Scribd
Upload
44 views1 page

Example Project - Moderators Comments: Criterion A: Planning

The moderator provided feedback on a student project across 5 criteria: (1) Planning was clearly explained but some success criteria could be more specific. (2) The solution overview provided details of tasks but the design overview and test plan needed more explanation and to address all success criteria. (3) The solution showed moderate complexity and ingenuity but techniques and algorithms were not fully explained. (4) Functionality addressed most success criteria and the solution was extensible due to design and programming style. (5) Evaluation addressed success criteria but lacked evidence of client/advisor feedback needed for a proper evaluation.

Uploaded by

Wei Dwhwh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
44 views1 page

Example Project - Moderators Comments: Criterion A: Planning

The moderator provided feedback on a student project across 5 criteria: (1) Planning was clearly explained but some success criteria could be more specific. (2) The solution overview provided details of tasks but the design overview and test plan needed more explanation and to address all success criteria. (3) The solution showed moderate complexity and ingenuity but techniques and algorithms were not fully explained. (4) Functionality addressed most success criteria and the solution was extensible due to design and programming style. (5) Evaluation addressed success criteria but lacked evidence of client/advisor feedback needed for a proper evaluation.

Uploaded by

Wei Dwhwh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Example Project - Moderators Comments

Link to the student project

Criterion A: Planning
The client is clearly stated with a reference to evidence of consultation in the appendix, and the
scenario is clear. The rationale is fully explained – both for product and for software. Most criteria for
success are specific and testable.

Criterion B: Solution overview


The record of tasks includes all 5 stages (plan, design, develop, test and implement) in sufficient detail.
The design overview is detailed, but should have been explained for better understanding. A test plan
is partially complete because it does not clearly address the criteria for success. For full marks, the
design overview should include UML diagrams with interdependencies explained and some algorithm
design. The test plan should address all success criteria.

Criterion C: Development
The complexity of the solution is sufficiently high, but most techniques have not been explained –
therefore moderate complexity. There is clear evidence of algorithmic thinking and creativity, but most
algorithms have not been explained – moderate to high ingenuity. The documentation is clear and
structured. Candidates should aim to explain their understanding of and the use of the techniques
involved and to showcase their algorithmic thinking and creativity.

Criterion D: Functionality and extensibility of product


Functionality of the solution in the video is fully evidenced and most criteria for success have been
addressed. Extensibility is straightforward due to the detailed design overview and to proper attention
to programming style.

Criterion E: Evaluation
All criteria for success are addressed and the recommendations are realistic, but there is no evidence
of client/adviser feedback. A proper evaluation should include a discussion of success criteria based
on significant client/adviser feedback and recommendations for improvement should be justified.

You might also like