Module

4
Fasteners

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

 Lesson
2
Cotter and knuckle
joint

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

Instructional Objectives

At the end of this lesson, the students should have the knowledge of
• A typical cotter joint, its components and working principle.
• Detailed design procedure of a cotter joint.
• A typical knuckle joint, its components and working principle.
• Detailed design procedure of a knuckle joint.

4.2.1 Cotter joint

A cotter is a flat wedge-shaped piece of steel as shown in figure-4.2.1.1. This is
used to connect rigidly two rods which transmit motion in the axial direction,
without rotation. These joints may be subjected to tensile or compressive forces
along the axes of the rods.
Examples of cotter joint connections are: connection of piston rod to the
crosshead of a steam engine, valve rod and its stem etc.

4.2.1.1F- A typical cotter with a taper on one side only (Ref.[6]).

A typical cotter joint is as shown in figure-4.2.1.2. One of the rods has a socket
end into which the other rod is inserted and the cotter is driven into a slot, made
in both the socket and the rod. The cotter tapers in width (usually 1:24) on one

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

side only and when this is driven in, the rod is forced into the socket. However, if
the taper is provided on both the edges it must be less than the sum of the
friction angles for both the edges to make it self locking i.e α1 + α 2 < φ1 + φ2 where

α1 , α 2 are the angles of taper on the rod edge and socket edge of the cotter

respectively and φ1, φ2 are the corresponding angles of friction. This also means
that if taper is given on one side only then α < φ1 + φ2 for self locking. Clearances

between the cotter and slots in the rod end and socket allows the driven cotter to
draw together the two parts of the joint until the socket end comes in contact with
the cotter on the rod end.

t1 l

b l1
d d1 d2

d4
d3

4.2.1.2F- Cross-sectional views of a typical cotter joint (Ref.[6]).

4.2.1.3F- An isometric view of a typical cotter joint (Ref.[6]).

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

4.2.2 Design of a cotter joint
If the allowable stresses in tension, compression and shear for the socket, rod
and cotter be σ t , σc and τ respectively, assuming that they are all made of the

same material, we may write the following failure criteria:

1. Tension failure of rod at diameter d

π 2
d σt = P
4

4.2.2.1F- Tension failure of the rod (Ref.[6]).

2. Tension failure of rod across slot

⎛π 2 ⎞
t

⎜ d1 − d1t ⎟ σ t = P
⎝4 ⎠

4.2.2.2F- Tension failure of rod across slot (Ref.[6]).

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

3. Tensile failure of socket across slot
⎛π 2 ⎞
⎜ (d 2 − d1 ) − (d 2 − d1 )t ⎟ σ t = P
2

⎝4 ⎠

d2
t
4.2.2.3F- Tensile failure of socket across slot (Ref.[6]).

4. Shear failure of cotter

2btτ = P

4.2.2.4F- Shear failure of cotter (Ref.[6]).

5. Shear failure of rod end

2l1d1τ = P

4.2.2.5F- Shear failure of rod end (Ref.[6]).

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

6. Shear failure of socket end
2l ( d3 − d1 ) τ = P

4.2.2.6F- Shear failure of socket end (Ref.[6]).

7. Crushing failure of rod or cotter

d1tσc = P

4.2.2.7F- Crushing failure of rod or cotter (Ref.[6]).

8. Crushing failure of socket or rod

(d 3
− d 1 ) tσ c = P

4.2.2.8F- Crushing failure of socket or rod (Ref.[6]).

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

 9. Crushing failure of collar
⎛π 2 2 ⎞
⎜ (d 4 − d1 ) ⎟ σ c = P
⎝4 ⎠

4.2.2.9F- Crushing failure of collar (Ref.[6]).

10. Shear failure of collar

πd1t1τ = P

4.2.2.10F- Shear failure of collar (Ref.[6]).

Cotters may bend when driven into position. When this occurs, the bending
moment cannot be correctly estimated since the pressure distribution is not
known. However, if we assume a triangular pressure distribution over the rod, as
shown in figure-4.2.2.11 (a), we may approximate the loading as shown in figure-
4.2.2.11 (b)

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

 P/2 P/2

d3
b

P/2 P/2

d3 − d1 d1
d3 − d1 d1 d 1 d1 +
d1 + 6 4
6 4 4 4
(a) (b)
4.2.2.11F- Bending of the cotter

P ⎛ d3 − d1 d1 ⎞
This gives maximum bending moment = + ⎟ and
2 ⎜⎝ 6 4⎠

P ⎛ d 3 − d1 d 1 ⎞ b ⎛d −d d ⎞
⎜ + ⎟ 3P ⎜ 3 1 + 1 ⎟
The bending stress, σ b = ⎝
4 ⎠2
= ⎝
2 6 6 4⎠
3 2
tb tb
12

Tightening of cotter introduces initial stresses which are again difficult to

estimate. Sometimes therefore it is necessary to use empirical proportions to
design the joint. Some typical proportions are given below:
d1 = 1.21.d
d 2 = 1.75.d
d3 = 2.4 d
d 4 = 1.5.d
t = 0.31d
b = 1.6d
l = l1 = 0.75d
t1 = 0.45d
s= clearance

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

 A design based on empirical relation may be checked using the formulae based
on failure mechanisms.

4.2.3 Knuckle Joint

A knuckle joint (as shown in figure- 4.2.3.1) is used to connect two rods under
tensile load. This joint permits angular misalignment of the rods and may take
compressive load if it is guided.

d2
d3
0.8d

t2
t1
0 .6
1.2d

d
d

t
P P

d
2d
1.

t1
1.2d
1.2d t2
0.25d

d1
Split pin
d3

4.2.3.1F- A typical knuckle joint

These joints are used for different types of connections e.g. tie rods, tension links
in bridge structure. In this, one of the rods has an eye at the rod end and the
other one is forked with eyes at both the legs. A pin (knuckle pin) is inserted
through the rod-end eye and fork-end eyes and is secured by a collar and a split
pin.
Normally, empirical relations are available to find different dimensions of the joint
and they are safe from design point of view. The proportions are given in the
figure-4.2.3.1.

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

 d = diameter of rod
d1 = d t = 1.25d
d 2 = 2d t1 = 0.75d
d 3 = 1.5.d t 2 = 0.5d

Mean diameter of the split pin = 0.25 d

However, failures analysis may be carried out for checking. The analyses are
shown below assuming the same materials for the rods and pins and the yield
stresses in tension, compression and shear are given by σt, σc and τ.
1. Failure of rod in tension:
π 2
d σt = P
4
2. Failure of knuckle pin in double shear:
π 2
2 d1 τ = P
4
3. Failure of knuckle pin in bending (if the pin is loose in the fork)
Assuming a triangular pressure distribution on the pin, the loading on the pin is
shown in figure- 4.2.3.2.
Equating the maximum bending stress to tensile or compressive yield stress we
have

⎛t t⎞
16P ⎜ 1 + ⎟
σt = ⎝ 3 4⎠
πd13

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

 P/2 P/2

d1
t1 t t1 t
+ P/2 P/2 +
3 4 3 4
t1 t/2 t/2 t1

4.2.3.2F- Bending of a knuckle pin

4. Failure of rod eye in shear:

( d 2 − d1 ) tτ = P
5. Failure of rod eye in crushing:
d1 tσ c = P

6. Failure of rod eye in tension:

( d 2 − d1 ) tσ t = P
7. Failure of forked end in shear:
2 ( d 2 − d1 ) t1τ = P

8. Failure of forked end in tension:

2 ( d 2 − d1 ) t1σt = P
9. Failure of forked end in crushing:
2d1t1σc = P

The design may be carried out using the empirical proportions and then the
analytical relations may be used as checks.

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

 2P
For example using the 2nd equation we have τ = . We may now put value of
πd12
τy
d1 from empirical relation and then find F.S. = which should be more than
τ
one.

4.2.4 Problems with Answers

Q.1: Design a typical cotter joint to transmit a load of 50 kN in tension or

compression. Consider that the rod, socket and cotter are all made of a
material with the following allowable stresses:
Allowable tensile stress σy = 150 MPa
Allowable crushing stress σc = 110 MPa
Allowable shear stress τy = 110 MPa.
A.1:
Refer to figure- 4.2.1.2 and 4.2.2.1
π 2
Axial load P = d σ y . On substitution this gives d=20 mm. In general
4
standard shaft size in mm are
6 mm to 22 mm diameter 2 mm in increment
25 mm to 60 mm diameter 5 mm in increment
60 mm to 110 mm diameter 10 mm in increment
110 mm to 140 mm diameter 15 mm in increment
140 mm to 160 mm diameter 20 mm in increment
500 mm to 600 mm diameter 30 mm in increment
We therefore choose a suitable rod size to be 25 mm.

Refer to figure-4.2.2.2

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

 ⎛π ⎞
For tension failure across slot ⎜ d 2 − d1t ⎟ σ y = P . This gives d1t = 1.58x10−4
⎝4 ⎠
m2.From empirical relations we may take t=0.4d i.e. 10 mm and this gives
d1= 15.8 mm. Maintaining the proportion let d1= 1.2 d = 30 mm.

Refer to figure-4.2.2.3
⎧⎛ π ⎞ ⎫
The tensile failure of socket across slot ⎨⎜ d 2 2 − d12 ⎟ − ( d 2 − d1 ) t ⎬ σ y = P
⎩⎝ 4 ⎠ ⎭
This gives d2 = 37 mm. Let d2 = 40 mm

Refer to figure-4.2.2.4
For shear failure of cotter 2btτ = P. On substitution this gives b = 22.72
mm.
Let b = 25 mm.

Refer to figure-4.2.2.5
For shear failure of rod end 2l1d1τ = P and this gives l1 = 7.57 mm. Let l1 =
10 mm.

Refer to figure-4.2.2.6
For shear failure of socket end 2l(d2-d1)τ = P. This gives l= 22.72 mm. Let
l=25 mm

Refer to figure-4.2.2.8
For crushing failure of socket or rod (d3-d1)tσc = P. This gives d3 = 75.5
mm. Let d3 = 77 mm.

Refer to figure-4.2.2.9
π 2
For crushing failure of collar
4
( d 4 − d12 ) σc = P . On substitution this gives

d4= 38.4 mm. Let d4= 40 mm.

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

 Refer to figure-4.2.2.10
For shear failure of collar πd1t1τ = P which gives t1= 4.8 mm. Let t1 = 5
mm.
Therefore the final chosen values of dimensions are
d= 25 mm; d1= 30 mm; d2 = 40 mm; d3 = 77 mm; d4 = 40 mm; t= 10 mm;
t1= 5 mm; l= 25 mm; l1= 10 mm; b= 27 mm.

Q.2: Two mild steel rods are connected by a knuckle joint to transmit an axial
force of 100 kN. Design the joint completely assuming the working
stresses for both the pin and rod materials to be 100 MPa in tension, 65
MPa in shear and 150 MPa in crushing.
A.2:
Refer to figure- 4.2.3.1
π 2
For failure of rod in tension, P = d σ y . On substituting P=100 kN,
4
σy = 100 MPa we have d= 35.6 mm. Let us choose the rod diameter d =
40 mm which is the next standard size.
We may now use the empirical relations to find the necessary dimensions
and then check the failure criteria.
d1= 40 mm t= 50 mm
d2 = 80 mm t1= 30 mm;
d3 = 60 mm t2= 20 mm;
split pin diameter = 0.25 d1 = 10 mm
To check the failure modes:
⎛ π ⎞
1. Failure of knuckle pin in shear: P ⎜ 2. d12 ⎟ = τ y which gives τy = 39.8
⎝ 4 ⎠
MPa. This is less than the yield shear stress.
⎛t t⎞
16P ⎜ 1 + ⎟
2. For failure of knuckle pin in bending: σ y = ⎝ 3 4 ⎠ . On substitution
πd13

this gives σy = 179 MPa which is more than the allowable tensile yield

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur

 stress of 100 MPa. We therefore increase the knuckle pin diameter to
55 mm which gives σy = 69 MPa that is well within the tensile yield
stress.
3. For failure of rod eye in shear: (d2-d1)tτ = P. On substitution d1 = 55mm
τ= 80 MPa which exceeds the yield shear stress of 65 MPa. So d2
should be at least 85.8 mm. Let d2 be 90 mm.
4. For failure of rod eye in crushing: d1tσc = P which gives σc = 36.36
MPa that is well within the crushing strength of 150 MPa.
5. Failure of rod eye in tension: (d2-d1)tσt = P. Tensile stress developed at
the rod eye is then σt = 57.14 MPa which is safe.
6. Failure of forked end in shear: 2(d2-d1)t1τ = P. Thus shear stress
developed in the forked end is τ = 47.61 MPa which is safe.
7. Failure of forked end in tension: 2(d2-d1)t1σy = P. Tensile strength
developed in the forked end is then σy= 47.61 MPa which is safe.
8. Failure of forked end in crushing: 2d1t1σc = P which gives the crushing
stress developed in the forked end as σc = 42 MPa. This is well within
the crushing strength of 150 MPa.
Therefore the final chosen values of dimensions are:
d1= 55 mm t= 50 mm
d2 = 90 mm t1= 30 mm; and d = 40 mm
d3 = 60 mm t2= 20 mm;

4.2.5 Summary of this Lesson

In this lesson two well known joints viz. cotter and knuckle joints used in
machinery are discussed. Their constructional detail and working principle
have been described. Then the detailed design procedures of both these
joints are given with suitable illustrations. Finally two examples, one on
cotter joint and the other on cotter joint have been solved.

Version 2 ME, IIT Kharagpur