismu), those which are derived from combinations of the gismu (the lujvo), a
nd those which are taken (usually in a modified form) from other languages (the
fu'ivla). In addition, there are a few cmavo that can act like brivla; these are
mentioned in Section 9, and discussed in full in Chapter 7.
For the purposes of this chapter, however, all brivla are alike. For example,
1.3) ta bloti
That is-a-boat.
That is a boat.
1.4) ta brablo
that is-a-large-boat.
That is a ship.
1.5) ta blotrskunri
That is-a-(boat)-schooner.
That is a schooner.
illustrate the three types of brivla (gismu, lujvo, and fu'ivla respectively), b
ut in each case the selbri is composed of a single word whose meaning can be lea
rned independent of its origins.
The remainder of this chapter will mostly use gismu as example brivla, because t
hey are short. However, it is important to keep in mind that wherever a gismu ap
pears, it could be replaced by any other kind of brivla.
2. Simple tanru
Beyond the single brivla, a selbri may consist of two brivla placed together. Wh
en a selbri is built in this way from more than one brivla, it is called a tanru
, a word with no single English equivalent. The nearest analogue to tanru in Eng
lish are combinations of two nouns such as ``lemon tree''. There is no way to te
ll just by looking at the phrase ``lemon tree'' exactly what it refers to, even
if you know the meanings of ``lemon'' and ``tree'' by themselves. As English-spe
akers, we must simply know that it refers to `à tree which bears lemons as frui
ts''. A person who didn't know English very well might think of it as analogous
to ``brown tree'' and wonder, ``What kind of tree is lemon-colored?''
In Lojban, tanru are also used for the same purposes as English adjective- noun
combinations like ``big boy'' and adverb-verb combinations like ``quickly run''.
This is a consequence of Lojban not having any such categories as ``noun'', ``v
erb'', `àdjective'', or `àdverb''. English words belonging to any of these cat
egories are translated by simple brivla in Lojban. Here are some examples of tan
ru:
2.1) tu pelnimre tricu
that-yonder is-a-(lemon tree).
That is a lemon tree.
2.2) la djan. barda nanla
John is-a-big boy.
John is a big boy.
2.3) mi sutra bajra
I quick run.
I quickly run/I run quickly.
Note that ``pelnimre'' is a lujvo for ``lemon''; it is derived from the gismu ``
pelxu'', yellow, and ``nimre'', citrus. Note also that ``sutra'' can mean ``fast
/quick'' or ``quickly'' depending on its use:
2.4) mi sutra
I am-fast/quick.
shows ``sutra'' used to translate an adjective, whereas in Example 2.3 it is tra
nslating an adverb. (Another correct translation of Example 2.3, however, would
be `Ì am a quick runner''.)
There are special Lojban terms for the two components of a tanru, derived from t
he place structure of the word ``tanru''. The first component is called the ``se
ltau'', and the second component is called the ``tertau''.
The most important rule for use in interpreting tanru is that the tertau carries
the primary meaning. A ``pelnimre tricu'' is primarily a tree, and only seconda
rily is it connected with lemons in some way. For this reason, an alternative tr
anslation of Example 2.1 would be:
2.5) That is a lemon type of tree.
This ``type of'' relationship between the components of a tanru is fundamental t
o the tanru concept.
We may also say that the seltau modifies the meaning of the tertau:
2.6) That is a tree which is lemon-ish
(in the way appropriate to trees)
would be another possible translation of Example 2.1. In the same way, a more ex
plicit translation of Example 2.2 might be:
2.7) John is a boy who is big in the way that boys are big.
This ``way that boys are big'' would be quite different from the way in which el
ephants are big; big-for-a-boy is small-for-an-elephant.
All tanru are ambiguous semantically. Possible translations of:
2.8) ta klama jubme
That is-a-goer type-of-table.
include:
That is a table which goes (a wheeled table, perhaps). That is a table owned
by one who goes. That is a table used by those who go (a sports doctor's table?
). That is a table when it goes (otherwise it is a chair?).
In each case the object referred to is a ``goer type of table'', but the ambiguo
us ``type of'' relationship can mean one of many things. A speaker who uses tanr
u (and pragmatically all speakers must) takes the risk of being misunderstood. U
sing tanru is convenient because they are short and expressive; the circumlocuti
on required to squeeze out all ambiguity can require too much effort.
No general theory covering the meaning of all possible tanru exists; probably no
such theory can exist. However, some regularities obviously do exist:
2.9) do barda prenu
You are-a-large person.
2.10) do cmalu prenu
You are-a-small person.
are parallel tanru, in the sense that the relationship between ``barda'' and ``p
renu'' is the same as that between ``cmalu'' and ``prenu''. Section 14 and Secti
on 15 contain a partial listing of some types of tanru, with examples.
3. Three-part tanru grouping with ``bo''
The following cmavo is discussed in this section:
bo BO closest scope grouping
Consider the English sentence:
3.1) That's a little girls' school.
What does it mean? Two possible readings are:
3.2) That's a little school for girls.
3.3) That's a school for little girls.
This ambiguity is quite different from the simple tanru ambiguity described in S
ection 2. We understand that ``girls' school'' means `à school where girls are
the students'', and not `à school where girls are the teachers'' or `à school
which is a girl'' (!). Likewise, we understand that ``little girl'' means ``girl
who is small''. This is an ambiguity of grouping. Is ``girls' school'' to be ta
ken as a unit, with ``little'' specifying the type of girls' school? Or is ``lit
tle girl'' to be taken as a unit, specifying the type of school? In English spee
ch, different tones of voice, or exaggerated speech rhythm showing the grouping,
are used to make the distinction; English writing usually leaves it unrepresent
ed.
Lojban makes no use of tones of voice for any purpose; explicit words are used t
o do the work. The cmavo ``bo'' (which belongs to selma'o BO) may be placed betw
een the two brivla which are most closely associated. Therefore, a Lojban transl
ation of Example 3.2 would be:
3.4) ta cmalu nixli bo ckule
That is-a-small girl -- school.
Example 3.3 might be translated:
3.5) ta cmalu bo nixli ckule
That is-a-small -- girl school.
The ``bo'' is represented in the literal translation by a hyphen because in writ
ten English a hyphen is sometimes used for the same purpose: `à big dog-catcher
'' would be quite different from a ``big-dog catcher'' (presumably someone who c
atches only big dogs).
Analysis of Example 3.4 and Example 3.5 reveals a tanru nested within a tanru. I
n Example 3.4, the main tanru has a seltau of ``cmalu'' and a tertau of ``nixli
bo ckule''; the tertau is itself a tanru with ``nixli'' as the seltau and ``ckul
e'' as the tertau. In Example 3.5, on the other hand, the seltau is ``cmalu bo n
ixli'' (itself a tanru), whereas the tertau is ``ckule''. This structure of tanr
u nested within tanru forms the basis for all the more complex types of selbri t
hat will be explained below.
What about Example 3.6? What does it mean?
3.6) ta cmalu nixli ckule
That is-a-small girl school.
The rules of Lojban do not leave this sentence ambiguous, as the rules of Englis
h do with Example 3.1. The choice made by the language designers is to say that
Example 3.6 means the same as Example 3.5. This is true no matter what three bri
vla are used: the leftmost two are always grouped together. This rule is called
the ``left-grouping rule''. Left-grouping in seemingly ambiguous structures is q
uite common --- though not universal --- in other contexts in Lojban.
Another way to express the English meaning of Example 3.4 and Example 3.5, using
parentheses to mark grouping, is:
3.7) ta cmalu nixli bo ckule
That is-a-small type-of (girl type-of school).
3.8) ta cmalu bo nixli ckule
That is-a-(small type-of girl) type-of school.
Because ``type-of'' is implicit in the Lojban tanru form, it has no Lojban equiv
alent.
Note: It is perfectly legal, though pointless, to insert ``bo'' into a simple ta
nru:
3.9) ta klama bo jubme
That is-a goer -- table
is a legal Lojban bridi that means exactly the same thing as Example 2.8, and is
ambiguous in exactly the same ways. The cmavo ``bo'' serves only to resolve gro
uping ambiguity: it says nothing about the more basic ambiguity present in all t
anru.
4. Complex tanru grouping
If one element of a tanru can be another tanru, why not both elements?
4.1) do mutce bo barda gerku bo kavbu
You are-a-(very type-of large) (dog type-of capturer).
You are a very large dog-catcher.
In Example 4.1, the selbri is a tanru with seltau ``mutce bo barda'' and tertau
``gerku bo kavbu''. It is worth emphasizing once again that this tanru has the s
ame fundamental ambiguity as all other Lojban tanru: the sense in which the ``do
g type-of capturer'' is said to be ``very type-of large'' is not precisely speci
fied. Presumably it is his body which is large, but theoretically it could be on
e of his other properties.
We will now justify the title of this chapter by exploring the ramifications of
the phrase ``pretty little girls' school'', an expansion of the tanru used in Se
ction 3 to four brivla. (Although this example has been used in the Loglan Proje
ct almost since the beginning --- it first appeared in Quine's book Word and Obj
ect (1960) --- it is actually a mediocre example because of the ambiguity of Eng
lish ``pretty''; it can mean ``beautiful'', the sense intended here, or it can m
ean ``very''. Lojban ``melbi'' is not subject to this ambiguity: it means only `
`beautiful''.) Here are four ways to group this phrase:
4.2) ta melbi cmalu
nixli ckule
That is-a-((pretty type-of little)
type-of girl) type-of school.
That is a school for girls who are beautifully small.
4.3) ta melbi cmalu nixli bo ckule
That is-a-(pretty type-of little) (girl type-of school).
That is a girls' school which is beautifully small.
4.4) ta melbi cmalu bo nixli
ckule
That is-a-(pretty type-of (little type-of girl))
type-of school.
That is a school for small girls who are beautiful.
4.5) ta melbi cmalu bo
nixli bo ckule
That is-a-pretty type-of (little type-of
(girl type-of school)).
That is a small school for girls which is beautiful.
Example 4.5 uses a construction which has not been seen before: ``cmalu bo nixli
bo ckule'', with two consecutive uses of ``bo'' between brivla. The rule for mu
ltiple ``bo'' constructions is the opposite of the rule when no ``bo'' is presen
t at all: the last two are grouped together. Not surprisingly, this is called th
e ``right-grouping rule'', and it is associated with every use of ``bo'' in the
language. Therefore,
4.6) ta cmalu bo nixli bo ckule
That is-a-little type-of (girl type-of school).
means the same as Example 3.4, not Example 3.5. This rule may seem peculiar at f
irst, but one of its consequences is that ``bo'' is never necessary between the
first two elements of any of the complex tanru presented so far: all of Examples
4.2 through 4.5 could have ``bo'' inserted between ``melbi'' and ``cmalu'' with
no change in meaning.
5. Complex tanru with ``ke'' and ``ke'e''
The following cmavo are discussed in this section:
ke KE start grouping
ke'e KEhE end grouping
There is, in fact, a fifth grouping of ``pretty little girls' school'' that cann
ot be expressed with the resources explained so far. To handle it, we must intro
duce the grouping parentheses cmavo, ``ke'' and ``ke'e'' (belonging to selma'o K
E and KEhE respectively). Any portion of a selbri sandwiched between these two c
mavo is taken to be a single tanru component, independently of what is adjacent
to it. Thus, Example 4.2 can be rewritten in any of the following ways:
5.1) ta ke melbi cmalu ke'e nixli ckule
That is-a-( pretty little ) girl school.
5.2) ta ke ke melbi cmalu ke'e nixli ke'e ckule
That is-a-( ( pretty little ) girl ) school.
5.3) ta ke ke ke melbi cmalu ke'e nixli ke'e ckule ke'e
That is-a-( ( ( pretty little ) girl ) school ).
Even more versions could be created simply by placing any number of ``ke'' cmavo
at the beginning of the selbri, and a like number of ``ke'e'' cmavo at its end.
Obviously, all of these are a waste of breath once the left-grouping rule has b
een grasped. However, the following is equivalent to Example 4.4 and may be easi
er to understand:
5.4) ta melbi ke cmalu nixli ke'e
ckule
That is-a-(pretty type-of ( little type-of girl ))
type-of school.
Likewise, a ``ke'' and ``ke'e'' version of Example 4.3 would be:
5.5) ta melbi cmalu
ke nixli ckule [ke'e]
That is-a-(pretty type-of little)
( girl type-of school ).
The final ``ke'e'' is given in square brackets here to indicate that it can be e
lided. It is always possible to elide ``ke'e'' at the end of the selbri, making
Example 5.5 as terse as Example 4.3.
Now how about that fifth grouping? It is
5.6) ta melbi
ke cmalu nixli ckule [ke'e]
That is-a-pretty type-of
( (little type-of girl) type-of school )
That is a beautiful school for small girls.
Example 5.6 is distinctly different in meaning from any of Examples 4.2 through
4.5. Note that within the ``ke ... ke'e'' parentheses, the left-grouping rule is
applied to ``cmalu nixli ckule''.
It is perfectly all right to mix ``bo'' and ``ke ... ke'e'' in a single selbri.
For instance, Example 4.5, which in pure ``ke ... ke'e'' form is
5.7) ta melbi
ke cmalu ke nixli ckule [ke'e] [ke'e]
That is-a-pretty type-of
( little type-of ( girl type-of school ) ).
can equivalently be expressed as:
5.8) ta melbi
ke cmalu nixli bo ckule [ke'e]
That is-a-pretty
type-of ( little type-of (girl type-of school) ).
and in many other different forms as well.
6. Logical connection within tanru
je JA tanru logical `ànd''
ja JA tanru logical `òr''
joi JOI mixed mass `ànd''
gu'e GUhA tanru forethought logical `ànd''
gi GI forethought connection separator
Consider the English phrase ``big red dog''. How shall this be rendered as a Loj
ban tanru? The naive attempt:
6.1) barda xunre gerku
(big type-of red) type-of dog
will not do, as it means a dog whose redness is big, in whatever way redness mig
ht be described as ``big''. Nor is
6.2) barda xunre bo gerku
big type-of (red type-of dog)
much better. After all, the straightforward understanding of the English phrase
is that the dog is big as compared with other dogs, not merely as compared with
other red dogs. In fact, the bigness and redness are independent properties of t
he dog, and only obscure rules of English adjective ordering prevent us from say
ing ``red big dog''.
The Lojban approach to this problem is to introduce the cmavo ``je'', which is o
ne of the many equivalents of English `ànd''. A big red dog is one that is both
big and red, and we can say:
6.3) barda je xunre gerku
(big and red) type-of dog
Of course,
6.4) xunre je barda gerku
(red and big) type-of dog
is equally satisfactory and means the same thing. As these examples indicate, jo
ining two brivla with ``je'' makes them a unit for tanru purposes. However, expl
icit grouping with ``bo'' or ``ke ... ke'e'' associates brivla more closely than
``je'' does:
6.5) barda je pelxu bo xunre gerku
barda je ke pelxu xunre ke'e gerku
(big and (yellow type-of red)) dog
big yellowish-red dog
With no grouping indicators, we get:
6.6) barda je pelxu xunre gerku
((big and yellow) type-of red) type-of dog
biggish- and yellowish-red dog
which again raises the question of Example 6.1: what is does ``biggish-red'' mea
n?
Unlike ``bo'' and ``ke ... ke'e'', ``je'' is useful as well as merely legal with
in simple tanru. It may be used to partly resolve the ambiguity of simple tanru:
6.7) ta blanu je zdani
that is-blue and is-a-house
definitely refers to something which is both blue and is a house, and not to any
of the other possible interpretations of simple ``blanu zdani''. Furthermore, `
`blanu zdani'' refers to something which is blue in the way that houses are blue
; ``blanu je zdani'' has no such implication --- the blueness of a ``blanu je zd
ani'' is independent of its houseness.
With the addition of ``je'', many more versions of ``pretty little girls' school
'' are made possible: see Section 16 for a complete list.
A subtle point in the semantics of tanru like Example 6.3 needs special elucidat
ion. There are at least two possible interpretations of:
6.8) ta melbi je nixli ckule
That is-a-(beautiful and girl) type-of school.
It can be understood as:
6.9) That is a girls' school and a beautiful school.
or as:
6.10) That is a school for things
which are both girls and beautiful.
The interpretation specified by Example 6.9 treats the tanru as a sort of abbrev
iation for:
6.11) ta ke melbi ckule ke'e
je ke nixli ckule [ke'e]
That is-a-( beautiful type-of school )
and ( girl type-of school )
whereas the interpretation specified by Example 6.10 does not. This is a kind of
semantic ambiguity for which Lojban does not compel a firm resolution. The way
in which the school is said to be of type ``beautiful and girl'' may entail that
it is separately a beautiful school and a girls' school; but the alternative in
terpretation, that the members of the school are beautiful and girls, is also po
ssible. Still another interpretation is:
6.12) That is a school for beautiful things
and also for girls.
so while the logical connectives help to resolve the meaning of tanru, they by n
o means compel a single meaning in and of themselves.
In general, logical connectives within tanru cannot undergo the formal manipulat
ions that are possible with the related logical connectives that exist outside t
anru; see Chapter 14 for further details.
The logical connective ``je'' is only one of the fourteen logical connectives th
at Lojban provides. Here are a few examples of some of the others:
6.13) le bajra cu jinga ja te jinga
the runner(s) is/are winner(s) or loser(s).
6.14) blanu naja lenku skapi
(blue only-if cold) skin
skin which is blue only if it is cold
6.15) xamgu jo cortu nuntavla
(good if-and-only-if short) speech
speech which is good if (and only if) it is short
6.16) vajni ju pluka nuntavla
(important whether-or-not pleasing) event-of-talking
speech which is important, whether or not it is pleasing
In Example 6.13, ``ja'' is grammatically equivalent to ``je'' but means `òr'' (
more precisely, `ànd/or''). Likewise, ``naja'' means `ònly if'' in Example 6.1
4, ``jo'' means `ìf and only if'' in Example 6.15, and ``ju'' means ``whether o
r not'' in Example 6.16.
Now consider the following example:
6.17) ricfu je blanu jabo crino
rich and (blue or green)
which illustrates a new grammatical feature: the use of both ``ja'' and ``bo'' b
etween tanru components. The two cmavo combine to form a compound whose meaning
is that of ``ja'' but which groups more closely; ``jabo'' is to ``ja'' as plain
``bo'' is to no cmavo at all. However, both ``ja'' and ``jabo'' group less close
ly than ``bo'' does:
6.18) ricfu je blanu jabo crino bo blanu
rich and (blue or green -- blue)
rich and (blue or greenish-blue)
An alternative form of Example 6.17 is:
6.19) ricfu je ke blanu ja crino [ke'e]
rich and ( blue or green )
In addition to the logical connectives, there are also a variety of non-logical
connectives, grammatically equivalent to the logical ones. The only one with a w
ell-understood meaning in tanru contexts is ``joi'', which is the kind of `ànd'
' that denotes a mixture:
6.20) ti blanu joi xunre bolci
This is-a-(blue and red) ball.
The ball described is neither solely red nor solely blue, but probably striped o
r in some other way exhibiting a combination of the two colors. Example 6.20 is
distinct from:
6.21) ti blanu xunre bolci
This is a bluish-red ball
which would be a ball whose color is some sort of purple tending toward red, sin
ce ``xunre'' is the more important of the two components. On the other hand,
6.22) ti blanu je xunre bolci
This is a (blue and red) ball
is probably self-contradictory, seeming to claim that the ball is independently
both blu and red at the same time, although some sensible interpretation may exi
st.
Finally, just as English `ànd'' has the variant form ``both ... and'', so ``je'
' between tanru components has the variant form ``gu'e ... gi'', where ``gu'e''
is placed before the components and ``gi'' between them:
6.23) gu'e barda gi xunre gerku
(both big and red) type-of dog
is equivalent in meaning to Example 6.3. For each logical connective related to
``je'', there is a corresponding connective related to ``gu'e ... gi'' in a syst
ematic way.
The portion of a ``gu'e ... gi'' construction before the ``gi'' is a full selbri
, and may use any of the selbri resources including ``je'' logical connections.
After the ``gi'', logical connections are taken to be wider in scope than the ``
gu'e ... gi'', which has in effect the same scope as ``bo'':
6.23) gu'e barda je xunre gi gerku ja mlatu
(both (big and red) and dog) or cat
something which is either big, red, and a dog,
or else a cat
leaves ``mlatu'' outside the ``gu'e--gi'' construction. The scope of the ``gi''
arm extends only to a single brivla or to two or more brivla connected with ``bo
'' or ``ke--ke'e''.
7. Linked sumti: ``be--bei--be'o''
be BE linked sumti marker
bei BEI linked sumti separator
be'o BEhO linked sumti terminator
The question of the place structures of selbri has been glossed over so far. Thi
s chapter does not attempt to treat place structure issues in detail; they are d
iscussed in Chapter 9. One grammatical structure related to places belongs here,
however. In simple sentences such as Example 1.1, the place structure of the se
lbri is simply the defined place structure of the gismu ``mamta''. What about mo
re complex selbri?
For tanru, the place structure rule is simple: the place structure of a tanru is
always the place structure of its tertau. Thus, the place structure of ``blanu
zdani'' is that of ``zdani'': the x1 place is a house or nest, and the x2 place
is its occupants.
What about the places of ``blanu''? Is there any way to get them into the act? I
n fact, ``blanu'' has only one place, and this is merged, as it were, with the x
1 place of ``zdani''. It is whatever is in the x1 place that is being characteri
zed as blue-for-a-house. But if we replace ``blanu'' with ``xamgu'', we get:
7.1) ti xamgu zdani
this is-a-good house.
This is a good (for someone, by some standard) house.
Since ``xamgu'' has three places (x1, the good thing; x2, the person for whom it
is good; and x3, the standard of goodness), Example 7.1 necessarily omits infor
mation about the last two: there is no room for them. Room can be made, however!
7.2) ti xamgu be do bei mi [be'o] zdani
this is-a-good ( for you by-standard me ) house.
This is a house that is good for you by my standards.
Here, the gismu ``xamgu'' has been followed by the cmavo ``be'' (of selma'o BE),
which signals that one or more sumti follows. These sumti are not part of the o
verall bridi place structure, but fill the places of the brivla they are attache
d to, starting with x2. If there is more than one sumti, they are separated by t
he cmavo ``bei'' (of selma'o BEI), and the list of sumti is terminated by the el
idable terminator ``be'o'' (of selma'o BEhO).
Grammatically, a brivla with sumti linked to it in this fashion plays the same r
ole in tanru as a simple brivla. To illustrate, here is a fully fleshed-out vers
ion of Example 3.4, with all places filled in:
7.3) ti cmalu be le ka canlu
bei lo'e ckule be'o
nixli be li mu
bei lo merko be'o bo
ckule la bryklyn. loi pemci
le mela nu,IORK. prenu
le jecta
This is a small (in-dimension the property-of volume
by-standard the-typical school)
(girl (of-years the-number five
by-standard some American-thing)
school) in-Brooklyn with-subject poems
for-audience New-York persons
with-operator the state.
This is a school, small in volume compared to the
typical school, pertaining to five-year-old
girls (by American standards), in Brooklyn,
teaching poetry to the New York community
and operated by the state.
Here the three places of ``cmalu'', the three of ``nixli'', and the four of ``ck
ule'' are fully specified. Since the places of ``ckule'' are the places of the b
ridi as a whole, it was not necessary to link the sumti which follow ``ckule''.
It would have been legal to do so, however:
7.4) mi klama be le zarci bei le zdani [be'o]
I go (to-the market from-the house).
means the same as
7.5) mi klama le zarci le zdani
I go to-the market from-the house.
No matter how complex a tanru gets, the last brivla always dictates the place st
ructure: the place structure of
7.6) melbi je cmalu nixli bo ckule
a (pretty and little) (girl school)
a school for girls which is both beautiful and small
is simply that of ``ckule''. (The sole exception to this rule is discussed in Se
ction 8.)
It is possible to precede linked sumti by the place structure ordering tags ``fe
'', ``fi'', ``fo'', and ``fu'' (of selma'o FA, discussed further in Chapter 9),
which serve to explicitly specify the x2, x3, x4, and x5 places respectively. No
rmally, the place following the ``be'' is the x2 place and the other places foll
ow in order. If it seems convenient to change the order, however, it can be acco
mplished as follows:
7.7) ti xamgu be fi mi bei fe do [be'o] zdani
this is-a-good ( by-standard me for you ) house
which is equivalent in meaning to Example 7.2. Note that the order of ``be'', ``
bei'', and ``be'o'' does not change; only the inserted ``fi'' tells us that ``mi
'' is the x3 place (and correspondingly, the inserted ``fe'' tells us that ``do'
' is the x2 place). Changing the order of sumti is often done to match the order
of another language, or for emphasis or rhythm.
Of course, using FA cmavo makes it easy to specify one place while omitting a pr
evious place:
7.8) ti xamgu be fi mi [be'o] zdani
this is-a-good (by-standard me) house
This is a good house by my standards.
Similarly, sumti labeled by modal or tense tags can be inserted into strings of
linked sumti just as they can into bridi:
7.9) ta blanu be ga'a mi [be'o] zdani
That is-a-blue ( to-observer me ) house.
That is a blue, as I see it, house.
The meaning of Example 7.9 is slightly different from:
7.10) ta blanu zdani ga'a mi
That is-a-blue house to-observer me.
That is a blue house, as I see it.
See discussions in Chapter 9 of modals and in Chapter 10 of tenses for more expl
anations.
The terminator ``be'o'' is almost always elidable: however, if the selbri belong
s to a description, then a relative clause following it will attach to the last
linked sumti unless ``be'o'' is used, in which case it will attach to the outer
description:
7.11) le xamgu be do noi barda cu zdani
The good-thing for you (who are-large) is-a-house.
7.12) le xamgu be do be'o noi barda cu zdani
The (good-thing for you) (which is-large) is-a-house
(Relative clauses are explained in Chapter 8.)
In other cases, however, ``be'o'' cannot be elided if ``ku'' has also been elide
d:
7.13) le xamgu be le ctuca [ku] be'o zdani
the good (for the teacher ) house
requires either ``ku'' or ``be'o'', and since there is only one occurrence of ``
be'', the ``be'o'' must match it, whereas it may be confusing which occurrence o
f ``le'' the ``ku'' terminates (in fact the second one is correct).
8. Inversion of tanru: ``co''
co CO tanru inversion marker
The standard order of Lojban tanru, whereby the modifier precedes what it modifi
es, is very natural to English-speakers: we talk of ``blue houses'', not of ``ho
uses blue''. In other languages, however, such matters are differently arranged,
and Lojban supports this reverse order (tertau before seltau) by inserting the
particle ``co''. Example 8.1 and Example 8.2 mean exactly the same thing:
8.1) ta blanu zdani
That is-a-blue type-of-house.
That is a blue house.
8.2) ta zdani co blanu
That is-a-house of-type blue.
That is a blue house.
This change is called ``tanru inversion''. In tanru inversion, the element befor
e ``co'' (``zdani'' in Example 8.2) is the tertau, and the element following ``c
o'' (``blanu'') in Example 8.2) is the seltau.
The meaning, and more specifically, the place structure, of a tanru is not affec
ted by inversion: the place structure of ``zdani co blanu'' is still that of ``z
dani''. However, the existence of inversion in a selbri has a very special effec
t on any sumti which follow that selbri. Instead of being interpreted as filling
places of the selbri, they actually fill the places (starting with x2) of the s
eltau. In Section 7, we saw how to fill interior places with ``be ... bei ... be
'o'', and in fact Example 8.3 and Example 8.4 have the same meaning:
8.3) mi klama be le zarci bei le zdani be'o
troci
I am-a-(goer to the market from the house)
type-of trier.
I try to go to the market from the house.
8.4) mi troci co klama le zarci le zdani
I am-a-trier
of-type (goer to-the market from-the house).
I try to go to the market from the house.
Example 8.4 is a less deeply nested construction, requiring fewer cmavo. As a re
sult it is probably easier to understand.
Note that in Lojban ``trying to go'' is expressed using ``troci'' as the tertau.
The reason is that ``trying to go'' is a ``going type of trying'', not a ``tryi
ng type of going''. The trying is more fundamental than the going --- if the att
empt fails, we may not have a going at all.
Any sumti which precede a selbri with an inverted tanru fill the places of the s
elbri (i.e., the places of the tertau) in the ordinary way. In Example 8.4, ``mi
'' fills the x1 place of ``troci co klama'', which is the x1 place of ``troci''.
The other places of the selbri remain unfilled. The trailing sumti ``le zarci''
and ``le zdani'' do not occupy selbri places, despite appearances.
As a result, the regular mechanisms (involving selma'o VOhA and GOhI, explained
in Chapter 7) for referring to individual sumti of a bridi cannot refer to any o
f the trailing places of Example 8.4, because they are not really ``sumti of the
bridi'' at all.
When inverting a more complex tanru, it is possible to invert it only at the mos
t general modifier-modified pair. The only possible inversion of Example 3.4, fo
r instance, is:
8.5) ta nixli [bo] ckule co cmalu
that (is-a-girl type-of school) of-type little.
That's a girls' school which is small.
Note that the ``bo'' of Example 3.4 is optional in Example 8.5, because ``co'' g
roups more loosely than any other cmavo used in tanru, including none at all. No
t even ``ke ... ke'e'' parentheses can encompass a ``co'':
8.6) ta cmalu ke nixli ckule [ke'e]
co melbi
that is-a-(little type-of (girl type-of school))
of-type pretty.
That's a small school for girls which is beautiful.
In Example 8.6, the ``ke'e'' is automatically inserted before the ``co'' rather
than at its usual place at the end of the selbri. As a result, there is a simple
and mechanical rule for removing ``co'' from any selbri: change `À co B'' to `
`ke B ke'e A''. (At the same time, any sumti following the selbri must be transf
ormed into ``be ... bei ... be'o'' form and attached following B.) Therefore,
8.7) ckule co melbi nixli
school of-type pretty girl
school for beautiful girls
means the same as:
8.8) ke melbi nixli ke'e ckule
( pretty girl ) school
Multiple ``co'' cmavo can appear within a selbri, indicating multiple inversions
: a right-grouping rule is employed, as for ``bo''. The above rule can be applie
d to interpret such selbri, but all ``co'' cmavo must be removed simultaneously:
8.9) ckule co nixli co cmalu
school of-type (girl of-type little)
becomes formally
8.10) ke ke cmalu ke'e nixli ke'e ckule
( ( little ) girl ) school
which by the left-grouping rule is simply
8.11) cmalu nixli ckule
little girl school
school for little girls
As stated above, the selbri places, other than the first, of
8.12) mi klama co sutra
I am-a-goer of-type quick
I go quickly
cannot be filled by placing sumti after the selbri, because any sumti in that po
sition fill the places of ``sutra'', the seltau. However, the tertau places (whi
ch means in effect the selbri places) can be filled with ``be'':
8.13) mi klama be le zarci co sutra
I am-a-goer (to the store) of-type quick.
I go to the store quickly.
9. Other kinds of simple selbri
go'i GOhA repeats the previous bridi
du GOhA equality
nu'a NUhA math operator to selbri
moi MOI changes number to ordinal selbri
mei MOI changes number to cardinal selbri
nu NU event abstraction
kei KEI terminator for ``nu''
So far we have only discussed brivla and tanru built up from brivla as possible
selbri. In fact, there are a few other constructions in Lojban which are grammat
ically equivalent to brivla: they can be used either directly as selbri, or as c
omponents in tanru. Some of these types of simple selbri are discussed at length
in Chapter 7, Chapter 11, and Chapter 18; but for completeness these types are
mentioned here with a brief explanation and an example of their use in selbri.
The cmavo of selma'o GOhA (with one exception) serve as pro-bridi, providing a r
eference to the content of other bridi; none of them has a fixed meaning. The mo
st commonly used member of GOhA is probably ``go'i'', which amounts to a repetit
ion of the previous bridi, or part of it. If I say:
9.1) la djan. klama le zarci
John goes-to the market.
you may retort:
9.2) la djan. go'i troci
John [repeat last] are-a-tryer
John tries to.
Example 9.2 is short for:
9.3) la djan. klama be le zarci be'o troci
John is-a-goer (to the market) type-of trier.
because the whole bridi of Example 9.1 has been packaged up into the single word
``go'i'' and inserted into Example 9.2.
The exceptional member of GOhA is ``du'', which represents the relation of ident
ity. Its place structure is:
x1 is identical with x2, x3, ...
for as many places as are given. More information on selma'o GOhA is available i
n Chapter 7.
Lojban mathematical expressions (mekso) can be incorporated into selbri in two d
ifferent ways. Mathematical operators such as ``su'i'', meaning ``plus'', can be
transformed into selbri by prefixing them with ``nu'a'' (of selma'o NUhA). The
resulting place structure is:
x1 is the result of applying (the operator) to arguments x2, x3, etc.
for as many arguments as are required. (The result goes in the x1 place because
the number of following places may be indefinite.) For example:
9.4) li vo nu'a su'i li re li re
The-number 4 is-the-sum-of the-number 2 and-the-number 2.
A possible tanru example might be:
9.5) mi jimpe tu'a nu'a su'i nabmi
I understand something-about the-mass-of is-the-sum-of problems.
I understand addition problems.
More usefully, it is possible to combine a mathematical expression with a cmavo
of selma'o MOI to create one of various numerical selbri. Details are available
in Chapter 18. Here are a few tanru:
9.6) la prim. palvr. pamoi cusku
Preem Palver is-the-1-th speaker.
Preem Palver is the first speaker.
9.7) la an,iis. joi la .asun. bruna remei
Anyi massed-with Asun are-a-brother type-of-twosome.
Anyi and Asun are two brothers.
Finally, an important type of simple selbri which is not a brivla is the abstrac
tion. Grammatically, abstractions are simple: a cmavo of selma'o NU, followed by
a bridi, followed by the elidable terminator ``kei'' of selma'o KEI. Semantical
ly, abstractions are an extremely subtle and powerful feature of Lojban whose fu
ll ramifications are documented in Chapter 11. A few examples:
9.8) ti nu zdile kei kumfa
This is-an-event-of amusement room.
This is an amusement room.
Example 9.8 is quite distinct in meaning from:
9.9) ti zdile kumfa
This is-an-amuser room.
which suggests the meaning `à room that amuses someone''.
10. selbri based on sumti: ``me''
me ME changes sumti to simple selbri
me'u MEhU terminator for ``me''
A sumti can be made into a simple selbri by preceding it with ``me'' (of selma'o
ME) and following it with the elidable terminator ``me'u'' (of selma'o MEhU). T
his makes a selbri with the place structure
x1 is one of the referents of ``[the sumti]''
which is true of the thing, or things, that are the referents of the sumti, and
not of anything else. For example, consider the sumti
10.1) le ci nolraitru
the three noblest-governors
the three kings
If these are understood to be the Three Kings of Christian tradition, who arrive
every year on January 6, then we may say:
10.2) la BALtazar. cu me le ci nolraitru
Balthazar is one-of-the-referents-of ``the three kings''.
Balthazar is one of the three kings.
and likewise
10.3) la kaspar. cu me le ci nolraitru
Caspar is one of the three kings.
and
10.4) la melxi,or. cu me le ci nolraitru
Melchior is one of the three kings.
If the sumti refers to a single object, then the effect of ``me'' is much like t
hat of ``du'':
10.5) do du la djan.
You are-identical-with the-one-called ``John''.
You are John.
means the same as
10.6) do me la djan.
You are-the-referent-of ``the-one-called `John'''.
You are John.
It is common to use ``me'' selbri, especially those based on name sumti using ``
la'', as seltau. For example:
10.7) ta me lai kraislr. [me'u] karce
That (is-a-referent of ``the-mass-called `Chrysler''') car.
That is a Chrysler car.
The elidable terminator ``me'u'' can usually be omitted. It is absolutely requir
ed only if the ``me'' selbri is being used in an indefinite description (a type
of sumti explained in Chapter 6), and if the indefinite description is followed
by a relative clause (explained in Chapter 8) or a sumti logical connective (exp
lained in Chapter 14). Without a ``me'u'', the relative clause or logical connec
tive would appear to belong to the sumti embedded in the ``me'' expression. Here
is a contrasting pair of sentences:
10.8) re me le ci nolraitru .e la djan. [me'u] cu blabi
Two of the group ``the three kings and John'' are white.
10.9) re me le ci nolraitru me'u .e la djan. cu blabi
Two of the three kings, and John, are white.
In Example 10.8 the ``me'' selbri covers the three kings plus John, and the inde
finite description picks out two of them that are said to be white: we cannot sa
y which two. In Example 10.9, though, the ``me'' selbri covers only the three ki
ngs: two of them are said to be white, and so is John.
Finally, here is another example requiring ``me'u'':
10.10) ta me la'e le se cusku be do me'u cukta
That is-a-(what-you-said) type of book.
That is the kind of book you were talking about.
There are other sentences where either ``me'u'' or some other elidable terminato
r must be expressed:
10.11) le me le ci nolraitru [ku] me'u nunsalci
the (the three kings) type-of-event-of-celebrating
the Three Kings celebration
requires either ``ku'' or ``me'u'' to be explicit, and (as with ``be'o'' in Sect
ion 7) the ``me'u'' leaves no doubt which cmavo it is paired with.
11. Conversion of simple selbri
Conversion is the process of changing a selbri so that its places appear in a di
fferent order. This is not the same as labeling the sumti with the cmavo of FA,
as mentioned in Section 7, and then rearranging the order in which the sumti are
spoken or written. Conversion transforms the selbri into a distinct, though clo
sely related, selbri with renumbered places.
In Lojban, conversion is accomplished by placing a cmavo of selma'o SE before th
e selbri:
11.1) mi prami do
I love you.
is equivalent in meaning to:
11.2) do se prami mi
You [swap x1 and x2] love me.
You are loved by me.
Conversion is fully explained in Chapter 9. For the purposes of this chapter, th
e important point about conversion is that it applies only to the following simp
le selbri. When trying to convert a tanru, therefore, it is necessary to be care
ful! Consider Example 11.3:
11.3) la .alis. cu cadzu klama le zarci
Alice is-a-walker type-of goer to-the market.
Alice walkingly goes to the market.
Alice walks to the market.
To convert this sentence so that ``le zarci'' is in the x1 place, one correct wa
y is:
11.4) le zarci cu se ke cadzu klama [ke'e] la .alis.
The market is-a-[swap x1/x2] ( walker type-of goer) Alice.
The market is-walkingly gone-to by-Alice.
The ``ke ... ke'e'' brackets cause the entire tanru to be converted by the ``se'
', which would otherwise convert only ``cadzu'', leading to:
11.5) le zarci cu se cadzu
klama la .alis.
The market (is-a-[swap x1/x2] walker)
type-of goer to Alice.
The market is-a-walking-surface type-of goer to Alice.
whatever that might mean. An alternative approach, since the place structure of
``cadzu klama'' is that of ``klama'' alone, is to convert only the latter:
11.6) le zarci cu cadzu se klama la .alis.
The market walkingly is-gone-to by-Alice.
But the tanru in Example 11.6 may or may not have the same meaning as that in Ex
ample 11.3; in particular, because ``cadzu'' is not converted, there is a sugges
tion that although Alice is the goer, the market is the walker. With a different
sumti as x1, this seemingly odd interpretation might make considerable sense:
11.7) la djan. cu cadzu se klama la .alis
John walkingly is-gone-to by Alice
suggests that Alice is going to John, who is a moving target.
There is an alternative type of conversion, using the cmavo ``jai'' of selma'o J
AI optionally followed by a modal or tense construction. Grammatically, such a c
ombination behaves exactly like conversion using SE. More details can be found i
n Chapter 9.
12. Scalar negation of selbri
Negation is too large and complex a topic to explain fully in this chapter; see
Chapter 15. In brief, there are two main types of negation in Lojban. This secti
on is concerned with so-called ``scalar negation'', which is used to state that
a true relation between the sumti is something other than what the selbri specif
ies. Scalar negation is expressed by cmavo of selma'o NAhE:
12.1) la .alis. cu na'e ke cadzu klama [ke'e] le zarci
Alice non- (walkingly goes) to-the market.
Alice other-than (walkingly goes) to-the market.
Alice doesn't walk to the market.
meaning that Alice's relationship to the market is something other than that of
walking there. But if the ``ke'' were omitted, the result would be:
12.2) la .alis. cu na'e cadzu klama le zarci
Alice non- walkingly goes to-the market.
Alice doesn't walk to the market.
meaning that Alice does go there in some way (``klama'' is not negated), but by
a means other than that of walking. Example 12.1 negates both ``cadzu'' and ``kl
ama'', suggesting that Alice's relation to the market is something different fro
m walkingly-going; it might be walking without going, or going without walking,
or neither.
Of course, any of the simple selbri types explained in Section 9 may be used in
place of brivla in any of these examples:
12.3) la djonz. cu na'e pamoi cusku
Jones is non-1st speaker
Jones is not the first speaker.
Since only ``pamoi'' is negated, an appropriate inference is that he is some oth
er kind of speaker.
Here is an assortment of more complex examples showing the interaction of scalar
negation with ``bo'' grouping, ``ke'' and ``ke'e'' grouping, logical connection
, and sumti linked with ``be'' and ``bei'':
12.4) mi na'e sutra cadzu be fi le birka be'o
klama le zarci
I ((non-quickly) ( walking using the arms))
go-to the market.
I go to the market, walking using my arms
other than quickly.
In Example 12.4, ``na'e'' negates only ``sutra''. Contrast Example 12.5:
12.5) mi na'e ke sutra cadzu be fi le birka [be'o] ke'e
klama le zarci
I non- ( quickly (walking using the arms) )
go-to the market.
I go to the market, other than by walking
quickly on my arms.
Now consider Example 12.6 and Example 12.7, which are equivalent in meaning, but
use ``ke'' grouping and ``bo'' grouping respectively:
12.6) mi sutra cadzu be fi le birka be'o je masno
klama le zarci
I (quickly -- (walking using the arms) and slowly)
go-to the market.
I go to the market, both quickly walking
using my arms and slowly.
12.7) mi ke sutra cadzu be fi le birka [be'o] ke'e
je masno klama le zarci
I ((quickly (walking using the arms))
and slowly) go-to the market.
I go to the market, both quickly walking
using my arms and slowly.
However, if we place a ``na'e'' at the beginning of the selbri in both Example 1
2.6 and Example 12.7, we get different results:
12.8) mi na'e sutra cadzu be fi le birka be'o
I ((non- quickly) -- (walking using the arms)
I go to the market, both walking using my arms
other than quickly, and also slowly.
12.9) mi na'e ke sutra cadzu be fi le birka [be'o] ke'e
I (non-(quickly (walking using the arms))
I go to the market, both other than quickly
walking using my arms, and also slowly.
The difference arises because the ``na'e'' in Example 12.9 negates the whole con
struction from ``ke'' to ``ke'e'', whereas in Example 12.8 it negates ``sutra''
alone.
Beware of omitting terminators in these complex examples! If the explicit ``ke'e
'' is left out in Example 12.9, it is transformed into:
12.10) mi na'e ke sutra cadzu be fi le birka be'o
je masno klama [ke'e] le zarci
I non-(quickly ((walking using the arms))
and slowly) go-to) the market.
I do something other than quickly both
going to the market walking using my arms
and slowly going to the market.
And if both ``ke'e'' and ``be'o'' are omitted, the results are even sillier:
12.11) mi na'e ke sutra cadzu be fi le birka
je masno klama [be'o] [ke'e] le zarci
I non-(quickly walk on my (arm-type
and slow) goers) on the market.
I do something other than quickly walking using the
goers, both arm-type and slow, relative-to the market.
In Example 12.11, everything after ``be'' is a linked sumti, so the place struct
ure is that of ``cadzu'', whose x2 place is the surface walked upon. It is less
than clear what an `àrm-type goer'' might be. Furthermore, since the x3 place h
as been occupied by the linked sumti, the ``le zarci'' following the selbri fall
s into the nonexistent x4 place of ``cadzu''. As a result, the whole example, th
ough grammatical, is complete nonsense. (The bracketed Lojban words appear where
a fluent Lojbanist would understand them to be implied.)
Finally, it is also possible to place ``na'e'' before a ``gu'e ... gi'' logicall
y connected tanru construction. The meaning of this usage has not yet been firml
y established.
13. Tenses and bridi negation
A bridi can have cmavo associated with it which specify the time, place, or mode
of action. For example, in
13.1) mi pu klama le zarci
I [past] go to-the market.
I went to the market.
the cmavo ``pu'' specifies that the action of the speaker going to the market ta
kes place in the past. Tenses are explained in full detail in Chapter 10. Tense
is semantically a property of the entire bridi; however, the usual syntax for te
nses attaches them at the front of the selbri, as in Example 13.1. There are alt
ernative ways of expressing tense information as well. Modals, which are explain
ed in Chapter 9, behave in the same way as tenses.
Similarly, a bridi may have the particle ``na'' (of selma'o NA) attached to the
beginning of the selbri to negate the bridi. A negated bridi expresses what is f
alse without saying anything about what is true. Do not confuse this usage with
the scalar negation of Section 12. For example:
13.2) la djonz. na pamoi cusku
Jones (Not!) is-the-first speaker
It is not true that Jones is the first speaker.
Jones isn't the first speaker.
Jones may be the second speaker, or not a speaker at all; Example 13.2 doesn't s
ay. There are other ways of expressing bridi negation as well; the topic is expl
ained fully in Chapter 15.
Various combinations of tense and bridi negation cmavo are permitted. If both ar
e expressed, either order is permissible with no change in meaning:
13.3) mi na pu klama le zarci
mi pu na klama le zarci
It is false that I went to the market.
I didn't go to the market.
It is also possible to have more than one ``na'', in which case pairs of ``na''
cmavo cancel out:
13.4) mi na na klama le zarci
It is false that it is false that I go to the market.
I go to the market.
It is even possible, though somewhat pointless, to have multiple ``na'' cmavo an
d tense cmavo mixed together, subject to the limitation that two adjacent tense
cmavo will be understood as a compound tense, and must fit the grammar of tenses
as explained in Chapter 10.
13.5) mi na pu na ca klama le zarci
I [not] [past]
[not] [present] go to-the market
It is not the case that in the past it was not
the case that in the present I went
to the market.
I didn't not go to the market.
Tense, modal, and negation cmavo can appear only at the beginning of the selbri.
They cannot be embedded within it.
14. Some types of asymmetrical tanru
This section and Section 15 contain some example tanru classified into groups ba
sed on the type of relationship between the modifying seltau and the modified te
rtau. All the examples are paralleled by compounds actually observed in various
natural languages. In the tables which follow, each group is preceded by a brief
explanation of the relationship. The tables themselves contain a tanru, a liter
al gloss, an indication of the languages which exhibit a compound analogous to t
his tanru, and (for those tanru with no English parallel) a translation.
Here are the 3-letter abbreviations used for the various languages (it is presum
ed to be obvious whether a compound is found in English or not, so English is no
t explicitly noted):
Aba = Abazin Chi = Chinese Eng = English Ewe = Ewe Fin = Finnish Geo = Georg
ian Gua = Guarani Hop = Hopi Hun = Hungarian Imb = Imbabura Quechua Kar = Karait
ic Kaz = Kazakh Kor = Korean Mon = Mongolian Qab = Qabardian Que = Quechua Rus =
Russian Skt = Sanskrit Swe = Swedish Tur = Turkish Udm = Udmurt
Any lujvo or fu'ivla used in a group are glossed at the end of that group.
The tanru discussed in this section are asymmetrical tanru; that is, ones in whi
ch the order of the terms is fundamental to the meaning of the tanru. For exampl
e, ``junla dadylsi'', or ``clock pendulum'', is the kind of pendulum used in a c
lock, whereas ``dadysli junla'', or ``pendulum clock'', is the kind of clock tha
t employs a pendulum. Most tanru are asymmetrical in this sense. Symmetrical tan
ru are discussed in Section 15.
The tertau represents an action, and the seltau then represents the object of th
at action:
pinsi kilbra
pencil sharpener (Hun) zgike nunctu music instruction (Hun) mirli nunkalte d
eer hunting (Hun) finpe nunkalte fish hunting (Tur,Kor,Udm,Aba = fishing) smacu
terkavbu mousetrap (Tur,Kor,Hun,Udm,Aba) zdani turni house ruler (Kar = host) ze
rle'a nunte'a thief fear (Skt = fear of thieves) cevni zekri god crime (Skt = of
fense against the gods) kilbra = sharp-apparatus nunctu = event-of-teaching nunk
alte = event-of-hunting terkavbu = trap zerle'a = crime-taker nunte'a = event-of
-fearing
The tertau represents a set, and the seltau the type of the elements contained i
n that set:
zdani lijgri
house row selci lamgri cell block karda mulgri card pack (Swe) rokci derxi s
tone heap (Swe) tadni girzu student group (Hun) remna girzu human-being group (Q
ab = group of people) cpumi'i lijgri tractor column (Qab) cevni jenmi god army (
Skt) cevni prenu god folk (Skt) lijgri = line-group lamgri = adjacent-group mulg
ri = complete-group cpami'i = pull-machine
Conversely: the tertau is an element, and the seltau represents a set in which t
hat element is contained. Implicitly, the meaning of the tertau is restricted fr
om its usual general meaning to the specific meaning appropriate for elements in
the given set. Note the opposition between ``zdani linji'' in the previous grou
p, and ``linji zdani'' in this one, which shows why this kind of tanru is called
`àsymmetrical''.
carvi dirgo
raindrop (Tur,Kor,Hun,Udm,Aba) linji zdani row house
The seltau specifies an object and the tertau a component or detail of that obje
ct; the tanru as a whole refers to the detail, specifying that it is a detail of
that whole and not some other.
junla dadysli
clock pendulum (Hun) purdi vorme garden door (Qab) purdi bitmu garden wall (
Que) moklu skapi mouth skin (Imb = lips) nazbi kevna nose hole (Imb = nostril) k
arce xislu automobile wheel (Chi) jipci pimlu chicken feather (Chi) vinji rebla
airplane tail (Chi) dadysli = hang-oscillator
Conversely: the seltau specifies a characteristic or important detail of the obj
ect described by the tertau; objects described by the tanru as a whole are diffe
rentiated from other similar objects by this detail.
pixra cukta
picture book kerfa silka hair silk (Kar = velvet) plise tapla apple cake (Tu
r) dadysli junla pendulum clock (Hun) dadysli = hang-oscillator
The tertau specifies a general class of object (a genus), and the seltau specifi
es a sub-class of that class (a species):
ckunu tricu
pine tree (Hun,Tur,Hop)
The tertau specifies an object of possession, and the seltau may specify the pos
sessor (the possession may be intrinsic or otherwise). In English, these compoun
ds have an explicit possessive element in them: ``lion's mane'', ``child's foot'
', ``noble's cow''.
cinfo kerfa
lion mane (Kor,Tur,Hun,Udm,Qab) verba jamfu child foot (Swe) nixli tuple gir
l leg (Swe) cinfo jamfu lion foot (Que) danlu skapi animal skin (Ewe) ralju zdan
i chief house (Ewe) jmive munje living world (Skt) nobli bakni noble cow (Skt) n
olraitru ralju king chief (Skt = emperor) nolraitru = nobly-superlative-ruler
The tertau specifies a habitat, and the seltau specifies the inhabitant:
lanzu tumla
family land
The tertau specifies a causative agent, and the seltau specifies the effect of t
hat cause:
kalselvi'i gapci
tear gas (Hun) terbi'a jurme disease germ (Tur) fenki litki crazy liquid (Ho
p = whisky) pinca litki urine liquid (Hop = beer) kalselvi'i = eye-excreted-thin
g terbi'a = disease
Conversely: the tertau specifies an effect, and the seltau specifies its cause.
djacu barna
water mark (Chi)
The tertau specifies an instrument, and the seltau specifies the purpose of that
instrument:
taxfu dadgreku
garment rack (Chi) tergu'i ti'otci lamp shade (Chi) xirma zdani horse house
(Chi = stall) nuzba tanbo news board (Chi = bulletin board) dadgreku = hang-fram
e tergu'i = source of illumination ti'otci = shadow-tool
More vaguely: the tertau specifies an instrument, and the seltau specifies the o
bject of the purpose for which that instrument is used:
cpina rokci
pepper stone (Que = stone for grinding pepper) jamfu djacu foot water (Skt =
water for washing the feet) grana mudri post wood (Skt = wood for making a post
) moklu djacu mouth water (Hun = water for washing the mouth) lanme gerku sheep
dog (dog for working sheep)
The tertau specifies a product from some source, and the seltau specifies the so
urce of the product:
moklu djacu
mouth water (Aba,Qab = saliva) ractu mapku rabbit hat (Rus) jipci sovda chic
ken egg (Chi) sikcurnu silka silkworm silk (Chi) mlatu kalci cat feces (Chi) bif
ce lakse bee wax (Chi = beeswax) cribe rectu bear meat (Tur,Kor,Hun,Udm,Aba) sol
xrula grasu sunflower oil (Tur,Kor,Hun,Udm,Aba) bifce jisra bee juice (Hop = hon
ey) tatru litki breast liquid (Hop = milk) kanla djacu eye water (Kor = tear) si
kcurnu = silk-worm solxrula = solar-flower
Conversely: the tertau specifies the source of a product, and the seltau specifi
es the product:
silna jinto
salt well (Chi) kolme terkakpa coal mine (Chi) ctile jinto oil well (Chi) te
rkakpa = source of digging
The tertau specifies an object, and the seltau specifies the material from which
the object is made. This case is especially interesting, because the referent o
f the tertau may normally be made from just one kind of material, which is then
overridden in the tanru.
rokci cinfo
stone lion snime nanmu snow man (Hun) kliti cipni clay bird blaci kanla glas
s eye (Hun) blaci kanla glass eye (Que = spectacles) solji sicni gold coin (Tur)
solji junla gold watch (Tur,Kor,Hun) solji djine gold ring (Udm,Aba,Que) rokci
zdani stone house (Imb) mudri zdani wood house (Ewe = wooden house) rokci bitmu
stone wall (Ewe) solji carce gold chariot (Skt) mudri xarci wood weapon (Skt = w
ooden weapon) cmaro'i dargu pebble road (Chi) sudysrasu cutci straw shoe (Chi) c
maro'i = small-rock sudysrasu = dry-grass
Note: the two senses of ``blaci kanla'' can be discriminated as:
blaci kanla bo tarmi
glass (eye shape) = glass eye blaci kanla bo sidju glass (eye helper) = spec
tacles
The tertau specifies a typical object used to measure a quantity and the seltau
specifies something measured. The tanru as a whole refers to a given quantity of
the thing being measured. English does not have compounds of this form, as a ru
le.
tumla spisa
land piece (Tur = piece of land) tcati kabri tea cup (Kor,Aba = cup of tea)
nanba spisa bread piece (Kor = piece of bread) bukpu spisa cloth piece (Udm,Aba
= piece of cloth) djacu calkyguzme water calabash (Ewe = calabash of water) calk
yguzme = shell-fruit, calabash
The tertau specifies an object with certain implicit properties, and the seltau
overrides one of those implicit properties:
kensa bloti
spaceship bakni verba cattle child (Ewe = calf)
The seltau specifies a whole, and the tertau specifies a part which normally is
associated with a different whole. The tanru then refers to a part of the seltau
which stands in the same relationship to the whole seltau as the tertau stands
to its typical whole.
kosta degji
coat finger (Hun = coat sleeve) denci genja tooth root (Imb) tricu stedu tre
e head (Imb = treetop)
The tertau specifies the producer of a certain product, and the seltau specifies
the product. In this way, the tanru as a whole distinguishes its referents from
other referents of the tertau which do not produce the product.
silka curnu
silkworm (Tur,Hun,Aba)
The tertau specifies an object, and the seltau specifies another object which ha
s a characteristic property. The tanru as a whole refers to those referents of t
he tertau which possess the property.
sonci manti
soldier ant ninmu bakni woman cattle (Imb = cow) mamta degji mother finger (
Imb = thumb) cifnu degji baby finger (Imb = pinky) pacraistu zdani hell house (S
kt) fagri dapma fire curse (Skt = curse destructive as fire) pacraistu = evil-su
perlative-site
As a particular case (when the property is that of resemblance): the seltau spec
ifies an object which the referent of the tanru resembles.
grutrceraso jbama
cherry bomb solji kerfa gold hair (Hun = golden hair) kanla djacu eye water
(Kar = spring) bakni rokci bull stone (Mon = boulder) grutrceraso = fu'ivla for
``cherry'' based on Linnean name sorprema'e = many-person-vehicle
The seltau specifies a place, and the tertau an object characteristically locate
d in or at that place.
ckana boxfo
bed sheet (Chi) mrostu mojysu'a tomb monument (Chi = tombstone) jubme tergus
ni table lamp (Chi) foldi smacu field mouse (Chi) briju ci'ajbu office desk (Chi
) rirxe xirma river horse (Chi = hippopotamus) xamsi gerku sea dog (Chi = seal)
cagyce'u zdani village house (Skt) mrostu = dead-site mojysu'a = remember-struct
ure ci'ajbu = write-table cagyce'u = farm-community
Specifically: the tertau is a place where the seltau is sold or made available t
o the public.
cidja barja
food bar (Chi = restaurant) cukta barja book bar (Chi = library)
The seltau specifies the locus of application of the tertau.
kanla velmikce
eye medicine (Chi) jgalu grasu nail oil (Chi = nail polish) denci pesxu toot
h paste (Chi) velmikce = treatment used by doctor
The tertau specifies an implement used in the activity denoted by the seltau.
me la pinpan. bolci
Ping-Pong ball (Chi)
The tertau specifies a protective device against the undesirable features of the
referent of the seltau.
carvi mapku
rain cap (Chi) carvi taxfu rain garment (Chi = raincoat) vindu firgai poison
mask (Chi = gas mask) firgai = face-cover
The tertau specifies a container characteristically used to hold the referent of
the seltau.
cukta vasru
book vessel (Chi = satchel) vanju kabri wine cup (Chi) spatrkoka lanka coca
basket (Que) djacu calkyzme water calabash (Ewe) rismi dakli rice bag (Ewe,Chi)
tcati kabri tea cup (Chi) ladru botpi milk bottle (Chi) rismi patxu rice pot (Ch
i) festi lante trash can (Chi) bifce zdani bee house (Kor = beehive) cladakyxa'i
zdani sword house (Kor = sheath) manti zdani ant nest (Gua = anthill) spatrkoka
= fu'ivla for ``coca'' calkyzme = shell-fruit, calabash cladakyxa'i = (long-kni
fe)-weapon
The seltau specifies the characteristic time of the event specified by the terta
u.
vensa djedi
spring day (Chi) crisa citsi summer season (Chi) cerni bumru morning fog (Ch
i) critu lunra autumn moon (Chi) dunra nicte winter night (Chi) nicte ckule nigh
t school (Chi)
The seltau specifies a source of energy for the referent of the tertau.
dikca tergusni
electric lamp (Chi) ratni nejni atom energy (Chi) brife molki windmill (Tur,
Kor,Hun,Udm,Aba) tergusni = illumination-source
Finally, some tanru which don't fall into any of the above categories.
ladru denci
milk tooth (Tur,Hun,Udm,Qab) kanla denci eye tooth
It is clear that ``tooth'' is being specified, and that ``milk'' and `èye'' act
as modifiers. However, the relationship between ``ladru'' and ``denci'' is some
thing like ``tooth which one has when one is drinking milk from one's mother'',
a relationship certainly present nowhere except in this particular concept. As f
or ``kanla denci'', the relationship is not only not present on the surface, it
is hardly possible to formulate it at all.
15. Some types of symmetrical tanru
This section deals with symmetrical tanru, where order is not important. Many of
these tanru can be expressed with a logical or non-logical connective between t
he components.
The tanru may refer to things which are correctly specified by both tanru compon
ents. Some of these instances may also be seen as asymmetrical tanru where the s
eltau specifies a material. The connective ``je'' is appropriate:
cipnrstrigi pacru'i
owl demon (Skt) nolraitru prije royal sage (Skt) remna nakni human-being mal
e (Qab = man) remna fetsi human-being female (Qab = woman) sonci tolvri soldier
coward (Que) panzi nanmu offspring man (Ewe = son) panzi ninmu offspring woman (
Ewe = daughter) solji sicni gold coin (Tur) solji junla gold watch (Tur,Kor,Hun)
solji djine gold ring (Udm,Aba,Que) rokci zdani stone house (Imb) mudri zdani w
ooden house (Ewe) rokci bitmu stone wall (Ewe) solji carce gold chariot (Skt) mu
dri xarci wooden weapon (Skt) zdani tcadu home town (Chi) cipnrstrigi = fu'ivla
for `òwl'' based on Linnean name pacru'i = evil-spirit tolvri = opposite-of-bra
ve
The tanru may refer to all things which are specified by either of the tanru com
ponents. The connective ``ja'' is appropriate:
nunji'a nunterji'a
victory defeat (Skt = victory or defeat) donri nicte day night (Skt = day an
d night) lunra tarci moon stars (Skt = moon and stars) patfu mamta father mother
(Imb,Kaz,Chi = parents) tuple birka leg arm (Kaz = extremity) nuncti nunpinxe e
ating drinking (Udm = cuisine) bersa tixnu son daughter (Chi = children) nunji'a
= event-of-winning nunterji'a = event-of-losing nuncti = event-of-eating nunpin
xe = event-of-drinking
Alternatively, the tanru may refer to things which are specified by either of th
e tanru components or by some more inclusive class of things which the component
s typify:
curnu jalra
worm beetle (Mon = insect) jalra curnu beetle worm (Mon = insect) kabri palt
a cup plate (Kaz = crockery) jipci gunse hen goose (Qab = housefowl) xrula tricu
flower tree (Chi = vegetation)
The tanru components specify crucial or typical parts of the referent of the tan
ru as a whole:
tumla vacri
land air (Fin = world) moklu stedu mouth head (Aba = face) sudysrasu cunmi h
ay millet (Qab = agriculture) gugde ciste state system (Mon = politics) prenu so
'imei people multitude (Mon = masses) djacu dertu water earth (Chi = climate) su
dysrasu = dry-grass so'imei = manysome
16. ``Pretty little girls' school'': forty ways to say it
The following examples show every possible grouping arrangement of ``melbi cmalu
nixli ckule'' using ``bo'' or ``ke ... ke'e'' for grouping and ``je'' or ``jebo
'' for logical connection. Most of these are definitely not plausible interpreta
tions of the English phrase ``pretty little girls' school'', especially those wh
ich describe something which is both a girl and a school.
Examples 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, and 5.6 are repeated here as Examples 16.1, 16.9, 1
6.17, 16.25, and 16.33 respectively. The seven examples following each of these
share the same grouping pattern, but differ in the presence or absence of ``je''
at each possible site. Some of the examples have more than one Lojban version.
In that case, they differ only in grouping mechanism, and are always equivalent
in meaning.
The logical connective ``je'' is associative: that is, `À and (B and C)'' is th
e same as ``(A and B) and C''. Therefore, some of the examples have the same mea
ning as others. In particular, 16.8, 16.16, 16.24, 16.32, and 16.40 all have the
same meaning because all four brivla are logically connected and the grouping i
s simply irrelevant. Other equivalent forms are noted in the examples themselves
. However, if ``je'' were replaced by ``naja'' or ``jo'' or most of the other lo
gical connectives, the meanings would become distinct.
It must be emphasized that, because of the ambiguity of all tanru, the English t
ranslations are by no means definitive --- they represent only one possible inte
rpretation of the corresponding Lojban sentence.
16.1) melbi cmalu nixli ckule
((pretty type-of little) type-of girl) type-of school
school for girls who are beautifully small
16.2) melbi je cmalu nixli ckule
((pretty and little) type-of girl) type-of school
school for girls who are beautiful and small
16.3) melbi bo cmalu je nixli ckule
((pretty type-of little) and girl) type-of school
school for girls and for beautifully small things
16.4) ke melbi cmalu nixli ke'e je ckule
((pretty type-of little) type-of girl) and school
thing which is a school and a beautifully small girl
16.5) melbi je cmalu je nixli ckule
((pretty and little) and girl) type-of school
school for things which are beautiful, small, and girls
Note: same as 16.21
16.6) melbi bo cmalu je nixli je ckule
((pretty type-of little) and girl) and school
thing which is beautifully small, a school, and a girl
Note: same as 16.14
16.7) ke melbi je cmalu nixli ke'e je ckule
((pretty and little) type-of girl) and school
thing which is a school and a girl who is both
beautiful and small
16.8) melbi je cmalu je nixli je ckule
((pretty and little) and girl) and school
thing which is beautiful, small, a girl, and a school
16.9) melbi cmalu nixli bo ckule
(pretty type-of little) type-of (girl type-of school)
girls' school which is beautifully small
16.10) melbi je cmalu nixli bo ckule
(pretty and little) type-of (girl type-of school)
girls' school which is beautiful and small
16.11) melbi cmalu nixli je ckule
(pretty type-of little) type-of (girl and school)
something which is a girl and a school
which is beautifully small
16.12) melbi bo cmalu je nixli bo ckule
(pretty type-of little) and (girl type-of school)
something which is beautifully small and a girls' school
16.13) melbi je cmalu nixli je ckule
(pretty and little) type-of (girl and school)
a pretty and little type of thing which is
both a girl and a school
16.14) melbi bo cmalu je nixli jebo ckule
(pretty type-of little) and (girl and school)
thing which is beautifully small, a school, and a girl
Note: same as 16.6
16.15) melbi jebo cmalu je nixli bo ckule
(pretty and little) and (girl type-of school)
thing which is beautiful and small and a girl's school
Note: same as 16.30
16.16) melbi jebo cmalu je nixli jebo ckule
(pretty and little) and (girl and school)
16.17) melbi cmalu bo nixli ckule
(pretty type-of (little type-of girl)) type-of school
school for beautiful girls who are small
16.18) melbi cmalu je nixli ckule
(pretty type-of (little and girl)) type-of school
school for beautiful things which are small and are girls
16.19) melbi je cmalu bo nixli ckule
(pretty and (little type-of girl)) type-of school
school for things which are beautiful and are small girls
16.20) ke melbi cmalu bo nixli ke'e je ckule
melbi bo cmalu bo nixli je ckule
(pretty type-of (little type-of girl)) and school
thing which is a school and a small girl who is beautiful
16.21) melbi je cmalu jebo nixli ckule
(pretty and (little and girl)) type-of school
school for things which are beautiful, small, and girls
Note: same as 16.5
16.22) melbi je cmalu bo nixli je ckule
(pretty and (little type-of girl)) and school
thing which is beautiful, a small girl, and a school
Note: same as 16.38
16.23) ke melbi cmalu je nixli ke'e je ckule
(pretty type-of (little and girl)) and school
thing which is beautifully small, a beautiful girl,
and a school
16.24) melbi je cmalu jebo nixli je ckule
(pretty and (little and girl)) and school
16.25) melbi cmalu bo nixli bo ckule
melbi ke cmalu ke nixli ckule [ke'e] [ke'e]
pretty type-of (little type-of (girl type-of school))
small school for girls which is beautiful
16.26) melbi ke cmalu nixli je ckule [ke'e]
pretty type-of (little type-of (girl and school))
small thing, both a girl and a school, which is beautiful
16.27) melbi cmalu je nixli bo ckule
pretty type-of (little and (girl type-of school))
thing which is beautifully small
and a girls' school that is beautiful
16.28) melbi je cmalu bo nixli bo ckule
melbi je ke cmalu nixli bo ckule [ke'e]
melbi je ke cmalu ke nixli ckule [ke'e] [ke'e]
pretty and (little type-of (girl type-of school))
thing which is beautiful and a small type of
girls' school
16.29) melbi cmalu je nixli jebo ckule
melbi cmalu je ke nixli je ckule [ke'e]
pretty type-of (little and (girl and school))
and a beautiful school
Note: same as 16.37
16.30) melbi je cmalu jebo nixli bo ckule
melbi je ke cmalu je nixli bo ckule [ke'e]
pretty and (little and (girl type-of school))
thing which is beautiful, small and a girls' school
Note: same as 16.15
16.31) melbi je ke cmalu nixli je ckule [ke'e]
pretty and (little type-of (girl and school))
beautiful thing which is a small girl and a small school
16.32) melbi jebo cmalu jebo nixli jebo ckule
pretty and (little and (girl and school))
16.33) melbi ke cmalu nixli ckule [ke'e]
pretty type-of ((little type-of girl) type-of school)
beautiful school for small girls
16.34) melbi ke cmalu je nixli ckule [ke'e]
pretty type-of ((little and girl) type-of school
beautiful school for things which are small
and are girls
16.35) melbi ke cmalu bo nixli je ckule [ke'e]
pretty type-of ((little type-of girl) and school)
beautiful thing which is a small girl and a school
16.36) melbi je ke cmalu nixli ckule [ke'e]
pretty and ((little type-of girl) type-of school)
thing which is beautiful and a school for small girls
16.37) melbi cmalu je nixli je ckule
pretty type-of ((little and girl) and school)
and a beautiful school
Note: same as 16.29
16.38) melbi je ke cmalu bo nixli je ckule [ke'e]
pretty and ((little type-of girl) and school)
thing which is beautiful, a small girl and a school
Note: same as 16.22
16.39) melbi je ke cmalu je nixli ckule [ke'e]
pretty and ((little and girl) type-of school)
thing which is beautiful and is a small school
and a girls' school
16.40) melbi je ke cmalu je nixli je ckule [ke'e]
pretty and ((little and girl) and school)
Chapter 6
To Speak Of Many Things: The Lojban sumti
1. The five kinds of simple sumti
If you understand anything about Lojban, you know what a sumti is by now, right?
An argument, one of those things that fills the places of simple Lojban sentenc
es like:
I go-to the market
In Example 1.1, ``mi'' and ``le zarci'' are the sumti. It is easy to see that th
ese two sumti are not of the same kind: ``mi'' is a pro-sumti (the Lojban analog
ue of a pronoun) referring to the speaker, whereas ``le zarci'' is a description
which refers to something described as being a market.
There are five kinds of simple sumti provided by Lojban:
1)
descriptions like ``le zarci'', which usually begin with a descriptor (calle
d a ``gadri'' in Lojban) such as ``le'';
2)
pro-sumti, such as ``mi'';
3)
names, such as ``la lojban.'', which usually begin with ``la'';
4)
quotations, which begin with ``lu'', ``le'u'', ``zo'', or ``zoi'';
5)
pure numbers, which usually begin with ``li''.
Here are a few examples of each kind of sumti:
1.2) e'osai ko sarji la lojban.
Please support Lojban!
Example 1.2 exhibits ``ko'', a pro-sumti; and ``la lojban.'', a name.
1.3) mi cusku lu e'osai li'u le tcidu
I express ``Please!'' to-the reader.
Example 1.3 exhibits ``mi'', a pro-sumti; ``lu e'osai li'u'', a quotation; and `
`le tcidu'', a description.
1.4) ti mitre li ci
This measures-in-meters the-number three.
This is three meters long.
Example 1.4 exhibits ``ti'', a pro-sumti; and ``li ci'', a number.
Most of this chapter is about descriptions, as they have the most complicated sy
ntax and usage. Some attention is also given to names, which are closely interwo
ven with descriptions. Pro-sumti, numbers, and quotations are described in more
detail in Chapter 7, Chapter 18, and Chapter 19 respectively, so this chapter on
ly gives summaries of their forms and uses. See Section 13 through Section 15 fo
r these summaries.
2. The three basic description types
le LE the, the one(s) described as
lo LE some, some of those which really are
la LA the one(s) named
ku KU elidable terminator for LE, LA
The syntax of descriptions is fairly complex, and not all of it can be explained
within the confines of this chapter: relative clauses, in particular, are discu
ssed in Chapter 8. However, most descriptions have just two components: a descri
ptor belonging to selma'o LE or LA, and a selbri. (The difference between selma'
o LE and selma'o LA is not important until Section 12.) Furthermore, the selbri
is often just a single brivla. Here is an elementary example:
2.1) le zarci
one-or-more-specific-things-each-of-which-
I-describe-as being-a-market
the market
The long gloss for ``le'' is of course far too long to use most of the time, and
in fact ``le'' is quite close in meaning to English ``the''. It has particular
implications, however, which ``the'' does not have.
The general purpose of all descriptors is to create a sumti which might occur in
the x1 place of the selbri belonging to the description. Thus ``le zarci'' conv
eys something which might be found in the x1 place of ``zarci'', namely a market
.
The specific purpose of ``le'' is twofold. First, it indicates that the speaker
has one or more specific markets in mind (whether or not the listener knows whic
h ones they are). Second, it also indicates that the speaker is merely describin
g the things he or she has in mind as markets, without being committed to the tr
uth of that description.
2.2) le zarci
cu barda
one-or-more-specific-things-which-I-describe as ``markets''
is/are-big.
The market is big.
The markets are big.
Note that English-speakers must state whether a reference to markets is to just
one (``the market'') or to more than one (``the markets''). Lojban requires no s
uch forced choice, so both colloquial translations of Example 2.2 are valid. Onl
y the context can specify which is meant. (This rule does not mean that Lojban h
as no way of specifying the number of markets in such a case: that mechanism is
explained in Section 7.)
Now consider the following strange-looking example:
2.3) le nanmu cu ninmu
one-or-more-specific-things-which-I-describe as ``men''
are women
The man is a woman.
The men are women.
Example 2.3 is not self-contradictory in Lojban, because ``le nanmu'' merely mea
ns something or other which, for my present purposes, I choose to describe as a
man, whether or not it really is a man. A plausible instance would be: someone w
e had assumed to be a man at a distance turned out to be actually a woman on clo
ser observation. Example 2.3 is what I would say to point out my observation to
you.
In all descriptions with ``le'', the listener is presumed to either know what I
have in mind or else not to be concerned at present (perhaps I will give more id
entifying details later). In particular, I might be pointing at the supposed man
or men: Example 2.3 would then be perfectly intelligible, since ``le nanmu'' me
rely clarifies that I am pointing at the supposed man, not at a landscape, or a
nose, which happens to lie in the same direction.
The second descriptor dealt with in this section is ``lo''. Unlike ``le'', ``lo'
' is nonspecific:
2.4) lo zarci
one-or-more-of-all-the-things-which-really are-markets
a market
some markets
Again, there are two colloquial English translations. The effect of using ``lo''
in Example 2.4 is to refer generally to one or more markets, without being spec
ific about which. Unlike ``le zarci'', ``lo zarci'' must refer to something whic
h actually is a market (that is, which can appear in the x1 place of a truthful
bridi whose selbri is ``zarci''). Thus
2.5
lo nanmu cu ninmu Some man is a woman. Some men are women.
must be false in Lojban, given that there are no objects in the real world which
are both men and women. Pointing at some specific men or women would not make E
xample 2.5 true, because those specific individuals are no more both-men-and-wom
en than any others. In general, ``lo'' refers to whatever individuals meet its d
escription.
The last descriptor of this section is ``la'', which indicates that the selbri w
hich follows it has been dissociated from its normal meaning and is being used a
s a name. Like ``le'' descriptions, ``la'' descriptions are implicitly restricte
d to those I have in mind. (Do not confuse this use of ``la'' with its use befor
e regular Lojbanized names, which is discussed in Section 12.) For example:
2.6) la cribe pu finti le lisri
the-one-named ``bear'' [past] creates the story.
Bear wrote the story.
In Example 2.6, ``la cribe'' refers to someone whose naming predicate is ``cribe
'', i.e. ``Bear''. In English, most names don't mean anything, or at least not a
nything obvious. The name ``Frank'' coincides with the English word ``frank'', m
eaning ``honest'', and so one way of translating ``Frank ate some cheese'' into
Lojban would be:
2.7) la stace pu citka lo cirla
The-one-called ``Honest/Frank'' [past] eats some cheese.
English-speakers typically would not do this, as we tend to be more attached to
the sound of our names than their meaning, even if the meaning (etymological or
current) is known. Speakers of other languages may feel differently. (In point o
f fact, ``Frank'' originally meant ``the free one'' rather than ``the honest one
''.)
It is important to note the differences between Example 2.6 and the following:
2.8) le cribe pu finti le lisri
One-or-more-specific-things-which-I-describe-as a-bear
[past] creates the story.
The bear(s) wrote the story.
2.9) lo cribe pu finti le lisri
One-or-more-of-the-things-which-really are-bears
[past] creates the story.
A bear wrote the story.
Some bears wrote the story.
Example 2.8 is about a specific bear or bearlike thing(s), or thing(s) which the
speaker (perhaps whimsically or metaphorically) describes as a bear (or more th
an one); Example 2.9 is about one or more of the really existing, objectively de
fined bears. In either case, though, each of them must have contributed to the w
riting of the story, if more than one bear (or ``bear'') is meant.
(The notion of a ``really existing, objectively defined bear'' raises certain di
fficulties. Is a panda bear a ``real bear''? How about a teddy bear? In general,
the answer is ``yes''. Lojban gismu are defined as broadly as possible, allowin
g tanru and lujvo to narrow down the definition. There probably are no necessary
and sufficient conditions for defining what is and what is not a bear that can
be pinned down with complete precision: the real world is fuzzy. In borderline c
ases, ``le'' may communicate better than ``lo''.)
So while Example 2.6 could easily be true (there is a real writer named ``Greg B
ear''), and Example 2.8 could be true if the speaker is sufficiently peculiar in
what he or she describes as a bear, Example 2.9 is certainly false.
Similarly, compare the following two examples, which are analogous to Example 2.
8 and Example 2.9 respectively:
2.10) le remna pu finti le lisri
The human being(s) wrote the story.
2.11) lo remna pu finti le lisri
A human being wrote the story.
Some human beings wrote the story.
Example 2.10 says who the author of the story is: one or more particular human b
eings that the speaker has in mind. If the topic of conversation is the story, t
hen Example 2.10 identifies the author as someone who can be pointed out or who
has been previously mentioned; whereas if the topic is a person, then ``le remna
'' is in effect a shorthand reference to that person. Example 2.11 merely says t
hat the author is human.
The elidable terminator for all descriptions is ``ku''. It can almost always be
omitted with no danger of ambiguity. The main exceptions are in certain uses of
relative clauses, which are discussed in Chapter 8, and in the case of a descrip
tion immediately preceding the selbri. In this latter case, using an explicit ``
cu'' before the selbri makes the ``ku'' unnecessary. There are also a few other
uses of ``ku'': in the compound negator ``naku'' (discussed in Chapter 15) and t
o terminate place-structure, tense, and modal tags that do not have associated s
umti (discussed in Chapter 9 and Chapter 10).
3. Individuals and masses
lei LE the mass I describe as
loi LE part of the mass of those which really are
lai LA the mass of those named
All Lojban sumti are classified by whether they refer to one of three types of o
bjects, known as `ìndividuals'', ``masses'', and ``sets''. The term `ìndividua
l'' is misleading when used to refer to more than one object, but no less-confus
ing term has as yet been found. All the descriptions in Sections 1 and 2 refer t
o individuals, whether one or more than one. Consider the following example:
3.1) le prenu cu bevri le pipno
One-or-more-of-those-I-describe-as persons
carry the piano.
The person(s) carry the piano.
(Of course the second ``le'' should really get the same translation as the first
, but I am putting the focus of this discussion on the first ``le'', the one pre
ceding ``prenu''. I will assume that there is only one piano under discussion.)
Suppose the context of Example 3.1 is such that you can determine that I am talk
ing about three persons. What am I claiming? I am claiming that each of the thre
e persons carried the piano. This claim can be true if the persons carried the p
iano one at a time, or in turns, or in a variety of other ways. But in order for
Example 3.1 to be true, I must be willing to assert that person 1 carried the p
iano, and that person 2 carried the piano, and that person 3 carried the piano.
But suppose I am not willing to claim that. For in fact pianos are heavy, and ve
ry few persons can carry a piano all by themselves. The most likely factual situ
ation is that person 1 carried one end of the piano, and person 2 the other end,
while person 3 either held up the middle or else supervised the whole operation
without actually lifting anything. The correct way of expressing such a situati
on in Lojban is:
3.2) lei prenu cu bevri le pipno
The-mass-of-one-or-more-of-those-I-describe-as persons
carry the piano.
Here the same three persons are treated not as individuals, but as a so-called `
`mass entity'', or just ``mass''. A mass has the properties of each individual w
hich composes it, and may have other properties of its own as well. This can lea
d to apparent contradictions. Thus suppose in the piano-moving example above tha
t person 1 has fair skin, whereas person 2 has dark skin. Then it is correct to
say that the person-mass has both fair skin and dark skin. Using the mass descri
ptor ``lei'' signals that ordinary logical reasoning is not applicable: contradi
ctions can be maintained, and all sorts of other peculiarities may exist. Howeve
r, we can safely say that a mass inherits only the component properties that are
relevant to it; it would be ludicrous to say that a mass of two persons is of m
olecular dimensions, simply because some of the parts (namely, the molecules) of
the persons are that small.
The descriptors ``loi'' and ``lai'' are analogous to ``lo'' and ``la'' respectiv
ely, but refer to masses either by property (``loi'') or by name (``lai''). A cl
assic example of ``loi'' use is:
3.3) loi cinfo cu xabju le fi'ortu'a
part-of-the-mass-of-those-which-really are-lions
dwell in-the African-land.
The lion dwells in Africa.
Lions dwell in Africa.
The difference between ``lei'' and ``loi'' is that ``lei cinfo'' refers to a mas
s of specific individuals which the speaker calls lions, whereas ``loi cinfo'' r
efers to some part of the mass of all those individuals which actually are lions
. The restriction to ``some part of the mass'' allows statements like Example 3.
3 to be true even though some lions do not dwell in Africa --- they live in vari
ous zoos around the world. On the other hand, Example 3.3 doesn't actually say t
hat most lions live in Africa: equally true is
3.4) loi glinanmu cu xabju le fi'ortu'a
part-of-the-mass-of-those-which-really are-English-men
dwell in-the African-land.
The Englishman dwells in Africa.
since there is at least one Englishman living there. Section 4 explains another
method of saying what is usually meant by ``The lion lives in Africa'' which doe
s imply that living in Africa is normal, not exceptional, for lions.
Note that the Lojban mass articles are sometimes translated by English plurals (
the most usual case), sometimes by English singulars (when the singular is used
to express typicalness or abstraction), and sometimes by singulars with no artic
le:
3.5) loi matne cu ranti
part-of-the-mass-of-that-which-really
is-a-quantity-of-butter is-soft.
Butter is soft.
Of course, some butter is hard (for example, if it is frozen butter), so the ``p
art-of'' implication of ``loi'' becomes once again useful. The reason this mecha
nism works is that the English words like ``butter'', which are seen as already
describing masses, are translated in Lojban by non- mass forms. The place struct
ure of ``matne'' is ``x1 is a quantity of butter from source x2'', so the single
English word ``butter'' is translated as something like `à part of the mass fo
rmed from all the quantities of butter that exist''. (Note that the operation of
forming a mass entity does not imply, in Lojban, that the components of the mas
s are necessarily close to one another or even related in any way other than con
ceptually. Masses are formed by the speaker's intention to form a mass, and can
in principle contain anything.)
The mass name descriptor ``lai'' is used in circumstances where we wish to talk
about a mass of things identified by a name which is common to all of them. It i
s not used to identify a mass by a single name peculiar to it. Thus the mass ver
sion of Example 2.5,
3.6) lai cribe pu finti
le vi cukta
the-mass-of-those-named ``bear'' [past] creates
the nearby book.
The Bears wrote this book.
in a context where ``la cribe'' would be understood as plural, would mean that e
ither Tom Bear or Fred Bear (to make up some names) might have written the book,
or that Tom and Fred might have written it as collaborators. Using ``la'' inste
ad of ``lai'' in Example 3.6 would give the implication that each of Tom and Fre
d, considered individually, had written it.
4. Masses and sets
le'i LE the set described as
lo'i LE the set of those which really are
la'i LA the set of those named
Having said so much about masses, let us turn to sets. Sets are easier to unders
tand than masses, but are more rarely used. Like a mass, a set is an abstract ob
ject formed from a number of individuals; however, the properties of a set are n
ot derived from any of the properties of the individuals that compose it.
Sets have properties like cardinality (how many elements in the set), membership
(the relationship between a set and its elements), and set inclusion (the relat
ionship between two sets, one of which --- the superset -- contains all the elem
ents of the other --- the subset). The set descriptors ``le'i'', ``lo'i'' and ``
la'i'' correspond exactly to the mass descriptors ``lei'', ``loi'', and ``lai''
except that normally we talk of the whole of a set, not just part of it. Here ar
e some examples contrasting ``lo'', ``loi'', and ``lo'i'':
4.1) lo ratcu cu bunre
one-or-more-of-those-which-really-are rats are-brown.
Some rats are brown.
4.2) loi ratcu
cu cmalu
part-of-the-mass-of-those-which-really-are rats
are-small.
Rats are small.
4.3) lo'i ratcu cu barda
The-set-of rats is-large.
There are a lot of rats.
The mass of rats is small because at least one rat is small; the mass of rats is
also large; the set of rats, though, is unquestionably large -- it has billions
of members. The mass of rats is also brown, since some of its components are; b
ut it would be incorrect to call the set of rats brown --- brown-ness is not the
sort of property that sets possess.
Lojban speakers should generally think twice before employing the set descriptor
s. However, certain predicates have places that require set sumti to fill them.
For example, the place structure of ``fadni'' is:
x1 is ordinary/common/typical/usual in property x2 among the members of set
x3
Why is it necessary for the x3 place of ``fadni'' to be a set? Because it makes
no sense for an individual to be typical of another individual: an individual is
typical of a group. In order to make sure that the bridi containing ``fadni'' i
s about an entire group, its x3 place must be filled with a set:
4.4) mi fadni fi lo'i lobypli
I am-ordinary among the-set-of Lojban-users.
I am a typical Lojban user.
Note that the x2 place has been omitted; I am not specifying in exactly which wa
y I am typical --- whether in language knowledge, or age, or interests, or somet
hing else. If ``lo'i'' were changed to ``lo'' in Example 4.4, the meaning would
be something like `Ì am typical of some Lojban user'', which is nonsense.
5. Descriptors for typical objects
lo'e LE the typical
le'e LE the stereotypical
As promised in Section 3, Lojban has a method for discriminating between ``the l
ion'' who lives in Africa and ``the Englishman'' who, generally speaking, doesn'
t live in Africa even though some Englishmen do. The descriptor ``lo'e'' means `
`the typical'', as in
5.1) lo'e cinfo cu xabju le fi'ortu'a
The-typical lion dwells-in the African-land.
The lion dwells in Africa.
What is this ``typical lion''? Surely it is not any particular lion, because no
lion has all of the ``typical'' characteristics, and (worse yet) some characteri
stics that all real lions have can't be viewed as typical. For example, all real
lions are either male or female, but it would be bizarre to suppose that the ty
pical lion is either one. So the typical lion has no particular sex, but does ha
ve a color (golden brown), a residence (Africa), a diet (game), and so on. Likew
ise we can say that
5.2) lo'e glinanmu cu xabju le fi'ortu'a
na.e le gligugde
The-typical English-man dwells-in the African-land
(Not!) and the English-country.
The typical Englishman dwells not in Africa
but in England.
The relationship between ``lo'e cinfo'' and ``lo'i cinfo'' may be explained thus
: the typical lion is an imaginary lion-abstraction which best exemplifies the s
et of lions. There is a similar relationship between ``le'e'' and ``le'i'':
5.3) le'e xelso merko
cu gusta ponse
The-stereotypical Greek-type-of American
is-a-restaurant-type-of owner.
Lots of Greek-Americans own restaurants.
Here we are concerned not with the actual set of Greek-Americans, but with the s
et of those the speaker has in mind, which is typified by one (real or imaginary
) who owns a restaurant. The word ``stereotypical'' is often derogatory in Engli
sh, but ``le'e'' need not be derogatory in Lojban: it simply suggests that the e
xample is typical in the speaker's imagination rather than in some objectively a
greed-upon way. Of course, different speakers may disagree about what the featur
es of ``the typical lion'' are (some would include having a short intestine, whe
reas others would know nothing of lions' intestines), so the distinction between
``lo'e cinfo'' and ``le'e cinfo'' may be very fine.
Furthermore,
5.4) le'e skina cu se finti ne'i la xali,uyd.
The-stereotypical movie is-invented in Hollywood.
is probably true to an American, but might be false (not the stereotype) to some
one living in India or Russia.
Note that there is no naming equivalent of ``lo'e'' and ``le'e'', because there
is no need, as a rule, for a ``typical George'' or a ``typical Smith''. People o
r things who share a common name do not, in general, have any other common attri
butes worth mentioning.
6. Quantified sumti
ro PA all of/each of
su'o PA at least (one of)
Quantifiers tell us how many: in the case of quantifiers with sumti, how many th
ings we are talking about. In Lojban, quantifiers are expressed by numbers and m
athematical expressions: a large topic discussed in some detail in Chapter 18. F
or the purposes of this chapter, a simplified treatment will suffice. Our exampl
es will employ either the simple Lojban numbers ``pa'', ``re'', ``ci'', ``vo'',
and ``mu'', meaning `òne'', ``two'', ``three'', ``four'', ``five'' respectively
, or else one of four special quantifiers, two of which are discussed in this se
ction and listed above. These four quantifiers are important because every Lojba
n sumti has either one or two of them implicitly present in it --- which one or
two depends on the particular kind of sumti. There is more explanation of implic
it quantifiers later in this section. (The other two quantifiers, ``piro'' and `
`pisu'o'', are explained in Section 7.)
Every Lojban sumti may optionally be preceded by an explicit quantifier. The pur
pose of this quantifier is to specify how many of the things referred to by the
sumti are being talked about. Here are some simple examples contrasting sumti wi
th and without explicit quantifiers:
6.1) do cadzu le bisli
You walk-on the ice.
6.2) re do cadzu le bisli
Two-of you walk-on the ice.
The difference between Example 6.1 and Example 6.2 is the presence of the explic
it quantifier ``re'' in the latter example. Although ``re'' by itself means ``tw
o'', when used as a quantifier it means ``two-of''. Out of the group of listener
s (the number of which isn't stated), two (we are not told which ones) are asser
ted to be ``walkers on the ice''. Implicitly, the others (if any) are not walker
s on the ice. In Lojban, you cannot say `Ì own three shoes'' if in fact you own
four shoes. Numbers need never be specified, but if they are specified they mus
t be correct.
(This rule does not mean that there is no way to specify a number which is vague
. The sentence
6.3) mi ponse su'o ci cutci
I possess at-least three shoes.
is true if you own three shoes, or four, or indeed any larger number. More detai
ls on vague numbers appear in the discussion of mathematical expressions in Chap
ter 18.)
Now consider Example 6.1 again. How many of the listeners are claimed to walk on
the ice? The answer turns out to be: all of them, however many that is. So Exam
ple 6.1 and Example 6.4:
6.4) ro do cadzu le bisli
All-of you walk-on the ice.
turn out to mean exactly the same thing. This is a safe strategy, because if one
of my listeners doesn't turn out to be walking on the ice, I can safely claim t
hat I didn't intend that person to be a listener! And in fact, all of the person
al pro-sumti such as ``mi'' and ``mi'o'' and ``ko'' obey the same rule. We say t
hat personal pro-sumti have a so-called `ìmplicit quantifier'' of ``ro'' (all).
This just means that if no quantifier is given explicitly, the meaning is the s
ame as if the implicit quantifier had been used.
Not all sumti have ``ro'' as the implicit quantifier, however. Consider the quot
ation in:
6.5) mi cusku lu do cadzu le bisli li'u
I express [quote] you walk-on the ice [unquote].
I say, ``You walk on the ice.''
What is the implicit quantifier of the quotation ``lu do cadzu le bisli li'u''?
Surely not ``ro''. If ``ro'' were supplied explicitly, thus:
6.6) mi cusku ro lu do cadzu le bisli li'u
I express all-of [quote] you walk-on the ice [unquote].
the meaning would be something like `Ì say every occurrence of the sentence 'Yo
u walk on the ice'''. Of course I don't say every occurrence of it, only some oc
currences. One might suppose that Example 6.5 means that I express exactly one o
ccurrence, but it is more Lojbanic to leave the number unspecified, as with othe
r sumti. We can say definitely, however, that I say it at least once.
The Lojban cmavo meaning `àt least'' is ``su'o'', and if no ordinary number fol
lows, ``su'o'' means `àt least once''. (See Example 6.3 for the use of ``su'o''
with an ordinary number). Therefore, the explicitly quantified version of Examp
le 6.5 is
6.7) mi cusku su'o lu do cadzu
le bisli li'u
I express at-least-one-of [quote] you walk-on
the ice [unquote].
I say one or more instances of ``You walk on the ice''.
I say ``You walk on the ice''.
If an explicit ordinary number such as ``re'' were to appear, it would have to c
onvey an exact expression, so
6.8) mi cusku re lu do cadzu le bisli li'u
I express two-of [quote] you walk-on the ice [unquote].
means that I say the sentence exactly twice, neither more nor less.
7. Quantified descriptions
piro PA the whole of
pisu'o PA a part of
Like other sumti, descriptions can be quantified. When a quantifier appears befo
re a description, it has the same meaning as one appearing before a non-descript
ion sumti: it specifies how many things, of all those referred to by the descrip
tion, are being talked about in this particular bridi. Suppose that context tell
s us that ``le gerku'' refers to three dogs. Then we can say that exactly two of
them are white as follows:
7.1) re le gerku cu blabi
two-of the dogs are-white.
Two of the dogs are white.
When discussing descriptions, this ordinary quantifier is called an `òuter quan
tifier'', since it appears outside the description. But there is another possibl
e location for a quantifier: between the descriptor and the selbri. This quantif
ier is called an `ìnner quantifier'', and its meaning is quite different: it te
lls the listener how many objects the description selbri characterizes.
For example, the context of Example 7.1 supposedly told us that ``le gerku'' ref
erred to some three specific dogs. This assumption can be made certain with the
use of an explicit inner quantifier:
7.2) re le ci gerku cu blabi
two-of the three dogs are-white.
Two of the three dogs are white.
(As explained in the discussion of Example 6.3, simple numbers like those in Exa
mple 7.2 must be exact: it therefore follows that the third dog cannot be white.
)
You may also specify an explicit inner quantifier and leave the outer quantifier
implicit:
7.3) le ci gerku cu blabi
the three dogs are-white.
The three dogs are white.
There are rules for each of the 11 descriptors specifying what the implicit valu
es for the inner and outer quantifiers are. They are meant to provide sensible d
efault values when context is absent, not necessarily to prescribe hard and fast
rules. The following table lists the implicit values:
le:
ro le su'o all of the at-least-one described as
lo:
su'o lo ro at least one of all of those which really are
la:
ro la su'o all of the at least one named
lei:
pisu'o lei su'o some part of the mass of the at-least-one described as
loi:
pisu'o loi ro some part of the mass of all those that really are
lai:
pisu'o lai su'o some part of the mass of the at-least-one named
le'i:
piro le'i su'o the whole of the set of the at-least-one described as
lo'i:
piro lo'i ro the whole of the set of all those that really are
la'i:
piro la'i su'o the whole of the set of the at-least-one named
le'e:
ro le'e su'o all the stereotypes of the at-least-one described as
lo'e:
su'o lo'e ro at least one of the types of all those that really are
When examined for the first time, this table looks dreadfully arbitrary. In fact
, there are quite a few regularities in it. First of all, the la-series (that is
, the descriptors ``la'', ``lai'', and ``la'i'') and the le-series (that is, the
descriptors ``le'', ``lei'', ``le'i'', and ``le'e'') always have corresponding
implicit quantifiers, so we may subsume the la-series under the le-series for th
e rest of this discussion: ``le-series cmavo'' will refer to both the le-series
proper and to the la-series.
The rule for the inner quantifier is very simple: the lo-series cmavo (namely, `
`lo'', ``loi'', ``lo'i'', and ``lo'e'') all have an implicit inner quantifier of
``ro'', whereas the le-series cmavo all have an implicit inner quantifier of ``
su'o''.
Why? Because lo-series descriptors always refer to all of the things which reall
y fit into the x1 place of the selbri. They are not restricted by the speaker's
intention. Descriptors of the le-series, however, are so restricted, and therefo
re talk about some number, definite or indefinite, of objects the speaker has in
mind --- but never less than one.
Understanding the implicit outer quantifier requires rules of greater subtlety.
In the case of mass and set descriptors, a single rule suffices for each: refere
nce to a mass is implicitly a reference to some part of the mass; reference to a
set is implicitly a reference to the whole set. Masses and sets are inherently
singular objects: it makes no sense to talk about two distinct masses with the s
ame components, or two distinct sets with the same members. Therefore, the large
st possible outer quantifier for either a set description or a mass description
is ``piro'', the whole of it.
(Pedantically, it is possible that the mass of water molecules composing an ice
cube might be thought of as different from the same mass of water molecules in l
iquid form, in which case we might talk about ``re lei djacu'', two masses of th
e water-bits I have in mind.)
Why ``pi-''? It is the Lojban cmavo for the decimal point. Just as ``pimu'' mean
s ``.5'', and when used as a quantifier specifies a portion consisting of five t
enths of a thing, ``piro'' means a portion consisting of the all-ness -- the ent
irety --- of a thing. Similarly, ``pisu'o'' specifies a portion consisting of at
least one part of a thing, i.e. some of it.
Smaller quantifiers are possible for sets, and refer to subsets. Thus ``pimu le'
i nanmu'' is a subset of the set of men I have in mind; we don't know precisely
which elements make up this subset, but it must have half the size of the full s
et. This is the best way to say ``half of the men''; saying ``pimu le nanmu'' wo
uld give us a half-portion of one of them instead! Of course, the result of ``pi
mu le'i nanmu'' is still a set; if you need to refer to the individuals of the s
ubset, you must say so (see ``lu'a'' in Section 10).
The case of outer quantifiers for individual descriptors (including ``le'', ``lo
'', ``la'', and the typical descriptors ``le'e'' and ``lo'e'') is special. When
we refer to specific individuals with ``le'', we mean to refer to all of those w
e have in mind, so ``ro'' is appropriate as the implicit quantifier, just as it
is appropriate for ``do''. Reference to non-specific individuals with ``lo'', ho
wever, is typically to only some of the objects which can be correctly described
, and so ``su'o'' is the appropriate implicit quantifier, just as for quotations
.
From the English-speaking point of view, the difference in structure between the
following example using ``le'':
7.4) [ro] le ci gerku cu blabi
[all-of] those-described-as three dogs are-white.
The three dogs are white.
and the corresponding form with ``lo'':
7.5) ci lo [ro] gerku cu blabi
three-of those-which-are [all] dogs are-white
Three dogs are white.
looks very peculiar. Why is the number ``ci'' found as an inner quantifier in Ex
ample 7.4 and as an outer quantifier in Example 7.5? The number of dogs is the s
ame in either case. The answer is that the ``ci'' in Example 7.4 is part of the
specification: it tells us the actual number of dogs in the group that the speak
er has in mind. In Example 7.5, however, the dogs referred to by ``... lo gerku'
' are all the dogs that exist: the outer quantifier then restricts the number to
three; which three, we cannot tell. The implicit quantifiers are chosen to avoi
d claiming too much or too little: in the case of ``le'', the implicit outer qua
ntifier ``ro'' says that each of the dogs in the restricted group is white; in t
he case of ``lo'', the implicit inner quantifier simply says that three dogs, ch
osen from the group of all the dogs there are, are white.
Using exact numbers as inner quantifiers in lo-series descriptions is dangerous,
because you are stating that exactly that many things exist which really fit th
e description. So examples like
7.7) [su'o] lo ci gerku cu blabi
[some-of] those-which-really-are three dogs are-white
are semantically anomalous; Example 7.7 claims that some dog (or dogs) is white,
but also that there are just three dogs in the universe!
Nevertheless, inner quantifiers are permitted on ``lo'' descriptors for consiste
ncy's sake, and may occasionally be useful.
Note that the inner quantifier of ``le'', even when exact, need not be truthful:
``le ci nanmu'' means ``what I describe as three men'', not ``three of what I d
escribe as men''. This follows from the rule that what is described by a ``le''
description represents the speaker's viewpoint rather than the objective way thi
ngs are.
8. Indefinite descriptions
By a quirk of Lojban syntax, it is possible to omit the descriptor ``lo'', but n
ever any other descriptor, from a description like that of Example 7.5; namely,
one which has an explicit outer quantifier but no explicit inner quantifier. The
following example:
8.1) ci gerku [ku] cu blabi
Three dogs are white.
is equivalent in meaning to Example 7.5. Even though the descriptor is not prese
nt, the elidable terminator ``ku'' may still be used. The name `ìndefinite desc
ription'' for this syntactic form is historically based: of course, it is no mor
e and no less indefinite than its counterpart with an explicit ``lo''. Indefinit
e descriptions were introduced into the language in order to imitate the syntax
of English and other natural languages.
Indefinite descriptions must fit this mold exactly: there is no way to make one
which does not have an explicit outer quantifier (thus ``*gerku cu blabi'' is un
grammatical), or which has an explicit inner quantifier (thus ``*reboi ci gerku
cu blabi'' is also ungrammatical --- ``re ci gerku cu blabi'' is fine, but means
``23 dogs are white'').
Note: Example 6.3 also contains an indefinite description, namely ``su'o ci cutc
i''; another version of that example using an explicit ``lo'' would be:
8.2) mi ponse su'o ci lo cutci
I possess at-least three things-which-really-are shoes
I own three (or more) shoes.
9. sumti-based descriptions
As stated in Section 2, most descriptions consist of just a descriptor and a sel
bri. (In this chapter, the selbri have always been single gismu, but of course a
ny selbri, however complex, can be employed in a description. The syntax and sem
antics of selbri are explained in Chapter 5.) In the intervening sections, inner
and outer quantifiers have been added to the syntax. Now it is time to discuss
a description of a radically different kind: the sumti-based description.
A sumti-based description has a sumti where the selbri would normally be, and th
e inner quantifier is required --- it cannot be implicit. An outer quantifier is
permitted but not required.
A full theory of sumti-based descriptions has yet to be worked out. One common c
ase, however, is well understood. Compare the following:
9.1) re do cu nanmu
Two-of you are-men.
9.2) le re do cu nanmu
The two-of you are men.
Example 9.1 simply specifies that of the group of listeners, size unknown, two a
re men. Example 9.2, which has the sumti-based description ``le re do'', says th
at of the two listeners, all (the implicit outer quantifier ``ro'') are men. So
in effect the inner quantifier ``re'' gives the number of individuals which the
inner sumti ``do'' refers to.
Here is another group of examples:
9.3) re le ci cribe cu bunre
Two-of the three bears are-brown.
9.4) le re le ci cribe cu bunre
The two-of the three bears are-brown.
9.5) pa le re le ci cribe cu bunre
One-of the two-of the three bears are-brown.
In each case, ``le ci cribe'' restricts the bears (or alleged bears) being talke
d of to some group of three which the speaker has in mind. Example 9.3 says that
two of them (which two is not stated) are brown. Example 9.4 says that a specif
ic pair of them are brown. Example 9.5 says that of a specific pair chosen from
the original three, one or the other of that pair is brown.
10. sumti qualifiers
la'e LAhE something referred to by
lu'e LAhE a reference to
tu'a LAhE an abstraction involving
lu'a LAhE an individual/member/component of
lu'i LAhE a set formed from
lu'o LAhE a mass formed from
vu'i LAhE a sequence formed from
na'ebo NAhE+BO something other than
to'ebo NAhE+BO the opposite of
no'ebo NAhE+BO the neutral form of
je'abo NAhE+BO that which indeed is
lu'u LUhU elidable terminator for LAhE and NAhE+BO
Well, that's quite a list of cmavo. What are they all about?
The above cmavo and compound cmavo are called the ``sumti qualifiers''. All of t
hem are either single cmavo of selma'o LAhE, or else compound cmavo involving a
scalar negation cmavo of selma'o NAhE immediately followed by ``bo'' of selma'o
BO. Syntactically, you can prefix a sumti qualifier to any sumti and produce ano
ther simple sumti. (You may need to add the elidable terminator ``lu'u'' to show
where the qualified sumti ends.)
Semantically, sumti qualifiers represent short forms of certain common special c
ases. Suppose you want to say `Ì see 'The Red Pony''', where ``The Red Pony'' i
s the title of a book. How about:
10.1) mi viska lu le xunre cmaxirma li'u
I see [quote] the red small-horse [unquote]
But Example 10.1 doesn't work: it says that you see a piece of text ``The Red Po
ny''. That might be all right if you were looking at the cover of the book, wher
e the words ``The Red Pony'' are presumably written. (More precisely, where the
words ``le xunre cmaxirma'' are written -- but we may suppose the book has been
translated into Lojban.)
What you really want to say is:
10.2) mi viska le selsinxa be
lu le xunre cmaxirma li'u
I see the thing-represented-by
[quote] the red small-horse [unquote]
The x2 place of ``selsinxa'' (the x1 place of ``sinxa'') is a sign or symbol, an
d the x1 place of ``selsinxa'' (the x2 place of ``sinxa'') is the thing represen
ted by the sign. Example 10.2 allows us to use a symbol (namely the title of a b
ook) to represent the thing it is a symbol of (namely the book itself).
This operation turns out to be needed often enough that it's useful to be able t
o say:
10.3) mi viska la'e lu le xunre cmaxirma li'u [lu'u]
I see the-referent-of
[quote] the red small-horse [unquote].
So when ``la'e'' is prefixed to a sumti referring to a symbol, it produces a sum
ti referring to the referent of that symbol. (In computer jargon, ``la'e'' deref
erences a pointer.)
By introducing a sumti qualifier, we correct a false sentence (Example 10.1), wh
ich too closely resembles its literal English equivalent, into a true sentence (
Example 10.3), without having to change it overmuch; in particular, the structur
e remains the same. Most of the uses of sumti qualifiers are of this general kin
d.
The sumti qualifier ``lu'e'' provides the converse operation: it can be prefixed
to a sumti referring to some thing to produce a sumti referring to a sign or sy
mbol for the thing. For example,
10.4) mi pu cusku lu'e le vi cukta
I [past] express a-symbol-for the nearby book.
I said the title of this book.
The equivalent form not using a sumti qualifier would be:
10.5) mi pu cusku le sinxa be le vi cukta
I [past] express the symbol-for the nearby book.
which is equivalent to Example 10.4, but longer.
The other sumti qualifiers follow the same rules. The cmavo ``tu'a'' is used in
forming abstractions, and is explained more fully in Chapter 11. The triplet ``l
u'a'', ``lu'i'', and ``lu'o'' convert between individuals, masses, and sets; ``v
u'i'' belongs to this group as well, but creates a sequence, which is similar to
a set but has a definite order. (The set of John and Charles is the same as the
set of Charles and John, but the sequences are different.) Here are some exampl
es:
10.6) mi troci tu'a le vorme
I try some-abstraction-about the door.
I try (to open) the door.
Example 10.6 might mean that I try to do something else involving the door; the
form is deliberately vague.
Most of the following examples make use of the cmavo ``ri'', belonging to selma'
o KOhA. This cmavo means ``the thing last mentioned''; it is equivalent to repea
ting the immediately previous sumti (but in its original context). It is explain
ed in more detail in Chapter 7.
10.7) lo'i ratcu cu barda
.iku'i lu'a ri cmalu
the-set-of rats is-large.
But some-members-of it-last-mentioned is-small
The set of rats is large,
but some of its members are small.
10.8) lo ratcu cu cmalu
.iku'i lu'i ri barda
some rats are-small.
But the-set-of them-last-mentioned is-large.
Some rats are small, but the set of rats is large.
10.9) mi ce do girzu
.i lu'o ri gunma
.i vu'i ri porsi
I in-a-set-with you are-a-set.
The-mass-of it-last-mentioned is-a-mass.
The-sequence-of it-last-mentioned is-a-sequence
The set of you and me is a set.
The mass of you and me is a mass.
The sequence of you and me is a sequence.
(Yes, I know these examples are a bit silly. This set was introduced for complet
eness, and practical examples are as yet hard to come by.)
Finally, the four sumti qualifiers formed from a cmavo of NAhE and ``bo'' are al
l concerned with negation, which is discussed in detail in Chapter 15. Here are
a few examples of negation sumti qualifiers:
10.10) mi viska na'ebo le gerka
I see something-other-than the dog.
This compound, ``na'ebo'', is the most common of the four negation sumti qualifi
ers. The others usually only make sense in the context of repeating, with modifi
cations, something already referred to:
10.11) mi nelci loi glare cidja
.ije do nelci
to'ebo ri
.ije la djein. nelci
no'ebo ra
I like part-of-the-mass-of hot-type-of food.
And you like
the-opposite-of the-last-mentioned.
And Jane likes
the-neutral-value-of something-mentioned.
I like hot food, and you like cold food,
and Jane likes lukewarm food.
(In Example 10.11, the sumti ``ra'' refers to some previously mentioned sumti ot
her than that referred to by ``ri''. We cannot use ``ri'' here, because it would
signify ``la djein.'', that being the most recent sumti available to ``ri''. Se
e more detailed explanations in Chapter 7.)
11. The syntax of vocative phrases
Vocative phrases are not sumti, but are explained in this chapter because their
syntax is very similar to that of sumti. Grammatically, a vocative phrase is one
of the so-called ``free modifiers'' of Lojban, along with subscripts, parenthes
es, and various other constructs explained in Chapter 19. They can be placed aft
er many, but not all, constructions of the grammar: in general, after any elidab
le terminator (which, however, must not then be elided!), at the beginnings and
ends of sentences, and in many other places.
The purpose of a vocative phrase is to indicate who the person being addressed i
s, or to indicate to that person that he or she ought to be listening. A vocativ
e phrase begins with a cmavo of selma'o COI or DOI, all of which are explained i
n more detail in Chapter 13. Sometimes that is all there is to the phrase:
11.1) coi
[greetings]
Hello.
11.2) je'e
[acknowledgement]
Uh-huh.
Roger!
In these cases, the person being addressed is obvious from the context. However,
a vocative word (more precisely, one or more cmavo of COI, possibly followed by
``doi'', or else just ``doi'' by itself) can be followed by one of several kind
s of phrases, all of which are intended to indicate the addressee. The most comm
on case is a name:
11.2.5) coi. djan.
Hello, John.
A pause is required (for morphological reasons) between a member of COI and a na
me. You can use ``doi'' instead of a pause:
11.3) coi doi djan.
Hello, John.
means exactly the same thing and does not require a pause. Using ``doi'' by itse
lf is like just saying someone's name to attract his or her attention:
11.4) doi djan.
John!
In place of a name, a description may appear, lacking its descriptor, which is u
nderstood to be ``le'':
11.5) coi xunre pastu nixli
Hello, (red-type-of dress)-type-of girl.
Hello, girl with the red dress!
The listener need not really be a ``xunre pastu nixli'', as long as she understa
nds herself correctly from the description. (Actually, only a bare selbri can ap
pear; explicit quantifiers are forbidden in this form of vocative, so the implic
it quantifiers ``su'o le ro'' are in effect.)
Finally, a complete sumti may be used, the most general case.
11.6) co'o la bab. .e la noras.
Goodbye, Bob and Nora.
Example 11.5 is thus the same as:
11.7) coi le xunre pastu nixli
Hello, the-one-described-as red-dress girl!
and Example 11.4 is the same as:
11.8) doi la djan.
The-one-named John!
Finally, the elidable terminator for vocative phrases is ``do'u'' (of selma'o DO
hU), which is rarely needed except when a simple vocative word is being placed s
omewhere within a bridi. It may also be required when a vocative is placed betwe
en a sumti and its relative clause, or when there are a sequence of so-called ``
free modifiers'' (vocatives, subscripts, utterance ordinals --- see Chapter 18 -
-- metalinguistic comments --- see Chapter 19 --- or reciprocals --- see Chapter
19) which must be properly separated.
The meaning of a vocative phrase that is within a sentence is not affected by it
s position in the sentence: thus Example 11.9 and Example 11.10 mean the same th
ing:
11.9) doi djan. ko klama mi
John, come to me!
11.10) ko klama mi doi djan.
Come to me, John!
As usual for this chapter, the full syntax of vocative phrases has not been expl
ained: relative clauses, discussed in Chapter 8, make for more possibilities.
12. Lojban names
Names have been used freely as sumti throughout this chapter without too much ex
planation. The time for the explanation has now come.
First of all, there are two different kinds of things usually called ``names'' w
hen talking about Lojban. The naming predicates of Section 2 are just ordinary p
redicates which are being used in a special sense. In addition, though, there is
a class of Lojban words which are used only to name things: these can be recogn
ized by the fact that they end in a consonant followed by a pause. Some examples
:
12.1) djan. meris. djein. .alis.
John. Mary. Jane. Alice.
(Note that ``.alis.'' begins as well as ends with a pause, because all Lojban wo
rds beginning with a vowel must be preceded by a pause. See Chapter 4 for more i
nformation.)
Names of this kind have two basic uses in Lojban: when used in a vocative phrase
(see Section 11) they indicate who the listener is or should be. When used with
a descriptor of selma'o LA, namely ``la'', ``lai'', or ``la'i'', they form sumt
i which refer to the persons or things known by the name.
12.2) la djonz. klama le zarci
Jones goes to-the store.
The Joneses go to-the store.
12.3) lai djonz. klama le zarci
The-mass-of Joneses go to-the store.
The Joneses go to the store.
In Example 12.2, the significance is that all the persons (perhaps only one) I m
ean to refer to by the name ``djonz.'' are going to the store. In Example 12.3,
the Joneses are massified, and only some part of them needs to be going. Of cour
se, by ``djonz.'' I can mean whomever I want: that person need not use the name
``djonz.'' at all.
The sumti in Example 12.2 and Example 12.3 operate exactly like the similar uses
of ``la'' and ``lai'' in Examples 2.5 and 3.6 respectively. The only difference
is that these descriptors are followed by Lojban name-words. And in fact, the o
nly difference between descriptors of selma'o LA (these three) and of selma'o LE
(all the other descriptors) is that the former can be followed by name-words, w
hereas the latter cannot.
There are certain limitations on the form of name-words in Lojban. In particular
, they cannot contain the letter-sequences (or sound-sequences) ``la'', ``lai'',
or ``doi'' unless a consonant immediately precedes within the name. Reciprocall
y, every name not preceded by ``la'', ``lai'', ``la'i'', or ``doi'' must be prec
eded by a pause instead:
12.4) coi .djan.
Hello, John.
12.5) zo .djan. cmene mi
The-word ``John'' is-the-name-of me.
My name is John.
In Example 12.4 and Example 12.5, ``.djan.'' appears with a pause before it as w
ell as after it, because the preceding word is not one of the four special cases
. These rules force names to always be separable from the general word-stream.
Unless some other rule prevents it (such as the rule that ``zo'' is always follo
wed by a single word, which is quoted), multiple names may appear wherever one n
ame is permitted, each with its terminating pause:
12.6) doi djan. pol. djonz.
le bloti cu klama fi la niuport. niuz.
John Paul Jones,
the boat comes (to somewhere) from Newport News.
A name may not contain any consonant combination that is illegal in Lojban words
generally: the `ìmpermissible consonant clusters'' of Lojban morphology (expla
ined in Chapter 3). Thus ``djeimz.'' is not a valid version of ``James'' (becaus
e ``mz'' is invalid): ``djeimyz'' will suffice. Similarly, ``la'' may be replace
d by ``ly'', ``lai'' by ``ly'i'', ``doi'' by ``do'i'' or ``dai''. Here are a few
examples:
English name invalid Lojban name valid Lojban names
Doyle *doi,l do'il or dai,l
Lyra *lairas ly'iras
Lottie (American pron.) *latis LYtis. or lotis.
Names may be borrowed from other languages or created arbitrarily. Another commo
n practice is to use one or more rafsi, arranged to end with a consonant, to for
m a name: thus the rafsi ``loj-'' for ``logji'' (logical) and ``ban-'' for ``ban
gu'' (language) unite to form the name of this language:
12.7) lojban.
Lojban
When borrowing names from another language which end in a vowel, or when turning
a Lojban brivla (all of which end in vowels) into a name, the vowel may be remo
ved or an arbitrary consonant added. It is common (but not required) to use the
consonants ``s'' or ``n'' when borrowing vowel-final names from English; speaker
s of other languages may wish to use other consonant endings.
The implicit quantifier for name sumti of the form ``la'' followed by a name is
``su'o'', just as for ``la'' followed by a selbri.
13. Pro-sumti summary
The Lojban pro-sumti are the cmavo of selma'o KOhA. They fall into several class
es: personal, definable, quantificational, reflexive, back-counting, indefinite,
demonstrative, metalinguistic, relative, question. More details are given in Ch
apter 7; this section mostly duplicates information found there, but adds materi
al on the implicit quantifier of each pro-sumti.
The following examples illustrate each of the classes. Unless otherwise noted be
low, the implicit quantification for pro-sumti is ``ro'' (all). In the case of p
ro-sumti which refer to other sumti, the ``ro'' signifies `àll of those referre
d to by the other sumti'': thus it is possible to restrict, but not to extend, t
he quantification of the other sumti.
Personal pro-sumti (``mi'', ``do'', ``mi'o'', ``mi'a'', ``ma'a'', ``do'o'', ``ko
'') refer to the speaker or the listener or both, with or without third parties:
13.1) mi prami do
I love you.
The personal pro-sumti may be interpreted in context as either representing indi
viduals or masses, so the implicit quantifier may be ``pisu'o'' rather than ``ro
'': in particular, ``mi'o'', ``mi'a'', ``ma'a'', and ``do'o'' specifically repre
sent mass combinations of the individuals (you and I, I and others, you and I an
d others, you and others) that make them up.
Definable pro-sumti (``ko'a'', ``ko'e'', ``ko'i'', ``ko'o'', ``ko'u'', ``fo'a'',
``fo'e'', ``fo'i'', ``fo'o'', ``fo'u'') refer to whatever the speaker has expli
citly made them refer to. This reference is accomplished with ``goi'' (of selma'
o GOI), which means ``defined-as''.
13.2) le cribe goi ko'a cu xekri
.i ko'a citka le smacu
The bear defined-as it-1 is-black.
It-1 eats the mouse.
Quantificational pro-sumti (``da'', ``de'', ``di'') are used as variables in bri
di involving predicate logic:
13.3) ro da poi prenu
cu prami pa de poi finpe
All somethings-1 which-are persons
love one something-2 which-is a-fish.
All persons love a fish (each his/her own).
(This is not the same as `Àll persons love a certain fish''; the difference bet
ween the two is one of quantifier order.) The implicit quantification rules for
quantificational pro-sumti are particular to them, and are discussed in detail i
n Chapter 16. Roughly speaking, the quantifier is ``su'o'' (at least one) when t
he pro-sumti is first used, and ``ro'' (all) thereafter.
Reflexive pro-sumti (``vo'a'', ``vo'e'', ``vo'i'', ``vo'o'', ``vo'u'') refer to
the same referents as sumti filling other places in the same bridi, with the eff
ect that the same thing is referred to twice:
13.4) le cribe cu batci vo'a
The bear bites what-is-in-the-x1-place.
The bear bites itself.
Back-counting pro-sumti (``ri'', ``ra'', ``ru'') refer to the referents of previ
ous sumti counted backwards from the pro-sumti:
13.5) mi klama la frankfurt. ri
I go to-Frankfurt from-the-referent-of-the-last-sumti
I go from Frankfurt to Frankfurt (by some unstated route).
Indefinite pro-sumti (``zo'e'', ``zu'i'', ``zi'o'') refer to something which is
unspecified:
13.6) mi klama la frankfurt. zo'e zo'e zo'e
I go to-Frankfurt from-unspecified via-unspecified
by-means-unspecified.
The implicit quantifier for indefinite pro-sumti is, well, indefinite. It might
be ``ro'' (all) or ``su'o'' (at least one) or conceivably even ``no'' (none), th
ough ``no'' would require a very odd context indeed.
Demonstrative pro-sumti (``ti'', ``ta'', ``tu'') refer to things pointed at by t
he speaker, or when pointing is not possible, to things near or far from the spe
aker:
13.7) ko muvgau ti ta tu
you [imperative] move this-thing from-that-nearby-place
to-that-further-away-place
Move this from there to over there!
Metalinguistic pro-sumti (``di'u'', ``de'u'', ``da'u'', ``di'e'', ``de'e'', ``da
'e'', ``dei'', ``do'i'') refer to spoken or written utterances, either preceding
, following, or the same as the current utterance.
13.8) li re su'i re du li vo
.i la'e di'u jetnu
The-number two plus two equals the-number four.
The-referent-of the-previous-utterance is-true.
The implicit quantifier for metalinguistic pro-sumti is ``su'o'' (at least one),
because they are considered analogous to ``lo'' descriptions: they refer to thi
ngs which really are previous, current, or following utterances.
The relative pro-sumti (``ke'a'') is used within relative clauses (see Chapter 8
for a discussion of relative clauses) to refer to whatever sumti the relative c
lause is attached to.
13.9) mi viska le mlatu ku
poi zo'e zbasu ke'a
loi slasi
I see the cat(s)
such-that something-unspecified makes it/them (the cats)
from-a-mass-of plastic.
I see the cat(s) made of plastic.
The question pro-sumti (``ma'') is used to ask questions which request the liste
ner to supply a sumti which will make the question into a truth:
13.10) do klama ma
You go to-what-sumti?
Where are you going?
The implicit quantifier for the question pro-sumti is ``su'o'' (at least one), b
ecause the listener is only being asked to supply a single answer, not all corre
ct answers.
In addition, sequences of lerfu words (of selma'o BY and related selma'o) can al
so be used as definable pro-sumti.
14. Quotation summary
There are four kinds of quotation in Lojban: text quotation, words quotation, si
ngle-word quotation, non-Lojban quotation. More information is provided in Chapt
er 19.
Text quotations are preceded by ``lu'' and followed by ``li'u'', and are an esse
ntial part of the surrounding text: they must be grammatical Lojban texts.
14.1) mi cusku lu mi'e djan. li'u
I say the-text [quote] I-am John [unquote].
I say `Ì'm John''.
Words quotations are quotations of one or more Lojban words. The words need not
mean anything, but they must be morphologically valid so that the end of the quo
tation can be discerned.
14.2) mi cusku lo'u li mi le'u
I say the-words [quote] ``li mi'' [unquote].
I say ``li mi''.
Note that the translation of Example 14.2 does not translate the Lojban words, b
ecause they are not presumed to have any meaning (in fact, they are ungrammatica
l).
Single-word quotation quotes a single Lojban word. Compound cmavo are not allowe
d.
14.3) mi cusku zo .ai
I say the-word ``.ai''.
Non-Lojban quotation can quote anything, Lojban or not, even non-speech such as
drum talk, whistle words, music, or belching. A Lojban word which does not appea
r within the quotation is used before and after it to set it off from the surrou
nding Lojban text.
14.4) mi cusku zoi kuot. I'm John .kuot
I say `Ì'm John''.
The implicit quantifier for all types of quotation is ``su'o'' (at least one), b
ecause quotations are analogous to ``lo'' descriptions: they refer to things whi
ch actually are words or sequences of words.
15. Number summary
The sumti which refer to numbers consist of the cmavo ``li'' (of selma'o LI) fol
lowed by an arbitrary Lojban mekso, or mathematical expression. This can be anyt
hing from a simple number up to the most complicated combination of numbers, var
iables, operators, and so on. Much more information on numbers is given in Chapt
er 18. Here are a few examples of increasing complexity:
15.1) li vo
the-number four
4
15.2) li re su'i re
the-number two plus two
2 + 2
15.3) li .abu bopi'i xy. bote'a re
su'i by. bopi'i xy. su'i cy.
the-number a times x to-power 2
plus b times x plus c
ax2 + bx + c
An alternative to ``li'' is ``me'o'', also of selma'o LI. Number expressions beg
inning with ``me'o'' refer to the actual expression, rather than its value. Thus
Example 15.1 and Example 15.2 above have the same meaning, the number four, whe
reas
15.4) me'o vo
the-expression four
``4''
and
15.5) me'o re su'i re
the-expression two plus two
``2+2''
refer to different pieces of text.
The implicit quantifier for numbers and mathematical expressions is ``su'o'', be
cause these sumti are analogous to ``lo'' descriptions: they refer to things whi
ch actually are numbers or pieces of text. In the case of numbers (with ``li''),
this is a distinction without a difference, as there is only one number which i
s 4; but there are many texts ``4'', as many as there are documents in which tha
t numeral appears.
Chapter 7
Brevity Is The Soul Of Language: Pro-sumti And Pro-bridi
1. What are pro-sumti and pro-bridi? What are they for?
Speakers of Lojban, like speakers of other languages, require mechanisms of abbr
eviation. If every time we referred to something, we had to express a complete d
escription of it, life would be too short to say what we have to say. In English
, we have words called ``pronouns'' which allow us to replace nouns or noun phra
ses with shorter terms. An English with no pronouns might look something like th
is:
1.1) Speakers of Lojban, like speakers of other languages,
require mechanisms of abbreviation. If every time
speakers of Lojban referred to a thing to which
speakers of Lojban refer, speakers of Lojban had to
express a complete description of what speakers
of Lojban referred to, life would be too short to say
what speakers of Lojban have to say.
Speakers of this kind of English would get mightily sick of talking. Furthermore
, there are uses of pronouns in English which are independent of abbreviation. T
here is all the difference in the world between:
1.2) John picked up a stick and shook it.
and
1.3) John picked up a stick and shook a stick.
Example 1.3 does not imply that the two sticks are necessarily the same, whereas
Example 1.2 requires that they are.
In Lojban, we have sumti rather than nouns, so our equivalent of pronouns are ca
lled by the hybrid term ``pro-sumti''. A purely Lojban term would be ``sumti cma
vo'': all of the pro-sumti are cmavo belonging to selma'o KOhA. In exactly the s
ame way, Lojban has a group of cmavo (belonging to selma'o GOhA) which serve as
selbri or full bridi. These may be called ``pro-bridi'' or ``bridi cmavo''. This
chapter explains the uses of all the members of selma'o KOhA and GOhA. They fal
l into a number of groups, known as series: thus, in selma'o KOhA, we have among
others the mi-series, the ko'a-series, the da-series, and so on. In each sectio
n, a series of pro-sumti is explained, and if there is a corresponding series of
pro-bridi, it is explained and contrasted. Many pro-sumti series don't have pro
-bridi analogues, however.
A few technical terms: The term ``referent'' means the thing to which a pro-sumt
i (by extension, a pro-bridi) refers. If the speaker of a sentence is James, the
n the referent of the word `Ì'' is James. On the other hand, the term `ànteced
ent'' refers to a piece of language which a pro-sumti (or pro-bridi) implicitly
repeats. In
1.4) John loves himself
the antecedent of ``himself'' is ``John''; not the person, but a piece of text (
a name, in this case). John, the person, would be the referent of ``himself''. N
ot all pro-sumti or pro-bridi have antecedents, but all of them have referents.
2. Personal pro-sumti: the mi-series
mi KOhA mi-series I, me
do KOhA mi-series you
mi'o KOhA mi-series you and I
mi'a KOhA mi-series I and others,
we but not you
ma'a KOhA mi-series you and I and others
do'o KOhA mi-series you and others
ko KOhA mi-series you-imperative
The mi-series of pro-sumti refer to the speaker, the listener, and others in var
ious combinations. ``mi'' refers to the speaker and perhaps others for whom the
speaker speaks; it may be a Lojbanic mass. ``do'' refers to the listener or list
eners. Neither ``mi'' nor ``do'' is specific about the number of persons referre
d to; for example, the foreman of a jury may refer to the members of the jury as
``mi'', since in speaking officially he represents all of them.
The referents of ``mi'' and ``do'' are usually obvious from the context, but may
be assigned by the vocative words of selma'o COI, explained in Chapter 13. The
vocative ``mi'e'' assigns ``mi'', whereas all of the other vocatives assign ``do
''.
2.1) mi'e djan. doi frank.
mi cusku lu mi bajra li'u do
I-am John, O Frank,
I express [quote] I run [unquote] to-you
I am John, Frank; I tell you `Ì run''.
The cmavo ``mi'o'', ``mi'a'', ``ma'a'', and ``do'o'' express various combination
s of the speaker and/or the listener and/or other people:
``mi'o'' includes only the speaker and the listener but no one else; ``mi'a'
' includes the speaker and others but excludes the listener;
``do'o'' includes the listener and others but excludes the speaker;
``ma'a'' includes all three: speaker, listener, others.
All of these pro-sumti represent masses. For example, ``mi'o'' is the same as ``
mi joi do'', the mass of me and you considered jointly.
In English, ``we'' can mean ``mi'' or ``mi'o'' or ``mi'a'' or even ``ma'a'', and
English-speakers often suffer because they mistake ``mi'o'' for ``mi'a'':
2.2) We're going to the store.
Does this include the listener or not? There's no way to be sure.
Finally, the cmavo ``ko'' is logically equivalent to ``do''; its referent is the
listener. However, its use alters an assertion about the listener into a comman
d to the listener to make the assertion true:
2.3) do klama le zarci
You go to-the store.
becomes:
2.4) ko klama le zarci
You [imperative] go to-the store.
Make ``you go to the store'' true!
Go to the store!
In English, the subject of a command is omitted, but in Lojban, the word ``ko''
must be used. However, ``ko'' does not have to appear in the x1 place:
2.5) mi viska ko
I see you [imperative]
Make `Ì see you'' true!
Be seen by me!
In Example 2.5, it is necessary to make the verb passive in English in order to
convey the effect of ``ko'' in the x2 place. Indeed, ``ko'' does not even have t
o be a sumti of the main bridi:
2.6) mi viska le prenu poi prami ko
I see the person that loves you [imperative]
Make `Ì see the person that loves you'' true!
Be such that the person who loves you is seen by me!
Show me the person who loves you!
As mentioned in Section 1, some pro-sumti series have corresponding pro-bridi se
ries. However, there is no equivalent of the mi-series among pro-bridi, since a
person isn't a relationship.
3. Demonstrative pro-sumti: the ti-series
ti KOhA ti-series this here,
a nearby object
ta KOhA ti-series that there,
a medium-distant object
tu KOhA ti-series that yonder,
a far-distant object
It is often useful to refer to things by pointing to them or by some related non
-linguistic mechanism. In English, the words ``this'' and ``that'' serve this fu
nction among others: ``this'' refers to something pointed at that is near the sp
eaker, and ``that'' refers to something further away. The Lojban pro-sumti of th
e ti-series serve the same functions, but more narrowly. The cmavo ``ti'', ``ta'
', and ``tu'' provide only the pointing function of ``this'' and ``that''; they
are not used to refer to things that cannot be pointed at.
There are three pro-sumti of the ti-series rather than just two because it is of
ten useful to distinguish between objects that are at more than two different di
stances. Japanese, among other languages, regularly does this. Until the 16th ce
ntury, English did too; the pronoun ``that'' referred to something at a medium d
istance from the speaker, and the now-archaic pronoun ``yon'' to something far a
way.
In conversation, there is a special rule about ``ta'' and ``tu'' that is often h
elpful in interpreting them. When used contrastingly, ``ta'' refers to something
that is near the listener, whereas ``tu'' refers to something far from both spe
aker and listener. This makes for a parallelism between ``ti'' and ``mi'', and `
`ta'' and ``do'', that is convenient when pointing is not possible; for example,
when talking by telephone. In written text, on the other hand, the meaning of t
he ti-series is inherently vague; is the writer to be taken as pointing to somet
hing, and if so, to what? In all cases, what counts as ``near'' and ``far away''
is relative to the current situation.
It is important to distinguish between the English pronoun ``this'' and the Engl
ish adjective ``this'' as in ``this boat''. The latter is not represented in Loj
ban by ``ti'':
3.1) le ti bloti
the this boat
does not mean ``this boat'' but rather ``this one's boat'', ``the boat associate
d with this thing'', as explained in Chapter 8. A correct Lojban translation of
Example 3.1 is
3.2) le vi bloti
the here boat
the nearby boat
using a spatial tense before the selbri ``bloti'' to express that the boat is ne
ar the speaker. (Tenses are explained in full in Chapter 11.) Another correct tr
anslation would be:
3.3) ti noi bloti
this-thing which-incidentally is-a-boat
There are no demonstrative pro-bridi to correspond to the ti-series: you can't p
oint to a relationship.
4. Utterance pro-sumti: the di'u-series
di'u KOhA di'u-series the previous utterance
de'u KOhA di'u-series an earlier utterance
da'u KOhA di'u-series a much earlier utterance
di'e KOhA di'u-series the next utterance
de'e KOhA di'u-series a later utterance
da'e KOhA di'u-series a much later utterance
dei KOhA di'u-series this very utterance
do'i KOhA di'u-series some utterance
The cmavo of the di'u-series enable us to talk about things that have been, are
being, or will be said. In English, it is normal to use ``this'' and ``that'' fo
r this (indeed, the immediately preceding ``this'' is an example of such a usage
):
4.1) You don't like cats.
That is untrue.
Here ``that'' does not refer to something that can be pointed to, but to the pre
ceding sentence ``You don't like cats''. In Lojban, therefore, Example 4.1 is re
ndered:
4.2) do na nelci loi mlatu
.i di'u jitfa jufra
You not like the-mass-of cats.
The-previous-utterance is-a-false sentence..
Using ``ta'' instead of ``di'u'' would cause the listener to look around to see
what the speaker of the second sentence was physically pointing to.
As with ``ti'', ``ta'', and ``tu'', the cmavo of the di'u-series come in threes:
a close utterance, a medium-distance utterance, and a distant utterance, either
in the past or in the future. It turned out to be impossible to use the `ì''/`
à''/`ù'' vowel convention discussed in Section 3 without causing collisions wi
th other cmavo, and so the di'u-series has a unique `ì''/`è''/`à'' convention
in the first vowel of the cmavo.
Most references in speech are to the past (what has already been said), so ``di'
e'', ``de'e'', and ``da'e'' are not very useful when speaking. In writing, they
are frequently handy:
4.3) la saimn. cusku di'e
Simon expresses the-following-utterance.
Simon says:
Example 4.3 would typically be followed by a quotation. Note that although presu
mably the quotation is of something Simon has said in the past, the quotation ut
terance itself would appear after Example 4.3, and so ``di'e'' is appropriate.
The remaining two cmavo, ``dei'' and ``do'i'', refer respectively to the very ut
terance that the speaker is uttering, and to some vague or unspecified utterance
uttered by someone at some time:
4.4) dei jetnu jufra
This-utterance is-a-true sentence.
What I am saying (at this moment) is true.
4.5) do'i jetnu jufra
Some-utterance is-a-true sentence.
That's true (where ``that'' is not necessarily what
was just said).
The cmavo of the di'u-series have a meaning that is relative to the context. The
referent of ``dei'' in the current utterance is the same as the referent of ``d
i'u'' in the next utterance. The term `ùtterance'' is used rather than ``senten
ce'' because the amount of speech or written text referred to by any of these wo
rds is vague. Often, a single bridi is intended, but longer utterances may be th
us referred to.
Note one very common construction with ``di'u'' and the cmavo ``la'e'' (of selma
'o LAhE; see Chapter 6) which precedes a sumti and means ``the thing referred to
by (the sumti)'':
4.6) mi prami la djein.
.i mi nelci la'e di'u
I love Jane.
And I like the-referent-of the-last-utterance.
I love Jane, and I like that.
The effect of ``la'e di'u'' in Example 4.6 is that the speaker likes, not the pr
evious sentence, but rather the state of affairs referred to by the previous sen
tence, namely his loving Jane. This cmavo compound is often written as a single
word: ``la'edi'u''. It is important not to mix up ``di'u'' and ``la'edi'u'', or
the wrong meaning will generally result:
4.7) mi prami la djein.
.i mi nelci di'u
I love Jane.
And I like the-last-utterance.
says that the speaker likes one of his own sentences.
There are no pro-bridi corresponding to the di'u-series.
5. Assignable pro-sumti and pro-bridi: the ko'a-series and the broda-series
The following cmavo and gismu are discussed in this section:
ko'a KOhA ko'a-series it-1
ko'e KOhA ko'a-series it-2
ko'i KOhA ko'a-series it-3
ko'o KOhA ko'a-series it-4
ko'u KOhA ko'a-series it-5
fo'a KOhA ko'a-series it-6
fo'e KOhA ko'a-series it-7
fo'i KOhA ko'a-series it-8
fo'o KOhA ko'a-series it-9
fo'u KOhA ko'a-series it-10
broda BRIVLA broda-series is-thing-1
brode BRIVLA broda-series is-thing-2
brodi BRIVLA broda-series is-thing-3
brodo BRIVLA broda-series is-thing-4
brodu BRIVLA broda-series is-thing-5
goi GOI pro-sumti assignment
cei CEI pro-bridi assignment
The discussion of personal pro-sumti in Section 2 may have seemed incomplete. In
English, the personal pronouns include not only `Ì'' and ``you'' but also ``he
'', ``she'', `ìt'', and ``they''. Lojban does have equivalents of this latter g
roup: in fact, it has more of them than English does. However, they are organize
d and used very differently.
There are ten cmavo in the ko'a-series, and they may be assigned freely to any s
umti whatsoever. The English word ``he'' can refer only to males, ``she'' only t
o females (and ships and a few other things), `ìt'' only to inanimate things, a
nd ``they'' only to plurals; the cmavo of the ko'a-series have no restrictions a
t all. Therefore, it is almost impossible to guess from the context what ko'a-se
ries cmavo might refer to if they are just used freely:
5.1) la .alis. klama le zarci .i ko'a blanu
Alice goes-to the store. It-1 is-blue.
The English gloss `ìt-1'', plus knowledge about the real world, would tend to m
ake English-speakers believe that ``ko'a'' refers to the store; in other words,
that its antecedent is ``le zarci''. To a Lojbanist, however, ``la .alis.'' is j
ust as likely an antecedent, in which case Example 5.1 means that Alice, not the
store, is blue.
To avoid this pitfall, Lojban employs special syntax, using the cmavo ``goi'':
5.2) la .alis. klama le zarci
.i ko'a goi la .alis. cu blanu
Alice goes-to the store.
It-1, also-known-as Alice, is-blue.
Syntactically, ``goi la .alis.'' is a relative phrase (relative phrases are expl
ained in Chapter 8). Semantically, it says that ``ko'a'' and ``la .alis.'' refer
to the same thing, and furthermore that this is true because ``ko'a'' is being
defined as meaning ``la .alis.''. It is equally correct to say:
.i la .alis. goi ko'a cu blanu
Alice, also-known-as it-1, is-blue.
in other words, ``goi'' is symmetrical. There is a terminator, ``ge'u'' (of selm
a'o GEhU), which is almost always elidable. The details are in Chapter 8.
The afterthought form of ``goi'' shown in Example 5.2 and Example 5.3 is probabl
y most common in speech, where we do not know until part way through our utteran
ce that we will want to refer to Alice again. In writing, though, ``ko'a'' may b
e assigned at the point where Alice is first mentioned. An example of this foret
hought form of ``goi'' is:
5.4) la .alis. goi ko'a klama le zarci
.i ko'a cu blanu
Alice, also-known-as it-1, goes-to the store.
It-1 is-blue.
Again, ``ko'a goi la .alis.'' would have been entirely acceptable in Example 5.4
. This last form is reminiscent of legal jargon: ``The party of the first part,
hereafter known as Buyer, ... ''.
Just as the ko'a-series of pro-sumti allows a substitute for a sumti which is lo
ng or complex, or which for some other reason we do not want to repeat, so the b
roda-series of pro-bridi allows a substitute for a selbri or even a whole bridi:
5.5) ti slasi je mlatu bo cidja lante gacri cei broda
.i le crino broda cu barda
.i le xunre broda cu cmalu
These are plastic cat-food can covers, or thingies.
The green thingy is large.
The red thingy is small.
The pro-bridi ``broda'' has as its antecedent the selbri ``slasi je mlatu bo cid
ja lante gacri''. The cmavo ``cei'' performs the role of ``goi'' in assigning ``
broda'' to this long phrase, and ``broda'' can then be used just like any other
brivla. (In fact, ``broda'' and its relatives actually are brivla: they are gism
u in morphology, although they behave exactly like the members of selma'o GOhA.
The reasons for using gismu rather than cmavo are buried in the Loglan Project's
history.)
Note that pro-bridi are so called because, even though they have the grammar of
selbri, their antecedents are whole bridi. In the following rather contrived exa
mple, the antecedent of ``brode'' is the whole bridi ``mi klama le zarci'':
5.6) mi klama cei brode le zarci .i do brode
I go-to (which-is claim-1) the store. You claim-1
I go to the store. You, too.
In the second bridi, ``do brode'' means ``do klama le zarci'', because ``brode''
carries the x2 sumti of ``mi klama le zarci'' along with it. It also potentiall
y carries the x1 sumti as well, but the explicit x1 sumti ``do'' overrides the `
`mi'' of the antecedent bridi. (Similarly, any tense or negation that is present
in the antecedent is also carried, and can be overridden by explicit tense or n
egation cmavo on the pro-bridi.) These rules hold for all pro-bridi that have an
tecedents.
Another use of ``broda'' and its relatives, without assignment, is as ``sample g
ismu'':
5.7) broda ke brode brodi
a thing-1 type of ( thing-2 type-of thing-3 )
represents an abstract pattern, a certain kind of tanru. (Historically, this use
was the original one.)
As is explained in Chapter 17, the words for Lojban letters, belonging to selma'
o BY and certain related selma'o, are also usable as assignable pro-sumti. The m
ain difference between letter pro-sumti and ko'a-series pro-sumti is that, in th
e absence of an explicit assignment, letters are taken to refer to the most rece
nt name or description sumti beginning with the same letter:
5.8) mi viska le gerku .i gy. cusku zo arf.
I see the dog. D expresses the-word `Àrf!''.
The Lojban word ``gerku'' begins with ``g'', so the antecedent of ``gy.'', the c
mavo for the letter ``g'', must be ``le gerku''. In the English translation, we
use the same principle to refer to the dog as ``D''. Of course, in case of ambig
uity, ``goi'' can be used to make an explicit assignment.
Furthermore, ``goi'' can even be used to assign a name:
5.9) le ninmu goi la sam. cu klama le zarci
The woman also-known-as Sam goes to-the store.
The woman, whom I'll call Sam, goes to the store.
This usage does not imply that the woman's name is Sam, or even that the speaker
usually calls the woman ``Sam''. ``Sam'' is simply a name chosen, as if at rand
om, for use in the current context only.
6. Anaphoric pro-sumti and pro-bridi: the ri-series and the go'i-series
ri KOhA ri-series (repeats last sumti)
ra KOhA ri-series (repeats previous sumti)
ru KOhA ri-series (repeats long-ago sumti)
go'i GOhA go'i-series (repeats last bridi)
go'a GOhA go'i-series (repeats previous bridi)
go'u GOhA go'i-series (repeats long-ago bridi)
go'e GOhA go'i-series (repeats last-but-one bridi)
go'o GOhA go'i-series (repeats future bridi)
nei GOhA go'i-series (repeats current bridi)
no'a GOhA go'i-series (repeats outer bridi)
ra'o RAhO pro-cmavo update
The term `ànaphora'' literally means ``repetition'', but is used in linguistics
to refer to pronouns whose significance is the repetition of earlier words, nam
ely their antecedents. Lojban provides three pro-sumti anaphora, ``ri'', ``ra'',
and ``ru''; and three corresponding pro-bridi anaphora, ``go'i'', ``go'a'', and
``go'u''. These cmavo reveal the same vowel pattern as the ti-series, but the `
`distances'' referred to are not physical distances, but distances from the anap
horic cmavo to its antecedent.
The cmavo ``ri'' is the simplest of these; it has the same referent as the last
complete sumti appearing before the ``ri'':
6.1) la .alis. sipna le ri kumfa
Alice sleeps-in the of-[repeat last sumti] room.
Alice sleeps in her room.
The ``ri'' in Example 6.1 is equivalent to repeating the last sumti, which is ``
la .alis.'', so Example 6.1 is equivalent to:
6.2) la .alis. sipna le la .alis. kumfa
Alice sleeps-in the of-Alice room.
Alice sleeps in Alice's room.
Note that ``ri'' does not repeat ``le ri kumfa'', because that sumti is not yet
complete when ``ri'' appears. This prevents ``ri'' from getting entangled in par
adoxes of self-reference. (There are plenty of other ways to do that!) Note also
that sumti within other sumti, as in quotations, abstractions, and the like, ar
e counted in the order of their beginnings; thus a lower level sumti like ``la a
lis.'' in Example 6.2 is considered to be more recent than a higher level sumti
that contains it.
Certain sumti are ignored by ``ri''; specifically, most of the other cmavo of KO
hA, and the almost-grammatically-equivalent lerfu words of selma'o BY. It is sim
pler just to repeat these directly:
6.3) mi prami mi
I love me.
I love myself.
However, the cmavo of the ti-series can be picked up by ``ri'', because you migh
t have changed what you are pointing at, so repeating ``ti'' may not be effectiv
e. Likewise, ``ri'' itself (or rather its antecedent) can be repeated by a later
``ri''; in fact, a string of ``ri'' cmavo with no other intervening sumti alway
s all repeat the same sumti:
6.4) la djan. viska le tricu
.i ri se jadni
le ri jimca
John sees the tree.
[repeat last] is-adorned-by
the of-[repeat last] branch
John sees the tree. It is adorned by its branches.
Here the second ``ri'' has as antecedent the first ``ri'', which has as antecede
nt ``le tricu''. All three refer to the same thing: a tree.
To refer to the next-to-last sumti, the third-from-last sumti, and so on, ``ri''
may be subscripted (subscripts are explained in Chapter 19):
6.5) lo smuci .i lo forca .i la rik. pilno rixire
.i la .alis. pilno riximu
A spoon. A fork. Rick uses [repeat next-to-last].
Alice uses [repeat fifth-from-last].
Here ``rixire'', or ``ri-sub-2'', skips ``la rik.'' to reach ``lo forca''. In th
e same way, ``riximu'', or ``ri-sub-5'', skips ``la .alis.'', ``rixire'', ``la r
ik.'', and ``lo forca'' to reach ``lo smuci''. As can clearly be seen, this proc
edure is barely practicable in writing, and would break down totally in speech.
Therefore, the vaguer ``ra'' and ``ru'' are also provided. The cmavo ``ra'' repe
ats a recently used sumti, and ``ru'' one that was further back in the speech or
text. The use of ``ra'' and ``ru'' forces the listener to guess at the referent
, but makes life easier for the speaker. Can ``ra'' refer to the last sumti, lik
e ``ri''? The answer is no if ``ri'' has also been used. If ``ri'' has not been
used, then ``ra'' might be the last sumti. Likewise, if ``ra'' has been used, th
en any use of ``ru'' would repeat a sumti earlier than the one ``ra'' is repeati
ng. A more reasonable version of Example 6.5, but one that depends more on conte
xt, is:
6.6) lo smuci .i lo forca .i la rik. pilno ra
.i la .alis. pilno ru
A spoon. A fork. Rick uses [some previous thing].
Alice uses [some more remote thing].
In Example 6.6, the use of ``ra'' tells us that something other than ``la rik.''
is the antecedent; ``lo forca'' is the nearest sumti, so it is probably the ant
ecedent. Similarly, the antecedent of ``ru'' must be something even further back
in the utterance than ``lo forca'', and ``lo smuci'' is the obvious candidate.
The meaning of ``ri'' must be determined every time it is used. Since ``ra'' and
``ru'' are more vaguely defined, they may well retain the same meaning for a wh
ile, but the listener cannot count on this behavior. To make a permanent referen
ce to something repeated by ``ri'', ``ra'', or ``ru'', use ``goi'' and a ko'a-se
ries cmavo:
.i ri goi ko'a blanu
It-last-mentioned also-known-as it-1 is-blue.
allows the store to be referred to henceforth as ``ko'a'' without ambiguity. Exa
mple 6.7 is equivalent to Example 5.1 and eliminates any possibility of ``ko'a''
being interpreted by the listener as referring to Alice.
The cmavo ``go'i'', ``go'a'', and ``go'u'' follow exactly the same rules as ``ri
'', ``ra'', and ``ru'', except that they are pro-bridi, and therefore repeat bri
di, not sumti --- specifically, main sentence bridi. Any bridi that are embedded
within other bridi, such as relative clauses or abstractions, are not counted.
Like the cmavo of the broda-series, the cmavo of the go'i-series copy all sumti
with them. This makes ``go'i'' by itself convenient for answering a question aff
irmatively, or for repeating the last bridi, possibly with new sumti:
6.8) xu zo djan. cmene do
.i go'i
[True-false?] The-word ``John'' is-the-name of you?
[repeat last bridi].
Is John your name? Yes.
6.9) mi klama le zarci .i do go'i
I go-to the store. You [repeat last bridi].
I go to the store. You, too.
Note that Example 6.9 means the same as Example 5.6, but without the bother of a
ssigning an actual broda-series word to the first bridi. For long-term reference
, use ``go'i cei broda'' or the like, analogously to ``ri goi ko'a'' in Example
6.7.
The remaining four cmavo of the go'i-series are provided for convenience or for
achieving special effects. The cmavo ``go'e'' means the same as ``go'ixire'': it
repeats the last bridi but one. This is useful in conversation:
6.10) A: mi ba klama le zarci
B: mi nelci le si'o mi go'i
A: do go'e
A: I [future] go-to the store.
B: I like the concept-of I [repeat last bridi].
A: You [repeat last bridi but one].
A: I am going to the store.
B: I like the idea of my going.
A: You'll go, too.
Here B's sentence repeats A's within an abstraction (explained in Chapter 11): `
`le si'o mi go'i'' means ``le si'o mi klama le zarci''. Why must B use the word
``mi'' explicitly to replace the x1 of ``mi klama le zarci'', even though it loo
ks like ``mi'' is replacing ``mi''? Because B's ``mi'' refers to B, whereas A's
``mi'' refers to A. If B said:
6.11) mi nelci le si'o go'i
that would mean:
I like the idea of your going to the store.
The repetition implied by ``go'i'' is not literally by words, but by concepts. F
inally, A repeats her own sentence, but with the x1 changed to ``do'', meaning B
. Note that in Example 6.10, the tense ``ba'' (future time) is carried along by
both ``go'i'' and ``go'e''.
Descriptions based on go'i-series cmavo can be very useful for repeating specifi
c sumti of previous bridi:
6.12) le xekri mlatu cu klama le zarci
.i le go'i cu
cadzu le bisli
The black cat goes-to the store.
That-described-as-the-x1-place-of [repeat last bridi]
walks-on the ice.
The black cat goes to the store. It walks on the ice.
Here the ``go'i'' repeats ``le xekri mlatu cu klama le zarci'', and since ``le''
makes the x1 place into a description, and the x1 place of this bridi is ``le x
ekri mlatu'', ``le go'i'' means ``le xekri mlatu''.
The cmavo ``go'o'', ``nei'', and ``no'a'' have been little used so far. They rep
eat respectively some future bridi, the current bridi, and the bridi that enclos
es the current bridi (``no'a'', unlike the other members of the go'i- series, ca
n repeat non-sentence bridi). Here are a few examples:
6.13) mi nupre le nu mi go'o
.i ba dunda le djini le bersa
.i ba dunda le zdani le tixnu
I promise the event-of I [repeat future bridi]
[Future] give the money to-the son
[Future] give the house to-the daughter
I promise to do the following:
Give the money to my son.
Give the house to my daughter.
(Note: The Lojban does not contain an equivalent of the ``my'' in the colloquial
English; it leaves the fact that it is the speaker's son and daughter that are
referred to implicit. To make the fact explicit, use ``le bersa/tixnu be mi''.)
For good examples of ``nei'' and ``no'a'', we need nested bridi contexts:
6.14) mi se pluka le nu do pensi
le nu nei kei
pu le nu do zukte
I am-pleased-by the event-of (you think-about
(the event-of [main bridi])
before the-event of (your acting).
I am pleased that you thought about whether I
would be pleased (about ... ) before you acted.
6.15) mi ba klama ca le nu
do no'a
I [future] go [present] the event-of
you [repeats outer bridi]
I will go when you do.
Finally, ``ra'o'' is a cmavo that can be appended to any go'i-series cmavo, or i
ndeed any cmavo of selma'o GOhA, to signal that pro-sumti or pro-bridi cmavo in
the antecedent are to be repeated literally and reinterpreted in their new conte
xt. Normally, any pro-sumti used within the antecedent of the pro-bridi keep the
ir meanings intact. In the presence of ``ra'o'', however, their meanings must be
reinterpreted with reference to the new environment. If someone says to you:
6.16) mi ba lumci lemi karca
I will wash my car.
you might reply either:
6.17) mi go'i
I will wash your car.
or:
6.18) mi go'i ra'o
I will wash my car.
The ``ra'o'' forces the second ``mi'' from the original bridi to mean the new sp
eaker rather than the former speaker. This means that ``go'e ra'o'' would be an
acceptable alternative to ``do go'e'' in B's statement in Example 6.10.
The anaphoric pro-sumti of this section can be used in quotations, but never ref
er to any of the supporting text outside the quotation, since speakers presumabl
y do not know that they may be quoted by someone else.
However, a ``ri''-series or ``go'a''-series reference within a quotation can ref
er to something mentioned in an earlier quotation if the two quotations are clos
ely related in time and context. This allows a quotation to be broken up by narr
ative material without interfering with the pro-sumti within it. Here's an examp
le:
6.19) la djan. cusku lu mi klama le zarci li'u
.i la .alis. cusku lu mi go'i li'u
John says [quote] I go-to the store [unquote].
Alice says [quote] I [repeat] [unquote].
John says, `Ì am going to the store.''
Alice says, ``Me too.''
Of course, there is no problem with narrative material referring to something wi
thin a quotation: people who quote, unlike people who are quoted, are aware of w
hat they are doing.
7. Indefinite pro-sumti and pro-bridi: the zo'e-series and the co'e-series
zo'e KOhA zo'e-series the obvious value
zu'i KOhA zo'e-series the typical value
zi'o KOhA zo'e-series the nonexistent value
co'e GOhA co'e-series has the obvious relationship
The cmavo of the zo'e-series represent indefinite, unspecified sumti. The cmavo
``zo'e'' represents an elliptical value for this sumti place; it is the optional
spoken place holder when a sumti is skipped without being specified. Note that
the elliptical value is not always the typical value. The properties of ellipsis
lead to an elliptical sumti being defined as ``whatever I want it to mean but h
aven't bothered to figure out, or figure out how to express''.
The cmavo ``zu'i'', on the other hand, represents the typical value for this pla
ce of this bridi:
7.1) mi klama le bartu be le zdani
le nenri be le zdani
zu'i zu'i
I go to-the outside of the house
from-the inside of the house
[by-typical-route] [by-typical-means]
In Example 7.1, the first ``zu'i'' probably means something like ``by the door''
, and the second ``zu'i'' probably means something like `òn foot'', those being
the typical route and means for leaving a house. On the other hand, if you are
at the top of a high rise during a fire, neither ``zu'i'' is appropriate. It's a
lso common to use ``zu'i'' in ``by standard'' places.
Finally, the cmavo ``zi'o'' represents a value which does not even exist. When a
bridi fills one of its places with ``zi'o'', what is really meant is that the s
elbri has a place which is irrelevant to the true relationship the speaker wishe
s to express. For example, the place structure of ``zbasu'' is
actor x1 makes x2 from materials x3
Consider the sentence
Living things are made from cells.
This cannot be correctly expressed as:
7.2) loi jmive cu se zbasu [zo'e] fi loi selci
The-mass-of living-things is-made [by-something]
from the-mass-of cells
because the ``zo'e'', expressed or understood, in Example 7.2 indicates that the
re is still a ``maker'' in this relationship. We do not generally suppose, howev
er, that someone ``makes'' living things from cells. The best answer is probably
to find a different selbri, one which does not imply a ``maker'': however, an a
lternative strategy is to use ``zi'o'' to eliminate the maker place:
7.3) loi jmive cu se zbasu zi'o
loi selci
The-mass-of living-things is-made [without-maker]
from the-mass-of cells.
Note: The use of ``zi'o'' to block up, as it were, one place of a selbri actuall
y creates a new selbri with a different place structure. Consider the following
examples:
7.4) mi zbasu le dinju loi mudri
I make the building from-some-of-the-mass-of wood.
I make the building out of wood.
7.5) zi'o zbasu le dinju
loi mudri
[without-maker] makes the building
from-some-of-the-mass-of wood.
The building is made out of wood.
7.6) mi zbasu zi'o
loi mudri
I make [without-thing-made]
from-some-of-the-mass-of wood.
I build using wood.
7.7) mi zbasu loi mudri zi'o
I make the building [without-material].
I make the building.
If Example 7.4 is true, then Examples 7.5 through 7.7 must be true also. However
, Example 7.3 does not correspond to any sentence with three regular (non-``zi'o
'') sumti.
The pro-bridi ``co'e'' (which by itself constitutes the co'e-series of selma'o G
OhA) represents the elliptical selbri. Lojban grammar does not allow the speaker
to merely omit a selbri from a bridi, although any or all sumti may be freely o
mitted. Being vague about a relationship requires the use of ``co'e'' as a selbr
i place-holder:
7.8) mi troci le nu
mi co'e le vorme
I try the event-of
my [doing-the-obvious-action] to-the door.
I try the door.
The English version means, and the Lojban version probably means, that I try to
open the door, but the relationship of opening is not actually specified; the Lo
jbanic listener must guess it from context. Lojban, unlike English, makes it cle
ar that there is an implicit action that is not being expressed.
The form of ``co'e'' was chosen to resemble ``zo'e''; the cmavo ``do'e'' of selm
a'o BAI (see Chapter 9) also belongs to the same group of cmavo.
Note that ``do'i'', of the di'u-series, is also a kind of indefinite pro-sumti:
it is indefinite in referent, but is restricted to referring only to an utteranc
e.
8. Reflexive and reciprocal pro-sumti: the vo'a-series
vo'a KOhA vo'a-series x1 of this bridi
vo'e KOhA vo'a-series x2 of this bridi
vo'i KOhA vo'a-series x3 of this bridi
vo'o KOhA vo'a-series x4 of this bridi
vo'u KOhA vo'a-series x5 of this bridi
soi SOI reciprocity
se'u SEhU soi terminator
The cmavo of the vo'a-series are pro-sumti anaphora, like those of the ri-series
, but have a specific function. These cmavo refer to the other places of the sam
e bridi; the five of them represent up to five places. The same vo'a-series cmav
o mean different things in different bridi. Some examples:
8.1) mi lumci vo'a
I wash myself
8.2) mi klama le zarci vo'e
I go to the store from itself
[by some route unspecified].
To refer to places of neighboring bridi, constructions like ``le se go'i ku'' do
the job: this refers to the 2nd place of the previous main bridi, as explained
in Section 6.
The cmavo of the vo'a-series are also used with ``soi'' (of selma'o SOI) to prec
isely express reciprocity, which in English is imprecisely expressed with a disc
ursive phrase like ``vice versa'':
8.3) mi prami do
soi vo'a vo'e
I love you
[reciprocity] [x1 of this bridi]
[x2 of this bridi].
I love you and vice versa (swapping `Ì'' and ``you'').
The significance of ``soi vo'a vo'e'' is that the bridi is still true even if th
e x1 (specified by ``vo'a'') and the x2 (specified by ``vo'e'') places are inter
changed. If only a single sumti follows ``soi'', then the sumti immediately prec
eding ``soi'' is understood to be one of those involved:
8.4) mi prami do soi vo'a
I love you [reciprocity] [x1 of this bridi].
again involves the x1 and x2 places.
Of course, other places can be involved, and other sumti may be used in place of
vo'a-series cmavo, provided those other sumti can be reasonably understood as r
eferring to the same things mentioned in the bridi proper. Here are several exam
ples that mean the same thing:
8.5) mi bajra ti ta soi vo'e
mi bajra ti ta soi vo'e vo'i
soi vo'e vo'i mi bajra ti ta
I run to this from that and vice versa
(to that from this).
The elidable terminator for ``soi'' is ``se'u'' (selma'o SEhU), which is normall
y needed only if there is just one sumti after the ``soi'', and the ``soi'' cons
truction is not at the end of the bridi. Constructions using ``soi'' are free mo
difiers, and as such can go almost anywhere. Here is an example where ``se'u'' i
s required:
8.6) mi bajykla ti
soi vo'i se'u ta
I runningly-go to-this
[reciprocity] [x3 of this bridi] from-that
I run to this from that and vice versa.
9. sumti and bridi questions: ``ma'' and ``mo''
ma KOhA sumti question
mo GOhA bridi question
Lojban questions are more fully explained in Chapter 19, but ``ma'' and ``mo'' a
re listed in this chapter for completeness. The cmavo ``ma'' asks for a sumti to
make the bridi true:
9.1) do klama ma
You go to-what-destination?
The cmavo ``mo'', on the other hand, asks for a selbri which makes the question
bridi true. If the answer is a full bridi, then the arguments of the answer over
ride the arguments in the question, in the same manner as the go'i-series cmavo.
A simple example is:
9.2) do mo
What predicate is true as applied to you?
How are you?
What are you doing?
What are you?
Example 9.3 is a truly pregnant question that will have several meanings dependi
ng on context.
(One thing it probably does not mean is ``Who are you?'' in the sense ``What is
your name/identity?'', which is better expressed by:
9.3) ma cmene do
What sumti is-the-name-of you?
What is your name?
or even
9.4) doi ma
O [what sumti?]
which uses the vocative ``doi'' to address someone, and simultaneously asks who
the someone is.)
A further example of ``mo'':
9.5) lo mo prenu cu darxi do
.i barda
A [what selbri?] type-of person hit you?
(Observative:) A big thing.
Which person hit you? The big one.
When ``ma'' or ``mo'' is repeated, multiple questions are being asked simultaneo
usly:
9.6) ma djuno ma
[what sumti] knows [what sumti]?
Who knows what?
10. Relativized pro-sumti: ``ke'a''
ke'a KOhA relativized sumti
This pro-sumti is used in relative clauses (explained in Chapter 8) to indicate
how the sumti being relativized fits within the clause. For example:
10.1) mi catlu lo mlatu
poi [zo'e] zbasu
ke'a
lei slasi
I see a cat such-that
something-unspecified makes
the-thing-being-relativized [the cat]
from-some-mass-of plastic.
I see a cat made of plastic.
If ``ke'a'' were omitted from Example 10.1, it might be confused with:
10.2) mi catlu lo mlatu poi [ke'a]
zbasu lei slasi
I see a cat such-that the-thing-being-relativized
[the cat] makes a-mass-of plastic
I see a cat that makes plastic.
The anaphora cmavo ``ri'' cannot be used in place of ``ke'a'' in Example 10.1 an
d Example 10.2, because the relativized sumti is not yet complete when the ``ke'
a'' appears.
Note that ``ke'a'' is used only with relative clauses, and not with other embedd
ed bridi such as abstract descriptions. In the case of relative clauses within r
elative clauses, ``ke'a'' may be subscripted to make the difference clear (see C
hapter 8).
11. Abstraction focus pro-sumti: ``ce'u''
ce'u KOhA abstraction focus
The cmavo ``ce'u'' is used within abstraction bridi, particularly property abstr
actions introduced by the cmavo ``ka''. Abstractions, including the uses of ``ce
'u'', are discussed in full in Chapter 11.
In brief: Every property abstraction specifies a property of one of the sumti in
it; that sumti place is filled by using ``ce'u''. This convention enables us to
distinguish clearly between:
11.1) le ka ce'u gleki
the property-of (X being-happy)
the property of being happy
happiness
and
11.2) le ka gleki ce'u
the property-of (being-happy about-X)
the property of being that which
someone is happy about
12. Bound variable pro-sumti and pro-bridi: the da-series and the bu'a-series
da KOhA da-series something-1
de KOhA da-series something-2
di KOhA da-series something-3
bu'a GOhA bu'a-series some-predicate-1
bu'e GOhA bu'a-series some-predicate-2
bu'i GOhA bu'a-series some-predicate-3
Bound variables belong to the predicate-logic part of Lojban, and are listed her
e for completeness only. Their semantics is explained in Chapter 16. It is worth
mentioning that the Lojban translation of Example 1.2 is:
12.1) la djan. cu lafti
da poi grana ku'o
gi'e desygau da
John raised
something-1 which is-a-stick
and shake-did something-1
John picked up a stick and shook it.
13. Pro-sumti and pro-bridi cancelling
da'o DAhO cancel all pro-sumti/pro-bridi
How long does a pro-sumti or pro-bridi remain stable? In other words, once we kn
ow the referent of a pro-sumti or pro-bridi, how long can we be sure that future
uses of the same cmavo have the same referent? The answer to this question depe
nds on which series the cmavo belongs to.
Personal pro-sumti are stable until there is a change of speaker or listener, po
ssibly signaled by a vocative. Assignable pro-sumti and pro-bridi last indefinit
ely or until rebound with ``goi'' or ``cei''. Bound variable pro-sumti and pro-b
ridi also generally last until re-bound; details are available in Chapter 16.
Utterance pro-sumti are stable only within the utterance in which they appear; s
imilarly, reflexive pro-sumti are stable only within the bridi in which they app
ear; and ``ke'a'' is stable only within its relative clause. Anaphoric pro-sumti
and pro-bridi are stable only within narrow limits depending on the rules for t
he particular cmavo.
Demonstrative pro-sumti, indefinite pro-sumti and pro-bridi, and sumti and bridi
questions potentially change referents every time they are used.
However, there are ways to cancel all pro-sumti and pro-bridi, so that none of t
hem have known referents. (Some, such as ``mi'', will acquire the same referent
as soon as they are used again after the cancellation.) The simplest way to canc
el everything is with the cmavo ``da'o'' of selma'o DAhO, which is used solely f
or this purpose; it may appear anywhere, and has no effect on the grammar of tex
ts containing it. One use of ``da'o'' is when entering a conversation, to indica
te that one's pro-sumti assignments have nothing to do with any assignments alre
ady made by other participants in the conversation.
In addition, the cmavo ``ni'o'' and ``no'i'' of selma'o NIhO, which are used pri
marily to indicate shifts in topic, may also have the effect of canceling pro-su
mti and pro-bridi assignments, or of reinstating ones formerly in effect. More e
xplanations of NIhO can be found in Chapter 19.
14. The identity predicate: du
du GOhA identity
The cmavo ``du'' has the place structure:
x1 is identical with x2, x3, ...
and appears in selma'o GOhA for reasons of convenience: it is not a pro-bridi. `
`du'' serves as mathematical ``='', and outside mathematical contexts is used fo
r defining or identifying. Mathematical examples may be found in Chapter 18.
The main difference between
14.1) ko'a du le nanmu
it-1 is-identical-to the man
and
14.2) ko'a mintu le nanmu
it-1 is-the-same-as the man
is this defining nature. Example 14.1 presumes that the speaker is responding to
a request for information about what ``ko'a'' refers to, or that the speaker in
some way feels the need to define ``ko'a'' for later reference. A bridi with ``
du'' is an identity sentence, somewhat metalinguistically saying that all attach
ed sumti are representations for the same referent. There may be any number of s
umti associated with ``du'', and all are said to be identical.
Example 14.2, however, predicates; it is used to make a claim about the identity
of ``ko'a'', which presumably has been defined previously.
Note: ``du'' historically is derived from ``dunli'', but ``dunli'' has a third p
lace which ``du'' lacks: the standard of equality.
15. lujvo based on pro-sumti
There exist rafsi allocated to a few cmavo of selma'o KOhA, but they are rarely
used. (See Section 16 for a complete list.) The obvious way to use them is as in
ternal sumti, filling in an appropriate place of the gismu or lujvo to which the
y are attached; as such, they usually stand as the first rafsi in their lujvo.
Thus ``donta'a'', meaning ``you-talk'', would be interpreted as ``tavla be do'',
and would have the place structure
15.1) t1 talks to you about subject t3 in language t4
since t2 (the addressee) is already known to be ``do''.
On the other hand, the lujvo ``donma'o'', literally ``you-cmavo'', which means `
à second person personal pronoun'', would be interpreted as ``cmavo be zo do'',
and have the place structure:
15.2) c1 is a second person pronoun in language c4
since both the c2 place (the grammatical class) and the c3 place (the meaning) a
re obvious from the context ``do''.
An anticipated use of rafsi for cmavo in the ``fo'a'' series is to express terjv
o which can't be expressed in a convenient rafsi form, because they are too long
to express, or are formally inconvenient (fu'ivla, cmene, and so forth.) An exa
mple would be:
15.3) fo'a goi le kulnrsu,omi .i lo fo'arselsanga
x6 stands for Finnish-culture. An x6-song
Finally, lujvo involving ``zi'o'' are also possible, and are fully discussed in
Chapter 12. In brief, the convention is to use the rafsi for ``zi'o'' as a prefi
x immediately followed by the rafsi for the number of the place to be deleted. T
hus, if we consider a beverage (something drunk without considering who, if anyo
ne, drinks it) as a ``se pinxe be zi'o'', the lujvo corresponding to this is ``z
ilrelselpinxe'' (deleting the second place of ``se pinxe''). Deleting the x1 pla
ce in this fashion would move all remaining places up by one. This would mean th
at ``zilpavypinxe'' has the same place structure as ``zilrelselpinxe'', and ``lo
zilpavypinxe'', like ``lo zilrelselpinxe'', refers to a beverage, and not to a
non-existent drinker.
The pro-bridi ``co'e'', ``du'', and ``bu'a'' also have rafsi, which can be used
just as if they were gismu. The resulting lujvo have (except for ``du''-based lu
jvo) highly context-dependent meanings.
16. KOhA cmavo by series
mi-series: mi I (rafsi: ``mib'') do you (rafsi: ``don'' and ``doi'') mi'o yo
u and I mi'a I and others, we but not you ma'a you and I and others do'o you and
others ko you-imperative
ti-series: ti this here; something nearby (rafsi: ``tif'') ta that there; so
mething distant (rafsi: ``taz'') tu that yonder; something far distant (rafsi: `
`tuf'')
di'u-series: di'u the previous utterance de'u an earlier utterance da'u a mu
ch earlier utterance di'e the next utterance de'e a later utterance da'e a much
later utterance dei this very utterance do'i some utterance
ko'a-series: ko'a it-1; 1st assignable pro-sumti ko'e it-2; 2nd assignable p
ro-sumti ko'i it-3; 3rd assignable pro-sumti ko'o it-4; 4th assignable pro-sumti
ko'u it-5; 5th assignable pro-sumti fo'a it-6; 6th assignable pro-sumti (rafsi:
``fo'a'') fo'e it-7; 7th assignable pro-sumti (rafsi: ``fo'e'') fo'i it-8; 8th
assignable pro-sumti (rafsi: ``fo'i'') fo'o it-9; 9th assignable pro-sumti fo'u
it-10; 10th assignable pro-sumti
ri-series: ri (repeats the last sumti) ra (repeats a previous sumti) ru (rep
eats a long-ago sumti)
zo'e-series: zo'e the obvious value zu'i the typical value zi'o the nonexist
ent value (rafsi: ``zil'')
vo'a-series: vo'a x1 of this bridi vo'e x2 of this bridi vo'i x3 of this bri
di vo'o x4 of this bridi vo'u x5 of this bridi
da-series: da something-1 (rafsi: ``dav''/``dza'') de something-2 di somethi
ng-3
others: ke'a relativized sumti ma sumti question ce'u abstraction focus
17. GOhA and other pro-bridi by series
broda-series (not GOhA): broda is-1; 1st assignable pro-bridi brode is-2; 2n
d assignable pro-bridi brodi is-3; 3rd assignable pro-bridi brodo is-4; 4th assi
gnable pro-bridi brodu is-5; 5th assignable pro-bridi
go'i-series: go'i (repeats the last bridi) go'a (repeats a previous bridi) g
o'u (repeats a long-ago bridi) go'e (repeats the last-but-one bridi) go'o (repea
ts a future bridi) nei (repeats the current bridi) no'a (repeats the next outer
bridi)
bu'a-series: bu'a some-predicate-1 (rafsi: ``bul'') bu'e some-predicate-2 bu
'i some-predicate-3
others: co'e has the obvious relationship (rafsi: ``com''/``co'e'') mo bridi
question du identity: x1 is identical to x2, x3 ... (rafsi: ``dub''/``du'o'')
17. Other cmavo discussed in this chapter
goi GOI pro-sumti assignment (ko'a-series)
cei CEI pro-bridi assignment (broda-series)
ra'o RAhO pro-sumti/pro-bridi update
soi SOI reciprocity
se'u SEhU soi terminator
da'o DAhO cancel all pro-sumti/pro-bridi
Chapter 8
Relative Clauses, Which Make sumti Even More Complicated
1. What are you pointing at?
poi NOI restrictive relative clause introducer
ke'a GOhA relative pro-sumti
ku'o KUhO relative clause terminator
Let us think about the problem of communicating what it is that we are pointing
at when we are pointing at something. In Lojban, we can refer to what we are poi
nting at by using the pro-sumti ``ti'' if it is nearby, or ``ta'' if it is somew
hat further away, or ``tu'' if it is distant. (Pro-sumti are explained in full i
n Chapter 7.)
However, even with the assistance of a pointing finger, or pointing lips, or wha
tever may be appropriate in the local culture, it is often hard for a listener t
o tell just what is being pointed at. Suppose one is pointing at a person (in pa
rticular, in the direction of his or her face), and says:
1.1) ti cu barda
This-one is-big.
What is the referent of ``ti''? Is it the person? Or perhaps it is the person's
nose? Or even (for ``ti'' can be plural as well as singular, and mean ``these on
es'' as well as ``this one'') the pores on the person's nose?
To help solve this problem, Lojban uses a construction called a ``relative claus
e''. Relative clauses are usually attached to the end of sumti, but there are ot
her places where they can go as well, as explained later in this chapter. A rela
tive clause begins with a word of selma'o NOI, and ends with the elidable termin
ator ``ku'o'' (of selma'o KUhO). As you might suppose, ``noi'' is a cmavo of sel
ma'o NOI; however, first we will discuss the cmavo ``poi'', which also belongs t
o selma'o NOI.
In between the ``poi'' and the ``ku'o'' appears a full bridi, with the same synt
ax as any other bridi. Anywhere within the bridi of a relative clause, the pro-s
umti ``ke'a'' (of selma'o KOhA) may be used, and it stands for the sumti to whic
h the relative clause is attached (called the ``relativized sumti''). Here are s
ome examples before we go any further:
1.2) ti poi ke'a prenu ku'o cu barda
This-thing such-that( IT is-a-person ) is-large.
This thing which is a person is big.
This person is big.
1.3) ti poi ke'a nazbi ku'o cu barda
This-thing such-that( IT is-a-nose ) is-large.
This thing which is a nose is big.
This nose is big.
1.4) ti poi ke'a nazbi kapkevna ku'o
cu barda
This-thing such-that( IT is-a-nose-type-of skin-hole )
is-big.
These things which are nose-pores are big.
These nose-pores are big.
In the literal translations throughout this chapter, the word `ÌT'', capitalize
d, is used to represent the cmavo ``ke'a''. In each case, it serves to represent
the sumti (in Examples 1.2 through 1.4, the cmavo ``ti'') to which the relative
clause is attached.
Of course, there is no reason why ``ke'a'' needs to appear in the x1 place of a
relative clause bridi; it can appear in any place, or indeed even in a sub-bridi
within the relative clause bridi. Here are two more examples:
1.5) tu poi le mlatu pu lacpu ke'a ku'o
cu ratcu
That-distant-thing such-that( the cat [past] drags IT )
is-a-rat.
That thing which the cat dragged is a rat.
What the cat dragged is a rat.
1.6) ta poi mi djica le nu mi ponse ke'a [kei] ku'o
cu bloti
That-thing such-that( I desire the event-of( I own IT ) )
is-a-boat.
That thing that I want to own is a boat.
In Example 1.6, ``ke'a'' appears in an abstraction clause (abstractions are expl
ained in Chapter 11) within a relative clause.
Like any sumti, ``ke'a'' can be omitted. The usual presumption in that case is t
hat it then falls into the x1 place:
1.7) ti poi nazbi cu barda
This-thing which is-a-nose is-big.
almost certainly means the same thing as Example 1.3. However, ``ke'a'' can be o
mitted if it is clear to the listener that it belongs in some place other than x
1:
1.8) tu poi le mlatu pu lacpu cu ratcu
That-distant-thing which the cat drags is-a-rat
is equivalent to Example 1.4.
As stated before, ``ku'o'' is an elidable terminator, and in fact it is almost a
lways elidable. Throughout the rest of this chapter, ``ku'o'' will not be writte
n in any of the examples unless it is absolutely required: thus, Example 1.2 can
be written:
1.9) ti poi prenu cu barda
That which is-a-person is-big.
That person is big.
without any change in meaning. Note that ``poi'' is translated ``which'' rather
than ``such-that'' when ``ke'a'' has been omitted from the x1 place of the relat
ive clause bridi. The word ``which'' is used in English to introduce English rel
ative clauses: other words that can be used are ``who'' and ``that'', as in:
1.10) I saw a man who was going to the store.
and
1.11) The building that the school was located in is large.
In Example 1.10 the relative clause is ``who was going to the store'', and in Ex
ample 1.11 it is ``that the school was located in''. Sometimes ``who'', ``which'
', and ``that'' are used in literal translations in this chapter in order to mak
e them read more smoothly.
2. Incidental relative clauses
noi NOI incidental relative clause introducer
There are two basic kinds of relative clauses: restrictive relative clauses intr
oduced by ``poi'', and incidental (sometimes called simply ``non-restrictive'')
relative clauses introduced by ``noi''. The difference between restrictive and i
ncidental relative clauses is that restrictive clauses provide information that
is essential to identifying the referent of the sumti to which they are attached
, whereas incidental relative clauses provide additional information which is he
lpful to the listener but is not essential for identifying the referent of the s
umti. All of the examples in Section 1 are restrictive relative clauses: the inf
ormation in the relative clause is essential to identification. (The title of th
is chapter, though, uses an incidental relative clause.)
Consider the following examples:
2.1) le gerku poi blanu cu barda
The dog which is-blue is-large.
The dog which is blue is large.
2.2) le gerku noi blanu cu barda
The dog incidentally-which is-blue is-large.
The dog, which is blue, is large.
In Example 2.1, the information conveyed by ``poi blanu'' is essential to identi
fying the dog in question: it restricts the possible referents from dogs in gene
ral to dogs that are blue. This is why ``poi'' relative clauses are called restr
ictive. In Example 2.2, on the other hand, the dog which is referred to has pres
umably already been identified clearly, and the relative clause ``noi blanu'' ju
st provides additional information about it. (If in fact the dog hasn't been ide
ntified clearly, then the relative clause does not help identify it further.)
In English, the distinction between restrictive and incidental relative clauses
is expressed in writing by surrounding incidental, but not restrictive, clauses
with commas. These commas are functioning as parentheses, because incidental rel
ative clauses are essentially parenthetical. This distinction in punctuation is
represented in speech by a difference in tone of voice. In addition, English res
trictive relative clauses can be introduced by ``that'' as well as ``which'' and
``who'', whereas incidental relative clauses cannot begin with ``that''. Lojban
, however, always uses the cmavo ``poi'' and ``noi'' rather than punctuation or
intonation to make the distinction.
Here are more examples of incidental relative clauses:
2.3) mi noi jdice cu zvati
I who-incidentally am-a-judge am-at [some-place].
I, a judge, am present.
In this example, ``mi'' is already sufficiently restricted, and the additional i
nformation that I am a judge is being provided solely for the listener's edifica
tion.
2.4) xu do viska le mi karce noi blabi
[True?] You see my car incidentally-which is-white.
Do you see my car, which is white?
In Example 2.4, the speaker is presumed to have only one car, and is providing i
ncidental information that it is white. (Alternatively, he or she might have mor
e than one car, since ``le karce'' can be plural, in which case the incidental i
nformation is that each of them is white.) Contrast Example 2.5 with a restricti
ve relative clause:
2.5) xu do viska le mi karce poi blabi
[True?] You see my car which is-white.
Do you see my car that is white?
Do you see my white car?
Here the speaker probably has several cars, and is restricting the referent of t
he sumti ``le mi karce'' (and thereby the listener's attention) to the white one
only. Example 2.5 means much the same as Example 2.6, which does not use a rela
tive clause:
2.6) xu do viska le mi blabi karce
[True?] You see my white car.
Do you see my car, the white one?
So a restrictive relative clause attached to a description can often mean the sa
me as a description involving a tanru. However, ``blabi karce'', like all tanru,
is somewhat vague: in principle, it might refer to a car which carries white th
ings, or even express some more complicated concept involving whiteness and car-
ness; the restrictive relative clause of Example 2.5 can only refer to a car whi
ch is white, not to any more complex or extended concept.
3. Relative phrases
pe GOI restrictive association
po GOI restrictive possession
po'e GOI restrictive intrinsic possession
po'u GOI restrictive identification
ne GOI incidental association
no'u GOI incidental identification
ge'u GEhU relative phrase terminator
There are types of relative clauses (those which have a certain selbri) which ar
e frequently wanted in Lojban, and can be expressed using a shortcut called a re
lative phrase. Relative phrases are introduced by cmavo of selma'o GOI, and cons
ist of a GOI cmavo followed by a single sumti.
Here is an example of ``pe'', plus an equivalent sentence using a relative claus
e:
3.1) le stizu pe mi cu blanu
The chair associated-with me is-blue.
My chair is blue.
3.2) le stizu poi ke'a srana mi
cu blanu
The chair such-that( IT is-associated-with me)
is-blue.
In Example 3.1 and Example 3.2, the link between the chair and the speaker is of
the loosest kind.
Here is an example of ``po'':
3.3) le stizu po mi cu xunre
The chair specific-to me is red.
3.4) le stizu poi
ke'a se steci srana mi cu xunre
The chair such-that
(IT is-specifically associated-with me) is-red.
Example 3.3 and Example 3.4 contrast with Example 3.1 and Example 3.2: the chair
is more permanently connected with the speaker. A plausible (though not the onl
y possible) contrast between Example 3.1 and Example 3.3 is that ``pe mi'' would
be appropriate for a chair the speaker is currently sitting on (whether or not
the speaker owned that chair), and ``po mi'' for a chair owned by the speaker (w
hether or not he or she was currently occupying it).
As a result, the relationship expressed between two sumti by ``po'' is usually c
alled ``possession'', although it does not necessarily imply ownership, legal or
otherwise. The central concept is that of specificity (``steci'' in Lojban).
Here is an example of ``po'e'', as well as another example of ``po'':
3.5) le birka po'e mi cu spofu
The arm intrinsically-possessed-by me is-broken
3.6) le birka poi
jinzi ke se steci srana mi
cu spofu
The arm which
is-intrinsically (specifically associated-with) me
is-broken
3.7) le botpi po mi cu spofu
The bottle specific-to me is-broken
Example 3.5 and Example 3.6 on the one hand, and Example 3.7 on the other, illus
trate the contrast between two types of possession called `ìntrinsic'' and `èx
trinsic'', or sometimes `ìnalienable'' and `àlienable'', respectively. Somethi
ng is intrinsically (or inalienably) possessed by someone if the possession is p
art of the possessor, and cannot be changed without changing the possessor. In t
he case of Example 3.5, people are usually taken to intrinsically possess their
arms: even if an arm is cut off, it remains the arm of that person. (If the arm
is transplanted to another person, however, it becomes intrinsically possessed b
y the new user, though, so intrinsic possession is a matter of degree.)
By contrast, the bottle of Example 3.7 can be given away, or thrown away, or los
t, or stolen, so it is possessed extrinsically (alienably). The exact line betwe
en intrinsic and extrinsic possession is culturally dependent. The U.S. Declarat
ion of Independence speaks of the `ìnalienable rights'' of men, but just what t
hose rights are, and even whether the concept makes sense at all, varies from cu
lture to culture.
Note that Example 3.5 can also be expressed without a relative clause:
3.8) le birka be mi cu spofu
The arm of-body me is broken
reflecting the fact that the gismu ``birka'' has an x2 place representing the bo
dy to which the arm belongs. Many, but not all, cases of intrinsic possession ca
n be thus covered without using ``po'e'' by placing the possessor into the appro
priate place of the description selbri.
Here is an example of ``po'u'':
3.9) le gerku po'u le mi pendo cu cinba mi
The dog which-is my friend kisses me.
3.10) le gerku poi du le mi pendo cu cinba mi
The dog which = my friend kisses me.
The cmavo ``po'u'' does not represent possession at all, but rather identity. (N
ote that it means ``poi du'' and its form was chosen to suggest the relationship
.)
In Example 3.9, the use of ``po'u'' tells us that ``le gerku'' and ``le mi pendo
'' represent the same thing. Consider the contrast between Example 3.9 and:
3.11) le mi pendo po'u le gerku cu cinba mi
My friend which-is the dog kisses me.
The facts of the case are the same, but the listener's knowledge about the situa
tion may not be. In Example 3.9, the listener is presumed not to understand whic
h dog is meant by ``le gerku'', so the speaker adds a relative phrase clarifying
that it is the particular dog which is the speaker's friend.
Example 3.11, however, assumes that the listener does not know which of the spea
ker's friends is referred to, and specifies that it is the friend that is the do
g (which dog is taken to be obvious). Here is another example of the same contra
st:
3.12) le tcadu po'u la nu,iork
The city of New York [not another city].
3.13) la nu,iork po'u le tcadu
New York the city (not the state or some other New York)
The principle that the possessor and the possessed may change places applies to
all the GOI cmavo, and allows for the possibility of odd effects:
3.14) le kabri pe le mi pendo cu cmalu
The cup associated-with my friend is small.
My friend's cup is small
3.15) le mi pendo pe le kabri cu cmalu
My friend associated-with the cup is small.
My friend, the one with the cup, is small.
Example 3.14 is useful in a context which is about my friend, and states that hi
s or her cup is small, whereas Example 3.15 is useful in a context that is prima
rily about a certain cup, and makes a claim about ``my friend of the cup'', as o
pposed to some other friend of mine. Here the cup appears to ``possess'' the per
son! English can't even express this relationship with a possessive --- ``the cu
p's friend of mine'' looks like nonsense --- but Lojban has no trouble doing so.
Finally, the cmavo ``ne'' and ``no'u'' stand to ``pe'' and ``po'u'', respectivel
y, as ``noi'' does to ``poi'' --- they provide incidental information:
3.16) le blabi gerku ne mi cu batci do
The white dog, incidentally-associated-with me,
bites you.
The white dog, which is mine, bites you.
In Example 3.16, the white dog is already fully identified (after all, presumabl
y the listener know which dog bit him or her!). The fact that it is yours is mer
ely incidental to the main bridi claim.
Distinguishing between ``po'u'' and ``no'u'' can be a little tricky. Consider a
room with several men in it, one of whom is named Jim. If you don't know their n
ames, I might say:
3.17) le nanmu no'u la djim. cu terpemci
The man, incidentally-who-is Jim, is-a-poet.
The man, Jim, is a poet.
Here I am saying that one of the men is a poet, and incidentally telling you tha
t he is Jim. But if you do know the names, then
3.18) le nanmu po'u la djim. cu terpemci
The man who-is Jim is-a-poet.
The man, the one named Jim, is a poet.
is appropriate. Now I am using the fact that the man I am speaking of is Jim in
order to pick out which man I mean.
It is worth mentioning that English sometimes over-specifies possession from the
Lojban point of view (and the point of view of many other languages, including
ones closely related to English). The idiomatic English sentence
3.19) The man put his hands in his pockets.
seems strange to a French- or German-speaking person: whose pockets would he put
his hands into? and even odder, whose hands would he put into his pockets? In L
ojban, the sentence
3.20) le nanmu cu punji le xanci le daski
The man puts the hand at-locus-the pocket.
is very natural. Of course, if the man is in fact putting his hands into another
's pockets, or another's hands into his pockets, the fact can be specified.
Finally, the elidable terminator for GOI cmavo is ``ge'u'' of selma'o GEhU; it i
s almost never required. However, if a logical connective immediately follows a
sumti modified by a relative phrase, then an explicit ``ge'u'' is needed to allo
w the connective to affect the relativized sumti rather than the sumti of the re
lative phrase. (What about the cmavo after which selma'o GOI is named? It is dis
cussed in Chapter 7, as it is not semantically akin to the other kinds of relati
ve phrases, although the syntax is the same.)
4. Multiple relative clauses: ``zi'e''
zi'e ZIhE relative clause joiner
Sometimes it is necessary or useful to attach more than one relative clause to a
sumti. This is made possible in Lojban by the cmavo ``zi'e'' (of selma'o ZIhE),
which is used to join one or more relative clauses together into a single unit,
thus making them apply to the same sumti. For example:
4.1) le gerku poi blabi zi'e poi batci le nanmu cu klama
The dog which is white and which bites the man goes.
The most usual translation of ``zi'e'' in English is `ànd'', but ``zi'e'' is no
t really a logical connective: unlike most of the true logical connectives (whic
h are explained in Chapter 14), it cannot be converted into a logical connection
between sentences.
It is perfectly correct to use ``zi'e'' to connect relative clauses of different
kinds:
4.2) le gerku poi blabi zi'e noi
le mi pendo cu ponse ke'a cu klama
The dog that-is( white) and incidentally-such-that(
my friend owns IT) goes.
The dog that is white, which my friend owns,
is going.
In Example 4.2, the restrictive clause ``poi blabi'' specifies which dog is refe
rred to, but the incidental clause ``noi le mi pendo cu ponse'' is mere incident
al information: the listener is supposed to already have identified the dog from
the ``poi blabi''. Of course, the meaning (though not necessarily the emphasis)
is the same if the incidental clause appears first.
It is also possible to connect relative phrases with ``zi'e'', or a relative phr
ase with a relative clause:
4.3) le botpi po mi zi'e poi blanu cu spofu
The bottle specific-to me and which-is blue is-broken.
My blue bottle is broken.
Note that if the colloquial translation of Example 4.3 were ``My bottle, which i
s blue, is broken'', then ``noi'' rather than ``poi'' would have been correct in
the Lojban version, since that version of the English implies that you do not n
eed to know the bottle is blue. As written, Example 4.3 suggests that I probably
have more than one bottle, and the one in question needs to be picked out as th
e blue one.
4.4) mi ba zutse le stizu pe mi
zi'e po do zi'e poi xunre
I [future] sit-in the chair associated-with me and
specific-to you and which-is red.
I will sit in my chair (really yours), the red one.
Example 4.4 illustrates that more than two relative phrases or clauses can be co
nnected with ``zi'e''. It almost defies colloquial translation because of the ve
ry un-English contrast between ``pe mi'', implying that the chair is temporarily
connected with me, and ``po do'', implying that the chair has a more permanent
association with you. (Perhaps I am a guest in your house, in which case the cha
ir would naturally be your property.)
Here is another example, mixing a relative phrase and two relative clauses, a re
strictive one and a non-restrictive one:
4.5) mi ba citka le dembi pe mi
zi'e poi cpana le mi palta
zi'e noi do dunda ke'a mi
I [future] eat the beans associated-with me
and which are-upon my plate
and which-incidentally you gave IT to-me.
I'll eat my beans that are on my plate, the ones
you gave me.
5. Non-veridical relative clauses: ``voi''
voi NOI non-veridical relative clause introducer
There is another member of selma'o NOI which serves to introduce a third kind of
relative clause: ``voi''. Relative clauses introduced by ``voi'' are restrictiv
e, like those introduced by ``poi''. However, there is a fundamental difference
between ``poi'' and ``voi'' relative clauses. A ``poi'' relative clause is said
to be veridical, in the same sense that a description using ``lo'' or ``loi'' is
: it is essential to the interpretation that the bridi actually be true. For exa
mple:
5.1) le gerku poi blabi cu klama
The dog which is-white goes.
it must actually be true that the dog is white, or the sentence constitutes a mi
scommunication. If there is a white dog and a brown dog, and the speaker uses ``
le gerku poi blabi'' to refer to the brown dog, then the listener will not under
stand correctly. However,
5.2) le gerku voi blabi cu klama
the dog which-I-describe-as white goes
puts the listener on notice that the dog in question may not actually meet objec
tive standards (whatever they are) for being white: only the speaker can say exa
ctly what is meant by the term. In this way, ``voi'' is like ``le''; the speaker
's intention determines the meaning.
As a result, the following two sentences
5.3) le nanmu cu ninmu
That-which-I-describe-as a-man is-a-woman.
The ``guy'' is actually a gal.
5.4) ti voi nanmu cu ninmu
This-thing which-I-describe-as a-man is-a-woman.
mean essentially the same thing (except that Example 5.5 involves pointing thank
s to the use of ``ti'', whereas Example 5.4 doesn't), and neither one is self-co
ntradictory: it is perfectly all right to describe something as a man (although
perhaps confusing to the listener) even if it actually is a woman.
6. Relative clauses and descriptors
So far, this chapter has described the various kinds of relative clauses (includ
ing relative phrases). The list is now complete, and the rest of the chapter wil
l be concerned with the syntax of sumti that include relative clauses. So far, a
ll relative clauses have appeared directly after the sumti to which they are att
ached. This is the most common position (and originally the only one), but a var
iety of other placements are also possible which produce a variety of semantic e
ffects.
There are actually three places where a relative clause can be attached to a des
cription sumti: after the descriptor (``le'', ``lo'', or whatever), after the em
bedded selbri but before the elidable terminator (which is ``ku''), and after th
e ``ku''. The relative clauses attached to descriptors that we have seen have oc
cupied the second position. Thus Example 5.1, if written out with all elidable t
erminators, would appear as:
6.1) le gerku poi blabi ku'o ku cu klama vau
the( dog which( is-white ) ) goes.
The dog which is white is going.
Here ``ku'o'' is the terminator paired with ``poi'' and ``ku'' with ``le'', and
``vau'' is the terminator of the whole bridi.
When a simple descriptor using ``le'', like ``le gerku'', has a relative clause
attached, it is purely a matter of style and emphasis where the relative clause
should go. Therefore, the following examples are all equivalent in meaning to Ex
ample 6.1:
6.2) le poi blabi ku'o gerku cu klama
The such-that (it-is-white) dog goes.
6.3) le gerku ku poi blabi cu klama
The( dog ) which is-white goes.
Example 6.1 will seem most natural to speakers of languages like English, which
always puts relative clauses after the noun phrases they are attached to; Exampl
e 6.2, on the other hand, may seem more natural to Finnish or Chinese speakers,
who put the relative clause first. Note that in Example 6.2, the elidable termin
ator ``ku'o'' must appear, or the selbri of the relative clause (``blabi'') will
merge with the selbri of the description (``gerku''), resulting in an ungrammat
ical sentence. The purpose of the form appearing in Example 6.3 will be apparent
shortly.
As is explained in detail in Chapter 6, two different numbers (known as the `ìn
ner quantifier'' and the `òuter quantifier'') can be attached to a description.
The inner quantifier specifies how many things the descriptor refers to: it app
ears between the descriptor and the description selbri. The outer quantifier app
ears before the descriptor, and specifies how many of the things referred to by
the descriptor are involved in this particular bridi. In the following example,
6.4) re le mu prenu cu klama le zarci
Two-of the five persons go to-the market.
Two of the five people [that I have in mind]
are going to the market.
``mu'' is the inner quantifier and ``re'' is the outer quantifier. Now what is m
eant by attaching a relative clause to the sumti ``re le mu prenu''? Suppose the
relative clause is ``poi ninmu'' (meaning ``who are women''). Now the three pos
sible attachment points discussed previously take on significance.
6.5) re le poi ninmu ku'o mu prenu
cu klama le zarci
Two of the such-that([they] are-women )
five persons go to-the market.
Two women out of the five persons go to the market.
6.6) re le mu prenu poi ninmu [ku]
cu klama le zarci
Two of the (five persons which are-women)
go to-the market.
Two of the five women go to the market.
6.7) re le mu prenu ku poi ninmu
cu klama le zarci
(Two of the five persons ) which are-women
go to-the market.
Two women out of the five persons go to the market.
As the parentheses show, Example 6.6 means that all five of the persons are wome
n, whereas Example 6.7 means that the two who are going to the market are women.
How do we remember which is which? If the relative clause comes after the expli
cit ``ku'', as in Example 6.7, then the sumti as a whole is qualified by the rel
ative clause. If there is no ``ku'', or if the relative clause comes before an e
xplicit ``ku'', then the relative clause is understood to apply to everything wh
ich the underlying selbri applies to.
What about Example 6.5? By convention, it means the same as Example 6.7, and it
requires no ``ku'', but it does typically require a ``ku'o'' instead. Note that
the relative clause comes before the inner quantifier.
When ``le'' is the descriptor being used, and the sumti has no explicit outer qu
antifier, then the outer quantifier is understood to be ``ro'' (meaning `àll'')
, as is explained in Chapter 6. Thus ``le gerku'' is taken to mean `àll of the
things I refer to as dogs'', possibly all one of them. In that case, there is no
difference between a relative clause after the ``ku'' or before it. However, if
the descriptor is ``lo'', the difference is quite important:
6.8) lo prenu ku noi blabi
cu klama le zarci
(Some persons) incidentally-which are-white
go to-the market.
Some people, who are white, go to the market.
6.9) lo prenu noi blabi [ku]
cu klama le zarci
Some (persons incidentally-which are-white)
go to-the market.
Some of the people, who by the way are white,
go to the market.
Both Examples 6.8 and 6.9 tell us that one or more persons are going to the mark
et. However, they make very different incidental claims. Now, what does ``lo pre
nu noi blabi'' mean? Well, the default inner quantifier is ``ro'' (meaning `àll
''), and the default outer quantifier is ``su'o'' (meaning `àt least one''). Th
erefore, we must first take all persons, then choose at least one of them. That
one or more people will be going.
In Example 6.8, the relative clause described the sumti once the outer quantifie
r was applied: one or more people, who are white, are going. But in Example 6.9,
the relative clause actually describes the sumti before the outer quantificatio
n is applied, so that it ends up meaning ``First take all persons --- by the way
, they're all white''. But not all people are white, so the incidental claim bei
ng made here is false.
The safe strategy, therefore, is to always use ``ku'' when attaching a ``noi'' r
elative clause to a ``lo'' descriptor. Otherwise we may end up claiming far too
much.
When the descriptor is ``la'', indicating that what follows is a selbri used for
naming, then the positioning of relative clauses has a different significance.
A relative clause inside the ``ku'', whether before or after the selbri, is reck
oned part of the name; a relative clause outside the ``ku'' is not. Therefore,
6.10) mi viska la nanmu poi terpa le ke'a xirma [ku]
I see that-named( ``man which fears the of-IT horse'' ).
I see Man Afraid Of His Horse.
says that the speaker sees a person with a particular name, who does not necessa
rily fear any horses, whereas
6.11) mi viska la nanmu ku poi terpa le ke'a xirma.
I see that-named( ``Man'' ) which fears the of-IT horse.
I see the person named ``Man'' who is afraid of his horse.
refers to one (or more) of those named ``Man'', namely the one(s) who are afraid
of their horses.
Finally, so-called indefinite sumti like ``re karce'', which means almost the sa
me as ``re lo karce'' (which in turn means the same as ``re lo ro karce''), can
have relative clauses attached; these are taken to be of the outside-the-``ku''
variety. Here is an example:
6.12) mi ponse re karce [ku] poi xekri
I possess two cars which-are black.
The restrictive relative clause only affects the two cars being affected by the
main bridi, not all cars that exist. It is ungrammatical to try to place a relat
ive clause within an indefinite sumti (that is, before an explicitly expressed t
erminating ``ku''.) Use an explicit ``lo'' instead.
7. Possessive sumti
In Examples 2.4 through 2.6, the sumti ``le mi karce'' appears, glossed as ``my
car''. Although it might not seem so, this sumti actually contains a relative ph
rase. When a sumti appears between a descriptor and its description selbri, it i
s actually a ``pe'' relative phrase. So
7.1) le mi karce cu xunre
my car is-red.
and
7.2) le pe mi karce cu xunre
the (associated-with me) car is-red.
mean exactly the same thing. Furthermore, since there are no special considerati
ons of quantifiers here,
7.3) le karce pe mi cu xunre
The car associated-with me is-red
means the same thing as well. A sumti like the one in Example 7.1 is called a ``
possessive sumti''. Of course, it does not really indicate possession in the sen
se of ownership, but like ``pe'' relative phrases, indicates only weak associati
on; you can say ``le mi karce'' even if you've only borrowed it for the night. (
In English, ``my car'' usually means ``le karce po mi'', but we do not have the
same sense of possession in ``my seat on the bus''; Lojban simply makes the weak
er sense the standard one.) The inner sumti, ``mi'' in Example 7.1, is correspon
dingly called the ``possessor sumti''.
Historically, possessive sumti existed before any other kind of relative phrase
or clause, and were retained when the machinery of relative phrases and clauses
as detailed in this chapter so far was slowly built up. When preposed relative c
lauses of the Example 7.2 type were devised, possessive sumti were most easily v
iewed as a special case of them.
Although any sumti, however complex, can appear in a full-fledged relative phras
e, only simple sumti can appear as possessor sumti, without a ``pe''. Roughly sp
eaking, the legal possessor sumti are: pro-sumti, quotations, names and descript
ions, and numbers. In addition, the possessor sumti may not be preceded by a qua
ntifier, as such a form would be interpreted as the unusual ``descriptor + quant
ifier + sumti'' type of description. All these sumti forms are explained in full
in Chapter 6.
Here is an example of a description used in a possessive sumti:
7.4) le le nanmu ku karce cu blanu
The (associated-with-the man) car is blue.
The man's car is blue.
Note the explicit ``ku'' at the end of the possessor sumti,

which prevents the selbri of the possessor sumti from merging
with the selbri of the main description sumti. Because of the
need for this ``ku'', the most common kind of possessor sumti
are pro-sumti, especially personal pro-sumti, which require no
elidable terminator. Descriptions are more likely to be attached
with relative phrases.
And here is a number used as a possessor sumti:
7.5) le li mu jdice se bende
The of-the-number-five judging team-member
Juror number 5
which is not quite the same as ``the fifth juror''; it simply indicates a weak a
ssociation between the particular juror and the number 5.
A possessive sumti may also have regular relative clauses attached to it. This w
ould need no comment if it were not for the following special rule: a relative c
lause immediately following the possessor sumti is understood to affect the poss
essor sumti, not the possessive. For example:
7.6) le mi noi sipna vau karce
cu na klama
The of-me incidentally-which( is-sleeping ) car
isn't going.
means that my car isn't going; the incidental claim of ``noi sipna'' applies to
me, not my car, however. If I wanted to say that the car is sleeping (whatever t
hat might mean) I would need:
7.7) le mi karce poi sipna cu na klama
The of-me car which sleeps isn't going.
Note that Example 7.6 uses ``vau'' rather than ``ku'o'' at the end of the relati
ve clause: this terminator ends every simple bridi and is almost always elidable
; in this case, though, it is a syllable shorter than the equally valid alternat
ive, ``ku'o''.
8. Relative clauses and complex sumti: ``vu'o''
vu'o VUhO relative clause attacher
Normally, relative clauses attach only to simple sumti or parts of sumti: pro-su
mti, names and descriptions, pure numbers, and quotations. An example of a relat
ive clause attached to a pure number is:
8.1) li pai noi na'e
frinu namcu
The-number pi, incidentally-which
is-a-non- fraction number
The irrational number pi
And here is an incidental relative clause attached to a quotation:
8.2) lu mi klama le zarci li'u
noi mi cusku ke'a cu jufra
[quote] I go to-the market [unquote]
incidentally-which( I express IT) is-a-sentence.
`Ì'm going to the market'', which I'd said, is a sentence.
which may serve to identify the author of the quotation or some other relevant,
but subsidiary, fact about it. All such relative clauses appear only after the s
imple sumti, never before it.
In addition, sumti with attached sumti qualifiers of selma'o LAhE or NAhE+BO (wh
ich are explained in detail in Chapter 6) can have a relative clause appearing a
fter the qualifier and before the qualified sumti, as in:
8.3) la'e poi tolcitno vau
lu le xunre cmaxirma li'u
cu zvati le vu kumfa
A-referent-of (which is-old)
[quote] The Red Small-horse [unquote]
is-at the [far distance] room.
An old ``The Red Pony'' is in the far room.
Example 8.3 is a bit complex, and may need some picking apart. The quotation ``l
u le xunre cmaxirma li'u'' means the string of words ``The Red Pony''. If the ``
la'e'' at the beginning of the sentence were omitted, Example 8.3 would claim th
at a certain string of words is in a room distant from the speaker. But obviousl
y a string of words can't be in a room! The effect of the ``la'e'' is to modify
the sumti so that it refers not to the words themselves, but to the referent of
those words, a novel by John Steinbeck (presumably in Lojban translation). The p
articular copy of ``The Red Pony'' is identified by the restrictive relative cla
use. Example 8.3 means exactly the same as:
8.4) la'e lu le xunre cmaxirma li'u lu'u
poi to'ercitno cu zvati le vu kumfa
A-referent-of ([quote] The Red Small-horse [unquote])
which is-old is-at the [far distance] room.
and the two sentences can be considered stylistic variants. Note the required ``
lu'u'' terminator, which prevents the relative clause from attaching to the quot
ation itself: we do not wish to refer to an old quotation!
Sometimes, however, it is important to make a relative clause apply to the whole
of a more complex sumti, one which involves logical or non-logical connection (
explained in Chapter 14). For example,
8.5) la frank. .e la djordj. noi nanmu
cu klama le zdani
Frank and George incidentally-who is-a-man
go to-the house.
Frank and George, who is a man, go to the house.
The incidental claim in Example 8.5 is not that Frank and George are men, but on
ly that George is a man, because the incidental relative clause attaches only to
``la djordj'', the immediately preceding simple sumti.
To make a relative clause attach to both parts of the logically connected sumti
in Example 8.5, a new cmavo is needed, ``vu'o'' (of selma'o VUhO). It is placed
between the sumti and the relative clause, and extends the sphere of influence o
f that relative clause to the entire preceding sumti, including however many log
ical or non-logical connectives there may be.
8.6) la frank. .e la djordj. vu'o noi nanmu
cu klama le zdani
Frank and George incidentally-who are-men
go to-the house.
Frank and George, who are men, go to the house.
The presence of ``vu'o'' here means that the relative clause ``noi nanmu'' exten
ds to the entire logically connected sumti ``la frank. .e la djordj.''; in other
words, both Frank and George are claimed to be men, as the colloquial translati
on shows.
English is able to resolve the distinction correctly in the case of Example 8.5
and Example 8.6 by making use of number: ``who is'' rather than ``who are''. Loj
ban doesn't distinguish between singular and plural verbs: ``nanmu'' can mean ``
is a man'' or `àre men'', so another means is required. Furthermore, Lojban's m
echanism works correctly in general: if ``nanmu'' (meaning `ìs-a-man'') were re
placed with ``pu bajra'' (``ran''), English would have to make the distinction s
ome other way:
8.7) la frank. .e la djordj. noi pu bajra
cu klama le zdani
Frank and (George who [past] runs)
go to-the house.
Frank and George, who ran, go to the house.
8.8) la frank. .e la djordj. vu'o noi pu bajra
cu klama le zdani
(Frank and George) who [past] runs
go to-the house.
Frank and George, who ran, go to the house.
In spoken English, tone of voice would serve; in written English, one or both se
ntences would need rewriting.
9. Relative clauses in vocative phrases
Vocative phrases are explained in more detail in Chapter 6. Briefly, they are a
method of indicating who a sentence or discourse is addressed to: of identifying
the intended listener. They take three general forms, all beginning with cmavo
from selma'o COI or DOI (called ``vocative words''; there can be one or many), f
ollowed by either a name, a selbri, or a sumti. Here are three examples:
9.1) coi. frank.
Hello, Frank.
9.2) co'o xirma
Goodbye, horse.
9.3) fi'i la frank. .e la djordj.
Welcome, Frank and George!
Note that Example 9.2 says farewell to something which doesn't really have to be
a horse, something that the speaker simply thinks of as being a horse, or even
might be something (a person, for example) who is named ``Horse''. In a sense, E
xample 9.2 is ambiguous between ``co'o le xirma'' and ``co'o la xirma'', a relat
ively safe semantic ambiguity, since names are ambiguous in general: saying ``Ge
orge'' doesn't distinguish between the possible Georges.
Similarly, Example 9.1 can be thought of as an abbreviation of:
9.4) coi la frank.
Hello, the-one-named ``Frank''.
Syntactically, vocative phrases are a kind of free modifier, and can appear in m
any places in Lojban text, generally at the beginning or end of some complete co
nstruct; or, as in Examples 9.1 to 9.3, as sentences by themselves.
As can be seen, the form of vocative phrases is similar to that of sumti, and as
you might expect, vocative phrases allow relative clauses in various places. In
vocative phrases which are simple names (after the vocative words), any relativ
e clauses must come just after the names:
9.5) coi. frank. poi xunre se bende
Hello, Frank who is-a-red team-member
Hello, Frank from the Red Team!
The restrictive relative clause in Example 9.5 suggests that there is some other
Frank (perhaps on the Green Team) from whom this Frank, the one the speaker is
greeting, must be distinguished.
A vocative phrase containing a selbri can have relative clauses either before or
after the selbri; both forms have the same meaning. Here are some examples:
9.6) co'o poi mi zvati ke'a ku'o xirma
Goodbye, such-that( I am-at IT ) horse
Goodbye, horse where I am!
9.7) co'o xirma poi mi zvati
Goodbye, horse such-that( I am-at-it).
Example 9.6 and Example 9.7 mean the same thing. In fact, relative clauses can a
ppear in both places.
10. Relative clauses within relative clauses
For the most part, these are straightforward and uncomplicated: a sumti that is
part of a relative clause bridi may itself be modified by a relative clause:
10.1) le prenu poi zvati le kumfa poi blanu cu masno
The person who is-in the room which is-blue is-slow.
However, an ambiguity can exist if ``ke'a'' is used in a relative clause within
a relative clause: does it refer to the outermost sumti, or to the sumti within
the outer relative clause to which the inner relative clause is attached? The la
tter. To refer to the former, use a subscript on ``ke'a'':
10.2) le prenu poi zvati le kumfa
poi ke'axire zbasu ke'a cu masno
The person who is-in the room
which IT-sub-2 built IT is-slow.
The person who is in the room which he built is slow.
Here, the meaning of `ÌT-sub-2'' is that sumti attached to the second relative
clause, counting from the innermost, is used. Therefore, ``ke'axipa'' (IT-sub-1)
means the same as plain ``ke'a''.
Alternatively, you can use a prenex (explained in full in Chapter 16), which is
syntactically a series of sumti followed by the special cmavo ``zo'u'', prefixed
to the relative clause bridi:
10.3) le prenu poi ke'a goi ko'a zo'u ko'a zvati le kumfa
poi ke'a goi ko'e zo'u ko'a zbasu ke'a cu masno
The man who (IT = it1 : it1 is-in the room
which (IT = it2 : it1 built it2) is-slow.
Example 10.3 is more verbose than Example 10.2, but may be clearer, since it exp
licitly spells out the two ``ke'a'' cmavo, each on its own level, and assigns th
em to the assignable cmavo ``ko'a'' and ``ko'e'' (explained in Chapter ).
11. Index of relative clause cmavo
Relative clause introducers (selma'o NOI):
noi incidental clauses
poi restrictive clauses
voi restrictive clauses (non-veridical)
Relative phrase introducers (selma'o GOI):
goi pro-sumti assignment
pe restrictive association
ne incidental association
po extrinsic (alienable) possession
po'e intrinsic (inalienable) possession
po'u restrictive identification
no'u incidental identification
Relativizing pro-sumti (selma'o KOhA):
ke'a pro-sumti for relativized sumti
Relative clause joiner (selma'o ZIhE)
zi'e joins relative clauses applying to
a single sumti
Relative clause associator (selma'o VUhO)
vu'o causes relative clauses to apply to
all of a complex sumti
Elidable terminators (each its own selma'o)
ku'o relative clause elidable terminator
ge'u relative phrase elidable terminator
Chapter 9
To Boston Via The Road Go I, With An Excursion Into The Land Of Modals
1. Introductory
The basic type of Lojban sentence is the bridi: a claim by the speaker that cert
ain objects are related in a certain way. The objects are expressed by Lojban gr
ammatical forms called ``sumti''; the relationship is expressed by the Lojban gr
ammatical form called a ``selbri''.
The sumti are not randomly associated with the selbri, but according to a system
atic pattern known as the ``place structure'' of the selbri. This chapter descri
bes the various ways in which the place structure of Lojban bridi is expressed a
nd by which it can be manipulated. The place structure of a selbri is a sequence
of empty slots into which the sumti associated with that selbri are placed. The
sumti are said to occupy the places of a selbri.
For our present purposes, every selbri is assumed to have a well-known place str
ucture. If the selbri is a brivla, the place structure can be looked up in a dic
tionary (or, if the brivla is a lujvo not in any dictionary, inferred from the p
rinciples of lujvo construction as explained in Chapter 12); if the selbri is a
tanru, the place structure is the same as that of the final component in the tan
ru.
The stock example of a place structure is that of the gismu ``klama'':
x1 comes/goes to destination x2 from origin x3 via route x4 employing means
of transport x5.
The ``x1 ... x5'' indicates that ``klama'' is a five-place predicate, and show t
he natural order (as assigned by the language engineers) of those places: agent,
destination, origin, route, means.
The place structures of brivla are not absolutely stable aspects of the language
. The work done so far has attempted to establish a basic place structure on whi
ch all users can, at first, agree. In the light of actual experience with the in
dividual selbri of the language, there will inevitably be some degree of change
to the brivla place structures.
2. Standard bridi form: ``cu''
cu CU prefixed selbri separator
The most usual way of constructing a bridi from a selbri such as ``klama'' and a
n appropriate number of sumti is to place the sumti intended for the x1 place be
fore the selbri, and all the other sumti in order after the selbri, thus:
2.1) mi cu klama la bastn. la .atlantas.
le dargu le karce
I go to-Boston from-Atlanta
via-the road using-the car.
Here the sumti are assigned to the places as follows:
x1 agent mi
x2 destination la bastn.
x3 origin la .atlantas.
x4 route le dargu
x5 means le karce
(Note: Many of the examples in the rest of this chapter will turn out to have th
e same meaning as Example 2.1; this fact will not be reiterated.)
This ordering, with the x1 place before the selbri and all other places in natur
al order after the selbri, is called ``standard bridi form'', and is found in th
e bulk of Lojban bridi, whether used in main sentences or in subordinate clauses
. However, many other forms are possible, such as:
2.2) mi la bastn. la .atlantas. le dargu
le karce cu klama
I, to-Boston from-Atlanta via-the road
using-the car, go.
Here the selbri is at the end; all the sumti are placed before it. However, the
same order is maintained.
Similarly, we may split up the sumti, putting some before the selbri and others
after it:
2.3) mi la bastn. cu klama la .atlantas. le dargu le karce
I to-Boston go from-Atlanta via-the road using-the car.
All of the variant forms in this section and following sections can be used to p
lace emphasis on the part or parts which have been moved out of their standard p
laces. Thus, Example 2.2 places emphasis on the selbri (because it is at the end
); Example 2.3 emphasizes ``la bastn.'', because it has been moved before the se
lbri. Moving more than one component may dilute this emphasis. It is permitted,
but no stylistic significance has yet been established for drastic reordering.
In all these examples, the cmavo ``cu'' (belonging to selma'o CU) is used to sep
arate the selbri from any preceding sumti. It is never absolutely necessary to u
se ``cu''. However, providing it helps the reader or listener to locate the selb
ri quickly, and may make it possible to place a complex sumti just before the se
lbri, allowing the speaker to omit elidable terminators, possibly a whole stream
of them, that would otherwise be necessary.
The general rule, then, is that the selbri may occur anywhere in the bridi as lo
ng as the sumti maintain their order. The only exception (and it is an important
one) is that if the selbri appears first, the x1 sumti is taken to have been om
itted:
2.4) klama la bastn. la .atlantas. le dargu le karce
A-goer to-Boston from-Atlanta via-the road using-the car.
Goes to-Boston from-Atlanta via-the road using-the car.
Look: a goer to Boston from Atlanta via the road
using the car!
Here the x1 place is empty: the listener must guess from context who is going to
Boston. In Example 2.4, ``klama'' is glossed `à goer'' rather than ``go'' beca
use ``Go'' at the beginning of an English sentence would suggest a command: ``Go
to Boston!''. Example 2.4 is not a command, simply a normal statement with the
x1 place unspecified, causing the emphasis to fall on the selbri ``klama''. Such
a bridi, with empty x1, is called an `òbservative'', because it usually calls
on the listener to observe something in the environment which would belong in th
e x1 place. The third translation above shows this observative nature. Sometimes
it is the relationship itself which the listener is asked to observe.
(There is a way to both provide a sumti for the x1 place and put the selbri firs
t in the bridi: see Example 3.7.)
Suppose the speaker desires to omit a place other than the x1 place? (Presumably
it is obvious or, for one reason or another, not worth saying.) Places at the e
nd may simply be dropped:
2.5) mi klama la bastn. la .atlantas.
I go to-Boston from-Atlanta (via an unspecified route,
using an unspecified means).
Example 2.5 has empty x4 and x5 places: the speaker does not specify the route o
r the means of transport. However, simple omission will not work for a place whe
n the places around it are to be specified: in
2.6) mi klama la bastn. la .atlantas. le karce
I go to-Boston from-Atlanta via-the car.
``le karce'' occupies the x4 place, and therefore Example 2.6 means:
I go to Boston from Atlanta, using the car as a route.
This is nonsense, since a car cannot be a route. What the speaker presumably mea
nt is expressed by:
2.7) mi klama la bastn. la .atlantas.
zo'e le karce
I go to-Boston from-Atlanta
via-something-unspecified using-the car.
Here the sumti cmavo ``zo'e'' is used to explicitly fill the x4 place; ``zo'e''
means ``the unspecified thing'' and has the same meaning as leaving the place em
pty: the listener must infer the correct meaning from context.
3. Tagging places: FA
fa FA tags x1 place
fe FA tags x2 place
fi FA tags x3 place
fo FA tags x4 place
fu FA tags x5 place
fi'a FA place structure question
In sentences like Example 2.1, it is easy to get lost and forget which sumti fal
ls in which place, especially if the sumti are more complicated than simple name
s or descriptions. The place structure tags of selma'o FA may be used to help cl
arify place structures. The five cmavo ``fa'', ``fe'', ``fi'', ``fo'', and ``fu'
' may be inserted just before the sumti in the x1 to x5 places respectively:
3.1) fa mi cu klama fe la bastn.
fi la .atlantas. fo le dargu fu le karce
x1= I go x2= Boston
x3= Atlanta x4= the road x5= the car.
I go to Boston from Atlanta via the road using the car.
In Example 3.1, the tag ``fu'' before ``le karce'' clarifies that ``le karce'' o
ccupies the x5 place of ``klama''. The use of ``fu'' tells us nothing about the
purpose or meaning of the x5 place; it simply says that ``le karce'' occupies it
.
In Example 3.1, the tags are overkill; they serve only to make Example 2.1 even
longer than it is. Here is a better illustration of the use of FA tags for clari
fication:
3.2) fa mi klama fe le zdani be mi be'o poi nurma vau
fi la nu,IORK.
x1= I go x2= (the house of me) which is-rural
x3= New York.
In Example 3.2, the place structure of ``klama'' is as follows:
x1 agent mi
x2 destination le zdani be mi be'o poi nurma vau
x3 origin la nu,IORK.
x4 route (empty)
x5 means (empty)
The ``fi'' tag serves to remind the hearer that what follows is in the x3 place
of ``klama''; after listening to the complex sumti occupying the x2 place, it's
easy to get lost.
Of course, once the sumti have been tagged, the order in which they are specifie
d no longer carries the burden of distinguishing the places. Therefore, it is pe
rfectly all right to scramble them into any order desired, and to move the selbr
i to anywhere in the bridi, even the beginning:
3.3) klama fa mi fi la .atlantas.
fu le karce fe la bastn. fo le dargu
go x1= I x3= Atlanta
x5= the car x2= Boston x4= the road.
Go I from Atlanta using the car to Boston via the road.
Note that no ``cu'' is permitted before the selbri in Example 3.3, because ``cu'
' separates the selbri from any preceding sumti, and Example 3.3 has no such sum
ti.
3.4) fu le karce fo le dargu fi la .atlantas.
fe la bastn. cu klama fa mi
x5= the car x4= the road x3= Atlanta
x2= Boston go x1=I
Using the car, via the road, from Atlanta to Boston
go I.
Example 3.4 exhibits the reverse of the standard bridi form seen in Examples 2.1
and 3.1, but still means exactly the same thing. If the FA tags were left out,
however, producing:
3.5) le karce le dargu la .atlantas.
la bastn. cu klama mi
The car to-the road from-Atlanta
via-Boston goes using-me.
The car goes to the road from Atlanta, with Boston
as the route, using me as a means
of transport.
the meaning would be wholly changed, and in fact nonsensical.
Tagging places with FA cmavo makes it easy not only to reorder the places but al
so to omit undesirable ones, without any need for ``zo'e'' or special rules abou
t the x1 place:
3.6) klama fi la .atlantas. fe la bastn. fu le karce
A-goer x3= Atlanta x2= Boston x5 = the car.
A goer from Atlanta to Boston using the car.
Here the x1 and x4 places are empty, and so no sumti are tagged with ``fa'' or `
`fo''; in addition, the x2 and x3 places appear in reverse order.
What if some sumti have FA tags and others do not? The rule is that after a FA-t
agged sumti, any sumti following it occupy the places numerically succeeding it,
subject to the proviso that an already-filled place is skipped:
3.7) klama fa mi la bastn. la .atlantas.
le dargu le karce
Go x1= I x2= Boston x3= Atlanta
x4= the road x5= the car.
Go I to Boston from Atlanta via the road
using the car.
In Example 3.7, the ``fa'' causes ``mi'' to occupy the x1 place, and then the fo
llowing untagged sumti occupy in order the x2 through x5 places. This is the mec
hanism by which Lojban allows placing the selbri first while specifying a sumti
for the x1 place.
Here is a more complex (and more confusing) example:
3.8) mi klama fi la .atlantas. le dargu
fe la bastn. le karce
I go x3= Atlanta the road
x2= Boston the car.
I go from Atlanta via the road to Boston using the car.
In Example 3.8, ``mi'' occupies the x1 place because it is the first sumti in th
e sentence (and is before the selbri). The second sumti, ``la .atlantas.'', occu
pies the x3 place by virtue of the tag ``fi'', and ``le dargu'' occupies the x4
place as a result of following ``la .atlantas.''. Finally, ``la bastn.'' occupie
s the x2 place because of its tag ``fe'', and ``le karce'' skips over the alread
y-occupied x3 and x4 places to land in the x5 place.
Such a convoluted use of tags should probably be avoided except when trying for
a literal translation of some English (or other natural-language) sentence; the
rules stated here are merely given so that some standard interpretation is possi
ble.
It is grammatically permitted to tag more than one sumti with the same FA cmavo.
The effect is that of making more than one claim:
3.9) [fa] la rik. fa la djein. klama
[fe] le skina fe le zdani fe le zarci
[x1=] Rick x1= Jane goes-to
x2= the movie x2= the house x2= the office
may be taken to say that both Rick and Jane go to the movie, the house, and the
office, merging six claims into one. More likely, however, it will simply confus
e the listener. There are better ways, involving logical connectives (explained
in Chapter 14), to say such things in Lojban. In fact, putting more than one sum
ti into a place is odd enough that it can only be done by explicit FA usage: thi
s is the motivation for the proviso above, that already-occupied places are skip
ped. In this way, no sumti can be forced into a place already occupied unless it
has an explicit FA cmavo tagging it.
The cmavo ``fi'a'' also belongs to selma'o FA, and allows Lojban users to ask qu
estions about place structures. A bridi containing ``fi'a'' is a question, askin
g the listener to supply the appropriate other member of FA which will make the
bridi a true statement:
3.10) fi'a do dunda [fe] le vi rozgu
[what place]? you give x2= the nearby rose
In what way are you involved in the giving of this rose?
Are you the giver or the receiver of this rose?
In Example 3.10, the speaker uses the selbri ``dunda'', whose place structure is
:
x1 gives x2 to x3
The tagged sumti ``fi'a do'' indicates that the speaker wishes to know whether t
he sumti ``do'' falls in the x1 or the x3 place (the x2 place is already occupie
d by ``le rozgu''). The listener can reply with a sentence consisting solely of
a FA cmavo: ``fa'' if the listener is the giver, ``fi'' if he/she is the receive
r.
I have inserted the tag ``fe'' in brackets into Example 3.10, but it is actually
not necessary, because ``fi'a'' does not count as a numeric tag; therefore, ``l
e vi rozgu'' would necessarily be in the x2 place even if no tag were present, b
ecause it immediately follows the selbri.
There is also another member of FA, namely ``fai'', which is discussed in Sectio
n 12.
4. Conversion: SE
se SE 2nd place conversion
te SE 3rd place conversion
ve SE 4th place conversion
xe SE 5th place conversion
So far we have seen ways to move sumti around within a bridi, but the actual pla
ce structure of the selbri has always remained untouched. The conversion cmavo o
f selma'o SE are incorporated within the selbri itself, and produce a new selbri
(called a converted selbri) with a different place structure. In particular, af
ter the application of any SE cmavo, the number and purposes of the places remai
n the same, but two of them have been exchanged, the x1 place and another. Which
place has been exchanged with x1 depends on the cmavo chosen. Thus, for example
, when ``se'' is used, the x1 place is swapped with the x2 place.
Note that the cmavo of SE begin with consecutive consonants in alphabetical orde
r. There is no ``1st place conversion'' cmavo, because exchanging the x1 place w
ith itself is a pointless maneuver.
Here are the place structures of ``se klama'':
x1 is the destination of x2's going from x3 via x4 using x5
and ``te klama'':
x1 is the origin and x2 the destination of x3 going via x4 using x5
and ``ve klama'':
x1 is the route to x2 from x3 used by x4 going via x5
and ``xe klama'':
x1 is the means in going to x2 from x3 via x4 employed by x5
Note that the place structure numbers in each case continue to be listed in the
usual order, x1 to x5.
Consider the following pair of examples:
4.1) la bastn. cu se klama mi
Boston is-the-destination of-me.
Boston is my destination.
Boston is gone to by me.
4.2) fe la bastn. cu klama fa mi
x2 = Boston go x1=I.
To Boston go I.
Example 4.1 and Example 4.2 mean the same thing, in the sense that there is a re
lationship of going with the speaker as the agent and Boston as the destination
(and with unspecified origin, route, and means). Structurally, however, they are
quite different. Example 4.1 has ``la bastn.'' in the x1 place and ``mi'' in th
e x2 place of the selbri ``se klama'', and uses standard bridi order; Example 4.
2 has ``mi'' in the x1 place and ``la bastn.'' in the x2 place of the selbri ``k
lama'', and uses a non-standard order.
The most important use of conversion is in the construction of descriptions. A d
escription is a sumti which begins with a cmavo of selma'o LA or LE, called the
descriptor, and contains (in the simplest case) a selbri. We have already seen t
he descriptions ``le dargu'' and ``le karce''. To this we could add:
4.3) le klama
the go-er, the one who goes
In every case, the description is about something which fits into the x1 place o
f the selbri. In order to get a description of a destination (that is, something
fitting the x2 place of ``klama''), we must convert the selbri to ``se klama'',
whose x1 place is a destination. The result is
4.4) le se klama
the destination gone to by someone
Likewise, we can create three more converted descriptions:
4.5) le te klama
the origin of someone's going
4.6) le ve klama
the route of someone's going
4.7) le xe klama
the means by which someone goes
Example 4.6 does not mean ``the route'' plain and simple: that is ``le pluta'',
using a different selbri. It means a route that is used by someone for an act of
``klama''; that is, a journey with origin and destination. A ``road'' on Mars,
on which no one has traveled or is ever likely to, may be called ``le pluta'', b
ut it cannot be ``le ve klama'', since there exists no one for whom it is ``le v
e klama be fo da'' (the route taken in an actual journey by someone [da]).
When converting selbri that are more complex than a single brivla, it is importa
nt to realize that the scope of a SE cmavo is only the following brivla (or equi
valent unit). In order to convert an entire tanru, it is necessary to enclose th
e tanru in ``ke ... ke'e'' brackets:
4.8) mi se ke blanu zdani [ke'e] ti
I [2nd conversion] blue house this-thing
The place structure of ``blanu zdani'' (blue house) is the same as that of ``zda
ni'', by the rule given in Section 1. The place structure of ``zdani'' is:
x1 is a house/nest/lair/den for inhabitant x2
The place structure of ``se ke blanu zdani [ke'e]'' is therefore:
x1 is the inhabitant of the blue house (etc.) x2
Consequently, Example 4.8 means:
I am the inhabitant of the blue house which is this thing.
Conversion applied to only part of a tanru has subtler effects which are explain
ed in Chapter 5.
It is grammatical to convert a selbri more than once with SE; later (inner) conv
ersions are applied before earlier (outer) ones. For example, the place structur
e of ``se te klama'' is achieved by exchanging the x1 and x2 place of ``te klama
'', producing:
x1 is the destination and x2 is the origin of x3 going via x4 using x5
On the other hand, ``te se klama'' has a place structure derived from swapping t
he x1 and x3 places of ``se klama'':
x1 is the origin of x2's going to x3 via x4 using x5
which is quite different. However, multiple conversions like this are never nece
ssary. Arbitrary scrambling of places can be achieved more easily and far more i
ntelligibly with FA tags, and only a single conversion is ever needed in a descr
iption.
(Although no one has made any real use of it, it is perhaps worth noting that co
mpound conversions of the form ``setese'', where the first and third cmavo are t
he same, effectively swap the two given places while leaving the others, includi
ng x1, alone: ``setese'' (or equivalently ``tesete'') swap the x2 and x3 places,
whereas ``texete'' (or ``xetexe'') swap the x3 and x5 places.)
5. Modal places: FIhO, FEhU
fi'o FIhO modal place prefix
fe'u FEhU modal terminator
Sometimes the place structures engineered into Lojban are inadequate to meet the
needs of actual speech. Consider the gismu ``viska'', whose place structure is:
x1 sees x2 under conditions x3
Seeing is a threefold relationship, involving an agent (le viska), an object of
sight (le se viska), and an environment that makes seeing possible (le te viska)
. Seeing is done with one or more eyes, of course; in general, the eyes belong t
o the entity in the x1 place.
Suppose, however, that you are blind in one eye and are talking to someone who d
oesn't know that. You might want to say, `Ì see you with the left eye.'' There
is no place in the place structure of ``viska'' such as ``with eye x4'' or the l
ike. Lojban allows you to solve the problem by adding a new place, changing the
relationship:
5.1) mi viska do fi'o kanla [fe'u] le zunle
I see you [modal] eye: the left-thing
I see you with the left eye.
The three-place relation ``viska'' has now acquired a fourth place specifying th
e eye used for seeing. The combination of the cmavo ``fi'o'' (of selma'o FIhO) f
ollowed by a selbri, in this case the gismu ``kanla'', forms a tag which is pref
ixed to the sumti filling the new place, namely ``le zunle''. The semantics of `
`fi'o kanla le zunle'' is that ``le zunle'' fills the x1 place of ``kanla'', who
se place structure is
x1 is an/the eye of body x2
Thus ``le zunle'' is an eye. The x2 place of ``kanla'' is unspecified and must b
e inferred from the context. It is important to remember that even though ``le z
unle'' is placed following ``fi'o kanla'', semantically it belongs in the x1 pla
ce of ``kanla''. The selbri may be terminated with ``fe'u'' (of selma'o FEhU), a
n elidable terminator which is rarely required unless a non-logical connective f
ollows the tag (omitting ``fe'u'' in that case would make the connective affect
the selbri).
The term for such an added place is a ``modal place'', as distinguished from the
regular numbered places. (This use of the word ``modal'' is specific to the Log
lan Project, and does not agree with the standard uses in either logic or lingui
stics, but is now too entrenched to change easily.) The ``fi'o'' construction ma
rking a modal place is called a ``modal tag'', and the sumti which follows it a
``modal sumti''; the purely Lojban terms ``sumti tcita'' and ``seltcita sumti'',
respectively, are also commonly used. Modal sumti may be placed anywhere within
the bridi, in any order; they have no effect whatever on the rules for assignin
g unmarked bridi to numbered places, and they may not be marked with FA cmavo.
Consider Example 5.1 again. Another way to view the situation is to consider the
speaker's left eye as a tool, a tool for seeing. The relevant selbri then becom
es ``pilno'', whose place structure is
x1 uses x2 as a tool for purpose x3
and we can rewrite Example 5.1 as
5.2) mi viska do fi'o se pilno le zunle kanla
I see you [modal] [conversion] use: the left eye
I see you using my left eye.
Here the selbri belonging to the modal is ``se pilno''. The conversion of ``piln
o'' is necessary in order to get the ``tool'' place into x1, since only x1 can b
e the modal sumti. The ``tool user'' place is the x2 of ``se pilno'' (because it
is the x1 of ``pilno'') and remains unspecified. The tag ``fi'o pilno'' would m
ean ``with tool user'', leaving the tool unspecified.
6. Modal tags: BAI
There are certain selbri which seem particularly useful in constructing modal ta
gs. In particular, ``pilno'' is one of them. The place structure of ``pilno'' is
:
x1 uses tool x2
and almost any selbri which represents an action may need to specify a tool. Hav
ing to say ``fi'o se pilno'' frequently would make many Lojban sentences unneces
sarily verbose and clunky, so an abbreviation is provided in the language design
: the compound cmavo ``sepi'o''.
Here ``se'' is used before a cmavo, namely ``pi'o'', rather than before a brivla
. The meaning of this cmavo, which belongs to selma'o BAI, is exactly the same a
s that of ``fi'o pilno fe'u''. Since what we want is a tag based on ``se pilno''
rather than ``pilno'' --- the tool, not the tool user --- the grammar allows a
BAI cmavo to be converted using a SE cmavo. Example 5.2 may therefore be rewritt
en as:
6.1) mi viska do sepi'o le zunle kanla
I see you with-tool: the left eye
I see you using my left eye.
The compound cmavo ``sepi'o'' is much shorter than ``fi'o se pilno [fe'u]'' and
can be thought of as a single word meaning ``with-tool''. The modal tag ``pi'o''
, with no ``se'', similarly means ``with-tool-user'', probably a less useful con
cept. Nevertheless, the parallelism with the place structure of ``pilno'' makes
the additional syllable worthwhile.
Some BAI cmavo make sense with as well as without a SE cmavo; for example, ``ka'
a'', the BAI corresponding to the gismu ``klama'', has five usable forms corresp
onding to the five places of ``klama'' respectively:
ka'a with-goer
seka'a with-destination
teka'a with-origin
veka'a with-route
xeka'a with-means-of-transport
Any of these tags may be used to provide modal places for bridi, as in the follo
wing examples:
6.2) la .eivn. cu vecnu loi flira cinta ka'a mi
Avon sells a-mass-of face paint with-goer me.
I am a traveling cosmetics salesperson for Avon.
(Example 6.2 may seem a bit strained, but it illustrates the way in which an exi
sting selbri, ``vecnu'' in this case, may have a place added to it which might o
therwise seem utterly unrelated.)
6.3) mi cadzu seka'a la bratfyd.
I walk with-destination Bradford.
I am walking to Bradford.
6.4) bloti teka'a la nu,IORK.
[Observative:] is-a-boat with-origin New York
A boat from New York!
6.5) do bajra veka'a lo djine
You run with-route a circle.
You are running in circles.
6.6) mi citka xeka'a le vinji
I eat with-means-of-transport the airplane.
I eat in the airplane.
There are sixty-odd cmavo of selma'o BAI, based on selected gismu that seemed us
eful in a variety of settings. The list is somewhat biased toward English, becau
se many of the cmavo were selected on the basis of corresponding English preposi
tions and preposition compounds such as ``with'', ``without'', and ``by means of
''. The BAI cmavo, however, are far more precise than English prepositions, beca
use their meanings are fixed by the place structures of the corresponding gismu.
All BAI cmavo have the form CV'V or CVV. Most of them are CV'V, where the C is t
he first consonant of the corresponding gismu and the two Vs are the two vowels
of the gismu. The table in Section 16 shows the exceptions.
There is one additional BAI cmavo that is not derived from a gismu: ``do'e''. Th
is cmavo is used when an extra place is needed, but it seems useful to be vague
about the semantic implications of the extra place:
6.7) lo nanmu be do'e le berti cu klama le tcadu
Some man [related to] the north came to-the city.
A man of the north came to the city.
Here ``le berti'' is provided as a modal place of the selbri ``nanmu'', but its
exact significance is vague, and is paralleled in the colloquial translation by
the vague English preposition `òf''. Example 6.7 also illustrates a modal place
bound into a selbri with ``be''. This construction is useful when the selbri of
a description requires a modal place; this and other uses of ``be'' are more fu
lly explained in Chapter 5.
7. Modal sentence connection: the causals
ri'a BAI rinka modal: physical cause
ki'u BAI krinu modal: justification
mu'i BAI mukti modal: motivation
ni'i BAI nibli modal: logical entailment
This section has two purposes. On the one hand, it explains the grammatical cons
truct called ``modal sentence connection''. On the other, it exemplifies some of
the more useful BAI cmavo: the causals. (There are other BAI cmavo which have c
ausal implications: ``ja'e'' means ``with result'', and so ``seja'e'' means ``wi
th cause of unspecified nature''; likewise, ``gau'' means ``with agent'' and ``t
ezu'e'' means ``with purpose''. These other modal cmavo will not be further disc
ussed here, as my purpose is to explain modal sentence connection rather than Lo
jbanic views of causation.)
There are four causal gismu in Lojban, distinguishing different versions of the
relationships lumped in English as ``causal'':
rinka: event x1 physically causes event x2 krinu: event x1 is the justificat
ion for event x2 mukti: event x1 is the (human) motive for event x2 nibli: event
x1 logically entails event x2
Each of these gismu has a related modal: ``ri'a'', ``ki'u'', ``mu'i'', and ``ni'
i'' respectively. Using these gismu and these modals, we can create various caus
al sentences with different implications:
7.1) le spati cu banro
ri'a le nu
do djacu dunda fi le spati
the plant grows
with-physical-cause the event-of
you water give to the plant.
The plant grows because you water it.
7.2) la djan. cpacu le pamoi se jinga
ki'u le nu la djan. jinga
John gets the first prize
with-justification the event-of John wins.
John got the first prize because he won.
7.3) mi lebna le cukta
mu'i le nu mi viska le cukta
I took the book
with-motivation the event-of I saw the book.
I took the book because I saw it.
7.4) la sokrates. morsi binxo
ni'i le nu la sokrates. remna
Socrates dead-became
with-logical-justification Socrates is-human.
Socrates died because Socrates is human.
In Examples 7.1 through 7.4, the same English word ``because'' is used to transl
ate all four modals, but the types of cause being expressed are quite different.
Let us now focus on Example 7.1, and explore some variations on it.
As written, Example 7.1 claims that the plant grows, but only refers to the even
t of watering it in an abstraction bridi (abstractions are explained in Chapter
11) without actually making a claim. If I express Example 7.1, I have said that
the plant in fact grows, but I have not said that you actually water it, merely
that there is a causal relationship between watering and growing. This is semant
ically asymmetrical. Suppose I wanted to claim that the plant was being watered,
and only mention its growth as ancillary information? Then we could reverse the
main bridi and the abstraction bridi, saying:
7.5) do djacu dunda fi le spati
seri'a le nu ri banro
You water-give to the plant
with-physical-effect it grows.
You water the plant; therefore, it grows.
with the ``ri'a'' changed to ``seri'a''. In addition, there are also symmetrical
forms:
7.6) le nu do djacu dunda fi le spati cu rinka
le nu le spati cu banro
The event-of (you water-give to the plant) causes
the event-of (the plant grows).
Your watering the plant causes its growth.
If you water the plant, then it grows.
does not claim either event, but asserts only the causal relationship between th
em. So in Example 7.6, I am not saying that the plant grows nor that you have in
fact watered it. The second colloquial translation shows a form of `ìf-then''
in English quite distinct from the logical connective `ìf-then'' explained in C
hapter 14.
Suppose we wish to claim both events as well as their causal relationship? We ca
n use one of two methods:
7.7) le spati cu banro .iri'abo do djacu dunda fi le spati
The plant grows. Because you water-give to the plant.
The plant grows because you water it.
7.8) do djacu dunda fi le spati
.iseri'abo le spati cu banro
You water-give to the plant.
Therefore it grows.
You water the plant; therefore, it grows.
The compound cmavo ``.iri'abo'' and ``.iseri'abo'' serve to connect two bridi, a
s the initial ``.i'' indicates. The final ``bo'' is necessary to prevent the mod
al from ``taking over'' the following sumti. If the ``bo'' were omitted from Exa
mple 7.7 we would have:
7.9) le spati cu banro
.i ri'a do djacu dunda
fi le spati
The plant grows.
Because of you, [something] water-gives
to the plant.
The plant grows. Because of you, water is given
to the plant.
Because ``ri'a do'' is a modal sumti in Example 7.9, there is no longer an expli
cit sumti in the x1 place of ``djacu dunda'', and the translation must be change
d.
The effect of sentences like Example 7.7 and Example 7.8 is that the modal, ``ri
'a'' in this example, no longer modifies an explicit sumti. Instead, the sumti i
s implicit, the event given by a full bridi. Furthermore, there is a second impl
ication: that the first bridi fills the x2 place of the gismu ``rinka''; it spec
ifies an event which is the effect. I am therefore claiming three things: that t
he plant grows, that you have watered it, and that there is a cause-and-effect r
elationship between the two.
In principle, any modal tag can appear in a sentence connective of the type exem
plified by Example 7.7 and Example 7.8. However, it makes little sense to use an
y modals which do not expect events or other abstractions to fill the places of
the corresponding gismu. The sentence connective ``.ibaubo'' is perfectly gramma
tical, but it is hard to imagine any two sentences which could be connected by a
n `ìn-language'' modal. This is because a sentence describes an event, and an e
vent can be a cause or an effect, but not a language.
8. Other modal connections
Like many Lojban grammatical constructions, sentence modal connection has both f
orethought and afterthought forms. (See Chapter 14 for a more detailed discussio
n of Lojban connectives.) Section 7 exemplifies only afterthought modal connecti
on, illustrated here by:
8.1) mi jgari lei djacu .iri'abo mi jgari le kabri
I grasp the-mass-of water
with-physical-cause I grasp the cup.
Causing the mass of water to be grasped by me,
I grasped the cup.
I grasp the water because I grasp the cup.
An afterthought connection is one that is signaled only by a cmavo (or compound
cmavo, in this case) between the two constructs being connected. Forethought con
nection uses a signal both before the first construct and between the two: the u
se of ``both'' and `ànd'' in the first half of this sentence represents a foret
hought connection (though not a modal one).
To make forethought modal sentence connections in Lojban, place the modal plus `
`gi'' before the first bridi, and ``gi'' between the two. No ``.i'' is used with
in the construct. The forethought equivalent of Example 8.1 is:
8.2) ri'agi mi jgari le kabri
gi mi jgari lei djacu
With-physical-cause I grasp the cup,
I grasp the-mass-of water.
Because I grasp the cup, I grasp the water.
Note that the cause, the x1 of ``rinka'' is now placed first. To keep the two br
idi in the original order of Example 8.1, we could say:
8.3) seri'agi mi jgari lei djacu
gi mi jgari le kabri
With-physical-effect I grasp the-mass-of water,
I grasp the cup.
In English, the sentence ``*Therefore I grasp the water, I grasp the cup'' is un
grammatical, because ``therefore'' is not grammatically equivalent to ``because'
'. In Lojban, ``seri'agi'' can be used just like ``ri'agi''.
When the two bridi joined by a modal connection have one or more elements (selbr
i or sumti or both) in common, there are various condensed forms that can be use
d in place of full modal sentence connection with both bridi completely stated.
When the bridi are the same except for a single sumti, as in Examples 8.1 throug
h 8.3, then a sumti modal connection may be employed:
8.4) mi jgari ri'agi le kabri gi lei djacu
I grasp because the cup , the-mass-of water.
Example 8.4 means exactly the same as Examples 8.1 through 8.3, but there is no
idiomatic English translation that will distinguish it from them.
If the two connected bridi are different in more than one sumti, then a termset
may be employed. Termsets are explained more fully in Chapter 14, but are essent
ially a mechanism for creating connections between multiple sumti simultaneously
.
8.5) mi dunda le cukta la djan.
.imu'ibo la djan. dunda lei jdini mi
I gave the book to John.
Motivated-by John gave the-mass-of money to-me.
I gave the book to John, because John gave money to me.
means the same as:
8.6) nu'i mu'igi mi le cukta la djan.
gi la djan. lei jdini mi nu'u dunda
[start] because I, the book, John;
John, the-mass-of money, me [end] gives.
Here there are three sumti in each half of the termset, because the two bridi sh
are only their selbri.
There is no modal connection between selbri as such: bridi which differ only in
the selbri can be modally connected using bridi-tail modal connection. The bridi
-tail construct is more fully explained in Chapter 14, but essentially it consis
ts of a selbri with optional sumti following it. Example 7.3 is suitable for bri
di-tail connection, and could be shortened to:
8.7) mi mu'igi viska le cukta gi lebna le cukta
I, because saw the book, took the book.
Again, no straightforward English translation exists. It is even possible to sho
rten Example 8.7 further to:
8.8) mi mu'igi viska gi lebna vau le cukta
I because saw, therefore took, the book.
where ``le cukta'' is set off by the non-elidable ``vau'' and is made to belong
to both bridi-tails --- see Chapter 14 for more explanations.
Since this is a chapter on rearranging sumti, it is worth pointing out that Exam
ple 8.8 can be further rearranged to:
8.9) mi le cukta mu'igi viska gi lebna
I, the book, because saw, therefore took
which doesn't require the extra ``vau''; all sumti before a conjunction of bridi
-tails are shared.
Finally, mathematical operands can be modally connected.
8.10) li ny. du li vo
.ini'ibo li ny. du li re su'i re
the number n = the-number 4.
Entailed-by the-number n = the-number 2 + 2.
n = 4 because n = 2 + 2.
can be reduced to:
8.11) li ny. du li
ni'igi vei re su'i re [ve'o] gi vo
the-number n = the-number
because ( 2 + 2 ) therefore 4.
n is 2 + 2, and is thus 4.
The cmavo ``vei'' and ``ve'o'' represent mathematical parentheses, and are requi
red so that ``ni'igi'' affects more than just the immediately following operand,
namely the first ``re''. (The right parenthesis, ``ve'o'', is an elidable termi
nator.) As usual, no English translation does Example 8.11 justice.
Note: Due to restrictions on the Lojban parsing algorithm, it is not possible to
form modal connectives using the ``fi'o''-plus-selbri form of modal. Only the p
redefined modals of selma'o BAI can be compounded as shown in Sections 7 and 8.
9. Modal selbri
Consider the example:
9.1) mi tavla bau la lojban.
bai tu'a la frank.
I speak in-language Lojban
with-compeller some-property-of Frank.
I speak in Lojban, under compulsion by Frank.
Example 9.1 has two modal sumti, using the modals ``bau'' and ``bai''. Suppose w
e wanted to specify the language explicitly but be vague about who's doing the c
ompelling. We can simplify Example 9.1 to:
9.2) mi tavla bau la lojban. bai [ku].
I speak in-language Lojban under-compulsion.
In Example 9.2, the elidable terminator ``ku'' has taken the place of the sumti
which would normally follow ``bai''. Alternatively, we could specify the one who
compels but keep the language vague:
9.3) mi tavla bau [ku]
bai tu'a la frank.
I speak in-some-language
under-compulsion-by some-property-of Frank.
We are also free to move the modal-plus-``ku'' around the bridi:
9.4) bau [ku] bai ku mi tavla
In-some-language under-compulsion I speak.
An alternative to using ``ku'' is to place the modal cmavo right before the selb
ri, following the ``cu'' which often appears there. When a modal is present, the
``cu'' is almost never necessary.
9.5) mi bai tavla bau la lojban.
I compelledly speak in-language Lojban.
In this use, the modal is like a tanru modifier semantically, although grammatic
ally it is quite distinct. Example 9.5 is very similar in meaning to:
9.6) mi se bapli tavla bau la lojban.
I compelledly-speak in-language Lojban.
The ``se'' conversion is needed because ``bapli tavla'' would be a compeller typ
e of speaker rather than a compelled (by someone) type of speaker, which is what
a ``bai tavla'' is.
If the modal preceding a selbri is constructed using ``fi'o'', then ``fe'u'' is
required to prevent the main selbri and the modal selbri from colliding:
9.7) mi fi'o kanla fe'u viska do
I with-eye see you
I see you with my eye(s).
There are two other uses of modals. A modal can be attached to a pair of bridi-t
ails that have already been connected by a logical, non-logical, or modal connec
tion (see Chapter 14 for more on logical and non-logical connections):
9.8) mi bai
ke ge klama le zarci gi cadzu le bisli [ke'e]
I under-compulsion
( both go to-the market and walk on-the ice )
Under compulsion, I both go to the market
and walk on the ice.
Here the ``bai'' is spread over both ``klama le zarci'' and ``cadzu le bisli'',
and the ``ge ... gi'' represents the logical connection ``both-and'' between the
two.
Similarly, a modal can be attached to multiple sentences that have been combined
with ``tu'e'' and ``tu'u'', which are explained in more detail in Chapter 19:
9.9) bai tu'e mi klama le zarci
.i mi cadzu le bisli [tu'u]
Under-compulsion [start] I go to-the market.
I walk on-the ice [end]
means the same thing as Example 9.8.
Note: Either BAI modals or ``fi'o''-plus-selbri modals may correctly be used in
any of the constructions discussed in this section.
10. Modal relative phrases; Comparison
pe GOI restrictive relative phrase
ne GOI incidental relative phrase
mau BAI zmadu modal
me'a BAI mleca modal
Relative phrases and clauses are explained in much more detail in Chapter 8. How
ever, there is a construction which combines a modal with a relative phrase whic
h is relevant to this chapter. Consider the following examples of relative claus
es:
10.1) la .apasionatas. poi se cusku la .artr. rubnstain.
cu se nelci mi
The Appassionata which is-expressed-by Artur Rubenstein
is-liked-by me.
10.2) la .apasionatas. noi se finti la betovn.
cu se nelci mi
The Appassionata, which is-created-by Beethoven,
is-liked-by me.
In Example 10.1, ``la .apasionatas.'' refers to a particular performance of the
sonata, namely the one performed by Rubenstein. Therefore, the relative clause `
`poi se cusku'' uses the cmavo ``poi'' (of selma'o NOI) to restrict the meaning
of ``la .apasionatas'' to the performance in question.
In Example 10.2, however, ``la .apasionatas.'' refers to the sonata as a whole,
and the information that it was composed by Beethoven is merely incidental. The
cmavo ``noi'' (also of selma'o NOI) expresses the incidental nature of this rela
tionship.
The cmavo ``pe'' and ``ne'' (of selma'o GOI) are roughly equivalent to ``poi'' a
nd ``noi'' respectively, but are followed by sumti rather than full bridi. We ca
n abbreviate Example 10.1 and Example 10.2 to:
10.3) la .apasionatas pe la .artr. rubnstain. se nelci mi
The Appassionata of Artur Rubenstein is-liked-by me.
10.4) la .apasionatas ne la betovn. se nelci mi
The Appassionata, which is of Beethoven, is-liked-by me.
Here the precise selbri of the relative clauses is lost: all we can tell is that
the Appassionata is connected in some way with Rubenstein (in Example 10.3) and
Beethoven (in Example 10.4), and that the relationships are respectively restri
ctive and incidental.
It happens that both ``cusku'' and ``finti'' have BAI cmavo, namely ``cu'u'' and
``fi'e''. We can recast Example 10.3 and Example 10.4 as:
10.5) la .apasionatas pe cu'u la .artr. rubnstain.
cu se nelci mi
The Appassionata expressed-by Artur Rubenstein
is-liked-by me.
10.6) la .apasionatas ne fi'e la betovn.
cu se nelci mi
The Appassionata, invented-by Beethoven,
is-liked-by me.
Example 10.5 and Example 10.6 have the full semantic content of Example 10.1 and
Example 10.2 respectively.
Modal relative phrases are often used with the BAI cmavo ``mau'' and ``me'a'', w
hich are based on the comparative gismu ``zmadu'' (more than) and ``mleca'' (les
s than) respectively. The place structures are:
zmadu x1 is more than x2 in property/quantity x3
by amount x4
mleca x1 is less than x2 in property/quantity x3
by amount x4
Here are some examples:
10.7) la frank. nelci la betis. ne semau la meiris.
Frank likes Betty, which-is more-than Mary.
Frank likes Betty more than (he likes) Mary.
Example 10.7 requires that Frank likes Betty, but adds the information that his
liking for Betty exceeds his liking for Mary. The modal appears in the form ``se
mau'' because the x2 place of ``zmadu'' is the basis for comparison: in this cas
e, Frank's liking for Mary.
10.8) la frank. nelci la meiris. ne seme'a la betis.
Frank likes Mary, which-is less-than Betty.
Frank likes Mary less than (he likes) Betty.
Here we are told that Frank likes Mary less than he likes Betty; the information
about the comparison is the same. It would be possible to rephrase Example 10.7
using ``me'a'' rather than ``semau'', and Example 10.8 using ``mau'' rather tha
n ``seme'a'', but such usage would be unnecessarily confusing. Like many BAI cma
vo, ``mau'' and ``me'a'' are more useful when converted with ``se''.
If the ``ne'' were omitted in Example 10.7 and Example 10.8, the modal sumti (``
la meiris.'' and ``la betis.'' respectively) would become attached to the bridi
as a whole, producing a very different translation. Example 10.8 would become:
10.9) la frank. nelci la meiris. seme'a la betis.
Frank likes Mary is-less-than Betty.
Frank's liking Mary is less than Betty.
which compares a liking with a person, and is therefore nonsense.
Pure comparison, which states only the comparative information but says nothing
about whether Frank actually likes either Mary or Betty (he may like neither, bu
t dislike Betty less), would be expressed differently, as:
10.10) le ni la frank. nelci la betis.
cu zmadu le ni la frank. nelci la meiris.
The quantity-of Frank's liking Betty
is-more-than the quantity-of Frank's liking Mary.
The mechanisms explained in this section are appropriate to many modals other th
an ``semau'' and ``seme'a''. Some other modals that are often associated with re
lative phrases are: ``seba'i'' (`ìnstead of''), ``ci'u'' (`òn scale''), ``de'i
'' (``dated''), ``du'i'' (`às much as''). Some BAI tags can be used equally wel
l in relative phrases or attached to bridi; others seem useful only attached to
bridi. But it is also possible that the usefulness of particular BAI modals is a
n English-speaker bias, and that speakers of other languages may find other BAIs
useful in divergent ways.
Note: The uses of modals discussed in this section are applicable both to BAI mo
dals and to ``fi'o''-plus-selbri modals.
11. Mixed modal connection
It is possible to mix logical connection (explained in Chapter 14) with modal co
nnection, in a way that simultaneously asserts the logical connection and the mo
dal relationship. Consider the sentences:
11.1) mi nelci do .ije mi nelci la djein.
I like you. And I like Jane
which is a logical connection, and
11.2) mi nelci do .iki'ubo mi nelci la djein.
I like you. Justified-by I like Jane.
The meanings of Example 11.1 and Example 11.2 can be simultaneously expressed by
combining the two compound cmavo, thus:
11.3) mi nelci do .ijeki'ubo mi nelci la djein.
I like you. And justified-by I like Jane.
Here the two sentences ``mi nelci do'' and ``mi nelci la djein.'' are simultaneo
usly asserted, their logical connection is asserted, and their causal relationsh
ip is asserted. The logical connective ``je'' comes before the modal ``ki'u'' in
all such mixed connections.
Since ``mi nelci do'' and ``mi nelci la djein.'' differ only in the final sumti,
we can transform Example 11.3 into a mixed sumti connection:
11.4) mi nelci do .eki'ubo la djein.
I like you and/because Jane.
Note that this connection is an afterthought one. Mixed connectives are always a
fterthought; forethought connectives must be either logical or modal.
There are numerous other afterthought logical and non-logical connectives that c
an have modal information planted within them. For example, a bridi-tail connect
ed version of Example 11.4 would be:
11.5) mi nelci do gi'eki'ubo nelci la djein.
I like you and/because like Jane.
The following three complex examples all mean the same thing.
11.6) mi bevri le dakli
.ijeseri'abo tu'e mi bevri le gerku
.ijadu'ibo mi bevri le mlatu [tu'u]
I carry the sack.
And [effect] (I carry the dog
And/or [equal] I carry the cat. )
I carry the sack.
As a result I carry the dog
or I carry the cat, equally.
gi'eseri'ake bevri le gerku
gi'adu'ibo bevri le mlatu [ke'e]
I carry the sack
and [effect] (carry the dog
and/or [equal] carry the cat ).
I carry the sack
and as a result carry the dog or carry the cat equally.
.eseri'ake le gerku
.adu'ibo le mlatu [ke'e]
I carry the sack
and [effect] (the cat
and/or [equal] the dog ).
I carry the sack, and as a result the cat
or the dog equally.
In Example 11.6, the ``tu'e ... tu'u'' brackets are the equivalent of the ``ke .
.. ke'e'' brackets in Example 11.7 and Example 11.8, because ``ke ... ke'e'' can
not extend across more than one sentence. It would also be possible to change th
e ``.ijeseri'abo'' to ``.ije seri'a'', which would show that the ``tu'e ... tu'u
'' portion was an effect, but would not pin down the ``mi bevri le dakli'' porti
on as the cause. It is legal for a modal (or a tense; see Chapter 10) to modify
the whole of a ``tu'e ... tu'u'' construct.
12. Modal conversion: JAI
jai JAI modal conversion
fai FA modal place structure tag
So far, conversion of numbered bridi places with SE and the addition of modal pl
aces with BAI have been two entirely separate operations. However, it is possibl
e to convert a selbri in such a way that, rather than exchanging two numbered pl
aces, a modal place is made into a numbered place. For example,
12.1) mi cusku bau la lojban.
I express [something] in-language Lojban.
has an explicit x1 place occupied by ``mi'' and an explicit ``bau'' place occupi
ed by ``la lojban.'' To exchange these two, we use a modal conversion operator c
onsisting of ``jai'' (of selma'o JAI) followed by the modal cmavo. Thus, the mod
al conversion of Example 12.1 is:
12.2) la lojban. jai bau cusku fai mi
Lojban is-the-language-of-expression used-by me.
In Example 12.2, the modal place ``la lojban.'' has become the x1 place of the n
ew selbri ``jai bau cusku''. What has happened to the old x1 place? There is no
numbered place for it to move to, so it moves to a special `ùnnumbered place''
marked by the tag ``fai'' of selma'o FA.
Note: For the purposes of place numbering, ``fai'' behaves like ``fi'a''; it doe
s not affect the numbering of the other places around it.
Like SE conversions, JAI conversions are especially convenient in descriptions.
We may refer to ``the language of an expression'' as ``le jai bau cusku'', for e
xample.
In addition, it is grammatical to use ``jai'' without a following modal. This us
age is not related to modals, but is explained here for completeness. The effect
of ``jai'' by itself is to send the x1 place, which should be an abstraction, i
nto the ``fai'' position, and to raise one of the sumti from the abstract sub-br
idi into the x1 place of the main bridi. This feature is discussed in more detai
l in Chapter 11. The following two examples mean the same thing:
12.3) le nu mi lebna le cukta
cu se krinu le nu mi viska le cukta
The event-of I take the book
is-justified-by the event-of I see the book.
My taking the book is justified by my seeing it.
12.4) mi jai se krinu le nu mi viska le cukta kei
[fai le nu mi lebna le cukta]
I am-justified by the event-of I see the book
[namely, the event-of I take the book]
I am justified in taking the book by seeing the book.
Example 12.4, with the bracketed part omitted, allows us to say that `Ì am just
ified'' whereas in fact it is my action that is justified. This construction is
vague, but useful in representing natural-language methods of expression.
13. Modal negation
Negation is explained in detail in Chapter 15. There are two forms of negation i
n Lojban: contradictory and scalar negation. Contradictory negation expresses wh
at is false, whereas scalar negation says that some alternative to what has been
stated is true. A simple example is the difference between ``John didn't go to
Paris'' (contradictory negation) and ``John went to (somewhere) other than Paris
'' (scalar negation).
Contradictory negation involving BAI cmavo is performed by appending ``-nai'' (o
f selma'o NAI) to the BAI. A common use of modals with ``-nai'' is to deny a cau
sal relationship:
13.1) mi nelci do mu'inai le nu do nelci mi
I like you, but not because you like me.
Example 13.1 denies that the relationship between my liking you (which is assert
ed) and your liking me (which is not asserted) is one of motivation. Nothing is
said about whether you like me or not, merely that that hypothetical liking is n
ot the motivation for my liking you.
Scalar negation is achieved by prefixing ``na'e'' (of selma'o NAhE), or any of t
he other cmavo of NAhE, to the BAI cmavo.
13.2) le spati cu banro na'emu'i le nu
do djacu dunda fi le spati
The plant grows other-than-motivated-by the event-of
you water-give to the plant.
Example 13.2 says that the relationship between the plant's growth and your wate
ring it is not one of motivation: the plant is not motivated to grow, as plants
are not something which can have motivation as a rule. Implicitly, some other re
lationship between watering and growth exists, but Example 13.2 doesn't say what
it is (presumably ``ri'a'').
Note: Modals made with ``fi'o'' plus a selbri cannot be negated directly. The se
lbri can itself be negated either with contradictory or with scalar negation, ho
wever.
14. Sticky modals
ki KI stickiness flag
Like tenses, modals can be made persistent from the bridi in which they appear t
o all following bridi. The effect of this ``stickiness'' is to make the modal, a
long with its following sumti, act as if it appeared in every successive bridi.
Stickiness is put into effect by following the modal (but not any following sumt
i) with the cmavo ``ki'' of selma'o KI. For example,
bai ki tu'a la frank.
.ibabo mi tavla bau la gliban.
compelled-by some-property-of Frank.
Afterward, I speak in-language English.
means the same as:
bai tu'a la frank.
.ibabo mi tavla bau la gliban.
bai tu'a la frank.
Afterward, I speak in-language English
In Example 14.1, ``bai'' is made sticky, and so Frank's compelling is made appli
cable to every following bridi. ``bau'' is not sticky, and so the language may v
ary from bridi to bridi, and if not specified in a particular bridi, no assumpti
on can safely be made about its value.
To cancel stickiness, use the form ``BAI ki ku'', which stops any modal value fo
r the specified BAI from being passed to the next bridi. To cancel stickiness fo
r all modals simultaneously, and also for any sticky tenses that exist (``ki'' i
s used for both modals and tenses), use ``ki'' by itself, either before the selb
ri or (in the form ``ki ku'') anywhere in the bridi:
14.3) mi ki tavla
I speak (no implication about language or compulsion).
Note: Modals made with ``fi'o''-plus-selbri cannot be made sticky. This is an un
fortunate, but unavoidable, restriction.
15. Logical and non-logical connection of modals
Logical and non-logical connectives are explained in detail in Chapter 14. For t
he purposes of this chapter, it suffices to point out that a logical (or non-log
ical) connection between two bridi which differ only in a modal can be reduced t
o a single bridi with a connective between the modals. As a result, Example 15.1
and Example 15.2 mean the same thing:
15.1) la frank. bajra seka'a le zdani
.ije la frank. bajra teka'a le zdani
Frank runs with-destination the house.
And Frank runs with-origin the house.
Frank runs to the house, and Frank runs from the house.
15.2) la frank. bajra seka'a je teka'a le zdani
Frank runs with-destination and with-origin the house.
Frank runs to and from the house.
Neither example implies whether a single act, or two acts, of running is referre
d to. To compel the sentence to refer to a single act of running, you can use th
e form:
15.3) la frank. bajra seka'a le zdani
ce'e teka'a le zdani
Frank runs with-destination the house
[joined-to] with-origin the-house.
The cmavo ``ce'e'' creates a termset containing two terms (termsets are explaine
d in Chapter 14 and Chapter 16). When a termset contains more than one modal tag
derived from a single BAI, the convention is that the two tags are derived from
a common event.
16. CV'V cmavo of selma'o BAI with irregular forms
There are 65 cmavo of selma'o BAI, of which all but one (``do'e'', discussed in
Section 6), are derived directly from selected gismu. Of these 64 cmavo, 36 are
entirely regular and have the form CV'V, where C is the first consonant of the c
orresponding gismu, and the Vs are the two vowels of the gismu. The remaining BA
I cmavo, which are irregular in one way or another, are listed in the table belo
w. The table is divided into sub-tables according to the nature of the exception
; some cmavo appear in more than one sub-table, and are so noted.
cmavo gismu comments
Monosyllables of the form CVV:
bai bapli
bau bangu
cau claxu
fau fasnu
gau gasnu
kai ckaji uses 2nd consonant of gismu
mau zmadu uses 2nd consonant of gismu
koi korbi
rai traji uses 2nd consonant of gismu
sau sarcu
tai tamsmi based on lujvo, not gismu
zau zanru
Second consonant of the gismu as the C:
(the gismu is always of the form CCVCV)
ga'a zgana
kai ckaji has CVV form (monosyllable)
ki'i ckini
la'u klani has irregular 2nd V
le'a klesi has irregular 2nd V
mau zmadu has CVV form (monosyllable)
me'e cmene
ra'a srana
ra'i krasi
rai traji has CVV form (monosyllable)
ti'i stidi
tu'i stuzi
Irregular 2nd V:
fi'e finti
la'u klani uses 2nd consonant of gismu
le'a klesi uses 2nd consonant of gismu
ma'e marji
mu'u mupli
ti'u tcika
va'o vanbi
Special cases:
ri'i lifri uses 3rd consonant of gismu
tai tamsmi based on lujvo, not gismu
va'u xamgu CV'V cmavo can't begin with ``x''
17. Complete table of BAI cmavo with rough English equivalents
The following table shows all the cmavo belonging to selma'o BAI, and has five c
olumns. The first column is the cmavo itself; the second column is the gismu lin
ked to it. The third column gives an English phrase which indicates the meaning
of the cmavo; and the fourth column indicates its meaning when preceded by ``se'
'.
For those cmavo with meaningful ``te'', ``ve'', and even ``xe'' conversions (dep
ending on the number of places of the underlying gismu), the meanings of these a
re shown on one or two extra rows following the primary row for that cmavo.
It should be emphasized that the place structures of the gismu control the meani
ngs of the BAI cmavo. The English phrases shown here are only suggestive, and ar
e often too broad or too narrow to correctly specify what the acceptable range o
f uses for the modal tag are.
ba'i basti replaced by instead of
bai bapli compelled by compelling
bau bangu in language in language of
be'i benji sent by transmitting
te=sent to ve=with transmit origin
xe=transmitted via
ca'i catni by authority of with authority over
cau claxu lacked by without
ci'e ciste in system with system function
te=of system components
ci'o cinmo felt by feeling emotion
ci'u ckilu on the scale on scale measuring
cu'u cusku as said by expressing
te=as told to ve=expressed in medium
de'i detri dated on the same date as
di'o diklo at the locus of at specific locus
do'e ----- vaguely related to
du'i dunli as much as equal to
du'o djuno according to knowing facts
te=knowing about
ve=under epistemology
fa'e fatne reverse of in reversal of
fau fasnu in the event of
fi'e finti created by creating work
te=created for purpose
ga'a zgana to observer observing
te=observed by means
ve=observed under cond.
gau gasnu with agent as agent in doing
ja'e jalge resulting in results because of
ja'i javni by rule by rule prescribing
ji'e jimte up to limit as a limit of
ji'o jitro under direction controlling
ji'u jicmu based on supporting
ka'a klama gone to by with destination
te=with origin ve=via route
xe=by transport mode
ka'i krati represented by on behalf of
kai ckaji characterizing with property
ki'i ckini as relation of related to
te=with relation
ki'u krinu justified by with justified result
koi korbi bounded by as boundary of
te=bordering
ku'u kulnu in culture in culture of
la'u klani as quantity of in quantity
le'a klesi in category as category of
te=defined by quality
li'e lidne led by leading
ma'e marji of material made from material
te=in material form of
ma'i manri in ref. frame as a standard for
mau zmadu exceeded by more than
me'a mleca undercut by less than
me'e cmene with name as a name for
te=as a name to
mu'i mukti motivated by motive therefore
mu'u mupli exemplified by as an example of
ni'i nibli entailed by entails
pa'a panra in addition to similar to
te=similar in pattern
ve=similar by standard
pa'u pagbu with component as a part of
pi'o pilno used by using tool
po'i porsi in the sequence sequenced by rule
pu'a pluka pleased by in order to please
pu'e pruce by process processing from
te=processing into
ve=passing through stages
ra'a srana pertained to by concerning
ra'i krasi from source as an origin of
rai traji with superl. superlative in
te=at extreme ve=superlative among
ri'a rinka caused by causing
ri'i lifri experienced by experiencing
sau sarcu requiring necessarily for
te=necessarily under cond.
si'u sidju aided by assisting in
ta'i tadji by method as a method for
tai tamsmi as a form of in form
te=in form similar to
ti'i stidi suggested by suggesting
te=suggested to
ti'u tcika with time at the time of
tu'i stuzi with site as location of
va'o vanbi under cond. as conditions for
va'u xamgu benefiting from with beneficiary
zau zanru approved by approving
zu'e zukte with actor with means to goal
te=with goal
The lujvo ``tamsmi'' on which ``tai'' is based is derived from the tanru ``tarmi
simsa'' and has the place structure:
x1 has form x2, similar in form to x3 in property/quality x4
This lujvo is employed because ``tarmi'' does not have a place structure useful
for the modal's purpose.
Chapter 10
Imaginary Journeys: The Lojban Space/Time Tense System
1. Introductory
This chapter attempts to document and explain the space/time tense system of Loj
ban. It does not attempt to answer all questions of the form ``How do I say such
-and-such (an English tense) in Lojban?'' Instead, it explores the Lojban tense
system from the inside, attempting to educate the reader into a Lojbanic viewpoi
nt. Once the overall system is understood and the resources that it makes availa
ble are familiar, the reader should have some hope of using appropriate tense co
nstructs and being correctly understood.
The system of Lojban tenses presented here may seem really complex because of al
l the pieces and all the options; indeed, this chapter is the longest one in thi
s book. But tense is in fact complex in every language. In your native language,
the subtleties of tense are intuitive. In foreign languages, you are seldom tau
ght the entire system until you have reached an advanced level. Lojban tenses ar
e extremely systematic and productive, allowing you to express subtleties based
on what they mean rather than on how they act similarly to English tenses. This
chapter concentrates on presenting an intuitive approach to the meaning of Lojba
n tense words and how they may be creatively and productively combined.
What is ``tense''? Historically, ``tense'' is the attribute of verbs in English
and related languages that expresses the time of the action. In English, three t
enses are traditionally recognized, conventionally called the past, the present,
and the future. There are also a variety of compound tenses used in English. Ho
wever, there is no simple relationship between the form of an English tense and
the time actually expressed:
I go to London tomorrow. I will go to London tomorrow. I am going to London
tomorrow.
all mean the same thing, even though the first sentence uses the present tense;
the second, the future tense; and the third, a compound tense usually called ``p
resent progressive''. Likewise, a newspaper headline says ``JONES DIES'', althou
gh it is obvious that the time referred to must be in the past. Tense is a manda
tory category of English: every sentence must be marked for tense, even if in a
way contrary to logic, because every main verb has a tense marker built into to
it. By contrast, Lojban brivla have no implicit or explicit tense marker attache
d to them.
In Lojban, the concept of tense extends to every selbri, not merely the verb-lik
e ones. In addition, tense structures provide information about location in spac
e as well as in time. All tense information is optional in Lojban: a sentence li
ke:
I go-to the market.
can be understood as:
I went to the market. I am going to the market. I have gone to the market. I
will go to the market. I continually go to the market.
as well as many other possibilities: context resolves which is correct.
The placement of a tense construct within a Lojban bridi is easy: right before t
he selbri. It goes immediately after the ``cu'', and can in fact always replace
the ``cu'' (although in very complex sentences the rules for eliding terminators
may be changed as a result). In the following examples, ``pu'' is the tense mar
ker for ``past time'':
1.2) mi cu pu klama le zarci
mi pu klama le zarci
I in-the-past go-to the market.
It is also possible to put the tense somewhere else in the bridi by adding ``ku'
' after it. This ``ku'' is an elidable terminator, but it's almost never possibl
e to actually elide it except at the end of the bridi:
1.3) puku mi klama le zarci
In-the-past I go-to the market.
Earlier, I went to the market.
1.4) mi klama puku le zarci
I go-to in-the-past the market.
I went earlier to the market.
1.5) mi klama le zarci pu [ku]
I go-to the market in-the-past.
I went to the market earlier.
Examples 1.2 through 1.5 are different only in emphasis. Abnormal order, such as
Examples 1.3 through 1.5 exhibit, adds emphasis to the words that have been mov
ed; in this case, the tense cmavo ``pu''. Words at either end of the sentence te
nd to be more noticeable.
2. Spatial tenses: FAhA and VA
vi VA short distance
va VA medium distance
vu VA long distance
zu'a FAhA left
ri'u FAhA right
ga'u FAhA up
ni'a FAhA down
ca'u FAhA front
ne'i FAhA within
be'a FAhA north of
(The complete list of FAhA cmavo can be found in Section 27.)
Why is this section about spatial tenses rather than the more familiar time tens
es of Section 1, asks the reader? Because the model to be used in explaining bot
h will be easier to grasp for space than for time. The explanation of time tense
s will resume in Section 4.
English doesn't have mandatory spatial tenses. Although there are plenty of ways
in English of showing where an event happens, there is absolutely no need to do
so. Considering this fact may give the reader a feel for what the optional Lojb
an time tenses are like. From the Lojban point of view, space and time are inter
changeable, although they are not treated identically.
Lojban specifies the spatial tense of a bridi (the place at which it occurs) by
using words from selma'o FAhA and VA to describe an imaginary journey from the s
peaker to the place referred to. FAhA cmavo specify the direction taken in the j
ourney, whereas VA cmavo specify the distance gone. For example:
2.1) le nanmu va batci le gerku
The man [medium distance] bites the dog.
Over there the man is biting the dog.
What is at a medium distance? The event referred to by the bridi: the man biting
the dog. What is this event at a medium distance from? The speaker's location.
We can understand the ``va'' as saying: `Ìf you want to get from the speaker's
location to the location of the bridi, journey for a medium distance (in some di
rection unspecified).'' This `ìmaginary journey'' can be used to understand not
only Example 2.1, but also every other spatial tense construct.
Suppose you specify a direction with a FAhA cmavo, rather than a distance with a
VA cmavo:
2.2) le nanmu zu'a batci le gerku
The man [left] bites the dog.
Here the imaginary journey is again from the speaker's location to the location
of the bridi, but it is now performed by going to the left (in the speaker's ref
erence frame) for an unspecified distance. So a reasonable translation is:
To my left, the man bites the dog.
The ``my'' does not have an explicit equivalent in the Lojban, because the speak
er's location is understood as the starting point.
(Etymologically, by the way, ``zu'a'' is derived from ``zunle'', the gismu for `
`left'', whereas ``vi'', ``va'', and ``vu'' are intended to be reminiscent of ``
ti'', ``ta'', and ``tu'', the demonstrative pronouns ``this-here'', ``that-there
'', and ``that-yonder''.)
What about specifying both a direction and a distance? The rule here is that the
direction must come before the distance:
2.3) le nanmu zu'avi batci le gerku
The man [left] [short distance] bites the dog.
Slightly to my left, the man bites the dog.
As explained in Section 1, it would be perfectly correct to use ``ku'' to move t
his tense to the beginning or the end of the sentence to emphasize it:
2.4) zu'aviku le nanmu cu batci le gerku
[Left] [short distance] the man bites the dog.
Slightly to my left, the man bites the dog.
3. Compound spatial tenses
Humph, says the reader: this talk of `ìmaginary journeys'' is all very well, bu
t what's the point of it? --- ``zu'a'' means `òn the left'' and ``vi'' means ``
nearby'', and there's no more to be said. The imaginary-journey model becomes mo
re useful when so-called compound tenses are involved. A compound tense is exact
ly like a simple tense, but has several FAhAs run together:
3.1) le nanmu ga'u zu'a batci le gerku
The man [up] [left] bites the dog.
The proper interpretation of Example 3.1 is that the imaginary journey has two s
tages: first move from the speaker's location upward, and then to the left. A tr
anslation might read:
Left of a place above me, the man bites the dog.
(Perhaps the speaker is at the bottom of a manhole, and the dog-biting is going
on at the edge of the street.)
In the English translation, the keywords ``left'' and `àbove'' occur in reverse
order to the Lojban order. This effect is typical of what happens when we `ùnf
old'' Lojban compound tenses into their English equivalents, and shows why it is
not very useful to try to memorize a list of Lojban tense constructs and their
colloquial English equivalents.
The opposite order also makes sense:
3.2) le nanmu zu'a ga'u batci le gerku
The man [left] [up] bites the dog.
Above a place to the left of me, the man bites the dog.
In ordinary space, the result of going up and then to the left is the same as th
at of going left and then up, but such a simple relationship does not apply in a
ll environments or to all directions: going south, then east, then north may ret
urn one to the starting point, if that point is the North Pole.
Each direction can have a distance following:
3.3) le nanmu zu'avi ga'uvu
batci le gerku
The man [left] [short distance] [up] [long distance]
bites the dog.
Far above a place slightly to the left of me,
the man bites the dog.
A distance can also come at the beginning of the tense construct, without any sp
ecified direction. (Example 2.1, with VA alone, is really a special case of this
rule when no directions at all follow.)
3.4) le nanmu vi zu'a batci le gerku
The man [short distance] [left] bites the dog.
Left of a place near me, the man bites the dog.
Any number of directions may be used in a compound tense, with or without specif
ied distances for each:
3.5) le nanmu ca'uvi ni'ava
ri'uvu ne'i
batci le gerku
The man [front] [short] [down] [medium]
[right] [long] [within]
bites the dog.
Within a place a long distance to the right
of a place which is a medium distance downward
from a place a short distance in front of me,
Whew! It's a good thing tense constructs are optional: having to say all that co
uld certainly be painful. Note, however, how much shorter the Lojban version of
Example 3.5 is than the English version.
4. Temporal tenses: PU and ZI
pu PU past
ca PU present
ba PU future
zi ZI short time distance
za ZI medium time distance
zu ZI long time distance
Now that the reader understands spatial tenses, there are only two main facts to
understand about temporal tenses: they work exactly like the spatial tenses, wi
th selma'o PU and ZI standing in for FAhA and VA; and when both spatial and temp
oral tense cmavo are given in a single tense construct, the temporal tense is ex
pressed first. (If space were expressed before time, then certain constructions
would be ambiguous.)
4.1) le nanmu pu batci le gerku
The man [past] bites the dog.
The man bit the dog.
means that to reach the dog-biting, you must take an imaginary journey through t
ime, moving towards the past an unspecified distance. (Of course, this journey i
s even more imaginary than the ones talked about in the previous sections, since
time-travel is not an available option.)
Lojban recognizes three temporal directions: ``pu'' for the past, ``ca'' for the
present, and ``ba'' for the future. (Etymologically, these derive from the corr
esponding gismu ``purci'', ``cabna'', and ``balvi''. See Section 23 for an expla
nation of the exact relationship between the cmavo and the gismu.) There are man
y more spatial directions, since there are FAhA cmavo for both absolute and rela
tive directions as well as ``direction-like relationships'' like ``surrounding''
, ``within'', ``touching'', etc. (See Section 27 for a complete list.) But there
are really only two directions in time: forward and backward, toward the future
and toward the past. Why, then, are there three cmavo of selma'o PU?
The reason is that tense is subjective: human beings perceive space and time in
a way that does not necessarily agree with objective measurements. We have a sen
se of ``now'' which includes part of the objective past and part of the objectiv
e future, and so we naturally segment the time line into three parts. The Lojban
design recognizes this human reality by providing a separate time-direction cma
vo for the ``zero direction'', Similarly, there is a FAhA cmavo for the zero spa
ce direction: ``bu'u'', which means something like ``coinciding''.
(Technical note for readers conversant with relativity theory: The Lojban time t
enses reflect time as seen by the speaker, who is assumed to be a ``point-like o
bserver'' in the relativistic sense: they do not say anything about physical rel
ationships of relativistic interval, still less about implicit causality. The na
ture of tense is not only subjective but also observer-based.)
Here are some examples of temporal tenses:
4.2) le nanmu puzi batci le gerku
The man [past] [short distance] bites the dog.
A short time ago, the man bit the dog.
4.3) le nanmu pu pu batci le gerku
The man [past] [past] bites the dog.
Earlier than an earlier time than now,
the man bit the dog.
The man had bitten the dog.
The man had been biting the dog.
4.4) le nanmu ba puzi batci le gerku
The man [future] [past] [short] bites the dog.
Shortly earlier than some time later than now,
the man will bite the dog.
Soon before then, the man will have bitten the dog.
The man will have just bitten the dog.
The man will just have been biting the dog.
What about the analogue of an initial VA without a direction? Lojban does allow
an initial ZI with or without following PUs:
4.5) le nanmu zi pu batci le gerku
The man [short] [past] bites the dog.
Before a short time from or before now,
the man bit or will bite the dog.
4.6) le nanmu zu batci le gerku
The man [long] bites the dog.
A long time from or before now,
the man will bite or bit the dog.
Example 4.5 and Example 4.6 are perfectly legitimate, but may not be very much u
sed: ``zi'' by itself signals an event that happens at a time close to the prese
nt, but without saying whether it is in the past or the future. A rough translat
ion might be `àbout now, but not exactly now''.
Because we can move in any direction in space, we are comfortable with the idea
of events happening in an unspecified space direction (``nearby'' or ``far away'
'), but we live only from past to future, and the idea of an event which happens
``nearby in time'' is a peculiar one. Lojban provides lots of such possibilitie
s that don't seem all that useful to English-speakers, even though you can put t
hem together productively; this fact may be a limitation of English.
Finally, here are examples which combine temporal and spatial tense:
4.7) le nanmu puzu vu batci le gerku
The man [past] [long time] [long space] bites the dog.
Long ago and far away, the man bit the dog.
Alternatively,
4.8) le nanmu batci le gerku puzuvuku
The man bites the dog [past] [long time] [long space].
The man bit the dog long ago and far away.
5. Interval sizes: VEhA and ZEhA
ve'i VEhA short space interval
ve'a VEhA medium space interval
ve'u VEhA long space interval
ze'i ZEhA short time interval
ze'a ZEhA medium time interval
ze'u ZEhA long time interval
So far, we have considered only events that are usually thought of as happening
at a particular point in space and time: a man biting a dog at a specified place
and time. But Lojbanic events may be much more ``spread out'' than that: ``mi v
asxu'' (I breathe) is something which is true during the whole of my life from b
irth to death, and over the entire part of the earth where I spend my life. The
cmavo of VEhA (for space) and ZEhA (for time) can be added to any of the tense c
onstructs we have already studied to specify the size of the space or length of
the time over which the bridi is claimed to be true.
5.1) le verba ve'i cadzu le bisli
The child [small space interval] walks-on the ice.
In a small space, the child walks on the ice.
The child walks about a small area of the ice.
means that her walking was done in a small area. Like the distances, the interva
l sizes are classified only roughly as ``small, medium, large'', and are relativ
e to the context: a small part of a room might be a large part of a table in tha
t room.
Here is an example using a time interval:
5.2) le verba ze'a cadzu le bisli
The child [medium time interval] walks-on the ice.
For a medium time, the child walks/walked/will walk
on the ice.
Note that with no time direction word, Example 5.2 does not say when the walking
happened: that would be determined by context. It is possible to specify both d
irections or distances and an interval, in which case the interval always comes
afterward:
5.3) le verba pu ze'a
cadzu le bisli
The child [past] [medium time interval]
walks-on the ice.
For a medium time, the child walked on the ice.
The child walked on the ice for a while.
In Example 5.3, the relationship of the interval to the specified point in time
or space is indeterminate. Does the interval start at the point, end at the poin
t, or is it centered on the point? By adding an additional direction cmavo after
the interval, this question can be conclusively answered:
5.4) mi ca ze'ica cusku dei
I [present] [short time interval -- present]
express this-utterance.
I am now saying this sentence.
means that for an interval starting a short time in the past and extending to a
short time in the future, I am expressing the utterance which is Example 5.4. Of
course, ``short'' is relative, as always in tenses. Even a long sentence takes
up only a short part of a whole day; in a geological context, the era of Homo sa
piens would only be a ``ze'i'' interval.
By contrast,
5.5) mi ca ze'ipu
cusku dei
I [present] [short time interval -- past]
express this-utterance.
I have just been saying this sentence.
means that for a short time interval extending from the past to the present I ha
ve been expressing Example 5.5. Here the imaginary journey starts at the present
, lays down one end point of the interval, moves into the past, and lays down th
e other endpoint. Another example:
5.6) mi pu ze'aba citka le mi sanmi
I [past] [medium time interval - future] eat my meal.
For a medium time afterward, I ate my meal.
I ate my meal for a while.
With ``ca'' instead of ``ba'', Example 5.6 becomes Example 5.7,
5.7) mi pu ze'aca citka le mi sanmi
I [past] [medium time interval - present] eat my meal
For a medium time before and afterward, I ate my meal.
I ate my meal for a while.
because the interval would then be centered on the past moment rather than orien
ted toward the future of that moment. The colloquial English translations are th
e same --- English is not well-suited to representing this distinction.
Here are some examples of the use of space intervals with and without specified
directions:
5.8) ta ri'u ve'i finpe
that-there [right] [short space interval] is-a-fish
That thing on my right is a fish.
In Example 5.8, there is no equivalent in the colloquial English translation of
the ``small interval'' which the fish occupies. Neither the Lojban nor the Engli
sh expresses the orientation of the fish. Compare Example 5.9:
5.9) ta ri'u ve'ica'u
finpe
that-there [right] [short space interval - front]
is-a-fish
That thing on my right extending forwards is a fish.
Here the space interval occupied by the fish extends from a point on my right to
another point in front of the first point.
6. Vague intervals and non-specific tenses
What is the significance of failing to specify an interval size of the type disc
ussed in Section 5? The Lojban rule is that if no interval size is given, the si
ze of the space or time interval is left vague by the speaker. For example:
I [past] go-to the market.
really means:
At a moment in the past, and possibly other moments as well, the event `Ì w
ent to the market'' was in progress.
The vague or unspecified interval contains an instant in the speaker's past. How
ever, there is no indication whether or not the whole interval is in the speaker
's past! It is entirely possible that the interval during which the going-to-the
-market is happening stretches into the speaker's present or even future.
Example 6.1 points up a fundamental difference between Lojban tenses and English
tenses. An English past-tense sentence like `Ì went to the market'' generally
signifies that the going-to-the-market is entirely in the past; that is, that th
e event is complete at the time of speaking. Lojban ``pu'' has no such implicati
on.
This property of a past tense is sometimes called `àorist'', in reference to a
similar concept in the tense system of Classical Greek. All of the Lojban tenses
have the same property, however:
6.3) le tricu ba crino
the tree [future] is-green
The tree will be green.
does not imply (as the colloquial English translation does) that the tree is not
green now. The vague interval throughout which the tree is, in fact, green may
have already started.
This general principle does not mean that Lojban has no way of indicating that a
tree will be green but is not yet green. Indeed, there are several ways of expr
essing that concept: see Section 10 (event contours) and Section 20 (logical con
nection between tenses).
7. Dimensionality: VIhA
vi'i VIhA on a line
vi'a VIhA in an area
vi'u VIhA through a volume
vi'e VIhA throughout a space/time interval
The cmavo of ZEhA are sufficient to express time intervals. One fundamental diff
erence between space and time, however, is that space is multi-dimensional. Some
times we want to say not only that something moves over a small interval, but al
so perhaps that it moves in a line. Lojban allows for this. I can specify that a
motion `ìn a small space'' is more specifically `ìn a short line'', `ìn a sm
all area'', or ``through a small volume''.
What about the child walking on the ice in Examples 5.1 through 5.3? Given the n
ature of ice, probably the area interpretation is most sensible. I can make this
assumption explicit with the appropriate member of selma'o VIhA:
7.1) le verba ve'a vi'a
cadzu le bisli
The child [medium space interval] [2-dimensional]
walks-on the ice.
In a medium-sized area, the child walks on the ice.
Space intervals can contain either VEhA or VIhA or both, but if both, VEhA must
come first, as Example 7.1 shows.
The reader may wish to raise a philosophical point here. (Readers who don't wish
to, should skip this paragraph.) The ice may be two-dimensional, or more accura
tely its surface may be, but since the child is three-dimensional, her walking m
ust also be. The subjective nature of Lojban tense comes to the rescue here: the
action is essentially planar, and the third dimension of height is simply irrel
evant to walking. Even walking on a mountain could be called ``vi'a'', because r
elatively speaking the mountain is associated with an essentially two-dimensiona
l surface. Motion which is not confined to such a surface (e.g., flying, or walk
ing through a three-dimensional network of tunnels, or climbing among mountains
rather than on a single mountain) would be properly described with ``vi'u''. So
the cognitive, rather than the physical, dimensionality controls the choice of V
IhA cmavo.
VIhA has a member ``vi'e'' which indicates a 4-dimensional interval, one that in
volves both space and time. This allows the spatial tenses to invade, to some de
gree, the temporal tenses; it is possible to make statements about space-time co
nsidered as an Einsteinian whole. (There are presently no cmavo of FAhA assigned
to ``pastward'' and ``futureward'' considered as space rather than time directi
ons --- they could be added, though, if Lojbanists find space-time expression us
eful.) If a temporal tense cmavo is used in the same tense construct with a ``vi
'e'' interval, the resulting tense may be self-contradictory.
8. Movement in space: MOhI
mo'i MOhI movement flag
All the information carried by the tense constructs so far presented has been pr
esumed to be static: the bridi is occurring somewhere or other in space and time
, more or less remote from the speaker. Suppose the truth of the bridi itself de
pends on the result of a movement, or represents an action being done while the
speaker is moving? This too can be represented by the tense system, using the cm
avo ``mo'i'' (of selma'o MOhI) plus a spatial direction and optional distance; t
he direction now refers to a direction of motion rather than a static direction
from the speaker.
8.1) le verba mo'i ri'u cadzu le bisli
The child [movement] [right] walks-on the ice.
The child walks toward my right on the ice.
This is quite different from:
8.2) le verba ri'u cadzu le bisli
The child [right] walks-on the ice.
To the right of me, the child walks on the ice.
In either case, however, the reference frame for defining ``right'' and ``left''
is the speaker's, not the child's. This can be changed thus:
8.3) le verba mo'i ri'u cadzu le bisli
ma'i vo'a
The child [movement] [right] walks on the ice
in-reference-frame the-x1-place.
The child walks toward her right on the ice.
Example 8.3 is analogous to Example 8.1. The cmavo ``ma'i'' belongs to selma'o B
AI (explained in Chapter 9), and allows specifying a reference frame.
Both a regular and a ``mo'i''-flagged spatial tense can be combined, with the ``
mo'i'' construct coming last:
8.4) le verba zu'avu mo'i ri'uvi
cadzu le bisli
The child [left] [long] [movement] [right] [short]
walks-on the ice.
Far to the left of me, the child walks a short
distance toward my right on the ice.
It is not grammatical to use multiple directions like ``zu'a ca'u'' after ``mo'i
'', but complex movements can be expressed in a separate bridi.
Here is an example of a movement tense on a bridi not inherently involving movem
ent:
8.5) mi mo'i ca'uvu citka le mi sanmi
I [movement] [front] [long] eat my meal.
While moving a long way forward, I eat my meal.
(Perhaps I am eating in an airplane.)
There is no parallel facility in Lojban at present for expressing movement in ti
me --- time travel --- but one could be added easily if it ever becomes useful.
9. Interval properties: TAhE and ``roi''
di'i TAhE regularly
na'o TAhE typically
ru'i TAhE continuously
ta'e TAhE habitually
di'inai TAhE irregularly
na'onai TAhE atypically
ru'inai TAhE intermittently
ta'enai TAhE contrary to habit
roi ROI ``n'' times
roinai ROI other than ``n'' times
ze'e ZEhA whole time interval
ve'e VEhA whole space interval
Consider Lojban bridi which express events taking place in time. Whether a very
short interval (a point) or a long interval of time is involved, the event may n
ot be spread consistently throughout that interval. Lojban can use the cmavo of
selma'o TAhE to express the idea of continuous or non-continuous actions.
9.1) mi puzu ze'u
velckule
I [past] [long distance] [long interval]
am-a-school-attendee (pupil).
Long ago I attended school for a long time.
probably does not mean that I attended school continuously throughout the whole
of that long-ago interval. Actually, I attended school every day, except for sch
ool holidays. More explicitly,
9.2) mi puzu ze'u di'i
velckule
I [past] [long distance] [long interval] [regularly]
am-a-pupil.
Long ago I regularly attended school for a long time.
The four TAhE cmavo are differentiated as follows: ``ru'i'' covers the entirety
of the interval, ``di'i'' covers the parts of the interval which are systematica
lly spaced subintervals; ``na'o'' covers part of the interval, but exactly which
part is determined by context; ``ta'e'' covers part of the interval, selected w
ith reference to the behavior of the actor (who often, but not always, appears i
n the x1 place of the bridi).
Using TAhE does not require being so specific. Either the time direction or the
time interval or both may be omitted (in which case they are vague). For example
:
9.3) mi ba ta'e klama le zarci
I [future] [habitually] go-to the market.
I will habitually go to the market.
I will make a habit of going to the market.
specifies the future, but the duration of the interval is indefinite. Similarly,
9.4) mi na'o klama le zarci
I [typically] go-to the market
I typically go/went/will go to the market
illustrates an interval property in isolation. There are no distance or directio
n cmavo, so the point of time is vague; likewise, there is no interval cmavo, so
the length of the interval during which these goings-to-the-market take place i
s also vague. As always, context will determine these vague values.
`Ìntermittently'' is the polar opposite notion to ``continuously'', and is expr
essed not with its own cmavo, but by adding the negation suffix ``-nai'' (which
belongs to selma'o NAI) to ``ru'i''. For example:
9.5) le verba ru'inai cadzu le bisli
The child [continuously-not] walks-on the ice.
The child intermittently walks on the ice.
As shown in the cmavo table above, all the cmavo of TAhE may be negated with ``-
nai''; ``ru'inai'' and ``di'inai'' are probably the most useful.
An intermittent event can also be specified by counting the number of times duri
ng the interval that it takes place. The cmavo ``roi'' (which belongs to selma'o
ROI) can be appended to a number to make a quantified tense. Quantified tenses
are common in English, but not so commonly named: they are exemplified by the ad
verbs ``never'', `ònce'', ``twice'', ``thrice'', ... `àlways'', and by the rel
ated phrases ``many times'', `à few times'', ``too many times'', and so on. All
of these are handled in Lojban by a number plus ``-roi'':
9.6) mi paroi klama le zarci
I [one time] go-to the market.
I go to the market once.
9.7) mi du'eroi klama le zarci
I [too-many times] go-to the market.
I go to the market too often.
With the quantified tense alone, we don't know whether the past, the present, or
the future is intended, but of course the quantified tense need not stand alone
:
9.8) mi pu reroi klama le zarci
I [past] [two times] go-to the market.
I went to the market twice.
The English is slightly over-specific here: it entails that both goings-to- the-
market were in the past, which may or may not be true in the Lojban sentence, si
nce the implied interval is vague. Therefore, the interval may start in the past
but extend into the present or even the future.
Adding ``-nai'' to ``roi'' is also permitted, and has the meaning `òther than (
the number specified)'':
9.9) le ratcu reroinai citka le cirli
The rat [twice-not] eats the cheese.
The rat eats the cheese other than twice
This may mean that the rat eats the cheese fewer times, or more times, or not at
all.
It is necessary to be careful with sentences like Example 9.6 and Example 9.8, w
here a quantified tense appears without an interval. What Example 9.8 really say
s is that during an interval of unspecified size, at least part of which was set
in the past, the event of my going to the market happened twice. The example sa
ys nothing about what happened outside that vague time interval. This is often l
ess than we mean. If we want to nail down that I went to the market once and onl
y once, we can use the cmavo ``ze'e'' which represents the ``whole time interval
'': conceptually, an interval which stretches from time's beginning to its end:
9.10) mi ze'e paroi klama le zarci
I [whole interval] [once] go-to the market.
Since specifying no ZEhA leaves the interval vague, Example 9.8 might in appropr
iate context mean the same as Example 9.10 after all --- but Example 9.10 allows
us to be specific when specificity is necessary.
A PU cmavo following ``ze'e'' has a slightly different meaning from one that fol
lows another ZEhA cmavo. The compound cmavo ``ze'epu'' signifies the interval st
retching from the infinite past to the reference point (wherever the imaginary j
ourney has taken you); ``ze'eba'' is the interval stretching from the reference
point to the infinite future. The remaining form, ``ze'eca'', makes specific the
``whole of time'' interpretation just given. These compound forms make it possi
ble to assert that something has never happened without asserting that it never
will.
9.11) mi ze'epu noroi klama le zarci
I [whole interval] [past] [never] go-to the market.
I have never gone to the market.
says nothing about whether I might go in future.
The space equivalent of ``ze'e'' is ``ve'e'', and it can be used in the same way
with a quantified space tense: see Section 11 for an explanation of space inter
val modifiers.
10. Event contours: ZAhO and ``re'u''
pu'o ZAhO inchoative
ca'o ZAhO continuitive
ba'o ZAhO perfective
co'a ZAhO initiative
co'u ZAhO cessitive
mo'u ZAhO completitive
za'o ZAhO superfective
co'i ZAhO achievative
de'a ZAhO pausative
di'a ZAhO resumptive
re'u ROI ordinal tense
The cmavo of selma'o ZAhO express the Lojban version of what is traditionally ca
lled `àspect''. This is not a notion well expressed by English tenses, but many
languages (including Chinese and Russian among Lojban's six source languages) c
onsider it more important than the specification of mere position in time.
The `èvent contours'' of selma'o ZAhO, with their bizarre keywords, represent t
he natural portions of an event considered as a process, an occurrence with an i
nternal structure including a beginning, a middle, and an end. Since the keyword
s are scarcely self-explanatory, each ZAhO will be explained in detail here. Not
e that from the viewpoint of Lojban syntax, ZAhOs are interval modifiers like TA
hEs or ROI compounds; if both are found in a single tense, the TAhE/ROI comes fi
rst and the ZAhO afterward. The imaginary journey described by other tense cmavo
moves us to the portion of the event-as-process which the ZAhO specifies.
It is important to understand that ZAhO cmavo, unlike the other tense cmavo, spe
cify characteristic portions of the event, and are seen from an essentially time
less perspective. The ``beginning'' of an event is the same whether the event is
in the speaker's present, past, or future. It is especially important not to co
nfuse the speaker-relative viewpoint of the PU tenses with the event-relative vi
ewpoint of the ZAhO tenses.
The cmavo ``pu'o'', ``ca'o'', and ``ba'o'' (etymologically derived from the PU c
mavo) refer to an event that has not yet begun, that is in progress, or that has
ended, respectively:
10.1) mi pu'o damba
I [inchoative] fight.
I'm on the verge of fighting.
10.2) la stiv. ca'o bacru
Steve [continuitive] utters.
Steve continues to talk.
10.3) le verba ba'o cadzu le bisli
The child [perfective] walks-on the ice.
The child is finished walking on the ice.
As discussed in Section 6, the simple PU cmavo make no assumptions about whether
the scope of a past, present, or future event extends into one of the other ten
ses as well. Examples 10.1 through 10.3 illustrate that these ZAhO cmavo do make
such assumptions possible: the event in 10.1 has not yet begun, definitively; l
ikewise, the event in 10.3 is definitely over.
Note that in Example 10.1 and Example 10.3, ``pu'o'' and ``ba'o'' may appear to
be reversed: ``pu'o'', although etymologically connected with ``pu'', is referri
ng to a future event; whereas ``ba'o'', connected with ``ba'', is referring to a
past event. This is the natural result of the event-centered view of ZAhO cmavo
. The inchoative, or ``pu'o'', part of an event, is in the ``pastward'' portion
of that event, when seen from the perspective of the event itself. It is only by
inference that we suppose that Example 10.1 refers to the speaker's future: in
fact, no PU tense is given, so the inchoative part of the event need not be coin
cident with the speaker's present: ``pu'o'' is not necessarily, though in fact o
ften is, the same as ``ca pu'o''.
The cmavo in Examples 10.1 through 10.3 refer to spans of time. There are also t
wo points of time that can be usefully associated with an event: the beginning,
marked by ``co'a'', and the end, marked by ``co'u''. Specifically, ``co'a'' mark
s the boundary between the ``pu'o'' and ``ca'o'' parts of an event, and ``co'u''
marks the boundary between the ``ca'o'' and ``ba'o'' parts:
10.4) mi ba co'a citka le mi sanmi
I [future] [initiative] eat my meal.
I will begin to eat my meal.
10.5) mi pu co'u citka le mi sanmi
I [past] [cessitive] eat my meal.
I ceased eating my meal.
Compare Example 10.4 with:
10.6) mi ba di'i co'a bajra
I [future] [regularly] [initiative] run.
I will regularly begin to run.
which illustrates the combination of a TAhE with a ZAhO.
A process can have two end points, one reflecting the ``natural end'' (when the
process is complete) and the other reflecting the `àctual stopping point'' (whe
ther complete or not). Example 10.5 may be contrasted with:
10.7) mi pu mo'u citka le mi sanmi
I [past] [completitive] eat my meal.
I finished eating my meal.
In Example 10.7, the meal has reached its natural end; in Example 10.5, the meal
has merely ceased, without necessarily reaching its natural end.
A process such as eating a meal does not necessarily proceed uninterrupted. If i
t is interrupted, there are two more relevant point events: the point just befor
e the interruption, marked by ``de'a'', and the point just after the interruptio
n, marked by ``di'a''. Some examples:
10.8) mi pu de'a citka le mi sanmi
I [past] [pausative] eat my meal.
I stopped eating my meal
(with the intention of resuming).
10.9) mi ba di'a citka le mi sanmi
I [future] [resumptive] eat my meal.
I will resume eating my meal.
In addition, it is possible for a process to continue beyond its natural end. Th
e span of time between the natural and the actual end points is represented by `
`za'o'':
10.10) le xirma ca za'o
jivna bajra
The horse [present] [superfective]
compete-type-of runs.
The horse keeps on running a race too long.
which means that it ran past the finish line (after the race was over --- in mos
t races, the runners do not stop right at the finish line).
An entire event can be treated as a single moment using the cmavo ``co'i'':
10.11) la djan. pu co'i catra la djim
John [past] [achievative] kills Jim.
John was at the point in time where he killed Jim.
Finally, since an activity is cyclical, an individual cycle can be referred to u
sing a number followed by ``re'u'', which is the other cmavo of selma'o ROI:
10.12) mi pare'u klama le zarci
I [first time] go-to the store.
I go to the store for the first time
(within a vague interval).
Note the difference between:
10.13) mi pare'u paroi klama le zarci
I [first time] [one time] go-to the store.
For the first time, I go to the store once.
and
10.14) mi paroi pare'u klama le zarci
I [one time] [first time] go-to the store.
There is one occasion on which I go to
the store for the first time.
11. Space interval modifiers: FEhE
fe'e FEhE space interval modifier flag
Like time intervals, space intervals can also be continuous, discontinuous, or r
epetitive. Rather than having a whole separate set of selma'o for space interval
properties, we instead prefix the flag ``fe'e'' to the cmavo used for time inte
rval properties. A space interval property would be placed just after the space
interval size and/or dimensionality cmavo:
11.1) ko vi'i fe'e di'i
sombo le gurni
You-imperative [1-dimensional] [space:] [regularly]
sow the grain.
Sow the grain in a line and evenly!
11.2) mi fe'e ciroi
tervecnu lo selsalta
I [space:] [three places]
buy those-which-are salad-ingredients.
I buy salad ingredients in three locations.
11.3) ze'e roroi ve'e
fe'e roroi ku
li re su'i re du li vo
[whole time] [all times] [whole space]
[space:] [all places]
The-number 2 + 2 = the-number 4.
Always and everywhere, two plus two is four.
As shown in Example 11.3, when a tense comes first in a bridi, rather than in it
s normal position before the selbri (in this case ``du''), it is emphasized.
The ``fe'e'' marker can also be used for the same purpose before members of ZAhO
. (The cmavo ``be'a'' belongs to selma'o FAhA; it is the space direction meaning
``north of''.)
11.4) tu ve'abe'a
fe'e co'a rokci
that-yonder [medium space interval - north]
[space] [initiative] is-a-rock.
That is the beginning of a rock extending to my north.
That is the south face of a rock.
Here the notion of a ``beginning point'' represented by the cmavo ``co'a'' is tr
ansferred from ``beginning in time'' to ``beginning in space'' under the influen
ce of the ``fe'e'' flag. Space is not inherently oriented, unlike time, which fl
ows from past to future: therefore, some indication of orientation is necessary,
and the ``ve'abe'a'' provides an orientation in which the south face is the ``b
eginning'' and the north face is the `ènd'', since the rock extends from south
(near me) to north (away from me).
Many natural languages represent time by a space-based metaphor: in English, wha
t is past is said to be ``behind us''. In other languages, the metaphor is rever
sed. Here, Lojban is representing space (or space interval modifiers) by a time-
based metaphor: the choice of a FAhA cmavo following a VEhA cmavo indicates whic
h direction is mapped onto the future. (The choice of future rather than past is
arbitrary, but convenient for English-speakers.)
If both a TAhE (or ROI) and a ZAhO are present as space interval modifiers, the
``fe'e'' flag must be prefixed to each.
12. Tenses as sumti tcita
So far, we have seen tenses only just before the selbri, or (equivalently in mea
ning) floating about the bridi with ``ku''. There is another major use for tense
s in Lojban: as sumti tcita, or argument tags. A tense may be used to add spatia
l or temporal information to a bridi as, in effect, an additional place:
12.1) mi klama le zarci ca le nu
do klama le zdani
I go-to the market [present] the event-of
you go-to the house.
I go to the market when you go to the house.
Here ``ca'' does not appear before the selbri, nor with ``ku''; instead, it gove
rns the following sumti, the ``le nu'' construct. What Example 12.1 asserts is t
hat the action of the main bridi is happening at the same time as the event ment
ioned by that sumti. So ``ca'', which means ``now'' when used with a selbri, mea
ns ``simultaneously-with'' when used with a sumti. Consider another example:
12.2) mi klama le zarci pu le nu
do pu klama le zdani
I go-to the market [past] the event-of
you [past] go-to the house.
The second ``pu'' is simply the past tense marker for the event of your going to
the house, and says that this event is in the speaker's past. How are we to und
erstand the first ``pu'', the sumti tcita?
All of our imaginary journeys so far have started at the speaker's location in s
pace and time. Now we are specifying an imaginary journey that starts at a diffe
rent location, namely at the event of your going to the house. Example 12.2 then
says that my going to the market is in the past, relative not to the speaker's
present moment, but instead relative to the moment when you went to the house. E
xample 12.2 can therefore be translated:
I had gone to the market before you went to the house.
(Other translations are possible, depending on the ever-present context.) Spatia
l direction and distance sumti tcita are exactly analogous:
12.3) le ratcu cu citka le cirla vi le panka
The rat eats the cheese [short distance] the park.
The rat eats the cheese near the park.
12.4) le ratcu cu citka le cirla
vi le vu panka
The rat eats the cheese
[short distance] the [long distance] park
The rat eats the cheese near the faraway park.
12.5) le ratcu cu citka le cirla
vu le vi panka
The rat eats the cheese
[long distance] the [short distance] park
The rat eats the cheese far away from the nearby park.
The event contours of selma'o ZAhO (and their space equivalents, prefixed with `
`fe'e'') are also useful as sumti tcita. The interpretation of ZAhO tcita differ
s from that of FAhA, VA, PU, and ZI tcita, however. The event described in the s
umti is viewed as a process, and the action of the main bridi occurs at the phas
e of the process which the ZAhO specifies, or at least some part of that phase.
The action of the main bridi itself is seen as a point event, so that there is n
o issue about which phase of the main bridi is intended. For example:
12.6) mi morsi ba'o le nu mi jmive
I am-dead [perfective] the event-of I live.
I die in the aftermath of my living.
Here the (point-)event of my being dead is the portion of my living-process whic
h occurs after the process is complete. Contrast Example 12.6 with:
12.7) mi morsi ba le nu mi jmive
I am-dead [future] the event-of I live.
As explained in Section 6, Example 12.7 does not exclude the possibility that I
died before I ceased to live!
Likewise, we might say:
12.8) mi klama le zarci pu'o le nu mi citka
I go-to the store [inchoative] the event-of I eat
which indicates that before my eating begins, I go to the store, whereas
12.9) mi klama le zarci ba'o le nu mi citka
I go-to the store [perfective] the event-of I eat
would indicate that I go to the store after I am finished eating.
Here is an example which mixes temporal ZAhO (as a tense) and spatial ZAhO (as a
sumti tcita):
12.10) le bloti pu za'o xelklama
fe'e ba'o le lalxu
the boat [past] [superfective]
is-a-transport-mechanism
[space] [perfective] the lake.
The boat sailed for too long and beyond the lake.
Probably it sailed up onto the dock. One point of clarification: although ``xelk
lama'' appears to mean simply `ìs-a-mode-of-transport'', it does not -- the bri
di of Example 12.10 has four omitted arguments, and thus has the (physical) jour
ney which goes on too long as part of its meaning.
The remaining tense cmavo, which have to do with interval size, dimension, and c
ontinuousness (or lack thereof) are interpreted to let the sumti specify the par
ticular interval over which the main bridi operates:
12.11) mi klama le zarci reroi le ca djedi
I go-to the market [twice] the [present] day
I go/went/will go to the market twice today.
Be careful not to confuse a tense used as a sumti tcita with a tense used within
a seltcita sumti:
12.12) loi snime cu carvi
ze'u le ca dunra
some-of-the-mass-of snow rains
[long time interval] the [present] winter.
Snow falls during this winter.
claims that the interval specified by ``this winter'' is long, as events of snow
fall go, whereas
12.13) loi snime cu carvi
ca le ze'u dunra
some-of-the-mass-of snow rains
[present] the [long time] winter.
Snow falls in the long winter.
claims that during some part of the winter, which is long as winters go, snow fa
lls.
13. Sticky and multiple tenses: KI
ki KI sticky tense set/reset
So far we have only considered tenses in isolated bridi. Lojban provides several
ways for a tense to continue in effect over more than a single bridi. This prop
erty is known as ``stickiness'': the tense gets ``stuck'' and remains in effect
until explicitly `ùnstuck''. In the metaphor of the imaginary journey, the plac
e and time set by a sticky tense may be thought of as a campsite or way-station:
it provides a permanent origin with respect to which other tenses are understoo
d. Later imaginary journeys start from that point rather than from the speaker.
To make a tense sticky, suffix ``ki'' to it:
13.1) mi puki klama le zarci
.i le nanmu cu batci le gerku
I [past] [sticky] go-to the market.
The man bites the dog.
I went to the market. The man bit the dog.
Here the use of ``puki'' rather than just ``pu'' ensures that the tense will aff
ect the next sentence as well. Otherwise, since the second sentence is tenseless
, there would be no way of determining its tense; the event of the second senten
ce might happen before, after, or simultaneously with that of the first sentence
.
(The last statement does not apply when the two sentences form part of a narrati
ve. See Section 14 for an explanation of ``story time'', which employs a differe
nt set of conventions.)
What if the second sentence has a tense anyway?
13.2) mi puki klama le zarci
.i le nanmu pu batci le gerku
I [past] sticky go-to the market.
The man [past] bites the dog.
Here the second ``pu'' does not replace the sticky tense, but adds to it, in the
sense that the starting point of its imaginary journey is taken to be the previ
ously set sticky time. So the translation of Example 13.2 is:
13.3) I went to the market.
The man had earlier bitten the dog.
and it is equivalent in meaning (when considered in isolation from any other sen
tences) to:
.i le nanmu pupu batci le gerku
The man [past] [past] bites the dog.
The point has not been discussed so far, but it is perfectly grammatical to have
more than one tense construct in a sentence:
13.5) puku mi ba klama le zarci
[past] I [future] go-to the market.
Earlier, I was going to go to the market.
Here there are two tenses in the same bridi, the first floating free and specifi
ed by ``puku'', the second in the usual place and specified by ``ba''. They are
considered cumulative in the same way as the two tenses in separate sentences of
Example 13.4. Example 13.5 is therefore equivalent in meaning, except for empha
sis, to:
13.6) mi puba klama le zarci
I [past] [future] go-to the market.
I was going to go to the market.
Compare Example 13.7 and Example 13.8, which have a different meaning from Examp
le 13.5 and Example 13.6:
13.7) mi ba klama le zarci puku
I [future] go-to the market [past].
I will have gone to the market earlier.
13.8) mi bapu klama le zarci
I [future] [past] go-to the market.
I will have gone to the market.
So when multiple tense constructs in a single bridi are involved, order counts -
-- the tenses cannot be shifted around as freely as if there were only one tense
to worry about.
But why bother to allow multiple tense constructs at all? They specify separate
portions of the imaginary journey, and can be useful in order to make part of a
tense sticky. Consider Example 13.9, which adds a second bridi and a ``ki'' to E
xample 13.5:
13.9
pukiku mi ba klama le zarci .i le nanmu cu batci le gerku [past] [sticky] I
[future] go-to the market. The man bites the dog.
What is the implied tense of the second sentence? Not ``puba'', but only ``pu'',
since only ``pu'' was made sticky with ``ki''. So the translation is:
I was going to go to the market. The man bit the dog.
Lojban has several ways of embedding a bridi within another bridi: descriptions,
abstractors, relative clauses. (Technically, descriptions contain selbri rather
than bridi.) Any of the selbri of these subordinate bridi may have tenses attac
hed. These tenses are interpreted relative to the tense of the main bridi:
13.10) mi pu klama le ba'o zarci
I [past] go-to the [perfective] market
I went to the former market.
The significance of the ``ba'o'' in Example 13.10 is that the speaker's destinat
ion is described as being `ìn the aftermath of being a market''; that is, it is
a market no longer. In particular, the time at which it was no longer a market
is in the speaker's past, because the ``ba'o'' is interpreted relative to the ``
pu'' tense of the main bridi.
Here is an example involving an abstraction bridi:
13.11) mi ca jinvi le du'u mi ba morsi
I now opine the fact-that I will-be dead.
I now believe that I will be dead.
Here the event of being dead is said to be in the future with respect to the opi
nion, which is in the present.
``ki'' may also be used as a tense by itself. This cancels all stickiness and re
turns the bridi and all following bridi to the speaker's location in both space
and time:
13.12) mi ki cusku dei
I [here and now] express this-utterance.
I say this sentence now.
In complex descriptions, multiple tenses may be saved and then used by adding a
subscript to ``ki''. A time made sticky with ``kixipa'' (ki-sub-1) can be return
ed to by specifying ``kixipa'' as a tense by itself. In the case of written expr
ession, the writer's here-and-now is often different from the reader's, and a pa
ir of subscripted ``ki'' tenses could be used to distinguish the two.
14. Story time
Making strict use of the conventions explained in Section 13 would be intolerabl
y awkward when a story is being told. The time at which a story is told by the n
arrator is usually unimportant to the story. What matters is the flow of time wi
thin the story itself. The term ``story'' in this section refers to any series o
f statements related in more-or-less time-sequential order, not just a fictional
one.
Lojban speakers use a different set of conventions, commonly called ``story time
'', for inferring tense within a story. It is presumed that the event described
by each sentence takes place some time more or less after the previous ones. The
refore, tenseless sentences are implicitly tensed as ``what happens next''. In p
articular, any sticky time setting is advanced by each sentence.
The following mini-story illustrates the important features of story time. A sen
tence-by-sentence explication follows:
14.1) puzuki ku ne'iki le kevna
le ninmu goi ko'a zutse le rokci
[past] [long] [sticky] [,] [inside] [sticky] the cave,
the woman defined-as she-1 sat-on the rock
Long ago, in a cave, a woman sat on a rock.
14.2) .i ko'a citka loi kanba rectu
She-1 [tenseless] eat some-of-the-mass-of goat flesh.
She was eating goat's meat.
14.3) .i ko'a pu jukpa ri le mudyfagri
She [past] cook the-last-mentioned
by-method the wood-fire.
She had cooked the meat over a wood fire.
14.4) .i lei rectu cu zanglare
The-mass-of flesh is-(favorable)-warm.
The meat was pleasantly warm.
14.5) .i le labno goi ko'e bazaki
nenri klama le kevna
The wolf defined-as it-2 [future] [medium] [sticky]
within-came to-the cave.
A while later, a wolf came into the cave.
14.6) .i ko'e lebna lei rectu ko'a
It-2 [tenseless] takes the-mass-of flesh from-her-1.
It took the meat from her.
14.7) .i ko'e bartu klama
It-2 out ran
It ran out.
Example 14.1 sets both the time (long ago) and the place (in a cave) using ``ki'
', just like the sentence sequences in Section 13. No further space cmavo are us
ed in the rest of the story, so the place is assumed to remain unchanged. The En
glish translation of Example 14.1 is marked for past tense also, as the conventi
ons of English storytelling require: consequently, all other English translation
sentences are also in the past tense. (We don't notice how strange this is; eve
n stories about the future are written in past tense!) This conventional use of
past tense is not used in Lojban narratives.
Example 14.2 is tenseless. Outside story time, it would be assumed that its even
t happens simultaneously with that of Example 14.1, since a sticky tense is in e
ffect; the rules of story time, however, imply that the event occurs afterwards,
and that the story time has advanced (changing the sticky time set in Example 1
4.1).
Example 14.3 has an explicit tense. This is taken relative to the latest setting
of the sticky time; therefore, the event of Example 14.3 happens before that of
Example 14.2. It cannot be determined if Example 14.3 happens before or after E
xample 14.1.
Example 14.4 is again tenseless. Story time was not changed by the flashback in
Example 14.3, so Example 14.4 happens after Example 14.2.
Example 14.5 specifies the future (relative to Example 14.4) and makes it sticky
. So all further events happen after Example 14.5.
Example 14.6 and Example 14.7 are again tenseless, and so happen after Example 1
4.5. (Story time is changed.)
So the overall order is 14.1 - 14.3 - 14.2 - 14.4 - (medium interval) - 14.5 - 1
4.6 - 14.7. It is also possible that 14.3 happens before 14.1.
If no sticky time (or space) is set initially, the story is set at an unspecifie
d time (or space): the effect is like that of choosing an arbitrary reference po
int and making it sticky. This style is common in stories that are jokes. The sa
me convention may be used if the context specifies the sticky time sufficiently.
15. Tenses in subordinate bridi
English has a set of rules, formally known as ``sequence of tense rules'', for d
etermining what tense should be used in a subordinate clause, depending on the t
ense used in the main sentence. Here are some examples:
15.1) John says that George is going to the market.
15.2) John says that George went to the market.
15.3) John said that George went to the market.
15.4) John said that George had gone to the market.
In Example 15.1 and Example 15.2, the tense of the main sentence is the present:
``says''. If George goes when John speaks, we get the present tense `ìs going'
' (``goes'' would be unidiomatic); if George goes before John speaks, we get the
past tense ``went''. But if the tense of the main sentence is the past, with ``
said'', then the tense required in the subordinate clause is different. If Georg
e goes when John speaks, we get the past tense ``went''; if George goes before J
ohn speaks, we get the past-perfect tense ``had gone''.
The rule of English, therefore, is that both the tense of the main sentence and
the tense of the subordinate clause are understood relative to the speaker (not
John, but the person who speaks Examples 15.1 through 15.4).
Lojban, like Russian and Esperanto, uses a different convention. A tense in a su
bordinate bridi is understood to be relative to the tense already set in the mai
n bridi. Thus Examples 15.1 through 15.4 can be expressed in Lojban respectively
thus:
15.5) la djan. ca cusku le se du'u
la djordj. ca klama le zarci
John [present] says the statement-that
George [present] goes-to the market.
15.6) la djan. ca cusku le se du'u
la djordj. pu klama le zarci
John [present] says the statement-that
George [past] goes-to the market.
15.7) la djan. pu cusku le se du'u
la djordj. ca klama le zarci
John [past] says the statement-that
George [present] goes-to the market.
la djordj. pu klama le zarci
George [past] goes-to the market.
Probably the most counterintuitive of the Lojban examples is Example 15.7. The `
`ca'' looks quite odd, as if George were going to the market right now, rather t
han back when John spoke. But this ``ca'' is really a ``ca'' with respect to a r
eference point specified by the outer ``pu''. This behavior is the same as the a
dditive behavior of multiple tenses in the same bridi, as explained in Section 1
3.
There is a special cmavo ``nau'' (of selma'o CUhE) which can be used to override
these rules and get to the speaker's current reference point. (Yes, it sounds l
ike English ``now''.) It is not grammatical to combine ``nau'' with any other cm
avo in a tense, except by way of a logical or non-logical connection (see Sectio
n 20). Here is a convoluted sentence with several nested bridi which uses ``nau'
' at the lowest level:
la .alis pu cusku le se du'u
la djordj. pu cusku le se du'u
la maris. nau klama le zarci
Alice [past] says the statement-that
George [past] says the statement that
Mary [now] goes-to the market.
John said that Alice had said that George had earlier
said that Mary is now going to the market.
The use of ``nau'' does not affect sticky tenses.
16. Tense relations between sentences
The sumti tcita method, explained in Section 12, of asserting a tense relationsh
ip between two events suffers from asymmetry. Specifically,
16.1) le verba cu cadzu le bisli
zu'a le nu le nanmu cu batci le gerku
The child walks-on the ice
[left] the event-of the man bites the dog.
The child walks on the ice to the left of where
which specifies an imaginary journey leftward from the man biting the dog to the
child walking on the ice, claims only that the child walks on the ice. By the n
ature of ``le nu'', the man's biting the dog is merely referred to without being
claimed. If it seems desirable to claim both, each event can be expressed as a
main sentence bridi, with a special form of ``.i'' connecting them:
16.2) le nanmu cu batci le gerku
.izu'abo le verba cu cadzu le bisli
[Left] the child walks-on the ice.
The man bites the dog. To the left, the child
walks on the ice.
``.izu'abo'' is a compound cmavo: the ``.i'' separates the sentences and the ``z
u'a'' is the tense. The ``bo'' is required to prevent the ``zu'a'' from gobbling
up the following sumti, namely ``le verba''.
Note that the bridi in Example 16.2 appear in the reverse order from their appea
rance in Example 16.1. With ``.izu'abo'' (and all other afterthought tense conne
ctives) the sentence specifying the origin of the journey comes first. This is a
natural order for sentences, but requires some care when converting between thi
s form and the sumti tcita form.
Example 16.2 means the same thing as:
.i zu'a la'edi'u
le verba cu cadzu le bisli
[Left] the-referent-of-the-last-sentence
the child walks-on the ice.
Left of what I just mentioned,
the child walks on the ice.
If the ``bo'' is omitted, the meaning changes:
.i zu'a le verba cu cadzu le bisli
[Left] the child [something] walks-on the ice.
The man bites the dog. To the left of the child,
something walks on the ice.
Here the first place of the second sentence is unspecified, because ``zu'a'' has
absorbed the sumti ``le verba''.
Do not confuse either Example 16.2 or Example 16.4 with the following:
.i zu'aku le verba cu cadzu le bisli
[Left] the child walks-on the ice.
The man bites the dog. Left of me, the child walks
on the ice.
In Example 16.5, the origin point is the speaker, as is usual with ``zu'aku''. E
xample 16.2 makes the origin point of the tense the event described by the first
sentence.
Two sentences may also be connected in forethought by a tense relationship. Just
like afterthought tense connection, forethought tense connection claims both se
ntences, and in addition claims that the time or space relationship specified by
the tense holds between the events the two sentences describe.
The origin sentence is placed first, preceded by a tense plus ``gi''. Another ``
gi'' is used to separate the sentences:
16.6) pugi mi klama le zarci gi mi klama le zdani
[past] I go-to the market [,] I go-to the house.
Before I go to the market, I go to the house.
A parallel construction can be used to express a tense relationship between sumt
i:
16.7) mi klama pugi le zarci gi le zdani
I go-to [past] the market [,] the house.
Because English does not have any direct way of expressing a tense-like relation
ship between nouns, Example 16.7 cannot be expressed in English without paraphra
sing it either into Example 16.6 or else into `Ì go to the house before the mar
ket'', which is ambiguous --- is the market going?
Finally, a third forethought construction expresses a tense relationship between
bridi-tails rather than whole bridi. (The construct known as a ``bridi-tail'' i
s explained fully in Chapter 14; roughly speaking, it is a selbri with any follo
wing sumti.) Example 16.8 is equivalent in meaning to Example 16.6 and Example 1
6.7:
16.8) mi pugi klama le zarci gi klama le zdani
I [past] go-to the market [,] go-to the house.
I, before going to the market, go to the house.
In both Example 16.7 and Example 16.8, the underlying sentences ``mi klama le za
rci'' and ``mi klama le zdani'' are not claimed; only the relationship in time b
etween them is claimed.
Both the forethought and the afterthought forms are appropriate with PU, ZI, FAh
A, VA, and ZAhO tenses. In all cases, the equivalent forms are (where X and Y st
and for sentences, and TENSE for a tense cmavo):
subordinate: X TENSE le nu Y afterthought coordinate: Y .i+TENSE+bo X foreth
ought coordinate: TENSE+gi X gi Y
17. Tensed logical connectives
The Lojban tense system interacts with the Lojban logical connective system. Tha
t system is a separate topic, explained in Chapter 14 and touched on only in sum
mary here. By the rules of the logical connective system, Example 17.1 through 1
7.3 are equivalent in meaning:
17.1) la teris. satre le mlatu
.ije la teris. satre le ractu
Terry strokes the cat.
And Terry strokes the rabbit.
17.2) la teris. satre le mlatu gi'e satre le ractu
Terry strokes the cat and strokes the rabbit.
17.3) la teris. satre le mlatu .e le ractu
Terry strokes the cat and the rabbit.
Suppose we wish to add a tense relationship to the logical connective `ànd''? T
o say that Terry strokes the cat and later strokes the rabbit, we can combine a
logical connective with a tense connective by placing the logical connective fir
st, then the tense, and then the cmavo ``bo'', thus:
17.4) la teris. satre le mlatu
.ijebabo la teris. satre le ractu
Terry strokes the cat.
And then Terry strokes the rabbit.
17.5) la teris. satre le mlatu gi'ebabo satre le ractu
Terry strokes the cat, and then strokes the rabbit.
17.6) la teris. satre le mlatu .ebabo le ractu
Terry strokes the cat and then the rabbit.
Example 17.4 through 17.6 are equivalent in meaning. They are also analogous to
Examples 17.1 through 17.3 respectively. The ``bo'' is required for the same rea
son as in Example 16.2: to prevent the ``ba'' from functioning as a sumti tcita
for the following sumti (or, in Example 17.5, from being attached to the followi
ng selbri).
In addition to the ``bo'' construction of Examples 17.4 through 17.6, there is a
lso a form of tensed logical connective with ``ke ... ke'e'' (``tu'e... tu'u'' f
or sentences). The logical connective system makes Examples 17.7 through 17.9 eq
uivalent in meaning:
.ije tu'e mi bevri le gerku
.ija mi bevri le mlatu tu'u
I carry the sack.
And (I carry the dog.
And/or I carry the cat).
I carry the sack. And I carry the dog, or I carry
the cat, or I carry both.
gi'eke bevri le gerku gi'a bevri le mlatu
I carry the sack
and (carry the dog and/or carry the cat).
I carry the sack, and also carry the dog
or carry the cat or carry both.
17.9) mi bevri le dakli .eke le gerku .a le mlatu
I carry the sack and (the dog or the cat)
I carry the sack and also the dog or the cat or both.
Note the uniformity of the Lojban, as contrasted with the variety of ways in whi
ch the English provides for the correct grouping. In all cases, the meaning is t
hat I carry the sack in any case, and either the cat or the dog or both.
To express that I carry the sack first (earlier in time), and then the dog or th
e cat or both simultaneously, I can insert tenses to form Examples 17.10 through
17.12:
.ije ba tu'e mi bevri le gerku
.ijacabo mi bevri le mlatu tu'u
I carry the sack.
And [future] (I carry the dog.
And/or [present] I carry the cat.)
I carry the sack. And then I will carry the dog
or I will carry the cat or I will carry both
at once.
gi'ebake bevri le gerku
gi'acabo bevri le mlatu
I carry the sack
and [future] (carry the dog
and/or [present] carry the cat).
I carry the sack and then will carry the dog
or carry the cat or carry both at once.
.ebake bevri le gerku .acabo le mlatu
I carry the sack and
[future] (the cat and/or [present] the dog).
I carry the sack, and then the cat or the dog
or both at once.
Examples 17.10 through 17.12 are equivalent in meaning to each other, and corres
pond to the tenseless Examples 17.7 through 17.9 respectively.
18. Tense negation
Any bridi which involves tenses of selma'o PU, FAhA, or ZAhO can be contradicted
by a ``-nai'' suffixed to the tense cmavo. Some examples:
18.1) mi punai klama le zarci
I [past] [not] go-to the market.
I didn't go to the market.
As a contradictory negation, Example 18.1 implies that the bridi as a whole is f
alse without saying anything about what is true. When the negated tense is a sum
ti tcita, ``-nai'' negation indicates that the stated relationship does not hold
:
18.2) mi klama le zarci canai le nu
do klama le zdani
I go-to the market [present] [not] the event-of
It is not true that I went to the market at the same
time that you went to the house.
18.3) le nanmu batci le gerku ne'inai le kumfa
The man bites the dog [within] [not] the room.
The man didn't bite the dog inside the room.
18.4) mi morsi ca'onai le nu mi jmive
I am-dead [continuitive - negated] the event-of I live.
It is false that I am dead during my life.
It is also possible to perform scalar negation of whole tense constructs by plac
ing a member of NAhE before them. Unlike contradictory negation, scalar negation
asserts a truth: that the bridi is true with some tense other than that specifi
ed. The following examples are scalar negation analogues of Examples 18.1 to 18.
3:
18.5) mi na'e pu klama le zarci
I [non-] [past] go-to the market.
I go to the market other than in the past.
18.6) le nanmu batci le gerku to'e ne'i le kumfa
The man bites the dog [opposite-of] [within] the room.
The man bites the dog outside the room.
18.7) mi klama le zarci na'e ca le nu
do klama le zdani
I go-to the market [non-] [present] the event-of
I went to the market at a time other than the time at
which you went to the house.
18.8) mi morsi na'e ca'o le nu mi jmive
I am-dead [non-] [continuitive] the event-of I live.
I am dead other than during my life.
Unlike ``-nai'' contradictory negation, scalar negation of tenses is not limited
to PU and FAhA:
18.9) le verba na'e ri'u cadzu le bisli
The child [non-] [right] walks-on the ice
The child walks on the ice other than to my right.
The use of ``-nai'' on cmavo of TAhE and ROI has already been discussed in Secti
on 9; this use is also a scalar negation.
19. Actuality, potentiality, capability: CAhA
ca'a CAhA actually is
ka'e CAhA is innately capable of
nu'o CAhA can but has not
pu'i CAhA can and has
Lojban bridi without tense markers may not necessarily refer to actual events: t
hey may also refer to capabilities or potential events. For example:
19.1) ro datka cu flulimna
all ducks are-float-swimmers
All ducks swim by floating.
is a Lojban truth, even though the colloquial English translation is false or at
best ambiguous. This is because the tenseless Lojban bridi doesn't necessarily
claim that every duck is swimming or floating now or even at a specific time or
place. Even if we add a tense marker to Example 19.1,
19.2) ro datka ca flulimna
all ducks [present] are-float-swimmers.
All ducks are now swimming by floating.
the resulting Example 19.2 might still be considered a truth, even though the co
lloquial English seems even more likely to be false. All ducks have the potentia
l of swimming even if they are not exercising that potential at present. To get
the full flavor of `Àll ducks are now swimming'', we must append a marker from
selma'o CAhA to the tense, and say:
19.3) ro datka ca ca'a flulimna
all ducks [present] [actual] are-float-swimmers
All ducks are now actually swimming by floating.
A CAhA cmavo is always placed after any other tense cmavo, whether for time or f
or space. However, a CAhA cmavo comes before ``ki'', so that a CAhA condition ca
n be made sticky.
Example 19.3 is false in both Lojban and English, since it claims that the swimm
ing is an actual, present fact, true of every duck that exists, whereas in fact
there is at least one duck that is not swimming now.
Furthermore, some ducks are dead (and therefore sink); some ducks have just hatc
hed (and do not know how to swim yet), and some ducks have been eaten by predato
rs (and have ceased to exist as separate objects at all). Nevertheless, all thes
e ducks have the innate capability of swimming --- it is part of the nature of d
uckhood. The cmavo ``ka'e'' expresses this notion of innate capability:
19.4) ro datka ka'e flulimna
all ducks [capable] are-float-swimmers.
All ducks are innately capable of swimming.
Under some epistemologies, innate capability can be extended in order to apply t
he innate properties of a mass to which certain individuals belong to the indivi
duals themselves, even if those individuals are themselves not capable of fulfil
ling the claim of the bridi. For example:
19.5) la djan. ka'e viska
John [capable] sees.
John is innately capable of seeing.
John can see.
might be true about a human being named John, even though he has been blind sinc
e birth, because the ability to see is innately built into his nature as a human
being. It is theoretically possible that conditions might occur that would enab
le John to see (a great medical discovery). On the other hand,
19.6) le cukta ka'e viska
The book [capable] sees.
The book can see.
is not true in most epistemologies, since the ability to see is not part of the
innate nature of a book.
Consider once again the newly hatched ducks mentioned earlier. They have the pot
ential of swimming, but have not yet demonstrated that potential. This may be ex
pressed using ``nu'o'', the cmavo of CAhA for undemonstrated potential:
19.7) ro cifydatka nu'o flulimna
all infant-ducks [can but has not] are-float-swimmers.
All infant ducks have an undemonstrated potential
for swimming by floating.
Baby ducks can swim but haven't yet.
Contrariwise, if Frank is not blind from birth, then ``pu'i'' is appropriate:
19.8) la frank. pu'i viska
Frank [can and has] sees.
Frank has demonstrated a potential for seeing.
Frank can see and has seen.
Note that the glosses given at the beginning of this section for ``ca'a'', ``nu'
o'', and ``pu'i'' incorporate ``ca'' into their meaning, and are really correct
for ``ca ca'a'', ``ca nu'o'', and ``ca pu'i''. However, the CAhA cmavo are perfe
ctly meaningful with other tenses than the present:
19.9) mi pu ca'a klama le zarci
I [past] [actual] go-to the store.
I actually went to the store.
19.10) la frank. pu nu'o klama le zdani
Frank [past] [can but has not] goes-to the store.
Frank could have, but will not have, gone to the
store (at some understood moment in the
future).
As always in Lojban tenses, a missing CAhA can have an indeterminate meaning, or
the context can be enough to disambiguate it. Saying
19.11) ta jelca
That burns/is-burning/might-burn/will-burn.
with no CAhA specified can translate the two very different English sentences ``
That is on fire'' and ``That is inflammable.'' The first demands immediate actio
n (usually), whereas the second merely demands caution. The two cases can be dis
ambiguated with:
19.12) ta ca ca'a jelca
That [present] [actual] burns.
That is on fire.
and
19.13) ta ka'e jelca
That [capable] burns.
That is capable of burning.
That is inflammable.
When no indication is given, as in the simple observative
19.14) fagri
fire
the prudent Lojbanist will assume the meaning ``Fire!''
20. Logical and non-logical connections between tenses
Like many things in Lojban, tenses may be logically connected; logical connectio
n is explained in more detail in Chapter 14. Some of the terminology in this sec
tion will be clear only if you already understand logical connectives.
The appropriate logical connectives belong to selma'o JA. A logical connective b
etween tenses can always be expanded to one between sentences:
20.1) mi pu je ba klama le zarci
I [past] and [future] go-to the market.
I went and will go to the market.
means the same as:
.ije mi ba klama le zarci
And I [future] go-to the market.
I went to the market, and I will go to the market.
Tense connection and tense negation are combined in:
20.3) mi punai je canai je ba
klama le zarci
I [past] [not] and [present] [not] and [future]
go-to the market.
I haven't yet gone to the market, but I will in future.
Example 20.3 is far more specific than
20.4) mi ba klama le zarci
I [future] go-to the market.
which only says that I will go, without claiming anything about my past or prese
nt. ``ba'' does not imply ``punai'' or ``canai''; to compel that interpretation,
either a logical connection or a ZAhO is needed.
Tense negation can often be removed in favor of negation in the logical connecti
ve itself. The following examples are equivalent in meaning:
20.5) mi mo'izu'anai je mo'iri'u cadzu
I [motion] [left-not] and [motion] [right] walk.
I walk not leftward but rightward.
20.6) mi mo'izu'a naje mo'iri'u cadzu
I [motion] [left] not-and [motion] [right] walk.
I walk not leftward but rightward.
There are no forethought logical connections between tenses allowed by the gramm
ar, to keep tenses simpler. Nor is there any way to override simple left-groupin
g of the connectives, the Lojban default.
The non-logical connectives of selma'o JOI, BIhI, and GAhO are also permitted be
tween tenses. One application is to specify intervals not by size, but by their
end-points (``bi'o'' belongs to selma'o BIhI, and connects the end-points of an
ordered interval, like English ``from ... to''):
20.7) mi puza bi'o bazu vasxu
I [past] [medium] from ... to [future] [long] breathe.
I breathe from a medium time ago till a long time
to come.
(It is to be hoped that I have a long life ahead of me.)
One additional use of non-logical connectives within tenses is discussed in Sect
ion 21. Other uses will probably be identified in future.
21. Sub-events
Another application of non-logical tense connection is to talk about sub-events
of events. Consider a six-shooter: a gun which can fire six bullets in successio
n before reloading. If I fire off the entire magazine twice, I can express the f
act in Lojban thus:
21.1) mi reroi pi'u xaroi
cecla le seldanti
I [twice] [cross-product] [six times]
shoot the projectile-launcher.
On two occasions, I fire the gun six times.
It would be confusing, though grammatical, to run the ``reroi'' and the ``xaroi'
' directly together. However, the non-logical connective ``pi'u'' expresses a Ca
rtesian product (also known as a cross product) of two sets. In this case, there
is a set of two firings each of which is represented by a set of six shots, for
twelve shots in all (hence the name ``product'': the product of 2 and 6 is 12).
Its use specifies very precisely what occurs.
In fact, you can specify strings of interval properties and event contours withi
n a single tense without the use of a logical or non-logical connective cmavo. T
his allows tenses of the type:
21.2) la djordj. ca'o co'a ciska
George [continuitive] [initiative] writes.
George continues to start to write.
21.3) mi reroi ca'o xaroi darxi le damri
I [twice] [continuitive] [six times] hit the drum.
On two occasions, I continue to beat the drum six times.
22. Conversion of sumti tcita: JAI
jai JAI tense conversion
fai FA indefinite place
Conversion is the regular Lojban process of moving around the places of a place
structure. The cmavo of selma'o SE serve this purpose, exchanging the first plac
e with one of the others:
22.1) mi cu klama le zarci
I go-to the market.
22.2) le zarci cu se klama mi
The market is-gone-to by-me.
It is also possible to bring a place that is specified by a sumti tcita (for the
purposes of this chapter, a tense sumti tcita) to the front, by using ``jai'' p
lus the tense as the grammatical equivalent of SE:
22.3) le ratcu cu citka le cirla vi le panka
The rat eats the cheese [short distance] the park.
The rat eats the cheese in the park.
22.4) le panka cu jai vi citka le cirla fai le ratcu
The park is-the-place-of eating the cheese by-the rat.
The park is where the rat eats the cheese.
In Example 22.4, the construction JAI+tense converts the location sumti into the
first place. The previous first place has nowhere to go, since the location sum
ti is not a numbered place; however, it can be inserted back into the bridi with
``fai'', the indefinite member of selma'o FA.
(The other members of FA are used to mark the first, second, etc. places of a br
idi explicitly:
22.5) fa mi cu klama fe le zarci
means the same as
22.6) fe le zarci cu klama fa mi
as well as the simple
22.7) mi cu klama le zarci
in which the place structure is determined by position.)
Like SE conversion, JAI+tense conversion is especially useful in descriptions wi
th LE selma'o:
22.8) mi viska le jai vi citka be le cirla
I saw the place-of eating the cheese.
Here the eater of the cheese is elided, so no ``fai'' appears.
Of course, temporal tenses are also usable with JAI:
22.9) mi djuno fi le jai ca morsi
be fai la djan.
I know about the [present] is-dead
of-the-one-called ``John''
I know the time of John's death.
I know when John died.
23. Tenses versus modals
Grammatically, every use of tenses seen so far is exactly paralleled by some use
of modals as explained in Chapter 9. Modals and tenses alike can be followed by
sumti, can appear before the selbri, can be used in pure and mixed connections,
can participate in JAI conversions. The parallelism is perfect. However, there
is a deep difference in the semantics of tense constructs and modal constructs,
grounded in historical differences between the two forms. Originally, modals and
tenses were utterly different things in earlier versions of Loglan; only in Loj
ban have they become grammatically interchangeable. And even now, differences in
semantics continue to be maintained.
The core distinction is that whereas the modal bridi
23.1) mi nelci do mu'i le nu do nelci mi
I like you with-motivation the event-of you like me.
I like you because you like me.
places the ``le nu'' sumti in the x1 place of the gismu ``mukti'' (which underli
es the modal ``mu'i''), namely the motivating event, the tensed bridi
23.2) mi nelci do ba le nu do nelci mi
I like you after the event-of you like me.
I like you after you like me.
places the ``le nu'' sumti in the x2 place of the gismu ``balvi'' (which underli
es the tense ``ba''), namely the point of reference for the future tense. Paraph
rases of Example 23.1 and Example 23.2, employing the brivla ``mukti'' and ``bal
vi'' explicitly, would be:
23.3) le nu do nelci mi cu mukti le nu mi nelci do
The event-of you like me motivates the event-of I like you
Your liking me is the motive for my liking you.
and
23.4) le nu mi nelci do cu balvi le nu do nelci mi
The event-of I like you is after the event of you like me.
My liking you follows (in time) your liking me.
(Note that the paraphrase is not perfect due to the difference in what is claime
d; Example 23.3 and Example 23.4 claim only the causal and temporal relationship
s between the events, not the existence of the events themselves.)
As a result, the afterthought sentence-connective forms of Example 23.1 and Exam
ple 23.2 are, respectively:
23.5) mi nelci do .imu'ibo do nelci mi
I like you. [That is] Because you like me.
23.6) do nelci mi .ibabo mi nelci do
You like me. Afterward, I like you.
In Example 23.5, the order of the two bridi ``mi nelci do'' and ``do nelci mi''
is the same as in Example 23.1. In Example 23.6, however, the order is reversed:
the origin point ``do nelci mi'' physically appears before the future-time even
t ``mi nelci do''. In both cases, the bridi characterizing the event in the x2 p
lace appears before the bridi characterizing the event in the x1 place of ``mukt
i'' or ``balvi''.
In forethought connections, however, the asymmetry between modals and tenses is
not found. The forethought equivalents of Example 23.5 and Example 23.6 are
23.7) mu'igi do nelci mi gi mi nelci do
Because you like me, I like you.
and
23.8) bagi do nelci mi gi mi nelci do
After you like me, I like you.
respectively.
The following modal sentence schemata (where X and Y represent sentences) all ha
ve the same meaning:
X .i BAI bo Y BAI gi Y gi X X BAI le nu Y
whereas the following tensed sentence schemata also have the same meaning:
X .i TENSE bo Y TENSE gi X gi Y Y TENSE le nu X
neglecting the question of what is claimed. In the modal sentence schemata, the
modal tag is always followed by Y, the sentence representing the event in the x1
place of the gismu that underlies the BAI. In the tensed sentences, no such sim
ple rule exists.
24. Tense questions: ``cu'e''
cu'e CUhE tense question
There are two main ways to ask questions about tense. The main English tense que
stion words are ``When?'' and ``Where?''. These may be paraphrased respectively
as `Àt what time?'' and `Àt what place?'' In these forms, their Lojban equival
ents simply involve a tense plus ``ma'', the Lojban sumti question:
24.1) do klama le zdani ca ma
you go-to the house [present] [what sumti?].
You go to the house at what time?
When do you go to the house?
24.2) le verba vi ma pu
cadzu le bisli
The child [short space] [what sumti?] [past]
walks-on the ice.
The child at/near what place walked on the ice?
Where did the child walk on the ice?
There is also a non-specific tense and modal question, ``cu'e'', belonging to se
lma'o CUhE. This can be used wherever a tense or modal construct can be used.
24.3) le nanmu cu'e batci le gerku
The man [what tense?] bites the dog.
When/Where/How does the man bite the dog?
Possible answers to Example 24.3 might be:
24.4) va
[medium space].
Some ways from here.
24.5) puzu
[past] [long time].
A long time ago.
24.6) vi le lunra
[short space] The moon.
On the moon.
24.7) pu'o
[inchoative]
He hasn't yet done so.
or even the modal reply (from selma'o BAI; see Chapter 9):
24.8) bai la djan.
Under John's compulsion.
The only way to combine ``cu'e'' with other tense cmavo is through logical conne
ction, which makes a question that pre-specifies some information:
24.9) do puzi je cu'e sombo le gurni
You [past] [short] and [when?] sow the grain?
You sowed the grain a little while ago;
when else do you sow it?
Additionally, the logical connective itself can be replaced by a question word:
24.10) la .artr. pu je'i ba nolraitru
Arthur [past] [which?] [future] is-a-king
Was Arthur a king or will he be?
Answers to Example 24.10 would be logical connectives such as ``je'', meaning ``
both'', ``naje'' meaning ``the latter'', or ``jenai'' meaning ``the former''.
25. Explicit magnitudes
It is a limitation of the VA and ZI system of specifying magnitudes that they ca
n only prescribe vague magnitudes: small, medium, or large. In order to express
both an origin point and an exact distance, the Lojban construction called a ``t
ermset'' is employed. (Termsets are explained further in Chapter 14 and Chapter
16.) It is grammatical for a termset to be placed after a tense or modal tag rat
her than a sumti, which allows both the origin of the imaginary journey and its
distance to be specified. Here is an example:
25.1) la frank. sanli zu'a nu'i la djordj.
lu'a lo mitre
be li mu [nu'u]
Frank stands [left] [start termset] George
[quantity] a thing-measuring-in-meters
the-number 5 [end termset].
Frank is standing five meters to the left of George.
Here the termset extends from the ``nu'i'' to the implicit ``nu'u'' at the end o
f the sentence, and includes the terms ``la djordj.'', which is the unmarked ori
gin point, and the tagged sumti ``lo mitre be li mu'', which the cmavo ``la'u''
(of selma'o BAI, and meaning ``with quantity''; see Chapter 9) marks as a quanti
ty. Both terms are governed by the tag ``zu'a''
It is not necessary to have both an origin point and an explicit magnitude: a te
rmset may have only a single term in it. A less precise version of Example 25.1
is:
25.2) la frank. sanli zu'a nu'i lu'a
lo mitre be li mu
Frank stands [left] [termset] [quantity]
a thing-measuring-in-meters the-number 5.
Frank stands five meters to the left.
26. Finally (an exercise for the much-tried reader)
26.1) a'o do pu seju ba roroi ca'o fe'e su'oroi jimpe
fi le lojbo temci selsku ciste
27. Summary of tense selma'o
PU
temporal direction pu = past, ca = present, ba = future ZI temporal distance
zi = short, za = medium, zu = long ZEhA temporal interval ze'i = short, ze'a =
medium, ze'u = long, ze'e = infinite ROI objective quantified tense flag noroi =
never, paroi = once, ..., roroi = always, etc. TAhE subjective quantified tense
di'i = regularly, na'o = typically, ru'i = continuously, ta'e = habitually ZAhO
event contours see Section 10
FAhA
spatial direction see Section 27 VA spatial distance vi = short, va = medium
, vu = long VEhA spatial interval ve'i = short, ve'a = medium, ve'u = long, ve'e
= infinite VIhA spatial dimensionality vi'i = line, vi'a = plane, vi'u = space,
vi'e = space-time FEhE spatial interval modifier flag fe'enoroi = nowhere, fe'e
roroi = everywhere, fe'eba'o = beyond, etc. MOhI spatial movement flag mo'i = mo
tion; see Section 27
KI
set or reset sticky tense tense+``ki'' = set, ``ki'' alone = reset CUhE tens
e question, reference point cu'e = asks for a tense or aspect nau = use speaker'
s reference point JAI tense conversion jaica = the time of, jaivi = the place of
, etc.
28. List of spatial directions and direction-like relations
The following list of FAhA cmavo gives rough English glosses for the cmavo, firs
t when used without ``mo'i'' to express a direction, and then when used with ``m
o'i'' to express movement in the direction. When possible, the gismu from which
the cmavo is derived is also listed.
cmavo gismu without mo'i with mo'i
----- ----- ------------ ---------
ca'u crane in front (of) forward
ti'a trixe behind backward
zu'a zunle on the left (of) leftward
ri'u pritu on the right (of) rightward
ga'u gapru above upward(ly)
ni'a cnita below downward(ly)
ne'i nenri within into
ru'u sruri surrounding orbiting
pa'o pagre transfixing passing through
ne'a next to moving while next to
te'e bordering moving along the border (of)
re'o adjacent (to) along
fa'a farna towards arriving at
to'o away from departing from
zo'i inward (from) approaching
ze'o outward (from) receding from
zo'a tangential (to) passing (by)
bu'u coincident (with) moving to coincide with
be'a berti north (of) northward(ly)
ne'u snanu south (of) southward(ly)
du'a stuna east (of) eastward(ly)
vu'a west (of) westward(ly)
Special note on ``fa'a'', ``to'o'', ``zo'i'', and ``ze'o'':
``zo'i'' and ``ze'o'' refer to direction towards or away from the speaker's loca
tion, or whatever the origin is.
``fa'a'' and ``to'o'' refer to direction towards or away from some other point.
Chapter 11
Events, Qualities, Quantities, And Other Vague Words: On Lojban Abstraction
1. The syntax of abstraction
The purpose of the feature of Lojban known as `àbstraction'' is to provide a me
ans for taking whole bridi and packaging them up, as it were, into simple selbri
. Syntactically, abstractions are very simple and uniform; semantically, they ar
e rich and complex, with few features in common between one variety of abstracti
on and another. We will begin by discussing syntax without regard to semantics;
as a result, the notion of abstraction may seem unmotivated at first. Bear with
this difficulty until Section 2.
An abstraction selbri is formed by taking a full bridi and preceding it by any c
mavo of selma'o NU. There are twelve such cmavo; they are known as `àbstractors
''. The bridi is closed by the elidable terminator ``kei'', of selma'o KEI. Thus
, to change the bridi
I go-to the store
into an abstraction using ``nu'', one of the members of selma'o NU, we change it
into
1.2) nu mi klama le zarci [kei]
an-event-of my going-to the store
The bridi may be a simple selbri, or it may have associated sumti, as here. It i
s important to beware of eliding ``kei'' improperly, as many of the common uses
of abstraction selbri involve following them with words that would appear to be
part of the abstraction if ``kei'' had been elided.
(Technically, ``kei'' is never necessary, because the elidable terminator ``vau'
' that closes every bridi can substitute for it; however, ``kei'' is specific to
abstractions, and using it is almost always clearer.)
The grammatical uses of an abstraction selbri are exactly the same as those of a
simple brivla. In particular, abstraction selbri may be used as observatives, a
s in Example 1.2, or used in tanru:
1.3) la djan. cu nu sonci kei djica
John is-an-(event-of being-a-soldier) type-of desirer.
John wants to be a soldier.
Abstraction selbri may also be used in descriptions, preceded by ``le'' (or any
other member of selma'o LE):
1.4) la djan. cu djica le nu sonci [kei]
John desires the event-of being-a-soldier.
We will most often use descriptions containing abstraction either at the end of
a bridi, or just before the main selbri with its ``cu''; in either of these circ
umstances, ``kei'' can normally be elided.
The place structure of an abstraction selbri depends on the particular abstracto
r, and will be explained individually in the following sections.
Note: In glosses of bridi within abstractions, the grammatical form used in the
English changes. Thus, in the gloss of Example 1.2 we see ``my going-to the stor
e'' rather than `Ì go-to the store''; likewise, in the glosses of Example 1.3 a
nd Example 1.4 we see ``being-a-soldier'' rather than `ìs-a-soldier''. This pro
cedure reflects the desire for more understandable glosses, and does not indicat
e any change in the Lojban form. A bridi is a bridi, and undergoes no change whe
n it is used as part of an abstraction selbri.
2. Event abstraction
nu NU event abstractor
The examples in Section 1 made use of ``nu'' as the abstractor, and it is certai
nly the most common abstractor in Lojban text. Its purpose is to capture the eve
nt or state of the bridi considered as a whole. Do not confuse the ``le'' descri
ption built on a ``nu'' abstraction with ordinary descriptions based on ``le'' a
lone. The following sumti are quite distinct:
2.1) le klama
the comer, that which comes
2.2) le se klama
the destination
2.3) le te klama
the origin
2.4) le ve klama
the route
2.5) le xe klama
the means of transportation
2.6) le nu klama
the event of someone coming to somewhere
from somewhere by some route using some means
Examples 2.1 through 2.5 are descriptions that isolate the five individual sumti
places of the selbri ``klama''. Example 2.6 describes something associated with
the bridi as a whole: the event of it.
In Lojban, the term `èvent'' is divorced from its ordinary English sense of som
ething that happens over a short period of time. The description:
2.7) le nu mi vasxu
the event-of my breathing
is an event which lasts for the whole of my life (under normal circumstances). O
n the other hand,
2.8) le nu la djan. cinba la djein.
the event-of John kissing Jane
is relatively brief by comparison (again, under normal circumstances).
We can see from Examples 2.6 through 2.8 that ellipsis of sumti is valid in the
bridi of abstraction selbri, just as in the main bridi of a sentence. Any sumti
may be ellipsized if the listener will be able to figure out from context what t
he proper value of it is, or else to recognize that the proper value is unimport
ant. It is extremely common for ``nu'' abstractions in descriptions to have the
x1 place ellipsized:
2.9) mi nelci le nu limna
I like the event-of swimming.
I like swimming.
is elliptical, and most probably means:
2.10) mi nelci le nu mi limna
I like the event-of I swim.
In the proper context, of course, Example 2.9 could refer to the event of somebo
dy else swimming. Its English equivalent, `Ì like swimming'', can't be interpre
ted as `Ì like Frank's swimming''; this is a fundamental distinction between En
glish and Lojban. In Lojban, an omitted sumti can mean whatever the context indi
cates that it should mean.
Note that the lack of an explicit NU cmavo in a sumti can sometimes hide an impl
icit abstraction. In the context of Example 2.10, the appearance of ``le se nelc
i'' (``that which is liked'') is in effect an abstraction:
2.11) le se nelci cu cafne
The liked-thing is-frequent.
The thing which I like happens often.
which in this context means
My swimming happens often.
Event descriptions with ``le nu'' are commonly used to fill the `ùnder conditio
ns...'' places, among others, of gismu and lujvo place structures:
2.12) la lojban. cu frili mi
le nu mi tadni [kei]
Lojban is-easy for-me
under-conditions-the event-of I study
Lojban is easy for me when I study.
(The ``when'' of the English would also be appropriate for a construction involv
ing a Lojban tense, but the Lojban sentence says more than that the studying is
concurrent with the ease.)
The place structure of a ``nu'' abstraction selbri is simply:
x1 is an event of (the bridi)
3. Types of event abstractions
mu'e NU point-event abstractor
pu'u NU process abstractor
zu'o NU activity abstractor
za'i NU state abstractor
Event abstractions with ``nu'' suffice to express all kinds of events, whether l
ong, short, unique, repetitive, or whatever. Lojban also has more finely discrim
inating machinery for talking about events, however. There are four other abstra
ctors of selma'o NU for talking about four specific types of events, or four way
s of looking at the same event.
An event considered as a point in time is called a ``point-event'', or sometimes
an `àchievement''. (This latter word should be divorced, in this context, from
all connotations of success or triumph.) A point-event can be extended in durat
ion, but it is still a point-event if it is thought of as unitary, having no int
ernal structure. The abstractor ``mu'e'' means ``point-event-of'':
3.1) le mu'e la djan. catra la djim. cu zekri
the point-event-of (John kills Jim) is-a-crime
John's killing Jim (considered as a point in time)
is a crime.
An event considered as extended in time, and structured with a beginning, a midd
le containing one or more stages, and an end, is called a ``process''. The abstr
actor ``pu'u'' means ``process-of'':
3.2) ca'o le pu'u le latmo balje'a
cu porpi kei
so'i je'atru cu selcatra
[continuitive] the process-of( the Latin great-state
breaking-up )
many state-rulers were-killed
During the fall of the Roman Empire,
many Emperors were killed.
An event considered as extended in time and cyclic or repetitive is called an ``
activity''. The abstractor ``zu'o'' means `àctivity-of'':
3.3) mi tatpi ri'a le zu'o mi plipe
I am-tired because-of the activity-of (I jump)
I am tired because I jump.
An event considered as something that is either happening or not happening, with
sharp boundaries, is called a ``state''. The abstractor ``za'i'' means ``state-
of'':
3.4) le za'i mi jmive cu ckape do
the state-of (I am-alive) is-dangerous-to you
My being alive is dangerous to you.
The abstractors in Examples 3.1 through 3.4 could all have been replaced by ``nu
'', with some loss of precision. Note that Lojban allows every sort of event to
be viewed in any of these four ways:
the ``state of running'' begins when the runner starts and ends when the run
ner stops;
the `àctivity of running'' consists of the cycle ``lift leg, step forward,
drop leg, lift other leg...'' (each such cycle is a process, but the activity co
nsists in the repetition of the cycle);
the ``process of running'' puts emphasis on the initial sprint, the steady s
peed, and the final slowdown;
the `àchievement of running'' is most alien to English, but sees the event
of running as a single indivisible thing, like ``Pheidippides' run from Marathon
to Athens'' (the original marathon).
Further information on types of events can be found in Section 12.
The four event type abstractors have the following place structures:
``mu'e'': x1 is a point event of (the bridi) ``pu'u'': x1 is a process of (t
he bridi) with stages x2 ``za'i'': x1 is a continuous state of (the bridi) being
true ``zu'o'': x1 is an activity of (the bridi) consisting of repeated actions
x2
4. Property abstractions
ka NU property abstractor
ce'u KOhA
The things described by ``le nu'' descriptions (or, to put it another way, the t
hings of which ``nu'' selbri may correctly be predicated) are only moderately ``
abstract''. They are still closely tied to happenings in space and time. Propert
ies, however, are much more ethereal. What is ``the property of being blue'', or
``the property of being a go-er''? They are what logicians call `ìntensions''.
If John has a heart, then ``the property of having a heart'' is an abstract obj
ect which, when applied to John, is true. In fact,
4.1) la djan. cu se risna zo'e
John has-as-heart something-unspecified.
John has a heart.
has the same truth conditions as
4.2) la djan. cu ckaji
le ka se risna [zo'e] [kei]
John has-the-property
the property-of having-as-heart something.
John has the property of having a heart.
(The English word ``have'' frequently appears in any discussion of Lojban proper
ties: things are said to ``have'' properties, but this is not the same sense of
``have'' as in `Ì have money'', which is possession.)
Property descriptions, like event descriptions, are often wanted to fill places
in brivla place structures:
4.3) do cnino mi
le ka xunre [kei]
You are-new to-me
in-the-quality-of-the property-of being-red.
You are new to me in redness.
(The English suffix ``-ness'' often signals a property abstraction, as does the
suffix ``-ity''.)
We can also move the property description to the x1 place of Example 4.3, produc
ing:
4.4) le ka do xunre [kei] cu cnino mi
The property-of your being-red is-new to me.
Your redness is new to me.
It would be suitable to use Examples 4.3 and 4.4 to someone who has returned fro
m the beach with a sunburn.
There are several different properties that can be extracted from a bridi, depen
ding on which place of the bridi is `ùnderstood'' as being specified externally
. Thus:
4.5) ka mi prami [zo'e] [kei]
a-property-of me loving something-unspecified
is quite different from
4.6) ka [zo'e] prami mi [kei]
a-property-of something-unspecified loving me
In particular, sentences like Example 4.7 and Example 4.8 are quite different in
meaning:
4.7) la djan. cu zmadu la djordj. le ka mi prami
John exceeds George in-the property-of (I love X)
I love John more than I love George.
4.8) la djan. cu zmadu la djordj. le ka prami mi
John exceeds George in the property of (X loves me).
John loves me more than George loves me.
The ``X'' used in the glosses of Examples 4.7 through 4.8 as a place-holder cann
ot be represented only by ellipsis in Lojban, because ellipsis means that there
must be a specific value that can fill the ellipsis, as mentioned in Section 2.
Instead, the cmavo ``ce'u'' of selma'o KOhA is employed when an explicit sumti i
s wanted. (The form ``X'' will be used in literal translations.)
Therefore, an explicit equivalent of Example 4.7, with no ellipsis, is:
4.9) la djan. cu zmadu la djordj. le ka mi prami ce'u
John exceeds George in-the property-of (I love X).
and of Example 4.8 is:
4.10) la djan. cu zmadu la djordj. le ka ce'u prami mi
John exceeds George in-the property-of (X loves me).
This convention allows disambiguation of cases like:
4.11) le ka [zo'e] dunda le xirma [zo'e] [kei]
the property-of giving the horse
into
4.12) le ka ce'u dunda le xirma
[zo'e] [kei]
the property-of (X is-a-giver of-the horse
to someone-unspecified)
the property of being a giver of the horse
which is the most natural interpretation of Example 4.11, versus
4.13) le ka [zo'e] dunda
le xirma ce'u [kei]
the property-of (someone-unspecified
is-a-giver of-the horse to X)
the property of being one to whom the horse is given
which is also a possible interpretation.
It is also possible to have more than one ``ce'u'' in a ``ka'' abstraction, whic
h transforms it from a property abstraction into a relationship abstraction, a r
esource of the language that has not yet been explored.
The place structure of ``ka'' abstraction selbri is simply:
x1 is a property of (the bridi)
5. Amount abstractions
ni NU amount abstraction
Amount abstractions are far more limited than event or property abstractions. Th
ey really make sense only if the selbri of the abstracted bridi is subject to me
asurement of some sort. Thus we can speak of:
5.1) le ni le pixra cu blanu [kei]
the amount-of (the picture being-blue)
the amount of blueness in the picture
because ``blueness'' could be measured with a colorimeter or a similar device. H
owever,
5.2) le ni la djein. cu mamta [kei]
the amount-of (Jane being-a-mother)
the amount of Jane's mother-ness (?)
the amount of mother-ness in Jane (?)
makes very little sense in either Lojban or English. We simply do not have any s
ort of measurement scale for being a mother.
Semantically, a sumti with ``le ni'' is a number; however, it cannot be treated
grammatically as a quantifier in Lojban unless prefixed by the mathematical cmav
o ``mo'e'':
5.3) li pa vu'u mo'e
le ni le pixra cu blanu [kei]
the-number 1 minus the-operand
the amount-of (the picture being-blue)
1 - B, where B = blueness of the picture
Mathematical Lojban is beyond the scope of this chapter, and is explained more f
ully in Chapter 18.
There are contexts where either property or amount abstractions make sense, and
in such constructions, amount abstractions can make use of ``ce'u'' just like pr
operty abstractors. Thus,
5.4) le pixra cu cenba le ka ce'u blanu [kei]
the picture varies in-the property-of (X is blue)
The picture varies in being blue.
The picture varies in blueness.
is not the same as
5.5) le pixra cu cenba le ni ce'u blanu [kei]
the picture varies in-the amount-of (X is blue)
The picture varies in how blue it is.
The picture varies in blueness.
Example 5.4 conveys that the blueness comes and goes, whereas Example 5.5 convey
s that its quantity changes over time.
Whenever we talk of measurement of an amount, there is some sort of scale, and s
o the place structure of ``ni'' abstraction selbri is:
x1 is the amount of (the bridi) on scale x2
Note: the best way to express the x2 places of abstract sumti is to use somethin
g like ``le ni ... kei be''. See Example 9.5 for the use of this construction.
6. Truth-value abstraction: ``jei''
The ``blueness of the picture'' discussed in Section 5 refers to the measurable
amount of blue pigment (or other source of blueness), not to the degree of truth
of the claim that blueness is present. That abstraction is expressed in Lojban
using ``jei'', which is closely related semantically to ``ni''. In the simplest
cases, ``le jei'' produces not a number but a truth value:
6.1) le jei li re su'i re du li vo [kei]
the truth-value-of the-number 2 + 2 = the-number 4
the truth of 2 + 2 being 4
is equivalent to ``truth'', and
6.2) le jei li re su'i re du li mu [kei]
the truth-value-of the-number 2 + 2 = the-number 5
the truth of 2 + 2 being 5
is equivalent to ``falsehood''.
However, not everything in life (or even in Lojban) is simply true or false. The
re are shades of gray even in truth value, and ``jei'' is Lojban's mechanism for
indicating the shade of grey intended:
6.3) mi ba jdice le jei
la djordj. cu zekri gasnu [kei]
I [future] decide the truth-value of
(George being-a-(crime doer)).
I will decide whether George is a criminal.
Example 6.3 does not imply that George is, or is not, definitely a criminal. Dep
ending on the legal system I am using, I may make some intermediate decision. As
a result, ``jei'' requires an x2 place analogous to that of ``ni'':
x1 is the truth value of (the bridi) under epistemology x2
Abstractions using ``jei'' are the mechanism for fuzzy logic in Lojban; the ``je
i'' abstraction refers to a number between 0 and 1 inclusive (as distinct from `
`ni'' abstractions, which are often on open-ended scales). The detailed conventi
ons for using ``jei'' in fuzzy-logic contexts have not yet been established.
7. Predication/sentence abstraction
du'u NU predication abstraction
There are some selbri which demand an entire predication as a sumti; they make c
laims about some predication considered as a whole. Logicians call these the ``p
ropositional attitudes'', and they include (in English) things like knowing, bel
ieving, learning, seeing, hearing, and the like. Consider the English sentence:
7.1) I know that Frank is a fool.
How's that in Lojban? Let us try:
7.2) mi djuno le nu la frank. cu bebna [kei]
I know the event of Frank being a fool.
Not quite right. Events are actually or potentially physical, and can't be conta
ined inside one's mind, except for events of thinking, feeling, and the like; Ex
ample 7.2 comes close to claiming that Frank's being-a-fool is purely a mental a
ctivity on the part of the speaker. (In fact, Example 7.2 is an instance of impr
operly marked ``sumti raising'', a concept discussed further in Section 10).
Try again:
7.3) mi djuno le jei la frank. cu bebna [kei]
I know the truth-value of Frank being a fool.
Closer. Example 7.3 says that I know whether or not Frank is a fool, but doesn't
say that he is one, as Example 7.1 does. To catch that nuance, we must say:
7.4) mi djuno le du'u la frank. cu bebna [kei]
I know the predication that Frank is a fool.
Now we have it. Note that the implied assertion ``Frank is a fool'' is not a pro
perty of ``le du'u'' abstraction, but of ``djuno''; we can only know what is in
fact true. (As a result, ``djuno'' like ``jei'' has a place for epistemology, wh
ich specifies how we know.) Example 7.5 has no such implied assertion:
7.5) mi kucli le du'u la frank. cu bebna [kei]
I am curious about whether Frank is a fool.
and here ``du'u'' could probably be replaced by ``jei'' without much change in m
eaning:
7.6) mi kucli le jei la frank. cu bebna [kei]
I am curious about how true it is
that Frank is a fool.
As a matter of convenience rather than logical necessity, ``du'u'' has been give
n an x2 place, which is a sentence (piece of language) expressing the bridi:
x1 is the predication (the bridi), expressed in sentence x2
and ``le se du'u ...'' is very useful in filling places of selbri which refer to
speaking, writing, or other linguistic behavior regarding bridi:
7.6.5) la djan. cusku
le se du'u
la djordj. klama le zarci [kei]
John expresses
the sentence-expressing-that
George goes-to the store
John says that George goes to the store.
Example 7.6 differs from
7.7) la djan cusku
lu la djordj. klama le zarci li'u
John expresses,
quote, George goes to the store, unquote.
John says ``George goes to the store''.
because Example 7.7 claims that John actually said the quoted words, whereas Exa
mple 7.6 claims only that he said some words or other which were to the same pur
pose.
``le se du'u'' is much the same as ``lu'e le du'u'', a symbol for the predicatio
n, but ``se du'u'' can be used as a selbri, whereas ``lu'e'' is ungrammatical in
a selbri. (See Chapter 5 for a discussion of ``lu'e''.)
8. Indirect questions
kau UI indirect question marker
There is an alternative type of sentence involving ``du'u'' and a selbri express
ing a propositional attitude. In addition to sentences like
8.1) I know that John went to the store.
we can also say things like
8.2) I know who went to the store.
This form is called an `ìndirect question'' in English because the embedded Eng
lish sentence is a question: ``Who went to the store?'' A person who says Exampl
e 8.2 is claiming to know the answer to this question. Indirect questions can oc
cur with many other English verbs as well: I can wonder, or doubt, or see, or he
ar, as well as know who went to the store.
To express indirect questions in Lojban, we use a ``le du'u'' abstraction, but r
ather than using a question word like ``who'' (``ma'' in Lojban), we use any wor
d that will fit grammatically and mark it with the suffix particle ``kau''. This
cmavo belongs to selma'o UI, so grammatically it can appear anywhere. The simpl
est Lojban translation of Example 8.2 is therefore:
8.3) mi djuno le du'u
makau pu klama le zarci
I know the predication-of
X [indirect question] [past] going to the store.
In Example 8.3, we have chosen to use ``ma'' as the word marked by ``kau''. In f
act, any other sumti would have done as well: ``zo'e'' or ``da'' or even ``la dj
an.''. Using ``la djan.'' would suggest that it was John who I knew had gone to
the store, however:
la djan. kau pu
klama le zarci
I know the predication-of/fact-that
John [indirect question] [past]
going to the store.
I know who went to the store, namely John.
I know that it was John who went to the store.
Using one of the indefinite pro-sumti such as ``ma'', ``zo'e'', or ``da'' does n
ot suggest any particular value.
Why does Lojban require the ``kau'' marker, rather than using ``ma'' as English
and Chinese and many other languages do? Because ``ma'' always signals a direct
question, and so
ma pu klama le zarci
I know the predication-of
[what sumti?] [past] goes-to the store
means
8.6) Who is it that I know goes to the store?
It is actually not necessary to use ``le du'u'' and ``kau'' at all if the indire
ct question involves a sumti; there is generally a paraphrase of the type:
8.7) mi djuno fi le pu klama be le zarci
I know about the [past] goer to-the store.
I know something about the one who went to the store
(namely, his identity).
because the x3 place of ``djuno'' is the subject of knowledge, as opposed to the
fact that is known. But when the questioned point is not a sumti, but (say) a l
ogical connection, then there is no good alternative to ``kau'':
8.8) mi ba zgana le du'u
la djan. jikau la djordj.
cu zvati le panka
I [future] observe the predication-of/fact-that
John [connective indirect question] George
is-at the park.
I will see whether John or George (or both)
is at the park.
In addition, Example 8.7 is only a loose paraphrase of Example 8.3, because it i
s left to the listener's insight to realize that what is known about the goer-to
-the-store is his identity rather than some other of his attributes.
9. Minor abstraction types
li'i NU experience abstractor
si'o NU concept abstractor
su'u NU general abstractor
There are three more abstractors in Lojban, all of them little used so far. The
abstractor ``li'i'' expresses experience:
9.1) mi morji le li'i mi verba
I remember the experience-of (my being-a-child)
The abstractor ``si'o'' expresses a mental image, a concept, an idea:
9.2) mi nelci le si'o la lojban. cu mulno
I enjoy the concept-of Lojban being-complete.
Finally, the abstractor ``su'u'' is a vague abstractor, whose meaning must be gr
asped from context:
9.3) ko zgana le su'u
le ci smacu cu bajra
you [imperative] observe the abstract-nature-of
the three mice running
See how the three mice run!
All three of these abstractors have an x2 place. An experience requires an exper
iencer, so the place structure of ``li'i'' is:
x1 is the experience of (the bridi) as experienced by x2
Similarly, an idea requires a mind to hold it, so the place structure of ``si'o'
' is:
x1 is the idea/concept of (the bridi) in the mind of x2
Finally, there needs to be some way of specifying just what sort of abstraction
``su'u'' is representing, so its place structure is:
x1 is an abstract nature of (the bridi) of type x2
The x2 place of ``su'u'' allows it to serve as a substitute for any of the other
abstractors, or as a template for creating new ones. For example,
9.4) le nu mi klama
the event-of my going
can be paraphrased as
9.5) le su'u mi klama kei be lo fasnu
the abstract-nature-of (my going) of-type an event
and there is a book whose title might be rendered in Lojban as:
9.6) le su'u la .iecuas. kuctra
selcatra kei
be lo sao'rdzifa'a
ke nalmatma'e sutyterjvi
the abstract-nature-of (Jesus is-an-intersect-shape
type-of-killed-one)
of-type a slope-low-direction
type-of non-motor-vehicle speed-competition
The Crucifixion of Jesus Considered As A
Downhill Bicycle Race
Note the importance of using ``kei'' after ``su'u'' when the x2 of ``su'u'' (or
any other abstractor) is being specified; otherwise, the ``be lo'' ends up insid
e the abstraction bridi.
10. Lojban sumti raising
tu'a LAhE an abstraction involving
jai JAI abstraction conversion
It is sometimes inconvenient, in a situation where an abstract description is lo
gically required, to express the abstraction. In English we can say:
10.1) I try to open the door.
which in Lojban is:
10.2) mi troci le nu
[mi] gasnu le nu
le vorme cu karbi'o
I try the event-of
(I am-agent-in the event-of
(the door open-becomes)).
which has an abstract description within an abstract description, quite a comple
x structure. In English (but not in all other languages), we may also say:
10.3) I try the door.
where it is understood that what I try is actually not the door itself, but the
act of opening it. The same simplification can be done in Lojban, but it must be
marked explicitly using a cmavo. The relevant cmavo is ``tu'a'', which belongs
to selma'o LAhE. The Lojban equivalent of Example 10.3 is:
10.4) mi troci tu'a le vorme
I try some-action-to-do-with the door.
The term ``sumti-raising'', as in the title of this section, signifies that a su
mti which logically belongs within an abstraction (or even within an abstraction
which is itself inside an intermediate abstraction) is ``raised'' to the main b
ridi level. This transformation from Example 10.2 to Example 10.4 loses informat
ion: nothing except convention tells us what the abstraction was.
Using ``tu'a'' is a kind of laziness: it makes speaking easier at the possible e
xpense of clarity for the listener. The speaker must be prepared for the listene
r to respond something like:
10.5) tu'a le vorme lu'u ki'a
something-to-do-with the door [terminator] [confusion!]
which indicates that ``tu'a le vorme'' cannot be understood. (The terminator for
``tu'a'' is ``lu'u'', and is used in Example 10.5 to make clear just what is be
ing questioned: the sumti-raising, rather than the word ``vorme'' as such.) An e
xample of a confusing raised sumti might be:
10.6) tu'a la djan. cu cafne
something-to-do-with John frequently-occurs
This must mean that something which John does, or which happens to John, occurs
frequently: but without more context there is no way to figure out what. Note th
at without the ``tu'a'', Example 10.6 would mean that John considered as an even
t frequently occurs --- in other words, that John has some sort of on-and-off ex
istence! Normally we do not think of people as events in English, but the x1 pla
ce of ``cafne'' is an event, and if something that does not seem to be an event
is put there, the Lojbanic listener will attempt to construe it as one. (Of cour
se, this analysis assumes that ``djan.'' is the name of a person, and not the na
me of some event.)
Logically, a counterpart of some sort is needed to ``tu'a'' which transposes an
abstract sumti into a concrete one. This is achieved at the selbri level by the
cmavo ``jai'' (of selma'o JAI). This cmavo has more than one function, discussed
in Chapter 9 and Chapter 11; for the purposes of this chapter, it operates as a
conversion of selbri, similarly to the cmavo of selma'o SE. This conversion cha
nges
10.7) tu'a mi rinka
le nu do morsi
something-to-do-with me causes
the event-of you are-dead
My action causes your death.
into
10.8) mi jai rinka le nu do morsi
I am-associated-with causing the event-of your death.
I cause your death.
In English, the subject of ``cause'' can either be the actual cause (an event),
or else the agent of the cause (a person, typically); not so in Lojban, where th
e x1 of ``rinka'' is always an event. Example 10.7 and Example 10.8 look equally
convenient (or inconvenient), but in making descriptions, Example 10.8 can be a
ltered to:
10.9) le jai rinka
be le nu do morsi
that-which-is associated-with causing
(the event-of your death)
the one who caused your death
because ``jai'' modifies the selbri and can be incorporated into the description
--- not so for ``tu'a''.
The weakness of ``jai'' used in descriptions in this way is that it does not spe
cify which argument of the implicit abstraction is being raised into the x1 plac
e of the description selbri. One can be more specific by using the modal form of
``jai'' explained in Chapter 9:
10.10) le jai gau rinka
be le nu do morsi
that-which-is agent-in causing
(the event-of your death)
12. Event-type abstractors and event contour tenses
This section is a logical continuation of Section 3.
There exists a relationship between the four types of events explained in Sectio
n 3 and the event contour tense cmavo of selma'o ZAhO. The specific cmavo of NU
and of ZAhO are mutually interdefining; the ZAhO contours were chosen to fit the
needs of the NU event types and vice versa. Event contours are explained in ful
l in Chapter 10, and only summarized here.
The purpose of ZAhO cmavo is to represent the natural portions of an event, such
as the beginning, the middle, and the end. They fall into several groups:
The cmavo ``pu'o'', ``ca'o'', and ``ba'o'' represent spans of time: before a
n event begins, while it is going on, and after it is over, respectively.
The cmavo ``co'a'', ``de'a'', ``di'a'', and ``co'u'' represent points of tim
e: the start of an event, the temporary stopping of an event, the resumption of
an event after a stop, and the end of an event, respectively. Not all events can
have breaks in them, in which case ``de'a'' and ``di'a'' do not apply.
The cmavo ``mo'u'' and ``za'o'' correspond to ``co'u'' and ``ba'o'' respecti
vely, in the case of those events which have a natural ending point that may not
be the same as the actual ending point: ``mo'u'' refers to the natural ending p
oint, and ``za'o'' to the time between the natural ending point and the actual e
nding point (the `èxcessive'' or ``superfective'' part of the event).
The cmavo ``co'i'' represents an entire event considered as a point-event or
achievement.
All these cmavo are applicable to events seen as processes and abstracted with `
`pu'u''. Only processes have enough internal structure to make all these points
and spans of time meaningful.
For events seen as states and abstracted with ``za'i'', the meaningful event con
tours are the spans ``pu'o'', ``ca'o'', and ``ba'o''; the starting and ending po
ints ``co'a'' and ``co'u'', and the achievement contour ``co'i''. States do not
have natural endings distinct from their actual ending. (It is an open question
whether states can be stopped and resumed.)
For events seen as activities and abstracted with ``zu'o'', the meaningful event
contours are the spans ``pu'o'', ``ca'o'', and ``ba'o'', and the achievement co
ntour ``co'i''. Because activities are inherently cyclic and repetitive, the beg
inning and ending points are not well-defined: you do not know whether an activi
ty has truly begun until it begins to repeat.
For events seen as point-events and abstracted with ``mu'e'', the meaningful eve
nt contours are the spans ``pu'o'' and ``ba'o'' but not ``ca'o'' (a point-event
has no duration), and the achievement contour ``co'i''.
Note that the parts of events are themselves events, and may be treated as such.
The points in time may be seen as ``mu'e'' point-events; the spans of time may
constitute processes or activities. Therefore, Lojban allows us to express proce
sses within processes, activities within states, and many other complicated abst
ract things.
13. Abstractor connection
An abstractor may be replaced by two or more abstractors joined by logical or no
n-logical connectives. Connectives are explained in detail in Chapter 14. The co
nnection can be expanded to one between two bridi which differ only in abstracti
on marker. Example 13.1 and Example 13.2 are equivalent in meaning:
13.1) le ka la frank. ciska cu xlali
.ije le ni la frank. ciska cu xlali
The quality-of Frank's writing is bad,
and the quantity of Frank's writing is bad.
13.2) le ka je ni la frank. ciska cu xlali
The quality and quantity of Frank's writing is bad.
This feature of Lojban has hardly ever been used, and nobody knows what uses it
may eventually have.
14. Table of abstractors
The following table gives each abstractor, an English gloss for it, a Lojban gis
mu which is connected with it (more or less remotely: the associations between a
bstractors and gismu are meant more as memory hooks than for any kind of inferen
ce), the rafsi associated with it, and (on the following line) its place structu
re.
nu event of fasnu nun
x1 is an event of (the bridi)
ka property of ckaji kam
x1 is a property of (the bridi)
ni amount of klani nil
x1 is an amount of (the bridi)
measured on scale x2
jei truth-value of jetnu jez
x1 is a truth-value of (the bridi)
under epistemology x2
li'i experience of lifri liz
x1 is an experience of (the bridi)
to experiencer x2
si'o idea of sidbo siz
x1 is an idea/concept of (the bridi)
in the mind of x2
du'u predication of ----- dum
x1 is the bridi (the bridi)
expressed by sentence x2
su'u abstraction of sucta sus
x1 is an abstract nature of (the bridi)
za'i state of zasti zam
x1 is a state of (the bridi)
zu'o activity of zukte zum
x1 is an activity of (the bridi)
pu'u process of pruce pup
x1 is a process of (the bridi)
mu'e point-event of mulno mub
x1 is a point-event/achievement
of (the bridi)
Chapter 12
Dog House And White House: Determining lujvo Place Structures
1. Why have lujvo?
The Lojban vocabulary is founded on its list of 1350-plus gismu, made up by comb
ining word lists from various sources. These gismu are not intended to be either
a complete vocabulary for the language nor a minimal list of semantic primitive
s. Instead, the gismu list serves as a basis for the creation of compound words,
or lujvo. The intention is that (except in certain semantically broad but shall
ow fields such as cultures, nations, foods, plants, and animals) suitable lujvo
can be devised to cover the ten million or so concepts expressible in all the wo
rld's languages taken together. Grammatically, lujvo behave just like gismu: the
y have place structures and function as selbri.
There is a close relationship between lujvo and tanru. In fact, lujvo are conden
sed forms of tanru:
1.1) ti fagri festi
That is-fire waste.
contains a tanru which can be reduced to the lujvo in:
1.2) ti fagyfesti
That is-fire-waste.
That is-ashes.
Although the lujvo ``fagyfesti'' is derived from the tanru ``fagri festi'', it i
s not equivalent in meaning to it. In particular, ``fagyfesti'' has a distinct p
lace structure of its own, not the same as that of ``festi''. (In contrast, the
tanru does have the same place structure as ``festi''.) The lujvo needs to take
account of the places of ``fagri'' as well. When a tanru is made into a lujvo, t
here is no equivalent of ``be ... bei ... be'o'' (described in Chapter 5) to inc
orporate sumti into the middle of the lujvo.
So why have lujvo? Primarily to reduce semantic ambiguity. On hearing a tanru, t
here is a burden on the listener to figure out what the tanru might mean. Adding
further terms to the tanru reduces ambiguity in one sense, by providing more in
formation; but it increases ambiguity in another sense, because there are more a
nd more tanru joints, each with an ambiguous significance. Since lujvo, like oth
er brivla, have a fixed place structure and a single meaning, encapsulating a co
mmonly-used tanru into a lujvo relieves the listener of the burden of creative u
nderstanding. In addition, lujvo are typically shorter than the corresponding ta
nru.
There are no absolute laws fixing the place structure of a newly created lujvo.
The maker must consider the place structures of all the components of the tanru
and then decide which are still relevant and which can be removed. What is said
in this chapter represents guidelines, presented as one possible standard, not n
ecessarily complete, and not the only possible standard. There may well be lujvo
that are built without regard for these guidelines, or in accordance with entir
ely different guidelines, should such alternative guidelines someday be develope
d. The reason for presenting any guidelines at all is so that Lojbanists have a
starting point for deciding on a likely place structure --- one that others seei
ng the same word can also arrive at by similar consideration.
If the tanru includes connective cmavo such as ``bo'', ``ke'', ``ke'e'', or ``je
'', or conversion or abstraction cmavo such as ``se'' or ``nu'', there are ways
of incorporating them into the lujvo as well. Sometimes this makes the lujvo exc
essively long; if so, the cmavo may be dropped. This leads to the possibility th
at more than one tanru could produce the same lujvo. Typically, however, only on
e of the possible tanru is useful enough to justify making a lujvo for it.
The exact workings of the lujvo-making algorithm, which takes a tanru built from
gismu (and possibly cmavo) and produces a lujvo from it, are described in Chapt
er 4.
2. The meaning of tanru: a necessary detour
The meaning of a lujvo is controlled by --- but is not the same as --- the meani
ng of the tanru from which the lujvo was constructed. The tanru corresponding to
a lujvo is called its ``veljvo'' in Lojban, and since there is no concise Engli
sh equivalent, that term will be used in this chapter. Furthermore, the left (mo
difier) part of a tanru will be called the ``seltau'', and the right (modified)
part the ``tertau'', following the usage of Chapter 5. For brevity, we will spea
k of the seltau or tertau of a lujvo, meaning of course the seltau or tertau of
the veljvo of that lujvo. (If this terminology is confusing, substituting ``modi
fier'' for ``seltau'' and ``modified'' for ``tertau'' may help.)
The place structure of a tanru is always the same as the place structure of its
tertau. As a result, the meaning of the tanru is a modified version of the meani
ng of the tertau; the tanru will typically, but not always, refer to a subset of
the things referred to by the tertau.
The purpose of a tanru is to join concepts together without necessarily focusing
on the exact meaning of the seltau. For example, in the Iliad, the poet talks a
bout ``the wine-dark sea'', in which ``wine'' is a seltau relative to ``dark'',
and the pair of words is a seltau relative to ``sea''. We're talking about the s
ea, not about wine or color. The other words are there to paint a scene in the l
istener's mind, in which the real action will occur, and to evoke relations to o
ther sagas of the time similarly describing the sea. Logical inferences about wi
ne or color will be rejected as irrelevant.
As a simple example, consider the rather non-obvious tanru ``klama zdani'', or `
`goer-house''. The gismu ``zdani'' has two places:
2.1) x1 is a nest/house/lair/den for inhabitant x2
(but in this chapter we will use simply ``house'', for brevity), and the gismu `
`klama'' has five:
2.2) x1 goes to destination x2 from origin point x3
via route x4 using means x5
The tanru ``klama zdani'' will also have two places, namely those of ``zdani''.
Since a ``klama zdani'' is a type of ``zdani'', we can assume that all goer-hous
es --- whatever they may be --- are also houses.
But is knowing the places of the tertau everything that is needed to understand
the meaning of a tanru? No. To see why, let us switch to a less unlikely tanru:
``gerku zdani'', literally ``dog house''. A tanru expresses a very loose relatio
n: a ``gerku zdani'' is a house that has something to do with some dog or dogs.
What the precise relation might be is left unstated. Thus, the meaning of ``lo g
erku zdani'' can include all of the following: houses occupied by dogs, houses s
haped by dogs, dogs which are also houses (e.g. houses for fleas), houses named
after dogs, and so on. All that is essential is that the place structure of ``zd
ani'' continues to apply.
For something (call it z1) to qualify as a ``gerku zdani'' in Lojban, it's got t
o be a house, first of all. For it to be a house, it's got to house someone (cal
l that z2). Furthermore, there's got to be a dog somewhere (called g1). For g1 t
o count as a dog in Lojban, it's got to belong to some breed as well (called g2)
. And finally, for z1 to be in the first place of ``gerku zdani'', as opposed to
just ``zdani'', there's got to be some relationship (called r) between some pla
ce of ``zdani'' and some place of ``gerku''. It doesn't matter which places, bec
ause if there's a relationship between some place of ``zdani'' and any place of
``gerku'', then that relationship can be compounded with the relationship betwee
n the places of ``gerku'' --- namely, ``gerku'' itself --- to reach any of the o
ther ``gerku'' places. Thus, if the relationship turns out to be between z2 and
g2, we can still state r in terms of z1 and g1: ``the relationship involves the
dog g1, whose breed has to do with the occupant of the house z1''.
Doubtless to the relief of the reader, here's an illustration. We want to find o
ut whether the White House (the one in which the U. S. President lives, that is)
counts as a ``gerku zdani''. We go through the five variables. The White House
is the z1. It houses Bill Clinton as z2, as of this writing, so it counts as a `
`zdani''. Let's take a dog --- say, Spot (g1). Spot has to have a breed; let's s
ay it's a Saint Bernard (g2). Now, the White House counts as a ``gerku zdani'' i
f there is any relationship (r) at all between the White House and Spot. (We'll
choose the g1 and z1 places to relate by r; we could have chosen any other pair
of places, and simply gotten a different relationship.)
The sky is the limit for r; it can be as complicated as ``The other day, g1 (Spo
t) chased Socks, who is owned by Chelsea Clinton, who is the daughter of Bill Cl
inton, who lives in z1 (the White House)'' or even worse. If no such r can be fo
und, well, you take another dog, and keep going until no more dogs can be found.
Only then can we say that the White House cannot fit into the first place of ``
gerku zdani''.
As we have seen, no less than five elements are involved in the definition of ``
gerku zdani'': the house, the house dweller, the dog, the dog breed (everywhere
a dog goes in Lojban, a dog breed follows), and the relationship between the hou
se and the dog. Since tanru are explicitly ambiguous in Lojban, the relationship
r cannot be expressed within a tanru (if it could, it wouldn't be a tanru any m
ore!) All the other places, however, can be expressed --- thus:
2.3) la blabi zdani cu gerku be fa la spot.
bei la sankt. berNARD. be'o
zdani la bil. klinton.
The White House is-a-dog (namely Spot
of-breed Saint Bernard)
type-of-house-for Bill Clinton.
Not the most elegant sentence ever written in either Lojban or English. Yet if t
here is any relation at all between Spot and the White House, Example 2.4 is arg
uably true. If we concentrate on just one type of relation in interpreting the t
anru ``gerku zdani'', then the meaning of ``gerku zdani'' changes. So if we unde
rstand ``gerku zdani'' as having the same meaning as the English word ``doghouse
'', the White House would no longer be a ``gerku zdani'' with respect to Spot, b
ecause as far as we know Spot does not actually live in the White House, and the
White House is not a doghouse (derogatory terms for incumbents notwithstanding)
.
3. The meaning of lujvo
This is a fairly long way to go to try and work out how to say ``doghouse''! The
reader can take heart; we're nearly there. Recall that one of the components in
volved in fixing the meaning of a tanru --- the one left deliberately vague ---
is the precise relation between the tertau and the seltau. Indeed, fixing this r
elation is tantamount to giving an interpretation to the ambiguous tanru.
A lujvo is defined by a single disambiguated instance of a tanru. That is to say
, when we try to design the place structure of a lujvo, we don't need to try to
discover the relation between the tertau and the seltau. We already know what ki
nd of relation we're looking for; it's given by the specific need we wish to exp
ress, and it determines the place structure of the lujvo itself.
Therefore, it is generally not appropriate to simply devise lujvo and decide on
place structures for them without considering one or more specific usages for th
e coinage. If one does not consider specifics, one will be likely to make errone
ous generalizations on the relationship r.
The insight driving the rest of this chapter is this: while the relation express
ed by a tanru can be very distant (e.g. Spot chasing Socks, above), the relation
ship singled out for disambiguation in a lujvo should be quite close. This is be
cause lujvo-making, paralleling natural language compounding, picks out the most
salient relationship r between a tertau place and a seltau place to be expresse
d in a single word. The relationship ``dog chases cat owned by daughter of perso
n living in house'' is too distant, and too incidental, to be likely to need exp
ression as a single short word; the relationship ``dog lives in house'' is not.
From all the various interpretations of ``gerku zdani'', the person creating ``g
erzda'' should pick the most useful value of r. The most useful one is usually g
oing to be the most obvious one, and the most obvious one is usually the closest
one.
In fact, the relationship will almost always be so close that the predicate expr
essing r will be either the seltau or the tertau predicate itself. This should c
ome as no surprise, given that a word like ``zdani'' in Lojban is a predicate. P
redicates express relations; so when you're looking for a relation to tie togeth
er ``le zdani'' and ``le gerku'', the most obvious relation to pick is the very
relation named by the tertau, ``zdani'': the relation between a home and its dwe
ller. As a result, the object which fills the first place of ``gerku'' (the dog)
also fills the second place of ``zdani'' (the house-dweller).
The seltau-tertau relationship in the veljvo is expressed by the seltau or terta
u predicate itself. Therefore, at least one of the seltau places is going to be
equivalent to a tertau place. This place is thus redundant, and can be dropped f
rom the place structure of the lujvo. As a corollary, the precise relationship b
etween the veljvo components can be implicitly determined by finding one or more
places to overlap in this way.
So what is the place structure of ``gerzda''? We're left with three places, sinc
e the dweller, the ``se zdani'', turned out to be identical to the dog, the ``ge
rku''. We can proceed as follows:
(The notation introduced casually in Section 2 will be useful in the rest of thi
s chapter. Rather than using the regular x1, x2, etc. to represent places, we'll
use the first letter of the relevant gismu in place of the ``x'', or more than
one letter where necessary to resolve ambiguities. Thus, z1 is the first place o
f ``zdani'', and g2 is the second place of ``gerku''.)
The place structure of ``zdani'' is given as Example 2.1, but is repeated here u
sing the new notation:
3.1) z1 is a nest/house/lair/den of z2
The place structure of ``gerku'' is:
3.2) g1 is a dog of breed g2
But z2 is the same as g1; therefore, the tentative place structure for ``gerzda'
' now becomes:
3.3) z1 is a house for dweller z2 of breed g2
which can also be written
3.4) z1 is a house for dog g1 of breed g2
or more concisely
3.5) z1 is a house for dweller/dog z2=g1 of breed g2
Despite the apparently conclusive nature of Example 3.5, our task is not yet don
e: we still need to decide whether any of the remaining places should also be el
iminated, and what order the lujvo places should appear in. These concerns will
be addressed in the remainder of the chapter; but we are now equipped with the t
erminology needed for those discussions.
4. Selecting places
The set of places of an ordinary lujvo are selected from the places of its compo
nent gismu. More precisely, the places of such a lujvo are derived from the set
of places of the component gismu by eliminating unnecessary places, until just e
nough places remain to give an appropriate meaning to the lujvo. In general, inc
luding a place makes the concept expressed by a lujvo more general; excluding a
place makes the concept more specific, because omitting the place requires assum
ing a standard value or range of values for it.
It would be possible to design the place structure of a lujvo from scratch, trea
ting it as if it were a gismu, and working out what arguments contribute to the
notion to be expressed by the lujvo. There are two reasons arguing against doing
so and in favor of the procedure detailed in this chapter.
The first is that it might be very difficult for a hearer or reader, who has no
preconceived idea of what concept the lujvo is intended to convey, to work out w
hat the place structure actually is. Instead, he or she would have to make use o
f a lujvo dictionary every time a lujvo is encountered in order to work out what
a ``se jbopli'' or a ``te klagau'' is. But this would mean that, rather than ha
ving to learn just the 1300-odd gismu place structures, a Lojbanist would also h
ave to learn myriads of lujvo place structures with little or no apparent patter
n or regularity to them. The purpose of the guidelines documented in this chapte
r is to apply regularity and to make it conventional wherever possible.
The second reason is related to the first: if the veljvo of the lujvo has not be
en properly selected, and the places for the lujvo are formulated from scratch,
then there is a risk that some of the places formulated may not correspond to an
y of the places of the gismu used in the veljvo of the lujvo. If that is the cas
e --- that is to say, if the lujvo places are not a subset of the veljvo gismu p
laces --- then it will be very difficult for the hearer or reader to understand
what a particular place means, and what it is doing in that particular lujvo. Th
is is a topic that will be further discussed in Section 14.
However, second-guessing the place structure of the lujvo is useful in guiding t
he process of subsequently eliminating places from the veljvo. If the Lojbanist
has an idea of what the final place structure should look like, he or she should
be able to pick an appropriate veljvo to begin with, in order to express the id
ea, and then to decide which places are relevant or not relevant to expressing t
hat idea.
5. Symmetrical and asymmetrical lujvo
A common pattern, perhaps the most common pattern, of lujvo-making creates what
is called a ``symmetrical lujvo''. A symmetrical lujvo is one based on a tanru i
nterpretation such that the first place of the seltau is equivalent to the first
place of the tertau: each component of the tanru characterizes the same object.
As an illustration of this, consider the lujvo ``balsoi'': it is intended to me
an ``both great and a soldier'' --- that is, ``great soldier'', which is the int
erpretation we would tend to give its veljvo, ``banli sonci''. The underlying gi
smu place structures are:
5.1) ``banli'': b1 is great in property b2 by standard b3
``sonci'': s1 is a soldier of army s2
In this case the s1 place of ``sonci'' is redundant, since it is equivalent to t
he b1 place of ``banli''. Therefore the place structure of ``balsoi'' need not i
nclude places for both s1 and b1, as they refer to the same thing. So the place
structure of ``balsoi'' is at most
5.2) b1=s1 is a great soldier of army s2
in property b2 by standard b3
Some symmetrical veljvo have further equivalent places in addition to the respec
tive first places. Consider the lujvo ``tinju'i'', ``to listen'' (``to hear atte
ntively, to hear and pay attention''). The place structures of the gismu ``tirna
'' and ``jundi'' are:
5.3) ``tirna'': t1 listens to t2 against background noise t3
``jundi'': j1 pays attention to j2
and the place structure of the lujvo is:
5.4) j1=t1 listens to j2=t2 against background noise t3
Why so? Because not only is the j1 place (the one who pays attention) equivalent
to the t1 place (the hearer), but the j2 place (the thing paid attention to) is
equivalent to the t2 place (the thing heard).
A substantial minority of lujvo have the property that the first place of the se
ltau (``gerku'' in this case) is equivalent to a place other than the first plac
e of the tertau; such lujvo are said to be `àsymmetrical''. (There is a deliber
ate parallel here with the terms `àsymmetrical tanru'' and ``symmetrical tanru'
' used in Chapter 5.)
In principle any asymmetrical lujvo could be expressed as a symmetrical lujvo. C
onsider ``gerzda'', discussed in Section 3, where we learned that the g1 place w
as equivalent to the z2 place. In order to get the places aligned, we could conv
ert ``zdani'' to ``se zdani'' (or ``selzda'' when expressed as a lujvo). The pla
ce structure of ``selzda'' is
5.5) s1 is housed by nest s2
and so the three-part lujvo ``gerselzda'' would have the place structure
5.6) s1=g1 is a dog housed in nest s2 of dog breed g2
However, although ``gerselzda'' is a valid lujvo, it doesn't translate ``doghous
e''; its first place is the dog, not the doghouse. Furthermore, it is more compl
icated than necessary; ``gerzda'' is simpler than ``gerselzda''.
From the reader's or listener's point of view, it may not always be obvious whet
her a newly met lujvo is symmetrical or asymmetrical, and if the latter, what ki
nd of asymmetrical lujvo. If the place structure of the lujvo isn't given in a d
ictionary or elsewhere, then plausibility must be applied, just as in interpreti
ng tanru.
The lujvo ``karcykla'', for example, is based on ``karce klama'', or ``car goer'
'. The place structure of ``karce'' is:
5.7) ka1 is a car carrying ka2 propelled by ka3
A asymmetrical interpretation of ``karcykla'' that is strictly analogous to the
place structure of ``gerzda'', equating the kl2 (destination) and ka1 (car) plac
es, would lead to the place structure
5.8) kl1 goes to car kl2=ka1 which carries ka2
propelled by ka3 from origin kl3
via route kl4 by means of kl5
But in general we go about in cars, rather than going to cars, so a far more lik
ely place structure treats the ka1 place as equivalent to the kl5 place, leading
to
5.9) kl1 goes to destination kl2 from origin kl3
via route kl4 by means of car kl5=ka1
carrying ka2 propelled by ka3.
instead.
6. Dependent places
In order to understand which places, if any, should be completely removed from a
lujvo place structure, we need to understand the concept of dependent places. O
ne place of a brivla is said to be dependent on another if its value can be pred
icted from the values of one or more of the other places. For example, the g2 pl
ace of ``gerku'' is dependent on the g1 place. Why? Because when we know what fi
ts in the g1 place (Spot, let us say, a well-known dog), then we know what fits
in the g2 place (``St. Bernard'', let us say). In other words, when the value of
the g1 place has been specified, the value of the g2 place is determined by it.
Conversely, since each dog has only one breed, but each breed contains many dog
s, the g1 place is not dependent on the g2 place; if we know only that some dog
is a St. Bernard, we cannot tell by that fact alone which dog is meant.
For ``zdani'', on the other hand, there is no dependency between the places. Whe
n we know the identity of a house-dweller, we have not determined the house, bec
ause a dweller may dwell in more than one house. By the same token, when we know
the identity of a house, we do not know the identity of its dweller, for a hous
e may contain more than one dweller.
The rule for eliminating places from a lujvo is that dependent places provided b
y the seltau are eliminated. Therefore, in ``gerzda'' the dependent g2 place is
removed from the tentative place structure given in Example 3.5, leaving the pla
ce structure:
6.1) z1 is the house dwelt in by dog z2=g1
Informally put, the reason this has happened --- and it happens a lot with selta
u places --- is that the third place was describing not the doghouse, but the do
g who lives in it. The sentence
6.2) la mon. rePOS. gerzda la spat.
Mon Repos is a doghouse of Spot.
really means
6.3) la mon. rePOS. zdani la spat. noi gerku
Mon Repos is a house of Spot, who is a dog.
since that is the interpretation we have given ``gerzda''. But that in turn mean
s
6.4) la mon. rePOS. zdani la spat noi ke'a gerku zo'e
Mon Repos is a house of Spot, who is a dog
of unspecified breed.
Specifically,
6.5) la mon. rePOS. zdani la spat.
noi ke'a gerku la sankt. berNARD.
Mon Repos is a house of Spot,
who is a dog of breed St. Bernard.
and in that case, it makes little sense to say
6.6) la mon. rePOS. gerzda la spat.
noi ke'a gerku la sankt. berNARD. ku'o
la sankt. berNARD.
Mon Repos is a doghouse of Spot,
who is a dog of breed St. Bernard,
of breed St. Bernard.
employing the over-ample place structure of Example 3.5. The dog breed is redund
antly given both in the main selbri and in the relative clause, and (intuitively
speaking) is repeated in the wrong place, since the dog breed is supplementary
information about the dog, and not about the doghouse.
As a further example, take ``cakcinki'', the lujvo for ``beetle'', based on the
tanru ``calku cinki'', or ``shell-insect''. The gismu place structures are:
6.7) ``calku'': ca1 is a shell/husk around ca2 made of ca3
``cinki'': ci1 is an insect/arthropod of species ci2
This example illustrates a cross-dependency between a place of one gismu and a p
lace of the other. The ca3 place is dependent on ci1, because all insects (which
fit into ci1) have shells made of chitin (which fits into ca3). Furthermore, ca
1 is dependent on ci1 as well, because each insect has only a single shell. And
since ca2 (the thing with the shell) is equivalent to ci1 (the insect), the plac
e structure is
6.8) ci1=ca2 is a beetle of species ci2
with not a single place of ``calku'' surviving independently!
(Note that there is nothing in this explanation that tells us just why ``cakcink
i'' means ``beetle'' (member of Coleoptera), since all insects in their adult fo
rms have chitin shells of some sort. The answer, which is in no way predictable,
is that the shell is a prominent, highly noticeable feature of beetles in parti
cular.)
What about the dependency of ci2 on ci1? After all, no beetle belongs to more th
an one species, so it would seem that the ci2 place of ``cakcinki'' could be eli
minated on the same reasoning that allowed us to eliminate the g2 place of ``ger
zda'' above. However, it is a rule that dependent places are not eliminated from
a lujvo when they are derived from the tertau of its veljvo. This rule is impos
ed to keep the place structures of lujvo from drifting too far from the tertau p
lace structure; if a place is necessary in the tertau, it's treated as necessary
in the lujvo as well.
In general, the desire to remove places coming from the tertau is a sign that th
e veljvo selected is simply wrong. Different place structures imply different co
ncepts, and the lujvo maker may be trying to shoehorn the wrong concept into the
place structure of his or her choosing. This is obvious when someone tries to s
hoe-horn a ``klama'' tertau into a ``litru'' or ``cliva'' concept, for example:
these gismu differ in their number of arguments, and suppressing places of ``kla
ma'' in a lujvo doesn't make any sense if the resulting modified place structure
is that of ``litru'' or ``cliva''.
Sometimes the dependency is between a single place of the tertau and the whole e
vent described by the seltau. Such cases are discussed further in Section 13.
Unfortunately, not all dependent places in the seltau can be safely removed: som
e of them are necessary to interpreting the lujvo's meaning in context. It doesn
't matter much to a doghouse what breed of dog inhabits it, but it can make quit
e a lot of difference to the construction of a school building what kind of scho
ol is in it! Music schools need auditoriums and recital rooms, elementary school
s need playgrounds, and so on: therefore, the place structure of ``kuldi'u'' (fr
om ``ckule dinju'', and meaning ``school building'') needs to be
6.9) d1 is a building housing school c1
teaching subject c3 to audience c4
even though c3 and c4 are plainly dependent on c1. The other places of ``ckule''
, the location (c2) and operators (c5), don't seem to be necessary to the concep
t ``school building'', and are dependent on c1 to boot, so they are omitted. Aga
in, the need for case-by-case consideration of place structures is demonstrated.
7. Ordering lujvo places.
So far, we have concentrated on selecting the places to go into the place struct
ure of a lujvo. However, this is only half the story. In using selbri in Lojban,
it is important to remember the right order of the sumti. With lujvo, the need
to attend to the order of sumti becomes critical: the set of places selected sho
uld be ordered in such a way that a reader unfamiliar with the lujvo should be a
ble to tell which place is which.
If we aim to make understandable lujvo, then, we should make the order of places
in the place structure follow some conventions. If this does not occur, very re
al ambiguities can turn up. Take for example the lujvo ``jdaselsku'', meaning ``
prayer''. In the sentence
7.1) di'e jdaselsku la dong.
This-utterance is-a-prayer somehow-related-to-Dong.
we must be able to know if Dong is the person making the prayer, giving the mean
ing
7.2) This is a prayer by Dong
or is the entity being prayed to, resulting in
7.3) This is a prayer to Dong
We could resolve such problems on a case-by-case basis for each lujvo (Section 1
4 discusses when this is actually necessary), but case-by-case resolution for ru
n-of-the-mill lujvo makes the task of learning lujvo place structures unmanageab
le. People need consistent patterns to make sense of what they learn. Such patte
rns can be found across gismu place structures (see Section 16), and are even mo
re necessary in lujvo place structures. Case-by-case consideration is still nece
ssary; lujvo creation is a subtle art, after all. But it is helpful to take adva
ntage of any available regularities.
We use two different ordering rules: one for symmetrical lujvo and one for asymm
etrical ones. A symmetrical lujvo like ``balsoi'' (from Section 5) has the place
s of its tertau followed by whatever places of the seltau survive the eliminatio
n process. For ``balsoi'', the surviving places of ``banli'' are b2 and b3, lead
ing to the place structure:
7.4) b1=s1 is a great soldier of army s2
in property b2 by standard b3
just what appears in Example 5.1. In fact, all place structures shown until now
have been in the correct order by the conventions of this section, though the fa
ct has been left tacit until now.
The motivation for this rule is the parallelism between the lujvo bridi-schema
7.5) b1 bansoi s2 b2 b3
b1 is-a-great-soldier of-army-s2
in-property-b2 by-standard-b3
and the more or less equivalent bridi-schema
7.6) b1 sonci s2 gi'e banli b2 b3
b1 is-a-soldier of-army-s2 and
is-great in-property-b2
by-standard-b3
where ``gi'e'' is the Lojban word for `ànd'' when placed between two partial br
idi, as explained in Chapter 14.
Asymmetrical lujvo like ``gerzda'', on the other hand, employ a different rule.
The seltau places are inserted not at the end of the place structure, but rather
immediately after the tertau place which is equivalent to the first place of th
e seltau. Consider ``dalmikce'', meaning ``veterinarian'': its veljvo is ``danlu
mikce'', or `ànimal doctor''. The place structures for those gismu are:
7.7) ``danlu'': d1 is an animal of species d2
``mikce'': m1 is a doctor to patient m2 for ailment m3
using treatment m4
and the lujvo place structure is:
7.8) m1 is a doctor for animal m2=d1 of species d2
for ailment m3 using treatment m4
Since the shared place is m2=d1, the animal patient, the remaining seltau place
d2 is inserted immediately after the shared place; then the remaining tertau pla
ces form the last two places of the lujvo.
8. lujvo with more than two parts.
The theory we have outlined so far is an account of lujvo with two parts. But of
ten lujvo are made containing more than two parts. An example is ``bavlamdei'',
``tomorrow'': it is composed of the rafsi for ``future'', `àdjacent'', and ``da
y''. How does the account we have given apply to lujvo like this?
The best way to approach such lujvo is to continue to classify them as based on
binary tanru, the only difference being that the seltau or the tertau or both is
itself a lujvo. So it is easiest to make sense of ``bavlamdei'' as having two c
omponents: ``bavla'i'', ``next'', and ``djedi''. If we know or invent the lujvo
place structure for the components, we can compose the new lujvo place structure
in the usual way.
In this case, ``bavla'i'' is given the place structure
8.1) b1=l1 is next after b2=l2
making it a symmetrical lujvo. We combine this with ``djedi'', which has the pla
ce structure:
8.2) duration d1 is d2 days long (default 1)
by standard d3
While symmetrical lujvo normally put any trailing tertau places before any selta
u places, the day standard is a much less important concept than the day the tom
orrow follows, in the definition of ``bavlamdei''. This is an example of how the
guidelines presented for selecting and ordering lujvo places are just that, not
laws that must be rigidly adhered to. In this case, we choose to rank places in
order of relative importance. The resulting place structure is:
8.3) d1=b1=l1 is a day following b2=l2,
d2 days later (default 1) by standard d3
Here is another example of a multi-part lujvo: ``cladakyxa'i'', meaning ``long-s
word'', a specific type of medieval weapon. The gismu place structures are:
8.4) ``clani'': c1 is long in direction c2 by standard c3
``dakfu'': d1 is a knife for cutting d2
with blade made of d3
``xarci'': xa1 is a weapon for use against xa2
by wielder xa3
Since ``cladakyxa'i'' is a symmetrical lujvo based on ``cladakfu xarci'', and ``
cladakfu'' is itself a symmetrical lujvo, we can do the necessary analyses all a
t once. Plainly c1 (the long thing), d1 (the knife), and xa1 (the weapon) are al
l the same. Likewise, the d2 place (the thing cut) is the same as the xa2 place
(the target of the weapon), given that swords are used to cut victims. Finally,
the c2 place (direction of length) is always along the sword blade in a longswor
d, by definition, and so is dependent on c1=d1=xa1. Adding on the places of the
remaining gismu in right-to-left order we get:
8.5) xa1=d1=c1 is a long-sword for use against xa2=d2
by wielder xa3, with a blade made of d3,
long measured by standard c3.
If the last place sounds unimportant to you, notice that what counts legally as
a ``sword'', rather than just a ``knife'', depends on the length of the blade (t
he cutoff point varies in different jurisdictions). This fifth place of ``cladak
yxa'i'' may not often be explicitly filled, but it is still useful on occasion.
Because it is so seldom important, it is best that it be last.
9. Eliding SE rafsi from seltau
It is common to form lujvo that omit the rafsi based on cmavo of selma'o SE, as
well as other cmavo rafsi. Doing so makes lujvo construction for common or usefu
l constructions shorter. Since it puts more strain on the listener who has not h
eard the lujvo before, the shortness of the word should not necessarily outweigh
ease in understanding, especially if the lujvo refers to a rare or unusual conc
ept.
Consider as an example the lujvo ``ti'ifla'', from the veljvo ``stidi flalu'', a
nd meaning ``bill, proposed law''. The gismu place structures are:
9.1) ``stidi'': agent st1 suggests idea/action st2
to audience st3
``flalu'': f1 is a law specifying f2 for community f3
under conditions f4 by lawgiver f5
This lujvo does not fit any of our existing molds: it is the second seltau place
, st2, that is equivalent to one of the tertau places, namely f1. However, if we
understand ``ti'ifla'' as an abbreviation for the lujvo ``selti'ifla'', then we
get the first places of seltau and tertau lined up. The place structure of ``se
lti'i'' is:
9.2) ``selti'i'': idea/action se1 is suggested by agent se2 to audience se3
Here we can see that se1 (what is suggested) is equivalent to f1 (the law), and
we get a normal symmetrical lujvo. The final place structure is:
9.3) f1=se1 is a bill specifying f2 for community f3
under conditions f4 by suggester se2
to audience/lawgivers f5=se3
or, relabeling the places,
9.4) f1=st2 is a bill specifying f2 for community f3
under conditions f4 by suggester st1
to audience/lawgivers f5=st3
where the last place (st3) is probably some sort of legislature.
Abbreviated lujvo like ``ti'ifla'' are more intuitive (for the lujvo-maker) than
their more explicit counterparts like ``selti'ifla'' (as well as shorter). They
don't require the coiner to sit down and work out the precise relation between
the seltau and the tertau: he or she can just rattle off a rafsi pair. But shoul
d the lujvo get to the stage where a place structure needs to be worked out, the
n the precise relation does need to be specified. And in that case, such abbrevi
ated lujvo form a trap in lujvo place ordering, since they obscure the most stra
ightforward relation between the seltau and tertau. To give our lujvo-making gui
delines as wide an application as possible, and to encourage analyzing the selta
u-tertau relation in lujvo, lujvo like ``ti'ifla'' are given the place structure
they would have with the appropriate SE added to the seltau.
Note that, with these lujvo, an interpretation requiring SE insertion is safe on
ly if the alternatives are either implausible or unlikely to be needed as a lujv
o. This may not always be the case, and Lojbanists should be aware of the risk o
f ambiguity.
10. Eliding SE rafsi from tertau
Eliding SE rafsi from tertau gets us into much more trouble. To understand why,
recall that lujvo, following their veljvo, describe some type of whatever their
tertau describe. Thus, ``posydji'' describes a type of ``djica'', ``gerzda'' des
cribes a type of ``zdani'', and so on. What is certain is that ``gerzda'' does n
ot describe a ``se zdani'' --- it is not a word that could be used to describe a
n inhabitant such as a dog.
Now consider how we would translate the word ``blue-eyed''. Let's tentatively tr
anslate this word as ``blakanla'' (from ``blanu kanla'', meaning ``blue eye'').
But immediately we are in trouble: we cannot say
10.1) la djak. cu blakanla
Jack is-a-blue-eye
because Jack is not an eye, ``kanla'', but someone with an eye, ``se kanla''. At
best we can say
10.2) la djak. cu se blakanla
Jack is-the-bearer-of-blue-eyes
But look now at the place structure of ``blakanla'': it is a symmetrical lujvo,
so the place structure is:
10.3) xe1=s1 is a blue eye of xe2=s2
We end up being most interested in talking about the second place, not the first
(we talk much more of people than of their eyes), so ``se'' would almost always
be required.
What is happening here is that we are translating the tertau wrongly, under the
influence of English. The English suffix ``-eyed'' does not mean `èye'', but so
meone with an eye, which is ``selkanla''.
Because we've got the wrong tertau (eliding a ``se'' that really should be there
), any attempt to accommodate the resulting lujvo into our guidelines for place
structure is fitting a square peg in a round hole. Since they can be so misleadi
ng, lujvo with SE rafsi elided from the tertau should be avoided in favor of the
ir more explicit counterparts: in this case, ``blaselkanla''.
11. Eliding KE and KEhE rafsi from lujvo
People constructing lujvo usually want them to be as short as possible. To that
end, they will discard any cmavo they regard as niceties. The first such cmavo t
o get thrown out are usually ``ke'' and ``ke'e'', the cmavo used to structure an
d group tanru. We can usually get away with this, because the interpretation of
the tertau with ``ke'' and ``ke'e'' missing is less plausible than that with the
cmavo inserted, or because the distinction isn't really important.
For example, in ``bakrecpa'o'', meaning ``beefsteak'', the veljvo is
11.1) [ke] bakni rectu [ke'e] panlo
( bovine meat ) slice
because of the usual Lojban left-grouping rule. But there doesn't seem to be muc
h difference between that veljvo and
11.2) bakni ke rectu panlo [ke'e]
bovine ( meat slice )
On the other hand, the lujvo ``zernerkla'', meaning ``to sneak in'', almost cert
ainly was formed from the veljvo
11.3) zekri ke nenri klama [ke'e]
crime ( inside go )
to go within, criminally
because the alternative,
11.4) [ke] zekri nenri [ke'e] klama
(crime inside) go
doesn't make much sense. (To go to the inside of a crime? To go into a place whe
re it is criminal to be inside --- an interpretation almost identical with Examp
le 11.3 anyway?)
There are cases, however, where omitting a KE or KEhE rafsi can produce another
lujvo, equally useful. For example, ``xaskemcakcurnu'' means `òceanic shellfish
'', and has the veljvo
11.5) xamsi ke calku curnu
ocean type-of (shell worm)
(``worm'' in Lojban refers to any invertebrate), but ``xascakcurnu'' has the vel
jvo
11.6) [ke] xamsi calku [ke'e] curnu
(ocean shell) type-of worm
and might refer to the parasitic worms that infest clamshells.
Such misinterpretation is more likely than not in a lujvo starting with ``sel-''
(from ``se''), ``nal-'' (from ``na'e'') or ``tol-'' (from ``to'e''): the scope
of the rafsi will likeliest be presumed to be as narrow as possible, since all o
f these cmavo normally bind only to the following brivla or ``ke ... ke'e'' grou
p. For that reason, if we want to modify an entire lujvo by putting ``se'', ``na
'e'' or ``to'e'' before it, it's better to leave the result as two words, or els
e to insert ``ke'', than to just stick the SE or NAhE rafsi on.
It is all right to replace the phrase ``se klama'' with ``selkla'', and the plac
es of ``selkla'' are exactly those of ``se klama''. But consider the related luj
vo ``dzukla'', meaning ``to walk to somewhere''. It is a symmmetrical lujvo, der
ived from the veljvo ``cadzu klama'' as follows:
11.7) ``cadzu'': c1 walks on surface c2 using limbs c3
``klama'': k1 goes to k2 from k3 via route k4 using k5
``dzukla'': c1=k1 walks to k2 from k3 via route k4
using limbs k5=c3 on surface c2
We can swap the k1 and k2 places using ``se dzukla'', but we cannot directly mak
e ``se dzukla'' into ``seldzukla'', which would represent the veljvo ``selcadzu
klama'' and plausibly mean something like ``to go to a walking surface''. Instea
d, we would need ``selkemdzukla'', with an explicit rafsi for ``ke''. Similarly,
``nalbrablo'' (from ``na'e barda bloti'') means ``non-big boat'', whereas ``na'
e brablo'' means `òther than a big boat''.
If the lujvo we want to modify with SE has a seltau already starting with a SE r
afsi, we can take a shortcut. For instance, ``gekmau'' means ``happier than'', w
hile ``selgekmau'' means ``making people happier than, more enjoyable than, more
of a 'se gleki' than''. If something is less enjoyable than something else, we
can say it is ``se selgekmau''.
But we can also say it is ``selselgekmau''. Two ``se'' cmavo in a row cancel eac
h other (``se se gleki'' means the same as just ``gleki''), so there would be no
good reason to have ``selsel'' in a lujvo with that meaning. Instead, we can fe
el free to interpret ``selsel-'' as ``selkemsel-''. The rafsi combinations ``ter
ter-'', ``velvel-'' and ``xelxel-'' work in the same way.
Other SE combinations like ``selter-'', although they might conceivably mean ``s
e te'', more than likely should be interpreted in the same way, namely as ``se k
e te'', since there is no need to re-order places in the way that ``se te'' prov
ides. (See Chapter 9.)
12. Abstract lujvo
The cmavo of NU can participate in the construction of lujvo of a particularly s
imple and well-patterned kind. Consider that old standard example, ``klama'':
12.1) k1 comes/goes to k2 from k3 via route k4 by means k5.
The selbri ``nu klama [kei]'' has only one place, the event-of-going, but the fu
ll five places exist implicitly between ``nu'' and ``kei'', since a full bridi w
ith all sumti may be placed there. In a lujvo, there is no room for such inside
places, and consequently the lujvo ``nunkla'' (``nun-'' is the rafsi for ``nu'')
, needs to have six places:
12.2) nu1 is the event of k1's coming/going to k2 from k3
via route k4 by means k5.
Here the first place of ``nunklama'' is the first and only place of ``nu'', and
the other five places have been pushed down by one to occupy the second through
the sixth places. Full information on ``nu'', as well as the other abstractors m
entioned in this section, is given in Chapter 11.
For those abstractors which have a second place as well, the standard convention
is to place this place after, rather than before, the places of the brivla bein
g abstracted. The place structure of ``nilkla'', the lujvo derived from ``ni kla
ma'', is the imposing:
12.3) ni1 is the amount of k1's coming/going to k2 from k3
via route k4 by means k5, measured on scale ni2.
It is not uncommon for abstractors to participate in the making of more complex
lujvo as well. For example, ``nunsoidji'', from the veljvo
12.4) nu sonci kei djica
event-of being-a-soldier desirer
12.5) d1 desires the event of (s1 being a soldier of army s2)
for purpose d3
where the d2 place has disappeared altogether, being replaced by the places of t
he seltau. As shown in Example 12.5, the ordering follows this idea of replaceme
nt: the seltau places are inserted at the point where the omitted abstraction pl
ace exists in the tertau.
The lujvo ``nunsoidji'' is quite different from the ordinary asymmetric lujvo ``
soidji'', a ``soldier desirer'', whose place structure is just
12.6) d1 desires (a soldier of army s2) for purpose d3
A ``nunsoidji'' might be someone who is about to enlist, whereas a ``soidji'' mi
ght be a camp-follower.
One use of abstract lujvo is to eliminate the need for explicit ``kei'' in tanru
: ``nunkalri gasnu'' means much the same as ``nu kalri kei gasnu'', but is short
er. In addition, many English words ending in ``-hood'' are represented with ``n
un-'' lujvo, and other words ending in ``-ness'' or ``-dom'' are often represent
able with ``kam-'' lujvo (``kam-'' is the rafsi for ``ka''); ``kambla'' is ``blu
eness''.
Even though the cmavo of NU are long-scope in nature, governing the whole follow
ing bridi, the NU rafsi should generally be used as short-scope modifiers, like
the SE and NAhE rafsi discussed in Section 9.
There is also a rafsi for the cmavo ``jai'', namely ``jax'', which allows senten
ces like
12.7) mi jai rinka le nu do morsi
I am-associated-with causing the event-of your death.
I cause your death.
explained in Chapter 11, to be rendered with lujvo:
12.8) mi jaxri'a le nu do morsi
I am-part-of-the-cause-of the event-of your dying.
In making a lujvo that contains ``jax-'' for a selbri that contains ``jai'', the
rule is to leave the ``fai'' place as a ``fai'' place of the lujvo; it does not
participate in the regular lujvo place structure. (The use of ``fai'' is also e
xplained in Chapter 11.)
13. Implicit-abstraction lujvo
Eliding NU rafsi involves the same restrictions as eliding SE rafsi, plus additi
onal ones. In general, NU rafsi should not be elided from the tertau, since that
changes the kind of thing the lujvo is talking about from an abstraction to a c
oncrete sumti. However, they may be elided from the seltau if no reasonable ambi
guity would result.
A major difference, however, between SE elision and NU elision is that the forme
r is a rather sparse process, providing a few convenient shortenings. Eliding ``
nu'', however, is extremely important in producing a class of lujvo called `ìmp
licit-abstraction lujvo''.
Let us make a detailed analysis of the lujvo ``nunctikezgau'', meaning ``to feed
''. (If you think this lujvo is excessively longwinded, be patient.) The veljvo
of ``nunctikezgau'' is ``nu citka kei gasnu''. The relevant place structures are
:
13.1) ``nu'': n1 is an event
``citka'': c1 eats c2
``gasnu'': g1 does action/is the agent of event g2
In accordance with the procedure for analyzing three-part lujvo given in Section
8, we will first create an intermediate lujvo, ``nuncti'', whose veljvo is ``nu
citka [kei]''. By the rules given in Section 12, ``nuncti'' has the place struc
ture
13.2) n1 is the event of c1 eating c2
Now we can transform the veljvo of ``nunctikezgau'' into ``nuncti gasnu''. The g
2 place (what is brought about by the actor g1) obviously denotes the same thing
as n1 (the event of eating). So we can eliminate g2 as redundant, leaving us wi
th a tentative place structure of
13.3) g1 is the actor in the event n1=g2 of c1 eating c2
But it is also possible to omit the n1 place itself! The n1 place describes the
event brought about; an event in Lojban is described as a bridi, by a selbri and
its sumti; the selbri is already known (it's the seltau), and the sumti are als
o already known (they're in the lujvo place structure). So n1 would not give us
any information we didn't already know. In fact, the n1=g2 place is dependent on
c1 and c2 jointly --- it does not depend on either c1 or c2 by itself. Being de
pendent and derived from the seltau, it is omissible. So the final place structu
re of ``nunctikezgau'' is:
13.4) g1 is the actor in the event of c1 eating c2
There is one further step that can be taken. As we have already seen with ``bals
oi'' in Section 5, the interpretation of lujvo is constrained by the semantics o
f gismu and of their sumti places. Now, any asymmetrical lujvo with ``gasnu'' as
its tertau will involve an event abstraction either implicitly or explicitly, s
ince that is how the g2 place of ``gasnu'' is defined.
Therefore, if we assume that ``nu'' is the type of abstraction one would expect
to be a ``se gasnu'', then the rafsi ``nun'' and ``kez'' in ``nunctikezgau'' are
only telling us what we would already have guessed --- that the seltau of a ``g
asnu'' lujvo is an event. If we drop these rafsi out, and use instead the shorte
r lujvo ``ctigau'', rejecting its symmetrical interpretation (``someone who both
does and eats''; `àn eating doer''), we can still deduce that the seltau refer
s to an event.
(You can't ``do an eater''/``gasnu lo citka'', with the meaning of ``do'' as ``b
ring about an event''; so the seltau must refer to an event, ``nu citka''. The E
nglish slang meanings of ``do someone'', namely ``socialize with someone'' and `
`have sex with someone'', are not relevant to ``gasnu''.)
So we can simply use ``ctigau'' with the same place structure as ``nunctikezgau'
':
13.5) agent g1 causes c1 to eat c2
g1 feeds c2 to c1.
This particular kind of asymmetrical lujvo, in which the seltau serves as the se
lbri of an abstraction which is a place of the tertau, is called an implicit-abs
traction lujvo, because one deduces the presence of an abstraction which is unex
pressed (implicit).
To give another example: the gismu ``basti'', whose place structure is
13.6) b1 replaces b2 in circumstances b3
can form the lujvo ``basygau'', with the place structure:
13.7) g1 (agent) replaces b1 with b2 in circumstances b3
where both ``basti'' and ``basygau'' are translated ``replace'' in English, but
represent different relations: ``basti'' may be used with no mention of any agen
t doing the replacing.
In addition, ``gasnu''-based lujvo can be built from what we would consider noun
s or adjectives in English. In Lojban, everything is a predicate, so adjectives,
nouns and verbs are all treated in the same way. This is consistent with the us
e of similar causative affixes in other languages. For example, the gismu ``litk
i'', meaning ``liquid'', with the place structure
13.8) l1 is a quantity of liquid of composition l2
under conditions l3
can give ``likygau'', meaning ``to liquefy'':
13.9) g1 (agent) causes l1 to be a quantity of liquid
of composition l2 under conditions l3.
While ``likygau'' correctly represents ``causes to be a liquid'', a different lu
jvo based on ``galfi'' (meaning ``modify'') may be more appropriate for ``causes
to become a liquid''. On the other hand, ``fetsygau'' is unsafe, because it cou
ld mean `àgent in the event of something becoming female'' (the implicit-abstra
ction interpretation) or simply ``female agent'' (the parallel interpretation),
so using implicit-abstraction lujvo is always accompanied with some risk of bein
g misunderstood.
Many other Lojban gismu have places for event abstractions, and therefore are go
od candidates for the tertau of an implicit-abstraction lujvo. For example, lujv
o based on ``rinka'', with its place structure
13.10) event r1 causes event r2 to occur
are closely related to those based on ``gasnu''. However, ``rinka'' is less gene
rally useful than ``gasnu'', because its r1 place is another event rather than a
person: ``lo rinka'' is a cause, not a causer. Thus the place structure of ``li
kyri'a'', a lujvo analogous to ``likygau'', is
13.11) event r1 causes l1 to be a quantity of liquid
of composition l2 under conditions l3
and would be useful in translating sentences like ``The heat of the sun liquefie
d the block of ice.''
Implicit-abstraction lujvo are a powerful means in the language of rendering qui
te verbose bridi into succinct and manageable concepts, and increasing the expre
ssive power of the language.
14. Anomalous lujvo
Some lujvo that have been coined and actually employed in Lojban writing do not
follow the guidelines expressed above, either because the places that are equiva
lent in the seltau and the tertau are in an unusual position, or because the sel
tau and tertau are related in a complex way, or both. An example of the first ki
nd is ``jdaselsku'', meaning ``prayer'', which was mentioned in Section 7. The g
ismu places are:
14.1) ``lijda'': l1 is a religion with believers l2
and beliefs l3
``cusku'': c1 expresses text c2 to audience c3
in medium c4
and ``selsku'', the tertau of ``jdaselsku'', has the place structure
14.2) s1 is a text expressed by s2 to audience s3
in medium s4
Now it is easy to see that the l2 and s2 places are equivalent: the
believer in the religion (l2) is the one who expresses the prayer (s2).
This is not one of the cases for which a place ordering rule has been
given in Section 7 or Section 13; therefore, for lack of a better rule,
we put the tertau places first and the remaining seltau places after them,
leading to the place structure:
14.3) s1 is a prayer expressed by s2=l2 to audience s3
in medium s4 pertaining to religion l1
The l3 place (the beliefs of the religion) is dependent on the l1 place (the rel
igion) and so is omitted.
We could make this lujvo less messy by replacing it with ``se seljdasku'', where
``seljdasku'' is a normal symmetrical lujvo with place structure:
14.4) c1=l2 religiously expresses
prayer c2 to audience c3
in medium s4 pertaining to religion l1
which, according to the rule expressed in Section 9, can be further expressed as
``selseljdasku''. However, there is no need for the ugly ``selsel-'' prefix jus
t to get the rules right: ``jdaselsku'' is a reasonable, if anomalous, lujvo.
However, there is a further problem with ``jdaselsku'', not resolvable by using
``seljdasku''. No veljvo involving just the two gismu ``lijda'' and ``cusku'' ca
n fully express the relationship implicit in prayer. A prayer is not just anythi
ng said by the adherents of a religion; nor is it even anything said by them act
ing as adherents of that religion. Rather, it is what they say under the authori
ty of that religion, or using the religion as a medium, or following the rules a
ssociated with the religion, or something of the kind. So the veljvo is somewhat
elliptical.
As a result, both ``seljdasku'' and ``jdaselsku'' belong to the second class of
anomalous lujvo: the veljvo doesn't really supply all that the lujvo requires.
Another example of this kind of anomalous lujvo, drawn from the tanru lists in C
hapter 5, is ``lange'u'', meaning ``sheepdog''. Clearly a sheepdog is not a dog
which is a sheep (the symmetrical interpretation is wrong), nor a dog of the she
ep breed (the asymmetrical interpretation is wrong). Indeed, there is simply no
overlap in the places of ``lanme'' and ``gerku'' at all. Rather, the lujvo refer
s to a dog which controls sheep flocks, a ``terlanme jitro gerku'', the lujvo fr
om which is ``terlantroge'u'' with place structure:
14.5) g1=j1 is a dog that controls sheep flock l3=j2
made up of sheep l1 in activity j3 of dog breed g2
based on the gismu place structures
14.6) ``lanme'': l1 is a sheep of breed l2 belonging to flock l3
``gerku'': g1 is a dog of breed g2
``jitro'': j1 controls j2 in activity j3
Note that this lujvo is symmetrical between ``lantro'' (sheep-controller) and ``
gerku'', but ``lantro'' is itself an asymmetrical lujvo. The l2 place, the breed
of sheep, is removed as dependent on l1. However, the lujvo ``lange'u'' is both
shorter than ``terlantroge'u'' and sufficiently clear to warrant its use: its p
lace structure, however, should be the same as that of the longer lujvo, for whi
ch ``lange'u'' can be understood as an abbreviation.
Another example is ``xanmi'e'', ``to command by hand, to beckon''. The component
place structures are:
14.7) ``xance'': xa1 is the hand of xa2
``minde'': m1 gives commands to m2 to cause m3 to happen
The relation between the seltau and tertau is close enough for there to be an ov
erlap: xa2 (the person with the hand) is the same as m1 (the one who commands).
But interpreting ``xanmi'e'' as a symmetrical lujvo with an elided ``sel-'' in t
he seltau, as if from ``se xance mindu'', misses the point: the real relation ex
pressed by the lujvo is not just `òne who commands and has a hand'', but ``to c
ommand using the hand''. The concept of `ùsing'' suggests in the gismu ``pilno'
', with place structure
14.8) p1 uses tool p2 for purpose p3
Some possible three-part veljvo are (depending on how strictly you want to const
rain the veljvo)
14.9) [ke] xance pilno [ke'e] minde
(hand user) type-of commander
14.10) [ke] minde xance [ke'e] pilno
(commander hand) type-of user
or even
14.11) minde ke xance pilno [ke'e]
commander type-of (hand user)
which lead to the three different lujvo ``xanplimi'e'', ``mi'erxanpli'', and ``m
inkemxanpli'' respectively.
Does this make ``xanmi'e'' wrong? By no means. But it does mean that there is a
latent component to the meaning of ``xanmi'e'', the gismu ``pilno'', which is no
t explicit in the veljvo. And it also means that, for a place structure derivati
on that actually makes sense, rather than being ad-hoc, the Lojbanist should pro
bably go through a derivation for ``xancypliminde'' or one of the other possibil
ities that is analogous to the analysis of ``terlantroge'u'' above, even if he o
r she decides to stick with a shorter, more convenient form like ``xanmi'e''. In
addition, of course, the possibilities of elliptical lujvo increase their poten
tial ambiguity enormously --- an unavoidable fact which should be borne in mind.
15. Comparatives and superlatives
English has the concepts of ``comparative adjectives'' and ``superlative adjecti
ves'' which can be formed from other adjectives, either by adding the suffixes `
`-er'' and ``-est'' or by using the words ``more'' and ``most'', respectively. T
he Lojbanic equivalents, which can be made from any brivla, are lujvo with the t
ertau ``zmadu'', ``mleca'', ``zenba'', ``jdika'', and ``traji''. In order to mak
e these lujvo regular and easy to make, certain special guidelines are imposed.
We will begin with lujvo based on ``zmadu'' and ``mleca'', whose place structure
s are:
15.1) ``zmadu'': z1 is more than z2 in property z3
in quantity z4
``mleca'': m1 is less than m2 in property m3
in quantity m4
For example, the concept ``young'' is expressed by the gismu ``citno'', with pla
ce structure
15.2) ``citno'': c1 is young
The comparative concept ``younger'' can be expressed by the lujvo ``citmau'' (ba
sed on the veljvo ``citno zmadu'', meaning ``young more-than'').
15.3) mi citmau do lo nanca be li xa
I am-younger-than you by-years the-number six.
I am six years younger than you.
The place structure for ``citmau'' is
15.4) z1=c1 is younger than z2=c1 by amount z4
Similarly, in Lojban you can say:
15.5) do citme'a mi lo nanca be li xa
You are-less-young-than me by-years the-number six.
You are six years less young than me.
In English, ``more'' comparatives are easier to make and use than ``less'' compa
ratives, but in Lojban the two forms are equally easy.
Because of their much simpler place structure, lujvo ending in ``-mau'' and ``-m
e'a'' are in fact used much more frequently than ``zmadu'' and ``mleca'' themsel
ves as selbri. It is highly unlikely for such lujvo to be construed as anything
other than implicit-abstraction lujvo. But there is another type of ambiguity re
levant to these lujvo, and which has to do with what is being compared.
For example, does ``nelcymau'' mean ``X likes Y more than X likes Z'', or ``X li
kes Y more than Z likes Y''? Does ``klamau'' mean: ``X goes to Y more than to Z'
', ``X goes to Y more than Z does'', ``X goes to Y from Z more than from W'', or
what?
We answer this concern by putting regularity above any considerations of concept
usefulness: by convention, the two things being compared always fit into the fi
rst place of the seltau. In that way, each of the different possible interpretat
ions can be expressed by SE-converting the seltau, and making the required place
the new first place. As a result, we get the following comparative lujvo place
structures:
15.6) ``nelcymau'': z1, more than z2, likes n2
by amount z4
``selnelcymau'': z1, more than z2, is liked by n1
in amount z4
``klamau'': z1, more than z2, goes to k2 from k3
via k4 by means of k5
``selklamau'': z1, more than z2, is gone to by k1
from k3 via k4 by means of k5
``terklamau'': z1, more than z2, is an origin point
from destination k2 for k1's going via k4
by means of k5
(See Chapter 11 for the way in which this problem is resolved when lujvo aren't
used.)
The ordering rule places the things being compared first, and the other seltau p
laces following. Unfortunately the z4 place, which expresses by how much one ent
ity exceeds the other, is displaced into a lujvo place whose number is different
for each lujvo. For example, while ``nelcymau'' has z4 as its fourth place, ``k
lamau'' has it as its sixth place. In any sentence where a difficulty arises, th
is amount-place can be redundantly tagged with ``vemau'' (for ``zmadu'') or ``ve
me'a'' (for ``mleca'') to help make the speaker's intention clear.
It is important to realize that such comparative lujvo do not presuppose their s
eltau. Just as in English, saying someone is younger than someone else doesn't i
mply that they're young in the first place: an octogenarian, after all, is still
younger than a nonagenarian. Rather, the 80-year-old has a greater ``ni citno''
than the 90-year-old. Similarly, a 5-year-old is older than a 1-year-old, but i
s not considered `òld'' by most standards.
There are some comparative concepts which are in which the ``se zmadu'' is diffi
cult to specify. Typically, these involve comparisons implicitly made with a for
mer state of affairs, where stating a z2 place explicitly would be problematic.
In such cases, it is best not to use ``zmadu'' and leave the comparison hanging,
but to use instead the gismu ``zenba'', meaning `ìncrease'' (and ``jdika'', me
aning ``decrease'', in place of ``mleca''). The gismu ``zenba'' was included in
the language precisely in order to capture those notions of increase which ``zma
du'' can't quite cope with; in addition, we don't have to waste a place in lujvo
or tanru on something that we'd never fill in with a value anyway. So we can tr
anslate `Ì'm stronger now'' not as
15.7) mi ca tsamau
I now am-stronger.
which implies that I'm stronger than somebody else (the elided occupant of the s
econd or z2 place), but as
15.8) mi ca tsaze'a
I increase in strength.
Finally, lujvo with a tertau of ``traji'' are used to build superlatives. The pl
ace structure of ``traji'' is
15.9) t1 is superlative in property t2, being
the t3 extremum (largest by default) of set t4
Consider the gismu ``xamgu'', whose place structure is:
15.10) xa1 is good for xa2 by standard xa3
The comparative form is ``xagmau'', corresponding to English ``better'', with a
place structure (by the rules given above) of
15.11) z1 is better than z2 for xa2 by standard xa3
in amount z4
We would expect the place structure of ``xagrai'', the superlative form, to some
how mirror that, given that comparatives and superlatives are comparable concept
s, resulting in:
15.12) xa1=t1 is the best of the set t4 for xa2
by standard xa3.
The t2 place in ``traji'', normally filled by a property abstraction, is replace
d by the seltau places, and the t3 place specifying the extremum of ``traji'' (w
hether the most or the least, that is) is presumed by default to be ``the most''
.
But the set against which the t1 place of ``traji'' is compared is not the t2 pl
ace (which would make the place structure of ``traji'' fully parallel to that of
``zmadu''), but rather the t4 place. Nevertheless, by a special exception to th
e rules of place ordering, the t4 place of ``traji''-based lujvo becomes the sec
ond place of the lujvo. Some examples:
15.12.5) la djudis. cu citrai lo'i lobypli
Judy is the youngest of all Lojbanists.
15.13) la ajnctain. cu balrai lo'i skegunka
Einstein was the greatest of all scientists.
16. Notes on gismu place structures
Unlike the place structures of lujvo, the place structures of gismu were assigne
d in a far less systematic way through a detailed case-by-case analysis and repe
ated reviews with associated changes. (The gismu list is now baselined, so no fu
rther changes are contemplated.) Nevertheless, certain regularities were imposed
both in the choice of places and in the ordering of places which may be helpful
to the learner and the lujvo-maker, and which are therefore discussed here.
The choice of gismu places results from the varying outcome of four different pr
essures: brevity, convenience, metaphysical necessity, and regularity. (These ar
e also to some extent the underlying factors in the lujvo place structures gener
ated by the methods of this chapter.) The implications of each are roughly as fo
llows:
Brevity tends to remove places: the fewer places a gismu has, the easier it
is to learn, and the less specific it is. As mentioned in Section 4, a brivla wi
th fewer place structures is less specific, and generality is a virtue in gismu,
because they must thoroughly blanket all of semantic space.
Convenience tends to increase the number of places: if a concept can be expr
essed as a place of some existing gismu, there is no need to make another gismu,
a lujvo or a fu'ivla for it.
Metaphysical necessity can either increase or decrease places: it is a press
ure tending to provide the ``right number'' of places. If something is part of t
he essential nature of a concept, then a place must be made for it; on the other
hand, if instances of the concept need not have some property, then this pressu
re will tend to remove the place.
Regularity is a pressure which can also either increase or decrease places.
If a gismu has a given place, then gismu which are semantically related to it ar
e likely to have the place also.
Here are some examples of gismu place structures, with a discussion of the press
ures operating on them:
16.1) ``xekri'': xe1 is black
Brevity was the most important goal here, reinforced by one interpretation of me
taphysical necessity. There is no mention of color standards here, as many peopl
e have pointed out; like all color gismu, ``xekri'' is explicitly subjective. Ob
jective color standards can be brought in by an appropriate BAI tag such as ``ci
'u'' (`ìn system''; see Chapter 9) or by making a lujvo.
16.2) ``jbena'': j1 is born to j2 at time j3 and location j4
The gismu ``jbena'' contains places for time and location, which few other gismu
have: normally, the time and place at which something is done is supplied by a
tense tag (see Chapter 10). However, providing these places makes ``le te jbena'
' a simple term for ``birthday'' and ``le ve jbena'' for ``birthplace'', so thes
e places were provided despite their lack of metaphysical necessity.
16.3) ``rinka'': event r1 is the cause of event r2
The place structure of ``rinka'' does not have a place for the agent, the one wh
o causes, as a result of the pressure toward metaphysical necessity. A cause-eff
ect relationship does not have to include an agent: an event (such as snow melti
ng in the mountains) may cause another event (such as the flooding of the Nile)
without any human intervention or even knowledge.
Indeed, there is a general tendency to omit agent places from most gismu except
for a few such as ``gasnu'' and ``zukte'' which are then used as tertau in order
to restore the agent place when needed: see Section 13.
16.4) ``cinfo'': c1 is a lion of species/breed c2
The c2 place of ``cinfo'' is provided as a result of the pressure toward regular
ity. All animal and plant gismu have such an c2 place; although there is in fact
only one species of lion, and breeds of lion, though they exist, aren't all tha
t important in talking about lions. The species/breed place must exist for such
diversified species as dogs, and for general terms like ``cinki'' (insect), and
are provided for all other animals and plants as a matter of regularity.
Less can be said about gismu place structure ordering, but some regularities are
apparent. The places tend to appear in decreasing order of psychological salien
cy or importance. There is an implication within the place structure of ``klama'
', for example, that ``lo klama'' (the one going) will be talked about more ofte
n, and is thus more important, than ``lo se klama'' (the destination), which is
in turn more important than ``lo xe klama'' (the means of transport).
Some specific tendencies (not really rules) can also be observed. For example, w
hen there is an agent place, it tends to be the first place. Similarly, when a d
estination and an origin point are mentioned, the destination is always placed j
ust before the origin point. Places such as `ùnder conditions'' and ``by standa
rd'', which often go unfilled, are moved to near the end of the place structure.
Chapter 13
Oooh! Arrgh! Ugh! Yecch! Attitudinal and Emotional Indicators
1. What are attitudinal indicators?
This chapter explains the various words that Lojban provides for expressing atti
tude and related notions. In natural languages, attitudes are usually expressed
by the tone of voice when speaking, and (very imperfectly) by punctuation when w
riting. For example, the bare words
1.1) John is coming.
can be made, through tone of voice, to express the speaker's feeling of happines
s, pity, hope, surprise, or disbelief. These fine points of tone cannot be expre
ssed in writing. Attitudes are also expressed with various sounds which show up
in print as oddly spelled words, such as the `Òooh!'', `Àrrgh!'', `Ùgh!'', an
d ``Yecch!'' in the title. These are part of the English language; people born t
o other languages use a different set; yet you won't find any of these words in
a dictionary.
In Lojban, everything that can be spoken can also be written. Therefore, these t
ones of voice must be represented by explicit words known as `àttitudinal indic
ators'', or just `àttitudinals''. This rule seems awkward and clunky to English
-speakers at first, but is an essential part of the Lojbanic way of doing things
.
The simplest way to use attitudinal indicators is to place them at the beginning
of a text. In that case, they express the speaker's prevailing attitude. Here a
re some examples, correlated with the attitudes mentioned following Example 1.1:
1.2) .ui la djan klama
[Whee!] John is coming!
1.3) .uu la djan klama
[Alas!] John is coming.
1.4) .a'o la djan klama
[Hopefully] John is coming.
1.5) .ue la djan klama
[Wow!] John is coming!
1.6) .ianai la djan klama
[Nonsense!] John is coming.
The primary Lojban attitudinals are all the cmavo of the form VV or V'V: one of
the few cases where cmavo have been classified solely by their form. There are 3
9 of these cmavo: all 25 possible vowel pairs of the form V'V, the four standard
diphthongs (``.ai'', ``.au'', ``.ei'', and ``.oi''), and the ten more diphthong
s that are permitted only in these attitudinal indicators and in names and borro
wings (``.ia'', ``.ie'', ``.ii'', ``.io'', ``.iu'', ``.ua'', ``.ue'', ``.ui'', `
`.uo'', and ``.uu''). Note that each of these cmavo has a period before it, mark
ing the pause that is mandatory before every word beginning with a vowel. Attitu
dinals, like most of the other kinds of indicators described in this chapter, be
long to selma'o UI.
Attitudinals can also be compound cmavo, of the types explained in Sections 4-8;
Example 1.6 illustrates one such possibility, the compound attitudinal ``.ianai
''. In attitudinals, ``-nai'' indicates polar negation: the opposite of the simp
le attitudinal without the ``-nai''. Thus, as you might suppose, ``.ia'' express
es belief, since ``.ianai'' expresses disbelief.
In addition to the attitudinals, there are other classes of indicators: intensit
y markers, emotion categories, attitudinal modifiers, observationals, and discur
sives. All of them are grammatically equivalent, which is why they are treated t
ogether in this chapter.
Every indicator behaves in more or less the same way with respect to the grammar
of the rest of the language. In general, one or more indicators can be inserted
at the beginning of an utterance or after any word. Indicators at the beginning
apply to the whole utterance; otherwise, they apply to the word that they follo
w. More details can be found in Section 9.
Throughout this chapter, tables of indicators will be written in four columns. T
he first column is the cmavo itself. The second column is a corresponding Englis
h word, not necessarily a literal translation. The fourth column represents the
opposite of the second column, and shows the approximate meaning of the attitudi
nal when suffixed with ``-nai''. The third column, which is sometimes omitted, i
ndicates a neutral point between the second and fourth columns, and shows the ap
proximate meaning of the attitudinal when it is suffixed with ``-cu'i''. The cma
vo ``cu'i'' belongs to selma'o CAI, and is explained more fully in Section 4.
One flaw that the English glosses are particularly subject to is that in English
it is often difficult to distinguish between expressing your feelings and talki
ng about them, particularly with the limited resource of the written word. So th
e gloss for ``.ui'' should not really be ``happiness'' but some sound or tone th
at expresses happiness. However, there aren't nearly enough of those that have u
nambiguous or obvious meanings in English to go around for all the many, many di
fferent emotions Lojban speakers can readily express.
Many indicators of CV'V form are loosely derived from specific gismu. The gismu
should be thought of as a memory hook, not an equivalent of the cmavo. Such gism
u are shown in this chapter between square brackets, thus: [gismu].
2. Pure emotion indicators
Attitudinals make no claim: they are expressions of attitude, not of facts or al
leged facts. As a result, attitudinals themselves have no truth value, nor do th
ey directly affect the truth value of a bridi that they modify. However, since e
motional attitudes are carried in your mind, they reflect reactions to that vers
ion of the world that the mind is thinking about; this is seldom identical with
the real world. At times, we are thinking about our idealized version of the rea
l world; at other times we are thinking about a potential world that might or mi
ght not ever exist.
Therefore, there are two groups of attitudinals in Lojban. The ``pure emotion in
dicators'' express the way the speaker is feeling, without direct reference to w
hat else is said. These indicators comprise the attitudinals which begin with ``
u'' or `ò'' and many of those beginning with `ì''.
The cmavo beginning with `ù'' are simple emotions, which represent the speaker'
s reaction to the world as it is, or as it is perceived to be.
.ua discovery confusion
.u'a gain loss
.ue surprise no surprise expectation
.u'e wonder commonplace
.ui happiness unhappiness
.u'i amusement weariness
.uo completion incompleteness
.u'o courage timidity cowardice
.uu pity cruelty
.u'u repentance lack of regret innocence
Here are some typical uses of the `ù'' attitudinals:
2.1) .ua mi facki fi le mi mapku
[Eureka!] I found my hat!
[emphasizes the discovery of the hat]
2.2) .u'a mi facki fi le mi mapku
[Gain!] I found my hat!
[emphasizes the obtaining of the hat]
2.3) .ui mi facki fi le mi mapku
[Yay!] I found my hat!
[emphasizes the feeling of happiness]
2.4) .uo mi facki fi le mi mapku
[At last!] I found my hat!
[emphasizes that the finding is complete]
2.5) .uu do cortu
[Pity!] You feel-pain.
[expresses speaker's sympathy]
2.6) .u'u do cortu
[Repentance!] You feel-pain
[expresses that speaker feels guilty]
In Example 2.4, note that the attitudinal ``.uo'' is translated by an English no
n-attitudinal phrase: `Àt last!'' It is common for the English equivalents of L
ojban attitudinals to be short phrases of this sort, with more or less normal gr
ammar, but actually expressions of emotion.
In particular, both ``.uu'' and ``.u'u'' can be translated into English as `Ì'm
sorry''; the difference between these two attitudes frequently causes confusion
among English-speakers who use this phrase, leading to responses like ``Why are
you sorry? It's not your fault!''
It is important to realize that ``.uu'', and indeed all attitudinals, are meant
to be used sincerely, not ironically. In English, the exclamation ``Pity!'' is j
ust as likely to be ironically intended, but this usage does not extend to Lojba
n. Lying with attitudinals is (normally) as inappropriate to Lojban discourse as
any other kind of lying: perhaps worse, because misunderstood emotions can caus
e even greater problems than misunderstood statements.
The following examples display the effects of ``nai'' and ``cu'i'' when suffixed
to an attitudinal:
2.7) .ue la djan. klama
[Surprise!] John comes.
2.8) .uecu'i la djan. klama
[Ho hum.] John comes.
2.9) .uenai la djan. klama
[Expected!] John comes.
In Example 2.9, John's coming has been anticipated by the speaker. In Example 2.
7 and Example 2.8, no such anticipation has been made, but in Example 2.7 the la
ck-of-anticipation goes no further --- in Example 2.8, it amounts to actual surp
rise.
It is not possible to firmly distinguish the pure emotion words beginning with `
ò'' or `ì'' from those beginning with `ù'', but in general they represent mor
e complex, more ambivalent, or more difficult emotions.
.o'a pride modesty shame
.o'e closeness detachment distance
.oi complaint/pain doing OK pleasure
.o'i caution boldness rashness
.o'o patience mere tolerance anger
.o'u relaxation composure stress
2.10) .oi la djan. klama
[Complaint!] John is coming.
Here the speaker is distressed or discomfited over John's coming. The word ``.oi
'' is derived from the Yiddish word `òy'' of similar meaning. It is the only cm
avo with a Yiddish origin.
2.11) .o'onai la djan. klama
[Anger!] John is coming!
Here the speaker feels anger over John's coming.
2.12) .o'i la djan. klama
[Beware!] John is coming.
Here there is a sense of danger in John's arrival.
2.13) .o'ecu'i la djan. klama
[Detachment!] John is coming.
2.14) .o'u la djan. klama
[Phew!] John is coming.
In Example 2.13 and Example 2.14, John's arrival is no problem: in the former ex
ample, the speaker feels emotional distance from the situation; in the latter ex
ample, John's coming is actually a relief of some kind.
The pure emotion indicators beginning with `ì'' are those which could not be fi
tted into the `ù'' or `ò'' groups because there was a lack of room, so they ar
e a mixed lot. ``.ia'', ``.i'a'', ``.ie'', and ``.i'e'' do not appear here, as t
hey belong in Section 3 instead.
.ii fear nervousness security
.i'i togetherness privacy
.io respect disrespect
.i'o appreciation envy
.iu love no love lost hatred
.i'u familiarity mystery
2.15) .ii smacu
[Fear!] [Observative:] a-mouse
Eek! A mouse!
2.16) la djan. .iu klama
John [love!] is coming.
2.17) la djan. .ionai klama
John [disrespect!] is coming.
Example 2.15 shows an attitude-colored observative; the attitudinal modifies the
situation described by the observative, namely the mouse that is causing the em
otion. Lojban-speaking toddlers, if there ever are any, will probably use senten
ces like Example 2.15 a lot.
Example 2.16 and Example 2.17 use attitudinals that follow ``la djan.'' rather t
han being at the beginning of the sentence. This form means that the attitude is
attached to John rather than the event of his coming; the speaker loves or disr
espects John specifically. Compare:
2.18) la djan. klama .iu
John is-coming [love!]
where it is specifically the coming of John that inspires the feeling.
Example 2.17 is a way of swearing at John: you could translate it as ``That good
-for-nothing John is coming.''
3. Propositional attitude indicators
As mentioned at the beginning of Section 2, attitudinals may be divided into two
groups, the pure emotion indicators explained in that section, and a contrastin
g group which may be called the ``propositional attitude indicators''. These ind
icators establish an internal, hypothetical world which the speaker is reacting
to, distinct from the world as it really is. Thus we may be expressing our attit
ude towards ``what the world would be like if ...'', or more directly stating ou
r attitude towards making the potential world a reality.
In general, the bridi paraphrases of pure emotions look (in English) something l
ike `Ì'm going to the market, and I'm happy about it''. The emotion is present
with the subject of the primary claim, but is logically independent of it. Propo
sitional attitudes, though, look more like `Ì intend to go to the market'', whe
re the main claim is logically subordinate to the intention: I am not claiming t
hat I am actually going to the market, but merely that I intend to.
There is no sharp distinction between attitudinals beginning with `à'' and thos
e beginning with `è''; however, the original intent (not entirely realized due
to the need to cram too many attitudes into too little space) was to make the me
mbers of the `à''-series the purer, more attitudinal realizers of a potential w
orld, while the members of the `è''-series were more ambivalent or complex abou
t the speaker's intention with regard to the predication. The relationship betwe
en the `à''-series and the `è''-series is similar to that between the `ù''-se
ries and the `ò''-series, respectively. A few propositional attitude indicators
overflowed into the `ì''-series as well.
In fact, the entire distinction between pure emotions and propositional attitude
s is itself a bit shaky: ``.u'u'' can be seen as a propositional attitude indica
tor meaning `Ì regret that ...'', and `à'e'' (discussed below) can be seen as
a pure emotion meaning `Ì'm awake/aware''. The division of the attitudinals int
o pure-emotion and propositional-attitude classes in this chapter is mostly by w
ay of explanation; it is not intended to permit firm rulings on specific points.
Attitudinals are the part of Lojban most distant from the ``logical language''
aspect.
Here is the list of propositional attitude indicators grouped by initial letter,
starting with those beginning with `à'':
.a'a attentive inattentive avoiding
.a'e alertness exhaustion
.ai intent indecision refusal
.a'i effort no real effort repose
.a'o hope despair
.au desire indifference reluctance
.a'u interest no interest repulsion
Some examples (of a parental kind):
3.1) .a'a do zgana le veltivni
[attentive] you observe the television-receiver.
I'm noticing that you are watching the TV.
3.2) .a'enai do ranji bacru
[exhaustion] you continuously utter.
I'm worn out by your continuous talking.
3.3) .ai mi benji do le ckana
[intent] I transfer you to-the bed.
I'm putting you to bed.
3.4) .a'i mi ba gasnu
le nu do cikna binxo
[effort] I [future] am-the-actor-in
the event-of you awake-ly become.
It'll be a real pain for me to wake you up.
3.5) .a'o mi kanryze'a
ca le bavlamdei
[hope] I am-health-increased at-time
the future-adjacent-day.
I hope I feel better tomorrow!
3.6) .au mi sipna
[desire] I sleep.
I want to sleep.
3.7) a'ucu'i do pante
[no interest] you complain
I have no interest in your complaints.
(In a real-life situation, Examples 3.1-3.7 would also be decorated by various p
ure emotion indicators, certainly including ``.oicai'', but probably also ``.iuc
ai''.)
Splitting off the attitude into an indicator allows the regular bridi grammar to
do what it does best: express the relationships between concepts that are inten
ded, desired, hoped for, or whatever. Rephrasing these examples to express the a
ttitude as the main selbri would make for unacceptably heavyweight grammar.
Here are the propositional attitude indicators beginning with `è'', which stand
roughly in the relation to those beginning with `à'' as the pure-emotion indic
ators beginning with `ò'' do to those beginning with `ù'' --- they are more co
mplex or difficult:
.e'a permission prohibition
.e'e competence incompetence
.ei obligation freedom
.e'i constraint independence resistance to constraint
.e'o request negative request
.e'u suggestion no suggestion warning
More examples (after a good night's sleep):
3.8) .e'a do sazri le karce
[permission] You drive the car.
Sure, you can drive the car.
3.9) e'e mi lifri tu'a do
[competence] I experience something-related-to you
I feel up to dealing with you.
3.10) .ei mi tisna
le karce ctilyvau
[obligation] I fill
the car-type-of petroleum-container.
I should fill the car's gas tank.
3.11) .e'o ko ko kurji
[request] You-imperative of-you-imperative take-care.
Please take care of yourself!
3.12) .e'u do klama le panka
[suggestion] You go to-the park.
I suggest going to the park.
Finally, the propositional attitude indicators beginning with `ì'', which are t
he overflow from the other sets:
.ia belief skepticism disbelief
.i'a acceptance blame
.ie agreement disagreement
.i'e approval non-approval disapproval
Still more examples (much, much later):
3.13) .ianai do pu pensi le nu tcica mi
[disbelief] You [past] think the event-of deceiving me.
I can't believe you thought you could fool me.
3.14) do .i'anai na xruti do le zdani
You [blame] did-not return you to-the house
I blame you for not coming home.
3.15) .ie mi na cusku
lu'e le tcika
be le nu xruti
[agreement] I did-not express
a-symbol-for the time-of-day
of the event-of (you return)
It's true I didn't tell you when to come back.
3.16) .i'enai do .i'e zukte
[disapproval] you [approval] act
I don't approve of what you did, but I approve of you.
Example 3.16 illustrates the use of a propositional attitude indicator, `ì'e'',
in both the usual sense (at the beginning of the bridi) and as a pure emotion (
attached to ``do''). The event expressed by the main bridi is disapproved of by
the speaker, but the referent of the sumti in the x1 place (namely the listener)
is approved of.
To indicate that an attitudinal discussed in this section is not meant to indica
te a propositional attitude, the simplest expedient is to split the attitudinal
off into a separate sentence. Thus, a version of Example 3.8 which actually clai
med that the listener was or would be driving the car might be:
3.17) do sazri le karce .i e'a
You drive the car. [Permission].
You're driving (or will drive) the car,
and that's fine.
4. Attitudes as scales
In Lojban, all emotions and attitudes are scales. These scales run from some ext
reme value (which we'll call ``positive'') to an opposite extreme (which we'll c
all ``negative''). In the tables above, we have seen three points on the scale:
``positive'', neutral, and ``negative''. The terms ``positive'' and ``negative''
are put into scare quotes because they are loaded words when applied to emotion
s, and the attitudinal system reflects this loading, which is a known cultural b
ias. Only two of the ``positive'' words, namely ``.ii'' (fear) and ``.oi'' (pain
/complaint), represent emotions commonly thought of as less ``virtuous'' in most
cases than their negative counterparts. But these two were felt to be instincti
ve, distinct, and very powerful emotions that needed to be expressible in a mono
syllable when necessary, while their counterparts are less commonly expressed.
(Why the overt bias? Because there are a lot of attitudinals and they will be di
fficult to learn as an entire set. By aligning our scales arbitrarily, we give t
he monosyllable ``nai'' a useful meaning and make it easier for a novice to reco
gnize at least the positive or negative alignment of an indicator, if not the sp
ecific word. Other choices considered were ``random'' orientation, which would h
ave unknown biases and be difficult to learn, and orientation based on our guess
es as to which scale orientations made the most frequent usages shorter, which w
ould be biased in favor of American perceptions of `ùsefulness''. If bias must
exist in our indicator set, it might as well be a known bias that eases learning
, and in addition might as well favor a harmonious and positive world-view.)
In fact, though, each emotional scale has seven positions defined, three ``posit
ive'' ones (shown below on the left), three ``negative'' ones (shown below on th
e right), and a neutral one indicating that no particular attitude on this scale
is felt. The following chart indicates the seven positions of the scale and the
associated cmavo. All of these cmavo, except ``nai'', are in selma'o CAI.
cai sai ru'e cu'i nairu'e naisai naicai
[carmi] [tsali] [ruble] [cumki]
A scalar attitude is expressed by using the attitudinal word, and then following
it by the desired scalar intensity. The bias creeps in because the ``negative''
emotions take the extra syllable ``nai'' to indicate their negative position on
the axis, and thus require a bit more effort to express.
Much of this system is optional. You can express an attitude without a scale ind
icator, if you don't want to stop and think about how strongly you feel. Indeed,
for most attitudinals, we've found that either no scalar value is used, or ``ca
i'' is used to indicate especially high intensity. Less often, ``ru'e'' is used
for a recognizably weak intensity, and ``cu'i'' is used in response to the attit
udinal question ``pei'' (see Section 10) to indicate that the emotion is not fel
t.
The following shows the variations resulting from intensity variation:
4.1) .ei
I ought to
(a non-specific obligation)
4.2) .eicai
I shall/must
(an intense obligation or requirement, possibly
a formal one)
4.3) .eisai
I should
(a strong obligation or necessity, possibly an
implied but not formal requirement)
4.4) .eiru'e
I might
(a weak obligation --- in English often mixed
with permission and desire)
4.5) .eicu'i
No matter
(no particular obligation)
4.6) .einai
I need not
(a non-obligation)
You can also utter a scale indicator without a specific emotion. This is often u
sed in the language: in order to emphasize a point about which you feel strongly
, you mark what you are saying with the scale indicator ``cai''. You could also
indicate that you don't care using ``cu'i'' by itself.
5. The space of emotions
Each of the attitude scales constitutes an axis in a multi-dimensional space. In
effect, given our total so far of 39 scales, we have a 39-dimensional space. At
any given time, our emotions and attitudes are represented by a point in this 3
9-dimensional space, with the intensity indicators serving as coordinates along
each dimension. A complete attitudinal inventory, should one decide to express i
t, would consist of reading off each of the scale values for each of the emotion
s, with the vector sum serving as a distinct single point, which is our attitude
.
Now no one is going to ever utter a string of 100-odd attitudinals to express th
eir emotions. If asked, we normally do not recognize more than one or two emotio
ns at a time --- usually the ones that are strongest or which most recently chan
ged in some significant way. But the scale system provides some useful insights
into a possible theory of emotion (which might be testable using Lojban), and in
cidentally explains how Lojbanists express compound emotions when they do recogn
ize them.
The existence of 39 scales highlights the complexity of emotion. We also aren't
bound to the 39. There are modifiers described in Section 6 that multiply the se
t of scales by an order of magnitude. You can also have mixed feelings on a scal
e, which might be expressed by ``cu'i'', but could also be expressed by using bo
th the ``positive'' and ``negative'' scale emotions at once. One expression of `
`fortitude'' might be ``.ii.iinai'' --- fear coupled with security.
Uttering one or more attitudinals to express an emotion reflects several things.
We will tend to utter emotions in their immediate order of importance to us. We
feel several emotions at once, and our expression reflects these emotions simul
taneously, although their order of importance to us is also revealing --- of our
attitude towards our attitude, so to speak. There is little analysis necessary;
for those emotions you feel, you express them; the ``vector sum'' naturally exp
resses the result. This is vital to their nature as attitudinals --- if you had
to stop and think about them, or to worry about grammar, they wouldn't be emotio
ns but rationalizations.
People have proposed that attitudinals be expressed as bridi just like everythin
g else; but emotions aren't logical or analytical --- saying `Ì'm awed'' is not
the same as saying ``Wow!!!''. The Lojban system is intended to give the effect
s of an analytical system without the thought involved. Thus, you can simply fee
l in Lojban.
A nice feature of this design is that you can be simple or complex, and the syst
em works the same way. The most immediate benefit is in learning. You only need
to learn a couple of the scale words and a couple of attitude words, and you're
ready to express your emotions Lojbanically. As you learn more, you can express
your emotions more thoroughly and more precisely, but even a limited vocabulary
offers a broad range of expression.
6. Emotional categories
The Lojban attitudinal system was designed by starting with a long list of Engli
sh emotion words, far too many to fit into the 39 available VV-form cmavo. To ke
ep the number of cmavo limited, the emotion words in the list were grouped toget
her by common features: each group was then assigned a separate cmavo. This was
like making tanru in reverse, and the result is a collection of indicators that
can be combined, like tanru, to express very complex emotions. Some examples in
a moment.
The most significant ``common feature'' we identified was that the emotional wor
ds on the list could easily be broken down into six major groups, each of which
was assigned its own cmavo:
ro'a social asocial antisocial
ro'e mental mindless
ro'i emotional denying emotion
ro'o physical denying physical
ro'u sexual sexual abstinence
re'e spiritual secular sacrilegious
Using these, we were able to assign `ò'u'' to mark a scale of what we might cal
l ``generalized comfort''. When you are comfortable, relaxed, satisfied, you exp
ress comfort with `ò'u'', possibly followed by a scale indicator to indicate ho
w comfortable you are. The six cmavo given above allow you to turn this scale in
to six separate ones, should you wish.
For example, embarrassment is a social discomfort, expressible as ``.o'unairo'a'
'. Some emotions that we label ``stress'' in English are expressed in Lojban wit
h ``.o'unairo'i''. Physical distress can be expressed with ``.o'unairo'o'', whic
h makes a nice groan if you say it with feeling. Mental discomfort might be what
you feel when you don't know the answer to the test question, but feel that you
should. Most adults can recall some instance where we felt sexual discomfort, `
ò'unairo'u''. Spiritual discomfort, `ò'unaire'e'', might be felt by a church-g
oer who has wandered into the wrong kind of religious building.
Most of the time when expressing an emotion, you won't categorize it with these
words. Emotional expressions should be quickly expressible without having to thi
nk about them. However, we sometimes have mixed emotions within this set, as for
example emotional discomfort coupled with physical comfort or vice versa.
Coupling these six words with our 39 attitude scales, each of which has a positi
ve and negative side, already gives you far more emotional expression words than
we have emotional labels in English. Thus, you'll never see a Lojban-English em
otional dictionary that covers all the Lojban possibilities. Some may be useless
, but others convey emotions that probably never had a word for them before, tho
ugh many have felt them (``.eiro'u'', for example --- look it up).
You can use scale markers and ``nai'' on these six category words, and you can a
lso use category words without specifying the emotion. Thus, `Ì'm trying to con
centrate'' could be expressed simply as ``ro'e'', and if you are feeling anti-so
cial in some non-specific way, ``ro'anai'' will express it.
There is a mnemonic device for the six emotion categories, based on moving your
arms about. In the following table, your hands begin above your head and move do
wn your body in sequence.
ro'a hands above head social
ro'e hands on head intellectual
ro'i hands on heart emotional
ro'o hands on belly physical
ro'u hands on groin sexual
re'e hands moving around spiritual
The implicit metaphors ``heart'' for emotional and ``belly'' for physical are no
t really Lojbanic, but they work fine for English-speakers.
7. Attitudinal modifiers
ga'i hauteur/rank equal rank meekness/lack of rank
[galtu]
le'o aggressive passive defensive
vu'e virtue (zabna) sin (mabla)
[vrude]
se'i self-orientation other-orientation
[sevzi]
ri'e release restraint control
[zifre]
fu'i with help without help with opposition
easily with difficulty
[frili]
be'u lack/need presence/satisfaction satiation
se'a self-sufficiency dependency
[sevzi]
It turned out that, once we had devised the six emotion categories, we also reco
gnized some other commonalities among emotions. These tended to fit nicely on sc
ales of their own, but generally tend not to be thought of as separate emotions.
Some of these are self-explanatory, some need to be placed in context. Some of
these tend to go well with only a few of the attitudinals, others go with nearly
all of them. To really understand these modifiers, try to use them in combinati
on with one or two of the attitudinals found in Sections 2 and 3, and see what e
motional pictures you can build:
The cmavo ``ga'i'' expresses the scale used to indicate condescension or polite
deference; it is not respect in general, which is ``.io''. Whatever it is attach
ed to is marked as being below (for ``ga'i'') or above (for ``ga'inai'') the spe
aker's rank or social position. Note that it is always the referent, not the spe
aker or listener, who is so marked: in order to mark the listener, the listener
must appear in the sentence, as with ``doi ga'inai'', which can be appended to a
statement addressed to a social inferior.
7.1) ko ga'inai
nenri klama le mi zdani
you-imperative [low-rank!]
enter-type-of come-to my house.
I would be honored if you would enter my residence.
Note that imperatives in Lojban need not be imperious! Corresponding examples wi
th ``ga'icu'i'' and ``ga'inai'':
7.2) ko ga'icu'i
you-imperative [equal-rank!]
Come on in to my place.
7.3) ko ga'i
you-imperative [high-rank!]
You! Get inside!
Since ``ga'i'' expresses the relative rank of the speaker and the referent, it d
oes not make much sense to attach it to ``mi'', unless the speaker is using ``mi
'' to refer to a group (as in English ``we''), or a past or future version of hi
mself with a different rank.
It is also possible to attach ``ga'i'' to a whole bridi, in which case it expres
ses the speaker's superiority to the event the bridi refers to:
7.4) ga'i le xarju pu citka
[high-rank!] the pig [past] eats
The pig ate (which is an event beneath my notice).
When used without being attached to any bridi, ``ga'i'' expresses the speaker's
superiority to things in general, which may represent an absolute social rank: `
`ga'icai'' is an appropriate opening word for an emperor's address from the thro
ne.
The cmavo ``le'o'' represents the scale of aggressiveness. We seldom overtly rec
ognize that we are feeling aggressive or defensive, but perhaps in counseling se
ssions, a psychologist might encourage someone to express these feelings on this
scale. And football teams could be urged on by their coach using ``ro'ole'o''.
``le'o'' is also useful in threats as an alternative to `ò'onai'', which expres
ses anger.
The cmavo ``vu'e'' represents ethical virtue or its absence. An excess of almost
any emotion is usually somewhat ``sinful'' in the eyes of most ethical systems.
On the other hand, we often feel virtuous about our feelings --- what we call r
ighteous indignation might be `ò'onaivu'e''. Note that this is distinct from la
ck of guilt: ``.u'unai''.
The cmavo ``se'i'' expresses the difference between selfish and generous, for ex
ample (in combination with ``.au''):
7.5) ause'i
[desire] [self]
I want it!
7.6) ause'inai
[desire] [other]
I want you to have it!
In both cases, the English `ìt'' is vague, reflecting the absence of a bridi. E
xample 7.5 and Example 7.6 are pure expressions of attitude. Analogously, ``.uus
e'i'' is self-pity, whereas ``.uuse'inai'' is pity for someone else.
The modifier ``ri'e'' indicates emotional release versus emotional control. `Ì
will not let him know how angry I am'', you say to yourself before entering the
room. The Lojban is much shorter:
7.7) .o'onai ri'enai
[anger] [control]
On the other hand, ``ri'e'' can be used by itself to signal an emotional outburs
t.
The cmavo ``fu'i'' may express a reason for feeling the way we do, as opposed to
a feeling in itself; but it is a reason that is more emotionally determined tha
n most. For example, it could show the difference between the mental discomfort
mentioned in Section 6 when it is felt on an easy test, as opposed to on a hard
test. When someone gives you a back massage, you could use ``.o'ufu'i'' to show
appreciation for the assistance in your comfort.
The cmavo ``be'u'' expresses, roughly speaking, whether the emotion it modifies
is in response to something you don't have enough of, something you have enough
of, or something you have too much of. It is more or less the attitudinal equiva
lent of the subjective quantifier cmavo ``mo'a'', ``rau'', and ``du'e'' (these b
elong to selma'o PA, and are discussed in Chapter 18). For example,
7.8) .uiro'obe'unai
[Yay!] [physical] [Enough!]
might be something you say after a large meal which you enjoyed.
Like all modifiers, ``be'u'' can be used alone:
7.9) le cukta be'u cu zvati ma
The book [Needed!] is at-location [what sumti?]
Where's the book? --- I need it!
Lastly, the modifier ``se'a'' shows whether the feeling is associated with self-
sufficiency or with dependence on others.
7.10) .e'ese'a
[I can!] [self-sufficient!]
I can do it all by myself!
is something a Lojban-speaking child might say. On the other hand,
7.11) .e'ese'anai
[I can!] [dependent]
I can do it if you help me.
from the same child would indicate a (hopefully temporary) loss of self- confide
nce. It is also possible to negate the ``.e'e'' in Example 7.7 and Example 7.8,
leading to:
7.12) .e'enaise'a
[I can't] [self-sufficient]
I can't do it by myself!
and
7.13) .e'enaise'anai
[I can't!] [dependent]
I can't do it if you insist on ``helping'' me!
Some of the emotional expressions may seem too complicated to use. They might be
for most circumstances. It is likely that most combinations will never get used
. But if one person uses one of these expressions, another person can understand
(as unambiguously as the expresser intends) what emotion is being expressed. Mo
st probably as the system becomes well-known and internalized by Lojban-speakers
, particular attitudinal combinations will come to be standard expressions (if n
ot cliches) of emotion.
8. Compound indicators
The grammar of indicators is quite simple; almost all facets are optional. You c
an combine indicators in any order, and they are still grammatical. The presumed
denotation is additive; thus the whole is the sum of the parts regardless of th
e order expressed, although the first expressed is presumed most important to th
e speaker. Every possible string of UI cmavo has some meaning.
Within a string of indicators, there will be conventions of interpretation which
amount to a kind of second-order grammar. Each of the modifier words is presume
d to modify an indicator to the left, if there is one. (There is an `ùnspecifie
d emotion'' word, ``ge'e'', reserved to ensure that if you want to express a mod
ifier without a root emotion, it doesn't attach to and modify a previous but dis
tinct emotional expression.)
For example, ``.ieru'e'' expresses a weak positive value on the scale of agreeme
nt: the speaker agrees (presumably with the listener or with something else just
stated), but with the least possible degree of intensity. But ``.ie ge'eru'e''
expresses agreement (at an unspecified level), followed by some other unstated e
motion which is felt at a weak level. A rough English equivalent of ``.ie ge'eru
'e'' might be `Ì agree, but ...'' where the ``but'' is left hanging. (Again, at
titudes aren't always expressed in English by English attitudinals.)
A scale variable similarly modifies the previous emotion word. You put the scale
word for a root emotion word before a modifier, since the latter can have its o
wn scale word. This merely maximizes the amount of information expressible. For
example, ``.oinaicu'i ro'ucai'' expresses a feeling midway between pain (``.oi''
) and pleasure (``.oinai'') which is intensely sexual (``ro'u'') in nature.
The cmavo ``nai'' is the most tightly bound modifier in the language: it always
negates exactly one word --- the preceding one. Of all the words used in indicat
or constructs, ``nai'' is the only one with any meaning outside the indicator sy
stem. If you try to put an indicator between a non-indicator cmavo and its ``nai
'' negator, the ``nai'' will end up negating the last word of the indicator. The
result, though unambiguous, is not what you want. For example,
8.1) mi .e .ui nai do
I and [Yay!] [Not!] you
means `Ì and (unfortunately) you'', whereas
8.2) mi .e nai .ui do
I and [Not!] [Yay!] you
means `Ì but (fortunately) not you''. Attitudinal ``nai'' expresses a ``scalar
negation'', a concept explained in Chapter 15; since every attitudinal word impl
ies exactly one scale, the effect of ``nai'' on each should be obvious.
Thus, the complete internal grammar of UI is as follows, with each listed part o
ptionally present or absent without affecting grammaticality, though it obviousl
y would affect meaning.
attitudinal ``nai'' intensity-word ``nai'' modifier ``nai'' intensity-word `
`nai'' (possibly repeated)
``ge'e'', the non-specific emotion word, functions as an attitudinal. If multipl
e attitudes are being expressed at once, then in the 2nd or greater position, ei
ther ``ge'e'' or a VV word must be used to prevent any modifiers from modifying
the previous attitudinal.
9. The uses of indicators
The behavior of indicators in the `òutside grammar'' is nearly as simple as the
ir internal structure. Indicator groupings are identified immediately after the
metalinguistic erasers ``si'', ``sa'', and ``su'' and some, though not all, kind
s of quotations. The details of such interactions are discussed in Chapter 19.
A group of indicators may appear anywhere that a single indicator may, except in
those few situations (as in ``zo'' quotation, explained in Chapter 19) where co
mpound cmavo may not be used.
At the beginning of a text, indicators modify everything following them indefini
tely: such a usage is taken as a raw emotional expression, and we normally don't
turn off our emotions when we start and stop sentences. In every other place in
an utterance, the indicator (or group) attaches to the word immediately to its
left, and indicates that the attitude is being expressed concerning the object o
r concept to which the word refers.
If the word that an indicator (or group) attaches to is itself a cmavo which gov
erns a grammatical structure, then the indicator construct pertains to the refer
ent of the entire structure. There is also a mechanism, discussed in Chapter 19,
for explicitly marking the range of words to which an indicator applies.
More details about the uses of indicators, and the way they interact with other
specialized cmavo, are given in Chapter 19. It is worth mentioning that real-wor
ld interpretation is not necessarily consistent with the formal scope rules. Peo
ple generally express emotions when they feel them, with only a minimum of gramm
atical constraint on that expression; complexities of emotional expression are s
eldom logically analyzable. Lojban attempts to provide a systematic reference th
at could possibly be ingrained to an instinctive level. However, it should alway
s be assumed that the referent of an indicator has some uncertainty.
For example, in cases of multiple indicators expressed together, the combined fo
rm has some ambiguity of interpretation. It is possible to interpret the second
indicator as expressing an attitude about the first, or to interpret both as exp
ressing attitudes about the common referent. For example, in
9.1) mi pu tavla do .o'onai .oi
I [past] talk-to you [Grrr!] [Oy!]
can be interpreted as expressing complaint about the anger, in which case it mea
ns ``Damn, I snapped at you''; or as expressing both anger and complaint about t
he listener, in which case it means `Ì told you, you pest!''
Similarly, an indicator after the final brivla of a tanru may be taken to expres
s an attitude about the particular brivla placed there --- as the rules have it
--- or about the entire bridi which hinges on that brivla. Remembering that indi
cators are supposedly direct expressions of emotion, this ambiguity is acceptabl
e.
Even if the scope rules given for indicators turn out to be impractical or unint
uitive for use in conversation, they are still useful in written expression. The
re, where you can go back and put in markers or move words around, the scope rul
es can be used in lieu of elaborate nuances of body language and intonation to c
onvey the writer's intent.
10. Attitude questions; empathy; attitude contours
pei attitude question
dai empathy
bu'o start emotion continue emotion end emotion
You can ask someone how they are feeling with a normal bridi sentence, but you w
ill get a normal bridi answer in response, one which may be true or false. Since
the response to a question about emotions is no more logical than the emotion i
tself, this isn't appropriate.
The word ``pei'' is therefore reserved for attitude questions. Asked by itself,
it captures all of the denotation of English ``How are you?'' coupled with ``How
do you feel?'' (which has a slightly different range of usage).
When asked in the context of discourse, ``pei'' acts like other Lojban question
words --- it requests the respondent to ``fill in the blank'', in this case with
an appropriate attitudinal describing the respondent's feeling about the refere
nt expression. As with other questions, plausibility is polite; if you answer wi
th an irrelevant UI cmavo, such as a discursive, you are probably making fun of
the questioner. (A ``ge'e'', however, is always in order --- you are not require
d to answer emotionally. This is not the same as ``.i'inai'', which is privacy a
s the reverse of conviviality.)
Most often, however, the asker will use ``pei'' as a place holder for an intensi
ty marker. (As a result, ``pei'' is placed in selma'o CAI, although selma'o UI w
ould have been almost as appropriate. Grammatically, there is no difference betw
een UI and CAI.) Such usage corresponds to a whole range of idiomatic usages in
natural languages:
10.1) .iepei
[agreement] [question]
Do you agree?
10.2) .iare'epei
[belief] [spiritual] [question]
Are you a Believer?
10.3) .aipei
[intention] [question]
Are you going to do it?
Example 10.3 might appear at the end of a command, to which the response
10.4) .aicai
[intention] [maximal]
corresponds to `Àye! Aye!'' (hence the choice of cmavo).
10.5) .e'apei
[permission] [question]
Please, Mommy! Can I??
Additionally, when ``pei'' is used at the beginning of an indicator construct, i
t asks specifically if that construct reflects the attitude of the respondent, a
s in (asked of someone who has been ill or in pain):
10.6) pei.o'u
[question] [comfort]
Are you comfortable?
10.7) pei.o'ucu'i
[question] [comfort] [neutral]
Are you no longer in pain?
10.8) pei.o'usai
[question] [comfort] [strong]
Are you again healthy?
Empathy, which is not really an emotion, is expressed by the indicator ``dai''.
(Don't confuse empathy with sympathy, which is ``.uuse'inai''.) Sometimes, as wh
en telling a story, you want to attribute emotion to someone else. You can of co
urse make a bridi claim that so-and-so felt such-and-such an emotion, but you ca
n also make use of the attitudinal system by adding the indicator ``dai'', which
attributes the preceding attitudinal to someone else --- exactly whom, must be
determined from context. You can also use ``dai'' conversationally when you empa
thize, or feel someone else's emotion as if it were your own:
10.9) .oiro'odai
[pain!] [physical] [empathy]
Ouch, that must have hurt!
It is even possible to `èmpathize'' with a non-living object:
10.10) le bloti .iidai .uu pu
klama le xasloi
the ship [fear!] [empathy] [pity!] [past]
goes-to the ocean-floor
Fearfully the ship, poor thing, sank.
suggesting that the ship felt fear at its impending destruction, and simultaneou
sly reporting the speaker's pity for it.
Both ``pei'' and ``dai'' represent exceptions to the normal rule that attitudina
ls reflect the speaker's attitude.
Finally, we often want to report how our attitudes are changing. If our attitude
has not changed, we can just repeat the attitudinal. (Therefore, ``.ui .ui .ui'
' is not the same as ``.uicai'', but simply means that we are continuing to be h
appy.) If we want to report that we are beginning to feel, continuing to feel, o
r ceasing to feel an emotion, we can use the attitudinal contour cmavo ``bu'o''.
When attached to an attitudinal, ``bu'o'' means that you are starting to have th
at attitude, ``bu'ocu'i'' that you are continuing to have it, and ``bu'onai'' th
at you are ceasing to have it. Some examples:
10.11) o'onai bu'o
[anger!] [start emotion]
I'm getting angry!
10.12) .iu bu'onai .uinai
[love!] [end emotion] [unhappiness!]
I don't love you any more; I'm sad.
Note the difference in effect between Example 10.12 and:
10.13) mi ca ba'o prami do ja'e le nu
mi badri
I [present] [cessitive] love you with-result the event-of
(I am-sad).
I no longer love you; therefore, I am sad.
which is a straightforward bridi claim. Example 10.13 states that you have (or h
ave had) certain emotions; Example 10.12 expresses those emotions directly.
11. Evidentials
ja'o I conclude
[jalge]
ca'e I define
ba'a I expect I experience I remember
[balvi]
su'a I generalize I particularize
[sucta]
ti'e I hear (hearsay)
[tirna]
ka'u I know by cultural means
[kulnu]
se'o I know by internal experience
[senva]
za'a I observe
[zgana]
pe'i I opine [pensi]
ru'a I postulate
[sruma]
ju'a I state [jufra]
Now we proceed from the attitudinal indicators and their relatives to the other,
semantically unrelated, categories of indicators. The indicators known as `èvi
dentials'' show how the speaker came to say the utterance; i.e. the source of th
e information or the idea. Lojban's list of evidentials was derived from lists d
escribing several American Indian languages. Evidentials are also essential to t
he constructed language LÃ¡adan, designed by the linguist and novelist Suzette Haden
Elgin. LÃ¡adan's set of indicators was drawn on extensively in developing the Lojba
n indicator system.
It is important to realize, however, that evidentials are not some odd system us
ed by some strange people who live at the other end of nowhere: although their E
nglish equivalents aren't single words, English-speakers have vivid notions of w
hat constitutes evidence, and of the different kinds of evidence.
Like the attitudinal indicators, the evidentials belong to selma'o UI, and may b
e treated identically for grammatical purposes. Most of them are not usually con
sidered scalar in nature, but a few have associated scales.
A bridi with an evidential in it becomes `ìndisputable'', in the sense that the
speaker is saying ``how it is with him or her'', which is beyond argument. Clai
ms about one's own mental states may be true or false, but are hardly subject to
other people's examination. If you say that you think, or perceive, or postulat
e such-and-such a predication, who can contradict you? Discourse that uses evide
ntials has therefore a different rhetorical flavor than discourse that does not;
arguments tend to become what can be called dialogues or alternating monologues
, depending on your prejudices.
Evidentials are most often placed at the beginning of sentences, and are often a
ttached to the ``.i'' that separates sentences in connected discourse. It is in
the nature of an evidential to affect the entire bridi in which it is placed: li
ke the propositional attitude indicators, they strongly affect the claim made by
the main bridi.
A bridi marked by ``ja'o'' is a conclusion by the speaker based on other (stated
or unstated) information or ideas. Rough English equivalents of ``ja'o'' are ``
thus'' and ``therefore''.
A bridi marked by ``ca'e'' is true because the speaker says so. In addition to d
efinitions of words, ``ca'e'' is also appropriate in what are called performativ
es, where the very act of speaking the words makes them true. An English example
is `Ì now pronounce you husband and wife'', where the very act of uttering the
words makes the listeners into husband and wife. A Lojban translation might be:
11.1) ca'e le re do cu simxu speni
[I define!] The two of-you are-mutual spouses.
The three scale positions of ``ba'a'', when attached to a bridi, indicate that i
t is based on the speaker's view of the real world. Thus ``ba'a'' means that the
statement represents a future event as anticipated by the speaker; ``ba'acu'i''
, a present event as experienced by the speaker; ``ba'anai'', a past event as re
membered by the speaker. It is accidental that this scale runs from future to pa
st instead of past to future.
11.2) ba'acu'i le tuple be mi cu se cortu
[I experience!] The leg of me is-the-locus-of-pain.
My leg hurts.
A bridi marked by ``su'a'' is a generalization by the speaker based on other (st
ated or unstated) information or ideas. The difference between ``su'a'' and ``ja
'o'' is that ``ja'o'' suggests some sort of reasoning or deduction (not necessar
ily rigorous), whereas ``su'a'' suggests some sort of induction or pattern recog
nition from existing examples (not necessarily rigorous).
The opposite point of the scale, ``su'anai'', indicates abduction, or drawing sp
ecific conclusions from general premises or patterns.
This cmavo can also function as a discursive (see Section 12), in which case ``s
u'a'' means `àbstractly'' or `ìn general'', and ``su'anai'' means ``concretely
'' or `ìn particular''.
A bridi marked by ``ti'e'' is relayed information from some source other than th
e speaker. There is no necessary implication that the information was relayed vi
a the speaker's ears; what we read in a newspaper is an equally good example of
``ti'e'', unless we have personal knowledge of the content.
11.3) ti'e la .uengas cu zergau
[I hear!] Wenga is-a-criminal-doer.
I hear that Wenga is a crook.
A bridi marked by ``ka'u'' is one held to be true in the speaker's cultural cont
ext, as a matter of myth or custom, for example. Such statements should be agree
d on by a community of people --- you cannot just make up your own cultural cont
ext --- although `òbjectivity'' in the sense of actual correspondence with the
facts is certainly not required.
On the other hand, ``se'o'' marks a bridi whose truth is asserted by the speaker
as a result of an internal experience not directly available to others, such as
a dream, vision, or personal revelation. In some cultures, the line between ``k
a'u'' and ``se'o'' is fuzzy or even nonexistent.
A bridi marked by ``za'a'' is based on perception or direct observation by the s
peaker. This use of `òbserve'' is not connected with the Lojban `òbservative''
, or bridi with the first sumti omitted. The latter has no explicit aspect, and
could be a direct observation, a conclusion, an opinion, or other aspectual poin
t of view.
11.4) za'a do tatpi
[I observe!] You are-tired.
I see you are tired.
A bridi marked by ``pe'i'' is the opinion of the speaker. The form ``pe'ipei'' i
s common, meaning `Ìs this your opinion?''. (Strictly, this should be ``peipe'i
'', in accordance with the distinction explained in Examples 10.6-10.8, but sinc
e ``pe'i'' is not really a scale, there is no real difference between the two or
ders.)
11.5) pe'i la kartagos. .ei se daspo
[I opine!] Carthage [obligation] is-destroyed.
In my opinion, Carthage should be destroyed.
A bridi marked by ``ru'a'' is an assumption made by the speaker. This is similar
to one possible use of ``.e'u''.
11.6) ru'a doi livinston.
Dr. Livingstone, I presume?
(A rhetorical question: Stanley knew who he was.)
Finally, the evidential ``ju'a'' is used to avoid stating a specific basis for a
statement. It can also be used when the basis for the speaker's statement is no
t covered by any other evidential. For the most part, using ``ju'a'' is equivale
nt to using no evidential at all, but in question form it can be useful: ``ju'ap
ei'' means ``What is the basis for your statement?'' and serves as an evidential
, as distinct from emotional, question.
12. Discursives
The term ``discursive'' is used for those members of selma'o UI that provide str
ucture to the discourse, and which show how a given word or utterance relates to
the whole discourse. To express these concepts in regular bridi would involve e
xtra layers of nesting: rather than asserting that `Ì also came'', we would hav
e to say `Ì came; furthermore, the event of my coming is an additional instance
of the relationship expressed by the previous sentence'', which is intolerably
clumsy. Typical English equivalents of discursives are words or phrases like ``h
owever'', ``summarizing'', `ìn conclusion'', and ``for example''.
Discursives are not attitudinals: they express no particular emotion. Rather, th
ey are abbreviations for metalinguistic claims that reference the sentence or te
xt they are found in.
Discursives are most often used at the beginning of sentences, often attached to
the ``.i'' that separates sentences in running discourse, but can (like all oth
er indicators) be attached to single words when it seems necessary or useful.
The discursives discussed in this section are given in groups, roughly organized
by function. First, the ``consecutive discourse'' group:
ku'i however/but/in contrast [karbi]
ji'a additionally [jmina]
si'a similarly [simsa]
mi'u ditto [mintu]
po'o the only relevant case
These five discursives are mutually exclusive, and therefore they are not usuall
y considered as scales. The first four are used in consecutive discourse. The fi
rst, ``ku'i'', makes an exception to the previous argument. The second, ``ji'a''
, adds weight to the previous argument. The third, ``si'a'', adds quantity to th
e previous argument, enumerating an additional example. The fourth, ``mi'u'', ad
ds a parallel case to the previous argument, and can also be used in tables or t
he like to show that something is being repeated from the previous column. It is
distinct from ``go'i'' (of selma'o GOhA, discussed in Chapter 7), which is a no
n-discursive version of ``ditto'' that explicitly repeats the claim of the previ
ous bridi.
Lastly, ``po'o'' is used when there is no other comparable case, and thus corres
ponds to some of the uses of `ònly'', a word difficult to express in pure bridi
form:
12.1) mi po'o darxi le mi tamne fo le nazbi
I [only] hit my cousin at-locus the nose.
Only I (nobody else) hit my cousin on his nose.
12.2) mi darxi po'o le mi tamne fo le nazbi
I hit [only] my cousin at-locus the nose.
I only hit my cousin on his nose
(I did nothing else to him).
12.3) mi darxi le mi tamne po'o fo le nazbi
I hit my cousin [only] at-locus the nose.
I hit only my cousin on his nose (no one else).
12.4) mi darxi le mi tamne fo le nazbi po'o
I hit my cousin at-locus the nose [only].
I hit my cousin only on his nose (nowhere else).
Note that `ònly'' can go before or after what it modifies in English, but ``po'
o'', as an indicator, always comes afterward.
Next, the ``commentary on words'' group:
va'i in other words in the same words
[valsi]
ta'u expanding a tanru making a tanru
[tanru]
The discursives ``va'i'' and ``ta'u'' operate at the level of words, rather than
discourse proper, or if you like, they deal with how things are said. An altern
ative English expression for ``va'i'' is ``rephrasing''; for ``va'inai'', ``repe
ating''. Also compare ``va'i'' with ``ke'u'', discussed below.
The cmavo ``ta'u'' is a discursive unique to Lojban; it expresses the particular
ly Lojbanic device of tanru. Since tanru are semantically ambiguous, they are su
bject to misunderstanding. This ambiguity can be removed by expanding the tanru
into some semantically unambiguous structure, often involving relative clauses o
r the introduction of additional brivla. The discursive ``ta'u'' marks the trans
ition from the use of a brief but possibly confusing tanru to its fuller, cleare
r expansion; the discursive ``ta'unai'' marks a transition in the reverse direct
ion.
Next, the ``commentary on discourse'' group:
li'a clearly/obviously obscurely
[klina]
ba'u exaggeration accuracy understatement
[banli]
zo'o humorously dully seriously
sa'e precisely speaking loosely speaking
[satci]
to'u in brief in detail
[tordu]
do'a generously parsimoniously
[dunda]
sa'u simply elaborating
[sampu]
pa'e justice prejudice
[pajni]
je'u truly falsely
[jetnu]
This group is used by the speaker to characterize the nature of the discourse, s
o as to prevent misunderstanding. It is well-known that listeners often fail to
recognize a humorous statement and take it seriously, or miss an exaggeration, o
r try to read more into a statement than the speaker intends to put there. In sp
eech, the tone of voice often provides the necessary cue, but the reader of iron
ic or understated or imprecise discourse is often simply clueless. As with the a
ttitudinals, the use of these cmavo will seem fussy to new Lojbanists, but it is
important to remember that ``zo'o'', for example, is the equivalent of smiling
while you speak, not the equivalent of a flat declaration like ``What I'm about
to say is supposed to be funny.''
A few additional English equivalents: for ``sa'enai'', ``roughly speaking'' or `
àpproximately speaking''; for ``sa'unai'', ``furthermore''; for ``to'u'', `ìn
short'' or ``skipping details''; for ``do'a'', ``broadly construed''; for ``do'a
nai'' (as you might expect), ``narrowly construed''.
The cmavo ``pa'e'' is used to claim (truly or falsely) that one is being fair or
just to all parties mentioned, whereas ``pa'enai'' admits (or proclaims) a bias
in favor of one party.
The scale of ``je'u'' and ``je'unai'' is a little different from the others in t
he group. By default, we assume that people speak the truth --- or at least, tha
t if they are lying, they will do their best to conceal it from us. So under wha
t circumstances would ``je'unai'' be used, or ``je'u'' be useful? For one thing,
``je'u'' can be used to mark a tautology: a sentence that is a truth of logic,
like `Àll cats are cats.'' Its counterpart ``je'unai'' then serves to mark a lo
gical contradiction. In addition, ``je'unai'' can be used to express one kind of
sarcasm or irony, where the speaker pretends to believe what he/she says, but a
ctually wishes the listener to infer a contrary opinion. Other forms of irony ca
n be marked with ``zo'o'' (humor) or ``.ianai'' (disbelief).
When used as a discursive, ``su'a'' (see Section 11) belongs to this group.
Next, the ``knowledge'' group:
ju'o certainly uncertain certainly not
[djuno]
la'a probably improbably
[lakne]
These two discursives describe the speaker's state of knowledge about the claim
of the associated bridi. They are similar to the propositional attitudes of Sect
ion 3, as they create a hypothetical world. We may be quite certain that somethi
ng is true, and label our bridi with ``ju'o''; but it may be false all the same.
Next, the ``discourse management'' group:
ta'o by the way returning to point
[tanjo]
ra'u chiefly equally incidentally
[ralju]
mu'a for example omitting ex. end examples
[mupli]
zu'u on the one hand on the other hand
ke'u repeating continuing
[krefu]
da'i supposing in fact
This final group is used to perform what may be called ``managing the discourse'
': providing reference points to help the listener understand the flow from one
sentence to the next.
Other English equivalents of ``ta'onai'' are `ànyway'', `ànyhow'', `ìn any ca
se'', `ìn any event'', `às I was saying'', and ``continuing''.
The scale of ``ra'u'' has to do with the importance of the point being, or about
to be, expressed: ``ra'u'' is the most important point, ``ra'ucu'i'' is a point
of equal importance, and ``ra'unai'' is a lesser point. Other English equivalen
ts of ``ra'u'' are `àbove all'' and ``primarily''.
The cmavo ``ke'u'' is very similar to ``va'i'', although ``ke'unai'' and ``va'in
ai'' are quite different. Both ``ke'u'' and ``va'i'' indicate that the same idea
is going to be expressed using different words, but the two cmavo differ in emp
hasis. Using ``ke'u'' emphasizes that the content is the same; using ``va'i'' em
phasizes that the words are different. Therefore, ``ke'unai'' shows that the con
tent is new (and therefore the words are also); ``va'inai'' shows that the words
are the same (and therefore so is the content). One English equivalent of ``ke'
unai'' is ``furthermore''.
The discursive ``da'i'' marks the discourse as possibly taking a non-real-world
viewpoint (``Supposing that'', ``By hypothesis''), whereas ``da'inai'' insists o
n the real-world point of view (`Ìn fact'', `Ìn truth'', `Àccording to the fa
cts''). A common use of ``da'i'' is to distinguish between:
12.5) ganai da'i do viska le mi citno mensi
gi ju'o do djuno le du'u ri pazvau
If you [hypothetical] see my young sister,
then [certain] you know that she is-pregnant.
If you were to see my younger sister,
you would certainly know she is pregnant.
and:
12.6) ganai da'inai do viska le mi citno mensi
gi ju'o do djuno le du'u ri pazvau
If you [factual] see my young sister,
then [certainty] you know that she is-pregnant.
If you saw my younger sister,
you would certainly know she is pregnant.
It is also perfectly correct to omit the discursive altogether, and leave the co
ntext to indicate which significance is meant. (Chinese always leaves this disti
nction to the context: the Chinese sentence
12.7) ru2guo^3 ni^3 kan4dao^4 wo^3 mei4mei,
ni^3 yi2ding^4 zhi1dao^4 ta^1 huai2yun^4 le
if you see-arrive my younger-sister,
you certainly know she pregnant
is the equivalent of either Example 12.5 or Example 12.6.)
13. Miscellaneous indicators
Some indicators do not fall neatly into the categories of attitudinal, evidentia
l, or discursive. This section discusses the following miscellaneous indicators:
ki'a metalinguistic confusion
na'i metalinguistic negator
jo'a metalinguistic affirmer
li'o omitted text (quoted material)
sa'a material inserted by editor/narrator
xu true-false question
pau question premarker rhetorical question
pe'a figurative language literal language
bi'u new information old information
ge'e non-specific indicator
The cmavo ``ki'a'' is one of the most common of the miscellaneous indicators. It
expresses metalinguistic confusion; i.e. confusion about what has been said, as
opposed to confusion not tied to the discourse (which is ``.uanai''). The confu
sion may be about the meaning of a word or of a grammatical construct, or about
the referent of a sumti. One of the uses of English ``which'' corresponds to ``k
i'a'':
13.1) mi nelci le ctuca
.i le ki'a ctuca
I like the teacher
Which teacher?
Here, the second speaker does not understand the referent of the sumti ``le ctuc
a'', and so echoes back the sumti with the confusion marker.
The metalinguistic negation cmavo ``na'i'' and its opposite ``jo'a'' are explain
ed in full in Chapter 15. In general, ``na'i'' indicates that there is something
wrong with a piece of discourse: either an error, or a false underlying assumpt
ion, or something else of the sort. The discourse is invalid or inappropriate du
e to the marked word or construct.
Similarly, ``jo'a'' marks something which looks wrong but is in fact correct. Th
ese two cmavo constitute a scale, but are kept apart for two reasons: ``na'inai'
' means the same as ``jo'a'', but would be too confusing as an affirmation; ``jo
'anai'' means the same as ``na'i'', but is too long to serve as a convenient met
alinguistic negator.
The next two cmavo are used to assist in quoting texts written or spoken by othe
rs. It is often the case that we wish to quote only part of a text, or to supply
additional material either by way of commentary or to make a fragmentary text g
rammatical. The cmavo ``li'o'' serves the former function. It indicates that wor
ds were omitted from the quotation. What remains of the quotation must be gramma
tical, however, as ``li'o'' does not serve any grammatical function. It cannot,
for example, take the place of a missing selbri in a bridi, or supply the missin
g tail of a description sumti: ``le li'o'' in isolation is not grammatical.
The cmavo ``sa'a'' indicates in a quotation that the marked word or construct wa
s not actually expressed, but is inserted for editorial, narrative, or grammatic
al purposes. Strictly, even a ``li'o'' should appear in the form ``li'osa'a'', s
ince the ``li'o'' was not part of the original quotation. In practice, this and
other forms which are already associated with metalinguistic expressions, such a
s ``sei'' (of selma'o SEI) or ``to'i'' (of selma'o TO) need not be marked except
where confusion might result.
In the rare case that the quoted material already contains one or more instances
of ``sa'a'', they can be changed to ``sa'asa'a''.
The cmavo ``xu'' marks truth questions, which are discussed in detail in Chapter
15. In general, ``xu'' may be translated `Ìs it true that ... ?'' and question
s whether the attached bridi is true. When ``xu'' is attached to a specific word
or construct, it directs the focus of the question to that word or construct.
Lojban question words, unlike those of English, frequently do not stand at the b
eginning of the question. Placing the cmavo ``pau'' at the beginning of a bridi
helps the listener realize that the bridi is a question, like the symbol at the
beginning of written Spanish questions that looks like an upside-down question m
ark. The listener is then warned to watch for the actual question word.
Although ``pau'' is grammatical in any location (like all indicators), it is not
really useful except at or near the beginning of a bridi. Its scalar opposite,
``paunai'', signals that a bridi is not really a question despite its form. This
is what we call in English a rhetorical question: an example appears in the Eng
lish text near the beginning of Section 11.
The cmavo ``pe'a'' is the indicator of figurative speech, indicating that the pr
evious word should be taken figuratively rather than literally:
13.2) mi viska le blanu pe'a zdani
I see the blue [figurative] house.
I see the ``blue'' house.
Here the house is not blue in the sense of color, but in some other sense, whose
meaning is entirely culturally dependent. The use of ``pe'a'' unambiguously mar
ks a cultural reference: ``blanu'' in Example 13.2 could mean ``sad'' (as in Eng
lish) or something completely different.
The negated form, ``pe'anai'', indicates that what has been said is to be interp
reted literally, in the usual way for Lojban; natural-language intuition is to b
e ignored.
Alone among the cmavo of selma'o UI, ``pe'a'' has a rafsi, namely ``pev''. This
rafsi is used in forming figurative (culturally dependent) lujvo, whose place st
ructure need have nothing to do with the place structure of the components. Thus
``risnyjelca'' (heart burn) might have a place structure like:
x1 is the heart of x2, burning in atmosphere x3 at temperature x4
whereas ``pevrisnyjelca'', explicitly marked as figurative, might have the place
structure:
x1 is indigestion/heartburn suffered by x2
which obviously has nothing to do with the places of either ``risna'' or ``jelca
''.
The uses of ``bi'u'' and ``bi'unai'' correspond to one of the uses of the Englis
h articles ``the'' and `à/an''. An English-speaker telling a story may begin wi
th `Ì saw a man who ...''. Later in the story, the same man will be referred to
with the phrase ``the man''. Lojban does not use its articles in the same way:
both `à man'' and ``the man'' would be translated ``le nanmu'', since the speak
er has in mind a specific man. However, the first use might be marked ``le bi'u
nanmu'', to indicate that this is a new man, not mentioned before. Later uses co
uld correspondingly be tagged ``le bi'unai nanmu''.
Most of the time, the distinction between ``bi'u'' and ``bi'unai'' need not be m
ade, as the listener can infer the right referent. However, if a different man w
ere referred to still later in the story, ``le bi'u nanmu'' would clearly show t
hat this man was different from the previous one.
Finally, the indicator ``ge'e'' has been discussed in Sections 8 and 10. It is u
sed to express an attitude which is not covered by the existing set, or to avoid
expressing any attitude.
Another use for ``ge'e'' is to explicitly avoid expressing one's feeling on a gi
ven scale; in this use, it functions like a member of selma'o CAI: ``.iige'e'' m
eans roughly `Ì'm not telling whether I'm afraid or not.''
kau indirect question
This cmavo is explained in detail in Chapter 11. It marks the word it is attache
d to as the focus of an indirect question:
dakau klama le zarci
I know the statement-that
somebody [ind. ?] goes to-the store.
I know who goes to the store.
14. Vocative scales
``Vocatives'' are words used to address someone directly; they precede and mark
a name used in direct address, just as ``la'' (and the other members of selma'o
LA) mark a name used to refer to someone. The vocatives actually are indicators
--- in fact, discursives --- but the need to tie them to names and other descrip
tions of listeners requires them to be separated from selma'o UI. But like the c
mavo of UI, the members of selma'o COI can be ``negated'' with ``nai'' to get th
e opposite part of the scale.
Because of the need for redundancy in noisy environments, the Lojban design does
not compress the vocatives into a minimum number of scales. Doing so would make
a non-redundant ``nai'' too often vital to interpretation of a protocol signal,
as explained later in this section.
The grammar of vocatives is explained in Chapter 6; but in brief, a vocative may
be followed by a name (without ``la''), a description (without ``le'' or its re
latives), a complete sumti, or nothing at all (if the addressee is obvious from
the context). There is an elidable terminator, ``do'u'' (of selma'o DOhU) which
is almost never required unless no name (or other indication of the addressee) f
ollows the vocative.
Using any vocative except ``mi'e'' (explained below) implicitly defines the mean
ing of the pro-sumti ``do'', as the whole point of vocatives is to specify the l
istener, or at any rate the desired listener --- even if the desired listener is
n't listening! We will use the terms ``speaker'' and ``listener'' for clarity, a
lthough in written Lojban the appropriate terms would be ``writer'' and ``reader
''.
In the following list of vocatives, the translations include the symbol X. This
represents the name (or identifying description, or whatever) of the listener.
The cmavo ``doi'' is the general-purpose vocative. Unlike the cmavo of selma'o C
OI, explained below, ``doi'' can precede a name directly without an intervening
pause. It is not considered a scale, and ``doinai'' is not grammatical. In gener
al, ``doi'' needs no translation in English (we just use names by themselves wit
hout any preceding word, although in poetic styles we sometimes say `Òh X'', wh
ich is equivalent to ``doi''). One may attach an attitudinal to ``doi'' to expre
ss various English vocatives. For example, ``doi .io'' means ``Sir/Madam!'', whe
reas ``doi .ionai'' means ``You there!''.
All members of selma'o COI require a pause when used immediately before a name,
in order to prevent the name from absorbing the COI word. This is unlike selma'o
DOI and LA, which do not require pauses because the syllables of these cmavo ar
e not permitted to be embedded in a Lojban name. When calling out to someone, th
is is fairly natural, anyway. ``Hey! John!'' is thus a better translation of ``j
u'i .djan.'' than ``Hey John!''. No pause is needed if the vocative reference is
something other than a name, as in the title of the Lojban journal, ``ju'i loby
pli''.
(Alternatively, ``doi'' can be inserted between the COI cmavo and the name, maki
ng a pause unnecessary: ``coi doi djan.'')
coi greetings
``Hello, X''; ``Greetings, X''; indicates a greeting to the listener.
co'o partings
``Good-bye, X''; indicates parting from immediate company by either the speaker
or the listener. ``coico'o'' means ``greeting in passing''.
ju'i attention at ease ignore me/us
[jundi]
`Àttention/Lo/Hark/Behold/Hey!/Listen, X''; indicates an important communicatio
n that the listener should listen to.
nu'e promise release promise non-promise
[nupre]
`Ì promise, X''; indicates a promise to the listener. In some contexts, ``nu'e'
' may be prefixed to an oath or other formal declaration.
ta'a interruption
[tavla]
`Ì interrupt, X'', `Ì desire the floor, X''; a vocative expression to (possibl
y) interrupt and claim the floor to make a statement or expression. This can be
used for both rude and polite interruptions, although rude interruptions will pr
obably tend not to use a vocative at all. An appropriate response to an interrup
tion might be ``re'i'' (or ``re'inai'' to ignore the interruption).
pe'u request
[cpedu]
``Please, X''; indicates a request to the listener. It is a formal, non-attitudi
nal, equivalent of ``.e'o'' with a specific recipient being addressed. On the ot
her hand, ``.e'o'' may be used when there is no specific listener, but merely a
``sense of petition floating in the air'', as it were.
ki'e appreciation disappreciation
[ckire]
gratitude ingratitude
``Thank you, X''; indicates appreciation or gratitude toward the listener. The u
sual response is ``je'e'', but ``fi'i'' is appropriate on rare occasions: see th
e explanation of ``fi'i''.
fi'i welcome, unwelcome,
offering inhospitality
[friti]
`Àt your service, X''; ``Make yourself at home, X''; offers hospitality (possib
ly in response to thanks, but not necessarily) to the listener. Note that ``fi'i
'' is NOT the equivalent of American English ``You're welcome'' as a mechanical
response to ``Thank you''; that is ``je'e'', as noted below.
be'e request to send
[benji]
``Request to send to X''; indicates that the speaker wishes to express something
, and wishes to ensure that the listener is listening. In a telephone conversati
on, can be used to request the desired conversant(s). A more colloquial equivale
nt is ``Hello? Can I speak to X?''.
re'i ready to receive not ready
[bredi]
``Ready to receive, X''; indicates that the speaker is attentive and awaiting co
mmunication from the listener. It can be used instead of ``mi'e'' to respond whe
n called to the telephone. The negative form can be used to prevent the listener
from continuing to talk when the speaker is unable to pay attention: it can be
translated ``Hold on!'' or ``Just a minute''.
mu'o completion of utterance more to follow
[mulno]
`Òver, X''; indicates that the speaker has completed the current utterance and
is ready to hear a response from the listener. The negative form signals that th
e pause or non-linguistic sound which follows does not represent the end of the
current utterance: more colloquially, `Ì'm not done talking!''
je'e successful unsuccessful
receipt receipt
[jimpe]
``Roger, X!'', `Ì understand''; acknowledges the successful receipt of a commun
ication from the listener. The negative form indicates failure to receive correc
tly, and is usually followed by ``ke'o''. The colloquial English equivalents of
``je'e'' and ``je'enai'' are the grunt typically written `ùh-huh'' and ``What?/
Excuse me?'': ``je'e'' is also used to mean ``You're welcome'' when that is a re
sponse to ``Thank you''.
vi'o will comply will not comply
``Wilco, X'', `Ì understand and will comply''. Similar to ``je'e'' but signals
an intention (similar to ``.ai'') to comply with the other speaker's request. Th
is cmavo is the main way of saying `ÒK'' in Lojban, in the usual sense of `Àgr
eed!'', although ``.ie'' carries some of the same meaning. The negative form ind
icates that the message was received but that you will not comply: a very colloq
uial version is ``No way!''.
ke'o please repeat no repeat needed
[krefu]
``What did you say, X?''; a request for repetition or clarification due to unsuc
cessful receipt or understanding. This is the vocative equivalent of ``ki'a'', a
nd is related to ``je'enai''. The negative form may be rendered `Òkay, already;
I get the point!''
fe'o end of communication not done
[fanmo]
`Òver and out, X''; indicates completion of statement(s) and communication dire
cted at the identified person(s). Used to terminate a letter if a signature is n
ot required because the sender has already been identified (as in memos). The ne
gative form means ``Wait, hold it, we're not done!'' and differs from ``mu'onai'
' in that it means more exchanges are to follow, rather than that the current ex
change is incomplete.
Do not confuse ``fe'o'' with ``fa'o'' (selma'o FAhO) which is a mechanical, extr
a-grammatical signal that a text is complete. One may say ``fe'o'' to one partic
ipant of a multi-way conversation and then go on speaking to the others.
mi'e self-identification non-identification
[cmavo: mi]
`Ànd I am X''; a generalized self-vocative. Although grammatically just like th
e other members of selma'o COI, ``mi'e'' is quite different semantically. In par
ticular, rather than specifying the listener, the person whose name (or descript
ion) follows ``mi'e'' is taken to be the speaker. Therefore, using ``mi'e'' spec
ifies the meaning of the pro-sumti ``mi''. It can be used to introduce oneself,
to close letters, or to identify oneself on the telephone.
This cmavo is often combined with other members of COI: ``fe'omi'e'' would be an
appropriate closing at the end of a letter; ``re'imi'e'' would be a self-vocati
ve used in delayed responses, as when called to the phone, or possibly in a roll
-call. As long as the ``mi'e'' comes last, the following name is that of the spe
aker; if another COI cmavo is last, the following name is that of the listener.
It is not possible to name both speaker and listener in a single vocative expres
sion, but this fact is of no importance, because wherever one vocative expressio
n is grammatical, any number of consecutive ones may appear.
The negative form denies an identity which someone else has attributed to you; `
`mi'enai .djan.'' means that you are saying you are not John.
Many of the vocatives been listed with translations which are drawn from radio u
se: ``roger'', ``wilco'', `òver and out''. This form of translation does not me
an that Lojban is a language of CB enthusiasts, but rather that in most natural
languages these forms are so well handled by the context that only in specific d
omains (like speaking on the radio) do they need special words. In Lojban, depen
dence on the context can be dangerous, as speaker and listener may not share the
right context, and so the vocatives provide a formal protocol for use when it i
s appropriate. Other appropriate contexts include computer communications and pa
rliamentary procedure: in the latter context, the protocol question ``ta'apei''
would mean ``Will the speaker yield?''
15. A sample dialogue
The following dialogue in Lojban illustrates the uses of attitudinals and protoc
ol vocatives in conversation. The phrases enclosed in ``sei ... se'u'' indicate
the speaker of each sentence.
15.1) la rik. .e la .alis. nerkla le kafybarja
Rick and Alice in-go to-the coffee-bar.
Rick and Alice go into the coffee bar.
15.2) .i sei la rik. cusku se'u
ta'a ro zvati be ti
mi baza speni ti .iu
[Comment] Rick says, [end-comment]
[Interrupt] all at this-place,
I [future] [medium] am-spouse-to this-one [love].
Rick said, ``Sorry to break in, everybody.
Pretty soon I'm getting married
to my love here.''
15.3) .i sei la djordj. cusku se'u
a'o ko gleki doi ma
[Comment] George says, [end-comment]
[Hope] [You-imperative] are-happy, O [who?].
George said, `Ì hope you'll be happy, um, ...?''
15.4) .i sei la pam. cusku se'u
pe'u .alis.
xu mi ba terfriti
le nunspenybi'o
[Comment] Pam says,
[Please] Alice, [end-comment]
[Is it true?] I [future] receive-offer-of
the event-of-spouse-becoming?
Pam said, ``Please, Alice, am I going to be
invited to the wedding?''
15.5) .i sei la mark. cusku se'u
coi baza speni
a'o le re do lifri
le ka xamgu
[Comment] Mark says, [end-comment]
[Greetings] [future] [medium] spouse(s),
[Hope] the two of-you experience
the-property-of being-happy
Mark said, ``Hello, spouses-to-be. I hope both of
you will be very happy.''
mi'e .rik. doi terpreti
[I am] Rick, O questioners.
Rick said, ``My name is Rick, for those of you who
want to know.''
15.7) .i sei la .alis. cusku se'u
nu'e .pam. .o'ero'i
do ba zvati
[Comment] Alice says, [end-comment]
[Promise-to] Pam, [closeness] [emotional]
you [future] are-at.
Alice said, `Ì promise you'll be there, Pam honey.''
15.8) .i sei la fred. cusku se'u
.uinaicairo'i
mi ji'a prami la .alis.
fe'o .rik.
[Comment] Fred says, [end-comment]
[Happy] [not] [emphatic] [emotional]
I [additionally] love Alice.
[Over and out to] Rick.
`Ì love Alice too,'' said Fred miserably. ``Have a
nice life, Rick.''
15.9) .i la fred. cliva
Fred leaves.
And he left.
fi'i ro zvati
ko pinxe pa ckafi
fi'o pleji mi
[Welcome-to] all at-place,
[You-imperative] drink one coffee
with-payer me.
Rick said, raising his voice, `À cup of coffee
for the house, on me.''
be'e selfu
[Comment] Pam says, [end-comment]
[Request to speak to] server.
Pam said, ``Waiter!''
15.12) .i sei le selfu cu cusku se'u
re'i [end-comment]
[Comment] The server says,
[Ready to receive].
The waiter replied, ``May I help you?''
e'o ko selfu
le traji xamgu ckafi
le baza speni
fi'o selpleji mi
[Petition] [You-imperative] serve
the (superlatively good) coffee
to-the [future] [medium] spouse
with-payment me.
Pam said, `Òne Jamaica Blue for the lovebirds here,
on my tab.''
15.14) .i sei le selfu cucusku se'u
vi'o
[Comment] The server says, [end-comment]
[Will comply].
``Gotcha'', said the waiter.
ki'e .pam.
[Thanks O] Pam.
``Thanks, Pam'', said Rick.
je'e
[Acknowledge].
``Sure'', said Pam.
15.17) .i sei la djan. cusku se'u
.y. mi .y. mutce spopa .y.
le nu le speni si .y.
ba speni .y. .y.
su .yyyyyy. mu'o
[Comment] John says, [end-comment]
[Uh] I [uh] very [nonexistent gismu] [uh]
the event-of the spouse [erase] [uh]
[future] spouse [uh] [uh]
[erase all] [uh] [over]
John said, `Ì, er, a lotta, uh, marriage,
upcoming marriage, .... Oh, forget it.
Er, later.''
ke'o .djan. zo'o
[Repeat O] John [humor].
``How's that again, John?'' said George.
ju'i .djordj.
.e'unai le kabri bazi farlu
[Attention] George,
[Warning] the cup [future] [short] falls
``George, watch out!'' said Pam. ``The cup's falling!''
15.20) .i le kabri cu je'a farlu
The cup indeed falls.
The cup fell.
15.21) .i sei la djan. cusku se'u
e'o doi djordj. zo'o rapygau
[Comment] John says, [end-comment]
[Petition] O George [humor] repeat-cause.
John said, ``Try that again, George!''
co'o ro zvati pe secau la djan. ga'i
[Partings] all at-place without John [superiority]
``Goodbye to all of you,'' said George sneeringly,
`èxcept John.''
15.23) .i la djordj. cliva
George leaves.
George left.
16. Tentative conclusion
The exact ramifications of the indicator system in actual usage are unknown. The
re has never been anything like it in natural language before. The system provid
es great potential for emotional expression and transcription, from which signif
icant Sapir-Whorf effects can be anticipated. When communicating across cultural
boundaries, where different indicators are often used for the same emotion, acc
idental offense can be avoided. If we ever ran into an alien race, a culturally
neutral language of emotion could be vital. (A classic example, taken from the s
cience fiction of Larry Niven, is to imagine speaking Lojban to the carnivorous
warriors called Kzinti, noting that a human smile bares the teeth, and could be
seen as an intent to attack.) And for communicating emotions to computers, when
we cannot identify all of the signals involved in subliminal human communication
(things like body language are also cultural), a system like this is needed.
We have tried to err on the side of overkill. There are distinctions possible in
this system that no one may care to make in any culture. But it was deemed more
neutral to overspecify and let usage decide, than to choose a limited set and c
onstrain emotional expression. For circumstances in which even the current indic
ator set is not enough, it is possible using the cmavo ``sei'', explained in Cha
pter 19, to create metalinguistic comments that act like indicators.
We envision an evolutionary development. At this point, the system is little mor
e than a mental toy. Many of you who read this will try playing around with vari
ous combinations of indicators, trying to figure out what emotions they express
and when the expressions might be useful. You may even find an expression for wh
ich there currently is no good English word and start using it. Why not, if it h
elps you express your feelings?
There will be a couple dozen of these used pretty much universally -- mostly jus
t simple attitudinals with, at most, intensity markers. These are the ones that
will quickly be expressed at the subconscious level. But every Lojbanist who pla
ys with the list will bring in a couple of new words. Poets will paint emotional
pictures, and people who identify with those pictures will use the words so cre
ated for their own experiences.
Just as a library of tanru is built up, so will a library of attitudes be built.
Unlike the tanru, though, the emotional expressions are built on some fairly ne
bulous root emotions --- words that cannot be defined with the precision of the
gismu. The emotion words of Lojban will very quickly take on a life of their own
, and the outline given here will evolve into a true system of emotions.
There are several theories as to the nature of emotion, and they change from yea
r to year as we learn more about ourselves. Whether or not Lojban's additive/sca
lar emotional model is an accurate model for human emotions, it does support the
linguistic needs for expressing those emotions. Researchers may learn more abou
t the nature of human emotions by exploring the use of the system by Lojban spea
kers. They also may be able to use the Lojban system as a means for more clearly
recording emotions.
The full list of scales and attitudes will probably not be used until someone sp
eaks the language from birth. Until then, people will use the attitudes that are
important to them. In this way, we counter cultural bias --- if a culture is pr
one to recognizing and/or expressing certain emotions more than others, its memb
ers will use only those out of the enormous set available. If a culture hides ce
rtain emotions, its members simply won't express them.
Perhaps native Lojban speakers will be more expressively clear about their emoti
ons than others. Perhaps they will feel some emotions more strongly than others
in ways that can be correlated with the word choices; any difference from the no
rms of other cultures could be significant. Psychologists have devised elaborate
tests for measuring attitudes and personality; this may be the easiest area in
which to detect any systematic cultural effect of the type sought to confirm Sap
ir-Whorf, simply because we already have tools in existence to test it. Because
Lojban is unique among languages in having such extensive and expressive indicat
ors, it is likely that a Sapir-Whorf effect will occur and will be recognized.
It is unlikely that we will know the true potential of a system like this one un
til and unless we have children raised entirely in a multi-cultural Lojban-speak
ing environment. We learn too many cultural habits in the realm of emotional com
munication `àt our mother's knee''. Such children will have a Lojban system tha
t has stronger reinforcement than any typical culture system. The second generat
ion of such children, then, could be said to be the start of a true Lojbanic cul
ture.
We shouldn't need to wait that long to detect significant effects. Emotion is so
basic to our lives that even a small change or improvement in emotional communi
cation would have immediately noticeable effects. Perhaps it will be the case th
at the most important contribution of our ``logical language'' will be in the no
n-logical realm of emotion!
Chapter 14
If Wishes Were Horses: The Lojban Connective System
1. Logical connection and truth tables
Lojban is a logical language: the name of the language itself means ``logical la
nguage''. The fundamentals of ordinary logic (there are variant logics, which ar
en't addressed in this book) include the notions of a ``sentence'', (sometimes c
alled a ``statement'' or ``proposition''), which asserts a truth or falsehood, a
nd a small set of ``truth functions'', which combine two sentences to create a n
ew sentence. The truth functions have the special characteristic that the truth
value (that is, the truth or falsehood) of the results depends only on the truth
value of the component sentences. For example,
1.1) John is a man or James is a woman.
is true if ``John is a man'' is true, or if ``James is a woman'' is true. If we
know whether John is a man, and we know whether James is a woman, we know whethe
r ``John is a man or James is a woman'' is true, provided we know the meaning of
`òr''. Here ``John is a man'' and ``James is a woman'' are the component sente
nces.
We will use the phrase ``negating a sentence'' to mean changing its truth value.
An English sentence may always be negated by prefixing `Ìt is false that ... '
', or more idiomatically by inserting ``not'' at the right point, generally befo
re the verb. ``James is not a woman'' is the negation of ``James is a woman'', a
nd vice versa. Recent slang can also negate a sentence by following it with the
exclamation ``Not!''
Words like `òr'' are called ``logical connectives'', and Lojban has many of the
m, as befits a logical language. This chapter is mostly concerned with explainin
g the forms and uses of the Lojban logical connectives. There are a number of ot
her logical connectives in English such as `ànd'', `ànd/or'', `ìf'', `ònly i
f'', ``whether or not'', and others; however, not every use of these English wor
ds corresponds to a logical connective. This point will be made clear in particu
lar cases as needed. The other English meanings are supported by different Lojba
n connective constructs.
The Lojban connectives form a system (as the title of this chapter suggests), re
gular and predictable, whereas natural-language connectives are rather less syst
ematic and therefore less predictable.
There exist 16 possible different truth functions. A truth table is a graphical
device for specifying a truth function, making it clear what the value of the tr
uth function is for every possible value of the component sentences. Here is a t
ruth table for `òr'':
first second result
------- ------- ------
True True True
True False True
False True True
False False False
This table means that if the first sentence stated is true, and the second sente
nce stated is true, then the result of the truth function is also true. The same
is true for every other possible combination of truth values except the one whe
re both the first and the second sentences are false, in which case the truth va
lue of the result is also false.
Suppose that ``John is a man'' is true (and ``John is not a man'' is false), and
that ``James is a woman'' is false (and ``James is not a woman'' is true). Then
the truth table tells us that
``John is a man, or James is not a woman'' (true, true) is true; ``John is a
man, or James is a woman'' (true, false) is true; ``John is not a man, or James
is not a woman'' (false, true) is true; ``John is not a man, or James is a woma
n'' (false, false) is false.
Note that the kind of `òr'' used in this example can also be expressed (in form
al English) with `ànd/or''. There is a different truth table for the kind of ``
or'' that means `èither ... or ... but not both''.
To save space, we will write truth tables in a shorter format henceforth. Let th
e letters T and F stand for True and False. The rows will always be given in the
order shown above: TT, TF, FT, FF for the two sentences. Then it is only necess
ary to give the four letters from the result column, which can be written TTTF,
as can be seen by reading down the third column of the table above. So TTTF is t
he abbreviated truth table for the `òr'' truth function. Here are the 16 possib
le truth functions, with an English version of what it means to assert that each
function is, in fact, true (``first'' refers to the first sentence, and ``secon
d'' to the second sentence):
TTTT (always true)
TTTF first is true and/or second is true.
TTFT first is true if second is true.
TTFF first is true whether or not second is true.
TFTT first is true only if second is true.
TFTF whether or not first is true, second is true.
TFFT first is true if and only if second is true.
TFFF first is true and second is true
FTTT first and second are not both true.
FTTF first or second is true, but not both.
FTFT whether or not first is true, second is false.
FTFF first is true, but second is false.
FFTT first is false whether or not second is true.
FFTF first is false, but second is true.
FFFT neither first nor second is true.
FFFF (always false)
Skeptics may work out the detailed truth tables for themselves.
2. The Four basic vowels
Lojban regards four of these 16 truth functions as fundamental, and assigns them
the four vowels A, E, O, and U. These letters do not represent actual cmavo or
selma'o, but rather a component vowel from which actual logical-connective cmavo
are built up, as explained in the next section. Here are the four vowels, their
truth tables, and rough English equivalents:
A TTTF or, and/or
E TFFF and
O TFFT if and only if
U TTFF whether or not
More precisely:
A is true if either or both sentences are true; E is true if both sentences
are true, but not otherwise; O is true if the sentences are both true or both fa
lse; U is true if the first sentence is true, regardless of the truth value of t
he second sentence.
With the four vowels, the ability to negate either sentence, and the ability to
exchange the sentences, as if their order had been reversed, we can create all o
f the 16 possible truth functions except TTTT and FFFF, which are fairly useless
anyway. The following table illustrates how to create each of the 14 remaining
truth functions:
TTTF A
TTFT A with second sentence negated
TTFF U
TFTT A with first sentence negated
TFTF U with sentences exchanged
TFFT O
TFFF E
FTTT A with both sentences negated
FTTF O with either first or second negated (not both)
FTFT U with sentences exchanged and then second negated
FTFF E with second sentence negated
FFTT U with first sentence negated
FFTF E with first sentence negated
FFFT E with both sentences negated
Note that exchanging the sentences is only necessary with U. The three other bas
ic truth functions are commutative; that is, they mean the same thing regardless
of the order of the component sentences. There are other ways of getting some o
f these truth tables; these just happen to be the methods usually employed.
3. The six types of logical connectives
In order to remain unambiguous, Lojban cannot have only a single logical connect
ive for each truth function. There are many places in the grammar of the languag
e where logical connection is permitted, and each must have its appropriate set
of connectives. If the connective suitable for sumti were used to connect selbri
, ambiguity would result. Consider the English sentence:
3.1) Mary went to the window and ...
where the last word could be followed by ``the door'', a noun phrase, or by ``sa
w the horses'', a sentence with subject omitted, or by ``John went to the door''
, a full sentence, or by one of a variety of other English grammatical construct
ions. Lojban cannot tolerate such grammatical looseness.
Instead, there are a total of five different selma'o used for logical connection
: A, GA, GIhA, GUhA, and JA. Each of these includes four cmavo, one based on eac
h of the four vowels, which is always the last vowel in the cmavo. In selma'o A,
the vowel is the entire cmavo.
Thus, in selma'o A, the cmavo for the function A is `à''. (Do not confuse A, wh
ich is a selma'o, with A, which is a truth function, or `à'', which is a cmavo.
) Likewise, the cmavo for E in selma'o GIhA is ``gi'e'', and the cmavo for U in
selma'o GA is ``gu''. This systematic regularity makes the cmavo easier to learn
.
Obviously, four cmavo are not enough to express the 14 truth functions explained
in Section 1. Therefore, compound cmavo must be used. These compound cmavo foll
ow a systematic pattern: each has one cmavo from the five logical connection sel
ma'o at its heart, and may also contain one or more of the auxiliary cmavo ``se'
', ``na'', or ``nai''. Which auxiliaries are used with which logical connection
cmavo, and with what grammar and meaning, will be explained in the following sec
tions. The uses of each of these auxiliary cmavo relates to its other uses in ot
her parts of Lojban grammar.
For convenience, each of the types of compound cmavo used for logical connection
is designated by a Lojban name. The name is derived by changing the final ``-A'
' of the selma'o name to ``-ek''; the reasons for using ``-ek'' are buried deep
in the history of the Loglan Project. Thus, compound cmavo based on selma'o A ar
e known as eks, and those based on selma'o JA are known as jeks. (When writing i
n English, it is conventional to use `èks'' as the plural of `èk''.) When the
term ``logical connective'' is used in this chapter, it refers to one or more of
these kinds of compound cmavo.
Why does the title of this section refer to ``six types'' when there are only fi
ve selma'o? A jek may be preceded by ``.i'', the usual Lojban cmavo for connecti
ng two sentences. The compound produced by ``.i'' followed by a jek is known as
an ijek. It is useful to think of ijeks as a sixth kind of logical connective, p
arallel to eks, jeks, geks, giheks, and guheks.
There also exist giks, joiks, ijoiks, and joigiks, which are not logical connect
ives but are other kinds of compound cmavo which will be introduced later.
4. Logical connection of bridi
Now we are ready to express Example 1.1 in Lojban! The kind of logical connectiv
e which is placed between two Lojban bridi to connect them logically is an ijek:
4.1) la djan. nanmu .ija la djeimyz. ninmu
John is-a-man or James is-a-woman.
Here we have two separate Lojban bridi, ``la djan. nanmu'' and ``la djeimyz. nin
mu''. These bridi are connected by ``.ija'', the ijek for the truth function A.
The ``.i'' portion of the ijek tells us that we are dealing with separate senten
ces here. Similarly, we can now say:
4.2) la djan. nanmu .ije la djeimyz. ninmu
John is-a-man and James is-a-woman.
4.3) la djan. nanmu .ijo la djeimyz. ninmu
John is-a-man if-and-only-if James is-a-woman.
4.4) la djan. nanmu .iju la djeimyz. ninmu
John is-a-man whether-or-not James is-a-woman.
To obtain the other truth tables listed in Section 2, we need to know how to neg
ate the two bridi which represent the component sentences. We could negate them
directly by inserting ``na'' before the selbri, but Lojban also allows us to pla
ce the negation within the connective itself.
To negate the first or left-hand bridi, prefix ``na'' to the JA cmavo but after
the ``.i''. To negate the second or right-hand bridi, suffix ``-nai'' to the JA
cmavo. In either case, the negating word is placed on the side of the connective
that is closest to the bridi being negated.
So to express the truth table FTTF, which requires O with either of the two brid
i negated (not both), we can say either:
4.5) la djan. nanmu .inajo la djeimyz. ninmu
John is-not-a-man if-and-only-if James is-a-woman.
4.6) la djan. nanmu .ijonai la djeimyz. ninmu
John is a man if-and-only-if James is-not-a-woman
The meaning of both Example 4.5 and Example 4.6 is the same as that of:
4.7) John is a man or James is a woman, but not both.
Here is another example:
4.8) la djan. nanmu .ijanai la djeimyz. ninmu
John is-a-man or James is-not-a-woman.
John is a man if James is a woman.
How's that again? Are those two English sentences in Example 4.8 really equivale
nt? In English, no. The Lojban TTFT truth function can be glossed `À if B'', bu
t the `ìf'' does not quite have its English sense. Example 4.8 is true so long
as John is a man, even if James is not a woman; likewise, it is true just becaus
e James is not a woman, regardless of John's gender. This kind of `ìf-then'' is
technically known as a ``material conditional''.
Since James is not a woman (by our assertions in Section 1), the English sentenc
e ``John is a man if James is a woman'' seems to be neither true nor false, sinc
e it assumes something which is not true. It turns out to be most convenient to
treat this `ìf'' as TTFT, which on investigation means that Example 4.8 is true
. Example 4.9, however, is equally true:
4.9) la djan. ninmu .ijanai la djeimyz. ninmu
John is a woman if James is a woman.
This can be thought of as a principle of consistency, and may be paraphrased as
follows: `Ìf a false statement is true, any statement follows from it.'' All us
es of English `ìf'' must be considered very carefully when translating into Loj
ban to see if they really fit this Lojban mold. Example 4.10, which uses the TFT
T truth function, is subject to the same rules: the stated gloss of TFTT as `òn
ly if'' works naturally only when the left-hand bridi is true; if it is false, t
he right-hand bridi may be either true or false. The last gloss of Example 4.10
illustrates the use of `ìf ... then'' as a more natural substitute for `ònly i
f''.
4.10) la djan. nanmu .inaja la djeimyz. ninmu
John is-not-a-man or James is-a-woman.
John is a man only if James is a woman.
If John is a man, then James is a woman.
The following example illustrates the use of ``se'' to, in effect, exchange the
two sentences. The normal use of ``se'' is to (in effect) tranpose places of a b
ridi, as explained in Chapter 5.
4.11) la djan. nanmu .iseju la djeimyz. ninmu
Whether or not John is a man, James is a woman.
If both ``na'' and ``se'' are present, which is legal but never necessary, ``na'
' would come before ``se''.
The full syntax of ijeks, therefore, is:
.i [na] [se] JA [nai]
where the cmavo in brackets are optional.
5. Forethought bridi connection
Many concepts in Lojban are expressible in two different ways, generally referre
d to as `àfterthought'' and ``forethought''. Section 4 discussed what is called
`àfterthought bridi logical connection''. The word `àfterthought'' is used be
cause the connective cmavo and the second bridi were added, as it were, afterwar
ds and without changing the form of the first bridi. This form might be used by
someone who makes a statement and then wishes to add or qualify that statement a
fter it has been completed. Thus,
5.1) la djan. nanmu
is a complete bridi, and adding an afterthought connection to make
5.2) la djan. nanmu .ija la djeimyz. ninmu
John is a man or James is a woman (or both)
provides additional information without requiring any change in the form of what
has come before, which may not be possible or practical, especially in speaking
. (The meaning, however, may be changed by the use of a negating connective.) Af
terthought connectives make it possible to construct all the important truth-fun
ctional relationships in a variety of ways.
In forethought style the speaker decides in advance, before expressing the first
bridi, that a logical connection will be expressed. Forethought and afterthough
t connectives are expressed with separate selma'o: the forethought logical conne
ctives corresponding to afterthought ijeks are geks:
5.3) ga la djan. nanmu gi la djeimyz. ninmu
Either John is a man or James is a woman (or both).
``ga'' is the cmavo which represents the A truth function in selma'o GA. The wor
d ``gi'' does not belong to GA at all, but constitutes its own selma'o: it serve
s only to separate the two bridi without having any content of its own. The Engl
ish translation of ``ga ... gi'' is `èither ... or'', but in the English form t
he truth function is specified both by the word `èither'' and by the word `òr'
': not so in Lojban.
Even though two bridi are being connected, geks and giks do not have any ``.i''
in them. The forethought construct binds up the two bridi into a single sentence
as far as the grammar is concerned.
Some more examples of forethought bridi connection are:
5.4) ge la djan. nanmu gi la djeimyz. ninmu
(It is true that)
both John is a man and James is a woman.
5.5) gu la djan. nanmu
gi la djeimyz. ninmu
It is true that John is a man,
whether or not James is a woman.
It is worth emphasizing that Example 5.5 does not assert that James is (or is no
t) a woman. The ``gu'' which indicates that ``la djeimyz. ninmu'' may be true or
false is unfortunately rather remote from the bridi thus affected.
Perhaps the most important of the truth functions commonly expressed in forethou
ght is TFTT, which can be paraphrased as `ìf ... then ... '':
5.6) ganai la djan. nanmu gi la djeimyz. ninmu
Either John is not a man, or James is a woman.
If John is a man, then James is a woman.
Note the placement of the ``nai'' in Example 5.6. When added to afterthought sel
ma'o such as JA, a following ``nai'' negates the second bridi, to which it is ad
jacent. Since GA cmavo precede the first bridi, a following ``nai'' negates the
first bridi instead.
Why does English insist on forethought in the translation of Example 5.6? Possib
ly because it would be confusing to seemingly assert a sentence and then make it
conditional (which, as the Lojban form shows, involves a negation). Truth funct
ions which involve negating the first sentence may be confusing, even to the Loj
banic understanding, when expressed using afterthought.
It must be reiterated here that not every use of English `ìf ... then'' is prop
erly translated by ``.inaja'' or ``ganai ... gi''; anything with implications of
time needs a somewhat different Lojban translation, which will be discussed in
Section 18. Causal sentences like `Ìf you feed the pig, then it will grow'' are
not logical connectives of any type, but rather need a translation using ``rink
a'' as the selbri joining two event abstractions, thus:
5.7) le nu do cidja dunda fi le xarju
cu rinka le nu ri ba banro
The event-of (you food-give to the pig)
causes the event-of (it will grow).
Causality is discussed in far more detail in Chapter 9.
Example 5.8 and Example 5.9 illustrates a truth function, FTTF, which needs to n
egate either the first or the second bridi. We already understand how to negate
the first bridi:
5.8) gonai la djan. nanmu gi la djeimyz. ninmu
John is-not-a-man if-and-only-if James is-a-woman,
Either John is a man or James is a woman but not both.
How can the second bridi be negated? By adding ``-nai'' to the ``gi''.
5.9) go la djan. nanmu ginai la djeimyz. ninmu
John is-a-man if-and-only-if James is-not-a-woman.
Either John is a man or James is a woman but not both.
A compound cmavo based on ``gi'' is called a gik; the only giks are ``gi'' itsel
f and ``ginai''.
Further examples:
5.10) ge la djan. nanmu ginai la djeimyz. ninmu
John is-a-man and James is-not-a-woman.
5.11) ganai la djan. nanmu ginai la djeimyz. ninmu
John is-not-a-man or James is-not-a-woman.
The syntax of geks is:
[se] GA [nai]
and of giks (which are not themselves connectives, but part of the machinery of
forethought connection) is:
gi [nai]
6. sumti connection
Geks and ijeks are sufficient to state every possible logical connection between
two bridi. However, it is often the case that two bridi to be logically connect
ed have one or more portions in common:
6.1) la djan. klama le zarci
.ije la .alis. klama le zarci
John goes to the market,
and Alice goes to the market.
Here only a single sumti differs between the two bridi. Lojban does not require
that both bridi be expressed in full. Instead, a single bridi can be given which
contains both of the different sumti and uses a logical connective from a diffe
rent selma'o to combine the two sumti:
6.2) la djan .e la .alis. klama le zarci
John and Alice go-to the market.
Example 6.2 means exactly the same thing as Example 6.1: one may be rigorously t
ransformed into the other without any change of logical meaning. This rule is tr
ue in general for every different kind of logical connection in Lojban; all of t
hem, with one exception (see Section 12), can always be transformed into a logic
al connection between sentences that expresses the same truth function.
The afterthought logical connectives between sumti are eks, which contain a conn
ective cmavo of selma'o A. If ijeks were used in Example 6.2, the meaning would
be changed:
6.3) la djan. .ije la .alis. klama le zarci
John [is/does something]. And Alices goes-to the market.
leaving the reader uncertain why John is mentioned at all.
Any ek may be used between sumti, even if there is no direct English equivalent:
6.4) la djan. .o la .alis. klama le zarci
John if-and-only-if Alice goes-to the market.
John goes to the market if, and only if, Alice does.
The second line of Example 6.3 is highly stilted English, but the first line (of
which it is a literal translation) is excellent Lojban.
What about forethought sumti connection? As is the case for bridi connection, ge
ks are appropriate. They are not the only selma'o of forethought logical-connect
ives, but are the most commonly used ones.
6.5) ga la djan. gi la .alis. klama le zarci
Either John or Alice (or both) goes-to the market.
Of course, eks include all the same patterns of compound cmavo that ijeks do. Wh
en ``na'' or ``se'' is part of an ek, a special writing convention is invoked, a
s in the following example:
6.6) la djan. na.a la .alis. klama le zarci
John only if Alice goes-to the market.
John goes to the market only if Alice does.
Note the period in ``na.a''. The cmavo of A begin with vowels, and therefore mus
t always be preceded by a pause. It is conventional to write all connective comp
ounds as single words (with no spaces), but this pause must still be marked in w
riting as in speech; otherwise, the ``na'' and `à'' would tend to run together.
7. More than two propositions
So far we have seen logical connectives used to connect exactly two sentences. H
ow about connecting three or more? Is this possible in Lojban? The answer is yes
, subject to some warnings and some restrictions.
Of the four primitive truth functions A, E, O, and U, all but O have the same tr
uth values no matter how their component sentences are associated in pairs. Ther
efore,
7.1) mi dotco .ije mi ricfu .ije mi nanmu
I am-German. And I am-rich. And I am-a-man.
means that all three component sentences are true. Likewise,
7.2) mi dotco .ija mi ricfu .ija mi nanmu
I am-German. Or I am-rich. Or I am-a-man.
means that one or more of the component sentences is true.
O, however, is different. Working out the truth table for
7.3) mi dotco .ijo mi ricfu
.ijo mi nanmu
I am-German. If-and-only-if I am-rich.
If-and-only-if I am-a-man.
shows that Example 7.3 does not mean that either I am all three of these things
or none of them; instead, an accurate translation would be:
Of the three properties --- German-ness, wealth, and manhood -- I possess ei
ther exactly one or else all three.
Because of the counterintuitiveness of this outcome, it is safest to avoid O wit
h more than two sentences. Likewise, the connectives which involve negation also
have unexpected truth values when used with more than two sentences.
In fact, no combination of logical connectives can produce the `àll or none'' i
nterpretation intended (but not achieved) by Example 7.3 without repeating one o
f the bridi. See Example 8.11.
There is an additional difficulty with the use of more than two sentences. What
is the meaning of:
7.4) mi nelci la djan. .ije mi nelci la martas.
.ija mi nelci la meris.
I like John. And I like Martha.
Or I like Mary.
Does this mean:
7.5) I like John, and I like
either Martha or Mary or both.
Or is the correct translation:
7.6) Either I like John and I like Martha,
or I like Mary, or both.
Example 7.6 is the correct translation of Example 7.4. The reason is that Lojban
logical connectives pair off from the left, like many constructs in the languag
e. This rule, called the left-grouping rule, is easy to forget, especially when
intuition pulls the other way. Forethought connectives are not subject to this p
roblem:
7.7) ga ge mi nelci la djan. gi mi nelci la martas.
gi mi nelci la meris.
Either (Both I like John and I like Martha)
or I like Mary.
is equivalent in meaning to Example 7.4, whereas
7.8) ge mi nelci la djan. gi
ga mi nelci la martas. gi mi nelci la meris.
Both I like John and
(Either I like Martha or I like Mary).
is not equivalent to Example 7.4, but is instead a valid translation into Lojban
, using forethought, of Example 7.5.
8. Grouping of afterthought connectives
There are several ways in Lojban to render Example 7.5 using afterthought only.
The simplest method is to make use of the cmavo ``bo'' (of selma'o BO). This cma
vo has several functions in Lojban, but is always associated with high precedenc
e and short scope. In particular, if ``bo'' is placed after an ijek, the result
is a grammatically distinct kind of ijek which overrides the regular left-groupi
ng rule. Connections marked with ``bo'' are interpreted before connections not s
o marked. Example 8.1 is equivalent in meaning to Example 7.8:
8.1) mi nelci la djan.
.ije mi nelci la martas.
.ijabo mi nelci la meris.
I like John,
and I like Martha or I like Mary.
The English translation feebly indicates with a comma what the Lojban marks far
more clearly: the `Ì like Martha'' and `Ì like Mary'' sentences are joined by
``.ija'' first, before the result is joined to `Ì like John'' by ``.ije''.
Eks can have ``bo'' attached in exactly the same way, so that Example 8.2 is
equivalent in meaning to Example 8.l:
8.2)
mi nelci la djan. .e la martas. .abo la meris.
Forethought connectives, however, never can be suffixed with ``bo'', for every u
se of forethought connectives clearly indicates the intended pattern of grouping
.
What happens if ``bo'' is used on both connectives, giving them the same high pr
ecedence, as in Example 8.3?
8.3) mi nelci la djan. .ebo la martas. .abo la meris.
Does this wind up meaning the same as Example 7.4 and Example 7.6? Not at all. A
second rule relating to ``bo'' is that where several ``bo''-marked connectives
are used in succession, the normal Lojban left-grouping rule is replaced by a ri
ght-grouping rule. As a result, Example 8.3 in fact means the same as Examples 8
.1 and 8.2. This rule may be occasionally exploited for special effects, but is
tricky to keep straight; in writing intended to be easy to understand, multiple
consecutive connectives marked with ``bo'' should be avoided.
The use of ``bo'', therefore, gets tricky in complex connections of more than th
ree sentences. Looking back at the English translations of Examples 7.7 and 7.8,
parentheses were used to clarify the grouping. These parentheses have their Loj
ban equivalents, two sets of them actually. ``tu'e'' and ``tu'u'' are used with
ijeks, and ``ke'' and ``ke'e'' with eks and other connectives to be discussed la
ter. (``ke'' and ``ke'e'' are also used in other roles in the language, but alwa
ys as grouping markers). Consider the English sentence:
8.4) I kiss you and you kiss me,
if I love you and you love me.
where the semantics tells us that the instances of `ànd'' are meant to have hig
her precedence than that of `ìf''. If we wish to express Example 8.4 in afterth
ought, we can say:
8.5) mi cinba do .ije[bo] do cinba mi
.ijanai mi prami do .ijebo do prami mi
I kiss you and you kiss me,
if I love you and you love me.
marking two of the ijeks with ``bo'' for high precedence. (The first ``bo'' is n
ot strictly necessary, because of the left-grouping rule, and is shown here in b
rackets.)
But it may be clearer to use explicit parenthesis words and say:
8.6) tu'e mi cinba do .ije do cinba mi tu'u
.ijanai tu'e mi prami do .ije do prami mi [tu'u]
( I kiss you and you kiss me )
if ( I love you and you love me ).
where the ``tu'e ... tu'u'' pairs set off the structure. The cmavo ``tu'u'' is a
n elidable terminator, and its second occurrence in Example 8.6 is bracketed, be
cause all terminators may be elided at the end of text.
In addition, parentheses are a general solution: multiple parentheses may be nes
ted inside one another, and additional afterthought material may be added withou
t upsetting the existing structure. Neither of these two advantages apply to ``b
o'' grouping. In general, afterthought constructions trade generality for simpli
city.
Because of the left-grouping rule, the first set of ``tu'e ... tu'u'' parenthese
s may actually be left off altogether, producing:
8.7) mi cinba do .ije do cinba mi
.ijanai tu'e mi prami do .ije do prami mi [tu'u]
I kiss you and you kiss me
if ( I love you and you love me ).
What about parenthesized sumti connection? Consider
8.8) I walk to either the market and the house,
or the school and the office.
Two pairs of parentheses, analogous to Example 8.6, would seem to be the right a
pproach. However, it is a rule of Lojban grammar that a sumti may not begin with
``ke'', so the first set of parentheses must be omitted, producing Example 8.10
, which is instead parallel to Example 8.7:
8.9) mi dzukla le zarci .e le zdani
.a ke le ckule .e le briju [ke'e]
I walk-to the market and the house
or ( the school and the office ).
If sumti were allowed to begin with ``ke'', unavoidable ambiguities would result
, so ``ke'' grouping of sumti is allowed only just after a logical connective. T
his rule does not apply to ``tu'e'' grouping of bridi, as Example 8.6 shows.
Now we have enough facilities to handle the problem of Example 7.3: `Ì am Germa
n, rich, and a man --- or else none of these.'' The following paraphrase has the
correct meaning:
8.10) [tu'e] mi dotco .ijo mi ricfu [tu'u]
.ije tu'e mi dotco .ijo mi nanmu [tu'u]
( I am-German if-and-only-if I am-rich )
and (I am-German if-and-only-if I am-a-man ).
The truth table, when worked out, produces T if and only if all three component
sentences are true or all three are false.
9. Compound bridi
So far we have seen how to handle two sentences that need have no similarity at
all (bridi connection) and sentences that are identical except for a difference
in one sumti (sumti connection). It would seem natural to ask how to logically c
onnect sentences that are identical except for having different selbri.
Surprise! Lojban provides no logical connective that is designed to handle selbr
i and nothing else. Instead, selbri connection is provided as part of a more gen
eral-purpose mechanism called ``compound bridi''. Compound bridi result from log
ically connecting sentences that differ in their selbri and possibly some of the
ir sumti.
The simplest cases result when the x1 sumti is the only common point:
9.1) mi klama le zarci .ije mi nelci la djan.
I go to the market, and I like John.
is equivalent in meaning to the compound bridi:
9.2) mi klama le zarci gi'e nelci la djan.
I go-to the market and like John.
As Example 9.2 indicates, giheks are used in afterthought to create compound bri
di; ``gi'e'' is the gihek corresponding to `ànd''. The actual phrases ``klama l
e zarci'' and ``nelci la djan.'' that the gihek connects are known as ``bridi-ta
ils'', because they represent (in this use) the ``tail end'' of a bridi, includi
ng the selbri and any following sumti, but excluding any sumti that precede the
selbri:
9.3) mi ricfu gi'e klama le zarci
I am-rich and go-to the market.
In Example 9.3, the first bridi-tail is ``ricfu'', a simple selbri, and the seco
nd bridi-tail is ``klama le zarci'', a selbri with one following sumti.
Suppose that more than a single sumti is identical between the two sentences:
9.4) mi dunda le cukta do
.ije mi lebna lo rupnu do
I give the book to-you,
and I take some currency-units from-you.
In Example 9.4, the first and last sumti of each bridi are identical; the selbri
and the second sumti are different. By moving the final sumti to the beginning,
a form analogous to Example 9.2 can be achieved:
9.5) fi do fa mi dunda le cukta
gi'e lebna lo rupnu
to/from you I give the book
and take some currency-units.
where the ``fi'' does not have an exact English translation because it merely pl
aces ``do'' in the third place of both ``lebna'' and ``dunda''. However, a form
that preserves natural sumti order also exists in Lojban. Giheks connect two bri
di-tails, but also allow sumti to be added following the bridi-tail. These sumti
are known as tail-terms, and apply to both bridi. The straightforward gihek ver
sion of Example 9.4 therefore is:
9.6) mi dunda le cukta
gi'e lebna lo rupnu vau do
I (give the book)
and (take some currency-units) to/from you.
The ``vau'' (of selma'o VAU) serves to separate the bridi-tail from the tail-ter
ms. Every bridi-tail is terminated by an elidable ``vau'', but only in connectio
n with compound bridi is it ever necessary to express this ``vau''. Thus:
9.7) mi klama le zarci [vau]
I go-to the market.
has a single elided ``vau'', and Example 9.2 is equivalent to:
9.8) mi klama le zarci [vau]
gi'e nelci la djan. [vau] [vau]
where the double ``vau'' at the end of Example 9.8 terminates both the right-han
d bridi-tail and the unexpressed tail-terms.
A final use of giheks is to combine bridi-tails used as complete sentences, the
Lojban observative:
9.9) klama le zarci gi'e dzukla le briju
A goer to-the market and a walker to-the office.
Since x1 is omitted in both of the bridi underlying Example 9.9, this compound b
ridi does not necessarily imply that the goer and the walker are the same. Only
the presence of an explicit x1 (other than ``zo'e'', which is equivalent to omis
sion) can force the goer and the walker to be identical.
A strong argument for this convention is provided by analysis of the following e
xample:
9.10) klama la nu,IORK. la finyks.
gi'e klama la nu,IORK. la rom.
A goer to-New York from-Phoenix
and a goer to-New York from-Rome.
If the rule were that the x1 places of the two underlying bridi were identified,
then (since there is nothing special about x1), the unspecified x4 (route) and
x5 (means) places would also have to be the same, leading to the absurd result t
hat the route from Phoenix to New York is the same as the route from Rome to New
York. Inserting ``da'', meaning roughly ``something'', into the x1 place cures
the problem:
9.11) da klama la nu,IORK. la finyks.
gi'e klama la nu,IORK. la rom.
Something is-a-goer to-New York from-Phoenix
and is-a-goer to-New York from-Rome.
The syntax of giheks is:
[na] [se] GIhA [nai]
which is exactly parallel to the syntax of eks.
10. Multiple compound bridi
Giheks can be combined with ``bo'' in the same way as eks:
10.1) mi nelci la djan.
gi'e nelci la martas. gi'abo nelci la meris.
I like John
and (like Martha or like Mary).
is equivalent in meaning to Example 8.1 and Example 8.2. Likewise, ``ke ... ke'e
'' grouping can be used after giheks:
10.2) mi dzukla le zarci gi'e dzukla le zdani
gi'a ke dzukla le ckule gi'e dzukla le briju [ke'e]
I walk-to the market and walk-to the house,
or walk-to the school and walk-to the office.
is the gihek version of Example 8.9. The same rule about using ``ke ... ke'e'' b
racketing only just after a connective applies to bridi-tails as to sumti, so th
e first two bridi-tails in Example 10.2 cannot be explicitly grouped; implicit l
eft-grouping suffices to associate them.
Each of the pairs of bridi-tails joined by multiple giheks can have its own set
of tail-terms:
10.3) mi dejni lo rupnu la djan.
.inaja mi dunda le cukta la djan.
.ijabo mi lebna le cukta la djan.
[If] I owe some currency-units to John,
then I give the book to John
or I take the book from John.
is equivalent in meaning to:
10.4) mi dejni lo rupnu nagi'a dunda gi'abo lebna vau
le cukta vau la djan.
[If] I owe some currency-units then (give or take)
a book to/from John.
The literal English translation in Example 10.4 is almost unintelligible, but th
e Lojban is perfectly grammatical. ``mi'' fills the x1 place of all three selbri
; ``lo rupnu'' is the x2 of ``dejni'', whereas ``le cukta'' is a tail-term share
d between ``dunda'' and ``lebna''; ``la djan.'' is a tail-term shared by ``dejni
'' and by ``dunda gi'abo lebna''. In this case, greater clarity is probably achi
eved by moving ``la djan.'' to the beginning of the sentence, as in Example 9.5:
10.5) fi la djan. fa mi dejni lo rupnu
nagi'a dunda gi'abo lebna vau le cukta
To/from John, [if] I owe some currency-units
then [I] give or take the book.
Finally, what about forethought logical connection of bridi-tails? There is no d
irect mechanism for the purpose. Instead, Lojban grammar allows a pair of foreth
ought-connected sentences to function as a single bridi-tail, and of course the
sentences need not have terms before their selbri. For example:
10.5.5) mi ge klama le zarci gi nelci la djan.
I both go to the market and like John.
is equivalent in meaning to Example 9.2.
Of course, either of the connected sentences may contain giheks:
10.6) mi ge klama le zarci gi'e dzukla le zdani
gi nelci la djan.
I both (go to the market and walk to the house)
and like John.
The entire gek-connected sentence pair may be negated as a whole by prefixing ``
na'':
10.7) mi na ge klama le zarci gi dzukla le zdani
[False!] I both go to the market and walk to the house.
Since a pair of sentences joined by geks is the equivalent of a bridi-tail, it m
ay be followed by tail terms. The forethought equivalent of Example 9.6 is:
10.8) mi ge dunda le cukta
gi lebna lo rupnu vau do
I both (give the book)
and (take some currency-units) to/from you.
Here is a pair of gek-connected observatives, a forethought equivalent of Exampl
e 9.9:
10.9) ge klama le zarci gi dzukla le briju
Both a goer to-the market and a walker to-the office.
Finally, here is an example of gek-connected sentences with both shared and unsh
ared terms before their selbri:
10.10) mi gonai le zarci cu klama
gi le bisli cu dansu
I either-but-not-both to-the office go
or on-the ice dance.
I either go to the office or dance on the ice
(but not both).
11. Termset logical connection
So far we have seen sentences that differ in all components, and require bridi c
onnection; sentences that differ in one sumti only, and permit sumti connection;
and sentences that differ in the selbri and possibly one or more sumti, and per
mit bridi-tail connection. Termset logical connectives are employed for sentence
s that differ in more than one sumti but not in the selbri, such as:
11.1) I go to the market from the office
and to the house from the school.
The Lojban version of Example 11.1 requires two termsets joined by a logical con
nective. A ``term'' is either a sumti or a sumti preceded by a tense or modal ta
g such as ``pu'' or ``bai''. Afterthought termsets are formed by linking terms t
ogether by inserting the cmavo ``ce'e'' (of selma'o CEhE) between each of them.
Furthermore, the logical connective (which is a jek) must be prefixed by the cma
vo ``pe'e'' (of selma'o PEhE). (We could refer to the combination of ``pe'e'' an
d a jek as a ``pehejek'', I suppose.)
11.2) mi klama le zarci ce'e le briju pe'e je
le zdani ce'e le ckule
I go to-the market [plus] from-the office [joint] and
to-the house [plus] from-the school.
The literal translation uses ``[plus]'' to indicate the termset connective, and
``[joint]'' to indicate the position of the logical connective joint. As usual,
there is an equivalent bridi-connection form:
11.3) mi klama le zarci le briju
.ije mi klama le zdani le ckule
I go to-the market from-the office,
and I go to-the house from-the school.
which illustrates that the two bridi differ in the x2 and x3 places only.
What happens if the two joined sets of terms are of unequal length? Expanding to
bridi connection will always make clear which term goes in which place of which
bridi. It can happen that a sumti may fall in the x2 place of one bridi and the
x3 place of another:
11.4) mi pe'e ja do ce'e le zarci
cu klama le briju
I [joint] or you to-the market [plus]
go to/from-the office.
can be clearly understood by expansion to:
11.5) mi klama le briju
.ija do le zarci cu klama le briju
I go to-the office,
or you to-the market go from-the office.
So ``le briju'' is your origin but my destination, and thus falls in the x2 and
x3 places of ``klama'' simultaneously! This is legal because even though there i
s only one selbri, ``klama'', there are two distinct bridi expressed here. In ad
dition, ``mi'' in Example 11.4 is serving as a termset containing only one term.
An analogous paradox applies to compound bridi with tail-terms and unequal numb
ers of sumti within the connected bridi-tails:
11.6) mi klama le zarci gi'e dzukla vau le briju
I (go to-the market and walk) to/from-the office.
means that I go to the market from the office, and I walk to the office; ``le br
iju'' is the x3 place of ``klama'' and the x2 place of ``dzukla''.
Forethought termsets also exist, and use ``nu'i'' of selma'o NUhI to signal the
beginning and ``nu'u'' of selma'o NUhU (an elidable terminator) to signal the en
d. Nothing is inserted between the individual terms: they simply sit side-by-sid
e. To make a logical connection in a forethought termset, use a gek, with the ge
k just after the ``nu'i'', and an extra ``nu'u'' just before the gik:
11.7) mi klama nu'i ge le zarci le briju
nu'u gi le zdani le ckule [nu'u]
I go [start termset] both to-the market from-the office
[joint] and to-the house from-the school
[end termset].
Note that even though two termsets are being connected, only one ``nu'i'' is use
d.
The grammatical uses of termsets that do not contain logical connectives are exp
lained in Chapter 12 and Chapter 16.
12. Logical connection within tanru
As noted at the beginning of Section 9, there is no logical connective in Lojban
that joins selbri and nothing but selbri. However, it is possible to have logic
al connectives within a selbri, forming a kind of tanru that involves a logical
connection. Consider the simple tanru ``blanu zdani'', blue house. Now anything
that is a blue ball, in the most ordinary understanding of the phrase at least,
is both blue and a ball. And indeed, instead of ``blanu bolci'', Lojbanists can
say ``blanu je bolci'', using a jek connective within the tanru. (We saw jeks us
ed in Section 11 also, but there they were always prefixed by ``pe'e''; in this
section they are used alone.) Here is a pair of examples:
12.1) ti blanu zdani
This is-a-blue type-of house.
12.2) ti blanu je zdani
This is-blue and a-house.
But of course Example 12.1 and Example 12.2 are not necessarily equivalent in me
aning! It is the most elementary point about Lojban tanru that Example 12.1 migh
t just as well mean
12.3) This is a house for blue inhabitants.
and Example 12.2 certainly is not equivalent in meaning to Example 12.3.
A full explanation of logical connection within tanru belongs rather to a discus
sion of selbri structure than to logical connectives in general. Why? Because al
though Example 12.2 happens to mean the same as
12.4) ti blanu gi'e zdani
and therefore as
12.5) ti blanu .ije ti zdani
the rule of expansion into separate bridi simply does not always work for tanru
connection. Supposing Alice to be a person who lives in blue houses, then
12.6) la .alis. cu blanu je zdani prenu
Alice is-a (blue and house) type-of-person.
would be true, because tanru grouping with a jek has higher precedence than unma
rked tanru grouping, but:
12.7) la .alis. cu blanu prenu
.ije la .alis. cu zdani prenu
Alice is-a blue person,
and Alice is-a house person.
is probably false, because the blueness is associated with the house, not with A
lice, even leaving aside the question of what it means to say `Àlice is a blue
person''. (Perhaps she belongs to the Blue team, or is wearing blue clothes.) Th
e semantic ambiguity of tanru make such logical manipulations impossible.
It suffices to note here, then, a few purely grammatical points about tanru logi
cal connection. ``bo'' may be appended to jeks as to eks, with the same rules:
12.8) la teris. cu ricfu je nakni jabo fetsi
Terry is rich and (male or female).
The components of tanru may be grouped with ``ke'' both before and after a logic
al connective:
12.9) la .teris. cu [ke] ricfu ja pindi [ke'e]
je ke nakni ja fetsi [ke'e]
Terry is (rich or poor)
and (male or female).
where the first ``ke ... ke'e'' pair may be omitted altogether by the rule of le
ft-grouping, but is optionally permitted (as in bridi connection). In any case,
both instances of ``ke'e'' may be elided.
The syntax of jeks is:
[na] [se] JA [nai]
parallel to eks and giheks.
Forethought tanru connection does not use geks, but uses guheks instead. Guheks
have exactly the same form as geks:
[se] GUhA [nai]
Using guheks in tanru connection (rather than geks) resolves what would otherwis
e be an unacceptable ambiguity between bridi-tail and tanru connection:
12.10) la .alis. gu'e ricfu gi fetsi
Alice is both rich and female.
Note that giks are used with guheks in exactly the same way they are used with g
eks. Like jeks, guheks bind more closely than unmarked tanru grouping does:
12.11) la .alis. gu'e blanu gi zdani prenu
Alice is-a-(both blue and a-house) type-of-person.
is the forethought version of Example 12.6.
A word of caution about the use of logically connected tanru within descriptions
. English-based intuition can lead the speaker astray. In correctly reducing
12.12) mi viska pa nanmu .ije mi viska pa ninmu
I see a man, and I see a woman.
to
12.13) mi viska pa nanmu .e pa ninmu
I see a man and a woman.
there is a great temptation to reduce further to:
12.14) mi viska pa nanmu je ninmu
I see a man and woman.
But Example 12.14 means that you see one thing which is both a man and a woman s
imultaneously! A ``nanmu je ninmu'' is a manwoman, a presumably non-existent cre
ature who is both a ``nanmu'' and a ``ninmu''.
13. Truth questions and connective questions
So far we have addressed only sentences which are statements. Lojban, like all h
uman languages, needs also to deal with sentences which are questions. There are
many ways of asking questions in Lojban, but some of these (like questions abou
t quantity, tense, and emotion) are discussed in other chapters.
The simplest kind of question is of the type `Ìs it true that ... '' where some
statement follows. This type is called a ``truth question'', and can be represe
nted in English by Example 13.1:
13.1) Is it true that Fido is a dog?
Is Fido a dog?
Note the two formulations. English truth questions can always be formed by prefi
xing `Ìs is true that'' to the beginning of a statement; there is also usually
a more idiomatic way involving putting the verb before its subject. `Ìs Alice a
dog?'' is the truth question corresponding to ``Fido is a dog''. In Lojban, the
equivalent mechanism is to prefix the cmavo ``xu'' (of selma'o UI) to the state
ment:
13.2) xu la faidon. gerku
is-it-true-that Fido is-a-dog?
Example 13.1 and Example 13.2 are equivalent in meaning.
A truth question can be answered ``yes'' or ``no'', depending on the truth or fa
lsity, respectively, of the underlying statement. The standard way of saying ``y
es'' in Lojban is ``go'i'' and of saying ``no'' is ``nago'i''. (The reasons for
this rule are explained in Chapter 7.) In answer to Example 13.2, the possible a
nswers are:
13.3) go'i
Fido is a dog.
and
13.4) nago'i
Fido is not a dog.
Some English questions seemingly have the same form as the truth questions so fa
r discussed. Consider
13.5) Is Fido a dog or a cat?
Superficially, Example 13.5 seems like a truth question with the underlying stat
ement:
13.6) Fido is a dog or a cat.
By translating Example 13.6 into Lojban and prefixing ``xu'' to signal a truth q
uestion, we get:
13.7) xu la faidon. gerku gi'onai mlatu
is-it-true-that Fido is-a-dog or is-a-cat
(but not both)?
Given that Fido really is either a dog or a cat, the appropriate answer would be
``go'i''; if Fido were a fish, the appropriate answer would be ``nago'i''.
But that is not what an English-speaker who utters Example 13.5 is asking! The t
rue significance of Example 13.5 is that the speaker desires to know the truth v
alue of either of the two underlying bridi (it is presupposed that only one is t
rue).
Lojban has an elegant mechanism for rendering this kind of question which is ver
y unlike that used in English. Instead of asking about the truth value of the co
nnected bridi, Lojban users ask about the truth function which connects them. Th
is is done by using a special question cmavo: there is one of these for each of
the logical connective selma'o, as shown by the following table:
ge'i GA forethought connective question
gi'i GIhA bridi-tail connective question
gu'i GUhA tanru forethought connective question
je'i JA tanru connective question
ji A sumti connective question
(This list unfortunately departs from the pretty regularity of the other cmavo f
or logical connection. The two-syllable selma'o, GIhA and GUhA, make use of the
cmavo ending in ``-i'' which is not used for a truth function, but ``gi'' and ``
.i'' were not available, and different cmavo had to be chosen. This table must s
imply be memorized, like most other non-connective cmavo assignments.)
One correct translation of Example 13.5 employs a question gihek:
13.8) la .alis gerku gi'i mlatu
Alice is-a-dog [truth function?] is-a-cat?
Here are some plausible answers:
13.9) nagi'e
Alice is not a dog and is a cat.
13.10) gi'enai
Alice is a dog and is not a cat.
13.11) nagi'enai
Alice is not a dog and is not a cat.
13.12) nagi'o
gi'onai
Alice is a dog or is a cat but not both
(I'm not saying which).
Example 13.12 is correct but uncooperative.
As usual, Lojban questions are answered by filling in the blank left by the ques
tion. Here the blank is a logical connective, and therefore it is grammatical in
Lojban to utter a bare logical connective without anything for it to connect.
The answer ``gi'e'', meaning that Alice is a dog and is a cat, is impossible in
the real world, but for:
13.13) do djica tu'a loi ckafi
ji loi tcati
you desire something-about a-mass-of coffee
[truth function?] a-mass-of tea?
Do you want coffee or tea?
the answer ``.e'', meaning that I want both, is perfectly plausible, if not nece
ssarily polite.
The forethought questions ``ge'i'' and ``gu'i'' are used like the others, but am
biguity forbids the use of isolated forethought connectives as answers --- they
sound like the start of forethought-connected bridi. So although Example 13.14 i
s the forethought version of Example 13.13:
13.14) do djica tu'a
ge'i loi ckafi
gi loi tcati
you desire something-about
[truth function?] a-mass-of coffee
[or] a-mass-of tea?
the answer must be in afterthought form.
There are natural languages, notably Chinese, which employ the Lojbanic form of
connective question. The Chinese sentence
13.15) ni3 zou3 hai2shi pao3
you walk [or?] run?
means ``Do you walk or run?'', and is exactly parallel to the Lojban:
13.16) do cadzu gi'i bajra
you walk [or?] run?
However, Chinese does not use logical connectives in the reply to such a questio
n, so the resemblance, though striking, is superficial.
Truth questions may be used in bridi connection. This form of sentence is perfec
tly legitimate, and can be interpreted by using the convention that a truth ques
tion is true if the answer is ``yes'' and false if the answer is ``no''. Analogo
usly, an imperative sentence (involving the special pro-sumti ``ko'', which mean
s ``you'' but marks the sentence as a command) is true if the command is obeyed,
and false otherwise. A request of Abraham Lincoln's may be translated thus:
13.17) ganai ti ckafi
gi ko bevri loi tcati mi
.ije ganai ti tcati
gi ko bevri loi ckafi mi
If this is-coffee
then [you!] bring a-mass-of tea to-me,
and if this is-tea
then [you!] bring a-mass-of coffee to-me.
If this is coffee, bring me tea;
but if this is tea, bring me coffee.
In logical terms, however, ``but'' is the same as `ànd''; the difference is tha
t the sentence after a ``but'' is felt to be in tension or opposition to the sen
tence before it. Lojban represents this distinction by adding the discursive cma
vo ``ku'i'' (of selma'o UI), which is explained in Chapter 13, to the logical ``
.ije''.)
14. Non-logical connectives
Way back in Section 1, the point was made that not every use of English `ànd'',
`ìf ... then'', and so on represents a Lojban logical connective. In particula
r, consider the `ànd'' of:
14.1) John and Alice carried the piano.
Given the nature of pianos, this probably means that John carried one end and Al
ice the other. So it is not true that:
14.2) John carried the piano,
and Alice carried the piano.
which would mean that each of them carried the piano by himself/herself. Lojban
deals with this particular linguistic phenomenon as a ``mass''. John and Alice a
re joined together into a mass, John-and-Alice, and it is this mass which carrie
d the piano, not either of them separately. The cmavo ``joi'' (of selma'o JOI) i
s used to join two or more components into a mass:
14.3) la djan. joi la .alis. cu bevri le pipno
John massed-with Alice carry the piano.
Example 14.3 covers the case mentioned, where John and Alice divide the labor; i
t also could mean that John did all the hauling and Alice did the supervising. T
his possibility arises because the properties of a mass are the properties of it
s components, which can lead to apparent contradictions: if John is small and Al
ice is large, then John-and-Alice is both small and large. Masses are also discu
ssed in Chapter 6.
Grammatically, ``joi'' can appear between two sumti (like an ek) or between two
tanru components (like a jek). This flexibility must be paid for in the form of
occasional terminators that cannot be elided:
14.4) le nanmu ku joi le ninmu [ku] cu klama le zarci
The man massed-with the woman go-to the market.
The cmavo ``ku'' is the elidable terminator for ``le'', which can almost always
be elided, but not in this case. If the first ``ku'' were elided here, Lojban's
parsing rules would see ``le nanmu joi'' and assume that another tanru component
is to follow; since the second ``le'' cannot be part of a tanru, a parsing erro
r results. No such problem can occur with logical connectives, because an ek sig
nals a following sumti and a jek a following tanru component unambiguously.
Single or compound cmavo involving members of selma'o JOI are called joiks, by a
nalogy with the names for logical connectives. It is not grammatical to use joik
s to connect bridi-tails.
In tanru, ``joi'' has the connotation ``mixed with'', as in the following exampl
e:
14.5) ti blanu joi xunre bolci
This is-a-(blue mixed-with red) ball.
This is a blue and red ball.
Here the ball is neither wholly blue nor wholly red, but partly blue and partly
red. Its blue/redness is a mass property. (Just how blue something has to be to
count as ``wholly blue'' is an unsettled question, though. A ``blanu zdani'' may
be so even though not every part of it is blue.)
There are several other cmavo in selma'o JOI which can be used in the same gramm
atical constructions. Not all of them are well-defined as yet in all contexts. A
ll have clear definitions as sumti connectives; those definitions are shown in t
he following table:
A joi B the mass with components A and B
A ce B the set with elements A and B
A ce'o B the sequence with elements A and B in order
A sece'o B the sequence with elements B and A in order
A jo'u B A and B considered jointly
A fa'u B A and B respectively
A sefa'u B B and A respectively
A jo'e B the union of sets A and B
A ku'a B the intersection of sets A and B
A pi'u B the cross product of sets A and B
A sepi'u B the cross product of sets B and A
The cmavo ``se'' is grammatical before any JOI cmavo, but only useful with those
that have inherent order. Here are some examples of joiks:
14.6) mi cuxna la .alis. la frank.
ce la .alis. ce la djeimyz.
I choose Alice from Frank
and-member Alice and-member James.
I choose Alice from among Frank, Alice, and James.
The x3 place of ``cuxna'' is a set from which the choice is being made. A set is
an abstract object which is determined by specifying its members. Unlike those
of a mass, the properties of a set are unrelated to its members' properties: the
set of all rats is large (since many rats exist), but the rats themselves are s
mall. This chapter does not attempt to explain set theory (the mathematical stud
y of sets) in detail: explaining propositional logic is quite enough for one cha
pter!
In Example 14.6 we specify that set by listing the members with ``ce'' joining t
hem.
14.7) ti liste mi ce'o do ce'o la djan.
This is-a-list-of me and-sequence you and-sequence John.
This is a list of you, me, and John.
The x2 place of ``liste'' is a sequence of the things which are mentioned in the
list. (It is worth pointing out that ``lo liste'' means a physical object such
as a grocery list: a purely abstract list is ``lo porsi'', a sequence.) Here the
three sumti connected by ``ce'o'' are in a definite order, not just lumped toge
ther in a set or a mass.
So ``joi'', ``ce'', and ``ce'o'' are parallel, in that the sumti connected are t
aken to be individuals, and the result is something else: a mass, a set, or a se
quence respectively. The cmavo ``jo'u'' serves as a fourth element in this patte
rn: the sumti connected are individuals, and the result is still individuals ---
but inseparably so. The normal Lojban way of saying that James and George are b
rothers is:
14.8) la djeimyz. bruna la djordj.
James is-the-brother-of George.
possibly adding a discursive element meaning `ànd vice versa''. However, ``Jame
s and George are brothers'' cannot be correctly translated as:
14.9) la djeimyz. .e la djordj. bruna
James and George is-a-brother.
since that expands to two bridi and means that James is a brother and so is Geor
ge, but not necessarily of each other. If the ``.e'' is changed to ``jo'u'', how
ever, the meaning of Example 14.8 is preserved:
14.10) la djeimyz. jo'u la djordj.
cu remei bruna
James in-common-with George
are-a-twosome type-of-brothers.
The tanru ``remei bruna'' is not strictly necessary in this sentence, but is use
d to make clear that we are not saying that James and George are both brothers o
f some third person not specified. Alternatively, we could turn the tanru around
: the x1 place of ``remei'' is a mass with two components, leading to:
14.11) la djeimyz. joi la djordj.
cu bruna remei
James massed-with George
are-a-brother type-of-twosome.
where ``joi'' is used to create the necessary mass.
Likewise, ``fa'u'' can be used to put two individuals together where order matte
rs. Typically, there will be another ``fa'u'' somewhere else in the same bridi:
14.12) la djeimyz. fa'u la djordj.
prami la meris. fa'u la martas.
James jointly-in-order-with George
loves Mary jointly-in-order-with Martha.
James and George love Mary and Martha, respectively.
Here the information carried by the English adverb ``respectively'', namely that
James loves Mary and George loves Martha, is divided between the two occurrence
s of ``fa'u''. If both uses of ``fa'u'' were to be changed to ``.e'', we would g
et:
14.13) la djeimyz. .e la djordj.
prami la meris. .e la martas.
James and George love Mary and Martha.
which can be transformed to four bridi:
14.14) la djeimyz. prami la meris.
.ije la djordj. prami la meris.
.ije la djeimyz. prami la martas.
.ije la djordj. prami la martas.
James loves Mary, and George loves Mary,
and James loves Martha, and George loves Martha
which represents quite a different state of affairs from Example 14.12. The mean
ing of Example 14.12 can also be conveyed by a termset:
14.15) la djeimyz. ce'e la meris.
pe'e .e la djordj. ce'e la martas. prami
James [plus] Mary
[joint] and George [plus] Martha loves.
at the expense of re-ordering the list of names so as to make the pairs explicit
. This option is not available when one of the lists is only described rather th
an enumerated:
14.16) la djeimyz. fa'u la djordj. prami re sorme
James and-respectively George love two sisters.
which conveys that James loves one sister and George the other, though we are no
t able to tell which of the sisters is which.
15. More about non-logical connectives
The final three JOI cmavo, ``jo'e'', ``ku'a'', and ``pi'u'', are probably only u
seful when talking explicitly about sets. They represent three standard set oper
ators usually called `ùnion'', `ìntersection'', and ``cross product'' (also kn
own as ``Cartesian product''). The union of two sets is a set containing all the
members that are in either set; the intersection of two sets is a set containin
g all the members that are in both sets. The cross product of two sets is the se
t of all possible ordered pairs, where each ordered pair contains a single eleme
nt from the first set followed by a single element from the second. This may see
m very abstract; hopefully, the following examples will help:
15.1) lo'i ricfu ku jo'e lo'i dotco
cu barda
The-set-of rich-things union the-set-of German-things
is large.
15.2) lo'i ricfu ku ku'a
lo'i dotco cu cmalu
The set-of rich-things intersection
the-set-of German-things is small.
There is a parallelism between logic and set theory that makes Example 15.1 and
Example 15.2 equivalent respectively to:
15.3) lo'i ricfu ja dotco cu barda
The-set-of rich-or-German-things is large.
and
15.4) lo'i ricfu je dotco cu cmalu
The-set-of rich-and-German-things is small.
The following example uses ``se remei'', which is a set (not a mass) of two elem
ents:
15.5) la djeimyz. ce[bo] la djordj.
pi'u la meris. cebo la martas.
cu prami se remei
James and-set George
cross-product Mary and-set Martha
are-lover type-of-pairs.
means that each of the pairs James/Mary, George/Mary, James/Martha, and George/M
artha love each other. Therefore it is similar in meaning to Example 14.13; howe
ver, that example speaks only of the men loving the women, not vice versa.
Joiks may be combined with ``bo'' or with ``ke'' in the same way as eks and jeks
; this allows grouping of non-logical connections between sumti and tanru units,
in complete parallelism with logical connections:
15.6) mi joibo do ce la djan. joibo la djein.
cu gunma se remei
(I massed-with you) and (John massed-with Jane)
are-a-mass type-of-two-set
asserts that there is a set of two items each of which is a mass.
Non-logical connection is permitted at the joint of a termset; this is useful fo
r associating more than one sumti or tagged sumti with each side of the non-logi
cal connection. The place structure of ``casnu'' is:
the mass x1 discusses/talks about x2
so the x1 place must be occupied by a mass (for reasons not explained here); how
ever, different components of the mass may discuss in different languages. To as
sociate each participant with his or her language, we can say:
15.7) mi ce'e bau la lojban.
pe'e joi do ce'e bau la gliban. nu'u casnu
( I [plus] in-language Lojban
massed-with you [plus] in-language English ) discuss.
Like all non-logical connectives, the usage shown in Example 15.7 cannot be mech
anically converted into a non-logical connective placed at another location in t
he bridi. The forethought equivalent of Example 15.7 is:
15.8) nu'i joigi mi bau la lojban
gi do bau la gliban. nu'u casnu
Non-logical forethought termsets are also useful when the things to be non-logic
ally connected are sumti preceded with tense or modal (BAI) tags:
15.9) la djan. fa'u la frank. cusku
nu'i bau la lojban.
nu'u fa'u
bai la djordj. [nu'u]
John respectively-with Frank express
[start termset] in-language Lojban
[joint] respectively-with
under-compulsion-by George.
John and Frank speak in Lojban and under George's
compulsion, respectively.
Example 14.17 associates speaking in Lojban with John, and speaking under George
's compulsion with Frank. We do not know what language Frank uses, or whether Jo
hn speaks under anyone's compulsion.
Joiks may be prefixed with ``.i'' to produce ijoiks, which serve to non-logicall
y connect sentences. The main known use here is ``.ice'o'', which indicates that
the event of the second bridi follows that of the first bridi in some way other
than a time relationship (which is handled with a tense):
15.10) mi ba gasnu la'edi'e
.i tu'e kanji lo ni cteki
.ice'o lumci le karce
.ice'o dzukansa le gerku tu'u
I [future] do the-referent-of-the-following:
( Compute the quantity of taxes.
And-then wash the car.
And-then walkingly-accompany the dog. )
List of things to do:
Figure taxes.
Wash car.
Walk dog.
Example 15.10 represents a list of things to be done in priority order. The orde
r is important, hence the need for a sequence connective, but does not necessari
ly represent a time order (the dog may end up getting walked first). Note the us
e of ``tu'e'' and ``tu'u'' as general brackets around the whole list. This is re
lated to, but distinct from, their use in Section 8, because there is no logical
connective between the introductory phrase ``mi ba gasnu la'edi'e'' and the res
t. The brackets effectively show how large an utterance the word ``di'e'', which
means ``the following utterance'', refers to.
The following ``nai'', if present, does not negate either of the things to be co
nnected, but instead specifies that some other connection (logical or non-logica
l) is applicable: it is a scalar negation:
15.11) mi jo'unai do cu remei
I in-common-with [not!] you are-a-twosome
The result of ``mi jo'u do'' would be two individuals, not a mass, therefore ``j
o'u'' is not applicable; ``joi'' would be the correct connective.
There is no joik question cmavo as such; however, joiks and ijoiks may be uttere
d in isolation in response to a logical connective question, as in the following
exchange:
15.12) do djica tu'a
loi ckafi
ji loi tcati
You desire something-about
a-mass-of coffee [what connective?]
a-mass-of tea?
Do you want coffee or tea?
15.13) joi
Mixed-mass-and.
Both as a mass (i.e, mixed together).
Ugh. (Or in Lojban: .a'unaisairo'o.)
16. Interval connectives and forethought non-logical connection
In addition to the non-logical connectives of selma'o JOI explained in Sections
14 and 15, there are three other connectives which can appear in joiks: ``bi'i''
, ``bi'o'', and ``mi'i'', all of selma'o BIhI. The first two cmavo are used to s
pecify intervals: abstract objects defined by two endpoints. The cmavo ``bi'i''
is correct if the endpoints are independent of order, whereas ``bi'o'' or ``sebi
'o'' are used when order matters.
An example of ``bi'i'' in sumti connection:
16.1) mi ca sanli
la drezdn. bi'i la frankfurt.
I [present] stand-on-surface
Dresden [interval] Frankfurt.
I am standing between Dresden and Frankfurt.
In Example 16.1, it is all the same whether I am standing between Dresden and Fr
ankfurt or between Frankfurt and Dresden, so ``bi'i'' is the appropriate interva
l connective. The sumti ``la drezdn. bi'i la frankfurt.'' falls into the x2 plac
e of ``sanli'', which is the surface I stand on; the interval specifies that sur
face by its limits. (Obviously, I am not standing on the whole of the interval;
the x2 place of ``sanli'' specifies a surface which is typically larger in exten
t than just the size of the stander's feet.)
16.2) mi cadzu ca
la pacac. bi'o la recac.
I walk simultaneous-with
First-hour [ordered-interval] Second-hour.
I walk from one o'clock to two o'clock.
In Example 16.2, on the other hand, it is essential that ``la pacac.'' comes bef
ore ``la recac.''; otherwise we have an 11-hour (or 23-hour) interval rather tha
n a one-hour interval. In this use of an interval, the whole interval is probabl
y intended, or at least most of it.
Example 16.2 is equivalent to:
16.3) mi cadzu ca
la recac. sebi'o la pacac.
I walk simultaneous-with
Second-hour [reverse] [ordered] First-hour.
English cannot readily express ``sebi'o'', but its meaning can be understood by
reversing the two sumti.
The third cmavo of selma'o BIhI, namely ``mi'i'', expresses an interval seen fro
m a different viewpoint: not a pair of endpoints, but a center point and a dista
nce. For example:
16.4) le jbama pu daspo la .uacintyn.
mi'i lo minli be li muno
the bomb [past] destroys Washington
[center] what-is measured-in-miles by 50.
The bomb destroyed Washington and fifty miles around.
Here we have an interval whose center is Washington and whose distance, or radiu
s, is fifty miles.
In Example 16.1, is it possible that I am standing in Dresden (or Frankfurt) its
elf? Yes. The connectives of selma'o BIhI are ambiguous about whether the endpoi
nts themselves are included in or excluded from the interval. Two auxiliary cmav
o ``ga'o'' and ``ke'i'' (of cmavo GAhO) are used to indicate the status of the e
ndpoints: ``ga'o'' means that the endpoint is included, ``ke'i'' that it is excl
uded:
16.5) mi ca sanli la drezdn.
ga'o bi'i ga'o la frankfurt.
I [present] stand Dresden
[inclusive] [interval] [inclusive] Frankfurt.
I am standing between Dresden and Frankfurt,
inclusive of both.
ga'o bi'i ke'i la frankfurt.
[inclusive] [interval] [exclusive] Frankfurt.
I am standing between Dresden (inclusive)
and Frankfurt (exclusive).
ke'i bi'i ga'o la frankfurt.
[exclusive] [interval] [inclusive] Frankfurt.
I am standing between Dresden (exclusive)
and Frankfurt (inclusive).
ke'i bi'i ke'i la frankfurt.
[exclusive] [interval] [exclusive] Frankfurt.
I am standing between Dresden and Frankfurt,
exclusive of both.
As these examples should make clear, the GAhO cmavo that applies to a given endp
oint is the one that stands physically adjacent to it: the left-hand endpoint is
referred to by the first GAhO, and the right-hand endpoint by the second GAhO.
It is ungrammatical to have just one GAhO.
(Etymologically, ``ga'o'' is derived from ``ganlo'', which means ``closed'', and
``ke'i'' from ``kalri'', which means `òpen''. In mathematics, inclusive interv
als are referred to as closed intervals, and exclusive intervals as open ones.)
BIhI joiks are grammatical anywhere that other joiks are, including in tanru con
nection and (as ijoiks) between sentences. No meanings have been found for these
uses.
Negated intervals, marked with a ``-nai'' following the BIhI cmavo, indicate an
interval that includes everything but what is between the endpoints (with respec
t to some understood scale):
16.9) do dicra .e'a mi ca la daucac. bi'onai la gaicac.
You disturb (allowed) me at 10 not-from ... to 12
You can contact me except from 10 to 12.
The complete syntax of joiks is:
[se] JOI [nai] [se] BIhI [nai] GAhO [se] BIhI [nai] GAhO
Notice that the colloquial English translations of ``bi'i'' and ``bi'o'' have fo
rethought form: ``between ... and'' for ``bi'i'', and ``from ... to'' for ``bi'o
''. In Lojban too, non-logical connectives can be expressed in forethought. Rath
er than using a separate selma'o, the forethought logical connectives are constr
ucted from the afterthought ones by suffixing ``gi''. Such a compound cmavo is n
ot unnaturally called a ``joigik''; the syntax of joigiks is any of:
[se] JOI [nai] GI [se] BIhI [nai] GI GAhO [se] BIhI [nai] GAhO GI
Joigiks may be used to non-logically connect bridi, sumti, and bridi-tails; and
also in termsets.
Example 14.3 in forethought becomes:
16.10) joigi la djan. gi la .alis. bevri le pipno
[Together] John and Alice carry the piano.
The first ``gi'' is part of the joigik; the second ``gi'' is the regular gik tha
t separates the two things being connected in all forethought forms.
Example 16.6 can be expressed in forethought as:
16.11) mi ca sanli ke'i bi'i ga'o
gi la drezdn.
gi la frankfurt.
I [present] stand
[exclusive] between [inclusive] Dresden
and Frankfurt.
I am standing between Dresden (exclusive)
and Frankfurt (inclusive).
In forethought, unfortunately, the GAhOs become physically separated from the en
dpoints, but the same rule applies: the first GAhO refers to the first endpoint.
17. Logical and non-logical connectives within mekso
Lojban has a separate grammar embedded within the main grammar for representing
mathematical expressions (or mekso in Lojban) such as ``2 + 2''. Mathematical ex
pressions are explained fully in Chapter 18. The basic components of mekso are o
perands, like ``2'', and operators, like ``+''. Both of these may be either logi
cally or non-logically connected.
Operands are connected in afterthought with eks and in forethought with geks, ju
st like sumti. Operators, on the other hand, are connected in afterthought with
jeks and in forethought with guheks, just like tanru components. (However, jeks
and joiks with ``bo'' are not allowed for operators.) This parallelism is no acc
ident.
In addition, eks with ``bo'' and with ``ke ... ke'e'' are allowed for grouping l
ogically connected operands, and ``ke ... ke'e'' is allowed for grouping logical
ly connected operators, although there is no analogue of tanru among the operato
rs.
Only a few examples of each kind of mekso connection will be given. Despite the
large number of rules required to support this feature, it is of relatively mino
r importance in either the mekso or the logical-connective scheme of things. The
se examples are drawn from Chapter 18, and contain many mekso features not expla
ined in this chapter.
Example 17.1 exhibits afterthought logical connection between operands:
17.1) vei ci .a vo [ve'o] prenu cu klama le zarci
( three or four ) people go-to the market.
Example 17.2 is equivalent in meaning, but uses forethought connection:
17.2) vei ga ci gi vo [ve'o] prenu cu klama le zarci
( either 3 or 4 ) people go-to the market.
Note that the mekso in Example 17.1 and Example 17.2 are being used as quantifie
rs. Lojban requires that any mekso other than a simple number be enclosed in ``v
ei'' and ``ve'o'' parentheses when used as a quantifier. The right parenthesis m
ark, ``ve'o'', is an elidable terminator.
Simple examples of logical connection between operators are hard to come by. A c
ontrived example is:
17.3) li re su'i je pi'i re du li vo
the-number 2 plus and times 2 equals the-number 4.
2 + 2 = 4 and 2 x 2 = 4.
The forethought form of Example 17.3 is:
17.4) li re ge su'i gi pi'i re
du li vo
the-number two both plus and times two
equals the-number four.
Both 2 + 2 = 4 and 2 x 2 = 4.
Non-logical connection with joiks or joigiks is also permitted between operands
and between operators. One use for this construct is to connect operands with ``
bi'i'' to create mathematical intervals:
17.5) li no ga'o bi'i ke'i pa
the-number zero (inclusive) from-to (exclusive) one
[0,1)
the numbers from zero to one,
including zero but not including one
You can also combine two operands with ``ce'o'', the sequence connective of selm
a'o JOI, to make a compound subscript:
17.6) xy. boi xi vei by. ce'o dy. [ve'o]
``x'' sub ( ``b'' sequence ``d'' )
$xb,d$
Note that the ``boi'' in Example 17.5 is not elidable, because the ``xi'' subscr
ipt needs something to attach to.
18. Tenses, modals, and logical connection
The tense and modal systems of Lojban interact with the logical connective syste
m. No one chapter can explain all of these simultaneously, so each chapter must
present its own view of the area of interaction with emphasis on its own concept
s and terminology. In the examples of this chapter, the many tenses of various s
elma'o as well as the modals of selma'o BAI are simplified to the simple time cm
avo ``pu'', ``ca'', and ``ba'' (of selma'o PU) representing the past, the presen
t, and the future respectively. Preceding a selbri, these cmavo state the time w
hen the bridi was, is, or will be true (analogous to English verb tenses); prece
ding a sumti, they state that the event of the main bridi is before, simultaneou
s with, or after the event given by the sumti (which is generally a ``le nu'' ab
straction; see Chapter 11).
The two types of interaction between tenses and logical connectives are logicall
y connected tenses and tensed logical connections. The former are fairly simple.
Jeks may be used between tense cmavo to specify two connected bridi that differ
only in tense:
18.1) la .artr. pu nolraitru
.ije la .artr. ba nolraitru
Arthur [past] is-a-noblest-governor.
And Arthur [future] is-a-noblest-governor.
Arthur was a king, and Arthur will be a king.
can be reduced to:
18.2) la .artr. pu je ba nolraitru
Arthur [past] and [future] is-a-noblest-governor.
Arthur was and will be king.
Example 18.1 and Example 18.2 are equivalent in meaning; neither says anything a
bout whether Arthur is king now.
Non-logical connection with joiks is also possible between tenses:
18.3) mi pu bi'o ba vasxu
I [past] from ... to [future] breathe.
I breathe from a past time until a future time.
The full tense system makes more interesting tense intervals expressible, such a
s ``from a medium time ago until a long time from now''.
No forethought connections between tenses are permitted by the grammar, nor is t
here any way to override the default left-grouping rule; these limitations are i
mposed to keep the tense grammar simpler. Whatever can be said with tenses or mo
dals can be said with subordinate bridi stating the time, place, or mode explici
tly, so it is reasonable to try to remove at least some complications.
Tensed logical connections are both more complex and more important than logical
connections between tenses. Consider the English sentence:
18.4) I went to the market, and I bought food.
The verbatim translation of Example 18.4, namely:
18.5) mi pu klama le zarci .ije mi pu tervecnu lo cidja
I [past] go-to the market. And I [past] buy items-of food.
fails to fully represent a feature of the English, namely that the buying came a
fter the going. (It also fails to represent that the buying was a consequence of
the going, which can be expressed by a modal that is discussed in Chapter 9.) H
owever, the tense information --- that the event of my going to the market prece
ded the event of my buying food --- can be added to the logical connective as fo
llows. The ``.ije'' is replaced by ``.ijebo'', and the tense cmavo ``ba'' is ins
erted between ``.ije'' and ``bo'':
.ijebabo mi pu tervecnu lo cidja
And [later] I [past] buy items-of food.
Here the ``pu'' cmavo in the two bridi-tails express the time of both actions wi
th respect to the speaker: in the past. The ``ba'' relates the two items to one
another: the second item is later than the first item. The grammar does not perm
it omitting the ``bo''; if it were omitted, the ``ba'' and the second ``pu'' wou
ld run together to form a compound tense ``bapu'' applying to the second bridi-t
ail only.
Adding tense or modal information to a logical connective is permitted only in t
he following situations:
Between an ek (or joik) and ``bo'', as in:
18.7) la .djan .ecabo la .alis. klama le zarci
John and [simultaneous] Alice go-to the market.
John and Alice go to the market simultaneously.
Between an ek (or joik) and ``ke'', as in:
18.8) mi dzukla le zarci
.epuke le zdani .a le ckule [ke'e]
I walk-to the market
and [earlier] ( the house or the school ).
I walk to the market and,
before that, to the house or the school.
Between a gihek and ``bo'', as in:
18.9) mi dunda le cukta
gi'ebabo lebna lo rupnu vau do
I give the book
and [later] take some currency-units from/to you.
I give you the book and then take some dollars
(pounds, yen) from you.
Between a gihek and ``ke'', as in:
18.10) mi dzukla le zarci
gi'ecake cusku zo'e la djan. [ke'e]
I walk-to the market
and [simultaneous] express something to-John.
I walk to the market and at the same time talk to John.
Between an ijek (or ijoik) and ``bo'', as in:
18.11) mi viska pa nanmu .ijebabo mi viska pa ninmu
I see a man. And [later] I see a woman.
I see a man, and then I see a woman.
Between an ijek (or ijoik) and ``tu'e'', as in:
18.12) mi viska pa nanmu
.ijebatu'e mi viska pa ninmu [tu'u]
I see a man.
And [later] I see a woman.
I see a man, and then I see a woman.
And finally, between a jek (or joik) and ``bo'', as in:
18.13) mi mikce jebabo ricfu
I-am-a doctor and [later] rich
I am a doctor and future rich person.
As can be seen from Example 18.11 and Example 18.12, the choice between ``bo'' a
nd ``ke'' (or ``tu'e'') is arbitrary when there are only two things to be connec
ted. If there were no tense information to include, of course neither would be r
equired; it is only the rule that tense information must always be sandwiched be
tween the logical connective and a following ``bo'', ``ke'', or ``tu'e'' that re
quires the use of one of these grouping cmavo in Example 18.7 and Examples 18.9
through 18.13.
Non-logical connectives with ``bo'' and ``ke'' can include tense information in
exactly the same way as logical connectives. Forethought connectives, however (e
xcept as noted below) are unable to do so, as are termsets or tense connectives.
Mathematical operands and operators can also include tense information in their
logical connectives as a result of their close parallelism with sumti and tanru
components respectively:
18.14) vei ci .ebabo vo [ve'o] tadni cu zvati le kumfa
( 3 and [future] 4 ) students are-at the room.
Three and, later, four students were in the room.
is a simple example. There is a special grammatical rule for use when a tense ap
plies to both of the selbri in a forethought bridi-tail connection: the entire f
orethought construction can just be preceded by a tense. For example:
18.15) mi pu ge klama le zarci gi tervecnu lo cidja
I [past] both go-to the market and buy some food
I went to the market and bought some food.
Example 18.15 is similar to Example 18.5. There is no time relationship specifie
d between the going and the buying; both are simply set in the past.
19. Abstractor connection and connection within abstractions
Last and (as a matter of fact) least: a logical connective is allowed between ab
straction markers of selma'o NU. As usual, the connection can be expanded to a b
ridi connection between two bridi which differ only in abstraction marker. Jeks
are the appropriate connective. Example 19.1 and Example 19.2 are equivalent in
meaning:
19.1) le ka la frank. ciska cu xlali
.ije le ni la frank. ciska cu xlali
The quality-of Frank's writing is bad,
and the quantity of Frank's writing is bad.
19.2) le ka je ni la frank. ciska cu xlali
The quality and quantity of Frank's writing is bad.
As with tenses and modals, there is no forethought and no way to override the le
ft-grouping rule.
Logical connectives and abstraction are related in another way as well, though.
Since an abstraction contains a bridi, the bridi may have a logical connection i
nside it. Is it legitimate to split the outer bridi into two, joined by the logi
cal connection? Absolutely not. For example:
19.3) mi jinvi le du'u loi jmive cu zvati
gi'onai na zvati vau la .iupiter.
I opine the fact-that a-mass-of living-things (is-at
or-else isn't-at) Jupiter.
I believe there either is or isn't life on Jupiter.
is true, since the embedded sentence is a tautology, but:
19.4) mi jinvi le du'u loi jmive
cu zvati la .iupiter.
.ijonai mi jinvi le du'u loi jmive
cu zvati la .iupiter.
I opine the fact-that a-mass-of living-things
is-at Jupiter
or-else I opine the fact-that a-mass-of living-things
isn't-at Jupiter
is false, since I have no evidence one way or the other (``jinvi'' requires some
sort of evidence, real or fancied, unlike ``krici'').
20. Constructs and appropriate connectives
The following table specifies, for each kind of construct that can be logically
or non-logically connected in Lojban, what kind of connective is required for bo
th afterthought and (when possible) forethought modes. An asterisk (*) indicates
that tensed connection is permitted.
A line of dashes indicates that connection of the specified type is not possible
.
construct afterth. foreth. afterth. foreth.
logical logical non-log. non-log.
--------- ------- ------- -------- --------
bridi ijek* gek ijoik* joigik
sumti ek* gek joik* joigik
bridi-tails gihek* gek --- joigik
termsets ek* gek joik* joigik
tanru parts jek guhek joik* ---
operands ek* gek joik* joigik
operators jek guhek joik ---
tenses/modals jek --- joik ---
abstractors jek --- joik ---
21. Truth functions and corresponding logical connectives
The following table specifies, for each truth function, the most-often used comp
ound cmavo which expresses it for each of the six types of logical connective. (
Other compound cmavo are often possible: for example, ``se.a'' means the same as
`à'', and could be used instead.)
truth ek jek gihek gek--gik guhek--gik
----- -- --- ----- --------- -----------
TTTF .a ja gi'a ga--gi gu'a--gi
TTFT .anai janai gi'anai ga--ginai gu'a--ginai
TTFF .u ju gi'u gu--gi gu'u--gi
TFTT na.a naja nagi'a ganai--gi gu'anai--gi
TFTF se.u seju segi'u segu--gi segu'u--gi
TFFT .o jo gi'o go--gi gu'o--gi
TFFF .e je gi'e ge--gi gu'e--gi
FTTT na.anai najanai nagi'anai ganai--ginai gu'anai--ginai
FTTF .onai jonai gi'onai go--ginai gu'o--ginai
FTFT se.unai sejunai segi'unai segu--ginai segu'u--ginai
FTFF .enai jenai gi'enai ge--ginai gu'e--ginai
FFTT na.u naju nagi'u gunai--gi gu'unai--gi
FFTF na.e naje nagi'e genai--gi gu'enai--gi
FFFT na.enai najenai nagi'enai genai--ginai gu'enai--ginai
Note: Ijeks are exactly the same as the corresponding jeks, except for the prefi
xed ``.i''.
22. Rules for making logical and non-logical connectives
The full set of rules for inserting ``na'', ``se'', and ``nai'' into any connect
ive is:
Afterthought logical connectives (eks, jeks, giheks, ijeks):
Negate first construct:
place ``na'' before the connective cmavo (but after the ``.i'' of an ijek).
Negate second construct:
place ``nai'' after the connective cmavo.
Exchange constructs:
place ``se'' before the connective cmavo (after ``na'' if any).
Forethought logical connectives (geks, guheks):
Negate first construct:
place ``nai'' after the connective cmavo.
Negate second construct:
place ``nai'' after the ``gi''.
place ``se'' before the connective cmavo.
Non-logical connectives (joiks, joigiks):
Negate connection:
place ``nai'' after the connective cmavo (but before the ``gi'' of a joigik)
.
place ``se'' before the connective cmavo.
23. Locations of other tables
Section 1: a table explaining the meaning of each truth function in English.
Section 2: a table relating the truth functions to the four basic vowels.
Section 13: a table of the connective question cmavo.
Section 14: a table of the meanings of JOI cmavo when used to connect sumti.
Chapter 15
``No'' Problems: On Lojban Negation
1. Introductory
The grammatical expression of negation is a critical part of Lojban's claim to b
eing logical. The problem of negation, simply put, is to come up with a complete
definition of the word ``not''. For Lojban's unambiguous grammar, this means fu
rther that meanings of ``not'' with different grammatical effect must be differe
nt words, and even different grammatical structures.
Logical assertions are implicitly required in a logical language; thus, an appar
atus for expressing them is built into Lojban's logical connectives and other st
ructures.
In natural languages, especially those of Indo-European grammar, we have sentenc
es composed of two parts which are typically called ``subject'' and ``predicate'
'. In the statement
1.1) John goes to the store
``John'' is the subject, and ``goes to the store'' is the predicate. Negating Ex
ample 1.1 to produce
1.2) John doesn't go to the store.
has the effect of declaring that the predicate does not hold for the subject. Ex
ample 1.2 says nothing about whether John goes somewhere else, or whether someon
e else besides John goes to the store.
We will call this kind of negation ``natural language negation''. This kind of n
egation is difficult to manipulate by the tools of logic, because it doesn't alw
ays follow the rules of logic. Logical negation is bi-polar: either a statement
is true, or it is false. If a statement is false, then its negation must be true
. Such negation is termed contradictory negation.
Let's look at some examples of how natural language negation can violate the rul
es of contradictory negation.
1.3) Some animals are not white.
1.4) Some animals are white.
Both of these statements are true; yet one is apparently the negation of the oth
er. Another example:
1.5) I mustn't go to the dance.
1.6) I must go to the dance.
At first thought, Example 1.5 negates Example 1.6. Thinking further, we realize
that there is an intermediate state wherein I am permitted to go to the dance, b
ut not obligated to do so. Thus, it is possible that both statements are false.
Sometimes order is significant:
1.7) The falling rock didn't kill Sam.
1.8) Sam wasn't killed by the falling rock.
Our minds play tricks on us with this one. Because Example 1.7 is written in wha
t is called the `àctive voice'', we immediately get confused about whether ``th
e falling rock'' is a suitable subject for the predicate ``did kill Sam''. ``Kil
l'' implies volition to us, and rocks do not have volition. This confusion is em
ployed by opponents of gun control who use the argument ``Guns don't kill people
; people kill people.''
Somehow, we don't have the same problem with Example 1.8. The subject is Sam, an
d we determine the truth or falsity of the statement by whether he was or wasn't
killed by the falling rock.
Example 1.8 also helps us focus on the fact that there are at least two question
able facts implicit in this sentence: whether Sam was killed, and if so, whether
the falling rock killed him. If Sam wasn't killed, the question of what killed
him is moot.
This type of problem becomes more evident when the subject of the sentence turns
out not to exist:
1.9) The King of Mexico didn't come to dinner.
1.10) The King of Mexico did come to dinner.
In the natural languages, we would be inclined to say that both of these stateme
nts are false, since there is no King of Mexico.
The rest of this chapter is designed to explain the Lojban model of negation.
2. bridi negation
In discussing Lojban negation, we will call the form of logical negation that si
mply denies the truth of a statement ``bridi negation''. Using bridi negation, w
e can say the equivalent of `Ì haven't stopped beating my wife'' without implyi
ng that I ever started, nor even that I have a wife, meaning simply `Ìt isn't t
rue that I have stopped beating my wife.'' Since Lojban uses bridi as smaller co
mponents of complex sentences, bridi negation is permitted in these components a
s well at the sentence level.
For the bridi negation of a sentence to be true, the sentence being negated must
be false. A major use of bridi negation is in making a negative response to a y
es/no question; such responses are usually contradictory, denying the truth of t
he entire sentence. A negative answer to
2.1) Did you go to the store?
is taken as a negation of the entire sentence, equivalent to
2.2) No, I didn't go to the store.
The most important rule about bridi negation is that if a bridi is true, its neg
ation is false, and vice versa.
The simplest way to express a bridi negation is to use the cmavo ``na'' of selma
'o NA before the selbri of the affirmative form of the bridi (but after the ``cu
'', if there is one):
I go-to the store.
when negated becomes:
2.4) mi na klama le zarci
I [false] go-to the store.
Note that we have used a special convention to show in the English that a bridi
negation is present. We would like to use the word ``not'', because this highlig
hts the naturalness of putting the negation marker just before the selbri, and m
akes the form easier to learn. But there is a major difference between Lojban's
bridi negation with ``na'' and natural language negation with ``not''. In Englis
h, the word ``not'' can apply to a single word, to a phrase, to an English predi
cate, or to the entire sentence. In addition, ``not'' may indicate either contra
dictory negation or another form of negation, depending on the sentence. Lojban'
s internal bridi negation, on the other hand, always applies to an entire bridi,
and is always a contradictory negation; that is, it contradicts the claim of th
e whole bridi.
Because of the ambiguity of English ``not'', we will use ``[false]'' in the tran
slation of Lojban examples to remind the reader that we are expressing a contrad
ictory negation. Here are more examples of bridi negation:
2.5) mi [cu] na ca klama le zarci
I [false] now am-a-go-er to the market.
I am not going to the market now.
2.6) lo ca nolraitru
be le fasygu'e cu na krecau
The-actual present noblest-governor
of the French country [false] is-hair-without.
The current king of France isn't bald.
2.7) ti na barda prenu co melbi mi
This [false] is a big-person of-type (beautiful to me).
This isn't a big person who is beautiful to me.
Although there is this fundamental difference between Lojban's internal bridi ne
gation and English negation, we note that in many cases, especially when there a
re no existential or quantified variables (the cmavo ``da'', ``de'', and ``di''
of selma'o KOhA, explained in Chapter 16) in the bridi, you can indeed translate
Lojban ``na'' as ``not'' (or `ìsn't'' or ``doesn't'', as appropriate).
The most important rule about bridi negation is that if a bridi is true, its neg
ation is false, and vice versa.
In Lojban, there are several structures that implicitly contain bridi, so that L
ojban sentences may contain more than one occurrence of ``na''. For example:
2.8) mi na gleki le nu
na klama le nu dansu
I [false] am-happy-about the event-of(
[false] going-to the event-of dancing).
It is not the case that I am happy about it not being
the case that I am going to the dance.
I am not happy about not going to the dance.
In the previous example, we used internal negations in abstraction
bridi; bridi negation may also be found in descriptions within
sumti. For example:
2.9) mi nelci le na melbi
I am fond of the-one-described-as ([false] beautiful)
I am fond of the one who isn't beautiful.
A more extreme (and more indefinite) example is:
2.10) mi nelci lo na ca nolraitru
be le frasygu'e
I am-fond-of one-who-is ([false] the current king
of the French-country).
I am fond of one who isn't the current king of France.
The claim of Example 2.10 could apply to anyone except a person who is fond of n
o one at all, since the relation within the description is false for everyone. Y
ou cannot readily express these situations in colloquial English.
Negation with ``na'' applies to an entire bridi, and not to just part of a selbr
i. Therefore, you won't likely have reason to put ``na'' inside a tanru. In fact
, the grammar currently does not allow you to do so (except in a lujvo and in el
aborate constructs involving GUhA, the forethought connector for selbri). Any si
tuation where you might want to do so can be expressed in a less-compressed non-
tanru form. This grammatical restriction helps ensure that bridi negation is kep
t separate from other forms of negation.
The grammar of ``na'' allows multiple adjacent negations, which cancel out, as i
n normal logic:
2.11) ti na na barda prenu co
melbi mi
This [false] [false] is-a-big person
that is (beautiful to me).
which is the same as:
2.12) ti barda prenu co melbi mi
This is a big-person that is (beautiful to me).
When a selbri is tagged with a tense or a modal, negation with ``na'' is permitt
ed in two positions: before or after the tag. No semantic difference between the
se forms has yet been defined, but this is not finally determined, since the int
eractions between tenses/modals and bridi negation have not been fully explored.
In particular, it remains to be seen whether sentences using less familiar tens
es, such as:
2.13) mi [cu] ta'e klama le zarci
I habitually go to the market.
mean the same thing with ``na'' before the ``ta'e'', as when the negation occurs
afterwards; we'll let future, Lojban-speaking, logicians decide on how they rel
ate to each other.
A final caution on translating English negations into Lojban: if you translate t
he English literally, you'll get the wrong one. With English causal statements,
and other statements with auxiliary clauses, this problem is more likely.
Thus, if you translate the English:
2.14) I do not go to the market because the car is broken.
as:
2.15) mi na klama le zarci ki'u lenu le karce cu spofu
I [false] go-to the market because the car is broken.
It is false that: `Ì go to the market because the car
is broken.''
you end up negating too much.
Such mistranslations result from the ambiguity of English compounded by the mess
iness of natural language negation. A correct translation of the normal interpre
tation of Example 2.14 is:
2.16) lenu mi na klama le zarci
cu se krinu
lenu le karce cu spofu
The event-of (my [false] going-to the market)
is justified by
the event-of (the car being broken).
My not going to the market is because the car is broken.
In Example 2.16, the negation is clearly confined to the event abstraction in th
e x1 sumti, and does not extend to the whole sentence. The English could also ha
ve been expressed by two separate sentences joined by a causal connective (which
we'll not go into here).
The problem is not confined to obvious causals. In the English:
2.17) I was not conscripted into the Army with the help of
my uncle the Senator.
we do not intend the uncle's help to be part of the negation. We must thus move
the negation into an event clause or use two separate sentences. The event-claus
e version would look like:
2.18) The event-of (my [false] being-conscripted-into
the Army) was aided by my uncle the Senator.
It is possible that someone will want to incorporate bridi negations into lujvo.
For this reason, the rafsi ``-nar-'' has been reserved for ``na''. However, bef
ore using this rafsi, make sure that you intend the contradictory bridi negation
, and not the scalar negation described in Section 3, which will be much more co
mmon in tanru and lujvo.
3. Scalar Negation
Let us now consider some other types of negation. For example, when we say:
3.1) The chair is not brown.
we make a positive inference --- that the chair is some other color. Thus, it is
legitimate to respond:
3.2) It is green.
Whether we agree that the chair is brown or not, the fact that the statement ref
ers to color has significant effect on how we interpret some responses. If we he
ar the following exchange:
3.3) The chair is not brown.
Correct. The chair is wooden.
we immediately start to wonder about the unusual wood that isn't brown. If we he
ar the exchange:
3.4) Is the chair green?
No, it is in the kitchen.
we are unsettled because the response seems to be a non-sequitur. But since it m
ight be true and it is a statement about the chair, one can't say it is entirely
irrelevant!
What is going on in these statements is something called ``scalar negation''. As
the name suggests, scalar negation presumes an implied scale. A negation of thi
s type not only states that one scalar value is false, but implies that another
value on the scale must be true. This can easily lead to complications. The foll
owing exchange seems reasonably natural (a little suspension of disbelief in suc
h inane conversation will help):
3.5) That isn't a blue house.
Right! That is a green house.
We have acknowledged a scalar negation by providing a correct value which is ano
ther color in the set of colors permissible for houses. While a little less like
ly, the following exchange is also natural:
Right! That is a blue car.
Again, we have acknowledged a scalar negation, and substituted a different objec
t in the universe of discourse of things that can be blue.
Now, if the following exchange occurs:
Right! That is a green car.
we find the result unsettling. This is because it seems that two corrections hav
e been applied when there is only one negation. Yet out of context, ``blue house
'' and ``green car'' seem to be reasonably equivalent units that should be mutua
lly replaceable in a sentence. It's just that we don't have a clear way in Engli
sh to say:
3.8) That isn't a ``blue-house''.
aloud so as to clearly imply that the scalar negation is affecting the pair of w
ords as a single unit.
Another even more confusing example of scalar negation is to the sentence:
3.9) John didn't go to Paris from Rome.
Might Example 3.9 imply that John went to Paris from somewhere else? Or did he g
o somewhere else from Rome? Or perhaps he didn't go anywhere at all: maybe someo
ne else did, or maybe there was no event of going whatsoever. One can devise cir
cumstances where any one, two or all three of these statements might be inferred
by a listener.
In English, we have a clear way of distinguishing scalar negation from predicate
negation that can be used in many situations. We can use the partial word ``non
-'' as a prefix. But this is not always considered good usage, even though it wo
uld render many statements much clearer. For example, we can clearly distinguish
3.10) That is a non-blue house.
from the related sentence
3.11) That is a blue non-house.
Example 3.10 and Example 3.11 have the advantage that, while they contain a nega
tive indication, they are in fact positive assertions. They say what is true by
excluding the false; they do not say what is false.
We can't always use ``non-'' though, because of the peculiarities of English's g
rammar. It would sound strange to say:
3.12) John went to non-Paris from Rome.
or
3.13) John went to Paris from non-Rome.
although these would clarify the vague negation. Another circumlocution for Engl
ish scalar negation is `òther than'', which works where ``non-'' does not, but
is wordier.
Finally, we have natural language negations that are called polar negations, or
opposites:
3.14) John is moral
3.15) John is immoral
To be immoral is much more than to just be not moral: it implies the opposite co
ndition. Statements like Example 3.15 are strong negations which not only deny t
he truth of a statement, but assert its opposite. Since, `òpposite'' implies a
scale, polar negations are a special variety of scalar negations.
To examine this concept more closely, let us draw a linear scale, showing two ex
amples of how the scale is used:
Affirmations (positive) Negations (negative)
|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
All Most Some Few None
Excellent Good Fair Poor Awful
Some scales are more binary than the examples we diagrammed. Thus we have ``not
necessary'' or `ùnnecessary'' being the polar opposite of necessary. Another sc
ale, especially relevant to Lojban, is interpreted based on situations modified
by one's philosophy: ``not true'' may be equated with ``false'' in a bi-valued t
ruth-functional logic, while in tri-valued logic an intermediate between ``true'
' and ``false'' is permitted, and in fuzzy logic a continuous scale exists from
true to false. The meaning of ``not true'' requires a knowledge of which variety
of truth scale is being considered.
We will define the most general form of scalar negation as indicating only that
the particular point or value in the scale or range is not valid and that some o
ther (unspecified) point on the scale is correct. This is the intent expressed i
n most contexts by ``not mild''.
Using this paradigm, contradictory negation is less restrictive than scalar nega
tion --- it says that the point or value stated is incorrect (false), and makes
no statement about the truth of any other point or value, whether or not on the
scale.
In English, scalar negation semantically includes phrases such as `òther than''
, ``reverse of'', or `òpposite from'' expressions and their equivalents. More c
ommonly, scalar negation is expressed in English by the prefixes ``non-'', `ùn-
'', `ìl-'', and `ìm-''. Just which form and permissible values are implied by
a scalar negation is dependent on the semantics of the word or concept which is
being negated, and on the context. Much confusion in English results from the un
controlled variations in meaning of these phrases and prefixes.
In the examples of Section 4, we will translate the general case of scalar negat
ion using the general formula `òther than'' when a phrase is scalar-negated, an
d ``non-'' when a single word is scalar-negated.
4. selbri and tanru negation
All the scalar negations illustrated in Section 3 are expressed in Lojban using
the cmavo ``na'e'' (of selma'o NAhE). The most common use of ``na'e'' is as a pr
efix to the selbri:
I go to the market.
4.2) mi na'e klama le zarci
I non-go to the market.
Comparing these two, we see that the negation operator being used in Example 4.2
is ``na'e''. But what exactly does ``na'e'' negate? Does the negation include o
nly the gismu ``klama'', which is the entire selbri in this case, or does it inc
lude the ``le zarci'' as well? In Lojban, the answer is unambiguously `ònly the
gismu''. The cmavo ``na'e'' always applies only to what follows it.
Example 4.2 looks as if it were parallel to:
I [false] go-to the market.
but in fact there is no real parallelism at all. A negation using ``na'' denies
the truth of a relationship, but a selbri negation with ``na'e'' asserts that a
relationship exists other than that stated, one which specifically involves the
sumti identified in the statement. The grammar allotted to ``na'e'' allows us to
unambiguously express scalar negations in terms of scope, scale, and range with
in the scale. Before we explain the scalar aspects, let us show how the scope of
``na'e'' is determined.
In tanru, we may wish to negate an individual element before combining it with a
nother to form the tanru. We in effect need a shorter-than-selbri-scope negation
, for which we can use ``na'e'' as well. The positive sentence
4.4) mi cadzu klama le zarci
I walking-ly go to the market.
can be subjected to selbri negation in several ways. Two are:
4.5) mi na'e cadzu klama le zarci
I (other-than-walkingly)-go-to the market.
4.6) mi cadzu na'e klama le zarci
I walkingly-(other-than-go-to) the market.
These negations show the default scope of ``na'e'' is close-binding on an indivi
dual brivla in a tanru. Example 4.5 says that I am going to the market, but in s
ome kind of a non-walking manner. (As with most tanru, there are a few other pos
sible interpretations, but we'll assume this one --- see Chapter 5 for a discuss
ion of tanru meaning).
In neither Example 4.5 nor Example 4.6 does the ``na'e'' negate the entire selbr
i. While both sentences contain negations that deny a particular relationship be
tween the sumti, they also have a component which makes a positive claim about s
uch a relationship. This is clearer in Example 4.5, which says that I am going,
but in a non-walking manner. In Example 4.6, we have claimed that the relationsh
ip between me and the market in some way involves walking, but is not one of ``g
oing to'' (perhaps we are walking around the market, or walking-in-place while a
t the market).
The ``scale'', or actually the ``set'', implied in Lojban tanru negations is any
thing which plausibly can be substituted into the tanru. (Plausibility here is i
nterpreted in the same way that answers to a ``mo'' question must be plausible -
-- the result must not only have the right number of places and have sumti value
s appropriate to the place structure, it must also be appropriate or relevant to
the context.) This minimal condition allows a speaker to be intentionally vague
, while still communicating meaningful information. The speaker who uses selbri
negation is denying one relationship, while minimally asserting a different rela
tionship.
We also need a scalar negation form that has a scope longer than a single brivla
. There exists such a longer-scope selbri negation form, as exemplified by (each
Lojban sentence in the next several examples is given twice, with parentheses i
n the second copy showing the scope of the ``na'e''):
4.7) mi na'eke cadzu klama [ke'e] le zarci
mi na'e (ke cadzu klama [ke'e]) le zarci
I other-than-(walkingly-go-to) the market.
This negation uses the same ``ke'' and ``ke'e'' delimiters (the ``ke'e'' is alwa
ys elidable at the end of a selbri) that are used in tanru. The sentence clearly
negates the entire selbri. The ``ke'e'', whether elided or not, reminds us that
the negation does not include the trailing sumti. While the trailing-sumti plac
e-structure is defined as that of the final brivla, the trailing sumti themselve
s are not part of the selbri and are thus not negated by ``na'e''.
Negations of just part of the selbri are also permitted:
4.8) mi na'eke sutra cadzu ke'e klama le zarci
mi na'e (ke sutra cadzu ke'e) klama le zarci
I other-than-(quickly-walkingly) go-to the market.
In Example 4.8, only the ``sutra cadzu'' tanru is negated, so the speaker is ind
eed going to the market, but not by walking quickly.
Negations made with ``na'e'' or ``na'eke'' also include within their scope any s
umti attached to the brivla or tanru with ``be'' or ``bei''. Such attached sumti
are considered part of the brivla or tanru:
4.9) mi na'e ke sutra cadzu be le mi birka ke'e
klama le zarci
I other-than-(quickly walking-on-my-arms-ly)
go-to the market.
Note that Example 4.10 and Example 4.11 do not express the same thing:
4.10) mi na'eke sutra cadzu [ke'e] lemi birka
mi na'e (ke sutra cadzu [ke'e]) lemi birka
I other-than-(quickly-walk-on) my-arms.
4.11) mi na'eke sutra cadzu be lemi birka [ke'e]
mi na'e (ke sutra cadzu be lemi birka [ke'e])
I other-than-(quickly-walk-on my-arms).
The translations show that the negation in Example 4.10 is more restricted in sc
ope; i.e. less of the sentence is negated with respect to x1 (``mi'').
Logical scope being an important factor in Lojban's claims to be unambiguous, le
t us indicate the relative precedence of ``na'e'' as an operator. Grouping with
``ke'' and ``ke'e'', of course, has an overt scope, which is its advantage. ``na
'e'' is very close binding to its brivla. Internal binding of tanru, with ``bo''
, is not as tightly bound as ``na'e''. ``co'', the tanru inversion operator has
a scope that is longer than all other tanru constructs.
In short, ``na'e'' and ``na'eke'' define a type of negation, which is shorter in
scope than bridi negation, and which affects all or part of a selbri. The resul
t of ``na'e'' negation remains an assertion of some specific truth and not merel
y a denial of another claim.
The similarity becomes striking when it is noticed that the rafsi ``-nal-'', rep
resenting ``na'e'' when a tanru is condensed into a lujvo, forms an exact parall
el to the English usage of ``non-''. Turning a series of related negations into
lujvo gives:
4.12) na'e klama becomes nalkla
na'e cadzu klama becomes naldzukla
na'e sutra cadzu klama becomes nalsu'adzukla
nake sutra cadzu ke'e klama becomes nalsu'adzuke'ekla
Note: ``-kem-'' is the rafsi for ``ke'', but it is omitted in the final lujvo as
superfluous --- ``ke'e'' is its own rafsi, and its inclusion in the lujvo impli
es a ``ke'' after the ``-nal-'', since it needs to close something; only a ``ke'
' immediately after the negation would make the ``ke'e'' meaningful in the tanru
expressed in this lujvo.
In a lujvo, it is probably clearest to translate ``-nal-'' as ``non-'', to match
the English combining forms, except when the ``na'e'' has single word scope and
English uses `ùn-'' or `ìm-'' to negate that single word. Translation style s
hould determine the use of `òther than'', ``non-'', or another negator for ``na
'e'' in tanru; the translator must render the Lojban into English so it is clear
in context. Let's go back to our simplest example:
4.13) mi na'e klama le zarci
I am other-than-(going-to) the market.
?I am not going-to the market.
4.14) mi nalkla le zarci
I am-a-non-go-er-to the market.
Note that to compare with the English translation form using ``non-'', we've tra
nslated the Lojban as if the selbri were a noun. Since Lojban ``klama'' is indif
ferently a noun, verb, or adjective, the difference is purely a translation chan
ge, not a true change in meaning. The English difference seems significant, thou
gh, due to the strongly different English grammatical forms and the ambiguity of
English negation.
Consider the following highly problematic sentence:
be le fasygu'e
cu krecau
An-actual currently noblest-governor
of the French country
is-hair-without.
The current King of France is bald.
The selbri ``krecau'' negates with ``na'e'' as:
be le fasygu'e
cu na'e krecau
is-other-than hair-without.
The current King of France is other-than-bald.
or, as a lujvo:
be le fasygu'e
cu nalkrecau
is-non-hair-without.
The current King of France is a non-bald-one.
Example 4.16 and Example 4.17 express the predicate negation forms using a negat
ion word (``na'e'') or rafsi (``-nal-''); yet they make positive assertions abou
t the current King of France; ie., that he is other-than-bald or non-bald. This
follows from the close binding of ``na'e'' to the brivla. The lujvo form makes t
his overt by absorbing the negative marker into the word.
Since there is no current King of France, it is false to say that he is bald, or
non-bald, or to make any other affirmative claim about him. Any sentence about
the current King of France containing only a selbri negation is as false as the
sentence without the negation. No amount of selbri negations have any effect on
the truth value of the sentence, which is invariably ``false'', since no affirma
tive statement about the current King of France can be true. On the other hand,
bridi negation does produce a truth:
be le fasygu'e
cu na krecau
An-actual current noblest-governor
of the French Country
[false] is-hair-without.
It is false that the current King of France is bald.
Note: ``lo'' is used in these sentences because negation relates to truth condit
ions. To meaningfully talk about truth conditions in sentences carrying a descri
ption, it must be clear that the description actually applies to the referent. A
sentence using ``le'' instead of ``lo'' can be true even if there is no current
king of France, as long as the speaker and the listener agree to describe somet
hing as the current king of France. (See the explanations of ``le'' in Chapter 6
.)
5. Expressing scales in selbri negation
In expressing a scalar negation, we must provide some indication of the scale, r
ange, frame-of-reference, or universe of discourse that is being dealt with in a
n assertion. As stated in Section 4, the default is the set of plausible alterna
tives. Thus if we say:
5.1) le stizu cu na'e xunre
The chair is a non-(red-thing).
the pragmatic interpretation is that we mean a different color and not
5.2) le stizu cu dzukla be le zarci
The chair walkingly-goes-to-the-market.
However, if we have reason to be more explicit (an obtuse or contrary listener,
or simply an overt logical analysis), we can clarify that we are referring to a
color by saying:
5.3) le stizu cu na'e xunre skari
The chair is of a non-(red)-color
(as perceived by something under some conditions).
We might also have reduced the pragmatic ambiguity by making the two trailing su
mti values explicit (the `às perceived by'' and `ùnder conditions'' places hav
e been added to the place structure of ``xunre''). But assume we have a really s
tubborn listener (an artificially semi-intelligent computer?) who will find a wa
y to misinterpret Example 5.3 even with three specific sumti provided.
In this case, we use a sumti tagged with the sumti tcita ``ci'u'', which transla
tes roughly as `òn a scale of X'', where ``X'' is the sumti. For maximal clarit
y, the tagged sumti can be bound into the negated selbri with ``be''. To clarify
Example 5.3, we might say:
5.4) le stizu cu na'e xunre be ci'u loka skari
The chair is a non-(red on-a-scale-of-colorness)-thing.
We can alternately use the sumti tcita ``teci'e'', based on ``ciste'', which tra
nslates roughly as `òf a system of components X'', for universes of discourse;
in this case, we would express Example 5.3 as:
be teci'e le skari
The chair is a non-(red
of-a-system-with-components-the-colors)-thing.
Other places of ``ciste'' can be brought out using the grammar of selma'o BAI mo
dals, allowing slightly different forms of expression, thus:
be ci'e lo'i skari
of-a-system-which-is-the-set-of-colors)-thing.
The cmavo ``le'a'', also in selma'o BAI, can be used to specify a category:
be le'a lo'i skari
of-a-category-which-is-the-set-of-colors)-thing.
which is minimally different in meaning from Example 5.6.
The cmavo ``na'e'' is not the only member of selma'o NAhE. If we want to express
a scalar negation which is a polar opposite, we use the cmavo ``to'e'', which i
s grammatically equivalent to ``na'e'':
5.8) le stizu cu to'e xunre
be ci'u loka skari
The chair is a (opposite-of red)
on-scale a-property-of color-ness.
Likewise, the midpoint of a scale can be expressed with the cmavo ``no'e'', also
grammatically equivalent to ``na'e''. Here are some parallel examples of ``na'e
'', ``no'e'', and ``to'e'':
5.9) ta melbi
That is-beautiful.
5.10) ta na'e melbi
That is-non-beautiful.
That is other than beautiful.
That is ugly [in one sense].
5.11) ta no'e melbi
That is-neutrally beautiful.
That is plain/ordinary-looking
(neither ugly nor beautiful).
5.12) ta to'e melbi
That is-opposite-of beautiful.
That is ugly/very ugly/repulsive.
The cmavo ``to'e'' has the assigned rafsi ``-tol-'' and ``-to'e-''; the cmavo ``
no'e'' has the assigned rafsi ``-nor-'' and ``-no'e-''. The selbri in Example 5.
10 through Example 5.12 could be replaced by the lujvo ``nalmle'', ``normle'', a
nd ``tolmle'' respectively.
This large variety of scalar negations is provided because different scales have
different properties. Some scales are open-ended in both directions: there is n
o `ùltimately ugly'' or `ùltimately beautiful''. Other scales, like temperatur
e, are open at one end and closed at the other: there is a minimum temperature (
so-called `àbsolute zero'') but no maximum temperature. Still other scales are
closed at both ends.
Correspondingly, some selbri have no obvious ``to'e'' --- what is the opposite o
f a dog? --- while others have more than one, and need ``ci'u'' to specify which
opposite is meant.
6. sumti negation
There are two ways of negating sumti in Lojban. We have the choice of quantifyin
g the sumti with zero, or of applying the sumti-negator ``na'ebo'' before the su
mti. It turns out that a zero quantification serves for contradictory negation.
As the cmavo we use implies, ``na'ebo'' forms a scalar negation.
Let us show examples of each.
6.1) no lo ca nolraitru
be le fasygu'e cu krecau
Zero of those who are currently noblest-governors
of the French country are-hair-without.
No current king of France is bald.
Is Example 6.1 true? Yes, because it merely claims that of the current Kings of
France, however many there may be, none are bald, which is plainly true, since t
here are no such current Kings of France.
Now let us look at the same sentence using ``na'ebo'' negation:
6.2) na'ebo lo ca nolraitru
be le fasygu'e cu krecau
[Something] other-than-(the-current-noblest-governor
of the French country) is-hair-without.
Something other than the current King of France is bald.
Example 6.2 is true provided that something reasonably describable as `òther th
an a current King of France'', such as the King of Saudi Arabia, or a former Kin
g of France, is in fact bald.
In place of ``na'ebo'', you may also use ``no'ebo'' and ``to'ebo'', to be more s
pecific about the sumti which would be appropriate in place of the stated sumti.
Good examples are hard to come by, but here's a valiant try:
6.3) mi klama to'ebo la bastn.
I go to the-opposite-of Boston.
I go to Perth.
(Boston and Perth are nearly, but not quite, antipodal cities. In a purely Unite
d States context, San Francisco might be a better `òpposite''.) Coming up with
good examples is difficult, because attaching ``to'ebo'' to a description sumti
is usually the same as attaching ``to'e'' to the selbri of the description.
It is not possible to transform sumti negations of either type into bridi negati
ons or scalar selbri negations. Negations of sumti will be used in Lojban conver
sation. The inability to manipulate these negations logically will, it is hoped,
prevent the logical errors that result when natural languages attempt correspon
ding manipulations.
7. Negation of minor grammatical constructs
We have a few other constructs that can be negated, all of them based on negatin
g individual words. For such negation, we use the suffix-combining negator, whic
h is ``nai''. ``nai'', by the way, is almost always written as a compound into t
he previous word that it is negating, although it is a regular separate-word cma
vo and the sole member of selma'o NAI.
Most of these negation forms are straightforward, and should be discussed and in
terpreted in connection with an analysis of the particular construct being negat
ed. Thus, we will not go into much detail here.
The following are places where ``nai'' is used:
When attached to tenses and modals (see Chapter 10), the ``nai'' suffix usually
indicates a contradictory negation of the tagged bridi. Thus ``punai'' as a tens
e inflection means ``not-in-the-past'', or ``not-previously'', without making an
y implication about any other time period unless explicitly stated. As a result,
7.1) mi na pu klama le zarci
I [false] [past] go-to the store.
I didn't go to the store.
and
7.2) mi punai klama le zarci
I [past-not] go-to the store.
I didn't go to the store.
mean exactly the same thing, although there may be a difference of emphasis.
Tenses and modals can be logically connected, with the logical connectives conta
ining contradictory negations; this allows negated tenses and modals to be expre
ssed positively using logical connectives. Thus ``punai je ca'' means the same t
hing as ``pu naje ca''.
As a special case, a ``-nai'' attached to the interval modifiers of selma'o TAhE
, ROI, or ZAhO (explained in Chapter 10) signals a scalar negation:
7.3) mi paroinai dansu le bisli
I [once] [not] dance-on the ice
means that I dance on the ice either zero or else two or more times within the r
elevant time interval described by the bridi. Example 7.3 is very different from
the English use of ``not once'', which is an emphatic way of saying ``never'' -
-- that is, exactly zero times.
In indicators and attitudinals of selma'o UI or CAI, ``nai'' denotes a polar neg
ation. As discussed in Chapter 13, most indicators have an implicit scale, and `
`nai'' changes the indicator to refer to the opposite end of the scale. Thus ``.
uinai'' expresses unhappiness, and ``.ienai'' expresses disagreement (not ambiva
lence, which is expressed with the neutral or undecided intensity as ``.iecu'i''
).
Vocative cmavo of selma'o COI are considered a kind of indicator, but one which
identifies the listener. Semantically, we could dispense with about half of the
COI selma'o words based on the scalar paradigm. For example, ``co'o'' could be e
xpressed as ``coinai''. However, this is not generally done.
Most of the COI cmavo are used in what are commonly called protocol situations.
These protocols are used, for example, in radio conversations, which often take
place in a noisy environment. The negatives of protocol words tend to convey dia
metrically opposite communications situations (as might be expected). Therefore,
only one protocol vocative is dependent on ``nai'': negative acknowledgement, w
hich is ``je'enai'' (`Ì didn't get that'').
Unlike the attitudinal indicators, which tend to be unimportant in noisy situati
ons, the protocol vocatives become more important. So if, in a noisy environment
, a protocol listener makes out only ``nai'', he or she can presume it is a nega
tive acknowledgement and repeat transmission or otherwise respond accordingly. C
hapter 13 provides more detail on this topic.
The abstractors of selma'o NU follow the pattern of the tenses and modals. NU al
lows negative abstractions, especially in compound abstractions connected by log
ical connectives: ``su'ujeninai'', which corresponds to ``su'u jenai ni'' just a
s ``punai je ca'' corresponds to ``pu naje ca''. It is not clear how much use lo
gically connected abstractors will be: see Chapter 13.
A ``nai'' attached to a non-logical connective (of selma'o JOI or BIhI) is a sca
lar negation, and says that the bridi is false under the specified mixture, but
that another connective is applicable. Non-logical connectives are discussed in
Chapter 14.
8. Truth questions
One application of negation is in answer to truth questions (those which expect
the answers ``Yes'' or ``No''). The truth question cmavo ``xu'' is in selma'o UI
; placed at the beginning of a sentence, it asks whether the sentence as a whole
is true or false.
8.1) xu la djan. pu klama la paris. .e la rom.
Is it true that:
(John previously went-to [both] Paris and Rome.)
You can now use each of the several kinds of negation we've discussed in answer
to this (presuming the same question and context for each answer).
The straightforward negative answer is grammatically equivalent to the expanded
sentence with the ``na'' immediately after the ``cu'' (and before any tense/moda
l):
8.2) na go'i
[false] [repeat previous]
No.
which means
8.3) la djan. [cu] na pu klama la paris. .e la rom.
John [false] previously went-to [both] Paris and Rome.
It's not true that John went to Paris and Rome.
The respondent can change the tense, putting the ``na'' in either before or afte
r the new tense:
8.4) na ba go'i
[false] [future] [repeat previous]
meaning
8.5) la djan. [cu] na ba klama la paris. .e la rom.
John [false] later-will-go-to [both] Paris and Rome.
It is false that John will go to Paris and Rome.
or alternatively
8.6) ba na go'i
[false] [future] [repeat previous]
meaning
8.7) la djan. [cu] ba na klama la paris. .e la rom.
John later-will [false] go-to [both] Paris and Rome.
We stated in Section 3 that sentences like Example 8.5 and Example 8.7 appear to
be semantically identical, but that subtle semantic distinctions may eventually
be found.
You can also use a scalar negation with ``na'e'', in which case, it is equivalen
t to putting a ``na'eke'' immediately after any tense:
8.8) na'e go'i
other-than [repeat previous]
which means
8.9) la djan. [cu] pu na'eke klama
[ke'e] la paris. .e la rom.
John previously other-than(went-to)
[both] Paris and Rome.
He might have telephoned the two cities instead of going there. The unnecessary
``ke'' and ``ke'e'' would have been essential if the selbri had been a tanru.
9. Affirmations
There is an explicit positive form for both selma'o NA (``ja'a'') and selma'o NA
hE (``je'a''), each of which would supplant the corresponding negator in the gra
mmatical position used, allowing one to assert the positive in response to a neg
ative question or statement without confusion. Assuming the same context as in S
ection 8:
9.1) xu na go'i
Is-it-true-that [false] [repeat previous]?
or equivalently
9.2) xu la djan. [cu] na pu klama
la paris. .e la rom.
Is it true that: John [false] previously-went-to
[both] Paris and Rome.]
The obvious, but incorrect, positive response to this negative question is:
9.3) go'i
[repeat previous]
A plain ``go'i'' does not mean ``Yes it is''; it merely abbreviates repeating th
e previous statement unmodified, including any negators present; and Example 9.3
actually states that it is false that John went to both Paris and Rome.
When considering:
9.4) na go'i
[false] [repeat previous]
as a response to a negative question like Example 9.2, Lojban designers had to c
hoose between two equally plausible interpretations with opposite effects. Does
Example 9.4 create a double negative in the sentence by adding a new ``na'' to t
he one already there (forming a double negative and hence a positive statement),
or does the ``na'' replace the previous one, leaving the sentence unchanged?
It was decided that substitution, the latter alternative, is the preferable choi
ce, since it is then clear whether we intend a positive or a negativ sentence wi
thout performing any manipulations. This is the way English usually works, but n
ot all languages work this way --- Russian, Japanese, and Navajo all interpret a
negative reply to a negative question as positive.
The positive assertion cmavo of selma'o NA can also replace the ``na'' in the co
ntext, giving:
9.5) ja'a go'i
(John truly-(previously went-to) [both] Paris and Rome.)
``ja'a'' can replace ``na'' in a similar manner wherever the latter is used:
9.6) ja'a go'i
John indeed previously went-to [both] Paris and Rome.
``je'a'' can replace ``na'e'' in exactly the same way, stating that scalar negat
ion does not apply, and that the relation indeed holds as stated. In the absence
of a negation context, it emphasizes the positive:
9.7) ta je'a melbi
that is-indeed beautiful.
10. Metalinguistic negation forms
The question of truth or falsity is not entirely synonymous with negation. Consi
der the English sentence
10.1) I have not stopped beating my wife.
If I never started such a heinous activity, then this sentence is neither true n
or false. Such a negation simply says that something is wrong with the non-negat
ed statement. Generally, we then use either tone of voice or else a correction t
o express a preferred true claim: `Ì never have beaten my wife.''
Negations which follow such a pattern are called ``metalinguistic negations''. I
n natural languages, the mark of metalinguistic negation is that an indication o
f a correct statement always, or almost always, follows the negation. Tone of vo
ice or emphasis may be further used to clarify the error.
Negations of every sort must be expressible in Lojban; errors are inherent to hu
man thought, and are not excluded from the language. When such negations are met
alinguistic, we must separate them from logical claims about the truth or falsit
y of the statement, as well as from scalar negations which may not easily expres
s (or imply) the preferred claim. Because Lojban allows concepts to be so freely
combined in tanru, limits on what is plausible or not plausible tend to be hard
er to determine.
Mimicking the muddled nature of natural language negation would destroy this sep
aration. Since Lojban does not use tone of voice, we need other means to metalin
guistically indicate what is wrong with a statement. When the statement is entir
ely inappropriate, we need to be able to express metalinguistic negation in a mo
re non-specific fashion.
Here is a list of some different kinds of metalinguistic negation with English-l
anguage examples:
10.2) I have not stopped beating my wife
(I never started --- failure of presupposition).
10.3) 5 is not blue
(color does not apply to abstract concepts --
failure of category).
10.4) The current King of France is not bald.
(there is no current King of France ---
existential failure)
10.5) I do not have THREE children.
(I have two --- simple undue quantity)
10.6) I have not held THREE jobs previously, but four.
(inaccurate quantity; the difference from the previous
example is that someone who has held four jobs has also
held three jobs)
10.7) It is not good, but bad.
(undue quantity negation indicating that the value on a
scale for measuring the predicate is incorrect)
10.8) She is not PRETTY; she is beautiful
(undue quantity transferred to a non-numeric scale)
10.9) The house is not blue, but green.
(the scale/category being used is incorrect, but a
related category applies)
10.10) The house is not blue, but is colored.
(the scale/category being used is incorrect, but a
broader category applies)
10.11) The cat is not blue, but long-haired.
(the scale/category being used is incorrect, but an
unrelated category applies)
10.12) A: He ain't coming today.
B: `Àin't'' ain't a word.
(solecism, or improper grammatical action)
10.13) I haven't STOOPED beating my wife; I've STOPPED.
(spelling or mispronunciation error)
10.14) Not only was it a sheep, it was a black sheep.
(non-contradictory correction)
The set of possible metalinguistic errors is open-ended.
Many of these forms have a counterpart in the various examples that we've discus
sed under logical negation. Metalinguistic negation doesn't claim that the sente
nce is false or true, though. Rather, it claims that, due to some error in the s
tatement, ``true'' and ``false'' don't really apply.
Because one can metalinguistically negate a true statement intending a non-contr
adictory correction (say, a spelling error); we need a way (or ways) to metaling
uistically negate a statement which is independent of our logical negation schem
es using ``na'', ``na'e'' and kin. The cmavo ``na'i'' is assigned this function.
If it is present in a statement, it indicates metalinguistically that something
in the statement is incorrect. This metalinguistic negation must override any e
valuation of the logic of the statement. It is equally allowed in both positive
and negative statements.
Since ``na'i'' is not a logical operator, multiple occurrences of ``na'i'' need
not be assumed to cancel each other. Indeed, we can use the position of ``na'i''
to indicate metalinguistically what is incorrect, preparatory to correcting it
in a later sentence; for this reason, we give ``na'i'' the grammar of UI. The in
clusion of ``na'i'' anywhere in a sentence makes it a non-assertion, and suggest
s one or more pitfalls in assigning a truth value.
Let us briefly indicate how the above-mentioned metalinguistic errors can be ide
ntified. Other metalinguistic problems can then be marked by devising analogies
to these examples:
Existential failure can be marked by attaching ``na'i'' to the descriptor ``lo''
or the ``poi'' in a ``da poi''-form sumti. (See Chapter 6 and Chapter 16 for de
tails on these constructions.) Remember that if a ``le'' sumti seems to refer to
a non-existent referent, you may not understand what the speaker has in mind --
- the appropriate response is then ``ki'a'', asking for clarification.
Presupposition failure can be marked directly if the presupposition is overt; if
not, one can insert a ``mock presupposition'' to question with the sumti tcita
(selma'o BAI) word ``ji'u''; ``ji'uku'' thus explicitly refers to an unexpressed
assumption, and ``ji'una'iku'' metalinguistically says that something is wrong
with that assumption. (See Chapter 10.)
Scale errors and category errors can be similarly expressed with selma'o BAI. ``
le'a'' has meaning `òf category/class/type X'', ``ci'u'' has meaning `òn scale
X'', and ``ci'e'', based on ``ciste'', can be used to talk about universes of d
iscourse defined either as systems or sets of components, as shown in Section 8.
``kai'' and ``la'u'' also exist in BAI for discussing other quality and quantit
y errors.
We have to make particular note of potential problems in the areas of undue quan
tity and incorrect scale/category. Assertions about the relationships between gi
smu are among the basic substance of the language. It is thus invalid to logical
ly require that if something is blue, that it is colored, or if it is not-blue,
then it is some other color. In Lojban, ``blanu'' (``blue'') is not explicitly d
efined as a ``skari'' (``color''). Similarly, it is not implicit that the opposi
te of ``good'' is ``bad''.
This mutual independence of gismu is only an ideal. Pragmatically, people will c
ategorize things based on their world-views. We will write dictionary definition
s that will relate gismu, unfortunately including some of these world-view assum
ptions. Lojbanists should try to minimize these assumptions, but this seems a li
kely area where logical rules will break down (or where Sapir-Whorf effects will
be made evident). In terms of negation, however, it is vital that we clearly pr
eserve the capability of denying a presumably obvious scale or category assumpti
on.
Solecisms, grammatical and spelling errors will be marked by marking the offendi
ng word or phrase with ``na'i'' (in the manner of any selma'o UI cmavo). In this
sense, ``na'i'' becomes equivalent to the English metalinguistic marker ``[sic]
''. Purists may choose to use ZOI or LOhU/LEhU quotes or ``sa'a''-marked correct
ions to avoid repeating a truly unparsable passage, especially if a computer is
to analyze the speech/text. See Chapter 19 for explanations of these usages.
In summary, metalinguistic negation will typically take the form of referring to
a previous statement and marking it with one or more ``na'i'' to indicate what
metalinguistic errors have been made, and then repeating the statement with corr
ections. References to previous statements may be full repetitions, or may use m
embers of selma'o GOhA. ``na'i'' at the beginning of a statement merely says tha
t something is inappropriate about the statement, without specificity.
In normal use, metalinguistic negation requires that a corrected statement follo
w the negated statement. In Lojban, however, it is possible to completely and un
ambiguously specify metalinguistic errors without correcting them. It will event
ually be seen whether an uncorrected metalinguistic negation remains an acceptab
le form in Lojban. In such a statement, metalinguistic expression would involve
an ellipsis not unlike that of tenseless expression.
Note that metalinguistic negation gives us another kind of legitimate negative a
nswer to a ``xu'' question (see Section 8). ``na'i'' will be used when something
about the questioned statement is inappropriate, such as in questions like ``Ha
ve you stopped beating your wife?'':
10.15) xu do sisti lezu'o do rapydarxi
ledo fetspe
Have you ceased the activity of repeat-hitting
your female-spouse?
Responses could include:
10.16) na'i go'i
The bridi as a whole is inappropriate in some way.
10.17) go'i na'i
The selbri (sisti) is inappropriate in some way.
One can also specifically qualify the metalinguistic negation, by explicitly rep
eating the erroneous portion of the bridi to be metalinguistically negated, or a
dding on of the selma'o BAI qualifiers mentioned above:
10.18) go'i ji'una'iku
Some presupposition is wrong with the previous bridi.
Finally, one may metalinguistically affirm a bridi with ``jo'a'', another cmavo
of selma'o UI. A common use for ``jo'a'' might be to affirm that a particular co
nstruction, though unusual or counterintuitive, is in fact correct; another usag
e would be to disagree with --- by overriding --- a respondent's metalinguistic
negation.
11. Summary --- Are All Possible Questions About Negation Now Answered?
11.1) na go'i .ije na'e go'i .ije na'i go'i
Chapter 16
``Who Did You Pass On The Road? Nobody'': Lojban And Logic
$Revision: 4.0 $
mkhtml: 1.1
1. What's wrong with this picture?

The following brief dialogue is from Chapter 7 of Through The Looking Glass by L
ewis Carroll.
1.1) ``Who did you pass on the road?'' the King went on,
holding out his hand to the Messenger for some more
hay.
1.2) ``Nobody,'' said the Messenger.
1.3) ``Quite right,'' said the King: ``this young lady saw
him too. So of course Nobody walks slower than you.''
1.4) `Ì do my best,'' the Messenger said in a sulky tone.
`Ì'm sure nobody walks much faster than I do!''
1.5) ``He can't do that,'' said the King, `òr else
he'd have been here first.''
This nonsensical conversation results because the King insists on treating the w
ord ``nobody'' as a name, a name of somebody. However, the essential nature of t
he English word ``nobody'' is that it doesn't refer to somebody; or to put the m
atter another way, there isn't anybody to which it refers.
The central point of contradiction in the dialogue arises in Example 1.3, when t
he King says ``... Nobody walks slower than you''. This claim would be plausible
if ``Nobody'' were really a name, since the Messenger could only pass someone w
ho does walk more slowly than he. But the Messenger interprets the word ``nobody
'' in the ordinary English way, and says (in Example 1.4) ``... nobody walks muc
h faster than I do'' (i.e., I walk faster, or as fast as, almost everyone), whic
h the King then again misunderstands. Both the King and the Messenger are correc
t according to their respective understandings of the ambiguous word ``nobody/No
body''.
There are Lojban words or phrases corresponding to the problematic English words
``somebody'', ``nobody'', `ànybody'', `èverybody'' (and their counterparts ``
some/no/any/everyone'' and ``some/no/any/everything''), but they obey rules whic
h can often be surprising to English-speakers. The dialogue above simply cannot
be translated into Lojban without distortion: the name ``Nobody'' would have to
be represented by a Lojban name, which would spoil the perfection of the wordpla
y. As a matter of fact, this is the desired result: a logical language should no
t allow two conversationalists to affirm ``Nobody walks slower than the Messenge
r'' and ``Nobody walks faster than the Messenger'' and both be telling the truth
. (Unless, of course, nobody but the Messenger walks at all, or everyone walks a
t exactly the same speed.)
This chapter will explore the Lojban mechanisms that allow the correct and consi
stent construction of sentences like those in the dialogue. There are no new gra
mmatical constructs explained in this chapter; instead, it discusses the way in
which existing facilities that allow Lojban-speakers to resolve problems like th
e above, using the concepts of modern logic. However, we will not approach the m
atter from the viewpoint of logicians, although readers who know something of lo
gic will discover familiar notions in Lojban guise.
Although Lojban is called a logical language, not every feature of it is ``logic
al''. In particular, the use of ``le'' is incompatible with logical reasoning ba
sed on the description selbri, because that selbri may not truthfully apply: you
cannot conclude from my statement that
1.6) mi viska le nanmu
I see the-one-I-refer-to-as-the man.
I see the man/men.
that there really is a man; the only thing you can conclude is that there is one
thing (or more) that I choose to refer to as a man. You cannot even tell which
man is meant for sure without asking me (although communication is served if you
already know from the context).
In addition, the use of attitudinals (see Chapter 13) often reduces or removes t
he ability to make deductions about the bridi to which those attitudinals are ap
plied. From the fact that I hope George will win the election, you can conclude
nothing about George's actual victory or defeat.
2. Existential claims, prenexes, and variables
Let us consider, to begin with, a sentence that is not in the dialogue:
2.1) Something sees me.
There are two plausible Lojban translations of Example 2.1. The simpler one is:
2.2) [zo'e] viska mi
Something-unspecified sees me.
The cmavo ``zo'e'' indicates that a sumti has been omitted (indeed, even ``zo'e'
' itself can be omitted in this case, as explained in Chapter 7) and the listene
r must fill in the correct value from context. In other words, Example 2.2 means
```You-know-what' sees me.''
However, Example 2.1 is just as likely to assert simply that there is someone wh
o sees me, in which case a correct translation is:
2.3) da zo'u da viska mi
There-is-an-X such-that X sees me.
Example 2.3 does not presuppose that the listener knows who sees the speaker, bu
t simply tells the listener that there is someone who sees the speaker. Statemen
ts of this kind are called `èxistential claims''. (Formally, the one doing the
seeing is not restricted to being a person; it could be an animal or --- in prin
ciple --- an inanimate object. We will see in Section 4 how to represent such re
strictions.)
Example 2.3 has a two-part structure: there is the part ``da zo'u'', called the
prenex, and the part ``da viska mi'', the main bridi. Almost any Lojban bridi ca
n be preceded by a prenex, which syntactically is any number of sumti followed b
y the cmavo ``zo'u'' (of selma'o ZOhU). For the moment, the sumti will consist o
f one or more of the cmavo ``da'', ``de'', and ``di'' (of selma'o KOhA), glossed
in the literal translations as ``X'', ``Y'', and ``Z'' respectively. By analogy
to the terminology of symbolic logic, these cmavo are called ``variables''.
Here is an example of a prenex with two variables:
2.4) da de zo'u da prami de
There-is-an-X there-is-a-Y such that X loves Y.
Somebody loves somebody.
In Example 2.4, the literal interpretation of the two variables ``da'' and ``de'
' as ``there-is-an-X'' and ``there-is-a-Y'' tells us that there are two things w
hich stand in the relationship that one loves the other. It might be the case th
at the supposed two things are really just a single thing that loves itself; not
hing in the Lojban version of Example 2.4 rules out that interpretation, which i
s why the colloquial translation does not say ``Somebody loves somebody else.''
The things referred to by different variables may be different or the same. (We
use ``somebody'' here rather than ``something'' for naturalness; lovers and belo
veds are usually persons, though the Lojban does not say so.)
It is perfectly all right for the variables to appear more than once in the main
bridi:
2.5) da zo'u da prami da
There-is-an-X such that X loves X
Somebody loves himself/herself.
What Example 2.5 claims is fundamentally different from what Example 2.4 claims,
because ``da prami da'' is not structurally the same as ``da prami de''. Howeve
r,
2.6) de zo'u de prami de
There-is-a-Y such that Y loves Y
means exactly the same thing as Example 2.5; it does not matter which variable i
s used as long as they are used consistently.
It is not necessary for a variable to be a sumti of the main bridi directly:
2.7) da zo'u le da gerku cu viska mi
There-is-an-X such-that the of-X dog sees me
Somebody's dog sees me
is perfectly correct even though the ``da'' is used only in a possessive constru
ction. (Possessives are explained in Chapter 8.)
It is very peculiar, however, even if technically grammatical, for the variable
not to appear in the main bridi at all:
2.8) da zo'u la ralf. gerku
There is something such that Ralph is a dog.
has a variable bound in a prenex whose relevance to the claim of the following b
ridi is completely unspecified.
3. Universal claims
What happens if we substitute `èverything'' for ``something'' in Example 2.1? W
e get:
3.1) Everything sees me.
Of course, this example is false, because there are many things which do not see
the speaker. It is not easy to find simple truthful examples of so-called unive
rsal claims (those which are about everything), so bear with us for a while. (In
deed, some Lojbanists tend to avoid universal claims even in other languages, si
nce they are so rarely true in Lojban.)
The Lojban translation of Example 3.1 is
3.2) ro da zo'u da viska mi
For-every X : X sees me.
When the variable cmavo ``da'' is preceded by ``ro'', the combination means ``Fo
r every X'' rather than ``There is an X''. Superficially, these English formulat
ions look totally unrelated: Section 6 will bring them within a common viewpoint
. For the moment, accept the use of ``ro da'' for `èverything'' on faith.
Here is a universal claim with two variables:
3.3) ro da ro de zo'u da prami de
For-every X, for-every Y : X loves Y.
Everything loves everything.
Again, X and Y can represent the same thing, so Example 3.3 does not mean `Èver
ything loves everything else.'' Furthermore, because the claim is universal, it
is about every thing, not merely every person, so we cannot use `èveryone'' or
`èverybody'' in the translation.
Note that ``ro'' appears before both ``da'' and ``de''. If ``ro'' is omitted bef
ore either variable, we get a mixed claim, partly existential like those of Sect
ion 2, partly universal.
3.4) ro da de zo'u da viska de
For-every X, there-is-a-Y : X sees Y.
Everything sees something.
3.5) da ro de zo'u da viska de
There-is-an-X such-that-for-every-Y : X sees Y.
Something sees everything.
Examples 3.4 and 3.5 mean completely different things. Example 3.4 says that for
everything, there is something which it sees, not necessarily the same thing se
en for every seer. Example 3.5, on the other hand, says that there is a particul
ar thing which can see everything that there is (including itself). Both of thes
e are fairly silly, but they are different kinds of silliness.
There are various possible translations of universal claims in English: sometime
s we use `ànybody/anything'' rather than `èverybody/everything''. Often it mak
es no difference which of these is used: when it does make a difference, it is a
rather subtle one which is explained in Section 8.
4. Restricted claims: ``da poi''
The universal claims of Section 3 are not only false but absurd: there is really
very little to be said that is both true and non-trivial about every object wha
tsoever. Furthermore, we have been glossing over the distinction between `èvery
thing'' and `èverybody'' and the other pairs ending in ``-thing'' and ``-body''
. It is time to bring up the most useful feature of Lojban variables: the abilit
y to restrict their ranges.
In Lojban, a variable ``da'', ``de'', or ``di'' may be followed by a ``poi'' rel
ative clause in order to restrict the range of things that the variable describe
s. Relative clauses are described in detail in Chapter 8, but the kind we will n
eed at present consist of ``poi'' followed by a bridi (often just a selbri) term
inated with ``ku'o'' or ``vau'' (which can usually be elided). Consider the diff
erence between
4.1) da zo'u da viska la djim.
There-is-an-X : X sees Jim.
Something sees Jim.
and
4.2) da poi prenu zo'u da viska la djim.
There-is-an-X which is-a-person : X sees Jim.
Someone sees Jim.
In Example 4.1, the variable ``da'' can refer to any object whatever; there are
no restrictions on it. In Example 4.2, ``da'' is restricted by the ``poi prenu''
relative clause to persons only, and so ``da poi prenu'' translates as ``someon
e.'' (The difference between ``someone'' and ``somebody'' is a matter of English
style, with no real counterpart in Lojban.) If Example 4.2 is true, then Exampl
e 4.1 must be true, but not necessarily vice versa.
Universal claims benefit even more from the existence of relative clauses. Consi
der
4.3) ro da zo'u da vasxu
For-every X : X breathes
Everything breathes
and
4.4) ro da poi gerku zo'u da vasxu
For-every X which is-a-dog : X breathes.
Every dog breathes.
Each dog breathes.
All dogs breathe.
Example 4.3 is a silly falsehood, but Example 4.4 is an important truth (at leas
t if applied in a timeless or potential sense: see Chapter 10). Note the various
colloquial translations `èvery dog'', `èach dog'', and `àll dogs''. They all
come to the same thing in Lojban, since what is true of every dog is true of al
l dogs. `Àll dogs'' is treated as an English plural and the others as singular,
but Lojban makes no distinction.
If we make an existential claim about dogs rather than a universal one, we get:
4.5) da poi gerku zo'u da vasxu
There-is-an-X which is-a-dog : X breathes.
Some dog breathes.
5. Dropping the prenex
It isn't really necessary for every Lojban bridi involving variables to have a p
renex on the front. In fact, none of the examples we've seen so far required pre
nexes at all! The rule for dropping the prenex is simple: if the variables appea
r in the same order within the bridi as they did in the prenex, then the prenex
is superfluous. However, any ``ro'' or ``poi'' appearing in the prenex must be t
ransferred to the first occurrence of the variable in the main part of the bridi
. Thus, Example 2.3 becomes just:
5.1) da viska mi
There-is-an-X-which sees me.
Something sees me.
and Example 4.4 becomes:
5.2) ro da poi gerku cu vasxu
For-every X which is-a-dog, it-breathes.
Every dog breathes.
You might well suppose, then, that the purpose of the prenex is to allow the var
iables in it to appear in a different order than the bridi order, and that would
be correct. Consider
5.3) ro da poi prenu ku'o
de poi gerku ku'o zo'u
de batci da
For-every X which is-a-person,
there-is-a-Y which is-a-dog:
Y bites X.
The prenex of Example 5.3 is like that of Example 3.4 (but with relative clauses
): it notes that the following bridi is true of every person with respect to som
e dog, not necessarily the same dog for each. But in the main bridi part, the ``
de'' appears before the ``da''. Therefore, the true translation is
5.4) Every person is bitten by some dog (or other).
If we tried to omit the prenex and move the ``ro'' and the relative clauses into
the main bridi, we would get:
5.5) de poi gerku cu batci
ro da poi prenu
There-is-a-Y which is-a-dog which-bites
every Y which is-a-person
Some dog bites everyone.
which has the structure of Example 3.5: it says that there is a dog (call him Fi
do) who bites, has bitten, or will bite every person that has ever existed! We c
an safely rule out Fido's existence, and say that Example 5.5 is false, while ag
reeing to Example 5.3.
Even so, Example 5.3 is most probably false, since some people never experience
dogbite. Examples like 5.3 and 4.4 (might there be some dogs which never have br
eathed, because they died as embryos?) indicate the danger in Lojban of universa
l claims even when restricted. In English we are prone to say that `Èveryone sa
ys'' or that `Èverybody does'' or that `Èverything is'' when in fact there are
obvious counterexamples which we are ignoring for the sake of making a rhetoric
al point. Such statements are plain falsehoods in Lojban, unless saved by a cont
ext (such as tense) which implicitly restricts them.
How can we express Example 5.3 in Lojban without a prenex? Since it is the order
in which variables appear that matters, we can say:
5.6) ro da poi prenu cu se batci
de poi gerku
Every-X which is-a-person is-bitten-by some-Y
which is-a-dog.
using the conversion operator ``se'' (explained in Chapter 5) to change the selb
ri ``batci'' (``bites'') into ``se batci'' (`ìs bitten by''). The translation g
iven in Example 5.4 uses the corresponding strategy in English, since English do
es not have prenexes (except in strained ``logician's English''). This implies t
hat a sentence with both a universal and an existential variable can't be freely
converted with ``se''; one must be careful to preserve the order of the variabl
es.
If a variable occurs more than once, then any ``ro'' or ``poi'' decorations are
moved only to the first occurrence of the variable when the prenex is dropped. F
or example,
5.7) di poi prenu zo'u
ti xarci di di
There-is-a-Z which is-a-person :
this-thing is-a-weapon for-use-against-Z by-Z
This is a weapon for someone to use against
himself/herself.
(in which ``di'' is used rather than ``da'' just for variety) loses its prenex a
s follows:
5.8) ti xarci di
poi prenu ku'o di
This-thing is-a-weapon-for-use-against
some-Z which is-a-person by-Z.
As the examples in this section show, dropping the prenex makes for terseness of
expression often even greater than that of English (Lojban is meant to be an un
ambiguous language, not necessarily a terse or verbose one), provided the rules
are observed.
6. Variables with generalized quantifiers
So far, we have seen variables with either nothing in front, or with the cmavo `
`ro'' in front. Now ``ro'' is a Lojban number, and means `àll''; thus ``ro pren
u'' means `àll persons'', just as ``re prenu'' means ``two persons''. In fact,
unadorned ``da'' is also taken to have an implicit number in front of it, namely
``su'o'', which means `àt least one''. Why is this? Consider Example 2.3 again
, this time with an explicit ``su'o'':
6.1) su'o da zo'u da viska mi
For-at-least-one X : X sees me.
Something sees me.
From this version of Example 2.3, we understand the speaker's claim to be that o
f all the things that there are, at least one of them sees him or her. The corre
sponding universal claim, Example 3.2, says that of all the things that exist, e
very one of them can see the speaker.
Any other number can be used instead of ``ro'' or ``su'o'' to precede a variable
. Then we get claims like:
6.2) re da zo'u da viska mi
For-two-Xes : X sees me.
Two things see me.
This means that exactly two things, no more or less, saw the speaker on the rele
vant occasion. In English, we might take ``Two things see me'' to mean that at l
east two things see the speaker, but there might be more; in Lojban, though, tha
t claim would have to be made as:
6.3) su'ore da zo'u da viska mi
For-at-least-two Xes : X sees me.
which would be false if nothing, or only one thing, saw the speaker, but not oth
erwise. We note the ``su'o'' here meaning `àt least''; ``su'o'' by itself is sh
ort for ``su'opa'' where ``pa'' means `òne'', as is explained in Chapter 18.
The prenex may be removed from Examples 6.2 and 6.3 as from the others, leading
to:
6.4) re da viska mi
Two Xes see me.
and
6.5) su'ore da viska mi
At-least-two Xes see me.
respectively, subject to the rules prescribed in Section 5.
Now we can explain the constructions ``ro prenu'' for `àll persons'' and ``re p
renu'' for ``two persons'' which were casually mentioned at the beginning of thi
s Section. In fact, ``ro prenu'', a so-called `ìndefinite description'', is sho
rthand for ``ro DA poi prenu'', where ``DA'' represents a fictitious variable th
at hasn't been used yet and will not be used in future. (Even if all three of ``
da'', ``de'', and ``di'' have been used up, it does not matter, for there are wa
ys of getting more variables, discussed in Section 14.) So in fact
6.6) re prenu viska mi
Two persons see me.
is short for
6.7) re da poi prenu cu viska mi
Two Xes which are-persons see me.
which in turn is short for:
6.8) re da poi prenu zo'u da viska mi
For-two Xes which are-persons : X sees me.
Note that when we move more than one variable to the prenex (along with its atta
ched relative clause), we must make sure that the variables are in the same orde
r in the prenex as in the bridi proper.
7. Grouping of quantifiers
Let us consider a sentence containing two quantifier expressions neither of whic
h is ``ro'' or ``su'o'' (remembering that ``su'o'' is implicit where no explicit
quantifier is given):
7.1) ci gerku cu batci re nanmu
Three dogs bite two men.
The question raised by Example 7.1 is, does each of the dogs bite the same two m
en, or is it possible that there are two different men per dog, for six men alto
gether? If the former interpretation is taken, the number of men involved is fix
ed at two; but if the latter, then the speaker has to be taken as saying that th
ere might be any number of men between two and six inclusive. Let us transform E
xample 7.1 step by step as we did with Example 6.6:
7.2) ci da poi gerku cu batci re de poi nanmu
Three Xes which are-dogs bite two Ys which are-men.
(Note that we need separate variables ``da'' and ``de'', because of the rule tha
t says each indefinite description gets a variable never used before or since.)
7.3) ci da poi gerku ku'o
re de poi nanmu zo'u
da batci de
For-three Xes which are-dogs,
for-two Ys which are-men :
X bites Y.
Here we see that indeed each of the dogs is said to bite two men, and it might b
e different men each time; a total of six biting events altogether.
How then are we to express the other interpretation, in which just two men are i
nvolved? We cannot just reverse the order of variables in the prenex to
7.4) re de poi nanmu ku'o
ci da poi gerku zo'u da batci de
For-two Ys which are-men,
for-three Xes which are-dogs, X bites Y
for although we have now limited the number of men to exactly two, we end up wit
h an indeterminate number of dogs, from three to six. The distinction is called
a ``scope distinction'': in Example 7.2, ``ci gerku'' is said to have wider scop
e than ``re nanmu'', and therefore precedes it in the prenex. In Example 7.4 the
reverse is true.
The solution is to use a termset, which is a group of terms either joined by ``c
e'e'' (of selma'o CEhE) between each term, or else surrounded by ``nu'i'' (of se
lma'o NUhI) on the front and ``nu'u'' (of selma'o NUhU) on the rear. Terms (whic
h are either sumti or sumti prefixed by tense or modal tags) that are grouped in
to a termset are understood to have equal scope:
7.5) ci gerku ce'e re nanmu cu batci
nu'i ci gerku re nanmu [nu'u] cu batci
Three dogs [plus] two men, bite.
which picks out two groups, one of three dogs and the other of two men, and says
that every one of the dogs bites each of the men. The second Lojban version use
s forethought; note that ``nu'u'' is an elidable terminator, and in this case ca
n be freely elided.
What about descriptors, like ``ci lo gerku'', ``le nanmu'' or ``re le ci mlatu''
? They too can be grouped in termsets, but usually need not be, except for the `
`lo'' case which functions like the case without a descriptor. Unless an actual
quantifier precedes it, ``le nanmu'' means ``ro le nanmu'', as is explained in C
hapter 6. Two sumti with ``ro'' quantifiers are independent of order, so:
7.6) [ro] le ci gerku cu batci [ro] le re nanmu
[All of] the three dogs bite [all of] the two men.
means that each of the dogs specified bites each of the men specified, for six a
cts of biting altogether. However, if there is an explicit quantifier before ``l
e'' other than ``ro'', the problems of this section reappear.
8. The problem of `àny''
Consider the English sentence
8.1) Anyone who goes to the store, walks across the field.
Using the facilities already discussed, a plausible translation might be
8.2) ro da poi klama le zarci cu cadzu le foldi
All X such-that-it goes-to the store walks-on the field.
Everyone who goes to the store walks across the field.
But there is a subtle difference between Example 8.1 and Example 8.2. Example 8.
2 tells us that, in fact, there are people who go to the store, and that they wa
lk across the field. A sumti of the type ``ro da poi klama'' requires that there
are things which ``klama'': Lojban universal claims always imply the correspond
ing existential claims as well. Example 8.1, on the other hand, does not require
that there are any people who go to the store: it simply states, conditionally,
that if there is anyone who goes to the store, he or she walks across the field
as well. This conditional form mirrors the true Lojban translation of Example 8
.1:
8.3) ro da zo'u ganai da klama le zarci
gi cadzu le foldi
For-every X: if X is-a-goer-to the store
then X is-a-walker-on the field.
Although Example 8.3 is a universal claim as well, its universality only implies
that there are objects of some sort or another in the universe of discourse. Be
cause the claim is conditional, nothing is implied about the existence of goers-
to-the-store or of walkers-on-the-field, merely that any entity which is one is
also the other.
There is another use of `àny'' in English that is not universal but existential
. Consider
8.4) I need any box that is bigger than this one.
Example 8.4 does not at all mean that I need every box bigger than this one, for
indeed I do not; I require only one box. But the naive translation
8.5) mi nitcu da poi tanxe
gi'e bramau ti
I need some-X which is-a-box
and is-bigger-than this-one
does not work either, because it asserts that there really is such a box, as the
prenex paraphrase demonstrates:
8.6) da poi tanxe
gi'e bramau ti zo'u mi nitcu da
There-is-an-X which is-a-box
and is-bigger-than this : I need X.
What to do? Well, the x2 place of ``nitcu'' can be filled with an event as well
as an object, and in fact Example 8.5 can also be paraphrased as:
8.7) mi nitcu lo nu mi ponse
lo tanxe poi bramau ti
I need an event-of I possess
some box(es) which-are bigger-than this-one.
Rewritten using variables, Example 8.7 becomes
8.8) mi nitcu lo nu da zo'u
da se ponse mi gi'e tanxe
gi'e bramau ti
I need an event-of there-being an-X such-that
X is-possessed-by me and is-a-box
and is-bigger-than this-thing.
So we see that a prenex can be attached to a bridi that is within a sentence. By
default, a variable always behaves as if it is bound in the prenex which (notio
nally) is attached to the smallest enclosing bridi, and its scope does not exten
d beyond that bridi. However, the variable may be placed in an outer prenex expl
icitly:
8.9) da poi tanxe
gi'e bramau ti zo'u
mi nitcu le nu mi ponse da
There-is-an-X which is-a-box
and is-bigger-than this-one such-that
I need the event-of my possessing X.
But what are the implications of Example 8.7 and Example 8.9? The main differenc
e is that in Example 8.9, the ``da'' is said to exist in the real world of the o
uter bridi; but in Example 8.7, the existence is only within the inner bridi, wh
ich is a mere event that need not necessarily come to pass. So Example 8.9 means
8.10) There's a box, bigger than this one, that I need
which is what Example 8.6 says, whereas Example 8.7 turns out to be an effective
translation of our original Example 8.1. So uses of `àny'' that aren't univers
al end up being reflected by variables bound in the prenex of a subordinate brid
i.
9. Negation boundaries
This section, as well as Section 10 through Section 12, are in effect a continua
tion of Chapter 15, introducing features of Lojban negation that require an unde
rstanding of prenexes and variables. In the examples below, ``there is a Y'' and
the like must be understood as ``there is at least one Y, possibly more''.
As explained in Chapter 15, the negation of a bridi is usually accomplished by i
nserting ``na'' at the beginning of the selbri:
I [false] go-to the store.
It is false that I go to the store.
I don't go to the store.
The other form of bridi negation is expressed by using the compound cmavo ``naku
'' in the prenex, which is identified and compounded by the lexer before looking
at the sentence grammar. In Lojban grammar, ``naku'' is then treated like a sum
ti. In a prenex, ``naku'' means precisely the same thing as the logician's `ìt
is not the case that'' in a similar English context. (Outside of a prenex, ``nak
u'' is also grammatically treated as a single entity --- the equivalent of a sum
ti --- but does not have this exact meaning; we'll discuss these other situation
s in Section 11.)
To represent a bridi negation using a prenex, remove the ``na'' from before the
selbri and place ``naku'' at the left end of the prenex. This form is called `è
xternal bridi negation'', as opposed to `ìnternal bridi negation'' using ``na''
. The prenex version of Example 9.1 is
9.2) naku zo'u la djan. klama
It is not the case that: John comes.
It is false that: John comes.
However, ``naku'' can appear at other points in the prenex as well. Compare
9.3) naku de zo'u de zutse
It is not the case that: for some Y, Y sits.
It is false that: for at least one Y, Y sits.
It is false that something sits.
Nothing sits.
with
9.4) su'ode naku zo'u de zutse
For at least one Y, it is false that: Y sits.
There is something that doesn't sit.
The relative position of negation and quantification terms within a prenex has a
drastic effect on meaning. Starting without a negation, we can have:
9.5) roda su'ode zo'u da prami de
For every X, there is a Y, such that X loves Y.
Everybody loves at least one thing (each,
not necessarily the same thing).
or:
9.6) su'ode roda zo'u da prami de
There is a Y, such that for each X, X loves Y.
There is at least one particular thing
that is loved by everybody.
The simplest form of bridi negation to interpret is one where the negation term
is at the beginning of the prenex:
9.7) naku roda su'ode zo'u
da prami de
It is false that: for every X, there is a Y, such that:
X loves Y.
It is false that: everybody loves at least one thing.
(At least) someone doesn't love anything.
the negation of Example 9.5, and
9.8) naku su'ode roda zo'u
da prami de
It is false that: there is a Y such that for each X,
X loves Y.
It is false that: there is at least one thing that is
loved by everybody.
There isn't any one thing that everybody loves.
the negation of Example 9.6.
The rules of formal logic require that, to move a negation boundary within a pre
nex, you must `ìnvert any quantifier'' that the negation boundary passes across
. Inverting a quantifier means that any ``ro'' (all) is changed to ``su'o'' (at
least one) and vice versa. Thus, Example 9.7 and Example 9.8 can be restated as,
respectively:
9.9) su'oda naku su'ode zo'u
da prami de
For some X, it is false that: there is a Y such that:
X loves Y.
There is somebody who doesn't love anything.
and:
9.10) rode naku roda zo'u da prami de
For every Y, it is false that: for every X, X loves Y.
For each thing, it is not true that everybody loves it.
Another movement of the negation boundary produces:
9.11) su'oda rode naku zo'u
da prami de
There is an X such that, for every Y,
it is false that X loves Y.
There is someone who, for each thing,
doesn't love that thing.
and
9.12) rode su'oda naku zo'u da prami de
For every Y, there is an X, such that it is false that:
X loves Y.
For each thing there is someone who doesn't love it.
Investigation will show that, indeed, each transformation preserves the meanings
of Example 9.7 and Example 9.8.
The quantifier ``no'' (meaning ``zero of'') also involves a negation boundary. T
o transform a bridi containing a variable quantified with ``no'', we must first
expand it. Consider
9.13) noda rode zo'u da prami de
There is no X, for every Y, such that X loves Y.
Nobody loves everything.
which is negated by:
9.14) naku noda rode zo'u
da prami de
It is false that: there is no X that, for every Y,
X loves Y.
It is false that there is nobody who loves everything.
We can simplify Example 9.14 by transforming the prenex. To move the negation ph
rase within the prenex, we must first expand the ``no'' quantifier. Thus ``for n
o x'' means the same thing as `ìt is false for some x'', and the corresponding
Lojban ``noda'' can be replaced by ``naku su'oda''. Making this substitution, we
get:
9.15) naku naku su'oda rode zo'u
da prami de
It is false that it is false that: for an X, for every Y:
X loves Y.
Adjacent double negation boundaries in the prenex can be dropped, so this means
the same as:
9.16) su'oda rode zo'u da prami de
There is an X such that, for every Y, X loves Y.
At least one person loves everything.
which is clearly the desired contradiction of Example 9.13.
The interactions between quantifiers and negation mean that you cannot eliminate
double negatives that are not adjacent. You must first move the negation phrase
s so that they are adjacent, inverting any quantifiers they cross, and then the
double negative can be eliminated.
10. bridi negation and logical connectives
A complete discussion of logical connectives appears in Chapter 14. What is said
here is intentionally quite incomplete and makes several oversimplifications.
A logical connective is a cmavo or compound cmavo. In this chapter, we will make
use of the logical connectives `ànd'' and `òr'' (where `òr'' really means ``
and/or'', `èither or both''). The following simplified recipes explain how to m
ake some logical connectives:
To logically connect two Lojban sumti with `ànd'', put them both in the bri
di and separate them with the cmavo ``.e''.
To logically connect two Lojban bridi with `ànd'', replace the regular sepa
rator cmavo ``.i'' with the compound cmavo ``.ije''.
To logically connect two Lojban sumti with `òr'', put them both in the brid
i and separate them with the cmavo ``.a''.
To logically connect two Lojban bridi with `òr'', replace the regular separ
ator cmavo ``.i'' with the compound cmavo ``.ija''.
More complex logical connectives also exist; in particular, one may place ``na''
before ``.e'' or ``.a'', or between ``.i'' and ``je'' or ``ja''; likewise, one
may place ``nai'' at the end of a connective. Both ``na'' and ``nai'' have negat
ive effects on the sumti or bridi being connected. Specifically, ``na'' negates
the first or left-hand sumti or bridi, and ``nai'' negates the second or right-h
and one.
Whenever a logical connective occurs in a sentence, that sentence can be expande
d into two sentences by repeating the common terms and joining the sentences by
a logical connective beginning with ``.i''. Thus the following sentence:
10.1) mi .e do klama ti
I and you come here.
can be expanded to:
10.2) mi klama ti .ije do klama ti
I come here, and, you come here.
The same type of expansion can be performed for any logical connective, with any
valid combination of ``na'' or ``nai'' attached. No change in meaning occurs un
der such a transformation.
Clearly, if we know what negation means in the expanded sentence forms, then we
know what it means in all of the other forms. But what does negation mean betwee
n sentences?
The mystery is easily solved. A negation in a logical expression is identical to
the corresponding bridi negation, with the negator placed at the beginning of t
he prenex. Thus:
10.3) mi .enai do prami roda
I, and not you, love everything.
expands to:
10.4) mi prami roda .ijenai do prami roda
I love everything, and-not, you love everything.
and then into prenex form as:
10.5) roda zo'u mi prami da
.ije naku zo'u do prami da
For each thing: I love it,
and it is false that you love (the same) it.
By the rules of predicate logic, the ``ro'' quantifier on ``da'' has scope over
both sentences. That is, once you've picked a value for ``da'' for the first sen
tence, it stays the same for both sentences. (The ``da'' continues with the same
fixed value until a new paragraph or a new prenex resets the meaning.)
Thus the following example has the indicated translation:
10.6) su'oda zo'u mi prami da
.ije naku zo'u do prami da
For at least one thing: I love that thing.
And it is false that: you love that (same) thing.
There is something that I love that you don't.
If you remember only two rules for prenex manipulation of negations, you won't g
o wrong:
Within a prenex, whenever you move ``naku'' past a bound variable (da, de, d
i, etc.), you must invert the quantifier.
A ``na'' before the selbri is always transformed into a ``naku'' at the left
-hand end of the prenex, and vice versa.
11. Using ``naku'' outside a prenex
Let us consider the English sentence
11.1) Some children do not go to school.
We cannot express this directly with ``na''; the apparently obvious translation
11.2) su'oda poi verba
na klama su'ode poi ckule
At-least-one X which-are child(ren)
[false] go-to at-least-one Y which-are school(s).
which converts to the external negation:
11.3) naku zo'u su'oda poi verba
cu klama su'ode poi ckule
It is false that some which are children
go-to some which are schools.
All children don't go to some school
(not just some children).
Lojban provides a negation form which more closely emulates natural language neg
ation. This involves putting ``naku'' before the selbri, instead of a ``na''. ``
naku'' is clearly a contradictory negation, given its parallel with prenex bridi
negation. Using ``naku'', Example 11.1 can be expressed as:
11.4) su'oda poi verba naku klama
su'ode poi ckule
Some which-are children don't go-to
some which-are schools.
Some children don't go to a school.
Although it is not technically a sumti, ``naku'' can be used in most of the plac
es where a sumti may appear. We'll see what this means in a moment.
When you use ``naku'' within a bridi, you are explicitly creating a negation bou
ndary. As explained in Section 9, when a prenex negation boundary expressed by `
`naku'' moves past a quantifier, the quantifier has to be inverted. The same is
true for ``naku'' in the bridi proper. We can move ``naku'' to any place in the
sentence where a sumti can go, inverting any quantifiers that the negation bound
ary crosses. Thus, the following are equivalent to Example 11.4 (no good English
translations exist):
11.5) su'oda poi verba cu klama rode poi ckule naku
For some children, for every school,
they don't go to it.
11.6) su'oda poi verba cu klama naku su'ode poi ckule
Some children don't go to (some) school(s).
11.7) naku roda poi verba cu klama su'ode poi ckule
It is false that all children go to some school(s).
In Example 11.5, we moved the negation boundary rightward across the quantifier
of ``de'', forcing us to invert it. In Example 11.7 we moved the negation bounda
ry across the quantifier of ``da'', forcing us to invert it instead. Example 11.
6 merely switched the selbri and the negation boundary, with no effect on the qu
antifiers.
The same rules apply if you rearrange the sentence so that the quantifier crosse
s an otherwise fixed negation. You can't just convert the selbri of Example 11.4
and rearrange the sumti to produce
11.8) su'ode poi ckule ku'o naku se klama roda poi verba
Some schools aren't gone-to-by every child.
or rather, Example 11.8 means something completely different from Example 11.4.
Conversion with ``se'' under ``naku'' negation is not symmetric; not all sumti a
re treated identically, and some sumti are not invariant under conversion. These
complications would make Lojban much harder to learn (just as their correspondi
ng natural language constructs are difficult to learn). Thus, internal negation
with ``naku'' is considered an advanced technique, used to achieve stylistic com
patibility with natural languages.
It isn't always easy to see which quantifiers have to be inverted in a sentence.
Example 11.4 is identical in meaning to:
11.9) su'o verba naku klama su'o ckule
Some children don't go-to some school.
but in Example 11.9, the bound variables ``da'' and ``de'' have been hidden.
It is trivial to export an internal bridi negation expressed with ``na'' to the
prenex, as we saw in Section 9; you just move it to the left end of the prenex.
In comparison, it is non-trivial to export a ``naku'' to the prenex because of t
he quantifiers. The rules for exporting ``naku'' require that you export all of
the quantified variables (implicit or explicit) along with ``naku'', and you mus
t export them from left to right, in the same order that they appear in the sent
ence. Thus Example 11.4 goes into prenex form as:
11.10) su'oda poi verba ku'o naku
su'ode poi ckule zo'u
da klama de
For some X which is a child, it is not the case that
there is a Y which is a school such that:
X goes to Y.
We can now move the ``naku'' to the left end of the prenex, getting a contradict
ory negation that can be expressed with ``na'':
11.11) naku roda poi verba
da klama de
It is not the case that for all X's which are children,
X goes to Y.
from which we can restore the quantified variables to the sentence, giving:
11.12) naku zo'u roda poi verba cu klama su'ode poi ckule
It is not the case that all children go to some school.
or more briefly
11.13) ro verba cu na klama su'o ckule
All children [false] go-to some school(s).
As noted in Section 5, a sentence with two different quantified variables, such
as Example 11.13, cannot always be converted with ``se'' without first exporting
the quantified variables. When the variables have been exported, the sentence p
roper can be converted, but the quantifier order in the prenex must remain uncha
nged:
11.14) roda poi verba
de na se klama da
It is not the case that for all X's which are children,
Y is gone to by X.
While you can't freely convert with ``se'' when you have two quantified variable
s in a sentence, you can still freely move sumti to either side of the selbri, a
s long as the order isn't changed. If you use ``na'' negation in such a sentence
, nothing special need be done. If you use ``naku'' negation, then quantified va
riables that cross the negation boundary must be inverted.
Clearly, if all of Lojban negation was built on ``naku'' negation instead of ``n
a'' negation, logical manipulation in Lojban would be as difficult as in natural
languages. In Section 12, for example, we'll discuss DeMorgan's Law, which must
be used whenever a sumti with a logical connection is moved across a negation b
oundary.
Since ``naku'' has the grammar of a sumti, it can be placed almost anywhere a su
mti can go, including ``be'' and ``bei'' clauses; it isn't clear what these mean
, and we recommend avoiding such constructs.
You can put multiple ``naku''s in a sentence, each forming a separate negation b
oundary. Two adjacent ``naku''s in a bridi are a double negative and cancel out:
11.16) mi naku naku le zarci cu klama
Other expressions using two ``naku''s may or may not cancel out. If there is no
quantified variable between them, then the ``naku''s cancel.
Negation with internal ``naku'' is clumsy and non-intuitive for logical manipula
tions, but then, so are the natural language features it is emulating.
12. Logical Connectives and DeMorgan's Law
DeMorgan's Law states that when a logical connective between terms falls within
a negation, then expanding the negation requires a change in the connective. Thu
s (where ``p'' and ``q'' stand for terms or sentences) ``not (p or q)'' is ident
ical to ``not p and not q'', and ``not (p and q)'' is identical to ``not p or no
t q''. The corresponding changes for the other two basic Lojban connectives are:
``not (p equivalent to q)'' is identical to ``not p exclusive-or not q'', and `
`not (p whether-or-not q)'' is identical to both ``not p whether-or-not q'' and
``not p whether-or-not not q''. In any Lojban sentence having one of the basic c
onnectives, you can substitute in either direction from these identities. (These
basic connectives are explained in Chapter 14.)
The effects of DeMorgan's Law on the logical connectives made by modifying the b
asic connectives with ``nai'', ``na'' and ``se'' can be derived directly from th
ese rules; modify the basic connective for DeMorgan's Law by substituting from t
he above identities, and then, apply each ``nai'', ``na'' and ``se'' modifier of
the original connectives. Cancel any double negatives that result.
When do we apply DeMorgan's Law? Whenever we wish to ``distribute'' a negation o
ver a logical connective; and, for internal ``naku'' negation, whenever a logica
l connective moves in to, or out of, the scope of a negation --- when it crosses
a negation boundary.
Let us apply DeMorgan's Law to some sample sentences. These sentences make use o
f forethought logical connectives, which are explained in Chapter 14. It suffice
s to know that ``ga'' and ``gi'', used before each of a pair of sumti or bridi,
mean `èither'' and `òr'' respectively, and that ``ge'' and ``gi'' used similar
ly mean ``both'' and `ànd''. Furthermore, ``ga'', ``ge'', and ``gi'' can all be
suffixed with ``nai'' to negate the bridi or sumti that follows.
We have defined ``na'' and ``naku zo'u'' as, respectively, internal and external
bridi negation. These forms being identical, the negation boundary always remai
ns at the left end of the prenex. Thus, exporting or importing negation between
external and internal bridi negation forms never requires DeMorgan's Law to be a
pplied. Example 12.1 and Example 12.2 are exactly equivalent:
12.1) la djan. na klama ga la paris. gi la rom.
John [false] goes-to either Paris or Rome.
12.2) naku zo'u la djan. klama ga la paris. gi la rom.
It-is-false that: John goes-to either Paris or Rome.
It is not an acceptable logical manipulation to move a negator from the bridi le
vel to one or more sumti. However, Example 12.1 and related examples are not sum
ti negations, but rather expand to form two logically connected sentences. In su
ch a situation, DeMorgan's Law must be applied. For instance, Example 12.2 expan
ds to:
12.3) ge la djan. la paris. na klama
gi la djan. la rom. na klama
[It is true that] both John, to-Paris, [false] goes,
and John, to-Rome, [false] goes.
The ``ga'' and ``gi'', meaning `èither-or'', have become ``ge'' and ``gi'', mea
ning ``both-and'', as a consequence of moving the negators into the individual b
ridi.
Here is another example of DeMorgan's Law in action, involving bridi-tail logica
l connection (explained in Chapter 14):
12.4) la djein. le zarci na ge dzukla gi bajrykla
Jane to-the market [false] both walks and runs.
12.5) la djein. le zarci ganai dzukla ginai bajrykla
Jane to-the market either [false] walks or [false] runs.
Jane to-the market if walks then ([false] runs).
(Placing ``le zarci'' before the selbri makes sure that it is properly associate
d with both parts of the logical connection. Otherwise, it is easy to erroneousl
y leave it off one of the two sentences.)
It is wise, before freely doing transformations such as the one from Example 12.
4 to Example 12.5, that you become familiar with expanding logical connectives t
o separate sentences, transforming the sentences, and then recondensing. Thus, y
ou would prove the transformation correct by the following steps. By moving its
``na'' to the beginning of the prenex as a ``naku'', Example 12.4 becomes:
12.6) naku zo'u la djein. le zarci
ge dzukla gi bajrykla
It is false that : Jane to-the market
(both walks and runs).
And by dividing the bridi with logically connected selbri into two bridi,
12.7) naku zo'u ge la djein. le zarci dzukla
gi la djein. le zarci bajrykla
It-is-false-that: both (Jane to-the market walks)
and (Jane to-the market runs).
is the result.
At this expanded level, we apply DeMorgan's Law to distribute the negation in th
e prenex across both sentences, to get
12.8) ga la djein. le zarci na dzukla
gi la djein. le zarci na bajrykla
Either Jane to-the market [false] walks,
or Jane to-the market [false] runs.
which is the same as
12.9) ganai la djein. le zarci dzukla
ginai la djein. le zarci bajrykla
If Jane to-the market walks,
then Jane to-the market [false] runs.
If Jane walks to the market, then she doesn't run.
which then condenses down to Example 12.5.
DeMorgan's Law must also be applied to internal ``naku'' negations:
12.10) ga la paris. gi la rom. naku se klama la djan.
(Either Paris or Rome) is-not gone-to-by John.
12.11) la djan. naku klama ge la paris. gi la rom.
John doesn't go-to both Paris and Rome.
That Example 12.10 and Example 12.11 mean the same should become evident by stud
ying the English. It is a good exercise to work through the Lojban and prove tha
t they are the same.
13. selbri variables
In addition to the variables ``da'', ``de'', and ``di'' that we have seen so far
, which function as sumti and belong to selma'o KOhA, there are three correspond
ing variables ``bu'a'', ``bu'e'', and ``bu'i'' which function as selbri and belo
ng to selma'o GOhA. These new variables allow existential or universal claims wh
ich are about the relationships between objects rather than the objects themselv
es. We will start with the usual silly examples; the literal translation will re
present ``bu'a'', ``bu'e'' and ``bu'i'' with F, G, and H respectively.
13.1) su'o bu'a zo'u
la djim. bu'a la djan.
For-at-least-one relationship-F :
Jim stands-in-relationship-F to-John.
There's some relationship between Jim and John.
The translations of Example 13.1 show how unidiomatic selbri variables are in En
glish; Lojban sentences like Example 13.1 need to be totally reworded in English
. Furthermore, when a selbri variable appears in the prenex, it is necessary to
precede it with a quantifier such as ``su'o''; it is ungrammatical to just say `
`bu'a zo'u''. This rule is necessary because only sumti can appear in the prenex
, and ``su'o bu'a'' is technically a sumti --- in fact, an indefinite descriptio
n like ``re nanmu'', since ``bu'a'' is grammatically equivalent to a brivla like
``nanmu''. However, indefinite descriptions involving the bu'a-series cannot be
imported from the prenex.
When the prenex is omitted, the preceding number has to be omitted too:
13.2) la djim. bu'a la djan.
Jim stands-in-at-least-one-relationship to-John.
As a result, if the number before the variable is anything but ``su'o'', the pre
nex is required:
13.3) ro bu'a zo'u
la djim. bu'a la djan.
For-every relationship-F :
Jim stands-in-relationship-F to-John.
Every relationship exists between Jim and John.
Example 13.1 and Example 13.2 are almost certainly true: Jim and John might be b
rothers, or might live in the same city, or at least have the property of being
jointly human. Example 13.3 is palpably false, however; if Jim and John were rel
ated by every possible relationship, then they would have to be both brothers an
d father-and-son, which is impossible.
14. A few notes on variables
A variable may have a quantifier placed in front of it even though it has alread
y been quantified explicitly or implicitly by a previous appearance, as in:
14.1) ci da poi mlatu cu blaci .ije re da cu barda
Three Xs which-are cats are white, and two Xs are big.
What does Example 14.1 mean? The appearance of ``ci da'' quantifies ``da'' as re
ferring to three things, which are restricted by the relative clause to be cats.
When ``re da'' appears later, it refers to two of the those three things --- th
ere is no saying which ones. Further uses of ``da'' alone, if there were any, wo
uld refer once more to the three cats, so the requantification of ``da'' is pure
ly local.
In general, the scope of a prenex that precedes a sentence extends to following
sentences that are joined by ijeks (explained in Chapter 14) such as the ``.ije'
' in Example 14.1. Theoretically, a bare ``.i'' terminates the scope of the pren
ex. Informally, however, variables may persist for a while even after an ``.i'',
as if it were an ``.ije''. Prenexes that precede embedded bridi such as relativ
e clauses and abstractions extend only to the end of the clause, as explained in
Section 8. A prenex preceding ``tu'e ... tu'u'' long-scope brackets persists un
til the ``tu'u'', which may be many sentences or even paragraphs later.
If the variables ``da'', ``de'', and ``di'' (or the selbri variables ``bu'a'', `
`bu'e'', and ``bu'i'') are insufficient in number for handling a particular prob
lem, the Lojban approach is to add a subscript to any of them. Each possible dif
ferent combination of a subscript and a variable cmavo counts as a distinct vari
able in Lojban. Subscripts are explained in full in Chapter 19, but in general c
onsist of the cmavo ``xi'' (of selma'o XI) followed by a number, one or more ler
fu words forming a single string, or a general mathematical expression enclosed
in parentheses.
A quantifier can be prefixed to a variable that has already been bound either in
a prenex or earlier in the bridi, thus:
14.2) ci da poi prenu cu se ralju pa da
Three Xs which are-persons are-led-by one-of X
Three people are led by one of them.
The ``pa da'' in Example 14.2 does not specify the number of things to which ``d
a'' refers, as the preceding ``ci da'' does. Instead, it selects one of them for
use in this sumti only. The number of referents of ``da'' remains three, but a
single one (there is no way of knowing which one) is selected to be the leader.
15. Conclusion
This chapter is incomplete. There are many more aspects of logic that I neither
fully understand nor feel competent to explain, neither in abstract nor in their
Lojban realization. Lojban was designed to be a language that makes predicate l
ogic speakable, and achieving that goal completely will need to wait for someone
who understands both logic and Lojban better than I do. I can only hope to have
pointed out the areas that are well-understood (and by implication, those that
are not).
Chapter 17
As Easy As A-B-C? The Lojban Letteral System And Its Uses
1. What's a letteral, anyway?
James Cooke Brown, the founder of the Loglan Project, coined the word ``letteral
'' (by analogy with ``numeral'') to mean a letter of the alphabet, such as ``f''
or ``z''. A typical example of its use might be
1.1) There are fourteen occurrences of the letteral
`è'' in this sentence.
(Don't forget the one within quotation marks.) Using the word ``letteral'' avoid
s confusion with ``letter'', the kind you write to someone. Not surprisingly, th
ere is a Lojban gismu for ``letteral'', namely ``lerfu'', and this word will be
used in the rest of this chapter.
Lojban uses the Latin alphabet, just as English does, right? Then why is there a
need for a chapter like this? After all, everyone who can read it already knows
the alphabet. The answer is twofold:
First, in English there are a set of words that correspond to and represent the
English lerfu. These words are rarely written down in English and have no standa
rd spellings, but if you pronounce the English alphabet to yourself you will hea
r them: ay, bee, cee, dee ... . They are used in spelling out words and in prono
uncing most acronyms. The Lojban equivalents of these words are standardized and
must be documented somehow.
Second, English has names only for the lerfu used in writing English. (There are
also English names for Greek and Hebrew lerfu: English-speakers usually refer t
o the Greek lerfu conventionally spelled ``phi'' as ``fye'', whereas ``fee'' wou
ld more nearly represent the name used by Greek-speakers. Still, not all English
-speakers know these English names.) Lojban, in order to be culturally neutral,
needs a more comprehensive system that can handle, at least potentially, all of
the world's alphabets and other writing systems.
Letterals have several uses in Lojban: in forming acronyms and abbreviations, as
mathematical symbols, and as pro-sumti --- the equivalent of English pronouns.
In earlier writings about Lojban, there has been a tendency to use the word ``le
rfu'' for both the letterals themselves and for the Lojban words which represent
them. In this chapter, that tendency will be ruthlessly suppressed, and the ter
m ``lerfu word'' will invariably be used for the latter. The Lojban equivalent w
ould be ``lerfu valsi'' or ``lervla''.
2. A to Z in Lojban, plus one
The first requirement of a system of lerfu words for any language is that they m
ust represent the lerfu used to write the language. The lerfu words for English
are a motley crew: the relationship between ``doubleyou'' and ``w'' is strictly
historical in nature; `àitch'' represents ``h'' but has no clear relationship t
o it at all; and ``z'' has two distinct lerfu words, ``zee'' and ``zed'', depend
ing on the dialect of English in question.
All of Lojban's basic lerfu words are made by one of three rules:
to get a lerfu word for a vowel, add ``bu''; to get a lerfu word for a conso
nant, add ``y''; the lerfu word for ``''' is ``.y'y''.
Therefore, the following table represents the basic Lojban alphabet:
' a b c d e
.y'y. .abu by. cy. dy. .ebu
f g i j k l
fy. gy. .ibu jy. ky. ly.
m n o p r s
my. ny. .obu py. ry. sy.
t u v x y z
ty. .ubu vy. xy. .ybu zy.
There are several things to note about this table. The consonant lerfu words are
a single syllable, whereas the vowel and ``''' lerfu words are two syllables an
d must be preceded by pause (since they all begin with a vowel). Another fact, n
ot evident from the table but important nonetheless, is that ``by'' and its like
are single cmavo of selma'o BY, as is ``.y'y''. The vowel lerfu words, on the o
ther hand, are compound cmavo, made from a single vowel cmavo plus the cmavo ``b
u'' (which belongs to its own selma'o, BU). All of the vowel cmavo have other me
anings in Lojban (logical connectives, sentence separator, hesitation noise), bu
t those meanings are irrelevant when ``bu'' follows.
Here are some illustrations of common Lojban words spelled out using the alphabe
t above:
2.1) ty. .abu ny. ry. .ubu
``t'' `à'' ``n'' ``r'' `ù''
2.2) ky. .obu .y'y. .abu
``k'' `ò'' ``''' `à''
Spelling out words is less useful in Lojban than in English, for two reasons: Lo
jban spelling is phonemic, so there can be no real dispute about how a word is s
pelled; and the Lojban lerfu words sound more alike than the English ones do, si
nce they are made up systematically. The English words ``fail'' and ``vale'' sou
nd similar, but just hearing the first lerfu word of either, namely `èff'' or `
`vee'', is enough to discriminate easily between them --- and even if the first
lerfu word were somehow confused, neither ``vail'' nor ``fale'' is a word of ord
inary English, so the rest of the spelling determines which word is meant. Still
, the capability of spelling out words does exist in Lojban.
Note that the lerfu words ending in ``y'' were written (in Example 2.1 and Examp
le 2.2) with pauses after them. It is not strictly necessary to pause after such
lerfu words, but failure to do so can in some cases lead to ambiguities:
2.3) mi cy. claxu
I lerfu-``c'' without
I am without (whatever is referred to by)
the letter ``c''.
without a pause after ``cy'' would be interpreted as:
2.4) micyclaxu
(Observative:) doctor-without
Something unspecified is without a doctor.
A safe guideline is to pause after any cmavo ending in ``y'' unless the next wor
d is also a cmavo ending in ``y''. The safest and easiest guideline is to pause
after all of them.
3. Upper and lower cases
Lojban doesn't use lower-case (small) letters and upper-case (capital) letters i
n the same way that English does; sentences do not begin with an upper-case lett
er, nor do names. However, upper-case letters are used in Lojban to mark irregul
ar stress within names, thus:
3.1) .iVAN.
the name `Ìvan'' in Russian/Slavic pronunciation.
It would require far too many cmavo to assign one for each upper-case and one fo
r each lower-case lerfu, so instead we have two special cmavo ``ga'e'' and ``to'
a'' representing upper case and lower case respectively. They belong to the same
selma'o as the basic lerfu words, namely BY, and they may be freely intersperse
d with them.
The effect of ``ga'e'' is to change the interpretation of all lerfu words follow
ing it to be the upper-case version of the lerfu. An occurrence of ``to'a'' caus
es the interpretation to revert to lower case. Thus, ``ga'e .abu'' means not `à
'' but `À'', and Ivan's name may be spelled out thus:
3.2) .ibu ga'e vy. .abu ny. to'a
i [upper] V A N [lower]
The cmavo and compound cmavo of this type will be called ``shift words''.
How long does a shift word last? Theoretically, until the next shift word that c
ontradicts it or until the end of text. In practice, it is common to presume tha
t a shift word is only in effect until the next word other than a lerfu word is
found.
It is often convenient to shift just a single letter to upper case. The cmavo ``
tau'', of selma'o LAU, is useful for the purpose. A LAU cmavo must always be imm
ediately followed by a BY cmavo or its equivalent: the combination is grammatica
lly equivalent to a single BY. (See Section 14 for details.)
A likely use of ``tau'' is in the internationally standardized symbols for the c
hemical elements. Each element is represented using either a single upper-case l
erfu or one upper-case lerfu followed by one lower-case lerfu:
3.3) tau sy.
[single shift] S
S (chemical symbol for sulfur)
3.4) tau sy. .ibu
[single shift] S i
Si (chemical symbol for silicon)
If a shift to upper-case is in effect when ``tau'' appears, it shifts the next l
erfu word only to lower case, reversing its usual effect.
4. The universal ``bu''
So far we have seen ``bu'' only as a suffix to vowel cmavo to produce vowel lerf
u words. Originally, this was the only use of ``bu''. In developing the lerfu wo
rd system, however, it proved to be useful to allow ``bu'' to be attached to any
word whatsoever, in order to allow arbitrary extensions of the basic lerfu word
set.
Formally, ``bu'' may be attached to any single Lojban word. Compound cmavo do no
t count as words for this purpose. The special cmavo ``ba'e'', ``za'e'', ``zei''
, ``zo'', ``zoi'', ``la'o'', ``lo'u'', ``si'', ``sa'', ``su'', and ``fa'o'' may
not have ``bu'' attached, because they are interpreted before ``bu'' detection i
s done; in particular,
4.1) zo bu
the word ``bu''
is needed when discussing ``bu'' in Lojban. It is also illegal to attach ``bu''
to itself, but more than one ``bu'' may be attached to a word; thus ``.abubu'' i
s legal, if ugly. (Its meaning is not defined, but it is presumably different fr
om ``.abu''.) It does not matter if the word is a cmavo, a cmene, or a brivla. A
ll such words suffixed by ``bu'' are treated grammatically as if they were cmavo
belonging to selma'o BY. However, if the word is a cmene it is always necessary
to precede and follow it by a pause, because otherwise the cmene may absorb pre
ceding or following words.
The ability to attach ``bu'' to words has been used primarily to make names for
various logograms and other unusual characters. For example, the Lojban name for
the ``happy face'' is ``.uibu'', based on the attitudinal ``.ui'' that means ``
happiness''. Likewise, the ``smiley face'', written ``:-)'' and used on computer
networks to indicate humor, is called ``zo'obu'' The existence of these names d
oes not mean that you should insert ``.uibu'' into running Lojban text to indica
te that you are happy, or ``zo'obu'' when something is funny; instead, use the a
ppropriate attitudinal directly.
Likewise, ``joibu'' represents the ampersand character, ``&'', based on the cmav
o ``joi'' meaning ``mixed and''. Many more such lerfu words will probably be inv
ented in future.
The ``.'' and ``,'' characters used in Lojbanic writing to represent pause and s
yllable break respectively have been assigned the lerfu words ``denpa bu'' (lite
rally, ``pause bu'') and ``slaka bu'' (literally, ``syllable bu''). The written
space is mandatory here, because ``denpa'' and ``slaka'' are normal gismu with n
ormal stress: ``denpabu'' would be a fu'ivla (word borrowed from another languag
e into Lojban) stressed ``denPAbu''. No pause is required between ``denpa'' (or
``slaka'') and ``bu'', though.
5. Alien alphabets
As stated in Section 1, Lojban's goal of cultural neutrality demands a standard
set of lerfu words for the lerfu of as many other writing systems as possible. W
hen we meet these lerfu in written text (particularly, though not exclusively, m
athematical text), we need a standard Lojbanic way to pronounce them.
There are certainly hundreds of alphabets and other writing systems in use aroun
d the world, and it is probably an unachievable goal to create a single system w
hich can express all of them, but if perfection is not demanded, a usable system
can be created from the raw material which Lojban provides.
One possibility would be to use the lerfu word associated with the language itse
lf, Lojbanized and with ``bu'' added. Indeed, an isolated Greek `àlpha'' in run
ning Lojban text is probably most easily handled by calling it ``.alfas. bu''. H
ere the Greek lerfu word has been made into a Lojbanized name by adding ``s'' an
d then into a Lojban lerfu word by adding ``bu''. Note that the pause after ``.a
lfas.'' is still needed.
Likewise, the easiest way to handle the Latin letters ``h'', ``q'', and ``w'' th
at are not used in Lojban is by a consonant lerfu word with ``bu'' attached. The
following assignments have been made:
.y'y.bu h
ky.bu q
vy.bu w
As an example, the English word ``quack'' would be spelled in Lojban thus:
5.1) ky.bu .ubu .abu cy. ky.
``q'' `ù'' `à'' ``c'' ``k''
Note that the fact that the letter ``c'' in this word has nothing to do with the
sound of the Lojban letter ``c'' is irrelevant; we are spelling an English word
and English rules control the choice of letters, but we are speaking Lojban and
Lojban rules control the pronunciations of those letters.
A few more possibilities for Latin-alphabet letters used in languages other than
English:
ty.bu Ã¾ (thorn)
dy.bu &edh; (edh)
However, this system is not ideal for all purposes. For one thing, it is
verbose. The native lerfu words are often quite long, and with ``bu'' added
they become even longer: the worst-case Greek lerfu word would be
``.Omikron. bu'', with four syllables and two mandatory pauses. In addition,
alphabets that are used by many languages have separate sets of lerfu words
for each language, and which set is Lojban to choose?
The alternative plan, therefore, is to use a shift word similar to those introdu
ced in Section 3. After the appearance of such a shift word, the regular lerfu w
ords are re-interpreted to represent the lerfu of the alphabet now in use. After
a shift to the Greek alphabet, for example, the lerfu word ``ty'' would represe
nt not Latin ``t'' but Greek ``tau''. Why ``tau''? Because it is, in some sense,
the closest counterpart of ``t'' within the Greek lerfu system. In principle it
would be all right to map ``ty.'' to ``phi'' or even `òmega'', but such an arb
itrary relationship would be extremely hard to remember.
Where no obvious closest counterpart exists, some more or less arbitrary choice
must be made. Some alien lerfu may simply not have any shifted equivalent, forci
ng the speaker to fall back on a ``bu'' form. Since a ``bu'' form may mean diffe
rent things in different alphabets, it is safest to employ a shift word even whe
n ``bu'' forms are in use.
Shifts for several alphabets have been assigned cmavo of selma'o BY:
lo'a Latin/Roman/Lojban alphabet
ge'o Greek alphabet
je'o Hebrew alphabet
jo'o Arabic alphabet
ru'o Cyrillic alphabet
The cmavo ``zai'' (of selma'o LAU) is used to create shift words to still other
alphabets. The BY word which must follow any LAU cmavo would typically be a name
representing the alphabet with ``bu'' suffixed:
5.2) zai .devanagar. bu
Devanagari (Hindi) alphabet
5.3) zai .katakan. bu
Japanese katakana syllabary
5.4) zai .xiragan. bu
Japanese hiragana syllabary
Unlike the cmavo above, these shift words have not been standardized and probabl
y will not be until someone actually has a need for them. (Note the ``.'' charac
ters marking leading and following pauses.)
In addition, there may be multiple visible representations within a single alpha
bet for a given letter: roman vs. italics, handwriting vs. print, Bodoni vs. Hel
vetica. These traditional ``font and face'' distinctions are also represented by
shift words, indicated with the cmavo ``ce'a'' (of selma'o LAU) and a following
BY word:
5.5) ce'a .xelveticas. bu
Helvetica font
5.6) ce'a .xancisk. bu
handwriting
5.7) ce'a .pavrel. bu
12-point font size
The cmavo ``na'a'' (of selma'o BY) is a universal shift-word cancel: it returns
the interpretation of lerfu words to the default of lower-case Lojban with no sp
ecific font. It is more general than ``lo'a'', which changes the alphabet only,
potentially leaving font and case shifts in place.
Several sections at the end of this chapter contain tables of proposed lerfu wor
d assignments for various languages.
6. Accent marks and compound lerfu words
Many languages that make use of the Latin alphabet add special marks to some of
the lerfu they use. French, for example, uses three accent marks above vowels, c
alled (in English) `àcute'', ``grave'', and ``circumflex''. Likewise, German us
es a mark called `ùmlaut''; a mark which looks the same is also used in French,
but with a different name and meaning.
These marks may be considered lerfu, and each has a corresponding lerfu word in
Lojban. So far, no problem. But the marks appear over lerfu, whereas the words m
ust be spoken (or written) either before or after the lerfu word representing th
e basic lerfu. Typewriters (for mechanical reasons) and the computer programs th
at emulate them usually require their users to type the accent mark before the b
asic lerfu, whereas in speech the accent mark is often pronounced afterwards (fo
r example, in German `à umlaut'' is preferred to `ùmlaut a'').
Lojban cannot settle this question by fiat. Either it must be left up to default
interpretation depending on the language in question, or the lerfu-word compoun
ding cmavo ``tei'' (of selma'o TEI) and ``foi'' (of selma'o FOI) must be used. T
hese cmavo are always used in pairs; any number of lerfu words may appear betwee
n them, and the whole is treated as a single compound lerfu word. The French wor
d ``Ã©tÃ©'', with acute accent marks on both `è'' lerfu, could be spelled as:
6.1) tei .ebu .akut. bu foi ty. tei .akut. bu .ebu foi
( `è'' acute ) ``t'' ( acute `è'' )
and it does not matter whether `àkut. bu'' appears before or after ``.ebu''; th
e ``tei ... foi'' grouping guarantees that the acute accent is associated with t
he correct lerfu. Of course, the level of precision represented by Example 6.1 w
ould rarely be required: it might be needed by a Lojban-speaker when spelling ou
t a French word for exact transcription by another Lojban-speaker who did not kn
ow French.
This system breaks down in languages which use more than one accent mark on a si
ngle lerfu; some other convention must be used for showing which accent marks ar
e written where in that case. The obvious convention is to represent the mark ne
arest the basic lerfu by the lerfu word closest to the word representing the bas
ic lerfu. Any remaining ambiguities must be resolved by further conventions not
yet established.
Some languages, like Swedish and Finnish, consider certain accented lerfu to be
completely distinct from their unaccented equivalents, but Lojban does not make
a formal distinction, since the printed characters look the same whether they ar
e reckoned as separate letters or not. In addition, some languages consider cert
ain 2-letter combinations (like ``ll'' and ``ch'' in Spanish) to be letters; thi
s may be represented by enclosing the combination in ``tei ... foi''.
In addition, when discussing a specific language, it is permissible to make up n
ew lerfu words, as long as they are either explained locally or well understood
from context: thus Spanish ``ll'' or Croatian ``lj'' could be called ``libu'', b
ut that usage would not necessarily be universally understood.
Section 19 contains a table of proposed lerfu words for some common accent marks
.
7. Punctuation marks
Lojban does not have punctuation marks as such: the denpa bu and the slaka bu ar
e really a part of the alphabet. Other languages, however, use punctuation marks
extensively. As yet, Lojban does not have any words for these punctuation marks
, but a mechanism exists for devising them: the cmavo ``lau'' of selma'o LAU. ``
lau'' must always be followed by a BY word; the interpretation of the BY word is
changed from a lerfu to a punctuation mark. Typically, this BY word would be a
name or brivla with a ``bu'' suffix.
Why is ``lau'' necessary at all? Why not just use a ``bu''-marked word and annou
nce that it is always to be interpreted as a punctuation mark? Primarily to avoi
d ambiguity. The ``bu'' mechanism is extremely open-ended, and it is easy for Lo
jban users to make up ``bu'' words without bothering to explain what they mean.
Using the ``lau'' cmavo flags at least the most important of such nonce lerfu wo
rds as having a special function: punctuation. (Exactly the same argument applie
s to the use of ``zai'' to signal an alphabet shift or ``ce'a'' to signal a font
shift.)
Since different alphabets require different punctuation marks, the interpretatio
n of a ``lau''-marked lerfu word is affected by the current alphabet shift and t
he current font shift.
8. What about Chinese characters?
Chinese characters (``han4zi4'' in Chinese, ``kanji'' in Japanese) represent an
entirely different approach to writing from alphabets or syllabaries. (A syllaba
ry, such as Japanese hiragana or Amharic writing, has one lerfu for each syllabl
e of the spoken language.) Very roughly, Chinese characters represent single ele
ments of meaning; also very roughly, they represent single syllables of spoken C
hinese. There is in principle no limit to the number of Chinese characters that
can exist, and many thousands are in regular use.
It is hopeless for Lojban, with its limited lerfu and shift words, to create an
alphabet which will match this diversity. However, there are various possible wa
ys around the problem.
First, both Chinese and Japanese have standard Latin-alphabet representations, k
nown as ``pinyin'' for Chinese and ``romaji'' for Japanese, and these can be use
d. Thus, the word ``han4zi4'' is conventionally written with two characters, but
it may be spelled out as:
8.1) .y'y.bu .abu ny. vo zy. .ibu vo
``h'' `à'' ``n'' 4 ``z'' `ì'' 4
The cmavo ``vo'' is the Lojban digit ``4''. It is grammatical to intersperse dig
its (of selma'o PA) into a string of lerfu words; as long as the first cmavo is
a lerfu word, the whole will be interpreted as a string of lerfu words. In Chine
se, the digits can be used to represent tones. Pinyin is more usually written us
ing accent marks, the mechanism for which was explained in Section 6.
The Japanese company named ``Mitsubishi'' in English is spelled the same way in
romaji, and could be spelled out in Lojban thus:
8.2) my. .ibu ty. sy. .ubu by. .ibu sy. .y'y.bu .ibu
``m'' `ì'' ``t'' ``s'' `ù'' ``b'' `ì'' ``s'' ``h'' `ì''
Alternatively, a really ambitious Lojbanist could assign lerfu words to the indi
vidual strokes used to write Chinese characters (there are about seven or eight
of them if you are a flexible human being, or about 40 if you are a rigid comput
er program), and then represent each character with a ``tei'', the stroke lerfu
words in the order of writing (which is standardized for each character), and a
``foi''. No one has as yet attempted this project.
9. lerfu words as pro-sumti
So far, lerfu words have only appeared in Lojban text when spelling out words. T
here are several other grammatical uses of lerfu words within Lojban. In each ca
se, a single lerfu word or more than one may be used. Therefore, the term ``lerf
u string'' is introduced: it is short for ``sequence of one or more lerfu words'
'.
A lerfu string may be used as a pro-sumti (a sumti which refers to some previous
sumti), just like the pro-sumti ``ko'a'', ``ko'e'', and so on:
9.1) .abu prami by.
A loves B
In Example 9.1, ``.abu'' and ``by.'' represent specific sumti, but which sumti t
hey represent must be inferred from context.
Alternatively, lerfu strings may be assigned by ``goi'', the regular pro-sumti a
ssignment cmavo:
9.2) le gerku goi gy. cu xekri .i gy. klama le zdani
The dog, or G, is black. G goes to the house.
There is a special rule that sometimes makes lerfu strings more advantageous tha
n the regular pro-sumti cmavo. If no assignment can be found for a lerfu string
(especially a single lerfu word), it can be assumed to refer to the most recent
sumti whose name or description begins in Lojban with that lerfu. So Example 9.2
can be rephrased:
9.3) le gerku cu xekri. .i gy. klama le zdani
The dog is black. G goes to the house.
(A less literal English translation would use ``D'' for ``dog'' instead.)
Here is an example using two names and longer lerfu strings:
9.4) la stivn. mark. djonz. merko
.i la .aleksandr. paliitc. kuzNIETsyf. rusko
.i symyjy. tavla .abupyky. bau la lojban.
Steven Mark Jones is-American.
Alexander Pavlovitch Kuznetsov is-Russian.
SMJ talks-to APK in Lojban.
Perhaps Alexander's name should be given as ``ru'o.abupyky'' instead.
What about
9.5) .abu dunda by. cy.
A gives B C
Does this mean that A gives B to C? No. ``by. cy.'' is a single lerfu string, al
though written as two words, and represents a single pro-sumti. The true interpr
etation is that A gives BC to someone unspecified. To solve this problem, we nee
d to introduce the elidable terminator ``boi'' (of selma'o BOI). This cmavo is u
sed to terminate lerfu strings and also strings of numerals; it is required when
two of these appear in a row, as here. (The other reason to use ``boi'' is to a
ttach a free modifier --- subscript, parenthesis, or what have you --- to a lerf
u string.) The correct version is:
9.6) .abu [boi] dunda by. boi cy. [boi]
A gives B to C
where the two occurrences of ``boi'' in brackets are elidable, but the remaining
occurrence is not. Likewise:
9.7) xy. boi ro [boi] prenu cu prami
X all persons loves.
X loves everybody.
requires the first ``boi'' to separate the lerfu string ``xy.'' from the digit s
tring ``ro''.
10. References to lerfu
The rules of Section 9 make it impossible to use unmarked lerfu words to refer t
o lerfu themselves. In the sentence:
10.1) .abu. cu lerfu
A is-a-letteral.
the hearer would try to find what previous sumti ``.abu'' refers to. The solutio
n to this problem makes use of the cmavo ``me'o'' of selma'o LI, which makes a l
erfu string into a sumti representing that very string of lerfu. This use of ``m
e'o'' is a special case of its mathematical use, which is to introduce a mathema
tical expression used literally rather than for its value.
10.2) me'o .abu cu lerfu
the-expression `à'' is-a-letteral.
Now we can translate Example 1.1 into Lojban:
10.4) dei vasru vo lerfu
po'u me'o .ebu
this-sentence contains four letterals
which-are the-expression `è''.
This sentence contains four `è''s.
Since the Lojban sentence has only four `è'' lerfu rather than fourteen, the tr
anslation is not a literal one --- but Example 10.4 is a Lojban truth just as Ex
ample 1.1 is an English truth. Coincidentally, the colloquial English translatio
n of Example 10.4 is also true!
The reader might be tempted to use quotation with ``lu ... li'u'' instead of ``m
e'o'', producing:
10.4.5) lu .abu li'u cu lerfu
[quote] .abu [unquote] is-a-letteral.
(The single-word quote ``zo'' cannot be used, because ``.abu'' is a compound cma
vo.) But Example 10.4 is false, because it says:
10.5) The word ``.abu'' is a letteral
which is not the case; rather, the thing symbolized by the word ``.abu'' is a le
tteral. In Lojban, that would be:
10.6) la'e lu .abu li'u cu lerfu
The-referent-of [quote] .abu [unquote] is-a-letteral.
which is correct.
11. Mathematical uses of lerfu strings
This chapter is not about Lojban mathematics, which is explained in Chapter 18,
so the mathematical uses of lerfu strings will be listed and exemplified but not
explained.
A lerfu string as mathematical variable:
11.1) li .abu du li by. su'i cy.
the-number a equals the-number b plus c
a = b + c
A lerfu string as function name (preceded by ``ma'o'' of selma'o MAhO):
11.2) li .y.bu du li ma'o fy. boi xy.
the-number y equals the number the-function f of x
y = f(x)
Note the ``boi'' here to separate the lerfu strings ``fy'' and ``xy''.
A lerfu string as selbri (followed by a cmavo of selma'o MOI):
11.3) le vi ratcu ny.moi le'i mi ratcu
the here rat is-nth-of the-set-of my rats
This rat is my Nth rat.
A lerfu string as utterance ordinal (followed by a cmavo of selma'o MAI):
11.4) ny.mai
Nthly
A lerfu string as subscript (preceded by ``xi'' of selma'o XI):
11.5) xy. xi ky.
x sub k
A lerfu string as quantifier (enclosed in ``vei ... ve'o'' parentheses):
11.6) vei ny. [ve'o] lo prenu
( ``n'' ) persons
The parentheses are required because ``ny. lo prenu'' would be two separate sumt
i, ``ny.'' and ``lo prenu''. In general, any mathematical expression other than
a simple number must be in parentheses when used as a quantifier; the right pare
nthesis mark, the cmavo ``ve'o'', can usually be elided.
All the examples above have exhibited single lerfu words rather than lerfu strin
gs, in accordance with the conventions of ordinary mathematics. A longer lerfu s
tring would still be treated as a single variable or function name: in Lojban, `
`.abu by. cy.'' is not the multiplication `à x b x c'' but is the variable `àb
c''. (Of course, a local convention could exist that made the value of a variabl
e like `àbc'', with a multi-lerfu-word name, equal to the values of the variabl
es `à'', ``b'', and ``c'' multiplied together.)
There is a special rule about shift words in mathematical text: shifts within ma
thematical expressions do not affect lerfu words appearing outside
mathematical expressions, and vice versa.
12. Acronyms
An acronym is a name constructed of lerfu. English examples are ``DNA'', ``NATO'
', ``CIA''. In English, some of these are spelled out (like ``DNA'' and ``CIA'')
and others are pronounced more or less as if they were ordinary English words (
like ``NATO''). Some acronyms fluctuate between the two pronunciations: ``SQL''
may be `èss cue ell'' or ``sequel''.
In Lojban, a name can be almost any sequence of sounds that ends in a consonant
and is followed by a pause. The easiest way to Lojbanize acronym names is to glu
e the lerfu words together, using ``''' wherever two vowels would come together
(pauses are illegal in names) and adding a final consonant:
12.1) la dyny'abub. .i la ny'abuty'obub.
.i la cy'ibu'abub. .i la sykybulyl.
.i la .ibubymym. .i la ny'ybucyc.
DNA. NATO.
CIA. SQL.
IBM. NYC.
There is no fixed convention for assigning the final consonant. In Example 12.1,
the last consonant of the lerfu string has been replicated into final position.
Some compression can be done by leaving out ``bu'' after vowel lerfu words (exce
pt for ``.y.bu'', wherein the ``bu'' cannot be omitted without ambiguity). Compr
ession is moderately important because it's hard to say long names without intro
ducing an involuntary (and illegal) pause:
12.2) la dyny'am. .i la ny'aty'om.
.i la cy'i'am. .i la sykybulym.
.i la .ibymym. .i la ny'ybucym.
DNA. NATO.
CIA. SQL.
IBM. NYC.
In Example 12.2, the final consonant ``m'' stands for ``merko'', indicating the
source culture of these acronyms.
Another approach, which some may find easier to say and which is compatible with
older versions of the language that did not have a ``''' character, is to use t
he consonant ``z'' instead of ``''':
12.3) la dynyzaz. .i la nyzatyzoz.
.i la cyzizaz. .i la sykybulyz.
.i la .ibymyz. .i la nyzybucyz.
DNA. NATO.
CIA. SQL.
IBM. NYC.
One more alternative to these lengthy names is to use the lerfu string itself pr
efixed with ``me'', the cmavo that makes sumti into selbri:
12.4) la me dy ny. .abu
that-named what-pertains-to ``d'' ``n'' `à''
This works because ``la'', the cmavo that normally introduces names used as sumt
i, may also be used before a predicate to indicate that the predicate is a (mean
ingful) name:
12.5) la cribe cu ciska
that-named ``Bear'' writes
Bear is a writer
Example 12.5 does not of course refer to a bear (``le cribe'' or ``lo cribe'') b
ut to something else, probably a person, named ``Bear''. Similarly, ``me dy ny.
.abu'' is a predicate which can be used as a name, producing a kind of acronym w
hich can have pauses between the individual lerfu words.
13. Computerized character codes
Since the first application of computers to non-numerical information, character
sets have existed, mapping numbers (called ``character codes'') into selected l
erfu, digits, and punctuation marks (collectively called ``characters''). Histor
ically, these character sets have only covered the English alphabet and a few se
lected punctuation marks. International efforts are now underway to create a uni
fied character set that can represent essentially all the characters in essentia
lly all the world's writing systems. Lojban can take advantage of these encoding
schemes by using the cmavo ``se'e'' (of selma'o BY). This cmavo is conventional
ly followed by digit cmavo of selma'o PA representing the character code, and th
e whole string indicates a single character in some computerized character set:
13.1) me'o se'ecixa cu lerfu
la .asycy'i'is. loi merko rupnu
the-expression [code] 36 is-a-letteral
in-set ASCII
for-the-mass-of American currency-units.
The character code 36 in ASCII represents
American dollars.
``&dollar;'' represents American dollars.
Understanding Example 13.1 depends on knowing the value in the ASCII character s
et (one of the simplest and oldest) of the ``&dollar;'' character. Therefore, th
e ``se'e'' convention is only intelligible to those who know the underlying char
acter set. For precisely specifying a particular character, however, it has the
advantages of unambiguity and (relative) cultural neutrality, and therefore Lojb
an provides a means for those with access to descriptions of such character sets
to take advantage of them.
As another example, the Unicode character set (also known as ISO 10646) represen
ts the international symbol of peace, an inverted trident in a circle, using the
base-16 value 262E. In a suitable context, a Lojbanist may say:
13.2) me'o se'erexarerei sinxa le ka panpi
the-expression [code] 262E is-a-sign-of
the quality-of being-at-peace
When a ``se'e'' string appears in running discourse, some metalinguistic convent
ion must specify whether the number is base 10 (as above) or some other base, an
d which character set is in use.
14. List of all auxiliary lerfu-word cmavo
cmavo selma'o meaning
bu BU makes previous word into
a lerfu word
ga'e BY upper case shift
to'a BY lower case shift
tau LAU case-shift next lerfu word only
lo'a BY Latin/Lojban alphabet shift
ge'o BY Greek alphabet shift
je'o BY Hebrew alphabet shift
jo'o BY Arabic alphabet shift
ru'o BY Cyrillic alphabet shift
se'e BY following digits are
a character code
na'a BY cancel all shifts
zai LAU following lerfu word
specifies alphabet
ce'a LAU following lerfu word
specifies font
lau LAU following lerfu word
is punctuation
tei TEI start compound lerfu word
foi FOI end compound lerfu word
Note that LAU cmavo must be followed by a BY cmavo or the equivalent, where `èq
uivalent'' means: either any Lojban word followed by ``bu'', another LAU cmavo (
and its required sequel), or a ``tei ... foi'' compound cmavo.
15. Proposed lerfu words --- introduction
The following sections contain tables of proposed lerfu words for some of the st
andard alphabets supported by the Lojban lerfu system. The first column of each
list is the lerfu (actually, a Latin-alphabet name sufficient to identify it). T
he second column is the proposed name-based lerfu word, and the third column is
the proposed lerfu word in the system based on using the cmavo of selma'o BY wit
h a shift word.
These tables are not meant to be authoritative (several authorities within the L
ojban community have niggled over them extensively, disagreeing with each other
and sometimes with themselves). They provide a working basis until actual usage
is available, rather than a final resolution of lerfu word problems. Probably th
e system presented here will evolve somewhat before settling down into a final,
conventional form.
For Latin-alphabet lerfu words, see Section 2 (for Lojban) and Section 5 (for no
n-Lojban Latin-alphabet lerfu).
16. Proposed lerfu words for the Greek alphabet
alpha .alfas. bu .abu
beta .betas. bu by
gamma .gamas. bu gy
delta .deltas. bu dy
epsilon .Epsilon. bu .ebu
zeta .zetas. bu zy
eta .etas. bu .e'ebu
theta .tetas. bu ty. bu
iota .iotas. bu .ibu
kappa .kapas. bu ky
lambda .lymdas. bu ly
mu .mus. bu my
nu .nus. bu ny
xi .ksis. bu ksis. bu
omicron .Omikron. bu .obu
pi .pis. bu py
rho .ros. bu ry
sigma .sigmas. bu sy
tau .taus. bu ty
upsilon .Upsilon. bu .ubu
phi .fis. bu py. bu
chi .xis. bu ky. bu
psi .psis. bu psis. bu
omega .omegas. bu .o'obu
rough .dasei,as. bu .y'y
smooth .psiles. bu xutla bu
17. Proposed lerfu words for the Cyrillic alphabet
The second column in this listing is based on the historical names of the letter
s in Old Church Slavonic. Only those letters used in Russian are shown; other la
nguages require more letters which can be devised as needed.
a .azys. bu .abu
b .bukys. bu by
v .vedis. bu vy
g .glagolis. bu gy
d .dobros. bu dy
e .iestys. bu .ebu
zh .jivet. bu jy
z .zemlias. bu zy
i .ije,is. bu .ibu
short i .itord. bu
k .kakos. bu ky
l .liudi,ies. bu ly
m .myslites. bu my
n .naciys. bu ny
o .onys. bu .obu
p .pokois. bu py
r .riytsis. bu ry
s .slovos. bu sy
t .tvriydos. bu ty
u .ukys. bu .ubu
f .friytys. bu fy
kh .xerys. bu xy
ts .tsis. bu tsys. bu
ch .tcriyviys. bu tcys. bu
sh .cas. bu cy
shch .ctas. bu ctcys. bu
hard sign .ier. bu jdari bu
yeri .ierys. bu .y.bu
soft sign .ieriys. bu ranti bu
reversed e .ecarn. bu
yu .ius. bu .iubu
ya .ias. bu .iabu
18. Proposed lerfu words for the Hebrew alphabet
aleph .alef. bu .alef. bu
bet .bet. bu by
gimel .gimel. bu gy
daled .daled. bu dy
he .xex. bu .y'y
vav .vav. bu vy
zayin .zai,in. bu zy
khet .xet. bu xy. bu
tet .tet. bu ty. bu
yud .iud. bu .iud. bu
kaf .kaf. bu ky
lamed .LYmed. bu ly
mem .mem. bu my
nun .nun. bu ny
samekh .samex. bu samex. bu
ayin .ai,in. bu .ai,in bu
pe .pex. bu py
tzadi .tsadik. bu tsadik. bu
quf .kuf. bu ky. bu
resh .rec. bu ry
shin .cin. bu cy
sin .sin. bu sy
taf .taf. bu ty.
dagesh .daGEC. bu daGEC. bu
hiriq .xirik. bu .ibu
tzeirekh .tseirex. bu .eibu
segol .seGOL. bu .ebu
qubbutz .kubuts. bu .ubu
qamatz .kamats. bu .abu
patach .patax. bu .a'abu
sheva .cyVAS. bu .y.bu
kholem .xolem. bu .obu
shuruq .curuk. bu .u'ubu
19. Proposed lerfu words for some accent marks and multiple letters
This list is intended to be suggestive, not complete: there are lerfu such as Po
lish ``dark'' l and Maltese h-bar that do not yet have symbols.
acute .akut. bu or
.pritygal. bu [pritu galtu]
grave .grav. bu
or .zulgal. bu [zunle galtu]
circumflex .cirkumfleks. bu
or .midgal. bu [midju galtu]
tilde .tildes. bu
macron .makron. bu
breve .brevis. bu
over-dot .garmoc. bu [gapru mokca]
umlaut/trema relmoc. bu [re mokca]
over-ring .garjin. bu [gapru djine]
cedilla .seDIlys. bu
double-acute .re'akut. bu [re akut.]
ogonek .ogoniek. bu
hacek .xatcek. bu
ligatured fi tei fy. ibu foi
Danish/Latin ae tei .abu .ebu foi
Dutch ij tei .ibu jy. foi
German es-zed tei sy. zy. foi
20. Proposed lerfu words for radio communication
There is a set of English words which are used, by international agreement, as l
erfu words (for the English alphabet) over the radio, or in noisy situations whe
re the utmost clarity is required. Formally they are known as the `ÌCAO Phoneti
c Alphabet'', and are used even in non-English-speaking countries.
This table presents the standard English spellings and proposed Lojban versions.
The Lojbanizations are not straightforward renderings of the English sounds, bu
t make some concessions both to the English spellings of the words and to the Lo
jban pronunciations of the lerfu (thus ``carlis. bu'', not ``tcarlis. bu'').
Alfa .alfas. bu
Bravo .bravos. bu
Charlie .carlis. bu
Delta .deltas. bu
Echo .ekos. bu
Foxtrot .fokstrot. bu
Golf .golf. bu
Hotel .xoTEL. bu
India .indias. bu
Juliet .juliet. bu
Kilo .kilos. bu
Lima .limas. bu
Mike .maik. bu
November .novembr. bu
Oscar .oskar. bu
Papa .paPAS. bu
Quebec .keBEK. bu
Romeo .romios. bu
Sierra .sieras. bu
Tango .tangos. bu
Uniform .Uniform. bu
Victor .viktas. bu
Whiskey .uiskis. bu
X-ray .eksreis. bu
Yankee .iankis. bu
Zulu .zulus. bu
Chapter 18
lojbau mekso: Mathematical Expressions in Lojban
1. Introductory
lojbau mekso (``Lojbanic mathematical-expression'') is the part of the Lojban la
nguage that is tailored for expressing statements of a mathematical character, o
r for adding numerical information to non-mathematical statements. Its formal de
sign goals include:
1)
representing all the different forms of expression used by mathematicians in
their normal modes of writing, so that a reader can unambiguously read off math
ematical text as written with minimal effort and expect a listener to understand
it;
2)
providing a vocabulary of commonly used mathematical terms which can readily
be expanded to include newly coined words using the full resources of Lojban;
3)
permitting the formulation, both in writing and in speech, of unambiguous ma
thematical text;
4)
encompassing all forms of quantified expression found in natural languages,
as well as encouraging greater precision in ordinary language situations than na
tural languages allow.
Goal 1 requires that mekso not be constrained to a single notation such as Polis
h notation or reverse Polish notation, but make provision for all forms, with th
e most commonly used forms the most easily used.
Goal 2 requires the provision of several conversion mechanisms, so that the boun
dary between mekso and full Lojban can be crossed from either side at many point
s.
Goal 3 is the most subtle. Written mathematical expression is culturally unambig
uous, in the sense that mathematicians in all parts of the world understand the
same written texts to have the same meanings. However, international mathematica
l notation does not prescribe unique forms. For example, the expression
1.1) 3x + 2y
contains omitted multiplication operators, but there are other possible interpre
tations for the strings ``3x'' and ``2y'' than as mathematical multiplication. T
herefore, the Lojban verbal (spoken and written) form of Example 1.1 must not om
it the multiplication operators.
The remainder of this chapter explains (in as much detail as is currently possib
le) the mekso system. This chapter is by intention complete as regards mekso com
ponents, but only suggestive about uses of those components --- as of now, there
has been no really comprehensive use made of mekso facilities, and many matters
must await the test of usage to be fully clarified.
2. Lojban numbers
pa PA 1
re PA 2
ci PA 3
vo PA 4
mu PA 5
xa PA 6
ze PA 7
bi PA 8
so PA 9
no PA 0
The simplest kind of mekso are numbers, which are cmavo or compound cmavo. There
are cmavo for each of the 10 decimal digits, and numbers greater than 9 are mad
e by stringing together the cmavo. Some examples:
2.1) pa re ci
one two three
123
one hundred and twenty three
2.2) pa no
one zero
10
ten
2.3) pa re ci vo mu xa ze bi so no
one two three four five six seven eight nine zero
1234567890
one billion, two hundred and thirty-four million,
five hundred and sixty-seven thousand,
eight hundred and ninety.
Therefore, there are no separate cmavo for ``ten'', ``hundred'', etc.
There is a pattern to the digit cmavo (except for ``no'', 0) which is worth expl
aining. The cmavo from 1 to 5 end in the vowels `à'', `è'', `ì'', `ò'', `ù'
' respectively; and the cmavo from 6 to 9 likewise end in the vowels `à'', `è'
', `ì'', and `ò'' respectively. None of the digit cmavo begin with the same co
nsonant, to make them easy to tell apart in noisy environments.
3. Signs and numerical punctuation
ma'u PA positive sign
ni'u PA negative sign
pi PA decimal point
fi'u PA fraction slash
ra'e PA repeating decimal
ce'i PA percent sign
ki'o PA comma between digits
A number can be given an explicit sign by the use of ``ma'u'' and ``ni'u'', whic
h are the positive and negative signs as distinct from the addition, subtraction
, and negation operators. For example:
3.1) ni'u pa
negative-sign 1
-1
Grammatically, the signs are part of the number to which they are attached. It i
s also possible to use ``ma'u'' and ``ni'u'' by themselves as numbers; the meani
ng of these numbers is explained in Section 8.
Various numerical punctuation marks are likewise expressed by cmavo, as illustra
ted in the following examples:
3.2) ci pi pa vo pa mu
three point one four one five
3.1415
(In some cultures, a comma is used instead of a period in the symbolic version o
f Example 3.2; ``pi'' is still the Lojban representation for the decimal point.)
3.3) re fi'u ze
two fraction seven
2/7
Example 3.3 is the name of the number two-sevenths; it is not the same as ``the
result of 2 divided by 7'' in Lojban, although numerically these two are equal.
If the denominator of the fraction is present but the numerator is not, the nume
rator is taken to be 1, thus expressing the reciprocal of the following number:
3.4) fi'u ze
fraction seven
1/7
3.5) pi ci mu ra'e pa vo re bi mu ze
point three five repeating one four two eight five seven
.35142857142857...
Note that the ``ra'e'' marks unambiguously where the repeating portion ``142857'
' begins.
3.6) ci mu ce'i
three five percent
35%
3.7) pa ki'o re ci vo ki'o mu xa ze
one comma two three four comma five six seven
1,234,567
(In some cultures, spaces are used in the symbolic representation of Example 3.7
; ``ki'o'' is still the Lojban representation.)
It is also possible to have less than three digits between successive ``ki'o''s,
in which case zeros are assumed to have been elided:
3.8) pa ki'o re ci ki'o vo
one comma two three comma four
1,023,004
In the same way, ``ki'o'' can be used after ``pi'' to divide fractions into grou
ps of three:
3.9) pi ki'o re re
point comma two two
.022
3.10) pi pa ki'o pa re ki'o pa
point one comma one two comma one
.101012001
4. Special numbers
ci'i PA infinity
ka'o PA imaginary i, sqrt(-1)
pai PA pi (approx 3.14159...)
te'o PA exponential e (approx 2.71828...)
fi'u PA golden ratio, phi,
(1 + sqrt(5))/2 (approx. 1.61803...)
The last cmavo is the same as the fraction sign cmavo: a fraction sign with neit
her numerator nor denominator represents the golden ratio.
Numbers can have any of these digit, punctuation, and special-number cmavo of Se
ctions 2, 3, and 4 in any combination:
4.1) ma'u ci'i
+Â¥
4.2) ci ka'o re
3i2 (a complex number equivalent to ``3 + 2i'')
Note that ``ka'o'' is both a special number (meaning `ì'') and a number punctua
tion mark (separating the real and the imaginary parts of a complex number).
4.3) ci'i no
infinity zero
Ã
0 (a transfinite cardinal)
The special numbers ``pai'' and ``te'o'' are mathematically important, which is
why they are given their own cmavo:
4.4) pai
pi
4.5) te'o
e
However, many combinations are as yet undefined:
4.6) pa pi re pi ci
1.2.3
4.7) pa ni'u re
1 negative-sign 2
Example 4.5 is not ``1 minus 2'', which is represented by a different cmavo sequ
ence altogether. It is a single number which has not been assigned a meaning. Th
ere are many such numbers which have no well-defined meaning; they may be used f
or experimental purposes or for future expansion of the Lojban number system.
It is possible, of course, that some of these `òddities'' do have a meaningful
use in some restricted area of mathematics. A mathematician appropriating these
structures for specialized use needs to consider whether some other branch of ma
thematics would use the structure differently.
More information on numbers may be found in Sections 8 to 12.
5. Simple infix expressions and equations
du GOhA equals
su'i VUhU plus
vu'u VUhU minus
pi'i VUhU times
te'a VUhU raised to the power
ny. BY letter ``n''
vei VEI left parenthesis
ve'o VEhO right parenthesis
Let us begin at the beginning: one plus one equals two. In Lojban, that sentence
translates to:
5.1) li pa su'i pa du li re
the-number one plus one equals the-number two.
1 + 1 = 2
Example 5.1, a mekso sentence, is a regular Lojban bridi that exploits mekso fea
tures. ``du'' is the predicate meaning ``x1 is mathematically equal to x2''. It
is a cmavo for conciseness, but it has the same grammatical uses as any brivla.
Outside mathematical contexts, ``du'' means ``x1 is identical with x2'' or ``x1
is the same object as x2''.
The cmavo ``li'' is the number article. It is required whenever a sentence talks
about numbers as numbers, as opposed to using numbers to quantify things. For e
xample:
5.2) le ci prenu
the three persons
requires no ``li'' article, because the ``ci'' is being used to specify the numb
er of ``prenu''. However, the sentence
5.3) levi sfani cu grake li ci
this fly masses-in-grams the-number three
This fly has a mass of 3 grams.
requires ``li'' because ``ci'' is being used as a sumti. Note that this is the w
ay in which measurements are stated in Lojban: all the predicates for units of l
ength, mass, temperature, and so on have the measured object as the first place
and a number as the second place. Using ``li'' for ``le'' in Example 5.2 would p
roduce
5.4) li ci prenu
the-number 3 is-a-person
which is grammatical but nonsensical: numbers are not persons.
The cmavo ``su'i'' belongs to selma'o VUhU, which is composed of mathematical op
erators, and means `àddition''. As mentioned before, it is distinct from ``ma'u
'' which means the positive sign as an indication of a positive number:
5.5) li ma'u pa su'i ni'u pa
du li no
the-number positive-sign one plus negative-sign one
equals the-number zero
+1 + -1 = 0
Of course, it is legal to have complex mekso on both sides of ``du'':
5.6) li mu su'i pa
du li ci su'i ci
the-number five plus one
equals the-number three plus three
5 + 1 = 3 + 3
Why don't we say ``li mu su'i li pa'' rather than just ``li mu su'i pa''? The an
swer is that VUhU operators connect mekso operands (numbers, in Example 5.6), no
t general sumti. ``li'' is used to make the entire mekso into a sumti, which the
n plays the roles applicable to other sumti: in Example 5.6, filling the places
of a bridi.
By default, Lojban mathematics is like simple calculator mathematics: there is n
o notion of `òperator precedence''. Consider the following example, where ``pi'
i'' means ``times'', the multiplication operator:
5.7) li ci su'i vo pi'i mu
du li reci
the-number three plus four times five
equals the-number two-three
3 + 4 Ã 5 = 23
Is the Lojban version of Example 5.7 true? No! ``3 + 4 Ã 5'' is indeed 23, because
the usual conventions of mathematics state that multiplication takes precedence
over addition; that is, the multiplication ``4 Ã 5'' is done first, giving 20, and
only then the addition ``3 + 20''. But VUhU operators by default are done left t
o right, like other Lojban grouping, and so a truthful bridi would be:
5.8) li ci su'i vo pi'i mu
du li cimu
the-number three plus four times five
equals the-number three-five
3 + 4 Ã 5 = 35
Here we calculate 3 + 4 first, giving 7, and then calculate 7 Ã 5 second, leading t
o the result 35. While possessing the advantage of simplicity, this result viola
tes the design goal of matching the standards of mathematics. What can be done?
There are three solutions, all of which will probably be used to some degree. Th
e first solution is to ignore the problem. People will say ``li ci su'i vo pi'i
mu'' and mean 23 by it, because the notion that multiplication takes precedence
over addition is too deeply ingrained to be eradicated by Lojban parsing, which
totally ignores semantics. This convention essentially allows semantics to domin
ate syntax in this one area.
(Why not hard-wire the precedences into the grammar, as is done in computer prog
ramming languages? Essentially because there are too many operators, known and u
nknown, with levels of precedence that vary according to usage. The programming
language 'C' has 13 levels of precedence, and its list of operators is not even
extensible. For Lojban this approach is just not practical. In addition, hard-wi
red precedence could not be overridden in mathematical systems such as spreadshe
ets where the conventions are different.)
The second solution is to use explicit means to specify the precedence of operat
ors. This approach is fully general, but clumsy, and will be explained in Sectio
n 20.
The third solution is simple but not very general. When an operator is prefixed
with the cmavo ``bi'e'' (of selma'o BIhE), it becomes automatically of higher pr
ecedence than other operators not so prefixed. Thus,
5.9) li ci su'i vo bi'e pi'i mu
du li reci
the-number three plus four-times-five
equals the-number two-three
3 + 4 Ã 5 = 23
is a truthful Lojban bridi. If more than one operator has a ``bi'e'' prefix, gro
uping is to the right; multiple ``bi'e'' prefixes on a single operator are not a
llowed.
In addition, of course, Lojban has the mathematical parentheses ``vei'' and ``ve
'o'', which can be used just like their written equivalents ``('' and ``)'' to g
roup expressions in any way desired:
5.10) li vei ny. su'i pa ve'o pi'i vei ny. su'i pa [ve'o]
du li ny. [bi'e] te'a re su'i re bi'e pi'i ny. su'i pa
the-number ( ``n'' plus one ) times ( ``n'' plus one )
equals the-number n-power-two plus two-times-``n'' plus 1
(n + 1)(n + 1) = n2 + 2n + 1
There are several new usages in Example 5.10: ``te'a'' means ``raised to the pow
er'', and we also see the use of the lerfu word ``ny'', representing the letter
``n''. In mekso, letters stand for just what they do in ordinary mathematics: va
riables. The parser will accept a string of lerfu words (called a ``lerfu string
'') as the equivalent of a single lerfu word, in agreement with computer-science
conventions; `àbc'' is a single variable, not the equivalent of `à Ã b Ã c''. (Of c
ourse, a local convention could state that the value of a variable like `àbc'',
with a multi-lerfu name, was equal to the values of the variables `à'', ``b'',
and ``c'' multiplied together.)
The explicit operator ``pi'i'' is required in the Lojban verbal form whereas mul
tiplication is implicit in the symbolic form. Note that ``ve'o'' (the right pare
nthesis) is an elidable terminator: the first use of it in Example 5.10 is requi
red, but the second use (marked by square brackets) could be elided. Additionall
y, the first ``bi'e'' (also marked by square brackets) is not necessary to get t
he proper grouping, but it is included here for symmetry with the other one.
6. Forethought operators (Polish notation, functions)
boi BOI numeral/lerfu string terminator
va'a VUhU negation/additive inverse
pe'o PEhO forethought flag
ku'e KUhE forethought terminator
py. BY letter ``p''
xy. BY letter ``x''
zy. BY letter ``z''
ma'o MAhO convert operand to operator
fy. BY letter ``f''
The infix form explained so far is reasonable for many purposes, but it is limit
ed and rigid. It works smoothly only where all operators have exactly two operan
ds, and where precedences can either be assumed from context or are limited to j
ust two levels, with some help from parentheses.
But there are many operators which do not have two operands, or which have a var
iable number of operands. The preferred form of expression in such cases is the
use of ``forethought operators'', also known as Polish notation. In this style o
f writing mathematics, the operator comes first and the operands afterwards:
6.1) li su'i paboi reboi ci[boi] du li xa
the-number the-sum-of one two three equals the-number six
sum(1,2,3) = 6
Note that the normally elidable number terminator ``boi'' is required after ``pa
'' and ``re'' because otherwise the reading would be ``pareci'' = 123. It is not
required after ``ci'' but is inserted here in brackets for the sake of symmetry
. The only time ``boi'' is required is, as in Example 6.1, when there are two co
nsecutive numbers or lerfu strings.
Forethought mekso can use any number of operands, in Example 6.1 three. How do w
e know how many operands there are in ambiguous circumstances? The usual Lojban
solution is employed: an elidable terminator, namely ``ku'e''. Here is an exampl
e:
6.2) li py. su'i va'a ny. ku'e su'i zy du li xy.
the-number ``p'' plus negative-of( ``n'' ) plus ``z''
equals the-number ``x''
p + -n + z = x
where we know that ``va'a'' is a forethought operator because there is no operan
d preceding it.
``va'a'' is the numerical negation operator, of selma'o VUhU. In contrast, j ``v
u'u'' is not used for numerical negation, but only for subtraction, as it always
has two or more operands. Do not confuse ``va'a'' and ``vu'u'', which are opera
tors, with ``ni'u'', which is part of a number.
In Example 6.2, the operator ``va'a'' and the terminator ``ku'e'' serve in effec
t as parentheses. (The regular parentheses ``vei'' and ``ve'o'' are NOT used for
this purpose.) If the ``ku'e'' were omitted, the ``su'i zy'' would be swallowed
up by the ``va'a'' forethought operator, which would then appear to have two op
erands, ``ny'' and ``su'i zy.'', where the latter is also a forethought expressi
on.
Forethought mekso is also useful for matching standard functional notation. How
do we represent ``z = f(x)''? The answer is:
6.3) li zy du li ma'o fy.boi xy.
the-number z equals the-number the-operator f x
z = f(x)
Again, no parentheses are used. The construct ``ma'o fy.boi'' is the equivalent
of an operator, and appears in forethought here (although it could also be used
as a regular infix operator). In mathematics, letters sometimes mean functions a
nd sometimes mean variables, with only the context to tell which. Lojban chooses
to accept the variable interpretation as the default, and uses the special flag
``ma'o'' to mark a lerfu string as an operator. The cmavo ``xy.'' and ``zy.'' a
re variables, but ``fy.'' is an operator (a function) because ``ma'o'' marks it
as such. The ``boi'' is required because otherwise the ``xy.'' would look like p
art of the operator name. (The use of ``ma'o'' can be generalized from lerfu str
ings to any mekso operand: see Section 21.)
When using forethought mekso, the optional marker ``pe'o'' may be placed in fron
t of the operator. This usage can help avoid confusion by providing clearly mark
ed ``pe'o'' and ``ku'e'' pairs to delimit the operand list. Examples 6.1 to 6.3,
respectively, with explicit ``pe'o'' and ``ku'e'':
6.4) li pe'o su'i paboi reboi ciboi ku'e du li xa
6.5) li py. su'i pe'o va'a ny. ku'e su'i zy du li xy.
6.6) li zy du li pe'o ma'o fy.boi xy. ku'e
Note: When using forethought mekso, be sure that the operands really are operand
s: they cannot contain regular infix expressions unless parenthesized with ``vei
'' and ``ve'o''. An earlier version of the complex Example 17.6 came to grief be
cause I forgot this rule.
7. Other useful selbri for mekso bridi
So far our examples have been isolated mekso (it is legal to have a bare mekso a
s a sentence in Lojban) and equation bridi involving ``du''. What about inequali
ties such as ``x < 5''? The answer is to use a bridi with an appropriate selbri,
thus:
7.1) li xy. mleca li mu
the-number x is-less-than the-number 5
Here is a partial list of selbri useful in mathematical bridi:
du x1 is identical to x2, x3, x4, ...
dunli x1 is equal/congruent to x2 in/on
property/quality/dimension/quantity x3
mleca x1 is less than x2
zmadu x1 is greater than x2
dubjavme'a x1 is less than or equal to x2
[du ja mleca, equal or less]
dubjavmau x1 is greater than or equal to x2
[du ja zmadu, equal or greater]
tamdu'i x1 is similar to x2
[tarmi dunli, shape-equal]
turdu'i x1 is isomorphic to x2
[stura dunli, structure-equal]
cmima x1 is a member of set x2
gripau x1 is a subset of set x2
[girzu pagbu, set-part]
na'ujbi x1 is approximately equal to
[namcu jibni, number-near]
terci'e x1 is a component with function x2
of system x3
Note the difference between ``dunli'' and ``du''; ``dunli'' has a third place th
at specifies the kind of equality that is meant. ``du'' refers to actual identit
y, and can have any number of places:
7.2) py. du xy.boi zy.
``p'' is-identical-to ``x'' ``z''
p = x = z
Lojban bridi can have only one predicate, so the ``du'' is not repeated.
Any of these selbri may usefully be prefixed with ``na'', the contradictory nega
tion cmavo, to indicate that the relation is false:
7.3) li re su'i re na du li mu
the-number 2 + 2 is-not equal-to the-number 5.
2 + 2 Â½ 5
As usual in Lojban, negated bridi say what is false, and do not say anything abo
ut what might be true.
8. Indefinite numbers
ro PA all
so'a PA almost all
so'e PA most
so'i PA many
so'o PA several
so'u PA a few
no'o PA the typical number of
da'a PA all but (one) of
piro PA+PA the whole of/all of
piso'a PA+PA almost the whole of
piso'e PA+PA most of
piso'i PA+PA much of
piso'o PA+PA a small part of
piso'u PA+PA a tiny part of
pino'o PA+PA the typical portion of
rau PA enough
du'e PA too many
mo'a PA too few
pirau PA+PA enough of
pidu'e PA+PA too much of
pimo'a PA+PA too little of
Not all the cmavo of PA represent numbers in the usual mathematical sense. For e
xample, the cmavo ``ro'' means `àll'' or `èach''. This number does not have a
definite value in the abstract: ``li ro'' is undefined. But when used to count o
r quantify something, the parallel between ``ro'' and ``pa'' is clearer:
8.1) mi catlu pa prenu
I look-at one person
8.2) mi catlu ro prenu
I look-at all persons
Example 8.1 might be true, whereas Example 8.2 is almost certainly false.
The cmavo ``so'a'', ``so'e'', ``so'i'', ``so'o'', and ``so'u'' represent a set o
f indefinite numbers less than ``ro''. As you go down an alphabetical list, the
magnitude decreases:
8.3) mi catlu so'a prenu
I look-at almost-all persons
8.4) mi catlu so'e prenu
I look-at most persons
8.5) mi catlu so'i prenu
I look-at many persons
8.6) mi catlu so'o prenu
I look-at several persons
8.7) mi catlu so'u prenu
I look-at a-few persons
The English equivalents are only rough: the cmavo provide space for up to five i
ndefinite numbers between ``ro'' and ``no'', with a built-in ordering. In partic
ular, ``so'e'' does not mean ``most'' in the sense of `à majority'' or ``more t
han half''.
Each of these numbers, plus ``ro'', may be prefixed with ``pi'' (the decimal poi
nt) in order to make a fractional form which represents part of a whole rather t
han some elements of a totality. ``piro'' therefore means ``the whole of'':
8.8) mi citka piro lei nanba
I eat the-whole-of the-mass-of bread
Similarly, ``piso'a'' means `àlmost the whole of''; and so on down to ``piso'u'
', `à tiny part of''. These numbers are particularly appropriate with masses, w
hich are usually measured rather than counted, as Example 8.8 shows.
In addition to these cmavo, there is ``no'o'', meaning ``the typical value'', an
d ``pino'o'', meaning ``the typical portion'': Sometimes ``no'o'' can be transla
ted ``the average value'', but the average in question is not, in general, a mat
hematical mean, median, or mode; these would be more appropriately represented b
y operators.
8.9) mi catlu no'o prenu
I look-at a-typical-number-of persons
8.10) mi citka pino'o lei nanba
I eat a-typical-amount-of the-mass-of bread.
``da'a'' is a related cmavo meaning `àll but'':
8.11) mi catlu da'a re prenu
I look-at all-but two persons
8.12) mi catlu da'a so'u prenu
I look-at all-but a-few persons
Example 8.12 is similar in meaning to Example 8.3.
If no number follows ``da'a'', then ``pa'' is assumed; ``da'a'' by itself means
`àll but one'', or in ordinal contexts `àll but the last'':
8.13) ro ratcu ka'e citka da'a ratcu
all rats can eat all-but-one rats.
All rats can eat all other rats.
(The use of ``da'a'' means that Example 8.13 does not require that all rats can
eat themselves, but does allow it. Each rat has one rat it cannot eat, but that
one might be some rat other than itself. Context often dictates that `ìtself''
is, indeed, the `òther'' rat.)
As mentioned in Section 3, ``ma'u'' and ``ni'u'' are also legal numbers, and the
y mean ``some positive number'' and ``some negative number'' respectively.
8.14) li ci vu'u re du li ma'u
the-number 3 - 2 = some-positive-number
8.15) li ci vu'u vo du li ni'u
the-number 3 - 4 = some-negative-number
8.16) mi ponse ma'u rupnu
I possess a-positive-number-of currency-units.
All of the numbers discussed so far are objective, even if indefinite. If there
are exactly six superpowers (``rairgugde'', ``superlative-states'') in the world
, then ``ro rairgugde'' means the same as ``xa rairgugde''. It is often useful,
however, to express subjective indefinite values. The cmavo ``rau'' (enough), ``
du'e'' (too many), and ``mo'a'' (too few) are then appropriate:
8.17) mi ponse rau rupnu
I possess enough currency-units.
Like the ``so'a''-series, ``rau'', ``du'e'', and ``mo'a'' can be preceded by ``p
i''; for example, ``pirau'' means `à sufficient part of.''
Another possibility is that of combining definite and indefinite numbers into a
single number. This usage implies that the two kinds of numbers have the same va
lue in the given context:
8.18) mi viska le rore gerku
I saw the all-of/two dogs.
I saw both dogs.
8.19) mi speni so'ici prenu
I am-married-to many/three persons.
I am married to three persons
(which is ``many'' in the circumstances).
Example 8.19 assumes a mostly monogamous culture by stating that three is ``many
''.
9. Approximation and inexact numbers
ji'i PA approximately
su'e PA at most
su'o PA at least
me'i PA less than
za'u PA more than
The cmavo ``ji'i'' (of selma'o PA) is used in several ways to indicate approxima
te or rounded numbers. If it appears at the beginning of a number, the whole num
ber is approximate:
9.1) ji'i vo no
approximation four zero
approximately 40
If ``ji'i'' appears in the middle of a number, all the digits following it are a
pproximate:
9.2) vo no ji'i mu no
four zero approximation five zero
roughly 4050
(where the ``four thousand'' is exact,
but the ``fifty'' is approximate)
If ``ji'i'' appears at the end of a number, it indicates that the number has bee
n rounded. In addition, it can then be followed by a sign cmavo (``ma'u'' or ``n
i'u''), which indicate truncation towards positive or negative infinity respecti
vely.
9.3) re pi ze re ji'i
two point seven two approximation
2.72 (rounded)
9.4) re pi ze re ji'i ma'u
two point seven two approximation positive-sign
2.72 (rounded up)
9.5) re pi ze pa ji'i ni'u
two point seven one approximation negative-sign
2.71 (rounded down)
Examples 9.3 through 9.5 are all approximations to ``te'o'' (exponential e). ``j
i'i'' can also appear by itself, in which case it means `àpproximately the typi
cal value in this context''.
The four cmavo ``su'e'', ``su'o'', ``me'i'', and ``za'u'', also of selma'o PA, e
xpress inexact numbers with upper or lower bounds:
9.6) mi catlu su'e re prenu
I look-at at-most two persons
9.7) mi catlu su'o re prenu
I look-at at-least two persons
9.8) mi catlu me'i re prenu
I look-at less-than two persons
9.9) mi catlu za'u re prenu
I look-at more-than two persons
Each of these is a subtly different claim: Example 9.7 is true of two or any gre
ater number, whereas Example 9.9 requires three persons or more. Likewise, Examp
le 9.6 refers to zero, one, or two; Example 9.8 to zero or one. (Of course, when
the context allows numbers other than non-negative integers, ``me'i re'' can be
any number less than 2, and likewise with the other cases.) The exact quantifie
r, `èxactly 2, neither more nor less'' is just ``re''. Note that ``su'ore'' is
the exact Lojban equivalent of English plurals.
If no number follows one of these cmavo, ``pa'' is understood: therefore,
9.10) mi catlu su'o prenu
I look-at at-least [one] person
is a meaningful claim.
Like the numbers in Section 8, all of these cmavo may be preceded by ``pi'' to m
ake the corresponding quantifiers for part of a whole. For example, ``pisu'o'' m
eans `àt least some part of''. The quantifiers ``ro'', ``su'o'', ``piro'', and
``pisu'o'' are particularly important in Lojban, as they are implicitly used in
the descriptions introduced by the cmavo of selma'o LA and LE, as explained in C
hapter 6. Descriptions in general are outside the scope of this chapter.
10. Non-decimal and compound bases
ju'u VUhU to the base
dau PA hex digit A = 10
fei PA hex digit B = 11
gai PA hex digit C = 12
jau PA hex digit D = 13
rei PA hex digit E = 14
vai PA hex digit F = 15
pi'e PA compound base point
In normal contexts, Lojban assumes that all numbers are expressed in the decimal
(base 10) system. However, other bases are possible, and may be appropriate in
particular circumstances.
To specify a number in a particular base, the VUhU operator ``ju'u'' is suitable
:
10.1) li pa no pa no ju'u re du li pa no
the-number 1010 base 2 equals the-number 10
Here, the final ``pa no'' is assumed to be base 10, as usual; so is the base spe
cification. (The base may also be changed permanently by a metalinguistic specif
ication; no standard way of doing so has as yet been worked out.)
Lojban has digits for representing bases up to 16, because 16 is a base often us
ed in computer applications. In English, it is customary to use the letters A-F
as the base 16 digits equivalent to the numbers ten through fifteen. In Lojban,
this ambiguity is avoided:
10.2) li daufeigai ju'u paxa du li rezevobi
the-number ABC base 16 equals the-number 2748
10.3) li jaureivai ju'u paxa du li cimuxaze
the-number DEF base 16 equals the-number 3567
Note the pattern in the cmavo: the diphthongs `àu'', `èi'', `ài'' are used tw
ice in the same order. The digits for A to D use consonants different from those
used in the decimal digit cmavo; E and F unfortunately overlap 2 and 4 --- ther
e was simply not enough available cmavo space to make a full differentiation pos
sible. The cmavo are also in alphabetical order.
The base point ``pi'' is used in non-decimal bases just as in base 10:
10.4) li vai pi bi ju'u paxa du li pamu pi mu
the-number F.8 base 16 equals the-number 15.5
Since ``ju'u'' is an operator of selma'o VUhU, it is grammatical to use any oper
and as the left argument. Semantically, however, it is undefined to use anything
but a numeral string on the left. The reason to make ``ju'u'' an operator is to
allow reference to a base which is not a constant.
There are some numerical values that require a ``base'' that varies from digit t
o digit. For example, times represented in hours, minutes, and seconds have, in
effect, three ``digits'': the first is base 24, the second and third are base 60
. To express such numbers, the compound base separator ``pi'e'' is used:
10.5) ci pi'e rere pi'e vono
3:22:40
Each digit sequence separated by instances of ``pi'e'' is expressed in decimal n
otation, but the number as a whole is not decimal and can only be added and subt
racted by special rules:
10.6) li ci pi'e rere pi'e vono su'i pi'e ci pi'e cici
du li ci pi'e rexa pi'e paci
the-number 3:22:40 plus :3:33 equals the-number 3:26:13
3:22:40 + 0:3:33 = 3:26:13
Of course, only context tells you that the first part of the numbers in Example
10.5 and Example 10.6 is hours, the second minutes, and the third seconds.
The same mechanism using ``pi'e'' can be used to express numbers which have a ba
se larger than 16. For example, base-20 Mayan mathematics might use digits from
``no'' to ``paso'', each separated by ``pi'e'':
10.7) li pa pi'e re pi'e ci ju'u reno du li vovoci
the-number 1;2;3 base 20 equals the-number 443
Carefully note the difference between:
10.8) pano ju'u reno
the-digit-10 base 20
which is equal to ten, and:
10.9) pa pi'e no ju'u reno
1;0 base 20
which is equal to twenty.
Both ``pi'' and ``pi'e'' can be used to express large-base decimal fractions:
10.10) li pa pi'e vo pi ze ju'u reno du li re vo pi ci mu
the-number 1;4.7 base 20 equals the-number 24.35
``pi'e'' is also used where the base of each digit is vague, as in the numbering
of the examples in this chapter:
10.11) dei jufra panopi'epapamoi
This-utterance is-a-sentence-type-of 10;11th-thing.
This is Sentence 10.11.
11. Special mekso selbri
mei MOI cardinal selbri
moi MOI ordinal selbri
si'e MOI portion selbri
cu'o MOI probability selbri
va'e MOI scale selbri
me ME make sumti into selbri
me'u MEhU terminator for ME
Lojban possesses a special category of selbri which are based on mekso. The simp
lest kind of such selbri are made by suffixing a member of selma'o MOI to a numb
er. There are four members of MOI, each of which serves to create number-based s
elbri with specific place structures.
``-mei'' creates cardinal selbri. The basic place structure is:
x1 is a mass formed from the set x2 of n members, one or more of which is/ar
e x3
A cardinal selbri interrelates a set with a given number of members, the mass fo
rmed from that set, and the individuals which make the set up. The mass argument
is placed first as a matter of convenience, not logical necessity.
Some examples:
11.1) lei mi ratcu cu cimei
those-I-describe-as-the-mass-of my rats are-a-threesome.
My rats are three.
I have three rats.
Here, the mass of my rats is said to have three components; that is, I have thre
e rats.
Another example, with one element this time:
11.2) mi poi pamei cu cusku dei
I who am-an-individual express this-sentence.
In Example 11.2, ``mi'' refers to a mass, ``the mass consisting of me''. Persona
l pronouns are vague between masses, sets, and individuals.
However, when the number expressed before ``-mei'' is an objective indefinite nu
mber of the kind explained in Section 8, a slightly different place structure is
required:
x1 is a mass formed from a set x2 of n members, one or more of which is/are
x3, measured relative to the set x4.
An example:
11.3) lei ratcu poi zvati le panka cu so'umei
fo lo'i ratcu
the-mass-of rats which are-in the park are a-fewsome
with-respect-to the-set-of rats.
The rats in the park are a small number
of all the rats there are.
In Example 11.3, the x2 and x3 places are vacant, and the x4 place is filled by
``lo'i ratcu'', which (because no quantifiers are explicitly given) means ``the
whole of the set of all those things which are rats'', or simply ``the set of al
l rats.''
11.4) le'i ratcu poi zvati le panka cu se so'imei
The-set-of rats which-are in the park is-a manysome.
There are many rats in the park.
In Example 11.4, the conversion cmavo ``se'' swaps the x1 and the x2 places, so
that the new x1 is the set. The x4 set is unspecified, so the implication is tha
t the rats are ``many'' with respect to some unspecified comparison set.
More explanations about the interrelationship of sets, masses, and individuals c
an be found in Chapter 6.
``-moi'' creates ordinal selbri. The place structure is:
x1 is the (n)th member of set x2 when ordered by rule x3
Some examples:
11.5) ti pamoi le'i mi ratcu
This-one is the first-of the rats associated-with me.
This is my first rat.
11.6) ta romoi le'i mi ratcu
That is-the-allth-of the rats associated-with me.
That is my last rat.
11.7) mi raumoi le velskina porsi
I am-enough-th-in the movie-audience sequence
I am enough-th in the movie line.
Example 11.7 means, in the appropriate context, that my position in line is suff
iciently far to the front that I will get a seat for the movie.
``-si'e'' creates portion selbri. The place structure is:
x1 is an (n)th portion of mass x2
Some examples:
11.8) levi sanmi cu fi'ucisi'e lei mi djedi cidja
This-here meal is-a-slash-three-portion-of my day-food.
This meal is one-third of my daily food.
``-cu'o'' creates probability selbri. The place structure is:
event x1 has probability (n) of occurring under conditions x2
The number must be between 0 and 1 inclusive. For example:
11.9) le nu lo sicni cu sedja'o cu pimucu'o
The event of a coin being a head-displayer
has probability .5.
``-va'e'' creates a scale selbri. The place structure is:
x1 is at scale position (n) on the scale x2
If the scale is granular rather than continuous, a form like ``cifi'uxa'' (3/6)
may be used; in this case, 3/6 is not the same as 1/2. Here is an example:
11.10) le vi rozgu cu sofi'upanova'e xunre
This rose is 8/10-scale red
This rose is 8 out of 10 on the scale of redness.
This rose is very red.
When the quantifier preceding any MOI cmavo includes the subjective numbers ``ra
u'', ``du'e'', or ``mo'a'' (enough, too many, too few) then an additional place
is added for ``by standard''. For example:
11.11) le ratcu poi zvati le panka cu du'emei fo mi
The rats which-are in the park are too-many
by-standard me.
There are too many rats in the park for me.
The extra place (which for ``-mei'' is the x4 place labeled by ``fo'') is provid
ed rather than using a BAI tag such as ``ma'i'' because a specification of the s
tandard for judgment is essential to the meaning of subjective words like `ènou
gh''.
This place is not normally explicit when using one of the subjective numbers dir
ectly as a number. Therefore, ``du'e ratcu'' means ``too many rats'' without spe
cifying any standard.
It is also grammatical to substitute a lerfu string for a number:
11.12) ta ny.moi le'i mi ratcu
that is-nth-of the-set-of my rats
That is my nth rat.
More complex mekso cannot be placed directly in front of MOI, due to the resulti
ng grammatical ambiguities. Instead, a somewhat artificial form of expression is
required.
The cmavo ``me'' (of selma'o ME) has the function of making a sumti into a selbr
i. It is often used to make a name into a predicate:
11.13) ti me la nu,IORK. [me'u]
this-here pertains-to what-I-call ``New York''.
This is New York (or is New York-related).
A whole ``me'' construction can have a member of MOI added to the end to create
a complex mekso selbri:
11.14) ta me li ny. su'i pa me'u moi le'i mi ratcu
that is the-number n plus one-th-of the-set-of my rats.
That is my (n+1)-th rat.
Here the mekso ``ny. su'i pa'' is made into a sumti (with ``li'') and then chang
ed into a mekso selbri with ``me'' and ``me'u moi''. The elidable terminator ``m
e'u'' is required here in order to keep the ``pa'' and the ``moi'' separate; oth
erwise, the parser will combine them into the compound ``pamoi'' and reject the
sentence as ungrammatical.
It is perfectly possible to use non-numerical sumti after ``me'' and before a me
mber of MOI, producing strange results indeed:
11.15) le nu mi nolraitru
cu me le'e snime bolci
be vi la xel. cu'o
The event-of me being-a-nobly-superlative-ruler
has-the-stereotypical snow type-of-ball
at Hell probability.
I have a snowball's chance in Hell of being king.
Note: the elidable terminator ``boi'' is not used between a number and a member
of MOI. As a result, the ``me'u'' in Example 11.14 could also be replaced by a `
`boi'', which would serve the same function of preventing the ``pa'' and ``moi''
from joining into a compound.
12. Number questions
xo PA number question
The cmavo ``xo'', a member of selma'o PA, is used to ask questions whose answers
are numbers. Like most Lojban question words, it fills the blank where the answ
er should go. (See Chapter 19 for more on Lojban questions.)
12.1) li re su'i re du li xo
the-number 2 plus 2 equals the-number what?
What is 2 + 2?
12.2) le xomoi prenu cu darxi do
the what-number-th person hit you?
Which person [as in a police lineup] hit you?
``xo'' can also be combined with other digits to ask questions whose answers are
already partly specified. This ability could be very useful in writing tests of
elementary arithmetical knowledge:
12.3) li remu pi'i xa du li paxono
the-number 25 times 6 equals the-number 1?0
to which the correct reply would be ``mu'', or 5. The ability to utter bare numb
ers as grammatical Lojban sentences is primarily intended for giving answers to
``xo'' questions. (Another use, obviously, is for counting off physical objects
one by one.)
13. Subscripts
xi XI subscript
Subscripting is a general Lojban feature, not used only in mekso; there are many
things that can logically be subscripted, and grammatically a subscript is a fr
ee modifier, usable almost anywhere. In particular, of course, mekso variables (
lerfu strings) can be subscripted:
13.1) li xy.boixici du li xy.boixipa su'i xy.boixire
the-number x-sub-3 equals the-number x-sub-1 plus x-sub-2
x3 = x1 + x2
Subscripts always begin with the flag ``xi'' (of selma'o XI). ``xi'' may be foll
owed by a number, a lerfu string, or a general mekso expression in parentheses:
13.2) xy.boixino
x0
13.3) xy.boixiny.
xn
13.4) xy.boixi vei ny. su'i pa [ve'o]
xn+1}
Note that subscripts attached directly to lerfu words (variables) generally need
a ``boi'' terminating the variable. Free modifiers, of which subscripts are one
variety, generally require the explicit presence of an otherwise elidable termi
nator.
There is no standard way of handling superscripts (other than those used as expo
nents) or for subscripts or superscripts that come before the main expression. I
f necessary, further cmavo could be assigned to selma'o XI for these purposes.
The elidable terminator for a subscript is that for a general number or lerfu st
ring, namely ``boi''. By convention, a subscript following another subscript is
taken to be a sub-subscript:
13.5) xy.boi xi by.boi xi vo
xb4
See Example 17.10 for the standard method of specifying multiple subscripts on a
single object.
More information on the uses of subscripts may be found in Chapter 19.
14. Infix operators revisited
tu'o PA null operand
ge'a VUhU null operator
gei VUhU exponential notation
The infix operators presented so far have always had exactly two operands, and f
or more or fewer operands forethought notation has been required. However, it is
possible to use an operator in infix style even though it has more or fewer tha
n two operands, through the use of a pair of tricks: the null operand ``tu'o'' a
nd the null operator ``ge'a''. The first is suitable when there are too few oper
ands, the second when there are too many. For example, suppose we wanted to expr
ess the numerical negation operator ``va'a'' in infix form. We would use:
14.1) li tu'o va'a ny. du
li no vu'u ny.
the-number (null) additive-inverse n equals
the-number zero minus n
-n = 0 - n
The ``tu'o'' fulfills the grammatical requirement for a left operand for the inf
ix use of ``va'a'', even though semantically none is needed or wanted.
Finding a suitable example of ``ge'a'' requires exhibiting a ternary operator, a
nd ternary operators are not common. The operator ``gei'', however, has both a b
inary and a ternary use. As a binary operator, it provides a terse representatio
n of scientific (also called `èxponential'') notation. The first operand of ``g
ei'' is the exponent, and the second operand is the mantissa or fraction:
14.2) li cinonoki'oki'o
du li bi gei ci
the-number three-zero-zero-comma-comma
equals the-number eight scientific three.
300,000,000 = 3 Ã 108
Why are the arguments to ``gei'' in reverse order from the conventional symbolic
notation? So that ``gei'' can be used in forethought to allow easy specificatio
n of a large (or small) imprecise number:
14.3) gei reno
(scientific) two-zero
1020
Note, however, that although 10 is far and away the most common exponent base, i
t is not the only possible one. The third operand of ``gei'', therefore, is the
base, with 10 as the default value. Most computers internally store so-called ``
floating-point'' numbers using 2 as the exponent base. (This has nothing to do w
ith the fact that computers also represent all integers in base 2; the IBM 360 s
eries used an exponent base of 16 for floating point, although each component of
the number was expressed in base 2.) Here is a computer floating-point number w
ith a value of 40:
14.4) papano bi'eju'u re
gei pipanopano bi'eju'u re ge'a re
(one-one-zero base 2)
scientific (point-one-zero-one-zero base 2) with-base 2
.10102 Ã 21102
15. Vectors and matrices
jo'i JOhI start vector
te'u TEhU end vector
pi'a VUhU matrix row combiner
sa'i VUhU matrix column combiner
A mathematical vector is a list of numbers, and a mathematical matrix is a table
of numbers. Lojban considers matrices to be built up out of vectors, which are
in turn built up out of operands.
``jo'i'', the only cmavo of selma'o JOhI, is the vector indicator: it has a synt
ax reminiscent of a forethought operator, but has very high precedence. The comp
onents must be simple operands rather than full expressions (unless parenthesize
d). A vector can have any number of components; ``te'u'' is the elidable termina
tor. An example:
15.1) li jo'i paboi reboi te'u su'i jo'i ciboi voboi
du li jo'i voboi xaboi
the-number array( one, two ) plus array( three, four)
equals the-number array( four, six)
(1,2) + (3,4) = (4,6)
Vectors can be combined into matrices using either ``pi'a'', the matrix row oper
ator, or ``sa'i'', the matrix column operator. The first combines vectors repres
enting rows of the matrix, and the second combines vectors representing columns
of the matrix. Both of them allow any number of arguments: additional arguments
are tacked on with the null operator ``ge'a''.
Therefore, the ``magic square'' matrix
8 1 6 3 5 7 4 9 2
can be represented either as:
15.2) jo'i biboi paboi xa pi'a jo'i ciboi muboi ze
ge'a jo'i voboi soboi re
the-vector (8 1 6) matrix-row the-vector (3 5 7)
, the-vector (4 9 2)
or as
15.3) jo'i biboi ciboi vo sa'i jo'i paboi muboi so
ge'a jo'i xaboi zeboi re
the-vector (8 3 4) matrix-column the-vector (1 5 9)
, the-vector (6 7 2)
The regular mekso operators can be applied to vectors and to matrices, since gra
mmatically both of these are expressions. It is usually necessary to parenthesiz
e matrices when used with operators in order to avoid incorrect groupings. There
are no VUhU operators for the matrix operators of inner or outer products, but
appropriate operators can be created using a suitable symbolic lerfu word or str
ing prefixed by ``ma'o''.
Matrices of more than two dimensions can be built up using either ``pi'a'' or ``
sa'i'' with an appropriate subscript numbering the dimension. When subscripted,
there is no difference between ``pi'a'' and ``sa'i''.
16. Reverse Polish notation
fu'a FUhA reverse Polish flag
So far, the Lojban notational conventions have mapped fairly familiar kinds of m
athematical discourse. The use of forethought operators may have seemed odd when
applied to ``+'', but when applied to ``f('' they appear as the usual functiona
l notation. Now comes a sharp break. Reverse Polish (RP) notation represents som
ething completely different; even mathematicians don't use it much. (The only co
mmon uses of RP, in fact, are in some kinds of calculators and in the implementa
tion of some programming languages.)
In RP notation, the operator follows the operands. (Polish notation, where the o
perator precedes its operands, is another name for forethought mekso of the kind
explained in Section 6.) The number of operands per operator is always fixed. N
o parentheses are required or permitted. In Lojban, RP notation is always explic
itly marked by a ``fu'a'' at the beginning of the expression; there is no termin
ator. Here is a simple example:
16.1) li fu'a reboi ci su'i
du li mu
the-number (RP!) two, three, plus
equals the-number five.
The operands are ``re'' and ``ci''; the operator is ``su'i''.
Here is a more complex example:
16.2) li fu'a reboi ci pi'i
voboi mu pi'i su'i
du li rexa
the-number (RP!) (two, three, times),
(four, five, times), plus
equals the-number two-six
Here the operands of the first ``pi'i'' are ``re'' and ``ci''; the operands of t
he second ``pi'i'' are ``vo'' and ``mu'' (with ``boi'' inserted where needed), a
nd the operands of the ``su'i'' are ``reboi ci pi'i'', or 6, and ``voboi mu pi'i
'', or 20. As you can see, it is easy to get lost in the world of reverse Polish
notation; on the other hand, it is especially easy for a mechanical listener (w
ho has a deep mental stack and doesn't get lost) to comprehend.
The operands of an RP operator can be any legal mekso operand, including parenth
esized mekso that can contain any valid syntax, whether more RP or something mor
e conventional.
In Lojban, RP operators are always parsed with exactly two operands. What about
operators which require only one operand, or more than two operands? The null op
erand ``tu'o'' and the null operator ``ge'a'' provide a simple solution. A one-o
perand operator like ``va'a'' always appears in a reverse Polish context as ``tu
'o va'a''. The ``tu'o'' provides the second operand, which is semantically ignor
ed but grammatically necessary. Likewise, the three-operand version of ``gei'' a
ppears in reverse Polish as ``ge'a gei'', where the ``ge'a'' effectively merges
the 2nd and 3rd operands into a single operand. Here are some examples:
16.3) li fu'a ciboi muboi vu'u
du li fu'a reboi tu'o va'a
The-number (RP!) (three, five, minus)
equals the-number (RP!) two, null, negative-of.
3 - 5 = -2
16.4) li cinoki'oki'o du
li fu'a biboi
ciboi panoboi ge'a gei
the-number 30-comma-comma equals
the-number (RP!) 8,
(3, 10, null-op), exponential-notation
30,000,000 = 3 Ã 108
17. Logical and non-logical connectives within mekso
.abu BY letter `à''
by BY letter ``b''
cy BY letter ``c''
fe'a VUhU nth root of (default square root)
lo'o LOhO terminator for LI
As befits a logical language, Lojban has extensive provision for logical connect
ives within both operators and operands. Full details on logical and non-logical
connectives are provided in Chapter 14. Operands are connected in afterthought
with selma'o A and in forethought with selma'o GA, just like sumti. Operators ar
e connected in afterthought with selma'o JA and in forethought with selma'o GUhA
, just like tanru components. This parallelism is no accident.
In addition, A+BO and A+KE constructs are allowed for grouping logically connect
ed operands, and ``ke ... ke'e'' is allowed for grouping logically connected ope
rators, although there are no analogues of tanru among the operators.
Despite the large number of rules required to support this feature, it is of rel
atively minor importance in the mekso scheme of things. Example 17.1 exhibits af
terthought logical connection between operands:
17.1) vei ci .a vo ve'o prenu cu klama le zarci
( three or four ) people go-to the market.
Example 17.2 is equivalent in meaning, but uses forethought connection:
17.2) vei ga ci gi vo ve'o prenu cu klama le zarci
( either 3 or 4 ) people go-to the market.
Note that the mekso here are being used as quantifiers. Lojban requires that any
mekso other than a simple number be enclosed in parentheses when used as a quan
tifier. This rule prevents ambiguities that do not exist when using ``li''.
By the way, ``li'' has an elidable terminator, ``lo'o'', which is needed when a
``li'' sumti is followed by a logical connective that could seem to be within th
e mekso. For example:
17.3) li re su'i re du
li vo lo'o .onai lo nalseldjuno namcu
the-number two plus two equals
the-number four or else a non-known number.
Omitting the ``lo'o'' would cause the parser to assume that another operand foll
owed the ``.onai'' and reject ``lo'' as an invalid operand.
Simple examples of logical connection between operators are hard to come by. A c
ontrived example is:
17.4) li re su'i je pi'i re du li vo
the-number two plus and times two equals the-number four.
2 + 2 = 4 and 2 Ã 2 = 4.
The forethought-connection form of Example 17.4 is:
17.5) li re ge su'i gi pi'i re
du li vo
the-number two both plus and times two
equals the-number four.
Both 2 + 2 = 4 and 2 Ã 2 = 4.
Here is a classic example of operand logical connection:
17.6) go li .abu bi'epi'i vei xy. te'a re ve'o
su'i by. bi'epi'i xy. su'i cy.
du li no
gi li xy. du li vei va'a by. ku'e
su'i ja vu'u fe'a
vei by. bi'ete'a re vu'u
vo bi'epi'i .abu bi'epi'i cy. ve'o [ku'e] ve'o
fe'i re bi'epi'i .abu
if-and-only-if the-number `à''-times-( ``x'' power two )
plus ``b''-times-``x'' plus ``c''
equals the-number zero
then the-number x equals the-number [ the-negation-of( b )
plus or minus the-root-of
( ``b''-power-2 minus
four-times-`à''-times-``c'' ) ]
divided-by two-times-`à''.
Iff ax2 + bx + c = 0,
then x =-b Â± Ã
(b2 - 4ac)
-----------------------
2a
Note the mixture of styles in Example 17.6: the negation of b and the square roo
t are represented by forethought and most of the operator precedence by prefixed
``bi'e'', but explicit parentheses had to be added to group the numerator prope
rly. In addition, the square root parentheses cannot be removed here in favor of
simple ``fe'a'' and ``ku'e'' bracketing, because infix operators are present in
the operand. Getting Example 17.6 to parse perfectly using the current parser t
ook several tries: a more relaxed style would dispense with most of the ``bi'e''
cmavo and just let the standard precedence rules be understood.
Non-logical connection with JOI and BIhI is also permitted between operands and
between operators. One use for this construct is to connect operands with ``bi'o
'' to create intervals:
17.7) li no ga'o bi'o ke'i pa
the-number zero (inclusive) from-to (exclusive) one
[0,1)
the numbers from zero to one, including zero
but not including one
Intervals defined by a midpoint and range rather than beginning and end points c
an be expressed by ``mi'i'':
17.8) li pimu ga'o mi'i ke'i pimu
the-number 0.5 plus-or-minus 0.5
which expresses the same interval as Example 17.7. Note that the ``ga'o'' and ``
ke'i'' still refer to the endpoints, although these are now implied rather than
expressed. Another way of expressing the same thing:
17.9) li pimu su'i ni'upimu bi'o ma'upimu
the-number 0.5 plus [-0.5 from-to +0.5]
Here we have the sum of a number and an interval, which produces another interva
l centered on the number. As Example 17.9 shows, non-logical (or logical) connec
tion of operands has higher precedence than any mekso operator.
You can also combine two operands with ``ce'o'', the sequence connective of selm
a'o JOI, to make a compound subscript:
17.10) xy. xi vei by. ce'o dy. [ve'o]
``x'' sub ( ``b'' sequence ``d'' )
xb,d}
18. Using Lojban resources within mekso
na'u NAhU selbri to operator
ni'e NIhE selbri to operand
mo'e MOhE sumti to operand
te'u TEhU terminator for all three
One of the mekso design goals requires the ability to make use of Lojban's vocab
ulary resources within mekso to extend the built-in cmavo for operands and opera
tors. There are three relevant constructs: all three share the elidable terminat
or ``te'u'' (which is also used to terminate vectors marked with ``jo'i'').
The cmavo ``na'u'' makes a selbri into an operator. In general, the first place
of the selbri specifies the result of the operator, and the other unfilled place
s specify the operands:
18.1) li na'u tanjo te'u
vei pai fe'i re [ve'o] du li ci'i
the-number the-operator tangent
( pi / 2 ) = the-number infinity
tan(pi/2) = Â¥
``tanjo'' is the gismu for ``x1 is the tangent of x2'', and the ``na'u'' here ma
kes it into an operator which is then used in forethought.
The cmavo ``ni'e'' makes a selbri into an operand. The x1 place of the selbri ge
nerally represents a number, and therefore is often a ``ni'' abstraction, since
``ni'' abstractions represent numbers. The ``ni'e'' makes that number available
as a mekso operand. A common application is to make equations relating pure dime
nsions:
18.2) li ni'e ni clani [te'u] pi'i
ni'e ni ganra [te'u] pi'i
ni'e ni condi te'u
du li ni'e ni canlu
the-number quantity-of length times
quantity-of width times
quantity-of depth
equals the-number quantity-of volume.
Length Ã Width Ã Depth = Volume
The cmavo ``mo'e'' operates similarly to ``ni'e'', but makes a sumti (rather tha
n a selbri) into an operand. This construction is useful in stating equations in
volving dimensioned numbers:
18.3) li mo'e re ratcu su'i mo'e re ractu
du li mo'e vo danlu
the-number two rats plus two rabbits
equals the-number four animals
2 rats + 2 rabbits = 4 animals.
Another use is in constructing Lojbanic versions of so-called ``folk quantifiers
'', such as `à pride of lions'':
18.4) mi viska vei mo'e lo'e lanzu ve'o cinfo
I see ( the-typical family )-number-of lions.
I see a pride of lions.
19. Other uses of mekso
me'o LI the mekso
nu'a NUhA operator to selbri
mai MAI utterance ordinal
mo'o MAI higher order utterance ordinal
roi ROI quantified tense
So far we have seen mekso used as sumti (with ``li''), as quantifiers (often par
enthesized), and in MOI and ME-MOI selbri. There are a few other minor uses of m
ekso within Lojban.
The cmavo ``me'o'' has the same grammatical use as ``li'' but slightly different
semantics. ``li'' means ``the number which is the value of the mekso ...'', whe
reas ``me'o'' just means ``the mekso ...'' So it is true that:
19.1) li re su'i re du li vo
the-number two plus two equals the-number four
2 + 2 = 4
but false that:
19.2) me'o re su'i re du me'o vo
the-mekso two plus two equals the-mekso four
``2 + 2'' = ``4''
since the expressions ``2 + 2'' and ``4'' are not the same. The relationship bet
ween ``li'' and ``me'o'' is related to that between ``la djan.'', the person nam
ed John, and ``zo .djan.'', the name ``John''.
The cmavo ``nu'a'' is the inverse of ``na'u'', and allows a mekso operator to be
used as a normal selbri, with the place structure:
x1 is the result of applying (operator) to x2, x3, ...
f or as many places as may be required. For example:
19.3) li ni'umu cu nu'a va'a li ma'umu
the-number -5 is-the-negation-of the-number +5
uses ``nu'a'' to make the operator ``va'a'' into a two-place bridi.
Used together, ``nu'a'' and ``na'u'' make it possible to ask questions about mek
so operators, even though there is no specific cmavo for an operator question, n
or is it grammatical to utter an operator in isolation. Consider Example 19.4, t
o which Example 19.5 is one correct answer:
19.4) li re na'u mo re du li vo
the-number two what-operator? two equals the-number four
2 ? 2 = 4
19.5) nu'a su'i
plus
In Example 19.4, ``na'u mo'' is an operator question, because ``mo'' is the selb
ri question cmavo and ``na'u'' makes the selbri into an operator. Example 19.5 m
akes the true answer ``su'i'' into a selbri (which is a legal utterance) with th
e inverse cmavo ``nu'a''. Mechanically speaking, inserting Example 19.5 into Exa
mple 19.4 produces:
19.6) li re na'u nu'a su'i re du li vo
the-number two (the-operator the-selbri plus)
two equals the-number four
where the ``na'u nu'a'' cancels out, leaving a truthful bridi.
Numerical free modifiers, corresponding to English ``firstly'', ``secondly'', an
d so on, can be created by suffixing a member of selma'o MAI to a digit string o
r a lerfu string. (Digit strings are compound cmavo beginning with a cmavo of se
lma'o PA, and containing only cmavo of PA or BY; lerfu strings begin with a cmav
o of selma'o BY, and likewise contain only PA or BY cmavo.) Here are some exampl
es:
19.7) pamai
firstly
19.8) remai
secondly
19.9) romai
all-ly
lastly
19.10) ny.mai
nth-ly
19.11) pasomo'o
nineteenthly (higher order)
Section 19
The difference between ``mai'' and ``mo'o'' is that ``mo'o'' enumerates larger s
ubdivisions of a text. Each ``mo'o'' subdivision can then be divided into pieces
and internally numbered with ``mai''. If this chapter were translated into Lojb
an, it would number each section with ``mo'o''.
A numerical tense can be created by suffixing a digit string with ``roi''. This
usage generates tenses corresponding to English `ònce'', ``twice'', and so on.
This topic belongs to a detailed discussion of Lojban tenses, and is explained f
urther in Chapter 10.
Note: the elidable terminator ``boi'' is not used between a number and a member
of MAI or ROI.
20. Explicit operator precedence
As mentioned earlier, Lojban does provide a way for the precedences of operators
to be explicitly declared, although current parsers do not understand these dec
larations.
The declaration is made in the form of a metalinguistic comment using ``ti'o'',
a member of selma'o SEI. ``sei'', the other member of SEI, is used to insert met
alinguistic comments on a bridi which give information about the discourse which
the bridi comprises. The format of a ``ti'o'' declaration has not been formally
established, but presumably would take the form of mentioning a mekso operator
and then giving it either an absolute numerical precedence on some pre-establish
ed scale, or else specifying relative precedences between new operators and exis
ting operators.
In future, we hope to create an improved machine parser that can understand decl
arations of the precedences of simple operators belonging to selma'o VUhU. Origi
nally, all operators would have the same precedence. Declarations would have the
effect of raising the specified cmavo of VUhU to higher precedence levels. Comp
lex operators formed with ``na'u'', ``ni'e'', or ``ma'o'' would remain at the st
andard low precedence; declarations with respect to them are for future implemen
tation efforts. It is probable that such a parser would have a set of ``commonly
assumed precedences'' built into it (selectable by a special ``ti'o'' declarati
on) that would match mathematical intuition: times higher than plus, and so on.
21. Miscellany
A few other points:
``se'' can be used to convert an operator as if it were a selbri, so that its ar
guments are exchanged. For example:
21.1) li ci se vu'u vo
du li pa
the-number three (inverse) minus four
equals the-number one.
3 subtracted from 4 equals 1.
The other converters of selma'o SE can also be used on operators with more than
two operands, and they can be compounded to create (probably unintelligible) ope
rators as needed.
Members of selma'o NAhE are also legal on an operator to produce a scalar negati
on of it. The implication is that some other operator would apply to make the br
idi true:
21.2) li ci na'e su'i vo du li pare
the-number 3 non-plus 4 equals the-number 12
21.3) li ci to'e vu'u re du li mu
the-number 3 opposite-of-minus 2 equals the-number 5
The sense in which ``plus'' is the opposite of ``minus'' is not a mathematical b
ut rather a linguistic one; negated operators are defined only loosely.
``la'e'' and ``lu'e'' can be used on operands with the usual semantics to get th
e referent of or a symbol for an operand. Likewise, a member of selma'o NAhE fol
lowed by ``bo'' serves to scalar-negate an operand, implying that some other ope
rand would make the bridi true:
21.4) li re su'i re du li na'ebo mu
the-number 2 plus 2 equals the-number non-5.
2 + 2 = something other than 5.
The digits 0-9 have rafsi, and therefore can be used in making lujvo. Additional
ly, all the rafsi have CVC form and can stand alone or together as names:
21.5) la zel. poi gunta
la tebes. pu nanmu
those-named ``Seven'' who attack
that-named ``Thebes'' [past] are-men
The Seven Against Thebes were men.
Of course, there is no guarantee that the name ``zel.'' is connected with the nu
mber rafsi: an alternative which cannot be misconstrued is:
21.6) la zemei poi gunta
la tebes. pu nanmu
those-named-the Sevensome who attack
Thebes [past] are-men.
Certain other members of PA also have assigned rafsi: ``so'a'', ``so'e'', ``so'i
'', ``so'o'', ``so'u'', ``da'a'', ``ro'', ``su'e'', ``su'o'', ``pi'', and ``ce'i
''. Furthermore, although the cmavo ``fi'u'' does not have a rafsi as such, it i
s closely related to the gismu ``frinu'', meaning ``fraction''; therefore, in a
context of numeric rafsi, you can use any of the rafsi for ``frinu'' to indicate
a fraction slash.
A similar convention is used for the cmavo ``cu'o'' of selma'o MOI, which is clo
sely related to ``cunso'' (probability); use a rafsi for ``cunso'' in order to c
reate lujvo based on ``cu'o''. The cmavo ``mei'' and ``moi'' of MOI have their o
wn rafsi, two each in fact: ``mem''/``mei'' and ``mom''/``moi'' respectively.
The grammar of mekso as described so far imposes a rigid distinction between ope
rators and operands. Some flavors of mathematics (lambda calculus, algebra of fu
nctions) blur this distinction, and Lojban must have a method of doing the same.
An operator can be changed into an operand with ``ni'enu'a'', which transforms
the operator into a matching selbri and then the selbri into an operand.
To change an operand into an operator, we use the cmavo ``ma'o'', already introd
uced as a means of changing a lerfu string such as ``fy.'' into an operator. In
fact, ``ma'o'' can be followed by any mekso operand, using the elidable terminat
or ``te'u'' if necessary.
There is a potential semantic ambiguity in ``ma'o fy. [te'u]'' if ``fy.'' is alr
eady in use as a variable: it comes to mean ``the function whose value is always
'f'''. However, mathematicians do not normally use the same lerfu words or stri
ngs as both functions and variables, so this case should not arise in practice.
22. Four score and seven: a mekso problem
Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address begins with the words ``Four score and seve
n years ago''. This section exhibits several different ways of saying the number
``four score and seven''. (A ``score'', for those not familiar with the term, i
s 20; it is analogous to a ``dozen'' for 12.) The trivial way:
22.1) bize
eight seven
87
Example 22.1 is mathematically correct, but sacrifices the spirit of the English
words, which are intended to be complex and formal.
22.2) vo pi'i reno su'i ze
four times twenty plus seven
4 Ã 20 + 7
Example 22.2 is also mathematically correct, but still misses something. ``Score
'' is not a word for 20 in the same way that ``ten'' is a word for 10: it contai
ns the implication of 20 objects. The original may be taken as short for ``Four
score years and seven years ago''. Thinking of a score as a twentysome rather th
an as 20 leads to:
22.3) mo'e voboi renomei su'i ze
the-number-of four twentysomes plus seven
In Example 22.3, ``voboi renomei'' is a sumti signifying four things each of whi
ch are groups of twenty; the ``mo'e'' and ``te'u'' then make this sumti into a n
umber in order to allow it to be the operand of ``su'i''.
Another approach is to think of ``score'' as setting a representation base. Ther
e are remnants of base-20 arithmetic in some languages, notably French, in which
87 is ``quatre-vingt-sept'', literally ``four-twenties-seven''. (This fact make
s the Gettysburg Address hard to translate into French!) If ``score'' is the rep
resentation base, then we have:
22.4) vo pi'e ze ju'u reno
four ; seven base 20
4720
Overall, Example 22.3 probably captures the flavor of the English best. Example
22.1 and Example 22.2 are too simple, and Example 22.4 is too tricky. Neverthele
ss, all four examples are good Lojban. Pedagogically, these examples illustrate
the richness of lojbau mekso: anything that can be said at all, can probably be
said in more than one way.
23. mekso selma'o summary
Except as noted, each selma'o has only one cmavo.
BOI elidable terminator for numerals
and lerfu strings
BY lerfu for variables and functions
(see Chapter 17)
FUhA reverse-Polish flag
GOhA includes ``du'' (mathematical equality)
and other non-mekso cmavo
JOhI array flag
KUhE elidable terminator for forethought mekso
LI mekso articles (li and me'o)
MAhO make operand into operator
MOI creates mekso selbri
(moi, mei, si'e, and cu'o, see Section 11)
MOhE make sumti into operand
NAhU make selbri into operator
NIhE make selbri into operand
NUhA make operator into selbri
PA numbers (see Section 25)
PEhO optional forethought mekso marker
TEhU elidable terminator for
NAhU, NIhE, MOhE, MAhO, and JOhI
VEI left parenthesis
VEhO right parenthesis
VUhU operators (see Section 24)
XI subscript flag
24. Complete table of VUhU cmavo, with operand structures
The operand structures specify what various operands (labeled a, b, c, ...) mean
. The implied context is forethought, since only forethought operators can have
a variable number of operands; however, the same rules apply to infix and RP use
s of VUhU.
su'i
plus (((a + b) + c) + ...) pi'i times (((a Ã b) Ã c) Ã ...) vu'u minus (((a - b) - c
- ...) fe'i divided by (((a / b) / c) / ...) ju'u number base numeral string ``
a'' interpreted in the base b pa'i ratio the ratio of a to b, a:b fa'i reciproca
l of/multiplicative inverse 1 / a gei scientific notation b Ã (c [default 10] to th
e a power) ge'a null operator (no operands) de'o logarithm log a to base b (defa
ult 10 or e as appropriate) te'a to the power/exponential a to the b power fe'a
nth root of/inverse power b'th root of a (default square root: b = 2) cu'a absol
ute value/norm | a | ne'o factorial a! pi'a matrix row vector combiner (all oper
ands are row vectors) sa'i matrix column vector combiner (all operands are colum
n vectors) ri'o integral integral of a with respect to b over range c sa'o deriv
ative derivative of a with respect to b of degree c (default 1) fu'u non-specifi
c operator (variable) si'i sigma summation summation of a using variable b over
range c va'a negation of/additive inverse - a re'a matrix transpose/dual a*
25. Complete table of PA cmavo: digits, punctuation, and other numbers.
Decimal digits:
no, pa, re, ci, vo, mu, xa, ze, bi, so 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 rafsi: n
on, pav, rel, cib, von, mum, xav, zel, biv, soz
Hexadecimal digits:
dau, fei, gai, jau, rei, vai A/10, B/11, C/12, D/13, E/14, F/15
Special numbers:
pai, ka'o, te'o, ci'i pi, imaginary i, exponential e, infinity
Number punctuation:
pi, ce'i, fi'u decimal point, percentage, fraction (not division) rafsi: piz
, cez, fi'u (from frinu; see Section 20)
pi'e, ma'u, ni'u mixed-base point, plus sign (not addition), minus sign (not
subtraction)
ki'o, ra'e thousands comma, repeating-decimal indicator
ji'i, ka'o approximation sign, complex number separator
Indefinite numbers:
ro, so'a, so'e, so'i, so'o, so'u, da'a all, almost all, most, many, several,
few, all but rafsi: rol, soj, sor or so'i, sos, sot, daz
su'e, su'o at most, at least rafsi: su'e, su'o
me'i, za'u less than, more than
no'o the typical number
Subjective numbers:
rau, du'e, mo'a enough, too many, too few
Miscellaneous:
xo, tu'o number question, null operand
26. Table of MOI cmavo, with associated rafsi and place structures
mei x1 is a mass formed from a set x2
of n members, one or more of which is/are x3,
[measured relative to the set x4/by standard x4]
rafsi: mem, mei
moi x1 is the (n)th member of set x2
when ordered by rule x3 [by standard x4]
rafsi: mom, moi
si'e x1 is an (n)th portion of mass x2
[by standard x3]
rafsi: none
cu'o event x1 has probability (n) of occurring
under conditions x2 [by standard x3]
rafsi: cu'o (borrowed from cunso; see Section 20)
Chapter 19
Putting It All Together: Notes on the Structure of Lojban Texts
$Revision: 4.3 $
mkhtml: 1.1
1. Introductory
This chapter is incurably miscellaneous. It describes the cmavo that specify the
structure of Lojban texts, from the largest scale (paragraphs) to the smallest
(single words). There are fewer examples than are found in other chapters of thi
s book, since the linguistic mechanisms described are generally made use of in c
onversation or else in long documents.
This chapter is also not very self-contained. It makes passing reference to a gr
eat many concepts which are explained in full only in other chapters. The altern
ative would be a chapter on text structure which was as complex as all the other
chapters put together. Lojban is a unified language, and it is not possible to
understand any part of it (in full) before understanding every part of it (to so
me degree).
2. Sentences: I
.i I sentence separator
Since Lojban is audio-visually isomorphic, there needs to be a spoken and writte
n way of signaling the end of a sentence and the start of the following one. In
written English, a period serves this purpose; in spoken English, a tone contour
(rising or falling) usually does the job, or sometimes a long pause. Lojban use
s a single separator: the cmavo ``.i'' (of selma'o I):
2.1) mi klama le zarci .i do cadzu le bisli
I go to-the store. You walk on-the ice.
The word ``separator'' should be noted. ``.i'' is not normally used after the la
st sentence nor before the first one, although both positions are technically gr
ammatical. ``.i'' signals a new sentence on the same topic, not necessarily by t
he same speaker. The relationship between the sentences is left vague, except in
stories, where the relationship usually is temporal, and the following sentence
states something that happened after the previous sentence.
Note that although the first letter of an English sentence is capitalized, the c
mavo ``.i'' is never capitalized. In writing, it is appropriate to place extra s
pace before ``.i'' to make it stand out better for the reader. In some styles of
Lojban writing that have been used so far, every ``.i'' is placed at the beginn
ing of a line, possibly leaving space at the end of the previous line.
An ``.i'' cmavo may or may not be used when the speaker of the following sentenc
e is different from the speaker of the preceding sentence, depending on whether
the sentences are felt to be connected or not.
An ``.i'' cmavo can be compounded with a logical or non-logical connective (a je
k or joik), a modal or tense connective, or both: these constructs are explained
in Chapter 9, Chapter 10, and Chapter 14. In all cases, the ``.i'' comes first
in the compound. Attitudinals can also be attached to an ``.i'' if they are mean
t to apply to the whole sentence: see Chapter 13.
There exist a pair of mechanisms for binding a sequence of sentences closely tog
ether. If the ``.i'' (with or without connectives) is followed by ``bo'' (of sel
ma'o BO), then the two sentences being separated are understood to be more close
ly grouped than sentences connected by ``.i'' alone.
Similarly, a group of sentences can be preceded by ``tu'e'' (of selma'o TUhE) an
d followed by ``tu'u'' (of selma'o TUhU) to fuse them into a single unit. A comm
on use of ``tu'e ... tu'u'' is to group the sentences which compose a poem: the
title sentence would precede the group, separated from it by ``.i''. Another use
might be a set of directions, where each numbered direction might be surrounded
by ``tu'e ... tu'u'' and contain one or more sentences separated by ``.i''. Gro
uping with ``tu'e'' and ``tu'u'' is analogous to grouping with ``ke'' and ``ke'e
'' to establish the scope of logical or non-logical connectives (see Chapter 14)
.
3. Paragraphs: NIhO
ni'o NIhO new topic
no'i NIhO old topic
da'o DAhO cancel cmavo assignments
The paragraph is a concept used in writing systems for two purposes: to indicate
changes of topic, and to break up the hard-to-read appearance of large blocks o
f text on the page. The former function is represented in both spoken and writte
n Lojban by the cmavo ``ni'o'' and ``no'i'', both of selma'o NIhO. Of these two,
``ni'o'' is the more common. By convention, written Lojban is broken into parag
raphs just before any ``ni'o'' or ``no'i'', but a very long passage on a single
topic might be paragraphed before an ``.i''. On the other hand, it is convention
al in English to start a new paragraph in dialogue when a new speaker starts, bu
t this convention is not commonly observed in Lojban dialogues. Of course, none
of these conventions affect meaning in any way.
A ``ni'o'' can take the place of an ``.i'' as a sentence separator, and in addit
ion signals a new topic or paragraph. Grammatically, any number of ``ni'o'' cmav
o can appear consecutively and are equivalent to a single one; semantically, a g
reater number of ``ni'o'' cmavo indicates a larger-scale change of topic. This f
eature allows complexly structured text, with topics, subtopics, and sub-subtopi
cs, to be represented clearly and unambiguously in both spoken and written Lojba
n. However, some conventional differences do exist between ``ni'o'' in writing a
nd in conversation.
In written text, a single ``ni'o'' is a mere discursive indicator of a new subje
ct, whereas ``ni'oni'o'' marks a change in the context. In this situation, ``ni'
oni'o'' implicitly cancels the definitions of all pro-sumti of selma'o KOhA as w
ell as pro-bridi of selma'o GOhA. (Explicit cancelling is expressed by the cmavo
``da'o'' of selma'o DAhO, which has the free grammar of an indicator -- it can
appear almost anywhere.) The use of ``ni'oni'o'' does not affect indicators (of
selma'o UI) or tense references, but ``ni'oni'oni'o'', indicating a drastic chan
ge of topic, would serve to reset both indicators and tenses. (See Section 8 for
a discussion of indicator scope.)
In spoken text, which is inherently less structured, these levels are reduced by
one, with ``ni'o'' indicating a change in context sufficient to cancel pro-sumt
i and pro-bridi assignment. On the other hand, in a book, or in stories within s
tories such as ``The Arabian Nights'', further levels may be expressed by extend
ing the ``ni'o'' string as needed. Normally, a written text will begin with the
number of ``ni'o'' cmavo needed to signal the largest scale division which the t
ext contains. ``ni'o'' strings may be subscripted to label each context of disco
urse: see Section 6.
``no'i'' is similar in effect to ``ni'o'', but indicates the resumption of a pre
vious topic. In speech, it is analogous to (but much shorter than) such English
discursive phrases as ``But getting back to the point ... ''. By default, the to
pic resumed is that in effect before the last ``ni'o''. When subtopics are neste
d within topics, then ``no'i'' would resume the previous subtopic and ``no'ino'i
'' the previous topic. Note that ``no'i'' also resumes tense and pro-sumti assig
nments dropped at the previous ``ni'o''.
If a ``ni'o'' is subscripted, then a ``no'i'' with the same subscript is assumed
to be a continuation of it. A ``no'i'' may also have a negative subscript, whic
h would specify counting backwards a number of paragraphs and resuming the topic
found thereby.
4. Topic-comment sentences: ZOhU
zo'u ZOhU topic/comment separator
The normal Lojban sentence is just a bridi, parallel to the normal English sente
nce which has a subject and a predicate:
I went to the market
In Chinese, the normal sentence form is different: a topic is stated, and a comm
ent about it is made. (Japanese also has the concept of a topic, but indicates i
t by attaching a suffix; other languages also distinguish topics in various ways
.) The topic says what the sentence is about:
4.2) zhe4 xiao1xi2 wo3 zhi1dao le
this news I know [perfective]
As for this news, I knew it.
I've heard this news already.
The wide space in the first two versions of Example 4.2 separate the topic (``th
is news'') from the comment (`Ì know already'').
Lojban uses the cmavo ``zo'u'' (of selma'o ZOhU) to separate topic (a sumti) fro
m comment (a bridi):
4.3) le nuzba zu'o mi ba'o djuno
The news : I [perfective] know.
Example 4.3 is the literal Lojban translation of Example 4.2. Of course, the top
ic-comment structure can be changed to a straightforward bridi structure:
4.4) mi ba'o djuno le nuzba
I [perfective] know the news.
Example 4.4 means the same as Example 4.3, and it is simpler. However, often the
position of the topic in the place structure of the selbri within the comment i
s vague:
4.5) le finpe zo'u citka
the fish : eat
Is the fish eating or being eaten? The sentence doesn't say. The Chinese equival
ent of Example 4.5 is:
4.6) yu2 chi1
fish eat
which is vague in exactly the same way.
Grammatically, it is possible to have more than one sumti before ``zo'u''. This
is not normally useful in topic-comment sentences, but is necessary in the other
use of ``zo'u'': to separate a quantifying section from a bridi containing quan
tified variables. This usage belongs to a discussion of quantifier logic in Lojb
an (see Chapter 16), but an example would be:
4.7) roda poi prenu ku'o su'ode zo'u
de patfu da
for-all X which-are-persons, there-exists-a-Y such-that
Y is the father of X.
Every person has a father.
The string of sumti before ``zo'u'' (called the ``prenex'': see Chapter 16) may
contain both a topic and bound variables:
4.8) loi patfu
roda poi prenu ku'o su'ode zo'u
de patfu da
for-the-mass-of fathers
for-all X which-are-persons, there-exists-a-Y such-that
Y is the father of X.
As for fathers, every person has one.
To specify a topic which affects more than one sentence, wrap the sentences in `
`tu'e ... tu'u'' brackets and place the topic and the ``zo'u'' directly in front
. This is the exception to the rule that a topic attaches directly to a sentence
:
4.9) loi jdini zo'u tu'e do ponse .inaja do djica [tu'u]
the-mass-of money : ( [if] you possess, then you want )
Money: if you have it, you want it.
Note: In Lojban, you do not ``want money''; you ``want to have money'' or someth
ing of the sort, as the x2 place of ``djica'' demands an event. As a result, the
straightforward rendering of Example 4.8 without a topic is not:
4.10) do ponse loi jdini .inaja do djica ri
You possess money only-if you desire its-mere-existence
where ``ri'' means ``loi jdini'' and is interpreted as ``the mere existence of m
oney'', but rather:
4.11) do ponse loi jdini .inaja do djica tu'a ri
You possess money only-if you desire something-about it
namely, the possession of money. But topic-comment sentences like Example 4.9 ar
e inherently vague, and this difference between ``ponse'' (which expects a physi
cal object in x2) and ``djica'' is ignored. See Example 9.3 for another topic/co
mment sentence.
The subject of an English sentence is often the topic as well, but in Lojban the
sumti in the x1 place is not necessarily the topic, especially if it is the nor
mal (unconverted) x1 for the selbri. Thus Lojban sentences don't necessarily hav
e a ``subject'' in the English sense.
5. Questions and answers
xu UI truth question
ma KOhA sumti question
mo GOhA bridi question
xo PA number question
ji A sumti connective question
ge'i GA forethought connective question
gi'i GIhA bridi-tail connective question
gu'i GUhA tanru forethought connective question
je'i JA tanru connective question
pei UI attitude question
fi'a FA place structure question
cu'e CUhE tense/modal question
pau UI question premarker
Lojban questions are not at all like English questions. There are two basic type
s: truth questions, of the form `Ìs it true that ... '', and fill-in-the-blank
questions. Truth questions are marked by preceding the bridi, or following any p
art of it specifically questioned, with the cmavo ``xu'' (of selma'o UI):
5.1) xu do klama le zarci
[True or false?] You go to the store
Are you going to the store/Did you go to the store?
(Since the Lojban is tenseless, either colloquial translation might be correct.)
Truth questions are further discussed in Chapter 15.
Fill-in-the-blank questions have a cmavo representing some Lojban word or phrase
which is not known to the questioner, and which the answerer is to supply. Ther
e are a variety of cmavo belonging to different selma'o which provide different
kinds of blanks.
Where a sumti is not known, a question may be formed with ``ma'' (of selma'o KOh
A), which is a kind of pro-sumti:
5.2) ma klama le zarci
[What sumti?] goes-to the store
Who is going to the store?
Of course, the ``ma'' need not be in the x1 place:
5.3) do klama ma
You go-to [what sumti?]
The answer is a simple sumti:
5.4) le zarci
The store.
A sumti, then, is a legal utterance, although it does not by itself constitute a
bridi -- it does not claim anything, but merely completes the open-ended claim
of the previous bridi.
There can be two ``ma'' cmavo in a single question:
5.5) ma klama ma
Who goes where?
and the answer would be two sumti, which are meant to fill in the two ``ma'' cma
vo in order:
5.6) mi le zarci
I, to the store.
An even more complex example, depending on the non-logical connective ``fa'u'' (
of selma'o JOI), which is like the English `ànd ... respectively'':
5.7) ma fa'u ma klama ma fa'u ma
Who and who goes where and where, respectively?
An answer might be
5.8) la djan. la marcas. le zarci le briju
John, Marsha, the store, the office.
John and Marsha go to the store and the office,
respectively.
(Note: A mechanical substitution of Example 5.8 into Example 5.7 produces an ung
rammatical result, because ``* ... le zarci fa'u le briju'' is ungrammatical Loj
ban: the first ``le zarci'' has to be closed with its proper terminator ``ku'',
for reasons explained in Chapter 14. This effect is not important: Lojban behave
s as if all elided terminators have been supplied in both question and answer be
fore inserting the latter into the former. The exchange is grammatical if questi
on and answer are each separately grammatical.)
Questions to be answered with a selbri are expressed with ``mo'' of selma'o GOhA
, which is a kind of pro-bridi:
5.9) la lojban. mo
Lojban [what selbri?]
What is Lojban?
Here the answerer is to supply some predicate which is true of Lojban. Such ques
tions are extremely open-ended, due to the enormous range of possible predicate
answers. The answer might be just a selbri, or might be a full bridi, in which c
ase the sumti in the answer override those provided by the questioner. To limit
the range of a ``mo'' question, make it part of a tanru.
Questions about numbers are expressed with ``xo'' of selma'o PA:
5.10) do viska xo prenu
You saw [what number?] persons.
How many people did you see?
The answer would be a simple number, another kind of non-bridi utterance:
5.11) vomu
Forty-five.
Fill-in-the-blank questions may also be asked about: logical connectives (using
cmavo ``ji'' of A, ``ge'i'' of GA, ``gi'i'' of GIhA, ``gu'i'' of GUhA, or ``je'i
'' of JA, and receiving an ek, gihek, ijek, or ijoik as an answer) --- see Chapt
er 14; attitudes (using ``pei'' of UI, and receiving an attitudinal as an answer
) --- see Chapter 13; place structures (using ``fi'a'' of FA, and receiving a cm
avo of FA as an answer) --- see Chapter 9; tenses and modals (using ``cu'e'' of
CUhE, and receiving any tense or BAI cmavo as an answer) --- see Chapter 9 and C
hapter 10.
Questions can be marked by placing ``pau'' (of selma'o UI) before the question b
ridi. See Chapter 13 for details.
The full list of non-bridi utterances suitable as answers to questions is:
any number of sumti (with elidable terminator ``vau'', see Chapter 6) an ek
or gihek (logical connectives, see Chapter 14) a number, or any mathematical exp
ression placed in parentheses (see Chapter 18) a bare ``na'' negator (to negate
some previously expressed bridi), or corresponding ``ja'a'' affirmer (see Chapte
r 15) a relative clause (to modify some previously expressed sumti, see Chapter
8) a prenex/topic (to modify some previously expressed bridi, see Chapter 16) li
nked arguments (beginning with ``be'' or ``bei'' and attached to some previously
expressed selbri, often in a description,see Chapter 5)
At the beginning of a text, the following non-bridi are also permitted:
one or more names (to indicate direct address without ``doi'', see Chapter 6
) indicators (to express a prevailing attitude, see Chapter 13) ``nai'' (to vagu
ely negate something or other, see Chapter 15)
Where not needed for the expression of answers, most of these are made grammatic
al for pragmatic reasons: people will say them in conversation, and there is no
reason to rule them out as ungrammatical merely because most of them are vague.
6. Subscripts: XI
xi XI subscript
The cmavo ``xi'' (of selma'o XI) indicates that a subscript (a number, a lerfu s
tring, or a parenthesized mekso) follows. Subscripts can be attached to almost a
ny construction and are placed following the construction (or its terminator wor
d, which is generally required). They are useful either to extend the finite cma
vo list to infinite length, or to make more refined distinctions than the standa
rd cmavo list permits. The remainder of this section mentions some places where
subscripts might naturally be used.
Lojban gismu have at most five places:
6.1) mi cu klama le zarci le zdani
le dargu le karce
I go to-the market from-the house
Consequently, selma'o SE (which operates on a selbri to change the order of its
places) and selma'o FA (which provides place number tags for individual sumti) h
ave only enough members to handle up to five places. Conversion of Example 6.1,
using ``xe'' to swap the x1 and x5 places, would produce:
6.2) le karce cu xe klama le zarci
le zdani le dargu mi
The car is-a-transportation-means to-the market
from-the house via-the road for-me.
And reordering of the place structures might produce:
6.3) fo le dargu fi le zdani fa mi fe le zarci
fu le karce cu klama
Via the road, from the house, I, to the market,
using-the car, go.
Examples 6.1 to 6.3 all mean the same thing. But consider the lujvo ``nunkla'',
formed by applying the abstraction operator ``nu'' to ``klama'':
6.4) la'edi'u cu nunkla
mi le zarci le zdani
le dargu le karce
The-referent-of-the-previous-sentence is-an-event-of-going
by-me to-the market from-the house
Example 6.4 shows that ``nunkla'' has six places: the five places of ``klama'' p
lus a new one (placed first) for the event itself. Performing transformations si
milar to that of Example 6.2 requires an additional conversion cmavo that exchan
ges the x1 and x6 places. The solution is to use any cmavo of SE with a subscrip
t:
6.5) le karce cu sexixa nunkla
mi le zarci le zdani le dargu
la'edi'u
The car is-a-transportation-means-in-the-event-of-going
by-me to-the market via-the road
which-is-referred-to-by-the-last-sentence.
Likewise, a sixth place tag can be created by using any cmavo of FA with a subsc
ript:
6.6) fu le dargu fo le zdani fe mi
fa la'edi'u fi le zarci
faxixa le karce cu klama
Via the road, from the house, by me,
the-referent-of-the-last-sentence, to the market,
using the car, is-an-event-of-going.
Examples 6.4 to 6.6 also all mean the same thing, and each is derived straightfo
rwardly from any of the others, despite the tortured nature of the English gloss
es. In addition, any other member of SE or FA could be substituted into ``sexixa
'' and ``faxixa'' without change of meaning: ``vexixa'' means the same thing as
``sexixa''.
Lojban provides two groups of pro-sumti, both belonging to selma'o KOhA. The ko'
a-series cmavo are used to refer to explicitly specified sumti to which they hav
e been bound using ``goi''. The da-series, on the other hand, are existentially
or universally quantified variables. (These concepts are explained more fully in
Chapter 16.) There are ten ko'a-series cmavo and 3 da-series cmavo available.
If more are required, any cmavo of the ko'a-series or the da-series can be subsc
ripted:
6.7) daxivo
X sub 4
is the 4th bound variable of the 1st sequence of the da-series, and
6.8) ko'ixipaso
something-3 sub 18
is the 18th free variable of the 3rd sequence of the ko'a-series. This conventio
n allows 10 sequences of ko'a-type pro-sumti and 3 sequences of da-type pro-sumt
i, each with arbitrarily many members. Note that ``daxivo'' and ``dexivo'' are c
onsidered to be distinct pro-sumti, unlike the situation with ``sexixa'' and ``v
exixa'' above. Exactly similar treatment can be given to the bu'a-series of selm
a'o GOhA and to the gismu pro-bridi ``broda'', ``brode'', ``brodi'', ``brodo'',
and ``brodu''.
Subscripts on lerfu words are used in the standard mathematical way to extend th
e number of variables:
6.9) li xy.boixipa du li xy.boixire su'i xy.boixici
The-number x-sub-1 equals the-number x-sub-2 plus x-sub-3
$x1 = x2 + x3$
and can be used to extend the number of pro-sumti as well, since lerfu strings o
utside mathematical contexts are grammatically and semantically equivalent to pr
o-sumti of the ko'a-series. (In Example 6.9, note the required terminator ``boi'
' after each ``xy.'' cmavo; this terminator allows the subscript to be attached
without ambiguity.)
Names, which are similar to pro-sumti, can also be subscripted to distinguish tw
o individuals with the same name:
6.10) la djan. xipa cusku lu mi'enai do li'u la djan. xire
John1 expresses `Ì-am-not you'' to John2.
Subscripts on tenses allow talking about more than one time or place that is des
cribed by the same general cmavo. For example, ``puxipa'' could refer to one poi
nt in the past, and ``puxire'' a second point (earlier or later).
You can place a subscript on the word ``ja'a'', the bridi affirmative of selma'o
NA, to express so-called fuzzy truths. The usual machinery for fuzzy logic (sta
tements whose truth value is not merely ``true'' or ``false'', but is expressed
by a number in the range 0 to 1) in Lojban is the abstractor ``jei'':
6.11) li pimu jei mi ganra
The-number .5 is-the-truth-value-of my being-broad
However, by convention we can attach a subscript to ``ja'a'' to indicate fuzzy t
ruth (or to ``na'' if we change the amount):
6.12) mi ja'a xipimu ganra
I truly-sub-.5 am-broad
Finally, as mentioned in Section 2, ``ni'o'' and ``no'i'' cmavo with matching su
bscripts mark the start and the continuation of a given topic respectively. Diff
erent topics can be assigned to different subscripts.
Other uses of subscripts will doubtless be devised in future.
7. Utterance ordinals: MAI
mai MAI utterance ordinal, -thly
mo'o MAI higher order utterance ordinal
Numerical free modifiers, corresponding to English ``firstly'', ``secondly'', an
d so on, can be created by suffixing ``mai'' or ``mo'o'' of selma'o MAI to a num
ber or a lerfu string. Here are some examples:
7.1) mi klama pamai le zarci .e remai le zdani
I go-to (firstly) the store and (secondly) the market.
This does not imply that I go to the store before I go to the market: that meani
ng requires a tense. The sumti are simply numbered for convenience of reference.
Like other free modifiers, the utterance ordinals can be inserted almost anywhe
re in a sentence without affecting its grammar or its meaning.
Any of the Lojban numbers can be used with MAI: ``romai'', for example, means ``
all-thly'' or ``lastly''. Likewise, if you are enumerating a long list and have
forgotten which number is wanted next, you can say ``ny.mai'', or ``Nthly''.
The difference between ``mai'' and ``mo'o'' is that ``mo'o'' enumerates larger s
ubdivisions of a text; ``mai'' was designed for lists of numbered items, whereas
``mo'o'' was intended to subdivide structured works. If this chapter were trans
lated into Lojban, it might number each section with ``mo'o'': this section woul
d then be introduced with ``zemo'o'', or ``Section 7.''
8. Attitude scope markers: FUhE/FUhO
fu'e FUhE open attitudinal scope
fu'o FUhO close attitudinal scope
Lojban has a complex system of `àttitudinals'', words which indicate the speake
r's attitude to what is being said. The attitudinals include indicators of emoti
on, intensity markers, discursives (which show the structure of discourse), and
evidentials (which indicate ``how the speaker knows''). Most of these words belo
ng to selma'o UI; the intensity markers belong to selma'o CAI for historical rea
sons, but the two selma'o are grammatically identical. The individual cmavo of U
I and CAI are discussed in Chapter 13; only the rules for applying them in disco
urse are presented here.
Normally, an attitudinal applies to the preceding word only. However, if the pre
ceding word is a structural cmavo which begins or ends a whole construction, the
n that whole construction is affected by the attitudinal:
8.1) mi viska le blanu .ia zdani [ku]
I see the blue [belief] house.
I see the house, which I believe to be blue.
8.2) mi viska le blanu zdani .ia [ku]
I see the blue house [belief].
I see the blue thing, which I believe to be a house.
8.3) mi viska le .ia blanu zdani [ku]
I see the [belief] blue house
I see what I believe to be a blue house.
8.4) mi viska le blanu zdani ku .ia
I see (the blue house ) [belief]
I see what I believe to be a blue house.
An attitudinal meant to cover a whole sentence can be attached to the preceding
``.i'', expressed or understood:
8.5) [.i] .ia mi viska le blanu zdani
[belief] I see the blue house
I believe I see a blue house.
or to an explicit ``vau'' placed at the end of a bridi.
Likewise, an attitudinal meant to cover a whole paragraph can be attached to ``n
i'o'' or ``no'i''. An attitudinal at the beginning of a text applies to the whol
e text.
However, sometimes it is necessary to be more specific about the range of one or
more attitudinals, particularly if the range crosses the boundaries of standard
Lojban syntactic constructions. The cmavo ``fu'e'' (of selma'o FUhE) and ``fu'o
'' (of selma'o FUhO) provide explicit scope markers. Placing ``fu'e'' in front o
f an attitudinal disconnects it from what precedes it, and instead says that it
applies to all following words until further notice. The notice is given by ``fu
'o'', which can appear anywhere and cancels all in-force attitudinals. For examp
le:
8.6) mi viska le fu'e .ia blanu zdani fu'o ponse
I see the [start] [belief] blue house [end] possessor
I see the owner of what I believe to be a blue house.
Here, only the ``blanu zdani'' portion of the three-part tanru ``blanu zdani pon
se'' is marked as a belief of the speaker. Naturally, the attitudinal scope mark
ers do not affect the rules for interpreting multi-part tanru: ``blanu zdani'' g
roups first because tanru group from left to right unless overridden with ``ke''
or ``bo''.
Other attitudinals of more local scope can appear after attitudinals marked by F
UhE; these attitudinals are added to the globally active attitudinals rather tha
n superseding them.
9. Quotations: LU, LIhU, LOhU, LEhU
lu LU begin quotation
li'u LIhU end quotation
lo'u LOhU begin error quotation
le'u LEhU end error quotation
Grammatically, quotations are very simple in Lojban: all of them are sumti, and
they all mean something like ``the piece of text here quoted'':
9.1) mi pu cusku lu mi'e djan [li'u]
I [past] express [quote] I-am John [unquote]
I said, `Ì'm John''.
But in fact there are four different flavors of quotation in the language, invol
ving six cmavo of six different selma'o. This being the case, quotation deserves
some elaboration.
The simplest kind of quotation, exhibited in Example 9.1, uses the cmavo ``lu''
(of selma'o LU) as the opening quotation mark, and the cmavo ``li'u'' (of selma'
o LIhU) as the closing quotation mark. The text between ``lu'' and ``li'u'' must
be a valid, parseable Lojban text. If the quotation is ungrammatical, so is the
surrounding expression. The cmavo ``li'u'' is technically an elidable terminato
r, but it's almost never possible to elide it except at the end of text.
The cmavo ``lo'u'' (of selma'o LOhU) and ``le'u'' (of selma'o LEhU) are used to
surround a quotation that is not necessarily grammatical Lojban. However, the te
xt must consist of morphologically correct Lojban words (as defined in Chapter 4
), so that the ``le'u'' can be picked out reliably. The words need not be meanin
gful, but they must be recognizable as cmavo, brivla, or cmene. Quotation with `
`lo'u'' is essential to quoting ungrammatical Lojban for teaching in the languag
e, the equivalent of the * that is used in English to mark such errors:
9.2) lo'u mi du do du la djan. le'u
na tergerna la lojban.
[quote] mi du do du la djan. [unquote]
is-not a-grammatical-structure-in Lojban.
Example 9.2 is grammatical even though the embedded quotation is not. Similarly,
``lo'u'' quotation can quote fragments of a text which themselves do not consti
tute grammatical utterances:
9.3) lu le mlatu cu viska le finpe li'u zo'u
lo'u viska le le'u
cu selbasti .ei
lo'u viska lo le'u
[quote] le mlatu cu viska le finpe [unquote] :
[quote] viska le [unquote]
is-replaced-by [obligation!]
[quote] viska lo [unquote].
In the sentence ``le mlatu viska le finpe'',
``viska le'' should be replaced by ``viska lo''.
Note the topic-comment formulation (Section 4) and the indicator applying to the
selbri only (Section 8). Neither ``viska le'' nor ``viska lo'' is a valid Lojba
n utterance, and both require ``lo'u'' quotation.
Additionally, pro-sumti or pro-bridi in the quoting sentence can refer to words
appearing in the quoted sentence when ``lu ... li'u'' is used, but not when ``lo
'u ... le'u'' is used:
9.4) la tcarlis. cusku lu le ninmu cu morsi li'u
.iku'i ri jmive
Charlie says [quote] the woman is-dead [unquote].
However, the-last-mentioned is-alive.
Charlie says ``The woman is dead'', but she is alive.
In Example 9.4, ``ri'' is a pro-sumti which refers to the most recent previous s
umti, namely ``le ninmu''. Compare:
9.5) la tcarlis. cusku lo'u le ninmu cu morsi le'u
.iku'i ri jmive
Charlie says [quote] le ninmu cu morsi [unquote].
However, the-last-mentioned is-alive.
Charlie says ``le ninmu cu morsi'', but he is alive.
In Example 9.5, ``ri'' cannot refer to the referent of the alleged sumti ``le ni
nmu'', because ``le ninmu cu morsi'' is a mere uninterpreted sequence of Lojban
words. Instead, ``ri'' ends up referring to the referent of the sumti ``la tcarl
is.'', and so it is Charlie who is alive.
The metalinguistic erasers ``si'', ``sa'', and ``su'', discussed in Section 13,
do not operate in text between ``lo'u'' and ``le'u''. Since the first ``le'u'' t
erminates a ``lo'u'' quotation, it is not directly possible to have a ``lo'u'' q
uotation within another ``lo'u'' quotation. However, it is possible for a ``le'u
'' to occur within a ``lo'u ... le'u'' quotation by preceding it with the cmavo
``zo'', discussed in Section 10. Note that ``le'u'' is not an elidable terminato
r; it is required.
10. More on quotations: ZO, ZOI
zo ZO quote single word
zoi ZOI non-Lojban quotation
la'o ZOI non-Lojban name
The cmavo ``zo'' (of selma'o ZO) is a strong quotation mark for the single follo
wing word, which can be any Lojban word whatsoever. Among other uses, ``zo'' all
ows a metalinguistic word to be referenced without having it act on the surround
ing text. The word must be a morphologically legal (but not necessarily meaningf
ul) single Lojban word; compound cmavo are not permitted. For example:
10.1) zo si cu lojbo valsi
``si'' is a Lojbanic word.
Since ``zo'' acts on a single word only, there is no corresponding terminator. B
revity, then, is a great advantage of ``zo'', since the terminators for other ki
nds of quotation are rarely or never elidable.
The cmavo ``zoi'' (of selma'o ZOI) is a quotation mark for quoting unlexable (no
n-Lojban) text. Its syntax is ``zoi X. text .X'', where X is a Lojban word (call
ed the delimiting word) which is separated from the quoted text by pauses, and w
hich is not found in the written text or spoken phoneme stream. It is common, bu
t not required, to use the lerfu word (of selma'o BY) which corresponds to the L
ojban name of the language being quoted:
10.2) zoi gy. John is a man .gy. cu glico jufra
``John is a man'' is an English sentence.
where ``gy'' stands for ``glico''. Other popular choices of delimiting words are
``.kuot.'', a Lojban name which sounds like the English word ``quote'', and the
word ``zoi'' itself. Another possibility is a Lojban word suggesting the topic
of the quotation.
Within written text, the Lojban written word used as a delimiting word may not a
ppear, whereas within spoken text, the sound of the delimiting word may not be u
ttered. This leads to occasional breakdowns of audio-visual isomorphism: Example
10.3 is fine in speech but ungrammatical as written, whereas Example 10.4 is co
rrect when written but ungrammatical in speech.
10.3) ?mi djuno fi le valsi po'u zoi gy. gyrations .gy.
I know about the word which-is ``gyrations''.
10.4) ?mi djuno fi le valsi po'u zoi jai. gyrations .jai
I know about the word which-is ``gyrations''.
The text ``gy'' appears in the written word ``gyrations'', whereas the sound rep
resented in Lojban by ``jai'' appears in the spoken word ``gyrations''. Such bor
derline cases should be avoided as a matter of good style.
It should be noted particularly that ``zoi'' quotation is the only way to quote
rafsi, specifically CCV rafsi, because they are not Lojban words, and ``zoi'' qu
otation is the only way to quote things which are not Lojban words. (CVC and CVV
rafsi look like names and cmavo respectively, and so can be quoted using other
methods.) For example:
10.5) zoi ry. sku .ry. cu rafsi zo cusku
``sku'' is a rafsi of ``cusku''.
(A minor note on interaction between ``lo'u ... le'u'' and ``zoi'': The text bet
ween ``lo'u'' and ``le'u'' should consist of Lojban words only. In fact, non-Loj
ban material in the form of a ``zoi'' quotation may also appear. However, if the
word ``le'u'' is used either as the delimiting word for the ``zoi'' quotation,
or within the quotation itself, the outer ``lo'u'' quotation will be prematurely
terminated. Therefore, ``le'u'' should be avoided as the delimiting word in any
``zoi'' quotation.)
Lojban strictly avoids any confusion between things and the names of things:
10.6) zo .bab. cmene la bab.
The-word ``Bob'' is-the-name-of the-one-named Bob.
In Example 10.6, ``zo .bab.'' is the word, whereas ``la bab.'' is the thing name
d by the word. The cmavo ``la'e'' and ``lu'e'' (of selma'o LAhE) convert back an
d forth between references and their referents:
10.7) zo .bab. cmene la'e zo .bab.
The-word ``Bob'' is-the-name-of
the-referent-of the-word ``Bob''.
10.8) lu'e la bab. cmene la bab.
A-symbol-for Bob is-the-name-of Bob.
Examples 10.6 through 10.8 all mean approximately the same thing, except for dif
ferences in emphasis. Example 10.9 is different:
10.9) la bab. cmene la bab.
Bob is the name of Bob.
and says that Bob is both the name and the thing named, an unlikely situation. P
eople are not names.
(In Examples 10.6 through 10.7, the name ``bab.'' was separated from a preceding
``zo'' by a pause, thus: ``zo .bab.''. The reason for this extra pause is that
all Lojban names must be separated by pause from any preceding word other than `
`la'', ``lai'', ``la'i'' (all of selma'o LA) and ``doi'' (of selma'o DOI). There
are numerous other cmavo that may precede a name: of these, ``zo'' is one of th
e most common.)
The cmavo ``la'o'' also belongs to selma'o ZOI, and is mentioned here for comple
teness, although it does not signal the beginning of a quotation. Instead, ``la'
o'' serves to mark non-Lojban names, especially the Linnaean binomial names (suc
h as ``Homo sapiens'') which are the internationally standardized names for spec
ies of animals and plants. Internationally known names which can more easily be
recognized by spelling rather than pronunciation, such as ``Goethe'', can also a
ppear in Lojban text with ``la'o'':
10.10) la'o dy. Goethe .dy. cu me la'o ly. Homo sapiens .ly.
Goethe is a Homo sapiens.
Using ``la'o'' for all names rather than Lojbanizing, however, makes for very cu
mbersome text. A rough equivalent of ``la'o'' might be ``la me zoi''.
11. Contrastive emphasis: BAhE
ba'e BAhE emphasize next word
za'e BAhE next word is nonce
English often uses strong stress on a word to single it out for contrastive emph
asis, thus
11.1) I saw George.
is quite different from
11.2) I saw George.
The heavy stress on ``George'' (represented in writing by italics) indicates tha
t I saw George rather than someone else. Lojban does not use stress in this way:
stress is used only to help separate words (because every brivla is stressed on
the penultimate syllable) and in names to match other languages' stress pattern
s. Note that many other languages do not use stress in this way either; typicall
y word order is rearranged, producing something like
11.4) It was George whom I saw.
In Lojban, the cmavo ``ba'e'' (of selma'o BAhE) precedes a single word which is
to be emphasized:
11.4.5) mi viska la ba'e .djordj.
I saw the-one-named [emphasis] ``George''.
I saw George.
Note the pause before the name ``djordj.'', which serves to separate it unambigu
ously from the ``ba'e''. Alternatively, the ``ba'e'' can be moved to a position
before the ``la'', which in effect emphasizes the whole construct ``la djordj.''
:
11.5) mi viska ba'e la djordj.
I saw [emphasis] the-one-named ``George''.
I saw George.
Marking a word with a cmavo of BAhE does not change the word's grammar in any wa
y. Any word in a bridi can receive contrastive emphasis marking:
11.6) ba'e mi viska la djordj.
I, no one else, saw George.
11.7) mi ba'e viska la djordj.
I saw (not heard or smelled) George.
Emphasis on one of the structural components of a Lojban bridi can also be achie
ved by rearranging it into an order that is not the speaker's or writer's usual
order. Any sumti moved out of place, or the selbri when moved out of place, is e
mphatic to some degree.
For completeness, the cmavo ``za'e'' should be mentioned, also of selma'o BAhE.
It marks a word as possibly irregular, non-standard, or nonce (created for the o
ccasion):
11.8) mi klama la za'e. .albeinias
I go-to so-called Albania
marks a Lojbanization of an English name, where a more appropriate standard form
might be something like ``la ctiipyris.'', reflecting the country's name in Alb
anian.
Before a lujvo or fu'ivla, ``za'e'' indicates that the word has been made up on
the spot and may be used in a sense that is not found in the unabridged dictiona
ry (when we have an unabridged dictionary!).
12. Parenthesis and metalinguistic commentary: TO, TOI, SEI
to TO open parenthesis
to'i TO open editorial parenthesis
toi TOI close parenthesis
sei SEI metalinguistic bridi marker
The cmavo ``to'' and ``toi'' are discursive (non-mathematical) parentheses, for
inserting parenthetical remarks. Any text whatsoever can go within the parenthes
es, and it is completely invisible to its context. It can, however, refer to the
context by the use of pro-sumti and pro-bridi: any that have been assigned in t
he context are still assigned in the parenthetical remarks, but the reverse is n
ot true.
12.1) doi lisas. mi djica le nu
to doi frank. ko sisti toi
do viska le mlatu
O Lisa, I desire the event-of
( O Frank, [imperative] stop! )
you see the cat.
Lisa, I want you to (Frank! Stop!) see the cat.
Example 12.1 implicitly redefines ``do'' within the parentheses: the listener is
changed by ``doi frank.'' When the context sentence resumes, however, the old l
istener, Lisa, is automatically restored.
There is another cmavo of selma'o TO: ``to'i''. The difference between ``to'' an
d ``to'i'' is the difference between parentheses and square brackets in English
prose. Remarks within ``to ... toi'' cmavo are implicitly by the same speaker, w
hereas remarks within ``to'i ... toi'' are implicitly by someone else, perhaps a
n editor:
12.2) la frank. cusku lu mi prami do
to'isa'a do du la djein. toi li'u
Frank expresses `Ì love you
[you = Jane]''
The ``sa'a'' suffix is a discursive cmavo (of selma'o UI) meaning `èditorial in
sertion'', and indicating that the marked word or construct (in this case, the e
ntire bracketed remark) is not part of the quotation. It is required whenever th
e ``to'i ... toi'' remark is physically within quotation marks, at least when sp
eaking to literal-minded listeners; the convention may be relaxed if no actual c
onfusion results.
Note: The parser believes that parentheses are attached to the previous word or
construct, because it treats them as syntactic equivalents of subscripts and oth
er such so-called ``free modifiers''. Semantically, however, parenthetical remar
ks are not necessarily attached either to what precedes them or what follows the
m.
The cmavo ``sei'' (of selma'o SEI) begins an embedded discursive bridi. Comments
added with ``sei'' are called ``metalinguistic'', because they are comments abo
ut the discourse itself rather than about the subject matter of the discourse. T
his sense of the term ``metalinguistic'' is used throughout this chapter, and is
not to be confused with the sense ``language for expressing other languages''.
When marked with ``sei'', a metalinguistic utterance can be embedded in another
utterance as a discursive. In this way, discursives which do not have cmavo assi
gned in selma'o UI can be expressed:
12.3) la frank. prami sei la frank. gleki la djein.
Frank loves (Frank is happy) Jane.
Using the happiness attitudinal, ``.ui'', would imply that the speaker was happy
. Instead, the speaker attributes happiness to Frank. It would probably be safe
to elide the one who is happy, and say:
12.4) la frank. prami sei gleki la djein.
Frank loves (he is happy) Jane.
The grammar of the bridi following ``sei'' has an unusual limitation: the sumti
must either all precede the selbri, or must be glued into the selbri with ``be''
and ``bei'':
12.5) la frank. prami sei gleki be fa la suzn. la djein.
Frank loves (Susan is happy) Jane.
This restriction allows the terminator cmavo ``se'u'' to almost always be elided
.
Since a discursive utterance is working at a ``higher'' level of abstraction tha
n a non-discursive utterance, a non-discursive utterance cannot refer to a discu
rsive utterance. Specifically, the various back-counting, reciprocal, and reflex
ive constructs in selma'o KOhA ignore the utterances at ``higher'' metalinguisti
c levels in determining their referent. It is possible, and sometimes necessary,
to refer to lower metalinguistic levels. For example, the English ``he said'' i
n a conversation is metalinguistic. For this purpose, quotations are considered
to be at a lower metalinguistic level than the surrounding context (a quoted tex
t cannot refer to the statements of the one who quotes it), whereas parenthetica
l remarks are considered to be at a higher level than the context.
Lojban works differently from English in that the ``he said'' can be marked inst
ead of the quotation. In Lojban, you can say:
12.6) la djan. cusku lu mi klama le zarci li'u
John expresses `Ì go to-the store''.
which literally claims that John uttered the quoted text. If the central claim i
s that John made the utterance, as is likely in conversation, this style is the
most sensible. However, in written text which quotes a conversation, you don't w
ant the ``he said'' or ``she said'' to be considered part of the conversation. I
f unmarked, it could mess up the anaphora counting. Instead, you can use:
12.7) lu mi klama le zarci
seisa'a la djan. cusku be dei li'u
`` I go to-the store
( John expresses this-sentence ) ''
`Ì go to the store'', said John.
And of course other orders are possible:
12.8) lu seisa'a la djan. cusku be dei mi klama le zarci
John said, `Ì go to the store''.
12.9) lu mi klama seisa'a la djan cusku le zarci
`Ì go'', John said, ``to the store''.
Note the ``sa'a'' following each ``sei'', marking the ``sei'' and its attached b
ridi as an editorial insert, not part of the quotation. In a more relaxed style,
these ``sa'a'' cmavo would probably be dropped.
The elidable terminator for ``sei'' is ``se'u'' (of selma'o SEhU); it is rarely
needed, except to separate a selbri within the ``sei'' comment from an immediate
ly following selbri (or component) outside the comment.
13. Erasure: SI, SA, SU
si SI erase word
sa SA erase phrase
su SU erase discourse
The cmavo ``si'' (of selma'o SI) is a metalinguistic operator that erases the pr
eceding word, as if it had never been spoken:
13.1) ti gerku si mlatu
This is-a-dog, er, is-a-cat.
means the same thing as ``ti mlatu''. Multiple ``si'' cmavo in succession erase
the appropriate number of words:
13.2) ta blanu zdani si si xekri zdani
That is-a-blue house, er, er, is-a-black house.
In order to erase the word ``zo'', it is necessary to use three ``si'' cmavo in
a row:
13.3) zo .bab. se cmene zo si si si la bab.
The-word ``Bob'' is-the-name-of the word ``si'', er, er, Bob.
The first use of ``si'' does not erase anything, but completes the ``zo'' quotat
ion. Two more ``si'' cmavo are then necessary to erase the first ``si'' and the
``zo''.
Incorrect names can likewise cause trouble with ``si'':
13.4) mi tavla fo la .esperanto
si si .esperanton.
I talk in-language that-named `ànd'' ``speranto'',
er, er, Esperanto.
The Lojbanized spelling ``.esperanto'' breaks up, as a consequence of the Lojban
morphology rules (see Chapter 4) into two Lojban words, the cmavo ``.e'' and th
e undefined fu'ivla ``speranto''. Therefore, two ``si'' cmavo are needed to eras
e them. Of course, ``.e speranto'' is not grammatical after ``la'', but recognit
ion of ``si'' is done before grammatical analysis.
Even more messy is the result of an incorrect ``zoi'':
13.5) mi cusku zoi fy. gy. .fy.
si si si si zo .djan
I express [foreign] [quote] ``sy'' [unquote],
er, er, er, er, ``John''.
In Example 13.5, the first ``fy'' is taken to be the delimiting word. The next w
ord must be different from the delimiting word, and ``gy.'', the Lojban name for
the letter ``g'', was chosen arbitrarily. Then the delimiting word must be repe
ated. For purposes of ``si'' erasure, the entire quoted text is taken to be a wo
rd, so four words have been uttered, and four more ``si'' cmavo are needed to er
ase them altogether. Similarly, a stray ``lo'u'' quotation mark must be erased w
ith ``fy. le'u si si si'', by completing the quotation and then erasing it all w
ith three ``si'' cmavo.
What if less than the entire ``zo'' or ``zoi'' construct is erased? The result i
s something which has a loose ``zo'' or ``zoi'' in it, without its expected sequ
els, and which is incurably ungrammatical. Thus, to erase just the word quoted b
y ``zo'', it turns out to be necessary to erase the ``zo'' as well:
13.6) mi se cmene zo .djan.
si si zo .djordj.
I am-named-by the-word ``John'',
er, er, the-word ``George''.
The parser will reject ``zo .djan. si .djordj.'', because in that context ``djor
dj.'' is a name (of selma'o CMENE) rather than a quoted word.
Note: The current machine parser does not implement ``si'' erasure.
As the above examples plainly show, precise erasures with ``si'' can be extremel
y hard to get right. Therefore, the cmavo ``sa'' (of selma'o SA) is provided for
erasing more than one word. The cmavo following ``sa'' should be the starting m
arker of some grammatical construct. The effect of the ``sa'' is to erase back t
o and including the last starting marker of the same kind. For example:
13.7) mi viska le sa .i mi cusku zo .djan.
I see the ... I say the-word ``John''.
Since the word following ``sa'' is ``.i'', the sentence separator, its effect is
to erase the preceding sentence. So Example 13.7 is equivalent to:
13.8) mi cusku zo .djan.
Another example, erasing a partial description rather than a partial sentence:
13.9) mi viska le blanu zdan. sa le xekri zdani
I see the blue hou ... the black house.
In Example 13.9, ``le blanu zdan.'' is ungrammatical, but clearly reflects the s
peaker's original intention to say ``le blanu zdani''. However, the ``zdani'' wa
s cut off before the end and changed into a name. The entire ungrammatical ``le'
' construct is erased and replaced by ``le xekri zdani''.
Note: The current machine parser does not implement ``sa'' erasure. Getting ``sa
'' right is even more difficult (for a computer) than getting ``si'' right, as t
he behavior of ``si'' is defined in terms of words rather than in terms of gramm
atical constructs (possibly incorrect ones) and words are conceptually simpler e
ntities. On the other hand, ``sa'' is generally easier for human beings, because
the rules for using it correctly are less finicky.
The cmavo ``su'' (of selma'o SU) is yet another metalinguistic operator that era
ses the entire text. However, if the text involves multiple speakers, then ``su'
' will only erase the remarks made by the one who said it, unless that speaker h
as said nothing. Therefore ``susu'' is needed to eradicate a whole discussion in
conversation.
Note: The current machine parser does not implement either ``su'' or ``susu'' er
asure.
14. Hesitation: Y
.y. Y hesitation noise
Speakers often need to hesitate to think of what to say next or for some extra-l
inguistic reason. There are two ways to hesitate in Lojban: to pause between wor
ds (that is, to say nothing) or to use the cmavo ``.y.'' (of selma'o Y). This re
sembles in sound the English hesitation noise written `ùh'' (or `èr''), but di
ffers from it in the requirement for pauses before and after. Unlike a long paus
e, it cannot be mistaken for having nothing more to say: it holds the floor for
the speaker. Since vowel length is not significant in Lojban, the ``y'' sound ca
n be dragged out for as long as necessary. Furthermore, the sound can be repeate
d, provided the required pauses are respected.
Since the hesitation sound in English is outside the formal language, English-sp
eakers may question the need for a formal cmavo. Speakers of other languages, ho
wever, often hesitate by saying (or, if necessary, repeating) a word (`èste'' i
n some dialects of Spanish, roughly meaning ``that is''), and Lojban's audio-vis
ual isomorphism requires a written representation of all meaningful spoken behav
ior. Of course, ``.y.'' has no grammatical significance: it can appear anywhere
at all in a Lojban sentence except in the middle of a word.
15. No more to say: FAhO
fa'o FAhO end of text
The cmavo ``fa'o'' (of selma'o FAhO) is the usually omitted marker for the end o
f a text; it can be used in computer interaction to indicate the end of input or
output, or for explicitly giving up the floor during a discussion. It is outsid
e the regular grammar, and the machine parser takes it as an unconditional signa
l to stop parsing unless it is quoted with ``zo'' or with ``lo'u ... le'u''. In
particular, it is not used at the end of subordinate texts quoted with ``lu ...
li'u'' or parenthesized with ``to ... toi''.
16. List of cmavo interactions
The following list gives the cmavo and selma'o that are recognized by the earlie
st stages of the parser, and specifies exactly which of them interact with which
others. All of the cmavo are at least mentioned in this chapter. The cmavo are
written in lower case, and the selma'o in UPPER CASE.
``zo'' quotes the following word, no matter what it is.
``si'' erases the preceding word unless it is a ``zo''.
``sa'' erases the preceding word and other words, unless the preceding word is a
``zo''.
``su'' is the same as ``sa'', but erases more words.
``lo'u'' quotes all following words up to a ``le'u'' (but not a ``zo le'u'').
``le'u'' is ungrammatical except at the end of a ``lo'u quotation.
ZOI cmavo use the following word as a delimiting word, no matter what it is, but
using ``le'u'' may create difficulties.
``zei'' combines the preceding and the following word into a lujvo, but does not
affect ``zo'', ``si'', ``sa'', ``su'', ``lo'u'', ZOI cmavo, ``fa'o'', and ``zei
''.
BAhE cmavo mark the following word, unless it is ``si'', ``sa'', or ``su'', or u
nless it is preceded by ``zo''. Multiple BAhE cmavo may be used in succession.
``bu'' makes the preceding word into a lerfu word, except for ``zo'', ``si'', ``
sa'', ``su'', ``lo'u'', ZOI cmavo, ``fa'o'', ``zei'', BAhE cmavo, and ``bu''. Mu
ltiple ``bu'' cmavo may be used in succession.
UI and CAI cmavo mark the previous word, except for ``zo'', ``si'', ``sa'', ``su
'', ``lo'u'', ZOI, ``fa'o'', ``zei'', BAhE cmavo, and ``bu''. Multiple UI cmavo
may be used in succession. A following ``nai'' is made part of the UI.
``.y.'', ``da'o'', ``fu'e'', and ``fu'o'' are the same as UI, but do not absorb
a following ``nai''.
17. List of Elidable Terminators
The following list shows all the elidable terminators of Lojban. The first colum
n is the terminator, the second column is the selma'o that starts the correspond
ing construction, and the third column states what kinds of grammatical construc
ts are terminated. Each terminator is the only cmavo of its selma'o, which natur
ally has the same name as the cmavo.
be'o BE sumti attached to a tanru unit
boi PA/BY number or lerfu string
do'u COI/DOI vocative phrases
fe'u FIhO ad-hoc modal tags
ge'u GOI relative phrases
kei NU abstraction bridi
ke'e KE groups of various kinds
ku LE/LA description sumti
ku'e PEhO forethought mekso
ku'o NOI relative clauses
li'u LU quotations
lo'o LI number sumti
lu'u LAhE/NAhE+BO sumti qualifiers
me'u ME tanru units formed from sumti
nu'u NUhI forethought termsets
se'u SEI/SOI metalinguistic insertions
te'u various mekso conversion constructs
toi TO parenthetical remarks
tu'u TUhE multiple sentences or paragraphs
vau (none) simple bridi or bridi-tails
ve'o VEI mekso parentheses
Chapter 20
A Catalogue of selma'o
The following paragraphs list all the selma'o of Lojban, with a brief explanatio
n of what each one is about, and reference to the chapter number where each is e
xplained more fully. As usual, all selma'o names are given in capital letters (w
ith ``h'' serving as the capital of ``''') and are the names of a representative
cmavo, often the most important or the first in alphabetical order. One example
is given of each selma'o: for selma'o which have several uses, the most common
use is shown.
selma'o A (Chapter 14)
Specifies a logical connection (e.g. `ànd'', `òr'', `ìf''), usually between s
umti.
la djan. .a la djein. klama le zarci John and/or Jane goes to the store.
Also used to create vowel lerfu words when followed with ``bu''.
selma'o BAI (Chapter 9)
May be prefixed to a sumti to specify an additional place, not otherwise present
in the place structure of the selbri, and derived from a single place of some o
ther selbri.
mi tavla bau la lojban. I speak in-language Lojban.
selma'o BAhE (Chapter 19)
Emphasizes the next single word, or marks it as a nonce word (one invented for t
he occasion.
la ba'e .djordj. klama le zarci George goes to the store. It is George who g
oes to the store.
selma'o BE (Chapter 5)
Attaches sumti which fill the place structure of a single unit making up a tanru
. Unless otherwise indicated, the sumti fill the x2, x3, and successive places i
n that order. BE is most useful in descriptions formed with LE. See BEI, BEhO.
mi klama be ta troci I am-a-(goer to-that) type-of-trier. I try to go to tha
t place.
selma'o BEI (Chapter 5)
Separates multiple sumti attached by BE to a tanru unit.
mi klama be le zarci bei le zdani be'o troci I am-a-(goer to-the store from-
the home) type-of-trier. I try to go from the home to the market.
selma'o BEhO (Chapter 5)
Elidable terminator for BE. Terminates sumti that are attached to a tanru unit.
mi klama be le zarci be'o troci I am-a-(goer to-the market) type-of-trier. I
try to go to the market.
selma'o BIhE (Chapter 18)
Prefix attached to a mathematical operator to mark it as higher priority than ot
her mathematical operators, binding its operands more closely.
li ci bi'e pi'u vo su'i mu du li paze The-number 3 [priority] times 4 plus 5
equals the-number 17. 3 * 4 + 5 = 17
selma'o BIhI (Chapter 14)
Joins sumti or tanru units (as well as some other things) to form intervals. See
GAhO.
mi ca sanli la drezdn. bi'i la frankfurt. I [present] stand-on-surface Dresd
en [interval] Frankfurt. I am standing between Dresden and Frankfurt.
selma'o BO (Chapter 5, Chapter 15, Chapter 18)
Joins tanru units, binding them together closely. Also used to bind logically or
non-logically connected phrases, sentences, etc. BO is always high precedence a
nd right-grouping.
ta cmalu nixli bo ckule That is-a-small type-of (girl type-of school). That
is a small school for girls.
selma'o BOI (Chapter 18)
Elidable terminator for PA or BY. Used to terminate a number (string of numeric
cmavo) or lerfu string (string of letter words) when another string immediately
follows.
li re du li vu'u voboi re The-number two equals the-number the-difference-of
four-and two.
selma'o BU (Chapter 17)
A suffix which can be attached to any word, typically a word representing a lett
er of the alphabet or else a name, to make a word for a symbol or a different le
tter of the alphabet. In particular, attached to single-vowel cmavo to make word
s for vowel letters.
.abu .ebu .ibu .obu .ubu .ybu a, e, i, o, u, y.
selma'o BY (Chapter 17)
Words representing the letters of the Lojban alphabet, plus various shift words
which alter the interpretation of other letter words.
.abu tavla .by le la .ibymym. skami A talks-to B about-the of-IBM computers.
A talks to B about IBM computers.
selma'o CAI (Chapter 13)
A particle which indicates the intensity of an emotion: maximum, strong, weak, o
r not at all. Typically follows another particle which specifies the emotion.
.ei cai mi klama le zarci [Obligation!] [Intense!] I go-to the market. I mus
t go to the market.
selma'o CAhA (Chapter 10)
Specifies whether a bridi refers to an actual fact, a potential (achieved or not
), or merely an innate capability.
ro datka ka'e flulimna all ducks [capability] are-float-swimmers All ducks h
ave the capability of swimming by floating.
selma'o CEI (Chapter 7)
Assigns a selbri definition to one of the five pro-bridi gismu: ``broda'', ``bro
de'', ``brodi'', ``brodo'', or ``brodu'', for later use.
ti slasi je mlatu bo cidja lante gacri cei broda .i le crino broda cu barda
.i le xunre broda cu cmalu This is a plastic cat-food can cover, or thingy. The
green thingy is large. The red thingy is small.
selma'o CEhE (Chapter 14, Chapter 16)
Joins multiple terms into a termset. Termsets are used to associate several term
s for logical connectives, for equal quantifier scope, or for special constructs
in tenses.
mi ce'e do pe'e je la djan. ce'e la djeimyz. cu pendo I [,] you [joint] and
John [,] James are-friends-of. I am a friend of you, and John is a friend of Jam
es.
selma'o CO (Chapter 5)
When inserted between the components of a tanru, inverts it, so that the followi
ng tanru unit modifies the previous one.
mi troci co klama le zarci le zdani I am-a-trier of-type (goer to-the market
from-the house). I try to go to the market from the house.
selma'o COI (Chapter 6, Chapter 13)
When prefixed to a name, description, or sumti, produces a vocative: a phrase wh
ich indicates who is being spoken to (or who is speaking). Vocatives are used in
conversational protocols, including greeting, farewell, and radio communication
. See DOI, DOhU.
coi .djan. Greetings, John.
selma'o CU (Chapter 9)
Separates the selbri of a bridi from any sumti which precede it. Never strictly
necessary, but often useful to eliminate various elidable terminators.
le gerku cu klama le zarci The dog goes to-the store.
selma'o CUhE (Chapter 10)
Forms a question which asks when, where, or in what mode the rest of the bridi i
s true. See PU, CAhA, TAhE, and BAI.
do cu'e klama le zarci You [When/Where?] go to-the store? When are you going
to the store?
selma'o DAhO (Chapter 7)
Cancels the assigned significance of all sumti cmavo (of selma'o KOhA) and bridi
cmavo (of selma'o GOhA).
selma'o DOI (Chapter 13)
The non-specific vocative indicator. May be used with or without COI. No pause i
s required between ``doi'' and a following name. See DOhU.
doi frank. mi tavla do O Frank, I speak-to you. Frank, I'm talking to you.
selma'o DOhU (Chapter 13)
Elidable terminator for COI or DOI. Signals the end of a vocative.
coi do'u Greetings [terminator] Greetings, O unspecified one!
selma'o FA (Chapter 9)
Prefix for a sumti, indicating which numbered place in the place structure the s
umti belongs in; overrides word order.
fa mi cu klama fi la .atlantas. fe la bastn. fo le dargu fu le karce x1= I g
o x3= Atlanta x2= Boston x4= the road x5= the car. I go from Atlanta to Boston v
ia the road using the car.
selma'o FAhA (Chapter 10)
Specifies the direction in which, or toward which (when marked with MOhI) or alo
ng which (when prefixed by VEhA or VIhA) the action of the bridi takes place.
le nanmu zu'a batci le gerku The man [left] bites the dog. To my left, the m
an bites the dog.
selma'o FAhO (Chapter 19)
A mechanical signal, outside the grammar, indicating that there is no more text.
Useful in talking to computers.
selma'o FEhE (Chapter 10)
Indicates that the following interval modifier (using TAhE, ROI, or ZAhO) refers
to space rather than time.
ko vi'i fe'e di'i sombo le gurni You-imperative [1-dimensional] [space] [reg
ularly] sow the grain. Sow the grain in a line and evenly!
selma'o FEhU (Chapter 9)
Elidable terminator for FIhO. Indicates the end of an ad hoc modal tag: the tagg
ed sumti immediately follows.
mi viska do fi'o kanla [fe'u] le zunle I see you [modal] eye: the left-thing
I see you with the left eye.
selma'o FIhO (Chapter 9)
When placed before a selbri, transforms the selbri into a modal tag, grammatical
ly and semantically equivalent to a member of selma'o BAI.
mi viska do fi'o kanla le zunle I see you with eye the left-thing I see you
with my left eye.
selma'o FOI (Chapter 17)
Signals the end of a compound alphabet letter word that begins with TEI. Not an
elidable terminator.
tei .ebu .akut. bu foi ( `è'' `àcute'' ) the letter `è'' with an acute ac
cent
selma'o FUhA (Chapter 18)
Indicates that the following mathematical expression is to be interpreted as rev
erse Polish (RP), a mode in which mathematical operators follow their operands.
li fu'a reboi re[boi] su'i du li vo the-number [RP!] two, two, plus equals t
he-number four 2 + 2 = 4
selma'o FUhE (Chapter 19)
Indicates that the following indicator(s) of selma'o UI affect not the preceding
word, as usual, but rather all following words until a FUhO.
mi viska le fu'e .ia blanu zdani fu'o ponse I see the [start] [belief] blue
house [end] possessor I see the owner of a blue house, or what I believe to be o
ne.
selma'o FUhO (Chapter 19)
Cancels all indicators of selma'o UI which are in effect.
mi viska le fu'e .ia blanu zdani fu'o ponse I see the [start] [belief] blue
house [end] possessor I see the owner of what I believe to be a blue house.
selma'o GA (Chapter 14)
Indicates the beginning of two logically connected sumti, bridi-tails, or variou
s other things. Logical connections include ``both ... and'', `èither ... or'',
`ìf ... then'', and so on. See GI.
ga la djan. nanmu gi la djeimyz. ninmu Either John is a man or James is a wo
man (or both).
selma'o GAhO (Chapter 14)
Specifies whether an interval specified by BIhI includes or excludes its endpoin
ts. Used in pairs before and after the BIhI cmavo, to specify the nature of both
the left- and the right-hand endpoints.
mi ca sanli la drezdn. ga'o bi'i ga'o la frankfurt. I [present] stand Dresde
n [inclusive] [interval] [inclusive] Frankfurt. I am standing between Dresden an
d Frankfurt, inclusive of both.
selma'o GEhU (Chapter 8)
Elidable terminator for GOI. Marks the end of a relative phrase. See KUhO.
la djan. goi ko'a ge'u blanu John (referred to as #1) is-blue.
selma'o GI (Chapter 14)
Separates two logically or non-logically connected sumti, tanru units, bridi-tai
ls, or other things, when the prefix is a forethought logical connective involvi
ng GA, GUhA, or JOI.
ge la djan. nanmu gi la djeimyz. ninmu (It is true that) both John is a man
and James is a woman.
selma'o GIhA (Chapter 14)
Specifies a logical connective (e.g. `ànd'', `òr'', `ìf'') between two bridi-
tails: a bridi-tail is a selbri with any associated following sumti, but not inc
luding any preceding sumti.
mi klama le zarci gi'e nelci la djan. I go-to the market and like John.
selma'o GOI (Chapter 8)
Specifies the beginning of a relative phrase, which associates a subordinate sum
ti (following) to another sumti (preceding). See GEhU, NOI.
la djan. goi ko'a cu blanu John (referred to as #1) is blue.
selma'o GOhA (Chapter 7)
A general selma'o for all cmavo which can take the place of brivla. There are se
veral groups of these.
A: mi klama le zarci B: mi go'i A: I'm going to the market. B: Me, too.
selma'o GUhA (Chapter 14)
Indicates the beginning of two logically connected tanru units. Takes the place
of GA when forming logically-connected tanru. See GI.
la .alis. gu'e ricfu gi blanu Alice is both rich and blue.
selma'o I (Chapter 19)
Separates two sentences from each other.
mi klama le zarci .i mi klama le zdani I go-to the market. I go-to the offic
e.
selma'o JA (Chapter 14)
Specifies a logical connection (e.g. `ànd'', `òr'', `ìf'') between two tanru
units, mathematical operands, tenses, or abstractions.
ti blanu je zdani This is-blue and a-house.
selma'o JAI (Chapter 9)
When followed by a tense or modal, creates a conversion operator attachable to a
selbri which exchanges the modal place with the x1 place of the selbri. When al
one, is a conversion operator exchanging the x1 place of the selbri (which shoul
d be an abstract sumti) with one of the places of the abstracted-over bridi.
mi jai gau galfi le bitmu skari I am-the-actor-in modifying the wall color.
I act so as to modify the wall color. I change the color of the wall.
selma'o JOI (Chapter 14)
Specifies a non-logical connection (e.g. together-with-as-mass, -set, or -sequen
ce) between two sumti, tanru units, or various other things. When immediately fo
llowed by GI, provides forethought non-logical connection analogous to GA.
la djan. joi la .alis. cu bevri le pipno John massed-with Alice carry the pi
ano.
selma'o JOhI (Chapter 18)
Indicates that the following mathematical operands (a list terminated by TEhU) f
orm a mathematical vector (one-dimensional array).
li jo'i paboi reboi te'u su'i jo'i ciboi voboi du li jo'i voboi xaboi the-nu
mber array( one, two ) plus array( three, four) equals the-number array( four, s
ix) (1,2) + (3,4) = (4,6)
selma'o KE (Chapter 5)
Groups everything between itself and a following KEhE for purposes of logical co
nnection, tanru construction, or other purposes. KE and KEhE are not used for ma
thematical (see VEI and VEhO) or discursive (see TO and TOI) purposes.
ta ke melbi cmalu ke'e nixli ckule That is-a-( pretty little ) girl school.
That is a school for girls who are pretty in their littleness.
selma'o KEI (Chapter 11)
Elidable terminator for NU. Marks the end of an abstraction bridi.
la djan. cu nu sonci kei djica John is-an-(event-of being-a-soldier) type-of
desirer. John wants to be a soldier.
selma'o KEhE (Chapter 5)
Elidable terminator for KE. Marks the end of a grouping.
ta ke melbi cmalu ke'e nixli ckule That is-a-( pretty little ) girl school.
That is a school for girls who are pretty in their littleness.
selma'o KI (Chapter 10)
When preceded by a tense, makes it ``sticky'', so that it applies to all further
bridi until reset by another appearance of KI. When alone, eliminates all stick
y tenses.
selma'o KOhA (Chapter 7)
A general selma'o which contains all cmavo which can substitute for sumti. These
cmavo are divided into several groups.
le blanu zdani goi ko'a cu barda .i ko'a na cmamau ti The blue house (referr
ed to as #1) is big. #1 is-not smaller-than this-thing.
selma'o KU (Chapter 6, Chapter 10)
Elidable terminator for LE and some uses of LA. Indicates the end of a descripti
on sumti. Also used after a tense or modal to indicate that no sumti follows, an
d in the compound NA+KU to indicate natural language-style negation.
le prenu ku le zdani ku klama The person, to-the house, goes. The person goe
s to the house.
selma'o KUhE (Chapter 18)
Elidable terminator for PEhO: indicates the end of a forethought mathematical ex
pression (one in which the operator precedes the operands).
li pe'o su'i reboi reboi re[boi] ku'e du li xa The number [forethought] the-
sum-of two two two [end] equals the-number six.
selma'o KUhO (Chapter 8)
Elidable terminator for NOI. Indicates the end of a relative clause.
le zdani poi blanu ku'o barda The house which is-blue is-big.
selma'o LA (Chapter 5)
Descriptors which change name words (or selbri) into sumti which identify people
or things by name. Similar to LE. May be terminated with KU if followed by a de
scription selbri.
la kikeros. du la tulis. Cicero is Tully.
selma'o LAU (Chapter 17)
Cmavo which combine with the following alphabetic letter to represent a single m
arker: change from lower to upper case, change of font, punctuation, etc.)
tau sy. .ibu [single-shift] ``s'' `ì'' Si (chemical symbol for silicon)
selma'o LAhE (Chapter 6)
Qualifiers which, when prefixed to a sumti, change it into another sumti with re
lated meaning. Qualifiers can also consist of a cmavo from selma'o NAhE plus BO.
See LUhU.
mi viska la'e zoi kuot. A Tale of Two Cities .kuot I see that-represented-by
the-text `` A Tale of Two Cities ''. I see the book `À Tale of Two Cities''.
selma'o LE (Chapter 6)
Descriptors which make selbri into sumti which describe or specify things that f
it into the x1 place of the selbri. See LA, KU.
le gerku klama le zdani The dog goes-to the house.
selma'o LEhU (Chapter 19)
Indicates the end of a quotation begun with LOhU. Not an elidable terminator.
lo'u mi du do du mi le'u cu na lojbo drani [quote] mi du do du mi [unquote]
is-not Lojbanically correct. ``mi du do du mi'' is not correct Lojban.
selma'o LI (Chapter 18)
Descriptors which change numbers or other mathematical expressions into sumti wh
ich specify numbers or numerical expressions. See LOhO.
li re su'u re na du li vo su'i vo the-number 2 minus 2 not equals the-number
4 plus 4. $2 - 2 <> 4 + 4$
selma'o LIhU (Chapter 19)
Elidable terminator for LU. Indicates the end of a text quotation.
mi cusku lu mi klama le zarci li'u I express [quote] I go-to the market [end
quote].
selma'o LOhO (Chapter 18)
Elidable terminator for LI. Indicates the end of a mathematical expression used
in a LI description.
li vo lo'o li ci lo'o cu zmadu The-number 4 [end number], the number 3 [end
number], is greater. $4 > 3$
selma'o LOhU (Chapter 19)
Indicates the beginning of a quotation (a sumti) which is grammatical as long as
the quoted material consists of Lojban words, whether they form a text or not.
Terminated by LEhU.
do cusku lo'u mi du do du ko'a le'u You express [quote] mi du do du ko'a [en
d quote]. You said, ``mi du do du ko'a''.
selma'o LU (Chapter 19)
Indicates the beginning of a quotation (a sumti) which is grammatical only if th
e quoted material also forms a grammatical Lojban text. Terminated by LIhU.
mi cusku lu mi klama le zarci li'u I express [quote] I go-to the market [end
quote].
selma'o LUhU (Chapter 6)
Elidable terminator for LAhE and NAhE+BO. Indicates the end of a qualified sumti
.
mi viska la'e lu barda gerku li'u lu'u I see the-referent-of [quote] big dog
[end quote] [end ref] I saw ``Big Dog'' [not the words, but a book or movie].
selma'o MAI (Chapter 18, Chapter 19)
When suffixed to a number or string of letter words, produces a free modifier wh
ich serves as an index number within a text.
pamai mi pu klama le zarci 1-thly, I [past] go to-the market. First, I went
to the market.
selma'o MAhO (Chapter 18)
Produces a mathematical operator from a letter or other operand. See TEhU, VUhU.
ma'o fy. boi xy. [operator] f x f(x)
selma'o ME (Chapter 5, Chapter 18)
Produces a tanru unit from a sumti, which is applicable to the things referenced
by the sumti. See MEhU.
ta me la ford. karce That is-a-Ford-type car That's a Ford car.
selma'o MEhU (Chapter 5)
The elidable terminator for ME. Indicates the end of a sumti converted to a tanr
u unit.
ta me mi me'u zdani That's a me type of house.
selma'o MOI (Chapter 5)
Suffixes added to numbers or other quantifiers to make various numerically-based
selbri.
la djan. joi la frank. cu bruna remei John in-a-mass-with Frank are-a-brothe
r-type-of twosome. John and Frank are two brothers.
selma'o MOhE (Chapter 18)
Produces a mathematical operand from a sumti; used to make dimensioned units. Te
rminated by TEhU.
li mo'e re ratcu su'i mo'e re ractu du li mo'e vo danlu the-number two rats
plus two rabbits equals the-number four animals 2 rats + 2 rabbits = 4 animals.
selma'o MOhI (Chapter 10)
A tense flag indicating movement in space, in a direction specified by a followi
ng FAhA cmavo.
le verba mo'i ri'u cadzu le bisli The child [movement] [right] walks-on the
ice. The child walks toward my right on the ice.
selma'o NA (Chapter 14, Chapter 15)
Contradictory negators, asserting that a whole bridi is false (or true).
mi na klama le zarci It is not true that I go to the market.
Also used to construct logical connective compound cmavo.
selma'o NAI (Chapter 14, Chapter 15)
Negates the previous word, but can only be used with certain selma'o as specifie
d by the grammar.
selma'o NAhE (Chapter 15)
Scalar negators, modifying a selbri or a sumti to a value other than the one sta
ted, the opposite of the one stated, etc. Also used with following BO to constru
ct a sumti qualifier; see LAhE.
ta na'e blanu zdani That is-a-non- blue house. That is a house which is othe
r than blue.
selma'o NAhU (Chapter 18)
Creates a mathematical operator from a selbri. See VUhU.
li na'u tanjo te'u vei pai fe'i re [ve'o] du li ci'i the-number the-operator
tangent ( pi / 2 ) = the-number infinity tan(pi/2) = infinity
selma'o NIhE (Chapter 18)
Creates a mathematical operand from a selbri, usually a ``ni'' abstraction. Term
inated by TEhU.
li ni'e ni clani [te'u] pi'i ni'e ni ganra [te'u] pi'i ni'e ni condi te'u du
li ni'e ni canlu the-number quantity-of length times quantity-of width times qu
antity-of depth equals the-number quantity-of volume. Length x Width x Depth = V
olume
selma'o NIhO (Chapter 19)
Marks the beginning of a new paragraph, and indicates whether it contains old or
new subject matter.
selma'o NOI (Chapter 8)
Relative clause introducers. The following bridi modifies the preceding sumti. T
erminated by KUhO. See GOI.
le zdani poi blanu cu cmalu The house which is blue is small.
selma'o NU (Chapter 11)
Abstractors which, when prefixed to a bridi, create abstraction selbri. Terminat
ed by KEI.
la djan. cu djica le nu sonci [kei] John desires the event-of being-a-soldie
r.
selma'o NUhA (Chapter 18)
Creates a selbri from a mathematical operator. See VUhU.
li ni'umu cu nu'a va'a li ma'umu the-number -5 is-the-negation-of the-number
+5
selma'o NUhI (Chapter 14, Chapter 16)
Marks the beginning of a termset, which is used to make simultaneous claims invo
lving two or more different places of a selbri.
mi klama nu'i le zarci le briju nu'u .e le zdani le ckule [nu'u] I go [start
] to-the market from-the office [joint] and to-the house from-the school.
selma'o NUhU (Chapter 14)
Elidable terminator for NUhI. Marks the end of a termset, and is also used in th
e middle of one to mark the termset joint (a logical or non-logical connective).
mi klama nu'i le zarci le briju nu'u .e le zdani le ckule [nu'u] I go [start
] to-the market from-the office [joint] and to-the house from-the school.
selma'o PA (Chapter 18)
Digits and related quantifiers (some, all, many, etc.).
mi speni re ninmu I am-married-to two women.
selma'o PEhE (Chapter 14)
Precedes a logical or non-logical connective that joins two termsets. Termsets (
see CEhE) are used to associate several terms for logical connectives, for equal
quantifier scope, or for special constructs in tenses.
mi ce'e do pe'e je la djan. ce'e la djeimyz. cu pendo I [,] you [joint] and
John [,] James are-friends-of. I am a friend of you, and John is a friend of Jam
es.
selma'o PEhO (Chapter 18)
An optional signal of forethought mathematical operators, which precede their op
erands. Terminated by KUhE.
li vo du li pe'o su'i reboi re The-number four equals the-number [forethough
t] sum-of two two
selma'o PU (Chapter 10)
Specifies simple time directions (future, past, or neither).
mi pu klama le zarci I [past] go-to the market. I went to the market.
selma'o RAhO (Chapter 7)
The pro-bridi update flag: changes the meaning of sumti implicitly attached to a
pro-bridi (see GOhA) to fit the current context rather than the original contex
t.
A: mi ba lumci le mi karce B: mi go'i A: I [future] wash my car. B: I do-the
-same (i.e. wash A's car). A: mi ba lumci le mi karce B: mi go'i ra'o A: I [futu
re] wash my car. B: I do-the-corresponding-thing (i.e. wash B's car).
selma'o ROI (Chapter 10)
A particle which, when suffixed to a number, makes an extensional tense (e.g. on
ce, twice, many times).
mi reroi klama le zarci I twice go-to the market.
selma'o SA (Chapter 19)
A particle which erases the previous phrase or sentence.
mi klama sa do klama le zarci I go, er, you go-to the market.
selma'o SE (Chapter 5)
Particles which convert a selbri, rearranging the order of places by exchanging
the x1 place with a specified numbered place.
le zarci se klama mi The market is-gone-to by me.
Also used in constructing connective and modal compound cmavo.
selma'o SEI (Chapter 19)
Marks the beginning of metalinguistic insertions which comment on the main bridi
. Terminated by SEhU.
la frank. prami sei gleki [se'u] la djein. Frank loves (he is happy) Jane.
selma'o SEhU (Chapter 19)
Elidable terminator for SEI and SOI. Ends metalinguistic insertions.
la frank. prami sei gleki se'u la djein. Frank loves (he is happy) Jane.
selma'o SI (Chapter 19)
A particle which erases the previous single word.
mi si do klama le zarci I, er, you go to-the market.
selma'o SOI (Chapter 7)
Marks reciprocity between two sumti (like ``vice versa'' in English).
mi prami do soi mi I love you [reciprocally] me. I love you and vice versa.
selma'o SU (Chapter 19)
A particle which closes and erases the entire previous discourse.
selma'o TAhE (Chapter 10)
A tense modifier specifying frequencies within an interval of time or space (reg
ularly, habitually, etc.).
le verba ta'e klama le ckule The child habitually goes to-the school.
selma'o TEI (Chapter 17)
Signals the beginning of a compound letter word, which acts grammatically like a
single letter. Compound letter words end with the non-elidable selma'o FOI.
tei .ebu .akut. bu foi ( `è'' `àcute'' ) the letter `è'' with an acute ac
cent
selma'o TEhU (Chapter 18)
Elidable terminator for JOhI, MAhO, MOhE, NAhU, or NIhE. Marks the end of a math
ematical conversion construct.
li jo'i paboi reboi te'u su'i jo'i ciboi voboi du li jo'i voboi xaboi the-nu
mber array( one, two ) plus array( three, four) equals the-number array( four, s
ix) (1,2) + (3,4) = (4,6)
selma'o TO (Chapter 19)
Left discursive parenthesis: allows inserting a digression. Terminated by TOI.
doi lisas. mi djica le nu to doi frank. ko sisti toi do viska le mlatu O Lis
a, I desire the event-of ( O Frank, [imperative] stop! ) you see the cat. Lisa,
I want you to (Frank! Stop!) see the cat.
selma'o TOI (Chapter 19)
Elidable terminator for TO. The right discursive parenthesis.
doi lisas. mi djica le nu to doi frank. ko sisti toi do viska le mlatu O Lis
a, I desire the event-of ( O Frank, [imperative] stop! ) you see the cat. Lisa,
I want you to (Frank! Stop!) see the cat.
selma'o TUhE (Chapter 19)
Groups multiple sentences or paragraphs into a logical unit. Terminated by TUhU.
xagmau zo'u tu'e ganai cidja gi cnino .i ganai vanju gi tolci'o [tu'u] is-be
st : [start] If food, then new. If wine, then old. As for what is best: if food,
then new [is best]; if wine, then old [is best].
selma'o TUhU (Chapter 19)
Logical terminator for TUhE. Marks the end of a multiple sentence group.
selma'o UI (Chapter 13)
Particles which indicate the speaker's emotional state or source of knowledge, o
r the present stage of discourse.
.ui la djan. klama [Happiness!] John is-coming. Hurrah! John is coming!
selma'o VA (Chapter 10)
A tense indicating distance in space (near, far, or neither).
le nanmu va batci le gerku The man [medium distance] bites the dog. Over the
re the man is biting the dog.
selma'o VAU (Chapter 14)
Elidable terminator for a simple bridi, or for each bridi-tail of a GIhA logical
connection.
mi dunda le cukta [vau] gi'e lebna lo rupnu vau do [vau] I (give the book) a
nd (take some currency-units) to/from you.
selma'o VEI (Chapter 18)
Left mathematical parenthesis: groups mathematical operations. Terminated by VEh
O.
li vei ny. su'i pa ve'o pi'i vei ny. su'i pa [ve'o] du li ny. [bo] te'a re s
u'i re bo pi'i ny. su'i pa the-number ( ``n'' plus one ) times ( ``n'' plus one
) equals the-number n-power-two plus two-times-``n'' plus 1 $(n + 1)(n + 1) = n2
+ 2n + 1$
selma'o VEhA (Chapter 10)
A tense indicating the size of an interval in space (long, medium, or short).
selma'o VEhO (Chapter 19)
Elidable terminator for VEI: right mathematical parenthesis.
li vei ny. su'i pa ve'o pi'i vei ny. su'i pa [ve'o] du li ny. [bo] te'a re s
u'i re bo pi'i ny. su'i pa the-number ( ``n'' plus one ) times ( ``n'' plus one
) equals the-number n-power-two plus two-times-``n'' plus 1 $(n + 1)(n + 1) = n2
+ 2n + 1$
selma'o VIhA (Chapter 10)
A tense indicating dimensionality in space (line, plane, volume, or space-time i
nterval).
le verba ve'a vi'a cadzu le bisli The child [medium space interval] [2-dimen
sional] walks-on the ice. In a medium-sized area, the child walks on the ice.
selma'o VUhO (Chapter 8)
A mechanism for attaching relative clauses or phrases to a whole (possibly conne
cted) sumti, rather than simply to the leftmost portion of the sumti.
la frank. ce la djordj. vu'o noi gidva cu zvati le kumfa Frank [in-set-with]
George, which are-guides, are-in the room. Frank and George, who are guides, ar
e in the room.
selma'o VUhU (Chapter 18)
Mathematical operators (e.g. $+$, $-$). See MAhO.
li mu vu'u re du li ci The-number 5 minus 2 equals the-number 3. 5 - 2 = 3
selma'o XI (Chapter 18)
The subscript marker: the following number or lerfu string is a subscript for wh
atever precedes it.
xy. xi re x sub 2 $x2$
selma'o Y (Chapter 19)
Hesitation noise: content-free, but holds the floor or continues the conversatio
n. It is different from silence in that silence may be interpreted as having not
hing more to say.
doi .y. .y. djan O, uh, uh, John!
selma'o ZAhO (Chapter 10)
A tense modifier specifying the contour of an event (e.g. beginning, ending, con
tinuing).
mi pu'o damba I [inchoative] fight. I'm on the verge of fighting.
selma'o ZEI (Chapter 4)
A morphological glue word, which joins the two words it stands between into the
equivalent of a lujvo.
ta xy. zei kantu kacma That is-an-(X - ray) camera That is an X-ray camera.
selma'o ZEhA (Chapter 10)
A tense indicating the size of an interval in time (long, medium, or short).
mi puze'a citka I [past] [short interval] eat. I ate for a little while.
selma'o ZI (Chapter 10)
A tense indicating distance in time (a long, medium or short time ago or in the
future).
mi puzi citka I [past] [short distance] eat. I ate a little while ago.
selma'o ZIhE (Chapter 8)
Joins multiple relative phrases or clauses which apply to the same sumti. Althou
gh it is generally translated with `ànd'', it is not considered a logical conne
ctive.
mi ponse pa gerku ku poi blabi zi'e noi mi prami ke'a I own one dog such-tha
t it-is-white and such-that-incidentally I love it. I own a dog that is white an
d which, incidentally, I love. I own a white dog, which I love.
selma'o ZO (Chapter 19)
Single-word quotation: quotes the following single Lojban word.
zo si cu lojbo valsi The-word ``si'' is-a-Lojbanic word.
selma'o ZOI (Chapter 19)
Non-Lojban quotation: quotes any text using a delimiting word (which can be any
single Lojban word) placed before and after the text. The delimiting word must n
ot appear in the text, and must be separated from the text by pauses.
zoi kuot. Socrates is mortal .kuot. cu glico jufra The-text `` Socrates is m
ortal '' is-an-English sentence.
selma'o ZOhU (Chapter 16, Chapter 19)
Separates a logical prenex from a bridi or group of sentences to which it applie
s. Also separates a topic from a comment in topic/comment sentences.
su'o da poi remna ro da poi finpe zo'u da prami de For-at-least-one X which
is-a-man, for-all Ys which are-fish : X loves Y There is a man who loves all fis
h.
Chapter 21
Formal Grammars
The following two listings constitute the formal grammar of Lojban. The first ve
rsion is written in the YACC language, which is used to describe parsers, and ha
s been used to create a parser for Lojban texts. This parser is available from t
he Logical Language Group. The second listing is in Extended Backus-Naur Form (E
BNF) and represents the same grammar in a more human-readable form. (In case of
discrepancies, the YACC version is official.) There is a cross-reference listing
for the EBNF format that shows, for each selma'o and rule, which rules refer to
it.
1. YACC Grammar of Lojban
/* LOJBAN MACHINE GRAMMAR, 3RD BASELINE AS OF 10 JANUARY 1997
WHICH IS ORIGINAL BASELINE 20 JULY 1990 INCORPORATING JC'S TECH FIXES 1-28
THIS DRAFT ALSO INCORPORATES CHANGE PROPOSALS 1-47 DATED 29 DECEMBER 1996
THIS DOCUMENT IS EXPLICITLY DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN
BY ITS AUTHOR, THE LOGICAL LANGUAGE GROUP INC.
CONTACT THAT ORGANIZATION AT 2904 BEAU LANE, FAIRFAX VA 22031 USA
U.S. PHONE: 703-385-0273
INTL PHONE: +1 703 385-0273
grammar.300 */
/* The Lojban machine parsing algorithm is a multi-step process. The YACC machin
e grammar presented here is an amalgam of those steps, concatenated so as to all
ow YACC to verify the syntactic ambiguity of the grammar. YACC is used to genera
te a parser for a portion of the grammar, which is LALR1 (the type of grammar th
at YACC is designed to identify and process successfully), but most of the rest
of the grammar must be parsed using some language-coded processing.
Step 1 - Lexing
From phonemes, stress, and pause, it is possible to resolve Lojban unambiguously
into a stream of words. Any machine processing of speech will have to have some
way to deal with 'non-Lojban' failures of fluent speech, of course. The resolve
d words can be expressed as a text file, using Lojban's phonetic spelling rules.
The following steps, assume that there is the possibility of non-Lojban text wit
hin the Lojban text (delimited appropriately). Such non-Lojban text may not be r
educible from speech phonetically. However, step 2 allows the filtering of a pho
netically transcribed text stream, to recognize such portions of non-Lojban text
where properly delimited, without interference with the parsing algorithm.
Step 2 - Filtering
From start to end, performing the following filtering and lexing tasks using the
given order of precedence in case of conflict:
a. If the Lojban word ``zoi'' (selma'o ZOI) is identified, take the following Lo
jban word (which should be end delimited with a pause for separation from the fo
llowing non-Lojban text) as an opening delimiter. Treat all text following that
delimiter, until that delimiter recurs *after a pause*, as grammatically a singl
e token (labelled 'anything_699' in this grammar). There is no need for processi
ng within this text except as necessary to find the closing delimiter.
b. If the Lojban word ``zo'' (selma'o ZO) is identified, treat the following Loj
ban word as a token labelled 'any_word_698', instead of lexing it by its normal
grammatical function.
c. If the Lojban word ``lo'u'' (selma'o LOhU) is identified, search for the clos
ing delimiter ``le'u'' (selma'o LEhU), ignoring any such closing delimiters abso
rbed by the previous two steps. The text between the delimiters should be treate
d as the single token 'any_words_697'.
d. Categorize all remaining words into their Lojban selma'o category, including
the various delimiters mentioned in the previous steps. In all steps after step
2, only the selma'o token type is significant for each word.
e. If the word ``si'' (selma'o SI) is identified, erase it and the previous word
(or token, if the previous text has been condensed into a single token by one o
f the above rules).
f. If the word ``sa'' (selma'o SA) is identified, erase it and all preceding tex
t as far back as necessary to make what follows attach to what precedes. (This r
ule is hard to formalize and may receive further definition later.)
g. If the word 'su' (selma'o SU) is identified, erase it and all preceding text
back to and including the first preceding token word which is in one of the selm
a'o: NIhO, LU, TUhE, and TO. However, if speaker identification is available, a
SU shall only erase to the beginning of a speaker's discourse, unless it occurs
at the beginning of a speaker's discourse. (Thus, if the speaker has said someth
ing, two ``su'''s are required to erase the entire conversation.
Step 3 - Termination
If the text contains a FAhO, treat that as the end-of-text and ignore everything
that follows it.
Step 4 - Absorption of Grammar-Free Tokens
In a new pass, perform the following absorptions (absorption means that the toke
n is removed from the grammar for processing in following steps, and optionally
reinserted, grouped with the absorbing token after parsing is completed).
a. Token sequences of the form any - (ZEI - any) ..., where there may be any num
ber of ZEIs, are merged into a single token of selma'o BRIVLA.
b. Absorb all selma'o BAhE tokens into the following token. If they occur at the
end of text, leave them alone (they are errors).
c. Absorb all selma'o BU tokens into the previous token. Relabel the previous to
ken as selma'o BY.
d. If selma'o NAI occurs immediately following any of tokens UI or CAI, absorb t
he NAI into the previous token.
e. Absorb all members of selma'o DAhO, FUhO, FUhE, UI, Y, and CAI into the previ
ous token. All of these null grammar tokens are permitted following any word of
the grammar, without interfering with that word's grammatical function, or causi
ng any effect on the grammatical interpretation of any other token in the text.
Indicators at the beginning of text are explicitly handled by the grammar.
Step 5 - Insertion of Lexer Lexemes
Lojban is not in itself LALR1. There are words whose grammatical function is det
ermined by following tokens. As a result, parsing of the YACC grammar must take
place in two steps. In the first step, certain strings of tokens with defined gr
ammars are identified, and either
a. are replaced by a single specified 'lexer token' for step 6, or
b. the lexer token is inserted in front of the token string to identify it uniqu
ely.
The YACC grammar included herein is written to make YACC generation of a step 6
parser easy regardless of whether a. or b. is used. The strings of tokens to be
labelled with lexer tokens are found in rule terminals labelled with numbers bet
ween 900 and 1099. These rules are defined with the lexer tokens inserted, with
the result that it can be verified that the language is LALR1 under option b. af
ter steps 1 through 4 have been performed. Alternatively, if option a. is to be
used, these rules are commented out, and the rule terminals labelled from 800 to
900 refer to the lexer tokens *without* the strings of defining tokens. Two set
s of lexer tokens are defined in the token set so as to be compatible with eithe
r option.
In this step, the strings must be labelled with the appropriate lexer tokens. Or
der of inserting lexer tokens *IS* significant, since some shorter strings that
would be marked with a lexer token may be found inside longer strings. If the to
kens are inserted before or in place of the shorter strings, the longer strings
cannot be identified.
If option a. is chosen, the following order of insertion works correctly (it is
not the only possible order): A, C, D, B, U, E, H, I, J, K, M ,N, G, O, V, W, F,
P, R, T, S, Y, L, Q. This ensures that the longest rules will be processed firs
t; a PA+MAI will not be seen as a PA with a dangling MAI at the end, for example
.
Step 6 - YACC Parsing
YACC should now be able to parse the Lojban text in accordance with the rule ter
minals labelled from 1 to 899 under option 5a, or 1 to 1099 under option 5b. Com
ment out the rules beyond 900 if option 5a is used, and comment out the 700-seri
es of lexer-tokens, while restoring the series of lexer tokens numbered from 900
up.
*/
%token A_501 /* eks; basic afterthought logical connectives */
%token BAI_502 /* modal operators */
%token BAhE_503 /* next word intensifier */
%token BE_504 /* sumti link to attach sumti to a selbri */
%token BEI_505 /* multiple sumti separator between BE, BEI */
%token BEhO_506 /* terminates BE/BEI specified descriptors */
%token BIhI_507 /* interval component of JOI */
%token BO_508 /* joins two units with shortest scope */
%token BRIVLA_509 /* any brivla */
%token BU_511 /* turns any word into a BY lerfu word */
%token BY_513 /* individual lerfu words */
%token CAhA_514 /* specifies actuality/potentiality of tense */
%token CAI_515 /* afterthought intensity marker */
%token CEI_516 /* pro-bridi assignment operator */
%token CEhE_517 /* afterthought term list connective */
%token CMENE_518 /* names; require consonant end, then pause no
LA or DOI selma'o embedded, pause before if
vowel initial and preceded by a vowel */
%token CO_519 /* tanru inversion */
%token COI_520 /* vocative marker permitted inside names; must
always be followed by pause or DOI */
%token CU_521 /* separator between head sumti and selbri */
%token CUhE_522 /* tense/modal question */
%token DAhO_524 /* cancel anaphora/cataphora assignments */
%token DOI_525 /* vocative marker */
%token DOhU_526 /* terminator for DOI-marked vocatives */
%token FA_527 /* modifier head generic case tag */
%token FAhA_528 /* superdirections in space */
%token FAhO_529 /* normally elided 'done pause' to indicate end
of utterance string */
%token FEhE_530 /* space interval mod flag */
%token FEhU_531 /* ends bridi to modal conversion */
%token FIhO_532 /* marks bridi to modal conversion */
%token FOI_533 /* end compound lerfu */
%token FUhE_535 /* open long scope for indicator */
%token FUhO_536 /* close long scope for indicator */
%token GA_537 /* geks; forethought logical connectives */
%token GEhU_538 /* marker ending GOI relative clauses */
%token GI_539 /* forethought medial marker */
%token GIhA_541 /* logical connectives for bridi-tails */
%token GOI_542 /* attaches a sumti modifier to a sumti */
%token GOhA_543 /* pro-bridi */
%token GUhA_544 /* GEK for tanru units, corresponds to JEKs */
%token I_545 /* sentence link */
%token JA_546 /* jeks; logical connectives within tanru */
%token JAI_547 /* modal conversion flag */
%token JOI_548 /* non-logical connectives */
%token KEhE_550 /* right terminator for KE groups */
%token KE_551 /* left long scope marker */
%token KEI_552 /* right terminator, NU abstractions */
%token KI_554 /* multiple utterance scope for tenses */
%token KOhA_555 /* sumti anaphora */
%token KU_556 /* right terminator for descriptions, etc. */
%token KUhO_557 /* right terminator, NOI relative clauses */
%token LA_558 /* name descriptors */
%token LAU_559 /* lerfu prefixes */
%token LAhE_561 /* sumti qualifiers */
%token LE_562 /* sumti descriptors */
%token LEhU_565 /* possibly ungrammatical text right quote */
%token LI_566 /* convert number to sumti */
%token LIhU_567 /* grammatical text right quote */
%token LOhO_568 /* elidable terminator for LI */
%token LOhU_569 /* possibly ungrammatical text left quote */
%token LU_571 /* grammatical text left quote */
%token LUhU_573 /* LAhE close delimiter */
%token ME_574 /* converts a sumti into a tanru_unit */
%token MEhU_575 /* terminator for ME */
%token MOhI_577 /* motion tense marker */
%token NA_578 /* bridi negation */
%token NAI_581 /* attached to words to negate them */
%token NAhE_583 /* scalar negation */
%token NIhO_584 /* new paragraph; change of subject */
%token NOI_585 /* attaches a subordinate clause to a sumti */
%token NU_586 /* abstraction */
%token NUhI_587 /* marks the start of a termset */
%token NUhU_588 /* marks the middle and end of a termset */
%token PEhE_591 /* afterthought termset connective prefix */
%token PU_592 /* directions in time */
%token RAhO_593 /* flag for modified interpretation of GOhI */
%token ROI_594 /* converts number to extensional tense */
%token SA_595 /* metalinguistic eraser to the beginning of
the current utterance */
%token SE_596 /* conversions */
%token SEI_597 /* metalinguistic bridi insert marker */
%token SEhU_598 /* metalinguistic bridi end marker */
%token SI_601 /* metalinguistic single word eraser */
%token SOI_602 /* reciprocal sumti marker */
%token SU_603 /* metalinguistic eraser of the entire text */
%token TAhE_604 /* tense interval properties */
%token TEI_605 /* start compound lerfu */
%token TO_606 /* left discursive parenthesis */
%token TOI_607 /* right discursive parenthesis */
%token TUhE_610 /* multiple utterance scope mark */
%token TUhU_611 /* multiple utterance end scope mark */
%token UI_612 /* attitudinals, observationals, discursives */
%token VA_613 /* distance in space-time */
%token VAU_614 /* end simple bridi or bridi-tail */
%token VEhA_615 /* space-time interval size */
%token VIhA_616 /* space-time dimensionality marker */
%token VUhO_617 /* glue between logically connected sumti
and relative clauses */
%token XI_618 /* subscripting operator */
%token Y_619 /* hesitation */
%token ZAhO_621 /* event properties - inchoative, etc. */
%token ZEhA_622 /* time interval size tense */
%token ZEI_623 /* lujvo glue */
%token ZI_624 /* time distance tense */
%token ZIhE_625 /* conjoins relative clauses */
%token ZO_626 /* single word metalinguistic quote marker */
%token ZOI_627 /* delimited quote marker */
%token ZOhU_628 /* prenex terminator (not elidable) */
%token BIhE_650 /* prefix for high-priority MEX operator */
%token BOI_651 /* number or lerfu-string terminator */
%token FUhA_655 /* reverse Polish flag */
%token GAhO_656 /* open/closed interval markers for BIhI */
%token JOhI_657 /* flags an array operand */
%token KUhE_658 /* MEX forethought delimiter */
%token MAI_661 /* change numbers to utterance ordinals */
%token MAhO_662 /* change MEX expressions to MEX operators */
%token MOI_663 /* change number to selbri */
%token MOhE_664 /* change sumti to operand, inverse of LI */
%token NAhU_665 /* change a selbri into an operator */
%token NIhE_666 /* change selbri to operand; inverse of MOI */
%token NUhA_667 /* change operator to selbri; inverse of MOhE */
%token PA_672 /* numbers and numeric punctuation */
%token PEhO_673 /* forethought (Polish) flag */
%token TEhU_675 /* closing gap for MEX constructs */
%token VEI_677 /* left MEX bracket */
%token VEhO_678 /* right MEX bracket */
%token VUhU_679 /* MEX operator */
%token any_words_697 /* a string of lexable Lojban words */
%token any_word_698 /* any single lexable Lojban words */
%token anything_699 /* a possibly unlexable phoneme string */
/* The following tokens are the actual lexer tokens. The _900 series
tokens are duplicates that allow limited testing of lexer rules in the
context of the total grammar. They are used in the actual parser, where
the 900 series rules are found in the lexer. */
%token lexer_A_701 /* flags a MAI utterance ordinal */
%token lexer_B_702 /* flags an EK unless EK_BO, EK_KE */
%token lexer_C_703 /* flags an EK_BO */
%token lexer_D_704 /* flags an EK_KE */
%token lexer_E_705 /* flags a JEK */
%token lexer_F_706 /* flags a JOIK */
%token lexer_G_707 /* flags a GEK */
%token lexer_H_708 /* flags a GUhEK */
%token lexer_I_709 /* flags a NAhE_BO */
%token lexer_J_710 /* flags a NA_KU */
%token lexer_K_711 /* flags an I_BO (option. JOIK/JEK lexer tags)*/
%token lexer_L_712 /* flags a PA, unless MAI (then lexer A) */
%token lexer_M_713 /* flags a GIhEK_BO */
%token lexer_N_714 /* flags a GIhEK_KE */
%token lexer_O_715 /* flags a modal operator BAI or compound */
%token lexer_P_716 /* flags a GIK */
%token lexer_Q_717 /* flags a lerfu_string unless MAI (then lexer_A)
*/
%token lexer_R_718 /* flags a GIhEK, not BO or KE */
%token lexer_S_719 /* flags simple I */
%token lexer_T_720 /* flags I_JEK */
%token lexer_U_721 /* flags a JEK_BO */
%token lexer_V_722 /* flags a JOIK_BO */
%token lexer_W_723 /* flags a JOIK_KE */
/* %token lexer_X_724 /* null */
%token lexer_Y_725 /* flags a PA_MOI */
/*%token lexer_A_905 /* : lexer_A_701 utt_ordinal_root_906 */

/*%token lexer_B_910 /* : lexer_B_702 EK_root_911 */
/*%token lexer_C_915 /* : lexer_C_703 EK_root_911 BO_508 */
/*%token lexer_D_916 /* : lexer_D_704 EK_root_911 KE_551 */
/*%token lexer_E_925 /* : lexer_E_705 JEK_root_926 */
/*%token lexer_F_930 /* : lexer_F_706 JOIK_root_931 */
/*%token lexer_G_935 /* : lexer_G_707 GA_537 */
/*%token lexer_H_940 /* : lexer_H_708 GUhA_544 */
/*%token lexer_I_945 /* : lexer_I_709 NAhE_583 BO_508 */
/*%token lexer_J_950 /* : lexer_J_710 NA_578 KU_556 */
/*%token lexer_K_955 /* : lexer_K_711 I_432 BO_508 */
/*%token lexer_L_960 /* : lexer_L_712 number_root_961 */
/*%token lexer_M_965 /* : lexer_M_713 GIhEK_root_991 BO_508 */
/*%token lexer_N_966 /* : lexer_N_714 GIhEK_root_991 KE_551 */
/*%token lexer_O_970 /* : lexer_O_715 simple_tense_modal_972 */
/*%token lexer_P_980 /* : lexer_P_716 GIK_root_981 */
/*%token lexer_Q_985 /* : lexer_Q_717 lerfu_string_root_986 */
/*%token lexer_R_990 /* : lexer_R_718 GIhEK_root_991 */
/*%token lexer_S_995 /* : lexer_S_719 I_545 */
/*%token lexer_T_1000 /* : lexer_T_720 I_545 simple_JOIK_JEK_957 */
/*%token lexer_U_1005 /* : lexer_U_721 JEK_root_926 BO_508 */
/*%token lexer_V_1010 /* : lexer_V_722 JOIK_root_931 BO_508 */
/*%token lexer_W_1015 /* : lexer_W_723 JOIK_root_931 KE_551 */
/*%token lexer_X_1020 /* null */
/*%token lexer_Y_1025 /* : lexer_Y_725 number_root_961 MOI_663 */
%start text_0
%%
text_0 : text_A_1
| indicators_411 text_A_1
| free_modifier_32 text_A_1
| cmene_404 text_A_1
| indicators_411 free_modifier_32 text_A_1
| NAI_581 text_0
;
text_A_1 : JOIK_JEK_422 text_B_2
/* incomplete JOIK_JEK without preceding I */
/* compare note on paragraph_10 */
| text_B_2
;
text_B_2 : I_819 text_B_2
| I_JEK_820 text_B_2
| I_BO_811 text_B_2
| para_mark_410 text_C_3
| text_C_3
;
text_C_3 : paragraphs_4
/* Only indicators which follow certain selma'o:
cmene, TOI_607, LU_571, and the lexer_K and lexer_S I_roots and compounds,
and at the start of text(_0), will survive the lexer; all other valid ones
will be absorbed. The only strings for which indicators generate a
potential ambiguity are those which contain NAI. An indicator cannot be
inserted in between a token and its negating NAI, else you can't tell
whether it is the indicator or the original token being negated. */
| /* empty */
/* An empty text is legal; formerly this was handled by the explicit
appearance of FAhO_529, but this is now absorbed by the preparser. */
;
paragraphs_4 : paragraph_10
| paragraph_10 para_mark_410 paragraphs_4
;
paragraph_10 : statement_11
| fragment_20
| paragraph_10 I_819 statement_11
| paragraph_10 I_819 fragment_20
| paragraph_10 I_819
/* this last fixes an erroneous start to a sentence,
and permits incomplete JOIK_JEK after I, as well
in answer to questions on those connectives */
;
statement_11 : statement_A_12
| prenex_30 statement_11
;
statement_A_12 : statement_B_13
| statement_A_12 I_JEK_820 statement_B_13
| statement_A_12 I_JEK_820
;
statement_B_13 : statement_C_14
| statement_C_14 I_BO_811 statement_B_13
| statement_C_14 I_BO_811
;
statement_C_14 : sentence_40
| TUhE_447 text_B_2 TUhU_gap_454
| tag_491 TUhE_447 text_B_2 TUhU_gap_454
;
fragment_20 : EK_802
| NA_445
| GIhEK_818
| quantifier_300
| terms_80 VAU_gap_456 /* answer to ma */
/* mod_head_490 requires both gap_450 and VAU_gap_456
but needs no extra rule to accomplish this */
| relative_clauses_121
| links_161
| linkargs_160
| prenex_30
;
prenex_30 : terms_80 ZOhU_492

;
free_modifier_32 : free_modifier_A_33
| free_modifier_A_33 free_modifier_32
;
free_modifier_A_33 : vocative_35
| parenthetical_36
| discursive_bridi_34
| subscript_486
| utterance_ordinal_801
;
discursive_bridi_34 : SEI_440
selbri_130 SEhU_gap_459
| SOI_498
sumti_90 SEhU_gap_459
| SOI_498
sumti_90 sumti_90 SEhU_gap_459
| SEI_440
terms_80 front_gap_451
selbri_130 SEhU_gap_459
| SEI_440 terms_80 selbri_130 SEhU_gap_459
;
vocative_35 : DOI_415 selbri_130 DOhU_gap_457
| DOI_415 selbri_130
relative_clauses_121 DOhU_gap_457
| DOI_415 relative_clauses_121
selbri_130 DOhU_gap_457
| DOI_415 relative_clauses_121
selbri_130 relative_clauses_121 DOhU_gap_457
| DOI_415 cmene_404 DOhU_gap_457
| DOI_415 cmene_404
| DOI_415 relative_clauses_121 cmene_404
DOhU_gap_457
| DOI_415 relative_clauses_121 cmene_404
| DOI_415 sumti_90 DOhU_gap_457
| DOI_415 DOhU_gap_457
;
parenthetical_36 : TO_606 text_0 TOI_gap_468
;
sentence_40 : bridi_tail_50 /* bare observative or mo answer */

| terms_80 front_gap_451 bridi_tail_50
| terms_80 bridi_tail_50
;
subsentence_41 : sentence_40
| prenex_30 subsentence_41
;
bridi_tail_50 : bridi_tail_A_51
| bridi_tail_A_51 GIhEK_KE_814 bridi_tail_50
KEhE_gap_466 tail_terms_71
;
bridi_tail_A_51 : bridi_tail_B_52
| bridi_tail_A_51 GIhEK_818 bridi_tail_B_52
tail_terms_71
;
bridi_tail_B_52 : bridi_tail_C_53
| bridi_tail_C_53 GIhEK_BO_813 bridi_tail_B_52
tail_terms_71
;
bridi_tail_C_53 : gek_sentence_54
| selbri_130 tail_terms_71
;
gek_sentence_54 : GEK_807 subsentence_41
GIK_816 subsentence_41 tail_terms_71
| tag_491 KE_493 gek_sentence_54 KEhE_gap_466
| NA_445 gek_sentence_54
;
tail_terms_71 : terms_80 VAU_gap_456
| VAU_gap_456
;
terms_80 : terms_A_81
| terms_80 terms_A_81
;
terms_A_81 : terms_B_82
| terms_A_81 PEhE_494 JOIK_JEK_422 terms_B_82
;
terms_B_82 : term_83
| terms_B_82 CEhE_495 term_83
;
term_83 : sumti_90
| modifier_84
| term_set_85
| NA_KU_810
;
modifier_84 : mod_head_490 gap_450
| mod_head_490 sumti_90
;
term_set_85 : NUhI_496 terms_80 NUhU_gap_460
| NUhI_496 GEK_807 terms_80 NUhU_gap_460
GIK_816 terms_80 NUhU_gap_460
;
sumti_90 : sumti_A_91
| sumti_A_91 VUhO_497 relative_clauses_121
;
sumti_A_91 : sumti_B_92
| sumti_B_92 EK_KE_804 sumti_90 KEhE_gap_466
| sumti_B_92 JOIK_KE_823 sumti_90 KEhE_gap_466
;
sumti_B_92 : sumti_C_93
| sumti_B_92 JOIK_EK_421 sumti_C_93
;
sumti_C_93 : sumti_D_94
| sumti_D_94 EK_BO_803 sumti_C_93
| sumti_D_94 JOIK_BO_822 sumti_C_93
;
sumti_D_94 : sumti_E_95
| GEK_807 sumti_90 GIK_816 sumti_D_94
;
sumti_E_95 : sumti_F_96
| sumti_F_96 relative_clauses_121
/* indefinite sumti */
| quantifier_300 selbri_130 gap_450
| quantifier_300 selbri_130
gap_450 relative_clauses_121
;
sumti_F_96 : sumti_G_97
/* outer-quantified sumti */
| quantifier_300 sumti_G_97
;
sumti_G_97 : qualifier_483 sumti_90 LUhU_gap_463
| qualifier_483 relative_clauses_121
sumti_90 LUhU_gap_463
/*sumti grouping, set/mass/individual conversion */
/*also sumti scalar negation */
| anaphora_400
| LA_499 cmene_404
| LA_499 relative_clauses_121 cmene_404
| LI_489 MEX_310 LOhO_gap_472
| description_110
| quote_arg_432
;
description_110 : LA_499 sumti_tail_111 gap_450

| LE_488 sumti_tail_111 gap_450
;
sumti_tail_111 : sumti_tail_A_112
/* inner-quantified sumti relative clause */
| relative_clauses_121 sumti_tail_A_112
/* pseudo-possessive
(an abbreviated inner restriction);
note that sumti cannot be quantified */
| sumti_G_97 sumti_tail_A_112
/* pseudo-possessive with outer restriction */
| sumti_G_97 relative_clauses_121 sumti_tail_A_112
;
sumti_tail_A_112 : selbri_130
| selbri_130 relative_clauses_121
/* explicit inner quantifier */
| quantifier_300 selbri_130
/* quantifier both internal to a description,
and external to a sumti thereby made specific */
| quantifier_300 selbri_130 relative_clauses_121
| quantifier_300 sumti_90
;
relative_clauses_121 : relative_clause_122
| relative_clauses_121 ZIhE_487 relative_clause_122
;
relative_clause_122 : GOI_485 term_83 GEhU_gap_464
| NOI_484 subsentence_41 KUhO_gap_469
;
selbri_130 : tag_491 selbri_A_131

| selbri_A_131
;
selbri_A_131 : selbri_B_132
| NA_445 selbri_130
;
selbri_B_132 : selbri_C_133
| selbri_C_133 CO_443 selbri_B_132
;
selbri_C_133 : selbri_D_134
| selbri_C_133 selbri_D_134
;
selbri_D_134 : selbri_E_135
| selbri_D_134 JOIK_JEK_422 selbri_E_135
| selbri_D_134 JOIK_KE_823 selbri_C_133
KEhE_gap_466
;
selbri_E_135 : selbri_F_136
| selbri_F_136 JEK_BO_821 selbri_E_135
| selbri_F_136 JOIK_BO_822 selbri_E_135
;
selbri_F_136 : tanru_unit_150
| tanru_unit_150 BO_479 selbri_F_136
| GUhEK_selbri_137
| NAhE_482 GUhEK_selbri_137
;
GUhEK_selbri_137 : GUhEK_808 selbri_130 GIK_816 selbri_F_136
;
tanru_unit_150 : tanru_unit_A_151
| tanru_unit_150 CEI_444 tanru_unit_A_151
;
tanru_unit_A_151 : tanru_unit_B_152
| tanru_unit_B_152 linkargs_160
;
tanru_unit_B_152 : bridi_valsi_407
| KE_493 selbri_C_133 KEhE_gap_466
| SE_480 tanru_unit_B_152
| JAI_478 tag_491 tanru_unit_B_152
| JAI_478 tanru_unit_B_152
| ME_477 sumti_90 MEhU_gap_465
| ME_477 sumti_90 MEhU_gap_465 MOI_476
| NUhA_475 MEX_operator_374
| NAhE_482 tanru_unit_B_152
| NU_425 subsentence_41 KEI_gap_453
;
linkargs_160 : BE_446 term_83 BEhO_gap_467

| BE_446 term_83 links_161 BEhO_gap_467
;
links_161 : BEI_442 term_83
| BEI_442 term_83 links_161
;
/* Main entry point for MEX; everything but a number must be in parens. */
quantifier_300 : number_812 BOI_gap_461
| left_bracket_470 MEX_310 right_bracket_gap_471
;
/* Entry point for MEX used after LI; no parens needed, but LI now has an
elidable terminator. (This allows us to express the difference between
``the expression a + b'' and ``the expression (a + b)''_) */
/* This rule supports left-grouping infix expressions and reverse Polish
expressions. To handle infix monadic, use a null operand; to handle
infix with more than two operands (whatever that means) use an extra
operator or an array operand. */
MEX_310 : MEX_A_311
| MEX_310 operator_370 MEX_A_311
| FUhA_441 rp_expression_330
;
/* Support for right-grouping (short scope) infix expressions with BIhE. */
MEX_A_311 : MEX_B_312
| MEX_B_312 BIhE_439 operator_370 MEX_A_311
;
/* Support for forethought (Polish) expressions. These begin with a
forethought flag, then the operator and then the argument(s). */
MEX_B_312 : operand_381
| operator_370 MEX_C_313 MEX_gap_452
| PEhO_438 operator_370 MEX_C_313 MEX_gap_452
;
MEX_C_313 : MEX_B_312
| MEX_C_313 MEX_B_312
;
/* Reverse Polish expressions always have exactly two operands.

To handle one operand, use a null operand;
to handle more than two operands, use a null operator. */
rp_expression_330 : rp_operand_332 rp_operand_332 operator_370
;
rp_operand_332 : operand_381
| rp_expression_330
;
/* Operators may be joined by logical connectives. */

operator_370 : operator_A_371
| operator_370 JOIK_JEK_422 operator_A_371
| operator_370 JOIK_KE_823 operator_370
KEhE_gap_466
;
operator_A_371 : operator_B_372
| GUhEK_808 operator_A_371 GIK_816 operator_B_372
| operator_B_372 JOIK_BO_822 operator_A_371
| operator_B_372 JEK_BO_821 operator_A_371
;
operator_B_372 : MEX_operator_374
| KE_493 operator_370 KEhE_gap_466
;
MEX_operator_374 : VUhU_679
| VUhU_679 free_modifier_32
| SE_480 MEX_operator_374
/* changes argument order */
| NAhE_482 MEX_operator_374
/* scalar negation */
| MAhO_430 MEX_310 TEhU_gap_473
| NAhU_429 selbri_130 TEhU_gap_473
;
operand_381 : operand_A_382
| operand_A_382 EK_KE_804 operand_381 KEhE_gap_466
| operand_A_382 JOIK_KE_823 operand_381 KEhE_gap_466
;
operand_A_382 : operand_B_383
| operand_A_382 JOIK_EK_421 operand_B_383
;
operand_B_383 : operand_C_385
| operand_C_385 EK_BO_803 operand_B_383
| operand_C_385 JOIK_BO_822 operand_B_383
;
operand_C_385 : quantifier_300
| lerfu_string_817 BOI_gap_461
/* lerfu string as operand - classic math variable */
| NIhE_428 selbri_130 TEhU_gap_473
/* quantifies a bridi - inverse of -MOI */
| MOhE_427 sumti_90 TEhU_gap_473
/* quantifies a sumti - inverse of LI */
| JOhI_431 MEX_C_313 TEhU_gap_473
| GEK_807 operand_381 GIK_816 operand_C_385
| qualifier_483 operand_381 LUhU_gap_463
;
/* _400 series constructs are mostly specific strings, some of which may
also be used by the lexer; the lexer should not use any reference to
terminals numbered less than _400, as they have grammars composed on
non-deterministic strings of selma'o. Some above _400 also are this
way, so care should be taken; this is especially true for those that
reference free_modifier_32. */
anaphora_400 : KOhA_555
| KOhA_555 free_modifier_32
| lerfu_string_817 BOI_gap_461
;
cmene_404 : cmene_A_405
| cmene_A_405 free_modifier_32
;
cmene_A_405 : CMENE_518 /* pause */
| cmene_A_405 CMENE_518 /* pause*/
/* multiple CMENE are identified morphologically (by the lexer) -- separated by
consonant & pause */
;
bridi_valsi_407 : bridi_valsi_A_408
| bridi_valsi_A_408 free_modifier_32
;
bridi_valsi_A_408 : BRIVLA_509
| PA_MOI_824
| GOhA_543
| GOhA_543 RAhO_593
;
para_mark_410 : NIhO_584
| NIhO_584 free_modifier_32
| NIhO_584 para_mark_410
;
indicators_411 : indicators_A_412
| FUhE_535 indicators_A_412
;
indicators_A_412 : indicator_413
| indicators_A_412 indicator_413
;
indicator_413 : UI_612
| CAI_515
| UI_612 NAI_581
| CAI_515 NAI_581
| Y_619
| DAhO_524
| FUhO_536
;
DOI_415 : DOI_525
| COI_416
| COI_416 DOI_525
;
COI_416 : COI_A_417
| COI_416 COI_A_417
;
COI_A_417 : COI_520
| COI_520 NAI_581
;
JOIK_EK_421 : EK_802
| JOIK_806
| JOIK_806 free_modifier_32
;
JOIK_JEK_422 : JOIK_806
| JOIK_806 free_modifier_32
| JEK_805
| JEK_805 free_modifier_32
;
XI_424 : XI_618
| XI_618 free_modifier_32
;
NU_425 : NU_A_426
| NU_425 JOIK_JEK_422 NU_A_426
;
NU_A_426 : NU_586
| NU_586 NAI_581
| NU_586 free_modifier_32
| NU_586 NAI_581 free_modifier_32
;
MOhE_427 : MOhE_664
| MOhE_664 free_modifier_32
;
NIhE_428 : NIhE_666
| NIhE_666 free_modifier_32
;
NAhU_429 : NAhU_665
| NAhU_665 free_modifier_32
;
MAhO_430 : MAhO_662
| MAhO_662 free_modifier_32
;
JOhI_431 : JOhI_657
| JOhI_657 free_modifier_32
;
quote_arg_432 : quote_arg_A_433
| quote_arg_A_433 free_modifier_32
;
quote_arg_A_433 : ZOI_quote_434
| ZO_quote_435
| LOhU_quote_436
| LU_571 text_0 LIhU_gap_448
;
/* The quoted material in the following three terminals must be identified by
the lexer, but no additional lexer processing is needed. */
ZOI_quote_434 : ZOI_627 any_word_698
/*pause*/ anything_699 /*pause*/ any_word_6
98
;
/* 'pause' is morphemic, represented by '.' The lexer assembles anything_699 */
ZO_quote_435 : ZO_626 any_word_698
;
/* 'word' may not be a compound; but it can be any valid Lojban selma'o value,
including ZO, ZOI, SI, SA, SU. The preparser will not lex the word per its
normal selma'o. */
LOhU_quote_436 : LOhU_569 any_words_697 LEhU_565
;
/* 'words' may be any Lojban words, with no claim of grammaticality; the
preparser will not lex the individual words per their normal selma'o;
used to quote ungrammatical Lojban, equivalent to the * or ? writing
convention for such text. */
/* The preparser needs one bit of sophistication for this rule. A
quoted string should be able to contain other quoted strings - this is
only a problem for a LOhU quote itself, since the LEhU clossing this
quote would otherwise close the outer quotes, which is incorrect. For
this purpose, we will cheat on the use of ZO in such a quote (since this
is ungrammatical text, it is a sign ignored by the parser). Use ZO to
mark any nested quotation LOhU. The preparser then will absorb it by
the ZO rule, before testing for LOhU. This is obviously not the
standard usage for ZO, which would otherwise cause the result to be a
sumti. But, since the result will be part of an unparsed string anyway,
it doesn't matter. */
/* It may be seen that any of the ZO/ZOI/LOhU trio of quotation markers
may contain the powerful metalinguistic erasers. Since these quotations
are not parsed internally, these operators are ignored within the quote.
To erase a ZO, then, two SI's are needed after giving a quoted word of
any type. ZOI takes four SI's, with the ENTIRE BODY OF THE QUOTE
treated as a single 'word' since it is one selma'o. Thus one for the
quote body, two for the single word delimiters, and one for the ZOI. In
LOhU, the entire body is treated as a single word, so three SI's can
erase it. */
/* All rule terminator names with 'gap' in them are potentially
elidable, where such elision does not cause an ambiguity. This is
implemented through use of the YACC 'error' token, which effectively
recovers from an elision. */
FIhO_437 : FIhO_532
| FIhO_532 free_modifier_32
;
PEhO_438 : PEhO_673
| PEhO_673 free_modifier_32
;
BIhE_439 : BIhE_650
| BIhE_650 free_modifier_32
;
SEI_440 : SEI_597
| SEI_597 free_modifier_32
;
FUhA_441 : FUhA_655
| FUhA_655 free_modifier_32
;
BEI_442 : BEI_505
| BEI_505 free_modifier_32
;
CO_443 : CO_519
| CO_519 free_modifier_32
;
CEI_444 : CEI_516
| CEI_516 free_modifier_32
;
NA_445 : NA_578
| NA_578 free_modifier_32
;
BE_446 : BE_504
| BE_504 free_modifier_32
;
TUhE_447 : TUhE_610
| TUhE_610 free_modifier_32
;
LIhU_gap_448 : LIhU_567
| error
;
gap_450 : KU_556
| KU_556 free_modifier_32
| error
;
front_gap_451 : CU_521
| CU_521 free_modifier_32
;
MEX_gap_452 : KUhE_658
| KUhE_658 free_modifier_32
| error
;
KEI_gap_453 : KEI_552
| KEI_552 free_modifier_32
| error
;
TUhU_gap_454 : TUhU_611
| TUhU_611 free_modifier_32
| error
;
VAU_gap_456 : VAU_614
| VAU_614 free_modifier_32
| error
;
/* redundant to attach a free modifier on the following */
DOhU_gap_457 : DOhU_526
| error
;
FEhU_gap_458 : FEhU_531
| FEhU_531 free_modifier_32
| error
;
SEhU_gap_459 : SEhU_598
| error
/* a free modifier on a discursive should be somewhere within the discursive.
See SEI_440 */
;
NUhU_gap_460 : NUhU_588
| NUhU_588 free_modifier_32
| error
;
BOI_gap_461 : BOI_651
| BOI_651 free_modifier_32
| error
;
sub_gap_462 : BOI_651
| error
;
LUhU_gap_463 : LUhU_573
| LUhU_573 free_modifier_32
| error
;
GEhU_gap_464 : GEhU_538
| GEhU_538 free_modifier_32
| error
;
MEhU_gap_465 : MEhU_575
| MEhU_575 free_modifier_32
| error
;
KEhE_gap_466 : KEhE_550
| KEhE_550 free_modifier_32
| error
;
BEhO_gap_467 : BEhO_506
| BEhO_506 free_modifier_32
| error
;
TOI_gap_468 : TOI_607
| error
;
KUhO_gap_469 : KUhO_557
| KUhO_557 free_modifier_32
| error
;
left_bracket_470 : VEI_677
| VEI_677 free_modifier_32
;
right_bracket_gap_471 : VEhO_678
| VEhO_678 free_modifier_32
| error
;
LOhO_gap_472 : LOhO_568
| LOhO_568 free_modifier_32
| error
;
TEhU_gap_473 : TEhU_675
| TEhU_675 free_modifier_32
| error
;
right_br_no_free_474 : VEhO_678
| error
;
NUhA_475 : NUhA_667
| NUhA_667 free_modifier_32
;
MOI_476 : MOI_663
| MOI_663 free_modifier_32
;
ME_477 : ME_574
| ME_574 free_modifier_32
;
JAI_478 : JAI_547
| JAI_547 free_modifier_32
;
BO_479 : BO_508
| BO_508 free_modifier_32
;
SE_480 : SE_596
| SE_596 free_modifier_32
;
FA_481 : FA_527
| FA_527 free_modifier_32
;
NAhE_482 : NAhE_583
| NAhE_583 free_modifier_32
;
qualifier_483 : LAhE_561
| LAhE_561 free_modifier_32
| NAhE_BO_809
;
NOI_484 : NOI_585
| NOI_585 free_modifier_32
;
GOI_485 : GOI_542
| GOI_542 free_modifier_32
;
subscript_486 : XI_424 number_812 sub_gap_462
| XI_424 left_bracket_470 MEX_310
right_br_no_free_474
| XI_424 lerfu_string_817 sub_gap_462
;
ZIhE_487 : ZIhE_625
| ZIhE_625 free_modifier_32
;
LE_488 : LE_562
| LE_562 free_modifier_32
;
LI_489 : LI_566
| LI_566 free_modifier_32
;
mod_head_490 : tag_491
| FA_481
;
tag_491 : tense_modal_815
| tag_491 JOIK_JEK_422 tense_modal_815
;
ZOhU_492 : ZOhU_628
| ZOhU_628 free_modifier_32
;
KE_493 : KE_551
| KE_551 free_modifier_32
;
PEhE_494 : PEhE_591
| PEhE_591 free_modifier_32
;
CEhE_495 : CEhE_517
| CEhE_517 free_modifier_32
;
NUhI_496 : NUhI_587
| NUhI_587 free_modifier_32
;
VUhO_497 : VUhO_617
| VUhO_617 free_modifier_32
;
SOI_498 : SOI_602
| SOI_602 free_modifier_32
;
LA_499 : LA_558
| LA_558 free_modifier_32
;
utterance_ordinal_801 : lexer_A_905
;
EK_802 : lexer_B_910
| lexer_B_910 free_modifier_32
;
EK_BO_803 : lexer_C_915
| lexer_C_915 free_modifier_32
;
EK_KE_804 : lexer_D_916
| lexer_D_916 free_modifier_32
;
JEK_805 : lexer_E_925
;
JOIK_806 : lexer_F_930
;
GEK_807 : lexer_G_935
| lexer_G_935 free_modifier_32
;
GUhEK_808 : lexer_H_940
| lexer_H_940 free_modifier_32
;
NAhE_BO_809 : lexer_I_945
| lexer_I_945 free_modifier_32
;
NA_KU_810 : lexer_J_950
| lexer_J_950 free_modifier_32
;
I_BO_811 : lexer_K_955
| lexer_K_955 free_modifier_32
;
number_812 : lexer_L_960
;
GIhEK_BO_813 : lexer_M_965
| lexer_M_965 free_modifier_32
;
GIhEK_KE_814 : lexer_N_966
| lexer_N_966 free_modifier_32
;
tense_modal_815 : lexer_O_970
| lexer_O_970 free_modifier_32
| FIhO_437 selbri_130 FEhU_gap_458
;
GIK_816 : lexer_P_980
| lexer_P_980 free_modifier_32
;
lerfu_string_817 : lexer_Q_985
;
GIhEK_818 : lexer_R_990
| lexer_R_990 free_modifier_32
;
I_819 : lexer_S_995
| lexer_S_995 free_modifier_32
;
I_JEK_820 : lexer_T_1000
| lexer_T_1000 free_modifier_32
;
JEK_BO_821 : lexer_U_1005
| lexer_U_1005 free_modifier_32
;
JOIK_BO_822 : lexer_V_1010
| lexer_V_1010 free_modifier_32
;
JOIK_KE_823 : lexer_W_1015
| lexer_W_1015 free_modifier_32
;
PA_MOI_824 : lexer_Y_1025
;
/* The following rules are used only in lexer processing. They have been
tested for ambiguity at various levels in the YACC grammar, but are in
the recursive descent lexer in the current parser. The lexer inserts
the lexer tokens before the processed strings, but leaves the original
tokens. */
lexer_A_905 : lexer_A_701 utt_ordinal_root_906
;
utt_ordinal_root_906 : lerfu_string_root_986 MAI_661
| number_root_961 MAI_661
;
lexer_B_910 : lexer_B_702 EK_root_911

;
EK_root_911 : A_501
| SE_596 A_501
| NA_578 A_501
| A_501 NAI_581
| SE_596 A_501 NAI_581
| NA_578 A_501 NAI_581
| NA_578 SE_596 A_501
| NA_578 SE_596 A_501 NAI_581
;
lexer_C_915 : lexer_C_703 EK_root_911 BO_508

| lexer_C_703 EK_root_911 simple_tag_971 BO_508
;
lexer_D_916 : lexer_D_704 EK_root_911 KE_551

| lexer_D_704 EK_root_911 simple_tag_971 KE_551
;
lexer_E_925 : lexer_E_705 JEK_root_926

;
JEK_root_926 : JA_546
| JA_546 NAI_581
| NA_578 JA_546
| NA_578 JA_546 NAI_581
| SE_596 JA_546
| SE_596 JA_546 NAI_581
| NA_578 SE_596 JA_546
| NA_578 SE_596 JA_546 NAI_581
;
lexer_F_930 : lexer_F_706 JOIK_root_931

;
JOIK_root_931 : JOI_548
| JOI_548 NAI_581
| SE_596 JOI_548
| SE_596 JOI_548 NAI_581
| interval_932
| GAhO_656 interval_932 GAhO_656
;
interval_932 : BIhI_507
| BIhI_507 NAI_581
| SE_596 BIhI_507
| SE_596 BIhI_507 NAI_581
;
lexer_G_935 : lexer_G_707 GA_537

| lexer_G_707 SE_596 GA_537
| lexer_G_707 GA_537 NAI_581
| lexer_G_707 SE_596 GA_537 NAI_581
| lexer_G_707 simple_tag_971 GIK_root_981
| lexer_G_707 JOIK_root_931 GI_539
;
lexer_H_940 : lexer_H_708 GUhA_544

| lexer_H_708 SE_596 GUhA_544
| lexer_H_708 GUhA_544 NAI_581
| lexer_H_708 SE_596 GUhA_544 NAI_581
;
lexer_I_945 : lexer_I_709 NAhE_583 BO_508

;
lexer_J_950 : lexer_J_710 NA_578 KU_556

;
lexer_K_955 : lexer_K_711 I_root_956 BO_508

| lexer_K_711 I_root_956 simple_tag_971 BO_508
;
I_root_956 : I_545
| I_545 simple_JOIK_JEK_957
;
simple_JOIK_JEK_957 : JOIK_806
| JEK_805
;
/* no freemod in this version; cf. JOIK_JEK_422 */
/* this reference to a version of JOIK and JEK
which already have the lexer tokens attached
prevents shift/reduce errors. The problem is
resolved in a hard-coded parser implementation
which builds lexer_K, before lexer_S, before
lexer_E and lexer_F. */
lexer_L_960 : lexer_L_712 number_root_961

;
number_root_961 : PA_672
| number_root_961 PA_672
| number_root_961 lerfu_word_987
;
lexer_M_965 : lexer_M_713 GIhEK_root_991 BO_508
| lexer_M_713 GIhEK_root_991 simple_tag_971 BO_508
;
lexer_N_966 : lexer_N_714 GIhEK_root_991 KE_551

| lexer_N_714 GIhEK_root_991 simple_tag_971 KE_551
;
lexer_O_970 : lexer_O_715 simple_tense_modal_972

;
/* the following rule is a lexer version of non-terminal _815 for compounding
PU/modals; it disallows the lexer picking out FIhO clauses, which would
require it to have knowledge of the main parser grammar */
simple_tag_971 : simple_tense_modal_972
| simple_tag_971 simple_JOIK_JEK_957
simple_tense_modal_972
;
simple_tense_modal_972 : simple_tense_modal_A_973
| NAhE_583 simple_tense_modal_A_973
| KI_554
| CUhE_522
;
simple_tense_modal_A_973: modal_974
| modal_974 KI_554
| tense_A_977
;
modal_974 : modal_A_975
| modal_A_975 NAI_581
;
modal_A_975 : BAI_502
| SE_596 BAI_502
;
tense_A_977 : tense_B_978
| tense_B_978 KI_554
;
tense_B_978 : tense_C_979
| CAhA_514
| tense_C_979 CAhA_514
;
/* specifies actuality/potentiality of the bridi */
/* puca'a = actually was */
/* baca'a = actually will be */
/* bapu'i = can and will have */
/* banu'o = can, but won't have yet */
/* canu'ojebapu'i = can, hasn't yet, but will */
tense_C_979 : time_1030
/* time-only */
/* space defaults to time-space reference space */
| space_1040
/* can include time if specified with VIhA */
/* otherwise time defaults to the time-space reference time */
| time_1030 space_1040
/* time and space - If space_1040 is marked with
VIhA for space-time the tense may be self-contradictory */
/* interval prop before space_time is for time distribution */
| space_1040 time_1030
;
lexer_P_980 : lexer_P_716 GIK_root_981
;
GIK_root_981 : GI_539
| GI_539 NAI_581
;
lexer_Q_985 : lexer_Q_717 lerfu_string_root_986
;
lerfu_string_root_986 : lerfu_word_987
| lerfu_string_root_986 lerfu_word_987
| lerfu_string_root_986 PA_672
;
lerfu_word_987 : BY_513
| LAU_559 lerfu_word_987
| TEI_605 lerfu_string_root_986 FOI_533
;
lexer_R_990 : lexer_R_718 GIhEK_root_991

;
GIhEK_root_991 : GIhA_541
| SE_596 GIhA_541
| NA_578 GIhA_541
| GIhA_541 NAI_581
| SE_596 GIhA_541 NAI_581
| NA_578 GIhA_541 NAI_581
| NA_578 SE_596 GIhA_541
| NA_578 SE_596 GIhA_541 NAI_581
;
lexer_S_995 : lexer_S_719 I_545

;
lexer_T_1000 : lexer_T_720 I_545 simple_JOIK_JEK_957
;
lexer_U_1005 : lexer_U_721 JEK_root_926 BO_508

| lexer_U_721 JEK_root_926 simple_tag_971 BO_508
;
lexer_V_1010 : lexer_V_722 JOIK_root_931 BO_508
| lexer_V_722 JOIK_root_931 simple_tag_971 BO_508
;
lexer_W_1015 : lexer_W_723 JOIK_root_931 KE_551
| lexer_W_723 JOIK_root_931 simple_tag_971 KE_551
;
lexer_Y_1025 : lexer_Y_725 number_root_961 MOI_663
| lexer_Y_725 lerfu_string_root_986 MOI_663
;
time_1030 : ZI_624
| ZI_624 time_A_1031
| time_A_1031
;
time_A_1031 : time_B_1032
| time_interval_1034
| time_B_1032 time_interval_1034
;
time_B_1032 : time_offset_1033
| time_B_1032 time_offset_1033
;
time_offset_1033 : time_direction_1035
| time_direction_1035 ZI_624
;
time_interval_1034 : ZEhA_622
| ZEhA_622 time_direction_1035
| time_int_props_1036
| ZEhA_622 time_int_props_1036
| ZEhA_622 time_direction_1035 time_int_props_1036
;
time_direction_1035 : PU_592
| PU_592 NAI_581
;
time_int_props_1036 : interval_property_1051
| time_int_props_1036 interval_property_1051
;
space_1040 : space_A_1042
| space_motion_1041
| space_A_1042 space_motion_1041
;
space_motion_1041 : MOhI_577 space_offset_1045

;
space_A_1042 : VA_613
| VA_613 space_B_1043
| space_B_1043
;
space_B_1043 : space_C_1044
| space_intval_1046
| space_C_1044 space_intval_1046
;
space_C_1044 : space_offset_1045
| space_C_1044 space_offset_1045
;
space_offset_1045 : space_direction_1048
| space_direction_1048 VA_613
;
space_intval_1046 : space_intval_A_1047
| space_intval_A_1047 space_direction_1048
| space_int_props_1049
| space_intval_A_1047 space_int_props_1049
| space_intval_A_1047 space_direction_1048
space_int_props_1049
;
space_intval_A_1047 : VEhA_615
| VIhA_616
| VEhA_615 VIhA_616
;
space_direction_1048 : FAhA_528
| FAhA_528 NAI_581
;
space_int_props_1049 : space_int_props_A_1050
| space_int_props_1049 space_int_props_A_1050
;
space_int_props_A_1050 : FEhE_530 interval_property_1051
;
/* This terminal gives an interval size in space-time (VEhA), and possibly a
dimensionality of the interval. The dimensionality may also be used
with the interval size left unspecified. When this terminal is used for the
spacetime origin, then barring any overriding VIhA, a VIhA here defines
the dimensionality of the space-time being discussed. */
interval_property_1051 : number_root_961 ROI_594

| number_root_961 ROI_594 NAI_581
| TAhE_604
| TAhE_604 NAI_581
| ZAhO_621
| ZAhO_621 NAI_581
;
/* extensional/intensional interval parameters */
/* These may be appended to any defined interval, or may stand in place of
either time or space tenses. If no other tense is present, this terminal
stands for the time-space interval parameter with an unspecified interval.*/
/* roroi = always and everywhere */
/* roroiku'avi = always here (ku'a = intersection) */
/* puroroi = always in the past
/* paroi = once upon a time (somewhere) */
/* paroiku'avi = once upon a time here */
/* The following are ``Lexer-only rules'', covered by steps 1-4 described

at the beginning. The grammar of these constructs is nonexistent,
except possibly in cases where they interact with each other. Even
there, however, the effects are semantic rather than grammatical. Where
it is believed possible that conflicts could exist, the grammar of these
constructs has been put in the above grammar, even though the
lexer/Preparser will actually prevent these from being passed thru to
the parse routine. (Otherwise we have to put unacceptably fancy code in
the PreParser to determine just when these can be passed thru, and when
they can't.) Constructs in this category include quotes and indicators
as defined above. (The above grammar handles utterance scope
(free_modifier) and clause scope (gap) applications of the latter,
however, and indicators should be allowed to be absorbed into almost any
word without changing its grammar.
SI_601, SA_595, and SU_603 are metalinguistic erasers.
token_1100 : any_word_698
| BAhE_503 any_word_698
| anything_699
| any_word_698 BU_511
| any_word_698 DAhO_524
| any_word_698 FUhO_536
| any_word_698 FUhE_535
| any_word_698 UI_612
| any_word_698 UI_612 NAI_581
| any_word_698 Y_619
| any_word_698 CAI_515
| any_word_698 CAI_515 NAI_581
| UI_612 NAI_581
| CAI_515 NAI_581
;
null_1101 : any_word_698 SI_601
| possibly_unlexable_word (PAUSE) SI_601
| utterance_20 SA_595
| possibly unlexable string (PAUSE) SA_595
erases back to the last individual token
I or NIhO or start of text, ignoring the
insides of ZOI, ZO, and LOhU/LEhU quotes.
Start of text is defined for SU below.
| text_C_3 SU_603
| possibly unparsable text (PAUSE) SU_603
erases back to start of text which is the
beginning of a speaker's statement,
a parenthesis (TO/TOI), a LU/LIhU quote,
or a TUhE/TUhU utterance string.
;
*/
%%
2. EBNF Grammar of Lojban
Lojban Machine Grammar, EBNF Version, 3rd Baseline as of 10 January 1997
This document is explicitly dedicated to the public domain by its author, the Lo
gical Language Group Inc. Contact that organization at: 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax
VA 22031 USA 703-385-0273 (intl: +1 703 385 0273)
Explanation of notation: All rules have the form:
namenumber = bnf-expression
which means that the grammatical construct ``name'' is defined by ``bnf-expressi

on''. The number cross-references this grammar with the rule numbers in the YACC
grammar. The names are the same as those in the YACC grammar, except that subru
les are labeled with A, B, C, ... in the YACC grammar and with 1, 2, 3, ... in t
his grammar. In addition, rule 971 is ``simple_tag'' in the YACC grammar but ``s
tag'' in this grammar, because of its frequent appearance.
1. Names in lower case are grammatical constructs.
2. Names in UPPER CASE are selma'o (lexeme) names, and are terminals.
3. Concatenation is expressed by juxtaposition with no operator symbol.
4. | represents alternation (choice).
5. [] represents an optional element.
6. & represents and/or (`À & B'' is the same as `À | B | A B'').
7. ... represents optional repetition of the construct to the left. Left-grou
ping is implied; right-grouping is shown by explicit self-referential recursion
with no ``...''
8. () serves to indicate the grouping of the other operators. Otherwise, ``..
.'' binds closer than &, which binds closer than |.
9. # is shorthand for ``[free ...]'', a construct which appears in many place
s.
10. // encloses an elidable terminator, which may be omitted (without change o
f meaning) if no grammatical ambiguity results.
text0 =
[NAI ...] [CMENE ... # | (indicators & free ...)] [joik-jek] text-1
text-12 =
[(I [jek | joik] [[stag] BO] #) ... | NIhO ... #] [paragraphs]
paragraphs4 =
paragraph [NIhO ... # paragraphs]
paragraph10 =
(statement | fragment) [I # [statement | fragment]] ...
statement11 =
statement-1
| prenex statement
statement-112 =
statement-2 [I joik-jek [statement-2]] ...
statement-213 =
statement-3 [I [jek | joik] [stag] BO # [statement-2]]
statement-314 =
sentence
| [tag] TUhE # text-1 /TUhU#/
fragment20 =
ek #
| gihek #
| quantifier
| NA #
| terms /VAU#/
| prenex
| relative-clauses
| links
| linkargs
prenex30 =
terms ZOhU #
sentence40 =
[terms [CU #]] bridi-tail
subsentence41 =
sentence
| prenex subsentence
bridi-tail50 =
bridi-tail-1 [gihek [stag] KE # bridi-tail /KEhE#/ tail-terms]
bridi-tail-151 =
bridi-tail-2 [gihek # bridi-tail-2 tail-terms] ...
bridi-tail-252 =
bridi-tail-3 [gihek [stag] BO # bridi-tail-2 tail-terms]
bridi-tail-353 =
selbri tail-terms
| gek-sentence
gek-sentence54 =
gek subsentence gik subsentence tail-terms
| [tag] KE # gek-sentence /KEhE#/
| NA # gek-sentence
tail-terms71 =
[terms] /VAU#/
terms80 =
terms-1 ...
terms-181 =
terms-2 [PEhE # joik-jek terms-2] ...
terms-282 =
term [CEhE # term] ...
term83 =
sumti | (tag | FA #) (sumti
| /KU#/)
| termset
| NA KU #
termset85 =
NUhI # gek terms /NUhU#/ gik terms /NUhU#/
| NUhI # terms /NUhU#/
sumti90 =
sumti-1 [VUhO # relative-clauses]
sumti-191 =
sumti-2 [(ek | joik) [stag] KE # sumti /KEhE#/]
sumti-292 =
sumti-3 [joik-ek sumti-3] ...
sumti-393 =
sumti-4 [(ek
| joik) [stag] BO # sumti-3]
sumti-494 =
sumti-5
| gek sumti gik sumti-4
sumti-595 =
[quantifier] sumti-6 [relative-clauses]
| quantifier selbri /KU#/ [relative-clauses]
sumti-697 =
(LAhE # | NAhE BO #) [relative-clauses] sumti /LUhU#/
| KOhA #
| lerfu-string /BOI#/
| LA # [relative-clauses] CMENE ... #
| (LA | LE) # sumti-tail /KU#/
| LI # mex /LOhO#/
| ZO any-word #
| LU text /LIhU#/
| LOhU any-word ... LEhU #
| ZOI any-word anything any-word #
sumti-tail111 =
[sumti-6 [relative-clauses]] sumti-tail-1
| relative-clauses sumti-tail-1
sumti-tail-1112 =
[quantifier] selbri [relative-clauses]
| quantifier sumti
relative-clauses121 =
relative-clause [ZIhE # relative-clause] ...
relative-clause122 =
GOI # term /GEhU#/
| NOI # subsentence /KUhO#/
selbri130 =
[tag] selbri-1
selbri-1131 =
selbri-2
| NA # selbri
selbri-2132 =
selbri-3 [CO # selbri-2]
selbri-3133 =
selbri-4 ...
selbri-4134 =
selbri-5 [joik-jek selbri-5 | joik [stag] KE # selbri-3 /KEhE#/] ...
selbri-5135 =
selbri-6 [(jek | joik) [stag] BO # selbri-5]
selbri-6136 =
tanru-unit [BO # selbri-6]
| [NAhE #] guhek selbri gik selbri-6
tanru-unit150 =
tanru-unit-1 [CEI # tanru-unit-1] ...
tanru-unit-1151 =
tanru-unit-2 [linkargs]
tanru-unit-2152 =
BRIVLA #
| GOhA [RAhO] #
| KE # selbri-3 /KEhE#/
| ME # sumti /MEhU#/ [MOI #] | (number
| lerfu-string) MOI #
| NUhA # mex-operator
| SE # tanru-unit-2
| JAI # [tag] tanru-unit-2
| any-word (ZEI any-word) ...
| NAhE # tanru-unit-2
| NU [NAI] # [joik-jek NU [NAI] #] ... subsentence /KEI#/
linkargs160 =
BE # term [links] /BEhO#/
links161 =
BEI # term [links]
quantifier300 =
number /BOI#/
| VEI # mex /VEhO#/
mex310 =
mex-1 [operator mex-1] ...
| FUhA # rp-expression
mex-1311 =
mex-2 [BIhE # operator mex-1]
mex-2312 =
operand
| [PEhO #] operator mex-2 ... /KUhE#/
rp-expression330 =
rp-operand rp-operand operator
rp-operand332 =
operand
| rp-expression
operator370 =
operator-1 [joik-jek operator-1 | joik [stag] KE # operator /KEhE#/] ...
operator-1371 =
operator-2
| guhek operator-1 gik operator-2
| operator-2 (jek | joik) [stag] BO # operator-1
operator-2372 =
mex-operator
| KE # operator /KEhE#/
mex-operator374 =
SE # mex-operator
| NAhE # mex-operator
| MAhO # mex /TEhU#/
| NAhU # selbri /TEhU#/
| VUhU #
operand381 =
operand-1 [(ek | joik) [stag] KE # operand /KEhE#/]
operand-1382 =
operand-2 [joik-ek operand-2] ...
operand-2383 =
operand-3 [(ek | joik) [stag] BO # operand-2]
operand-3385 =
quantifier
| lerfu-string /BOI#/
| NIhE # selbri /TEhU#/
| MOhE # sumti /TEhU#/
| JOhI # mex-2 ... /TEhU#/
| gek operand gik operand-3
| (LAhE # | NAhE BO #) operand /LUhU#/
number812 =
PA [PA | lerfu-word] ...
lerfu-string817 =
lerfu-word [PA | lerfu-word] ...
lerfu-word987 =
BY
| any-word BU
| LAU lerfu-word
| TEI lerfu-string FOI
ek802 =
[NA] [SE] A [NAI]
gihek818 =
[NA] [SE] GIhA [NAI]
jek805 =
[NA] [SE] JA [NAI]
joik806 =
[SE] JOI [NAI]
| interval
| GAhO interval GAhO
interval932 =
[SE] BIhI [NAI]
joik-ek421 =
joik #
| ek #
joik-jek422 =
joik #
| jek #
gek807 =
[SE] GA [NAI] #
| joik GI #
| stag gik
guhek808 =
[SE] GUhA [NAI] #
gik816 =
GI [NAI] #
tag491 =
tense-modal [joik-jek tense-modal] ...
stag971 =
simple-tense-modal [(jek | joik) simple-tense-modal] ...
tense-modal815 =
simple-tense-modal #
| FIhO # selbri /FEhU#/
simple-tense-modal972 =
[NAhE] [SE] BAI [NAI] [KI]
| [NAhE] (time [space]
| space [time]) & CAhA [KI]
| KI
| CUhE
time1030 =
ZI & time-offset ... & ZEhA [PU [NAI]] & interval-property ...
time-offset1033 =
PU [NAI] [ZI]
space1040 =
VA & space-offset ... & space-interval & (MOhI space-offset)
space-offset1045 =
FAhA [NAI] [VA]
space-interval1046 =
((VEhA & VIhA) [FAhA [NAI]]) & space-int-props
space-int-props1049 =
(FEhE interval-property) ...
interval-property1051 =
number ROI [NAI]
| TAhE [NAI]
| ZAhO [NAI]
free32 =
SEI # [terms [CU #]] selbri /SEhU/
| SOI # sumti [sumti] /SEhU/
| vocative [relative-clauses] selbri [relative-clauses] /DOhU/
| vocative [relative-clauses] CMENE ... # [relative-clauses] /DOhU/
| vocative [sumti] /DOhU/
| (number | lerfu-string) MAI
| TO text /TOI/
| XI # (number | lerfu-string) /BOI/
| XI # VEI # mex /VEhO/
vocative415 =
(COI [NAI]) ... & DOI
indicators411 =
[FUhE] indicator ...
indicator413 =
(UI | CAI) [NAI]
| Y
| DAhO
| FUhO
The following rules are non-formal:
word1100 =
[BAhE] any-word [indicators]
any-word =
`àny single word (no compound cmavo)''
anything =
`àny text at all, whether Lojban or not''
null1101 =
any-word SI
| utterance SA
| text SU
FAhO is a universal terminator and signals the end of parsable input.
3. EBNF Cross-Reference
A
ek802
BAI
simple-tense-modal972
BAhE
word1100
BE
linkargs160
BEI
links161
BEhO
linkargs160
BIhE
mex-1311
BIhI
interval932
BO
bridi-tail-252, operand-2383, operand-3385, operator-1371, selbri-5135, selb
ri-6136, statement-213, sumti-393, sumti-697, text-12
BOI
free32, operand-3385, quantifier300, sumti-697
BRIVLA
tanru-unit-2152
BU
lerfu-word987
BY
lerfu-word987
CAI
indicator413
CAhA
CEI
tanru-unit150
CEhE
terms-282
CMENE
free32, sumti-697, text0
CO
selbri-2132
COI
vocative415
CU
free32, sentence40
CUhE
DAhO
indicator413
DOI
vocative415
DOhU
free32
FA
term83
FAhA
space-interval1046, space-offset1045
FEhE
space-int-props1049
FEhU
tense-modal815
FIhO
tense-modal815
FOI
lerfu-word987
FUhA
mex310
FUhE
indicators411
FUhO
indicator413
GA
gek807
GAhO
joik806
GEhU
relative-clause122
GI
gek807, gik816
GIhA
gihek818
GOI
relative-clause122
GOhA
tanru-unit-2152
GUhA
guhek808
I
paragraph10, statement-112, statement-213, text-12
JA
jek805
JAI
tanru-unit-2152
JOI
joik806
JOhI
operand-3385
KE
bridi-tail50, gek-sentence54, operand381, operator-2372, operator370, selbri
-4134, sumti-191, tanru-unit-2152
KEI
tanru-unit-2152
KEhE
bridi-tail50, gek-sentence54, operand381, operator-2372, operator370, selbri
-4134, sumti-191, tanru-unit-2152
KI
KOhA
sumti-697
KU
sumti-595, sumti-697, term83
KUhE
mex-2312
KUhO
relative-clause122
LA
sumti-697
LAU
lerfu-word987
LAhE
operand-3385, sumti-697
LE
sumti-697
LEhU
sumti-697
LI
sumti-697
LIhU
sumti-697
LOhO
sumti-697
LOhU
sumti-697
LU
sumti-697
LUhU
MAI
free32
MAhO
mex-operator374
ME
tanru-unit-2152
MEhU
tanru-unit-2152
MOI
tanru-unit-2152
MOhE
operand-3385
MOhI
space1040
NA
ek802, fragment20, gek-sentence54, gihek818, jek805, selbri-1131, term83
NAI
ek802, gek807, gihek818, gik816, guhek808, indicator413, interval-property10
51, interval932, jek805, joik806, simple-tense-modal972, space-interval1046, spa
ce-offset1045, tanru-unit-2152, text0, time-offset1033, time1030, vocative415
NAhE
mex-operator374, operand-3385, selbri-6136, simple-tense-modal972, sumti-697
, tanru-unit-2152
NAhU
mex-operator374
NIhE
operand-3385
NIhO
paragraphs4, text-12
NOI
relative-clause122
NU
tanru-unit-2152
NUhA
tanru-unit-2152
NUhI
termset85
NUhU
termset85
PA
lerfu-string817, number812
PEhE
terms-181
PEhO
mex-2312
PU
time-offset1033, time1030
RAhO
tanru-unit-2152
ROI
interval-property1051
SA
null1101
SE
ek802, gek807, gihek818, guhek808, interval932, jek805, joik806, mex-operato
r374, simple-tense-modal972, tanru-unit-2152
SEI
free32
SEhU
free32
SI
null1101
SOI
free32
SU
null1101
TAhE
TEI
lerfu-word987
TEhU
mex-operator374, operand-3385
TO
free32
TOI
free32
TUhE
statement-314
TUhU
statement-314
UI
indicator413
VA
space-offset1045, space1040
VAU
fragment20, tail-terms71
VEI
free32, quantifier300
VEhA
space-interval1046
VEhO
free32, quantifier300
VIhA
space-interval1046
VUhO
sumti90
VUhU
mex-operator374
XI
free32
Y
indicator413
ZAhO
ZEI
tanru-unit-2152
ZEhA
time1030
ZI
time-offset1033, time1030
ZIhE
relative-clauses121
ZO
sumti-697
ZOI
sumti-697
ZOhU
prenex30
any-word
lerfu-word987, null1101, sumti-697, tanru-unit-2152, word1100
anything
sumti-697
bridi-tail
bridi-tail50, sentence40
bridi-tail-1
bridi-tail50
bridi-tail-2
bridi-tail-151, bridi-tail-252
bridi-tail-3
bridi-tail-252
ek
fragment20, joik-ek421, operand-2383, operand381, sumti-191, sumti-393
fragment
paragraph10
free
text0
gek
gek-sentence54, operand-3385, sumti-494, termset85
gek-sentence
bridi-tail-353, gek-sentence54
gihek
bridi-tail-151, bridi-tail-252, bridi-tail50, fragment20
gik
gek-sentence54, gek807, operand-3385, operator-1371, selbri-6136, sumti-494,
termset85
guhek
operator-1371, selbri-6136
indicator
indicators411
indicators
text0, word1100
interval
joik806
interval-property
space-int-props1049, time1030
jek
joik-jek422, operator-1371, selbri-5135, stag971, statement-213, text-12
joik
gek807, joik-ek421, joik-jek422, operand-2383, operand381, operator-1371, op
erator370, selbri-4134, selbri-5135, stag971, statement-213, sumti-191, sumti-39
3, text-12
joik-ek
joik-jek
operator370, selbri-4134, statement-112, tag491, tanru-unit-2152, terms-181,
text0
lerfu-string
free32, lerfu-word987, operand-3385, sumti-697, tanru-unit-2152
lerfu-word
lerfu-string817, lerfu-word987, number812
linkargs
fragment20, tanru-unit-1151
links
fragment20, linkargs160, links161
mex
free32, mex-operator374, quantifier300, sumti-697
mex-1
mex-1311, mex310
mex-2
mex-1311, mex-2312, operand-3385
mex-operator
mex-operator374, operator-2372, tanru-unit-2152
number
free32, interval-property1051, quantifier300, tanru-unit-2152
operand
mex-2312, operand-3385, operand381, rp-operand332
operand-1
operand381
operand-2
operand-1382, operand-2383
operand-3
operand-2383, operand-3385
operator
mex-1311, mex-2312, mex310, operator-2372, operator370, rp-expression330
operator-1
operator-1371, operator370
operator-2
operator-1371
paragraph
paragraphs4
paragraphs
paragraphs4, text-12
prenex
fragment20, statement11, subsentence41
quantifier
fragment20, operand-3385, sumti-595, sumti-tail-1112
relative-clause
relative-clauses121
relative-clauses
fragment20, free32, sumti-595, sumti-697, sumti-tail-1112, sumti-tail111, su
mti90
rp-expression
mex310, rp-operand332
rp-operand
rp-expression330
selbri
bridi-tail-353, free32, mex-operator374, operand-3385, selbri-1131, selbri-6
136, sumti-595, sumti-tail-1112, tense-modal815
selbri-1
selbri130
selbri-2
selbri-1131, selbri-2132
selbri-3
selbri-2132, selbri-4134, tanru-unit-2152
selbri-4
selbri-3133
selbri-5
selbri-6
sentence
statement-314, subsentence41
simple-tense-modal
stag971, tense-modal815
space
space-int-props
space-interval1046
space-interval
space1040
space-offset
space1040
stag
bridi-tail-252, bridi-tail50, gek807, operand-2383, operand381, operator-137
1, operator370, selbri-4134, selbri-5135, statement-213, sumti-191, sumti-393, t
ext-12
statement
paragraph10, statement11
statement-1
statement11
statement-2
statement-112, statement-213
statement-3
statement-213
subsentence
gek-sentence54, relative-clause122, subsentence41, tanru-unit-2152
sumti
free32, operand-3385, sumti-191, sumti-494, sumti-697, sumti-tail-1112, tanr
u-unit-2152, term83
sumti-1
sumti90
sumti-2
sumti-191
sumti-3
sumti-292, sumti-393
sumti-4
sumti-393, sumti-494
sumti-5
sumti-494
sumti-6
sumti-595, sumti-tail111
sumti-tail
sumti-697
sumti-tail-1
sumti-tail111
tag
gek-sentence54, selbri130, statement-314, tanru-unit-2152, term83
tail-terms
bridi-tail-151, bridi-tail-252, bridi-tail-353, bridi-tail50, gek-sentence54
tanru-unit
selbri-6136
tanru-unit-1
tanru-unit150
tanru-unit-2
tanru-unit-1151, tanru-unit-2152
tense-modal
tag491
term
linkargs160, links161, relative-clause122, terms-282
terms
fragment20, free32, prenex30, sentence40, tail-terms71, termset85
terms-1
terms80
terms-2
terms-181
termset
term83
text
free32, null1101, sumti-697
text-1
statement-314, text0
time
time-offset
time1030
utterance
null1101
vocative
free32

Lojban Book

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lojban Book

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lojban Book

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are the main features of Lojban?

What are the main features of Lojban?

What is this book about?

What is this book about?

Chapter 1

Lojban As We Mangle It In Lojbanistan: About This Book

Note the explicit ``ku'' at the end of the possessor sumti,

1. What's wrong with this picture?

/*%token lexer_A_905 /* : lexer_A_701 utt_ordinal_root_906 */

prenex_30 : terms_80 ZOhU_492

sentence_40 : bridi_tail_50 /* bare observative or mo answer */

description_110 : LA_499 sumti_tail_111 gap_450

selbri_130 : tag_491 selbri_A_131

linkargs_160 : BE_446 term_83 BEhO_gap_467

/* Reverse Polish expressions always have exactly two operands.

/* Operators may be joined by logical connectives. */

lexer_B_910 : lexer_B_702 EK_root_911

lexer_C_915 : lexer_C_703 EK_root_911 BO_508

lexer_D_916 : lexer_D_704 EK_root_911 KE_551

lexer_E_925 : lexer_E_705 JEK_root_926

lexer_F_930 : lexer_F_706 JOIK_root_931

lexer_G_935 : lexer_G_707 GA_537

lexer_H_940 : lexer_H_708 GUhA_544

lexer_I_945 : lexer_I_709 NAhE_583 BO_508

lexer_J_950 : lexer_J_710 NA_578 KU_556

lexer_K_955 : lexer_K_711 I_root_956 BO_508

lexer_L_960 : lexer_L_712 number_root_961

lexer_N_966 : lexer_N_714 GIhEK_root_991 KE_551

lexer_O_970 : lexer_O_715 simple_tense_modal_972

lexer_R_990 : lexer_R_718 GIhEK_root_991

lexer_S_995 : lexer_S_719 I_545

lexer_U_1005 : lexer_U_721 JEK_root_926 BO_508

space_motion_1041 : MOhI_577 space_offset_1045

interval_property_1051 : number_root_961 ROI_594

/* The following are ``Lexer-only rules'', covered by steps 1-4 described

which means that the grammatical construct ``name'' is defined by ``bnf-expressi

You might also like

/%token lexer_A_905 / : lexer_A_701 utt_ordinal_root_906 */