Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Expert 10 Pts Proficient 6 Pts Competent 4 Pts Needs Work 2 Pts

    Uploaded by

    Camille Morales
    This document outlines a rubric for evaluating group presentations on a topic related to economics. It provides criteria for assessing students on their knowledge of material, organization, presentation skills, creativity, and time/participation. Performance is scored on a scale of "Expert", "Proficient", "Competent", or "Needs Work" and assigned point values ranging from 2 to 10 points. Guidelines specify that presentations should be between 4-10 minutes long and include the presenter asking 5-10 questions of their interview subject.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Expert 10 Pts Proficient 6 Pts Competent 4 Pts Needs Work 2 Pts

    Uploaded by

    Camille Morales
    6 views2 pages
    This document outlines a rubric for evaluating group presentations on a topic related to economics. It provides criteria for assessing students on their knowledge of material, organization, presentation skills, creativity, and time/participation. Performance is scored on a scale of "Expert", "Proficient", "Competent", or "Needs Work" and assigned point values ranging from 2 to 10 points. Guidelines specify that presentations should be between 4-10 minutes long and include the presenter asking 5-10 questions of their interview subject.

    Original Title

    pt

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document outlines a rubric for evaluating group presentations on a topic related to economics. It provides criteria for assessing students on their knowledge of material, organization, presentation skills, creativity, and time/participation. Performance is scored on a scale of "Expert", "Proficient", "Competent", or "Needs Work" and assigned point values ranging from 2 to 10 points. Guidelines specify that presentations should be between 4-10 minutes long and include the presenter asking 5-10 questions of their interview subject.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    6 views2 pages

    Expert 10 Pts Proficient 6 Pts Competent 4 Pts Needs Work 2 Pts

    Uploaded by

    Camille Morales
    This document outlines a rubric for evaluating group presentations on a topic related to economics. It provides criteria for assessing students on their knowledge of material, organization, presentation skills, creativity, and time/participation. Performance is scored on a scale of "Expert", "Proficient", "Competent", or "Needs Work" and assigned point values ranging from 2 to 10 points. Guidelines specify that presentations should be between 4-10 minutes long and include the presenter asking 5-10 questions of their interview subject.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Expert Proficient Competent Needs Work

     
    10 pts 6 pts 4 pts 2 pts

    Knowledge of Expert Proficient Competent Needs Work


    Material
    All group members display thorough All group members display thorough All group members display some Group members make serious errors in
    knowledge of material presented. Answers knowledge of material. Answers greatly knowledge of material presented. material presented. Answers do not
    thoroughly reflect characterization of reflect characterization of characters in the Answers mostly reflect reflect characterization of characters in
    characters in the story. Script has been story. Script was incomplete, but turned in. characterization of characters in the the story. Script was not turned in.
    turned in. story.
    Script was not turned in.

    Organization Expert Proficient Competent Needs Work

    Presentation and materials are well Presentation is well-organized, but some All group members show minor More than one group member seems
    organized. All group members know their group members show minor disorganization, or one group member very disorganized. Group members do
    roles well. disorganization. seems very disorganized. not seem to know their roles well.

    Presentation Expert Proficient Competent Needs Work

    All group members speak clearly and All group members speak clearly, but there All group members speak clearly, but Some students do not speak clearly, and
    loudly and make good eye contact. are minor problems with volume or eye there are minor problems with volume there are problems with volume and eye
    contact. and eye contact. contact.

    Creativity Expert Proficient Competent Needs Work

    Presentation shows significant effort. Presentation shows effort. Students Presentation is acceptable. Discussion Discussion is somewhat lacking in basic
    Students go beyond basic questions and occasionally go beyond basic is adequate, but does not go beyond questions/answers. No use of
    answers. Good use of props/costumes. questions/answers. Some use of basic questions/answers. props/costumes.
    props/costumes.

    Time and Expert Proficient Competent Needs Work


    Participation
    The group presentation did not exceed 15 The group presentation exceeded 15 The group presentation exceeded 15 The group presentation had little
    minutes, and each member of the group minutes, or each member of the group did minutes, and some members of the participation from group members and
    had a speaking role. not have a speaking role. group did not have a speaking role. time was ignored completely.
    PERFOR
    MANCE
    Guidelines:

    TASK SA
     Pumili ng paksa na naayon sa Supply at demand, elasticity, pamilihan.
    Mag- interview ng kasapi ng iyong pamilya.
    ARALIN
     Minimum of 4 minutes at Maximum of 10 minutes
     Ang presenter ay dapat maka pagtanong ng 5-10 questions.

    G
    PANLIP
    UNAN

    You might also like