The Keynesian Income & Expenditure Analysis
The Keynesian Income & Expenditure Analysis
The Keynesian Income & Expenditure Analysis
at the potential output level there are no involuntary unemployed persons – this
level of economic activity is also referred to as the full-employment level of output
whenever actual output is below potential output there will be spare capacity in the economy –
machines will be idle and there will be involuntary unemployed workers
why should output be away from the full employment level?
John Maynard Keynes developed a framework to explain the high levels of unemployment
experienced in the 1920s and 1930s in Great Britain
the naive (simple) Keynesian income expenditure model makes two key
Assumptions:
1. Prices, wages and the interest rate are all fixed
2. Output is demand determined – spare capacity will be used by firms to supply as much output
as customers wish to buy
the level of output depends upon only the total level of demand (aggregate demand)
in the economy as a whole
to start off we will look at an economy in which there are just two sectors – households and
firms
AD = C + I
1
Consumption Expenditure by Households
consumption is related to the level of household income – as income increases
then so does household consumption
Consumption (C)
Income (Y)
this relationship between household income and consumption is known as the consumption
function
C = c0 + c1Y
c1Y is affected by the level of income- c1 is known as the marginal propensity to consume
(MPC)
the MPC is the fraction of extra income that households wish to consume
since the MPC is defined as a fraction, its value will run from 0 to 1
- if the MPC = 0, no part of extra income will be consumed
- if the MPC = 1, all extra income will be used for consumption purposes
for example, if the MPC is 0.8 and household income increases by $100,
household consumption will increase by $80 i.e. (100 x 0.8)
Investment Expenditure by Firms
investment expenditure is the planned additions to physical capital and inventories by firms
the chief determinant of investment expenditure will be firms’ expectations of how the demand
for their output will change
there is no close connection between the current level of output and expectations about
changes in the level of demand
2
Investment (I)
Income/Output
the level of investment expenditure is determined by business firms expectations about
future demand for goods and services
I = i0
Aggregate Demand
Aggregate Demand
C + I (=AD)
C
I
Income/Output
Example
C = 20 + 0.8Y
I = 10
If Y = 100,
C = 20 + 0.8 (100)
C = 100
I = 10
AD = 100 +10 =110
Equilibrium
planned aggregate spending equals the output that is actually produced
output produced = output demanded
3
Y =AD
Aggregate
Demand Y>AD
Excess Demand
Y> AD
Excess Supply
o
45
Income/Output
Aggregate Y = AD
Demand
AD = C + I
AD
E
o
45
YE Income/Output
at points to the right of E, output exceeds desired expenditure
at points to the left of E, desired expenditure exceeds output
two concluding points:
1. note the distinction between planned and unplanned investment
2. there is no reason why equilibrium output should be at the full employment output level
a numerical example:
Equilibrium occurs where Y = AD
Since AD = C + I
Y=C+I
if C = 20 + 0.8Y, and
I = 20
Y = 20 + 0.8Y + 20
Y – 0.8Y = 40
4
0.2Y = 40
Y = 200
Aggregate
Demand
AD’
AD
C 0 + i0
Income/Output
AD
Change in I =10
45 o
Y1 Y2 Y
equilibrium output will obviously increase, but will it also increase by 10?
we have already seen that when I = 20, YE = 200 ...
5
but when I = 30, equilibrium output occurs
where
Y = AD
AD = C + I
Y=C+I
Y = 20 + 0.8Y + 30
Y = 250
the ratio of a given change in autonomous expenditure to the overall change in equilibrium
output is known as the multiplier
M = change in Y = 50
change in E 10
6
Spending on Goods and Services
Government
Spending (G)
Income/Output
the government is committed to spending money on schools, hospitals, the wages of civil
servants etc, and these types of expenditures are unaffected by short-term fluctuations in the
level of national income
government spending is wholly autonomous i.e. it is unrelated to the level of income G = g0
the total level of demand within the
economy (aggregate demand) is now equal
to:
AD = C + I + G
to satisfy its spending requirements, the government needs to raise money by
taxing household income
Government Taxation
a proportional tax is taken as a fixed fraction of household income
T = t1Y 0<t1<1
t1 is known as the marginal propensity to tax
taxes will have an impact upon household consumption patterns
household consumption expenditure is not related to pre-tax income, but to post-
tax income
Yd = (1 - t1)Y
C = c0 + c1Yd
C = c0 + c1(1 – t1)Y
so consider the following example
C = 20 + 0.8Yd
I = 20
G = 30
7
t1 = 0.25
equilibrium output occurs where Y = AD
since AD = C + I + G
Y=C+I+G
Y = 20 + 0.8Yd + 20 + 30
Y = 20 + 0.8(1 – 0.25)Y + 20 + 30
Y = 70 + 0.6Y
0.4Y = 70
Y = 175
note that the MPC is no longer equal to c1
Taxes Consumption Savings
MPT=t1 MPC=1/c1(1-t1) MPS=1/(1-c1)(1-t1)
Household Factor Income
In its simplest form, this function suggested that the amount of consumption expenditure of the
household sector depends mainly on the amount of ( disposable ) income generated from the
production activities of an economy.
C = a + b. Y
b : marginal propensity to consume ( MPC ) which lies between zero and one.
8
the amount of durable stocks ;
the expectation on prices ;
the degree of consumer indebtedness ;
the attitude of people towards thrift ;
the government policies like the taxation system ;
the distribution of income – the APC of the relatively low-income group is greater than the
APC of the high-income group.
Savings Function
Saving refers to the change of wealth over time. It is a flow. Wealth refers to the amount of
savings or stocks accumulated from the past savings.
Savings is the amount of money not immediately consumed for any purposes. Saving may
also refer to the act of sacrificing present consumption for the future.
Investment Function
Investment function is a spending on accumulating capital (goods).
It is a derived demand affected by the cost of borrowing or holding money. It is an
exogenous (pre-determined) variable in this simplified model, i.e. the money market is
assumed to be in equilibrium.
Investment also leads to capital formation. The investment function can lead to the optimal
or most desirable level of capital stock which in turn determines the level of output.
by other firms. The income earned will induce a flow of expenditure again, according to the consumption
function.
An initial change in expenditure will induce income of a sector. The circular flow of income and products
starts its circulation with the second round, third round.
This leads to a multiplier effect on the national income within a period. The economy is stimulated by
the initial round of spending.
9
Based on the Keynesian functions, savings depends on income. We have to cut our consumption
expenditure in order to save more. By the multiplier effect, the fall in consumption will lead to a
fall in income or GNP. And with this smaller amount of income, we can then save less than before.
The more we save, the less income we shall have as a result.
It is paradoxial to find that : If people try to increase their savings, they will end up saving less.
It then follows that: When times are tough (economically unfavourable), we should not tighten our
belts.
It is called a paradox (of thrift) because the act of a single person to save more for the future is not
directly applicable to the whole economy.
Thrift for an individual is fine but not for the economy. Why?
Saving is good for a person but is not desirable for the whole economy.
Economic Situation
The traditional view carries the concept of self-adjustment of the economy with savings and investment moved in the same
direction to maintain an equilibrium output.
Whereas the Keynesian view argued that there is no apparent linkage between savings and
investment. That is, when savings rises and consumption expenditure falls, the multiplier
effect leads to a fall in income also. The amount of investment is not affected by income. As a result,
the paradox may exist.
That is, an increase in government spending, accompanied by an equal increase in taxes, increases the
level of income by exactly the amount of the increase in government spending. The major point is that a
balanced budget change (say, a cut) in government spending changes (lowers) the equilibrium income.
The change in government spending has a stronger impact on equilibrium income than the same
amount of change in taxes. A dollar cut in taxes leads only to a fraction of a dollar’s increase in
10
consumption spending, the rest being saved, while the government spending is reflected dollar for
dollar in a change in aggregate demand.
Government activity acts as an exogenous variable in the model. At the same time, government
expenditure is financed by taxation. The amount and form of tax bears an offsetting effect (compared
with the effect of G) on the level of equilibrium income. Any variable carrying such an offsetting effect
on income is termed a built-in stabilizer of the economic model.
They refer to all those institutional arrangements that automatically increase the government deficit (or
decrease the government surplus) during recessions; and increase the government surplus during
booms; without any decisions on government policy.
They are called stabilizers because they reduce the response of national income to any economic shocks
in the economy.
They are anything that reduces the marginal propensity to consume out of national income and hence,
reduce the multiplier. They lessen the magnitude of fluctuation in national income caused by
autonomous changes in such expenditures like investment expenditure.
Examples of these stabilizers include: progressive (income) tax system; social security allowances;
They are built-in because once they are used; they will automatically exist in an economy to affect the
fluctuation in national income of that economy.
11
The above analysis is confined to a closed economy. For an open economy, the effect of export
and import had to be considered. The value of export depends mainly on foreign demand
condition. So, export is an exogenous variable. Import depends on the local demand and income
earned.
Potential GNP is the level of income under full-employment. Any economy has its potential to
fully employ its resources to reach this level of output and income.
If demand is insufficient, the economy may reach an equilibrium state with its actual income
smaller than the potential income. In a graph, there exists a so-called deflationary gap.
If demand is in excess of supply even at the potential output, the opposite exists and it is called
an inflationary gap.
12