0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views6 pages

Electrospinning Nanofibers of PANI/PMMA Blends

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 6

Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 736 © 2003 Materials Research Society D2.7.

Electrospinning Nanofibers of PANI/PMMA Blends

Keyur Desai and Changmo Sung


Center for Advanced Materials, Department of Chemical and Nuclear Engineering,
One University Avenue, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA 01854, U.S.A.

ABSTRACT

Electrically conducting organic polymers are a novel class of ‘synthetic metals’ that combine
the chemical and mechanical properties of polymers with the electronic properties of metals and
semiconductors. Electronically conducting polymers have been studied extensively owing to
their applications in energy conversion devices, sensors, electro chromic devices,
electromagnetic interference shielding (EMI), electronic circuits etc. Polyaniline - an organic
conducting polymer - has been blended with poly methyl methacrylate and the blends have been
electrospun to produce conducting nanofibers. The electrospun blends have been characterized to
study fiber morphology and formulate conditions for nanofiber formation.

INTRODUCTION

Polyaniline is an organic polymer, but is totally unmoldable and insoluble. It is a conducting


polymer and exists in three oxidation states [1]. It has varied applications; its first applications
were to make conducting coating of plastic materials i.e. printed circuit board production and
also corrosion protection.
Electrospinning is a process by which sub-micron polymer fibers can be produced using an
electrostatically driven jet of polymer solution [2]. The fibers are collected as a non-woven mat
or membrane with high surface area to volume ratio. Since, polyaniline is insoluble in most
organic solvents it cannot be spun by itself, as for electrospinning a polymer solution is required.
Therefore it has to be blended with other polymers to form a polymer solution for spinning. In
this study we have blended polyaniline (PANI) with poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) to form
electrospun fibers.

EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS

Polyaniline is made conducting by doping with protonating acids like campor sulfonic acid
D2.7.2

(CSA) to make it conducting. Polyaniline of the emeraldine base form (Aldrich M.W. 65,000)
was doped with CSA (Aldrich) in ratio of 0.5:0.5 wt % polymer repeating unit [3]. The PANI-
CSA complex thus formed was mixed with desired amount of PMMA (Aldrich M.W. 120,000) in
chloroform (Aldrich) solvent. The resulting mixture thus formed was electrospun to form fibers.
Solutions were prepared with 2 – 12 wt % PANI-CSA and 5 – 16 wt % PMMA.
In electrospinning an electrode connected to a high voltage power supply is inserted into a
polymeric solution contained within a pipette as shown in Figure 1. A grounded collection plate
is kept at a suitable distance from tip of the pipette to collect the fibers. The formation of fibers
depends upon the voltage applied, concentration of polymers in the solution, tip-target distance
and flow rate of solution from the pipette [4]. For the first phase of this research we have studied
the effect of polymer concentrations and spinning voltage applied on the formation of fibers.
The electrospun fibers were characterized by scanning electron microscope (Amray AMR
1000), transmission electron microscope (Philips EM 400 T) and atomic force microscope (PSIA
model XE-100. The photomicrographs obtained were then image processed by image processing
software (GAIA blue) to calculate fiber thickness, bead diameter, bead length and bead density.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

During electrospinning of PANI-CSA/PMMA blends we found formation of beads along


with fibers. Beads can be described as an unwanted by-product of electrospinning [4]. The
morphology of the fibers formed after electrospinning was characterized based on the shape and
size of the fibers in terms of bead density, bead length, bead diameter and fiber thickness.

Figure 1. Electrospinning Set-Up


D2.7.3

Effect of Polymer Concentration

Figure 2 shows a plot of bead diameter, bead length, fiber thickness and bead density at
various polymer concentrations. We can see that as the total polymer concentration (polyaniline
and poly methyl methacrylate) increases, the bead diameter, length and fiber thickness decrease,
which is desirable for fiber formation. Also increasing polymer concentration results in decrease
of bead density as shown in the SEM micrographs in Figure 3. Since, our polymer solution is a
blend of two polymers to make optimum blend for nanofiber formation we have to look at effect
of individual polymer concentration in the blend on fiber formation (table 1). We can see that
increasing the PANI-CSA concentration leads to a reduction in bead size and fiber thickness
which is desirable but increasing PMMA concentration leads to increase in bead size and fiber
thickness which is undesirable, therefore based on results shown in Figure 2 and Table 1 we can
summarize that 8 wt% PANI-CSA 12 wt% PMMA and 12 wt% PANI-CSA 5 wt % PMMA are
good blend ratios for fiber formation which would be further studied to optimize the other
electrospinning parameters. The fibers obtained are in the sub-micron to nanometer range with
the thinnest being 100 nm shown in TEM micrographs in Figure 4. Figure 5 shows the AFM
phase images of the electrospun fibers.

30 40
Bead Diameter
Bead length
Bead Density 35
25 Fiber Thickness
Bead diameter , length and Fiber thickness in micrometer

30

20
25

Bead Density (%)


15 20

15
10

10

5
5

0 0
2.0 - 12.0 2.0 - 14.0 2.0 - 16.0 2.0 - 18.0 4.0 - 10.0 4.0 - 16.0 8.0 - 10.0 8.0 - 12.0 8.0 - 16.0 12.0 - 5.0
PANI-CSA wt % - PMMA wt%
/

Figure 2. Effect of polymer concentration on bead diameter, length and density


D2.7.4

Table 1. Effect of individual polymers on fiber formation

Polymer Concentrations Bead Density Bead Diameter Bead Length Fiber Thickness

PANI-CSA

PMMA

Figure 3. SEM micrographs showing reduction in bead density with increasing polymer
concentration: (a) 4 wt% PANI-CSA 10 wt % PMMA,(b) 8 wt% PANI-CSA – 12 wt% PMMA
and (c)12 wt% PANI-CSA – 5 wt% PMMA.

Figure 4. TEM micrographs of 12 wt% PANI-CSA 5 wt% PMMA showing nanofibers of fiber
thickness 100nm and very small beads.
D2.7.5

Figure 5: AFM topography (left) and phase images showing distribution of two polymers in the
fibers.

Effect of Spinning Voltage

Based on the results obtained for various polymer concentrations we investigated the effect
of spinning voltage on fiber formation at three different blend compositions. We observed that
fibers appear to form at an applied voltage of 15 kV and as you further increase the voltage up to
25 kV the bead density and fiber thickness decrease as shown in Figure 6. Therefore based on
our experiments we can say that an applied voltage of 25 kV is optimum for nanofiber formation.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated for the first time formation of nanofibers of PANI-CSA/PMMA


blends with fiber thickness ranging from 2.28µm to 100nm depending on concentration of
polymers used in the blend. Higher spinning voltage favors formation of thinner fibers with
fewer beads. The concentration of polymers in the polymer blend has a significant effect on
morphology of formed fibers and as our ultimate goal is to make conducting nanofibers, blends
with higher PANI-CSA concentrations are an optimum choice and would be further
characterized by electrostatic force microscopy to measure charge distribution and conductivity
of the fibers.
D2.7.6

40

35

30 Bead Density at 15 kV

Bead Density at 20 kV
25
Bead Density (%)

Bead Density at 25 kV

20

15

10

0
8%PANI-CSA 12%PMMA 8%PANI-CSA 16%PMMA 4%PANI-CSA 16%PMMA
Polymer Concentrations
/

Figure 6: Effect of spinning voltage on bead density

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support received by them from
National Science Foundation (NSF) for this research project under OMI-0200498. The authors
would like to express their gratitude to Ms Samira Farboodmanesh for having helped in setting
up the electrospinning equipment and Ms Bongwoo Kang for assisting with the various
characterization techniques.

REFERENCES

1. B. Wessling, Synthetic Metals 85, 1313-1318 (1997).


2. J. M. Deitzel, J. Kleinmeyer, D. Harris and N.C. Beck Tan, Polymer 42, 261-272 (2001).
3. C. Y. Yang, Y. Cao, Paul Smith and A. J. Heeger, Synthetic Metals 53, 293-301 (1993).
4. H. Fong, I. Chun, D. H. Renekar, Polymer 40, 4585-4592 (1999).

You might also like