Profile of Boarding Houses of Students of The Kalinga-Apayao State College

International Journal of Advanced Research in ISSN: 2278-6236
Management and Social Sciences Impact Factor: 6.284
PROFILE OF BOARDING HOUSES OF STUDENTS OF THE KALINGA-

APAYAO STATE COLLEGE
Paulino P. Reyes II, Director for Student Services, Kalinga-Apayao State College
Abstract: The study assessed the profile of the boarding houses of the students enrolled in
Kalinga-Apayao State College during the period 2010-2011.
The study specifically determined the profile of the student boarders as to gender, age,
degree program enrolled, and ethnic affiliation; the profile of the boarding houses as
identified parameters, and the degree of seriousness of problems encountered by the
student boarders.
Findings of the study were the following: the student boarders varied in their profile with the
females dominating, more from ages 18-20 or from the second to fourth year levels, from
the BEED and BSED programs, and are mostly from the Kalinga tribe coming from the far
flung areas of the province; majority of the boarding houses of the students was of the single
type which accommodate 4-6 student boarders with a monthly rental of P701 and above
including water and electric bills; the boarding houses have their own artesian wells as
source of water for their boarders; almost all of them use the manual flush type of comfort
rooms which is common for both males and female boarders; the main appliance used by
students in their boarding house was the electric fan with a small number using television;
and burning of wastes was a dominant practice of the boarders as a way of waste disposal.
Finally, the problems of the student boarders were generally moderately serious with three
identified problems very serious, namely: no abode policies, rules and regulations, and
contracts executed between the landlady/landlord and the boarders, and common bath and
comfort rooms for both male and female boarders.
Recommendations formulated in the study were the following: owners of boarding houses
should have abode policies, rules, and regulations; owners should convert their boarding
house into commercial type where comfort rooms and bath rooms for male and females are
separated; and should orient and encourage their boarders to practice waste segregation
and composting.
Vol. 5 | No. 6 | June 2016 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 1

The researchers proposed home visitation of students in their boarding houses and the
conduct of orientation or seminars based on what was found to student boarders and
owners of boarding houses.
RATIONALE
Many students of the Kalinga-Apayao State College come from far-flung barangays and from
its neighboring provinces like Apayao, Cagayan, Ifugao, and Mountain Province. Some stay
with their relatives while majority stay in boarding houses.
The kind of a boarding house can very well affect a student’s academic performance. If the
environment is depressing to student, that depression will interfere with a student’s study
skills. On the other hand, if the environment is lively, a lot of activity and peer pressure, that
also can have a negative effect on students performance. Students must feel comfortable
within their environment, and in an environment that facilitate a good balance between
school responsibilities and personal life.
In the Kalinga-Apayao State College, it is believed that one of the potent factors that
contribute to the academic performance of the students is the quality of housing that is
accorded to them. It is the premises of this study to look into the profile of the boarding
houses of the students of the Kalinga-Apayao State College that will serve as benchmark for
planning and implementation.
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
Objectives
1. To identify the profile of the student-boarders as to gender, degree program, and
ethnic affiliation
2. To determine the profile of the boarding houses of KASC students as to physical
structures and social services
3. To determine the degree of seriousness of the problems encountered by the
students in their boarding houses
4. To propose an action plan for implementation by the ITE with the Office of the
Director for Student Services and Admission
FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY
Boarding houses of students are their homes way from their real home. Thus, students
especially freshmen and even those at the higher years including their parents must check

the houses before deciding where their child or children will stay while studying at the
College or State University.
Students who lives in housing facilities are expected to have better performance in school
than who live in substandard homes. Good housing facilities with clean environment,
sanitary waste disposal system, portable water supply, and peaceful surrounding will enable
students to concentrate better in their studies. They are afforded the materials, gadgets,
supplies, and equipment needed in school work (Bomogao, et.al., 2010).
In the Ateneo University (2012), A committee organized by the Office of Student Affairs
(OSA) visited a twenty-four and new houses for occupancy. During the two-day ocular
inspection, the accreditation team took particular notice of the house’s safety and security,
sanitation and suitability to student’s needs like amenities, owner’s supervision and
coordination with parents.
Throughout the year, the OSA keeps the profile of the students at the accredited houses for
monitoring and possible program or activities and interventions by the University to the
specific needs/concerns of students away from their families.
Considering the geographical location of Kalinga, many of the students enrolled in the
Kalinga-Apayao State College need to stay in boarding houses while studying the college. In
addition, some students from the neighboring provinces for some reasons come to study at
KASC. Hence, there is a need to gather data regarding the boarding houses of the students
as bases for possible program interventions from the college.
FINAL METHODOLOGY
1. Ocular inspection
2. Review of secondary data
3. Questionnaire preparation
4. Floating of questionnaire to the 95 ITE student boarders
5. Treatment of data through a 3 point Likert scale
6. Quantified data gathered using frequency, ranking and the Weighted Mean
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Profile of the student-boarders
Table 1 presents the profile of the student respondents

Table 1. Profile of the Student Respondents

Variables Number Percent Rank
1.Gender
Male 14 14.74 2
Female 81 85.26 1
Total 95 100
2. Age
17 years old –below 11 11.58 3
18-20 years 59 62.11 1
21 years –above 25 26.32 2
Total 95 100
2.Degree Program
BEED 46 48.42 2
BSED 49 51.58 1
Total 95 100
3. Ethnic Affiliation
Igorot 11 11.58 3
Ilocano 20 21.05 2
Kalinga 64 67.37 1
Total 95 100
As to Gender, from the 95 student boarders surveyed, almost all (85.26%) were females.
There were only 14 males. The data reflects the scenario in the Teacher Education Institute
being dominated by female students.
As to Age, ages18-20 was the biggest in number. They comprise 62.11% of the group of
respondents while the youngest group of 17 years and below were the least in number. The
data shows that the students who stayed in boarding houses at the time of the study varied
in ages with more third and fourth year levels as indicated by their ages of 18-20.
As to Degree Program, the student boarders represent both the BEED and BSED programs
with more students coming from the BSED program.
As to Ethnic Affiliation, about three-fourths of the students were from the Kalinga ethnic
group with 67.37% with the Igorot tribe as the least in number equivalent to 11.58%.
The conclusive result derived is that the students who stayed in boarding houses while
studying in KASC were dominated by females, with ages from 18-20, from the BEED and
BSED programs, who are mostly from the Kalinga tribe coming from he far flung areas of the
province.

Profile of the Boarding Houses of KASC Students as to Physical Structures and Social
Services
Table 2. Profile of the Boarding Houses of KASC Students as to Physical Structures and
Social Services
A. As to Type of Boarding Houses Frequency Percent Rank
1. Single house(complete dwelling unit for 1 family 45 47.37 1
household)
2. Duplex(Divided into 2 separate living quarters) 43 45.26 2
3. Apartment(a structure with both housing and 4 4.21 3
commercial units)
4. Commercial( a structure with both housing and 3 3.16 4
commercial units)
Total 95 100
B. As to Distance of the Boarding House from the
School
1. 1 kilometer and below 68 71.58 1
2. 2-3 kilometers 8 8.42 3
3. 4.5Kilometers 7 7.37 4
4. 6-above kilometers 12 12.63 2
Total 95 100
C. As to number of occupants per room
1. 1-3 43 45.26 2
2. 4-6 50 52.63 1
3. 7-9 2 2.11 3
4. 10 – above 0 - -
Total 95 100
D.As to Monthly House Rental
1. P200-300 (including water and electric bills) 7 7.37 5
2. 301-400 (including water and electric bills) 8 8.42 3.5
3. 401-500(including water and electric bills) 29 30.53 2
4. 501-600 (including water and electric bills) 8 8.42 3.5
5. 601-700 (including water and electric bills) 5 5.26 6
6. 701-above (including water and electric bills) 38 40 1
Total 95 100
E.As to facilities used in cooking
1. Electricity 7 7.37 3
2. Gas Range 89 93.68 1
3. Firewood 15 15.79 2
4. Charcoal 2 2.11 4
Total 95 100
F.As to source of water supply
1. Piped water 40 42.11 2
2. Private artesian or pump well 43 45.26 1

3. Open well 8 8.42 3

4. Others (Delivery) 4 4.21 4
Total 95 100
G.As to type of Comfort Room(s) used
1. Automatic flush 2 2.11 3
2. Manual flush 89 93.68 1
3. Open pit 4 4.21 2
Total 95 100
H.As to appliances used
1. Radio 21 22.11 3
2. Television 23 24.21 2
3. Refrigerator 7 7.37 5.5
4. Electric fan 59 62.11 1
5. Air Condition 1 1.05 9
6. Washing Machine 5 5.26 7
7. Component CD/VCD SET 10 10.53 4
8. Computer Set 4 4.21 8
9. Others (Electric Iron) 7 7.37 5.5
Total 95 100
I. As to Ways of Disposing Garbage
1. Burning 61 64.21 1
2. Composting 15 15.79 3
3. Using dump open pit 7 7.37 4
4. Collected by disposal team 35 36.84 2
As to Type of Boarding House

As reflected on the table and supported by Figure1, there are 4 types of boarding house
rented by the student boarders. Forty five or 47.37% of them stayed in single
house(complete dwelling unit for 1 family household) with a similar percentage (45.26) who
stayed in Duplex(Divided into 2 separate living quarters) type with very few who are
boarding in an apartment and commercial types. The finding indicates that the biggest
number of the student boarders are staying in a single house divided into rooms. In most
cases, the owner of the house where the boarders stay with is a relative or a family friend of
the parents of the students.

Figure 1. Graph showing the distribution of respondents as to Type of Boarding House

As to Distance of the Boarding House from the School
The graph below glaringly reflects that the boarding houses where the student boarders
stayed were 1 kilometer and below (68.72%) from the school with very few staying in
boarding houses situated in farther locations. The data implies that the students stay in
boarding houses which are walking distances to and from the school.
Figure 2. A Graph showing the distribution of the Respondents as to Distance from the
School

As to number of occupants per room

The graph and table reveals that more than 50% of the respondents indicated that 4-6 of
them occupy 1 room closely followed by those 1-3 occupants per room (43.26%) group. The
data supports the earlier finding of Bomogao et.al. (2010) that the biggest number of the
student boarders occupies a single type of boarding houses.
As to Monthly House Rental
The biggest percentage (40%) of the students boarders, pay a monthly house rental of P701-
above (including water and electric bills), followed by 29 or 30.53% who pay P401-
500(including water and electric bills) as their monthly house rental. There was a
considerably few (7 or 7.37%) of the student boarders who pay P201-300 as their monthly
rental. The result indicates that the monthly rental in the boarding houses in the City of
Tabuk is now starting to increase considering the increasing number of students looking for
rooms to rent due to the increasing number of higher education institutions with increasing
number of course offerings in the province.
As to facilities used in cooking
Figure 5. Distribution of the Respondents as to facilities used in cooking

The graph and table reveal that of the identified facilities for cooking, the use of gas range
dominated the other cooking facilities. There are 89 or 93.68% using gas range with few
using firewood, electricity, and charcoal. From the finding, it is noted that the cooking
facility of the students is convenient.

As to source of water supply
Figure 5. Distribution of the respondents as to source of water supply

The data indicates that the biggest number and percentage of the student boarders (43 or
45.26%) use water from private artesian wells and from the Tabuk Water System (piped
water) with 40 or 42.11% while a few of them source out water from delivery trucks. It is
implied from the finding that the owners of the boarding houses have their own pump wells
or supplied by the Tabuk Water System of the City of Tabuk.
As to type of Comfort Rooms used
Figure 6. Distribution of the Respndents as to type of comfort rooms used

The table and Figure show that almost all the boarding houses (94%) use manual flush type
of comfort rooms. It is noted that very few use the traditional type of open toilets but very

few also use the modern type of automatic flush type. The data reflects that owners of
boarding houses must improve their facilities for the convenience of their boarders.
As to appliances used
Figure 7. Distribution of the Respondents as to as to appliances used

The graph and table shows that electric fan is the number one appliance used by boarders in
their boarding houses. This was followed by television, radio, component CD/VCD set,
refrigerator and electric iron, washing machine, computer set, and air condition set. The
finding reflects that there is a need for all boarders to use electric fan considering the
climatic condition of Tabuk City. However, as determined earlier in the study of Bomogao, et
al (2010), 100% of the student boarders experienced financial difficulty due to the high
monthly rentals (98%). Hence, not all of them can buy their own electric fans. Similarly,
television must also be provided per boarding house for educational purpose to the
boarders.
As to Ways of Disposing Garbage
Figure 8. Distribution of the Respondents as to Ways of Disposing Garbage

The table and graph show that burning of wastes was a dominant practice of the boarders
of the boarding houses (61 or 64.21%). The second practice was collection of waste by the
waste collection and disposal team of the City of Tabuk with 35 or 36.84%. Composting was
done by 15.79% of the students while dumping of wastes in open pits is still practiced by 7
or 7.37 % of the student boarders. The finding is suggestive of conducting an information
dissemination to owners of boarding houses as well as boarders the disadvantages of
burning wastes to the environment.
Degree of seriousness of the problems encountered by the students in their boarding
houses
Table 3. Degree of Seriousness of Problems Encountered by Students in their Boarding
Houses (n=95)
Problems/ Degree of seriousness VS MoS LS Weighted
(3) (2) (1) Mean
1. Overcrowded rooms 21 33 41 1.79
2. Noisy 27 38 30 1.97
3. Stealing of properties 22 27 46 1.75
4. Air pollution 19 30 46 1.72
5. Lack of water supply 40 31 24 2.17
6. Poor lighting 19 25 51 1.66
7. Poor ventilation 17 31 47 1.68
8. Not allowed to wash clothes 15 18 62 1.51
9. Not allowed to iron clothes 22 21 52 1.68
10. Unsafe water 21 31 43 1.77
11. No study room 24 26 45 1.78
12. Mixed tribes 45 25 25 2.32
13. Far from the school 23 27 45 1.77
14. No separate comfort rooms for 49 24 22 2.38
men and women
15. Too strict landlady/landlord 25 29 41 1.73
16. No abode policies and contracts 50 35 10 2.42
executed
17. Mixed boarders (male/female) 23 30 42 1.80
18. No separate bathrooms for men 49 31 15 2.36
and women
19. Far from the road 23 29 43 1.79
20. Unsanitary environment 23 29 43 1.79
Total Mean 1.89
Legend: 1.00- 1.66 – Less Serious (LS)
1.67-2.32- Moderately Serious (MoS)
2.33-3.00 –Very Serious (VS)

The total Mean of 1.89 reveals that the problems encountered by the student boarders are
generally moderately serious. However, 3 of the identified problems were identified as very
serious by the student boarders. These are the problem indicators of “no abode policies and
contracts executed”, “no separate bathrooms for men and women”, and “no separate
comfort rooms for men and women”, with obtained Means2.42, 2.36 and 2.38, respectively.
Similar to the finding, the recent study of Bomogao et al. (2010) reflected that 90% of the
respondents claimed that their boarding houses were not in a conducive environment.
When the researchers asked the student boarders, they answered that in their boarding
houses, both males and females use the same facility for comfort and for taking a bath.
Having mixed boarders (male/female) and mixed tribes were both felt as moderately serious
problems by the student respondents as indicated by the Mean of 2.32 each. Similarly, the
problem of lack of water supply was considered by the boarders as moderately serious as
shown by the Mean of 2.17. In addition, all the remaining identified problems were
considered by the respondents as moderately serious, namely: far from the road, unsanitary
environment, no abode policies and contracts executed, too strict landlady/landlord, far
from the school, no study room, not allowed to iron clothes, unsafe water, overcrowded
rooms, noisy, stealing of properties, air pollution, lack of water supply, and poor ventilation.
On the other hand, 2 of the identified problems were perceived as less serious. These are
the problems of “not allowed to wash clothes” and poor lighting. The findings imply that
student boarders do not have problems on where to wash their clothes and as to lighting in
their boarding houses. In is worth knowing that owners of the boarding houses of the
students provided facilities or spaces as well as water for their boarders to wash their
clothes. Likewise, the rooms are well lighted for the convenience of the students.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The student boarders varied in their profile with the females dominating, more from
ages 18-20 or from the second to fourth year levels, from the BEED and BSED
programs, and are mostly from the Kalinga tribe coming from the far flung areas of
the province.
2. a. Majority of the boarding houses of the students is of the single type which
accommodates 4-6 student boarders with a monthly rental of P701 and above which
include water and electric bills.

b. The main source of water for the boarding houses is from private artesian wells
and from the water system of the City.
c. Almost all the boarding houses use the manual flush type of comfort rooms which
common to males and female boarders.
d. The main appliance used by students in their boarding house is the electric fan
with a small number using the television
e. Burning of wastes is the dominant practice of the boarders as a way of waste
disposal
3. The problems of the student boarders were generally moderately serious
a. Having no abode policies, rules and regulations, and contracts executed between
the landlady/landlord and the boarders, and common bath and comfort rooms were
very the very serious problems identified
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Owners of boarding houses should formulate and implement concrete abode
policies, rules, and regulations
2. Owners of boarding houses should convert their barding house into commercial type
where comfort rooms and bath rooms for male and females are separated
3. Owners of boarding houses should orient and encourage their boarders to practice
waste segregation and composting
Proposed Action Plan for Implementation
Activity Strategies Time Frame Persons Outcome
Involved
1. Identification of Conduct a survey August to Dean, program Better
boarding houses and Sept. 2013 Chairman and
student boarders faculty student
2.Home Visitation Coordinate with the Sept.-Oct. Dean, Program
and Training Need Office of the Director 2013 Chairman, academic
Assessment (TNA) for Student Services DSSA,
and Admission Guidance performance
Counselor, &
faculty
4.Orientation/seminar Conduct Jan.-March Dean, Program
for owners of boarding orientation/seminars 2014 Chairman,
houses and student On: Waste DSSA,
boarders management, Guidance
Boarding House Counselor, &

policies and rules faculty and

formulation, and other students of ITE
seminars
Based on identified
needs
REFERENCES
1. Bomogao, et al. (2010). “Living Conditions of Boarding Houses of Students of the
Kalinga-Apayao State College, Dagupan Campus for the School Year 2009-2012”,
Undergraduate thesis, Kalinga-Apayao State College.
2. Virtus, Rodolfo, SB Jr. (2012). ADNU Accredits Homes for Ateneans. ADNU
3. Website, ADNU, Bagumbayan

Profile of Boarding Houses of Students of The Kalinga-Apayao State College

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Profile of Boarding Houses of Students of The Kalinga-Apayao State College

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Profile of Boarding Houses of Students of The Kalinga-Apayao State College

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

International Journal of Advanced Research in ISSN: 2278-6236

Management and Social Sciences Impact Factor: 6.284

PROFILE OF BOARDING HOUSES OF STUDENTS OF THE KALINGA-

Vol. 5 | No. 6 | June 2016 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 1

Vol. 5 | No. 6 | June 2016 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 2

Vol. 5 | No. 6 | June 2016 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 3

Table 1. Profile of the Student Respondents

Vol. 5 | No. 6 | June 2016 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 4

Vol. 5 | No. 6 | June 2016 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 5

3. Open well 8 8.42 3

As to Type of Boarding House

Vol. 5 | No. 6 | June 2016 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 6

Figure 1. Graph showing the distribution of respondents as to Type of Boarding House

Vol. 5 | No. 6 | June 2016 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 7

As to number of occupants per room

Figure 5. Distribution of the Respondents as to facilities used in cooking

Vol. 5 | No. 6 | June 2016 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 8

As to source of water supply

Figure 5. Distribution of the respondents as to source of water supply

Figure 6. Distribution of the Respndents as to type of comfort rooms used

Vol. 5 | No. 6 | June 2016 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 9

Figure 7. Distribution of the Respondents as to as to appliances used

Figure 8. Distribution of the Respondents as to Ways of Disposing Garbage

Vol. 5 | No. 6 | June 2016 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 10

Vol. 5 | No. 6 | June 2016 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 11

Vol. 5 | No. 6 | June 2016 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 12

Vol. 5 | No. 6 | June 2016 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 13

policies and rules faculty and

Vol. 5 | No. 6 | June 2016 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 14

You might also like