BS 476: Part 7: 1997

Method For Classification Of

The Surface Spread Of Flame
Of Products

WF Report Number

176617

Date:

9th March 2009

Test Sponsor:

Hempel Paints (S.A.) W.L.L.

0249
 WF Report No. 176617
Page 2 of 12

Bodycote warringtonfire Report No. 176617

BS 476: Part 7: 1997

Method For Classification Of The
Surface Spread Of Flame Of Products

Sponsored By

Hempel Paints (S.A.) W.L.L.

Dammam First Industrial City
PO Box 1077
Dammam 31431
Saudi Arabia
 WF Report No. 176617
Page 3 of 12

CONTENTS PAGE NO.

TEST DETAILS............................................................................................................................ 4

DESCRIPTION OF TEST SPECIMENS ......................................................................................... 5

TEST RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 7

SIGNATORIES............................................................................................................................ 8

APPENDIX 1 ............................................................................................................................ 10

APPENDIX 2 ............................................................................................................................ 11
 WF Report No. 176617
Page 4 of 12

Test Details
Purpose of test To determine the performance of a product when it is subjected to the
conditions of the test specified in BS 476: Part 7: 1997, "Fire tests on building
materials and structures, method for classification of the surface spread of
flame of products". This test was therefore performed in accordance with the
procedure specified in BS 476: Part 7: 1997, and this report should be read in
conjunction with that British Standard.

Scope of test BS 476: Part 7: 1997 specifies a method of test for measuring the lateral
spread of flame along the surface of a specimen of a product orientated in the
vertical position, and a classification system based on the rate and extent of
flame spread. It provides data suitable for comparing the performances of
essentially flat materials, composites, or assemblies, which are used primarily
as the exposed surfaces of walls or ceilings.

Fire test study Certain aspects of some fire test specifications are open to different
group/EGOLF interpretations. The Fire Test Study Group and EGOLF have identified a
number of such areas and have agreed Resolutions which define common
agreement of interpretations between fire test laboratories which are members
of the Groups. Where such Resolutions are applicable to this test they have
been followed.

Instruction to The test was conducted on the 17th September 2008 at the request of Hempel
test Paints (S.A.) W.L.L., the sponsor of the test.

Provision of test The specimens were supplied by the sponsor of the test. Bodycote
specimens warringtonfire was not involved in any selection or sampling procedure.

Conditioning of The specimens were received on the 12th September 2008 and were
specimens conditioned to constant mass at a temperature of 23 ± 2oC and a relative
humidity of 50 ± 5% prior to testing.

Form in which Assembly

the specimens
were tested

Specimen Each specimen was placed over 25mm thick by 20mm wide calcium silicate
mounting based spacers positioned around its perimeter and mounted onto a backing
board so that a 25mm enclosed air gap was provided between the unexposed
face of the specimen and the backing board.

Exposed face The coated face of the specimens was exposed to the heating conditions of the
test.
 WF Report No. 176617
Page 5 of 12

Description of Test Specimens

The description of the specimens given below has been prepared from information provided by the
sponsor of the test. All values quoted are nominal, unless tolerances are given.

General description A three coat coating system applied to one face of a

concrete based substrate
Product reference of coating system “Water Borne Emulsion Paint – Matt Finish”
Name of manufacturer of coating system Hempel Paints
Colour reference of coating system “White, 588ME-10000”
Overall coating system thickness Between 90 and 150μm
Thickness of composite 29.17mm (determined by Bodycote
warringtonfire)
Weight per unit area of composite 63.66kg/m2 (determined by Bodycote
warringtonfire)
Generic type A water borne coating
Product reference “Hempel’s Topaz Matt Emulsion 588ME”
Full composition details See Note 1 Below
Name of manufacturer Hempel Paints.
Colour “White - 10000”
Number of coats Two
Application thickness per Between 30 and 50μm
coat
Final coating
Application rate per coat 124g/m2 (at 30μm thickness)
product
(Test face) Application method Roller
Specific gravity 1.4
Trade name of flame See Note 2 Below
retardant
Generic type of flame See Note 1 Below
retardant
Amount of flame retardant See Note 2 Below
Curing process per coat 1 hour at 20°C between coats. Fully dried after 7
days
Generic type A water borne primer coating
Product reference “Hempel’s Maestro Hi-Seal Primer 28830”
Full composition details See Note 1 Below
Name of manufacturer Hempel Paints.
Colour “White - 10000”
Number of coats One
Application thickness per Between 30 and 50μm
coat
First coating
Application rate per coat 149g/m2 (at 30μm thickness)
product
Application method Roller
Specific gravity See Note 2 Below
Trade name of flame See Note 2 Below
retardant
Generic type of flame See Note 1 Below
retardant
Amount of flame retardant See Note 2 Below
Curing process per coat 2 hours at 20°C
Continued on next page
 WF Report No. 176617
Page 6 of 12

Product reference “Concrete Panels”

Generic type Concrete
Name of manufacturer Radicon Contracting Company
Colour “Grey”
Substrate
Thickness 29mm
Weight per unit area 63.66kg/m2
Flame retardant details See Note 3 below
Preparation details Panels casted with mortar and cured for 28 days.
Brief description of manufacturing process of See Note 2 Below
coatings

Note 1. The sponsor of the test has provided this information but at the specific request of
the sponsor, these details have been omitted from the report and are instead held on the
confidential file relating to this investigation.

Note 2. The sponsor of the test was unwilling to provide this information.

Note 3. The sponsor of the test has confirmed that no flame retardant additives were
utilised in the production of the product / component.
 WF Report No. 176617
Page 7 of 12

Test Results
Results and The test results for the individual specimens, together with observations made
observations during the test and comments on any difficulties encountered during the test
are given in Table 1.

Classification In accordance with the class definitions given in BS 476: Part 7:

1997, the specimens tested are classified as class 1.

Criteria for If the prefix 'D' or suffix 'R' or 'Y' is included in the classification, this indicates
classification that the results should be treated with caution. An explanation of the reason
for the prefix and suffixes is given in Appendix 1, together with the irradiance
along the horizontal reference line of the specimen position during the test and
the classification limits specified in the Standard.

Applicability of The test results relate only to the behaviour of the test specimens of the
test result product under the particular conditions of test; they are not intended to be the
sole criterion for assessing the potential fire hazard of the product in use.

The test results relate only to the specimens of the product in the form in which
they were tested. Small differences in the composition or thickness of the product
may significantly affect the performance during the test and may therefore
invalidate the test results. Care should be taken to ensure that any product which
is supplied or used is fully represented by the specimens which were tested.

Attention is drawn to Appendix 2 entitled "Effect of thermal characteristics on the

performance of assemblies".

Validity The specification and interpretation of fire test methods are the subject of
ongoing development and refinement. Changes in associated legislation may
also occur. For these reasons it is recommended that the relevance of test
reports over five years old should be considered by the user. The laboratory
that issued the report will be able to offer, on behalf of the legal owner, a
review of the procedures adopted for a particular test to ensure that they are
consistent with current practices, and if required may endorse the test report.

This report may only be reproduced in full. Extracts or abridgements shall not be
published without permission of Bodycote warringtonfire.
 WF Report No. 176617
Page 8 of 12

Signatories

Responsible Officer
S. Deeming*

Approved
T. Mort*
Senior Technical Officer

Authorised
C. Dean *
Operations Manager

* For and on behalf of Bodycote warringtonfire.

Report Issued: 9th March 2009

This version of the report has been produced from a .pdf format electronic file that has been provided by
Bodycote warringtonfire to the sponsor of the report and must only be reproduced in full. Extracts or
abridgements of reports must not be published without permission of Bodycote warringtonfire. The
original signed paper version of this report, which includes signatures in blue ink, is the sole authentic
version. Only original paper versions of this report bear authentic signatures of the responsible Bodycote
warringtonfire staff.
 WF Report No. 176617
Page 9 of 12

Table 1

SPECIMEN No. 1 2 3 4 5 6

Maximum distance travelled at

<50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
1.5 minutes (mm)

Distance (mm) Time to travel to indicated distance

(minutes : seconds)

75
165
190
215
240
265
290
375
455
500
525
600
675
710
750
785
825

Time to reach maximum

1:00 1:00 1:00 1:00 1:00 1:00
distance travelled

Maximum distance travelled in

10 minutes (mm) <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50

Note: Six specimens are usually tested. If the test on any specimen is deemed to be invalid, as defined in
the Standard, it is permissible for up to a maximum of nine specimens to be tested in order to obtain the
six valid test results.

Observations made during test and comments on any difficulties encountered during the test:

In the case of specimen 6, slight blistering of the coating product was observed from the fourth minute of the
test, extending up to a maximum distance of 165mm.
 WF Report No. 176617
Page 10 of 12

Appendix 1
Irradiance along Distance along reference line from
the horizontal the hotter end of the specimen 75 225 375 525 675 825
reference line of position (mm)
the specimen
position during the Irradiance at points specified above
test 32.5 21.0 14.5 10.0 7.0 5.0
(kW/m²)

Note: A tolerance of ± 0.5 kW/m² is specified on the irradiance measurement

Classification of
spread of flame Spread of Flame at 1.5 min Final Spread of Flame

Classification
Limit for one Limit for one
Limit Limit
specimen specimen
(mm) (mm)
(mm) (mm)

Class 1 165 165 + 25 165 165 + 25

Class 2 215 215 + 25 455 455 + 45
Class 3 265 265 + 25 710 710 + 75

Class 4 Exceeding the limits for class 3

Explanation of 1. A suffix R is added to the classification if more than six specimens are
prefix and suffixes required in order to obtain six valid test results (e.g. class 2R).
which may be
added to the 2. A prefix D is added to the classification of any product which does not comply
classification with the surface characteristics specified in the Standard and has therefore
been tested in a modified form (e.g. class D3).

3. A suffix Y is added to the classification if any softening and/or other behaviour

that may affect the flame spread occurs (e.g. class 3Y).

For example, a classification of D3RY could be achieved indicating (a) a modified

surface has been used; (b) a class 3 result has been obtained; (c) additional
specimens have been used to obtain 6 valid results and; (d) softening and/or
other behaviour has occurred which is considered to have affected the test result.
 WF Report No. 176617
Page 11 of 12

Appendix 2
Effect of thermal The result of the test in accordance with BS 476: Part 7: 1997 is applicable
characteristics only to the specimens in the form in which they were tested. Small differences
on the in the composition or thickness of the product may significantly affect the
performance of performance during the test and may therefore invalidate the test result. It is
specimens important that the specimens which are tested fully represent the product
which is supplied and the manner in which it will be used. This may require a
product to be tested in a number of different ways to determine the
classification which will be achieved in its different methods of use.

A surface coating, for example, may be applied to a selected substrate using a

particular method and application rate. The test classification which is
achieved for that set of specimens will be applicable only to that situation. If
the substrate or method and rate of application in a particular practical
situation are different from that which was tested, then it will be necessary to
determine the classification which will be achieved for that situation. Similarly,
specimens incorporating a wallcovering must be fully representative of the
situation which occurs in practice and will normally consist of the wallcovering
bonded to a chosen substrate with a chosen adhesive; the test result will only
apply to that composite system. The same principle applies to any composite
or assembly which is being investigated.

It is sometimes possible to assume a `worst case' situation which will enable a

chosen set, or sets, of specimens to be constructed and tested to provide a
foundation for the assessment of the probable performance of variations within
the system. Similarly, it is sometimes possible to formulate a series of
exploratory tests to investigate the effect of variations within a product or
system, usually culminating in a series of formal tests to provide the basis for a
composite assessment of pre-determined variables. In such cases, however, it
is essential that careful planning of the programmes is undertaken by suitably
qualified fire safety practitioners.

The following is re-produced from Appendix B of BS 476: Part 7: 1997;

With thin materials or composites, particularly those with a high thermal

conductivity, the presence of an air gap and the nature of any underlying
construction may significantly affect the ignition performance of the exposed
surface. Increasing the thermal capacity of the underlying construction
increases the "heat sink" effect and may delay ignition of the exposed surface.
Any backing provided to the test specimen and in intimate contact with it, such
as the non-combustible spacers, may alter this "heat sink” effect and may be
fundamental to the test result itself. The influence of the underlying layers on
the performance of the assembly should be understood and care should be
taken to ensure that the result obtained on any assembly is relevant to its use
in practice.
 WF Report No. 176617
Page 12 of 12

The following advice is offered on the construction and preparation of test

specimens;

(a) Where the thermal properties of the product are such that no significant
heat loss to the underlying layers can occur, e.g. a material or composite
greater than approximately 6 mm thick of high thermal capacity and/or low
thermal conductivity, then the product should be tested backed only by the
backing board.

(b) Where the product is normally used as a free-standing sheet and the
characteristics noted in (a) do not apply, then an air space should be provided
at the back of the product by testing over spacers of non-combustible
insulation board 20 mm wide and (25 ± 1) mm thick.

(c) Where the product is to be used over a low density non-combustible

substrate and the characteristics noted in (a) do not apply, then the product
should be tested in conjunction with that substrate.

(d) Where the product is to be used over a combustible substrate and the
characteristics noted in (a) do not apply, then the product should be tested in
conjunction with that substrate.

NOTE: Discussions are taking place in ISO/TC92/SC1 concerning the possible

use of a restricted range of reference substrates (mainly non-combustible)
where it is not apparent or possible to test materials or products in the
representative end-use substrate.
Bodycote warringtonfire · Head Office · Holmesfield Road · Warrington · Cheshire · WA1 2DS · United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0) 1925 655 116 · Fax: +44 (0) 1925 655 419 · Email: [email protected] · Website: www.warringtonfire.net