Module 2 Soil Tests and Indeces
Module 2 Soil Tests and Indeces
𝒎𝟏 − 𝒎𝟐 𝑽𝟏 − 𝑽𝟐
𝑺𝑳 = − 𝛄𝐰
𝒎𝟐 𝒎𝟐
Atterberg’s Limits
Where:
Atterberg limits, then, are water contents at
critical stages of soil behavior. They, together with 𝒎𝟏 = Mass of the wet soil pat in the dish at
natural water content, are essential descriptions of the beginning of the test (grams)
fine-grained soils.
𝒎𝟐 = Mass of the dry soil in the pat
(grams)
2.2 ATTERBERG’S LIMIT
𝑽𝟏 = Initial volume of the soil in the pat (cc)
It is the range of water content within which The dry powder of the soil is mixed with
the soil exhibits plastic properties; that is, it is the distilled water turning it into a paste. The soil paste is
difference between liquid and plastic limits. then placed into the cup to a thickness of about 12.5
mm and a groove is then cut at the center of the paste
𝑷𝑰 = 𝑳𝑳 − 𝑷𝑳 using the standard grooving tool. The crank operating
the cam is turned at the rate of 2 revolutions per
2.2.5 SHRINKAGE INDEX, SI second lifting the cup and dropped it from a height of
10 mm. The liquid limit is the moisture content
It is defined as the difference between the required to close a distance of 12.5 mm along the
plastic and shrinkage limits of a soil; In other words, It bottom of the groove after 25 blows.
is the range of water content within which a soil is in
a semisolid state of consistency. The required closure in 25 blows is difficult to
achieve in a single test. Four or more tests to the
𝑺𝑰 = 𝑷𝑳 − 𝑺𝑳 same soil at varying water contents are to be done for
12.5 mm closure of the groove. The results are then
2.2.6 CONSISTENCY INDEX or RELATIVE
plotted on a semi-logarithmic graph with moisture
CONSISTENCY, CI content along the vertical axis (algebraic scale) and
number of blows along the horizontal axis (logarithmic
It is defined as the ratio of the difference
scale).
between liquid and the natural water content to the
plasticity index of soil.
𝑳𝑳 − 𝒘
𝑪𝑰 =
𝑷𝑳
𝒘 − 𝑷𝑳
𝑳𝑰 =
𝑷𝑰
𝒘𝟏 − 𝒘𝟐
𝑭𝒍𝒐𝒘 𝑰𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒙, 𝑭𝑰 =
𝑵
𝒍𝒐𝒈 ( 𝟐 )
𝑵𝟏
Where:
The shrinkage limit is determined as follows. 3. Eugene plans to build his house in Konoha. The
A mass of wet soil, m1, is placed in a porcelain dish building requires 10,000 m3 fill at a void ratio of
44.5 mm in diameter and 12.5 mm high and then oven 44%. Material for earthfill was available at the
dried. With oven-dried soil still in the dish, the volume backyard of Sir Crocodile at P400 per cubic
of shrinkage can be determined by filling the dish with meter. It was found that the average void ratio
mercury. The volume of mercury that fills the dish is from the site is 80%. Estimate the total cost of the
equal to the shrinkage volume. fill.
2.3.5 SOIL COMPACTION 4. Following are the results of a shrinkage limit test:
In most specification for earthwork, the Initial volume of soil in saturated state = 24.6 cc
contractor is instructed to achieve a compacted dry
Final volume of soil in a dry state = 15.9 cc
unit weight of 90 to 95% of the maximum dry unit
weight determined in the laboratory by either the Initial mass in a saturated state = 44 g
standard or modified Proctor test. This is a Final mass in a dry state = 30.1 g
specification for relative compaction, which can be
a. Determine the dry density of the soil in g/cc
expressed as
b. Determine the void ratio of the soil
c. Determine the shrinkage limit of the soil
𝒀𝒅 (𝒇𝒊𝒆𝒍𝒅)
𝑹(%) = 𝒙 𝟏𝟎𝟎 d. Determine the shrinkage ratio
𝒀𝒅 (𝒎𝒂𝒙 − 𝒍𝒂𝒃) e. Determine the specific gravity of the solids
Also relative compaction in terms of relative density is 5. The following results were obtained from a liquid
test on clay using the Casagrande cup device.
𝑹𝒐
𝑹(%) = The natural water content of this clay is 35% and
𝟏 − 𝑫𝒓 (𝟏 − 𝑹𝒐)
the plastic limit is 19%.
Where:
Water
Number of
Content
𝒀𝒅 (𝒎𝒊𝒏) Blows
𝑹𝒐 = (%)
𝒀𝒅 (𝒎𝒂𝒙) 6 52.5
12 47.1
20 42.3
28 38.6
EXAMPLE
32 37.5
A. Liquid Limit
Test Number 1 2 3 4
Cone Penetration, mm 16 18 28 33
Weight of Wet Soil + Container, g 34.76 35.32 38.41 43.55
Weight of Dry Soil + Container, g 29.45 28.95 32.94 34.57
Weight of Container, g 11.60 11.82 11.40 11.45
Weight of Water, g
Weight of Dry Soil, g
Water Content, %
B. Plastic Limit
Plastic Limit Natural Water Content
Test Number 1 2 1 2
Weight of Wet Soil + Container, g 30.28 32.33 26.17 29.89
Weight of Dry Soil + Container, g 26.33 27.85 24.38 26.26
Weight of Container, g 11.71 12.68 11.47 11.32
Weight of Water, g
Weight of Dry Soil, g
Water Content, %
Average, %
Determine the shrinkage limit of the soil. CUBRINOVSKI, M., and ISHIHARA, K. (2002).
“Maximum and Minimum Void Ratio Characteristics
of Sands,” Soils and Foundations. Vol. 42, No. 6, 65–
13. Following are the results from the liquid and
78.
plastic limit tests for a soil. Liquid limit test:
LADE, P. V., LIGGIO, C. D., and YAMAMURO, J. A.
Water (1998). “Effects of Non-Plastic Fines on Minimum and
Number of
Content Maximum Void Ratios of Sand,” Geotechnical Testing
Blows
(%) Journal, ASTM. Vol. 21, No. 4, 336–347.
16 36.5
20 34.1
28 27.0
Prepared by:
Plastic limit test: PL = 12.2%
ENGR. LEO GERARDO S. ROXAS, MME
a. Determine the plasticity index of the soil Civil Engineering Department
b. Determine the liquidity index of the soil if Faculty, College of Engineering and Architecture
the in-situ water content is 31%.
Water
Number of
Content
Blows
(%)
15 42.0
20 40.8
28 39.1