Defoaming Effect of Calcium Soap: Hui Zhang, Clarence A. Miller, Peter R. Garrett, Kirk H. Raney
Defoaming Effect of Calcium Soap: Hui Zhang, Clarence A. Miller, Peter R. Garrett, Kirk H. Raney
www.elsevier.com/locate/jcis
Abstract
The effect of calcium oleate on foam stability was studied for aqueous solutions of two commonly used surfactants (anionic and nonionic)
under alkaline conditions in the absence of oil. For the anionic surfactant, defoaming by calcium oleate appears to involve two mechanisms.
One is that oleate and calcium ions are presumably incorporated into the surfactant monolayers with a resulting decrease in the maximum
of the disjoining pressure curve and therefore produces less stable thin films. The other is bridging of the films by calcium oleate particles.
The latter mechanism was especially important in freshly made solutions where precipitation in the aqueous phase was still occurring when
the foam was generated. Foams generated after aging (hours) when precipitation was nearly complete were more stable even though solution
turbidities were greater. Foams of the nonionic surfactant were less stable than those of the anionic surfactant but were also destabilized
by sufficient amounts of calcium oleate and exhibited a similar aging effect. A simplified model was developed for estimating the sodium
oleate concentration at which precipitation commences in solutions of the anionic surfactant containing dissolved calcium. It includes en-
hancement of calcium content in the electrical double layers of the surfactant micelles. Predictions of the model were in agreement with
experiment.
2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Foam; Thin film; Sodium soap; Calcium soap; Defoaming; Aging effect
the rate of collapse of a foam column were supplemented by 3.2. Optical observation of horizontal foam film
microscopic observations of individual foam films and by
measurement of turbidity and surface tensions. Millimeter sized foam films were observed in reflected
monochromatic light with wavelength of 546 nm by using
the method of Sheludko and Exerowa [3,4]. The film was
2. Materials formed from a biconcave drop placed in a capillary (i.d.
3 mm, height 1.2 mm) by sucking out liquid from a side
Two commercial surfactants supplied by Shell Chemical orifice. The film was illuminated and observed in a direction
L.P. (Houston, TX) were used as foaming agents. One is an perpendicular to its surfaces with a videomicroscopy system.
anionic surfactant, an alkyl ethoxy sulfate sodium salt with a
straight C12 –C15 hydrocarbon chain and an average of three 3.3. Surface tension measurement
ethylene oxide (EO) groups, denoted as N25-3S later on. It is
typical of surfactants used in hand dishwashing and shampoo A University of Texas Model 300 spinning drop ten-
products. The other is a nonionic surfactant, a linear alcohol siometer was utilized to measure surface tensions. Measure-
ethoxylate also with a C12 –C15 hydrocarbon chain but with ments were made by introducing a small air bubble to the
an average of seven EO groups, denoted as N25-7 later on. sample tube which was filled with surfactant solution. Data
It is representative of nonionic surfactants which are used in were collected after running the sample for at least 20 min.
combination with anionic surfactants in household laundry
products. 3.4. Turbidity measurement
Sodium oleate with a purity 99% was purchased
from Fluka Chemie. Calcium chloride (from Alfa Products,
Turbidity was measured by a Brinkmann PC 800 col-
reagent grade) was dissolved in deionized water to prepare
orimeter. The original measured datum was the percentage
hard water. The concentration of hardness was calculated
of transparency, T%, of the solution. Turbidity was then cal-
as CaCO3 in accordance with the usual convention, i.e., the
culated from 100 T%. The colorimeter was calibrated be-
concentration that would exist if the same amount of cal-
fore each measurement with deionized water which gives
cium had been added as CaCO3 . Alkalinity was provided
100 − T%.
by sodium hydroxide purchased from Fisher Scientific with
assay of NaOH 98.5%. Water used for experiments was
distilled and deionized. 3.5. Ultrafiltration and titration
Mixtures of triolein (with a purity of 99%, from Fluka
Chemie) or n-hexadecane (with a purity of 99%, from the Ultrafiltration (UF) was used to separate free electrolyte
Humphrey Chemical Company) with a small amount of oleic solution from surfactant micelles. Hutchinson [5] showed
acid (with a purity of 95%, from Fisher Scientific Company) that this could be achieved at sufficiently high rates of fil-
were sometimes used as defoaming agents in experiments tration through UF membrane. UF membranes used in this
conducted for comparison with the oil-free systems. The study were Amicon YM3 with 3000 nominal molecular
mixture of hexadecane and oleic acid at weight ratio of 9 weight limit (NMWL) from Millipore Corp. The material
to 1 is denoted as C16/HOl, and the mixture of triolein and was regenerated cellulose. Surfactant and electrolyte solu-
oleic acid at weight ratio of 9 to 1 is denoted as TO/HOl. tions were charged to a stirred filtration cell of 50 to 55 mL
capacity and forced through UF membrane with 330 kPa
[48 psi] nitrogen pressure. Filtration rates were 0.48 to
0.53 g/min. During each filtration, successive samples of
3. Methods
filtrate were collected and analyzed for surfactant and cal-
cium.
3.1. Foam stability tests Concentration of anionic surfactant and calcium ion were
analyzed by potentiometric titration. The apparatus was
Foam stability was determined by measuring the rate of an automatic titrator, Metrohm Titrino Model 716, pur-
collapse of a vertical foam column formed by mixing air chased from Brinkman Instruments. For analysis of anionic
with a surfactant solution at the base of the column [1]. The surfactant, the titrant solution is 0.004 M benzothonium
procedure consisted of filling the apparatus with approxi- chloride (Hyamine 1622), reagent, ordered from Gallord–
mately 440 ml of solution to the 0-cm mark of the gradu- Schlesinger, Inc. The indicator is a combination anionic sur-
ated cylinder. Foam was generated while the solution was factant specific electrode purchased from Phoenix Electrode
pumped through a recycle loop and air was allowed into the Co., Cat. No. SUR1502R. For analysis of calcium ion, the
recycle line. The pump was shut off when the foam reached titrant is reagent EDTA, a product of Fisher Chemicals. The
the 20-cm mark, and foam decay was recorded as a function indicator is a calcium ion-specific electrode purchased from
of time. Phoenix Electrode Co., Cat. No. CAL1502R.
H. Zhang et al. / Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 279 (2004) 539–547 541
Table 1 Table 3
Turbidity measurements with 0.01 wt% N25-3S, 300 ppm (0.03%) Ca, pH 9 Turbidity measurements with 0.1 wt% N25-7, 300 ppm (0.03%) Ca, pH 9
Transmittance, T% Transmittance, T%
0.0001% NaOl 0.0004% NaOl 0.001% NaOl NaOl 0.001% 0.002% 0.003% 0.004% 0.005% 0.01%
Fresh 99.9 98.8 96.3 Fresh 99.9 99.6 99.4 91.4 88.7 69.5
4h 99.9 97.7 92.6 4h 99.9 99.7 2 h 95.0 83.0 7 h 59.3 34.6
23 h 99.8 96.8 89.6 23 h 99.9 99.3 25 h 92.2 77.3
29 h 99.9 96.6 89.6 29 h 99.9 99.5 34 h 93.1 79.7
Table 2
Turbidity measurements with 0.05 wt% N25-3S, 300 ppm (0.03%) Ca, pH 9
Transmittance, T%
0.0005% NaOl 0.001% NaOl
Fresh 99.8 97.9
2h 99.9 96.5
25 h 99.7 95.8
50 h 99.6 96.1
4. Results and discussion Fig. 1. Foam stability with 0.01% N25-3S at different concentrations of
sodium oleate.
4.1. Turbidity centration. Again aging effects over periods of hours were
observed.
As indicated previously, the main objective of this study
was to determine the effect of calcium soaps on foam sta- 4.2. Foam stability
bility. For this purpose it is important to know whether solid
soap is present. Most calcium soaps have low solubility in Foam stability was tested by the method described in Sec-
water, e.g., the solubility product of calcium oleate is ten to tion 3.1. Reproducibility was confirmed by running each
the power of −15.4 at 295 K and zero ionic strength [6]. So system twice or more.
when sodium oleate (NaOl) is added to an alkaline aqueous
phase containing hardness, turbidity of the solution is ex- 4.2.1. Experiments with freshly mixed solutions
pected to increase. Accordingly, a series of turbidity studies A series of fresh solutions containing 0.01 wt% N25-3S
was carried out by measuring the transmittance as a function and different amounts of sodium oleate and hardness were
of the concentration of NaOl and aging time. Samples were tested at pH 9 for foam stability. Fig. 1 illustrates the results
blanketed by nitrogen during aging. at 300 ppm hardness. At the lowest studied concentration of
Transmittances of solutions containing N25-3S at two NaOl, 0.0001 wt%, foam stability was not influenced by the
concentrations, 0.01 wt% (cmc) and 0.05 wt%, are given in addition of NaOl. Nor was turbidity, according to Table 1,
Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Water hardness was 300 ppm. which indicates that calcium oleate particles were absent. As
Regarding the stoichiometry of calcium oleate, CaOl2 , cal- the concentration of sodium oleate increased, foam stabil-
cium is in excess for all compositions of NaOl studied. Here, ity decreased. The lower the concentration of sodium oleate,
fresh solution means that the measurements were conducted the longer the delay before the initiation of foam decay, and
within 30 min after the samples were prepared. the larger the final stable foam height. Substantial decrease
Clearly, turbidity increased with aging time over periods in foam stability was found for NaOl concentration up to
of hours except for the first solutions of Tables 1 and 2. 0.005% with little additional effect beyond that point. So-
This increase shows that solid calcium oleate particles are lutions containing 0.0004 and 0.0008 wt% sodium oleate
growing. Turbidity increased as the concentration of NaOl were visually transparent, although transmittance was less
increased, indicating more precipitate formed in the solution. than 100% as shown in Table 1. With 0.001% NaOl, the so-
As concentration of N25-3S increased, turbidity decreased, lution was bluish. When the concentration of sodium oleate
indicating fewer particles were formed because more oleate increased to 0.005% and 0.01%, solutions were quite turbid.
and calcium were incorporated in micelles. Foam stability was tested for a hardness range of 20–
For solutions of the nonionic surfactant N25-7 at 0.1 wt%, 300 ppm, the range of interest for laundry, dishwashing, and
transmittances were measured at 300 ppm hardness and dif- other cleaning applications. Trends similar to those of Fig. 1
ferent concentrations of sodium oleate, as shown in Table 3. were observed for other calcium concentrations, as shown in
The solutions are clear up to 0.002% NaOl. Beyond that Table 4, which gives foam heights after 20 min when foam
point, transmittance decreased rapidly with increasing con- stability curves reached equilibrium heights. Since calcium
542 H. Zhang et al. / Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 279 (2004) 539–547
Table 4
Foam height (cm) after 20 min
NaOl (wt%) Hardness
20 ppm 50 ppm 100 ppm 300 ppm
0.0004 8.0 7.7 7.4 7.9
0.001 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.0
Fig. 7. Foam stability of fresh and aged solutions of N25-7 containing NaOl.
(a)
(a)
(b)
(b)
Fig. 10. Foam film with pH 9 solution containing 0.01% N25-3S, 300 ppm
hardness, and 0.005% NaOl. (a) Nonuniform white film formed at around
59 s; (b) nonuniform black film formed at around 3 min.
(c)
Table 5
Surface tension (mN/m) of solutions containing soap and hardness
0.01 wt% N25-3S, 300 ppm hardness, pH 9 plus
0.0% NaOl 0.001% NaOl 0.005% NaOl 0.05% NaOl
Freshly mixed solution 27.5 27.8 28.8 30.1
Aged 40 h 27.5 27.6 27.9
Aged 140 h 27.4 27.7 27.5
546 H. Zhang et al. / Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 279 (2004) 539–547
4.5. Precipitation of calcium oleate in micellar solutions 0
COl − = Ksp/C 0 2+ . With cmc of NaOl at pH 9 (COl cmc
)
Ca
of N25-3S as 0.052 mM [12], the composition of oleate in the mixed
micelle is calculated by x = COl 0 /C cmc . The concentration
− Ol
In micellar solutions, precipitation of calcium soap is a of N25-3S in micelles is the difference between total sur-
more complex process than that in the absence of micelles. factant concentration, CST , and monomer concentration, CS0 .
Since some calcium and oleate are incorporated in the mi- The latter is based on measured surfactant concentration in
celles, concentrations of molecularly dissolved calcium and the filtrate at the same total calcium concentration. These
oleate are less than the total amounts added. This effect micelles are expected to contain oleate in the amount of
m = x(C T − C 0 ). Therefore, the total oleate added at the
COl
should be taken into account in the analysis to determine − S S
the conditions for precipitation. In this section, a simplified precipitation boundary is COl m + C0 .
− Ol−
approach is applied to model such behavior. The objective is The precipitation boundary calculated this way was com-
to estimate the precipitation boundary of calcium oleate, i.e., pared with that found experimentally, which is the boundary
the amount of sodium oleate which must be added to a solu- between the isotropic region (100% transmittance) and the
tion with given concentrations of N25-3S and CaCl2 before region with turbidity (with transmittance less than 99.8%).
calcium oleate starts to precipitate. Results for surfactant concentrations between 0.01 and
Our interest here lies in systems where the molar concen- 0.05 wt% are given in Fig. 13. The calculated and experi-
tration of oleate is much less than that of N25-3S and cal- mental boundaries match well in spite of the limitations of
cium. Owing to the low solubility product of calcium oleate, our simplified model. As Fig. 13 shows, the effect of the
the monomer concentration of oleate ion will be very low micelles must certainly be included. Fig. 13 is based on ex-
for significant amounts of calcium in bulk solution. There- periments and calculations summarized in Table 6. It is clear
fore, there should be very little oleate in the micelles, and from the fifth column in Table 6 that the percentage of oleate
their behavior should be similar to N25-3S micelles. So we in mixed micelles was as low as 1%. This justifies our as-
assume that binding of calcium with micelles in the presence sumption that there was very little oleate in the micelles, and
of a small amount sodium oleate and alkalinity can be esti- that binding of calcium should be similar to that of N25-
mated by the same model as for a solution without sodium 3S micelles. In fact, experimental values of calcium binding
oleate. Hirasaki and Lawson [11] have studied the associa- were compared for solutions containing 0.05% N25-3S and
tion of calcium with micelles of N25-3S and justified their
electrostatic model, which does not consider the fine points
of ion binding interaction, by data obtained with an ultrafil-
tration (UF) membrane. We performed UF when NaOl was
also present, determined the concentration of free calcium
ions, C 0 2+ , in the filtrate, and used this value to approxi-
Ca
mate free calcium concentration in the micellar solution. If
the measured concentration of free calcium ions is not avail-
able, it can be estimated from the model of Hirasaki and
Lawson [11].
Anionic surfactants have been found to mix ideally in
micelles. Accordingly, we assume here ideal mixing of N25-
3S and oleate, even though the former is ethoxylated. Thus,
with a solubility product Ksp of calcium oleate of 10−15 [6], Fig. 13. Precipitation boundary of calcium oleate in micellar solution of
the monomer concentration of oleate, COl 0 , is calculated by N25-3S.
−
Table 6
Calculation of precipitation boundary at 300 ppm hardness (CaCl2 )
Conc. of Conc. of Conc. of Conc. of mol% of Conc. of Total oleate Calculated Experiment
N25-3S N25-3S free Ca2+ mono. Ol− Ol− in Ol− in micelle Cm − + C0 boundary boundary
Ol Ol−
(wt%) CST C 0 2+ a C 0 − × 104 micelles C m − × 104 (mM × 104 ) (wt% × 105 ) (wt% ×105 )
Ca Ol Ol
0.0 0.0 3.00 5.77 0.0 0.0 5.77 1.76 –
0.01 0.22 2.87 5.90 1.13 7.9 13.8 4.22 9
0.02 0.44 2.79 5.99 1.15 33.4 39.4 12.0 15
0.03 0.66 2.73 6.05 1.16 59.4 65.4 19.9 22
0.04 0.88 2.59 6.21 1.19 87.2 93.4 28.5 30
0.05 1.10 2.47 6.36 1.22 128.5 134.9 41.1 42
Note. Unit of concentration is mM if not otherwise specified; conc. of mono. is monomeric concentration.
a Obtained by direct measurement of filtrate composition; C 0 (cmc of N25-3S at 300 ppm hardness) used is 0.15 mM based on the measured surfactant
S
concentration in the filtrate.
H. Zhang et al. / Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 279 (2004) 539–547 547
300 ppm hardness with and without 0.0003% NaOl. No dif- foam stability after aging is similar to that for the anionic
ference was found. surfactant and presumably occurs for the same reason.
Although precipitation boundaries for hardness less than A simplified model for estimating the precipitation bound-
300 ppm were not actually determined experimentally, theo- ary including the enhancement of calcium content in the
retical calculation shows that the assumptions made for this electrical double layers of anionic surfactant (N25-3S) mi-
model are reasonable for calcium concentrations as low as celles yielded results in agreement with experiment. This
50 ppm for N25-3S concentrations up to 0.05 wt%. Thus, for model assumes that mixing of N25-3S and oleate in the mi-
other situations such as low concentration of NaOl at hard- celle is ideal; that micelles with a small amount of sodium
ness less than 300 ppm, a frequently occurring situation in oleate behave similarly to N25-3S micelles; and that calcium
laundry applications, this model can be used to predict the binding with micelle can be described by an electrostatic
amount of N25-3S needed to prevent calcium oleate from approach. It is demonstrated that predictions of this model
precipitating. Also, this same method could be used to esti- gave reasonable agreement with the measured precipitation
mate the precipitation boundary (or at least turbidity bound- boundary.
ary) for other anionic surfactants.
Acknowledgment
5. Summary
The authors acknowledge the National Science Founda-
Calcium soap, without dispersed oil, can decrease foam tion for supporting this work under grant CTS-9911954.
stability for both anionic (N25-3S) and nonionic (N25-7)
surfactants. For the anionic surfactant, defoaming by cal-
cium oleate appears to involve two mechanisms. One is in- References
corporation of oleate and calcium ions into the surfactant
[1] H. Zhang, C.A. Miller, P.R. Garrett, K.H. Raney, J. Colloid Interface
monolayers, which decreases the maximum of the disjoining Sci. 263 (2003) 633.
pressure curve and therefore produces less stable thin films. [2] H. Peper, J. Colloid Sci. 13 (1958) 199.
The other is bridging of the films by calcium oleate particles. [3] A. Sheludko, D. Exerowa, Kolloid-Z. 155 (1957) 39.
Foams generated from freshly mixed solutions were less sta- [4] A. Sheludko, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1 (1967) 391.
[5] E. Hutchinson, Z. Phys. Chem. Neue Folge 21 (1959) 38.
ble than those generated hours later when precipitation and
[6] R.R. Irani, C.F. Callis, J. Phys. Chem. 64 (1960) 1741.
growth of calcium oleate particles were nearly complete. [7] M. Rutland, R.J. Pugh, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. As-
Since observations of individual foam films showed that par- pects 125 (1997) 33.
ticle entry into the film surfaces was facilitated for the fresh [8] P.R. Garrett, in: P.R. Garrett (Ed.), Defoaming: Theory and Industrial
solutions, we conclude that particle bridging was mainly re- Application, Dekker, New York, 1993, chap. 1.
[9] R. Raghavachari, K.S. Narayan, N. Nayaar, in: P.R. Garrett (Ed.), Ab-
sponsible for the reduced stability of their foams.
stracts of Eurofoam Conference, 2002.
Foams of the nonionic surfactant were also destabilized [10] D. Monin, A. Espert, A. Colin, Langmuir 16 (2000) 3873.
by sufficient amounts of calcium oleate. Particle bridging is [11] G.J. Hirasaki, J.B. Lawson, SPE Reservoir Eng. (March 1986) 119.
again an important defoaming mechanism. The increase in [12] K. Theander, R.J. Pugh, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 239 (2001) 209.