American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Development (AJMRD)

Volume 2, Issue 3 (March- 2020), PP 21-25

ISSN: 2360-821X
www.ajmrd.com

Research Paper Open Access

Influence of Motivation and Work Environment

The Performance of Employees Pt. Multi Putra Makmur
Artris Feronika Korompot
Estiningsih, SE, MM
Faculty of Management, Gunadarma University, Indonesia

ABSTRACT:- Motivation and work environment are the two aspects that influence the performance of
employees so this study aimed to determine the effect of motivation and work environment on the performance
of employees of PT. Multi Putra Makmur. The object of this study are employees who are qualified sample of
30 respondents. The data used is primary data obtained using a questionnaire. Data were analyzed using
multiple linear analysis, T test and F test to test and prove the hypothesis of this study. The results of the
analysis dikertahui that motivation and the working environment positive and significant effect on employee
performance.

Keywords: Motivation, Work Environment, Employee Performance.

I. INTRODUCTION
Basically the company does not just apply human resources capable and skilled, but more importantly
the company expects employees are willing to work hard and willing to achieve optimal results. This is caused
because the success of an organization or company will be determined by human factors or employees reach
their goals. An employee has an optimal performance can support the achievement of goals and objectives that
have been set by the company.
Performance is generally defined as a person's success in carrying out a job. Employee performance is
the result of work achieved in executing his duties.
According to Setiawan and Waridin (2006) the employee's performance is the result or performance to
be assessed in terms of the quality of work quantity based on the standards specified by the organization. The
excellent performance is the optimal performance, the performance of appropriate standards organization and
support the achievement of organizational goals. There is a negative factor that can degrade the performance of
the employee, including the employee wishes to achieve a decrease in work performance, absenteeism is less,
the lack of timeliness in completion of the work so that less follow the rules, as well as the work program is not
reached.
Factors that influence the performance of employees, among others, is motivation. Performance will be
better if the employees are encouraged to have high expertise, willing to work Because paid or are paid in
accordance with the agreement, have expectations of a better future. Salary or wages and their expectations are
what creates motivation to work an employee is willing to carry kehiatan work and good performance.
Other factors that also affect the performance of employees is the work environment factors. The
working environment is more emphasis on the physical condition of the workplace is based on the
understanding that the work environment can affect the performance of the employee in performing their duties.
With a good working environment, safe, and comfortable without any disruption to eg incorrect temperature,
noise, lighting more or less, as well as other disorders.
PT. Multi Putra Makmur is a company engaged in the field of labor provider services (outsourcing),
services, and building management. Companies that have a total staff of about 53 employees who are divided
into permanent employees and contract employees. Permanent employees in this company employee who has
experienced over the past year working at PT. Multi Putra Makmur. Whereas, for the contract employee who is
still focused on the area poject and nothing is settled in the office, some only as a team leader in the project area.
These companies in their activities rely heavily on human resources. With the qualified human resources, the
company will be able to achieve the goals that have been planned. Factors that can be used to increase
productivity PT.

II. METHOD

Multidisciplinary Journal www.ajmrd.com Page | 21

 Influence of Motivation and Work Environment The Performance of Employees Pt. Multi…
The data used in scientific writing is the primary data. Primary data was collected researchers
information directly from the source (Hadi Sutrisno, 2001). With data analysis using SPSS 22.. The method of
determining the number of samples is by using purposive sampling of respondents criteria: 1). Employees
PT.Multi Putra Makmur; 2). Employees who receive compensation from PT. Multi Putra Makmur; 3).
Employees who work at least 1 year old. The number of respondents who qualify are as many as 30 people. The
data collection technique also used a questionnaire using Likert scale.
Based on indicator variables, the obtained five indicators for motivation variable, five indicators for
work environment variables, and five varabel for employee performance. With the number of questions in the
questionnaire of 15 statements having previously been through validity and reliability.

III. RESULTS
The test result shows that the correlation between the validity of each of the indicators to the total score
of each variable constructs showed significant results, and show that r count> r table. It can be concluded that all
the items declared invalid statement.
Item-Total Statistics
variables Corrected R Table Conclusion
Item-Total
Correlation
Motivation (X1)
X1.1 , 849 .361 valid
X1.2 , 691 .361 valid
X1.3 , 833 .361 valid
X1.4 , 764 .361 valid
x1.5 , 816 .361 valid
Working
Environment (X2) , 923 .361 valid
X2.1
X2.2 , 773 .361 valid
X2.3 , 881 .361 valid
X2.4 , 686 .361 valid
X2.5 , 788 .361 valid
Employee
Performance (Y) , 915 .361 valid
Y1.1
Y1.2 , 792 .361 valid
Y1.3 , 854 .361 valid
Y1.4 , 875 .361 valid
Y1.5 , 734 .361 valid

The reliability test results show that all the variables have a large enough alpha coefficient is above 0.6
so that it can be said of all the concept of measuring each of the variables of the questionnaire is reliable so as to
further the items in each of these variables concept fit for use as a tool measuring.
variables Alpha Information
Motivation 0929 Reliable
Work environment 0925 Reliable
Employee performance 0938 Reliable

Multiple test results in the table below:

Coefficientsa
Model Coefficients unstandardized standardized T Sig.
Coefficients
B Std. Error beta
1 (Constant) 3,714 1,674 2,219 , 035
X1 , 398 , 162 , 307 2,463 .002
X2 , 850 , 159 , 665 5.336 , 000
a. Dependent Variable: Y
From the calculation above table can be created regression equation as follows:
Multidisciplinary Journal www.ajmrd.com Page | 22
 Influence of Motivation and Work Environment The Performance of Employees Pt. Multi…
Y = 3.714 + 0.398 + 0.850 Motivation at Work + e
Information: Y = Employee performance
a = constant
b1, B2, b3 = Coefficient of the regression line
X1 = Motivation
X2 = Work Environment
e = Error / Variable spam
1. A constant value (a) of 3,714, that is, if the variable motivation (X1) and the Working Environment
(X2) is worth staying, then the purchase decision variable (Y) of 3,714.
2. Motivation variable regression coefficients () of 0.398. States that every an increase of 1 scores for
the motivation to work will be followed by an increase in the performance of employees is 0.398.
3. Coefficient of work environment shows the number of 0.850. states that if there is an increase of 1
scores for the work environment will be followed by an increase in the performance of employees amounted to
0.850

Partial assay results or t test. The t-test is used to determine the effect of one independent variable (free)
individually or each of the dependent variable (dependent). In this study to examine the significance of any free
variables (motivation, and work environment). SCARA partial effect on the dependent variable (performance of
employees).
Coefficientsa
, Model Coefficients unstandardized standardized T Sig.
Coefficients
B Std. Error beta
1 (Constant) 3,714 1,674 2,219 , 035
X1 , 398 , 162 , 307 2,463 .002
X2 , 850 , 159 , 665 5.336 , 000
a. Dependent Variable: Y
The results of t test analysis (df) obtained t table at a significant level α = 0.05 = 2.0422 while the t each variable
is as follows:
1. T value the motivation variable (X1) is approximately 2,463 with a significant level of 0.020. Because
2.463> 2.0422 and 0.002 <0.05. Then Ho is rejected and Ha accepted. Which means the motivation variable
partial effect on employee performance.
2. T value on the work environment variables (X2) is approximately 5.336 with a significant level of
0.000. Because 5.336> 2.0422 and 0.000 <0.05. Then Ho is rejected and Ha accepted. Which means that the
working environment variable partial effect against kinerjakaryawan.
Based on the regression equation, all the independent variables and the motivation variable work of the
environmental variables or (X1 and X2) affect positively on Y (the employee's performance) that can be seen
from the regression coefficient is positive.
It can be concluded motivation and a good working environment becomes the driving improve employee
performance.
The results are consistent with research conducted by Anak Agung Ayu Mirah Kencana Wati (2013) with the
title Influence of leadership, work ethic, motivation and discipline to employee performance intermediate
Denpasar tax office. Shows that the variable of leadership, work ethic and discipline simultaneously and pasrsial
positive and significant impact on employee performance.

The test results simultaneously

ANOVA A
Model Sum of Df mean Square F Sig.
Squares
1 Regression 662.397 2 331.198 99.467 , 000b
residual 89.903 27 3,330
Total 752.300 29
a. Dependent Variable: Y
b. Predictors: (Constant), X2, X1
The hypothesis of this study are as follows:
- Ho : No influence jointly between variables da workplace motivation to variable employee
performance.

Multidisciplinary Journal www.ajmrd.com Page | 23

 Influence of Motivation and Work Environment The Performance of Employees Pt. Multi…
- Ha : There is jointly influence between motivation and work environment variable to variable
employee performance.
From the results obtained f 4:10 table count sebnbesar 99.467 of these results it can be concluded that Ha is
accepted, because f calculated at 99.467> F table of 4.20 at α = 5%. This shows that together there is influence
between independent variables are variables of motivation, and working environment on the dependent variable
is the performance of employees

The coefficient of determination

The coefficient of determination is a quantity that shows the amount of variation of the dependent variable that
can be explained by the independent variable. In other words, the coefficient of determination is used to measure
how much the dependent variables. The coefficient of determination is determined by the adjusted R-square
value sebagaimanadapat seen in the table:
Model Summary B
Mode R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of
l the Estimate
1 , 495A , 245 , 189 1,816
a. Predictors: (Constant), x2, x1
b. Dependent Variable: y
Source: Results penglohan data through SPSS 22

From the table of coefficients of determination) daitas show the amount adjusted is .189 this means 18.9%.
Employee performance variation can be explained by the variation of the two independent variables, motivation
and work environment. While the remaining 81.1 the result of the calculation (100% -18.9%), explained by
other causes outside the model. Standard Error of the Estimate (SEE) from the table above by 1.816. The
smaller the value SEE it will make increasingly precise regression equation to predict the dependent
variable.

IV. CONCLUSION
In the discussion that has been described in previous chapters, it can be concluded this study can prove
that the motivation and the working environment at PT. Multi Putra Makmur has a partial positive influence on
employee performance. This study can also prove that the motivation and the working environment in PT.Multi
Putra Makmur simultaneously have a positive influence on employee performance.

REFERENCES
[1]. Alex S.Nitisemito. Revised Edition 2002. Personnel Management. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
[2]. Alex S.Nitisemito.2004. Personnel Management, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
[3]. True amber Sulistiyani and Rosidah 2003, Human Resource Management, Graha Science: Yogyakarta
[4]. Anwar King Mangkunegara 2002, Human Resource Management, PT.Remaja Rosda paper, Bandung
[5]. Anwar King Mangkunegara. 2003. Planning and Human Resources Development. Bandung: Refika
Aditama.
[6]. Arep and the Cape, 2008. The Human Resource Management, Second Edition. Yogyakarta: BPEC.
[7]. Cahyono, Budhi and Suharto 2005, Effects of Organizational Culture, Leadership and Motivation
Work To Performance Human Resources in the Parliament Secretariat, Central Java Province, journals,
JRBI Vol. 1, Yogyakarta.
[8]. Ghozali, Imam, 2009. Applications Multivariate Analysis With SPSS Program, Fourth Edition,
Publisher Diponegoro University.
[9]. Ghozali, Imam. 2005. Applications Multivariate Analysis with SPSS, Publisher Agency Diponegoro
University, Semarang.
[10]. Gomes, Faustino Cardosa. Drs. 2005. Human Resource Management. Yogyakarta. Andi Offset.
[11]. Guritno, Bambang and Waridin. 2005. Influence of Leadership Behavior Regarding Employee
Perception, Job Satisfaction and Motivation on Performance. JRBI. Vol 1. No. 1. 63-74.
[12]. Gujarati, Damodar. 2006. Fundamentals Ekonometrika.Jakarta: Erland.
[13]. Hariandja, Marihot Old Efendi. 2005.Manajemen Resources Manusia.Jakarta: PT.Grasindo.
[14]. Hadi, Sutrisno. Research Methodology 2001. Volume III. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
[15]. Hasan, M. Iqbal. Principles of Materials Research Methodology and Application. Ghalia Indonesia,
Bogor, 2002,

Multidisciplinary Journal www.ajmrd.com Page | 24

 Influence of Motivation and Work Environment The Performance of Employees Pt. Multi…
[16]. Luthans, Fred. 2006.Perilaku Organization, (Interpreting VA Yuwono, et al), the Indonesian edition,
Yogyakarta: ANDI,
[17]. Mangkunagara, AAAP, 2004, the Company Human Resource Management, Youth Rosdakarya,
Bandung.
[18]. Mathis, RL, and JH Jackson, 2001, Human Resource Management, book one and book two,
Translation, Salemba Four, Jakarta.
[19]. Mathis, R and Jackson, W.2006. Human Resources Development (MBA Track series / translation).
Jakarta; achievement Reader
[20]. Priyanto, Duwi, 2010. SPSS: Understood Sytatistik Data Analysis with SPSS. Mediakom. Yogyakarta.
[21]. Robbins, Stephen. P. and Mary Coulter. 2005. Management. INDEX PT Gramedia Group. Jakarta
[22]. Sedarmayanti. (2001). Work Productivity Manusiadan Resources. Jakarta: Mandar Maju.
[23]. Siagian, Sondra P. (2004). Human Resource Management. Jakarta: Earth Literacy.
[24]. Sihombing, Umberto. (2004). Effect of Involvement in Decision Making, Environmental Assessment at
Work and Achievement Motivation on Job Satisfaction of the Civil Service.
[25]. Simamora, 2002, the Consumer Behavior Research Guide, Surabaya: Pustaka Utama.
[26]. Wagner III, John A., Hollenbeck, John R, 1992, Management of Organizational Behavior, S
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Pretice Hall, Inc.

Multidisciplinary Journal www.ajmrd.com Page | 25