Yes 1
Yes 1
Project no:
Author:
Project data
Project name
Project number
Author
Description
Date 7/13/2020
Design code EN
Material
Steel S 275
Concrete C30/37
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Design
Name CON1
Description
Analysis Stress, strain/ simplified loading
Cross-sections
Name Material
2 - CHS323.9/10.0 S 275
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Cross-sections
Name Material Drawing
2 - CHS323.9/10.0 S 275
Anchors
Diameter fu Gross area
Name Bolt assembly
[mm] [MPa] [mm2]
M24 8.8 M24 8.8 24 800.0 452
Foundation block
Item Value Unit
CB 1
Dimensions 3051 x 3051 mm
Depth 2500 mm
Anchor M24 8.8
Anchoring length 800 mm
Shear force transfer Anchors
Mortar joint 35 mm
Check
Summary
Name Value Status
Analysis 100.0% OK
Plates 0.0 < 5% OK
Loc. deformation 0.0 < 3% OK
Anchors 58.0 < 100% OK
Welds 62.1 < 100% OK
Concrete block 10.4 < 100% OK
Buckling Not calculated
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Plates
Thickness σEd εPl
Name Loads Status
[mm] [MPa] [%]
M1 10.0 LE1 275.1 0.0 OK
BP1 20.0 LE1 217.7 0.0 OK
RIB1a 16.0 LE1 76.1 0.0 OK
RIB1b 16.0 LE1 115.7 0.0 OK
RIB1c 16.0 LE1 117.8 0.0 OK
RIB1d 16.0 LE1 70.5 0.0 OK
RIB1e 16.0 LE1 53.4 0.0 OK
RIB1f 16.0 LE1 136.9 0.0 OK
RIB1g 16.0 LE1 134.0 0.0 OK
RIB1h 16.0 LE1 42.2 0.0 OK
Design data
fy εlim
Material
[MPa] [%]
S 275 275.0 5.0
Loc. deformation
d0 δ δ lim δ/d0
Name Loads Check status
[mm] [mm] [mm] [%]
M1 324 LE1 0 10 0.0 OK
Anchors
Ft,Ed V Nrdc Nrdp Utt Fb,Rd Uts Utts VRd,cp VRd,c
Name Loads Detailing Status
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kN] [%] [kN] [%] [%] [kN] [kN]
A1 LE1 32.9 1.1 179.6 1670.8 19.0 412.8 5.0 3.9 311.2 474.0 OK OK
A2 LE1 39.7 1.5 179.6 1670.8 23.0 247.7 7.2 5.8 311.2 474.0 OK OK
A3 LE1 100.2 0.9 179.6 1670.8 58.0 247.7 7.8 34.2 311.2 474.0 OK OK
A4 LE1 38.7 1.5 179.6 1670.8 22.4 247.7 7.1 5.5 311.2 474.0 OK OK
A5 LE1 20.3 1.8 179.6 1670.8 11.8 247.7 7.9 2.0 311.2 474.0 OK OK
A6 LE1 0.0 1.3 0.0 1670.8 0.0 247.7 5.2 1.2 311.2 474.0 OK OK
A7 LE1 0.0 0.8 0.0 1670.8 0.0 247.7 2.9 0.5 311.2 474.0 OK OK
A8 LE1 0.0 1.3 0.0 1670.8 0.0 247.7 4.9 1.1 311.2 474.0 OK OK
A9 LE1 22.1 1.8 179.6 1670.8 12.8 247.7 8.1 2.3 311.2 474.0 OK OK
Design data
Ft,Rd Bp,Rd Fv,Rd Vrds Stf
Name
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kN] [MN/m]
M24 8.8 - 1 172.8 492.8 113.0 21.3 494
Project:
Project no:
Author:
k2 = 0.90 – Factor
fub = 800.0 MPa – Ultimate tensile strength of the bolt
As = 353 mm2 – Tensile stress area of the bolt
αb = 1.00 – Factor
fu = 430.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
d = 24 mm – Nominal diameter of the fastener
t = 20 mm – Thickness
γM 2 = 1.25 – Safety factor
where:
γM C = 1.50 – Safety factor
0
VRk,c = 1045.0 kN – Initial value of the characteristic resistance of an anchor
ψα,V = 1.00 – Factor of the angle between the load direction and concrete edge
Utilization in tension
Ft,Ed
Utt = min(Ft,Rd ;Bp,Rd ,NRd,c ) = 19.0 %
Utilization in shear
VEd
Uts = min(Fv,Rd ;Fb,Rd ;VRd,s ;VRd,cp ;VRd,c ) = 5.0 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
k2 = 0.90 – Factor
tp = 20 mm – Thickness
fu = 430.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
γM 2 = 1.25 – Safety factor
αb = 1.00 – Factor
fu = 430.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
d = 24 mm – Nominal diameter of the fastener
t = 20 mm – Thickness
γM 2 = 1.25 – Safety factor
where:
γM C = 1.50 – Safety factor
0
VRk,c = 1045.0 kN – Initial value of the characteristic resistance of an anchor
Utilization in tension
Ft,Ed
Utt = min(Ft,Rd ;Bp,Rd ,NRd,c ) = 23.0 %
Utilization in shear
VEd
Uts = min(Fv,Rd ;Fb,Rd ;VRd,s ;VRd,cp ;VRd,c ) = 7.2 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
tp = 20 mm – Thickness
fu = 430.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
γM 2 = 1.25 – Safety factor
where:
γM C = 1.50 – Safety factor
0
VRk,c = 1045.0 kN – Initial value of the characteristic resistance of an anchor
Utilization in tension
Ft,Ed
Utt = min(Ft,Rd ;Bp,Rd ,NRd,c ) = 58.0 %
Utilization in shear
VEd
Uts = min(Fv,Rd ;Fb,Rd ;VRd,s ;VRd,cp ;VRd,c ) = 7.8 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
k2 = 0.90 – Factor
fub = 800.0 MPa – Ultimate tensile strength of the bolt
As = 353 mm2 – Tensile stress area of the bolt
tp = 20 mm – Thickness
fu = 430.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
γM 2 = 1.25 – Safety factor
where:
γM C = 1.50 – Safety factor
0
VRk,c = 1045.0 kN – Initial value of the characteristic resistance of an anchor
Utilization in tension
Ft,Ed
Utt = min(Ft,Rd ;Bp,Rd ,NRd,c ) = 22.4 %
Utilization in shear
VEd
Uts = min(Fv,Rd ;Fb,Rd ;VRd,s ;VRd,cp ;VRd,c ) = 7.1 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
MRk,s = 0.8 kNm – Characteristic bending resistance lowered by normal force - ETAG 001 - Annex C 5.2.3.2
l = 56 mm – Lever arm
where:
γM C = 1.50 – Safety factor
0
VRk,c = 1045.0 kN – Initial value of the characteristic resistance of an anchor
ψα,V = 1.00 – Factor of the angle between the load direction and concrete edge
ψec,V = 1.00 – Factor of group effect
ψre,V = 1.00 – Factor of the type of reinforcement
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Utilization in tension
Ft,Ed
Utt = min(Ft,Rd ;Bp,Rd ,NRd,c ) = 11.8 %
Utilization in shear
VEd
Uts = min(Fv,Rd ;Fb,Rd ;VRd,s ;VRd,cp ;VRd,c ) = 7.9 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
k2 = 0.90 – Factor
tp = 20 mm – Thickness
A0c,N = 0 mm2 – Area of concrete of an individual anchor with large spacing
0
NRk,c = 1390.1 kN – Characteristic resistance of an anchor
ψs,N = 1.00 – Factor of distribution of stresses in the concrete
MRk,s = 0.9 kNm – Characteristic bending resistance lowered by normal force - ETAG 001 - Annex C 5.2.3.2
l = 56 mm – Lever arm
where:
γM C = 1.50 – Safety factor
0
VRk,c = 1045.0 kN – Initial value of the characteristic resistance of an anchor
ψα,V = 1.00 – Factor of the angle between the load direction and concrete edge
ψec,V = 1.00 – Factor of group effect
Utilization in tension
Ft,Ed
Utt = min(Ft,Rd ;Bp,Rd ,NRd,c ) = 0.0 %
Utilization in shear
VEd
Uts = min(Fv,Rd ;Fb,Rd ;VRd,s ;VRd,cp ;VRd,c ) = 5.2 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
k2 = 0.90 – Factor
tp = 20 mm – Thickness
A0c,N = 0 mm2 – Area of concrete of an individual anchor with large spacing
0
NRk,c = 1390.1 kN – Characteristic resistance of an anchor
ψs,N = 1.00 – Factor of distribution of stresses in the concrete
MRk,s = 0.9 kNm – Characteristic bending resistance lowered by normal force - ETAG 001 - Annex C 5.2.3.2
l = 56 mm – Lever arm
where:
γM C = 1.50 – Safety factor
0
VRk,c = 1045.0 kN – Initial value of the characteristic resistance of an anchor
ψα,V = 1.00 – Factor of the angle between the load direction and concrete edge
ψec,V = 1.00 – Factor of group effect
Utilization in tension
Ft,Ed
Utt = min(Ft,Rd ;Bp,Rd ,NRd,c ) = 0.0 %
Utilization in shear
VEd
Uts = min(Fv,Rd ;Fb,Rd ;VRd,s ;VRd,cp ;VRd,c ) = 2.9 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
k2 = 0.90 – Factor
tp = 20 mm – Thickness
fu = 430.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
γM 2 = 1.25 – Safety factor
A0c,N = 0 mm2 – Area of concrete of an individual anchor with large spacing
0
NRk,c = 1390.1 kN – Characteristic resistance of an anchor
ψs,N = 1.00 – Factor of distribution of stresses in the concrete
MRk,s = 0.9 kNm – Characteristic bending resistance lowered by normal force - ETAG 001 - Annex C 5.2.3.2
l = 56 mm – Lever arm
t = 20 mm – Thickness
where:
γM C = 1.50 – Safety factor
0
VRk,c = 1045.0 kN – Initial value of the characteristic resistance of an anchor
ψα,V = 1.00 – Factor of the angle between the load direction and concrete edge
ψec,V = 1.00 – Factor of group effect
Utilization in tension
Ft,Ed
Utt = min(Ft,Rd ;Bp,Rd ,NRd,c ) = 0.0 %
Utilization in shear
VEd
Uts = min(Fv,Rd ;Fb,Rd ;VRd,s ;VRd,cp ;VRd,c ) = 4.9 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
k2 = 0.90 – Factor
fub = 800.0 MPa – Ultimate tensile strength of the bolt
As = 353 mm2 – Tensile stress area of the bolt
tp = 20 mm – Thickness
fu = 430.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
γM 2 = 1.25 – Safety factor
αb = 1.00 – Factor
t = 20 mm – Thickness
where:
γM C = 1.50 – Safety factor
0
VRk,c = 1045.0 kN – Initial value of the characteristic resistance of an anchor
Utilization in tension
Ft,Ed
Utt = min(Ft,Rd ;Bp,Rd ,NRd,c ) = 12.8 %
Utilization in shear
VEd
Uts = min(Fv,Rd ;Fb,Rd ;VRd,s ;VRd,cp ;VRd,c ) = 8.1 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Design data
βw σw,Rd 0.9 σ
[-] [MPa] [MPa]
S 275 0.85 404.7 309.6
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 10.5 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 17.5 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 28.4 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 31.9 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 21.9 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 22.5 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 51.9 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 52.4 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 14.8 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 21.5 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 52.9 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 50.5 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 15.0 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 7.7 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 28.5 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 24.3 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 8.8 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 11.5 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 21.6 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 22.8 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 14.0 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 17.0 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 62.1 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 61.8 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 15.8 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 14.6 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 60.6 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 60.3 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 10.4 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 7.3 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 17.2 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 15.7 %
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
; σ⊥,Rd ) = 42.4 %
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Concrete block
c Aeff σ kj Fjd Ut
Item Loads 2
Status
[mm] [mm ] [MPa] [-] [MPa] [%]
Aef f = 66362 mm2 – Effective area, on which the column force N is distributed
αcc = 1.00 – Long-term effects on Fcd
βj = 0.67 – Joint coefficient βj
Stress utilization
σ
Ut = Fjd = 10.4 %
Buckling
Buckling analysis was not calculated.
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Symbol explanation
Symbol Symbol explanation
εPl Strain
σEd Eq. stress
fy Yield strength
εlim Limit of plastic strain
Ft,Rd Bolt tension resistance EN 1993-1-8 tab. 3.4
Bp,Rd Punching shear resistance
Ft,Ed Tension force
V Resultant of shear forces Vy, Vz in bolt
Fv,Rd Bolt shear resistance EN_1993-1-8 table 3.4
Vrds Characteristic anchor resistance ETAG 001 Annex C (5.2.3.2)
Fb,Rd Plate bearing resistance EN 1993-1-8 tab. 3.4
Utt Utilization in tension
Uts Utilization in shear
Vrd,cp Concrete pry-out failure ETAG 001 Annex C (5.2.3.3)
Vrd,c Concrete edge failure ETAG 001 Annex C (5.2.3.4)
σw,Ed Equivalent stress
σw,Rd Equivalent stress resistance
σ⏊ Perpendicular stress
τ|| Shear stress parallel to weld axis
τ⏊ Shear stress perpendicular to weld axis
0.9 σw,Rd Perpendicular stress resistance - 0.9*fu/γM2
βw Corelation factor EN 1993-1-8 tab. 4.1
Ut Utilization
Utc Weld capacity utilization
c Bearing width
Aeff Effective area
σ Average stress in concrete
kj Concentration factor
Code settings
Item Value Unit Reference
γM0 1.00 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM1 1.00 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM2 1.25 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM3 1.25 - EN 1993-1-8: 2.2
γC 1.50 - EN 1992-1-1: 2.4.2.4
γInst 1.20 - ETAG 001-C: 3.2.1
Joint coefficient βj 0.67 - EN 1993-1-8: 6.2.5
Effective area - influence of mesh size 0.10 -
Friction coefficient - concrete 0.25 - EN 1993-1-8
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Theoretical Background
CBFEM versus Component method
The weak point of standard Component method is in analyzing of internal forces and stress in a joint. CBFEM replaces specific analysis of
internal forces in joint with general FEA.
Check methods of specific components like bolts or welds are done according to standard Component method (Eurocode).
For the fasteners – bolts and welds – special FEM components had to be developed to model the welds and bolts behaviour in joint. All
parts of 1D members and all additional plates are modelled as plate/walls. These elements are made of steel (metal in general) and the
behaviour of this material is significantly nonlinear.
The real stress-strain diagram of steel is replaced by the ideal plastic material for design purposes in building practice. The advantage of
ideal plastic material is, that only yield strength and modulus of elasticity must be known to describe the material curve. The granted
ductility of construction steel is 15 %. The real usable value of limit plastic strain is 5% for ordinary design (1993-1-5 appendix C paragraph
C.8 note 1).
The stress in steel cannot exceed the yield strength when using the ideal elastic-plastic stress-strain diagram.
CBFEM method aims to model the real state precisely. Meshes of plates / walls are not merged, no intersections are generated between
them, unlike it is used to when modelling structures and buildings. Mesh of finite elements is generated on each individual plate
independently on mesh of other plates.
Between the meshes, special massless force interpolation constraints are added. They ensure the connection between the edge of one
plate and the surface or edge of the other plate.
This unique calculation model provides very good results – both for the point of view of precision and of the analysis speed. The method is
protected by patent.
The steel base plate is placed loosely on the concrete foundation. It is a contact element in the analysis model – the connection resists
compression fully, but does not resist tension.
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Stress-strain diagram of contact between the concrete block and the base plate
Welds are modelled using a special elastoplastic element, which is added to the interpolation links between the plates. The element
respects the weld throat thickness, position and orientation. The plasticity state is controlled by stresses in the weld throat section. The
plastic redistribution of stress in welds allows for stress peaks to be redistributed along the longer part of the weld.
Bolted connection consists of two or more clasped plates and one or more bolts. Plates are placed loosely on each other.
A contact element is inserted between plates in the analysis model, which acts only in compression. No forces are carried in tension.
Shear force is taken by bearing. Special model for its transferring in the force direction only is implemented. IDEA StatiCa Connection can
check bolts for interaction of shear and tension. The bolt behavior is implemented according to the following picture.
Bolt – tension
Symbols explanation:
The concrete block in CBFEM is modelled using Winkler-Pasternak subsoil model. The stiffness of subsoil is determined using modulus of
elasticity of concrete and effective height of subsoil. The concrete block is not designed by CBFEM method.
Loads
End forces of member of the frame analysis model are transferred to the ends of member segments. Eccentricities of members caused by
the joint design are respected during load transfer.
The analysis model created by CBFEM method corresponds to the real joint very precisely, whereas the analysis of internal forces is
performed on very idealised 3D FEM 1D model, where individual beams are modelled using centrelines and the joints are modelled using
immaterial nodes.
Internal forces are analysed using 1D members in 3D model. There is an example of courses of internal forces in the following picture.
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Internal forces in horizontal beam. M and V are the end forces at joint.
The effects caused by member on the joint are important to design the joint (connection). The effects are illustrated in the following picture.
Effects of the member on the joint. CBFEM model is drawn in dark blue color.
Moment M and shear force V act in a theoretical joint. The point of theoretical joint does not exist in CBFEM model, thus the load cannot be
applied here. The model must be loaded by actions M and V, which have to be transferred to the end of segment in the distance r.
Mc = M − V · r
Vc = V
In CBFEM model, the end section of segment is loaded by moment Mc and force Vc.
Welds
Design resistance
The stress in the throat section of fillet weld is determined according to EN 1993-1-8 – Cl. 4.5.3:
σw,Ed = [σ⊥2 + 3 (τ⊥2 + τ||2)] 0.5
σw,Rd = fu / (βw γM2)
0.9·σw,Rd = fu / γM2
Weld utilisation
Ut = min (σw,Ed/σw,Rd; σ⊥/0.9·σw,Rd)
βw – correlation factor – Tab. 4.1
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Bolts
Design tension resistance of bolt: Ft,Rd = 0.9 fub As/ γM2.
Design shear resistance at punching of bolt head or nut EN 1993-1-8: Bp,Rd = 0.6 π dm tp fu / γM2.
Design shear resistance per one shear plane: Fv,Rd = αv fub A / γM2.
Design bearing resistance of plate EN 1993-1-8: Fb,Rd = k1 ab fu d t / γM2.
Utilisation in tension [%]: Utt = Ft,Ed / min (Ft,Rd, Bp,Rd).
Utilisation in shear [%]: Uts = V / min (Fv,Rd, Fb,Rd).
Interaction of shear and tension [%]: Utts = (V / Fv,Rd ) + (Ft,Ed / 1.4 Ft,Rd).
where
A – gross cross-section of the bolt or tensile stress area of the bolt if threads are intercepted by shear area,
As – tensile stress area of the bolt,
fub – ultimate tensile strength,
dm – bolt head diameter,
d – bolt diameter,
tp – plate thickness under the bolt head/nut,
fu – ultimate steel strength,
αv = 0.6 for classes (4.6, 5.6, 8.8)
αv = 0.5 for classes (4.8, 5.8, 6.8, 10.9),
k1 ≤ 2.5 – factor from Table 3.4,
ab ≤ 1.0 – factor from Table 3.4,
Ft,Ed – design tensile force in bolt,
V – resultant of shear forces in bolt.
Preloaded bolts
The design slip resistance of a preloaded class 8.8 or 10.9 bolt is subjected to an applied tensile force, Ft,Ed.
Preloading force to be used EN 1993-1-8 – 3.9 (3.7)
Fp,C = 0.7 fub As
Design slip resistance per bolt EN 1993-1-8 3.9 – (3.8)
Fs,Rd = ks n μ (Fp,C − 0.8 Ft,Ed) / γ M3
Utilisation in shear [%]:
Uts = V / Fs,Rd where
Anchors
Concrete cone failure resistance of anchor or group of anchors ETAG-001 Annex C – 5.2.2.4:
NRkc = N0Rkc AcN/ A0cN ΨsN ΨreN.
Initial value of characteristic resistance:
N0Rkc = 7.2 fck0.5 hef1.5,
where
A0cN – area of concrete cone of an individual anchor; circle of diameter 1.5 * hef,
hef – length of anchor in concrete,
fck – characteristic concrete compressive strength,
AcN – actual area of concrete cone of the anchorage at the concrete surface respecting influence of edges and adjoining anchors,
ΨsN = 1,
ΨreN = 1.
Anchors shear resistance in case of transfer of shear forces. Friction is not taken into account. Valid in case, that the anchor failure
precedes the concrete failure ETAG-001 5.2.3.2:
VRks = 0.5 fy As.
V – shear force,
k = 1 for hef < 60
k = 2 for hef ≥ 60.
lf = hef,
c1 – edge distance,
d – anchor diameter,
ΨsV = 1,
ΨreV = 1,
A0cV – area of concrete cone of an individual anchor at the lateral concrete surface not affected by edges (4.5 c12),
AcV – actual area of concrete cone of anchorage at the lateral concrete surface.
Concrete block
Concrete resistance at concentrated compression:
Fjd = βj kj fck / γC.
Average stress under the base plate:
σ = N / Aeff.