Introduction To Ethics - PDF
Introduction To Ethics - PDF
when the act is
intended for its
own sake, either
as a means or as
an end
EXAMPLE
He who intends to go
to a party in order to
drink with friends
wills both the going to
the party and the
drinking with friends.
Both acts, therefore,
are directly voluntary.
INDIRECT VOLUNTARY
ACT
an act which is not intended
for its own sake but with
merely follows as a regrettable
consequence of an action
directly willed.
Refers to an act which is
desired not as an end in itself
but as a foreseen effect or
consequences of an act.
Refers to an act which is the
foreseen consequence of
another act directly intended.
EXAMPLES
Throwing precious cargoes from a sinking
boat to save lives of passengers. Here the
throwing and losing of the cargoes is not
desired or intended. It comes as a
consequence of saving lives of passengers.
Going to a party to enjoy with friends but
making trouble when drunk. The making
of trouble may have been foreseen and
foreknown but it may have been intended;
in which case, the act of making trouble is
only indirectly voluntary.
A person is accountable for
indirectly voluntary acts when:
1. The doer is able to foresee the evil
result or consequence in a general
way.
2. The doer is free to refrain from doing
the action which would result in the
foreseen evil.
3. The doer has the moral obligation
not to do that which would result in
something evil.
ACTS WITH DOUBLE EFFECTS: MORAL
PRINCIPLES by ALFREDO PANIZO
1. A person is held morally responsible
for any evil effect which flows from
the action directly willed and as a
natural consequence of such action,
though such evil effect is not
directly willed nor intended.
2. A human act with double effect,
good and evil, is morally permissible
under 4 conditions:
ACTS WITH DOUBLE EFFECTS: MORAL
PRINCIPLES by ALFREDO PANIZO
THE 4 conditions:
1. The action which produces double effects
must be good in itself.
2. The good effect must not come from the evil
effect.
3. The purpose of the doer is the attainment of
the good effect.
4. The good effect must overweigh in
importance of the evil result.
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HUMAN ACTS
saving one’s honor, or in order to win a case,
etc., without incurring moral guilt, because
while the end is good the means employed
(lying) is bad.
It is not morally justified to shorten the life of
one dying even with the intention of saving him
from the prolonged and useless pain and
suffering.
It is not morally justified to shorten the life of
one dying even with the intention of saving him
from the prolonged and useless pain and
suffering.
It is immoral to practice intentional abortion for
any reason whatsoever.
MODIFIERS OF HUMAN ACT
1. IGNORANCE. It is the absence of knowledge
which a person ought to posses.
a.Vincible Ignorance. One which can easily
corrected through ordinary diligence. (lessens voluntariness)
PRINCIPLES OF VIOLENCE.
1. External or Commanded Acts performed
by a person subjected to violence, to which
reasonable resistance has been offered, are
involuntary and not accountable.
2. Elicited Acts, or those done by the will
alone, are not subject to violence and are
therefor involuntary.
MODIFIERS OF HUMAN ACT
5. HABITS. These are the readiness,
born of frequently repeated acts, for
acting a certain manner. Habits are
acquired through a repetition of an act
over a period of time. They are either
good or bad, and becomes like a second
nature, moving one to do something with
relative ease without much reflection.
MODIFIERS OF HUMAN ACT
PRINCIPLES OF HABITS
1.Actions done by force of habit are voluntary in
cause, unless a reasonable effort is made to
counteract the inclination.
2.Habits are voluntary in cause, because they
are a result of previously willed acts done
repeatedly over a period of time. However,
when a person exerts consistent efforts to
counteract the habit, the actions resulting
from such habit are regarded as acts of man,
and therefor, not accountable.
MODIFIERS OF HUMAN ACT
6. POVERTY. It is never an excuse for
committing a crime just as wealth does not
justify abuses. But there is a correlation
between poverty and crimes. People who are
dirt poor and starving are unlikely to think
about their morals.
Nobody deserves to be a poor. It is a social
evil that must be corrected by the State. It
becomes an act of injustice by the State that
fails to look after the welfare of the people,
neglecting their economic needs.
ACTION & EMOTION
Man is not a robot devoid of feelings.
Every human act involves a person
emotionally.
Emotions are natural and beneficial. The
positive tendencies of love, kindness,
humility, reverence and justice express
approval of what is good and worthy in
an object. The negative tendencies of
anger, horror and hatred express
disapproval and repudiation of evil.
REFINEMENT & EMOTION
EMOTIONS, however, need to be
subjugated to reason because unbridled
passions could lead to his perdition. One
must learn to rein his emotions and work
them to his advantage.
Moral perfection comes from within.
Filipinos speak of a good person
possessing “mabuting kalooban,”
“mapagmahal,” “matulungin sa kapwa” at
“may takot sa Diyos.”
QUIZ (10 pts. each)
1.Why are we accountable for our
actions?
2.How should we manage our
passions?
ASSIGNMENT (10 pts. each)
1.Is it morally permitted to tell a lie in
order to avoid torture?
2.Is helping somebody morally wrong if
we do not enjoy doing it?
The Ends of Human Act
The Ends of Human Act
Man does not act aimlessly. Every
Action is done for a purpose. The
purpose of human act is significant
because it defines the nature of an act
and reveals the moral judgment of the
doer.