People of The Philippines vs. Hermogenes Flora and Edwin Flora G.R. No. 125909, June 23, 2000

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES vs.

HERMOGENES FLORA AND EDWIN FLORA


G.R. No. 125909, June 23, 2000

RULING

. In the present case, when Hermogenes Flora first fired his gun at Ireneo, but missed, and
hit Emerita Roma and Flor Espinas instead, he became liable for Emerita's death and Flor's
injuries. Hermogenes cannot escape culpability on the basis of aberratio ictus principle. Criminal
liability is incurred by any person committing a felony, although the wrongful act be different
from that which he intended.

We find that the death of Emerita and of Ireneo were attended by treachery. In order for
treachery to exist, two conditions must concur namely: (1) the employment of means, methods or
manner of execution which would ensure the offender's safety from any defense or retaliatory act
on the part of the offended party; and (2) such means, method or manner of execution was
deliberately or consciously chosen by the offender. When Hermogenes Flora suddenly shot
Emerita and Ireneo, both were helpless to defend themselves. Their deaths were murders, not
simply homicides since the acts were qualified by treachery. Thus, we are compelled to conclude
that appellant Hermogenes Flora is guilty beyond reasonable doubt of double murder for the
deaths of Emerita Roma and Ireneo Gallarte, and guilty of attempted murder of Flor Espinas.

You might also like