GREEN GAS

Facilitating a future green gas grid

through the production of renewable gas

IEA Bioenergy Task 37

IEA Bioenergy: Task 37: 2018 : 2
Green gas Title page

Green Gas
Facilitating a future green gas grid through the production of renewable gas

David M. Wall, (MaREI centre, University College Cork, Ireland)

Mathieu Dumont (Netherlands Enterprise Agency, Utrecht, The Netherlands)
Jerry D. Murphy (Director MaREI centre, ERI, University College Cork, Ireland)

EDITED BY
Jerry D. Murphy

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
We acknowledge the following for their country specific input: James Browne (Gas Networks Ireland),
Morten Gyllenborg (Nature Energy, Denmark), Stefano Bozzetto (Biogas Refinery Development SRL, Italy)

Copyright © 2018 IEA Bioenergy. All rights Reserved

ISBN: 978-1-910154-37-3 (printed paper edition)
ISBN: 978-1-910154-38-0 (eBook electronic edition)

Cover photo: Lars Huigen, Wjister Green Gas Hub http://www.attero.nl/klanten-leveranciers/locaties/wijster

Published by IEA Bioenergy

IEA Bioenergy, also known as the Technology Collaboration Programme (TCP) for a Programme of Research, Development and Demonstration on
Bioenergy, functions within a Framework created by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Views, findings and publications of IEA Bioenergy do
not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or of its individual Member countries
 Table of contents Green gas

Table of contents
1. Executive summary 4
2. Introduction 5
2.1 What is green gas? 5
2.2 Coupling biomass availability with technology application 5
2.3 Benefits of a biomethane economy 6
2.4 Biogas and biomethane deployment 7
2.5 Advanced technologies for biomethane production 9
3. Algal biofuels 9
3.1 The role of seaweed in future biomethane production 9
3.2 Micro-algae and the circular economy 10
4. Gasification to expand the biomass and biomethane resource 11
5. Advanced smart grid technologies 12
5.1 Facilitating intermittent renewable electricity 12
5.2 Demand driven biogas systems 13
5.3 Power to Gas 13
6. Country case studies: future strategies for biomethane 15
6.1 Ireland 15
6.2 The Netherlands 18
6.3 The United Kingdom (UK) 20
6.4 Italy 21
6.5 Denmark 22
7. Integration of renewable green gas systems 24
8. Grid injection: challenges and solutions 25
8.1 Biomethane injection to the natural gas grid 25
8.2 Approaches to balancing the gas grid in biomethane injection 25
9. Conclusion and Outlook 27
4

Green gas Executive summary

1. Executive summary
To mitigate climate change, it is essential to develop natural gas demand in these countries respectively and thus
integrated and sustainable decarbonised renewable energy indicates a significant source of clean renewable energy and
systems. Heat and transport together, account for about the role that gas energy and infrastructure can play in the
80% of final energy consumption. Significant progress has future. It is suggested that in 2050 the same gas demand will
been made in renewable electricity but decarbonisation of be needed in Europe as today, however potentially 76% of
transport fuel is problematic. Gaseous renewable energy the gas could be green (EURATIV, 2017).
carriers, such as renewable ‘green gas’ can have a considera-
ble impact in future energy systems and play a key role in Cascading bioenergy
decarbonising heat and transport. Green gas at present is Cascading renewable gas systems will become a very
dominated by biomethane, which can be generated from the important tool in maximising the quantities of green gas
anaerobic digestion of organic biomass and residues pro- production and ensuring sufficient sustainability. An exam-
duced in agriculture, food production and waste processing. ple of cascading bioenergy could include integration of
green gas technologies, to maximise sustainable renewable
Biomethane present and future gaseous fuel production whilst minimising greenhouse gas
In 2015, there were 459 biogas-upgrading plants in emissions. The technologies investigated in this report
operation producing 1,230 M Nm3 of biomethane (Euro- (anaerobic digestion, gasification-methanation, power to
pean Biogas Association, 2016). The market for biomethane gas, micro-algae biogas upgrading) and feedstocks (energy
is still growing. Sweden, the UK, Switzerland, France and crops, agricultural residues and wastes, food waste, micro-
the Netherlands have all increased their biomethane pro- algae, seaweed, woody crops) when integrated can optimise
duction significantly in the last five years. In the short term, a system producing decarbonised indigenous renewable
the development of green gas projects, including the injec- energy. By-products of the different technologies maybe
tion of biomethane to gas networks will be the primary further amalgamated to ensure the use of the full supply
focus of this developing industry. Future renewable gas chain and circular economy concepts. Examples of this
technologies such as gasification-methanation and power include CO2 from biogas used in a power to gas system to
to gas systems have been identified as methods that could produce more green gas; solid digestate from a biogas plant
contribute substantially to greening natural gas grids of the used as a feedstock for gasification; oxygen produced from
future. Recent EU policy measures facilitate the develop- electrolysis used for the gasification process; and micro-
ment of such pathways with progressively increasing obli- algae biogas upgrading as a method of offsetting the costs
gations on decarbonisation. The share in renewable and of traditional upgrading methods.
low-carbon transport fuels (excluding first generation bio-
fuels and including for electrification) is required to The biomethane economy
increase from 1.5% in 2021 to 6.8% in 2030, with advanced As indicated in this report, an indigenous biomethane
biofuels to make up at least 3.6% by that time (EC, 2016). resource can potentially replace significant amounts of
natural gas. Particularly in countries with well-established
Country roadmaps and technology deployment and closely linked gas grids, there are good opportunities
Many countries are currently dependent on fossil fuels for cross-border trade and to create a market for biometh-
(including natural gas) to meet their national energy ane, thus lowering dependency on fossil fuels. Biomethane
demand. The concept of renewable electricity is well under- is very flexible in its application. Its may be injected direct-
stood. However a number of countries are now in the pro- ly into the existing natural gas grid allowing for energy-
cess of generating roadmaps for the deployment of renew- efficient and cost-effective transportation. Gas grid opera-
able green gas; these roadmaps highlight the potential tors can switch to a renewable gas source in a straightfor-
availability of biomass and technological innovation. This ward manner and provide energy for an array of applica-
report outlines the various substrates and technologies for tions including electricity generation, heat and transport.
green gas production and examines how much natural gas The production of biomethane from regional resources
can be replaced by green gas in specific countries. The logis- creates jobs, especially in agriculture, supply logistics, engi-
tics of injecting green gas in to existing gas grid infrastruc- neering, plant construction and maintenance. Farmers can
ture are also examined. The roadmaps developed for accel- profit in “non-food” related sectors with an alternative
erating the use of green gas thus far in specific countries are source of revenue through biomethane.
analysed. Utilising all of the available deployment pathways,
future production of green gas may account for 41PJ in This report was produced by IEA Bioenergy Task 37,
Ireland, 77PJ in the Netherlands, 280PJ in the UK, 1260PJ which addresses the challenges related to the economic and
in Italy and over 100PJ in Denmark. This represents environmental sustainability of green gas production and
approximately 26%, 24%, 8%, 44% and 75% of current utilisation.
 5

Introduction Green gas

2. Introduction
2.1 What is green gas? generated can be used directly in CHP units to produce
Green gas refers to renewable gas, which can be gen- electricity and heat or upgraded to biomethane and used
erated from the anaerobic digestion of organic biomass in the same manner as natural gas. The supply of biogas
and residues produced in agriculture, food production or biomethane can be maintained year-round by ensur-
and waste processing. The digestion process involves a ing a constant supply of feedstock. Slurries, manures
series of biological processes in which microorganisms (Figure 2.1a) and organic wastes from food processing
break down the biodegradable material in the absence of can be accumulated and stored. Similarly, harvested crop-
oxygen. Typically the biogas produced is approximately biomass can be preserved in silos and designed with suf-
60% methane (CH4) and 40% carbon dioxide (CO2). The ficient scale to supply the required quantity of feedstock
biogas can be combusted directly in a combined heat and annually. Thus, the production of biogas and biomethane
power (CHP) plant or upgraded to biomethane through can be considered a stable and reliable energy source.
the removal of CO2 to leave a product similar to natural The biological process for producing biogas reflects
gas (with greater than 95% CH4 content). a natural process present in ruminant animals (Figure
Renewable gas can also be produced from high-tem- 2.1b). Naturally occurring bacteria breakdown the bio-
perature gasification of woody crops with methanation of mass in the digester (similar to the way crops are digested
the syngas. Renewable gas may also be produced through in the stomach of a cow) producing biogas consisting
power to gas technologies using electricity; preferably of CH4 and CO2. Minimal amounts of other trace gases
(but not always) this electricity would be both renewable such as ammonia and hydrogen sulphide (H2S) can also
to ensure sustainability and surplus electricity which may be produced in digestion.
otherwise be curtailed or constrained to ensure financial Of late, there has been an academic focus on algal bio-
sustainability. Algae are also a proposed source of biom- fuels. Algae are an additional biomass source with signifi-
ethane; this includes for both seaweed and micro-algae. cant growth rates, which may be cultivated in the form of
Gas of biomethane standard is considered a very flex- seaweed (macro-algae) in a marine environment or as a
ible energy vector as it can be injected directly in to exist- means of capture of CO2 through cultivation of micro-
ing gas grid infrastructure. It is an important fuel in terms algae typically in raceway type ponds situated on mar-
of contributing to future renewable energy strategies in ginal land. The production of biomethane is suggested as
electricity, transport and heat whilst abating greenhouse a beneficial route to sustainable energy for algae and is
gas (GHG) emissions in these sectors. described in detail in the IEA Bioenergy report entitled “A
This report outlines the potential for biomethane perspective on algal biogas” (Murphy et al., 2015).
(and renewable gas) as a multifaceted solution in “green- An additional technology pathway for renewable gas
ing” future gas grids. production is gasification-methanation. Gasification is
a low-carbon pathway to produce energy, fuels, chemi-
2.2 Coupling biomass availability with technology cals, and fertilisers. A large variety of biomass, typically
application with higher dry solids content greater than 40%, such as
Biomass is a finite but wide ranging resource. It can come agri-forestry residues, black bin waste, indigenous energy
in the form of specifically grown crops, or by-products crops grown on marginal land, and sewage sludge can
generated in agriculture (slurries/manures) or from in- be used in this process. Gasification involves the partial
dustrial applications such as paper, wood, and furniture combustion of carbonaceous feeds to produce a synthetic
manufacturing. Biomass will play an important role in gas (known as syngas). For biomethane, a methanation
the future realisation of a sustainable energy system and step is used to create synthetic natural gas (bio-SNG)
considering its finite nature, it is important to maximise with a CH4 content greater than 95%.
the available resource. One of the most auspicious appli- Furthermore, power to gas is a technology that con-
cations of available biomass is the generation of biogas verts electricity to hydrogen gas (through electrolysis of
or biomethane. Wet biomass (with dry solids content in water), which can be subsequently converted to CH4 in a
the range of 5-30%) can be used as input feed to produce methanation step. The theoretical advantage in this tech-
biogas in an anaerobic digester. As indicated, the biogas nology is the use of surplus electricity associated with
6

Green gas Introduction

Figure 2.1 (a) Slurries and manures generated in agriculture can be used as feedstocks for anaerobic digestion; (b) Ruminants stomach digests
crops similar to biological digestion process
(From DEN EELDER FARM: Small farm scale mono-digestion of dairy slurry, March 2017 available in http://task37.ieabioenergy.com/case-stud-
ies.html)

intermittent renewable electricity sources such as from biomass derived energy. The utilisation of agricultural
wind turbines and solar energy devices. Electricity, which wastes for biomethane production can make a further
would otherwise be curtailed and/or constrained, may contribution to climate protection and contributes to
be available at a cheaper rate. This advantage of cheap the overall ideology of greening agriculture and diver-
excess electricity may also be associated with transmis- sifying the rural economy. For instance, the digestion of
sion grid constraints. In practice the power to gas sys- freshly collected manure can potentially reduce methane
tem would be oversized or under capacity in terms of emissions from manure storage on farms. The European
equipment if the only source of electricity were surplus Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) methodology
electricity. It is expected that such systems will be sized assumes a 17% methane emissions savings through re-
for long term operation and as such will bid for electric- placing open slurry storage with digestion as described
ity alongside other users (Ahern et al., 2015). However in the 2017 IEA Bioenergy report on methane emissions
power to gas offers a storage solution for electricity in the from biogas plants (Liebetrau et al., 2017). In essence
form of renewable gas whilst changing the energy vector slurry biomethane systems (or indeed other combined
to one available to transport fuel. This fuel is termed gas- waste management biogas systems) can be carbon nega-
eous fuel from non-biological origin in the EU Renew- tive. It is recommended by the authors that crop diges-
able Energy Directive (RED) and is seen as an advanced tion systems include for co-digestion with slurries to
biofuel (EC, 2017). ensure the maximum possible decarbonisation. This
positive attribute is unique to biomethane production
2.3 Benefits of a biomethane economy technologies. As such biomethane systems are an effec-
Biomethane generated from biological processes sub- tive measure in contributing to key European renewable
stitute fossil-natural gas as a source of electricity, heat or energy supply (RES) targets and also alleviating GHG
transport fuel. It can abate GHG emissions through for emissions in problematic sectors such as transport and
example reduction of fugitive methane emissions from agriculture.
open slurry holding tanks and from displacement of fos- Many countries are dependent on the importation
sil fuels. Biomethane can promote a sustainable, circular of fossil fuels to meet their national energy demand. Bi-
economy. CO2 emissions resulting from the burning of omethane can be an indigenous resource, derived from
fossil-fuels and CH4 from slurry management and waste localised organic wastes and residues. Previous literature
facilities are primary causes of global warming. Biom- studies and developed roadmaps in member countries
ethane produced from crops release CO2, which was ab- have shown that biomethane can replace significant
sorbed from the atmosphere by the crops as they mature; amounts of natural gas. For example, utility compa-
this is known as short term carbon. Therefore, the provi- ny Engie estimates that biogas from agricultural and
sion of low carbon energy is conceivable through crop other waste (excluding crops) can provide for 100% of
 7

Introduction Green gas

gas consumption in France by 2050 (Reuters, 2017). In plants. It can be used by heating systems with highly ef-
countries with a well-established and closely linked gas ficient conversion efficiencies, and employed as a regen-
grid, there are good opportunities for cross-border trade erative power source in gas-powered vehicles. The utilisa-
and to create a market for biomethane, thus lowering the tion of biomethane as a source of energy is a crucial step
import dependency of fossil fuels. The production of bi- towards a sustainable energy economy. A further pathway
omethane from regional resources creates jobs, especially for biomethane can be found in large industry energy
in agriculture, supply logistics, engineering, plant con- users. A growing demand for green gas has been evident
struction and maintenance. Farmers can profit in “non- from multinational companies who want to fulfil their
food” related sectors with an alternative source of revenue corporate social responsibilities. These industries would
through biomethane. typically include breweries, distilleries, milk processing
Anaerobic digestion plants are typically located in facilities and data centres. The substitution of natural gas
close proximity to areas where biomass is cultivated or with biomethane can lower the use of fossil materials and
sourced. This circumvents the need for energy-inten- support the intended change from a fossil to a bio-based
sive transportation of biomass to the plant location. It society without the need for expensive new infrastructure.
also minimises the cost of redistributing the digestate,
a commercial biofertiliser by-product, to the surround- 2.4 Biogas and biomethane deployment
ing cropland. The digestate can reduce the farmers’ costs Anaerobic digestion can now be considered a mature
associated with the purchase of manufactured chemical technology that is widespread particularly throughout
fertilisers. The use of all by-products generated in biom- Europe. If biomethane is produced, the preferred end-
ethane production systems can ensure the optimisation use typically varies by country and the extent of their gas
of the full value-added chain. grid infrastructure. For instance, Sweden has a gas grid
Biomethane is very flexible in its application, more restricted to one region in the country and so biometh-
so than other renewable sources of energy. Its ability to ane is used primarily as a vehicle fuel with set financial
be injected directly into the existing natural gas grid al- incentives (IEA Bioenergy Task 40 and Task 37, 2014). At
lows for energy-efficient and cost-effective transporta- the end of 2015 there was a total of 17,376 biogas plants
tion. This allows gas grid operators to enable consumers and 459 biomethane plants in operation in Europe (Eu-
to make an easy transition to a renewable source of gas. ropean Biogas Association, 2016). Figure 2.2 gives an
The diverse, flexible spectrum of applications in the ar- insight into the quantity of biogas plants in a number
eas of electricity generation, heat provision, and mobility of countries and the different types of facility (WWTP,
creates a broad base of potential customers. Biomethane agricultural/industrial or landfill). The estimated energy
can be used to generate electricity and heating from with- output (TWh) from the facilities in the same countries is
in smaller decentralised or large centrally-located CHP indicated in Figure 2.3.

Figure 2.2 Number and

type of biogas plants in
selected countries
(Source: IEA Bioenergy
Task 37 Country Report
summaries 2016,
http://task37.ieabioen-
ergy.com/country-
reports.html)
8

Green gas Introduction

Figure 2.3 Current energy output (TWh) from anaerobic digestion in selected countries
(Source: IEA Bioenergy Task 37 Country Report summaries 2016, http://task37.ieabioenergy.com/country-reports.html)

If biomethane, due to its flexibility as an energy carri- for biogas upgrading varies, however four main methods
er, is considered the future of renewable gas, the technol- are currently most practiced: water scrubbing; chemical
ogy for upgrading biogas becomes a key consideration. scrubbing; membrane separation; and pressure swing
Figure 2.4 gives the current breakdown of the number absorption (PSA). Figure 2.4 also illustrates the break-
of upgrading plants in specific countries with Germany down of CO2 removal technologies used for the coun-
and the UK leading the way in Europe, and South Korea tries listed and highlights the growth of upgrading tech-
also demonstrating high uptake. The technology used nologies since the turn of the century.

Water Scrubber Chemical Scrubber Membrane

PSA Organic physical scrubber Other + unknown
Cryogenic upgrading

Figure 2.4 A: Number of biogas upgrading plants per country; B: Breakdown of biogas upgrading technologies used at biomethane plants;
C: Biogas upgrading technologies uptake over time (IEA Task 37 Energy from Biogas, 2016)
 9

Algal biofuels Green gas

3. Algal biofuels
2.5 Advanced technologies for biomethane production 3.1 The role of seaweed in future biomethane production
First generation biofuels, such as rapeseed biodiesel Third generation, advanced biofuel sources such as
and wheat ethanol, are now capped under the EU Re- macro-algae (seaweeds), do not require arable or agri-
newable Energy Directive (RED) at 7% in terms of con- cultural land for production. Moreover, seaweeds that are
tributing to renewable energy supply targets for trans- farm cultivated at sea may offer a sustainable alternative
port. This is to avoid a potential “food versus fuel” debate to more traditional crops with higher growth rates. Rich
and alleviate concerns over the sustainability of first gen- in carbohydrates and with low lignin content, seaweeds
eration biofuels in achieving sufficient GHG emissions represent an attractive feedstock for biomethane pro-
savings. It is proposed that the cap on first generation duction with a variety of seaweeds such as S. latissima,
biofuels may be even further reduced to 3.8% by 2030 L. digitata, S. polyschides and A. nodosum, investigated
under the most recent EU legislation proposals in the in literature (Tabassum et al., 2017). Table 3.1 presents
Recast RED (EC, 2016). Consequently, second genera- energy yields from a number of different seaweeds. How-
tion biofuel substrates, such as lignocellulosic crops (in- ever, different seaweed species vary in composition, with
cluding perennial ryegrass), organic municipal wastes respect to carbohydrate and protein content; this vari-
and agriculture residues, have become the main focus of ance is also influenced the time of year at which they are
renewable energy generation through anaerobic diges- harvested. Specific growth conditions such as tempera-
tion. The digestion of second generation feedstocks is ture, nutrient availability and sunlight alter this compo-
generally well understood. Typically, a form of pre-treat- sition. Thus, the time of harvest is critical in maximising
ment is required for lignocellulosic materials to enhance the total biomethane production from seaweed. Seasonal
their digestibility and improve biogas yields. However, variation of seaweeds is also an important characteristic
providing a renewable and decarbonised energy sys- in terms of the concentrations of polyphenols and ash,
tem (for electricity, heat and transport) through second both of which, in high concentrations, may inhibit the
generation (land based) biofuels may put a significant anaerobic digestion process and lower the attainable bi-
constraint on both arable and agricultural land. As the omethane yields. The ash in seaweeds is predominantly
world’s population increases, the total energy consump- salt (chloride) and is evident in much higher levels than
tion and demand for food will increase. Use of large more traditional crop feedstocks.
swathes of land for bioenergy may become questionable Procuring a secure source of feedstock is vital to the
with potential rises in food production prices. Since the development of a seaweed biomethane industry. In the
proportion of land that can be devoted to bioenergy is fi- short term, seaweeds from natural stocks may be di-
nite, future energy systems may need to shift to the sea to gested for their energy content and may even provide a
provide sufficient feedstock resources to meet increasing method of waste treatment. Eutrophication is a common
energy demand. More advanced feedstocks such as mi- cause of green tides, whereby green seaweed washes up
cro and macro-algae are now receiving attention as an al- on the shorelines of bays or estuaries due to excess ni-
ternative to the more traditional land based biofuel pro- trogen run-off into water streams, as occurs in Ireland,
duction. Non-biological sources of renewable gas such Japan and France. Green seaweed can pose a health risk
as power to gas are also considered to have high potential and must be removed; for instance, Ulva Lactuca (sea let-
in expanding the overall energy resource to 2050. Recent tuce) can generate high concentrations of the toxic gas
EU policy measures have encouraged the development H2S. Co-digestion of seaweeds such as Ulva Lactuca with
of such pathways suggesting progressively increasing farm slurry for example can provide a mutual synergy
obligations. The share in renewable and low-carbon by optimising carbon to nitrogen (C:N) ratios in the di-
transport fuels (excluding first generation biofuels and gestion process and supplying essential trace elements
including for electrification) is required to increase from required by the anaerobic microbial consortium (Allen
1.5% in 2021 to 6.8% in 2030, with advanced biofuels to et al., 2013).
make up at least 3.6% by that time (EC, 2016). 
10

Green gas Algal biofuels

Table 3.1 Potential methane and energy yields from seaweed in

Ireland (Tabassum et al., 2017) increase in the digester loading rate and improvement of
biomethane yields as compared to the mono-digestion
Seaweed species L CH4 kg VS−1 GJ ha−1 yr−1 *
of micro-algae. Thermal, mechanical, chemical and bio-
S. latissima 342 52 – 384
logical pre-treatments have all been investigated to in-
S. Polyschides 263 52 – 191
crease the solubilisation of micro-algae by attacking the
A. Esculenta 226 41 – 307
cell walls and thus to increase the obtainable energy yield
L. digitata 254 38 – 96 from the feedstock.
L. hyperborean 253 38 – 96 Micro-algae are very interesting feedstock in that
*Dependent on the specific methane yield, volatile solids content and potentially they can also be used to upgrade biogas to
seaweed yield per hectare. These values account for both basic and biomethane. The CO2 in biogas (typically 40-50%) can
optimistic harvesting potentials.
be captured through micro-algae growth in a photosyn-
Cultivation of seaweeds for biomethane production may thetic process. This novel method of biogas upgrading
provide a more long-term strategy. One method of inter- may be advantageous in that it could potentially offset
est is combining seaweed cultivation with existing fish the cost of a traditional biogas upgrading system. Care
farms, known as integrated multitrophic aquaculture must be taken in situations wherby CH4 in the biogas
(IMTA). The advantage of IMTA is that a form of biore- and O2 from micro-algae respiration could exist together
mediation occurs, in that the seaweed absorbs the nutri- at explosive levels. This threat may be overcome in sys-
ent-rich waste produced from the fish in their growth. tems such as high rate algal ponds coupled with external
This can increase growth productivity of the seaweed. In absorption columns (containing alkaliphilic bacteria)
terms of seaweed preservation and storage, drying sea- or incorporating biofixation of CO2 in a bicarbonate/
weeds is energy intensive and relies on fossil fuels, which carbonate cycle. These microalgae biogas-upgrading
is unsustainable. An alternative approach involves the systems are at a low technology readiness level (TRL)
ensiling of seaweed, similar to methods in the ensiling of but can potentially provide a biomethane-standard end
crops on farms, and may even increase the available bi- product.
omethane yield from the seaweed by digesting any silage From a biorefinery perspective, micro-algae can be
effluent produced (Herrmann et al., 2015). Research in- used for biodiesel production through the transesterifica-
vestigating the seasonal variation of seaweed, combined tion of lipids with the remaining residues post extraction
with effective ensiling methods, will enable the provision utilised for biomethane production. The digestate pro-
of a year-round supply of high quality biomass. duced from the digestion process can potentially be used
as a nutrient source for the cultivation of micro-algae,
3.2 Micro-algae and the circular economy avoiding the external purchase of such nutrients. Other
Micro-algae are unicellular algal species that can be sources of CO2 generation besides biogas from anaerobic
cultivated and used for biomethane production through digestion include power plants and distilleries, which may
anaerobic digestion. As a feedstock, micro-algae of- also be taken into consideration for micro-algae growth.
fer higher growth productivity than traditional energy Micro-algae, as a third generation, advanced biofuel sub-
crops, require no land and have the potential for carbon strate, can employ circular economy concepts and pro-
savings through sequestration. The cultivation of micro- vide a cascading bioenergy system with regards to feed-
algae can be achieved in growth systems such as open stock production, gas upgrading and nutrient recycling.
raceway ponds or more expensive photobioreactors. The It must be noted that these technologies are not ma-
advantage of using micro-algae for biomethane produc- ture and algal biomethane systems may be overly ex-
tion is that no specific algae strains are required, unlike pensive. Projects such as the EU funded All-Gas project
for biodiesel production. However, micro-algae are con- (http://www.all-gas.eu/en/home), which aim to dem-
sidered a more challenging substrate for digestion due to onstrate the integration of the full production chain of
a high nitrogen content, which results in a low C:N ratio algae to biofuels (including transport fuel) should ad-
(typically less than 10). To overcome this, co-digestion of vance the TRL significantly. Full scale application will
micro-algae with carbon rich feedstocks such as barley involve certain challenges such as technology costs and
straw, beet silage or brown seaweed has been proposed geographical and seasonal constraints of micro-algae
(Herrmann et al., 2016). Such methods can allow for an growth (Zhu et al., 2016).
 11

Gasification to expand the biomass and biomethane resource Green gas

4. Gasification to expand the biomass

and biomethane resource
Woody residues, such as forest thinnings, and crops A successful application of the technology has been
such as short rotation coppice (SRC) willow are consid- demonstrated in Gothenburg GoBiGas plant (Figure 4.1).
ered second generation biofuel substrates that are also This project was developed as a proof of concept for the
suitable for biomethane production. With high dry solids gasification-methanation technology in providing a po-
content (typically greater than 40%), such feedstocks are tential avenue for expanding the growth of biomethane
more suited to gasification technologies than anaerobic to meet the increasing demand in Sweden. Plant costs are
digestion for energy conversion. Gasification is a thermo- estimated at € 150 million and the system has the poten-
chemical process (using high temperatures in excess of tial to fuel 15,000 cars (GEODE, 2016). A second phase
700°C) that converts lignocellulosic biomass to syngas, is planned in which a much larger scale plant will be de-
which can be purified and upgraded in a methanation veloped; biomethane production will increase from 160
phase to produce biomethane. The technology when in- GWh/a (0.58 PJ/a) to a capacity of 800 GWh/a (2.88 PJ/a)
cluding methanation is not as mature as anaerobic diges- (Alamia et al., 2016). Ultimately the two plants could po-
tion; it is also operated on a much larger technology scale tentially provide up to 1TWh – a resource equivalent to
and hence requires substantially more capital investment. the total biogas produced in Sweden at present, enough to
Nonetheless, in terms of the future production of green fuel 100,000 cars (GEODE, 2016).
gas, gasification-methanation can play an important role.  

Figure 4.1 The GoBiGas plant in Gothenburg is the first of its kind in the world, injecting biomethane from thermal gasifi-
cation and methanation to the natural gas grid of Gothenburg. At full production, the 20 MW methane plant will deliver
160 GWh/yr. (Photo: Used with permission of Rob Vanstone and Göteborg Energi, Sweden).
12

Green gas Advanced smart grid technologies

5. Advanced smart grid technologies

5.1 Facilitating intermittent renewable electricity is highest in the winter (Tsupari et al., 2016). The UK
In the future our energy system will undergo a transi- has forecasted onshore wind capacity to increase almost
tion towards sustainable and renewable energy sources. four-fold by 2035 to 21GW, and this could be surpassed
Renewable energy sources are different from conven- by offshore wind capacity in the same time period, esti-
tional fossil energy sources due to their low life-cycle mated at 37.5GW (Qadrdan et al., 2015). In Denmark,
carbon emissions and their intermittent nature. Sus- Spain, Portugal, Ireland and Germany, an increase in
tainable electricity production is highly dependent on installed wind capacity has also been evident, already
weather conditions. The intermittent nature of solar contributing ca. 9-34% of the electricity supply (Götz
and wind energy means that matching the supply and et al., 2016). The intermittency of electricity generated
demand of sustainably generated electricity is challeng- through wind and solar platforms is problematic as of-
ing. Consequently there will be a greater need for energy ten, supply does not match with times of high consumer
storage and flexibility of the energy infrastructure in the demand. Although the current curtailment of renewable
future. During the winter season, the demand for energy electricity is typically due to constraints on the electricity
can be many times higher than in the summer in colder transmission lines, the increased share of electricity from
climates. However during the summer in warm climates, intermittent renewable sources is likely to compound
air conditioning can lead to very high energy demand. this problem. This is exemplified by considering wind
Energy carriers need to be available and flexible to match electricity providing 40% of a country’s electricity. If the
energy demand. capacity factor of wind generation is 30% then when the
The share of renewable electricity in the EU is ex- wind is blowing it can provide 133% of the average elec-
pected to increase significantly to 2050, potentially rep- tricity demand at a given time. If this resource coincides
resenting between 64-97% of the electricity mix (Collet with low demand by night, a significant storage capacity
et al., 2016). On a global scale, the total wind installation is required or a significant electricity spillage may tran-
has increased from 17GW to 318GW since the turn of spire.
the century (Götz et al., 2016). Storage of intermittent Opportunities to use and/or store the excess produc-
renewable electricity will be required in countries where tion of sustainable electricity must be found. Existing
the installation of wind and solar devices has been signif- electricity storage methods include batteries, flywheels,
icant. For instance, Finland has significant solar irradia- compressed air energy storage (CAES) and pumped
tion on long summer days meaning electricity generation hydroelectric storage (PHS). However these particular
could potentially be high; however, energy consumption technologies may be limited as they do not store large

Figure 5.1 Electricity storage capacity and duration (source: DNV GL)
 13

Advanced smart grid technologies Green gas

quantities of energy for long periods of time (Walker et production through such operation. Furthermore when
al., 2016) and often rely on specific geographical features. the biogas plant is not supporting the electrical grid it can
Figure 5.1 illustrates the different electricity storage meth- produce biomethane (via biogas upgrading). Thus po-
ods and their respective capacity. Renewable gas systems tentially an anaerobic digestion facility can support both
can support the increasing proportion of intermittent re- the electricity grid and gas grid (Figure 5.2). Previous lit-
newable electricity through two principle methods: 1) as erature studies have modelled a continuously operating
a storage mechanism for curtailed renewable electricity, 435 kWe continuously fed digestion system, which when
with conversion of the energy vector to gas (power to gas) converted to demand driven, operated as a 2 MWe CHP
which is available for similar use as that of natural gas; unit for 60 min per day, whereby 21% of biogas was used
and 2) as a support to intermittent renewable electricity in the CHP generator and 79% was supplied to the biogas
generation through demand driven biogas systems. upgrading system (O’Shea et al., 2016c).

5.2 Demand driven biogas systems 5.3 Power to Gas

With increasing wind, wave and solar deployment, the Power to Gas (PtG) is an emerging smart grid con-
amount of variable renewable electricity on the electricity cept whereby electricity (preferably surplus renewable
grid will increase. Such renewable devices are not con- electricity) is converted to methane for storage purposes.
sidered “dispatchable” (cannot be turned on or switched When electricity storage is challenging and current infra-
off at any given time) and so electricity supply does not structure does not support long-term management of this
always match electricity demand – for example when the problem, the PtG process converts the energy vector from
wind is not blowing and the demand for electricity is high. electricity to gas, which can be injected into the gas grid.
Currently, carbon intensive fossil fuels (such as combined PtG uses electrolysis, powered by electricity, to split water
cycle gas turbines) are used to back up the electrical load (H2O) into hydrogen and oxygen. To convert the hydro-
when such intermittent devices cannot meet demand. gen from electrolysis to renewable green gas in the form
Bioenergy can be made dispatchable on demand. Bi- of methane, a source of CO2 and a methanation phase
ogas generated from anaerobic digestion can be stored are necessary. Figure 5.3 contains a flow diagram that de-
onsite and fed to a CHP unit for electricity production scribes the flows on a proportional basis. It visualises the
when required. Alternatively, to minimise the cost of bi- material flows and the mass efficiency of the process can
ogas storage onsite, the feeding regime of the digester can be estimated. The flow diagram also demonstrates that
be varied to generate biogas at a specific time to match only part of the electricity is converted to hydrogen and
high electricity demand. This is known as a demand only a proportion of the hydrogen is converted to meth-
driven biogas system and often the biogas plant opera- ane. Methane is then mixed with small quantities of other
tor may receive a premium rate (price) for the electricity gases (CO2 maybe used to reduce volumetric energy den-

Figure 5.2 Combination of (A) power to gas system with (B) demand driven biogas system (Ahern et al., 2015; Persson et al., 2014)
14

Green gas Advanced smart grid technologies

Figure 5.3 Product flows in the Power-to-Gas concept (source: DNV GL)

sity and propane to rise it) in order to comply with the and water (4H2 + CO2 -> CH4 + 2H2O). For catalytic
local gas-quality specification before it can be injected in methanation, a form of catalyst (typically nickel-based)
to the gas grid. Both electrolysis and methanation pro- is used making it less robust than biological methana-
cesses release heat. tion to contaminants in biogas. Biogas used in catalytic
Three main technologies reported for electrolysis methanation typically requires a cleaning step between
are: the alkaline electrolyser; the polymer electrolyte production and methanation. Catalytic methanation
membrane (PEM); and the solid oxide electrolysis cell operates at a high temperature range of 200-500°C with
(SOEC). Alkaline and PEM are considered low tempera- high pressures of 1-100 bar (Götz et al., 2016). Biologi-
ture technologies; SOEC is a high temperature process cal methanation uses hydrogenotrophic methanogenic
at a low TRL and is intended to improve the efficiency archaea to convert the hydrogen and CO2 to methane,
considerably (Parra & Patel, 2016). Alkaline electrolysis as opposed to catalysts. The biological method can be
is at a more mature stage of development than PEM or “in-situ” whereby hydrogen is injected directly into an
SOEC and is commercially available with modules up anaerobic digester and combines with the CO2 in biogas;
to 2.5MWe (Schiebahn et al., 2015). However, in the or “ex-situ” in which both hydrogen and CO2 are intro-
future, higher process efficiencies may be potentially vi- duced to an external methanation reactor. The source of
able in PEM and SOEC technologies. When evaluating CO2 for PtG can be provided by biogas plants, large CO2
electrolysis units, the most important features for PtG emitters in industry (such as distilleries), or wastewater
include conversion efficiency to hydrogen, cold start up treatment plants (WWTPs) where cheap, concentrated
flexibility, and operational lifetime (Götz et al., 2016). sources of CO2 can be accessed (O’Shea et al., 2017).
PtG requires a quick start up time from the perspec- PtG has been demonstrated for proof of concept in
tive that the system may be turned off and on to match laboratory studies. On a larger scale, two projects aim-
times when electricity is cheap (as would be the case if ing for commercial viability with regards to PtG with
the electricity source was curtailed electricity). PEM is biological methanation are the Electrochaea – BioCat
a faster technology than alkaline but is more expensive project (Denmark) and MicrobEnergy – BioPower2Gas
since the technology requires noble catalysts such as Pt, project (Germany); with both utilising biogas plants
Ir, Ru (Schiebahn et al., 2015). Any future enhancements for the source of CO2 (Bailera et al., 2017). The cost of
in electrolysis may depend on the high efficiency associ- electricity is deemed to be a very significant factor in the
ated with SOEC technology (greater than 90%), which is development of PtG systems. As discussed, lower elec-
currently at a low technology maturity. tricity prices could be available through curtailed renew-
The methanation step can be catalytic or biological; able electricity. A system conflict exists between: short
both methods adhere to the process of combining hy- operating times using cheap electricity and oversized
drogen and CO2 (at a ratio of 4:1) to produce methane electrolysis systems; and long operation times with more
 15

Country case studies: future strategies for biomethane Green gas

6. Country case studies: future

strategies for biomethane
expensive electricity and cheaper capital costs. Literature 6.1 Ireland
studies give examples whereby green gas can be produced To date, the Republic of Ireland (with a population
from a PtG system at €1.80/m3 when the price of electric- of ca. 4.5 million people) has made significant progress
ity is €0.05/kWeh, decreasing to €1.10/m3 when electricity in generating renewable electricity; approximately 25%
is purchased at €0.02/kWeh (Vo et al., 2017). of power generation comes from renewable sources such
PtG systems can provide a valuable control function as wind. However, Ireland has struggled to make progress
for the electrical grid in its capability to utilise curtailed in renewable heat and transport. In 2013, the total final
electricity in real time and produce green gas. The tech- energy consumption in Ireland for transport and ther-
nology costs for electrolysis and methanation must be de- mal energy was 179PJ (55 TWh) and 187PJ (52 TWh),
fined as the levels of curtailed electricity become apparent respectively. Currently there is a 6% gap to reach the 12%
in the future. Utilising the full value chain of PtG systems renewable energy supply in heat (RES-H) target for Ire-
can make such projects more financially viable (Breyer et land, which equates to about 3 TWh a-1 (10.8 PJ). Many
al., 2015). For instance, oxygen generated through elec- large energy users in the food and beverage industry are
trolysis can offer a valuable by-product with a monetary committed to procuring green energy through their en-
value. The cascading bioenergy system could use this ergy supplier. The Irish Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI)
oxygen in a gasification plant. For example a study by for biomethane injection is expected to be announced by
McDonagh et al. (2018) suggested an levelised cost of en- the government in 2018. This commodity support will
ergy (LCOE) of a catalytic PtG system of €124/MWh with potentially act as the catalyst to mobilise growth in the
costs dominated by electricity charges (56%) and CAPEX biomethane sector in the coming years. Although there
(33%). Valorisation of the produced oxygen could reduce has been a relatively small uptake so far in biogas and bi-
the LCOE to €105/MWh. An additional payment for an- omethane in Ireland, a variety of biomass resources such
cillary services to the electricity grid (€15/MWe for 8500h as grass, agricultural residues and food waste are available
p.a) would further lower the LCOE to €87/MWh. which could substantially increase renewable gas produc-
In 2012, the European Power to Gas Platform was tion. The total theoretical resource is assessed as per Fig-
founded by DNV GL. Its members are European Trans- ure 6.1.
mission and Distribution System operators, branch or- Grass is the predominant crop feedstock available in
ganisations and technology suppliers. The Platform Ireland. Ireland has 4.4 Mha of agricultural land, which is
facilitates the dialogue between these stakeholders and comprised of over 90% grassland. With a temperate cli-
provides them with a forum to gain and exchange knowl- mate, high yields of grass per hectare (10 tDM ha-1) are
edge and explore the conditions under which PtG can be readily achievable. Grass silage (preserved grass) is tradi-
successful. Within the Platform, knowledge gaps related tionally used as a feed for Ireland’s livestock. Ireland has
to the PtG concept and its implementation are identi- a large agricultural industry that will account for ca. 35%
fied and, where possible, investigated in internal stud- of the country’s total GHG emissions by 2020. Production
ies. These studies include expected curtailments in dif- of grass in excess of the quantity required for livestock
ferent European countries towards 2030, business cases feed has been identified as the biomass of most poten-
of PtG pathways and compatibility aspects of different tial for anaerobic digestion. This grass resource has pre-
CO2 sources for methanation. Recently, a study has been viously been estimated in literature at ca. 1.7 Mt DM a-1
finalised which investigated the role of PtG in a purely (McEniry et al., 2013), available in excess of livestock
renewables based European energy system. The Platform requirements and could be used for biomethane produc-
member’s common goal is to realize the energy transition tion.
as cost-effectively as possible.
16

Green gas Country case studies: future strategies for biomethane

Legislation on the collection of food waste and the Residues from agriculture in Ireland include for farm
introduction of high landfill levies has encouraged its slurries, slaughterhouse wastes and processing wastes
disposal through other means in Ireland. Food waste from the production of milk and cheese. Typically these
(and the organic fraction of municipal solid waste) is a residues are land spread; however, such wastes can also
commonly identified feedstock for anaerobic digestion, be considered a valuable resource for energy production
as it can achieve high specific methane yields (SMYs). as they incur no cost and can achieve very high GHG
It is considered the low hanging fruit as a digestion emissions savings on a whole life cycle basis (compared
feedstock as it is a waste stream that can potentially to the fossil fuel displaced) due to the removal of fugi-
accrue a gate fee (for the operator) as opposed to en- tive methane emissions in open slurry storage tanks. The
ergy crops which have a production cost, supporting majority of slurry will come from Ireland’s dairy herd,
the economic feasibility of such digesters. The composi- where slurry is collected in pits when the animals are
tion of food waste is variable depending on origin, that housed inside in winter. Pig slurry may also be a viable
is, whether it is sourced from rural or urban areas. Es- feedstock as it is collected year round. Slaughterhouse
timates of the collectable household food and garden wastes typically comprise of paunch (material extracted
waste have been made for Ireland by multiplying popu- from the stomach of the animal) and sludge (from the
lation numbers by the quantity of waste available; it has wastewater treatment process), both organic by-prod-
been assessed that 138,588 t Volatile Solids (VS) a-1 of ucts suitable for digestion and biomethane production.
food waste is potentially available in Ireland (O’Shea et Milk processing waste is generated at dairy produce fa-
al., 2016a). cilities and typically comes in the form of an effluent or

Micro-algae (rudimentary) is
an approximate resource,
Gas, 181.26 which does not include for
weather conditions or actual
time based CO2 availability
from power stations; micro-
Total, 153.8 Power to gas, 1.43 algae (in-depth) includes for
weather conditions, daylight
Microalgae (in-depth), 1.75 hours and actual production
of CO2 from power plants
Microalgae (rudimentary), 9.76

Diesel, 114.18 Grass silage, 128.40

Source separated household organic waste, 1.50

Milk processing waste, 0.17

Slaughterhouse waste, 0.21
Chicken manure, 0.12
Pig slurry, 0.27
Sheep manure, 0.61
Cattle slurry, 9.59
Gas Diesel Total theoretical renewable
gas resource

Figure 6.1 Ireland’s total theoretical biomethane potential resource from identified feedstocks as compared to natural gas consumption and diesel consumption.
Data on gas demand and diesel demand adapted from (Howley & Holland, 2016; O’Shea et al., 2016a; O’Shea et al., 2016b).
 17

Country case studies: future strategies for biomethane Green gas

sludge. The residual sludge from primary and second- highlights Ireland’s potential to produce the most renew-
ary wastewater treatment processes may also be digested able gas per capita within the EU by 2030, with a realistic
for biomethane in Ireland. Many wastewater treatment potential of 13 TWh a-1 (47 PJ a-1).
plants already have digesters onsite as part of their treat- Mobilising Ireland’s biomethane potential has been
ment process in reducing the organic content of their the focus of much research, strategy development and so-
effluent streams. lution design within Gas Networks Ireland (GNI). GNI
Several studies have been published on Ireland’s to- owns and operates over 13,500 km of transmission and
tal biomethane production potential, which ranges from distribution gas pipelines in Ireland (with approximately
about 4 – 50 TWh a-1 (15 to 180 PJ a-1) depending on feed- 680,000 connections to homes and businesses). GNI are
stock mobilisation assumptions. The total practical re- committed to facilitating renewable gas in decarbonis-
source (as opposed to potential resource) of biomethane ing energy supply to customers, particularly in the heat
identified by O’Shea et al., (O’Shea et al., 2016a; O’Shea and transport sectors. Based on detailed assessments of
et al., 2016b) based on currently available resources in the many biomethane solutions throughout Europe, GNI
Ireland was 27.8PJ as indicted in Figure 6.2. If this biom- identifies the “Hub and Pod model” as the model with the
ethane resource was used for transport or thermal energy most potential to maximise the mobilisation of biometh-
it could provide ca. 15% renewables in either sector. A ane in Ireland. This model incorporates road transport of
recent study by the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ire- biomethane in compressed trailer units from biogas pro-
land (SEAI) on Ireland’s renewable gas potential has indi- duction facilities located remotely from the gas network
cated that as many as 900 digesters, ranging in size from (Pods) to centralised injections facilities connected to the
500 kWe (CHP) to 6000 kWe (biomethane), would be gas network (Hubs). Such a solution could maximise the
required to exploit the existing and future biomass avail- potential for Irish farmers, as biogas production can be
able nationally (SEAI, 2017). The future resource from located remote from the gas network on farm scale biogas
biomethane was reported in this study as ca. 22 PJ which Pods, with clusters of biogas Pods feeding biomethane
would result in GHG emissions savings of 2 Mt CO2eq, to centralised grid Injection Hubs. Assuming ongoing
equivalent to 3.7% of the total national GHG emissions biomethane policy supports, GNI predicts the growth
in the baseline year 1990. A recent study published by the rate of biomethane injection facilities to grow with up to
EU Commission in March 2017 (Kampman et al., 2017) 43 centralised Hubs in place by 2030, with an average of

Table 6.1 Gasification-methanation of willow for biomethane in Ireland

(Gallagher & Murphy, 2013)
Gasification Conversion Unit
feedstock
6,800 Required for one 50MWth gasifier ha a-1
74,800 For eleven 50MWth gasifiers ha a-1
SRC
1,795,200 assuming 24 t/ha t a-1
willow
15.8 Lower heating value (LHV) 8.8 GJ/t PJ a-1
10.3 Process efficiency @ 65% PJ a-1

Table 6.2 Potential methane resource from power to gas in Ireland

adapted from (Ahern et al., 2015)
Electricity Conversion Unit
4.5 consumption in 2015 Mtoe a-1
188 consumption in 2015 PJ a-1
75 assuming 40% renewable electricity (RES-E) PJ a-1
5.3 assuming 7% curtailment PJ a-1
4.0 assume 75% efficiency conversion to H2 PJ a-1
Figure 6.2 Irelands practical biomethane resource from identified feedstocks
(O’Shea et al., 2016a; O’Shea et al., 2016b), 3.0 assume 75% methanation efficiency PJ a-1
18

Green gas Country case studies: future strategies for biomethane

8 biomethane production Pods supplying each hub (over grid; each gasifier would require 6,800 ha of willow (Gal-
300 on-farm anaerobic digestion Pods nationwide). This lagher & Murphy, 2013). The energy resource from gasi-
scenario would see 11.5 TWh a-1 (41.4 PJ a-1) of biom- fication is extrapolated in Table 6.1. Future renewable gas
ethane supplied to energy customers which would be production could increase by 10.3 PJ a-1 by the introduc-
approximately 20% of predicted natural gas demand in tion of eleven 50MWth gasifiers, increasing Irelands total
2030. theoretical energy resource to ca. 38 PJ a-1. Ireland is also
In addition to this, GNI are supporting the creation examining the concept of storing surplus electricity as a
of a biomethane market in Ireland by co-funding other gas through PtG systems. A recent literature study (Ta-
major projects through the Gas Innovation Fund. The ble 6.2) indicates that a resource of ca. 3 PJ a-1 would be
Causeway Project will examine the impact of increased available based on 7% renewable electricity curtailment
levels of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) fast refill sta- in 2015. It is not feasible to operate based solely on cur-
tions and renewable gas injection on the operation of the tailed electricity as the CAPEX based on low run hours
gas network in Ireland and is co-funded by the European would generate a low capacity factor and expensive re-
Union through the Connecting Europe Facility. The pro- newable gas (McDonagh et al., 2018). The theoretical
ject will deliver 14 fast fill public access CNG stations in- resource is assessed as 1.43PJ in Figure 6.1.
stalled by the end of 2019.
Furthermore the Green Gas Certification Scheme 6.2 The Netherlands
project which is co-funded by the Department of Com- At present, the Netherlands produces ca. 4 TWh a-1
munications, Climate Action and Environment, Depart- (14.4 PJ a-1) of biogas, which is primarily used for elec-
ment of Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation as well as GNI tricity and heat. Approximately 900 GWh a-1 (3.24 PJ a-1)
and the Renewable Gas Forum of Ireland was launched of biomethane is also injected to the natural gas grid.
in April 2017, and aims to devel-
op a comprehensive meth-
odology for a certification
scheme that facilitates bi-
omethane trading for both
renewable heat and trans-
port markets. It is antici-
pated that such certification
and independent traceabil-
ity of Guarantees of Origin
and sustainability criteria
will be mandated in the up-
dated RED as well as dem-
onstrating compliance with
EU and national targets.
For advanced technolo-
gies in Ireland, gasification
studies have shown an in-
digenous supply of willow
could feed eleven 50MWth
gasifiers located on the gas

Figure 6.3 Biogas resource potential

in the Netherlands (Green Gas Forum,
2014) (Groen Gas Nederland (GGNL))
 19

Country case studies: future strategies for biomethane Green gas

7 Figure 6.4 Maximum

potential per marketing route
for biogas in The Netherlands
(Green Gas Forum, 2014) (Groen
Gas Nederland (GGNL))

Figure 6.5 Gas development route to

2050 for the Netherlands
(Source: Ton Voncken, Groen Gas
Nederland (GGNL)) 5

The Green Gas Roadmap for the

Netherlands was published in
2014 and estimated the potential
for biomethane production in the
country. Predictions for biogas
production, and thus m3 of natu-
ral gas equivalent, were made for
the years 2020 and 2030. An illus-
tration of the potential is shown
in Figure 6.3.
It is estimated that 0.75 bil-
lion m3 of natural gas equiva-
lent (biomethane) could be pro-
duced by 2020 with this resource
increasing to 2.2 billion m3 of
natural gas equivalent by 2030 (Green Gas Forum, 2014). sign guidelines, process criteria and principles were de-
This is equivalent to approximately 25 PJ a-1 in 2020 and termined. These formed the basis for demonstrating
77 PJ a-1 in 2030, a significant resource (Green Gas Fo- PtG in a realistic environment with every element of the
rum, 2014). The method by which the renewable gas will value chain considered, from production to end-use. The
be applied to market in the Netherlands will be site spe- project entailed the production of sustainable electricity
cific – dependent upon whether there is a demand for from solar panels, which was subsequently converted into
heat and electricity (CHP), or direct injection to the gas synthetic gas (of natural gas quality), via hydrogen and
grid or as a transport fuel. Figure 6.4 highlights the im- methane and was applied in the gas-fired boiler of nearby
pact of different digestion feedstocks, and their respective buildings. The produced synthetic gas complied with all
biogas production, in terms of their maximum potential the specifications that apply to injection into the Dutch
in each route to market. gas grid. In the implementation of the project, practical
Figure 6.5 outlines the development route for the information was obtained about the technical feasibility
Netherlands. The guiding principle is that, even when en- of the complete system and the individual system com-
ergy conservation is implemented and natural gas is re- ponents. For example, the conversion of electricity into
placed with other sustainable energy options, demand for hydrogen and oxygen was performed with an energetic
gas will always remain. This will then be met in full using efficiency of 47%. The remainder of the energy - in the
gas from renewable sources. form of heat - could not be used locally. Heat is also re-
For PtG in the Netherlands, DSO Stedin, DNV GL, leased during the catalytic conversion of hydrogen and
Community of Rotterdam and the housing association CO2 and this heat was not used either. The energetic ef-
Ressort Wonen carried out a demonstration project that ficiency of this methanation process was assessed at 73%.
investigated the use and applicability of the technology. The energy balance of the complete PtG system (includ-
Prior to the realisation of this project, the technical de- ing methanation) demonstrated an energetic efficiency
20

Green gas Country case studies: future strategies for biomethane

of 35%. It should be remarked that the efficiencies of The UK government has indicated a strong inter-
the latest electrolysers (for higher capacities) are signifi- est in the production of renewable hydrogen (as well as
cantly higher than the one used in this project. Besides methane). More specifically the Department of Business,
optimising the energetic efficiency, it is important that Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) has invested £25m
the outgoing gas complies with the specifications that in developing a supply chain for hydrogen in the UK.
apply to injection into the gas grid. The Dutch distribu- Hydrogen will be produced through steam reforming of
tion network requires gas to contain no more than 0.1 methane. If this is associated with carbon capture there is
mol% hydrogen. The optimum settings of the metha- a decarbonistion effect as combustion does not produce
nation process are therefore a compromise between the CO2. The CO2 from steam reforming can be stored in
highest achievable energetic efficiency and the outgoing depleted offshore gas reservoirs. Hydrogen gas pipeline
hydrogen concentration. infrastructure could be established in the UK by 2030.
The implementation of hydrogen gas can utilise a dedi-
6.3 The United Kingdom (UK) cated hydrogen grid or may involve a hydrogen-methane
The following section is based on the information from blend in the existing gas grid. Cluster projects include for
the Energy and Utilities Alliance (2017) and Future of Gas developments in Leeds, which is assessing 100% hydro-
(2017) publications. gen and the Liverpool-Manchester area, which is inves-
The uptake of anaerobic digestion in the UK over the tigating a hydrogen-methane blend. The advantage of a
past number of years has been significant to the extent hydrogen-methane blend is that it would involve lower
where capacity is now sufficient to power over a million costs as no new infrastructure would be required. Ad-
homes. The number of plants has risen to 559; biom- ditional studies are underway examining how much hy-
ethane plants will total 144 when current projects under drogen can be added to the existing gas network without
construction are complete. The total energy generation affecting its operation. Although it is still unclear how
from anaerobic digestion in 2017 stands at 10.7TWh. It is these pathways will unfold, a combination of options are
suggested that increases in feedstock availability/uptake, likely to occur; for example, 100% hydrogen could be
an update in legislation regarding the RHI scheme and used in local hydrogen grids, biomethane plants can sup-
availability of agricultural payments for energy genera- ply the existing natural gas grid and hydrogen can also
tion on farms could see the total energy yield increase be added as a blend at safe levels to the existing network.
to 78TWh. This would be considered a significant socio- By 2050, it is proposed that 28% of the UK’s heat
economic benefit given the UK’s dependency on gas as could be provided by hydrogen. Overall the gas demand
a fuel. Almost 50% of the UK’s primary energy needs in in the UK will rise, estimated at 130% of the 2016 levels,
relation to power generation and heat is supplied by gas with 55% supplied by hydrogen. From a transport per-
and this gas is also responsible for 40% of the UK’s GHG spective, heavy goods vehicles (HGVs) and buses are also
emissions. expected to be powered by hydrogen with a take up of
In terms of the green gas strategy of the UK, two electric vehicles (EVs) in the private car sector. At present
policy scenarios have been proposed. The first involves in the UK, a two year trial has been initiated to compare a
the removal of gas as an energy carrier with decarbonisa- variety of gas powered trucks against their diesel fuelled
tion of the electricity system; whilst the second involves counterparts. The project will act as a proof of concept,
decarbonising the gas grid. However, rather than reduc- investigating factors such as vehicle performance, fuel
ing the need for gas in the future, it is expected that the efficiency, reliability and cost. The environmental ben-
UK will have an increasing gas industry; this is proposed efits of gas powered vehicles in the potential reduction in
as the preferred route as consumers are already familiar GHG emissions will also be examined.
with and connected to the existing gas grid. The UK has The UK will also see the development of a commer-
an advanced natural gas grid infrastructure that supplies cial bioSNG plant that can convert black bag waste into
heat energy to 85% of homes. Decarbonisation of the gas green gas suitable for grid injection. The plant will accept
system could be achieved through the production of re- 10,000 t a-1 of waste and produce 22GWh of gas – enough
newable gas. Offering a source of renewable or green gas to fuel 40 trucks or heat 1,500 homes whilst achieving
going forward would provide significant advantages in significant GHG emissions savings (5,000 t a-1). The
terms of sustainability. technology itself can achieve between 80-190% GHG
 21

Country case studies: future strategies for biomethane Green gas

emissions savings as compared to the fossil gas compara- 18.5 billion Nm3 per annum with 75% of this resource
tor depending on whether the CO2 stream from the pro- coming from the co-digestion of biomass as opposed
cess is captured. Success in such a project will ultimately to the direct mono-digestion of crops. This resource of
lead to further deployment of this pathway in the UK. 185TWh (666PJ a-1) is 1.5 times the current national
The potential resource has been estimated at 100TWh a-1 fossil fuel production in Italy.
of green gas, which is equivalent to fuelling all of Britain’s To increase the resource of biomethane in Italy, gasifi-
HGVs or supplying one third of the UK’s domestic gas cation is once again identified as a technology of interest.
demand. Forestry materials can be diverted from direct combus-
tion, which is deemed to have implications in terms of air
6.4 Italy pollution, and used for biomethane through gasification.
The following section is based on information from However issues such as biomass procurement, technol-
Bozzetto et al. (2017). ogy cost and sustainability in relation to GHG emissions
The Italian biogas sector has grown to be the sec- savings must be established prior to full technology de-
ond largest in Europe (only behind Germany). In 2015, ployment.
the output was 1,450  MWe, which originated from In Italy, PtG systems are recognised as a non-biogenic
1,900 digesters with a thermal biogas equivalent of future pathway for biomethane. The potential to couple
25 TWh (90PJ a-1). Co-digestion of crops and livestock such systems with the upgrading of biogas is suggested
residues are estimated to make up ca. 30-35% of the ener- as favourable. Other CO2 sources such as flue gases from
gy produced in the biogas and this figure could double by power plants and CO2 from ambient air are also advo-
2030. Figure 6.6 indicates the rise in biomethane resource cated for methanation with renewable hydrogen but are
in Italy over the last decade. suggested to come at a higher cost.
By 2030 the total biogas potential in Italy is estimated Including for advances in technology (gasification and
to reach 10 billion Nm3 per annum accounting for agri- PtG), the total biomethane (renewable gas) yield in 2050
cultural crops and residues, organic municipal waste and for Italy is estimated to be 300-350 TWh (1080 – 1260 PJ).
other feedstocks. The resource is equivalent to 100TWh a-1 This is viewed as a significant platform on which to re-
(360 PJ a-1). Such ambition is thought to promote a more duce the country’s reliance on fossil fuel imports whilst
sustainable and competitive agricultural industry in Italy, utilising the existing gas grid infrastructure. Figure 6.7
lowering the fossil fuel dependency on farms and pro- illustrates the potential growth in renewable gas produc-
moting the use of biofertilisers. Furthermore by 2050, the tion in Italy in the future.
total estimated biogas resource is proposed to increase to

Figure 6.6 Increase in biomethane resource in Italy (Bozzetto et al., 2017) Figure 6.7 Potential future renewable gas production in Italy (Bozzetto et al., 2017)
22

Green gas Methods for measuring and calculation of methane emission rates

6.5 Denmark agricultural waste, abattoir waste and food waste. The
The following section is adapted from the following upgraded biogas from the plant is injected to the natu-
publications: State of Green (2017a), (2017b), (2017c) and ral gas grid. Farmers in the surrounding area have 30%
includes for input from NGF Nature Energy. ownership of the Holsted plant, and the plant provides
The production of biogas in Denmark is rapidly in- them with an added revenue stream (GEODE, 2016).
creasing and is mainly based on the on-farm digestion The total production of biogas is expected to more
of manure and digestion of sewage sludge in cities. A than triple in Denmark from 2012 to 2020, reaching a
smaller number of biogas plants are industrial, or land- total annual production of 15 PJ. To date the majority
fill plants treating organic wastes. Biogas production in of the produced biogas is used in electricity production.
Denmark is spread throughout the country and is con- In the future it is expected that a greater share of the
sidered a combined process for both energy production produced biogas will be upgraded to biomethane and
and waste treatment. In particular, Denmark has signifi- delivered to the natural gas grid. Figure 6.8 shows the
cant potential for biomethane production due to high historical and expected future biogas production and its
animal densities in rural areas and a well-developed gas use in Denmark from 2012 to 2020. Already Denmark
infrastructure. The gas network provides for more than holds the highest share of green gas in Europe at 11%
400,000 households in Denmark. of natural gas consumption. Denmark has set ambitious
Denmark also plans to exhibit one of the world’s targets to supply the existing gas grid with 100% green
largest biogas facilities, under development by NGF Na- gas by 2035 through the use of food, industrial and ag-
ture Energy. The facility in Korskro will boast a biomass ricultural wastes. If this was to happen, Denmark would
capacity of over 1 Mt a-1 producing 45.4 MW a-1, which become the first EU state to be ‘free’ of any natural gas
can heat 26,000 homes. Full operation of the plant is ex- dependency. Furthermore, the gas grid is seen as a key
pected in mid-2018. Currently NGF Nature Energy has to the future of green energy systems in Denmark. Pro-
4 biogas plants in operation, with a further 12-17 do- jects whereby decentralised systems producing renew-
mestic projects in the pipeline. Such projects typically in- able gas are subsequently injected to the distribution gas
volve securing binding long-term contracts with all ma- grid have grown significantly in recent years with 21 such
jor suppliers and procuring a secure source of biomass. developments from 2014 – 2017. Ultimately, green gas
The NGF Nature Energy plant in Holsted (20MW) has is expected to offset the equivalent of 800,000 tonnes of
attained certification under the EU RED, which docu- CO2 in Denmark by 2018.
ments that the biomethane is sustainability produced Government policy has supported the biogas indus-
from second generation biofuel sources. The plant pro- try in Denmark and this has led to some of the initial
cesses 400,000 tonnes of feedstock, which includes for success. Continuing with the right framework condi-

PJ
18
16
14 Heat
12
Transport
10
Process
8
6 Gas grid
Figure 6.8 Historical and future
4 Electricity biogas production and its use in
Denmark 2012-2020.
2
(Source: Jakob Lorenzen; Dansk
0 Year Fagcenter for Biogas; Danish Energy
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agency)
 23

Methods for measuring and calculation of methane emission rates Green gas

Figure 6.9 The gas grid and the future use of the gas grid with biogas plants (yellow dots) connected to the gas grid in Denmark. (Source: Jakob
Lorenzen; Dansk Fagcenter for Biogas)

tions, the potential for green gas in Denmark is proposed assist in the transition for green gas in Denmark. An in-
at 72 PJ in 2035 equivalent to the expected gas consump- vestment of over € 7 billion on the gas network by these
tion in the country by then. Current gas consumption three companies will continue to ensure a safe, reliable
is ca. 120PJ but it is estimated to decrease to 60-80PJ by supply of gas to its consumers. The perspective in Den-
2050; this is because both district and local heating are mark is that not one source of energy will be required
moving away from gas technologies for a number of rea- going forward and that different energy sources must
sons although this may not be necessary if green gas can complement and supplement for higher efficiency; for
be provided. This resource of 72PJ is principally based on example, gas supporting wind energy when the wind is
a rise in availability of manures and wastes, improved bi- not blowing and solar energy when the sun is not shin-
ogas production efficiencies and an increase in the diges- ing. There is an emphasis on integration of technologies
tion of straw. and the gas distribution network is a key element sup-
The current Danish energy system is heavily based on plying CO2-neutral gas. Accounting for more advanced
wind power due to the historical focus on the wind power technologies such as electricity storage through PtG (with
industry. Thus in the future, the Danish energy system methanation) could increase the resource to 100 PJ.
will consist of a large amount of fluctuating power. In or- From a transport fuel perspective biomethane is also
der to cope with this, the need for a storable (dispatach- seen as a valuable solution in Denmark. The first CNG
able) energy source will increase. In this case, biogas and service station is planned for development in Odense
biomethane will be an important energy source. Gas from while the first CNG project for public transport is being
the North Sea is currently on the decline so the focus for developed with a commercial CNG station in Fredericia.
Denmark has been on indigenous resources, which will  
also mitigate any geo-political risks. Figure 6.9 illustrates
the existing gas grid in Denmark and the future use of the
gas grid with connected biogas plants (yellow dots).
A national initiative between three gas distribution
companies HMN Naturgas, Dansk Gas Distribution and
NGF Nature Energy has been developed to inform and
24

Green gas Integration of renewable green gas systems

7. Integration of renewable green gas systems

Integration of green gas technologies will be funda- The most recent proposals for the recast of the EU
mental to providing sustainable renewable energy sys- RED has recommended a significant push for advanced
tems and reducing GHG emissions. The aforementioned biofuels to drive the reduction of GHG emissions in the
technologies (anaerobic digestion, gasification-meth- energy sector. It is proposed that advanced biofuels make
anation, PtG, micro-algae biogas upgrading) and feed- up at least 3.6% of all transport fuel by 2030 whilst first
stocks (energy crops, agricultural residues and wastes, generation biofuels originating from food based crops
food waste, micro-algae, IMTA seaweed, woody crops) are to be limited to 3.8%, down from the current limit
outlined in this report can also ensure an indigenous of 7%, by 2030. The emphasis on biofuel sustainability
supply of renewable energy. By-products of the differ- is also addressed. Targets of 70% GHG savings are pro-
ent technologies must be further amalgamated to ensure posed for transport biofuels and 85% potentially for re-
the use of the full supply chain and a circular economy. newable heat compared to the fossil fuel comparator on
For instance, liquid digestate effluent produced from a whole life cycle analysis basis. Through cascading bio-
anaerobic digestion could be used as a culture medium energy systems, biomethane can provide a sustainable
for cultivating micro-algae. The CO2 in the biogas from renewable energy source. This will be ever more impor-
the same digester could be used as a carbon source for tant going forward with stricter GHG emission reduc-
micro-algae growth. The resulting micro-algae harvest tion targets for biofuels.
could provide feedstock for the digester. Alternatively, Not all renewable gas is biogas, as described in
CO2 in biogas could be directed to a biological metha- this report a range of options exist. The integra-
nation system for the benefit of PtG. The oxygen from tion of technologies – anaerobic digestion, gasifi-
electrolysis could be used in the gasification process with cation-methanation and PtG – as shown in Fig-
solid digestate used as feedstock. Such integration de- ure 7.1, should provide a platform for which the
fines cascading bioenergy systems as illustrated in Figure maximum quantity of green gas can be produced. On
7.1, which facilitates greening of the natural gas grid us- a European scale, it is reported that there is currently
ing sustainable technologies and processes for the pro- ca. 18 billion m3 per annum of renewable gas being pro-
duction of biomethane. duced; this is approximately 4% of the total gas market
(450 billion m3). With
cascading bioenergy
systems the outlook for
renewable gas is prom-
ising. Studies have indi-
cated that the same gas
demand will be needed
in Europe in 2050 as to-
day but that 76% of the
gas could be renewable
(EURATIV, 2017). This
indicates significant up-
take of renewable gas
technologies going for-
ward.

Figure 7.1 Example of a future

integrated cascading biometh-
ane energy system
(Source: Green Gas Brochure,
www.MaREI.ie)
 25

Grid injection: challenges and solutions Green gas

8. Grid injection: challenges and solutions

8.1 Biomethane injection to the natural gas grid injection points in the grid to decentralised consumption
As stated, biomethane can be derived from the up- of gas down the grid. Decentralised injection can there-
grading of biogas generated from anaerobic digestion fore sometimes conflict with the existing infrastructure
plants or from methanation of syngas produced from developed and with the gas demand in local situations.
gasifiers. If biomethane is to be injected to the gas grid, This gas flow is upstream oriented while traditional gas
the specific gas quality requirements of the grid must be flow is downstream oriented only.
satisfied. The gas grid is a dynamic system in which gas is Figure 8.1 presents the case of biomethane injection
inserted and removed. In particular for the distribution to a grid at a constant flow. The gas demand will be de-
grid, gas should only be injected depending on the gas pendent on the time of year and temperature. During
consumption of the end-users connected to this specific winter there will be a higher gas demand than summer. In
distribution grid. Gas input and gas output must be bal- the case of the biomethane production capacity (repre-
anced, otherwise the pressure of the system may be affect- sented by the dark green bar) it can be expected that grid
ed. Injection of biomethane in relatively small amounts injection will not conflict with gas demand at any time.
to the grid with an existing high gas flow (such as in the However when the biomethane production increases (to
transmission grid) is therefore not a big challenge in the level indicated by the light green bar) then constant
terms of holding this balance. However, in cases where grid injection is not feasible anymore.
relatively large amounts of biomethane are to be injected
in the gas system with a comparably low gas demand,
problems can become evident in grid balancing. Particu- 8.2 Approaches to balancing the gas grid in biomethane
lar attention must be paid to the summer trough when injection
gas demand decreases. Thus, biomethane produced local- A general approach for grid injection and other in-
ly should be injected to the grid in a decentralised man- novative methods that can contribute in balancing the
ner; this is a fundamental change to traditional gas dis- gas grid in the case of biomethane injection are presented
tribution systems which are developed from centralised below.

Figure 8.1 Relationship

between gas consump-
tion, annual load curve,
decentralised gas points
and injection levels
(Source RVO; Nether-
lands)
26

Green gas Grid injection: challenges and solutions

Figure 8.2 Schematic illustration of the Wijster green gas hub (from: http://task37.ieabioenergy.com/case-studies.html)

• Choose a logical point to connect to a gas grid: cility. The upgraded biogas can be injected at a higher
In the early stage of plant development, contact the pressure level of the gas grid with a higher gas flow.
grid operator responsible for grid connections in An example of this approach is the gas hub at Attero
the region. An injection point must be chosen with in Wijster in the Netherlands (Figure 8.2) in which
a high enough gas demand during the year. This may several biogas facilities are combined with a single
necessitate extending the connection pipelines ap- centralised upgrading facility; a number of grid in-
propriately to the grid or connecting to a part of the jection points are operated in the distribution grid
gas grid with higher pressures. (DSO) and the transmission grid (TSO). There is
• If a lengthy and expensive connection to the gas also a grid connection associated with an agricultural
grid is required, other options may be considered. biogas plant in proximity to this location. More con-
The grid operator may be able to connect some parts nections are planned in the future. The full case study
of the local gas grid to “increase” the gas demand. In is available at the Task 37 website
this option the injected gas will flow to a wider area (http://task37.ieabioenergy.com/case-studies.html)
of gas consumers, thus the feed-in capacity of the bi- • Development of demand side management sys-
omethane plant will be able to be increased. tems: An example of this is the SG3 project in which
• It may be plausible to effect recompression of the set point of the gas pressure in the gas grid is lower
gas from a grid with lower transport capacity and during summer time. In this way a priority position
lower pressure to a grid with higher pressure and gas for the biomethane injection can be achieved. The
flow. This measure will also increase the feed-in ca- pressure set points of the grid are locally dependent.
pacity for biomethane injection as a larger part of the The set point of the lower pressure in the grid is criti-
gas grid becomes available. cal. The gas demand has to be assured at all times. If
• Development of biogas hubs: This approach the pressure drops below this set point then the valve
involves a concentrated area of biogas producers in to the TSO connection will be opened to secure the
combination with a centralised biogas upgrading fa- gas demand of all consumers connected to the grid.
 27

Conclusion and Outlook Green gas

9. Conclusion and Outlook

The principle of this measure is in using the storage Gaseous fuels have a significant role to play in fu-
capacity of the grid between a lower pressure level and ture energy markets in industry (breweries, distilleries),
the normal operating pressure in the grid. in heating (buildings connected to the gas grid) and in
• Another example of demand side management transport in natural gas vehicles (NGVs). Biomethane
is the development of a green gas platform concept in produced from anaerobic digestion and gasification-
which the grid operator can facilitate (through data methanation, and renewable gas from power to gas
transmission) between biomethane operation and gas systems, can potentially achieve a large substitution of
consumption, for example, at a filling station. If the natural gas. A renewable gas industry would deliver sig-
maximum level of grid injection occurs then the grid nificantly towards climate mitigation and support a re-
operator could transmit a signal to the filling station newable transition particularly in the transport and heat
to open the valve to their gas storage in order to fill energy sectors, which are not as advanced as the renew-
this storage. able electricity sector. There is potential for a reduction
• An alternative approach is the development of in natural gas demand as an overall percentage of energy
biogas based distribution systems. The difference with demand but to satisfy greenhouse gas reduction targets
normal grid injection is that the baseload of the gas this gas will have to be decarbonised. Thus it is not essen-
comes from biogas, which has not been upgraded. The tial to create a resource equivalent to present natural gas
biogas is just dried and desulpherised before use in demand but to ensure those sectors, which will continue
this distribution system. The end applications should to use natural gas, use decarbonised gas.
be able to operate with different calorific values of gas. Biomethane is presently sourced from a number of
If the locally available gas capacity is not enough to biomass sources; slurries, energy crops and food waste
meet the local gas demand then natural gas can added have already been successfully used to produce biometh-
to this biogas distribution system. Therefore a mixing ane. In 2015, there were 459 biogas-upgrading plants in
station is installed. The advantage of this system is that operation producing 1,230 M Nm3 of biomethane (Euro-
the costs for biogas upgrading are not necessary. This pean Biogas Association, 2016) from these sources.
approach is applicable in new gas projects but also in Future sources of biomethane will include macro-
areas undergoing renovation. and micro-algae. Gasification-methanation of woody
biomass can also be deployed at a much larger scale to
produce renewable gas. Such technologies are at a low
technology level but are being considered for future de-
ployment.
Future innovations ideally would include for cascad-
ing bioenergy systems whereby CO2 is captured and re-
used leading to increased decarbonisation. These systems
include for power to gas where electricity is converted to
hydrogen and reacted with CO2 to produce renewable
methane. Micro-algae may also be used to capture CO2;
the micro-algae may be used for further biomethane pro-
duction or be used in a biorefinery.
Utilising all of the available deployment pathways,
this report indicates that future production of green gas
may account for as much as 26% of current natural gas
demand in Ireland, 24% in the Netherlands, 8% in the
UK, 44% in Italy and 75% in Denmark. Such levels of
Figure 8.3 Biogas distribution system supplemented where necessary renewable gas indicate its importance as a future energy
by natural gas injection (Source RVO; Netherlands) vector.
28

Green gas References

References
AHERN, E.P., DEANE, P., PERSSON, T., Ó GALLACHÓIR, ctiv.com/section/energy/interview/gas-lobby-chief-in-
B., MURPHY, J.D. 2015. A perspective on the potential 2050-76-of-gas-could-be-renewable/.
role of renewable gas in a smart energy island system. EUROPEAN BIOGAS ASSOCIATION. 2016. 6th edition of
Renewable Energy, 78, 648-656. the Statistical Report on European anaerobic digestion
ALAMIA, A., MAGNUSSON, I., JOHNSSON, F., THUN- industry and markets.
MAN, H. 2016. Well-to-wheel analysis of bio-methane FUTURE OF GAS. 2017. Decarbonised gas: A future of gas
via gasification, in heavy duty engines within the trans- programme sensitivity Available from: http://future-
port sector of the European Union. Applied Energy, 170, ofgas.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Decarbonised-
445-454. Gas-sensitivity.pdf.
ALLEN, E., BROWNE, J., HYNES, S., MURPHY, J.D. 2013. GALLAGHER, C., MURPHY, J.D. 2013. What is the real-
The potential of algae blooms to produce renewable istic potential for biomethane produced through gasi-
gaseous fuel. Waste Management, 33(11), 2425-2433. fication of indigenous Willow or imported wood chip
BAILERA, M., LISBONA, P., ROMEO, L.M., ESPATOLERO, to meet renewable energy heat targets? Applied Energy,
S. 2017. Power to Gas projects review: Lab, pilot and 108, 158-167.
demo plants for storing renewable energy and CO2. Re- GEODE. 2016. A sustainable Europe: green gas, green grids,
newable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 292-312. green future. Available from: https://drive.google.com/
BOZZETTO, S., CURLISI, C., FABBRI, C., PEZZAGLIA, file/d/0BwfOJcyMDSzZT3NKaW5LaTJ2NUU/view.
M., Rossi, L., Sibilla, F. 2017. The development of biom- GÖTZ, M., LEFEBVRE, J., MÖRS, F., McDANIEL KOCH,
ethane: a sustainable choice for the economy and the A., GRAF, F., BAJOHR, S., REIMERT, R., KOLB, T. 2016.
environment. Available from: https://www.consorzio- Renewable Power-to-Gas: A technological and econom-
biogas.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/LA-BIOGAS- ic review. Renewable Energy, 85, 1371-1390.
REFINERY-ENG-2017-FINAL.pdf.
GREEN GAS FORUM. 2014. Green gas roadmap - Nether-
BREYER, C., TSUPARI, E., TIKKA, V., VAINIKKA, P. 2015. lands. Available at: https://www.ecn.nl/publicaties/Pdf-
Power-to-Gas as an Emerging Profitable Business Fetch.aspx?nr=ECN-O--15-058.
Through Creating an Integrated Value Chain. Energy
HERRMANN, C., FITZGERALD, J., O’SHEA, R., XIA, A.,
Procedia, 73, 182-189.
O’KIELY, P., MURPHY, J.D. 2015. Ensiling of seaweed
COLLET, P., FLOTTES, E., FAVRE, A., RAYNAL, L., PIERRE, for a seaweed biofuel industry. Bioresource Technology,
H., CAPELA, S., PEREGRINA, C. 2016. Techno-eco- 196, 301-313.
nomic and Life Cycle Assessment of methane produc-
HERRMANN, C., KALITA, N., WALL, D., XIA, A., MUR-
tion via biogas upgrading and power to gas technology.
PHY, J.D. 2016. Optimised biogas production from
Applied Energy.
microalgae through co-digestion with carbon-rich co-
EC. 2017. ANNEXES to the Proposal for a Directive of the substrates. Bioresource Technology, 214, 328-337.
European Parliament and the Council on the promo-
HOWLEY, M., HOLLAND, M. 2016. Energy in Ireland 1990
tion of the use of energy from renewable sources (re-
– 2015. Available at: http://www.seai.ie/Publications/
cast) 2009/28/EC
Statistics_Publications/Energy_in_Ireland/Energy-in-
EC. 2016. DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Ireland-1990-2015.pdf.
AND OF THE COUNCIL on the promotion of the use
IEA Bioenergy Task 40 and Task 37. 2014. Biomethane
of energy from renewable sources. http://eur-lex.eu-
Status and Factors Affecting Market Development and
ropa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:3eb9ae57-faa6-11e6-
Trade. IEA Bioenergy.
8a35-01aa75ed71a1.0007.02/DOC_1&format=PDF.
IEA Task 37 Energy from Biogas. 2016. Upgrading Plant
ENERGY AND UTILITIES ALLIANCE. 2017. Green Gas –
List 2016. Available at: http://task37.ieabioenergy.com/
The low carbon solution for the future? . Available from:
plant-list.html.
https://www.eua.org.uk/uploads/5A002E205701E.pdf.
KAMPMAN, B., LEGUIJT, C., SCHOLTEN T. 2017. Opti-
EURATIV. 2017. Gas lobby chief: ‘In 2050, 76% of gas
mal use of biogas from waste stream. An assessment of
could be renewable’. Available from: http://www.eura-
the potential of biogas from digestion in the EU beyond
 29

References Green gas

2020. Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/ REUTERS. 2017. Engie plans to go green via biogas and re-
sites/ener/files/documents/ce_delft_3g84_biogas_be- newable hydrogen. Available from: https://www.reuters.
yond_2020_final_report.pdf. com/article/us-engie-biogas/engie-plans-to-go-green-
LIEBETRAU, J., REINELT, T., AGOSTINI, A., LINKE, B. via-biogas-and-renewable-hydrogen-idUSKBN1DY22D.
2017. Methane emissions from biogas plants -Methods SCHIEBAHN, S., GRUBE, T., ROBINIUS, M., TIETZE, V.,
for measurement, results and effect on greenhouse gas KUMAR, B., STOLTEN, D. 2015. Power to gas: Techno-
balance of electricity produced. IEA Bioenergy: Task 37: logical overview, systems analysis and economic assess-
2017: 12. ment for a case study in Germany. International Journal
MCENIRY, J., CROSSON, P., FINNERAN, E., MCGEE, M., of Hydrogen Energy, 40(12), 4285-4294.
KEADY, T.W.J., O’KIELY, P. 2013. How much grassland SEAI. 2017. Assessment of Cost and Benefits of Biogas and
biomass is available in Ireland in excess of livestock Biomethane in Ireland.
requirements? Irish J Agr. Food. Res., 52: 67–80. STATE OF GREEN. 2017a. The Danish gas grid could be
MURPHY, J.D., DROSG, B., ALLEN, E., JERNEY, J., XIA, A., filled with green gas in 2035. Available from: https://
HERRMANN, C. 2015. A perspective on algal biogas. stateofgreen.com/en/profiles/state-of-green/news/
IEA Bioenergy. the-danish-gas-grid-could-be-filled-with-green-gas-
O’SHEA, R., WALL, D.M., MCDONAGH, S., MURPHY, J.D. in-2035.
2017. The potential of power to gas to provide green gas STATE OF GREEN. 2017b. New initiative focuses on the role
utilising existing CO2 sources from industries, distilleries of gas in the green transition. Available from: https://
and wastewater treatment facilities. Renewable Energy, stateofgreen.com/en/profiles/state-of-green/news/new-
114, 1090-1100. initiative-focuses-on-the-role-of-gas-in-the-green-tran-
sition.
O’SHEA, R., KILGALLON, I., WALL, D., MURPHY, J.D.
2016a. Quantification and location of a renewable gas STATE OF GREEN. 2017c. The world’s largest biogas facility
industry based on digestion of wastes in Ireland. Applied is being built in a gravel pit in Denmark. Available from:
Energy, 175, 229-239. https://stateofgreen.com/en/profiles/state-of-green/
news/the-world-s-largest-biogas-facility-is-being-built-
O’SHEA, R., WALL, D., KILGALLON, I., MURPHY, J.D.
in-a-gravel-pit-in-denmark.
2016b. Assessment of the impact of incentives and of
scale on the build order and location of biomethane TABASSUM, M.R., XIA, A., MURPHY, J.D. 2017. Potential
facilities and the feedstock they utilise. Applied Energy, of seaweed as a feedstock for renewable gaseous fuel pro-
182, 394-408. duction in Ireland. Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews, 68, 136-146.
O’SHEA, R., WALL, D., MURPHY, J.D. 2016c. Modelling a
demand driven biogas system for production of electric- TSUPARI, E., KÄRKI, J., VAKKILAINEN, E. 2016. Economic
ity at peak demand and for production of biomethane at feasibility of power-to-gas integrated with biomass fired
other times. Bioresource Technology, 216, 238-249. CHP plant. Journal of Energy Storage, 5, 62-69.

PARRA, D., PATEL, M.K. 2016. Techno-economic implica- VO, T.T.Q., XIA, A., WALL, D.M., MURPHY, J.D. 2017. Use
tions of the electrolyser technology and size for power- of surplus wind electricity in Ireland to produce com-
to-gas systems. International Journal of Hydrogen En- pressed renewable gaseous transport fuel through bio-
ergy, 41(6), 3748-3761. logical power to gas systems. Renewable Energy, 105,
495-504.
PERSSON, T., MURPHY, J.D., JANNASCH, A.K., AHERN,
WALKER, S.B., MUKHERJEE, U., FOWLER, M., ELKAMEL,
E., LIEBETRAU, J., TROMMLER, M., TOYAMA, J. 2014.
A. 2016. Benchmarking and selection of Power-to-Gas
A perspective on the potential role of biogas in smart en-
utilizing electrolytic hydrogen as an energy storage al-
ergy grids. IEA Bioenergy, Task 37.
ternative. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,
QADRDAN, M., ABEYSEKERA, M., CHAUDRY, M., WU, J.,
41(19), 7717-7731.
JENKINS, N. 2015. Role of power-to-gas in an integrated
ZHU, L., YAN, C., LI, Z. 2016. Microalgal cultivation with
gas and electricity system in Great Britain. International
biogas slurry for biofuel production. Bioresource Tech-
Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40(17), 5763-5775.
nology, 220, 629-636.
Green gas IEA Bioenergy

Task 37 - Energy from Biogas

IEA Bioenergy aims to accelerate the use of environmentally sustainable and cost competitive bioenergy that will contribute to
future low-carbon energy demands. This report is the result of the work of IEA Bioenergy Task 37: Energy from Biogas.

The following countries are members of Task 37, in the 2018 Work Programme:

Australia Bernadette McCABE

Austria Bernhard DROSG
Günther BOCHMANN
Brazil Paulo SCHMIDT
Maecelo ALVES DE SOUSA
Rodrigo REGIS DE ALMEIDA GALVÃO
Denmark Teodorita AL-SEADI
Estonia Elis VOLLMER
Finland Saija RASI
France Olivier THÉOBALD
Guillaume BASTIDE
Germany Jan LIEBETRAU
Norway Tormod BRISEID
Republic of Ireland (Task Leader) Jerry D MURPHY, [email protected]
Republic of Korea Soon Chul PARK
Sweden Anton FAGERSTRÖM
Switzerland Urs BAIER
The Netherlands Mathieu DUMONT
United Kingdom Clare LUKEHURST
Charles BANKS
WRITTEN BY:
David M. Wall
Mathieu Dumont
Jerry D. Murphy

EDITED BY:
Jerry D. Murphy

PUBLISHED BY IEA BIOENERGY, February 2018 ISBN: 978-1-910154-38-0

IMPRESSUM: Graphic Design by Susanne AUER/www.friedlundpartner.at http://www.iea-biogas.net
Further Information
www.ieabioenergy.com

Contact us:
www.ieabioenergy.com/contact-us/