Prince Felix Wants To Improve His Palace Grounds For His Grandchildren
Prince Felix Wants To Improve His Palace Grounds For His Grandchildren
Prince Felix Wants To Improve His Palace Grounds For His Grandchildren
He decides to build a
large swimming pool and a small fairground. Prince Felix entered into a contract with Greta
to build the swimming pool for£1 million payable on completion. The contract provides for
completion of the swimming pool by 1st March.
Prince Felix entered into a contract with Hans to build the fairground for £9 million payable in
three equal instalments: on signing the contract; on the commencement of work; and on
completion. The contract provides for the completion of the fairground by 1st October.
When work commences on the swimming pool, Greta encounters harder ground than she
anticipated and demands an extra £100,000 to cover her increased costs. Prince Felix cannot
find any other builder with the expertise to complete the contract on time and so agrees
without protest so that the pool will be completed in time for his granddaughter Elsa’s
birthday celebrations. On completion of the swimming pool on 1st March, Prince Felix refuses
to pay Greta any more than £1 million.
Prince Felix pays Hans the first and second payments as required by the contract. Prince
Felix’s palace then suffers extensive damage in a fire, which will be costly to repair.
Consequently, he tells Hans that he will not be able to make the final payment and so Hans
offers to reduce it by one third to £2 million. Hans then regrets agreeing to reduce the final
instalment and demands the original amount offering Prince Felix an extra three months to
find the money.
General remarks
A question requiring a discussion of consideration and related principles. It was important to
identify that this question raises issues of contract modification rather than formation; time
was often wasted discussing offer and acceptance, which is irrelevant.
Law cases, reports and other references the examiners would expect you to use
Need to analyse each contract separately, as follows.
Common errors
Knowledge shown of the W v R test and the principles of promissory estoppel but not applied
correctly to the two scenarios. Discussing offer and acceptance and contract formation rather
than modification. Focusing on irrelevant points (such as the fire and whether it frustrated the
contract – no impact on the two key contracts).