Identification of Business Objectives and Purpose:: Q1. What Are The Four Steps of Strategic Management Process?
Identification of Business Objectives and Purpose:: Q1. What Are The Four Steps of Strategic Management Process?
Identification of Business Objectives and Purpose:: Q1. What Are The Four Steps of Strategic Management Process?
The strategic management process covers the following four steps, which are: 1. Identification
of business objectives and purposes 2. Formulation of strategies 3. Implementation of
strategies and 4. Evaluation of strategies!
The corporate objectives signify the final end results which are to be attained over a period of
time. A strategy is a means to achieve the objectives. Generally, the words purpose and mission
are used interchangeably. However these terms have different meanings in management.
Corporate purpose gives a clear picture of what the company is about and what is wants to
achieve in future. It is a statement of the principal line of business which it wants to pursue.
Corporate mission explains the scope of business in terms of products and markets. Objectives
For example, the mission of Fertilizer Company may be mentioned as to fight world hunger and
2. Formulation of Strategies:
In strategy formulation, a firm must be aware of its strength, weaknesses, opportunities and
threats. SWOT analysis focus attention on these four variables viz, strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities and threats. The first two are internal whereas the last two are external to an
organisation.
(a) Strength
(b) Weaknesses
(c) Opportunities
(d) Threats
3. Implementation:
4. Evaluation of Strategies:
The last phase of strategic management is evaluation and control. In business, conditions often
change resulting in the need of evaluation of existing strategies and planning the new ones to
According to Arthur Sharplin “The purpose of strategic evaluation is to monitor and evaluate
progress towards organisation’s objectives and to guide or correct the process or change the
1. It can cause financial cuts in critical areas that harm the business.
It is a worthy goal to maintain a low-cost position. Many leaders following this style will find
ways where money can be saved from the current budget. There is also a danger here that
some cost leaders may look to reduce costs in critical areas of the company, like in their
customer service division. Although the price is nice for the consumer, the customers who
incorporate the value of customer service into their value calculations will stay away from this
company.
2. It reduces product innovation.
One of the first cuts that always tends to happen with the cost leadership styles is in research
and development. To many of these leaders, R&D seems like an extraneous cost. The outcome
of cutting funding here is that there are fewer new products or services reaching the market.
There are fewer chances at innovation. Instead, this leadership style encourages the same
products to be sold at lower prices only.
3. It reduces the importance of consumer feedback.
When leaders are focused primarily on the price of the goods or services being offered, then it
becomes easy to ignore how the market shifts over time. Customers are always evolving their
preferences and taste for certain items. If the sole focus is to maintain a service or product and
just reduce its cost, you’ll find that some customers will pay more to go with a competitive
product because it is better able to meet their needs.
4. It encourages a lower quality product to be offered to the market.
Being able to cut costs is not an easy process. Once leaders find the obvious items that can be
cut, the real work of cost leadership begins. It may require a lower quality set of ingredients or
raw materials to create a higher profit margin. There may need to be a change to the
advertising or marketing budget, which could reduce the number of new customers obtained.
Some companies may even choose to pay their workers less if labor costs are one of their
primary expenses.
5. It cannot be applied to every product or service.
The goal of cost leadership is to cut production costs, while still producing an acceptable
product, that meets the basic needs of the consumer. An acceptable product is different than
an exemplary product. For an elite brand, such as Apple, a process that involves cost leadership
is almost certain to backfire. There is an expected standard in the product that must be met for
consumers to engage with the brand. Almost all forms of cost leadership involve some type of
quality reduction.
1. Trusteeship: The board of directors act as trustees to the property and welfare of the
company. Hence, the board must use the company’s property for the long-run gain of the
company, but not for their personal use.
2. Formulation of Mission, Objection and Policies: Board of directors must see the long run
view and have long run perspective of the company. The board formulates, reviews and
reformulates the company’s mission, objectives and policies which forms the basis for strategy
formulation and implementation.
3. Designing Organizational Structure: The board designs the structure of the organization
based on the objectives, policies, environmental factors, degree of competition, role of quality,
expectations of employees etc.
4. Selection of Top Executives: The board should assume the responsibility of screening and
selecting the top executives who can formulate and implement the strategies. Chief executives
are key personnel in the process of strategy implementation.
5. Financial Sanctions: The important financial decisions like sanctioning of finances to various
projects, reserves, distribution of profit to shareholders and repayment of loans and advances
etc., are taken by the board. Further, the board reviews the financial performance of the
company from time to time and reformulates the financial policies.
6. Feed forward and Feedback: The board has to obtain information from the external
environmental factors and feed that information forward to various key points in the company
in order to prevent possible hurdles and mistakes in the process of achieving organizational
goals. Further, the board also obtains the information from internal sources of the organization,
and feeds it forward to prevent possible failures in decision-making by the top level executives.
The board also feeds the information back to the executives regarding their failures in decision-
making with a view to avoid the recurrence of such mistakes. Thus, feedback of information
helps the board to check and control the activities as board has the ultimate responsibility for
the success of the company.
7. Link between the Company and External Environment: The board acts a vital and
continuous link between the company and external environment like government, other
companies, social and economic institutions etc.