Course1 - Intro (1) 2.key
Course1 - Intro (1) 2.key
Reading List:
• Ioana Ștefănescu, 1984, English Morphology
• Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey Pullum, 2002, The Cambridge Grammar of English Language,
Chapter on Verb Phrases
• Geoffrey Leech, 1987, Meaning and the English Verb
Course Overview
The Morphology course deals with the system of English verbs and verbal categories. The present course
will deal with the traditional parts of speech, in particular with the grammatical categories/inflectional
categories traditionally associated with the major parts of speech such as tense, aspect, mood, for the verb.
Students will develop theoretical knowledge of grammar and will grasp the differences between different
anguage systems.
By the end of the course, students will have acquired the knowledge of the morphological system of Englis
and will be asked to apply it to the practical language use.
students will be asked to translate into Romanian or English paying attention to the system of English
verbal morphology
Active participation is compulsory.
Lectures:
Introduction to Inflectional Morphology and X-Bar Theory
The Category of Tense, Reichenbach’s Tense Theory
The Category of Aspect: Situation-type/ Lexical Aspect
The Category of Aspect: Viewpoint/ Grammatical Aspect – The Progressive Aspect
The Category of Aspect: Cases of Recategorization; The Perfective Aspect – building on the Present Perfec
Simple
The Present Tenses
The Past Tenses
Course Overview
•
Inflectional affixes have the following characteristics:
1. They produce closure upon words (can no longer attach a derivational
element to them)
2. Inflected forms are organized in paradigms, i.e. they are in
complementary distribution; for instance, nouns occurs in pairs hat –
hats, book – books.
3. The elements of a paradigm may evince the phenomenon of suppletion –
one of the forms is not phonologically related to the other: went for go,
better for good.
4. A paradigm can be defective – lacks a form: can - *cans, trousers -
*trouser.
5. Inflections are formal markers (semantically they are empty, abstract);
they help us delimit the lexical category of the word to which they
attach. In other words, each lexical category (major part of speech) is
characterized by specific inflectional markers. =>
6. Case, number, gender, and determination characterize nouns.
7. Tense, aspect, mood, number and person characterize verbs.
8. Person, number and –in some cases – gender characterize pronouns.
9. Adjectives and adverbs are characterized by comparison.
10. Although all of them lack descriptive content, they pass on the
descriptive content of the category they depend on.
Generative Grammars
•
lexical/grammatical categories can be defined only through their roles in the
rules and principles of grammar.
•
Generative grammars operate with two types of categories: lexical and
grammatical/syntactic categories.
•
Lexical categories (N, V, A) coincide with the traditional parts of speech and the
structuralist open classes
•
grammatical categories (NP, VP, AP) correspond to phrases or syntagms –
specific sequences of words.
•
Each lexical category has a corresponding syntactic phrase - N → NP. In other
words, syntactic phrases are projections of lexical categories.
•
Then we translate the syntactic information in N → NP into functional
information
•
model, it is not lexical categories (N, V, A etc.) that correspond to semantic
categories, but major syntactic categories (NP, VP, AP etc.) The syntactic
categories are in a relation of correspondence with semantic categories such as
events, processes, states, individual objects etc.
•
The lexical categories are defined in terms of features to be found in their
lexical entries in the lexicon. These features include morpho-syntactic
categories, i.e. inflections.
•
The most important opposition for the parts of speech system is the opposition
between verbal and nominal categories. Parts of speech are analyzed along the
dimension [+/- V] or [+/- N]. The [+/- N] categories (A, N) are marked for
gender, number and case, while the [+/- V] categories are not characterized by
these features. Adjectives and adverbs share the inflectional/functional category
of comparison.
Inflectional Morphology
•
Another important opposition is between lexical categories and functional categories.
This opposition is in part the same as the structural distinction between open
classes (N, V, A etc.) and closed classes (Determiner, Inflection,
Complementizer etc) of items. The open classes are defined as classes with
descriptive/semantic content (N, V, A) containing indefinitely many items and
which allow conscious coining, borrowing etc. On the other hand, functional
categories include free morphemes: determiners, quantifiers, pronouns, auxiliary
verbs, complementizers etc. and bound morphemes/inflectional affixes:
inflections for tense, aspect, agreement/number. Hence the term ‘functional
categories’ covers minor parts of speech and inflectional categories. They form a
closed set of items which
1. never occur alone,
2. have a unique Complement and can’t be separated from it,
3. lack descriptive semantic content,
4. act as operators placing the Complement in time, in the world
5. are heads of lexical categories.
6. Information expressed by inflection is not always dictated by syntactic
structure. There are two types of inflection:
7. Inherent/morphological inflection (not required by the syntactic context):
number with nouns and pronouns, person for pronouns, gender for nouns.
8. Contextual/syntactic (which follows from syntax): number and person in verbs,
case in noun
X-Bar Theory and the Structure of Sentences
MOVE α
•
Each lexical item is assigned to a lexical category (i.e. verb, adjective,
noun, preposition) in a given language according to its general distribution
and morphological properties.
=> That is what we have called subcategorization frame of a lexical item:
X-Bar Theory
•
The subcategorization frame/features of lexical items is lexical
knowledge, that is, we take this information about lexical items from
our mental Lexicon. We do not know the meaning of a lexical item
unless we know the structure of a minimal phrase containing that
lexical item.
•
In early 80's, Chomsky set up another model of grammar in order to
make grammar more explanatory: "Government and Binding" (GB)
(1981).
Universal Grammar (UG) = “the system of principles, conditions and rules
that are elements or properties of all human languages…. the essence
of human language.” The goal of UG is to provide a theory of grammar
that should be able to offer a number of principles, a number of
generalized statements which are valid cross-linguistically. The
differences between languages are accounted for in terms of
parameters, namely the different values that the principles have in
different languages.
X-Bar Theory