100% found this document useful (1 vote)
787 views2 pages

Assign-3 (Comparison of British Code of Conduct With IEEE and ACM Code of Conducts)

This document contains an assignment response that compares the British code of ethics to the ACM and IEEE codes of ethics. The response identifies several points that are covered by the British code of ethics but are not fully covered by the ACM and IEEE codes. These include standards around termination of care, addressing ethical misconduct, avoiding exploitation and conflicts of interest, maintaining personal boundaries, general respect, informed consent, self-determination, recognizing limits of competence, and recognizing impairment. The response was authored by group members Ahsan Zubair and Nayab Arooj Saeed for Assignment 03.

Uploaded by

Nayab Abbasi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
787 views2 pages

Assign-3 (Comparison of British Code of Conduct With IEEE and ACM Code of Conducts)

This document contains an assignment response that compares the British code of ethics to the ACM and IEEE codes of ethics. The response identifies several points that are covered by the British code of ethics but are not fully covered by the ACM and IEEE codes. These include standards around termination of care, addressing ethical misconduct, avoiding exploitation and conflicts of interest, maintaining personal boundaries, general respect, informed consent, self-determination, recognizing limits of competence, and recognizing impairment. The response was authored by group members Ahsan Zubair and Nayab Arooj Saeed for Assignment 03.

Uploaded by

Nayab Abbasi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Group member 1: Ahsan Zubair-F17-BCSE-058

Group member 2: Nayab Arooj Saeed-F17-BCSE-086

Assignment No: 03
Question
Compare British code of ethics with ACM and IEEE codes of ethics and find
Page | 1
out those points which are not covered in ACM and IEEE code of ethics
fully?

Answer
These are the points of British code of ethics which are not covered in IEEE and
ACM code of conduct fully.

 Standards of termination and continuity of care:


Professionals should make clear at the first contact, or at the earliest opportunity, the
conditions under which the professional services may be terminated.

 Standard of Addressing Ethical Misconduct:


Professionals must challenge colleagues who appear to have engaged in ethical
misconduct, and/or consider bringing allegations of such misconduct to the attention of
those charged with the responsibility to investigate them.

 Standard of avoiding exploitation and conflicts of interest:


Professionals must avoid forming relationships that may impair professional objectivity
or otherwise lead to exploitation of or conflicts of interest with a client.

 Standard of Maintaining Personal Boundaries:


Professionals must refrain from engaging in any form of relationship with persons to
whom they are providing professional services, or to whom they owe a continuing duty of
care, or with whom they have a relationship of trust. This might include a former patient,
a student or trainee, or a junior staff member.

 Standard of general respect:


Professionals must respect individual, cultural and role differences, including those
involving age, disability, education, ethnicity, gender, language, national origin, race,
religion, family status and socio-economic status.

 Standard of informed consent:


Professionals must ensure that clients, particularly children and vulnerable adults, are
given ample opportunity to understand the nature, purpose, and anticipated
consequences of any professional services or research participation, so that they may
give informed consent to the extent that their capabilities allow.
Group member 1: Ahsan Zubair-F17-BCSE-058
Group member 2: Nayab Arooj Saeed-F17-BCSE-086

 Standards of self-determination:
Professionals must Endeavour to support the self-determination of clients, while at the
same time remaining alert to potential limits placed upon self-determination by personal
Page | 2
characteristics or by externally imposed circumstances.

 Standard of recognizing limits of competence:


Professionals must do practice within the boundaries of their competence and should be
engaged in Continued Professional Development.

 Standard of recognizing impairment:


Professionals must monitor their own personal and professional lifestyle in order to
remain alert to signs of impairment.

You might also like