Lab Report Experiment: Compression Testing Name: Group
Lab Report Experiment: Compression Testing Name: Group
10
8
diameter mm
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
sample
strain vs stress
sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4
sample 5 offset sample1 offset sample 2 offset sample3
offset sample4 offset sample5
800
700
600
500
stress MPa
400
300
200
100
0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14
strain
mm
In the above graph, strain vs stress plot is drawn for all five samples. Each sample has its own color line
as shown above.
strain vs stress
sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4
sample 5 7000 N sample 1 sample 2 7000N sample 3 7000 N
sample 4 7000 N sample 5 7000N
800
700
600
500
stress MPa
400
300
200
100
0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14
strain
mm
600
500
stress MPa
400
300
200
100
0
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07
strain
mm
In the above graph, stress and strain points at 7000 N load are determined and shown for each sample.
In the table 2, each point is tabulated.
strain vs stress
sample 1 Linear (sample 1) sample 2 Linear (sample 2)
sample 3 Linear (sample 3) sample 4 Linear (sample 4)
sample 5 Linear (sample 5)
800
700 f(x) = 19977.5 x − 38.95
600 f(x)=f(x)
f(x) = 5963.77
=16637.71
11348.81x x−x−48.28
−55.01
47.38
500
stress MPa
400
300
f(x) = 7996.26 x − 16.25
200
100
0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14
strain
mm
600
500
stress MPa
400
300
200
100
0
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07
strain
mm
In the above graph, slope of each curve for every sample is determined. The slope is young
modulus value. It is given in following table.2.
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01 error in young modulus
0.01
0
0
0
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5
sample
From the above experiment, it can be seen that for high tensile strength, the compression strength
is low and for high compression strength, tensile strength is low.
Answer to the question:
Aspect ratio of compression sample should be between 1 to 3 because as the aspect ratio
increases, the compression of the material also increases. If the compression ration is larger than
the limit then the strength of material will decrease.
Sample calculation:
Following is the calculation of stress and strain for sample 1.
revised adjusted
Extensio extensio extensio revised
Time n Load n n load strain stress
mm/m
(sec) (mm) (N) (mm) mm N m Mpa
-
0.0965 0.00175 1.79377
0 0 8 0 0.09658 5 9
-
- 0.2133 0.00197 2.41129
0.1 0.00113 9 0.00113 0.21339 1 5
-
0.4543 0.00219 3.09797
0.2 -0.003 3 0.003 0.45433 4 9
-
- 1.2981 0.00240 3.84231
0.3 0.00493 2 0.00493 1.29812 2 9
-
- 3.9595 0.00261
0.4 0.00663 3 0.00663 3.95953 8 4.77095
-
- 7.0913 0.00284 5.75721
0.5 0.00833 6 0.00833 7.09136 1 5
-
- 10.999 0.00307 6.87066
0.6 0.00997 7 0.00997 10.9997 1 8
-
- 16.006 16.0068 0.00328 8.04590
0.7 0.01173 8 0.01173 3 7 5
-
- 22.183 22.1836 0.00350 9.19792
0.8 0.01337 7 0.01337 0 7 3 7
-
- 29.820 29.8204 0.00371 10.4465
0.9 0.01502 5 0.01502 0.00165 8 8 8
-
- 38.312 38.3127 0.00393 11.6930
1 0.01672 7 0.01672 0.00335 1 4 4
- 47.5179
1.1 -0.0183 47.518 0.0183 0.00493 6 0.00415 12.9828
-
- 59.002 59.0023 0.00438 14.4345
1.2 0.01995 3 0.01995 0.00658 4 1 7
1.3 - - 0.02165 0.00828 71.1994 0.00458 15.8162
71.199
0.02165 5 8 8 6
-
84.969 84.9695 0.00480 17.2681
1.4 -0.0234 6 0.0234 0.01003 5 4 7
-
- 99.503 99.5037 0.00503 18.7857
1.5 0.02505 7 0.02505 0.01168 1 4 2
-
- 113.75 113.750 0.00524 20.2604
1.6 0.02669 1 0.02669 0.01332 8 3 9
-
- 129.19 129.192 0.00546
1.7 0.02833 3 0.02833 0.01496 9 6 21.8329
-
- 144.60 144.607 0.00568
1.8 0.02998 8 0.02998 0.01661 9 9 23.4427
-
- 160.55 160.558 0.00591 25.1800
1.9 0.03162 8 0.03162 0.01825 3 2 2
-
- 178.51 178.512 0.00613 26.8474
2 0.03338 2 0.03338 0.02001 3 5 9
- 195.599 0.00634 28.4709
2.1 0.03496 -195.6 0.03496 0.02159 7 4 3
-
- 213.55 213.555 0.00655
2.2 0.03661 5 0.03661 0.02324 5 9 30.1128
-
- 232.32 0.00677 31.8247
2.3 0.03836 3 0.03836 0.02499 232.323 4 8
-
- 250.56 250.561 0.00699 33.5287
2.4 0.03995 1 0.03995 0.02658 5 1 5
-
- 270.00 270.007 0.00722 35.4267
2.5 0.04165 7 0.04165 0.02828 5 8 2
-
- 289.91 289.915 0.00744 37.2285
2.6 0.04335 6 0.04335 0.02998 9 4 6
-
- 311.40 311.401 0.00766 39.0148
2.7 0.04505 1 0.04505 0.03168 3 7 8
-
- 332.02 332.022 40.8657
2.8 0.04675 3 0.04675 0.03338 9 0.00789 9
2.9 - -352.1 0.04834 0.03497 352.1 0.00810 42.6658
0.04834 6 6
-
- 372.40 372.405 0.00831 44.4946
3 0.04998 5 0.04998 0.03661 1 4 1
-
- 393.57 393.577 0.00853 46.2899
3.1 0.05162 7 0.05162 0.03825 1 7 3
- - 0.00876 48.2739
3.2 0.05327 414.65 0.05327 0.0399 414.65 8 5
-
- 438.12 438.122 0.00898 50.1878
3.3 0.05508 2 0.05508 0.04171 2 3 7
-
- 460.40 460.405 0.00919 52.0801
3.4 0.05672 6 0.05672 0.04335 6 9 9
-
- 482.49 482.497 0.00940 53.9759
3.5 0.05842 7 0.05842 0.04505 1 7 9
-
- 505.38 505.387 55.8934
3.6 0.06012 7 0.06012 0.04675 3 0.00963 9
Sd=√ ∑ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿
√
Sd = (3.98−3.9665) +(3.96−3.9665) +(3.96−3.9665) +(3.966−3.9665)
4
Sd = 0.009434 mm
Following is calculation for uncertainty calculation in young modulus:
Figure 8 error in young modulus
Figure 9 error in young modulus
Figure 10 error in young modulus